Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol., 24 October 2025

Sec. Industrial Biotechnology

Volume 13 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1695586

Two-step purification of elastin-like polypeptide-fusion superoxide dismutase via hydrophobicity and thermoresponsiveness

Weiwei Wang,Weiwei Wang1,2Jinping Chen,Jinping Chen3,4Hao Zhu,Hao Zhu3,4Aixia HuangAixia Huang1Dongren ZhouDongren Zhou1Yuchen WangYuchen Wang1Yang ZhouYang Zhou4Feng Lin
Feng Lin1*Xiangai Dong
Xiangai Dong3*Yu Wu
Yu Wu3*
  • 1Key Laboratory of Healthy Freshwater Aquaculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Zhejiang Institute of Freshwater Fisheries, Huzhou, Zhejiang, China
  • 2College of Biology and Food Engineering, Suzhou University, Suzhou, Anhui, China
  • 3Nephrology Department, The Affiliated Xuzhou Municipal Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, China
  • 4School of Life Sciences, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China

Introduction: Superoxide dismutase (SOD) catalyzes the dismutation of superoxide radicals to oxygen and hydrogen peroxide, serving as a key antioxidant enzyme with important therapeutic and industrial applications. However, the purification of recombinant SOD remains challenging due to low expression levels and the complexity of traditional purification methods, which involve time-consuming and multi-step chromatography. Elastin-like polypeptides (ELPs) offer a promising alternative due to their hydrophobic and thermoresponsive properties, which can be leveraged for non-chromatographic purification.

Methods: A fusion protein of human SOD and an ELP tag (hSOD-ELP) was produced. The purification strategy consisted of two sequential steps. First, foam separation was employed, exploiting the hydrophobicity of the ELP to selectively adsorb hSOD-ELP at the gas-liquid interface. Second, inverse transition cycling (ITC) was used to further purify hSOD-ELP by exploiting ELP’s thermoresponsiveness.

Results: Under optimized conditions (0.4 mg/mL protein, 30 °C), the initial foam separation step achieved an enrichment ratio of 1.93, a protein recovery of 85.67%, an enzyme activity enrichment of 2.15, and an activity recovery of 93.32%. The subsequent ITC step yielded a recovery rate of 91.98% and a purification fold of 17.45. The cumulative two-step process resulted in a total yield of 85.84% and overall purification fold of 37.52, yielding the purified hSOD-ELP with a final purity of approximately 85%.

Discussion: These results demonstrate that ELP-mediated purification offers a scalable and economical alternative to conventional methods. The combination of foam separation and thermal precipitation minimizes the need for expensive chromatography, making this strategy particularly promising for industrial-scale biotechnological applications.

1 Introduction

Foam separation is an emerging separation technology that relies on the selective adsorption of substances at the gas-liquid interface. Its underlying principle is that surface-active materials have a propensity to accumulate at the interface, enabling the enrichment and separation of specific components. This technique has gained substantial attention in various fields, especially in the separation of proteins (Fang et al., 2023; Wang et al., 2023). Proteins, being amphiphilic molecules with both hydrophilic and hydrophobic groups, have a natural tendency to adsorb at the gas-liquid interface. This characteristic makes them suitable for separation via foam flotation. The process typically involves introducing air into a protein solution, forming bubbles that selectively adsorb proteins. These protein-laden bubbles subsequently rise to the surface, forming a foam layer that can be collected and further processed. This method is particularly effective for the concentration and recovery of proteins from dilute solutions, offering a low cost, easy operation, no pollution, and high efficiency alternative to traditional separation techniques.

Xu et al. employed foam fractionation to enhance the silica gel adsorption (SGA) of urokinase from human urine. They investigated the impacts of pH, superficial air flow rate, beta-cyclodextrin concentration, and the amount of silica gel added on the activity recovery yield and purification fold of urokinase (Xu et al., 2019). The activity recovery and purification fold of urokinase reached 89.5% and 56.8, respectively, which were 25.3% and 79.2% higher than those obtained by SGA alone (Xu et al., 2019). Tian et al. developedd a method combining foam fractionation with isoelectric precipitation to effectively recover casein from its highly diluted solution (Tian et al., 2018). Then, the foamate was treated with precipitation, and the supernatant could be reused as the feed solution for the first-stage foam fractionation. As a result, the enrichment ratio was further increased to 52.6, and the recovery percentage reached 91.7%. In two-stage continuous foam fractionation, the enrichment ratio and recovery percentage of casein were obtained as high as 12.1% and 92.3%, respectively (Tian et al., 2018). Li et al. utilized Na-citrate to enhance the self-association of bovine serum albumin (BSA) at the gas–liquid interface and improve the stability of protein foams (Li et al., 2016). Under optimal conditions, the enrichment ratio and recovery of BSA were 14.6% and 57.6%, respectively (Li et al., 2016).

Superoxide dismutase (SOD) is a crucial antioxidant enzyme that catalyzes the dismutation of superoxide radicals (O2) into oxygen and hydrogen peroxide, thereby protecting cells from oxidative damage (Saxena et al., 2022). Consequently, SOD has garnered significant attention due to its potential anti-aging, antiviral, and anti-inflammatory effects in living organisms (Chidambaram et al., 2024). SOD from various organisms have been cloned, heterologously expressed and purified. The purification of SOD is essential for its applications in pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and food industries. Traditional purification methods, such as affinity chromatography or ion-exchange chromatography, are among the most versatile and powerful techniques for isolating specific molecules or groups of molecules from complex mixtures. However, these methods have several drawbacks. The high cost of affinity resins, yield losses during purification, and reduced activity of the target protein due to multiple washing steps are major challenges. Additionally, in some cases, the presence of a large quantity of impurities can further complicate the purification process. Therefore, there is a need to explore more cost-effective and efficient purification strategies to improve the yield while minimizing impurities.

In recent years, alternative approaches leveraging the unique properties of fusion tags have been explored to simplify and enhance the purification process. Elastin-like polypeptide (ELP) are synthetic, thermally responsive polypeptides composed of repeating pentapeptide sequences with the general formula (VPGXG)n; where X can be any amino acid except proline, and n represents the number of repeats, typically ranging from 20 to 330 (Han et al., 2022; Meyer and Chilkoti, 2002). ELP exhibits a quick and thermodynamic reversible phase transition behavior at a specific temperature referred to as the inverse transition temperature (Tt). Below their Tt, ELP are structurally disordered and soluble in aqueous solution. Conversely, when the temperature exceeds Tt, the ELP becomes insoluble and begins to aggregate, which can then be easily separated by centrifugation (Addai et al., 2025; Sugawara-Narutaki, 2025). When ELPs are genetically fused to a target protein, the resulting ELP-fusion protein retains the characteristic inverse transition behavior (Chen et al., 2023). This behavior allows for a simple method to isolate a recombinant ELP fusion protein from cell contaminants by taking the solution through the soluble and insoluble phase of the ELP fusion protein, a technique designated as the inverse transition cycling (ITC) (Sugawara-Narutaki, 2025). This property enables a straightforward and efficient purification strategy, facilitating the isolation of recombinant ELP-fusion proteins from cell contaminants (Shin and Chae, 2024). Several studies have demonstrated the successful purification of recombinant enzymes using ELP fusion tags. We previously reported the purification of β-galactosidase e using ELP fusion, achieving a purification fold of 13.04 and a recovery rate of 95.66% (Peprah Addai et al., 2020). Similarly, Wang et al. utilized ELP fusion to purify endoglucanase, resulting in a purification fold of 11.8 and a recovery rate of 78.1%. Furhermore, The ELP fusion endoglucanase had a better thermostability, higher optimal temperature, and longer half-life than those of free endoglucanase (Wang et al., 2020b). These studies highlight the efficiency and simplicity of the ELP-based purification approach.

