Immunometabolic factors contributing to obesity-linked hepatocellular carcinoma
May G. Akl
Scott B. Widenmaier- 1Department of Anatomy, Physiology, and Pharmacology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
- 2Department of Physiology, University of Alexandria, Alexandria, Egypt
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a major public health concern that is promoted by obesity and associated liver complications. Onset and progression of HCC in obesity is a multifactorial process involving complex interactions between the metabolic and immune system, in which chronic liver damage resulting from metabolic and inflammatory insults trigger carcinogenesis-promoting gene mutations and tumor metabolism. Moreover, cell growth and proliferation of the cancerous cell, after initiation, requires interactions between various immunological and metabolic pathways that provide stress defense of the cancer cell as well as strategic cell death escape mechanisms. The heterogenic nature of HCC in addition to the various metabolic risk factors underlying HCC development have led researchers to focus on examining metabolic pathways that may contribute to HCC development. In obesity-linked HCC, oncogene-induced modifications and metabolic pathways have been identified to support anabolic demands of the growing HCC cells and combat the concomitant cell stress, coinciding with altered utilization of signaling pathways and metabolic fuels involved in glucose metabolism, macromolecule synthesis, stress defense, and redox homeostasis. In this review, we discuss metabolic insults that can underlie the transition from steatosis to steatohepatitis and from steatohepatitis to HCC as well as aberrantly regulated immunometabolic pathways that enable cancer cells to survive and proliferate in the tumor microenvironment. We also discuss therapeutic modalities targeted at HCC prevention and regression. A full understanding of HCC-associated immunometabolic changes in obesity may contribute to clinical treatments that effectively target cancer metabolism.
1 Obesity-linked non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma: A global and complex problem
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most fatal cancers and there are limited therapeutic options (Diehl and Day, 2017; Anstee et al., 2019; Geh et al., 2021; Sung et al., 2021). According to the World Health Organization, HCC related death amounted to approximately 700,000 in 2018 and is expected to reach 1 million in 2030 (Samant et al., 2021). Several factors cause HCC. Most commonly is chronic viral hepatitis, driven by hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Other factors include alcoholic liver disease, metabolic liver diseases such as hereditary hemochromatosis and Wilson’s disease (Gunjan et al., 2017; Jayachandran et al., 2020), and exposure to toxins such as aflatoxin B1 (Cao et al., 2022). Of rising concern is the impact of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), which is expected to become the most common cause (Ascha et al., 2010; Karagozian et al., 2014; Estes et al., 2018a; Estes et al., 2018b; Younossi et al., 2018; Ioannou, 2021a). As NAFLD prevalence has reached 37% globally (Le et al., 2019), there is urgent need for therapeutics that can uncouple mechanisms linking NAFLD to HCC onset as well as delay HCC progression and promote remission. However, such treatment strategies will need to consider the metabolic context, as NAFLD has a strong association with obesity but still approximately 40% of cases are non-obese and 20% are lean (Ha et al., 2022). In obesity, there are immunometabolic alterations (Hotamisligil, 2017; Dyck and Lynch, 2018; Lee et al., 2018) that can impact NAFLD incidence and its progression to HCC, which are likely distinct from pathogenic mechanisms in lean people with NAFLD. Future research is needed to clarify similarities and differences. In this review, we will discuss signatures of NAFLD-induced HCC, obesity-linked stressors that contribute to NAFLD and HCC, immunometabolic rewiring that promote HCC initiation and growth, and agents under development to treat NAFLD and HCC.
1.1 Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma, and obesity
NAFLD encompasses a spectrum of fatty liver diseases, with simple steatosis being most common and a relatively benign condition that has a low risk for HCC (Serfaty and Lemoine, 2008). In contrast, liver can progress to a more serious pathology called non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), which has the added distinguishing characteristic of liver inflammation and fibrosis. NASH accounts for approximately 20% of NAFLD cases and associated fibrosis is a turning point for adverse effects (Ekstedt et al., 2015; Povsic et al., 2019); this link between advanced fibrosis and HCC is also a common feature for HCV and alcoholic fatty liver disease (Marot et al., 2017; Ioannou, 2021b; Shiha et al., 2021). When compared to simple steatosis, annual HCC incidence increases by more than 10-fold in people with NASH and even higher when associated with cirrhosis (Negro, 2020; Grgurevic et al., 2021).
Obesity is an independent risk factor for HCC initiation, progression, and invasion (Nair et al., 2002; Calle and Kaaks, 2004; Gan et al., 2018) and also impacts HCC in people with HCV (Minami et al., 2021) and those with alcoholic fatty liver disease (Chiang and McCullough, 2014). There is interest in determining how these interactions contribute to HCC pathogenesis, progression, and treatment (Joshi-Barve et al., 2015; Ntandja Wandji et al., 2020; Bianco et al., 2021a). Larsson and Wolk (Larsson and Wolk, 2007) found the risk of HCC increase by 17% in overweight people and 89% in people with obesity, indicating severity of metabolic imbalance is related to liver pathology. Several mechanisms have been identified that may link obesity to cancers such as HCC via abnormal hormone and cytokine action, exposure to metabolic toxicity, oxidative damage, dysregulated cell cycle, and impaired immunity (Calle and Kaaks, 2004; Diehl and Day, 2017; Dyck and Lynch, 2018; Gan et al., 2018; Anstee et al., 2019; Hou et al., 2020; Peiseler et al., 2022). The common theme is chronic metabolic burdens that arise in obesity drive persistently high levels of stress in hepatocytes and other types of liver cells and alter immune responses of the developing and established tumor (Buck et al., 2017; Diehl and Day, 2017; Hotamisligil, 2017; Dyck and Lynch, 2018).
1.2 Genetic, molecular, and metabolic signatures of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma
Similar to many cancers, tumor promoting mutations play a key role. Prevalent small nucleotide polymorphic (SNP) risk alleles have been found for patatin-like phospholipase domain containing 3 (PNPLA3), transmembrane 6 superfamily member 2 (TM6SF2), membrane bound O-acyltransferase domain containing 7 (MBOAT7), glucokinase regulator (GCKR), and 17ß-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 13 (HSD17B1), and interestingly, the products for these genes impact liver metabolism, which may underlie promotion of NAFLD and HCC (Liu et al., 2014a; Liu et al., 2014b; Singal et al., 2014; Mancina et al., 2016; Thabet et al., 2016; Diehl and Day, 2017; Seko et al., 2017; Seko et al., 2018; Anstee et al., 2019; Tang et al., 2019; Bianco et al., 2021a; Bianco et al., 2021b; Geh et al., 2021). PNPLA3 hydrolyzes triglycerides and retinyl esters, TM6SF2 regulates lipoprotein export, and MBOAT7 is involved in phospholipid remodeling, and these three molecules are now recognized as important biomarkers (Geh et al., 2021). Additionally, a group of recent studies sought to identify common and distinct genetic variants that underlie HCC risk in HBV, HCC, alcoholic fatty liver disease, and NASH (Schulze et al., 2015; Fujimoto et al., 2016; Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, 2017). This includes large multi-platform analyses across a range of ethnicity, age, and gender. The results reinforce a role for mutated cell cycle regulators (e.g., TP53 and CCND1) and identify factors linked to antioxidant defense (e.g., NFE2L2 and KEAP1), inflammation (e.g., IL6 and STAT3), and lipid metabolism (e.g., APOB and CPS1). Moreover, Govaere et al. (2020) characterized the transcriptional signatures and associated plasma biomarkers that correspond with the progression of steatosis to early and late-stage NASH and liver fibrosis, which led them to identify markers with potential diagnostic and prognostic value and revealing a role for impaired sterol homeostasis.
Metabolomic and lipidomic approaches comparing liver and plasma of patients with steatosis, NASH, and cirrhosis has been utilized to identify biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis (Aranha et al., 2008; Ferslew et al., 2015; Gorden et al., 2015; Mouzaki et al., 2016; Puri et al., 2018; Masoodi et al., 2021). One finding that emerged from liver lipidomic comparisons is that unesterified (free) cholesterol is elevated in NASH compared to steatosis (Puri et al., 2007; Caballero et al., 2009; Min et al., 2012). Subsequent studies have shown elevated cholesterol can crystalize within hepatocytes and surround cytoplasmic lipid droplets and that this feature distinguishes NASH from simple steatosis for humans and mice (Ioannou et al., 2013; Ioannou et al., 2019). Also, mechanistic studies with rodents and cultured cells as well as epidemiological studies show there is a link with increased dietary cholesterol and reveal elevated free cholesterol in liver is not just a biomarker but a causal factor for NASH pathogenesis (Musso et al., 2013; Ioannou, 2016; Horn et al., 2022). Additionally, hepatic oxidized phospholipid has been identified as a signature distinction and causative factor for NASH (Sun et al., 2020). Development of agents to counteract the accumulation of cholesterol and oxidized phospholipid and alleviate the stress they impose on the liver may have substantial therapeutic value.
1.3 Preclinical models to study non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma
The study of NASH driven HCC in a clinical setting is ideal but has limitations for deciphering mechanisms of pathogenesis. Complementary mouse models are an invaluable resource for this purpose. That being said, it is recognized there is not any one mouse model system that accurately reflects all aspects of NASH or HCC. Instead, there are multiple models that capture certain elements of the disease. These can be classified into three main categories: diet-induced, carcinogen-induced, and genetic models.
Mice fed high fat diet (HFD) composed of 60% lard-based fat develop hepatic steatosis associated with oxidative stress, insulin resistance and inflammation (Brown et al., 2022). However, most experimental mice strains fed this type of diet rarely progress to severe forms of NASH or develop HCC, unless there is a genetic predisposition (Takahashi et al., 2012; Nakagawa et al., 2014). Green et al. (2022) found the addition of high glucose and fructose water to HFD promoted spontaneous induction of NASH driven HCC after 54 weeks. Similarly, diet high in saturated fat, cholesterol and sucrose promote weight gain, insulin resistance, liver injury and inflammation that is comparable to the human disease phenotype (Machado et al., 2015). While addition of cholesterol and fructose to high fat intake seems key to progression of NASH and development of cancer, the mechanisms underlying disease progression are still under investigation (Ribas et al., 2021). In comparison, the methionine and choline deficient diet (MCD) model is a rapid onset and robust dietary model in which liver develops severe steatohepatitis due to defects in lipid droplet and lipoprotein metabolism, but mice fed this diet lack typical associated features of NASH such as obesity and insulin resistance and thus it has limited utility to understand chronic fatty liver stress that leads to NASH (Haberl et al., 2020; Alshawsh et al., 2022). Alternatively, the Gubra Amylin NASH inducing diet (40% kcal fat (of these 46% are saturated fatty acids), 22% fructose, 10% sucrose, 2% cholesterol) has a phenotypical and transcriptomic resemblance to clinically presented NASH and emerges upon long term diet exposure (Hansen et al., 2020). However, it is not yet known if this diet, on its own, promotes HCC.
Chemical carcinogens are used to cause HCC in mice. Though it is difficult to understand how well this can phenocopy human HCC, it is assumed the underlying mechanism is similar (i.e., ROS induced tumor causing mutation) and the effect is robust and reproducible. Recent studies used carcinogens added to steatosis or NASH diet. Administering a single dose of diethylnitrosamine (DEN) in 1 week old mice is capable of inducing spontaneous HCC (Umemura et al., 2016), and this has also been combined with a high fat, choline deficient diet model that bear partial resemblance to NASH induced HCC (Kishida et al., 2016). Likewise, streptozotocin can induce HCC, but with the absence of weight gain due to insulin deficiency (Fujii et al., 2013). Once a week low dose carbon tetrachloride (CCl4) for 24 weeks plus HFD is an efficient model to induce liver fibrosis and HCC with resemblance to the human HCC transcriptome profile (Tsuchida et al., 2018).
Genetically engineered models of HCC are also available. Liver specific PTEN deletion mice is a widely used genetic model of NASH induced HCC, in which the mice develop steatohepatitis and more than half develop HCC by 74–78 weeks of age (Horie et al., 2004). MicroRNA122 (miR-122) is highly enriched in liver and an established suppressor of HCC and a mouse model with liver-deletion of miR-122 locus has been generated to study its antitumor function and potential to generate novel therapies (Nakao et al., 2014). Mice with liver-specific or whole body deletion of NFκB essential modulator (NEMO), peroxisome proliferator activated receptor alpha (PPARα), farnesoid x-activated receptor (FXR), acetyl CoA oxidase (ACOX1) and methionine adenosyltransferase 1A (MAT1A) have also been used as models of NASH driven HCC, but poorly resemble clinically presented NASH (Nakagawa, 2015; Febbraio et al., 2019; Mohs et al., 2021). In contrast, MUP-uPA transgenic mice, a model of transient hepatocyte ER stress, when given a HFD develop a surprisingly similar picture of NASH and more than 78% of HFD-fed MUP-uPA mice develop tumors (Nakagawa et al., 2014). Also, the recently established diet-induced animal model of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatocellular cancer (DIAMOND) mice have emerged as a model of HCC derived NASH. When fed high fat, high carbohydrate, and 0.1% cholesterol diet plus a fructose-glucose solution, 89% of DIAMOND mice develop HCC between 32 and 52 weeks of diet exposure, and this coincides with steatohepatitis that has similar histological and biochemical features of human NASH as well as similar lipogenic, inflammatory, and proapoptotic signaling profiles (Asgharpour et al., 2016). Altogether, there is a large arsenal of in vivo tools for preclinical investigation of NASH and HCC.
2 Immunometabolic drivers: Focus on reactive oxygen species and cholesterol
Coordinated interactions between metabolism and immunity control homeostasis. Disrupting this interaction underlie a cluster of obesity-linked diseases, including NAFLD (Hotamisligil, 2017). In obesity, there is increased risk of metabolic insults resulting from insulin resistance, diabetes, gut dysbiosis, abnormal bile acid metabolism, and hepatic lipid accumulation which can trigger maladaptive immunological responses that cause further insult and stimulate fibrosis-promoting actions by stellate cells (Ioannou, 2016; Diehl and Day, 2017; Schwabe et al., 2020; Peiseler et al., 2022). Over time, these insults can cause organelle dysfunction and gene mutations that lead to HCC. It is not clear if one type of insult predominates above all others across all populations, and the mechanistic role of each is incompletely understood. For instance, while excess triglyceride (TG) in liver is linked to steatosis and insulin resistance, mechanistic studies suggest TG in lipid droplets has a relatively benign effect on promoting stress that leads to NASH. Yet, certain fatty acids as well as fatty acid-based products and intermediates can promote or counteract liver stress depending on its chemical nature, subcellular location, and whether it is being used for energy or membrane structure (Gluchowski et al., 2017; Loomba et al., 2021). Likewise, there is still more to understand regarding the relationship between bile acids and microbial metabolic products with NAFLD progression (Chavez-Talavera et al., 2017; Tilg et al., 2022). Here, we focus on the role of hepatic oxidative stress, which is a common feature of most NASH-linked metabolic insults, and the role of hepatic cholesterol excess, which has emerged to be a potential key turning point in triggering chronic liver inflammation.
