- 1Department of Science and Technology for Sustainable Development and One Health, Unit of Electronics for Sensor Systems, University Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
- 2KU Leuven, Micro- and Nanosystems (MNS), Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT), Leuven, Belgium
- 3Department of Mechatronics, Faculty of Electrical Engineering & Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Perlis, Malaysia
- 4Department of Engineering, Unit of Electronics for Sensor Systems, University Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
- 5Research Unit of Neurology, Neurophysiology and Neurobiology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
- 6Brain Innovations Lab, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
- 7KU Leuven, Department of Physics and Astronomy (HF), Leuven, Belgium
- 8KU Leuven, Department of Electrical Engineering (ESAT-MNS), Leuven, Belgium
Diabetes mellitus represents one of the most widespread chronic diseases globally, characterized by alterations in glucose metabolism that require constant monitoring of blood glucose levels. Traditionally, blood testing has been the standard for glucose monitoring; however, interstitial fluid has emerged as a viable alternative, due to its less invasive nature which enhances user comfort. Despite improvements in technology, the accuracy of currently available continuous glucose monitors remains a concern, particularly when the rate of change is higher, such as in hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic ranges. Effective management of hypoglycemia relies on the monitor’s ability to provide precise and specific readings when blood glucose levels drop dangerously low. In this context, the demand for heightened accuracy is paramount to timely alert users to impending hypoglycemic events. The inaccuracies of these sensors are attributed to the dynamics of the sample analysis. Specifically the interstitial fluid experiences a delay in concentration due to the diffusion process from capillary blood to interstitial fluid. In this study, we developed a microfluidic device that simulates the diffusion dynamics from capillary glucose to interstitial fluid. We demonstrate the reduction of lag time diffusion from 20 min to 5 min by increasing dermal electro-osmotic flow, which generates convection that transports glucose faster than diffusion, thus resulting in lower lag times. These findings highlight the potential of inciting electro-osmotic flow for improving the responsiveness and accuracy of CGMs, ultimately enhancing diabetes management for users.
1 Introduction
Type 1 diabetes is a metabolic disorder characterized by elevated blood glucose levels, which can lead to serious complications such as heart disease, kidney disease, retinopathy, and neuropathy (Harding et al., 2019; Galicia-Garcia et al., 2020). The global prevalence of diabetes has risen dramatically, with over 415 million people affected worldwide. This alarming increase highlights the urgent need for effective management strategies and innovative treatment solutions (Ogurtsova et al., 2017).
The traditional capillary blood glucose meters measure the concentration of glucose from capillary blood samples obtained by the patient. This procedure, in addition to being painful and inconvenient, results in sampling a limited number of glucose values throughout the day, leaving the patient without proper monitoring during the day and especially at night, which can be quite critical in some cases.
Wearable devices for continuous self-monitoring of glucose can play a crucial role in the management of the disease. While traditional glucose meters use capillary blood, most commercial Continous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) devices measure glucose from interstitial fluid (ISF) localized in the subcutaneous adipose tissue including Freestyle Libre, Dexcom G7 (subcutaneous needle) and Eversense from Senseonics (subcutaneous sensor), which can be accessed using a minimally invasive approach. Many compounds, such as glucose, are transported from the blood into the cells via ISF (Scallan and Huxley, 2009; Sansalone et al., 2013). The glucose concentration in ISF strongly correlates with the blood glucose concentration, but the sampling of ISF non-invasively is challenging due to the barrier function of the skin. Thus, all approaches based on ISF that have reached commercial success are based on needles that penetrate the skin and reach the ISF in the dermis (Cengiz and Tamborlane, 2009; Dye et al., 2010). For instance, persons with type-1 diabetes who use CGM devices are less prone to hypoglycemia (low blood sugar) and hyperglycemia (high blood sugar) (Fokkert et al., 2019; Charleer et al., 2020), stay longer within the target glucose range (Šoupal et al., 2020; Šoupal et al., 2016), and have better glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels.
