Skip to main content


Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 24 February 2022
Sec. Biosafety and Biosecurity
Volume 10 - 2022 |

Application of Psychrotolerant Antarctic Bacteria and Their Metabolites as Efficient Plant Growth Promoting Agents

  • 1Institute of Microbiology, Department of Environmental Microbiology and Biotechnology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
  • 2Institute of Microbiology, Department of Geomicrobiology, Faculty of Biology, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland

Iron is the fourth most abundant element on earth. However, its low bioavailability is a key plant-growth limiting factor. Bacteria play an important role in plant growth promotion since they produce specific secondary metabolites that may increase macro- and micronutrient accessibility in soil. Therefore, bacterial-derived iron chelators, as well as surface-active compounds, are recognised as essential to plant welfare. In this study, three cold-active Antarctic bacterial strains, i.e. Pseudomonas sp. ANT_H12B, Psychrobacter sp. ANT_H59 and Bacillus sp. ANT_WA51, were analysed. The physiological and genomic characterisation of these strains revealed their potential for plant growth promotion, reflected in the production of various biomolecules, including biosurfactants (that may lower the medium surface tension of even up to 53%) and siderophores (including ANT_H12B-produced mixed-type siderophore that demonstrated the highest production, reaching the concentration of up to 1.065 mM), increasing the availability of nutrients in the environment and neutralising fungal pathogens. Tested bacteria demonstrated an ability to promote the growth of a model plant, alfalfa, increasing shoots’ length and fresh biomass even up to 26 and 46% respectively; while their metabolites increased the bioavailability of iron in soil up to 40%. It was also revealed that the introduced strains did not disrupt physicochemical conditions and indigenous soil microbial composition, which suggests that they are promising amendments preserving the natural biodiversity of soil and increasing its fertility.


Many microorganisms that are found in the rhizosphere may facilitate plant growth and, hence, are called plant growth-promoting bacteria (PGPB) or plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) (Olanrewaju et al., 2017). Amongst well characterised rhizospheric PGPB are representatives of the following genera: Agrobacterium, Azospirillum, Azotobacter, Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Streptomyces (Glick, 2012), as well as Psychrobacter (Ma et al., 2011; García-López et al., 2014).

PGPB can affect plants, both through indirect and direct mechanisms. Indirect mechanisms mainly concern the inhibition of plant pathogens, i.e., fungi (e.g., Fusarium tricinctum (Chen T. et al., 2018)) and bacteria (e.g., Pseudomonas syringae (Morris et al., 2008)). This is a consequence of the production of hydrogen cyanide, antibiotics or fungistatic agents (Haas and Keel, 2003; Prashar et al., 2013). Direct mechanisms include: the production of plant hormones; the facilitation of nitrogen uptake; an increase in the bioavailability of phosphorus; cellulolytic and ligninolytic activity; the ability to break down complex compounds and xenobiotics; and the production of a wide variety of secondary metabolites, like biosurfactants (crucial in the mobilization of hydrophobic carbon sources) and iron-chelating agents (Antonella Di Benedetto et al., 2017; Olanrewaju et al., 2017).

Iron is essential for the growth and metabolism of living organisms. In the environment it occurs usually as Fe(III) in the form of oxides and hydroxides and has very low solubility in a pH above 3–4 (Crowley, 2006). Since, iron is a component of many vital enzymes, contributes to the biosynthesis of chlorophyll and is essential for the maintenance of chloroplast structure and function, its low bioavailability makes it a key plant growth-limiting element in nature (Rout and Sahoo, 2015). One of the most common and efficient mechanism of iron chelation is the production of siderophores. These are small compounds showing a high affinity mainly for iron (III) (Hider and Kong, 2010) and are produced in response to iron deficiency in the environment (Carroll and Moore, 2018). Based on the chemical structure of siderophores, they have been divided into four classes: hydroxamates, catecholates (also defined as phenolate), carboxylates and mixed ones (Carroll and Moore, 2018). Interestingly, plants have developed receptors enabling the uptake of bacterial siderophores. Thus, they may ‘steal’ these biomolecules using them as iron carriers, which increases the overall fitness of plants (Chu et al., 2010; Dimkpa, 2016). The beneficial influence of bacterial siderophores on plants’ growth relies also on their ability to limit the development of some pathogenic fungi and bacteria, by entailing iron deficiency in soil (Scavino and Pedraza, 2013). One of the best-studied siderophores, with direct antifungal properties, is pyoverdine produced by Pseudomonas spp., which contributes to the suppression of pathogens’ development, through increased iron competition—the fungal siderophores have a generally lower Fe(III) affinity (Sharma and Johri, 2003; Selvakumar et al., 2009; Scavino and Pedraza, 2013). In addition, many bacterial siderophores, like pyochelin, are capable of inducing systemic resistance in plants (Höfte and Bakker, 2007; Aznar and Dellagi, 2015).

Another secondary metabolite that may promote the plant growth are biosurfactants. These are surface active compounds of various chemical nature produced by microorganisms. They facilitate microbial adaptation in rhizosphere through stimulating biofilm formation on the plant roots surface, as well as improving bacterial motility (Sachdev and Cameotra, 2013; Alsohim et al., 2014). Moreover, bacterial surfactants increase the bioavailability of hydrophobic compounds in the soil and therefore increase its overall fertility and wettability. Importantly, biosurfactants are considered as effective antifungal agents, e.g. surfactin exhibits antagonistic activity against pathogenic fungi including Fusarium spp. and Aspergillus spp. (Joshi et al., 2008; Velho et al., 2011; Sachdev and Cameotra, 2013).

The crop vegetation cycles in the temperate climatic zone in the Northern hemisphere begin usually in early spring or even late winter, which are characterised by low temperatures and occasional frost. It is deleterious to the growth of mesophilic bacteria used as biofertilizers and their plant growth-promoting (PGP) activities. Under low temperatures, the majority of microbial activities are inhibited or slowed down (Mishra et al., 2010). Antarctic, cold-active PGPB are an excellent alternative to mesophilic strains in this situation. So far, several cold-active bacterial strains with plant growth promotion properties have been described, e.g. Pantoea dispersa and Serratia marcescens, which were able to promote wheat growth even at 5°C (Selvakumar et al., 2008a; Selvakumar et al., 2008b). However, nowadays, novel nature-based solutions for agriculture are still needed; thus, scientists are constantly searching for novel candidates for biofertilizers.

Here, we present a complex characterisation of three bacterial species, that is: Pseudomonas sp. ANT_H12B, Psychrobacter sp. ANT_H59 and Bacillus sp. ANT_WA51, originating from Antarctic soils. We reveal their plant growth-promoting activities such as: increasing the availability of phosphorus; utilizing of various complex compounds in the soil and production of plant hormones. However, we particularly focused on their ability to produce siderophores and biosurfactants, recognised as beneficial factors for plants (Amin et al., 2009; Pahari et al., 2018). All plant growth-promoting features were demonstrated in accordance with the genomic backgrounds of investigated bacteria. Moreover, the influence of bacteria and their metabolites on soil chemistry and the structure of soil microbial (both bacterial and fungal) communities was presented.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Strains and Plant

The bacterial strains including Pseudomonas sp. ANT_H12B, Psychrobacter sp. ANT_H59 and Bacillus sp. ANT_WA51 were obtained from a collection of bacterial cultures that were previously isolated from the soil samples taken in 2012 from King George Island (Antarctica; GPS coordinates: 62 09.6010 S, 58 28.4640 W) (Romaniuk et al., 2018). Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L., TANGO type) was selected as a plant representing the Leguminosae family (legumes) of high agricultural importance (Kulkarni et al., 2018) and bioremediation potential (Debiec-Andrzejewska et al., 2020).

Analysis of Siderophore Production

To determine the amount of produced siderophores, bacteria were cultivated for 7 days in GASN medium at 20°C with rotary shaking set to 150 rpm. The initial optical density at 600 nm (OD600) was 0.1. After 7 days of cultivation, bacteria were centrifuged (6,000 rpm for 5 min) and supernatants were added in a 1:1 ratio to the CAS (chrome azurol S) reagent (Schwyn and Neilands, 1987). GASN medium was used as a negative control, while deferoxamine mesylate salt (Sigma-Aldrich), at a concentration of 0.025 mM, was used as a positive control. All experiments were performed in triplicates. After an hour of incubation, the absorbance at 630 nm was measured using an automated microplate reader. Furthermore, Neilands (Neilands, 1981), Arnow (Arnow, 1937) and Shenker (Shenker et al., 1992) biochemical assays were used to determine hydroxamate, catecholate and carboxylate functional groups of siderophores, respectively.

Analysis of Surfactant Production

To determine the presence of biosurfactants, bacterial cultures were cultivated for 7 days in LB medium at 20°C with rotary shaking set to 150 rpm in two variants: 1) with 1% (w/v) sunflower oil and 2) without this supplementation. The initial optical density at 600 nm (OD600) was 0.1. Additionally, the ability to produce surfactants was tested on GASN medium (without the addition of oil). The controls were uninoculated variants. The experiments were performed in triplicates. After 7 days of cultivation, bacteria were centrifuged (6,000 rpm for 5 min) and supernatants were tested through the ring method (du Noüy method) using a Kruss Tensiometer K20 (Kruss GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) (Malavenda et al., 2015).

Analysis of Indole Acetic Acid Production

The production of indole acetic acid (IAA) was estimated in inoculated LB medium, supplemented with 5 mM tryptophan, at 20°C with rotary shaking set to 150 rpm in the dark. After 7 days of incubation, cultures were centrifuged (6,000 rpm for 5 min) and supernatants were used for the quantification of IAA. Salkowski reagent (0.5 M FeCl3 with 35% perchloric acid) was added to the culture supernatant at a 4:1 ratio and the absorbance (OD) was measured at 530 nm. As a control indole-3-acetic acid (Sigma-Aldrich) and uninoculated media were used. Experiments were performed in triplicate (Mohite, 2013; Pranaw et al., 2020).

Ureolytic Activity

To determine the ureolytic activity of tested bacterial strains, the LB medium was supplemented with 1% (w/v) urea and 0.001% (w/v) phenol red (Sigma-Aldrich). The inoculated media were then cultivated for 7 days at 20°C with rotary shaking set to 150 rpm. The initial optical density at 600 nm (OD600) was 0.1. The supplemented medium, due to the presence of ammonia and higher pH turned pink. pH changes were additionally confirmed with a pH meter. The following controls were used: 1) inoculated LB supplemented with 0.001% phenol red; 2) inoculated LB supplemented with 1% urea; 3) non-inoculated LB supplemented with 1% urea and 0.001% phenol red (Sigurdarson et al., 2020). The experiments were performed in triplicate.

Inorganic Phosphate Solubilisation

The phosphate solubilisation potential of bacterial strains was estimated using NBRIP medium (National Botanical Research institute’s phosphate growth medium) (Nautiyal, 1999). Cultures were grown overnight (OD600 ∼0.5) and spot-inoculated in triplicates of 5 µL on plates. Bacteria were then incubated at 20°C for 7 days. The presence of a halo zone around the areas of bacterial growth indicated the inorganic phosphate solubilisation potential (Rana et al., 2011).

Cellulolytic Activity

To determine the cellulolytic activities of the tested bacteria, cultures were grown overnight (OD600 ∼0.5) and spot-inoculated in triplicates of 5 µL on plates with solid Mandels and Reese medium (Mandels and Reese, 1957) containing carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) sodium salt (Sigma-Aldrich) (Liang et al., 2014). Bacteria were then incubated at 20°C for 7 days. After the incubation time, plates were flooded with an aqueous solution of Congo red (1 mg/ml) for 15 min. The Congo red solution was then poured off and visualised zones of hydrolysis were stabilised by flooding the agar with 1 M HCl (Teather and Wood, 1982).