2.1 Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and oxidative stress
Production of cellular energy [i.e., adenosine triphosphate (ATP)] and building blocks that sustain life processes (i.e., proteins, membrane, DNA, etc.) depend on access to molecular components and energy stored within chemical bonds of absorbed nutrients and related intermediates. To gain such access, cells produce enzymes and place these metabolites in subcellular environments that enable chemical reactivity. A caveat is that this chemical reactivity also poses a risk of producing reactive biproducts and that absorbed food often contains xenobiotics that are more challenging to manage. Overproduction of such agents result in generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Hepatocytes and other liver cells counteract this problem by clearing xenobiotics and associated endotoxin when it enters portal circulation from the gut. In obesity, chronic nutrient overload can overburden hepatocyte defenses and in turn promote susceptibility to oxidative stress-induced tumor causing mutations.
Hepatocytes employ defense mechanisms that are capable of scavenging ROS and counteracting their damaging effect on cellular constituents but also must preserve physiological amounts of ROS required for signal transduction and proper cell functions. Physiological levels of ROS has a role in pathways such as proliferation and differentiation, combating pathogens, and plasma membrane repair (Murakami and Motohashi, 2015; Horn and Jaiswal, 2018; Sies and Jones, 2020; Lennicke and Cocheme, 2021). Although the oxidative stress response is pivotal in cell homeostasis, chronic exposure prevents these protective mechanisms from functioning adequately, leading to imbalance between ROS and antioxidant molecule production (Mossenta et al., 2020). The enhanced ROS production will chemically react with and consequently cause DNA damage, lipid peroxidation, and protein misfolding (Sosa et al., 2013; Bartolini et al., 2018). Over time, persistence of these harmful effects, in addition to the failure of the DNA repair mechanisms, can lead to genetic mutations, especially in oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes (Guichard et al., 2012) and consequently, cancer initiation.
In liver tissue, major sources of ROS are mitochondria, microsome, and peroxisome, which can occur during free fatty acid (FFA) oxidation (Uchida et al., 2020). To prevent excess accumulation, FFA can be stored in TG and secreted in very low-density lipoproteins, incorporated into phospholipid that are then excreted into bile, or alternatively, oxidized to produce energy (Alves-Bezerra and Cohen, 2017). During NAFLD, FFA oxidation in dysfunctional mitochondrial promote ROS accumulation and liver damage. A microsomal enzyme that mediates ω-oxidation of FFA named CYP4A was found to be abundant in plasma of patients with NAFLD, and accumulation of CYP4A11 in HepG2 human hepatoma cells was associated with buildup of ROS derived product malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), inflammatory cytokines and liver transaminases (Gao et al., 2020). This may suggest ROS accumulation through CYP4A mediated FFA oxidation may promote NASH progression.
2.2 Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatic cholesterol
Cholesterol has unique properties that support membrane homeostasis, but in excess can promote disease. There are several genetic polymorphisms linked to NASH that are also associated with altered cholesterol metabolism (Horn et al., 2022), which has driven attention to the link between cholesterol and HCC development. Over the last 15 years, it has been established that cholesterol accumulation in liver is a major factor driving the progression of steatosis to NASH. An initial finding was free cholesterol accumulates in liver of people with NASH and not in those with simple steatosis (Puri et al., 2007; Caballero et al., 2009; Min et al., 2012). Subsequent experimental studies have demonstrated hepatic cholesterol accumulation triggers NASH (Ioannou et al., 2013; Musso et al., 2013; Savard et al., 2013; Ioannou, 2016; Ioannou et al., 2017; Hansen et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020; Ribas et al., 2021; Horn et al., 2022). Most of these studies examined dietary cholesterol. However, cholesterol biosynthesis also has an effect, as the genetic induction of the cholesterol synthesis pathway was shown to result in accumulation of liver cholesterol, NASH, and HCC development (Ribas et al., 2021). Moreover, high expression of cholesterol synthesis enzyme 3β-hydroxysteroid-Δ24 reductase (DHCR24) has been found in human HCC liver, whereas inhibiting DHCR24 impeded tumor growth, invasion, and metastasis both in liver cancer cell lines and in Hep3B xenografts (Wu et al., 2020).
The mechanisms by which hepatic cholesterol excess promote NASH and how this contributes to HCC are still under investigation. Elevated liver cholesterol may alter membrane composition to trigger membrane stress and alter lipid rafts (Fu et al., 2012), and it has been shown to induce HCC-promoting and fibrosis associated signaling pathways (Schwabe et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2020; Wang et al., 2022). Another intriguing mechanism is that excess cholesterol is a risk factor for cholesterol crystal formation, which can trigger NASH. Such crystals have been shown to distinguish between steatosis and NASH in humans and mice (Ioannou et al., 2013; Ioannou et al., 2017; Ioannou et al., 2019), coincide with increased cholesterol, and appear to nucleate at lipid droplets and stimulate NLR family pyrin domain containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome activity. This may be a critical step, as NLRP3 is known to sense cholesterol crystals and experimental evidence indicates hepatocyte NLRP3 is required and sufficient to drive liver inflammation and fibrosis (Wree et al., 2014a; Wree et al., 2014b). Deciphering strategies to uncouple hepatic cholesterol accumulation from liver stress and inflammasome activation is likely to have important therapeutic value. However, it is unclear why cholesterol accumulates and crystalizes in liver, and whether hepatocytes are capable of re-solubilizing cholesterol crystals after they form.
3 Immunometabolic adaptations In hepatocellular carcinoma
Chronic hepatocyte injury drives the initiation of HCC from NASH, and continual exposure to DNA damaging agents and replacement of hepatocytes results in an established tumor (Ringelhan et al., 2018; Hou et al., 2020; Li et al., 2021; Peiseler et al., 2022). While immune responses are capable of identifying and eliminating such cells, altered immune instruction and dysfunction commonly observed in obesity and that can sustain HCC growth has been identified in NASH. In parallel, the tumor acquires altered metabolic needs and defense systems to sustain survival. Here, we discuss alterations in the metabolic demands and adaptations of the tumor as well as NASH-linked alterations to liver immunity that contribute to the onset and progression of HCC.
3.1 Hepatocellular carcinoma rely on glucose metabolism
Cancer cells require tremendous amounts of energy to fulfil their metabolic needs (Hoxhaj and Manning, 2020). The most efficient and accessible source of ATP is glucose. Metabolic conversion of glucose to lactate, even in the presence of oxygen, is a distinguishing factor between normal and cancerous cells (Warburg et al., 1927; Lunt and Vander Heiden, 2011) and is referred to as aerobic glycolysis or the Warburg effect. Although this feature has been known for nearly a century the mechanisms and advantages underlying this metabolic shift are still under investigation. In cancer cells, high demand for energy and macromolecules require a rapid but efficient means of ATP production that correspondingly generate a source of carbon atoms such as lactate and pyruvate that serve as substrates for synthesis of products needed for cell anabolism and proliferation (Hoxhaj and Manning, 2020).
Insulin resistance and consequential hyperglycemia commonly arise in obesity (Hotamisligil, 2017; Lee et al., 2018; Loomba et al., 2021), and liver tumors can take advantage of elevated glucose accessibility. Glucose is imported via plasma membrane localized glucose transporters. Tumor cancer cells express high levels of glucose transporter 1 (GLUT1), due to enhanced lactate accumulation and efflux as well as the cancer-associated hypoxic microenvironment (Paltoglou and Roberts, 2005; Jiang, 2017). As a result, GLUT1 is rate limiting for glucose import in cancerous tumors, while virtually undetectable in non-tumor and benign tumor tissue (Younes et al., 1995; Cooper et al., 2003; Amann et al., 2009). Overexpression of GLUT1 appears crucial for HCC growth and survival and this enhanced expression was associated with an additional risk of cancer recurrence and worse prognosis in HCC patients after hepatectomy (Chen et al., 2018a). GLUT1 deletion was found to impair HCC proliferation and angiogenesis (Amann et al., 2009). Another glucose importer expressed in HCC, and not in non-cancerous hepatocytes, is the sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2), which in physiological conditions mediates absorption of filtered glucose by renal proximal convoluted tubules. Interestingly, pharmacological agents that inhibit SGLT2 such as Canagliflozin were developed to block renal absorption of glucose and thus treat diabetes. It turns out this agent may also be useful to treat HCC, as Canagliflozin was shown to disrupt SGLT2-expressing liver cancers by reducing glucose uptake, inhibiting glycolytic metabolism, and attenuating proangiogenic activity (Kaji et al., 2018).
The phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT pathway plays a major role in regulating glucose metabolism in HCC (Hoxhaj and Manning, 2020). One mechanism is via suppressing thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP), which is a tumor suppressor that regulates glucose flux (Parikh et al., 2007; Katturajan et al., 2022). AKT inhibits TXNIP via phosphorylation, and this results in increased expression and function of glucose transporters GLUT1 and GLUT4 (Waldhart et al., 2017). This may be critical for HCC progression as downregulation of TXNIP and its impact on glucose metabolism has been recognized as a hallmark in prostate, lung, and colorectal cancer (Qu et al., 2018; Tang et al., 2020; Hu et al., 2021), and TXNIP downregulation was evident in HBV-related HCCs and contributed to cancer initiation (Zhang et al., 2021). In addition to regulating TXNIP, the PI3K-AKT pathway can activate glycolytic enzymes through phosphorylation and transcriptional activation (Hoxhaj and Manning, 2020). One example is hexokinase 2 (HK2), which phosphorylates glucose to prevent its efflux, and phosphofructokinase 1 (PFK1), which controls a rate limiting step in glycolysis by catalyzing the conversion of fructose 6 phosphate to fructose 1,6 bisphosphate (Hue and Rider, 1987). HK2 was found to be critical for cancer initiation in mouse and human (Patra et al., 2013; Chen et al., 2014), and its expression level has prognostic value for human breast cancer patients (Sato-Tadano et al., 2013). There is now interest to inhibit HK2 in cancer cells and xenograft models (Zheng et al., 2021). In normal physiology glucokinase (GCK) is the main liver hexokinase, but HK2 expression predominates in HCC and is distinctive to cancerous hepatocytes. Moreover, HK2 depletion was shown to promote cancer cell death and stimulated oxidative phosphorylation (Dewaal et al., 2018), revealing the importance of enhanced HK2 expression and indicating blocking HK2 may have important therapeutic impact for patients with HCC.
3.2 Adaptations to oxidative stress that promote hepatocellular carcinoma
While persistently elevated ROS cause HCC-promoting mutations necessary for cancer initiation, adaptations to oxidative stress have also been implicated in cancer cell survival, growth, metastasis, and chemotherapy resistance (Kumari et al., 2018). The master regulator of oxidative stress responses, nuclear factor erythroid 2–related factor 2 (NRF2), appears to play an important role. NRF2 complexes with the ROS-sensor kelch like ECH-associated protein-1 (KEAP1). When ROS levels rise, NRF2 will dissociate from KEAP1 and translocate into the nucleus to drive transcriptional programs that promote cell survival. These functions relate to glutathione metabolism, ROS-detoxification, bile acid and lipid metabolism, inflammation, and autophagy (Kamisako et al., 2014; Chambel et al., 2015; Ahmed et al., 2017; Bartolini et al., 2018; Yamamoto et al., 2018; Li et al., 2020). Such action may protect against HCC initiation but after the tumor has been established it appears HCC cells take advantage of this property for growth and survival. This is supported by the fact that NRF2 gain of function mutations have been associated with HCC (Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network, 2017; Ngo et al., 2017), chronic NRF2 activation causes hepatomegaly (Komatsu et al., 2010; He et al., 2020), and upregulation of NRF2 has been observed as a biomarker for HCC (Zhang et al., 2015; Bartolini et al., 2018; Mohs et al., 2021).
Targeting oxidative stress in NASH to prevent HCC is a promising venue. Using antioxidants like vitamin E and C as well as enhancing internal antioxidant defenses may provide resistance to liver injury (Ramos-Tovar and Muriel, 2020). Moreover, targeting NRF2 has been shown to counteract liver toxicity (Camer et al., 2015; Chan et al., 2021; Mohs et al., 2021). Opposingly, enhancing hepatocyte ROS toxicity and promoting ROS induced cancer cell death has been a focus (Wei et al., 2019; Kim et al., 2021). This is either by increasing ROS production or inhibiting antioxidant defense mechanisms (Nogueira and Hay, 2013). For example, use of a glutathione inhibitor augmented the anti-tumor effect of multi-kinase inhibitors on liver cancer cells, an effect potentially driven by augmenting ROS toxicity (Cucarull et al., 2021). A plant-based alkaloid with anti-cancer effects named Copstin was found to mediate autophagy and mitophagy in Hep3B cells by inhibiting the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway, which consequently led to ROS accumulation (Kim et al., 2021), and a synthetic chemical preservative, propyl gallate (PG), has been shown to induce ROS production and cell death in HCC cells (Wei et al., 2019). Hence, when it comes to ROS-targeting therapies for NASH and HCC, disease stage is likely to be an important consideration for the design strategy.
3.3 Hepatocellular carcinoma and the of role of autophagy
Autophagy is required by cells to maintain energy balance and homeostasis. During this process, autophagosomes sequester cytosolic content and mediate their transport to autolysosomes where the substances are degraded into basic constituents, such as amino acids, nucleic acids, sugars, and fatty acids (Schneider and Cuervo, 2014). Unselective bulk autophagy is enhanced during metabolic emergencies such as in periods of starvation, allowing cells to use their stored nutrients to fulfil their energy and nutrient needs. During cell stress, a more selective - adaptor mediated - form of autophagy is induced to permit selective recycling of faulty components and organelles (Schneider and Cuervo, 2014; Moscat et al., 2016; Poillet-Perez and White, 2019). Presumably, cancer cells need both types of autophagy to maintain the nutrient requirements of these rapidly growing cells and to remove and recycle abnormal organelles. This process, among others, contributes to the immortalized nature of cancer cells, allowing them to proliferate and survive the ongoing insult-induced stress (Poillet-Perez et al., 2015; Poillet-Perez and White, 2019).
