Efficient and reversible Cas13d-mediated knockdown with an all-in-one lentivirus-vector

Introduction

Being able to tune down the expression of a target gene has empowered modern genetics in multi-cellular organisms. Many methods were developed for such applications, such as anti-sense RNA, siRNA, or gene knockout. Before the era of CRISPR, siRNA was the dominating method for gene knockdown for 2 decades, and it is still widely used. Yet, the off-target effect of siRNA was not unrecognized (Seok et al., 2018), which may be attributed to the involvement of proteins critical for endogenous processes. CRISPR/Cas9-based methods, since their first application in the mammalian system (Cong et al., 2013; Mali et al., 2013), quickly gained popularity, which wipes out gene expression at the DNA level. CRISPR-based effectors are nucleases that can target and cut substrate DNA or RNA when activated by base-pairing between the target and small CRISPR-RNA. Among CRISPR effectors, Cas9 is a DNA nuclease. Unlike siRNA, CRISPR-based technologies are orthogonal to mammalian endogenous processes as they harness the immune system of microorganisms. Yet the change in DNA sequence introduced by conventional Cas9-mediated knockout is irreversible. In addition to Cas9, several other CRISPR-based single-molecule effectors have been uncovered, some of which are RNA-guided RNA nucleases, such as Cas13a (Abudayyeh et al., 2017), Cas13b (Smargon et al., 2017), and Cas13d (Konermann et al., 2018; Yan et al., 2018). These effectors are targeted to RNA by a single CRISPR RNA (crRNA) which base-pairs with the target. When used for gene knockdown, all Cas13 are reported to have fewer off-target effects than RNA interference (Abudayyeh et al., 2017; Konermann et al., 2018). Among Cas13 effectors, RfxCas13d is reported to have better efficacy than others for both protein-coding genes and non-coding genes in both cell culture and in vivo (Kushawah et al., 2020; Wessels et al., 2020; Li et al., 2021). As a result, Cas13d has been promptly applied to many organisms including plants (Mahas et al., 2019), mice (Zhou et al., 2020), flies (Buchman et al., 2020), and fish (Kushawah et al., 2020).

To deliver an expression cassette into mammalian cells, lentivirus vectors have many advantages including high transduction efficiency, wide-spectrum host cell types, and large packaging capacity. While the initial application of RfxCas13d utilized two vectors expressing CasRx and crRNA, respectively (Konermann et al., 2018), the two cassettes can be expressed in one lentivirus vector (Wessels et al., 2020). Yet, an inducible system would be preferred under many circumstances, for example, to study the instant effect of gene knockdown, to turn off and on genes dynamically, or to study the dosage effect of a gene. The current inducible CasRx lentivirus vector expresses crRNA and CasRx with separate vectors possibly due to the size limit of the vector (Wessels et al., 2020). Here we present an all-in-one vector design, pLenti-TRE-CasRx-U6-gRNA, which renders efficient inducible knockdown with CasRx.

Materials and methods

Key reagents and resources used in this study are as follows.

Cell culture

All cells were cultured at 37°C in 5% CO₂. HEK-293T, HLF, MDA-MB-231, and Swiss-3T3 were cultured in DMEM (Thermo, C11995500BT). K562 and 22RV1 were cultured in RPMI-1640 (Procell PM150110). MV4-11 was cultured in IMDM (Procell PM150510). Caki-1 was cultured in McCoy’s 5A medium (Procell PM150710). The medium for these cells was supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (PAN ST30-3302). E14 cells were cultured in DMEM supplemented with 15% fetal bovine serum (GIBCO, 141-044), 1% penicillin–streptomycin (Gibco 15140122), 1% non-essential amino acids (Gibco 11140050), 1% L-Glutamax (Gibco 35050061), 0.55 mM 2-mercaptoethanol (Gibco 21985023), 1,000 units/ml ESGRO mLIF (Millipore ESG1107), 3 μM CHIR-99021 (MCE HY10182), and 1 μM PD0325901 (MCE HY-10254) on gelatin (Sigma G1890)-coated tissue culture plates.

Western blot

Western blot was performed exactly as previously reported (Song et al., 2021). The antibodies used are listed in the aforementioned reagent table.

Total RNA extraction and reverse transcription

Total RNA extraction and reverse transcription were performed as previously reported (Song et al., 2021). Briefly, RNA was extracted with TRIZOL reagent following the manufacturer’s instructions and then treated with DNase I (Sigma-Aldrich AMPD1-1 KT) to remove DNA contamination. Reverse transcription was performed using the Improm-II reverse transcription kit (Promega A3800) following the manufacturer’s instructions with random primers as primers.