Proteolytic Activity

To examine the proteolytic activity of strains, bacteria were grown overnight (OD600 ∼0.5) and spot-inoculated in triplicates on LB agar plates supplemented with 1% (w/v) skimmed milk. The presence of a halo zone around the areas of bacterial growth indicated proteolytic activity (Jones et al., 2007).

Lipolytic Activity

The lipolytic activity of the bacterial strains was tested on Egg-Yolk Agar on which bacteria were spot-inoculated in triplicates of 5 µL overnight (OD600 ∼0.5) cultures. After 7 days of incubation, saturated CuSO4 solution was poured into the plates and left 20 min for staining. Then, the excess solution was removed and a greenish-blue color confirmed lipolysis (Faiz, 2021).

Preparation of Bacterial Cultures and Secondary Metabolites

To reach the maximum number of siderophores, bacterial strains were cultivated overnight in lysogeny broth (LB) medium at 20°C with rotary shaking set to 150 rpm. Cultures were then centrifuged (6,000 rpm for 5 min) and washed three times with 0.85% saline solution. Next, bacteria were added in triplicates into the fresh GASN medium (Bultreys and Gheysen, 2000) and cultivated at 20°C with rotary shaking set to 150 rpm. In each case, the initial optical density at 600 nm (OD600) was 0.1. The growth kinetics were assessed by measuring the changes in the optical density of cultures in comparison with the non-inoculated controls, using an automated microplate reader (Sunrise TECAN, Tecan Trading AG, Männedorf, Switzerland). The OD600 of the respective cultures was measured every 24 h for 7 days. Bacteria were then centrifuged (6,000 rpm for 5 min) and supernatants containing metabolites for the experiments were obtained through 0.22-µm pore size filtering. To obtain bacteria cells, overnight cultures in lysogeny broth were centrifuged (6,000 rpm for 5 min), washed three times and diluted in 0.85% saline solution to reach a final concentration of 108 CFU (colony forming unit) per 1 g of soil.

Soil Parameters

Potted garden soil, the properties of which were examined and described in the previous work (Debiec-Andrzejewska et al., 2020), was used for the experiments. The initial pH and redox potential were 6.37 (+/− 0.6) and 32.7 (+/− 0.58), respectively. Under such conditions iron bioavailability is limited, which refers to the conditions occuring naturally when cultivating alfalfa (optimal growth at pH of 6.5–7.5). Soil parameters were measured after 7 (T1), 14 (T2) and 21 (T3) days of experiment.

Experimental Setup

Alfalfa was first pre-cultivated. The seeds of alfalfa plants were planted into soil without the addition of bacteria or their metabolites and were incubated for 7 days. The pre-culture was carried out in pots (600 mm long/180 mm width/140 mm depth), containing 2 kg of soil. After this time, young plants were transplanted into previously prepared soil, which was bioaugmented with ANT_H12B, ANT_H59 or ANT_WA51 strains and supplemented with their metabolites. Strains and metabolites were used separately. The experiment was carried out in identical pots (dimensions: 600 × 180 × 140 mm in length, width and height, respectively) containing 2 kg of soil for each of the eight variants, i.e.,: (i) control with a saline solution (0.85% NaCl); (ii–iv) soil bioaugmented with particular strains: ANT_H12B, ANT_H59 and ANT_WA51, respectively; (v) control with GASN medium and (vi-viii) soil containing supernatants with metabolites from: ANT_H12B (siderophores), ANT_H59 (siderophores) and ANT_WA51 (siderophores and biosurfactants), respectively. Each variant was performed in three replicates (pots) containing 25 plants per pot, equal to a total of 75 plants per variant (Supplementary Figure S1). The results were observed at the beginning of the experiment and after 7, 14 and 21 days, respectively. At every time point five plants from each of three replicates of a given variant were harvested for further analyses.

Morphological Analysis of Plants

Length, growth rate, fresh weight (FW) and dry weight (DW) of roots and shoots of alfalfa were appointed at: the beginning (T0) and after 7 (T1), 14 (T2) and 21 (T3) days of experimentation. For DW determination, samples were dried at 30°C for 72 h (Michalska-Kacymirow et al., 2014).

Analysis of Total Iron Concentration in Plants and Soil

To determine the total iron concentration in plant tissues, 0.1 g of sample was digested in 5 ml of the oxidizing mixture, i.e.,: 4.5 ml HNO3 (69%) and 0.5 ml H2O2 (35%) at 180°C for 30 min using the closed microwave system (Milestone Ethos Plus, Sorisole, Italy). Mineralisation of soil samples (0.3 g) was performed with the use of the same mixture of 69% HNO3 and 35% H2O2 (ratio 9:1) under the same conditions. Digested samples were transferred to plastic tubes and stored at 4°C. The amount of iron was measured by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (FAAS) and Graphite Furnace Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (GFAAS) using a Thermo Scientific SOLAAR M Series (TJA Solution, SOLAAR M, Cambridge, United Kingdom). In FAAS, the gas mixture was air and acetylene. The calibration curve range was 0–10 mg L−1 and the lower limit of quantification was 0.01 mg L−1. In GFAAS, graphite cuvette duty cycle was as follows: evaporation −100°C/30 s; incineration - 1,100°C/20 s; atomization - 2,100°C/3 s; cleaning - 2,500°C/3 s and the calibration curve range was 0–20 μg L−1 with a lower limit of quantification of 0.1 μg L−1. The deuterium lamp (TJA Solution, SOLAAR M, Cambridge, United Kingdom) was used for background correction. Iron standard solutions (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) were prepared in 3% HNO3.

Analysis of Bioavailable Iron Concentration in Soil

In order to determine the content of bioavailable iron in the soil, the extraction procedure was performed in accordance with Draft International Standard ISO/DIS 14870. The extraction solution consisted of 0.005 M diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid, 0.01 M CaCl2 and 0.1 M triethylamine, buffered at pH 7.3. All reagents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, United States). 5 g of air-dried soil was added to 10 ml of extraction solution and shaken for 2 hours (Barteková et al., 2006). The extracts were then filtered through 0.22-µm filters and submitted for further analysis. Distilled water was used as a control extraction solution. All extractions were performed in triplicates.

Determination of the Quantity of Heterotrophic Bacteria in the Soil

To determine the number of heterotrophs in soil, bacteria were rinsed from soil by adding 2 g of fresh soil (1 g of dry weight) to 50 ml of sterile 0.85% NaCl solution and shaken for 24 h. The obtained extracts were spread on the LB solid medium and after 7 days of cultivation at 20°C, the quantity of bacteria (CFU, colony-forming units/mL) was determined.

Activity Against Plant Pathogenic Fungi

Nine plant pathogenic fungi, i.e.,: Thamnidium elegans WA18081, Aspergillus niger WA50716, Aspergillus ochraceus WA72081, Penicillium expansum WA72083, Botrytis cinerea WA72082, Alternaria sp. WA67128, Cladosporium sp. WA72809, Fusarium tricinctum WA67200 and Fusarium sporotrichioides WA67190 were obtained from the Herbarium Universitatis Varsoviensis, Botanic Garden, University of Warsaw (WABG) (Poland). The antifungal activity of bacteria was assessed against all investigated plant pathogenic fungi on potato dextrose agar (PDA) medium (Dennis and Webster, 1971). Fungi were grown on PDA medium for 7 days at 20°C. After incubation, 1 cm plugs of mycelia of actively growing fungi were placed in the centers of new PDA plates. In the first variant, bacteria were spot-inoculated in sterile cylinders using 10 µL of bacterial culture. In the second variant, 10 µL of the respective bacterial metabolites were spot-injected into sterile cylinders. Bacteria, metabolites and controls (i.e., GASN medium and 0.85% (w/v) saline solution) were prepared in the same way as for the plant experiment. Fungi along with the appropriate bacteria or metabolites were cultured for 7 days at 20°C. The experiments were performed in triplicate.

Draft Genome Sequencing

Genomic DNA of the Pseudomonas sp. ANT_H12B, Psychrobacter sp. ANT_H59 and Bacillus sp. ANT_WA51 was isolated using the cetyl trimethylammonium bromide (CTAB)/lysozyme method (Sambrook and Russell, 2001). Illumina TruSeq libraries for each strain were constructed following the manufacturer’s instructions. The genomic libraries were sequenced on an Illumina MiSeq instrument (using the v3 chemistry kit) (Illumina, San Diego, CA, United States) in the DNA Sequencing and Oligonucleotide Synthesis Laboratory ( at the Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw. Raw reads were processed with the fastp (Chen S. et al., 2018) version 0.19.5 with the following flags: -cut_by_quality3 --cut_window_size 10 --cut_mean_quality 25 --trim_poly_x --poly_x_min_len 15 --length_required 100. Filtered reads were used for assembly with SPAdes version 3.11.1 (Bankevich et al., 2012) with --careful flag.

Bioinformatic Analysis

Analysed bacterial genomes were automatically annotated using RAST (Aziz et al., 2008) on the PATRIC 3.6.8 (Wattam et al., 2017) web service and manually curated. Similarity searches were performed using BLAST programs (Altschul et al., 1997). The metabolic features were identified with the SEED viewer webserver (Overbeek et al., 2014), KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes) Automatic Annotation System (KAAS) database (Moriya et al., 2007) and the bacterial version of the antiSMASH webserver (Blin et al., 2019). All options were selected with the default parameters. Additionally, for deeper metabolic investigation, the amino acid sequences were subjected to analysis with BLAST-KOALA (Kanehisa et al., 2016). The KO (KEGG Orthology) assignments were performed using a modified version of the internally used KOALA (KEGG Orthology And Links Annotation) algorithm (BLAST-KOALA) after the BLAST search against a non-redundant dataset of pangenome sequences (Kanehisa et al., 2016). To investigate the virulence factors of the tested strains, the VFDB database (Virulence Factors database) was used (Liu et al., 2019). To identify putative antibiotic resistance genes, we used the Resistance Gene Identifier (RGI) in the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance database (CARD) (Jia et al., 2017). Hits showing at least 50% identity with the reference protein were considered significant. Each hit was verified manually using BLASTp analysis.

