Abstract
Chlamydia species infect a large range of vertebral hosts and have become of major economic and public health concern over the last decades. They are obligate intracellular bacteria that undergo a unique cycle of development characterized by the presence of two distinct bacterial forms. After infection of the host cell, Chlamydia are found inside a membrane-bound compartment, the inclusion. The surrounding membrane of the inclusion contributes to the host-Chlamydia interface and specific pathogen-derived Inc proteins shape this interface allowing interactions with distinct cellular proteins. In contrast to many other bacteria, Chlamydia species acquire sphingomyelin from the host cell. In recent years a clearer picture of how Chlamydia trachomatis acquires this lipid emerged showing that the bacteria interact with vesicular and non-vesicular transport pathways that involve the recruitment of specific RAB proteins and the lipid-transfer protein CERT. These interactions contribute to the development of a new sphingomyelin-producing compartment inside the host cell. Interestingly, recruitment of CERT is conserved among different Chlamydia species including Chlamydia psittaci. Here we discuss our current understanding on the molecular mechanisms used by C. trachomatis and C. psittaci to establish these interactions and to create a novel sphingomyelin-producing compartment inside the host cell important for the infection.
Introduction
Lipids are important factors in bacterial infections. They serve as energy source, structural components and are involved in the immune response. Like many bacteria, Chlamydia trachomatis is able to synthesize most phospholipids except for sphingomyelin, cholesterol and phosphatidylcholine. Sphingomyelin is mainly produced by eukaryotic cells thus; the detection of sphingomyelin inside chlamydial cells was astonishing. This review summarizes recent advances in our understanding of how Chlamydia spp. acquire sphingolipids from the host cell and describes their functions for Chlamydia biology.
Clinics of Chlamydia trachomatis and C. psittaci Infections
Chlamydia trachomatis strains can be divided into biovars. The trachoma biovar (serovars A-C) can cause trachoma, the leading cause of preventable blindness that is hyperendemic in many rural areas of Africa, Central and South America, Asia, Australia and the Middle East. Infections with the urogenital tract biovar (serovars D-K) are among the most frequently sexually transmitted bacterial infections world-wide. They affect mainly young adults and persons with multiple sex partners (Newman et al., 2015). Symptoms range from asymptomatic to urethritis and proctitis in both genders and cervicitis in females. In particular, untreated or re-occurring infections in women have been associated with severe outcomes including pelvic inflammatory diseases (PID), ectopic pregnancies and infertility. Furthermore, during pregnancy, untreated C. trachomatis infections are a risk factor of preterm birth, conjunctivitis and pneumonia of the newborn. C. trachomatis belonging to the lymphogranuloma venereum biovar (LGV, L1-L3) is also sexually transmitted and can cause urogenital or anorectal infections in humans that can be more invasive by disseminating to the lymph nodes (Elwell et al., 2016).
Chlamydia psittaci is a zoonotic pathogen that causes respiratory disease in humans and avian species, also known as psittacosis or ornithosis (Knittler et al., 2014; Knittler and Sachse, 2015). The agent was originally isolated from birds, but meanwhile it has been found in different mammalian hosts like cattle, horses and pigs (Longbottom and Coulter, 2003). C. psittaci can be transmitted from domestic birds to humans by inhalation of aerosolized bacteria from the feces of infected avian species (Knittler et al., 2014; Knittler and Sachse, 2015). In many cases C. psittaci infections remain undetected and undiagnosed due to unspecific symptoms (fever, chills, headache, malaise, myalgia) (Knittler et al., 2014; Knittler and Sachse, 2015).
Biology of Chlamydiaceae
Both C. trachomatis and C. psittaci belong to the family of Chlamydiaceae. A hallmark of all members of this family is their obligate intracellular, biphasic cycle of development that takes place in a membrane-bound compartment inside a eukaryotic host cell (Moulder, 1991; Hybiske, 2015).