In our previous study, ELP was fused to human superoxide dismutase 1 (hSOD) modified with His tag to produce recombinant hSOD-Linker-ELP-His (hSODLEH) which was expressed in Escherichia coli and purified via ITC and Ni-NTA resin. The results showed that the purification by ITC was superior to Ni-NTA resin due to its convenient purification process, improved recovery rate and purification fold (Wang et al., 2024). In this study, we presents a two-step purification strategy for recombinant hSODLEH. The first step involves foam separation, leveraging the hydrophobicity of the ELP tag to selectively adsorb hSODLEH at the gas-liquid interface. The second step utilizes ITC to further purify hSODLEH. The total yield and purification fold was 85.84% and 37.52 after the two-step purification, yielding the purified hSODLEH with a final purity of approximately 85%.

Our study integrates foam separation with the thermoresponsive and hydrophobic properties of ELP, offering a more efficient and cost-effective purification process compared to traditional methods. Additionally, we provide insights into the aggregation behavior and surface hydrophobicity of hSODLEH, which contribute to its enhanced adsorption and separation efficiency. These findings not only demonstrate the potential of ELP-mediated strategies for protein purification but also highlight the versatility of combining different physical properties for improved biotechnological applications.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Materials

The expression vector pET-28a (+) and E. coli strains DH5a and BL21 (DE3) were stored in our lab. Kanamycin, protease inhibitors phenylmethanesulfonyl fluoride (PMSF), isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), Glycine, Tris, SDS, Bromophenol blue and Coomassie brilliant blue R 250 were purchased from Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China). Thermo Scientific Pierce BCA Protein Assay Kit was purchased from Thermo Fisher Scientific (MA, United States). CuZn-SOD activity assay kit (WST-8 method) was purchased from Beyotime (Shanghai, China). Isopropanol, absolute ethanol, β-mercaptoethanol, ammonium persulfate, 1-ethyl-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC), N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) and glacial acetic acid were obtained from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent (Shanghai, China). Ammonium 8-phenylamino-1-naphthalene sulfonate (ANS) was purchased from Merrier Laboratory Equipment Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC) was purchased from Maclin Biochemical Technology Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Ni-NTA Resin was purchased from GenScript (Nanjing, China). All chemical reagents were of analytical grade and were used without further treatment.

2.2 Construction of recombinant expression plasmids

The amino acid coding sequence for hSOD were obtained from GenBank (accession number: CR541742.1). The hSOD gene was fused with a 50-repeating pentapeptide ELP sequence ((VPGVG)50) via a flexible linker (GGGGS)3. The resulting nucleotide sequence was synthesized by Synbio Tech (Jiangsu, China) and subcloned into the pET28a (+) vector to generate the recombinant expression plasmid pET28a (+)-hSODLEH (hSOD-Linker-ELP-6xHis, hSODLEH). Additionally, a recombinant plasmid pET28a (+)-hSOD containing the hSOD gene and a 6xHis-tag was constructed.

The pasmids (pET28a (+)-hSODLEH, pET28a (+)-hSOD, or empty vector) are transformed into E. coli BL21 (DE3) for protein production. Briefly, a single colony was incubated overnight in LB medium with kanamycin (50 μg/mL) with shaking at 37 °C. The overnight culture was then diluted 1:100 into 1 L of fresh LB medium (containing kanamycin) and grown at 37 °C with shaking. When OD600 reached 0.4–0.6, IPTG was added to a final concentration of 0.2 mM to induce protein expression at 25 °C with shaking at 200 rpm. After shaking about 6 h, the cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4,500 g, and the cell pellets were resuspended in Tris-HCl buffer (50 mM, pH8.0). After adding PMSF, the cells was lysed by sonication (ultrasonic disruption) for 30 min, with alternately sonication 10 s and intermittent periods of cooling 10 s. The lysate was centrifuged at 12,000 × g, 4 °C, 20 min twice to separate soluble (supernatant) and insoluble (pellet) fractions. For detailed procedures regarding the construction and expression, please refer to our previous studies (Lin et al., 2018; Wang et al., 2024).

2.3 Foam separation

The foam separation equipment was designed by our lab (Fang et al., 2023; Xue et al., 2024). The process of foam separation and purification of hSODLEH is shown in Figure 1. The cell lysis solution of hSODLEH or hSOD, with different concentrations (0.2–1.0 mg/mL) was added to the separation column. The temperature was controlled using a circulating water bath device, maintained at 25, 30, 35, 40, and 45 °C. Nitrogen was passed into the separation column at a gas flow rate of 300 mL/min and a gas flow time of 22 s. Foam was collected until it no longer flowed out of the tower mouth. Mechanical agitation was employed to defoam the collected foam, yielding the final defoamed solution.

Figure 1
Illustration of a recombinant protein purification process. Top section shows transformation, expression induction, and recombinant plasmid details. Left side details foam collection apparatus. Bottom right highlights centrifugation steps with ammonium sulfate, supernatant treatment, and temperature variations. A legend explains symbols: hSOD, ELP, hSODLEH, and contaminants.

Figure 1. Schematic diagram of foam separation and further ITC purification of hSODLEH.

The foam separation efficiency of recombinant enzyme was evaluated by the enrichment ratio of the protein (Ep) (Equation 1), the protein recovery percentage (Rp) (Equation 2), the enrichment ratio of enzyme activity (Ee) (Equation 3), and the enzyme activity recovery percentage (Re) (Equation 4).

Ep=CbCi(1)
Rp=Cb×VbCi×Vi×100%(2)
Ee=UbUi(3)
Re=Cb×Vb×UbCi×Vi×Ui×100%(4)

Where Cb indicates the protein concentration of defoaming solution (mg/mL). Ci is the initial protein concentration (mg/mL). Vb represents defoaming liquid volume (mL). Vp is the liquid intake volume (mL). Ub indicates specific enzyme activity of defoaming solution (U/mg). Ui represents the initial specific enzyme activity (U/mg).

2.4 ITC purification

hSODLEH was further purified using ITC, according to previous experiments in our lab (Addai et al., 2025; Peprah Addai et al., 2020). Initially, to determine the optimal salt for purification, different salts, namely, 1 M NaH2PO4, 1 M (NH4)2SO4, 1 M Na2SO4, and 2.5 M NaCl, were employed to purify hSODLEH. Following SDS–PAGE analysis, (NH4)2SO4 was identified as the most suitable purification salt. Subsequently, a certain amount of (NH4)2SO4 was added into the cell lysis solution of hSODLEH. The mixed solution was incubated at 25 °C for 20 min and then centrifuged at 25 °C, 12,000 rpm for 10 min. The supernatant was discarded and the pellet resuspended in cold Tris-HCl buffer (50 mM, pH 8.0). The samples were incubated in an ice water for 1 h, and then centrifuged at 12,000 rpm, 4 °C for 20 min. The supernatant was the purified hSODLEH.