For the analysis of plant-growth promoting genes distribution, amino acid sequences of 68 reference proteins involved in the following plant growth promoting processes were used: 2,4-diacetylphloroglucinol synthesis (genes: phlA, phlB, phlC, phlD); ACC deamination (acdS); acetoin and 2,3-butanediol synthesis (budA, budB, budC, ilvI); auxin synthesis (ipdC); GABA synthesis (gabD, gabT); hydrogen cyanide synthesis (hcnA, hcnB, hcnC); nitric oxide synthesis (nirK); nitrogen fixation (nifA, nifD, nifE, nifF, nifH, nifK); phosphate solubilization (pqqB, pqqC, pqqE, pqqF, pqqG, pstA, pstB, pstC); urease synthesis (ureA, ureB); achromobactin synthesis (acsA, acsB, acsC, acsD, acsE, acsF); bacillibactin synthesis (dhbA, dhbB, dhbC, dhbE, dhbF); pyoverdine synthesis (pvdA, pvdE, pvdH, pvdL, pvdM, pvdN, pvdO, pvdP, pvdQ, pvdS, pvdY); vibrioferrin synthesis (pvsA, pvsB, pvsC, pvsD, pvsE); surfactin synthesis (srfAA, srfAB, srfAC, srfAD) and fengycin synthesis (fenA, fenB, fenC, fenD, fenE) (Supplementary Data 1). The following strains (with the following assembly accession numbers presented in parentheses) were used for the comparative proteomic analysis: Bacillus sp. ANT_WA51 (GCF_008,369,185.1), Bacillus sp. 916 Contig1 (GCF_000,275,,785.1), Bacillus sp. JS (GCF_000,259,,365.1), Bacillus sp. RZ2MS9 (GCF_001,816,185.2), B. amyloliquefaciens BS006 (GCF_001,278,635.1), B. amyloliquefaciens Y2 (GCF_000,262,,385.1), B. atrophaeus GQJK17 (GCF_002,243,495.1), B. atrophaeus UCMB-5137 (GCF_000,385,,965.2), B. cereus T4S (GCF_017,356,065.1), B. pumilus TUAT1 (GCF_001,548,215.1), B. subtilis PTS-394 (GCF_000,507,,005.1), B. velezensis FZB42 (GCF_000,015,785.2), B. velezensis GQJK49 (GCF_002,192,235.1), B. velezensis LDO2 (GCF_003,073,455.1), B. velezensis W2 (GCF_000,732,,055.1), B. velezensis YAU B9601-Y2 (GCF_000,284,,395.1), Pseudomonas sp. ANT_H12B (GCF_008,369,325.1), Pseudomonas sp. B10 (GCF_900,156,235.1), Pseudomonas sp. UW4 (GCF_000,316,,175.1), Pseudomonas sp. VI4.1 (GCF_002,029,345.1), P. chlororaphis HT66 (GCF_000,597,,925.1), P. fluorescens SBW25 (GCF_000,009,225.2), P. fluorescens UM270 (GCF_000,836,,415.1), P. protegens CHA0 (GCF_900,560,965.1), P. psychrotolerans CS51 (GCF_006,384,975.1), P. putida BIRD-1 (GCF_000,183,,645.1), P. putida MTCC 5279 (GCF_000,411,,615.1), P. seleniipraecipitans D1-6 (GCF_001,839,645.1), P. simiae WCS417 (GCF_000,698,,265.1), P. syringae GR12-2 (GCF_001,698,815.1), P. veronii VI4T1 (GCF_002,029,325.1), Psychrobacter sp. ANT_H59 (GCF_008,369,225.1), P. arcticus 273–4 (GCF_000,012,305.1), P. cryohalolentis K5 (GCF_000,013,905.1). Proteomes were compared against reference protein sequences using BLASTp and only the first hit for each of them was retained for further analysis if following thresholds were passed: e-value not higher than 1e-5, sequence identity and sequence query coverage per HSP of at least 50 and 70%, respectively.

Analysis of the Changes in Soil Microbiome Composition

To determine changes in the soil microbial composition after bioaugmentation with selected bacteria or their metabolites, the DNA from control and supplemented soil was extracted from three pooled replicate 500-mg samples with the use of a FastDNA® SPIN Kit for Feces DNA Extraction Kit and bead beater (MP Biomedica, Santa Ana, CA, United States) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. The concentration and the quality of the extracted DNA were estimated using NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, United States) and gel electrophoresis.

Used PCR primers covered: 1) V3–V4 regions of bacterial 16S rDNA gene (16S–V3–F: 5′-TCGTCGGCAGCGTCAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGCCTACGGCWGCAG-3′ and 16S–V4-R: 5′-GTCTCGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAGGACTACHVGGGTATCTAATCC-3′) and 2) ITS1-ITS2 regions of eukaryotic internal transcribed spacers (ITS-ITS1-F: 5′-TCG​TCG​GCA​GCG​TCA​GAT​GTG​TAT​AAG​AGA​CAG​GCA​TCG​ATG​AAG​AAC​GCA​G-3′ and ITS-ITS2-R: 5′-GTC​TCG​TGG​GCT​CGG​AGA​TGT​GTA​TAA​GAG​ACA​GTC​CTC​CGC​TTA​TTG​ATA​TGC-3′). The metagenomics DNA was used as a template for amplification. The PCR was carried out in triplicate for each sample in a Mastercycler Nexus GX2 thermocycler (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). The PCR amplification for 16S rDNA regions was performed according to the following process: 1) initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, 2) 25 cycles of the denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, primer attachment at 60°C for 30 s, DNA strand synthesis at 72°C for 30 s and 3) the final DNA strand extension at 72°C for 5 min. The PCR conditions for amplification of ITS regions were as follows: 1) initial denaturation at 95°C for 5 min, 2) 25 cycles of the denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, primer attachment at 60°C for 30 s, DNA strand synthesis at 72°C for 90 s and 3) the final DNA strand extension at 72°C for 5 min. The reaction mixture (25 μL) contained template DNA (20 ng), dNTP mix (400 nM of each the deoxynucleotides), MgCl2 (2 mM), Kapa High Fidelity polymerase (0.5 U), specific primers (400 nM of each primer) and 5× Fidelity buffer (1×) for 16S rDNA amplification or 5× GC buffer (1×) for ITS region.

Approximately 250 ng of each amplicon (pooled from replicate PCRs) were used for the library preparation. Libraries were verified using the 2,100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent) High-Sensitivity DNA Assay and KAPA Library Quantification Kits for the Illumina. Amplicon libraries were prepared with Illumina Nextera NT adapters (Illumina) and the sequencing of those DNA amplicons was performed with the Illumina MiSeq Platform (Illumina) using MiSeq Illumina Kit in the paired-end in the DNA Sequencing and Oligonucleotide Synthesis Laboratory—oligo. pl (Institute of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Polish Academy of Science). The sequencing provided from 108,027 to 214,779 paired reads for bacterial amplicons and from 96,605 to 251,871 reads for fungal amplicons.

Complete analysis of bacterial and fungal diversity was carried out using the QIIME2 framework version 2020.08 (Bolyen et al., 2019). Briefly, raw reads were imported to QIIME2, primers were removed with the CutAdapt plugin (Martin, 2011) and trimmed reads were processed with the DADA2 plugin without any further trimming, in independent pooling denoising mode and with the application of consensus chimera detection method (Callahan et al., 2016). The number of obtained amplicon variant sequences (ASVs) was sufficient to cover the whole biodiversity for both bacterial and fungal analysis as revealed by diversity alpha-rarefaction plugin analysis. Taxonomic classification of ASVs was performed with the application of a pretrained naïve Scikit-learn classifier based on SILVA SSU NR99 reference database version 138 (Quast et al., 2013) for bacterial samples and VSEARCH (Rognes et al., 2016) using 85% sequence identity and 90% sequence coverage as thresholds based on UNITE dynamic database version 8.2 for fungal samples (Nilsson et al., 2019). Alfa and beta diversity metrics were generated using the following QIIME2 plugins: phylogeny, diversity and emperor.

Statistical Analysis

The significance of the differences between the mean values of the control and treated plant and soil samples was statistically evaluated by a two-tailed t-test at p ≤ 0.05. The Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon test was applied whenever data failed to present a normal distribution or had different variances. The statistical analysis was carried out using the XLSTAT (version 2021.1) program. Principal component analysis (PCA) analysis was computed in R v4.1.2 using prcomp function with scaling and centering. The results were presented with ggplot2 v3.3.5 (Wickham, 2016) and ggbiplot v0.55 (Vu, 2011) packages.


General Physiological Characterisation of Pseudomonas sp. ANT_H12B, Psychrobacter sp. ANT_H59 and Bacillus sp. ANT_WA51

All tested bacteria, i.e., Pseudomonas sp. ANT_H12B, Psychrobacter sp. ANT_H59 and Bacillus sp. ANT_WA51, were isolated from the extreme Antarctic environment (Romaniuk et al., 2018). These strains exhibited features characteristic for extremophiles. The ANT_H12B and ANT_H59 strains were able to grow in a wide range of temperatures, i.e., 4–30°C and 4–37°C, respectively, while ANT_WA51 in the range of 10–37°C. All tested strains exhibited halophilic properties, i.e., ANT_H12B could survive in 4% NaCl solution, ANT_H59 in 6%, while ANT_WA51, due to its ability to form spores, was able to survive in up to 10% NaCl solution. The tested strains were active in a wide range of pH, i.e., ANT_H12B was able to grow in a pH from 4 to 12, ANT_H59 in a pH from 6 to 11 and ANT_WA51 in a pH from 5 to 11 (Romaniuk et al., 2018).

All tested strains indicated potential useful features in plant growth promotion. Analyses revealed that two strains, i.e. Pseudomonas sp. ANT_H12B and Bacillus sp. ANT_WA51, were able to dissolve inorganic phosphorus compounds (e.g. Ca3(PO4)2), degrade cellulose and produce plant hormones such as indole acetic acid (IAA). Moreover, ANT_H12B and ANT_WA51 exhibited proteolytic abilities. What is important, Psychrobacter ANT_H59 and Bacillus ANT_WA51 were able to break down lipids and produce surfactants. In the case of ANT_H59, the interfacial tension (IFT) analysed on oil-supplemented LB medium was reduced from 55 (+/− 1) to 32 (+/− 1). ANT_WA51 produced surfactants constitutively (i.e., without induction with oil) on LB medium and lowered the surface tension from 55 (+/− 1) to 26 (+/− 1). Furthermore, only Bacillus sp. ANT_WA51 produced surface-active agents on GASN medium and lowered the IFT from 55 (+/− 2) to 33 (+/− 1) mN/m. Additionally, all three tested strains produced various types of siderophores, which were identified biochemically and measured spectrophotometrically in CAS reagent using deferoxamine as a reference agent. The ANT_H12B produced a mixed-type siderophore and demonstrated the highest production—1.065 mM (+/− 0.09), while ANT_H59 and ANT_WA51 produced respectively 0.188 mM (+/− 0.005) of carboxylate and 0.305 mM (+/− 0.028) of catecholate siderophores.

Experimental Evaluation of Antifungal Properties of Analyzed Strains and Their Metabolites

One of the main attributes of plant growth-promoting microorganisms is their ability to inhibit the growth of pathogens. It was shown, that only Bacillus sp. ANT_WA51 exhibited fungistatic activity and was effective against B. cinerea WA72082, Alternaria sp. WA67128, Cladosporium sp. WA72809 and F. tricinctum WA67200 (Figure 1).


FIGURE 1. The antifungal activity of: ANT_H59 strain (1), GASN medium, as control (2), ANT_WA51 strain (3) and ANT_H12B strain (4) against: (A) B. cinerea WA72082, (B) Alternaria sp. WA67128, (C) Cladosporium sp. WA72809 and (D) F. tricinctum WA67200.

Overall Genomic Characterisation

Sequencing of the Pseudomonas sp. ANT_H12B, Psychrobacter sp. ANT_H59 and Bacillus sp. ANT_WA51 genomes generated 1,914,430 paired-reads and 513.705,394 nucleotides, 2,013,190 paired-reads and 601,632,051 nucleotides and 2,183,916 paired-reads and 654,484,729 nucleotides, respectively. Assembled genomes were deposited in the GenBank database under the following organism accession numbers: VOBI00000000—Pseudomonas sp. ANT_H12B, VOBE00000000—Psychrobacter sp. ANT_H59 and VOBB00000000—Bacillus sp. ANT_WA51. The genomic features for the three strains are presented in Table 1.


TABLE 1. General features of the Pseudomonas sp. ANT_H12B, Psychrobacter sp. ANT_H59 and Bacillus sp. ANT_WA51 draft genomes.