It is characterized by the switch between the extracellular, infectious elementary bodies (EBs) and the intracellular, non-infectious, metabolically active reticulate bodies (RBs) (Figure 1). EBs are 0.3 μm in size and enter the host cell by receptor-mediated endocytosis or phagocytosis, involving bacterial adhesins, host cell receptors, and host-specific heparan proteoglycans (Elwell et al., 2016). After internalization, EBs are found in vacuoles, termed inclusions that protect the bacteria from the immune response of the host cell. By releasing effector molecules into the host cell via a type III secretion system, the inclusion membrane is modified and can escape the phagolysosomal pathway (Moore and Ouellette, 2014). Within the inclusion, EBs differentiate into the osmotically instable RBs. These 1 μm small, structurally flexible bacteria divide asymmetrically (Nunes and Gomes, 2014; Abdelrahman et al., 2016). RBs synthesize a family of special proteins, the Inc proteins, which are unique to Chlamydia spp. and are integral parts of the bacterial inclusion membrane. They are important bacterial constituents of the inclusion-host cell interface and confer stability to the inclusion membrane (Mirrashidi et al., 2015; Weber et al., 2017). Inc proteins were originally identified in C. psittaci. They are a family of Chlamydia-specific proteins lacking sequence homology to any known proteins, or to themselves. Interestingly, genomic comparison of different Chlamydia strains showed that some Inc proteins are conserved between different species and others are species-specific. These non-conserved Inc proteins may be involved in tissue tropism (Dehoux et al., 2011; Lutter et al., 2012).
FIGURE 1
At 16–20 h post infection (p.i.) some RBs start to transform back into EBs, while other RBs continue to replicate. Depending on chlamydial species and growth conditions, at 48–72 h p.i. both developmental stages are released from the host cell by either complete lysis of the host cell or by a mechanism called extrusion – the release of the intact inclusion enveloped by host cell plasma membrane (Figure 1; Hybiske and Stephens, 2007). Freed EBs can infect neighboring host cells and start a new round of infection.
Sphingolipid Synthesis in Eukaryotic Cells
Sphingolipids are major integral components of eukaryotic cell membranes. They function as structural and signaling molecules that can regulate apoptosis, cellular proliferation and stress responses (Heung et al., 2006; Breslow and Weissman, 2010). Defects in sphingolipid metabolism have been linked to different diseases including carcinogenesis, cardiovascular and neurodegenerative diseases (Heung et al., 2006).
A sphingoid base linked to a specific fatty acid is the building block of the diverse family of sphingolipids. In sphingomyelin, this backbone is linked to a head group of phosphocholine whereas complex glycosphingolipids are generated by addition of a specific sugar residue. Sphingolipids are a family of structurally and functionally diverse lipids and are synthesized by three distinct pathways: (1) de novo synthesis, (2) sphingomyelinase pathways, and (3) salvage pathway that involve specific enzymes localized to distinct organelles inside the cell.
De novo sphingolipid synthesis begins with condensation of serine and palmitoyl coenzyme A (CoA) which takes place at the cytosolic leaflet of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) catalyzed by the highly conserved palmitoyltransferase (SPTLC) (Yard et al., 2007; Breslow and Weissman, 2010; Hannun and Obeid, 2018). The product of SPTLC, 3-ketosphinganine, is further reduced by 3-ketosphinganine reductase (KDSR) and N-acylated by the action of fatty acid specific dihydroceramide synthases (CERS1-6). Finally, dihydroceramide is desaturated by dihydroceramide desaturase (DEGS) to generate ceramide. Ceramide represents the central precursor molecule of the sphingolipid metabolism, which in turn is used to generate several sphingolipids, like sphingomyelin, sphingosine or complex glycosphingolipids. Ceramide is then transported from the ER to the Golgi apparatus by vesicular trafficking or by transport proteins (Bartke and Hannun, 2009; Hanada, 2010). Within the Golgi, ceramides are modified at the head-group position by adding phosphocholine and phosphate to produce sphingomyelin and ceramide 1-phosphate (Tafesse et al., 2006; Hannun and Obeid, 2018). Ceramide is converted to sphingomyelin by sphingomyelin synthases (SMS) located at the lumen of the trans-Golgi (SMS1 and SMS2) and at the plasma membrane (SMS2) (Tafesse et al., 2006; Yamaji and Hanada, 2015). Precursor of complex glycosphingolipids, such as glucosylceramide and galactosylceramide, are formed by the addition of glucose and galactose residues in a glycosidic linkage to ceramide (Breslow and Weissman, 2010; Yamaji and Hanada, 2015). Ultimately, sphingolipids and glycosphingolipids are transported through secretory pathways to plasma membranes and subcellular organelles.
Alternatively, ceramides can be generated by the breakdown of complex sphingolipids, termed salvage pathway (Kitatani et al., 2008). Sphingolipids and glycosphingolipids are degraded in acidic subcellular compartments, such as late endosomes and lysosomes, to form sphingosine (Kitatani et al., 2008). In contrast to ceramide, which is not capable to leave the lysosome, sphingosine is able to enter different cell compartments (Bartke and Hannun, 2009). Released sphingosine may re-enter sphingolipid pathways and is reused by the ceramide synthase to generate ceramides again via re-acylation (Kitatani et al., 2008).
