Transcriptional Control of Axon Guidance at Midline Structures
Eloísa Herrera
Augusto Escalante- Instituto de Neurociencias, CSIC-UMH, Alicante, Spain
The development of the nervous system is a time-ordered and multi-stepped process that includes neurogenesis and neuronal specification, axonal navigation, and circuits assembly. During axonal navigation, the growth cone, a dynamic structure located at the tip of the axon, senses environmental signals that guide axons towards their final targets. The expression of a specific repertoire of receptors on the cell surface of the growth cone together with the activation of a set of intracellular transducing molecules, outlines the response of each axon to specific guidance cues. This collection of axon guidance molecules is defined by the transcriptome of the cell which, in turn, depends on transcriptional and epigenetic regulators that modify the structure and DNA accessibility to determine what genes will be expressed to elicit specific axonal behaviors. Studies focused on understanding how axons navigate intermediate targets, such as the floor plate of vertebrates or the mammalian optic chiasm, have largely contributed to our knowledge of how neurons wire together during development. In fact, investigations on axon navigation at these midline structures led to the identification of many of the currently known families of proteins that act as guidance cues and their corresponding receptors. Although the transcription factors and the regulatory mechanisms that control the expression of these molecules are not well understood, important advances have been made in recent years in this regard. Here we provide an updated overview on the current knowledge about the transcriptional control of axon guidance and the selection of trajectories at midline structures.
Introduction
The survival of organisms relies on their ability to detect stimuli, process sensory information and generate adequate motor responses. These functions depend on the precise organization of neural networks that enable communication between cells in an efficient and accurate manner. These networks emerge during embryonic development when newly born neurons extend axons away from the cell body to navigate through the developing embryo in order to reach their final targets. The growth cone at the tip of the travelling axon is a specialized structure armed with a plethora of receptors that defines the response of the growing axon to the environmental cues and determines its direction. The existence of both commissural neurons that project to the opposite side of the brain and ipsilateral neurons that connect with targets in the same hemisphere, is essential for the distribution and integration of sensory information and the subsequent generation of coordinated motor responses in species with bilateral symmetry (Colamarino and Tessier-Lavigne, 1995). Intense research during the last few decades focused on how ipsilateral and contralateral axons behave at the midline in different species and contexts has lead to the identification of many families of cues, receptors, and signaling cascades involved in axon pathfinding. Post-transcriptional mechanisms such as the microRNA-dependent regulation of guidance receptors (Yang et al., 2018), the regulation of local translation in axons (Zhuang et al., 2019; Corradi and Baudet, 2020), the role of lipids in axon guidance (Guy and Kamiguchi, 2021), novel ways of presenting guidance proteins (Dominici et al., 2017; Moreno-Bravo et al., 2017; Varadarajan et al., 2017; Wu et al., 2019; Dorskind and Kolodkin, 2021), interactions between different families of receptors (Zelina et al., 2014) or the targeted degradation of ligands or receptors (Gorla et al., 2019), all contribute to guarantee proper axon guidance progression and today we know that aberrant expression of axon guidance proteins or alterations in any of these mechanisms may result in a wide variety of neurodevelopmental diseases (Engle, 2010; Izzi and Charron, 2011; Nugent et al., 2012; Chédotal, 2014; Blockus and Chédotal, 2015; Van Battum et al., 2015; Roig-Puiggros et al., 2020). Despite these remarkable advances on the molecular mechanisms underlying axon guidance processes, current knowledge about the transcription factors (TFs) and the regulatory networks that orchestrate the expression of guidance molecules is still very limited (Butler and Tear, 2007). Here we provide an updated overview of the transcriptional mechanisms that control axonal trajectories during embryonic development paying particular attention to the navigation of neural axons at midline structures.
Identification of Regulatory Factors Controlling Axon Guidance
Pioneer work on Drosophila initially identified a number of TFs involved in controlling the trajectories of motoneurons (MNs) axons towards their corresponding muscles and, subsequent work in vertebrates, revealed some of the transcriptional regulators that define specific limb muscles innervation (Landgraf et al., 1999; Keleman and Dickson, 2001; Dasen et al., 2003; Fujioka et al., 2003; Broihier et al., 2004; Dasen et al., 2005; Labrador et al., 2005; Garces and Thor, 2006; Layden et al., 2006). Further studies in vertebrates proposed that combinatorial codes of LIM proteins specify different MN trajectories and these TFs control the expression of specific axon guidance receptors from the EphA family to define MN trajectories to the different limb regions (Tsuchida et al., 1994; Sharma et al., 1998; Thor et al., 1999; Kania et al., 2000; Kania and Jessell, 2003; Shirasaki et al., 2006). In addition, another member of the homeobox TF family, Nkx2.9, was described to control the expression of the Slit receptor Robo2 and promote dorsal axon exit from the spinal cord in vertebrate spinal accessory MNs (Dillon et al., 2005; Bravo-Ambrosio et al., 2012).
Subsequently, other families of TFs have been associated with determining axonal trajectories in different neural circuits. For instance, the POU-domain TF Acj6 (abnormal chemosensory jump) was described as essential for the targeting of olfactory projection neurons in Drosophila (Komiyama et al., 2003), and Pou4f2, another member of the POU-family (aka Brn3.2 or Brn3b), seems to play an important role in the specification and pathfinding of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axons (Erkman et al., 2000; Wang et al., 2000). Also in the visual system, members of the FOX family (FoxG1 and FoxD1) regulate the expression of the ephrinA receptors to determine the termination of retinal projections along the anterior-posterior axis at the visual targets (Herrera, 2004; Carreres et al., 2011). In the mouse cortex, the zinc-finger TFs Fezf2 and Ctip2 direct the projections of layer 5 corticospinal axons towards subcortical regions (Arlotta et al., 2005; Bin Chen et al., 2005; Jie-Guang Chen et al., 2005; Molyneaux et al., 2005; Lodato et al., 2014) and Ctip2 together with Satb2 control the formation of the corpus callosum (Srivatsa et al., 2014). In both vertebrates and invertebrates the Run-containing domain TFs control specific axonal trajectories since missexpression of Runt in Drosophila photoreceptors results in axons targeting the medulla instead of the lamina (Kaminker et al., 2002) and alterations in the levels of Runx3 shift the laminar termination of somatosensory neuron axons along the dorsoventral axis of the mouse spinal cord (Chen et al., 2006).