Other approaches for non-invasive CGM under active research include sampling of the interstitial fluid with reverse iontophoresis (Rao et al., 1993; Pu et al., 2021; Leboulanger et al., 2004; Ching and Connolly, 2008; Chin et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2025), magnetic fields (Hakala et al., 2022), ultrasound (Mitragotri Samir et al., 2000; Mitragotri Sami et al., 2000), and detection of glucose through optical methods (Diessel et al., 2005; Hsieh and Zahn, 2005), radio waves (Hanna et al., 2020) and non-enzymatic glucose sensors (Yu et al., 2024; Benedetti et al., 2024; Dissanayake et al., 2025). Recent advancements in technology have removed the need for calibrating CGMs with fingerprick glucose measurements. However, the accuracy of all commercially available CGMs remains lowest in the hypoglycemic range, where the demand for accuracy is critical for effectively functioning as an alarm for hypoglycemia. Both invasive and non-invasive methods for CGM face the common challenge of lag time between the concentration of glucose in ISF and in blood. The glucose concentration in the ISF, which depends on concentration differences that change over time due to physical activities and insulin doses (Scuffi et al., 2012; Davey et al., 2010), reaches about 70% of the glucose level in the blood. According to the literature (Davey et al., 2010), there is a delay of approximately 15–20 min in this process and is influenced by factors such as local blood flow, tissue perfusion and ISF permeability (Schmelzeisen-Redeker et al., 2015). The mismatch between glucose readings from CGMs and glucose concentration in blood is of concern, particularly in the hypoglicemic range, where CGMs time lag causes CGMs glucose readings to deviate from actual glucose levels by more than 2.2 mM (40 mg/dL) in response to rapid rates of decline in glucose concentration (Davey et al., 2010). In the case of CGM sensors, the delay depends on various contributions, including physiological and technological factors. The physiological time delay in glucose sensing primarily arises from the time it takes for glucose to diffuse through capillary walls and the interstitial space before reaching the sensor (Schmelzeisen-Redeker et al., 2015). Notably, there is significant variability in these time delays among individuals and across different CGM systems. In addition to physiological delays, technological time delays can occur and are due to calculations before the results are displayed. Another contribution of delay is related to the filtering techniques used to mitigate data noise, with reported technological delays ranging from 3 to 12 min (Keenan et al., 2009; Rebrin et al., 2010). These delays are also attributed to glucose diffusion through protective membranes and the sensor’s reaction speed, such as enzymatic activity in the case of electrochemical glucose sensors currently used in CGM systems, which generally accounts for an additional few minutes. Reports indicate a wide range of overall time delays, from 5 to 40 min (Keenan et al., 2009; Rebrin et al., 2010), which may stem from differences in CGM systems or experimental conditions. However, much of the literature fails to address interindividual and intraindividual differences in these delays due to insufficient data. Additionally, the effects of glycemic ranges and patient-specific factors—such as physical activity—on time delays remain largely unexplored (Schmelzeisen-Redeker et al., 2015). This lag can significantly affect the timely detection of hypoglycemia and hyperglycemia, which are critical for effective diabetes management (Facchinetti et al., 2013; Dessi et al., 2019; Kovatchev and Cobelli, 2016). Reducing both physiological and technological time delays is essential for enhancing the accuracy and reliability of CGM systems, as these delays contribute considerably to discrepancies between CGM data and actual blood glucose values, ultimately affecting patient outcomes and timely interventions in diabetes management.
Stout et al. (2004) reported a technique for the reduction of physiological lag time with modulated pressure application to enhance local blood flow. However, the current investigation is constrained by methodological limitations, including a restricted dataset and the need for comprehensive empirical validation to assess reproducibility, sustained efficacy, and consistent performance across variable physiological parameters and glycemic trajectories. Electrical stimulation applied externally to the skin has been explored as a strategy to enhance local blood perfusion, thereby indirectly improving glucose equilibration and potentially reducing the lag in CGM measurements (Peters et al., 1998; Indergand and Morgan, 1994). The mechanisms underlying this effect have been attributed to different physiological pathways. Chen et al. (1991) reported that electrical stimulation can induce vasodilation by exciting peripheral nerves, while Tracy et al. (1988) suggested that increased perfusion results from the elevated metabolic demand of electrically induced muscle contractions. These mechanisms act primarily on microcirculatory dynamics, not directly on transdermal molecular transport. In recent years, microneedle (MN)-based platforms have been increasingly combined with reverse iontophoresis to reduce invasiveness and improve sampling efficiency (Kusama et al., 2021; Li et al., 2021; Cheng et al., 2022; Amir et al., 2025). Microneedles create microchannels through the stratum corneum, facilitating transdermal glucose extraction and enhancing electrode–skin coupling. Despite these advances, the time lag in glucose measurement often remains comparable—or even more pronounced—than in commercially available CGM systems, primarily due to diffusion and equilibration limitations within the interstitial space.
Considering these premises, this paper presents a microfluidic device that simulate a condition of physiological concentrations difference between the capillary blood and the ISF through a microfluidic channel, a semipermeable membrane, and a reservoir. The device was used to evaluate how the application of electric currents delivered through two electrodes influences the physiological behavior of glucose diffusion between the two compartments. This concept hold potential to enhance the dermal electro-osmotic flow and thus improve the delay between the glucose concentration in capillaries and in the ISF due the physiological diffusion as shown in Figure 1, especially pronounced in case of rapid fluctuations in glucose concentration. This technological concept seamlessly integrates with CGMs, offering potential to enhance patient outcomes.