Real-time quantitative PCR

Real-time quantitative PCR was performed as previously reported (Song et al., 2021). Briefly, the reaction was performed with the ThunderBird Syb Sybgreen Master Mix (Toyobo, QPK-201) or the QuantiNova SYBR Green PCR kit (QIAGEN 208054) in a 96-well plate. The primers used are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

Cell proliferation

Adherent cells were seeded into 6-cm dishes and were transduced with lentivirus 24 h later in the presence of 8 μg/ml polybrene. MV4-11 cells were transduced with spinoculation (2000rpm, 2 h). Cells were passaged into a new 10-cm dish and selected with 1 μg/ml puromycin for 5 days. The cells were collected and stained with trypan blue and live cells were counted. Doxycycline was added to the cell culture to induce gene knockdown where indicated.

Lentivirus production and transduction

A total of 2.6 μg psPAX2, 1.4 μg pMD2. G, and 4 μg pLenti-TRE-CasRx were co-transfected into 293T cells in a 6-cm dish. The medium was changed 24 h later. Culture suspension was collected 24 h later and filtered through a 0.45 μm filter. The suspension was then added to the cells in the presence of 8 μg/ml polybrene.

Measuring virus infection titer

A total of 200,000 cells were seeded to a 6-well plate and transduced with different volumes of virus suspension in the presence of 8 μg/ml polybrene. The cells were passaged into a 10-cm dish 24 h later. The cells were then either let grow or selected with 1 μg/ml puromycin for 4 days and cell numbers were counted. The infection titer was calculated with the number of infected cells/volume of virus suspension.

Immunofluorescence

Cells were fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min at room temperature. The cells were then permeabilized with 0.5% Triton-X100 in cold PBS and blocked in 1% BSA. The cells were incubated with primary antibodies, anti-HA tag (CST #3724), washed with PBST (PBS+0.2% Tween20), and incubated with Alexa Fluor-conjugated secondary antibodies (Invitrogen #711-545-152). The cells were then stained with DAPI for 5 min at room temperature, washed with PBST, and mounted onto a slide with a mounting medium (Abcam #AB104135). Photos were taken with Zeiss-A1 Axiovert A1 fluorescence microscope equipped with a 63x oil object lens with a QImaging Retiga R6 Monochrome camera.

Xenograft assay

Animal experiments were performed following the institute guidelines and approved by the ethics committee of Tongji Medical College and animal facility of Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Mice were kept at a temperature-controlled SPF facility at Huazhong University facility for experimental animals. The mice were acclimated to the new environment for at least 1 week. 5*10⁶ cells were injected subcutaneously into the flanks of six 5-week-old female Nu/Nu nude mice (Charles River, Beijing) in a 1:1 mixture with matrigel (BD #354248). The following day, doxycycline was added to drinking water at 1 mg/ml. Tumors were measured once a week in the beginning and twice a week later. The tumor volume was estimated by the formula 1/2*L*W*W. Before any tumor reached 1000 mm³, the mice were euthanized. Tumors were collected for Western blot analysis where indicated.

Plasmid construction

The pLenti-TRE-CasRx-U6-gRNA vector was prepared by PCR, restriction digestion, and ligation. The U6 promoter and PAC were amplified from pLenti-CRISPR-V2 (addgene 52961). An SV40 early promoter was amplified from plenti4 (invitrogen). TRE was cut from pLenti6-CMV-Tight-DEST (Addgene_26433). rtTA3 was amplified and assembled from pLenti-CMV-rtTA3 Blast (Addgene 26429) and Fuw-M2-rtTA (Addgene 20342).

gRNA sequences were picked from the online source https://cas13design.nygenome.org/ (Wessels et al., 2020). Forward primers with 5′-AAAC overhang and reverse primer with 3′-AAAA overhang were annealed together and treated with polynucleotide kinase. Afterward, annealed oligo was ligated to pLenti-TRE-CasRx-U6 cut with BsmBI and treated with alkaline phosphatase. Sequences of all insertions were then verified by Sanger sequencing. Guide RNA sequences used are listed in Supplementary Table S1.

Figure preparation

All figures were assembled in Adobe Illustrator. Bar graphs were first generated with GraphPad Prism. The map of pLenti-TRE-CasRx-U6-gRNA was first generated with Snapgene 3.2.1.

Quantification and statistical analysis

PCR results were processed with Microsoft Excel and visualized with GraphPad Prism 8.0. Densitometry of Western blot results was performed with FIJI. For xenograft assay, two-way ANOVA was used to compare the difference.

