Hypoxia-Modified Cancer Cell Metabolism
Wafaa Al Tameemi
Tina P. Dale
Rakad M. Kh Al-Jumaily
Nicholas R. Forsyth1*- 1Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Institute for Science and Technology in Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, United Kingdom
- 2Department of Biology, College of Science, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, Iraq
While oxygen is critical to the continued existence of complex organisms, extreme levels of oxygen within a system, known as hypoxia (low levels of oxygen) and hyperoxia (excessive levels of oxygen), potentially promote stress within a defined biological environment. The consequences of tissue hypoxia, a result of a defective oxygen supply, vary in response to the gravity, extent and environment of the malfunction. Persistent pathological hypoxia is incompatible with normal biological functions, and as a result, multicellular organisms have been compelled to develop both organism-wide and cellular-level hypoxia solutions. Both direct, including oxidative phosphorylation down-regulation and inhibition of fatty-acid desaturation, and indirect processes, including altered hypoxia-sensitive transcription factor expression, facilitate the metabolic modifications that occur in response to hypoxia. Due to the dysfunctional vasculature associated with large areas of some cancers, sections of these tumors continue to develop in hypoxic environments. Crucial to drug development, a robust understanding of the significance of these metabolism changes will facilitate our understanding of cancer cell survival. This review defines our current knowledge base of several of the hypoxia-instigated modifications in cancer cell metabolism and exemplifies the correlation between metabolic change and its support of the hypoxic-adapted malignancy.
Introduction
Hypoxic regions, areas of reduced tissue oxygen levels, are found in many solid tumors occurring as a consequence of the disordered vasculature developed to supply oxygen to the rapidly growing tumor. In cancer patients tumor hypoxia leads to a poor prognosis (Vaupel, 2008) due to the potential of increased malignancy, resistance to both chemotherapy and radiation treatment, and an increased likelihood of metastasis (Höckel and Vaupel, 2001). In comparison to normal human tissues where the oxygen tension typically exceeds 40 mmHg, in tumors an oxygen tension of 0–20 mmHg may persist (Vaupel et al., 1989). Hypoxia typically arises in solid tumors at a distance of approximately 100 μm from a functional blood vessel (Helmlinger et al., 1997).
Tumor cells are exposed to a continuum of oxygen concentrations and consequently solid tumors are comprised of three tissue regions: the normoxic, hypoxic and necrotic (Figure 1). Situated nearby functional blood vessels normoxic cells are typically viable and proliferative. At distances of 150 μm from patent blood vessels cells may become anoxic, giving rise to patches of necrosis. Peri-necrotic cells are typically hypoxic and capable of existing at very low oxygen concentrations (PO2 ≤ 1%) (Hall and Giaccia, 2006). In normal cells, hypoxia typically leads to cell death. Counter-intuitively, however, hypoxia can induce genomic changes that enable tumor cells to adapt to poor nutrition and the hostile microenvironment, thus remaining viable. Consequently, hypoxia exerts a selection pressure that leads to the survival of subpopulations of viable cells with the genetic machinery for malignant progression (Vaupel and Harrison, 2004). Tumors can overcome the proliferation limitations posed by the stressful microenvironment by stimulating the production of new blood vessels via the release of hypoxia-inducible angiogenic factors, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) to develop a new blood supply (Seo et al., 2014). Paradoxically, following neovascularization in solid tumor tissue, which consists of poorly organized, elongated, dilated, twisted and blind-ended blood vessels, oxygen supply for the tumor may still be deficient (Helmlinger et al., 1997).
Figure 1. Hypoxic regions of solid tumors. Tumors contain regions of oxygenated cells situated near to blood vessels, becoming increasingly hypoxic with increased distance from a functional blood supply.
In human tumors hypoxia presents as one of two classes, chronic or acute forms, based on the conventional categorization common in research and medical oncology (Höckel and Vaupel, 2001; Vaupel et al., 2001). As noted by Vaupel et al. (2001) and Vaupel and Harrison (2004), the structural and functional abnormalities arising from the chaotic vasculature and structure of a tumor, including dilated, elongated and twisted blood vessels, poor endothelium, reduced functional cell receptors, no regulation of blood flow, which results in spontaneous stasis, result in poor oxygen delivery as a consequence of inadequate blood flow. This form of hypoxia is termed ischemic hypoxia and is generally transient (Vaupel et al., 2001; Vaupel and Harrison, 2004). Chronic, diffusion-limited hypoxia results from an imbalance of oxygen supply and demand due to an increase in diffusion distance with tumor growth, where rapid tumor expansion results in tumor tissue at distances further than 70–150 μm from patent blood vessels receiving insufficient oxygen. Occasionally, anemic hypoxia can arise, initiated by a decreased capacity of the blood to transport oxygen when anemia is induced by chemotherapy (Vaupel et al., 2001). Both acute and chronic hypoxia are correlated with poor patient outcome and an aggressive tumor phenotype (Williams et al., 2001; Vaupel and Harrison, 2004).
Cellular Responses and Adaptations to Hypoxia
Hypoxia induces both proteomic and genomic changes within tumor cells (Figure 2). Proteomic changes may initiate cell cycle arrest, differentiation, necrosis and apoptosis (Lee and Lin, 2017). Additionally, hypoxia- induced proteomic changes may also stimulate tumor growth, invasion and metastasis by facilitating acclimatization and survival in a hostile, nutrient-deprived environment (Vaupel and Harrison, 2004). At a molecular level, the adaptation of tumor cells to hypoxic stress is regulated largely by hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF), a transcription factor which accumulates in response to decreased cellular oxygen levels (Schito and Rey, 2017; Wolff et al., 2017).
Figure 2. The role of hypoxia in the cancer-specific biological pathways. In hypoxic conditions, cancer cell metabolism undergoes a shift from oxidative phosphorylation to aerobic glycolysis. Additionally, hypoxia regulates cell proliferation and supports evasion of apoptosis by the tumor cells. Furthermore, hypoxia contributes to the changes that confer limitless replicative potential and to the expression of genes, allowing invasion, and metastasis.
Hypoxia-Inducible Factors (HIFs) the Key Operator in Hypoxia Signaling
Three human HIF family members have been identified, HIF-1, HIF-2, and HIF-3, these heterodimers comprise of α subunit and β subunit, which dissociate in normoxic conditions (Figure 3). Of the three isoforms, HIF-1 is frequently overexpressed in tumor cells (Weidemann and Johnson, 2008; Robinson et al., 2017), with HIF-2 [endothelial PAS domain protein 1 (EPAS1)] strongly expressed by subsets of tumor-associated macrophages (Talks et al., 2000) and HIF-3 expressed in pulmonary alveolar epithelial cells (Li et al., 2006) and in human kidney (Yang et al., 2015). The most extensive characterization has been provided for HIF-1α. Although the DNA binding and dimerization domains of HIF-1α and HIF-2α are similar from a structural perspective, the transactivation domains of these two forms are dissimilar. This may be the reason for the genome wide screen detection of the binding of both forms to identical (hypoxia-response elements) HRE consensus sites, but with a different transcriptional responses being activated (Mole et al., 2009). Another difference is that HIF-1α has all-pervasive expression, whereas HIF-2α expression is more limited to specific tissues (Hu et al., 2003; Bhatia et al., 2013). On the whole, the two forms react to hypoxia through different biological actions (Loboda et al., 2010). To give an example, the transcription of genes that encode enzymes participating in glycolysis is regulated solely by HIF-1α as observed by Hu et al. (2003). By contrast, HIF-2α is believed to play a role in adjustment to high altitudes (van Patot and Gassmann, 2011). In the case of human colon cancer, HIF-1α staining was strong whilst HIF-2α staining was weak in late stage tumors, whereas the opposite has been documented in early stage tumors. This phenomenon has prompted Imamura et al. (2009) to deduce that the involvement of HIF-1α and HIF-2α in human colon cancer was not the same (Imamura et al., 2009). On the other hand, the transactivation domain is absent from HIF-3α which means that this form possesses a suppressive effect, preventing HIF-1α from initiating transcription by binding to it. Due to this action, HIF-3α is also referred to as the ‘inhibitory Per-Arnt-Sim PAS domain’ (IPAS) (Weidemann and Johnson, 2008).
Figure 3. Activation and degradation of the hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α). In normoxia HIF-1α is rapidly degraded, while it accumulates in hypoxic conditions. HIF-1α associates with HIF-1β and the resulting heterodimer binds to the hypoxia response element (HRE) of target genes.
The transcription of HIF-1α does not require oxygen, however, in normoxia, HIF-1α is rapidly degraded (Kaelin et al., 2016). Degradation of HIF-1α under normoxic conditions is a ubiquitin-mediated process, activated by the tumor suppressor protein pVHL (von-Hippel-Lindau protein). In contrast, ARNT ((Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor Nuclear Translocator), also known as HIF-1β) is not downregulated by oxygen and is constitutively present. At low oxygen levels, HIF-1α is stabilized and translocates from the cytoplasm into the nucleus where it binds to its heterodimeric partner ARNT, inducing a conformational change and the formation of active HIF-1 (Zimna and Kurpisz, 2015). Over 100 genes are regulated directly and indirectly by HIF (Goda and Kanai, 2012; Semenza, 2012a), the active form of which binds to a HRE in the target gene promoter region. These genes are implicated in a myriad of functions, including the promotion of angiogenesis, erythropoiesis, cell growth and proliferation, invasion/metastasis and metabolic adaptation. Many of the genes induced by HIF-1 are highly expressed in tumors relative to normal tissues, for example VEGF, Glucose transporter 1, Glucose transporter 3, Insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 and -3, Insulin-like growth factor II, Transforming growth factor-β3 and p21 (Maxwell et al., 2001; Masoud and Li, 2015). In HIF induced angiogenesis, the extent of neo-vascularization implicates HIF-mediated expression of the two key angiogenic factors, VEGF-A and angiopoietin-2 (Brahimi-Horn and Pouysségur, 2007).
The Role of Hypoxia in Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs)
In common with normal adult stem cells (ASCs), cancer stem cells (CSCs) are undifferentiated self-renewing cells able to form a heterogeneous population of daughter cells. Under atmospheric oxygen conditions (21%), in vitro stem cells lose their stemness characteristics (Simon and Keith, 2008). In vivo, ASCs are maintained in hypoxic conditions, typically defined as 1% oxygen; an example being haematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) that reside in the hypoxic endosteal regions of bone marrow (Kubota et al., 2008). CSCs also favor hypoxic sites within tumors (Das et al., 2008), enabling the cells to maintain their undifferentiated state. As with ASCs, differentiation occurs in in vitro populations of cells under physiologically normal levels of oxygen (Jögi et al., 2002; Heddleston et al., 2009).
The stimulation of cancer cell stemness by HIFs is well documented, with studies revealing HIF-1α and HIF-2α to be central to CSC stemness. Upregulation of HIF-1α, which heralds CSC proliferation, is essential for CSC survival in hypoxic conditions (Lau et al., 2017). HIF-2α is also key to CSC survival and it co–localizes with CSC markers. HIF-1α and HIF-2α are both essential for maintaining stem–like properties and CSC survival (Li et al., 2009). The contributions made by HIF-1α and HIF-2α in maintaining the stem–like state of CSCs differ (Li et al., 2009). As previously mentioned HIF-1α binds to and stimulates the genes for survival in low oxygen conditions, such as those of the glycolysis pathway. On the other hand, the target structures of HIF-2α are stem cell upkeep genes, including Notch, octamer-binding transcription factor 4 (Oct4) and the sex determining region Y-box 2 (Sox2). This differentiation of function suggests that stemness may be influenced more by HIF-2α than HIF-1α (Covello et al., 2006; Keith et al., 2012).