Figure 1. Schematic representation of glucose diffusion enhanced by intradermal electro-osmotic flow.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Computational model
The computational model was developed to investigate glucose diffusion variation between the two compartments. The model aimed to characterize the experimental conditions, geometry and parameters governing molecular transport. This model provided a starting point for modeling diffusion between the compartments, effectively translating the real dynamics of diffusion from capillary blood to interstitial fluid within a microfluidic device over a timeframe of 20 min.
The modeling and simulation of the developed device were conducted using COMSOL Multiphysics 6.0 software. The free and porous fluid flow, as well as the transport of diluted species and the laminar flow, was modeled to represent the behavior of the microfluidic setup. The model assumes incompressible flow conditions, with Reynolds numbers ranging from 1.67 to 8.34, confirming deeply laminar flow regime. We developed a 3D model of the geometry consisting of the
The concentration values within the reservoir were assessed through the volume integral relative to the reservoir, evaluating the glucose concentration in the reservoir at different time points. The laminar flow was set in the microfluidic channel to reproduce the flow conditions defined in the real setup, with the flow established from
2.2 Device fabrication
The fabricated microfluidic chip consists of three distinct layers: (i) the lower microfluidic channel was fabricated in polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS, Sylgard 184, Dow Corning), prepared by mixing the base and curing agent in a 10:1 ratio and cast by soft lithography using an SU-8 mold. The channel had a width of 200 um and was used to simulate the capillary; (ii) the upper microfluidic channel was fabricated identical to the first. A reservoir with a diameter of 6 mm was created along the microfluidic channel by punching a hole through the PDMS using a controlled-diameter punch. This upper channel was used to simulate the ISF; (iii) a commercially available polycarbonate (PC) membrane from Whatman Cyclopore (Maidstone, United Kingdom) with a pore size of 5 um was used as an endothelial mimic layer and located at the interface between the lower microfluidic channel and the reservoir in the upper microfluidic channel. The developed and applied technique involves an optimization of the procedure reported in Jeffrey et al. (2021), including the use of 2% 3-aminopropyl triethoxysilane (APTES) solution, 28% DI water and 70% ethanol.
The bonding step was performed using an optimized version of the protocol described in Jeffrey et al. (2021), specifically adapted to avoid any alteration of the membrane’s transport properties. As shown in Figure 2a, the membrane and the lower PDMS slab containing the microfluidic channel were first activated by oxygen plasma (200 mT, 40 sccm of
Figure 2. Fabrication workflow of the microfluidic device with the integration of the Pt-wire electrodes. (a) Activation of the surface with
Finally, the assembly was chemically bond together by a post bake at 90 °C for 1 h. During the bake a weight of 200 g was applied to ensure a tight contact between the components. This process resulted in a water tight bond ensuring no leakage from the microfluidic channels.
The integration of Pt wire electrodes (diameter = 0.125 mm) was achieved via cuts made on the sides of the reservoir, and the wires were inserted to have approximately 0.9 cm of electrode in contact with the fluid in the reservoir Figure 2e). Once the electrodes were inserted and positioned at a distance of 2 mm, the cuts in the PDMS were sealed with a PDMS mortar.
2.3 Electro-diffusion device and experimental setup
Several portable and programmable devices for reverse iontophoresis have been described in the literature, mainly focusing on non-invasive monitoring and transdermal drug delivery (Tak-Shing Ching and Chih, 2014; Tak-Shing Ching et al., 2012; Ching et al., 2005).
The portable electronics used for electro-diffusion is a custom-made apparatus developed by the authors (Zompanti et al., 2024). The system is based on a 32-bit MCU (SAM3X8E), designed for the delivery of dc current, biphasic and monophasic square wave current. The electronic interface incorporates a high-precision voltage-controlled current source coupled with a current mirror and an H-Bridge, providing a wide voltage compliance range of
Considering a 0.9 cm length of the electrode in contact with the solution in the reservoir, and applying a current of 5
where:
•
•
•
•
At 500 Hz, the impedance of the medium is relatively low, and with an applied current of 5
In the case of current stimulation, the device was connected to the exposed contacts of the microfluidic device and controlled via an interface for current delivery. Concurrently, the voltage values across the load were recorded during the stimulation in order to evaluate the achieved polarization, highlighting the lower impedance encountered at high frequency and furthermore the lower voltage applied delivering the same current. The microfluidic device performance was evaluated by quantifying the transfer of glucose into the reservoir over a range of flow rates ranging from 20
2.4 Glucose measurements
Quantitative analysis of glucose concentration was performed using the D-Glucose GOPOD FORMAT enzymatic assay kit from Megazyme Ltd. (Wicklow, Ireland). At predetermined time points, 50
3 Results and discussions
The assembly of the device described in this paper uses a novel way of bonding the PC membranes to the two layers of PDMS. Most commonly, the used techniques include: (i) spin-coating of 1:1 ratio of toluene to PDMS onto glass followed by dipping the PDMS slabs to create a mortar for uniting the interfaces (Chueh et al., 2007); and (ii) functionalization of the membrane through a process based on APTES, (Jeffrey et al., 2021). However, these techniques suffer from several issues: (i) clogging of the channels due to the PDMS mortar; (ii) modification of the membrane properties through APTES treatment, which alters the diffusion characteristics of the PC membrane, leading to a reduction and instability in diffusion.
The bonding method described in the paper did not suffer from channel clogging, as no mortar-like materials were employed during the bonding procedure that could potentially obstruct the microfluidic channels.
Furthermore, membrane properties remained unaltered, since the APTES treatment was selectively applied only to surfaces not involved in fluid exchange between the reservoir and the channel.
Our bonding procedure successfully achieves strong interfacial adhesion between the three layers while crucially preserving the membrane’s diffusion properties - a significant improvement over the previously reported techniques which compromised membrane functionality.
The diffusion rate was tested under three flow rate conditions: 20
Figure 3. The time-course glucose concentration in the receiver chamber at different timepoints for various flow rates: (i) in blue 20
The computational model has allowed for the estimation of the diffusivity coefficient of glucose through the PC membrane, which is
Subsequently, the diffusion test was repeated under current stimulation. Two stimulation patterns were applied: (i) square wave current (Figure 4 in red) and (ii) DC current (Figure 4 in blue) for 5 min. The corresponding voltage signals are shown in Figure 4. The application of an electric field enhances permeability and attracts ions in the solution toward the electrodes, which in turn facilitates the movement of neutral species, such as glucose, at physiological pH. The use of controlled square wave currents allows for lower voltage values between the electrodes due to the reduced impedance encountered at 500 Hz, as well as minimizing the Joule heating effect.
Figure 4. The voltage drop across the two electrodes during current-controlled electrical stimulation: in blue, the voltage at the electrodes during the application of direct current; in red, the voltage across the two electrodes during the application of the square wave current at 500 Hz, 50% duty cycle, and 5
Figure 5 shows the measured glucose concentration after 5 min under current stimulation. The diffusion achieved through DC stimulation and square wave stimulation increased of 2.8 and 3.9 times in average, respectively, compared to diffusion without stimulation. This corresponds to a passive concentration at 5 min of 0.27
Figure 5. Electro-osmotic flow enhancement in diffusion dynamics: comparative analysis of diffusion mechanisms under varying applied current to enhance electro-osmotic flow. (i) In white, passive diffusion at 50
Based on the obtained results, it appears that pulsed current produces effects on glucose diffusion comparable to those of DC current, consistent with findings reported in literature about Na+ transport (Bagn et al., 1990). At lower frequencies (100 Hz), medium impedance is higher, leading to larger voltage drops and increased electrode polarization, which reduces net transport. At higher frequencies (
Figure 6. Impedance stability of electrodes under continuous stimulation. Measurements of modulus and phase were performed at 0, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h of continuous monophasic stimulation at 5
These preliminary results lead to considerations about the possibility of leveraging electric stimulation to accelerate physiological diffusion in situations with sudden rate changes. These changes are triggered by insulin-related phenomena, stress and physical activity, where sensor response becomes critically important for patients, especially for making compensatory clinical decisions. The delay phenomena, caused by physiological diffusion lag and technological delay, can be minimized to reduce the time gap between capillary concentration and ISF concentration. Moreover, the technological delay persists in the measurement delay contribution due both to the response times of the enzymatic sensor and to the computational times. This delay contribution can be reduced by introducing a non-enzymatic glucose sensor to construct a fully robust system (Wei et al., 2020; Hwang et al., 2018; Abbasnia et al., 2024; Franceschini and Taurino, 2022; Franceschini et al., 2023).
Although the proposed microfluidic platform provides a controlled and reproducible environment to investigate magnitude gradient of glucose transport, it represents a simplified model of the complex architecture of the dermal interstitial space diffusion. In particular, static reservoirs and the polycarbonate membrane do not fully reproduce the heterogeneous extracellular matrix present in vivo, which includes collagen networks, binding proteins, and cellular components that influence diffusion and fluid dynamics. These structural and biochemical features are not captured in the current model, constituting an intrinsic limitation.
However, it is important to note that the primary objective of this study was not to fully replicate the in vivo dermal environment, but rather to validate the concept that low-intensity electrical stimulation can enhance glucose transport across a defined barrier. These simplified system allows precise control over experimental variables and the isolation of electro-osmotic effects without confounding factors from cellular metabolism or matrix complexity.
Moreover, the diffusion delays measured in our system under passive conditions are within the range reported in continuous glucose monitoring studies (15–20 min), supporting the translational relevance of the model. For future work, more physiologically representative platforms could include collagen-based hydrogels with cellular components, which would better mimic the mechanical, tortuous, and reactive nature of the interstitial space. Despite these simplifications, the present in vitro model effectively demonstrates the potential of pulsed electrical currents to accelerate glucose transport, providing a foundation for future bioengineered systems.
4 Conclusion
In the present work, we have presented and validated a novel approach to reduce the delay present in commercial CGMs caused by physiological diffusion lag time between capillary blood and ISF. To achieve this, we fabricated an experimental setup, which allowed us to obtain experimental results of glucose diffusion rates under current stimulation. We demonstrated that using a low current density of 140
Although our microfluidic setup offers important insights into glucose diffusion under electrical stimulation, it represents an approximation of the in vivo dermal environment. Future studies will focus on validating these findings in more physiologically relevant models.
The proposed technology can be optimized to simulate a continuous trend throughout the day. In this way, we can evaluate the effects of stimulation techniques on intradermal diffusion, allowing for significant progress toward lag-free glucose sensors. Beyond diabetes applications, this technology can be integrated into any minimally invasive sensor to reduce the lag time and improve sensor accuracy in monitoring molecules diffusing from capillary blood to ISF.
Beyond diabetes applications, this proof-of-concept can be integrated into any minimally invasive sensor to reduce lag time and improve accuracy in monitoring molecules diffusing from capillary blood to ISF. For practical wearable applications, future developments will focus on miniaturization and integration with CGM sensors. In addition, the impact of electrical stimulation on sensor performance will be assessed to ensure safe operation and reliable biosensing.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors upon request.
Author contributions
DC: Conceptualization, Data curation, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. RV: Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review and editing. NI: Methodology, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review and editing. AZ: Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review and editing. SG: Data curation, Formal Analysis, Writing – review and editing. LdB: Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review and editing. MS: Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review and editing. GP: Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review and editing. IT: Conceptualization, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declared that financial support was not received for this work and/or its publication.
Conflict of interest
The author(s) declared that this work was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declared that generative AI was not used in the creation of this manuscript.
Any alternative text (alt text) provided alongside figures in this article has been generated by Frontiers with the support of artificial intelligence and reasonable efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, including review by the authors wherever possible. If you identify any issues, please contact us.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Abbasnia Tehrani, M., Ahmadi, S. H., Alimohammadi, S., Sasanpour, P., Batvani, N., Habib Kazemi, S., et al. (2024). Continuous glucose monitoring using wearable non-enzymatic sensors in a physiological environment. Biosens. Bioelectron. X 18, 100482. doi:10.1016/j.biosx.2024.100482
Amir, M., Rosa, M. A., Debeer, L., Vercooren, N., Franceschini, F., Van Den Eeckhoudt, R., et al. (2025). Cleanroom-compatible polymeric nanostructured microneedle patch for advanced wearable applications. Biosens. Bioelectron. 288, 117806. doi:10.1016/j.bios.2025.117806
Bagniefski, T., and Burnette, R. R. (1990). A comparison of pulsed and continuous current iontophoresis. J. Control. Release 11 (1-3), 113–122. doi:10.1016/0168-3659(90)90125-d
Benedetti, T. M., Somerville, S. V., Wordsworth, J., Yamamoto, Y., Schuhmann, W., Tilley, R. D., et al. (2024). An artificial enzyme: how nanoconfinement allows the selective electrochemical detection of glucose directly in whole blood. Adv. Funct. Mater. 34 (30), 2400322. doi:10.1002/adfm.202400322
Cengiz, E., and Tamborlane, W. V. (2009). A tale of two compartments: interstitial blood glucose monitoring. Diabetes Technol. Therap. 11 (S1), S11–S16. doi:10.1089/dia.2009.0002
Charleer, S., De Block, C., Van Huffel, L., Broos, B., Fieuws, S., Nobels, F., et al. (2020). Quality of life and glucose control after 1 year of nationwide reimbursement of intermittently scanned continuous glucose monitoring in adults living with type 1 diabetes (future): a prospective observational real-world cohort study. Diabetes Care 43 (2), 389–397. doi:10.2337/dc19-1610
Chen, J. Q., Yonehara, N., Imai, Y., Xu, W. J., and Inoki, R. (1991). Effects of morphine on cutaneous blood flow and substance p release evoked by electric stimulation of rat sciatic nerve. Zhongguo Yao Li Xue Bao= Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 12 (4), 355–357.
Cheng, Y., Gong, X., Yang, J., Zheng, G., Zheng, Y., Li, Y., et al. (2022). A touch-actuated glucose sensor fully integrated with microneedle array and reverse iontophoresis for diabetes monitoring. Biosens. Bioelectron. 203, 114026. doi:10.1016/j.bios.2022.114026
Ching, C. T. S., Buisson, Y., and Connolly, P. (2008). The effect of pulsed bipolar dc on the simultaneous extraction of glucose and lactate by reverse iontophoresis. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 129 (2), 504–509. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2007.08.045
Ching, C. T. S., and Connolly, P. (2008). Reverse iontophoresis: a non-invasive technique for measuring blood lactate level. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 129 (1), 352–358. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2007.08.031
Ching, C. T. S., Camilleri, I., and Connolly, P. (2005). A low-cost, programmable device for versatile current delivery in iontophoresis applications. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 106 (2), 534–540. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2004.07.022
Chueh, B., Huh, D., Kyrtsos, C. R., Houssin, T., Futai, N., and Takayama, S. (2007). Leakage-free bonding of porous membranes into layered microfluidic array systems. Anal. Chem. 79 (9), 3504–3508. doi:10.1021/ac062118p
Davey, R. J., Low, C., Jones, T. W., and Fournier, P. A. (2010). Contribution of an intrinsic lag of continuous glucose monitoring systems to differences in measured and actual glucose concentrations changing at variable rates in vitro. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 4 (6), 1393–1399. doi:10.1177/193229681000400614
Dessi, P. Z., Turksoy, K., McGaugh, S. M., Pooni, R., Todd, V., Ly, T., et al. (2019). Lag time remains with newer real-time continuous glucose monitoring technology during aerobic exercise in adults living with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Technol. Therap. 21 (6), 313–321. doi:10.1089/dia.2018.0364
Diessel, E., Kamphaus, P., Grothe, K., Kurte, R., Damm, U., and Heise, H. M. (2005). Nanoliter serum sample analysis by mid-infrared spectroscopy for minimally invasive blood-glucose monitoring. Appl. Spectroscopy 59 (4), 442–451. doi:10.1366/0003702053641360
Dissanayake, M., Somerville, S. V., Soda, Y., Yao, Y., Duong, H. T. K., Tilley, R. D., et al. (2025). An array of glucose nanozymes that can selectively detect glucose in whole blood. ACS Sensors 10 (1), 545–552. doi:10.1021/acssensors.4c03106
Dye, L., Mansfield, M., Lasikiewicz, N., Mahawish, L., Schnell, R., Talbot, D., et al. (2010). Correspondence of continuous interstitial glucose measurement against arterialised and capillary glucose following an oral glucose tolerance test in healthy volunteers. Br. J. Nutr. 103 (1), 134–140. doi:10.1017/S0007114509991504
Facchinetti, A., Sparacino, G., Guerra, S., Luijf, Y. M., DeVries, J. H., Mader, J. K., et al. (2013). Real-time improvement of continuous glucose monitoring accuracy: the smart sensor concept. Diabetes Care 36 (4), 793–800. doi:10.2337/dc12-0736
Fokkert, M., Dijk, P. V., Edens, M., Barents, E., Mollema, J., Slingerland, R., et al. (2019). Improved well-being and decreased disease burden after 1-year use of flash glucose monitoring (flare-nl4). BMJ Open Diabetes Res. Care 7 (1), e000809. doi:10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000809
Franceschini, F., and Taurino, I. (2022). Nickel-based catalysts for non-enzymatic electrochemical sensing of glucose: a review. Phys. Med. 14, 100054. doi:10.1016/j.phmed.2022.100054
Franceschini, F., Payo, M. R., Schouteden, K., Ustarroz, J., Locquet, J. P., and Taurino, I. (2023). Mbe grown vanadium oxide thin films for enhanced non-enzymatic glucose sensing. Adv. Funct. Mater. 33 (43), 2304037. doi:10.1002/adfm.202304037
Galicia-Garcia, U., Benito-Vicente, A., Jebari, S., Larrea-Sebal, A., Siddiqi, H., Uribe, K. B., et al. (2020). Pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21 (17), 6275. doi:10.3390/ijms21176275
Hakala, T. A., Zschaechner, L. K., Vänskä, R. T., Nurminen, T. A., Wardale, M., Morina, J., et al. (2022). Pilot study in human healthy volunteers on the use of magnetohydrodynamics in needle-free continuous glucose monitoring. Sci. Rep. 12 (1), 18318. doi:10.1038/s41598-022-21424-9
Hanna, J., Bteich, M., Tawk, Y., Ramadan, A. H., Dia, B., Asadallah, F. A., et al. (2020). Noninvasive, wearable, and tunable electromagnetic multisensing system for continuous glucose monitoring, mimicking vasculature anatomy. Sci. Adv. 6 (24), eaba5320. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aba5320
Harding, J. L., Pavkov, M. E., Magliano, D. J., Shaw, J. E., and Gregg, E. W. (2019). Global trends in diabetes complications: a review of current evidence. Diabetologia 62, 3–16. doi:10.1007/s00125-018-4711-2
Hsieh, Y.-C., and Zahn, J. D. (2005). Glucose recovery in a microfluidic microdialysis biochip. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 107 (2), 649–656. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2004.11.039
Hwang, D.-W., Lee, S., Seo, M., and Chung, T. D. (2018). Recent advances in electrochemical non-enzymatic glucose sensors–a review. Anal. Chimica Acta 1033, 1–34. doi:10.1016/j.aca.2018.05.051
Indergand, H. J., and Morgan, B. J. (1994). Effects of high-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on limb blood flow in healthy humans. Phys. Therapy 74 (4), 361–367. doi:10.1093/ptj/74.4.361
Jeffrey, F., Pei, Z., and Ren, C. L. (2021). Effect of surface roughness on bond strength between pcte membranes and pdms towards microfluidic applications. Int. J. Adhesion Adhesives 106, 102800. doi:10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.102800
Keenan, D. B., Mastrototaro, J. J., Voskanyan, G., and Steil, G. M. (2009). Delays in minimally invasive continuous glucose monitoring devices: a review of current technology. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 3 (5), 1207–1214. doi:10.1177/193229680900300528
Kono, M., Takahashi, T., Nakamura, H., Miyaki, T., and Rekimoto, J. (2018). Design guideline for developing safe systems that apply electricity to the human body. ACM Trans. Computer-Human Interact. (TOCHI) 25 (3), 1–36. doi:10.1145/3184743
Kovatchev, B., and Cobelli, C. (2016). Glucose variability: timing, risk analysis, and relationship to hypoglycemia in diabetes. Diabetes Care 39 (4), 502–510. doi:10.2337/dc15-2035
Kusama, S., Sato, K., Matsui, Y., Kimura, N., Abe, H., Yoshida, S., et al. (2021). Transdermal electroosmotic flow generated by a porous microneedle array patch. Nat. Commun. 12 (1), 658. doi:10.1038/s41467-021-20948-4
Leboulanger, B., Guy, R. H., and Delgado-Charro, M. B. (2004). Reverse iontophoresis for non-invasive transdermal monitoring. Physiol. Measure. 25 (3), R35–R50. doi:10.1088/0967-3334/25/3/r01
Li, X., Huang, X., Mo, J., Wang, H., Huang, Q., Yang, C., et al. (2021). A fully integrated closed-loop system based on mesoporous microneedles-iontophoresis for diabetes treatment. Adv. Sci. 8 (16), 2100827. doi:10.1002/advs.202100827
Mitragotri, S., Coleman, M., Kost, J., and Langer, R. (2000a). Transdermal extraction of analytes using low-frequency ultrasound. Pharm. Res. 17, 466–470. doi:10.1023/a:1007537222591
Mitragotri, S., Coleman, M., Kost, J., and Langer, R. (2000b). Analysis of ultrasonically extracted interstitial fluid as a predictor of blood glucose levels. J. Appl. Physiol. 89, 961–966. doi:10.1152/jappl.2000.89.3.961
Ogurtsova, K., Fernandes, J. D. da R., Huang, Y., Linnenkamp, U., Guariguata, L., Cho, N. H., et al. (2017). Idf diabetes atlas: global estimates for the prevalence of diabetes for 2015 and 2040. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 128, 40–50. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2017.03.024
Peters, E. J. G., Armstrong, D. G., Wunderlich, R. P., Bosma, J., Stacpoole-Shea, S., and Lavery, L. A. (1998). The benefit of electrical stimulation to enhance perfusion in persons with diabetes mellitus. J. Foot Ankle Surg. 37 (5), 396–400. doi:10.1016/s1067-2516(98)80048-3
Pu, Z., Zhang, X., Yu, H., Tu, J., Chen, H., Liu, Y., et al. (2021). A thermal activated and differential self-calibrated flexible epidermal biomicrofluidic device for wearable accurate blood glucose monitoring. Sci. Adv. 7 (5), eabd0199. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abd0199
Rao, G., Glikfeld, P., and Guy, R. H. (1993). Reverse iontophoresis: development of a noninvasive approach for glucose monitoring. Pharm. Res. 10, 1751–1755. doi:10.1023/a:1018926215306
Rebrin, K., Norman, F., Sheppard, J., and Steil, G. M. (2010). Use of subcutaneous interstitial fluid glucose to estimate blood glucose: revisiting delay and sensor offset. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 4, 1087–1098. doi:10.1177/193229681000400507
Sansalone, V., Kaiser, J., Naili, S., and Lemaire, T. (2013). Interstitial fluid flow within bone canaliculi and electro-chemo-mechanical features of the canalicular milieu: a multi-parametric sensitivity analysis. Biomech. Model. Mechanobiol. 12, 533–553. doi:10.1007/s10237-012-0422-7
Schmelzeisen-Redeker, G., Schoemaker, M., Kirchsteiger, H., Freckmann, G., Heinemann, L., and Re, L. D. (2015). Time delay of cgm sensors: relevance, causes, and countermeasures. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 9 (5), 1006–1015. doi:10.1177/1932296815590154
Scuffi, C., Lucarelli, F., and Valgimigli, F. (2012). Minimizing the impact of time lag variability on accuracy evaluation of continuous glucose monitoring systems. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol. 6 (6), 1383–1391. doi:10.1177/193229681200600618
Šoupal, J., Petruželková, L., Flekač, M., Pelcl, T., Matoulek, M., Daňková, M., et al. (2016). Comparison of different treatment modalities for type 1 diabetes, including sensor-augmented insulin regimens, in 52 weeks of follow-up: a comisair study. Diabetes Technol. Therap. 18 (9), 532–538. doi:10.1089/dia.2016.0171
Šoupal, J., Petruželková, L., Grunberger, G., Hásková, A., Flekač, M., Matoulek, M., et al. (2020). Glycemic outcomes in adults with t1d are impacted more by continuous glucose monitoring than by insulin delivery method: 3 years of follow-up from the comisair study. Diabetes Care 43 (1), 37–43. doi:10.2337/dc19-0888
Stout, P. J., Racchini, J. R., and Hilgers, M. E. (2004). A novel approach to mitigating the physiological lag between blood and interstitial fluid glucose measurements. Diabetes Technol. Therapeutics 6 (5), 635–644. doi:10.1089/dia.2004.6.635
Tak-Shing Ching, C., and Chih, W.-Y. (2014). Design and evaluation of an affordable and programmable mobile device, capable of delivering constant current and high voltage electric pulses of different waveforms for biomedical and clinical applications. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 194, 361–370. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2013.12.107
Tak-Shing Ching, C., Sun, T.-P., Huang, W.-T., Huang, S.-H., Hsiao, C.-S., and Chang, K.-M. (2012). A circuit design of a low-cost, portable and programmable electroporation device for biomedical applications. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 166, 292–300. doi:10.1016/j.snb.2012.02.065
Tracy, J. E., Currier, D. P., and Joseph Threlkeld, A. (1988). Comparison of selected pulse frequencies from two different electrical stimulators on blood flow in healthy subjects. Phys. Therapy 68 (10), 1526–1532.
Wang, Q., Jiao, C., Chen, W., Li, L., Zhang, X., Guo, Z., et al. (2025). Reusable gallium-based electrochemical sensor for efficient glucose detection. Biosens. Bioelectron. 268, 116858. doi:10.1016/j.bios.2024.116858
Wei, M., Qiao, Y., Zhao, H., Liang, J., Li, T., Luo, Y., et al. (2020). Electrochemical non-enzymatic glucose sensors: recent progress and perspectives. Chem. Commun. 56 (93), 14553–14569. doi:10.1039/d0cc05650b
Yu, J., Chen, T., Wen, X., Shi, H., Wang, L., and Xu, Y. (2024). Highly selective nanozyme-based glucose sensing platform via construction of artificial recognition sites on gold nanospheres. Biosens. Bioelectron. 253, 116169. doi:10.1016/j.bios.2024.116169
Zompanti, A., Ciarrocchi, D., Grasso, S., Olivieri, R., Ferri, G., Santonico, M., et al. (2024). Improving electrical stimulation effectiveness and versatility for non-invasive transdermal monitoring applications via an innovative mixed-signal electronic interface. Sensors 24 (23), 7626. doi:10.3390/s24237626
Keywords: continuous glucose monitoring, diabetes, electrical stimulation, electro-osmotic flow, interstitial fluid, lag time reduction, low current density, microfluidic chip
Citation: Ciarrocchi D, Van den Eeckhoudt R, Izni Rusli N, Zompanti A, Grasso S, di Biase L, Santonico M, Pennazza G and Taurino I (2026) Breaking through lag: enhancing intradermal electro-osmotic flow and the future of delay-free continuous glucose monitoring. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 13:1717650. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1717650
Received: 02 October 2025; Accepted: 29 December 2025;
Published: 16 January 2026.
Edited by:
Made Adi Paramartha Putra, Primakara University, IndonesiaCopyright © 2026 Ciarrocchi, Van den Eeckhoudt, Izni Rusli, Zompanti, Grasso, di Biase, Santonico, Pennazza and Taurino. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Davide Ciarrocchi, ZGF2aWRlLmNpYXJyb2NjaGlAdW5pY2FtcHVzLml0
Nurul Izni Rusli3