2.5 Enzyme activity assay

The catalyzing activity of the recombinant hSODLEH or hSOD was measured by Cu/Zn-SOD assay kit. Following the manufacturer’s instructions, a preliminary experiment was performed to determine the optimal amount of hSODLEH or hSOD required to achieve an inhibition rate between 30% and 70%. The enzyme working solution (160 μL), certain amount of hSODLEH or hSOD (20 μL) and reaction starting solution (20 μL) were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C in a thermostatic water bath (Honghua, Jiangsu, China) under static conditions. The absorbance was then measured at 450 nm using Synergy H4 hybrid multi-mode microplate reader (BioTek, United States). The activity of the enzyme was calculated in accordance with the instructions provided by the manufacturer.

2.6 Dynamic light scattering (DLS)

The particle size distribution in hSODLEH or hSOD solutions was analyzed using a laser particle size analyzer (Litesizer ™ 500, Anton Paar, Austria). One mL of hSODLEH or hSOD (1 mg/mL) was transferred to a 1.5 mL Eppendorf tube. (NH4)2SO4 was added to achieve a final concentration of 200 mM, and the mixture was vortexed thoroughly. The mixture was loaded into a quartz cuvette, and DLS measurements were carried out at 4 °C (<Tt) or 55 °C (>Tt), with an equilibration time of 5 min. The spectrogram data were collected.

2.7 Fluorescence labeling

Ten mL (1 mg/mL) of either the hSODLEH or hSOD solution was reconstituted in sodium acetate buffer (50 Mm, pH 5.5). Then, 5 mg of EDC and 2.5 mg of NHS were added to the enzyme solution and stirred at 4 °C for 60 min. A total of 63 μg of FITC was added to the enzyme-buffer mixture. The resulting solution was then stirred gently in darkness at 4 °C for 2 h. The fluorescence-labeled enzyme were dialyzed at 4 °C for 24 h in darkness to remove residual FITC, EDC and NHS. After the dialysis, a final concentration of 200 mM (NH4)2SO4 was added to the enzyme solution. The mixture was incubated for 30 min at either 4 °C (<Tt) or 55 °C (>Tt). Fluorescence was measured at 519 nm after excitation at 488 nm using confocal laser microscopy (Leica TCS SP5, Leica instrument).

2.8 Determination of surface hydrophobicity

The surface hydrophobicity of hSODLEH and hSOD was determined using the fluorescent probe ANS. The 1 mg/mL hSODLEH or hSOD was stepwise diluted with Tris-HCl (50 mM, pH8.0) to concentrations of 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 mg/mL. The mixtures were homogenized and incubated at 4 or 55 °C for 30 min. The ANS solution (8.0 mM) was added to the solutions to achieve a final concentration of 400 µM. After full mixing, the solutions were equilibrated at room temperature for 1 h. 300 μL was transferred to a quartz sample cell. The fluorescence intensity was measured, starting from the lowest to the highest concentration, using a spectrofluorometer (Agilent Technologies, Australia), with excitation and emission slits set at 5 nm, excitation wavelength of 380 nm and emission wavelength in the range of 420–580 nm at a rate of 800 nm/min. Each concentration was repeated three times. The relative fluorescence intensity of protein dilution blanks (no ANS) and a buffer blank (buffer + ANS) were also measured. The relative fluorescence intensity of each protein dilution blank was subtracted from that of the corresponding protein dilution with ANS to provide net relative fluorescence intensity. Standardization of net relative fluorescence intensity values was based on measuring the relative fluorescence intensity for ANS (10 µL) in methanol (10 mL) and normalizing to a standard value of 70 (Glibowski et al., 2006; Paraman et al., 2007). Surface hydrophobicity (S0) was expressed as the initial slope of the plot of standardized net relative fluorescence intensity values vs. % protein concentration.

3 Results

3.1 Construction, expression of ELP-tagged recombinant protein (hSODLEH)

We previously successfully constructed the plasmids for hSOD and hSODLEH, with the nucleotide fragment lengths being 462 bp for hSOD and 1,293 bp for hSODLEH. These recombinant plasmids were successfully expressed in E. coli BL21 (DE3) cells, and the expressed proteins were predominantly in a soluble form (Wang et al., 2024). The apparent molecular weights of the expressed proteins were approximately 20 kDa for hSOD and 40 kDa for hSODLEH (Wang et al., 2024).

3.2 Size distribution and aggregation of hSODLEH

The Tt of the hSODLEH was determined in our previous study. Results showed that when the protein concentration was 0.5 mg/mL, and 0, 100, 200, 300, 400 and 500 mM of (NH4)2SO4 was added, the Tt was >80, 77.3, 60.0, 31.3, 27.0 and <22 °C, respectively. When the concentration of hSODLEH increased to 1 mg/mL, the Tt of hSODLEH were observed to be >80, 56.0, 43.7, 28.7, <22 and <22 °C (Wang et al., 2024). To investigate the aggregation behavior characteristics, DLS and confocal fluorescence microscopy imaging were used to characterize at 1.0 mg/mL hSOD and hSODLEH in the presence of 200 mM (NH4)2SO4 at below the Tt (4 °C) or above the Tt (55 °C).

The hydrodynamic radius (Rh) of hSOD and hSODLEH at 4 °C were 229 and 300 nm, respectively (Figures 2A,C). This indicated that both hSOD and hSODLEH primarily existed as monomers dispersed uniformly in the solution, with relatively even distribution among particles. When the temperature was increased to 55 °C, the average Rh values for the hSODLEH increased significantly to 1,380 nm (Figure 2D). However, the average Rh value for hSOD did not increase significantly and remained at 207 nm (Figure 2B). This suggested that hSODLEH self-assembled into larger aggregates at 55 °C, while hSOD did not exhibit significant aggregation under the same conditions.

Figure 2
Graphs and microscopy images show the effects of temperature on hSOD and hSODLEH. Panels A-D present intensity versus diameter graphs at four conditions: hSOD 4°C, hSOD 55°C, hSODLEH 4°C, and hSODLEH 55°C, with varying R and PDI values. Panels E-H display corresponding fluorescence microscopy images, showing particle distributions at the same conditions.

Figure 2. DLS curves (A–D) and fluorescent fields (E–H) of the hSOD and hSODLEH at different temperatures (4 or 55 °C).

Fluorescence confocal microscopy analysis was performed to further characterize aggregate behavior at 4 or 55 °C. The microscopy images revealed that at 4 °C, both hSOD and hSODLEH were uniformly dispersed (Figures 2E,G). However, at 55 °C, hSODLEH underwent self-aggregation, forming large protein aggregates (Figure 2H). This demonstrated that hSODLEH could form larger protein aggregates through self-aggregation in the aqueous phase with the temperature increase, and the particle size also increased significantly.

3.3 Surface hydrophobicity of the hSOD and hSODLEH

To further investigate the temperature dependent aggregation mechanism of hSODLEH, we used the ProtScale online software (https://web.expasy.org/protscale) to predict the hydrophobicity of the protein. The larger the positive value stands for the more hydrophobic, and the larger the negative value means the more hydrophilic (Han et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2021). The grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY) (GRAVY) of hSOD and hSODLEH were −0.344 and 0.565, respectively, indicating that hSODLEH exhibits significantly higher hydrophobicity than hSOD (Figures 3A,B).

Figure 3
Charts showing hSOD and hSODLEH data. (A) plots hydropathy scores for hSOD from positions 0 to 150. (B) plots hydropathy scores for hSODLEH from positions 0 to 400. (C) and (D) display fluorescence intensity for hSOD at 4 and 55 degrees Celsius respectively with concentrations at 0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 milligrams per milliliter, and ANS. (E) and (F) show fluorescence intensity for hSODLEH at 4 and 55 degrees Celsius with similar concentrations and ANS reference. Wavelengths range from 400 to 600 nanometers.