In addition to the abovementioned examples, two neuronal populations have been particularly useful to study the molecular mechanisms underlying axon pathfinding: spinal neurons at the time their axons navigate the floor plate, and retinal ganglion cells when their axons traverse the optic chiasm. In the following sections we review recent findings on the transcriptional regulation of neuronal trajectories using these two classic midline axon guidance models.
Transcriptional Regulation of Axon Midline Crossing
The population of early born interneurons located in the most dorsal part of the spinal cord is known as dI1. As soon as dI1 neurons differentiate, they migrate ventrally to finally occupy the deep dorsal horns (Junge et al., 2016). A large number of reports studying this neuronal population have contributed to the current knowledge of how axons are attracted/repelled by guidance cues and their receptors [for recent reviews see (Chédotal, 2019; Comer et al., 2019)] and investigations on these neurons have also provided major insights into the regulatory mechanisms controlling axon guidance. There are two main subtypes of dI1 neurons: a population that occupies the medial intermediate spinal cord and project contralaterally (dI1c) and another cluster of cells that settle in the lateral intermediate spinal cord and avoid the floor plate to project ipsilaterally (dI1i). Both subtypes are derived from progenitor cells expressing the bHLH TF Atoh1 (Helms and Johnson, 1998, 2003; Lee et al., 1998; Helms et al., 2000; Gowan et al., 2001; Saba et al., 2005). Atoh1 induces the expression of the homeobox TFs Groucho co-repressors Barhl1 and Barhl2 (Bermingham et al., 2001; Saba et al., 2005; Reig et al., 2007) that are expressed in both dI1i and dI1c. Gain-of-function experiments showed that Barhl1 overexpression results in ectopic expression of Robo3, Nrp2 and DCC, and promotes midline crossing (Kawauchi et al., 2010). Using a similar approach, it was shown that Barhl2 also promotes a commissural phenotype and that Barhl2 overexpression leads to the induction of the adhesion molecule Tag-1 (Saba et al., 2003).
On the other hand, it has been reported that Atoh1 induces the expression of the LIM homeodomain TFs Lhx2 and Lhx9, either directly or indirectly through Barhl TFs (Bermingham et al., 2001; Gowan et al., 2001; Nakada, 2004). Barhl2 mutant mice exhibited a shift in the position of dI1i neurons from lateral to medial regions concomitant with a dramatic loss of ipsilateral projections and an increased number of commissural axons, which agrees with the observed aberrant upregulation of the homeodomain TF Lhx2 in the dI1i neurons of these mice. In vitro, Barhl2 binds to the regulatory sequences of Lhx2 and represses its expression (Ding et al., 2012). Gain-of-function experiments have shown that this TF is able to induce Lhx2 and another member of the same family, Lhx9 in spinal neurons (Kawauchi et al., 2010). Together these results suggest that Barhl2 represses Lhx2 in dI1i neurons to block the commissural phenotype. Independent gain-of-function experiments in the chick spinal cord suggested a role for Lhx9 in dI1c axons after midline crossing in the control of rostral turning and the dorsoventral positioning of axons in the longitudinal plane (Avraham et al., 2009), but these two Lhx factors seem to contribute to the diversification of dI1c and dI1i subtypes at earlier stages of dl1 differentiation.
Both Lhx2 and Lhx9 are expressed in dI1c neurons whereas dI1i neurons express only Lhx9 (Wilson et al., 2008). Single Lhx2 or Lhx9 mutant mice do not exhibit guidance phenotypes in dI1 neurons but commissural axons do not cross the midline in double Lhx2/9 mutants, similarly to the phenotype observed in Robo3 mutants (Sabatier et al., 2004). This pointed at Robo3 as a downstream target of Lhx TFs (Wilson et al., 2008). Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays in vitro and in vivo revealed that Lhx2 binds the Robo3 promoter (Wilson et al., 2008; Marcos-Mondéjar et al., 2012) and gain-of-function experiments in the mouse spinal cord demonstrated that Lhx2 is capable of inducing Robo3 (Kawauchi et al., 2010). All these experiments suggested that the Lhx2/9-Robo3 cascade is the default program in dl1 neurons and this program needs to be repressed in order to generate ipsilateral neurons. Supporting this idea, it was shown that ectopic expression of Robo3 in dorsal spinal neurons redirects ipsilateral axons towards and across the floor plate (Escalante et al., 2013). Interestingily, another member of the Robo family, Robo2, is differentially expressed in the dl1 subpopulations and, while dI1c projections are not affected in Robo2 mutants, dl1i axons project aberrantly through the motor neuron pool closer to the midline (Wurmser et al., 2021). Additionally, different components of the Wnt signaling pathway, including β-catenin and several Wnt receptors seem to be also required for midline crossing in dl1c (Avilés and Stoeckli, 2016).
Despite all this progress, it is difficult to reconcile a simple linear cascade in the gene regulatory network (GRN) specifying a commissural versus ipsilateral choice in dI1 neurons given the complexity of the regulatory mechanisms linking Atoh1, Barhl1/2, Lhx2/9 and downstream targets. Together with a more precise definition of the GRN controlling the specification of dl1 subtypes, other questions such as whether Lhx TFs activate other guidance receptors such as DCC, Robo2 or members of the Wnt pathway, or whether Robo3 expression is regulated by other homeodomain TFs in different types of commissural interneurons remain to be answered.
In the mouse visual system, the majority of retinal ganglion cell axons cross the ventral diencephalon at the optic chiasm level (cRGCs) while a minority of these axons project to the ipsilateral hemisphere (iRGCs). In this model, also largely used to study axon guidance mechanisms, another member of the LIM homeodomain TF family, Islet2 (Isl2), is differentially expressed in the ipsi and the contralateral RGCs subpopulations (Pak et al., 2004). Isl2 mutant mice show an increased number of iRGCs at the expense of the cRGCs. However, this only affects the subgroup of cRGCs that are born in the ventrotemporal region of the retina at late developmental stages and the targets of Isl2 to control the projection of this late-born RGC population have not been identified. The TF Pou4f1 (aka Brn3a) is also expressed in cRGCs but not iRGCs (Quina et al., 2005) but its function in axon guidance at the midline is still a matter of investigation. Finally, other TFs implicated in the establishment of cRGCs identity are the members of the SoxC family, particularly Sox4, Sox11 and Sox12 (Kuwajima et al., 2017). SoxC proteins bind to the Hes5 promoter to repress Notch signaling and induce cRGCs differentiation. SoxC genes regulate the expression of Plexin-A1 and Nr-Cam, which are required in cRGCs for correct axonal decussation at the chiasm (Kuwajima et al., 2012). Also, an ectopic ipsilateral projection is apparent in Sox4/Sox11/Sox12 triple conditional mutant mice (Kuwajima et al., 2017), suggesting that these proteins may be repressing the differentiation of iRGCs.
Transcriptional Regulation of Axon Midline Avoidance
While the transcriptional regulation of midline crossing was originally described in dl1 spinal neurons, the regulation of axon midline avoidance was initially characterized in the visual system. The zinc finger TF Zic2, expressed in ipsilateral but not in contralateral RGCs, was reported as the main determinant of iRGC (Herrera et al., 2003). The expression of Zic2 and the generation of iRGCs in the ventrotemporal retina depends, at least partially, on the expression of CyclinD2 in a populatin of neural progenitors located at the ciliary margin zone of the embryonic retina (Marcucci et al., 2016). Functional experiments in mice initially demonstrated that Zic2 is necessary and sufficient to induce the expression of the tyrosine kinase receptor EphB1 that mediates axonal repulsion throught its ligand ephrinB2 expressed by midline cells (Williams et al., 2003; García-Frigola et al., 2008). The upregulation of EphB1 by Zic2 in iRGCs was later confirmed by chromatin immunoprecipitation assays followed by massive secuencing (ChIP-seq) which also identified other Zic2 targets including different members of the Wnt signaling pathway (Morenilla-Palao et al., 2020). In agreement with previous observations in spinal dl1c neurons (Avilés and Stoeckli, 2016), loss-of-function experiments in RGCs demonstrated that β-catenin is essential also for midline crossing in visual axons. Further functional experiments ruled out the canonical Wnt pathway as a regulator of axon guidance at the midline and demonstrated that, while contralateral axons enhance their growth upon Wnt5a exposure, ipsilateral axons collapse in response to Wnt5a, suggesting that a non-canonical Wnt signaling pathway mediates midline crossing. ChIP-Seq assays in RGCs also demonstrated that the differential response of ipsi- and contralateral visual axons to Wnt5a is regulated by binding of Zic2 to the regulatory regions of specific Wnt receptors and other Wnt signaling components such as Apc2. The induction of Zic2 results in the accumulation of β-catenin which is potentially phosphorylated by EphB1 at the growth cone after contact with ephrinB2 at the midline (Morenilla-Palao et al., 2020). Another component of the Zic2-controlled program is the Netrin receptor Unc5c. Unc5c is expressed in a subset of cRGCs that transiently project to the opposite retina during early postnatal stages. Netrin1 is expressed in the ventral diencephalon to impede the growth of these retino-retinal axons into the optic chiasm. In iRGCs, Zic2 binds to regulatory regions near the Unc5c locus and represses its expression in order to facilitate their growth into the diencephalic region (Murcia-Belmonte et al., 2019) (Figure 1). Thus, Zic2 binds to the regulatory regions of many genes, including EphB1, different components of the Wnt pathway and Unc5c, to specify iRGCs and regulate their guidance at the midline.
FIGURE 1. Transcriptional control of ipsilateral trajectories in the visual system. The TF Zic2 controls the trajectory of ipsilateral RGC axons through the transcriptional upregulation of the tyrosine receptor EphB1, which in turn mediates repulsion from glial cells at the midline that express ephrinB2. Concomitantly, Zic2 induces the expression of several Wnt receptors and cytoplasmic proteins to inhibit the attractive response towards Wnt5a -also expressed at the midline-experienced by contralateral RGCs. Zic2 also represses the expression of the Netrin1 receptor Unc5c in iRGCs to allow axon growth through a Netrin1-expressing area at the chiasm.
The positive correlation between the number of ipsilateral axons and the expression of Zic2 in the retina of different species pointed to this TF as a determinant of iRGCs identity across evolution. In addition to being expressed in the developing mouse retina, Zic2 is expressed in ferrets in a larger retinal area that coincides with the zone occupied by iRGCs in this species. In humans, Zic2 and EphB1 are both expressed in the temporal half of the retina also coinciding with the location of iRGCs and, in Xenopus, Zic2 is expressed in the retina during metamorphosis when a late-born ipsilateral projection is generated. However, in zebrafish and chicken Zic2 is not expressed in RGCs during development and accordingly these species lack an ipsilateral projection (Herrera et al., 2003; Lambot et al., 2005; Murcia-Belmonte et al., 2019; Vigouroux et al., 2021). Interestingly, ectopic expression of Zic2 in zebrafish RGCs leads to the appearance of an ectopic ipsilateral projection (Vigouroux et al., 2021), revealing that Zic2 is able to activate a transcriptional module that controls midline avoidance even in species that naturally lack an ipsilateral projection. Recent reports have shown that non-teleost bony fish also have an ipsilateral retinal projection (Vigouroux et al., 2021) but the function of this projection is still unknown and future experiments are needed to uncover this question and also to dilucidate the regulatory mechanisms that control this ancient ipsilateral projection.
Further functional experiments in chick and mice demonstrated that Zic2 does not only determines axon midline avoidance in the visual system but also in other types of ipsilateral neurons such as the thalamocortical projections and the late-born population of excitatory interneurons (dILB) located in the dorsal horns of the spinal cord. dILB neurons are born very close to the dorsal midline (Alaynick et al., 2011; Gross et al., 2002; Helms and Johnson, 2003; Lewis, 2006; Müller et al., 2002; Petkó and Antal, 2012). These cells but not their inhibitory counterpart dILA neurons that project locally and contralaterally (Escalante and Klein, 2020; Tulloch et al., 2019), express Zic2 which, in turn, is necessary and sufficient to define their ipsilateral trajectory (Escalante et al., 2013) (Figure 2). Chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments in a cell line and in spinal neurons, demonstrated that Zic2 is able to bind to the promoter of another Eph receptor, EphA4. Further functional experiments in chick and mice also confirmed that, instead of regulating EphB1 as in the visual system, in spinal neurons Zic2 controls the expression of EphA4 (Escalante et al., 2013; Luo et al., 2015; Morenilla-Palao et al., 2019). As EphB1, EphA4 binds to ephrinBs to mediate axon repulsion and it has been shown that ephrinB1, ephrinB2 and ephrinB3 are all expressed at the spinal cord midline (Kullander et al., 2001; Kullander et al., 2003; Escalante et al., 2013; Paixão et al., 2013; Klein and Kania, 2014; Haimson et al., 2021).
FIGURE 2. Axon guidance strategies in different subtypes of spinal cord neurons. dI1 neurons are born early in neural tube development and are separated from the midline by the subventricular zone, populated by progenitor cells. Expression of Lhx2 in dl1 neurons activates a contralateral program, in part through the upregulation of Robo3. Ipsilateral dI1 neurons do never confront midline cues and project their axons into the ipsilateral lateral funiculus, likely through the expression of Robo2 and possibly mediated by Lhx9. Later, by the time that dILB neurons are born, progenitor neurons have already differentiated and postmitotic neurons distribute at both sides of the dorsal midline. In this scenario, EphA4 and likely other guidance molecules, are controlled by Zic2 to ensure midline repulsion and ipsilateral projection through the dorsal and lateral funiculi. These TFs are downregulated following development and are not expressed in adulthood.
All together, these observations point to the existence of several gene programs that control axonal laterality in ipsilateral spinal neuron populations with dispar ontogeny. Early born dl1 neurons locate far away from the midline because the ventricle and the subventricular zone (SVZ), which is rich in progenitor cells, occupy the medial region of the dorsal tube. As progenitors exit the cell cycle, the SVZ shrinks and the somas of the late born dILB neurons locate close to the midline. In contrast to the dl1i population whose axons never approach the midline and their projection patterns rely on Lhx factors, dILB neurons are born in close contact with the midline and their axons need to be repelled as soon as they start growing in order to project ipsilaterally. Thus, it is not surprising that although both populations, dI1i and dILB neurons project ipsilaterally, they developed alternative strategies to control the guidance of their respective axons (Escalante et al., 2013) (Figure 2).
Conclusion
Despite the increasing number of rapidly emerging innovative techniques that largely facilitates research on the transcriptional mechanisms regulating gene expression, only a handful of TFs have been convincingly shown to control genetic programs involved in the regulation of axonal behaviors. In the last decade, the interest to understand how neural circuits function has exponentially increased and the development and application of genetically encoded, magnetic and thermal tools to manipulate neuronal circuits is helping us to disentangle brain connectivity and circuits function. However, it is surprising that in the era of next generation sequencing and single cell transcriptomic approaches (Escalante et al., 2020) there are still very few studies taking advantage of these technologies to elucidate the genetic programs that precisely control the definition of axonal trajectories. Incorrect circuit wiring during embryonic development may have a huge impact in the adult individual and we are still far from understanding how circuits are built in the first place. Future efforts devoted to understand the regulatory logic underlying neuronal trajectories will certainly contribute to prevent pathologies derived from neural circuits miswiring.
Author Contributions
AE wrote the original draft. AE and EH revised subsequent versions of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was funded through the Junior Leader Programme of La Caixa Foundation (LCF/BQ/PI18/11630005) to AE. The laboratory of EH is supported by the following grants: PROMETEO/2020/007 from the Generalitat Valenciana, PID2019-110535GB-I00 from the National Grant Research Program, 20191956 from the Ramón Areces Foundation. The Institute of Neurosciences receives funding from the “Severo Ochoa” Program for Centers of Excellence in R&D (SEV-2017-0723).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Acknowledgments
We thank members of the Herrera lab for thoughtful discussion and feedback, and Juan Antonio Sánchez Alcañiz and Carlos Sánchez Huertas for critical reading of the manuscript. We apologize to those researchers whose work could not be included in this manuscript due to space constraints.
References
Alaynick, W. A., Jessell, T. M., and Pfaff, S. L. (2011). SnapShot: Spinal Cord Development. Cell 146, 178. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.06.038
Arlotta, P., Molyneaux, B. J., Chen, J., Inoue, J., Kominami, R., and Macklis, J. D. (2005). Neuronal Subtype-specific Genes that Control Corticospinal Motor Neuron Development In Vivo. Neuron 45, 207–221. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.12.036
Avilés, E. C., and Stoeckli, E. T. (2016). Canonical Wnt Signaling Is Required for Commissural Axon Guidance. Dev. Neurobiol. 76, 190–208. doi:10.1002/dneu.22307
Avraham, O., Hadas, Y., Vald, L., Zisman, S., Schejter, A., Visel, A., et al. (2009). Transcriptional Control of Axonal Guidance and Sorting in Dorsal Interneurons by the Lim-HD Proteins Lhx9 and Lhx1. Neural Dev. 4, 21. doi:10.1186/1749-8104-4-21
Bermingham, N. A., Hassan, B. A., Wang, V. Y., Fernandez, M., Banfi, S., Bellen, H. J., et al. (2001). Proprioceptor Pathway Development Is Dependent on Math1. Neuron 30, 411–422. doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00305-1
Bin Chen, B., Schaevitz, L. R., and McConnell, S. K. (2005). Fezl Regulates the Differentiation and Axon Targeting of Layer 5 Subcortical Projection Neurons in Cerebral Cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102, 17184–17189. doi:10.1073/pnas.0508732102
Blockus, H., and Chédotal, A. (2015). “Disorders of Axon Guidance,” in The Genetics of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (John Wiley & Sons), 155–194. doi:10.1002/9781118524947.ch8
Bravo-Ambrosio, A., Mastick, G., and Kaprielian, Z. (2012). Motor Axon Exit from the Mammalian Spinal Cord Is Controlled by the Homeodomain Protein Nkx2.9 via Robo-Slit Signaling. Development 139, 1435–1446. doi:10.1242/dev.072256
Broihier, H. T., Kuzin, A., Zhu, Y., Odenwald, W., and Skeath, J. B. (2004). Drosophilahomeodomain Protein Nkx6 Coordinates Motoneuron Subtype Identity and Axonogenesis. Development 131, 5233–5242. doi:10.1242/dev.01394
Butler, S. J., and Tear, G. (2007). Getting Axons onto the Right Path: the Role of Transcription Factors in Axon Guidance. Development 134, 439–448. doi:10.1242/dev.02762
Carreres, M. I., Escalante, A., Murillo, B., Chauvin, G., Gaspar, P., Vegar, C., et al. (2011). Transcription Factor Foxd1 Is Required for the Specification of the Temporal Retina in Mammals. J. Neurosci. 31, 5673–5681. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0394-11.2011
Chédotal, A. (2014). Development and Plasticity of Commissural Circuits: from Locomotion to Brain Repair. Trends Neurosciences 37, 551–562. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2014.08.009
Chédotal, A. (2019). Roles of Axon Guidance Molecules in Neuronal Wiring in the Developing Spinal Cord. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 20, 380–396. doi:10.1038/s41583-019-0168-7
Chen, A. I., de Nooij, J. C., and Jessell, T. M. (2006). Graded Activity of Transcription Factor Runx3 Specifies the Laminar Termination Pattern of Sensory Axons in the Developing Spinal Cord. Neuron 49, 395–408. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.12.028
Colamarino, S. A., and Tessier-Lavigne, M. (1995). The Role of the Floor Plate in Axon Guidance. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 18, 497–529. doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.002433
Comer, J. D., Alvarez, S., Butler, S. J., and Kaltschmidt, J. A. (2019). Commissural Axon Guidance in the Developing Spinal Cord: from Cajal to the Present Day. Neural Dev. 14, 9. doi:10.1186/s13064-019-0133-1
Corradi, E., and Baudet, M.-L. (2020). In the Right Place at the Right Time: miRNAs as Key Regulators in Developing Axons. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 21, 8726. doi:10.3390/ijms21228726
Dasen, J. S., Liu, J.-P., and Jessell, T. M. (2003). Motor Neuron Columnar Fate Imposed by Sequential Phases of Hox-C Activity. Nature 425, 926–933. doi:10.1038/nature02051
Dasen, J. S., Tice, B. C., Brenner-Morton, S., and Jessell, T. M. (2005). A Hox Regulatory Network Establishes Motor Neuron Pool Identity and Target-Muscle Connectivity. Cell 123, 477–491. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.09.009
Dillon, A. K., Fujita, S. C., Matise, M. P., Jarjour, A. A., Kennedy, T. E., Kollmus, H., et al. (2005). Molecular Control of Spinal Accessory Motor Neuron/axon Development in the Mouse Spinal Cord. J. Neurosci. 25, 10119–10130. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3455-05.2005
Ding, Q., Joshi, P. S., Xie, Z.-H., Xiang, M., and Gan, L. (2012). BARHL2 Transcription Factor Regulates the Ipsilateral/contralateral Subtype Divergence in Postmitotic dI1 Neurons of the Developing Spinal Cord. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 109, 1566–1571. doi:10.1073/pnas.1112392109
Dominici, C., Moreno-Bravo, J. A., Puiggros, S. R., Rappeneau, Q., Rama, N., Vieugue, P., et al. (2017). Floor-plate-derived Netrin-1 Is Dispensable for Commissural Axon Guidance. Nature 545, 350–354. doi:10.1038/nature22331
Dorskind, J. M., and Kolodkin, A. L. (2021). Revisiting and Refining Roles of Neural Guidance Cues in Circuit Assembly. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 66, 10–21. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2020.07.005
Engle, E. C. (2010). Human Genetic Disorders of Axon Guidance. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 2, a001784. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a001784
Erkman, L., Yates, P. A., McLaughlin, T., McEvilly, R. J., Whisenhunt, T., O'Connell, S. M., et al. (2000). A POU Domain Transcription Factor-dependent Program Regulates Axon Pathfinding in the Vertebrate Visual System. Neuron 28, 779–792. doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)00153-7
Escalante, A., and Klein, R. (2020). Spinal Inhibitory Ptf1a-Derived Neurons Prevent Self-Generated Itch. Cell Rep 33, 108422. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2020.108422
Escalante, A., González-Martínez, R., and Herrera, E. (2020). New Techniques for Studying Neurodevelopment. F1000prime Rep. 9, 17. doi:10.12703/r/9-17
Escalante, A., Murillo, B., Morenilla-Palao, C., Klar, A., and Herrera, E. (2013). Zic2-Dependent Axon Midline Avoidance Controls the Formation of Major Ipsilateral Tracts in the CNS. Neuron 80, 1392–1406. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.007
Fujioka, M., Lear, B. C., Landgraf, M., Yusibova, G. L., Zhou, J., Riley, K. M., et al. (2003). Even-skipped, Acting as a Repressor, Regulates Axonal Projections in Drosophila. Development 130, 5385–5400. doi:10.1242/dev.00770
Garces, A., and Thor, S. (2006). Specification ofDrosophilaaCC Motoneuron Identity by a Genetic cascade Involvingeven-Skipped, Grainandzfh1. Development 133, 1445–1455. doi:10.1242/dev.02321
García-Frigola, C., Carreres, M. I., Vegar, C., Mason, C., and Herrera, E. (2008). Zic2 Promotes Axonal Divergence at the Optic Chiasm Midline by EphB1-dependent and -independent Mechanisms. Development 135, 1833–1841. doi:10.1242/dev.020693
Gorla, M., Santiago, C., Chaudhari, K., Layman, A. A. K., Oliver, P. M., and Bashaw, G. J. (2019). Ndfip Proteins Target Robo Receptors for Degradation and Allow Commissural Axons to Cross the Midline in the Developing Spinal Cord. Cel Rep. 26, 3298–3312. e4. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.02.080
Gowan, K., Helms, A. W., Hunsaker, T. L., Collisson, T., Ebert, P. J., Odom, R., et al. (2001). Crossinhibitory Activities of Ngn1 and Math1 Allow Specification of Distinct Dorsal Interneurons. Neuron 31, 219–232. doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00367-1
Gross, M. K., Dottori, M., and Goulding, M. (2002). Lbx1 Specifies Somatosensory Association Interneurons in the Dorsal Spinal Cord. Neuron 34, 535–549. doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00690-6
Guy, A. T., and Kamiguchi, H. (2021). Lipids as New Players in Axon Guidance and Circuit Development. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 66, 22–29. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2020.09.003
Haimson, B., Meir, O., Sudakevitz-Merzbach, R., Elberg, G., Friedrich, S., Lovell, P. V., et al. (2021). Natural Loss of Function of Ephrin-B3 Shapes Spinal Flight Circuitry in Birds. Sci. Adv. 7, eabg5968. doi:10.1126/sciadv.abg5968
Helms, A. W., Abney, A. L., Ben-Arie, N., Zoghbi, H. Y., and Johnson, J. E. (2000). Autoregulation and Multiple Enhancers Control Math1 Expression in the Developing Nervous System. Development 127, 1185–1196. doi:10.1242/dev.127.6.1185
Helms, A. W., and Johnson, J. E. (1998). Progenitors of Dorsal Commissural Interneurons Are Defined by MATH1 Expression. Development 125, 919–928. doi:10.1242/dev.125.5.919
Helms, A. W., and Johnson, J. E. (2003). Specification of Dorsal Spinal Cord Interneurons. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 13, 42–49. doi:10.1016/s0959-4388(03)00010-2
Herrera, E., Brown, L., Aruga, J., Rachel, R. A., Dolen, G., Mikoshiba, K., et al. (2003). Zic2 Patterns Binocular Vision by Specifying the Uncrossed Retinal Projection. Cell 114, 545–557. doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00684-6
Herrera, E., Marcus, R., Li, S., Williams, S. E., Erskine, L., Lai, E., et al. (2004). Foxd1 Is Required for Proper Formation of the Optic Chiasm. Development 131, 5727–5739. doi:10.1242/dev.01431
Izzi, L., and Charron, F. (2011). Midline Axon Guidance and Human Genetic Disorders. Clin. Genet. 80, 226–234. doi:10.1111/j.1399-0004.2011.01735.x
Jie-Guang Chen, J.-G., Rasin, M.-R., Kwan, K. Y., and Sestan, N. (2005). Zfp312 Is Required for Subcortical Axonal Projections and Dendritic Morphology of Deep-Layer Pyramidal Neurons of the Cerebral Cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102, 17792–17797. doi:10.1073/pnas.0509032102
Junge, H. J., Yung, A. R., Goodrich, L. V., and Chen, Z. (2016). Netrin1/DCC Signaling Promotes Neuronal Migration in the Dorsal Spinal Cord. Neural Dev. 11, 19. doi:10.1186/s13064-016-0074-x
Kaminker, J. S., Canon, J., Salecker, I., and Banerjee, U. (2002). Control of Photoreceptor Axon Target Choice by Transcriptional Repression of Runt. Nat. Neurosci. 5, 746–750. doi:10.1038/nn889
Kania, A., and Jessell, T. M. (2003). Topographic Motor Projections in the Limb Imposed by LIM Homeodomain Protein Regulation of Ephrin-A:EphA Interactions. Neuron 38, 581–596. doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00292-7
Kania, A., Johnson, R. L., and Jessell, T. M. (2000). Coordinate Roles for LIM Homeobox Genes in Directing the Dorsoventral Trajectory of Motor Axons in the Vertebrate Limb. Cell 102, 161–173. doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00022-2
Kawauchi, D., Muroyama, Y., Sato, T., and Saito, T. (2010). Expression of Major Guidance Receptors Is Differentially Regulated in Spinal Commissural Neurons Transfated by Mammalian Barh Genes. Dev. Biol. 344, 1026–1034. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2010.06.025
Keleman, K., and Dickson, B. J. (2001). Short- and Long-Range Repulsion by the Drosophila Unc5 Netrin Receptor. Neuron 32, 605–617. doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00505-0
Klein, R., and Kania, A. (2014). Ephrin Signalling in the Developing Nervous System. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 27, 16–24. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2014.02.006
Komiyama, T., Johnson, W. A., Luo, L., and Jefferis, G. S. X. E. (2003). From Lineage to Wiring Specificity. Cell 112, 157–167. doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(03)00030-8
Kullander, K., Butt, S. J. B., Lebret, J. M., Lundfald, L., Restrepo, C. E., Rydström, A., et al. (2003). Role of EphA4 and EphrinB3 in Local Neuronal Circuits that Control Walking. Science 299, 1889–1892. doi:10.1126/science.1079641
Kullander, K., Mather, N. K., Diella, F., Dottori, M., Boyd, A. W., and Klein, R. (2001). Kinase-dependent and Kinase-independent Functions of EphA4 Receptors in Major Axon Tract Formation In Vivo. Neuron 29, 73–84. doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00181-7
Kuwajima, T., Yoshida, Y., Takegahara, N., Petros, T. J., Kumanogoh, A., Jessell, T. M., et al. (2012). Optic Chiasm Presentation of Semaphorin6D in the Context of Plexin-A1 and Nr-CAM Promotes Retinal Axon Midline Crossing. Neuron 74, 676–690. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.03.025
Kuwajima, T., Soares, C. A., Sitko, A. A., Lefebvre, V., and Mason, C. (2017). SoxC Transcription Factors Promote Contralateral Retinal Ganglion Cell Differentiation and Axon Guidance in the Mouse Visual System. Neuron 93, 1110–1125. e5. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.01.029
Labrador, J. P., O’Keefe, D., Yoshikawa, S., McKinnon, R. D., Thomas, J. B., and Bashaw, G. J. (2005). The Homeobox Transcription Factor Even-Skipped Regulates Netrin-Receptor Expression to Control Dorsal Motor-Axon Projections in Drosophila. Curr. Biol. 15, 1413–1419. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.06.058
Lambot, M.-A., Depasse, F., Noel, J.-C., and Vanderhaeghen, P. (2005). Mapping Labels in the Human Developing Visual System and the Evolution of Binocular Vision. J. Neurosci. 25, 7232–7237. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0802-05.2005
Landgraf, M., Roy, S., Prokop, A., VijayRaghavan, K., and Bate, M. (1999). Even-Skipped Determines the Dorsal Growth of Motor Axons in Drosophila. Neuron 22, 43–52. doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(00)80677-7
Layden, M. J., Odden, J. P., Schmid, A., Garces, A., Thor, S., and Doe, C. Q. (2006). Zfh1, a Somatic Motor Neuron Transcription Factor, Regulates Axon Exit from the CNS. Dev. Biol. 291, 253–263. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.12.009
Lee, K. J., Mendelsohn, M., and Jessell, T. M. (1998). Neuronal Patterning by BMPs: a Requirement for GDF7 in the Generation of a Discrete Class of Commissural Interneurons in the Mouse Spinal Cord. Genes Dev. 12, 3394–3407. doi:10.1101/gad.12.21.3394
Lewis, K. E. (2006). How Do Genes Regulate Simple Behaviours? Understanding How Different Neurons in the Vertebrate Spinal Cord Are Genetically Specified. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 361, 45–66. doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1778
Lodato, S., Molyneaux, B. J., Zuccaro, E., Goff, L. A., Chen, H.-H., Yuan, W., et al. (2014). Gene Co-regulation by Fezf2 Selects Neurotransmitter Identity and Connectivity of Corticospinal Neurons. Nat. Neurosci. 17, 1046–1054. doi:10.1038/nn.3757
Luo, Z., Gao, X., Lin, C., Smith, E. R., Marshall, S. A., Swanson, S. K., et al. (2015). Zic2 Is an Enhancer-Binding Factor Required for Embryonic Stem Cell Specification. Mol. Cel 57, 685–694. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2015.01.007
Marcos-Mondéjar, P., Peregrín, S., Li, J. Y., Carlsson, L., Tole, S., and López-Bendito, G. (2012). The Lhx2 Transcription Factor Controls Thalamocortical Axonal Guidance by Specific Regulation of Robo1 and Robo2 Receptors. J. Neurosci. 32, 4372–4385. The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5851-11.2012
Marcucci, F., Murcia-Belmonte, V., Wang, Q., Coca, Y., Ferreiro-Galve, S., Kuwajima, T., et al. (2016). The Ciliary Margin Zone of the Mammalian Retina Generates Retinal Ganglion Cells. Cel Rep. 17, 3153–3164. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2016.11.016
Molyneaux, B. J., Arlotta, P., Hirata, T., Hibi, M., and Macklis, J. D. (2005). Fezl Is Required for the Birth and Specification of Corticospinal Motor Neurons. Neuron 47, 817–831. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2005.08.030
Morenilla-Palao, C., López-Cascales, M. T., López-Atalaya, J. P., Baeza, D., Calvo-Diaz, L., Gracia, A. G. D., et al. (2019). Zic2 Abrogates an Alternative Wnt Signaling Pathway to Convert Axon Attraction into Repulsion. Cold Spring Harbor: BioRxiv, 759407.
Morenilla-Palao, C., López-Cascales, M. T., López-Atalaya, J. P., Baeza, D., Calvo-Díaz, L., Barco, A., et al. (2020). A Zic2-Regulated Switch in a Noncanonical Wnt/βcatenin Pathway Is Essential for the Formation of Bilateral Circuits. Sci. Adv. 6, eaaz8797. doi:10.1126/sciadv.aaz8797
Moreno-Bravo, J. A., Puiggros, S. R., Blockus, H., Dominici, C., Zelina, P., Mehlen, P., et al. (2017). Commissural Neurons Transgress the CNS/PNS Boundary in Absence of Ventricular Zone-Derived Netrin-1. Cambridge: Development, 159400.
Müller, T., Brohmann, H., Pierani, A., Heppenstall, P. A., Lewin, G. R., Jessell, T. M., et al. (2002). The Homeodomain Factor Lbx1 Distinguishes Two Major Programs of Neuronal Differentiation in the Dorsal Spinal Cord. Neuron 34, 551–562. doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00689-x
Murcia-Belmonte, V., Coca, Y., Vegar, C., Negueruela, S., de Juan Romero, C., Valiño, A. J., et al. (2019). A Retino-Retinal Projection Guided by Unc5c Emerged in Species with Retinal Waves. Curr. Biol. 29, 1149–1160. e4. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2019.02.052
Nakada, Y., Hunsaker, T. L., Henke, R. M., and Johnson, J. E. (2004). Distinct Domains within Mash1 and Math1 Are Required for Function in Neuronal Differentiation versus Neuronal Cell-type Specification. Development 131, 1319–1330. doi:10.1242/dev.01008
Nugent, A. A., Kolpak, A. L., and Engle, E. C. (2012). Human Disorders of Axon Guidance. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 22, 837–843. doi:10.1016/j.conb.2012.02.006
Paixão, S., Balijepalli, A., Serradj, N., Niu, J., Luo, W., Martin, J. H., et al. (2013). EphrinB3/EphA4-Mediated Guidance of Ascending and Descending Spinal Tracts. Neuron 80, 1407–1420. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2013.10.006
Pak, W., Hindges, R., Lim, Y.-S., Pfaff, S. L., and O'Leary, D. D. M. (2004). Magnitude of Binocular Vision Controlled by Islet-2 Repression of a Genetic Program that Specifies Laterality of Retinal Axon Pathfinding. Cell 119, 567–578. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2004.10.026
Petkó, M., and Antal, M. (2012). Propriospinal Pathways in the Dorsal Horn (Laminae I–IV) of the Rat Lumbar Spinal Cord. Brain Res. Bull. 89, 41–49. doi:10.1016/j.brainresbull.2012.06.005
Quina, L. A., Pak, W., Lanier, J., Banwait, P., Gratwick, K., Liu, Y., et al. (2005). Brn3a-Expressing Retinal Ganglion Cells Project Specifically to Thalamocortical and Collicular Visual Pathways. J. Neurosci. 25, 11595–11604. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2837-05.2005
Reig, G., Cabrejos, M. E., and Concha, M. L. (2007). Functions of BarH Transcription Factors during Embryonic Development. Dev. Biol. 302, 367–375. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2006.10.008
Roig-Puiggros, S., Vigouroux, R. J., Beckman, D., Bocai, N. I., Chiou, B., Davimes, J., et al. (2020). Construction and Reconstruction of Brain Circuits: normal and Pathological Axon Guidance. J. Neurochem. 153, 10–32. doi:10.1111/jnc.14900
Saba, R., Nakatsuji, N., and Saito, T. (2003). Mammalian BarH1Confers Commissural Neuron Identity on Dorsal Cells in the Spinal Cord. J. Neurosci. 23, 1987–1991. doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-06-01987.2003
Saba, R., Johnson, J. E., and Saito, T. (2005). Commissural Neuron Identity Is Specified by a Homeodomain Protein, Mbh1,that Is Directly Downstream of Math1. Development 132, 2147–2155. doi:10.1242/dev.01781
Sabatier, C., Plump, A. S., Le Ma, L., Brose, K., Tamada, A., Murakami, F., et al. (2004). The Divergent Robo Family Protein rig-1/Robo3 Is a Negative Regulator of Slit Responsiveness Required for Midline Crossing by Commissural Axons. Cell 117, 157–169. doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(04)00303-4
Sharma, K., Sheng, H. Z., Lettieri, K., Li, H., Karavanov, A., Potter, S., et al. (1998). LIM Homeodomain Factors Lhx3 and Lhx4 Assign Subtype Identities for Motor Neurons. Cell 95, 817–828. doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81704-3
Shirasaki, R., Lewcock, J. W., Lettieri, K., and Pfaff, S. L. (2006). FGF as a Target-Derived Chemoattractant for Developing Motor Axons Genetically Programmed by the LIM Code. Neuron 50, 841–853. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2006.04.030
Srivatsa, S., Parthasarathy, S., Britanova, O., Bormuth, I., Donahoo, A. L., Ackerman, S. L., et al. (2014). Unc5C and DCC Act Downstream of Ctip2 and Satb2 and Contribute to Corpus Callosum Formation. Nat. Commun. 5, 3708. doi:10.1038/ncomms4708
Thor, S., Andersson, S. G. E., Tomlinson, A., and Thomas, J. B. (1999). A LIM-Homeodomain Combinatorial Code for Motor-Neuron Pathway Selection. Nature 397, 76–80. doi:10.1038/16275
Tsuchida, T., Ensini, M., Morton, S. B., Baldassare, M., Edlund, T., Jessell, T. M., et al. (1994). Topographic Organization of Embryonic Motor Neurons Defined by Expression of LIM Homeobox Genes. Cell 79, 957–970. doi:10.1016/0092-8674(94)90027-2
Tulloch, A. J., Teo, S., Carvajal, B. V., Tessier-Lavigne, M., and Jaworski, A. (2019). Diverse Spinal Commissural Neuron Populations Revealed by Fate Mapping and Molecular Profiling Using a Novel Robo3Cre Mouse. J. Comp. Neurol. 527, 2948–2972. doi:10.1002/cne.24720
Van Battum, E. Y., Brignani, S., and Pasterkamp, R. J. (2015). Axon Guidance Proteins in Neurological Disorders. Lancet Neurol. 14, 532–546. doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70257-1
Varadarajan, S. G., Kong, J. H., Phan, K. D., Kao, T. J., Panaitof, S. C., Cardin, J., et al. (2017). Netrin1 Produced by Neural Progenitors, Not Floor Plate Cells, Is Required for Axon Guidance in the Spinal Cord. Neuron 94, 790. e3. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2017.03.007
Vigouroux, R. J., Duroure, K., Vougny, J., Albadri, S., Kozulin, P., Herrera, E., et al. (2021). Bilateral Visual Projections Exist in Non-teleost Bony Fish and Predate the Emergence of Tetrapods. Science 372, 150–156. doi:10.1126/science.abe7790
Wang, S. W., Gan, L., Martin, S. E., and Klein, W. H. (2000). Abnormal Polarization and Axon Outgrowth in Retinal Ganglion Cells Lacking the POU-Domain Transcription Factor Brn-3b. Mol. Cel Neurosci 16, 141–156. doi:10.1006/mcne.2000.0860
Williams, S. E., Mann, F., Erskine, L., Sakurai, T., Wei, S., Rossi, D. J., et al. (2003). Ephrin-B2 and EphB1 Mediate Retinal Axon Divergence at the Optic Chiasm. Neuron 39, 919–935. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2003.08.017
Wilson, S. I., Shafer, B., Lee, K. J., and Dodd, J. (2008). A Molecular Program for Contralateral Trajectory: Rig-1 Control by LIM Homeodomain Transcription Factors. Neuron 59, 413–424. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2008.07.020
Wu, Z., Makihara, S., Yam, P. T., Teo, S., Renier, N., Balekoglu, N., et al. (2019). Long-Range Guidance of Spinal Commissural Axons by Netrin1 and Sonic Hedgehog from Midline Floor Plate Cells. Neuron 101, 635. e4. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2018.12.025
Wurmser, M., Muppavarapu, M., Tait, C. M., Laumonnerie, C., González-Castrillón, L. M., and Wilson, S. I. (2021). Robo2 Receptor Gates the Anatomical Divergence of Neurons Derived from a Common Precursor Origin. Front. Cel Dev. Biol. 9, 1337. doi:10.3389/fcell.2021.668175
Yang, T., Huang, H., Shao, Q., Yee, S., Majumder, T., and Liu, G. (2018). miR-92 Suppresses Robo1 Translation to Modulate Slit Sensitivity in Commissural Axon Guidance. Cel Rep 24, 2694. e6. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.021
Zelina, P., Blockus, H., Zagar, Y., Péres, A., Friocourt, F., Wu, Z., et al. (2014). Signaling Switch of the Axon Guidance Receptor Robo3 during Vertebrate Evolution. Neuron 84, 1258–1272. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2014.11.004
Keywords: neuron, growth cone, axon pathfinding, target, transcriptional regulation, circuits development
Citation: Herrera E and Escalante A (2022) Transcriptional Control of Axon Guidance at Midline Structures. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 10:840005. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.840005
Received: 20 December 2021; Accepted: 31 January 2022;
Published: 21 February 2022.
Edited by:
Rosa Barrio, CIC bioGUNE, SpainReviewed by:
Takaaki Kuwajima, University of Pittsburgh, United StatesAvihu Klar, Hebrew University Hadassah Medical School, Israel
Copyright © 2022 Herrera and Escalante. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Augusto Escalante, aescalante@umh.es