Results

pLenti-TRE-CasRx-U6 expresses CasRx in a tightly inducible manner

To express crRNA and inducible RfxCas13d with one vector, we designed a compact lentivirus vector (Figure 1A and Supplementary Figure S1). In this vector, crRNA is driven by human U6 promoter and RfxCas13d is driven by a tetracycline-responsive element (TRE), which is composed of a TET-operator and minimal CMV promoter. An SV40 nuclear localization signal was fused to both the N-terminus and C-terminus to RfxCas13d to prepare the previous-named CasRx, which increased knockdown efficiency (Konermann et al., 2018). An HA-tag was fused to the C-terminus of CasRx for detection of CasRx expression. rtTA3 is driven by the SV40 promoter. SV40 also drives the expression of puromycin N-acetyltransferase (pac), which allows fast selection of transduced cells. The SV40 promoter was chosen due to its compact size and consistent activity in different cell types (Qin et al., 2010). The TRE and rtTA3 system was also shown to work in divergent systems (Qin et al., 2010). To introduce guide RNA, only the ∼23 bp sequence complementary to target RNA needs to be ligated into the vector cut with BsmBI (Figure 1A) with 5′-AAAC and 3′-AAAA overhangs. BsmBI was chosen so that sgRNA oligos inherited from the popular SpCas9-based lenti-crisprV2 (Sanjana et al., 2014) or other vectors (Wessels et al., 2020) can be directly used. After a crRNA was introduced, the size of the vector is only 10.4 kB. We name the vector pLenti-TRE-CasRx-U6-gRNA (Supplementary Figure S1). We first inserted a 23 bp oligo with no significant homology into the human/mouse genome to make pLenti-TRE-CasRx-U6-scram. With this plasmid, we then tested whether RfxCas13d expression can be efficiently induced by doxycycline. After transfected into 293 T cells, efficient induction can be detected after 24-h doxycycline treatment (Figure 1B). Robust induction was also observed with a stable cell population from human hepatocellular carcinoma HLF cells transduced with lentivirus (Figure 1C). Next, we tested whether a satisfactory virus titer can be generated with this vector and we confirmed that about 100% transduction efficiency can be readily achieved in HLF cells with virus produced from regular packaging processes even without antibiotic selection (Figure 1D). In addition, no discernible cell death was observed during 2-week puromycin selection, indicating the high efficiency of vector integration into the human genome. To measure the infection titer of the virus, we added different amounts of virus suspension to HLF cell culture and selected cells with puromycin. For HLF cells, the infection titer was calculated to be higher than 5*10^5/ml with un-concentrated 293T culture suspension (Figure 1E). Collectively, these results show that pLenti-TRE-CasRx-U6 can give rise to a satisfactory virus titer and express RfxCas13d in a tightly inducible manner.

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 1. pLenti-TRE-CasRx-U6 expresses CasRx in a tightly-inducible manner. (A) Schematic representation of plenti-TRE-CasRx. (B) A total of 293 T cells were transfected with pLenti-TRE-CasRx; 24 h later, the cells were treated with 1 μg/ml Doxycycline for 24 h. Shown are WB results. First lane shows Donor cell. (C) HLF cells were transduced with a virus expressing pLenti-TRE-CasRx. Cells were selected with 1 μg/ml puromycin for 5 days and then treated with 1 μg/ml Doxycycline for 24 h. Shown are WB results. First lane shows Donor cell. (D) HLF cells were transduced with a virus expressing pLenti-TRE-CasRx; 48 h later, the cells were treated with 1 μg/ml Doxycycline for 24 h. Shown are immunofluorescence results. Nuclei were counter-stained with DAPI. Scale bar: 50 μm. (E) HLF cells were transduced with different volumes of virus suspension and then selected with puromycin. Cell proliferation during 4 days was counted and normalized to the cells infected with 2 ml virus which was confirmed to express HA-CasRx at about 100% with immunofluorescence.