The third pathway, termed sphingomyelinase pathway, occurs in the plasma membrane and endosome/lysosome systems (Yamaji and Hanada, 2015; Teo et al., 2016). Within these compartments, sphingomyelin is converted to ceramide by acid sphingomyelinases (Kitatani et al., 2008). At plasma membranes, SMS2 adds phosphocholine head groups to ceramide, which leads to the production of sphingomyelin.
Sphingolipid Transport in Chlamydia-Infected Cells
Twenty four years ago, Hackstadt et al. (1995) showed that fluorescently labeled sphingomyelin is acquired by C. trachomatis from the host cell. Based on the observation that purified EBs contained fluorescent sphingomyelin the authors concluded that Golgi-derived sphingomyelin accumulates in bacteria rather than its precursor ceramide. Classical protein markers of the transport between the Golgi apparatus and the plasma membrane were not found in the inclusion membrane suggesting that a subset of Golgi-derived exocytic vesicles is targeted (Hackstadt et al., 1996; Scidmore et al., 1996a). C. trachomatis protein synthesis is required for this interaction and bacterial factors that mediate fusogenicity with sphingomyelin-containing vesicles seem to be continually replenished (Scidmore et al., 1996b, 2003). Shortly after these initial observations, quantitative analysis indicated that C. trachomatis membranes contain up to 4% of sphingolipids (Wylie et al., 1997). Interfering with bacterial sphingolipid acquisition resulted in less infectious bacteria, leads to the formation of aberrant chlamydial forms and demonstrated the requirement of sphingolipid metabolism for reactivation after INFγ treatment of C. trachomatis-infected cells (van Ooij et al., 2000; Rejman Lipinski et al., 2009; Robertson et al., 2009). Interestingly, synthesis of sphingomyelin from ceramide seems to be a prerequisite for sphingolipid uptake into the inclusion and into the bacteria, as a ceramide derivative that cannot be converted to sphingomyelin (1-O-methyl-ceramide) was not translocated across the inclusion membrane but rather accumulated around the inclusion (Banhart et al., 2014). This ceramide derivative showed strong anti-chlamydial activity suggesting that C. trachomatis generates a sphingomyelin-producing compartment inside the host cell which is important for chlamydial growth (Banhart et al., 2014; Saied et al., 2015). Surprisingly, a recent study suggests that sphingomyelin uptake by Chlamydia species is linked to host adaptation and/or virulence rather than to its obligate intracellular life style (Dille et al., 2015).
In recent years, vesicular and non-vesicular transport pathways were identified that were hijacked by C. trachomatis to obtain sphingolipids from the host cell (Figure 2). These pathways are not redundant and play distinct roles during the chlamydial cycle of development. It has been shown that C. trachomatis can intercept vesicular transport routes from different organelles including Golgi mini-stacks or multivesicular bodies (MVBs). Transport of sphingolipid-containing vesicles derived from Golgi mini-stacks requires cellular GTPases RAB14, RAB6A and RAB11A, ARF1 and its guanine nucleotide exchange factor GBF1 (Heuer et al., 2009; Elwell et al., 2011). Interestingly, RAB14, RAB6A, and RAB11A appear to be important for Chlamydia progeny formation whereas ARF1 and GBF1 seem to be dispensable (Rejman Lipinski et al., 2009; Capmany and Damiani, 2010; Elwell et al., 2011). The recruitment of RAB14-postive vesicles was shown to be controlled by the Akt signaling pathway, a pathway that is activated by C. trachomatis infections (Capmany et al., 2019). Several other kinases have also been implicated in sphingomyelin transport to the C. trachomatis inclusion. These include SRC family kinase Fyn and serine/threonine kinases that have been identified in an RNAi screen and based upon inhibition by rotterlin, respectively (Shivshankar et al., 2008; Mital and Hackstadt, 2011). The precise mechanisms how rotterlin inhibits sphingomyelin uptake by C. trachomatis remains elusive as rotterlin appears to have multiple targets inside the host cell (Lei et al., 2012). In addition, sphingomyelin is transported from MVBs by RAB39 (Gambarte Tudela et al., 2019). The MVB marker protein CD63 has been detected inside C. trachomatis inclusion but its functional role remains elusive (Beatty, 2006, 2008). In contrast, much less is known for sphingolipid acquisition in C. psittaci infections (Figure 2). For both species, infection results in fragmentation of the cellular Golgi apparatus into smaller Golgi mini-stacks thereby increasing Golgi surface (Heuer et al., 2009; Knittler et al., 2014). This phenotype has been shown to boost sphingolipid acquisition in C. trachomatis infections (Heuer et al., 2009). In sum, multiple cellular processes contribute to sphingolipid acquisition in Chlamydia infections (Moore, 2012). How these factors regulate sphingolipid transport and influence the infection is currently not completely understood.