In NAFLD, autophagy appears to have a protective effect against lipid accumulation by enhancing lipid mobilization and lipophagy (Schneider and Cuervo, 2014; Filali-Mouncef et al., 2022). For instance, ERK1/2 stimulation was found to improve liver steatosis via Atg7-dependent autophagy in leptin resistant db/db mice (Xiao et al., 2016). Conversely, alterations in autophagic flux as observed by high p62 (an autophagy adaptor protein) level and autophagosome accumulation appear to contribute to HCC, although p62 can also have autophagy independent effects (Taniguchi et al., 2016; Umemura et al., 2016; Denk et al., 2019; Tan et al., 2021). Evidence thus far indicate that autophagy contribute to HCC cancer initiation, progression, and invasion (Chen et al., 2018b), and inhibition of autophagy, either chemically or by Atg7 knockdown, has been shown to suppress hepatocarcinogenesis in the activated RAS signaling HCC murine model (Cho et al., 2021). It may be that autophagy must be fine-tuned to meet the requirement of cellular homeostasis (Marot et al., 2017; Ioannou, 2021b; Shiha et al., 2021), but when initiated, cancer cells can use autophagy pathways to maintain growth, proliferation, and survival.
3.4 Role of fatty acids in hepatocellular carcinoma
The liver is a primary organ for lipid metabolism. A balance between lipid uptake and synthesis, on one hand, and lipid transport and catabolism, on the other, is required to prevent lipid overload and hepatocyte damage (Alannan et al., 2020). Under normal condition, hepatocytes derive most fatty acid content from external sources such as adipose tissue lipolysis. But in liver cancer cells, de novo lipogenesis is upregulated to address enhanced nutrient needs (Sangineto et al., 2020). Acetyl-CoA is a substrate for the synthesis of glucose, lipid, and protein and there has been interest on its role in cancer cell metabolism (Alannan et al., 2020). For example, Acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) is an enzyme required for acetyl-CoA carboxylation into malonyl-Co A and this activity is rate limiting for lipogenesis. Interestingly, ACC activating mutations have been associated with liver carcinogenesis (Nakagawa et al., 2018) and ACC inhibition can protect against DEN-induced HCC in mice (Lally et al., 2019). Also, lipogenesis has been shown to support HCC survival in glucose deprived conditions, and high ACC alpha expression has prognostic value for patients with HCC (Wang et al., 2016). Another important lipogenic enzyme is fatty acid synthase (FASN), which catalyzes the conversion of acetyl-CoA to fatty acid. The drug metformin has been shown to protect against liver cancer by inhibiting FASN in DEN-induced and AKT-overexpression models of HCC (Bhalla et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2019). In addition to providing nutritional needs, newly synthesized saturated and monounsaturated fatty acids may protect against oxidative damage associated with metabolism of polyunsaturated fatty acids and as a result protect cancer cells from membrane damage (Rysman et al., 2010).
The role of fatty acid oxidation (FAO) is unclear. FAO is generally suppressed in HCC (Hu et al., 2020), likely since cancer cells are more dependent on aerobic glycolysis for energy needs. Interestingly, overexpression of carnitine/acylcarnitine transporter (CACT), a mitochondrial membrane protein responsible for the transport of acylcarnitine into mitochondrial matrix for oxidation, in a HCC cell line and human HCC tumor tissue has been shown to suppress cancer growth and migration due to increased FAO (Yuan et al., 2021). Growing HCC cells have reduced FAO levels and this may be linked to hypoxic challenges faced by cancer cell in the growing tumor (Eales et al., 2016). However, there may be exceptions, as increased FAO was identified to coincide with catenin beta-1 (CTNNB1)-mutated HCC. In this case, translocated mutant ß-catenin activates the ß-catenin transcriptional functions in the nucleus to promote cancer formation, which would normally promote cell proliferation and differentiation (Rebouissou et al., 2016; Senni et al., 2019), and this HCC appear to thrive on FAO rather than glycolysis (Senni et al., 2019). The mechanism by which this occurs may be informative for understanding distinct HCC subtypes.
3.5 Immunological environment in hepatocellular carcinoma
Liver has a unique structure, with its proximity to portal circulation coming from the gut, which requires a similarly unique immune system. This immune system precludes gut derived microbes and microbial compounds such as lipopolysaccharide from reaching systemic circulation. For that to occur without evoking a systemic immune response, liver immune cells have some degree of immunotolerance (Protzer et al., 2012; Jenne and Kubes, 2013). The liver has approximately 80% of resident macrophage population, called Kupffer cells (KCs), in the body and a large population of natural killer cells (NK cells), natural killer T cells (NKT cells), in addition to resident T lymphocytes that constitute innate immunity. Moreover, liver can recruit infiltrating T lymphocytes and B lymphocytes (Ringelhan et al., 2018). Interestingly, metabolic conditions instruct immunological responses (Buck et al., 2017; Dyck and Lynch, 2018) and a growing body of work shows metabolic context associated with obesity promotes hyperactivation of certain immune responses and defects in other immune responses in liver, which in turn contribute to the pathogenesis and progression of NASH and HCC (Ringelhan et al., 2018; Hou et al., 2020; Peiseler et al., 2022).
There is an incomplete understanding of how immune cell types in liver interact with each other and with hepatocytes to promote or guard against tumor development. This is a complex scenario that is context and timing dependent. That being said, it has been shown in NASH-linked HCC that immunosurveillance is impaired, the proportion of monocyte-derived macrophage versus KCs is increased, cancer promoting inflammation is enhanced, and T cells capable of eliminating the tumor are dysfunctional (Ringelhan et al., 2018; Hou et al., 2020; Li et al., 2021; Barreby et al., 2022). In chronic liver inflammation such as in NASH, KCs are depleted and replaced by monocyte-derived macrophage (Reid et al., 2016; Kazankov et al., 2019). This shift has been shown to underlie insulin resistance as well as liver steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis through release of inflammatory and non-inflammatory factors (Clementi et al., 2009; Stienstra et al., 2010; Papackova et al., 2012; Han et al., 2013; Morinaga et al., 2015; Morgantini et al., 2019; Ramachandran et al., 2020; Daemen et al., 2021). Cytokines that influence resistance to cancer onset include interleukin 10 and 11, whereas cancer promoting cytokines include tumor necrosis factor alpha and interleukin 6 (Ringelhan et al., 2018; Widjaja et al., 2019; Peiseler et al., 2022). Critical transcriptional effectors of the cytokine signaling cascade are signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 and NFκB (Ringelhan et al., 2018; Taniguchi and Karin, 2018; Hou et al., 2020; Li et al., 2021; Peiseler et al., 2022).
Interestingly, obesity-linked metabolic derangements can alter the transcription profile of liver macrophage even before they develop a pro-inflammatory state (Morgantini et al., 2019; Barreby et al., 2022). Likewise, the function and composition of other hepatic immune cell types can also be altered in this metabolic condition to impact progression of NASH to HCC (Ringelhan et al., 2018; Hou et al., 2020; Li et al., 2021), reinforcing that environment has a major influence on immune cell function (Buck et al., 2017; Dyck and Lynch, 2018). The tumor immune microenvironment in HCC has been under intense investigation, which has revealed T cell exhaustion coincides with cancer and distinct roles for various types of macrophages, T cells, and B cells that depend on whether cells are intra-tumoral or peri-tumoral and associated metabolic landscape such as nutrient and oxygen concentration (Ringelhan et al., 2018; Hou et al., 2020; Li et al., 2021). In mice and humans, NAFLD has been associated with a decrease in CD4+ T cells, but not CD8+ T cells (Ma et al., 2016). Using mice, this study showed CD4+ T cell loss resulted from increased mitochondrial ROS generated via fatty acid oxidation, and that blockage of ROS-induced CD4+ T cell loss can suppress NAFLD-linked HCC. Additionally, liver in human NASH and a mouse model of choline deficient plus high fat diet-induced NASH were both found to contain elevated levels of activated intrahepatic CD8+ T cells and NKT cells (Wolf et al., 2014). In mice, these activated cells were shown to cooperatively trigger liver damage to induce HCC. Interestingly, a subsequent study showed immunoglobulin A (IgA+) B cells that accumulate in human NASH and in multiple mouse models of NASH are able to suppress cytotoxic effects of the intrahepatic CD8+ T cells on the HCC tumor (Shalapour et al., 2017). Interestingly, tumor repressing effects of these cells were restored by treatment with the promising new therapy PD-L1 blockade. Hence, despite the complexity, a growing understanding of how metabolic state influences immune responses may reveal a novel means of eliminating established NASH-linked HCC tumors.
4 Therapeutic interventions for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatocellular carcinoma
There is a growing need to prevent HCC and improve outcomes after HCC incidence. To prevent NASH-associated HCC, pharmacological therapies for NASH are under extensive investigations. Treatment of major risk factors of HCC is considered a vital preventive measure. The treatment agents evolve around three components of NASH: steatosis, fibrosis, and inflammation. Although there are no therapies yet approved for NASH, many have shown promising results in preclinical and clinical studies. A summary of available treatments targeting NASH and HCC and how this fit within the stage of disease progression are shown in Figure 1 and Table 1.
FIGURE 1. A schematic of therapeutic strategies to target NASH and HCC at different stages of disease progression. This figure was created with Biorender.com.
TABLE 1. Therapeutic interventions for NASH and HCC.
4.1 Agents that reduce insulin resistance
Insulin resistance can be a cause and a consequence of hepatocyte lipid accumulation (Loomba et al., 2021). Insulin resistance enhances adipose tissue lipolysis and FFA influx to liver, which consequently stimulate liver lipogenesis and triglyceride accumulation. In contrast, intermediate lipid accumulation in liver can impair hepatocyte insulin signaling and lipid metabolism (Finck, 2018). The thiazolidinediones (TZDs) pioglitazone and rosiglitazone are insulin sensitizing drugs used in the treatment of type II diabetes mellitus. Their action is primarily mediated through peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-γ (PPARγ) with a resultant enhancement in adipose insulin sensitivity and reduction in free fatty acid transport to liver (Palavicini et al., 2021). TZDs has been shown to improve insulin sensitivity and liver fat accumulation in preclinical animal models of NASH (Kalavalapalli et al., 2018; Tahara and Takasu, 2019) and to be an effective therapy in patients with NASH (Della Pepa et al., 2021; Panunzi et al., 2021). The glucagon like peptide 1 (GLP1) based agent, Semaglutide is another anti-diabetic drug with promising result in clinical trials for NASH (Flint et al., 2021; Newsome et al., 2021). Semaglutide was shown to improve NASH associated steatosis and NASH resolution but did not affect liver fibrosis, which is consistent with studies using preclinical models (Ding et al., 2006; Valdecantos et al., 2017). In addition, TZDs and GLP1 receptor agonists have been shown to reduce hepatocarcinogenesis, cell proliferation and invasion in animal models and cancer cell lines (Yang et al., 2015; Li et al., 2019; Kojima et al., 2020). More clinical trials are underway (Vuppalanchi et al., 2021).
4.2 Agents that alter lipid metabolism
Firsocostat is an ACC inhibitor. In liver, Firsocostat decreases steatosis in NASH by inhibiting de novo lipogenesis, enhancing lipid oxidation, reducing lipotoxicity, and impairing hepatic stellate cell (HSC) activity (Bates et al., 2020). It has been shown to reduce steatosis and fibrosis markers in preclinical models and clinical trials (Alkhouri et al., 2020). Stearoyl-CoA desaturase 1 (SCD1) is another enzyme involved in fatty acid synthesis that is being targeted to treat NASH. Aramchol is an SCD1 inhibitor used in clinical trials in patients with NASH that was shown to reduce liver fat content in patients after 3 months of daily treatment (Safadi et al., 2014). Other evidence showed Aramchol improved histological markers of NASH associated inflammation and fibrosis in the methionine and choline deficient dietary model of NASH in mice (Iruarrizaga-Lejarreta et al., 2017).
In addition to directly targeting metabolic enzymes, there has been interest in targeting master regulators of lipid metabolic programs. For this purpose, agonists for thyroid hormone receptor ß (THRβ) have emerged as a category of drugs for NASH. Activating liver THRβ has been shown to improve lipid profile, bile acid synthesis and lipid oxidation (Sinha et al., 2019). Mice treated with a selective THRβ agonist named Resmetirom have lower liver size, fat content, and improved markers of liver damage and fibrosis (Kannt et al., 2021). Similar fat lowering effect was shown in a recent phase II clinical trial using the same drug (Harrison et al., 2019).
As discussed in Section 2.2 increased hepatic cholesterol, altered cholesterol metabolism, and the precipitation of pro-inflammatory intrahepatic cholesterol crystals are a hallmark of NASH. Thus, counteracting therapeutic agents may alleviate NASH and prevent HCC. Clinical trials investigating the statin class of drugs, which inhibit cholesterol synthesis and reduce circulating low density lipoprotein, support this possibility. Patients in the GREACE study who were treated with atorvastatin showed improved liver function (Athyros et al., 2010), and atorvastatin was found to alleviate NAFLD in a prospective open label study on non-diabetic patients (Athyros et al., 2006), with similar results observed in patients treated with rouvastatin (Kargiotis et al., 2015). However, beneficial effects of statins appear to be ineffective in people with the high-risk allele for PNPLA3 (Dongiovanni et al., 2015), indicating patients may need genotype stratification before a statin can be prescribed to treat NAFLD. Moreover, a recent pre-clinical study showed that a non-statin type of cholesterol-targeting therapy can actually be detrimental for liver health (Ioannou et al., 2022), revealing that the mechanism of drug action will be an important determinant for identifying the most effective therapeutic approach.
4.3 Agents that target PPARs in liver
PPARs are nuclear receptors that regulate multiple processes including glucose and lipid metabolism and inflammation. PPAR agonists are under investigation to treat NASH as well as HCC. PPARδ and PPARγ pharmacological and genetic enhancement attenuated hepatic steatosis by inducing autophagy dependent hepatic lipolysis and ß-oxidation in mouse livers and primary mouse hepatocytes (Tong et al., 2019) and improving insulin sensitivity (Heikkinen et al., 2007). Lanifibranor is a pan-PPAR agonist in clinical trial for NASH treatment. Patients with active NASH given Lanifibranor showed a significant reduction in steatosis and fibrosis when compared to placebo group and had improved liver enzymes and lipid profile (Francque et al., 2021). PPAR β/δ are also connected with hepatocarcinogenesis and PPAR β/δ agonists show promising results in preclinical models of HCC (Balandaram et al., 2016; Shen et al., 2020). Similar results have been found for the fibrate type drug, fenofibrate (Mahmoudi et al., 2022a; Mahmoudi et al., 2022b). Therefore, modulation of PPAR may turn out to be effective for preventing and for treating HCC.