Knockdown can be induced in a doxycycline dosage-dependent manner

Next we applied the vector for endogenous gene knockdown and characterized the conditions for optimal effect. We first tested the time needed to induce a maximal level of RfxCas13d. In 293 T cells, a 48 h-induction with 1 μg/ml doxycycline is sufficient to induce the maximal level (Figure 2A). Next we tested the time needed to achieve optimal knockdown efficiency. We transduced HLF cells with lentivirus targeting the KDM1B gene. KDM1B was chosen for such a purpose due to our observation that knocking down this gene did not cause significant changes in HLF cell proliferation (Figure 2B). Western blot showed that 1-day induction already showed discernible knockdown while the best efficiency can be seen after four–eight days (Figure 2C). Induction beyond such time did not significantly change the efficacy (Figure 2C). A similar result was observed with another gene, DOT1L (Figure 2D). In contrast, non-targeting control sgRNA did not cause significant changes in KDM1B or DOT1L (Figure 2E). One potential advantage of the TET-On system is that Doxycycline might trigger a dosage-dependent outcome, which would be particularly advantageous over constitutive knockdown in studying the dosage effect of a gene. We first tested the effect of doxycycline dosage on CasRx expression and found that CasRx expression was induced in a doxycycline dosage-dependent manner which peaked at about 0.5 μg/ml (Figure 2F). Consistently, Western blot showed KDM1B and EZH2 knockdown efficiency also increased with the concentration of Doxycycline (Figures 2G,H). We further examined whether doxycycline generated a dosage-dependent effect downstream of EZH2. Indeed, we observed a decrease in H3K27me3 and cell proliferation concordant with Doxycycline concentration (Figure 2I), which was consistent with previous report that EZH2 could be a potential oncogene in Hepatocellular carcinoma (Chen et al., 2007). These results show that efficient knockdown can be achieved with Doxycycline induction for about 4–8 days and the efficiency of knockdown can be tuned with the concentration of Doxycycline.

FIGURE 2

FIGURE 2. Knockdown can be induced in a Doxycycline dosage-dependent manner. (A) 293 T cells were transfected with pLenti-TRE-CasRx-scram. Cells were treated with 1 μg/ml Doxycycline 24 h hours later for the indicated time. Shown are WB results. (B) Ctrl or KDM1B-knockdown (KD) cells were seeded into a 6-well plate. Knockdown was induced with 1 μg/ml doxycycline. Shown is the relative cell proliferation during 7 days normalized to the control (Ctrl) group. “NS” denotes “not significant” as examined with a two-sided unpaired Welch’s t-test. (C) HLF cells were transduced with a virus expressing pLenti-TRE-CasRx-KDM1B-sgRNA. Cells were then selected with 1 μg/ml puromycin for 5 days and treated with 1 μg/ml Doxycycline for different times. Shown are the WB results. (D) HLF cells were transduced with a virus expressing pLenti-TRE-CasRx-DOT1L-sgRNA. Cells were then selected with 1 μg/ml puromycin for 5 days and treated with 1 μg/ml Doxycycline for different times. Shown are the WB results. (E) HLF cells were transduced with a virus expressing pLenti-TRE-CasRx-scramble. Cells were then selected with 1 μg/ml puromycin for 5 days. Afterward, cells were treated with 1 μg/ml Doxycycline for different times. Shown are WB results. (F) 293 T cells were transfected with a virus expressing pLenti-TRE-CasRx-scram. 24 h later, cells were treated for 48 h with Doxycycline at different dosages. Shown are the WB results. (G) HLF cells were transduced with a virus expressing pLenti-TRE-CasRx-KDM1B-sgRNA. Cells were then selected with 1 μg/ml puromycin for 5 days. Afterward, cells were treated with Doxycycline for 4 days at different dosages. Shown are WB results. (H) HLF cells were transduced with a virus expressing pLenti-TRE-CasRx-EZH2-sgRNA. Cells were then selected with 1 μg/ml puromycin for 5 days. Afterward, cells were treated with Doxycycline for 4 days at different dosages. Shown are WB results. (I) HLF cells were transduced with a virus expressing pLenti-TRE-CasRx-EZH2-sgRNA. Cells were then selected with 1 μg/ml puromycin for 5 days. Afterward, the cells were treated with Doxycycline for 4 days at different dosages. The left panel shows the relative mRNA level of EZH2. The middle panel shows the WB results. The right panel shows the relative fold of cell proliferation.

pLenti-TRE-CasRx-U6-gRNA can achieve reversible knockdown

Another potential advantage of the Tet-On system is that knockdown might be reversed after doxycycline withdrawal, which allows knockdown within a specific time window and determining whether the biological consequence can be reversed. One factor expected to affect the necessary time for the target gene expression to restore is the stability of the CasRx protein. So we examined the stability of CasRx with cycloheximide treatment. We found that CasRx has a fast turn-over rate in HLF cells (Figure 3A), which may presumably favor prompt target gene expression restoration after doxycycline withdrawal. Next, we washed out doxycycline in HLF cells infected with a virus targeting KDM1B. Expression of KDM1B was restored to normal 2–3 days after doxycycline withdrawal (Figure 3B). These results show that knockdown by plenti-TRE-CasRx-U6-gRNA is reversible.