FIGURE 2
The recruitment of cellular proteins, especially RAB proteins, is species dependent (Damiani et al., 2014). In the past, the localizations of RAB proteins were investigated during infection of different Chlamydia species and showed that a core subset of RAB proteins is recruited to the inclusion membrane of different Chlamydia species whereas a few RAB proteins are species-specific (Rzomp et al., 2003). Interestingly, although recruitment of a RAB protein is conserved between different Chlamydia species (Rab4 in C. trachomatis serovar L2 and D, C. muridarum, and C. pneumoniae), its identified bacterial interaction partner that is responsible for the interaction (CT229 in C. trachomatis serovar L2) has not been found in the other chlamydial species (Rzomp et al., 2006). This leaves a question mark on of how the mechanisms of functional recruitment differ between Chlamydia species.
Future research regarding the role of these different vesicular pathways in infections with different Chlamydia species, the identification of transported lipids and bacterial factors controlling these interactions is needed to understand the intricate relationship.
Cert-Dependent Acquisition of Sphingolipids and Beyond
New studies showed that C. trachomatis and C. psittaci hijack the cellular ceramide transport protein CERT to obtain ceramide from the host cell (Derre et al., 2011; Koch-Edelmann et al., 2017). CERT transfers ceramide from the ER to the Golgi apparatus in uninfected cells using the C-terminal START domain (Ponting and Aravind, 1999). Its N-terminal pleckstrin homology (PH) domain binds phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate (PI4P) (Peretti et al., 2008) at the cis-face of the Golgi apparatus and is linked with the ER due to its central FFAT motif binding VAPs (Vesicle-associated membrane protein-associated protein) (Loewen et al., 2003). In C. trachomatis-infected cells, CERT is recruited to the inclusion membrane by interaction with IncD (Figure 2). Targeted deletion of CERT domains showed that the FFAT motif is relevant for binding and co-recruiting VAPs to the inclusion membrane, but lack of the PH domain interrupts association to the inclusion (Agaisse and Derre, 2014). The interaction of IncD with CERT is driven by the charged and hydrophobic motif in its C-terminus as well as the charged motif in the N-terminus (Kumagai et al., 2018). These motifs are conserved in C. trachomatis, C. suis, C. muridarum, C. caviae, and C. felis. Also, the proximity of both domains and the possibility of forming homooligomers mediated by the transmembrane domain are necessary for increasing the affinity to CERT. After CERT recruitment to the inclusion membrane, ceramide is likely transported from the ER to the inclusion membrane at ER-inclusion contact sides where ceramide is subsequently converted into sphingomyelin by the also recruited host SMS2 (Figure 2; Elwell et al., 2011). IncD belongs to the non-conserved Inc proteins that are not found in all Chlamydia species, for example C. psittaci. Thus, it is currently not known how CERT is recruited to C. psittaci inclusions (Koch-Edelmann et al., 2017). In uninfected cells, the CERT PH domain binds to PI4P-enriched membranes in the trans-Golgi region. It has been suggested, that PI4P is present at C. trachomatis inclusion membranes and might thereby partially mediate CERT binding (Moorhead et al., 2010). Assuming that C. psittaci inclusions are PI4P positive, this mode of binding could be conserved between the different Chlamydia species. In addition, proteomic analysis of C. trachomatis inclusions revealed that VAPB, a binding partner of CERT is significantly enriched in the inclusion proteome (Aeberhard et al., 2015). Whether VAPB is also associated with C. psittaci inclusions or if a currently unknown C. psittaci factor facilitates CERT recruitment still needs to be determined. Thus, future experiments are needed to reveal the nature of CERT binding to C. psittaci inclusions.
Sphingomyelin is one of the essential host-derived lipids that is incorporated into chlamydial membranes (Saka and Valdivia, 2010) and is described to play a role in bacterial replication and inclusion growth (Hackstadt et al., 1996; Rejman Lipinski et al., 2009; Elwell et al., 2011). Further evidence for this suggestion is that CERT recruitment is conserved among Chlamydia spp. (Koch-Edelmann et al., 2017). For C. trachomatis and C. muridarum it has been shown by RNA interference that CERT seems to be essential for the production of infectious progeny, indicating that CERT is a crucial factor in chlamydial development (Derre et al., 2011; Elwell et al., 2011). Recent studies using CRISPR/Cas9-mediated CERT-knockout cells demonstrated that deficiency of CERT in C. psittaci infections also leads to decreased infectious progeny formation (Koch-Edelmann et al., 2017). Interestingly, CERT-knockout caused an increase of sphingolipid uptake by C. psittaci (Koch-Edelmann et al., 2017). This is in stark contrast to C. trachomatis infection that shows a drastic decrease in bacterial sphingolipid acquisition under CERT depletion. These findings possibly suggest a CERT-independent sphingolipid uptake pathway in C. psittaci infections. How sphingolipids are transported to C. psittaci in CERT-knockout cells is currently not known. The involvement of one or more novel factor/s of either bacterial and/or cellular origin that compensate for loss of CERT is likely. Besides that, these results underline that acquisition of sphingomyelin needs to be controlled by Chlamydia spp. and suggest that CERT might have additional roles in chlamydial development beyond sphingolipid transport, which need to be investigated in the future.