4.4 Agents that target liver inflammation and fibrosis
As a main target of NASH therapeutic agents, inflammatory responses occurring in liver after any chronic injury are currently under investigations, with CC-chemokine receptors (CCRs) serving as a high value target (Lefere et al., 2020). CCR stimulation causes macrophage infiltration and HSC activation (Vuppalanchi et al., 2021), which then is a trigger for pathogenesis of liver fibrosis. HSCs interact with hepatocytes to either maintain normal liver phenotype, promote hepatocyte regeneration in an acute liver injury setting, or promote fibrosis in cases of chronic liver injury and inflammation such as in NASH (Cai et al., 2020). Cenicriviroc is a dual CCR2/CCR5 antagonist that has been investigated extensively in preclinical models of NASH and shown to diminish liver macrophage infiltration, inflammation, and fibrosis (Lefebvre et al., 2016; Krenkel et al., 2018), which is consistent with the effect of deleting CCR2 (Miura et al., 2012). In a randomized clinical trial on patients with NASH, Cenicriviroc reduced fibrosis but not inflammatory scores (Friedman et al., 2018). Moreover, a CCR2 antagonist has been shown to inhibit tumor growth, reduce tumor size and prevent recurrence after resection in a liver cancer experimental model (Li et al., 2017).
Galectin 3 (Gal3) is a ubiquitously expressed protein secreted from macrophages that can activate fibroblasts to induce fibrogenesis via transforming growth factor ß-dependent pathway (Al Attar et al., 2021). Gal3 deficient mice are protected against NASH (Iacobini et al., 2011). However, an inhibitor of Gal3 called Belapectin was used in patients with NASH and cirrhosis and showed no significant effect on histological scores of fibrosis or on hepatic vein pressure gradient in patients suffering from portal hypertension (Chalasani et al., 2020).
Farnesoid X receptor (FXR) is a bile acid activated nuclear receptor located mainly in liver and intestines, with a regulatory role in lipid and glucose metabolism. FXR may also influence liver fibrosis (Vuppalanchi et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2022). In a phase II clinical trial, an FXR agonist called Obeticholic acid (OCA) was found to reduce liver fibrosis in 45% of patients with non-cirrhotic NASH (Neuschwander-Tetri et al., 2015). Cilofexor and Tropifexor are also FXR agonists that have demonstrated antifibrotic effect in animal models and are under investigation for their safety in clinical trials (Hernandez et al., 2019; Schwabl et al., 2021; Zhao et al., 2022).
4.5 Approved drugs for hepatocellular carcinoma in clinical use
In addition to preventing HCC by ameliorating NASH, there is more agents needed to treat the cancer after onset. In patients with HCC, surgical resection and local ablation are the main lines of treatment in early locally confined tumors. Liver transplantation is a favorable option, especially in cases with microinvasions, as this has a lower rate of recurrence. Locally administrated chemo- and radio-therapeutic drugs are two options provided in advanced non-resectable tumors (Wege et al., 2019; Ayoub et al., 2022). Systemic pharmacological agents that are currently approved for use by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are mainly targeting cell proliferation, angiogenesis, and tumor immunity.
The first approved systemic pharmacological option for HCC treatment is Sorafenib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor with anti-proliferative and anti-angiogenic effect. Sorafenib improved the overall survival rate in patients diagnosed with advanced HCC versus placebo group (Llovet et al., 2008). Several other multi-kinase inhibitors such as Lenvatinib, Regorafenib, and Cabozantinib are now also approved and shown efficacy in improving overall survival (Bruix et al., 2017; Abou-Alfa et al., 2018; Kudo et al., 2018). Another class of agent is Nivolumab, a checkpoint inhibitor that targets programmed death-1 (PD-1) receptor by blocking its natural ligands and consequently activating T cell antitumor capacities and cytokine production (Chiew Woon et al., 2020). Also, Ramucirumab is a human IgG2 monoclonal antibody that inhibits ligand activation of VEGFR2. Ramucirumab has shown improved overall survival with better tolerability in patients with advanced HCC and persistently elevated α-feto protein after sorafenib intake (Zhu et al., 2019).
Overall, the advances in systemic treatment of NASH and HCC, especially those targeting liver cell metabolism add new hope for patients and require more attention in research to improve their efficacy in the prevention of NASH induced HCC development.
5 Conclusion
We discuss various immunometabolic factors contributing to NASH and HCC, and how this relates to cancer growth and survival. HCC cells are able to change their metabolism and stress adaptive capacity to fit the new anabolic requirements and tumor microenvironment. Likewise, the immune cell environment is altered in the metabolic state of obesity in a manner that supports tumor growth, and the associated metabolic burdens trigger chronic hepatocyte insults that in turn establish tumor initiation. Hence, in the metabolic context of obesity-linked NASH, strategies to prevent HCC and promote HCC regression require consideration of how these factors differ from other known causes of HCC, such as HBV and aflatoxin B1. There is urgency to acquire this knowledge given the accelerating incidence of obesity-linked fatty liver disease around the world.
Author contributions
MGA drafted the majority of the manuscript and prepared the figure. SBW drafted some of the manuscript, edited the manuscript, and is responsible for its content.
Funding
Grants supporting our research were awarded to SBW from Saskatchewan Health Research Foundation, National Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, and Canadian Institutes of Health Research. SBW is supported by a National New Investigator Award and McDonald Scholarship from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. MGA is supported by a James Regan Cardiology Research scholarship.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Abou-Alfa, G. K., Meyer, T., Cheng, A-L., El-Khoueiry, A. B., Rimassa, L., Ryoo, B-Y., et al. (2018). Cabozantinib in patients with advanced and progressing hepatocellular carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 379 (1), 54–63. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1717002
Ahmed, S. M., Luo, L., Namani, A., Wang, X. J., and Tang, X. (2017). Nrf2 signaling pathway: Pivotal roles in inflammation. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 1863 (2), 585–597. doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2016.11.005
Al Attar, A., Antaramian, A., and Noureddin, M. (2021). Review of galectin-3 inhibitors in the treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Expert Rev. Clin. Pharmacol. 14 (4), 457–464. doi:10.1080/17512433.2021.1894127
Alannan, M., Fayyad-Kazan, H., Trezeguet, V., and Merched, A. (2020). Targeting lipid metabolism in liver cancer. Biochemistry 59 (41), 3951–3964. doi:10.1021/acs.biochem.0c00477
Alkhouri, N., Lawitz, E., Noureddin, M., Defronzo, R., and Shulman, G. I. G. S. (2020). GS-0976 (Firsocostat): An investigational liver-directed acetyl-CoA carboxylase (ACC) inhibitor for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Expert Opin. Investigational Drugs 29 (2), 135–141. doi:10.1080/13543784.2020.1668374
Alshawsh, M. A., Alsalahi, A., Alshehade, S. A., Saghir, S. A. M., Ahmeda, A. F., Al Zarzour, R. H., et al. (2022). A comparison of the gene expression profiles of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease between animal models of a high-fat diet and methionine-choline-deficient diet. Molecules 27 (3), 858. doi:10.3390/molecules27030858
Alves-Bezerra, M., and Cohen, D. E. (2017). Triglyceride metabolism in the liver. Compr. Physiol. 8, 1–8. doi:10.1002/cphy.c170012
Amann, T., Maegdefrau, U., Hartmann, A., Agaimy, A., Marienhagen, J., Weiss, T. S., et al. (2009). GLUT1 expression is increased in hepatocellular carcinoma and promotes tumorigenesis. Am. J. Pathol. 174 (4), 1544–1552. doi:10.2353/ajpath.2009.080596
Anstee, Q. M., Reeves, H. L., Kotsiliti, E., Govaere, O., and Heikenwalder, M. (2019). From NASH to HCC: Current concepts and future challenges. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 16 (7), 411–428. doi:10.1038/s41575-019-0145-7
Aranha, M. M., Cortez-Pinto, H., Costa, A., da Silva, I. B., Camilo, M. E., de Moura, M. C., et al. (2008). Bile acid levels are increased in the liver of patients with steatohepatitis. Eur. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 20 (6), 519–525. doi:10.1097/MEG.0b013e3282f4710a
Ascha, M. S., Hanouneh, I. A., Lopez, R., Tamimi, T. A., Feldstein, A. F., and Zein, N. N. (2010). The incidence and risk factors of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatology 51 (6), 1972–1978. doi:10.1002/hep.23527
Asgharpour, A., Cazanave, S. C., Pacana, T., Seneshaw, M., Vincent, R., Banini, B. A., et al. (2016). A diet-induced animal model of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and hepatocellular cancer. J. Hepatology 65 (3), 579–588. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2016.05.005
Athyros, V. G., Mikhailidis, D. P., Didangelos, T. P., Giouleme, O. I., Liberopoulos, E. N., Karagiannis, A., et al. (2006). Effect of multifactorial treatment on non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in metabolic syndrome: A randomised study. Curr. Med. Res. Opin. 22 (5), 873–883. doi:10.1185/030079906X104696
Athyros, V. G., Tziomalos, K., Gossios, T. D., Griva, T., Anagnostis, P., Kargiotis, K., et al. (2010). Safety and efficacy of long-term statin treatment for cardiovascular events in patients with coronary heart disease and abnormal liver tests in the Greek atorvastatin and coronary heart disease evaluation (GREACE) study: A post-hoc analysis. Lancet 376 (9756), 1916–1922. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61272-X
Ayoub, W. S., Jones, P. D., Yang, J. D., and Martin, P. (2022). Emerging drugs for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Expert Opin. Emerg. Drugs 27 (2), 141–149. doi:10.1080/14728214.2022.2083107
Balandaram, G., Kramer, L. R., Kang, B-H., Murray, I. A., Perdew, G. H., Gonzalez, F. J., et al. (2016). Ligand activation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-β/δ suppresses liver tumorigenesis in Hepatitis B transgenic mice. Toxicology 363-364, 1–9. doi:10.1016/j.tox.2016.07.010
Barreby, E., Chen, P., and Aouadi, M. (2022). Macrophage functional diversity in NAFLD - more than inflammation. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 18 (8), 461–472. doi:10.1038/s41574-022-00675-6
Bartolini, D., Dallaglio, K., Torquato, P., Piroddi, M., and Galli, F. (2018). Nrf2-p62 autophagy pathway and its response to oxidative stress in hepatocellular carcinoma. Transl. Res. 193, 54–71. doi:10.1016/j.trsl.2017.11.007
Bates, J., Vijayakumar, A., Ghoshal, S., Marchand, B., Yi, S., Kornyeyev, D., et al. (2020). Acetyl-CoA carboxylase inhibition disrupts metabolic reprogramming during hepatic stellate cell activation. J. Hepatology 73 (4), 896–905. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2020.04.037
Bhalla, K., Hwang, B. J., Dewi, R. E., Twaddel, W., Goloubeva, O. G., Wong, K. K., et al. (2012). Metformin prevents liver tumorigenesis by inhibiting pathways driving hepatic lipogenesis. Cancer Prev. Res. (Phila). 5 (4), 544–552. doi:10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0228
Bianco, C., Casirati, E., Malvestiti, F., and Valenti, L. (2021). Genetic predisposition similarities between NASH and ASH: Identification of new therapeutic targets. JHEP Rep. 3 (3), 100284. doi:10.1016/j.jhepr.2021.100284
Bianco, C., Jamialahmadi, O., Pelusi, S., Baselli, G., Dongiovanni, P., Zanoni, I., et al. (2021). Non-invasive stratification of hepatocellular carcinoma risk in non-alcoholic fatty liver using polygenic risk scores. J. Hepatol. 74 (4), 775–782. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2020.11.024
Brown, A. R., Alhallak, I., Simmen, R. C. M., Melnyk, S. B., Heard-Lipsmeyer, M. E., Montales, M. T. E., et al. (2022). Krüppel-like factor 9 (KLF9) suppresses hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-Promoting oxidative stress and inflammation in mice fed high-fat diet. Cancers 14 (7), 1737. doi:10.3390/cancers14071737
Bruix, J., Qin, S., Merle, P., Granito, A., Huang, Y-H., Bodoky, G., et al. (2017). Regorafenib for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who progressed on sorafenib treatment (RESORCE): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 389 (10064), 56–66. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32453-9
Buck, M. D., Sowell, R. T., Kaech, S. M., and Pearce, E. L. (2017). Metabolic instruction of immunity. Cell 169 (4), 570–586. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.04.004
Caballero, F., Fernandez, A., De Lacy, A. M., Fernandez-Checa, J. C., Caballeria, J., and Garcia-Ruiz, C. (2009). Enhanced free cholesterol, SREBP-2 and StAR expression in human NASH. J. Hepatol. 50 (4), 789–796. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2008.12.016
Cai, X., Wang, J., Wang, J., Zhou, Q., Yang, B., He, Q., et al. (2020). Intercellular crosstalk of hepatic stellate cells in liver fibrosis: New insights into therapy. Pharmacol. Res. 155, 104720. doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104720
Calle, E. E., and Kaaks, R. (2004). Overweight, obesity and cancer: Epidemiological evidence and proposed mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Cancer 4 (8), 579–591. doi:10.1038/nrc1408
Camer, D., Yu, Y., Szabo, A., Dinh, C. H. L., Wang, H., Cheng, L., et al. (2015). Bardoxolone methyl prevents insulin resistance and the development of hepatic steatosis in mice fed a high-fat diet. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 412, 36–43. doi:10.1016/j.mce.2015.05.018
Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2017). Comprehensive and integrative genomic characterization of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell 169 (7), 1327–1341. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.046
Cao, W., Yu, P., Yang, K., and Cao, D. (2022). Aflatoxin B1: Metabolism, toxicology, and its involvement in oxidative stress and cancer development. Toxicol. Mech. Methods 32 (6), 395–419. doi:10.1080/15376516.2021.2021339
Chalasani, N., Abdelmalek, M. F., Garcia-Tsao, G., Vuppalanchi, R., Alkhouri, N., Rinella, M., et al. (2020). Effects of Belapectin, an inhibitor of galectin-3, in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis with cirrhosis and portal hypertension. Gastroenterology 158 (5), 1334–1345. e5. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.11.296
Chambel, S. S., Santos-Goncalves, A., and Duarte, T. L. (2015). The dual role of Nrf2 in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Regulation of antioxidant defenses and hepatic lipid metabolism. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015, 597134. doi:10.1155/2015/597134
Chan, B. K. Y., Elmasry, M., Forootan, S. S., Russomanno, G., Bunday, T. M., Zhang, F., et al. (2021). Pharmacological activation of Nrf2 enhances functional liver regeneration. Hepatology 74 (2), 973–986. doi:10.1002/hep.31859
Chavez-Talavera, O., Tailleux, A., Lefebvre, P., and Staels, B. (2017). Bile acid control of metabolism and inflammation in obesity, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology 152 (7), 1679–1694. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2017.01.055
Chen, D. P., Ning, W. R., Li, X. F., Wei, Y., Lao, X. M., Wang, J. C., et al. (2018). Peritumoral monocytes induce cancer cell autophagy to facilitate the progression of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Autophagy 14 (8), 1335–1346. doi:10.1080/15548627.2018.1474994
Chen, H. L., OuYang, H. Y., Le, Y., Jiang, P., Tang, H., Yu, Z. S., et al. (2018). Aberrant MCT4 and GLUT1 expression is correlated with early recurrence and poor prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma after hepatectomy. Cancer Med. 7 (11), 5339–5350. doi:10.1002/cam4.1521
Chen, J., Zhang, S., Li, Y., Tang, Z., and Kong, W. (2014). Hexokinase 2 overexpression promotes the proliferation and survival of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 35 (4), 3743–3753. doi:10.1007/s13277-013-1496-2
Chiang, D. J., and McCullough, A. J. (2014). The impact of obesity and metabolic syndrome on alcoholic liver disease. Clin. Liver Dis. 18 (1), 157–163. doi:10.1016/j.cld.2013.09.006
Chiew Woon, L., Joycelyn Jie Xin, L., and Su Pin, C. (2020). Nivolumab for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 20 (7), 687–693. doi:10.1080/14712598.2020.1749593
Cho, K. J., Shin, S. Y., Moon, H., Kim, B. K., and Ro, S. W. (2021). Knockdown of Atg7 suppresses Tumorigenesis in a murine model of liver cancer. Transl. Oncol. 14 (9), 101158. doi:10.1016/j.tranon.2021.101158
Clementi, A. H., Gaudy, A. M., van Rooijen, N., Pierce, R. H., and Mooney, R. A. (2009). Loss of Kupffer cells in diet-induced obesity is associated with increased hepatic steatosis, STAT3 signaling, and further decreases in insulin signaling. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1792 (11), 1062–1072. doi:10.1016/j.bbadis.2009.08.007
Cooper, R., Sarioglu, S., Sokmen, S., Fuzun, M., Kupelioglu, A., Valentine, H., et al. (2003). Glucose transporter-1 (GLUT-1): A potential marker of prognosis in rectal carcinoma? Br. J. Cancer 89 (5), 870–876. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6601202
Cucarull, B., Tutusaus, A., Hernáez-Alsina, T., García De Frutos, P., Reig, M., Colell, A., et al. (2021). Antioxidants threaten multikinase inhibitor efficacy against liver cancer by blocking mitochondrial reactive oxygen species. Antioxidants 10 (9), 1336. doi:10.3390/antiox10091336
Daemen, S., Gainullina, A., Kalugotla, G., He, L., Chan, M. M., Beals, J. W., et al. (2021). Dynamic shifts in the composition of resident and recruited macrophages influence tissue remodeling in NASH. Cell Rep. 34 (2), 111660. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111660
Della Pepa, G., Russo, M., Vitale, M., Carli, F., Vetrani, C., Masulli, M., et al. (2021). Pioglitazone even at low dosage improves NAFLD in type 2 diabetes: Clinical and pathophysiological insights from a subgroup of the TOSCA.IT randomised trial. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract. 178, 108984. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108984
Denk, H., Stumptner, C., Abuja, P. M., and Zatloukal, K. (2019). Sequestosome 1/p62-related pathways as therapeutic targets in hepatocellular carcinoma. Expert Opin. Ther. Targets 23 (5), 393–406. doi:10.1080/14728222.2019.1601703
Dewaal, D., Nogueira, V., Terry, A. R., Patra, K. C., Jeon, S-M., Guzman, G., et al. (2018). Author Correction: Hexokinase-2 depletion inhibits glycolysis and induces oxidative phosphorylation in hepatocellular carcinoma and sensitizes to metformin. Nat. Commun. 9 (1), 2539. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-04182-z
Diehl, A. M., and Day, C. (2017). Cause, pathogenesis, and treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 377 (21), 2063–2072. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1503519
Ding, X., Saxena, N. K., Lin, S., Gupta, N., and Anania, F. A. (2006). Exendin-4, a glucagon-like protein-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist, reverses hepatic steatosis inob/ob mice. Hepatology 43 (1), 173–181. doi:10.1002/hep.21006
Dongiovanni, P., Petta, S., Mannisto, V., Mancina, R. M., Pipitone, R., Karja, V., et al. (2015). Statin use and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in at risk individuals. J. Hepatol. 63 (3), 705–712. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2015.05.006
Dyck, L., and Lynch, L. (2018). Cancer, obesity and immunometabolism - connecting the dots. Cancer Lett. 417, 11–20. doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2017.12.019
Eales, K. L., Hollinshead, K. E. R., and Tennant, D. A. (2016). Hypoxia and metabolic adaptation of cancer cells. Oncogenesis 5 (1), e190–e. doi:10.1038/oncsis.2015.50
Ekstedt, M., Hagstrom, H., Nasr, P., Fredrikson, M., Stal, P., Kechagias, S., et al. (2015). Fibrosis stage is the strongest predictor for disease-specific mortality in NAFLD after up to 33 years of follow-up. Hepatology 61 (5), 1547–1554. doi:10.1002/hep.27368
Estes, C., Anstee, Q. M., Arias-Loste, M. T., Bantel, H., Bellentani, S., Caballeria, J., et al. (2018). Modeling NAFLD disease burden in China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, United Kingdom, and United States for the period 2016-2030. J. Hepatol. 69 (4), 896–904. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2018.05.036
Estes, C., Razavi, H., Loomba, R., Younossi, Z., and Sanyal, A. J. (2018). Modeling the epidemic of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease demonstrates an exponential increase in burden of disease. Hepatology 67 (1), 123–133. doi:10.1002/hep.29466
Febbraio, M. A., Reibe, S., Shalapour, S., Ooi, G. J., Watt, M. J., and Karin, M. (2019). Preclinical models for studying NASH-driven HCC: How useful are they? Cell Metab. 29 (1), 18–26. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2018.10.012
Ferslew, B. C., Xie, G., Johnston, C. K., Su, M., Stewart, P. W., Jia, W., et al. (2015). Altered bile acid metabolome in patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Dig. Dis. Sci. 60 (11), 3318–3328. doi:10.1007/s10620-015-3776-8
Filali-Mouncef, Y., Hunter, C., Roccio, F., Zagkou, S., Dupont, N., Primard, C., et al. (2022). The menage a trois of autophagy, lipid droplets and liver disease. Autophagy 18 (1), 50–72. doi:10.1080/15548627.2021.1895658
Finck, B. N. (2018). Targeting metabolism, insulin resistance, and diabetes to treat nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Diabetes 67 (12), 2485–2493. doi:10.2337/dbi18-0024
Flint, A., Andersen, G., Hockings, P., Johansson, L., Morsing, A., Sundby Palle, M., et al. (2021). Randomised clinical trial: Semaglutide versus placebo reduced liver steatosis but not liver stiffness in subjects with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease assessed by magnetic resonance imaging. Alimentary Pharmacol. Ther. 54 (9), 1150–1161. doi:10.1111/apt.16608
Francque, S. M., Bedossa, P., Ratziu, V., Anstee, Q. M., Bugianesi, E., Sanyal, A. J., et al. (2021). A randomized, controlled trial of the pan-PPAR agonist lanifibranor in NASH. N. Engl. J. Med. 385 (17), 1547–1558. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2036205
Friedman, S. L., Ratziu, V., Harrison, S. A., Abdelmalek, M. F., Aithal, G. P., Caballeria, J., et al. (2018). A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of cenicriviroc for treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis with fibrosis. Hepatology 67 (5), 1754–1767. doi:10.1002/hep.29477
Fu, S., Watkins, S. M., and Hotamisligil, G. S. (2012). The role of endoplasmic reticulum in hepatic lipid homeostasis and stress signaling. Cell Metab. 15 (5), 623–634. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2012.03.007
Fujii, M., Shibazaki, Y., Wakamatsu, K., Honda, Y., Kawauchi, Y., Suzuki, K., et al. (2013). A murine model for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis showing evidence of association between diabetes and hepatocellular carcinoma. Med. Mol. Morphol. 46 (3), 141–152. doi:10.1007/s00795-013-0016-1
Fujimoto, A., Furuta, M., Totoki, Y., Tsunoda, T., Kato, M., Shiraishi, Y., et al. (2016). Whole-genome mutational landscape and characterization of noncoding and structural mutations in liver cancer. Nat. Genet. 48 (5), 500–509. doi:10.1038/ng.3547
Gan, L., Liu, Z., and Sun, C. (2018). Obesity linking to hepatocellular carcinoma: A global view. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer 1869 (2), 97–102. doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2017.12.006
Gao, H., Cao, Y., Xia, H., Zhu, X., and Jin, Y. (2020). CYP4A11 is involved in the development of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease via ROS-induced lipid peroxidation and inflammation. Int. J. Mol. Med. 45, 1121–1129. doi:10.3892/ijmm.2020.4479
Geh, D., Anstee, Q. M., and Reeves, H. L. (2021). NAFLD-associated HCC: Progress and opportunities. J. Hepatocell. Carcinoma 8, 223–239. doi:10.2147/JHC.S272213
Gluchowski, N. L., Becuwe, M., Walther, T. C., and Farese, R. V. (2017). Lipid droplets and liver disease: From basic biology to clinical implications. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 14 (6), 343–355. doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2017.32
Gorden, D. L., Myers, D. S., Ivanova, P. T., Fahy, E., Maurya, M. R., Gupta, S., et al. (2015). Biomarkers of NAFLD progression: A lipidomics approach to an epidemic. J. Lipid Res. 56 (3), 722–736. doi:10.1194/jlr.P056002
Govaere, O., Cockell, S., Tiniakos, D., Queen, R., Younes, R., Vacca, M., et al. (2020). Transcriptomic profiling across the nonalcoholic fatty liver disease spectrum reveals gene signatures for steatohepatitis and fibrosis. Sci. Transl. Med. 12 (572), eaba4448. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aba4448
Green, C. D., Weigel, C., Brown, R. D. R., Bedossa, P., Dozmorov, M., Sanyal, A. J., et al. (2022). A new preclinical model of Western diet-induced progression of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis to hepatocellular carcinoma. FASEB J. 36 (7), e22372. doi:10.1096/fj.202200346R
Grgurevic, I., Bozin, T., Mikus, M., Kukla, M., and O'Beirne, J. (2021). Hepatocellular carcinoma in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: From epidemiology to diagnostic approach. Cancers (Basel) 13 (22), 5844. doi:10.3390/cancers13225844
Guichard, C., Amaddeo, G., Imbeaud, S., Ladeiro, Y., Pelletier, L., Maad, I. B., et al. (2012). Integrated analysis of somatic mutations and focal copy-number changes identifies key genes and pathways in hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat. Genet. 44 (6), 694–698. doi:10.1038/ng.2256
Gunjan, D., Shalimar, , Nadda, N., Kedia, S., Nayak, B., Paul, S. B., et al. (2017). Hepatocellular carcinoma: An unusual complication of longstanding Wilson disease. J. Clin. Exp. Hepatol. 7 (2), 152–154. doi:10.1016/j.jceh.2016.09.012
Ha, J., Yim, S. Y., and Karagozian, R. (2022). Mortality and liver-related events in lean versus non-lean non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2022.11.019
Haberl, E. M., Pohl, R., Rein-Fischboeck, L., Höring, M., Krautbauer, S., Liebisch, G., et al. (2020). Hepatic lipid profile in mice fed a choline-deficient, low-methionine diet resembles human non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Lipids Health Dis. 19 (1), 250. doi:10.1186/s12944-020-01425-1
Han, M. S., Jung, D. Y., Morel, C., Lakhani, S. A., Kim, J. K., Flavell, R. A., et al. (2013). JNK expression by macrophages promotes obesity-induced insulin resistance and inflammation. Science 339 (6116), 218–222. doi:10.1126/science.1227568
Hansen, H. H., Ægidius, H. M., Oró, D., Evers, S. S., Heebøll, S., Eriksen, P. L., et al. (2020). Human translatability of the GAN diet-induced obese mouse model of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. BMC Gastroenterol. 20 (1), 210. doi:10.1186/s12876-020-01356-2
Harrison, S. A., Bashir, M. R., Guy, C. D., Zhou, R., Moylan, C. A., Frias, J. P., et al. (2019). Resmetirom (MGL-3196) for the treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial. Lancet 394 (10213), 2012–2024. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32517-6
He, F., Antonucci, L., Yamachika, S., Zhang, Z., Taniguchi, K., Umemura, A., et al. (2020). NRF2 activates growth factor genes and downstream AKT signaling to induce mouse and human hepatomegaly. J. Hepatol. 72 (6), 1182–1195. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2020.01.023
Heikkinen, S., Auwerx, J., and Argmann, C. (2007). PPARgamma in human and mouse physiology. Biochimica Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 1771 (8), 999–1013. doi:10.1016/j.bbalip.2007.03.006
Hernandez, E. D., Zheng, L., Kim, Y., Fang, B., Liu, B., Valdez, R. A., et al. (2019). Tropifexor-mediated abrogation of steatohepatitis and fibrosis is associated with the antioxidative gene expression profile in rodents. Hepatol. Commun. 3 (8), 1085–1097. doi:10.1002/hep4.1368
Horie, Y., Suzuki, A., Kataoka, E., Sasaki, T., Hamada, K., Sasaki, J., et al. (2004). Hepatocyte-specific Pten deficiency results in steatohepatitis and hepatocellular carcinomas. J. Clin. Investigation 113 (12), 1774–1783. doi:10.1172/JCI20513
Horn, A., and Jaiswal, J. K. (2018). Cellular mechanisms and signals that coordinate plasma membrane repair. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 75 (20), 3751–3770. doi:10.1007/s00018-018-2888-7
Horn, C. L., Morales, A. L., Savard, C., Farrell, G. C., and Ioannou, G. N. (2022). Role of cholesterol-associated steatohepatitis in the development of NASH. Hepatol. Commun. 6 (1), 12–35. doi:10.1002/hep4.1801
Hotamisligil, G. S. (2017). Inflammation, metaflammation and immunometabolic disorders. Nature 542 (7640), 177–185. doi:10.1038/nature21363
Hou, J., Zhang, H., Sun, B., and Karin, M. (2020). The immunobiology of hepatocellular carcinoma in humans and mice: Basic concepts and therapeutic implications. J. Hepatol. 72 (1), 167–182. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2019.08.014
Hoxhaj, G., and Manning, B. D. (2020). The PI3K–AKT network at the interface of oncogenic signalling and cancer metabolism. Nat. Rev. Cancer 20 (2), 74–88. doi:10.1038/s41568-019-0216-7
Hu, B., Lin, J. Z., Yang, X. B., and Sang, X. T. (2020). Aberrant lipid metabolism in hepatocellular carcinoma cells as well as immune microenvironment: A review. Cell Prolif. 53 (3), e12772. doi:10.1111/cpr.12772
Hu, J., Feng, L., Ren, M., Zhao, Y., Lu, G., Lu, X., et al. (2021). Colorectal cancer cell differentiation is dependent on the repression of aerobic glycolysis by NDRG2-TXNIP Axis. Dig. Dis. Sci. 67, 3763–3772. doi:10.1007/s10620-021-07188-8
Hue, L., and Rider, M. H. (1987). Role of fructose 2, 6-bisphosphate in the control of glycolysis in mammalian tissues. Biochem. J. 245 (2), 313–324. doi:10.1042/bj2450313
Iacobini, C., Menini, S., Ricci, C., Blasetti Fantauzzi, C., Scipioni, A., Salvi, L., et al. (2011). Galectin-3 ablation protects mice from diet-induced NASH: A major scavenging role for galectin-3 in liver. J. Hepatol. 54 (5), 975–983. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2010.09.020
Ioannou, G. N. (2021). Epidemiology and risk-stratification of NAFLD-associated HCC. J. Hepatol. 75 (6), 1476–1484. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2021.08.012
Ioannou, G. N., Haigh, W. G., Thorning, D., and Savard, C. (2013). Hepatic cholesterol crystals and crown-like structures distinguish NASH from simple steatosis. J. Lipid Res. 54 (5), 1326–1334. doi:10.1194/jlr.M034876
Ioannou, G. N. (2021). HCC surveillance after SVR in patients with F3/F4 fibrosis. J. Hepatol. 74 (2), 458–465. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2020.10.016
Ioannou, G. N., Landis, C. S., Jin, G. Y., Haigh, W. G., Farrell, G. C., Kuver, R., et al. (2019). Cholesterol crystals in hepatocyte lipid droplets are strongly associated with human nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Hepatol. Commun. 3 (6), 776–791. doi:10.1002/hep4.1348
Ioannou, G. N., Lee, S. P., Linsley, P. S., Gersuk, V., Yeh, M. M., Chen, Y. Y., et al. (2022). Pcsk9 deletion promotes murine nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and hepatic carcinogenesis: Role of cholesterol. Hepatol. Commun. 6 (4), 780–794. doi:10.1002/hep4.1858
Ioannou, G. N., Subramanian, S., Chait, A., Haigh, W. G., Yeh, M. M., Farrell, G. C., et al. (2017). Cholesterol crystallization within hepatocyte lipid droplets and its role in murine NASH. J. Lipid Res. 58 (6), 1067–1079. doi:10.1194/jlr.M072454
Ioannou, G. N. (2016). The role of cholesterol in the pathogenesis of NASH. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 27 (2), 84–95. doi:10.1016/j.tem.2015.11.008
Iruarrizaga-Lejarreta, M., Varela-Rey, M., Fernández-Ramos, D., Martínez-Arranz, I., Delgado, T. C., Simon, J., et al. (2017). Role of aramchol in steatohepatitis and fibrosis in mice. Hepatol. Commun. 1 (9), 911–927. doi:10.1002/hep4.1107
Jayachandran, A., Shrestha, R., Bridle, K. R., and Crawford, D. H. G. (2020). Association between hereditary hemochromatosis and hepatocellular carcinoma: A comprehensive review. Hepatoma Res. 2020, 2020. doi:10.20517/2394-5079.2019.35
Jenne, C. N., and Kubes, P. (2013). Immune surveillance by the liver. Nat. Immunol. 14 (10), 996–1006. doi:10.1038/ni.2691
Jiang, B. (2017). Aerobic glycolysis and high level of lactate in cancer metabolism and microenvironment. Genes Dis. 4 (1), 25–27. doi:10.1016/j.gendis.2017.02.003
Joshi-Barve, S., Kirpich, I., Cave, M. C., Marsano, L. S., and McClain, C. J. (2015). Alcoholic, nonalcoholic, and toxicant-associated steatohepatitis: Mechanistic similarities and differences. Cell Mol. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 1 (4), 356–367. doi:10.1016/j.jcmgh.2015.05.006
Kaji, K., Nishimura, N., Seki, K., Sato, S., Saikawa, S., Nakanishi, K., et al. (2018). Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor canagliflozin attenuates liver cancer cell growth and angiogenic activity by inhibiting glucose uptake. Int. J. Cancer 142 (8), 1712–1722. doi:10.1002/ijc.31193
Kalavalapalli, S., Bril, F., Koelmel, J. P., Abdo, K., Guingab, J., Andrews, P., et al. (2018). Pioglitazone improves hepatic mitochondrial function in a mouse model of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 315 (2), E163-E173–E73. doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00023.2018
Kamisako, T., Tanaka, Y., Kishino, Y., Ikeda, T., Yamamoto, K., Masuda, S., et al. (2014). Role of Nrf2 in the alteration of cholesterol and bile acid metabolism-related gene expression by dietary cholesterol in high fat-fed mice. J. Clin. Biochem. Nutr. 54 (2), 90–94. doi:10.3164/jcbn.13-92
Kannt, A., Wohlfart, P., Madsen, A. N., Veidal, S. S., Feigh, M., and Schmoll, D. (2021). Activation of thyroid hormone receptor-β improved disease activity and metabolism independent of body weight in a mouse model of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis and fibrosis. Br. J. Pharmacol. 178 (12), 2412–2423. doi:10.1111/bph.15427
Karagozian, R., Derdak, Z., and Baffy, G. (2014). Obesity-associated mechanisms of hepatocarcinogenesis. Metabolism 63 (5), 607–617. doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2014.01.011
Kargiotis, K., Athyros, V. G., Giouleme, O., Katsiki, N., Katsiki, E., Anagnostis, P., et al. (2015). Resolution of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis by rosuvastatin monotherapy in patients with metabolic syndrome. World J. Gastroenterol. 21 (25), 7860–7868. doi:10.3748/wjg.v21.i25.7860
Katturajan, R., Nithiyanandam, S., Parthasarathy, M., Gopalakrishnan, A. V., Sathiyamoorthi, E., Lee, J., et al. (2022). Immunomodulatory role of thioredoxin interacting protein in cancer's impediments: Current understanding and therapeutic implications. Vaccines (Basel) 10 (11), 1902. doi:10.3390/vaccines10111902
Kazankov, K., Jorgensen, S. M. D., Thomsen, K. L., Moller, H. J., Vilstrup, H., George, J., et al. (2019). The role of macrophages in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 16 (3), 145–159. doi:10.1038/s41575-018-0082-x
Kim, S. Y., Hwangbo, H., Kim, M. Y., Ji, S. Y., Lee, H., Kim, G. Y., et al. (2021). Coptisine induces autophagic cell death through down-regulation of PI3K/Akt/mTOR signaling pathway and up-regulation of ROS-mediated mitochondrial dysfunction in hepatocellular carcinoma Hep3B cells. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 697, 108688. doi:10.1016/j.abb.2020.108688
Kishida, N., Matsuda, S., Itano, O., Shinoda, M., Kitago, M., Yagi, H., et al. (2016). Development of a novel mouse model of hepatocellular carcinoma with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis using a high-fat, choline-deficient diet and intraperitoneal injection of diethylnitrosamine. BMC Gastroenterol. 16 (1), 61. doi:10.1186/s12876-016-0477-5
Kojima, M., Takahashi, H., Kuwashiro, T., Tanaka, K., Mori, H., Ozaki, I., et al. (2020). Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist prevented the progression of hepatocellular carcinoma in a mouse model of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21 (16), 5722. doi:10.3390/ijms21165722
Komatsu, M., Kurokawa, H., Waguri, S., Taguchi, K., Kobayashi, A., Ichimura, Y., et al. (2010). The selective autophagy substrate p62 activates the stress responsive transcription factor Nrf2 through inactivation of Keap1. Nat. Cell Biol. 12 (3), 213–223. doi:10.1038/ncb2021
Krenkel, O., Puengel, T., Govaere, O., Abdallah, A. T., Mossanen, J. C., Kohlhepp, M., et al. (2018). Therapeutic inhibition of inflammatory monocyte recruitment reduces steatohepatitis and liver fibrosis. Hepatology 67 (4), 1270–1283. doi:10.1002/hep.29544
Kudo, M., Finn, R. S., Qin, S., Han, K-H., Ikeda, K., Piscaglia, F., et al. (2018). Lenvatinib versus sorafenib in first-line treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet 391 (10126), 1163–1173. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30207-1
Kumari, S., Badana, A. K., and Malla, R. (2018). Reactive oxygen species: A key constituent in cancer survival. Biomark. Insights 13, 117727191875539. doi:10.1177/1177271918755391
Lally, J. S. V., Ghoshal, S., DePeralta, D. K., Moaven, O., Wei, L., Masia, R., et al. (2019). Inhibition of acetyl-CoA carboxylase by phosphorylation or the inhibitor ND-654 suppresses lipogenesis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Cell Metab. 29 (1), 174–182. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2018.08.020
Larsson, S. C., and Wolk, A. (2007). Overweight, obesity and risk of liver cancer: A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Br. J. Cancer 97 (7), 1005–1008. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603932
Le, M. H., Yeo, Y. H., Li, X., Li, J., Zou, B., Wu, Y., et al. (2019). Global NAFLD prevalence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 20 (12), 2809–2817.e28. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2021.12.002
Lee, Y. S., Wollam, J., and Olefsky, J. M. (2018). An integrated view of immunometabolism. Cell 172 (1-2), 22–40. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.12.025
Lefebvre, E., Moyle, G., Reshef, R., Richman, L. P., Thompson, M., Hong, F., et al. (2016). Antifibrotic effects of the dual CCR2/CCR5 antagonist cenicriviroc in animal models of liver and Kidney fibrosis. PLoS One 11 (6), e0158156. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158156
Lefere, S., Devisscher, L., and Tacke, F. (2020). Targeting CCR2/5 in the treatment of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and fibrosis: Opportunities and challenges. Expert Opin. Investigational Drugs 29 (2), 89–92. doi:10.1080/13543784.2020.1718106
Lennicke, C., and Cocheme, H. M. (2021). Redox metabolism: ROS as specific molecular regulators of cell signaling and function. Mol. Cell 81 (18), 3691–3707. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2021.08.018
Li, L., Fu, J., Liu, D., Sun, J., Hou, Y., Chen, C., et al. (2020). Hepatocyte-specific Nrf2 deficiency mitigates high-fat diet-induced hepatic steatosis: Involvement of reduced PPARγ expression. Redox Biol. 30, 101412. doi:10.1016/j.redox.2019.101412
Li, S., Ghoshal, S., Sojoodi, M., Arora, G., Masia, R., Erstad, D. J., et al. (2019). Pioglitazone reduces hepatocellular carcinoma development in two rodent models of cirrhosis. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 23 (1), 101–111. doi:10.1007/s11605-018-4004-6
Li, X., Ramadori, P., Pfister, D., Seehawer, M., Zender, L., and Heikenwalder, M. (2021). The immunological and metabolic landscape in primary and metastatic liver cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 21 (9), 541–557. doi:10.1038/s41568-021-00383-9
Li, X., Yao, W., Yuan, Y., Chen, P., Li, B., Li, J., et al. (2017). Targeting of tumour-infiltrating macrophages via CCL2/CCR2 signalling as a therapeutic strategy against hepatocellular carcinoma. Gut 66 (1), 157–167. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310514
Liu, Y. L., Patman, G. L., Leathart, J. B., Piguet, A. C., Burt, A. D., Dufour, J. F., et al. (2014). Carriage of the PNPLA3 rs738409 C >G polymorphism confers an increased risk of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease associated hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Hepatol. 61 (1), 75–81. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2014.02.030
Liu, Y. L., Reeves, H. L., Burt, A. D., Tiniakos, D., McPherson, S., Leathart, J. B., et al. (2014). TM6SF2 rs58542926 influences hepatic fibrosis progression in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Nat. Commun. 5, 4309. doi:10.1038/ncomms5309
Llovet, J. M., Ricci, S., Mazzaferro, V., Hilgard, P., Gane, E., Blanc, J. F., et al. (2008). Sorafenib in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 359 (4), 378–390. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa0708857
Loomba, R., Friedman, S. L., and Shulman, G. I. (2021). Mechanisms and disease consequences of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Cell 184 (10), 2537–2564. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.04.015
Lunt, S. Y., and Vander Heiden, M. G. (2011). Aerobic glycolysis: Meeting the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 27, 441–464. doi:10.1146/annurev-cellbio-092910-154237
Ma, C., Kesarwala, A. H., Eggert, T., Medina-Echeverz, J., Kleiner, D. E., Jin, P., et al. (2016). NAFLD causes selective CD4(+) T lymphocyte loss and promotes hepatocarcinogenesis. Nature 531 (7593), 253–257. doi:10.1038/nature16969
Machado, M. V., Michelotti, G. A., Xie, G., De Almeida, T. P., Boursier, J., Bohnic, B., et al. (2015). Mouse models of diet-induced nonalcoholic steatohepatitis reproduce the heterogeneity of the human disease. PLOS ONE 10 (5), e0127991. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0127991
Mahmoudi, A., Jamialahmadi, T., Johnston, T. P., and Sahebkar, A. (2022). Impact of fenofibrate on NAFLD/NASH: A genetic perspective. Drug Discov. Today 27 (8), 2363–2372. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2022.05.007
Mahmoudi, A., Moallem, S. A., Johnston, T. P., and Sahebkar, A. (2022). Liver protective effect of fenofibrate in NASH/NAFLD animal models. PPAR Res. 2022, 5805398. doi:10.1155/2022/5805398
Mancina, R. M., Dongiovanni, P., Petta, S., Pingitore, P., Meroni, M., Rametta, R., et al. (2016). The MBOAT7-TMC4 variant rs641738 increases risk of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in individuals of European descent. Gastroenterology 150 (5), 1219–1230. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2016.01.032
Marot, A., Henrion, J., Knebel, J. F., Moreno, C., and Deltenre, P. (2017). Alcoholic liver disease confers a worse prognosis than HCV infection and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease among patients with cirrhosis: An observational study. PLoS One 12 (10), e0186715. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0186715
Masoodi, M., Gastaldelli, A., Hyotylainen, T., Arretxe, E., Alonso, C., Gaggini, M., et al. (2021). Metabolomics and lipidomics in NAFLD: Biomarkers and non-invasive diagnostic tests. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 18 (12), 835–856. doi:10.1038/s41575-021-00502-9
Min, H. K., Kapoor, A., Fuchs, M., Mirshahi, F., Zhou, H., Maher, J., et al. (2012). Increased hepatic synthesis and dysregulation of cholesterol metabolism is associated with the severity of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Cell Metab. 15 (5), 665–674. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2012.04.004
Minami, T., Tateishi, R., Fujiwara, N., Nakagomi, R., Nakatsuka, T., Sato, M., et al. (2021). Impact of obesity and heavy alcohol consumption on hepatocellular carcinoma development after HCV eradication with antivirals. Liver Cancer 10 (4), 309–319. doi:10.1159/000513705
Miura, K., Yang, L., van Rooijen, N., Ohnishi, H., and Seki, E. (2012). Hepatic recruitment of macrophages promotes nonalcoholic steatohepatitis through CCR2. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 302 (11), G1310–G1321. doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00365.2011
Mohs, A., Otto, T., Schneider, K. M., Peltzer, M., Boekschoten, M., Holland, C. H., et al. (2021). Hepatocyte-specific NRF2 activation controls fibrogenesis and carcinogenesis in steatohepatitis. J. Hepatol. 74 (3), 638–648. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2020.09.037
Morgantini, C., Jager, J., Li, X., Levi, L., Azzimato, V., Sulen, A., et al. (2019). Liver macrophages regulate systemic metabolism through non-inflammatory factors. Nat. Metab. 1 (4), 445–459. doi:10.1038/s42255-019-0044-9
Morinaga, H., Mayoral, R., Heinrichsdorff, J., Osborn, O., Franck, N., Hah, N., et al. (2015). Characterization of distinct subpopulations of hepatic macrophages in HFD/obese mice. Diabetes 64 (4), 1120–1130. doi:10.2337/db14-1238
Moscat, J., Karin, M., and Diaz-Meco, M. T. (2016). p62 in cancer: Signaling adaptor beyond autophagy. Cell 167 (3), 606–609. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.09.030
Mossenta, M., Busato, D., Dal Bo, M., and Toffoli, G. (2020). Glucose metabolism and oxidative stress in hepatocellular carcinoma: Role and possible implications in novel therapeutic strategies. Cancers (Basel) 12 (6), 1668. doi:10.3390/cancers12061668
Mouzaki, M., Wang, A. Y., Bandsma, R., Comelli, E. M., Arendt, B. M., Zhang, L., et al. (2016). Bile acids and dysbiosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. PLoS One 11 (5), e0151829. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151829
Murakami, S., and Motohashi, H. (2015). Roles of Nrf2 in cell proliferation and differentiation. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 88, 168–178. doi:10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2015.06.030
Musso, G., Gambino, R., and Cassader, M. (2013). Cholesterol metabolism and the pathogenesis of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Prog. Lipid Res. 52 (1), 175–191. doi:10.1016/j.plipres.2012.11.002
Nair, S., Mason, A., Eason, J., Loss, G., and Perrillo, R. P. (2002). Is obesity an independent risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhosis? Hepatology 36 (1), 150–155. doi:10.1053/jhep.2002.33713
Nakagawa, H., Hayata, Y., Kawamura, S., Yamada, T., Fujiwara, N., and Koike, K. (2018). Lipid metabolic reprogramming in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 10 (11), 447. doi:10.3390/cancers10110447
Nakagawa, H., Umemura, A., Taniguchi, K., Font-Burgada, J., Dhar, D., Ogata, H., et al. (2014). ER stress cooperates with hypernutrition to trigger TNF-dependent spontaneous HCC development. Cancer Cell 26 (3), 331–343. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2014.07.001
Nakagawa, H. (2015). Recent advances in mouse models of obesity- and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis-associated hepatocarcinogenesis. World J. Hepatology 7 (17), 2110–2118. doi:10.4254/wjh.v7.i17.2110
Nakao, K., Miyaaki, H., and Ichikawa, T. (2014). Antitumor function of microRNA-122 against hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Gastroenterol. 49 (4), 589–593. doi:10.1007/s00535-014-0932-4
Neuschwander-Tetri, B. A., Loomba, R., Sanyal, A. J., Lavine, J. E., Van Natta, M. L., Abdelmalek, M. F., et al. (2015). Farnesoid X nuclear receptor ligand obeticholic acid for non-cirrhotic, non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (FLINT): A multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 385 (9972), 956–965. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61933-4
Newsome, P. N., Buchholtz, K., Cusi, K., Linder, M., Okanoue, T., Ratziu, V., et al. (2021). A placebo-controlled trial of subcutaneous semaglutide in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. N. Engl. J. Med. 384 (12), 1113–1124. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa2028395
Ngo, H. K. C., Kim, D. H., Cha, Y. N., Na, H. K., and Surh, Y. J. (2017). Nrf2 mutagenic activation drives hepatocarcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 77 (18), 4797–4808. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-3538
Nogueira, V., and Hay, N. (2013). Molecular pathways: Reactive oxygen species homeostasis in cancer cells and implications for cancer therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 19 (16), 4309–4314. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1424
Ntandja Wandji, L. C., Gnemmi, V., Mathurin, P., and Louvet, A. (2020). Combined alcoholic and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. JHEP Rep. 2 (3), 100101. doi:10.1016/j.jhepr.2020.100101
Palavicini, J. P., Chavez-Velazquez, A., Fourcaudot, M., Tripathy, D., Pan, M., Norton, L., et al. (2021). The insulin-sensitizer pioglitazone remodels adipose tissue phospholipids in humans. Front. Physiol. 12, 784391. doi:10.3389/fphys.2021.784391
Paltoglou, S. M., and Roberts, B. J. (2005). Role of the von Hippel-Lindau tumour suppressor protein in the regulation of HIF-1alpha and its oxygen-regulated transactivation domains at high cell density. Oncogene 24 (23), 3830–3835. doi:10.1038/sj.onc.1208531
Panunzi, S., Maltese, S., Verrastro, O., Labbate, L., De Gaetano, A., Pompili, M., et al. (2021). Pioglitazone and bariatric surgery are the most effective treatments for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: A hierarchical network meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes. Metab. 23 (4), 980–990. doi:10.1111/dom.14304
Papackova, Z., Palenickova, E., Dankova, H., Zdychova, J., Skop, V., Kazdova, L., et al. (2012). Kupffer cells ameliorate hepatic insulin resistance induced by high-fat diet rich in monounsaturated fatty acids: The evidence for the involvement of alternatively activated macrophages. Nutr. Metab. (Lond) 9, 22. doi:10.1186/1743-7075-9-22
Parikh, H., Carlsson, E., Chutkow, W. A., Johansson, L. E., Storgaard, H., Poulsen, P., et al. (2007). TXNIP regulates peripheral glucose metabolism in humans. PLoS Med. 4 (5), e158. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.0040158
Patel, K., Harrison, S. A., Elkhashab, M., Trotter, J. F., Herring, R., Rojter, S. E., et al. (2020). Cilofexor, a nonsteroidal FXR agonist, in patients with noncirrhotic NASH: A phase 2 randomized controlled trial. Hepatology 72 (1), 58–71. doi:10.1002/hep.31205
Patra, K. C., Wang, Q., Bhaskar, P. T., Miller, L., Wang, Z., Wheaton, W., et al. (2013). Hexokinase 2 is required for tumor initiation and maintenance and its systemic deletion is therapeutic in mouse models of cancer. Cancer Cell 24 (2), 213–228. doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2013.06.014
Peiseler, M., Schwabe, R., Hampe, J., Kubes, P., Heikenwalder, M., and Tacke, F. (2022). Immune mechanisms linking metabolic injury to inflammation and fibrosis in fatty liver disease - novel insights into cellular communication circuits. J. Hepatol. 77 (4), 1136–1160. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2022.06.012
Poillet-Perez, L., Despouy, G., Delage-Mourroux, R., and Boyer-Guittaut, M. (2015). Interplay between ROS and autophagy in cancer cells, from tumor initiation to cancer therapy. Redox Biol. 4, 184–192. doi:10.1016/j.redox.2014.12.003
Poillet-Perez, L., and White, E. (2019). Role of tumor and host autophagy in cancer metabolism. Genes & Dev. 33 (11-12), 610–619. doi:10.1101/gad.325514.119
Povsic, M., Wong, O. Y., Perry, R., and Bottomley, J. (2019). A structured literature review of the epidemiology and disease burden of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Adv. Ther. 36 (7), 1574–1594. doi:10.1007/s12325-019-00960-3
Protzer, U., Maini, M. K., and Knolle, P. A. (2012). Living in the liver: Hepatic infections. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 12 (3), 201–213. doi:10.1038/nri3169
Puri, P., Baillie, R. A., Wiest, M. M., Mirshahi, F., Choudhury, J., Cheung, O., et al. (2007). A lipidomic analysis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology 46 (4), 1081–1090. doi:10.1002/hep.21763
Puri, P., Daita, K., Joyce, A., Mirshahi, F., Santhekadur, P. K., Cazanave, S., et al. (2018). The presence and severity of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis is associated with specific changes in circulating bile acids. Hepatology 67 (2), 534–548. doi:10.1002/hep.29359
Qu, X., Sun, J., Zhang, Y., Li, J., Hu, J., Li, K., et al. (2018). c-Myc-driven glycolysis via TXNIP suppression is dependent on glutaminase-MondoA axis in prostate cancer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 504 (2), 415–421. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.08.069
Ramachandran, P., Matchett, K. P., Dobie, R., Wilson-Kanamori, J. R., and Henderson, N. C. (2020). Single-cell technologies in hepatology: New insights into liver biology and disease pathogenesis. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 17 (8), 457–472. doi:10.1038/s41575-020-0304-x
Ramos-Tovar, E., and Muriel, P. (2020). Free radicals, antioxidants, nuclear factor-E2-related factor-2 and liver damage. J. Appl. Toxicol. 40 (1), 151–168. doi:10.1002/jat.3880
Rebouissou, S., Franconi, A., Calderaro, J., Letouzé, E., Imbeaud, S., Pilati, C., et al. (2016). Genotype-phenotype correlation of CTNNB1 mutations reveals different ß-catenin activity associated with liver tumor progression. Hepatology 64 (6), 2047–2061. doi:10.1002/hep.28638
Reid, D. T., Reyes, J. L., McDonald, B. A., Vo, T., Reimer, R. A., and Eksteen, B. (2016). Kupffer cells undergo fundamental changes during the development of experimental NASH and are critical in initiating liver damage and inflammation. PLOS ONE 11 (7), e0159524. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0159524
Ribas, V., Conde De La Rosa, L., Robles, D., Núñez, S., Segalés, P., Insausti-Urkia, N., et al. (2021). Dietary and genetic cholesterol loading rather than steatosis promotes liver tumorigenesis and NASH-driven HCC. Cancers 13 (16), 4091. doi:10.3390/cancers13164091
Ringelhan, M., Pfister, D., O’Connor, T., Pikarsky, E., and Heikenwalder, M. (2018). The immunology of hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat. Immunol. 19 (3), 222–232. doi:10.1038/s41590-018-0044-z
Rysman, E., Brusselmans, K., Scheys, K., Timmermans, L., Derua, R., Munck, S., et al. (2010). De novo lipogenesis protects cancer cells from free radicals and chemotherapeutics by promoting membrane lipid saturation. Cancer Res. 70 (20), 8117–8126. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3871
Safadi, R., Konikoff, F. M., Mahamid, M., Zelber-Sagi, S., Halpern, M., Gilat, T., et al. (2014). The fatty acid-bile acid conjugate Aramchol reduces liver fat content in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 12 (12), 2085–2091. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2014.04.038
Samant, H., Amiri, H. S., and Zibari, G. B. (2021). Addressing the worldwide hepatocellular carcinoma: Epidemiology, prevention and management. J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 12 (2), S361–S373. doi:10.21037/jgo.2020.02.08
Sangineto, M., Villani, R., Cavallone, F., Romano, A., Loizzi, D., and Serviddio, G. (2020). Lipid metabolism in development and progression of hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancers (Basel). 12 (6), 1419. doi:10.3390/cancers12061419
Sato-Tadano, A., Suzuki, T., Amari, M., Takagi, K., Miki, Y., Tamaki, K., et al. (2013). Hexokinase II in breast carcinoma: A potent prognostic factor associated with hypoxia-inducible factor-1α and ki-67. Cancer Sci. 104 (10), 1380–1388. doi:10.1111/cas.12238
Savard, C., Tartaglione, E. V., Kuver, R., Haigh, W. G., Farrell, G. C., Subramanian, S., et al. (2013). Synergistic interaction of dietary cholesterol and dietary fat in inducing experimental steatohepatitis. Hepatology 57 (1), 81–92. doi:10.1002/hep.25789
Schneider, J. L., and Cuervo, A. M. (2014). Liver autophagy: Much more than just taking out the trash. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 11 (3), 187–200. doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2013.211
Schulze, K., Imbeaud, S., Letouze, E., Alexandrov, L. B., Calderaro, J., Rebouissou, S., et al. (2015). Exome sequencing of hepatocellular carcinomas identifies new mutational signatures and potential therapeutic targets. Nat. Genet. 47 (5), 505–511. doi:10.1038/ng.3252
Schwabe, R. F., Tabas, I., and Pajvani, U. B. (2020). Mechanisms of fibrosis development in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology 158 (7), 1913–1928. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.11.311
Schwabl, P., Hambruch, E., Budas, G. R., Supper, P., Burnet, M., Liles, J. T., et al. (2021). The non-steroidal FXR agonist cilofexor improves portal hypertension and reduces hepatic fibrosis in a Rat NASH model. Biomedicines 9 (1), 60. doi:10.3390/biomedicines9010060
Seko, Y., Sumida, Y., Tanaka, S., Mori, K., Taketani, H., Ishiba, H., et al. (2017). Development of hepatocellular carcinoma in Japanese patients with biopsy-proven non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: Association between PNPLA3 genotype and hepatocarcinogenesis/fibrosis progression. Hepatol. Res. 47 (11), 1083–1092. doi:10.1111/hepr.12840
Seko, Y., Yamaguchi, K., Mizuno, N., Okuda, K., Takemura, M., Taketani, H., et al. (2018). Combination of PNPLA3 and TLL1 polymorphism can predict advanced fibrosis in Japanese patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J. Gastroenterol. 53 (3), 438–448. doi:10.1007/s00535-017-1372-8
Senni, N., Savall, M., Cabrerizo Granados, D., Alves-Guerra, M. C., Sartor, C., Lagoutte, I., et al. (2019). β-catenin-activated hepatocellular carcinomas are addicted to fatty acids. Gut 68 (2), 322–334. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315448
Serfaty, L., and Lemoine, M. (2008). Definition and natural history of metabolic steatosis: Clinical aspects of NAFLD, NASH and cirrhosis. Diabetes Metab. 34 (2), 634–637. doi:10.1016/S1262-3636(08)74597-X
Shalapour, S., Lin, X-J., Bastian, I. N., Brain, J., Burt, A. D., Aksenov, A. A., et al. (2017). Inflammation-induced IgA+ cells dismantle anti-liver cancer immunity. Nature 551 (7680), 340–345. doi:10.1038/nature24302
Shen, B., Li, A., Wan, Y-J. Y., Shen, G., Zhu, J., and Nie, Y. (2020). Lack of pparβ/δ-inactivated SGK-1 is implicated in liver carcinogenesis. BioMed Res. Int. 2020, 9563851–9563911. doi:10.1155/2020/9563851
Shiha, G., Soliman, R., Mikhail, N., Hassan, A., and Eslam, M. (2021). Development of a simple dynamic algorithm for individualized hepatocellular carcinoma risk-based surveillance using pre- and post-treatment general evaluation score. Liver Int. 41 (11), 2768–2776. doi:10.1111/liv.14995
Sies, H., and Jones, D. P. (2020). Reactive oxygen species (ROS) as pleiotropic physiological signalling agents. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 21 (7), 363–383. doi:10.1038/s41580-020-0230-3
Singal, A. G., Manjunath, H., Yopp, A. C., Beg, M. S., Marrero, J. A., Gopal, P., et al. (2014). The effect of PNPLA3 on fibrosis progression and development of hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 109 (3), 325–334. doi:10.1038/ajg.2013.476
Sinha, R. A., Bruinstroop, E., Singh, B. K., and Yen, P. M. (2019). Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and hypercholesterolemia: Roles of thyroid hormones, metabolites, and agonists. Thyroid 29 (9), 1173–1191. doi:10.1089/thy.2018.0664
Sosa, V., Moline, T., Somoza, R., Paciucci, R., Kondoh, H., and Me, L. L. (2013). Oxidative stress and cancer: An overview. Ageing Res. Rev. 12 (1), 376–390. doi:10.1016/j.arr.2012.10.004
Stienstra, R., Saudale, F., Duval, C., Keshtkar, S., Groener, J. E., van Rooijen, N., et al. (2010). Kupffer cells promote hepatic steatosis via interleukin-1beta-dependent suppression of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha activity. Hepatology 51 (2), 511–522. doi:10.1002/hep.23337
Sun, X., Seidman, J. S., Zhao, P., Troutman, T. D., Spann, N. J., Que, X., et al. (2020). Neutralization of oxidized phospholipids ameliorates non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Cell Metab. 31 (1), 189–206. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2019.10.014
Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R. L., Laversanne, M., Soerjomataram, I., Jemal, A., et al. (2021). Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 71 (3), 209–249. doi:10.3322/caac.21660
Tahara, A., and Takasu, T. (2019). SGLT2 inhibitor ipragliflozin alone and combined with pioglitazone prevents progression of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis in a type 2 diabetes rodent model. Physiol. Rep. 7 (22), e14286. doi:10.14814/phy2.14286
Takahashi, Y., Soejima, Y., and Fukusato, T. (2012). Animal models of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease/nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. World J. Gastroenterology 18 (19), 2300–2308. doi:10.3748/wjg.v18.i19.2300
Tan, C. T., Soh, N. J. H., Chang, H. C., and Yu, V. C. (2021). p62/SQSTM1 in liver diseases: the usual suspect with multifarious identities. FEBS J. doi:10.1111/febs.16317
Tang, J. Y., Li, D. Y., He, L., Qiu, X. S., Wang, E. H., and Wu, G. P. (2020). HPV 16 E6/E7 promote the glucose uptake of GLUT1 in lung cancer through downregulation of TXNIP due to inhibition of PTEN phosphorylation. Front. Oncol. 10, 559543. doi:10.3389/fonc.2020.559543
Tang, S., Zhang, J., Mei, T. T., Guo, H. Q., Wei, X. H., Zhang, W. Y., et al. (2019). Association of TM6SF2 rs58542926 T/C gene polymorphism with hepatocellular carcinoma: A meta-analysis. BMC Cancer 19 (1), 1128. doi:10.1186/s12885-019-6173-4
Taniguchi, K., and Karin, M. (2018). NF-κB, inflammation, immunity and cancer: Coming of age. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 18 (5), 309–324. doi:10.1038/nri.2017.142
Taniguchi, K., Yamachika, S., He, F., and Karin, M. (2016). p62/SQSTM1-Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde that prevents oxidative stress but promotes liver cancer. FEBS Lett. 590 (15), 2375–2397. doi:10.1002/1873-3468.12301
Thabet, K., Asimakopoulos, A., Shojaei, M., Romero-Gomez, M., Mangia, A., Irving, W. L., et al. (2016). MBOAT7 rs641738 increases risk of liver inflammation and transition to fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Nat. Commun. 7, 12757. doi:10.1038/ncomms12757
Tilg, H., Adolph, T. E., and Trauner, M. (2022). Gut-liver axis: Pathophysiological concepts and clinical implications. Cell Metab. 34, 1700–1718. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2022.09.017
Tong, L., Wang, L., Yao, S., Jin, L., Yang, J., Zhang, Y., et al. (2019). PPARδ attenuates hepatic steatosis through autophagy-mediated fatty acid oxidation. Cell Death Dis. 10 (3), 197. doi:10.1038/s41419-019-1458-8
Tsuchida, T., Lee, Y. A., Fujiwara, N., Ybanez, M., Allen, B., Martins, S., et al. (2018). A simple diet- and chemical-induced murine NASH model with rapid progression of steatohepatitis, fibrosis and liver cancer. J. Hepatol. 69 (2), 385–395. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.011
Uchida, D., Takaki, A., Oyama, A., Adachi, T., Wada, N., Onishi, H., et al. (2020). Oxidative stress management in chronic liver diseases and hepatocellular carcinoma. Nutrients 12 (6), 1576. doi:10.3390/nu12061576
Umemura, A., He, F., Taniguchi, K., Nakagawa, H., Yamachika, S., Font-Burgada, J., et al. (2016). p62, upregulated during preneoplasia, induces hepatocellular carcinogenesis by maintaining survival of stressed HCC-initiating cells. Cancer Cell 29 (6), 935–948. doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2016.04.006
Valdecantos, M. P., Pardo, V., Ruiz, L., Castro-Sánchez, L., Lanzón, B., Fernández-Millán, E., et al. (2017). A novel glucagon-like peptide 1/glucagon receptor dual agonist improves steatohepatitis and liver regeneration in mice. Hepatology 65 (3), 950–968. doi:10.1002/hep.28962
Vuppalanchi, R., Noureddin, M., Alkhouri, N., and Sanyal, A. J. (2021). Therapeutic pipeline in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 18 (6), 373–392. doi:10.1038/s41575-020-00408-y
Waldhart, A. N., Dykstra, H., Peck, A. S., Boguslawski, E. A., Madaj, Z. B., Wen, J., et al. (2017). Phosphorylation of TXNIP by AKT mediates acute influx of glucose in response to insulin. Cell Rep. 19 (10), 2005–2013. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.05.041
Wang, M-D., Wu, H., Fu, G-B., Zhang, H-L., Zhou, X., Tang, L., et al. (2016). Acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase alpha promotion of glucose-mediated fatty acid synthesis enhances survival of hepatocellular carcinoma in mice and patients. Hepatology 63 (4), 1272–1286. doi:10.1002/hep.28415
Wang, X., Cai, B., Yang, X., Sonubi, O. O., Zheng, Z., Ramakrishnan, R., et al. (2020). Cholesterol stabilizes TAZ in hepatocytes to promote experimental non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Cell Metab. 31 (5), 969–986. doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2020.03.010
Wang, X., Zeldin, S., Shi, H., Zhu, C., Saito, Y., Corey, K. E., et al. (2022). TAZ-induced Cybb contributes to liver tumor formation in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. J. Hepatol. 76 (4), 910–920. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2021.11.031
Warburg, O., Wind, F., and Negelein, E. (1927). The metabolism of tumors in the body. J. Gen. Physiol. 8 (6), 519–530. doi:10.1085/jgp.8.6.519
Wege, H., Li, J., and Ittrich, H. (2019). Treatment lines in hepatocellular carcinoma. Visc. Med. 35 (4), 266–272. doi:10.1159/000501749
Wei, P-L., Huang, C-Y., and Chang, Y-J. (2019). Propyl gallate inhibits hepatocellular carcinoma cell growth through the induction of ROS and the activation of autophagy. PLOS ONE 14 (1), e0210513. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0210513
Widjaja, A. A., Singh, B. K., Adami, E., Viswanathan, S., Dong, J., D'Agostino, G. A., et al. (2019). Inhibiting interleukin 11 signaling reduces hepatocyte death and liver fibrosis, inflammation, and steatosis in mouse models of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Gastroenterology 157 (3), 777–792. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2019.05.002
Wolf, M. J., Adili, A., Piotrowitz, K., Abdullah, Z., Boege, Y., Stemmer, K., et al. (2014). Metabolic activation of intrahepatic CD8+ T cells and NKT cells causes nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and liver cancer via cross-talk with hepatocytes. Cancer Cell 26 (4), 549–564. doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2014.09.003
Wree, A., Eguchi, A., McGeough, M. D., Pena, C. A., Johnson, C. D., Canbay, A., et al. (2014). NLRP3 inflammasome activation results in hepatocyte pyroptosis, liver inflammation, and fibrosis in mice. Hepatology 59 (3), 898–910. doi:10.1002/hep.26592
Wree, A., McGeough, M. D., Pena, C. A., Schlattjan, M., Li, H., Inzaugarat, M. E., et al. (2014). NLRP3 inflammasome activation is required for fibrosis development in NAFLD. J. Mol. Med. Berl. 92 (10), 1069–1082. doi:10.1007/s00109-014-1170-1
Wu, J., Guo, L., Qiu, X., Ren, Y., Li, F., Cui, W., et al. (2020). Genkwadaphnin inhibits growth and invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma by blocking DHCR24-mediated cholesterol biosynthesis and lipid rafts formation. Br. J. Cancer 123 (11), 1673–1685. doi:10.1038/s41416-020-01085-z
Xiao, Y., Liu, H., Yu, J., Zhao, Z., Xiao, F., Xia, T., et al. (2016). Activation of ERK1/2 ameliorates liver steatosis in leptin receptor-deficient (db/db) mice via stimulating ATG7-dependent autophagy. Diabetes 65 (2), 393–405. doi:10.2337/db15-1024
Yamamoto, M., Kensler, T. W., and Motohashi, H. (2018). The KEAP1-NRF2 system: A thiol-based sensor-effector apparatus for maintaining redox homeostasis. Physiol. Rev. 98 (3), 1169–1203. doi:10.1152/physrev.00023.2017
Yang, Y., Zhao, L. H., Huang, B., Wang, R. Y., Yuan, S. X., Tao, Q. F., et al. (2015). Pioglitazone, a PPARγ agonist, inhibits growth and invasion of human hepatocellular carcinoma via blockade of the rage signaling. Mol. Carcinog. 54 (12), 1584–1595. doi:10.1002/mc.22231
Younes, M., Brown, R. W., Mody, D. R., Fernandez, L., and Laucirica, R. (1995). GLUT1 expression in human breast carcinoma: Correlation with known prognostic markers. Anticancer Res. 15 (6), 2895–2898.
Younossi, Z., Anstee, Q. M., Marietti, M., Hardy, T., Henry, L., Eslam, M., et al. (2018). Global burden of NAFLD and NASH: Trends, predictions, risk factors and prevention. Nat. Rev. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 15 (1), 11–20. doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2017.109
Yuan, P., Mu, J., Wang, Z., Ma, S., Da, X., Song, J., et al. (2021). Down-regulation of SLC25A20 promotes hepatocellular carcinoma growth and metastasis through suppression of fatty-acid oxidation. Cell Death Dis. 12 (4), 361. doi:10.1038/s41419-021-03648-1
Zhang, C., Hu, J., Sheng, L., Yuan, M., Wu, Y., Chen, L., et al. (2019). Metformin delays AKT/c-Met-driven hepatocarcinogenesis by regulating signaling pathways for de novo lipogenesis and ATP generation. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 365, 51–60. doi:10.1016/j.taap.2019.01.004
Zhang, M., Zhang, C., Zhang, L., Yang, Q., Zhou, S., Wen, Q., et al. (2015). Nrf2 is a potential prognostic marker and promotes proliferation and invasion in human hepatocellular carcinoma. BMC Cancer 15 (1), 531. doi:10.1186/s12885-015-1541-1
Zhang, Y., Yan, Q., Gong, L., Xu, H., Liu, B., Fang, X., et al. (2021). C-terminal truncated HBx initiates hepatocarcinogenesis by downregulating TXNIP and reprogramming glucose metabolism. Oncogene 40 (6), 1147–1161. doi:10.1038/s41388-020-01593-5
Zhao, M., Wang, L., Wang, M., Zhou, S., Lu, Y., Cui, H., et al. (2022). Targeting fibrosis: Mechanisms and clinical trials. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 7 (1), 206. doi:10.1038/s41392-022-01070-3
Zheng, M., Wu, C., Yang, K., Yang, Y., Liu, Y., Gao, S., et al. (2021). Novel selective hexokinase 2 inhibitor Benitrobenrazide blocks cancer cells growth by targeting glycolysis. Pharmacol. Res. 164, 105367. doi:10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105367
Zhu, A. X., Kang, Y-K., Yen, C-J., Finn, R. S., Galle, P. R., Llovet, J. M., et al. (2019). Ramucirumab after sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and increased α-fetoprotein concentrations (REACH-2): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 20 (2), 282–296. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30937-9
Keywords: immunometabolism, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), stress pathways, obesity, NAFLD
Citation: Akl MG and Widenmaier SB (2023) Immunometabolic factors contributing to obesity-linked hepatocellular carcinoma. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 10:1089124. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.1089124
Received: 03 November 2022; Accepted: 27 December 2022;
Published: 12 January 2023.
Edited by:
Si Zhang, Fudan University, ChinaReviewed by:
Tsutomu Matsubara, Osaka Metropolitan University, JapanAaron Koenig, The Ohio State University, United States
Copyright © 2023 Akl and Widenmaier. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Scott B. Widenmaier, scott.widenmaier@usask.ca