FIGURE 3

FIGURE 3. pLenti-TRE-CasRx-U6-gRNA can achieve reversible knockdown. (A) HLF cells transduced with a virus expressing pLenti-TRE-CasRx-scram were selected with 1 μg/ml puromycin for 5 days and then treated with 25 μg/ml cycloheximide for the indicated time. Shown are WB results. (B) HLF cells transduced with a virus expressing pLenti-TRE-CasRx-scram were selected with 1 μg/ml puromycin for 5 days and then treated with 1 μg/ml Doxycycline for 4 days. Cells were then cultured in a fresh medium without doxycycline for the indicated time. Shown are WB results.

Different types of genes can be efficiently knocked-down

After testing the vector as mentioned previously, we next applied it to knockdown genes of different types. We first tested its effect on protein-coding genes whose product localizes to different cellular compartments. Both nucleus-localized METTL3 (Liu et al., 2014) and cytoplasm-localized FKBP8 (Shirane and Nakayama, 2003) could be knocked-down efficiently (Figures 4A,B). OGT, a shuttling protein (Kreppel et al., 1997), can also be efficiently knocked-down, which led to a decrease in the level of its substrate DOT1L as we reported previously (Song et al., 2021) (Figure 4C). Then we examined the effect of the new vector on non-coding RNA. MALAT1, a long non-coding RNA could also be efficiently knocked-down after doxycycline treatment (Figure 4D). Collectively, pLenti-TRE-CasRx-U6-gRNA could be applied to knockdown both protein-coding genes and non-coding genes.

FIGURE 4

FIGURE 4. Different types of genes can be efficiently knocked-down. (A) HLF cells were transduced with the pLenti-TRE-CasRx-METTL3-sgRNA virus. Cells were then selected with 1 μg/ml puromycin for 5 days. Afterward, cells were treated with 1 μg/ml Doxycycline for 4 days. The left panel shows the WB results. The right panel shows the densitometric analysis of the left panel. (B) HLF cells were transduced with the pLenti-TRE-CasRx-FKBP8-sgRNA virus. Cells were then selected with 1 μg/ml puromycin for 5 days. Afterward, cells were treated with 1 μg/ml Doxycycline for 4 days. The left panel shows the WB results. The right panel shows the densitometric analysis of the left panel. (C) HLF cells were transduced with the pLenti-TRE-CasRx-OGT-sgRNA virus. Cells were then selected with 1 μg/ml puromycin for 5 days. Afterward, cells were treated with 1 μg/ml Doxycycline for 4 days. The left panel shows the WB results. The right panel shows the densitometric analysis of the left panel. (D) HLF cells were transduced with the pLenti-TRE-CasRx-MALAT1-sgRNA virus. Cells were then selected with 1 μg/ml puromycin for 5 days. Afterward, cells were treated with 1 μg/ml Doxycycline for 4 days. Shown are the RT-PCR results (error bars denote the standard deviation of three technical replicates).

Genes can be efficiently knocked-down in different cell types

pLenti-TRE-CasRx-U6-gRNA requires U6, SV40, and TRE promoters all to function properly. Yet, the functionality of a promoter may vary among different cells (Qin et al., 2010). So we further tested whether pLenti-TRE-CasRx could work in different cell types. In addition to HLF liver cancer cells, crRNA targeting KDM1B led to efficient knockdown in cells of human kidney (Caki-1), breast (MBA-MB-231), prostate (22RV1), and blood origins (K562) (Figures 5A–D). We also tested the functionality of this vector in mouse cells. In both mouse fibroblast cell Swiss-3T3 and embryonic stem cell E14, Mettl3, as the target gene, was knocked-down efficiently (Figures 5E,F).

FIGURE 5

FIGURE 5. Genes can be efficiently knocked-down in different cell types. (A–D) Cells were transduced with a virus expressing pLenti-TRE-CasRx-KDM1B-sgRNA. Cells were then selected with 1 μg/ml puromycin for 5 days. Afterward, cells were then treated with 1 μg/ml Doxycycline for 4 days. Shown are WB results. (E,F) Cells were transduced with a virus expressing pLenti-TRE-CasRx-Mettl3-sgRNA. Cells were then selected with 1 μg/ml puromycin for 5 days. Afterward, cells were treated with 1 μg/ml Doxycycline for 4 days. Shown are WB results.