Figure 3. Hydrophobicity analysis of hSOD and hSODLEH (A,B). Fluorescence intensity of hSOD and hSODLEH at 4 and 55 °C (C–F).

Addationally, the hydrophobic fluorescent probe ANS was utilized to explore the influence of external temperature on the surface hydrophobicity of hSOD and hSODLEH. ANS exhibits fluorescence in aqueous solution, however, its fluorescence intensity significantly increases upon binding to proteins, making it widely used for determining protein surface hydrophobicity. When the excitation wavelength was 380 nm, ANS had a maximum emission wavelength of around 520 nm when it existed alone, with a very low fluorescence intensity value of 5.03.

Upon the addition of hSOD and hSODLEH, the maximum emission wavelengths of ANS underwent a blue-shift to around 480 nm (Figures 3C–F). The surface hydrophobicity index S0 of hSOD and hSODLEH was illustrated in Supplementary Figure S1, and the value of S0 was shown in Table 1. At 4 °C, the S0 value of hSODLEH/ANS (1,054.60) was slightly higher than that of hSOD/ANS (935.90), indicating a moderate increase in hydrophobic exposure. When the temperature increased to 55 °C, the S0 value of hSODLEH/ANS rose significantly 1763.54, while hSOD/ANS showed a smaller increase to 1,384.80. This indicated that hSODLEH exposes more hydrophobic regions at elevated temperatures, consistent with its thermoresponsive aggregation behavior.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Surface hydrophobicity indices (S0) of hSOD and hSODLEH at different temperatures.

3.4 Effect of protein concentration on the foams separation of hSOD and hSODLEH

The influence of initial protein concentration of hSOD and hSODLEH cell lysis solution on foam separation was investigated, and the results are presented in Figures 4A,B. As the initial protein concentration increased, the recovery rates of both hSOD and hSODLEH increased, while the enrichment ratios decreased. Considering Ep, Rp, Ee, Re as evaluation criteria, initial protein concentrations of 0.4 mg/mL were selected as the appropriate conditions for subsequent experiments with both proteins.

Figure 4
Graphs comparing hSOD and hSODLEH under varying conditions. (A) and (B) show initial protein concentration effects on \(E_c\), \(E_p\), \(R_p\), and \(R_e\). (C) and (D) illustrate temperature effects on the same parameters. \(E_c\) and \(E_p\) are represented as bar graphs in gray and blue, while \(R_p\) and \(R_e\) are line graphs in green and black or blue. Error bars indicate variability.

Figure 4. Effects of initial protein concentration (A,B) and temperature (C,D) of foam separation on hSOD and hSODLEH.

The effect of temperature on the enrichment ratio and recovery percentage is shown in Figures 4C,D. As temperature increased from 25 °C to 45 °C, the enrichment ratio increased, while the recovery percentage decreased with increasing temperature. Balancing recovery percentage and enrichment ratio, 30 °C was chosen as the optimal temperature for performing foam separation.

In summary, the optimized foam separation conditions for hSOD and hSODLEH from cell lysis solution were determined as follows: the initial protein concentration of 0.4 mg/mL and the temperature of 30 °C.

3.5 Foam separation of hSOD and hSODLEH

Under the optimal conditions, the purification efficiency of foam separation of hSOD and hSODLEH were presented in Table 2. For hSODLEH, the values for Ep, Ee, Rp and Re were 1.93, 2.15, 86.57%, and 100%, respectively. For hSOD, the corresponding values of Ep, Ee, Rp and Re were 1.27, 1.36, 64.76%, and 65.49%, respectively. Notably, SOD activity was barely detectable in the residual liquid of the hSODLEH crude lysate after foam separation. In contrast, 34.50% of enzyme activity remained in residual liquid of hSOD after foam separation. These results indicated that ELP tag facilitates the specific adsorption of the recombinant enzyme onto the bubble surface, enabling the preferential separation and enrichment of the recombinant enzyme under these conditions.

Table 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Effect of purification of hSOD and hSODLEH by Foam separation method under optimal conditions.

3.6 Further purification of hSODLEH by the thermally responsive property of ELP

The hSODLEH was further purified using the thermally responsive property of ELP, with the defoaming solution fromfoam separation as the raw material. First, different types of salts on the purification efficiency of HSODLEH by ITC was investigated. Figure 5A showed that (NH4)2SO4 was the optimal salt. Secondly, various concentrations of (NH4)2SO4 on the purification efficiency of hSODLEH was test. Figure 5B showed that a clear band at around 40 kDa appeared, indicating that 0.4–1.8 M (NH4)2SO4 could be used to purify hSODLEH by ITC. However, as the concentration of (NH4)2SO4 increased from 1.0 to 1.8 M, more and more impurities appeared in the bands. According to Figure 5C, the purification fold of hSODLEH reached a maximum of 17.45, and the recovery rate was 91.98% at an (NH4)2SO4 concentration of 1.2 M. Nevertheless, considering various factors, 1.2 M (NH4)2SO4 was ultimately selected as the optimal purification salt for hSODLEH. hSOD without the ELP tag exhibited negligible aggregation and purification under identical conditions (data not shown), confirming that the thermoresponsive property of the ELP tag is essential for efficient ITC purification of hSODLEH. Overall, the total yield and purification fold after two-step purification was 85.84% (93.32% foam separation × 91.98% ITC) and 37.52 (2.15 foam separation × 17.45 ITC), respectively. Following the two-step purification process, the final purity of hSODLEH was approximately 85%, as determined by SDS-PAGE densitometric analysis (Figure 5B), with an absolute yield of approximately 8 mg per liter of E. coli culture.

Figure 5
(A) SDS-PAGE gel showing protein bands for hSODLEH purification under different conditions, with molecular weight markers on the side. (B) Similar gel with varying concentrations of ammonium sulfate. (C) Graph displaying purification fold and recovery rate versus ammonium sulfate concentration, showing trends in protein purification efficiency.

Figure 5. Optimization conditions for purification of hSODLEH by ITC. (A) SDS-PAGE analysis of hSODLEH purified by different salt ions (1 M NaH2PO4, 1 M Na2SO4, 1 M (NH4)2SO4, and 1 and 2.5 M NaCl). (B) SDS–PAGE of hSODLEH purified by ITC using 0.4–1.8 M (NH4)2SO4. (C) Recovery rate and purification fold of hSODLEH at different concentrations of (NH4)2SO4. Lane M–protein marker, Lane Ctrl, E. coli transformed with empty plasmid, Lanes Lys, Sup and Pel refers to whole cell lysate, supernatant and pellet of E. coli transformed with plasmid containing the expressing hSODLEH.

4 Discussion

In the field of protein purification, it is crucial to develop efficient and cost - effective separation techniques for various biotechnological and pharmaceutical applications (Zhang et al., 2022). This study aimed to the effective separation and purification of hSODLEH from a cell lysis solution. The approach combines foam separation with an ELP fusion tag, leveraging their unique properties for enhanced purification efficiency.