Summary and Outlook
Twenty four years after the initial observation that C. trachomatis can acquire sphingomyelin from the Golgi apparatus of the infected host cells a clearer picture is emerging on the molecular pathways used by different Chlamydia species to obtain sphingolipids. Chlamydia species use distinct, non-redundant pathways to obtain sphingolipids. These include vesicular and non-vesicular transport pathways. The characterization of CERT as a conserved factor in ceramide delivery to different Chlamydia species and the recruitment of the human SMS2 to the C. trachomatis inclusion suggests that at least C. trachomatis creates a novel sphingomyelin-producing compartment inside the infected host cells. Additionally, in C. trachomatis infections sphingomyelin is transported by distinct vesicles. For that purpose, C. trachomatis exploits cellular GTPases, including RAB and ARF proteins, and kinases to facilitate bacterial sphingomyelin acquisition from fragmented Golgi mini-stacks and MVBs. How vesicular and non-vesicular transport of sphingolipids is controlled by different Chlamydia species, how they process CERT-delivered ceramide, and how ceramide and sphingomyelin regulate chlamydial infections are just a few open questions. The development of novel tools including the genetic manipulation of Chlamydia species and the biochemical isolation of chlamydial inclusions now allows addressing these questions.
Statements
Author contributions
DH developed the conception of the manuscript and wrote the manuscript. SB designed the figures. ES, J-MG, and SB contributed to and wrote sections of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemein- schaft (SPP 1580 to DH, HE6008/1-1 and HE6008/1-2) and the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) in the framework of the national research network “Zoonotic Chlamydia – Models of chronic and persistent infections in humans and animals.” We apologize to those investigators whose work we were unable to cite because of space constraints.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AbdelrahmanY.OuelletteS. P.BellandR. J.CoxJ. V. (2016). Polarized cell division of Chlamydia trachomatis.PLoS Pathog.12:e1005822. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005822
2
AeberhardL.BanhartS.FischerM.JehmlichN.RoseL.KochS.et al (2015). The proteome of the isolated Chlamydia trachomatis containing vacuole reveals a complex trafficking platform enriched for retromer components.PLoS Pathog.11:e1004883. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004883
3
AgaisseH.DerreI. (2014). Expression of the effector protein IncD in Chlamydia trachomatis mediates recruitment of the lipid transfer protein CERT and the endoplasmic reticulum-resident protein VAPB to the inclusion membrane.Infect. Immun.822037–2047. 10.1128/IAI.01530-14
4
BanhartS.SaiedE. M.MartiniA.KochS.AeberhardL.MadelaK.et al (2014). Improved plaque assay identifies a novel anti-Chlamydia ceramide derivative with altered intracellular localization.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.585537–5546. 10.1128/AAC.03457-14
5
BartkeN.HannunY. A. (2009). Bioactive sphingolipids: metabolism and function.J. Lipid Res.50(Suppl.), S91–S96.
6
BeattyW. L. (2006). Trafficking from CD63-positive late endocytic multivesicular bodies is essential for intracellular development of Chlamydia trachomatis.J. Cell Sci.119350–359. 10.1242/jcs.02733
7
BeattyW. L. (2008). Late endocytic multivesicular bodies intersect the chlamydial inclusion in the absence of CD63.Infect. Immun.762872–2881. 10.1128/IAI.00129-08
8
BreslowD. K.WeissmanJ. S. (2010). Membranes in balance: mechanisms of sphingolipid homeostasis.Mol. Cell40267–279. 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.10.005
9
CapmanyA.DamianiM. T. (2010). Chlamydia trachomatis intercepts Golgi-derived sphingolipids through a Rab14-mediated transport required for bacterial development and replication.PLoS One5:e14084. 10.1371/journal.pone.0014084
10
CapmanyA.Gambarte TudelaJ.Alonso BivouM.DamianiM. T. (2019). Akt/AS160 signaling pathway inhibition impairs infection by decreasing Rab14-controlled sphingolipids delivery to Chlamydial Inclusions.Front. Microbiol.10:666. 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00666
11
DamianiM. T.Gambarte TudelaJ.CapmanyA. (2014). Targeting eukaryotic Rab proteins: a smart strategy for chlamydial survival and replication.Cell. Microbiol.161329–1338. 10.1111/cmi.12325
12
DehouxP.FloresR.DaugaC.ZhongG.SubtilA. (2011). Multi-genome identification and characterization of chlamydiae-specific type III secretion substrates: the Inc proteins.BMC Genomics12:109. 10.1186/1471-2164-12-109
13
DerreI.SwissR.AgaisseH. (2011). The lipid transfer protein CERT interacts with the Chlamydia inclusion protein IncD and participates to ER-Chlamydia inclusion membrane contact sites.PLoS Pathog.7:e1002092. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002092
14
DilleS.KleinschnitzE. M.KontchouC. W.NolkeT.HackerG. (2015). In contrast to Chlamydia trachomatis, Waddlia chondrophila grows in human cells without inhibiting apoptosis, fragmenting the Golgi apparatus, or diverting post-Golgi sphingomyelin transport.Infect. Immun.833268–3280. 10.1128/IAI.00322-15
15
ElwellC.MirrashidiK.EngelJ. (2016). Chlamydia cell biology and pathogenesis.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.14385–400. 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.30
16
ElwellC. A.JiangS.KimJ. H.LeeA.WittmannT.HanadaK.et al (2011). Chlamydia trachomatis co-opts GBF1 and CERT to acquire host sphingomyelin for distinct roles during intracellular development.PLoS Pathog.7:e1002198. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002198
17
Gambarte TudelaJ.BuonfigliJ.LujanA.Alonso BivouM.CebrianI.CapmanyA.et al (2019). Rab39a and Rab39b display different intracellular distribution and function in sphingolipids and phospholipids transport.Int. J. Mol. Sci.20:E1688. 10.3390/ijms20071688
18
HackstadtT.RockeyD. D.HeinzenR. A.ScidmoreM. A. (1996). Chlamydia trachomatis interrupts an exocytic pathway to acquire endogenously synthesized sphingomyelin in transit from the Golgi apparatus to the plasma membrane.EMBO J.15964–977. 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00433.x
19
HackstadtT.ScidmoreM. A.RockeyD. D. (1995). Lipid metabolism in Chlamydia trachomatis-infected cells: directed trafficking of Golgi-derived sphingolipids to the chlamydial inclusion.Proc Natl Acad Sci U.S.A.924877–4881. 10.1073/pnas.92.11.4877
20
HanadaK. (2010). Intracellular trafficking of ceramide by ceramide transfer protein.Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B Phys. Biol. Sci.86426–437. 10.2183/pjab.86.426
21
HannunY. A.ObeidL. M. (2018). Sphingolipids and their metabolism in physiology and disease.Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.19175–191. 10.1038/nrm.2017.107
22
HeuerD.Rejman LipinskiA.MachuyN.KarlasA.WehrensA.SiedlerF.et al (2009). Chlamydia causes fragmentation of the Golgi compartment to ensure reproduction.Nature457731–735. 10.1038/nature07578
23
HeungL. J.LubertoC.Del PoetaM. (2006). Role of sphingolipids in microbial pathogenesis.Infect. Immun.7428–39. 10.1128/iai.74.1.28-39.2006
24
HybiskeK. (2015). Expanding the molecular toolkit for Chlamydia.Cell Host Microbe1811–13. 10.1016/j.chom.2015.06.016
25
HybiskeK.StephensR. S. (2007). Mechanisms of host cell exit by the intracellular bacterium Chlamydia.Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.10411430–11435. 10.1073/pnas.0703218104
26
KitataniK.Idkowiak-BaldysJ.HannunY. A. (2008). The sphingolipid salvage pathway in ceramide metabolism and signaling.Cell. Signal.201010–1018. 10.1016/j.cellsig.2007.12.006
27
KnittlerM. R.BerndtA.BockerS.DutowP.HanelF.HeuerD.et al (2014). Chlamydia psittaci: new insights into genomic diversity, clinical pathology, host-pathogen interaction and anti-bacterial immunity.Int. J. Med. Microbiol.304877–893. 10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.06.010
28
KnittlerM. R.SachseK. (2015). Chlamydia psittaci: update on an underestimated zoonotic agent.Pathog. Dis.731–15. 10.1093/femspd/ftu007
29
Koch-EdelmannS.BanhartS.SaiedE. M.RoseL.AeberhardL.LaueM.et al (2017). The cellular ceramide transport protein CERT promotes Chlamydia psittaci infection and controls bacterial sphingolipid uptake.Cell. Microbiol.19:e12752. 10.1111/cmi.12752
30
KumagaiK.ElwellC. A.AndoS.EngelJ. N.HanadaK. (2018). Both the N- and C- terminal regions of the Chlamydial inclusion protein D (IncD) are required for interaction with the pleckstrin homology domain of the ceramide transport protein CERT.Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.5051070–1076. 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.09.168
31
LeiL.LiZ.ZhongG. (2012). Rottlerin-mediated inhibition of Chlamydia trachomatis growth and uptake of sphingolipids is independent of p38-regulated/activated protein kinase (PRAK).PLoS One7:e44733. 10.1371/journal.pone.0044733
32
LoewenC. J.RoyA.LevineT. P. (2003). A conserved ER targeting motif in three families of lipid binding proteins and in Opi1p binds VAP.EMBO J.222025–2035. 10.1093/emboj/cdg201
33
LongbottomD.CoulterL. J. (2003). Animal chlamydioses and zoonotic implications.J. Comp. Pathol.128217–244. 10.1053/jcpa.2002.0629
34
LutterE. I.MartensC.HackstadtT. (2012). Evolution and conservation of predicted inclusion membrane proteins in chlamydiae.Comp. Funct. Genomics2012:362104. 10.1155/2012/362104
35
MirrashidiK. M.ElwellC. A.VerschuerenE.JohnsonJ. R.FrandoA.Von DollenJ.et al (2015). Global mapping of the Inc-human interactome reveals that retromer restricts chlamydia infection.Cell Host Microbe18109–121. 10.1016/j.chom.2015.06.004
36
MitalJ.HackstadtT. (2011). Role for the SRC family kinase Fyn in sphingolipid acquisition by chlamydiae.Infect. Immun.794559–4568. 10.1128/IAI.05692-11
37
MooreE. R. (2012). Sphingolipid trafficking and purification in Chlamydia trachomatis-infected cells.Curr. Protoc. Microbiol.Chapter 11:2.
38
MooreE. R.OuelletteS. P. (2014). Reconceptualizing the chlamydial inclusion as a pathogen-specified parasitic organelle: an expanded role for Inc proteins.Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.4:157. 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00157
39
MoorheadA. M.JungJ. Y.SmirnovA.KauferS.ScidmoreM. A. (2010). Multiple host proteins that function in phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate metabolism are recruited to the chlamydial inclusion.Infect. Immun.781990–2007. 10.1128/IAI.01340-09
40
MoulderJ. W. (1991). Interaction of chlamydiae and host cells in vitro.Microbiol. Rev.55143–190.
41
NewmanL.RowleyJ.Vander HoornS.WijesooriyaN. S.UnemoM.LowN.et al (2015). Global estimates of the prevalence and incidence of four curable sexually transmitted infections in 2012 based on systematic review and global reporting.PLoS One10:e0143304. 10.1371/journal.pone.0143304
42
NunesA.GomesJ. P. (2014). Evolution, phylogeny, and molecular epidemiology of Chlamydia.Infect. Genet. Evol.2349–64. 10.1016/j.meegid.2014.01.029
43
PerettiD.DahanN.ShimoniE.HirschbergK.LevS. (2008). Coordinated lipid transfer between the endoplasmic reticulum and the Golgi complex requires the VAP proteins and is essential for Golgi-mediated transport.Mol. Biol. Cell193871–3884. 10.1091/mbc.E08-05-0498
44
PontingC. P.AravindL. (1999). START: a lipid-binding domain in StAR, HD-ZIP and signalling proteins.Trends Biochem. Sci.24130–132. 10.1016/s0968-0004(99)01362-6
45
Rejman LipinskiA.HeymannJ.MeissnerC.KarlasA.BrinkmannV.MeyerT. F.et al (2009). Rab6 and Rab11 regulate Chlamydia trachomatis development and golgin-84-dependent Golgi fragmentation.PLoS Pathog.5:e1000615. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000615
46
RobertsonD. K.GuL.RoweR. K.BeattyW. L. (2009). Inclusion biogenesis and reactivation of persistent Chlamydia trachomatis requires host cell sphingolipid biosynthesis.PLoS Pathog.5:e1000664. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000664
47
RzompK. A.MoorheadA. R.ScidmoreM. A. (2006). The GTPase Rab4 interacts with Chlamydia trachomatis inclusion membrane protein CT229.Infect. Immun.745362–5373. 10.1128/iai.00539-06
48
RzompK. A.ScholtesL. D.BriggsB. J.WhittakerG. R.ScidmoreM. A. (2003). Rab GTPases are recruited to chlamydial inclusions in both a species-dependent and species-independent manner.Infect. Immun.715855–5870. 10.1128/iai.71.10.5855-5870.2003
49
SaiedE. M.BanhartS.BurkleS. E.HeuerD.ArenzC. (2015). A series of ceramide analogs modified at the 1-position with potent activity against the intracellular growth of Chlamydia trachomatis.Future Med. Chem.71971–1980. 10.4155/fmc.15.126
50
SakaH. A.ValdiviaR. H. (2010). Acquisition of nutrients by Chlamydiae: unique challenges of living in an intracellular compartment.Curr. Opin. Microbiol.134–10. 10.1016/j.mib.2009.11.002
51
ScidmoreM. A.FischerE. R.HackstadtT. (1996a). Sphingolipids and glycoproteins are differentially trafficked to the Chlamydia trachomatis inclusion.J. Cell Biol.134363–374. 10.1083/jcb.134.2.363
52
ScidmoreM. A.RockeyD. D.FischerE. R.HeinzenR. A.HackstadtT. (1996b). Vesicular interactions of the Chlamydia trachomatis inclusion are determined by chlamydial early protein synthesis rather than route of entry.Infect. Immun.645366–5372.
53
ScidmoreM. A.FischerE. R.HackstadtT. (2003). Restricted fusion of Chlamydia trachomatis vesicles with endocytic compartments during the initial stages of infection.Infect. Immun.71973–984. 10.1128/iai.71.2.973-984.2003
54
ShivshankarP.LeiL.WangJ.ZhongG. (2008). Rottlerin inhibits chlamydial intracellular growth and blocks chlamydial acquisition of sphingolipids from host cells.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.741243–1249. 10.1128/aem.02151-07
55
TafesseF. G.TernesP.HolthuisJ. C. (2006). The multigenic sphingomyelin synthase family.J. Biol. Chem.28129421–29425. 10.1074/jbc.r600021200
56
TeoW. X.KerrM. C.HustonW. M.TeasdaleR. D. (2016). Sortilin is associated with the chlamydial inclusion and is modulated during infection.Biol. Open5429–435. 10.1242/bio.016485
57
van OoijC.KalmanL.Ijzendoorn vanP.NishijimaM.HanadaK.MostovK.et al (2000). Host cell-derived sphingolipids are required for the intracellular growth of Chlamydia trachomatis.Cell. Microbiol.2627–637. 10.1046/j.1462-5822.2000.00077.x
58
WeberM. M.LamJ. L.DooleyC. A.NorieaN. F.HansenB. T.HoytF. H.et al (2017). Absence of specific Chlamydia trachomatis inclusion membrane proteins triggers premature inclusion membrane lysis and host cell death.Cell Rep.191406–1417. 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.04.058
59
WylieJ. L.HatchG. M.McClartyG. (1997). Host cell phospholipids are trafficked to and then modified by Chlamydia trachomatis.J. Bacteriol.1797233–7242. 10.1128/jb.179.23.7233-7242.1997
60
YamajiT.HanadaK. (2015). Sphingolipid metabolism and interorganellar transport: localization of sphingolipid enzymes and lipid transfer proteins.Traffic16101–122. 10.1111/tra.12239
61
YardB. A.CarterL. G.JohnsonK. A.OvertonI. M.DorwardM.LiuH.et al (2007). The structure of serine palmitoyltransferase; gateway to sphingolipid biosynthesis.J. Mol. Biol.370870–886.
Summary
Keywords
Chlamydia, sphingolipid, sphingomyelin (SM), ceramide (CER), CERT (CERamide Transfer protein), Inc proteins, infection, RAB proteins
Citation
Banhart S, Schäfer EK, Gensch J-M and Heuer D (2019) Sphingolipid Metabolism and Transport in Chlamydia trachomatis and Chlamydia psittaci Infections. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 7:223. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2019.00223
Received
28 June 2019
Accepted
20 September 2019
Published
04 October 2019
Volume
7 - 2019
Edited by
Sibylle Schneider-Schaulies, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Germany
Reviewed by
Vera Kozjak-Pavlovic, Julius Maximilian University of Würzburg, Germany; Maria Teresa Damiani, Instituto de Histología y Embriología Dr. Mario H. Burgos (IHEM CONICET), Argentina
Updates
Copyright
© 2019 Banhart, Schäfer, Gensch and Heuer.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Dagmar Heuer, heuerd@rki.de
This article was submitted to Membrane Physiology and Membrane Biophysics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.