Indispensable genes could be efficiently knocked-down in cells hard to transduce

In cells that are hard to transduce, an inducible vector renders further benefits over constitutive vectors, especially if knocking down a gene is detrimental to the cells. To showcase potential application in such scenarios, we tried knocking-down DOT1L in MV4-11 leukemia cells. For MV4-11, even with spinoculation, less than 20% cells can be transduced in our experiments. In addition, MV4-11 cells are very sensitive to DOT1L inhibition (Daigle et al., 2011; Daigle et al., 2013). With a constitutive vector targeting DOT1L, almost no cell was alive after 5 days of selection (Figure 6A). First, it was hard to tell how much effect came from DOT1L knockdown. Second, not enough cells were left for most mechanistic investigation. But with an inducible vector, after puromycin selection and propagation, cell proliferation was significantly inhibited by an 8-day Doxycycline treatment, which could be attributed to DOT1L inhibition (Figure 6B). Collectively, the new vector not only allows a reliable conclusion on the connection between gene knockdown and biological effects but also provides enough surviving cells for mechanistic study.

FIGURE 6

FIGURE 6. Indispensable genes could be efficiently knocked-down in cells hard to transduce. (A) Same number of MV4-11 cells were transduced with a virus expressing constitutive DOT1L-sgRNA or control sgRNA. Cells were then selected with 1 μg/ml puromycin for 5 days. Shown is the relative fold of proliferation after selection as compared to the group without puromycin selection. (B) Same number of MV4-11 cells were transduced with a virus expressing pLenti-TRE-CasRx-DOT1L-sgRNA or control vector. Cells were then selected with 1 μg/ml puromycin for 5 days. Afterward, cells were treated with 1 μg/ml Doxycycline for 7 days. The left panel shows the relative fold of proliferation after selection as normalized to the cells without Doxycycline induction. The right panel shows WB results.

Genes can be efficiently knocked-down in vivo

After validating the efficacy of the new vector in various cell types, we then tested whether it could also work in vivo. We inoculated HLF liver cancer cells transduced with a virus expressing inducible scramble-sgRNA or EZH2-sgRNA. Doxycycline administered in drinking water significantly inhibited tumor growth in EZH2-sgRNA (Figure 7A). Afterward, xenograft tumors were collected and two tumors from each group were analyzed with Western blot. The result showed that EZH2 was indeed knocked down (Figure 7B). In summary, this new vector renders efficient gene knocking-down in vivo.

FIGURE 7

FIGURE 7. Genes can be efficiently knocked-down in vivo. HLF cells expressing EZH2-sgRNA or control vector was inoculated subcutaneously into nude mice. Gene knock-down was induced with Doxycycline in drinking water. (A) Growth curve of the xenograft tumors. (B) Western Blot results for four representative tumors.

Discussion

pLenti-TRE-CasRx-U6-gRNA is an agile vector for CasRx-mediated gene knockdown

RfxCas13d presents a novel tool to tune down gene expression at the mRNA level with high specificity. Inducible knockdown is advantageous over constitutive knockdown in many applications. Yet current strategies rely on separate vectors to achieve inducible knockdown, which could be cumbersome to use. In this study, we present an all-in-one Tet-On vector which can achieve efficient knockdown for different gene types in different cell types and in mice. We show that the knock-down efficiency can be fine-tuned with doxycycline dosage, which may facilitate the study of the dosage effects of target genes. Importantly, we find that the CasRx protein has a short half-life in mammalian cells and knockdown mediated by this new vector can be promptly reversed by doxycycline withdrawal. Furthermore, we show this vector is particularly useful to study indispensable genes in cells hard to transduce.

As shown previously, introducing an array of gRNA separated by unprocessed direct repeat allows targeting multiple genes or one gene’s multiple regions at the same time (Konermann et al., 2018). We envisage that such applications can also be achieved with the new vector. In addition, CasRx-based vectors have been used in high-throughput screening (Wessels et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2021). We notice an inducible system may carry extra benefits in such applications as an antibiotic selection process itself may cause the loss of some guide sequences with constitutive vectors. In addition, compared to the two-vector system, the new one-vector system might have less cell-to-cell variation in the sgRNA/CasRx ratio.

Potential factors that might affect the efficacy

The efficiency of knockdown might be affected by many factors. We tested the effect on knockdown efficiency by Doxycycline concentration and duration. The result suggested that typically 500 ng/ml Doxycycline for 4–8 days might be enough to trigger efficient knockdown (Figure 2). We anticipate several other factors might affect the time needed to achieve optimal knockdown at the protein level. First, the abundance of the target transcript might affect the time needed to digest the mRNA. Second, higher protein stability may cause a longer time for the protein level to drop. In addition, proteins of the indispensable gene might take longer to drop for two reasons. First, dilution of the target gene product due to cell proliferation becomes limited. Second, cells with better knockdown in a population will be selected against. Despite all these potential compounding factors, we showed that robust knockdown can be achieved with this vector with various types of genes (Figure 4 and Figure 5).