ELP has emerged as a powerful tool for protein engineering and purification due to their unique thermal responsiveness and biocompatibility (Zhou et al., 2019). First, ELP exhibits a thermodynamic reversible phase transition behavior at Tt, enabling selective precipitation of the fusion protein from solution upon temperature change. This property simplifies the purification process, as the ELP-tagged protein can be easily separated from cell lysates and other contaminants by adjusting the temperature. Second, ELP are composed of repeating pentapeptide sequences that are biologically inert and do not significantly interfere with the structure or function of the target protein (Chilkoti et al., 2006). We have previously constructed several ELP-fusion proteins. Results demonstrated that the purification by ITC was superior to the traditional Ni-NTA resin. Moreover, the ELP did not affect the enzyme activity, kinetic parameters and secondary structure of ELP-fusion protein. More importantly, ELP improved the stability in harsh conditions of ELP-fusion protein such as heating and exposure to denaturant (Peprah Addai et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2024; Zhou et al., 2019). Finally, ELP is biocompatible, non-immunogenic, and can enhance the stability of fused proteins (Shi et al., 2022).

The surface hydrophobicity of ELP-tagged proteins is inherently associated with their phase transition behavior (Fang et al., 2023). In this study, hSODLEH had a positive GRAVY score (0.565), contrasting with hSOD’s negative score (−0.344), thereby validating the role of the ELP tag in enhancing hydrophobicity. This finding was consistent with the S0. The hydrophobic fluorescent probe ANS was employed to effectively visualize these changes. Below Tt (4 °C), the fluorescence enhancement of hSODLEH/ANS was slightly higher than that of hSOD/ANS. Above Tt (55 °C), However, hSODLEH/ANS exhibited significantly greater fluorescence enhancement, indicating that hSODLEH exposes more hydrophobic regions at elevated temperatures.

The increase in surface hydrophobicity is primarily attributed to the conformational change of the ELP tag. As the temperature exceeds Tt, ELP transform from a random, disordered structure to an ordered β-turn conformation, exposing more internal hydrophobic regions of the recombinant proteins, enhancing hydrophobic interactions, and increasing S0 (Alizadeh-Pasdar and Li-Chan, 2000). The rise in surface hydrophobicity stems from the conformational change of the ELP tag, which promotes hydrophobic interactions between protein molecules. This behavior directly correlates with elevated hydrophobicity, as hydrophobic regions tend to aggregate to minimize their contact with water (Chandler, 2005).

Protein flotation is a separation technique that exploits the differences in protein surface properties to achieve the separation and enrichment of proteins using foam (Han et al., 2020). Foam separation experiments demonstrated that hSODLEH achieved higher Ep, Rp, Ee, Re than hSOD. This confirms that the hydrophobic ELP-fusion protein can be more effectively separated and enriched through foam flotation. Several factors influence protein flotation efficiency, including pH, ionic strength, bubble size, gas flow rate, temperature, protein hydrophobicity (Bergfreund et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2025; Li et al., 2023; Pan et al., 2022; Schwenzfeier et al., 2013; Zhao et al., 2024b). Among those, protein hydrophobicity plays a pivotal role. Hydrophobic proteins have a higher affinity for air-water interfaces as they reduce interfacial energy by displacing water molecules (Damodaran, 2005).

The increased surface hydrophobicity of hSODLEH not only promotes its adsorption at the gas-liquid interface but also strengthens the hydrophobic interactions within the foam matrix (Bergfreund et al., 2021). When adsorbed onto the bubble surface, hSODLEH’s hydrophobic amino acid residues interact with the bubble surface, preventing bubbles from easily rupturing and coalescing. This stability allows the foam to more effectively carry hSODLEH to the solution surface, enhancing the flotation efficiency and enrichment. Hu et al. developed a two-stage foam separation to efficiently recover protein from Perilla seed meal (PSM) using glycine betaine as an enhancer, achieving a total recovery rate of 94.5% and an enrichment factor of 7.1. They demonstrated that glycine betain engaged in cation-π interactions with aromatic residues of PSM protein, which made the protein structure unfold and enabled its hydrophobic groups of PSMP to be more exposed. These factors, plus protein aggregation, were responsible for the enhanced interfacial adsorption of PSMP (Hu et al., 2021).

The increase in surface hydrophobicity caused by the conformational change of the ELP tag also leads to the aggregation of hSODLEH (Wierenga and Gruppen, 2010). Münch et al. demonstrated that diverse ALS-causing mutations provoke SOD1 aggregation by increasing their propensity to expose hydrophobic surfaces. They found that exposure of hydrophobic surfaces precedes aggregation. This shows that aggregation of diverse pathogenic SOD1 mutants is driven by intermolecular hydrophobic interactions either between constitutively hydrophobic mutants or aggregation intermediates exposing hydrophobic surfaces (Münch and Bertolotti, 2010). As quantitatively demonstrated in Table 1, the surface hydrophobicity of hSODLEH increased at elevated temperatures. The enhanced hydrophobicity promotes intermolecular interactions that drive the protein aggregation, as directly evidenced by the increase in hydrodynamic radius (Figures 2C,D) and the formation of large aggregates (Figures 2G,H). These aggregates are more easily captured and carried by foam, further enhancing the separation efficiency of hSODLEH in foam flotation.

ELP is a class of synthetic peptides derived from elastin, composed of the Val-Pro-Gly-Xaa-Gly (VPGXG)n repeat unit, where the guest residue Xaa represents any amino acid except Pro. In this study, valine was selected as the guest residue (Xaa), and repeat number (n) to was set to 50 to enhance the hydrophobicity of the ELP. The decision to use 50 repeats of the VPGVG sequence was based on the fact that the hydrophobicity and thermal responsiveness of ELP are positively correlated with the number of repeats (n). A length of 50 repeats falls within the commonly reported range for ELPs (20–330) and represents a well-characterized and moderate choice that provides a clear thermal transition and sufficient hydrophobicity. Our findings provide a foundation for systematically exploring how key structural parameters of ELP-specifically the repeat number (n) and the identity of the guest residue (Xaa)-affect foam separation performance. Future work could investigate ELP variants with systematically varied repeat lengths (n) and guest residue (Xaa) hydrophobicities to establish a quantitative correlation between ELP architecture and key separation metrics, including enrichment ratio and recovery yield. This approach is anticipated to generate valuable insights that will facilitate the optimization of ELP-based flotation system designs. Additionally, it holds the potential to reveal the fundamental molecular mechanisms governing protein-bubble interactions. Such discoveries could open new and promising directions for developing more efficient, customized ELP-based flotation agents tailored to specific flotation applications.

Protein purification remains a critical challenge for large-scale bioproduction. In this study, the performance of our two-step purification strategy (foam separation + ITC, FM-ITC) was evaluated and compared with other conventional methods for SOD purification, as summarized in Table 3. Previous studies have reported SOD purification using Ni-NTA affinity chromatography from various sources Cohnella sp. A01, Pseudoalteromonas sp. ANT506, Halomonas sp. ANT108, Homo sapiens. Additionally, methods such as size exclusion chromatography (e.g., Superdex, Sephadex G-100, Superdex 200, Sephadex G-75) and ion exchange chromatography (e.g., DEAE-Sepharose, DEAE-32, CM-cellulose, Q-Sepharose) have been widely applied across species (Table 3). Our integrated FM-ITC approach achieved a purification fold of 37.52 and a recovery rate of 85.84%, which compares favorably with many multi-step chromatographic methods in terms of both efficiency and overall yield. This strategy also reduces the need for expensive chromatography resins and equipment, simplifies the purification process into two non-chromatographic steps, and presents a scalable alternative suitable for industrial applications. This enhancement arises from the synergistic integration of ELP’s hydrophobicity and thermoresponsiveness: foam separation leverages ELP-mediated hydrophobic adsorption at the gas-liquid interface for initial enrichment, while ITC utilizes temperature-induced phase transitions to further purify the protein.

Table 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. Comparison of purification efficiency of SOD by different methods.

In this study, the purification process was conducted using a sequential approach initiating with foam separation followed by ITC (FM-ITC). The reverse order (ITC followed by foam separation, ITC-FM) were not experimentally evaluated. The FM-ITC order was selected based on the following considerations. First, initiating purification with foam separation allows for efficient capture and concentration of soluble hSODLEH directly from the crude lysate, effectively reducing sample volume and removing significant hydrophilic contaminants. This step provides a pre-enriched feedstock that enhances the subsequent efficiency of ITC. Second, the reverse order (ITC-FM) require resolubilization of the thermally aggregated product prior to foam separation could be applied, introducing additional handling and potential losses. Furthermore, the aggregated form of the protein might exhibit lower adsorption efficiency at the air–water interface, which could adversely affectfoam separation performance. While the FM-ITC sequence demonstrates encouraging efficiency and practical advantages, a systematic comparison of different purification order or single-step represents a valuable direction for future research. Such comparative studies would provide further insight into process optimization and scalability assessment.

It should be pointed out tha the purity of hSODLEH after two-step purification was ∼85%, as assessed by SDS-PAGE (Figure 5B). While this level of purity, achieved in the absence of conventional chromatography, is competitive for many industrial applications such as cosmetics and nutraceuticals, pharma-grade SOD typically requires a higher purity standard (≥95–98%). For applications demanding ultra-high purity, the present method can serve as an efficient initial capture and intermediate purification step. Subsequent polishing steps, such as ion-exchange or size-exclusion chromatography, may be incorporated to further enhance purity to meet pharmaceutical requirements. Additionally, this study was conducted at a laboratory scale (mL to L). Although the results demonstrate a promising purification strategy, further validation through scale-up experiments and process stability studies will be essential to assess its industrial applicability. Notwithstanding these considerations, the method presents several potential practical advantages. By replacing expensive affinity chromatography resins with low-cost consumables such as ammonium sulfate and minimizing the need for complex instrumentation, the process operates on a simpler and potentially more economical basis.

5 Conclusion

In this study, a two-step purification strategy integrated foam separation (leveraging ELP’s hydrophobic properties) with ITC (utilizing ELP’s thermoresponsive behavior) to isolate and purify hSODLEH from cell lysate. During the foam separation, the hydrophobic ELP tag promoted selective adsorption of hSODLEH to the gas-liquid interface, enabling efficient concentration and enrichment. Under optimized conditions (protein concentration: 0.4 mg/mL, temperature: 30 °C), the method achieved an Ep of 1.93, Rp of 86.57%, Ee of 2.15, and Re of 93.32%. Subsequently, ITC purification achieved 91.98% recovery rate and 17.45-fold purification fold. Overall the two-step process resulted in 85.84% total recovery rate and 37.52-fold overall purification fold, with a purity of approximately 85%. These results highlight that the dual functionality of ELP-hydrophobicity for interfacial targeting and thermoresponsiveness for phase separation-offer a novel strategy for efficient protein separation and purification. The method not only simplifies the purification workflow and reduces dependence on chromatography, but also offers economic and scalability benefits. Future studies should focus on enhancing protein purity through further process optimization and implementing the strategy on a larger scale to evaluate its feasibility for industrial production. The combination of thermoresponsive and hydrophobic properties of ELPs offers a promising platform for developing sustainable and high-throughput protein purification technologies.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Author contributions

WW: Formal Analysis, Writing – original draft. JC: Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft. HZ: Data curation, Software, Writing – original draft. AH: Resources, Writing – original draft. DZ: Investigation, Writing – original draft. YW: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft. YZ: Methodology, Writing – original draft. FL: Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing – review and editing. XD: Supervision, Writing – review and editing. YW: Writing – review and editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by the Open Project of National Engineering Laboratory of Crop Stress Resistance Breeding (NELCOF20240104), Major Project of Fishery Seed Industry of Jiangxi Province (2023YYZYGG-08), Suzhou Science and Technology Plan Project (2019087), Medical Science and Technology Innovation Project of Xuzhou Municipal Health Commission (XWKYHT20240005), Xuzhou Medical University Affiliated Hospital Science and Technology Development Fund (XYFM202315), Clinical Medical Science and Technology Development Fund of Jiangsu University (JLY2021145). Anhui Provincial Key Research and Development Project (2022AH051362).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1695586/full#supplementary-material

References

Abrashev, R., Feller, G., Kostadinova, N., Krumova, E., Alexieva, Z., Gerginova, M., et al. (2016). Production, purification, and characterization of a novel cold-active superoxide dismutase from the antarctic strain Aspergillus glaucus 363. Fungal Biol. 120, 679–689. doi:10.1016/j.funbio.2016.03.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Addai, F. P., Chen, X., Zhu, H., Zhen, Z., Lin, F., Feng, C., et al. (2025). Structural stabilization and activity enhancement of glucoamylase via the machine-learning technique and immobilization. J. Agri. Food Chem. 73, 7347–7363. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.4c11907

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Alizadeh-Pasdar, N., and Li-Chan, E. C. Y. (2000). Comparison of protein surface hydrophobicity measured at various pH values using three different fluorescent probes. J. Agri. Food Chem. 48, 328–334. doi:10.1021/jf990393p

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bergfreund, J., Bertsch, P., and Fischer, P. (2021). Adsorption of proteins to fluid interfaces: role of the hydrophobic subphase. J. Colloid Interf. Sci. 584, 411–417. doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2020.09.118

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bhatia, K., Mal, G., Bhar, R., Attri, C., and Seth, A. (2018). Purification and characterization of thermostable superoxide dismutase from Anoxybacillus gonensis KA 55 MTCC 12684. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 117, 1133–1139. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.06.031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chandler, D. (2005). Interfaces and the driving force of hydrophobic assembly. Nature 437, 640–647. doi:10.1038/nature04162

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, Y., Wu, Y., Xiong, F., Yu, W., Wang, T., Xiong, J., et al. (2023). Construction of a Collagen-like protein based on Elastin-like polypeptide fusion and evaluation of its performance in promoting wound healing. Molecules 28, 6773. doi:10.3390/molecules28196773

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, Y., Chen, L., Li, F., Huang, L., Yan, Y., and He, R. (2025). Synergistic effect of edible salts on the physicochemical properties of whey protein isolate-carrageenan complexes and their application as foam and emulsion stabilizers. Food Res. Int. 201, 115621. doi:10.1016/j.foodres.2024.115621

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chidambaram, S. B., Anand, N., Varma, S. R., Ramamurthy, S., Vichitra, C., Sharma, A., et al. (2024). Superoxide dismutase and neurological disorders. IBRO Neurosci. Rep. 16, 373–394. doi:10.1016/j.ibneur.2023.11.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chilkoti, A., Christensen, T., and Mackay, J. A. (2006). Stimulus responsive elastin biopolymers: applications in medicine and biotechnology. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 10, 652–657. doi:10.1016/j.cbpa.2006.10.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Damodaran, S. (2005). Protein stabilization of emulsions and foams. J. Food Sci. 70, R54–R66. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2005.tb07150.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fang, S., Huang, W., Wu, J., Han, J., Wang, L., and Wang, Y. (2023). Separation and purification of recombinant β-glucosidase with hydrophobicity and thermally responsive property from cell lysis solution by foam separation and further purification. J. Agri. Food Chem. 71, 3362–3372. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.2c07405

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Glibowski, P., Mleko, S., and Wesolowska-Trojanowska, M. (2006). Gelation of single heated vs. double heated whey protein isolate. Int. Dairy J. 16, 1113–1118. doi:10.1016/j.idairyj.2005.10.024

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hadji, I., Marzouki, M. N., Ferraro, D., Fasano, E., Majdoub, H., Pani, G., et al. (2007). Purification and characterization of a Cu,Zn-SOD from garlic (Allium sativum L.). antioxidant effect on tumoral cell lines. app. biochem. Biotech. 143, 129–141. doi:10.1007/s12010-007-0042-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Han, J., Wang, L., Wang, Y., Cai, Y., Mao, Y., Ni, L., et al. (2019). Preparation of temperature-sensitive magnetic microspheres for separation and purification of bromelain. Food Bioprod. process. 114, 253–262. doi:10.1016/j.fbp.2019.01.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Han, J., Cai, Y., Wang, L., Mao, Y., Ni, L., and Wang, Y. (2020). A high efficiency method combining metal chelate ionic liquid-based aqueous two-phase flotation with two-step precipitation process for bromelain purification. Food Chem. 309, 125749. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125749

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Han, J., Fang, S., He, X., Wang, L., Li, C., Wu, J., et al. (2022). Combination of aqueous two-phase flotation and inverse transition cycling: strategies for separation and purification of recombinant β-glucosidase from cell lysis solution. Food Chem. 373, 131543. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.131543

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hatzinikolaou, D. G., Tsoukia, C., Kekos, D., and Macris, B. J. (1998). An efficient and optimized purification procedure for the superoxide dismutase from Aspergillus niger. Partial characterization of the purified enzyme. Bioseparation 7, 39–46. doi:10.1023/A:1007986510153

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hu, N., Zhang, K., Li, Y., Hou, T., Zhang, Z., and Li, H. (2021). Glycine betaine enhanced foam separation for recovering and enriching protein from the crude extract of perilla seed meal. Sep. Purif. Technol. 276, 118712. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2021.118712

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Karadag, H., and Bilgin, R. (2010). Purification of copper-zinc superoxide dismutase from human erythrocytes and partial characterization. Biotechnol. Biotech. Eq. 24, 1653–1656. doi:10.2478/V10133-010-0021-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kumar, S., and Malhotra, S. P. (2008). Partial purification of superoxide dismutase and peroxidase from ber (Zizyphus mauritiana Lamk.) fruit using anion exchange chromatography. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Pla. 14, 167–172. doi:10.1007/s12298-008-0015-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kumar, S., Dhillon, S., Singh, D., and Singh, R. (2004). Partial purification and characterization of superoxide dismutase from tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) fruit. Pre. Nutr. Food Sci. 9, 283–288. doi:10.3746/jfn.2004.9.3.283

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, R., Fu, N., Wu, Z., Wang, Y., Liu, W., and Wang, Y. (2016). Enhancing protein self-association at the gas–liquid interface for foam fractionation of bovine serum albumin from its highly diluted solution. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 109, 638–646. doi:10.1016/j.cherd.2016.03.018

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Y., Jia, S., Zhang, Y., Huang, L., He, R., and Ma, H. (2023). Characterization of the interaction between allicin and soy protein isolate and functional properties of the adducts. J. Agri. Food Chem. 103, 5156–5164. doi:10.1002/jsfa.12593

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lin, F., Yan, D., Chen, Y., E, F. E., Shi, H., Han, B., et al. (2018). Cloning, purification and enzymatic characterization of recombinant human superoxide dismutase 1 (hSOD1) expressed in Escherichia coli. Acta Biochim. Pol. 65, 235–240. doi:10.18388/abp.2017_2350

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lü, M., Cai, R., Wang, S., Liu, Z., Jiao, Y., Fang, Y., et al. (2013). Purification and characterization of iron-cofactored superoxide dismutase from Enteromorpha linza. Chin. J. Oceanol. Limn. 31, 1190–1195. doi:10.1007/s00343-013-3049-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Meyer, D. E., and Chilkoti, A. (2002). Genetically encoded synthesis of protein-based polymers with precisely specified molecular weight and sequence by recursive directional ligation: examples from the elastin-like polypeptide system. Biomacromolecules 3, 357–367. doi:10.1021/bm015630n

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moon-Ai, W., Niyomploy, P., Boonsombat, R., Sangvanich, P., and Karnchanatat, A. (2012). A superoxide dismutase purified from the rhizome of curcuma aeruginosa roxb. as inhibitor of nitric oxide production in the macrophage-like RAW 264.7 cell line. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 166, 2138–2155. doi:10.1007/s12010-012-9640-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Münch, C., and Bertolotti, A. (2010). Exposure of hydrophobic surfaces initiates aggregation of diverse ALS-causing superoxide dismutase-1 mutants. J. Mol. Biol. 399, 512–525. doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2010.04.019

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nonaka, K., Yoon, K. S., and Ogo, S. (2014). Biochemical characterization of psychrophilic Mn-superoxide dismutase from newly isolated Exiguobacterium sp. OS-77. Extremophiles 18, 363–373. doi:10.1007/s00792-013-0621-x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pan, J. Y., Zhang, Z. L., Mintah, B. K., Xu, H. N., Dabbour, M., Cheng, Y., et al. (2022). Effects of nonthermal physical processing technologies on functional, structural properties and digestibility of food protein: a review. J. Food Process Eng. 45, ARTN e14010. doi:10.1111/jfpe.14010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Paraman, I., Hettiarachchy, N. S., Schaefer, C., and Beck, M. I. (2007). Hydrophobicity, solubility, and emulsifying properties of enzyme-modified rice endosperm protein. Cereal Chem. 84, 343–349. doi:10.1094/cchem-84-4-0343

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Peprah Addai, F., Wang, T., Kosiba, A. A., Lin, F., Zhen, R., Chen, D., et al. (2020). Integration of elastin-like polypeptide fusion system into the expression and purification of Lactobacillus sp. B164 β-galactosidase for lactose hydrolysis. Bioresour. Technol. 311, 123513. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123513

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Saxena, P., Selvaraj, K., Khare, S. K., and Chaudhary, N. (2022). Superoxide dismutase as multipotent therapeutic antioxidant enzyme: role in human diseases. Biotechnol. Lett. 44, 1–22. doi:10.1007/s10529-021-03200-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Schwenzfeier, A., Lech, F., Wierenga, P. A., Eppink, M. H. M., and Gruppen, H. (2013). Foam properties of algae soluble protein isolate: effect of pH and ionic strength. Food Hydrocoll. 33, 111–117. doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2013.03.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Seatovic, S., Gligic, L., Radulovic, Z., and Jankov, R. M. (2004). Purification and partial characterization of superoxide dismutase from the thermophilic bacteria Thermothrix sp. J. Serb. Chem. Soc. 69, 9–16. doi:10.2298/JSC0401009S

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shahi, Z. K. M., Takalloo, Z., Mohamadzadeh, J., Sajedi, R. H., Haghbeen, K., and Aminzadeh, S. (2021). Thermophilic iron containing type superoxide dismutase from Cohnella sp. A01. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 187, 373–385. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.07.150

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shi, X., Chen, D., Liu, G., Zhang, H., Wang, X., Wu, Z., et al. (2022). Application of Elastin-like polypeptide in tumor therapy. Cancers 14, 3683. doi:10.3390/cancers14153683

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shin, H. B., and Chae, Y. K. (2024). Aggregation-dispersion chromatography: application of Elastin-like polypeptides. Separations 11, 335. doi:10.3390/separations11120335

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sugawara-Narutaki, A. (2025). Self-assembled nanofibers and hydrogels of double-hydrophobic Elastin-like polypeptides formed via coacervation. Polym. J. 57, 863–871. doi:10.1038/s41428-025-01028-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tan, B. H., Chor Leow, T., Foo, H. L., and Abdul Rahim, R. (2014). Molecular characterization of a recombinant manganese superoxide dismutase from Lactococcus lactis M4. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014, 1–9. doi:10.1155/2014/469298

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thakur, A., Kumar, P., Lata, J., Devi, N., and Chand, D. (2018). Thermostable Fe/Mn superoxide dismutase from Bacillus licheniformis SPB-13 from thermal springs of Himalayan region: purification, characterization and antioxidative potential. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 115, 1026–1032. doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.04.155

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tian, S., Wu, Z., Liu, W., Zhang, M., Lv, Y., Xu, Y., et al. (2018). Effective recovery of casein from its highly diluted solution by using a technology of foam fractionation coupled with isoelectric precipitation. J. Food Eng. 216, 72–80. doi:10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.07.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Q. F., Wang, Y. F., Hou, Y. H., Shi, Y. L., Han, H., Miao, M., et al. (2016). Cloning, expression and biochemical characterization of recombinant superoxide dismutase from Antarctic psychrophilic bacterium Pseudoalteromonas sp. ANT506. ANT506. J. Basic Microb. 56, 753–761. doi:10.1002/jobm.201500444

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Q., Nie, P., Hou, Y., and Wang, Y. (2020a). Purification, biochemical characterization and DNA protection against oxidative damage of a novel recombinant superoxide dismutase from psychrophilic bacterium Halomonas sp. ANT108. ANT108. Protein Expres. Purif. 173, 105661. doi:10.1016/j.pep.2020.105661

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, S., Lin, R., Ren, Y., Zhang, T., Lu, H., Wang, L., et al. (2020b). Non-chromatographic purification of thermostable endoglucanase from Thermotoga maritima by fusion with a hydrophobic elastin-like polypeptide. Protein Expres. Purif. 173, 105634. doi:10.1016/j.pep.2020.105634

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, L., Lan, H., Guan, W., Wang, Y., Han, J., Yang, Y., et al. (2023). New insights into selective flotation recovery of gold using dye-derived thermo-responsive polymeric surfactant: DFT calculation and adsorption mechanism. Sep. Purif. Technol. 320, 124199. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2023.124199

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, W., Wang, Y., Xia, Z., Hao, G., Tuffour, A., Yan, L., et al. (2024). Enhancing the purification and stability of superoxide dismutase by fusion with thermoresponsive self-assembly of Elastin like polypeptide. ChemistrySelect 9, e202401100. doi:10.1002/slct.202401100

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wierenga, P. A., and Gruppen, H. (2010). New views on foams from protein solutions. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 15, 365–373. doi:10.1016/j.cocis.2010.05.017

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xu, N., Wang, L., Dou, N., Zhang, L., Guan, J., Chang, Y., et al. (2019). Foam fractionation for enhancing silica gel adsorption of urokinase from human urine. Asia-Pac. J. Chem. Eng. 14, e2334. doi:10.1002/apj.2334

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xue, J., Huang, W., Zhang, C., Han, J., Wu, J., Wang, L., et al. (2024). Process integration of foam separation and inverse transition cycling by the thermally responsive properties of ELP-fusion β-glucosidase. Biochem. Eng. J. 207, 109314. doi:10.1016/j.bej.2024.109314

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yao, C.-L., Wang, A.-L., Wang, Z.-Y., Wang, W.-N., and Sun, R.-Y. (2007). Purification and partial characterization of Cu, Zn superoxide dismutase from haemolymph of Oriental river prawn Macrobrachium nipponense. Aquaculture 270, 559–565. doi:10.1016/j.aquaculture.2007.04.068

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, J., Huang, X., Shi, J., Liu, L., Zhang, X., Zou, X., et al. (2021). A visual bi-layer indicator based on roselle anthocyanins with high hydrophobic property for monitoring griskin freshness. Food Chem. 355, 129573. doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129573

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, J., Liu, M., Deng, H., Zhao, Y., Zhu, Y., Bai, J., et al. (2022). Purification and identification of lipid-lowering protein from barley extract after lactiplantibacillus plantarum dy-1 fermentation. J. Agri. Food Chem. 70, 14488–14498. doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.2c05211

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, C., Huang, W., Su, J., Zhang, X., Xue, J., Zhang, C., et al. (2024a). Purification and characterization of recombinant human superoxide dismutase integrated with resilin-like polypeptide. Protein Expres. Purif. 222, 106535. doi:10.1016/j.pep.2024.106535

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, M., Liu, L., Wang, G., Awais, M., Tong, L., Fan, B., et al. (2024b). Comparative study on the foam and air-water interface properties of ethanol-soluble and non-ethanol components in wheat aqueous phase protein. Food Hydrocoll. 150, 109700. doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2023.109700

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zheng, Z., Jiang, Y.-H., Miao, J.-L., Wang, Q.-F., Zhang, B.-T., and Li, G.-Y. (2006). Purification and characterization of a cold-active iron superoxide dismutase from a Psychrophilic Bacterium, Marinomonas sp. NJ522. Biotechnol. Lett. 28, 85–88. doi:10.1007/s10529-005-4951-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhou, Y., Li, X., Yan, D., Addai Peprah, F., Ji, X., Fletcher, E. E., et al. (2019). Multifunctional Elastin-like polypeptide renders β-glucosidase enzyme phase transition and high stability. Biotechnol. Biofuels 12, 157. doi:10.1186/s13068-019-1497-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, Y., Li, H., Ni, H., Liu, J., Xiao, A., and Cai, H. (2014). Purification and biochemical characterization of manganesecontaining superoxide dismutase from deep-sea thermophile Geobacillus sp. EPT3. Acta Oceanol. Sin. 33, 163–169. doi:10.1007/s13131-014-0534-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: superoxide dismutase, elastin-like polypeptide, hydrophobicity, foam separation, purification

Citation: Wang W, Chen J, Zhu H, Huang A, Zhou D, Wang Y, Zhou Y, Lin F, Dong X and Wu Y (2025) Two-step purification of elastin-like polypeptide-fusion superoxide dismutase via hydrophobicity and thermoresponsiveness. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 13:1695586. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1695586

Received: 30 August 2025; Accepted: 15 October 2025;
Published: 24 October 2025.

Edited by:

Inchan Kwon, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Republic of Korea

Reviewed by:

Zhanzhi Liu, Jiangnan University, China
Young Kee Chae, Sejong University, Republic of Korea

Copyright © 2025 Wang, Chen, Zhu, Huang, Zhou, Wang, Zhou, Lin, Dong and Wu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Feng Lin, d3dsaW5mZW5nQHpqZmlzaC5jb20uY24=; Xiangai Dong, ZG9uZ3hpYW5nYWlAeHpzZHl5eS5jb20=; Yu Wu, NzYwMDIwMjIwNDIzQHh6aG11LmVkdS5jbg==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.