A significant challenge for clinicians treating cancer is chemotherapy resistance leading to a poor therapeutic response, and in turn, to relapse (Dean et al., 2005). One mechanism of resistance can be attributed to the capacity of CSCs to evade and resist chemotherapy by virtue of their stem cell qualities. CSCs can adopt slow cycling growth, known as quiescence, enabling the cells to avoid those therapies that target rapidly dividing cells; additionally, the survival signaling pathways can be modified preventing cell death (Clarke and Hass, 2006). Moreover, the self-renewing capability of CSCs leads them to act as reservoir cells, facilitating cancer reoccurrence (Clarke and Hass, 2006; Holohan et al., 2013; Schöning et al., 2017). Using a murine model Saito et al. (2010) used chemical stimuli to induce CSCs present in the hypoxic endosteal region of the bone marrow to enter the cell cycle. When combined with chemotherapy, the survival of mice with leukemia was increased by this treatment methodology (Saito et al., 2010). Thus, maintaining CSCs in hypoxic microenvironments sustains the cells’ quiescent state and consequently, they are able to resist most chemotherapy interventions (Schöning et al., 2017).
The Role of Hypoxia in the Tumor Stroma
Rather than only being determined by cancer cells, cancer progression is the product of the entire tumor microenvironment, including cancer cells, extracellular matrix (ECM) and stroma (Hanahan and Coussens, 2012). Through inhibition of the expression of Bid, the pro-apoptotic Bcl-2-family protein, HIF-1 reduces apoptosis (Erler et al., 2004). HIF-1 also stimulates expression of survivin, an apoptosis inhibitor (Peng et al., 2006). These mechanisms enable cancer cells to endure; they are protected from the punishing hypoxic environment and reduce the cells’ susceptibility to drug actions (Erler et al., 2004).
The growth of cancer cells can result from autocrine signaling. By having growth factor receptors on the membrane, these cells can stimulate their own growth and survival by secreting growth factors. During tumor development stromal cells are in close proximity with cancer cells thus these same growth factors modify the phenotypic behavior of surrounding stromal cells to promote tumors (Semenza, 2012b). Furthermore, cancer cell invasion and metastasis is promoted by hypoxia. Under such conditions, cancer cells experience greater motility and invasiveness by encouraging epithelial to mesenchymal transition. The mechanism responsible for this is upregulated expression of the transcription factors Snail Family Transcriptional Repressor 1 (Snail1), Snail Family Transcriptional Repressor 2 (Snail2), and Twist. As a result, the expression of E-cadherin, which is a key component of adherens junctions, is downregulated (Schwab et al., 2012). Cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) are primary tumor stroma components (Cirri and Chiarugi, 2012; Lau et al., 2017). CAFs act in a paracrine manner, encouraging tumor growth and sustaining CSCs’ stemness property (Forsberg et al., 1993; Giannoni et al., 2010). Research shows that CAFs are a heterogeneous population, of which the majority adopt the activated phenotype, exhibiting increased secretion of ECM, growth factors and proteases, greater contractile force, and proliferation activity (Tao et al., 2017). There are numerous origins of CAFs, varying with different forms of cancer. Several studies reveal that by secreting signaling molecules, cancer cells cause resting fibroblasts to become CAFs. Such signals include basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), interleukin-6 (IL-6), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) (Tao et al., 2017).
HIF-1 contributes to the behavior of normal fibroblasts and CAFs; furthermore, HIF-1α demonstrates tumor-promoting capability. Elevated tumor growth has been observed in studies that use the active form of HIF-1α expressed by human skin fibroblasts co-injected with MDA-MB-231 cells. The same effect was not detected with HIF-2α. It is proposed that activating HIF-1α initiates autophagy and aerobic glycolysis; this provides cells surrounding the cancer cells with the energy necessary to promote their growth (Chiavarina et al., 2010).
HIF Hydroxylation
Under conditions of normoxia, hydroxylation of the two proline residues located in the oxygen dependent degradation domain (ODDD) region by prolyl-4-hydroxylase domain (PHD) enzyme and lysine (Lys532) acylation by acetyl-transferase-arrest-defective-1 (ARD-33 1) enzyme activity (Dengler et al., 2014) destabilizes the HIF-α subunits. Subsequent to hydroxylation and acetylation, HIF-α is identified by p-VHL tumor suppressor resulting in poly-ubiquitination by E3 ubiquitin-ligase; and this complex is then further degraded by proteasome 26S (Masoud and Li, 2015). A further hydroxylation reaction takes place on Asparagine 803 on the C-terminal domain of HIF-α. This hydroxylation is due to factor inhibiting HIF (FIH), which restricts co-activation with p300, thereby inhibiting HIF transcriptional activation (Masoud and Li, 2015). Prolyl-hydroxylase and asparagine hydroxylase are both members of the oxygen-dependent hydroxylase families whose catalytic properties are dependent upon oxygen, and are viewed as the cellular detectors for oxygen concentration (Schofield and Ratcliffe, 2004). Under hypoxic conditions, the absence of oxygen, which constitutes the substrate for PHDs and FIH, results in a cessation of the hydroxylation process, preventing the binding of HIF-α to the p-VHL (Arsenault et al., 2015; Maxwell et al., 2017). This leads to the build-up of HIF-1α in its stable isomer, translocation across the nuclear membrane and binding to the β- subunit to generate the active HIF dimer. This subsequently binds to co-activators, e.g., CREB-binding protein CBP/p300, transcription intermediary factor 2 and steroid–receptor activator activators to up-regulate gene transcription (Ke and Costa, 2006; Luo et al., 2011).
Prolyl-4-hydroxylase domain enzyme activity represents the connection between oxygen sensing and energy generation by the Kreb’s Cycle. Secondary metabolites of the Kreb’s Cycle are key to the PHDs activity, whilst end-products of the Kreb’s Cycle (e.g., succinate and fumarate) inhibit PHD enzyme activity (Isaacs et al., 2005; Koivunen et al., 2007). Mutations involving metabolic genes [e.g., fumarate hydratase (FH), the subunits of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), and isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH1 and IDH2)] can give rise to a condition termed pseudo-hypoxia by formation of a reduced variety of 2-oxoglutarate, (R)-2-hydroxyglutarate, as an oncometabolite, involving activation of HIF-1, irrespective of a normal oxygen environment (Chowdhury et al., 2011; Koivunen et al., 2012).
At least four isoforms of the prolyl hydroxylase domain enzyme (PHD1-4) have been identified so far in mammalian tissues. The PHDs all possess a double strand β-helix core fold, which are also termed jelly roll folds (Karuppagounder and Ratan, 2012). All PHD isoforms are able to hydroxylate the LXXLAP motif in HIF-α subunits and this sequence is also present in other molecules, including the nuclear factor of kappa light polypeptide gene enhancer in B-cells inhibitor (IκBα), RNA polymerase and β-adrenergic receptors (Fong and Takeda, 2008). The HIF mechanism is halted under conditions of normoxia by the inhibitory influence of PHD, whilst under conditions of hypoxia; PHDs are inactive, resulting in an active HIF pathway (Fong and Takeda, 2008). PHDs are viewed as the cellular oxygen sensor, because they express a high affinity to oxygen, possessing a Km-value within the 230–250 μM range, when compared with alternative hydroxylase enzymes, such as collagen hydroxylase (Olcina et al., 2018). So as to ensure optimum activity, PHDs have a requirement for oxygen molecules: one oxygen atom combines with proline to produce hydroxyl-proline and the other oxygen atom is utilized for de-carboxylation of 2-OG to produce succinate (Gerald et al., 2004). Furthermore, the PHDs also need non-haem-Fe2+ in order to engage in catalytic activity; which binds to the His-X-Asp/Glu-Xn-His motif to promote such enzymatic activity. In addition, the PHD also requires ascorbic acid to recycle Fe2+ to its active form (Hancock et al., 2015). The activity of PHDs is inhibited by hypoxia, nitric oxide, ROS, 2-OG analogs and cobalt chloride (Maxwell et al., 2017).
Prolyl-4-hydroxylase domains can be inhibited through multiple methods under normoxic conditions: via disruption of the Fe2+ equilibrium by application of an iron chelator such as deferoxamine (DFO) or via application of a competitive inhibitor, such as cobalt chloride (Deppe et al., 2016). These non-specific chemicals result in the potential for off-target effects to be significant (Deppe et al., 2016). An alternative approach for modulation of PHDs activity is via application of 2-OG analogs, including: L-Mimosine (L-Mim); dimethyloxalyl-glycine (DMOG); 3,4-dihydroxybenzoate (3,4-DHB); and N-[[1,2-dihydro-4-hydroxy-2-oxo-1-(phenylmethyl)-3-quinolinyl] carbonyl]-glycine (IOX2). IOX2 possesses significantly greater potency than DMOG, where relative IC50 values are 0.022 μM and 5 μM respectively. IOX2 is able to inhibit both PHD-2 and FIH with greater than 5000 times the selectivity for PHD-2 than histone demethylases (Chowdhury et al., 2013).
Epigenetic Interactions With the Metabolism of Tumor Cells
Gene expression is dramatically influenced by metabolic changes which are associated with cancer. Whilst metabolite profiles may not have much influence at the genetic level, it would seem that they do exert a significant influence on epigenetic regulation of gene expression. Epigenetic factors can be defined as heritable factors, which in this case influence gene expression, without requiring modification of DNA sequences (Wong et al., 2017). Such epigenetic regulation of gene expression can be extremely malleable in response to a wide variety of environmental parameters (Herceg and Vaissière, 2011; Feil and Fraga, 2012). Epigenetics fundamentally involves the chemical alteration of DNA and histone molecules and constitutes a mechanism which inherently connects nutritional state with gene expression. Consequently, it is possible for metabolic changes to override the epigenomic apparatus within cancer cells (Gupta et al., 2014; Johnson et al., 2015). Similarly, epigenetic deregulation in cancer at least partly facilitates altered gene expression (Wong et al., 2017).
Epigenetics and metabolism in cancer are connected by four interlinking pathways: (1) metabolic rewiring may influence the required cofactor availability for epigenetic enzyme alteration; (2) oncometabolites functioning as agonists and/or antagonists for such epigenetic enzyme alteration may be generated, influencing the epigenetic environment; (3) conversely, epigenetic dysfunction can directly alter metabolism by influencing metabolic enzyme expression; (4) the signal transduction cascades contributing to the regulation of cellular metabolism may be altered (Wong et al., 2017). The role played by epigenetics in cellular responses to hypoxia is becoming widely acknowledged. This type of epigenetic control may function in tandem with the HIFs or, may provide a robust pathway for the maintenance of a hypoxia-adapted cellular phenotype for some time following the HIF initiation of immediate response mechanisms. This includes: the part played by epigenetics in both the stabilization and bonding of HIF to its transcriptional targets; the part played by histone demethylase enzymes subsequent to direct HIF transactivation; and, the effect of a hypoxic mileau on global histone modification responses and DNA methylation (Watson et al., 2010). There is growing support for the suggestion that HIF activity is superimposed over a background of epigenetic alterations which are a prerequisite for assessing any hypoxic response. In particular, epigenetic alterations, at both the level of the DNA and histones proffer the capability to specify HIF binding to target gene promoters. Furthermore, hypoxia is inherently a potent inducer of chromatin remodeling by regulating enzymes responsible for DNA methylation modulation and histone alterations (Watson et al., 2010). It is also critical to observe that chronic hypoxia can lead to alterations in gene expression which remain independent of the classical HIF mechanism. This can take place via changes in the methylation status of gene sequences or, changes to the normoxic histone code, potentially via prolonged modifications to epigenetic altering enzymes (Watson et al., 2010; Vanharanta et al., 2013). At the moment, there are four different views on the relationship between epigenetics and hypoxia: (1) HIF stabilization is affected by the epigenetic control of VHL and PHD3 expression; (2) epigenetic pathways control HIF binding by ensuring a transcriptionally active chromatin configuration in and in the vicinity of HIF binding sites (this may be due to the HIF-1α coactivation complex or to direct changes to the HRE binding sites, thereby preventing HIF binding); (3) a major proportion of histone demethylase enzymes are direct HIF-1 target genes which consequently play a major part in the control of transcription during responses to hypoxia; (4) major wide-reaching changes in histone alterations and DNA methylation take place following exposure to hypoxia (Watson et al., 2010; Wong et al., 2017).
The Influence of Epigenetics in HIF-α Stabilization Control
Susceptibility to VHL-dependent ubiquitination and degradation is conferred by PHD-dependent hydroxylation of HIF-α under aerobic conditions (Hatzimichael et al., 2009). VHL tumor suppressor gene mutations in humans are known to result in a predisposition to a range of tumors, such as renal cell carcinoma, hemangioblastoma of the central nervous system, and phaeochromocytoma. Furthermore, VHL loss of function mutations have been extensively investigated revealing that expression of VHL can be blocked by promoter hypermethylation in renal cell carcinoma and multiple myeloma (Hatzimichael et al., 2009). Loss of VHL expression, as a consequence of promoter hypermethylation, potentially represents a key epigenetic mechanism which can lead to exacerbation of HIF activity (Hatzimichael et al., 2009, 2010). The original suggestion that the hypoxic response is largely dependent upon the cooperation of epigenetics was proposed following examination of the HIF-1α coactivation complex, where a number of epigenetic modifying enzymes were identified in direct contact with HIF-1α during the initial cellular hypoxic response. It is known that the histone acetyltransferase enzyme CBP/p300 directly associates with HIF-1α and takes part in the coactivation of a network of hypoxia-inducible genes (Kallio et al., 1998; Watson et al., 2010). Whilst many of the current perspectives on the relationship between hypoxic response and epigenetic mechanisms concentrate on the known interactions with HIF-1α, it is considered that epigenetics is likely to have additional important roles relating to cell adaptation and survival under chronic hypoxic conditions subsequent to the initial HIF-1α-induced cellular response (Watson et al., 2010; Vanharanta et al., 2013; Hancock et al., 2015).
Changes in Metabolism That Are Conducive to Redox Status
Every cell produces reactive oxygen species (ROS), a varied group of radical species constituting a normal by-product of metabolic activities. The attributes and downstream effects of ROS vary according to the levels in which these radical species occur. When their concentration is low, ROS subject kinases and phosphatases to post-translational alterations, thus stimulating cells to proliferate and survive (Giannoni et al., 2005; Cao et al., 2009). NADPH and NADPH oxidase (NOX) are usually responsible for production of ROS in low concentration, which is necessary for signaling events associated with homeostasis. When their concentration is moderate, ROS trigger the expression of stress-responsive genes (e.g., HIF-1α) (Gao et al., 2007; Chandel, 2010).
A notable incongruity is the fact that stabilization and activation of HIF-1 are associated not only with conditions of reduced levels of oxygen, but also with ROS. Guzy et al. (2005) reported that under normoxia HIF-1α was stabilized and the expression of HRE-reporter constructs was increased when hydrogen peroxide was added. Furthermore, under the same conditions of normoxia coupled with addition of hydrogen peroxide, HRE-luciferase reporter activity can be displayed by Hep3B cells, which lack mitochondrial electron transport function (Chandel et al., 2000). Meanwhile in a different study, breast tumor cells from mouse models were exposed to nitric oxide as a way of demonstrating the molecular basis of HIF-1 stabilization by ROS. Under normoxia, a particular cysteine residue in the Oxygen-dependent degradation ODD domain of HIF-1α underwent nitrosylation when nitric oxide was added. In this way, the binding of the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) protein to HIF-1α was not possible and as a result, HIF-1α did not deteriorate (Weidemann and Johnson, 2008). Involvement in the HIF-1 signaling pathway under conditions of oxygen deficiency (hypoxia) is an additional function that is thought to be undertaken by ROS. As has been reported by several researchers, e.g. (Guzy et al., 2005; Mansfield et al., 2005) the cells that did not have functional mitochondria, and implicitly had low levels of ROS, failed to achieve stabilization of HIF-α under circumstances of hypoxia. Furthermore, it was observed that HRE-luciferase reporter activity was diminished when excessive expression of catalase in human 293 cells suppressed hydrogen peroxide under hypoxia; what was implied from this was that HIF-1α activity was reduced, and therefore hydrogen peroxide was added in order to recover it. This may be related to fact that HIF participates in ROS regulation while ROS play a role in HIF expression and activity (Kotake-Nara and Saida, 2007; Owusu-Ansah et al., 2008; Zeng et al., 2011). The conclusion that has been derived from such observations was that, under conditions of hypoxia, HIF-1α could only be stabilized if hydrogen peroxide was present in the cytosol (Chandel et al., 2000).
Earlier research has demonstrated that ROS inactivate PHDs via oxidation of the ferrous ion which is required for their catalytic mechanism, thereby stabilizing HIF-1α (Yang et al., 2014). Vitamin C has been demonstrated to reduce HIF-1 levels by blocking the oxidation of the catalytic ferrous ion (Gao et al., 2007; Calvani et al., 2012). Furthermore, it has also been recently reported that the anti-carcinogenic influence of antioxidants, such as N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) and vitamin C, are without doubt HIF-1-dependent in murine simulations of Myc-mediated tumor genesis (Calvani et al., 2012). Earlier research has also demonstrated that under conditions of hypoxia, melanoma cells are subject to constant oxidative stress as a consequence of raised intracellular levels of ROS, resulting from mitochondrial complex III deregulation (Comito et al., 2011). Mitochondrial ROS have been found to play a predominant role in ROS formation and subsequent HIF-1 stabilization in hypoxic environments (Bell et al., 2007), as well as under non-hypoxic situations (Patten et al., 2010). In addition to mitochondria, NADPH oxidases have also been identified as playing a significant part in ROS generation and in redox-dependent HIF-1 stabilization (predominantly under normoxic conditions) (Lee et al., 2011). Calvani et al. (2012) demonstrated that production of hypoxic ROS is a primary role for HIF-1 stabilization, and activation of its transcriptional response (Calvani et al., 2012). This was demonstrated by showing how hypoxia evokes a redox-dependent stabilization of HIF-1 in rat phaeochromocytoma PC12 cells, which subsequently depends upon NADPH oxidase-driven ROS, Ca2+ and the mammalian objective of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling (Calvani et al., 2012). Enhancing ROS production under conditions of hypoxia may initiate a redox adaptation response which allows cancer cells to survive, as a consequence of raised tolerance to exogenous stress, up-regulation of survival molecules and enhanced drug inactivation capabilities (Pagé et al., 2008).
The Role of Hypoxia-Regulated MicroRnas in Cancer Metabolism
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small, endogenous RNA molecules; they measure 18–24 nucleotides in length, and occur in eukaryotes only. They do not code proteins, but regulate post-transcriptional and translational gene expression. These molecules have multiple actions contributing to diverse normal and pathological cellular processes, including cell death, development, metabolism, neuronal patterning and oncogenesis (Pocock, 2011; Yu et al., 2012; Agrawal et al., 2016). Research indicates that a group of microRNAs are regulated by HIF-1, and in other instances, HIF-1 is the target of microRNAs. Many aspects of tumorigenesis are attributed to the interaction between microRNAs and HIF-1; such aspects include angiogenesis, apoptosis, cell cycle regulation, metabolism, metastasis, proliferation and anticancer therapy resistance (Crosby et al., 2009; Fasanaro et al., 2009; Shen et al., 2013). Other studies that use the microarray method reveal that in a hypoxic environment, different miRNAs are expressed (hypoxia- regulated miRNAs; HRMs). Some miRNAs, such as miR-210, -155, -372/373, and -10b, are up-regulated in hypoxia (Crosby et al., 2009; Neal et al., 2010; Loayza-Puch et al., 2010; Bruning et al., 2011); in contrast, miR-20b and miR-200b were down-regulated in hypoxic conditions (Chan et al., 2011). The α and β subunits of HIF-1 may adjoin both ends of the HRE in the promoter regions of HRM genes. In hypoxia, the affinity between the HIF-1 subunits and HRE can intensify, causing the transcription of HRMs to increase. HIF-1 regulates the expression of a number of HRMs, including miR-210, -155, and -373, by modulating HREs (Huang et al., 2009; Bruning et al., 2011). It has recently been discovered that in hypoxic conditions, miR-210 regulates mitochondrial metabolism. A number of researchers have shown that the function of miR-210 is to inhibit parts of the mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC) complexes stages, causing mitochondria to switch from oxidative phosphorylation to glycolysis (Fasanaro et al., 2009; Huang et al., 2009; Chen et al., 2010; Favaro et al., 2010). miR-210 targets the iron-sulfur cluster scaffold homolog and cytochrome c oxidase assembly factor (COX10) proteins, inhibiting mitochondrial respiration. Other important cell metabolism structures that are the target of miR-210 include GPD1-L (Favaro et al., 2010), NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1 alpha sub-complex 4 (NDUFA4) (Giannakakis et al., 2008), and succinate dehydrogenase complex (Puissegur et al., 2011).
HIF-1-Induced Metabolic Adaptations
Metabolic alterations were among the first biochemical distinctive feature of cancer cells to be discovered and increased understanding of tumor metabolism enables the elucidation of novel targets and informs the development of new anticancer therapies (Koukourakis et al., 2006; Giatromanolaki et al., 2017). The difference between normal tissue and cancer metabolism was first noted in the 1920s; with healthy cells, in normoxic conditions, glucose is broken down into pyruvate, which is then further catabolised via the tricarboxylic acid cycle and oxidative phosphorylation in the mitochondria. In normal cells, the rate of glycolysis is suppressed by the presence of oxygen (Pasteur effect). Mitochondrial activity maintains elevated levels of ATP, this leads to allosteric inhibition of the enzyme responsible for glycolysis, phosphofructokinase (PFK) (Alfarouk et al., 2014). In hypoxic conditions the end product of anaerobic glycolysis is pyruvate that is then metabolized to lactate. Tumors, in contrast to non-malignant tissue, tend to rely heavily on an increased rate of glycolysis to support their energy demands even when oxygen is plentiful, a phenomenon termed aerobic glycolysis or the Warburg Effect (Liberti and Locasale, 2016) (Figure 4).
Figure 4. Anaerobic glycolysis. Glycolysis provides two ATP molecules and does not require oxygen. One glucose molecule is converted into two pyruvate molecules, which are subsequently fermented to two lactic acid molecules.
Warburg (1930) noticed that, compared to normal cells, tumor cells exhibited higher glucose metabolism rates and preferentially utilized glycolysis over oxidative phosphorylation, even when oxygen levels were adequate (House et al., 1956; Warburg, 1956). Since then, a wide range of types of tumors have been found to manifest aerobic glycolysis and evidence has been accumulated that cancer progression is accompanied by an overall restructuring of metabolism (Fritz and Fajas, 2010).
The influence of HIF-1α on glycolytic metabolism is well established (Maxwell et al., 2001); glycolysis in tumors could possibly be driven by HIF-1α stabilization, independently of the hypoxic environment. According to an earlier survey of cancer cell lines, there was about a 50% incidence of HIF-1α stabilizing under normoxic conditions in cancers (Welsh et al., 2004; Robey et al., 2005). Further to this the enzymes responsible for the shift in metabolism by the repression of oxidative phosphorylation and promotion of anaerobic glycolysis are controlled by HIF-1α (Weidemann and Johnson, 2008; Danquah et al., 2011). HIF-1α initiates over-expression in tumor cells and raises the activity of a number of glycolytic protein isoforms which are different to those present in non-malignant cells. Such isoforms include: adenylate kinase-3; aldolase-A,C (ALDA,C); carbonic anhydrase-9; enolase-1 (ENO1); glucose transporter-1,3 (Glut-1,3); glyceraldehyde phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH); hexokinase 1,2 (HK1,2); lactate dehydrogenase-A (LDHA); phosphofructokinase L (PFKL); phosphoglycerate kinase 1 (PGK1); and 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/gructose-2,6-bisphosphate-3 (PFKFB3); (Ke and Costa, 2006; Semenza, 2010).
Hypoxia-inducible factor directly up-regulate the genes coding for glucose transporters such as Glut-1 and the enzymes of the glycolytic pathway. HIF-1α induces the expression of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase 1 (PDK1), which phosphorylates and consequently inhibits pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) (Kim et al., 2006), which converts pyruvate to acetyl-CoA. Reduced PDH activity under hypoxic conditions decreases the entry of acetyl-CoA into the Krebs cycle, reducing the amount of substrate available for downstream mitochondrial respiration and as a result, oxygen consumption. Additionally, HIF-1α enables cells to regulate to the reduced intracellular pH that occurs as a consequence of increased anaerobic glycolysis and the resulting lactic acid production (Weidemann and Johnson, 2008).
In a previous analysis of RT-qPCR data, the mRNA expression of the HK-1 and 2, PKM-2, LDH-A, and Glut-1 genes, has demonstrated cross tissue variation in expression and correlations with clinical or pathological characteristics. Degrees of expression of Glut-1, LDH-A, HK-1, PKM-2 and VDAC-1 mRNA were observed to be significantly greater in primary tumor/liver metastasis tissues relative to normal tissue mucosa (Graziano et al., 2017).
A significant contributing mechanism responsible for this aberrant behavior is believed to be mitochondrial dysfunction (Chandra and Singh, 2011; Owens et al., 2011). Mitochondria are highly dynamic organelles. Mitochondrial morphology is regulated by fission/fusion mechanisms, which are modulated according to changes in oxygen availability. Under hypoxia, faster glucose consumption occurs in an attempt to maintain ATP production using less efficient anaerobic glycolysis (Lum et al., 2007) and a shortage in the provision of substrates like acetyl-CoA and O2 to mitochondria induces major structural, functional, and dynamical changes. The structural and dynamical changes are characterized by impairment of fusion process that leads to mitochondrial depolarization, loss of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) that may be associated with altered respiration rates, and uneven distribution of the mitochondria within cells (Jezek and Plecitá-Hlavatá, 2009). Under continuous hypoxia, neurons have reduced mitochondrial size and altered mitochondrial morphology, possibly in accordance with changes in the activity of nitric oxide synthase (Guo et al., 2008). As described by López-Ríos et al. (2007) and Moreno-Sánchez et al. (2007), many alterations in mitochondria expression and function are associated with the increased rate of glycolysis in rapidly expanding tumors. In addition to a decrease in the number of mitochondria within the cells, there is an associated decrease in expressed levels of oxidative enzymes and transporters, and conversely, an increase in a protein (IF1) which inhibits mitochondrial ATP synthase. Furthermore, activation of glycolysis results in lower levels of oxidative phosphorylation (López-Ríos et al., 2007; Moreno-Sánchez et al., 2007). The increase in the rate of glucose metabolism through aerobic glycolysis is significant, with the rate of lactate production from glucose being between 10 and 100 times greater than total oxidation of glucose in mitochondria. However, the quantity of ATP synthesized in a given period of time is similar regardless of the form of glucose metabolism used (Shestov et al., 2014; Liberti and Locasale, 2016). Several factors contributing to the switch to aerobic glycolysis in various cancer types were identified by Zheng (2012) and included oncogene activation, tumor suppressor loss, the hypoxic microenvironment, mutations in mtDNA and the tissue of origin (Zheng, 2012).
Aerobic glycolysis exhibits a number of essential, but poorly understood, benefits which facilitate the preference for glycolysis rather than mitochondrial oxidation in cancer cells, despite the stoichiometric indication that mitochondrial oxidation is required to maintain high glycolysis rates (De Souza et al., 2011). Production of vital secondary metabolites for generation of lipids, proteins and nucleic acids to promote cancer cell development and proliferation is a key role for aerobic glycolysis (Graziano et al., 2017). Tumors may benefit from the cell-independent effects of lactate production, as lactate may interfere with normal tissue structure, thus making tumor cells more invasive (Locasale and Cantley, 2010). While a correlation between rates of glycolysis and tumor aggressiveness has been demonstrated in vitro, not all tumor cell types depend on glycolysis for ATP generation. Some tumor types utilize both glycolysis and oxidative phosphorylation, or some completely on oxidative phosphorylation for ATP supply (Moreno-Sánchez et al., 2007; Zheng, 2012). The evidence of this correlation is demonstrated in comparing the non-invasive MCF7 breast cancer cell line (non-invasive), which has much lower glucose consumption with the more aggressive and highly invasive MDA-MD-231 breast tumor cell line (Gatenby and Gillies, 2004). The conversion of glucose into pyruvate and then lactate leads to a lowering of intracellular pH, which is countered by the export of lactate from the cell, causing extracellular acidification and consequently suppression of the anticancer immune response (Locasale and Cantley, 2010). Tumor- associated fibroblasts express the monocarboxylate co-transporters MCT1 and MCT4, which transport important monocarboxylates such as lactate and pyruvate (Koukourakis et al., 2006). Lactate can be sequestered by stromal cells through the monocarboxylate transporters to regenerate pyruvate that either can be used for oxidative phosphorylation or can be used to refuel the cancer cell through the lactic acid cycle (Koukourakis et al., 2006).
Successful treatment approaches have so far not been accomplished, despite endeavors to use compounds like 2-deoxyglucose to inhibit aerobic glycolysis in cancer cells. Suppression of lactate dehydrogenase and the blocking of monocarboxylate transporters carrying lactate over the plasma membrane are among the novel treatment strategies, with multiple targets in the glycolytic process that are presently being assessed (Fantin et al., 2006; Le et al., 2010). There are a number of methods of disrupting glycolysis; developing glycolytic inhibitors capable of acting with very high specificity is a target for the pharmaceutical industry that may translate into a clinical success (Ganapathy-Kanniappan and Geschwind, 2013; Ganapathy-Kanniappan et al., 2013).
Glucose Transporters (Gluts)
Glycolysis produces only two molecules of ATP from a single molecule of glucose, compared with oxidative phosphorylation, which produces 36 ATP molecules; cancer cells therefore demand high fluxes of glucose to make up for this shortfall and satisfy their energy demand (Alberts et al., 2008). Almost all mammalian cells utilize glucose as a major source for energy and ATP generation. Glucose is also a vital substrate for the synthesis of triglycerides, glycoproteins and glycogen (Martinez-Outschoorn et al., 2017). Tissue specific glucose transport is conducted via the 13 facilitative glucose transporter family (Glut/SLC2A) members, which vary by their mode of regulation and affinities, for example, Glut-5 transports fructose (Palm and Thompson, 2017). This process enables the facilitative glucose transporters to maintain the glucose concentration gradient, an energy-independent process, ensuring a continuous source of glucose for metabolism (Zhou et al., 2017). Gluts are overexpressed in solid tumors and are directly linked to a poor prognosis in cancer patients. The Glut-1 isoform is overexpressed in a variety of malignant neoplasms, including brain, hepatic, and pancreatic tumors (Shibuya et al., 2015; Barron et al., 2016) and correlates with tumor aggressiveness and poor prognosis (Kunkel et al., 2003). Glut-1 overexpression also correlates with tumor grade and distance from stromal blood supply, which suggests a link with tumor hypoxia (Mendez et al., 2002). In support of this hypothesis it has been found to be abundantly expressed in hypoxic regions surrounding necrotic foci of breast and colorectal cancers (Chen et al., 2017). Prolonged hypoxia induces the expression of Glut-1 via the inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation and upregulation of HIF-1 (Giatromanolaki et al., 2017).
Researchers including Suh and Han (2013) and Ancey et al. (2018) have shown that Glut-1 synthesis and transfer to the cell membrane are positively influenced by multiple hypoxia-related components, including VEGF receptor and calcium channel transactivation (Suh and Han, 2013; Ancey et al., 2018). Recently, the same researchers (Ancey et al., 2018) have demonstrated the actions of Glut-1 and Glut-3 in enhancing cancer cell metabolism. Simpson et al. (2008) demonstrated that, as glucose transporters, Glut-1 and Glut-3 expression is up regulated to increase glucose uptake and ultimately increase HIF-1 driven glycolysis. Furthermore, earlier work in an erythroleukemia mouse model demonstrating that Glut-1 expression is positively related to resistance to multiple anti-cancer therapies, including vincristine (Trendowski et al., 2015). Both Glut-1 and Glut-3 are overexpressed in human tumors, with Glut-1 expressed with greater frequency than Gut-3. However, the Glut-3 type is the major glucose transporter expressed in human brain tumors of glial origin (Simpson et al., 2008). Subsequently, other researchers demonstrated a positive relationship in HIF-1α and Glut-3 expression in human glioma tumors, by immunohistochemistry and western blotting (Liu et al., 2009). These markers, HIF-1α and Glut-3, show a positive correlation with the grade of glioma and there is evidence to support a relationship between these markers and tumor formation and rate of progression. On this basis, we can conclude that the presence and level of these markers are robust and valid reporters for glioma development and growth (Liu et al., 2009).
The Role of Hypoxia in Resistance to Conventional Chemo- and Radiation Therapy
There is a significant body of evidence that demonstrates hypoxia-induced therapeutic resistance (Trédan et al., 2007; Khawar et al., 2015). In part, this association may be due to the fact that many anticancer drugs are large molecules, which are not able to diffuse to target tissue due to the poorly formed vasculature. Moreover, hypoxic tumor cells are distant from the blood supply and as a result only a proportion of them may be exposed to a lethal dose of a cytotoxic agent (Trédan et al., 2007).
Tumor-associated hypoxia is shown to promote drug resistance, specifically through increased expression and amplification of the genes for the P-glycoprotein (P-gp) membrane exporter. The consequence of increased expression of P-gp is a reduction in cellular sequestration of multiple anti-cancer drugs, and it is likely that this pathway is correlated with tumor resistance to topoisomerase II-targeted drugs (Trédan et al., 2007). Radioresistance is the negative effect of tumor hypoxia that impacts the ability of radiotherapy to treat tumors (Harrison et al., 2002; Moeller et al., 2007). Tumor sensitivity to radiation exposure rapidly declines when the local pO2 is less than 25–30 mmHg (3.3–3.9%) (Ruan et al., 2009). Oxygen enhancement is the term used to describe the process by which hypoxia confers radioresistance within a tumor. As a consequence of radiotherapy, via ionization or associated with oxygen-favoring radicals, such as hydroxyl radical and superoxide, resulting from ionization of water surrounding DNA, tumor cell DNA is damaged. In short, radiotherapy results in DNA breakages, and failure by the cell to repair the damage frequently results in cell death. In hypoxia situations, the cells have increased ability to conduct repairs to the disrupted DNA, while in the presence of oxygen; stable peroxides are created between oxygen and the free DNA ends, which are substantially more resistant to cellular repair (Hu and Harrison, 2005; Hall and Giaccia, 2006; Ruan et al., 2009). Resistant tumor cells can remain viable after treatment, which leads to resistant subpopulations of cells and poor local control for the patient (Moeller et al., 2007). In addition, there is an association between HIF-1, the tumor blood vessel network, and radiation resistance (Moeller et al., 2004), inasmuch as HIF-1 activity is influenced by radiation. The activity of HIF-1 in a tumor can nearly double 24–28 h after exposure to radiation. This phenomenon is restricted to in vivo tests only, as it relies on essential input from the tumor microenvironment (Moeller et al., 2007). Following radiotherapy, tumors may undergo a transient rise in oxygen tension, or reoxygenation, due to the reduction in diffusion-limited (chronic) hypoxia as a consequence of cytoreduction (Bayer and Vaupel, 2012). Subsequently, radiation-induced re-oxygenation of hypoxic tumor cells leads to the production of ROS that induce HIF-1, which, in turn, activates the expression of cytokines, including VEGF and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF), which confer radio-protective effects on neighboring endothelial cells. Ultimately, this leads to inhibition of endothelial apoptosis via induction of anti-apoptotic signals to tumor blood vessels, promoting an additional mechanism of radiation resistance (Moeller et al., 2007; Zhou et al., 2017).
Conclusion
Tumor cells have three major specifications, namely, heightened energy generation, adequate macromolecular biosynthesis and redox balance preservation, which must be balanced by the metabolic adaptations. These processes must be closely investigated to identify the weakness in tumor metabolic pathways and thus formulate effective treatment strategies. Creation of therapeutic approaches capable of retarding tumor progression, enhancing treatment response and achieving favorable clinical results is the overarching aim. Furthermore, an enhanced appreciation of tumor metabolism, specifically the relationship between aerobic glycolysis and adaptive malignant growth, may direct the advancement of tumor-targeting and normal tissue-sparing neo-therapeutics. Driving permissive cellular and tissue survival factors, hypoxia-led metabolic change in cancers permits enhanced malignancy, and subsequently results in lower survival rates via enhanced therapy resistance and augmented metastatic capacity. Clarifying the processes by which hypoxia drives metabolic change at the cellular level will facilitate a strategic focus on the defined pathways, ultimately ensuring death of the tumor cells.
Author Contributions
WAT, TD, RA-J, and NF contributed to the planning and writing and editing of this review article.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
Agrawal, R., Dale, T. P., Al-Zubaidi, M. A., Malgulwar, P. B., Forsyth, N. R., and Kulshreshtha, R. (2016). Pluripotent and multipotent stem cells display distinct hypoxic miRNA expression profiles. PLoS One 11:e0164976. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0164976
Alberts, B., Johnson, A., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., and Walter, P. (2008). Molecular Biology of the Cell. New York, NY: Garland science.
Alfarouk, K. O., Verduzco, D., Rauch, C., Muddathir, A. K., Adil, H. B., Elhassan, G. O., et al. (2014). Glycolysis, tumor metabolism, cancer growth and dissemination. A new pH-based etiopathogenic perspective and therapeutic approach to an old cancer question. Oncoscience 1, 777–802. doi: 10.18632/oncoscience.109
Ancey, P. B., Contat, C., and Meylan, E. (2018). Glucose transporters in cancer: from tumor cells to the tumor microenvironment. FEBS J. doi: 10.1111/febs.14577 [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1111/febs.14577
Arsenault, P. R., Heaton Johnson, K. J., Li, L. S., Song, D., Ferreira, V. S., Patel, N., et al. (2015). Identification of prolyl hydroxylation modifications in mammalian cell proteins. Proteomics 15, 1259–1267. doi: 10.1002/pmic.201400398
Barron, C. C., Bilan, P. J., Tsakiridis, T., and Tsiani, E. (2016). Facilitative glucose transporters: implications for cancer detection, prognosis and treatment. Metabolism 65, 124–139. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2015.10.007
Bayer, C., and Vaupel, P. (2012). Acute versus chronic hypoxia in tumors. Strahlenther. Onkol. 188, 616–627. doi: 10.1007/s00066-012-0085-4
Bell, E. L., Klimova, T. A., Eisenbart, J., Schumacker, P. T., and Chandel, N. S. (2007). Mitochondrial reactive oxygen species trigger hypoxia-inducible factor-dependent extension of the replicative life span during hypoxia. Mol. Cell. Biol. 27, 5737–5745. doi: 10.1128/MCB.02265-06
Bhatia, M., Karlenius, T. C., Di Trapani, G., and Tonissen, K. F. (2013). The Interaction Between Redox and Hypoxic Signalling Pathways in the Dynamic Oxygen Environment of Cancer Cells. London: InTech. doi: 10.5772/55185
Brahimi-Horn, M. C., and Pouysségur, J. (2007). Oxygen, a source of life and stress. FEBS Lett. 581, 3582–3591. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2007.06.018
Bruning, U., Cerone, L., Neufeld, Z., Fitzpatrick, S. F., Cheong, A., Scholz, C. C., et al. (2011). MicroRNA-155 promotes resolution of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α activity during prolonged hypoxia. Mol. Cell. Biol. 31, 4087–4096. doi: 10.1128/MCB.01276-10
Calvani, M., Comito, G., Giannoni, E., and Chiarugi, P. (2012). Time-dependent stabilization of hypoxia inducible factor-1α by different intracellular sources of reactive oxygen species. PLoS One 7:e38388. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038388
Cao, J., Schulte, J., Knight, A., Leslie, N. R., Zagozdzon, A., Bronson, R., et al. (2009). Prdx1 inhibits tumorigenesis via regulating PTEN/AKT activity. EMBO J. 28, 1505–1517. doi: 10.1038/emboj.2009.101
Chan, Y. C., Khanna, S., Roy, S., and Sen, C. K. (2011). miR-200b targets Ets-1 and is down-regulated by hypoxia to induce angiogenic response of endothelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 2047–2056. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.158790
Chandel, N. S. (2010). “Mitochondrial regulation of oxygen sensing,” in Membrane Receptors, Channels and Transporters in Pulmonary Circulation, eds J. X. J. Yuan and J. P. T. Ward (Berlin: Springer).
Chandel, N. S., Mcclintock, D. S., Feliciano, C. E., Wood, T. M., Melendez, J. A., Rodriguez, A. M., et al. (2000). Reactive oxygen species generated at mitochondrial complex III stabilize hypoxia-inducible factor-1α during hypoxia a mechanism of O2 sensing. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 25130–25138. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M001914200
Chandra, D., and Singh, K. K. (2011). Genetic insights into OXPHOS defect and its role in cancer. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1807, 620–625. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2010.10.023
Chen, X., Lu, P., Zhou, S., Zhang, L., Zhao, J.-H., and Tang, J.-H. (2017). Predictive value of glucose transporter-1 and glucose transporter-3 for survival of cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Oncotarget 8, 13206–13213. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14570
Chen, Z., Li, Y., Zhang, H., Huang, P., and Luthra, R. (2010). Hypoxia-regulated microRNA-210 modulates mitochondrial function and decreases ISCU and COX10 expression. Oncogene 29, 4362–4368. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.193
Chiavarina, B., Whitaker-Menezes, D., Migneco, G., Martinez-Outschoorn, U. E., Pavlides, S., Howell, A., et al. (2010). HIF1-alpha functions as a tumor promoter in cancer-associated fibroblasts, and as a tumor suppressor in breast cancer cells: autophagy drives compartment-specific oncogenesis. Cell Cycle 9, 3534–3551. doi: 10.4161/cc.9.17.12908
Chowdhury, R., Candela-Lena, J. I., Chan, M. C., Greenald, D. J., Yeoh, K. K., Tian, Y.-M., et al. (2013). Selective small molecule probes for the hypoxia inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylases. ACS Chem. Biol. 8, 1488–1496. doi: 10.1021/cb400088q
Chowdhury, R., Yeoh, K. K., Tian, Y. M., Hillringhaus, L., Bagg, E. A., Rose, N. R., et al. (2011). The oncometabolite 2-hydroxyglutarate inhibits histone lysine demethylases. EMBO Rep. 12, 463–469. doi: 10.1038/embor.2011.43
Cirri, P., and Chiarugi, P. (2012). Cancer-associated-fibroblasts and tumour cells: a diabolic liaison driving cancer progression. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 31, 195–208. doi: 10.1007/s10555-011-9340-x
Clarke, M. F., and Hass, A. T. (2006). “Cancer stem cells,” in Reviews in Cell Biology and Molecular Medicine, ed. R. A. Meyers (Weinheim: Wiley-VCH Verlag).
Comito, G., Calvani, M., Giannoni, E., Bianchini, F., Calorini, L., Torre, E., et al. (2011). HIF-1α stabilization by mitochondrial ROS promotes Met-dependent invasive growth and vasculogenic mimicry in melanoma cells. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 51, 893–904. doi: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2011.05.042
Covello, K. L., Kehler, J., Yu, H., Gordan, J. D., Arsham, A. M., Hu, C.-J., et al. (2006). HIF-2α regulates Oct-4: effects of hypoxia on stem cell function, embryonic development, and tumor growth. Genes Dev. 20, 557–570. doi: 10.1101/gad.1399906
Crosby, M. E., Kulshreshtha, R., Ivan, M., and Glazer, P. M. (2009). MicroRNA regulation of DNA repair gene expression in hypoxic stress. Cancer Res. 69, 1221–1229. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2516
Danquah, M. K., Zhang, X. A., and Mahato, R. I. (2011). Extravasation of polymeric nanomedicines across tumor vasculature. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 63, 623–639. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2010.11.005
Das, B., Tsuchida, R., Malkin, D., Koren, G., Baruchel, S., and Yeger, H. (2008). Hypoxia enhances tumor stemness by increasing the invasive and tumorigenic side population fraction. Stem Cells 26, 1818–1830. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2007-0724
De Souza, A. C. S., Justo, G. Z., De Araujo, D. R., and Cavagis, A. D. M. (2011). Defining the molecular basis of tumor metabolism: a continuing challenge since Warburg’s discovery. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. 28, 771–792. doi: 10.1159/000335792
Dean, M., Fojo, T., and Bates, S. (2005). Tumour stem cells and drug resistance. Nat. Rev. Cancer 5, 275–284. doi: 10.1038/nrc1590
Dengler, V. L., Galbraith, M. D., and Espinosa, J. M. (2014). Transcriptional regulation by hypoxia inducible factors. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 49, 1–15. doi: 10.3109/10409238.2013.838205
Deppe, J., Popp, T., Egea, V., Steinritz, D., Schmidt, A., Thiermann, H., et al. (2016). Impairment of hypoxia-induced HIF-1α signaling in keratinocytes and fibroblasts by sulfur mustard is counteracted by a selective PHD-2 inhibitor. Arch. Toxicol. 90, 1141–1150. doi: 10.1007/s00204-015-1549-y
Erler, J. T., Cawthorne, C. J., Williams, K. J., Koritzinsky, M., Wouters, B. G., Wilson, C., et al. (2004). Hypoxia-mediated down-regulation of Bid and Bax in tumors occurs via hypoxia-inducible factor 1-dependent and-independent mechanisms and contributes to drug resistance. Mol. Cell. Biol. 24, 2875–2889. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.7.2875-2889.2004
Fantin, V. R., St-Pierre, J., and Leder, P. (2006). Attenuation of LDH-A expression uncovers a link between glycolysis, mitochondrial physiology, and tumor maintenance. Cancer Cell 9, 425–434. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2006.04.023
Fasanaro, P., Greco, S., Lorenzi, M., Pescatori, M., Brioschi, M., Kulshreshtha, R., et al. (2009). An integrated approach for experimental target identification of hypoxia-induced miR-210. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 35134–35143. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M109.052779
Favaro, E., Ramachandran, A., Mccormick, R., Gee, H., Blancher, C., Crosby, M., et al. (2010). MicroRNA-210 regulates mitochondrial free radical response to hypoxia and krebs cycle in cancer cells by targeting iron sulfur cluster protein ISCU. PLoS One 5:e10345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010345
Feil, R., and Fraga, M. F. (2012). Epigenetics and the environment: emerging patterns and implications. Nat. Rev. Genet. 13, 97–109. doi: 10.1038/nrg3142
Fong, G., and Takeda, K. (2008). Role and regulation of prolyl hydroxylase domain proteins. Cell Death Differ. 15, 635–641. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2008.10
Forsberg, K., Valyi-Nagy, I., Heldin, C.-H., Herlyn, M., and Westermark, B. (1993). Platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF) in oncogenesis: development of a vascular connective tissue stroma in xenotransplanted human melanoma producing PDGF-BB. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 90, 393–397. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.2.393
Fritz, V., and Fajas, L. (2010). Metabolism and proliferation share common regulatory pathways in cancer cells. Oncogene 29, 4369–4377. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.182
Ganapathy-Kanniappan, S., and Geschwind, J.-F. H. (2013). Tumor glycolysis as a target for cancer therapy: progress and prospects. Mol. Cancer 12:152. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-12-152
Ganapathy-Kanniappan, S., Kunjithapatham, R., and Geschwind, J.-F. (2013). Anticancer efficacy of the metabolic blocker 3-bromopyruvate: specific molecular targeting. Anticancer Res. 33, 13–20.
Gao, P., Zhang, H., Dinavahi, R., Li, F., Xiang, Y., Raman, V., et al. (2007). HIF-dependent antitumorigenic effect of antioxidants in vivo. Cancer Cell 12, 230–238. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2007.08.004
Gatenby, R. A., and Gillies, R. J. (2004). Why do cancers have high aerobic glycolysis? Nat. Rev. Cancer 4, 891–899. doi: 10.1038/nrc1478
Gerald, D., Berra, E., Frapart, Y. M., Chan, D. A., Giaccia, A. J., Mansuy, D., et al. (2004). JunD reduces tumor angiogenesis by protecting cells from oxidative stress. Cell 118, 781–794. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2004.08.025
Giannakakis, A., Sandaltzopoulos, R., Greshock, J., Liang, S., Huang, J., Hasegawa, K., et al. (2008). miR-210 links hypoxia with cell cycle regulation and is deleted in human epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Biol. Ther. 7, 255–264. doi: 10.4161/cbt.7.2.5297
Giannoni, E., Bianchini, F., Masieri, L., Serni, S., Torre, E., Calorini, L., et al. (2010). Reciprocal activation of prostate cancer cells and cancer-associated fibroblasts stimulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer stemness. Cancer Res. 70, 6945–6956. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0785
Giannoni, E., Buricchi, F., Raugei, G., Ramponi, G., and Chiarugi, P. (2005). Intracellular reactive oxygen species activate Src tyrosine kinase during cell adhesion and anchorage-dependent cell growth. Mol. Cell. Biol. 25, 6391–6403. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.15.6391-6403.2005
Giatromanolaki, A., Liousia, M., Arelaki, S., Kalamida, D., Pouliliou, S., Mitrakas, A., et al. (2017). Differential effect of hypoxia and acidity on lung cancer cell and fibroblast metabolism. Biochem. Cell Biol. 95, 428–436. doi: 10.1139/bcb-2016-0197
Goda, N., and Kanai, M. (2012). Hypoxia-inducible factors and their roles in energy metabolism. Int. J. Hematol. 95, 457–463. doi: 10.1007/s12185-012-1069-y
Graziano, F., Ruzzo, A., Giacomini, E., Ricciardi, T., Aprile, G., Loupakis, F., et al. (2017). Glycolysis gene expression analysis and selective metabolic advantage in the clinical progression of colorectal cancer. Pharmacogenomics J. 17, 258–264. doi: 10.1038/tpj.2016.13
Guo, S., Kim, W. J., Lok, J., Lee, S.-R., Besancon, E., Luo, B.-H., et al. (2008). Neuroprotection via matrix-trophic coupling between cerebral endothelial cells and neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 105, 7582–7587. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0801105105
Gupta, V., Gopinath, P., Iqbal, M. A., Mazurek, S., Wellen, K. E., and Bamezai, R. N. (2014). Interplay between epigenetics & cancer metabolism. Curr. Pharm. Des. 20, 1706–1714. doi: 10.2174/13816128113199990536
Guzy, R. D., Hoyos, B., Robin, E., Chen, H., Liu, L., Mansfield, K. D., et al. (2005). Mitochondrial complex III is required for hypoxia-induced ROS production and cellular oxygen sensing. Cell Metab. 1, 401–408. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.05.001
Hall, E. J., and Giaccia, A. J. (2006). Radiobiology for the Radiologist. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
Hanahan, D., and Coussens, L. M. (2012). Accessories to the crime: functions of cells recruited to the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Cell 21, 309–322. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.02.022
Hancock, R. L., Dunne, K., Walport, L. J., Flashman, E., and Kawamura, A. (2015). Epigenetic regulation by histone demethylases in hypoxia. Epigenomics 7, 791–811. doi: 10.2217/epi.15.24
Harrison, L. B., Chadha, M., Hill, R. J., Hu, K., and Shasha, D. (2002). Impact of tumor hypoxia and anemia on radiation therapy outcomes. Oncologist 7, 492–508. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.7-6-492
Hatzimichael, E., Dasoula, A., Shah, R., Syed, N., Papoudou-Bai, A., Coley, H. M., et al. (2010). The prolyl-hydroxylase EGLN3 and not EGLN1 is inactivated by methylation in plasma cell neoplasia. Eur. J. Haematol. 84, 47–51. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.2009.01344.x
Hatzimichael, E., Dranitsaris, G., Dasoula, A., Benetatos, L., Stebbing, J., Crook, T., et al. (2009). von Hippel–Lindau methylation status in patients with multiple myeloma: a potential predictive factor for the development of bone disease. Clin. Lymphoma Myeloma 9, 239–242. doi: 10.3816/CLM.2009.n.047
Heddleston, J. M., Li, Z., Mclendon, R. E., Hjelmeland, A. B., and Rich, J. N. (2009). The hypoxic microenvironment maintains glioblastoma stem cells and promotes reprogramming towards a cancer stem cell phenotype. Cell Cycle 8, 3274–3284. doi: 10.4161/cc.8.20.9701
Helmlinger, G., Yuan, F., Dellian, M., and Jain, R. K. (1997). Interstitial pH and pO2 gradients in solid tumors in vivo: high-resolution measurements reveal a lack of correlation. Nat. Med. 3, 177–182. doi: 10.1038/nm0297-177
Herceg, Z., and Vaissière, T. (2011). Epigenetic mechanisms and cancer: an interface between the environment and the genome. Epigenetics 6, 804–819. doi: 10.4161/epi.6.7.16262
Höckel, M., and Vaupel, P. (2001). Biological consequences of tumor hypoxia. Semin. Oncol. 28(2 Suppl. 8), 36–41. doi: 10.1016/S0093-7754(01)90211-8
Holohan, C., Van Schaeybroeck, S., Longley, D. B., and Johnston, P. G. (2013). Cancer drug resistance: an evolving paradigm. Nat. Rev. Cancer 13, 714–726. doi: 10.1038/nrc3599
House, S. W., Warburg, O., Burk, D., and Schade, A. L. (1956). On respiratory impairment in cancer cells. Science 124, 267–272. doi: 10.1126/science.124.3215.267
Hu, C.-J., Wang, L.-Y., Chodosh, L. A., Keith, B., and Simon, M. C. (2003). Differential roles of hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) and HIF-2α in hypoxic gene regulation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23, 9361–9374. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.24.9361-9374.2003
Hu, K., and Harrison, L. B. (2005). Impact of anemia in patients with head and neck cancer treated with radiation therapy. Curr. Treat. Options Oncol. 6, 31–45. doi: 10.1007/s11864-005-0011-4
Huang, X., Ding, L., Bennewith, K. L., Tong, R. T., Welford, S. M., Ang, K. K., et al. (2009). Hypoxia-inducible mir-210 regulates normoxic gene expression involved in tumor initiation. Mol. Cell 35, 856–867. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2009.09.006
Imamura, T., Kikuchi, H., Herraiz, M. T., Park, D. Y., Mizukami, Y., Mino-Kenduson, M., et al. (2009). HIF-1α and HIF-2α have divergent roles in colon cancer. Int. J. Cancer 124, 763–771. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24032
Isaacs, J. S., Jung, Y. J., Mole, D. R., Lee, S., Torres-Cabala, C., Chung, Y.-L., et al. (2005). HIF overexpression correlates with biallelic loss of fumarate hydratase in renal cancer: novel role of fumarate in regulation of HIF stability. Cancer Cell 8, 143–153. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2005.06.017
Jezek, P., and Plecitá-Hlavatá, L. (2009). Mitochondrial reticulum network dynamics in relation to oxidative stress, redox regulation, and hypoxia. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 41, 1790–1804. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2009.02.014
Jögi, A., Øra, I., Nilsson, H., Lindeheim, Å., Makino, Y., Poellinger, L., et al. (2002). Hypoxia alters gene expression in human neuroblastoma cells toward an immature and neural crest-like phenotype. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 99, 7021–7026. doi: 10.1073/pnas.102660199
Johnson, C., Warmoes, M. O., Shen, X., and Locasale, J. W. (2015). Epigenetics and cancer metabolism. Cancer Lett. 356, 309–314. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.09.043
Kaelin, W. G., Ratcliffe, P. J., and Semenza, G. L. (2016). Pathways for oxygen regulation and homeostasis: the 2016 Albert Lasker basic medical research award. JAMA 316, 1252–1253. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.12386
Kallio, P. J., Okamoto, K., O’brien, S., Carrero, P., Makino, Y., Tanaka, H., et al. (1998). Signal transduction in hypoxic cells: inducible nuclear translocation and recruitment of theCBP/p300 coactivator by the hypoxia-induciblefactor-1α. EMBO J. 17, 6573–6586. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.22.6573
Karuppagounder, S. S., and Ratan, R. R. (2012). Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibition: robust new target or another big bust for stroke therapeutics? J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 32, 1347–1361. doi: 10.1038/jcbfm.2012.28
Ke, Q., and Costa, M. (2006). Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1). Mol. Pharmacol. 70, 1469–1480. doi: 10.1124/mol.106.027029
Keith, B., Johnson, R. S., and Simon, M. C. (2012). HIF1α and HIF2α: sibling rivalry in hypoxic tumour growth and progression. Nat. Rev. Cancer 12, 9–22. doi: 10.1038/nrc3183
Khawar, I. A., Kim, J. H., and Kuh, H.-J. (2015). Improving drug delivery to solid tumors: priming the tumor microenvironment. J. Controll. Release 201, 78–89. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2014.12.018
Kim, J.-W., Tchernyshyov, I., Semenza, G. L., and Dang, C. V. (2006). HIF-1-mediated expression of pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase: a metabolic switch required for cellular adaptation to hypoxia. Cell Metab. 3, 177–185. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2006.02.002
Koivunen, P., Hirsilä, M., Remes, A. M., Hassinen, I. E., Kivirikko, K. I., and Myllyharju, J. (2007). Inhibition of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) hydroxylases by citric acid cycle intermediates possible links between cell metabolism and stabilization of HIF. J. Biol. Chem. 282, 4524–4532. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M610415200
Koivunen, P., Lee, S., Duncan, C. G., Lopez, G., Lu, G., Ramkissoon, S., et al. (2012). Transformation by the (R)-enantiomer of 2-hydroxyglutarate linked to EGLN activation. Nature 483, 484–488. doi: 10.1038/nature10898
Kotake-Nara, E., and Saida, K. (2007). Characterization of CoCl2-induced reactive oxygen species (ROS): inductions of neurite outgrowth and endothelin-2/vasoactive intestinal contractor in PC12 cells by CoCl2 are ROS dependent, but those by MnCl2 are not. Neurosci. Lett. 422, 223–227. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2007.06.026
Koukourakis, M. I., Giatromanolaki, A., Harris, A. L., and Sivridis, E. (2006). Comparison of metabolic pathways between cancer cells and stromal cells in colorectal carcinomas: a metabolic survival role for tumor-associated stroma. Cancer Res. 66, 632–637. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-3260
Kubota, Y., Takubo, K., and Suda, T. (2008). Bone marrow long label-retaining cells reside in the sinusoidal hypoxic niche. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 366, 335–339. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.11.086
Kunkel, M., Reichert, T. E., Benz, P., Lehr, H. A., Jeong, J. H., Wieand, S., et al. (2003). Overexpression of Glut-1 and increased glucose metabolism in tumors are associated with a poor prognosis in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer 97, 1015–1024. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11159
Lau, E. Y.-T., Ho, N. P.-Y., and Lee, T. K.-W. (2017). Cancer stem cells and their microenvironment: biology and therapeutic implications. Stem Cells Int. 2017:3714190. doi: 10.1155/2017/3714190
Le, A., Cooper, C. R., Gouw, A. M., Dinavahi, R., Maitra, A., Deck, L. M., et al. (2010). Inhibition of lactate dehydrogenase A induces oxidative stress and inhibits tumor progression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 2037–2042. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0914433107
Lee, H.-Y., Lee, T., Lee, N., Yang, E. G., Lee, C., Lee, J., et al. (2011). Src activates HIF-1α not through direct phosphorylation of HIF-1α-specific prolyl-4 hydroxylase 2 but through activation of the NADPH oxidase/Rac pathway. Carcinogenesis 32, 703–712. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgr034
Lee, R.-M., and Lin, P.-S. (2017). Induction of tumor hypoxia for cancer therapy. U.S. Patent No 2,018,005,003,9A1.
Li, Q. F., Wang, X. R., Yang, Y. W., and Lin, H. (2006). Hypoxia upregulates hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)-3α expression in lung epithelial cells: characterization and comparison with HIF-1α. Cell Res. 16, 548–558. doi: 10.1038/sj.cr.7310072
Li, Z., Bao, S., Wu, Q., Wang, H., Eyler, C., Sathornsumetee, S., et al. (2009). Hypoxia-inducible factors regulate tumorigenic capacity of glioma stem cells. Cancer Cell 15, 501–513. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2009.03.018
Liberti, M. V., and Locasale, J. W. (2016). The Warburg effect: how does it benefit cancer cells? Trends Biochem. Sci. 41, 211–218. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2015.12.001
Liu, Y., Li, Y.-M., Tian, R.-F., Liu, W.-P., Fei, Z., Long, Q.-F., et al. (2009). The expression and significance of HIF-1α and GLUT-3 in glioma. Brain Res. 1304, 149–154. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2009.09.083
Loayza-Puch, F., Yoshida, Y., Matsuzaki, T., Takahashi, C., Kitayama, H., and Noda, M. (2010). Hypoxia and RAS-signaling pathways converge on, and cooperatively downregulate, the RECK tumor-suppressor protein through microRNAs. Oncogene 29, 2638–2648. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.23
Loboda, A., Jozkowicz, A., and Dulak, J. (2010). HIF-1 and HIF-2 transcription factors—similar but not identical. Mol. Cells 29, 435–442. doi: 10.1007/s10059-010-0067-2
Locasale, J. W., and Cantley, L. C. (2010). Altered metabolism in cancer. BMC Biol. 8:88. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-8-88
López-Ríos, F., Sánchez-Aragó, M., García-García, E., Ortega, Á. D., Berrendero, J. R., Pozo-Rodríguez, F., et al. (2007). Loss of the mitochondrial bioenergetic capacity underlies the glucose avidity of carcinomas. Cancer Res. 67, 9013–9017. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1678
Lum, J. J., Bui, T., Gruber, M., Gordan, J. D., Deberardinis, R. J., Covello, K. L., et al. (2007). The transcription factor HIF-1α plays a critical role in the growth factor-dependent regulation of both aerobic and anaerobic glycolysis. Genes Dev. 21, 1037–1049. doi: 10.1101/gad.1529107
Luo, W., Hu, H., Chang, R., Zhong, J., Knabel, M., O’meally, R., et al. (2011). Pyruvate kinase M2 is a PHD3-stimulated coactivator for hypoxia-inducible factor 1. Cell 145, 732–744. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.03.054
Mansfield, K. D., Guzy, R. D., Pan, Y., Young, R. M., Cash, T. P., Schumacker, P. T., et al. (2005). Mitochondrial dysfunction resulting from loss of cytochrome c impairs cellular oxygen sensing and hypoxic HIF-α activation. Cell Metab. 1, 393–399. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2005.05.003
Martinez-Outschoorn, U. E., Peiris-Pagés, M., Pestell, R. G., Sotgia, F., and Lisanti, M. P. (2017). Cancer metabolism: a therapeutic perspective. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 14, 11–31. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.60
Masoud, G. N., and Li, W. (2015). HIF-1α pathway: role, regulation and intervention for cancer therapy. Acta Pharm. Sin. B 5, 378–389. doi: 10.1016/j.apsb.2015.05.007
Maxwell, P. H., Pugh, C. W., and Ratcliffe, P. J. (2001). Activation of the HIF pathway in cancer. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 11, 293–299. doi: 10.1016/S0959-437X(00)00193-3
Maxwell, P. H., Pugh, C. W., Ratcliffe, P. J., and Schofield, C. J. (2017). Antibody against human HIF hydroxylase. U.S. Patent No 984,454,6B2.
Mendez, L. E., Manci, N., Cantuaria, G., Gomez-Marin, O., Penalver, M., Braunschweiger, P., et al. (2002). Expression of glucose transporter-1 in cervical cancer and its precursors. Gynecol. Oncol. 86, 138–143. doi: 10.1006/gyno.2002.6745
Moeller, B. J., Cao, Y., Li, C. Y., and Dewhirst, M. W. (2004). Radiation activates HIF-1 to regulate vascular radiosensitivity in tumors: role of reoxygenation, free radicals, and stress granules. Cancer Cell 5, 429–441. doi: 10.1016/S1535-6108(04)00115-1
Moeller, B. J., Richardson, R. A., and Dewhirst, M. W. (2007). Hypoxia and radiotherapy: opportunities for improved outcomes in cancer treatment. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 26, 241–248. doi: 10.1007/s10555-007-9056-0
Mole, D. R., Blancher, C., Copley, R. R., Pollard, P. J., Gleadle, J. M., Ragoussis, J., et al. (2009). Genome-wide association of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α and HIF-2α DNA binding with expression profiling of hypoxia-inducible transcripts. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 16767–16775. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M901790200
Moreno-Sánchez, R., Rodríguez-Enríquez, S., Marín-Hernández, A., and Saavedra, E. (2007). Energy metabolism in tumor cells. FEBS J. 274, 1393–1418. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2007.05686.x
Neal, C. S., Michael, M. Z., Rawlings, L. H., Van Der Hoek, M. B., and Gleadle, J. M. (2010). The VHL-dependent regulation of microRNAs in renal cancer. BMC Med. 8:64. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-64
Olcina, M. M., Kim, R. K., Melemenidis, S., Graves, E. E., and Giaccia, A. J. (2018). The tumour microenvironment links complement system dysregulation and hypoxic signalling. Br. J. Radiol. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180069 [Epub ahead of print].
Owens, K. M., Kulawiec, M., Desouki, M. M., Vanniarajan, A., and Singh, K. K. (2011). Impaired OXPHOS complex III in breast cancer. PLoS One 6:e23846. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023846
Owusu-Ansah, E., Yavari, A., Mandal, S., and Banerjee, U. (2008). Distinct mitochondrial retrograde signals control the G1-S cell cycle checkpoint. Nat. Genet. 40, 356–361. doi: 10.1038/ng.2007.50
Pagé, E. L., Chan, D. A., Giaccia, A. J., Levine, M., and Richard, D. E. (2008). Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α stabilization in nonhypoxic conditions: role of oxidation and intracellular ascorbate depletion. Mol. Biol. Cell 19, 86–94. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e07-06-0612
Palm, W., and Thompson, C. B. (2017). Nutrient acquisition strategies of mammalian cells. Nature 546, 234–242. doi: 10.1038/nature22379
Patten, D. A., Lafleur, V. N., Robitaille, G. A., Chan, D. A., Giaccia, A. J., and Richard, D. E. (2010). Hypoxia-inducible factor-1 activation in nonhypoxic conditions: the essential role of mitochondrial-derived reactive oxygen species. Mol. Biol. Cell 21, 3247–3257. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e10-01-0025
Peng, X.-H., Karna, P., Cao, Z., Jiang, B.-H., Zhou, M., and Yang, L. (2006). Cross-talk between epidermal growth factor receptor and hypoxia-inducible factor-1α signal pathways increases resistance to apoptosis by up-regulating survivin gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 25903–25914. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M603414200
Pocock, R. (2011). Invited review: decoding the microRNA response to hypoxia. Pflügers Arch. 461, 307–315. doi: 10.1007/s00424-010-0910-5
Puissegur, M., Mazure, N., Bertero, T., Pradelli, L., Grosso, S., Robbe-Sermesant, K., et al. (2011). miR-210 is overexpressed in late stages of lung cancer and mediates mitochondrial alterations associated with modulation of HIF-1 activity. Cell Death Differ. 18, 465–478. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2010.119
Robey, I. F., Lien, A. D., Welsh, S. J., Baggett, B. K., and Gillies, R. J. (2005). Hypoxia-inducible factor-1α and the glycolytic phenotype in tumors. Neoplasia 7, 324–330. doi: 10.1593/neo.04430
Robinson, P. J., Hack, C., Merrill, E. A., and Mattie, D. R. (2017). Mathematical Model of HIF-1 Alpha Pathway, Oxygen Transport and Hypoxia. Bethesda, MD: Henry M. Jackson Foundation For the Advancement of Military Medicine.
Ruan, K., Fang, X., and Ouyang, G. (2009). MicroRNAs: novel regulators in the hallmarks of human cancer. Cancer Lett. 285, 116–126. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2009.04.031
Saito, Y., Uchida, N., Tanaka, S., Suzuki, N., Tomizawa-Murasawa, M., Sone, A., et al. (2010). Induction of cell cycle entry eliminates human leukemia stem cells in a mouse model of AML. Nat. Biotechnol. 28, 275–280. doi: 10.1038/nbt.1607
Schito, L., and Rey, S. (2017). Hypoxic pathobiology of breast cancer metastasis. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1868, 239–245. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2017.05.004
Schofield, C. J., and Ratcliffe, P. J. (2004). Oxygen sensing by HIF hydroxylases. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 5, 343–354. doi: 10.1038/nrm1366
Schöning, J. P., Monteiro, M., and Gu, W. (2017). Drug resistance and cancer stem cells: the shared but distinct roles of hypoxia-inducible factors HIF 1α and HIF 2α. Clin. Exp. Pharmacol. Physiol. 44, 153–161. doi: 10.1111/1440-1681.12693
Schwab, L. P., Peacock, D. L., Majumdar, D., Ingels, J. F., Jensen, L. C., Smith, K. D., et al. (2012). Hypoxia-inducible factor 1α promotes primary tumor growth and tumor-initiating cell activity in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 14:R6. doi: 10.1186/bcr3087
Semenza, G. L. (2010). HIF-1: upstream and downstream of cancer metabolism. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 20, 51–56. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2009.10.009
Semenza, G. L. (2012a). Hypoxia-inducible factors in physiology and medicine. Cell 148, 399–408. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.01.021
Semenza, G. L. (2012b). Hypoxia-inducible factors: mediators of cancer progression and targets for cancer therapy. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 33, 207–214. doi: 10.1016/j.tips.2012.01.005
Seo, B. R., Delnero, P., and Fischbach, C. (2014). In vitro models of tumor vessels and matrix: engineering approaches to investigate transport limitations and drug delivery in cancer. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 69, 205–216. doi: 10.1016/j.addr.2013.11.011
Shen, G., Li, X., Jia, Y.-F., Piazza, G. A., and Xi, Y. (2013). Hypoxia-regulated microRNAs in human cancer. Acta Pharm. Sin. 34, 336–341. doi: 10.1038/aps.2012.195
Shestov, A. A., Liu, X., Ser, Z., Cluntun, A. A., Hung, Y. P., Huang, L., et al. (2014). Quantitative determinants of aerobic glycolysis identify flux through the enzyme GAPDH as a limiting step. eLife 3:e03342. doi: 10.7554/eLife.03342
Shibuya, K., Okada, M., Suzuki, S., Seino, M., Seino, S., Takeda, H., et al. (2015). Targeting the facilitative glucose transporter GLUT1 inhibits the self-renewal and tumor-initiating capacity of cancer stem cells. Oncotarget 6, 651–661. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.2892
Simon, M. C., and Keith, B. (2008). The role of oxygen availability in embryonic development and stem cell function. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9, 285–296. doi: 10.1038/nrm2354
Simpson, I. A., Dwyer, D., Malide, D., Moley, K. H., Travis, A., and Vannucci, S. J. (2008). The facilitative glucose transporter GLUT3: 20 years of distinction. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 295, E242–E253. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.90388.2008
Suh, H. N., and Han, H. J. (2013). Fibronectin-induced VEGF receptor and calcium channel transactivation stimulate GLUT-1 synthesis and trafficking through PPARγ and TC10 in mouse embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Res. 10, 371–386. doi: 10.1016/j.scr.2013.01.008
Talks, K. L., Turley, H., Gatter, K. C., Maxwell, P. H., Pugh, C. W., Ratcliffe, P. J., et al. (2000). The expression and distribution of the hypoxia-inducible factors HIF-1α and HIF-2α in normal human tissues, cancers, and tumor-associated macrophages. Am. J. Pathol. 157, 411–421. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)64554-3
Tao, L., Huang, G., Song, H., Chen, Y., and Chen, L. (2017). Cancer associated fibroblasts: an essential role in the tumor microenvironment. Oncol. Lett. 14, 2611–2620. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.6497
Trédan, O., Galmarini, C. M., Patel, K., and Tannock, I. F. (2007). Drug resistance and the solid tumor microenvironment. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 99, 1441–1454. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djm135
Trendowski, M., Mitchell, J. M., Corsette, C. M., Acquafondata, C., and Fondy, T. P. (2015). Chemotherapy with cytochalasin congeners in vitro and in vivo against murine models. Invest. New Drugs 33, 290–299. doi: 10.1007/s10637-014-0203-5
van Patot, M. C., and Gassmann, M. (2011). Hypoxia: adapting to high altitude by mutating EPAS-1, the gene encoding HIF-2α. High Alt. Med. Biol. 12, 157–167. doi: 10.1089/ham.2010.1099
Vanharanta, S., Shu, W., Brenet, F., Hakimi, A. A., Heguy, A., Viale, A., et al. (2013). Epigenetic expansion of VHL-HIF signal output drives multiorgan metastasis in renal cancer. Nat. Med. 19, 50–56. doi: 10.1038/nm.3029
Vaupel, P. (2008). Hypoxia and aggressive tumor phenotype: implications for therapy and prognosis. Oncologist 13, 21–26. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.13-S3-21
Vaupel, P., and Harrison, L. (2004). Tumor hypoxia: causative factors, compensatory mechanisms, and cellular response. Oncologist 9, 4–9. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.9-90005-4
Vaupel, P., Kallinowski, F., and Okunieff, P. (1989). Blood flow, oxygen and nutrient supply, and metabolic microenvironment of human tumors: a review. Cancer Res. 49, 6449–6465.
Vaupel, P., Thews, O., and Hoeckel, M. (2001). Treatment resistance of solid tumors. Med. Oncol. 18, 243–259. doi: 10.1385/MO:18:4:243
Warburg, O. (1956). On the origin of cancer cells. Science 123, 309–314. doi: 10.1126/science.123.3191.309
Watson, J. A., Watson, C. J., Mccann, A., and Baugh, J. (2010). Epigenetics: the epicenter of the hypoxic response. Epigenetics 5, 293–296. doi: 10.4161/epi.5.4.11684
Weidemann, A., and Johnson, R. (2008). Biology of HIF-1α. Cell Death Differ. 15, 621–627. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2008.12
Welsh, S., Williams, R., Kirkpatrick, L., Paine-Murrieta, G., and Powis, G. (2004). Antitumor activity and pharmacodynamic properties of PX-478, an inhibitor of hypoxia-inducible factor-1α. Mol. Cancer Ther. 3, 233–244.
Williams, K. J., Cowen, R. L., and Stratford, I. J. (2001). Hypoxia and oxidative stress in breast cancer Tumour hypoxia–therapeutic considerations. Breast Cancer Res. 3, 328–331. doi: 10.1186/bcr316
Wolff, M., Kosyna, F. K., Dunst, J., Jelkmann, W., and Depping, R. (2017). Impact of hypoxia inducible factors on estrogen receptor expression in breast cancer cells. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 613, 23–30. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2016.11.002
Wong, C., Qian, Y., and Yu, J. (2017). Interplay between epigenetics and metabolism in oncogenesis: mechanisms and therapeutic approaches. Oncogene 36, 3359–3374. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.485
Yang, M., Su, H., Soga, T., Kranc, K. R., and Pollard, P. J. (2014). Prolyl hydroxylase domain enzymes: important regulators of cancer metabolism. Hypoxia 2,127–142.
Yang, S. L., Wu, C., Xiong, Z. F., and Fang, X. (2015). Progress on hypoxia-inducible factor-3: its structure, gene regulation and biological function. Mol. Med. Rep. 12, 2411–2416. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2015.3689
Yu, Z., Li, Y., Fan, H., Liu, Z., and Pestell, R. G. (2012). miRNAs regulate stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Front. Genet. 3:191. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2012.00191
Zeng, H.-L., Zhong, Q., Qin, Y.-L., Bu, Q.-Q., Han, X.-A., Jia, H.-T., et al. (2011). Hypoxia-mimetic agents inhibit proliferation and alter the morphology of human umbilical cord-derived mesenchymal stem cells. BMC Cell Biol. 12:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-12-32
Zheng, J. (2012). Energy metabolism of cancer: glycolysis versus oxidative phosphorylation. Oncol. Lett. 4, 1151–1157. doi: 10.3892/ol.2012.928
Zhou, J., Wu, S.-G., Sun, J.-Y., Li, F.-Y., Lin, H.-X., Chen, Q.-H., et al. (2017). Comparison of clinical outcomes of squamous cell carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, and adenosquamous carcinoma of the uterine cervix after definitive radiotherapy: a population-based analysis. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 143, 115–122. doi: 10.1007/s00432-016-2246-9
Keywords: hypoxia, metabolism, Warburg effect, HIF, Glut-1, glycolysis, mitochondria
Citation: Al Tameemi W, Dale TP, Al-Jumaily RMK and Forsyth NR (2019) Hypoxia-Modified Cancer Cell Metabolism. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 7:4. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00004
Received: 21 September 2018; Accepted: 10 January 2019;
Published: 29 January 2019.
Edited by:
Eleonora Napoli, University of California, Davis, United StatesReviewed by:
Michael P. Lisanti, University of Salford, United KingdomSalvatore Rizza, Danish Cancer Society, Denmark
Copyright © 2019 Al Tameemi, Dale, Al-Jumaily and Forsyth. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Nicholas R. Forsyth, n.r.forsyth@keele.ac.uk