Potential adaption of the current vector

We expect that this vector can be further engineered for wider applications. First, although we have tested the efficacy of this vector in different cell types, it is possible that SV40 or human U6 promoter might not be as active in some scenarios, in which case, the promoters can be changed to a more proper one thereof. Alternatively, if a tissue-specific knockdown in vivo is pursed, a promoter for such a purpose could be used in place of the SV40 promoter to drive the expression of rtTA. Second, the enzymatically inactive RfxCas13d still binds the target RNA with high specificity, which has been harnessed for tracking or modifying specific RNA in the cells (Wang et al., 2019; Han et al., 2020; Xia et al., 2021; Xie et al., 2021; Xiong et al., 2021). The current pLenti-TRE-CasRx-U6 vector can also be adapted for such purposes if CasRx is replaced with its inactive mutant.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusion of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by the ethics committee of Tongji Medical College.

Author contributions

TS and LS conceived the project, designed the experiments, and wrote the manuscript. SL, XZ, XM, QZ, NL, YY, and TS conducted the experiments. Every author approved the manuscript and made suggestions.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31871284, 32071296, 31800641, and 31971149).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Huazhong University of Science and Technology has filed for a patent related to this work.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors, and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2022.960192/full#supplementary-material

References

Abudayyeh, O. O., Gootenberg, J. S., Essletzbichler, P., Han, S., Joung, J., Belanto, J. J., et al. (2017). RNA targeting with CRISPR-Cas13. Nature 550, 280–284. doi:10.1038/nature24049 | |

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Buchman, A. B., Brogan, D. J., Sun, R., Yang, T., Hsu, P. D., and Akbari, O. S. (2020). Programmable RNA targeting using CasRx in flies. CRISPR J. 3, 164–176. doi:10.1089/crispr.2020.0018 | |

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, Y., Lin, M. C., Yao, H., Wang, H., Zhang, A. Q., Yu, J., et al. (2007). Lentivirus-mediated RNA interference targeting enhancer of zeste homolog 2 inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma growth through down-regulation of stathmin. Hepatology 46, 200–208. doi:10.1002/hep.21668 | |

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cong, L., Ran, F. A., Cox, D., Lin, S., Barretto, R., Habib, N., et al. (2013). Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339, 819–823. doi:10.1126/science.1231143 | |

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Daigle, S. R., Olhava, E. J., Therkelsen, C. A., Basavapathruni, A., Jin, L., Boriack-Sjodin, P. A., et al. (2013). Potent inhibition of DOT1L as treatment of MLL-fusion leukemia. Blood 122, 1017–1025. doi:10.1182/blood-2013-04-497644 | |

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Daigle, S. R., Olhava, E. J., Therkelsen, C. A., Majer, C. R., Sneeringer, C. J., Song, J., et al. (2011). Selective killing of mixed lineage leukemia cells by a potent small-molecule DOT1L inhibitor. Cancer Cell 20, 53–65. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2011.06.009 | |

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Han, S., Zhao, B. S., Myers, S. A., Carr, S. A., He, C., and Ting, A. Y. (2020). RNA-protein interaction mapping via MS2- or Cas13-based APEX targeting. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 117, 22068–22079. doi:10.1073/pnas.2006617117 | |

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Konermann, S., Lotfy, P., Brideau, N. J., Oki, J., Shokhirev, M. N., and Hsu, P. D. (2018). Transcriptome engineering with RNA-targeting type VI-D CRISPR effectors. Cell 173, 665–676 e614. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.033 | |

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kreppel, L. K., Blomberg, M. A., and Hart, G. W. (1997). Dynamic glycosylation of nuclear and cytosolic proteins. Cloning and characterization of a unique O-GlcNAc transferase with multiple tetratricopeptide repeats. J. Biol. Chem. 272, 9308–9315. doi:10.1074/jbc.272.14.9308 | |

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kushawah, G., Hernandez-Huertas, L., Abugattas-Nunez Del Prado, J., Martinez-Morales, J. R., DeVore, M. L., Hassan, H., et al. (2020). CRISPR-Cas13d induces efficient mRNA knockdown in animal embryos. Dev. Cell 54, 805–817 e807. doi:10.1016/j.devcel.2020.07.013 | |

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, S., Li, X., Xue, W., Zhang, L., Yang, L. Z., Cao, S. M., et al. (2021). Screening for functional circular RNAs using the CRISPR-Cas13 system. Nat. Methods 18, 51–59. doi:10.1038/s41592-020-01011-4 | |