Genome-Based Insight Into General Metabolic Potential

The analysis of the metabolic potential of the Pseudomonas sp. ANT_H12B strain revealed various genetic pathways of the carbohydrate metabolism, including: glycolysis (Embden-Meyerhof pathway), gluconeogenesis, the citrate cycle (Krebs cycle), oxidative and non-oxidative phase of pentose phosphate cycle, Entner-Doudoroff glucose catabolism, d-galactonate degradation (De Ley-Doudoroff pathway) and glycogen degradation. Moreover, ANT_H12B possesses genes responsible for beta-oxidation of fatty acids and degradation of acylglycerols. In the genome of ANT_H12B, the following enzymes involved in nitrate metabolism are present: 1) large and small subunit of nitrite reductase (NADH) (EC: (GenBank accession numbers: KAA0957090, KAA0957091, respectively); 2) alpha, beta and gamma subunits of nitrate reductase (EC: (GenBank accession numbers: KAA0967878, KAA0967879, KAA0967881, respectively); 3) ferrocytochrome:nitrate oxidoreductase (EC: along with its electron transfer subunit (GenBank accession numbers: KAA0980329, KAA0980330, respectively); 4) nitrous-oxide reductase (EC: (GenBank accession numbers: KAA0967836, KAA0954707); 5) nitric oxide reductase (EC: subunit B (GenBank accession numbers: KAA0973007, KAA0967859, KAA0951541) and subunit C (GenBank accession numbers: KAA0967858, KAA0951542); and 6) NO-forming nitrite reductase (EC: (GenBank accession number: KAA0967854). Furthermore, ANT_H12B encodes pathways responsible for assimilatory sulfates reduction into sulphides, i.e. 1) alpha and beta components of sulfite reductase (NADPH) (EC: (GenBank accession numbers: KAA0964218 and KAA0968679, respectively); 2) thioredoxin (EC: (GenBank accession number: KAA0957116); 3) CysN/CysC bifunctional enzyme (EC: (GenBank accession number: KAA0971378); and 4) subunit two of sulfate adenylyltransferase (EC: (GenBank accession number: KAA0971377).

The ANT_H12B strain possesses also genes encoding enzymes of metabolic pathways crucial for the breakdown of various xenobiotics like: 1) benzoates, i.e.: alpha and beta subunit of benzoate 1,2-dioxygenase (EC: (GenBank accession numbers: KAA0968753, KAA0968752, respectively); dihydroxycyclohexadiene carboxylate dehydrogenase (EC: (GenBank accession number: KAA0968750) and benzoate 1,2-dioxygenase reductase (EC: 1.18.1.-) (GenBank accession number: KAA0968751), 2) anthranilates, i.e.: small, large and reductase subunits of anthranilate 1,2-dioxygenase (EC: (GenBank accession numbers: KAA0975371, KAA0975370, KAA0975372, respectively), 3) catechols (through ortho-cleavage), i.e.: 3-oxoadipate enol-lactonase (EC: (GenBank accession numbers: KAA0973994, KAA0953176, respectively); muconate cycloisomerase (EC: (GenBank accession number: KAA0968757); catechol 1,2-dioxygenase (EC: (GenBank accession number: KAA0968755); and muconolactone d-isomerase (EC: (GenBank accession number: KAA0968756), as well as 4) halide impurities, i.e.,: 2-haloacid dehalogenase (EC: (GenBank accession number: KAA0975607), haloacetate dehalogenase (EC: (GenBank accession numbers: KAA0980549, KAA0969117, respectively), tetrachlorobenzoquinone reductase (EC: (GenBank accession number: KAA0968799) and carboxymethylenebutenolidase (EC: (GenBank accession numbers: KAA0980307, KAA0980364, KAA0975367, respectively).

Within the genome of the next analysed Antarctic strain, Psychrobacter sp. ANT_H59, several pathways of carbohydrate degradation were found, i.e.: the citrate cycle (Krebs cycle), non-oxidative phase of pentose phosphate cycle, Entner-Doudoroff glucose catabolism and the glyoxylate cycle. The ANT_H59 also encodes complete metabolic pathways responsible for beta-oxidation of fatty acids, degradation of acylglycerols and digestion of amino acids like: histidine, methionine and leucine. Furthermore, similarly to Pseudomonas sp. ANT_H12B, the ANT_H59 strain possesses genes encoding enzymes potentially contributing to: 1) benzoate degradation, i.e.: alpha and beta subunit of benzoate 1,2-dioxygenase (EC: (GenBank accession numbers: KAA0939514, KAA0939515, respectively); dihydroxycyclohexadiene carboxylate dehydrogenase (EC: (GenBank accession number: KAA0939517) and benzoate 1,2-dioxygenase reductase (EC:1.18.1.-) (GenBank accession number: KAA0939516), 2) catechol ortho-cleavage (i.e. 3-oxoadipate enol-lactonase (EC: (GenBank accession numbers: KAA0939522, KAA0930838, respectively); muconate cycloisomerase (EC: (GenBank accession number: KAA0939511); catechol 1,2-dioxygenase (EC: (GenBank accession number: KAA0939513); and muconolactone d-isomerase (EC: (GenBank accession number: KAA0939512) and 3) dehalogenation, i.e.: 2-haloacid dehalogenase (EC: (GenBank accession number: KAA0939827) and haloacetate dehalogenase (EC: (GenBank accession number: KAA0939528).

In the genome of Bacillus sp. ANT_WA51, similar metabolic pathways of carbohydrate degradation as in the ANT_H12B were identified, i.e.: glycolysis (Embden-Meyerhof pathway), gluconeogenesis, the citrate cycle (Krebs cycle), oxidative and non-oxidative phase of pentose phosphate cycle and Entner-Doudoroff glucose catabolism. Moreover, metabolic pathways of d-galacturonate, d-glucuronate, galactose, glycogen and histidine degradation were also identified in this strain. Deeper investigation of the ANT_WA51 genome revealed the presence of genes involved in: 1) dissimilatory nitrate reduction, i.e.: large (GenBank accession numbers: KAA0933206, KAA0933208) and small (GenBank accession number: KAA0933209) subunits of nitrite reductase (NADH) (EC:; alpha, beta and gamma subunits of nitrate reductase (EC: (GenBank accession numbers: KAA0934458, KAA0934457 and KAA0934455, respectively) and 2) assimilatory sulfate reduction (i.e.: alpha and beta components of sulfite reductase (NADPH) (EC: (GenBank accession numbers: KAA0934095 and KAA0934094, respectively); thioredoxin (EC: (GenBank accession numbers: KAA0936206, KAA0936678); adenylylsulfate kinase (EC: (GenBank accession number: KAA0936204, KAA0936681); and sulfate adenylyltransferase (EC: (GenBank accession numbers: KAA0936205, KAA0936680). Furthermore, Bacillus sp. ANT_WA51 contains an encoded ribulose monophosphate pathway (i.e.: 6-phosphofructokinase 1 (EC:, fructose-bisphosphate aldolase, class II (EC: 3-hexulose-6-phosphate synthase (EC: and 6-phospho-3-hexuloisomerase (EC: (GenBank accession numbers: KAA0938057, KAA0934442, KAA0933193 and KAA0933194, respectively), which are associated with the metabolism of C1 compounds.

Additionally, Bacillus sp. ANT_WA51 carries genes whose products are potentially involved in the decomposition of xenobiotics, such as: 1) benzoate compounds, i.e.: carboxymuconolactone decarboxylase (EC: (GenBank accession numbers: KAA0937823, KAA0932560), 4-oxalocrotonate tautomerase (EC: (GenBank accession number: KAA0934489) and catechol 2,3-dioxygenase (EC:; 2) aminobenzoates (vanillin dehydrogenase (EC: (GenBank accession number: KAA0930986), C and D subunit 4-hydroxybenzoate decarboxylase (EC: (GenBank accession numbers respectively: KAA0933177, KAA0933176), 4-nitrophenyl phosphatase (EC: (GenBank accession number: KAA0933977) and 3) halides (i.e., 2-haloacid dehalogenase (EC: (GenBank accession number: KAA0930988).

Genome-Based Insight Into Plant Growth Promoting Traits

Each of the analysed strains possesses different repertoire of genes and thus specific metabolic features, which also refers to plant growth promoting traits.

In the genome of Pseudomonas sp. ANT_H12B, we found various genes encoding enzymes responsible for the production of plant growth promotion agents. There are genes encoding alpha and beta subunits of urease (EC: (GenBank accession numbers: KAA0967691 and KAA0967692, respectively) and genes encoding enzymes related to the production of indole acetic acid (IAA), i.e., indolepyruvate ferredoxin oxidoreductase (EC: (GenBank accession number: KAA0975498) and cellulose degradation, i.e., beta-glucosidase (EC: (GenBank accession number: KAA0973975). Importantly, ANT_H12B encodes the pvd genes, which are responsible for the biosynthesis of pyoverdine siderophore (Figure 2; Table 2). Moreover, the clustered acs genes involved in biosynthesis of the secondary siderophore, achromobactin, were also identified, as well genes encoding achromobactin permease (GenBank accession number: KAA0975730) and ABC transporters (GenBank accession numbers: KAA0975548, KAA0975549, KAA0975550, KAA0975551 and KAA0975552) (Figure 2; Table 2).


FIGURE 2. Gene clusters responsible for the biosynthesis of siderophores, i.e.,: (A) pyoverdine and (B) achromobactin of Pseudomonas sp. ANT_H12B; (C) vibrioferrin of Psychrobacter sp. ANT_H59; (D) bacillibactin of Bacillus sp. ANT_WA51 and biosurfactants, i.e.,: (E) surfactin and (F) fengycin of ANT_WA51. Gene names and thair GenBank accession numbers are displayed above and under the arrows, respectively.


TABLE 2. Siderophore and biosurfactant biosynthesis genes encoded by ANT_H12B, ANT_H59 and ANT_WA51. NCBI—National Center for Biotechnology Information; AA—amino acids.

In the genome of Psychrobacter sp. ANT_H59, we identified clustered genes encoding three main subunits of urease (EC, i.e.: alpha (GenBank accession numbers: KAA0939809, KAA0939890), beta (GenBank accession number: KAA0939891) and gamma (GenBank accession numbers: KAA0939892, KAA0939808), as well as the cluster of pvs genes involved in vibrioferrin siderophore biosynthesis (Figure 2; Table 2).

In-depth analysis of the ANT_WA51 genome revealed the presence of genes related to cellulolytic—i.e. beta-1,4-glucanase (EC (GenBank accession number: KAA0937117), 6-phospho-beta-glucosidase (EC (GenBank accession numbers: KAA0932637, KAA0932987, KAA0933198) and ureolytic—i.e., alpha, beta and gamma urease subunits (GenBank accession numbers: KAA0934394, KAA0934395, KAA0934396, respectively) activities. Moreover, ANT_WA51 encodes genes responsible for synthesis of bacilysin, i.e.,: bacE, bacD, bacC, bacB, bacA (GenBank accession numbers: KAA0932482, KAA0932483, KAA0932484, KAA0932485 and KAA0932486, respectively), as well as many other biotechnologically important enzymes such as levanase (EC (GenBank accession number: KAA0937826), pullulanase (EC (GenBank accession number: KAA0938134), arabinogalactan endo-1,4-beta-galactanase (EC (GenBank accession number: KAA0934156), neopullulanase (EC (GenBank accession number: KAA0934202), endo-beta-1.3–1.4 glucanase (licheninase) (EC (GenBank accession number: KAA0932620), glucuronoarabinoxylan endo-1,4-beta-xylanase (EC (GenBank accession number: KAA0937119), arabinoxylan arabinofuranohydrolase (EC (GenBank accession number: KAA0937120), endo-1,4-beta-xylanase (EC (GenBank accession number: KAA0937190) and chitosanase (EC (GenBank accession number: KAA0937810).

Importantly, in the genome of ANT_WA51, there are clusters of genes responsible for the formation of two different biosurfactants, i.e. fengycin and surfactin (Figure 2; Table 2). Moreover, in this genome, genes involved in catecholate siderophore—bacillibactin—biosynthesis were found (Figure 2; Table 2).

For the analysis of the distribution of plant growth promoting traits in various efficient plant growth promoters belonging to the same genera as strains investigated in this study, a comparative analysis of proteomes of ANT_H12B and ANT_WA51 with 15 strains belonging to respective taxa was performed. In case of Psychrobacter sp. ANT_H59 there was no genome/proteome for a plant growth promoter available, thus, for the analysis two reference type-strains were used, i.e. Psychrobacter arcticus 273–4 and Psychrobacter cryohalolentis K5 (Figure 3). Analysis revealed that only two Pseudomonas strains, i.e. ANT_H12B and HT66 have complete sets of genes needed for achromobactin (secondary siderophore) production, however ANT_H12B have more copies of genes (namely pqqB, pqqC and pqqE) encoding proteins involved in phosphate solubilization (Figure 3). In case of compared Bacillus spp., no unique features of the ANT_WA51 strain were observed. Interestingly, it was also revealed that the content of plant growth promoting traits in Psychrobacter sp. ANT_H59 and P. cryohalolentis K5 is identical (Figure 3), but to our best knowledge the later strain was not tested for its ability to promote plant growth.


FIGURE 3. Distribution of various plant growth promoting traits in the proteomes of efficient plant growth promoters of the genus Bacillus and Pseudomonas, as well as the reference Psychrobacter strains.

Effect of Bacteria and Their Metabolites on Plant Growth

The main aim of the research was to test the effect of soil bioaugmentation with Antarctic strains, as well as the influence of their metabolites (including siderophores and biosurfactants) on plant (alfalfa) growth promotion. For this purpose, a complex experiment was performed with eight of the tested experimental variants including: 1) bioaugmentation with ANT_H12B, ANT_H59 or ANT_WA51 strains; 2) soil supplementation with bacterial metabolites originated from each strain; and 3) two adequate controls (i.e., GASN medium and 0.85% (w/v) saline solution). The measurements were performed every 7 days for 3 weeks.

Bioaugmentation with bacteria after 21 days of experimentation resulted in significant changes in the length of plants shoots and fresh root biomass. It was shown that treating soil with ANT_H12B, ANT_H59 and ANT_WA51 increased shoots’ length by 26, 22 and 26% and shoots’ fresh biomass by 37, 46 and 40%, respectively, compared to plants grown in non-inoculated soil (Figure 4). The increase in roots’ fresh biomass was observed only in plants cultivated in soil bioaugmented with the ANT_H12B strain, which resulted in a 40% increase compared to the control (Figure 4). However, both ANT_H12B and ANT_H59 decreased the roots’ length by 23 and 29%, respectively. Observed results were also reflected in principal component analysis (PCA) (Figure 5A). Two main components accounted for 67.2% of the variability observed in the data, with PC1 accounting for 42.6% of the total variation and PC2 accounting for 24.6%. PCA indicated positive correlations between inoculation with all tested strains and shoots’ biomass and length as well as roots’ biomass, especially for ANT_H12B (Figure 5A). In case of application of metabolites produced by tested strains, no transparent and statistically significant effect was observed (Figures 4, 5B).


FIGURE 4. Length and biomass of shoots and roots of plants after 21 days of the experiment. Panels (A,B) refer to soil bioaugmentation with bacteria; (C,D) to the application of their metabolites. Error bars represent standard deviations. */* - means statistical significance (p < 0.05) for length and biomass; */means statistical significance (p < 0.05) for length only.


FIGURE 5. Principal component analysis (PCA) of plant morphological features in reponse to: (A) inoculation with various tested bacteria; (B) supplementation with bacterial metabolites after 21 days of the experiment. Particular bacterial strains used for inoculation (panel (A)) or strain-specific metabolites (panel (B)) are represented by unified color code. PCA eigenvectors on both panels indicate the influence of each variable on principal components.

All analyzed strains were efficient producers of siderophores. Thus, to investigate the potential effect of siderophores on plant growth promotion, the iron content of alfalfa’s roots and shoots was measured. It was shown that inoculation of soil with the ANT_H12B strain, after 21 days, increased the amount of iron in the roots by 38%. No statistically significant changes were observed when the sole metabolites produced by the strains were used (Table 3).


TABLE 3. Iron content (µg/mg) in shoots and roots of plants after bioaugmentation with bacteria or application of metabolites. Presented results refer to the 21st day of the experiment. * — means statistical significance p < 0.05 compared to control.

The Influence of Bacteria and Their Metabolites on the Physical and Chemical Properties of Soil and Soil Microbiome Composition

Measuring soil pH and redox potential revealed that both bioaugmentation with bacteria and supplementation with their metabolites had a negligible effect on the general physicochemical conditions of the soil since no statistically significant changes were observed (Supplementary Table S1). Further soil analyses concerned the influence of bacteria and their metabolites on the abundance and bioavailability of iron in the soil. The measurement of the total iron content showed that the addition of the metabolites produced by ANT_H12B, ANT_H59 and ANT_WA51 reduced the total iron content in the soil after 21 days by 11, 24 and 14%, respectively. However, the analysis of iron bioavailability revealed a beneficial effect of supplementation with the metabolites of the ANT_H12B and ANT_WA51 strains. After 7, 14 and 21 days of the experiment, the addition of metabolites of ANT_H12B increased the bioavailability of iron in soil by 19, 30 and 40%, respectively, while the addition of metabolites of the ANT_WA51 increased it by 30, 36 and 18%, respectively. Moreover, bioaugmentation with Psychrobacter sp. ANT_H59, as well as with Pseudomonas sp. ANT_H12B, increased total iron content by 15 and 19%, respectively, after 21 days. The ANT_H12B strain also increased iron bioavailability by: 46% after 7 days, 28% after 14 days and 29% after 21 days of the experiment (Figure 6).


FIGURE 6. Total (A) and bioavailable (B) iron content in soil after 21 days of the experiment. Error bars represent standard deviations. * —means statistical significance p < 0.05 compared to control.

The number of heterotrophic bacteria in the soil did not show significant differences after 7, 14 and 21 days of the experiment, both in soil treated with metabolites and bioaugmented with bacteria (Supplementary Figure S2). However, metagenomic analyses confirmed the presence of the tested strains in bioaugmented soils after 21 days of the experiment. What is important, it was established that bioaugmentation with the ANT_H12B, ANT_H59 and ANT_WA51 strains did not significantly change the composition of the bacterial and fungal microbiome in the soil but influenced the relative abundance of microorganisms (Figure 7). The most significant result is an increase in the content of pseudomonads in soil by 30%, which was coupled with bioaugmentation with the ANT_H12B strain (Figure 7).


FIGURE 7. Bacterial (A) and fungal (B) diversity based on V3-V4 of 16S rRNA and ITS2 amplicons analysis. The diversity was presented on the genus level when possible, otherwise, the last specific taxon level name was used. For the clarity of the figure, only taxa with abundance over 1% or 0.5% for Bacteria and Fungi, respectively, are shown. Taxa with abundances below thresholds are presented as the “Other” group. ASVs that were not classified or were classified with not specific taxonomic names are presented as “Unassigned” or “Unspecified” groups, respectively. In the case of Psychrobacter, Pseudomonas and Bacillus genera, also the abundance below the threshold was shown and marked in red. In the variant description, “C” and “M” are abbreviations of control samples and metabolites used for supplementation, respectively.


Bacteria living in the soil play a fundamental role in the proper development of plants. Many PGP microorganisms can compensate nutrient deficiencies by producing multiple enzymes, secondary metabolites or performing biotransformations of other compounds into desired ones (Jabborova et al., 2020; Kalam et al., 2020; Akhtar et al., 2021; Hamid et al., 2021). In addition, some PGPB may also protect plants against fungal pathogens (Glick, 2012). However, common mesophilic bacteria indicate low activity during the late autumn, winter and early spring periods of temperate climatic zones (Mishra et al., 2010). In this study, we demonstrated the ability of Antarctic cold-active bacterial strains, that is, Pseudomonas ANT_H12B, Psychrobacter ANT_H59 and Bacillus sp. ANT_WA51, to promote plant growth.

Cold-active strains that promote plant growth are microorganisms especially desired in agriculture; thus, recently many scientists have been seeking out psychrotolerant PGPB (Verma et al., 2015). Strains analysed in this study exhibited these desired features. It was shown that ANT_H12B and ANT_WA51 were able to dissolve inorganic forms of phosphorus (thus increasing its bioavailability) and produce plant hormones (auxins). Moreover, both strains showed proteolytic and cellulolytic activities, which may significantly increase the bioavailability of organic carbon in soils (Utobo and Tewari, 2015).

The ability to break down lipids and produce biosurfactants is a desirable feature in agriculture. The presence of biosurfactants significantly improves the quality of soil by: facilitating bioremediation processes—including degradation of hydrophobic petroleum compounds and pesticides (Bustamante et al., 2012; Ahmad et al., 2018); improving wettability (Ahmad et al., 2018) and facilitating the colonisation of the rhizosphere by bacteria (Sachdev and Cameotra, 2013). Moreover, the hydrophobic compounds released from the soil through biosurfactant activity may serve as a source of nutrients for microorganisms and plants (Sachdev and Cameotra, 2013). Investigated Antarctic strains, namely ANT_H59 and ANT_WA51, decomposed lipids as well as efficiently produced biosurfactants. While little is known about the chemical nature of the biosurfactants produced by Psychrobacter species, the ability to produce lipopeptide biosurfactants is a common feature of Bacillus spp. (Ongena et al., 2007). Bacillus sp. ANT_WA51 constitutively produced at least two lipopeptide biosurfactants, i.e. surfactin and fengicin, which may contribute to the induced systemic resistance of plants (Ongena et al., 2007) and protection against fungal pathogens such as B. cinerea (Kefi et al., 2015), Aspergillus spp. (Farzaneh et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2020) or Fusarium spp. (Hu et al., 2007; Jiang et al., 2016).

An important feature of analysed strains is their ability to produce siderophores. Numerous studies (Verma et al., 2011; Meena et al., 2017; Pradesh et al., 2019) indicate the key role of such iron chelators in plant growth promotion. The siderophores produced by bacteria analysed in this study represented distinct types; for example, catechol bacillibactin produced by ANT_WA51, carboxylic vibrioferrin produced by ANT_H59 and mixed pyoverdine secreted by ANT_H12B. Genomic and biochemical analyses confirmed the presence of these groups of siderophores. In the genome of ANT_H12B, there were also genes conferring the production of achromobactin. However, as a secondary siderophore, its production occurs under very specific environmental conditions. Moreover, it has a lower affinity for iron and its quantity is usually negligible compared to pyoverdine (Owen and Ackerley, 2011; Schalk et al., 2020). Vibrioferrin is a siderophore often associated with the marine environment from where it was first isolated (Amin et al., 2009). However, the PGP properties of this siderophore produced by the soil bacterium Azotobacter sp. were also confirmed (Sumbul et al., 2020). One of the most specific features of vibrioferrin is its high photosensitivity and susceptibility to photolysis. Interestingly, after photolysis, this iron-complexed siderophore is imported faster and more efficiently by bacteria (Amin et al., 2009). The production of vibrioferrin by Psychrobacter sp. ANT_H59 may be related to high UV radiation in the Antarctic region and thus be a result of adaptation to extreme environments (Staehelin et al., 2001). While there are only single mentions of the plant growth-promoting abilities of vibrioferrin, bacillibactin and pyoverdin are much better recognised in this regard. Bacillibactin is a common siderophore among Bacillus species and have the strongest affinity for iron compared to any other natural siderophore. Such iron chelator has been reported to be an efficient plant growth-promoting and antifungal agent (Li et al., 2014; Nithyapriya et al., 2021). Many reports also indicate the plant beneficial properties of pyoverdine, such as: facilitating plant growth (Vansuyt et al., 2007), increasing chlorophyll production and total iron content in plants, enhancing the production of various pigments and anthocyanins in plants (Nagata et al., 2013) and fungicidal activity (Bakker, 2005; Cornelis and Matthijs, 2007; Sass et al., 2018).

One of the PGP features of siderophores is the ability to limit the growth of pathogens due to competition for iron in the environment (Scavino and Pedraza, 2013). Siderophores produced by mesophilic strains lose their activity at lower temperatures, whereas many fungal phytopathogens are still active. Thus, the application of siderophores as fungicidal agents faces some limitations. A possible solution is using thermostable siderophores produced by cold-active bacteria. So far, evidence exists of the successful use of cold-active, siderophore-producing strains against various fungal pathogens (Yadav et al., 2015; Yarzábal et al., 2018). In this study, it was revealed that Antarctic Bacillus sp. ANT_WA51 was effective against a wide spectrum of fungal pathogens, which suggests its huge potential in agriculture.

The primary function of siderophores is to increase the bioavailability of iron. Here, it was shown that supplementation with metabolites originating from all three strains resulted in a reduction of the total iron content in the soil, but only metabolites from ANT_H12B and ANT_WA51 significantly increased iron bioavailability. Lack of an increase in the case of ANT_H59 may be a consequence of the properties of the produced siderophore since vibrioferrin is a much weaker chelator than the other two (Amin et al., 2009). None of the supplementation variants increased the iron content in alfalfa’s roots. This phenomenon can be explained by the reduction of iron retention due to the action of siderophores, which could have resulted in its rinsing out of the pots. On the other hand, the increase in the total iron in the soil by bioaugmentation with Psychrobacter sp. ANT_H59 and Pseudomonas sp. ANT_H12B may be the result of bacterial activity and, thus, increased iron retention.

In the case of bacterial bioaugmentation, all investigated strains facilitated the growth of alfalfa’s shoots. It should be noted that only the ANT_H12B strain increased iron bioavailability in soil as well as biomass and iron content in the roots. Interestingly, the amount of bioavailable iron, as a result of bioaugmentation with ANT_H12B, decreased by almost two times after the first week and remained stable during subsequent weeks. The result correlates with the iron content in alfalfa’s roots, as plants bioaugmented with ANT_H12B had as much as 38% more iron content in their roots compared to the control. Furthermore, similarly to the application of ANT_H12B, bioaugmentation with Psychrobacter sp. ANT_H59, significantly reduced the length of alfalfa roots, but in this case, biomass remained similar to the control. This may mean that the plants bioaugmented with ANT_H59 or ANT_H12B strain did not have to invest in root length to search for nutrients (Atkinson et al., 2014).

In this study, the negligible effect of supplementation with metabolites and bioaugmentation with bacteria on the general physicochemical conditions of the soil was observed. It may be beneficial especially for plants with strict soil requirements. Similarly, metagenomic analyses confirmed that supplementation had only a limited effect on the structure of autochthonous microbiota in soil and, therefore, did not disturb the natural ecosystem. This is in line with the principles of sustainable agriculture, which assumes limiting the impact on soil biodiversity and maintaining natural and intact homeostasis in soil systems (Dobrovol’skaya et al., 2015).


Three investigated psychrotolerant bacteria, that is, Pseudomonas sp. ANT_H12B, Psychrobacter sp. ANT_H59 and Bacillus sp. ANT_WA51, revealed plant growth-promoting properties. Functional analyses confirmed their abilities to: produce siderophores and biosurfactants; decompose lipids, proteins and cellulose; increase the availability of phosphorus; and production of plant hormones. Bacillus sp. ANT_WA51 also inhibited the growth of fungal pathogens. Genomic analyses revealed the presence of complete gene clusters responsible for synthesis of three different siderophores, that is, pyoverdine (pvd), vibrioferrin (pvs) and bacillibactin (dhb) in ANT_H12B, ANT_H59 and ANT_WA51, respectively. In the genome of Bacillus sp. ANT_WA51, genes involved in synthesis of surface-active compounds, including surfactin (srf), were also found. It was shown that all tested strains stimulated alfalfa growth, but ANT_H12B also increased iron content in roots as well as their biomass. What is more, the application of the ANT_H12B strain, its metabolites and metabolites from ANT_WA51 increased iron bioavailability in soil. Bioaugmentation with Antarctic bacteria did not affect the physicochemical conditions and had a negligible effect on the structure of the bacterial and fungal community in the soil.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below:, NZ_VOBI00000000, NZ_VOBE00000000, NZ_VOBB00000000.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: MS, KD-A, LD; Data curation: MS, PD, LD; Formal Analysis: MS, LD; Funding acquisition: LD; Investigation: MS, GB, PD, BR; Methodology: MS, PD, BR, KD-A; Project administration: LD; Resources: LD; Software: PD; Supervision: LD; Validation: MS, KD-A, LD; Visualization: MS, PD; Writing—original draft: MS; Writing—review & editing: MS, KD-A, LD.


This work was supported by the National Science Centre (Poland), grant no. 2016/23/B/NZ9/02909.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.


We thank Jan Gawor from the DNA Sequencing and Oligonucleotide Synthesis Laboratory IBB PAS for his help in DNA sequencing and Mikolaj Iwan for his technical assistance.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at:


Ahmad, Z., Imran, M., Qadeer, S., Hussain, S., Kausar, R., Dawson, L., et al. (2018). Biosurfactants for Sustainable Soil Management. 1st ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 81–130.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Akhtar, N., Ilyas, N., Yasmin, H., Sayyed, R. Z., Hasnain, Z., A. Elsayed, E. E., et al. (2021). Role of Bacillus Cereus in Improving the Growth and Phytoextractability of Brassica Nigra (L.) K. Koch in Chromium Contaminated Soil. Molecules. 26, 1569. doi:10.3390/molecules26061569

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alsohim, A. S., Taylor, T. B., Barrett, G. A., Gallie, J., Zhang, X.-X., Altamirano-Junqueira, A. E., et al. (2014). The Biosurfactant Viscosin Produced byPseudomonas Fluorescens SBW25 Aids Spreading Motility and Plant Growth Promotion. Environ. Microbiol. 16, 2267–2281. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.12469

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Altschul, S., Madden, T. L., Schaffer, A. A., Zhang, J., Zhang, Z., Miller, W., et al. (1997). Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a New Generation of Protein Database Search Programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389–3402. doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Amin, S. A., Green, D. H., Küpper, F. C., and Carrano, C. J. (2009). Vibrioferrin, an Unusual marine Siderophore: Iron Binding, Photochemistry, and Biological Implications. Inorg. Chem. 48, 11451–11458. doi:10.1021/ic9016883

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Antonella Di Benedetto, N., Rosaria Corbo, M., Rosaria Corbo, M., Campaniello, D., Pia Cataldi, M., Bevilacqua, A., et al. (2017). The Role of Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria in Improving Nitrogen Use Efficiency for Sustainable Crop Production: a Focus on Wheat. AIMS Microbiol. 3, 413–434. doi:10.3934/microbiol.2017.3.413

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Arnow, L. E. (1937). Colorimetric Determination of the Components of 3,4-Dihydroxyphenylalaninetyrosine Mixtures. J. Biol. Chem. 118, 531–537. doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)74509-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Atkinson, J. A., Rasmussen, A., Traini, R., Voß, U., Sturrock, C., Mooney, S. J., et al. (2014). Branching Out in Roots: Uncovering Form, Function, and Regulation. Plant Physiol. 166, 538–550. doi:10.1104/pp.114.245423

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Aziz, R. K., Bartels, D., Best, A. A., DeJongh, M., Disz, T., Edwards, R. A., et al. (2008). The RAST Server: Rapid Annotations Using Subsystems Technology. BMC Genomics. 9, 75. doi:10.1186/1471-2164-9-75

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Aznar, A., and Dellagi, A. (2015). New Insights into the Role of Siderophores as Triggers of Plant Immunity: What Can We Learn from Animals? J. Exp. Bot. 66, 3001–3010. doi:10.1093/jxb/erv155

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bakker, P. A. H. M. (2005). Determinants of Pseudomonas Putida WCS358 Involved in Inducing Systemic Resistance in Plants. Mol. Plant Pathol. 6, 177–185. doi:10.1111/J.1364-3703.2004.00276.X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bankevich, A., Nurk, S., Antipov, D., Gurevich, A. A., Dvorkin, M., Kulikov, A. S., et al. (2012). SPAdes: A New Genome Assembly Algorithm and its Applications to Single-Cell Sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 19, 455–477. doi:10.1089/cmb.2012.0021

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barteková, J., Žemberyová, M., Bajčan, D., and Vyšinská, D. (2006). Determination of Bioavailable Iron in Noncontaminated Slovak Soils by Flame Atomic Absorption Spectrometry. Chem. Pap. 60, 122–124. doi:10.2478/s11696-006-0022-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Blin, K., Shaw, S., Steinke, K., Villebro, R., Ziemert, N., Lee, S. Y., et al. (2019). antiSMASH 5.0: Updates to the Secondary Metabolite Genome Mining Pipeline. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, W81–W87. doi:10.1093/nar/gkz310

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bolyen, E., Rideout, J. R., Dillon, M. R., Bokulich, N. A., Abnet, C. C., Al-Ghalith, G. A., et al. (2019). Reproducible, Interactive, Scalable and Extensible Microbiome Data Science Using QIIME 2. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 852–857. doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bultreys, A., and Gheysen, I. (2000). Production and Comparison of Peptide Siderophores from Strains of Distantly Related Pathovars of Pseudomonas syringae and Pseudomonas Viridiflava LMG 2352. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 325–331. doi:10.1128/AEM.66.1.325-331.2000

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bustamante, M., Durán, N., and Diez, M. C. (2012). Biosurfactants Are Useful Tools for the Bioremediation of Contaminated Soil: a Review. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 12, 667–687. doi:10.4067/s0718-95162012005000024

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Callahan, B. J., McMurdie, P. J., Rosen, M. J., Han, A. W., Johnson, A. J. A., and Holmes, S. P. (2016). DADA2: High-Resolution Sample Inference from Illumina Amplicon Data. Nat. Methods. 13, 581–583. doi:10.1038/nmeth.3869

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carroll, C. S., and Moore, M. M. (2018). Ironing Out Siderophore Biosynthesis: a Review of Non-Ribosomal Peptide Synthetase (NRPS)-independent Siderophore Synthetases. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 53, 356–381. doi:10.1080/10409238.2018.1476449

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, S., Zhou, Y., Chen, Y., and Gu, J. (2018). Fastp: An Ultra-fast All-In-One FASTQ Preprocessor. Bioinformatics. 34, i884–i890. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty560

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, T., Nan, Z., Zhang, X., Hou, F., Christensen, M., and Baskin, C. (2018). Does Dormancy Protect Seeds against Attack by the Pathogenic Fungus Fusarium Tricinctum in a Semiarid Grassland of Northwest China. Plant Soil. 422, 155–168. doi:10.1007/s11104-017-3420-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chu, B. C., Garcia-Herrero, A., Johanson, T. H., Krewulak, K. D., Lau, C. K., Peacock, R. S., et al. (2010). Siderophore Uptake in Bacteria and the Battle for Iron with the Host; a Bird's Eye View. BioMetals. 23, 601–611. doi:10.1007/s10534-010-9361-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cornelis, P., and Matthijs, S. (2007). Pseudomonas Siderophores and Their Biological Significance. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

Google Scholar

Crowley, D. E. (2006). “Microbial Siderophores in the Plant Rhizosphere,” in Iron Nutrition in Plants and Rhizospheric Microorganisms (Dordrecht: Springer), 169–198. doi:10.1007/1-4020-4743-6_8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Debiec-Andrzejewska, K., Krucon, T., Piatkowska, K., and Drewniak, L. (2020). Enhancing the Plants Growth and Arsenic Uptake from Soil Using Arsenite-Oxidizing Bacteria. Environ. Pollut. 264, 114692. doi:10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114692

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dennis, C., and Webster, J. (1971). Antagonistic Properties of Species-Groups of Trichoderma. Trans. Br. Mycol. Soc. 57, 25–IN3. doi:10.1016/s0007-1536(71)80077-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dimkpa, C. O., and Bindraban, P. S. (2016). Fortification of Micronutrients for Efficient Agronomic Production: a Review. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 36, 7–16. doi:10.1007/s13593-015-0346-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dobrovol’skaya, T. G., Zvyagintsev, D. G., Chernov, I. Y., Golovchenko, A. V., Zenova, G. M., Lysak, L. V., et al. (2015). The Role of Microorganisms in the Ecological Functions of Soils. Eurasian Soil Sci. 48, 959–967. doi:10.1134/S1064229315090033

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Faiz, S. (2021). Isolation, Screening and Characterization of Lipase from Bacterial Isolates and its Application in Detergents and Oily Waste Water Degradation. Pure Appl. Biol. 10, 209–224. doi:10.19045/bspab.2021.100022

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Farzaneh, M., Shi, Z.-Q., Ahmadzadeh, M., Hu, L.-B., and Ghassempour, A. (2016). Inhibition of the Aspergillus flavus Growth and Aflatoxin B1 Contamination on Pistachio Nut by Fengycin and Surfactin-Producing Bacillus Subtilis UTBSP1. Plant Pathol. J. 32, 209–215. doi:10.5423/PPJ.OA.11.2015.0250

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

García-López, M.-L., Santos, J. A., Otero, A., and Rodríguez-Calleja, J. M. (2014). “Psychrobacter,” in Psychrobacter. Encycl. Food Microbiol. Second Ed (Elsevier Ltd., Academic Press), 3, 261–268. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12-384730-0.00285-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Glick, B. R. (2012). Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria: Mechanisms and Applications. Scientifica 2012, 1–15. doi:10.6064/2012/963401

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Haas, D., and Keel, C. (2003). Regulation of Antibiotic Production in Root-Colonizing Pseudomonas Spp. And Relevance for Biological Control of Plant Disease. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 41, 117–153. doi:10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.052002.095656

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hamid, B., Zaman, M., Farooq, S., Fatima, S., Sayyed, R. Z., Baba, Z. A., et al. (2021). Bacterial Plant Biostimulants: A Sustainable Way towards Improving Growth, Productivity, and Health of Crops. Sustainability. 13, 2856. doi:10.3390/su13052856

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hider, R. C., and Kong, X. (2010). Chemistry and Biology of Siderophores. Nat. Prod. Rep. 27, 637–657. doi:10.1039/b906679a

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Höfte, M., and Bakker, P. A. H. M. (2007). “Competition for Iron and Induced Systemic Resistance by Siderophores of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria,” in Microbial Siderophores (Heidelberg: Springer), 121–133. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-71160-5_6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, L. B., Shi, Z. Q., Zhang, T., and Yang, Z. M. (2007). Fengycin Antibiotics Isolated from B-FS01 Culture Inhibit the Growth ofFusarium moniliformeSheldon ATCC 38932. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 272, 91–98. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.2007.00743.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jabborova, D., Wirth, S., Kannepalli, A., Narimanov, A., Desouky, S., Davranov, K., et al. (2020). Co-Inoculation of Rhizobacteria and Biochar Application Improves Growth and Nutrientsin Soybean and Enriches Soil Nutrients and Enzymes. Agronomy 10, 1142. doi:10.3390/agronomy10081142

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jia, B., Raphenya, A. R., Alcock, B., Waglechner, N., Guo, P., Tsang, K. K., et al. (2017). CARD 2017: Expansion and Model-Centric Curation of the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D566–D573. doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jiang, J., Gao, L., Bie, X., Lu, Z., Liu, H., Zhang, C., et al. (2016). Identification of Novel Surfactin Derivatives from NRPS Modification of Bacillus Subtilis and its Antifungal Activity against Fusarium Moniliforme. BMC Microbiol. 16, 1–14. doi:10.1186/s12866-016-0645-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jones, B. V., Sun, F., and Marchesi, J. R. (2007). Using Skimmed Milk agar to Functionally Screen a Gut Metagenomic Library for Proteases May lead to False Positives. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 45, 418–420. doi:10.1111/j.1472-765X.2007.02202.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Joshi, S., Bharucha, C., and Desai, A. J. (2008). Production of Biosurfactant and Antifungal Compound by Fermented Food Isolate Bacillus Subtilis 20B. Bioresour. Techn. 99, 4603–4608. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2007.07.030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kalam, S., Basu, A., Ahmad, I., Sayyed, R. Z., El-Enshasy, H. A., Dailin, D. J., et al. (2020). Recent Understanding of Soil Acidobacteria and Their Ecological Significance: A Critical Review. Front. Microbiol. 11, 580024. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2020.580024

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kanehisa, M., Sato, Y., and Morishima, K. (2016). BlastKOALA and GhostKOALA: KEGG Tools for Functional Characterization of Genome and Metagenome Sequences. J. Mol. Biol. 428, 726–731. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2015.11.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kefi, A., Slimene, I. B., Karkouch, I., Rihouey, C., Azaeiz, S., Bejaoui, M., et al. (2015). Characterization of Endophytic Bacillus Strains from Tomato Plants (Lycopersicon esculentum) Displaying Antifungal Activity against Botrytis Cinerea Pers. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 31, 1967–1976. doi:10.1007/s11274-015-1943-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kulkarni, K. P., Tayade, R., Asekova, S., Song, J. T., Shannon, J. G., and Lee, J.-D. (2018). Harnessing the Potential of Forage Legumes, Alfalfa, Soybean, and Cowpea for Sustainable Agriculture and Global Food Security. Front. Plant Sci. 9, 1–17. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01314

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, B., Li, Q., Xu, Z., Zhang, N., Shen, Q., and Zhang, R. (2014). Responses of Beneficial Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens SQR9 to Different Soilborne Fungal Pathogens through the Alteration of Antifungal Compounds Production. Front. Microbiol. 5, 1–11. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2014.00636

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liang, Y.-L., Zhang, Z., Wu, M., Wu, Y., and Feng, J.-X. (2014). Isolation, Screening, and Identification of Cellulolytic Bacteria from Natural Reserves in the Subtropical Region of China and Optimization of Cellulase Production byPaenibacillus terraeME27-1. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 1–13. doi:10.1155/2014/512497

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, B., Zheng, D., Jin, Q., Chen, L., and Yang, J. (2019). VFDB 2019: a Comparative Pathogenomic Platform with an Interactive Web Interface. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D687–D692. doi:10.1093/nar/gky1080

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, Y., Teng, K., Wang, T., Dong, E., Zhang, M., Tao, Y., et al. (2020). Antimicrobial Bacillus Velezensis HC6: Production of Three Kinds of Lipopeptides and Biocontrol Potential in maize. J. Appl. Microbiol. 128, 242–254. doi:10.1111/jam.14459

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ma, Y., Rajkumar, M., Vicente, J. A. F., and Freitas, H. (2010). Inoculation of Ni-Resistant Plant Growth Promoting BacteriumPsychrobactersp. Strain SRS8 for the Improvement of Nickel Phytoextraction by Energy Crops. Int. J. Phytoremediation. 13, 126–139. doi:10.1080/15226511003671403

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Malavenda, R., Rizzo, C., Michaud, L., Gerçe, B., Bruni, V., Syldatk, C., et al. (2015). Biosurfactant Production by Arctic and Antarctic Bacteria Growing on Hydrocarbons. Polar Biol. 38, 1565–1574. doi:10.1007/s00300-015-1717-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mandels, M., and Reese, E. T. (1957). Induction of Cellulase in Trichoderma Viride as Influenced by Carbon Sources and Metals. J. Bacteriol. 73, 269–278. doi:10.1128/jb.73.2.269-278.1957

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Martin, M. (2011). Cutadapt Removes Adapter Sequences from High-Throughput Sequencing Reads. EMBnet j. 17, 10. doi:10.14806/ej.17.1.200

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meena, M., Swapnil, P., Zehra, A., Aamir, M., Dubey, M. K., Goutam, J., et al. (2017). Beneficial Microbes for Disease Suppression and Plant Growth Promotion. Singapore: Springer

Google Scholar

Michalska-Kacymirow, M., Kurek, E., Smolis, A., Wierzbicka, M., and Bulska, E. (2014). Biological and Chemical Investigation of Allium cepa L. Response to Selenium Inorganic Compounds. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 406, 3717–3722. doi:10.1007/s00216-014-7742-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mishra, P. K., Joshi, P., Bisht, S. C., Bisht, J. K., and Selvakumar, G. (2010). “Cold-tolerant Agriculturally Important Microorganisms,” in Plant Growth and Health Promoting Bacteria (Heidelberg: Springer), 273–296. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13612-2_12

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mohite, B. (2013). Isolation and Characterization of Indole Acetic Acid (IAA) Producing Bacteria from Rhizospheric Soil and its Effect on Plant Growth. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr. 13, 638–649. doi:10.4067/S0718-95162013005000051

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moriya, Y., Itoh, M., Okuda, S., Yoshizawa, A. C., and Kanehisa, M. (2007). KAAS: an Automatic Genome Annotation and Pathway Reconstruction Server. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, W182–W185. doi:10.1093/nar/gkm321

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Morris, C. E., Sands, D. C., Vinatzer, B. A., Glaux, C., Guilbaud, C., Buffière, A., et al. (2008). The Life History of the Plant Pathogen Pseudomonas syringae Is Linked to the Water Cycle. ISME J. 2, 321–334. doi:10.1038/ismej.2007.113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nagata, T., Oobo, T., and Aozasa, O. (2013). Efficacy of a Bacterial Siderophore, Pyoverdine, to Supply Iron to Solanum lycopersicum Plants. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 115, 686–690. doi:10.1016/j.jbiosc.2012.12.018

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nautiyal, C. S. (1999). An Efficient Microbiological Growth Medium for Screening Phosphate Solubilizing Microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 170, 265–270. doi:10.1111/j.1574-6968.1999.tb13383.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Neilands, J. B. (1981). Microbial Iron Compounds. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 50, 715–731. doi:10.1146/

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nilsson, R. H., Larsson, K.-H., Taylor, A. F. S., Bengtsson-Palme, J., Jeppesen, T. S., Schigel, D., et al. (2019). The UNITE Database for Molecular Identification of Fungi: Handling Dark Taxa and Parallel Taxonomic Classifications. Nucleic Acids Res. 47, D259–D264. doi:10.1093/nar/gky1022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nithyapriya, S., Lalitha, S., Sayyed, R. Z., Reddy, M. S., Dailin, D. J., El Enshasy, H. A., et al. (2021). Production, Purification, and Characterization of Bacillibactin Siderophore of Bacillus Subtilis and its Application for Improvement in Plant Growth and Oil Content in Sesame. Sustainability. 13, 5394. doi:10.3390/su13105394

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Olanrewaju, O. S., Glick, B. R., and Babalola, O. O. (2017). Mechanisms of Action of Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 33, 1–16. doi:10.1007/s11274-017-2364-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ongena, M., Jourdan, E., Adam, A., Paquot, M., Brans, A., Joris, B., et al. (2007). Surfactin and Fengycin Lipopeptides of Bacillus Subtilis as Elicitors of Induced Systemic Resistance in Plants. Environ. Microbiol. 9, 1084–1090. doi:10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01202.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Overbeek, R., Olson, R., Pusch, G. D., Olsen, G. J., Davis, J. J., Disz, T., et al. (2014). The SEED and the Rapid Annotation of Microbial Genomes Using Subsystems Technology (RAST). Nucl. Acids Res. 42, D206–D214. doi:10.1093/nar/gkt1226

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Owen, J. G., and Ackerley, D. F. (2011). Characterization of Pyoverdine and Achromobactin in Pseudomonas syringae Pv. Phaseolicola 1448a. BMC Microbiol. 11, 218. doi:10.1186/1471-2180-11-218

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pahari, A., Pradhan, A., Nayak, S. K., and Mishra, B. B. (2018). Bacterial Siderophore as a Plant Growth Promoter. Singapore: Springer, 163–180.

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pradesh, H., Yadav, N., Pradesh, U., Kumar, A., South, R. G., Pradesh, U., et al. (2019). Rhizospheric Microbiomes: Biodiversity, Mechanisms of Plant Growth Promotion, and Biotechnological Applications for Sustainable Agriculture. Singapore: Springer.

Google Scholar

Pranaw, K., Pidlisnyuk, V., Trögl, J., and Malinská, H. (2020). Bioprospecting of a Novel Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterium Bacillus Altitudinis KP-14 for Enhancing Miscanthus × Giganteus Growth in Metals Contaminated Soil. Biology. 9, 305–325. doi:10.3390/biology9090305

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Prashar, P., Kapoor, N., and Sachdeva, S. (2013). “Biocontrol of Plant Pathogens Using Plant Growth Promoting Bacteria,” in Sustainable Agriculture Reviews (Dordrecht: Springer), 319–360. doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5961-9_10

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Quast, C., Pruesse, E., Yilmaz, P., Gerken, J., Schweer, T., Yarza, P., et al. (2013). The SILVA Ribosomal RNA Gene Database Project: Improved Data Processing and Web-Based Tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596. doi:10.1093/nar/gks1219

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rana, A., Saharan, B., Joshi, M., Prasanna, R., Kumar, K., and Nain, L. (2011). Identification of Multi-Trait PGPR Isolates and Evaluating Their Potential as Inoculants for Wheat. Ann. Microbiol. 61, 893–900. doi:10.1007/s13213-011-0211-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rognes, T., Flouri, T., Nichols, B., Quince, C., and Mahé, F. (2016). VSEARCH: a Versatile Open Source Tool for Metagenomics. PeerJ. 4, e2584. doi:10.7717/peerj.2584

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Romaniuk, K., Ciok, A., Decewicz, P., Uhrynowski, W., Budzik, K., Nieckarz, M., et al. (2018). Insight into Heavy Metal Resistome of Soil Psychrotolerant Bacteria Originating from King George Island (Antarctica). Polar Biol. 41, 1319–1333. doi:10.1007/s00300-018-2287-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rout, G. R., and Sahoo, S. (2015). Role of Iron in Plant Growth and Metabolism. Rev. Agric. Sci. 3, 1–24. doi:10.7831/ras.3.1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sachdev, D. P., and Cameotra, S. S. (2013). Biosurfactants in Agriculture. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 97, 1005–1016. doi:10.1007/s00253-012-4641-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sambrook, J., and Russell, D. W. (2001). Molecular Cloning : A Laboratory Manual, III. New York: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

Google Scholar

Sass, G., Nazik, H., Penner, J., Shah, H., Ansari, S. R., Clemons, K. V., et al. (2018). Studies of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Mutants Indicate Pyoverdine as the central Factor in Inhibition of Aspergillus fumigatus Biofilm. J. Bacteriol. 200, 1–24. doi:10.1128/JB.00345-17

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Scavino, A. F., and Pedraza, R. O. (2013). “The Role of Siderophores in Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria,” in Bacteria in Agrobiology: Crop Productivity (Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag), 265–285. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37241-4_11

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schalk, I. J., Rigouin, C., and Godet, J. (2020). An Overview of Siderophore Biosynthesis Among Fluorescent Pseudomonads and New Insights into Their Complex Cellular Organization. Environ. Microbiol. 22, 1447–1466. doi:10.1111/1462-2920.14937

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schwyn, B., and Neilands, J. B. (1987). Universal Chemical Assay for the Detection and Determination of Siderophores. Anal. Biochem. 160, 47–56. doi:10.1016/0003-2697(87)90612-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Selvakumar, G., Joshi, P., Nazim, S., Mishra, P. K., Kundu, S., and Gupta, H. S. (2009). Exiguobacterium Acetylicum Strain 1P (MTCC 8707) a Novel Bacterial Antagonist from the North Western Indian Himalayas. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 25, 131–137. doi:10.1007/s11274-008-9874-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Selvakumar, G., Kundu, S., Joshi, P., Nazim, S., Gupta, A. D., Mishra, P. K., et al. (2008a). Characterization of a Cold-Tolerant Plant Growth-Promoting Bacterium Pantoea Dispersa 1A Isolated from a Sub-alpine Soil in the North Western Indian Himalayas. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 24, 955–960. doi:10.1007/s11274-007-9558-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Selvakumar, G., Mohan, M., Kundu, S., Gupta, A. D., Joshi, P., Nazim, S., et al. (2008b). Cold Tolerance and Plant Growth Promotion Potential of Serratia marcescens Strain SRM (MTCC 8708) Isolated from Flowers of Summer Squash (Cucurbita Pepo). Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 46, 171–175. doi:10.1111/j.1472-765X.2007.02282.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sharma, A., and Johri, B. N. (2003). Growth Promoting Influence of Siderophore-Producing Pseudomonas Strains GRP3A and PRS9 in maize (Zea mays L.) under Iron Limiting Conditions. Microbiol. Res. 158, 243–248. doi:10.1078/0944-5013-00197

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shenker, M., Oliver, I., Helmann, M., Hadar, Y., and Chen, Y. (1992). Utilization by Tomatoes of Iron Mediated by a Siderophore Produced byRhizopus Arrhizus. J. Plant Nutr. 15, 2173–2182. doi:10.1080/01904169209364466

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sigurdarson, J. J., Svane, S., and Karring, H. (2020). Development of a M9‐based Urea Medium (M9U) for Sensitive and Real‐time Monitoring of Ureolytic Activity of Bacteria and Cell‐free Urease. Microbiologyopen. 9, 1–11. doi:10.1002/mbo3.976

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Staehelin, J., Harris, N. R. P., Appenzeller, C., and Eberhard, J. (2001). Ozone Trends: a Review. Rev. Geophys. 39, 231–290. doi:10.1029/1999RG000059

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sumbul, A., Ansari, R. A., Rizvi, R., and Mahmood, I. (2020). Azotobacter: a Potential Bio-Fertilizer for Soil and Plant Health Management. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 27, 3634–3640. doi:10.1016/j.sjbs.2020.08.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Teather, R. M., and Wood, P. J. (1982). Use of Congo Red-Polysaccharide Interactions in Enumeration and Characterization of Cellulolytic Bacteria from the Bovine Rumen. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 43, 777–780. doi:10.1128/aem.43.4.777-780.1982

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Utobo, E. B., and Tewari, L. (2015). Soil Enzymes as Bioindicators of Soil Ecosystem Status. Aeer. 13, 147–169. doi:10.15666/aeer/1301_147169

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vansuyt, G., Robin, A., Briat, J.-F., Curie, C., and Lemanceau, P. (2007). Iron Acquisition from Fe-Pyoverdine by Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 20, 441–447. doi:10.1094/MPMI-20-4-0441

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Velho, R. V., Medina, L. F. C., Segalin, J., and Brandelli, A. (2011). Production of Lipopeptides Among Bacillus Strains Showing Growth Inhibition of Phytopathogenic Fungi. Folia Microbiol. 56, 297–303. doi:10.1007/s12223-011-0056-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Verma, P., Yadav, A. N., Khannam, K. S., Panjiar, N., Kumar, S., Saxena, A. K., et al. (2015). Assessment of Genetic Diversity and Plant Growth Promoting Attributes of Psychrotolerant Bacteria Allied with Wheat (Triticum aestivum) from the Northern hills Zone of India. Ann. Microbiol. 65, 1885–1899. doi:10.1007/s13213-014-1027-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Verma, V. C., Singh, S. K., and Prakash, S. (2011). Bio-Control and Plant Growth Promotion Potential of Siderophore Producing Endophytic Streptomyces from Azadirachta indica A. Juss. J. Basic Microbiol. 51, 550–556. doi:10.1002/jobm.201000155

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vu, V. Q. (2011). Ggbiplot: A Ggplot2 Based Biplot. R Package Version 0.55. Available at: (Accessed January 2, 2022).

Google Scholar

Wattam, A. R., Davis, J. J., Assaf, R., Boisvert, S., Brettin, T., Bun, C., et al. (2017). Improvements to PATRIC, the All-Bacterial Bioinformatics Database and Analysis Resource center. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D535–D542. doi:10.1093/nar/gkw1017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2. Cham: Springer International Publishing

Google Scholar

Yadav, A. N., Sachanhos, S. G., Verma, P., Tyagi, S. P., Kaushik, R., and Saxena, A. K. (2015). Culturable Diversity and Functional Annotation of Psychrotrophic Bacteria from Cold Desert of Leh Ladakh (India). World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 31, 95–108. doi:10.1007/s11274-014-1768-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yarzábal, L. A., Monserrate, L., Buela, L., and Chica, E. (2018). Antarctic Pseudomonas Spp. Promote Wheat Germination and Growth at Low Temperatures. Polar Biol. 41, 2343–2354. doi:10.1007/s00300-018-2374-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Antarctica, biosurfactant, plant growth promoting bacteria, psychrotolerant bacteria, siderophore

Citation: Styczynski M, Biegniewski G, Decewicz P, Rewerski B, Debiec-Andrzejewska K and Dziewit L (2022) Application of Psychrotolerant Antarctic Bacteria and Their Metabolites as Efficient Plant Growth Promoting Agents. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 10:772891. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.772891

Received: 08 September 2021; Accepted: 07 February 2022;
Published: 24 February 2022.

Edited by:

Marko Vincekovic, University of Zagreb, Croatia

Reviewed by:

Asma Imran, National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (Pakistan), Pakistan
Divjot Kour, Eternal University, India
Riyazali Zafarali Sayyed, P.S.G.V.P.M’s Arts, Science & Commerce College, India

Copyright © 2022 Styczynski, Biegniewski, Decewicz, Rewerski, Debiec-Andrzejewska and Dziewit. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Lukasz Dziewit,