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Liu, J., Yue, Y., Han, D., Wang, X., Fu, Y., Zhang, L., et al. (2014). A METTL3-METTL14 complex mediates mammalian nuclear RNA N6-adenosine methylation. Nat. Chem. Biol. 10, 93–95. doi:10.1038/nchembio.1432 | |

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mahas, A., Aman, R., and Mahfouz, M. (2019). CRISPR-Cas13d mediates robust RNA virus interference in plants. Genome Biol. 20, 263. doi:10.1186/s13059-019-1881-2 | |

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mali, P., Yang, L., Esvelt, K. M., Aach, J., Guell, M., DiCarlo, J. E., et al. (2013). RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339, 823–826. doi:10.1126/science.1232033 | |

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Qin, J. Y., Zhang, L., Clift, K. L., Hulur, I., Xiang, A. P., Ren, B. Z., et al. (2010). Systematic comparison of constitutive promoters and the doxycycline-inducible promoter. PLoS One 5, e10611. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010611 | |

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sanjana, N. E., Shalem, O., and Zhang, F. (2014). Improved vectors and genome-wide libraries for CRISPR screening. Nat. Methods 11, 783–784. doi:10.1038/nmeth.3047 | |

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Seok, H., Lee, H., Jang, E. S., and Chi, S. W. (2018). Evaluation and control of miRNA-like off-target repression for RNA interference. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 75, 797–814. doi:10.1007/s00018-017-2656-0 | |

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shirane, M., and Nakayama, K. I. (2003). Inherent calcineurin inhibitor FKBP38 targets Bcl-2 to mitochondria and inhibits apoptosis. Nat. Cell Biol. 5, 28–37. doi:10.1038/ncb894 | |

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Smargon, A. A., Cox, D. B. T., Pyzocha, N. K., Zheng, K., Slaymaker, I. M., Gootenberg, J. S., et al. (2017). Cas13b is a type VI-B CRISPR-associated RNA-guided RNase differentially regulated by accessory proteins Csx27 and Csx28. Mol. Cell 65, 618–630 e617. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2016.12.023 | |

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Song, T., Zou, Q., Yan, Y., Lv, S., Li, N., Zhao, X., et al. (2021). DOT1L O-GlcNAcylation promotes its protein stability and MLL-fusion leukemia cell proliferation. Cell Rep. 36, 109739. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109739 | |

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, H., Nakamura, M., Abbott, T. R., Zhao, D., Luo, K., Yu, C., et al. (2019). CRISPR-mediated live imaging of genome editing and transcription. Science 365, 1301–1305. doi:10.1126/science.aax7852 | |

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wessels, H. H., Mendez-Mancilla, A., Guo, X., Legut, M., Daniloski, Z., and Sanjana, N. E. (2020). Massively parallel Cas13 screens reveal principles for guide RNA design. Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 722–727. doi:10.1038/s41587-020-0456-9 | |

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xia, Z., Tang, M., Ma, J., Zhang, H., Gimple, R. C., Prager, B. C., et al. (2021). Epitranscriptomic editing of the RNA N6-methyladenosine modification by dCasRx conjugated methyltransferase and demethylase. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, 7361–7374. doi:10.1093/nar/gkab517 | |

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xie, S., Jin, H., Yang, F., Zheng, H., Chang, Y., Liao, Y., et al. (2021). Programmable RNA N(1) -methyladenosine demethylation by a cas13d-directed demethylase. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 60, 19592–19597. doi:10.1002/anie.202105253 | |

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xiong, F., Wang, R., Lee, J. H., Li, S., Chen, S. F., Liao, Z., et al. (2021). RNA m(6)A modification orchestrates a LINE-1-host interaction that facilitates retrotransposition and contributes to long gene vulnerability. Cell Res. 31, 861–885. doi:10.1038/s41422-021-00515-8 | |

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yan, W. X., Chong, S., Zhang, H., Makarova, K. S., Koonin, E. V., Cheng, D. R., et al. (2018). Cas13d is a compact RNA-targeting type VI CRISPR effector positively modulated by a WYL-domain-containing accessory protein. Mol. Cell 70, 327–339 e325. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2018.02.028 | |

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Nguyen, T. M., Zhang, X. O., Wang, L., Phan, T., Clohessy, J. G., et al. (2021). Optimized RNA-targeting CRISPR/Cas13d technology outperforms shRNA in identifying functional circRNAs. Genome Biol. 22, 41. doi:10.1186/s13059-021-02263-9 | |

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, H., Su, J., Hu, X., Zhou, C., Li, H., Chen, Z., et al. (2020). Glia-to-Neuron conversion by CRISPR-CasRx alleviates symptoms of neurological disease in mice. Cell 181, 590–603 e516. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.03.024 | |

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar