Abstract
Background: An endocochlear potential (EP) exists in the mammalian cochlea generated by the stria vascularis and an associated fibrocyte network. It plays an essential role for sensory cell function and hearing sensitivity. In non-mammalian ectothermic animals the endocochlear potential is low and its origin somewhat unclear. In this study, we explored the crocodilian auditory organ and describe the fine structure of a stria vascularis epithelium that has not been verified in birds.
Material and Methods: Three Cuban crocodiles (Crocodylus rhombifer) were analyzed with light and transmission electron microscopy. The ears were fixed in glutaraldehyde The temporal bones were drilled out and decalcified. The ears were dehydrated, and embedded and was followed by semi-thin and thin sectioning.
Results: The fine structure of the crocodile auditory organ including the papilla basilaris and endolymph system was outlined. The upper roof of the endolymph compartment was specialized into a Reissner membrane and tegmentum vasculosum. At the lateral limbus an organized, multilayered, vascularized epithelium or stria vascularis was identified.
Discussion: Electron microscopy demonstrates that the auditory organ in Crocodylus rhombifer, unlike in birds, contains a stria vascularis epithelium separate from the tegmentum vasculosum. It is believed to secrete endolymph and to generate a low grade endocochlear potential. It may regulate endolymph composition and optimize hearing sensitivity alongside the tegmentum vasculosum. It could represent a parallel evolution essential for the adaptation of crocodiles to their diverse habitats.
Introduction
Hearing in amniotes depends on the activation of a set of inner ear hair cells submersed in a fluid called endolymph that is rich in potassium ions. In the mammalian cochlea there is a high positive endo-cochlear potential (EP), that is essential for the high sensitivity of the auditory receptors to transduce mechanical energy into electrical signals, especially at high frequencies (Russell, 1983; Russell et al., 1986; Hibino and Kurachi, 2006; Hibino et al., 2010). In the mammalian auditory organ, the EP is thought to be generated by the stria vascularis (SV); a vascularized multicellular epithelium associated with a fibrocyte network in the lateral wall of the cochlea (Békésy and Sy, 1952; Tasaki and Spyropoulos, 1959; Salt et al., 1987; Spicer and Schulte, 1996). The cells are endowed with a plethora of ion channels and transporters. Schmidt (1963) characterized three types of EPs in ectothermic, avian, and mammalian auditory organs. Frogs, turtles, snakes, lizards, and crocodilians generally have a low EP, around +2 to +7 mV (Schmidt and Fernandez, 1962), while birds have a somewhat higher EP between +10 and +20 mV (Schmidt, 1963; Sauer et al., 1999) and therian mammals +80 to +90 mV (Wangemann, 2002; Wilms et al., 2016). A SV is well developed in marsupials that have a cochlea similar to eutherian mammals (Aitkin et al., 1979) and is remarkably developed in monotremes, such as the duckbill and spiny anteaters (Tachyglossidae). The monotremes seem to have both reptilian features such as egg-laying and some mammalian organization of the organ of Corti. They hold a lagena at the distal end of the cochlear duct and have a well-developed SV with associated capillary network (Pritchard, 1881; Smith and Takasaka, 1971; Fritzsch et al., 2013; Schultz et al., 2017). In non-mammalian tetrapods including birds, the Reissner membrane contains a folded single-layer epithelium named tegmentum vasculosum (TV) overlying the basilar papilla between the scala media and vestibule cells (Deiters, 1860; Retzius, 1884; Satoh, 1917; Kolmer, 1928; Jahnke et al., 1969; Dohlman, 1970; Rosenhall, 1971; Smith and Takasaka, 1971; Tanaka and Smith, 1978; Wilms et al., 2016; Pfaff et al., 2019). If it is homologous with the mammalian SV responsible for the production of EP and secretion of endolymph is not known.
Recently, we analyzed the auditory organ in two species of the crocodilian family (Crocodilys rhombifer and Osteolaemus tetraspis), using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and immunohistochemistry (Li et al., 2022). Besides a highly specialized TV, we also detected a separate multicellular epithelium located at the abneural side of the papilla basilaris with intra-epithelial capillaries. It is reminiscent of a mammalian SV and we speculate that, unlike many other non-mammalian species, the crocodilians also possess a functionally equivalent SV. It could represent an early evolutionary transformation of structure resulting in an analogous organization of endolymph secreting epithelia and generating EP. A survey of literature showed that an epithelium reminding of a SV tissue was already described in crocodilians by Gustaf Retzius (1884) at the lateral limbus in the Alligator mississippiensis (Retzius, 1884) and also by Ganeshina (1990) in the Caiman crocodylus (Ganeshina, 1990). No similar epithelium was described in birds to our knowledge. Hasse (1873) studied the inner ear in two crocodilian specimens (Crocodylus niloticus) but there is no mention of a SV (Hasse, 1873). Anatomical analyses, including electron microscopy, of the crocodilian auditory organ have been performed by several authors without description of SV (Baird, 1974; Boord, 1961; Baird, 1974; Leake, 1977; Drenckhahn et al., 1991; Gleich and Manley, 2000; von Düring et al., 1974; Li et al., 2022). The aim of this presentation was to give a detailed portrayal of the fine structure of the SV in the Cuban crocodile (Crocodylus rhombifer). Electron microscopic imaging of the crocodilian SV has not been presented before to our knowledge. Hopefully it could broaden our understanding of the ancient progression and evolution of this important part of the inner ear across different vertebrates.
Material and methods
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
Two male specimens of the Cuban crocodile (Crocodylus rhombifer) weighing 250 gm were anesthetized using Ketamine 5 mg and Medetomidine 0.05 mg and euthanized using an intracardial injection of T-61 0.4 mL (Merck Animal Health. 200 mg embutramide for narcotic action and 50 mg mebezonium iodide for curariform action and 5 mg tetracaine hydrochloride, in aqueous solution). The skull was separated, and the temporal bones were removed using an oscillating saw. The eardrum and the columella were removed and the ears immersed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 1% PFA in 2.5% phosphate buffer. The temporal bones were placed in fixative for 48 h and in 0.1 M Na-EDTA for 3 weeks. Thereafter, the surrounding bone was further removed and the ears placed in 1% osmium tetroxide. The specimens were dehydrated in graded ethanol and embedded in Epon. The embedded specimens were divided into different pieces and mounted for semi-sectioning (1 µm thick). Sections were stained in toluidine blue and photographed. Areas of interest were thin-sectioned, and the sections were stained in lead citrate and uranyl acetate and examined at 80 kV in a Tecnai G2 Spirit TEM (Thermo Fisher/FEI Company, Eindhoven, Netherlands). Images were acquired with an ORIUS™ SC200 CCD camera (Gatan Inc. Pleasanton, CA, United States), using the Gatan Digital Micrograph software. A human SV from a cochlea taken out for an earlier study was used for analysis and comparison (Rask-Andersen et al., 2000).
Results
Light microscopy
Semi-thin cross sections of the crocodilian auditory organ showed the scala media with papilla basilaris, tectorial membrane, and the epithelium overlying the organ separating endolymph from the scala vestibule perilymph (Figure 1). A Reissner membrane varied in morphology from a thin or cubic single layer to a folded, epithelium with many subepithelial blood vessels representing a tegmentum vasculosum (TV). Reissner membrane was composed of dark and light cells reaching the surface.
FIGURE 1
Lateral to the hyaline cells, there was an epithelial ridge extending approximately 300 µm to the Reissner membrane (Figure 1). It was multi-layered and contained dark cells facing endolymph that had both a densely stained cytoplasm and cell nucleus. They were both flat and columnar and had an irregular basal and basolateral cell coat. Basal light cells had a less densely stained cytoplasm and cell nucleus. The light cells ramified and extended from the limbus up against the dark cells. Several darkly stained, branched cells were located deep in the epithelium. In contrast to the TV, this epithelium contained blood vessels and thereby reminded one of a mammalian SV. These vessels entered through the basal lamina and branched from a richly vascularized lateral limbus (Figure 2). The SV contained remarkable spherical intercellular spaces having a diameter around 20 µm. They appeared close to the epithelial surface but also deeper in the epithelium near the basal lamina. The spaces seemed to be shaped by the light cells and contained densely stained dark cells with foliated cell processes.
FIGURE 2
TEM
The SV epithelium in the Crocodylus rhombifer was approximately 75–100 microns in height and consisted of apical electron-dense cells and basal light electron-lucent cells (Figure 3). Laterally, the epithelium extended to the cover fold of the Reissner membrane. The epithelium is located on the vascularized fibrocartilaginous limbus separated by a thin basal lamina through which vessels ran into the epithelium. Electron microscopy showed that the multi-layered epithelium contained several intra-epithelial capillaries. The electron-dense dark cells faced endolymph and showed a multitude of mitochondria almost completely filling the apical cytoplasm (Figure 4A). They also contained clear secretory-like vesicles associated with prominent Golgi structures and rough endoplasmic reticulum. Basally, the dark cells displayed extensive enfoldings or lamellae, less than 40 nm thick, forming complex geometric coils (Figure 4B). The lamellae were dilated only to give space for the large number of mitochondria, sometimes as long as 3 microns (Figure 4C). Their cytoplasm also contained dense ribosomal aggregates. The cellular coils were bathed in large intercellular spaces surrounded by branched light cells forming a network of fluid-filled cavities (Figure 5A). The light cells rested on a thin basal lamina, ramified and extended to the dark cells to which they formed tight junction-like membrane specializations (Figures 5B, C). The light cells were also rich in mitochondria and displayed prominent gap junctions and occasionally round electron-dense bodies (Figures 6A, B). No nerve fibers were detected inside the epithelium except around the hyaline cells as earlier described (Li et al., 2022). The dark cell lamellae often adhered and interacted with the light cells with focal adhesions (Figure 6C, D). Occasionally, lamellae penetrated deep into the light cell cytoplasm (Figures 7A–C). A few round lymphocyte-like cells could be observed in the intercellular spaces. These cells also interacted physically with the dark cell lamellae (Figure 8). The dark basal enfoldings also attached to a basal lamina around the intra-epithelial capillaries (Figure 9) forming palisades of interdigitating podocyte-like processes (Figure 10). The capillaries had a thin endothelium surrounded by a discontinuous basal lamina and an interrupted pericyte sheet. There was a rim of loose extracellular tissue surrounding the vessels containing some fibrous elements margined by a continuous basal lamina (Figures 9B, C, 10). The light cells partly surrounded the capillaries and were interconnected by multiple gap junctions and intimately related to the capillaries (Figures 10B, 11).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 7
FIGURE 8
FIGURE 9
FIGURE 10
FIGURE 11
The SV contained dark cells also located deeper into the epithelium. Figures 12A–D, a–c show different morphologies of dark cells, sometimes arranged as cell clusters partly surrounded by light cells (Figure 12D). Sections showed that they had expanded basally with the cell nucleus located basally (Figures 12, 13). The dark cells were surrounded by light cell processes forming dilated intercellular spaces at different levels of the epithelium (Figures 12A–C). Serial sections seemed to show that the dark cells maintained connections to the endolymph. The cells had an irregular nuclear envelope (Figure 13B) and often prominent nucleoli. The perinuclear cytoplasm contained many membrane-bound vesicles. Near the endolymph lumen there were large clear, various-sized vacuoles and the cytoplasm showed intensely stained ribosomal conglomerates (Figures 13C, D). Many cells had a close relationship with the capillaries and displayed lateral and basolateral cell processes or lamellae.
FIGURE 12
FIGURE 13
The Reissner membrane and tegmentum vasculosum
The tegmentum vasculosum also contained dark and light cells (Figure 14). Both cell types reached the lumen. The dark cells had an electron-dense cytoplasm with extensive basal interdigitating enfoldings with many rod-shaped mitochondria of somewhat different appearance than those in the SV. Several blood vessels had subepithelial location. Not invariably, the epithelial cells formed aggregates, and it was not possible to evaluate if the epithelium was single-layered. Basally, it was bordered by light cells forming a rim or cell layer facing the basal lamina. These light cells seemed to be the same as those fronting the lumen and surrounded by dark cells similar to the crocodilian SV. Many dark cells contained clear secretory-like vesicles. The Reissner membrane also contained light and dark cells. Some of these dark cells displayed a large number of thin processes attached to the light cells. Their cytoplasm contained many secretory-like clear vesicles.
FIGURE 14
Discussion
In mammals, the SV is an epithelium with unique intraepithelial capillaries containing three functionally different cell types, namely, the marginal, intermediate, and basal cells. Together with the lateral fibrocyte system, they are believed to secrete and recirculate K+ ions and generate an EP essential for sensory hair cell transduction (Tasaki and Spyropoulos, 1959; Salt et al., 1987; Wangemann, 2002; Hibino et al., 2010). In a recent investigation, focusing on hair cell regeneration, a separate multi-layered epithelium with intraepithelial capillaries was detected at the lateral fibrocartilaginous plate in the Crocodylus rhombifer (Li et al., 2022). Structurally, it is similar to a mammalian SV being vascularized and having both dark and light cells (Smith, 1957; Rodriguez Echandia and Burgos, 1965; Kimura and Schuknecht, 2009). The crocodilian SV showed morphological differences from the mammalian with no joined fibrocyte cell system connected to the epithelium. Melanocyte-like, pigmented intermediate cells were also not clearly recognized. Its location and morphology differed from the TV described in non-mammalian tetrapods such as anurans and birds (Deiters, 1860; Kuhn, 1881; Retzius, 1881; Ishiyama et al., 1970; Hossler et al., 2002b; Mason et al., 2015).
Earlier studies of the stria vascularis in crocodilians
It was generally believed that crocodiles and birds lack a true SV and that it is substituted by the TV. Retzius (1884) described a similar epithelium consisting of columnar cells at the lateral limbus in the auditory organ of the Alligator mississippiensis. An equivalent epithelium was not defined in birds (Columba livia domestica). In his detailed illustrations he showed that it contains blood vessels and named it Stria vascularis (Retzius, 1884). In his classical work Das Gehörorgan des Wierbelthiere II, Das Gehörorgan Der Reptilien, Der Vögel und Der Säugethiere” he described this “remarkable” epithelium and stated that he considers this to be the only vascularized epithelium in the body (“Es ist dies Epithel meines Wissens das einzige gefässführende, echte Epithel im Organismus“). Ganeshina (1990) also described a SV located at the abneural limbus in Caiman crocodilus (Ganeshina, 1990). She believed it was secretory together with TV and the Reissner membrane suggesting a unique level of morphological differentiation of the secretory apparatus in caimans compared to mammals. All three regions contained dark and light epithelial cells, but the SV epithelium displayed morphological peculiarities with extraordinary intercellular spaces suggesting a separate secretory function. The dark cells were more elongated with extensive luminal surfaces. The giant intercellular spaces were closed by tight junctions. A blood capillary was also mentioned running inside the epithelium near the basal lamina derived from a vessel of the lateral limbus. A few possible nerve fibers were also described in the epithelium. The author concluded that the TV may produce the main volume of endolymph while the SV and Reissner membrane may regulate its delicate ionic composition. Several electron micrographs were presented of the TV but none of the SV.
The stria vascularis in Crocodylus rhombifer
The arrangement of the dark cell lamellae with podocyte-like foot processes adhering to the blood capillaries is similar to that of a nephron glomerulus. Moreover, dark and light cells showed membrane adhesions suggesting absorptive routes. The aqueous spaces could offer optimal conditions for the greatly enlarged surface of the lamellae to absorb fluid and ions to be secreted into endolymph. This machinery could transfer and fine-tune endolymph secretion and EP generation akin to the intermediate and marginal cells of the mammalian SV (Figure 11). The different morphology of the dark cells could suggest that they are highly dynamic cells possibly even “amoeboid-like” able to expand deeper into the epithelium still maintaining exchange to the endolymph surface. It could increase the potential to process and secrete endolymph fluid.
The light cells resemble intermediate perivascular cells that are essential for the generation of high EP in the mammalian SV (Hibino et al., 1997; Wangemann, 2002; Hibino and Kurachi, 2006; Liu et al., 2017). Intermediate cells are known to express the inward rectifying potassium channel Kir4.1. Gap junctions were prominent between the light cells suggesting exchange of ions, small metabolites, and second messengers between adjacent cells (Figure 11). They may facilitate K+ transport to the dark cells and could suggest that the light cells have a function also similar to the basal cells in the mammalian SV. The light cells in the crocodile could therefore be analogous to both the basal and intermediate cells to relay K+ ions for endolymph secretion and generation of EP. The intercellular spaces formed by the light cells in the crocodile could be analogous to the electrically isolated intrastrial space in mammals that are surrounded by marginal and intermediate/basal cells indispensable for maintaining EP (Nin et al., 2008). Further examinations are required to establish the involved ion transporters as well as the molecular composition of the gap junctions in the crocodilians.
The tegmentum vasculosum
The Crocodylus rhombifer displayed a prominent but variable TV that overlay the papilla basilaris as earlier demonstrated in the Alligator mississippienses and Caiman crocodilus (Retzius, 1884; Ganeshina, 1990). Retzius’ illustrations show a tegmentum of varying size along the papilla basilaris, but it seems to be missing in some regions. Deiters (1860) and others described this peculiar epithelium and indicated its analogy to the mammalian SV (Deiters, 1860). It was folded and highly vascularized with subepithelial vessels in anurans, neobatrachians, and birds (Hasse, 1873; Kuhn, 1881; Retzius, 1881; Retzius, 1884; Satoh, 1917; Held, 1926; Dohlman, 1964; Jahnke et al., 1969; Dohlman, 1971; Smith and Takasaka, 1971; Mason et al., 2015; Wilms et al., 2016). It is believed to secrete endolymph and generate EP, and its spectacular ultrastructure was exquisitely demonstrated in birds (Ishiyama et al., 1970; Rosenhall, 1971; Hossler et al., 2002a; Hossler et al., 2002b). Extensive basolateral dark cell enfoldings were described with many mitochondria similar to the crocodilian SV. Not only similarities but also differences between the TV, vestibular system, and marginal cells of the mammalian SV were highlighted. Typically, a basal lamina separated light and dark cells from the connective tissue and blood vessels (Ishiyama et al., 1970; Hossler et al., 2002b). Na/K-ATPase activity was demonstrated in the chicken TV similar to the dark cells of mammalian SV (Kuijpers et al., 1970; Yoshihara et al., 1987). Wilms et al. (2016) also identified several deafness genes encoding ion channels and transporters known to be expressed in the mammalian SV. They concluded that both the TV and SV may have evolved from an ancestral vestibular type of epithelium. GJB2 and GJB6, which are important human deafness genes encoding connexin26 and connexin30, were also expressed. The gene encoding the inward-rectifying potassium channel Kir4.1, known to be essential for the formation of high EP in mammalian SV, could not be localized in the avian TV (Tanaka and Smith, 1978; Hibino et al., 2010; Wilms et al., 2016). In the present investigation, the Reissner membrane epithelium also contained dark cells with digitating processes and secretory-like clear vesicles. Therefore, all secretory-like epithelia in the crocodilian seem to share some similar morphological signatures.
Crocodiles and the evolution of the endocochlear potential
The mammalian cochlea has an exceptionally high EP playing an important evolutionary role (Manley, 2012; Köppl and Manley (2019)). It is believed to be generated in the multi-cellular compartments of the SV by an electrogenic component generated by active ion transport across the perilymph-endolymph barrier and K+ diffusion potentials (Kuijpers et al., 1970; Salt et al., 1987; Wangemann, 1995; Sauer et al., 1999; Nin et al., 2008; Hibino et al., 2010). It is developed during the period of cochlear elongation and high-frequency hearing. Studies in the pigeon and crocodiles, including caiman crocodilus (Paleosuchus trigonatus, Melanosuchus niger, Caiman crocodilus), show that cochlear microphonics and large summating potentials can be detected even in the absence of a large DC potential (Schmidt and Fernandez, 1962). Low hearing thresholds and increased sensitivity were recorded even in animals with low EP. Moreover, an EP may not entirely depend on a developed SV. Some birds, especially the barn owl, have a high anoxia-sensitive EP and possess a large TV (Wilms et al., 2016; Köppl, 2022). Crocodilians are ectothermic animals and anoxia-insensitive with a low EP (Schmidt and Fernandez, 1962) that could be linked to their low metabolic rate, respiratory differences, and adaption to different aquatic environments (Wilms et al., 2016; Köppl et al., 2018). The EP constitutes the driving force for K+ across the transduction channels, and, similar to mammals, caiman crocodilus have an inner ear travelling wave, and there is also active mechanical processes within the basilar papilla (Wilson et al., 1985). Crocodylus rhombifer surprisingly expressed the anion transporter prestin in both the long and short hair cells suggesting a voltage-dependent electromotility or active amplification driven by voltages across the hair cell membrane (Li et al., 2022). Recordings of stimulated otoacoustic emissions showed a non-linear growth with stimulus intensity and frequency-selective suppression characteristics in the caimans (Wilson et al., 1985). It may improve sensitivity to higher frequencies even though characteristic frequencies of single auditory neurons in the caimans seems restricted from 70 to 2,900 Hz with tonotopic organization of central neurons similar to birds (Manley, 1970; Wilms et al., 2016). Furthermore, the tight cellular organization within the crocodilian basilar papilla may restrict active hair cell motion and alternate system of hair bundle gating could play a more prominent role.
The size of the SV seems to vary among the investigated crocodile species, possibly explained by the different regions that were analyzed (Retzius, 1884; Baird, 1974; Ganeshina, 1990). SV in caimans was restricted to the proximal part of the cochlear duct (Ganeshina, 1990) that may suggest that gradients exist along the papilla to monitor endolymph microchemistry. Variations at different frequency locations may reflect the existing gradients in endolymph composition, receptor currents, and EP, serving to optimize hearing sensitivity at different hair cell regions as suggested by Ganeshina (1990). Gradients in Na/K-ATPase activity were shown in the mammalian cochlea being larger in the basal turn compared to the apex (Kuijpers et al., 1970; Salt et al., 1987; Sziklai et al., 1992).
Crocodiles and birds belong to the archosaurs dating back to the dinosaurian era (Brusatte et al., 2015). Their well-developed hearing and communication skills imply intriguing steps in the evolution of the amniotic ear. Crocodiles and birds have anatomically similar inner ears but only crocodilians seem to have developed a SV (Takasaka and Smith, 1971; Baird, 1974; Oesterle et al., 1992; Köppl, 2022). This is surprising, considering its assumed function is to generate an EP, which is larger in birds than in crocodilians (Schmidt and Fernandez, 1962). It may suggest that the TV, which is well developed in both birds and crocodilians, also plays an important role for the generation of EP. Crocodilians depend on the external physical environment to a high degree, while birds have an endothermic (“warm-blooded”) metabolism. Birds are believed to have expanded greatly after the mass annihilation about 66 million years ago (Brusatte et al., 2015). Genetic evolution suggests that nearly all modern birds developed during a relatively short period thereafter (Jarvis et al., 2014). Dinosaurs are believed to be intermediate (“mesothermic”) (Padian and Horner, 2004) and may have been more like large living birds and mammals than reptiles. Consequently, crocodilians could have adopted particular instruments to adapt to more variable aqueous-terrestrial habitats, such as under water and in low temperature conditions, which have led to modifications of their inner ear secretory epithelia.
Hearing depends on a strict homeostatic regulation of the ionic and micro-chemical environment around the hair cells. In mammals, a blood-labyrinth and tight junction barrier exists (Claudin-11) that protects the inner ear to some degree from fluctuations in homeostasis (Gow et al., 2004; Kitajiri et al., 2004; Liu et al., 2017). In the crocodile, endolymphatic membranes, such as the Reissner membrane and TV, are well vascularized, seemingly lacking such barriers, making them theoretically more vulnerable to external conditions. However, a tight junction barrier looks to exist between the light and dark cells to create an isolated environment in the dilated spaces. This may correspond to the unique intrastrial compartment of the mammalian SV essential for the generation of the electric field potential. Crocodilian species possess extracellular osmoregulation through specific salt excreting glands (Taplin and Grigg, 1981). Alligator mississippiensis live in freshwater ecosystems and lack salt-secreting glands that are present in Crocodylidae. Different marine/estuarine habitats, ecological niches, and isolated cave ecosystems (Shirley et al., 2017) could increase requirements for supplementary systems to fine-regulate endolymph homeostasis and optimize hearing. This may explain the different anatomy and evolution of the inner ear secretory epithelia in reptiles and birds. The crocodilian SV seems to be an ancient functional innovation and may constitute example of an intriguing parallel evolution through different selective pressures.
Conclusion
Transmission electron microscopy shows that the auditory organ in Crocodylus rhombifer contains a SV separate from the TV. Here, we show the cellular organization for the first time. The SV is believed to secrete endolymph and participate in the generation of the EP, essential to increase crocodile hearing sensitivity under various environmental conditions. The crocodilian SV may constitute example of an intriguing parallel evolution through different selective pressures alongside the TV.
Statements
Data availability statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.
Ethics statement
A human cochlea was reused, semi-thin sectioned, and photographed in figure 2 (From Rask-Andersen et al., 2000). The study was approved by the Local Ethics Committee (No. 99398, 22/91,999, Cont. 2003, No. C254/4; No. C45/7 2007, Dnr. 2013/190). The study adhered to the rules of the Declaration of Helsinki. The animal study was reviewed and approved by our study was approved by Jordbruksverket 2021-06-24. De regionala djurförsöksetiska nämnderna Linköpings djurförsöksetiska nämnd Dnr 9667-2021.
Author contributions
HR was the head of the laboratory in Uppsala and planned the project and analyzed the images together with HL, KS and MH. HR wrote the manuscript together with HL. KS and MH performed electron microscopy including thin sectioning for TEM. K-GM supplied the animal specimens and assisted in the collection of tissue. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Acknowledgments
We want to acknowledge the kind donations of private funds by David Giertz, Sweden. We are also grateful to the Bio-Vis Platform at Uppsala University for providing transmission electron microscopy (TEM) equipment and personal support throughout the study. We thank Karin Lodin for her skillful artwork.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
AitkinL. M.GatesG. R.KenyonC. E. (1979). Some peripheral auditory characteristics of the marsupial brush‐tailed possum, Trichosurus vulpecula. J. Exp. Zool.209, 317–322. 10.1002/jez.1402090212
2
BairdI. L. (1974). Anatomical features of the inner ear in submammalian vertebrates. Audit. Syst. Handb. Sens. Physiol. B. Ser.1534 (5/1), 159–212.
3
BékésyG. V.SyG. V. B. (1952). DC resting potentials inside the cochlear partition exploration of cochlear potentials in Guinea pig with a microelectrode DC resting potentials inside the cochlear partition. Cit. J. Acoust. Soc. Am.24, 72.
4
BoordR. L. (1961). The efferent cochlear bundle in the Caiman and pigeon∼. Eexperimental Neurol.3, 225–239. 10.1016/0014-4886(61)90014-0
5
BrusatteS. L.O’ConnorJ. K.JarvisE. D. (2015). The origin and diversification of birds. Curr. Biol.25, R888–R898. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26439352/. 10.1016/j.cub.2015.08.003
6
DeitersO. (1860). Untersuchungen uber die Schnecke der Vogel. Arch. Anat. Physiol. Wiss Med., 409–460.
7
DohlmanG. F. (1964). LX: Secretion and absorption of endolymph. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol.73, 708–723. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000348946407300311?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub++0pubmed (Accessed November 5, 2022).
8
DohlmanG. F. (1970). Electron-microscopic examination of the inner ear of the pigeon. Acta Otolaryngol.69, 3–7. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/00016487009131503 (Accessed January 29, 2022).
9
DohlmanG. F. (1971). The attachment of the cupulae, otolith and tectorial membranes to the sensory cell areas. Acta Otolaryngol.71, 89–105. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/00016487109125337 (Accessed March 20, 2022).
10
DrenckhahnD.MerteC.von DüringM.SmoldersJ.KlinkeR. (1991). Actin, myosin and alpha-actinin containing filament bundles in hyaline cells of the caiman cochlea. Hear. Res.54, 29–38. 10.1016/0378-5955(91)90133-t
11
FritzschB.PanN.JahanI.DuncanJ. S.KopeckyB. J.ElliottK. L.et al (2013). Evolution and development of the tetrapod auditory system: An organ of Corti-centric perspective. Evol. Dev.15, 63–79. Available at:/pmc/articles/PMC3918746/. (Accessed January 26, 2023). 10.1111/ede.12015
12
GaneshinaO. T. (1990). The structure of secretory (ion-transporting) elements in the cochlear duct of Caiman crocodilus (vertebrata, reptilia). Z. fur Mikroskopisch-Anatomische Forsch. - Abt.2 (104), 349–367.
13
GleichO.ManleyG. A. (2000). The hearing organ of birds and crocodilia, 70–138.
14
GowA.DaviesC.SouthwoodC. M.FrolenkovG.ChrustowskiM.NgL.et al (2004). Deafness in claudin 11-null mice reveals the critical contribution of basal cell tight junctions to stria vascularis function. J. Neurosci.24, 7051–7062. Available at: https://www.jneurosci.org/content/24/32/7051. (Accessed December 5, 2022). 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1640-04.2004
15
HasseC. (1873). Die vergleichende Morphologie und Histologie des häutigen Gehörorgans der Wirbelthiere. Anatomische studien. Leipzig.
16
HeldH. (1926). Die Cochlea der Seugetier und der Vogel, ihre Entwicklung und ihre Bau, 11. Hanndb. d. noral u. Pathol.
17
HibinoH.KurachiY. (2006). Molecular and physiological bases of the K+ circulation in the mammalian inner ear. Physiology21, 336–345. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16990454/. (Accessed April 7, 2022). 10.1152/physiol.00023.2006
18
HibinoH.HorioY.InanobeA.DoiK.ItoM.YamadaM.et al (1997). An ATP-dependent inwardly rectifying potassium channel, KAB-2 (Kir4.1), in cochlear stria vascularis of inner ear: Its specific subcellular localization and correlation with the formation of endocochlear potential. J. Neurosci.17, 4711. Available at:/pmc/articles/PMC6573344/(Accessed November 8, 2022).
19
HibinoH.NinF.TsuzukiC.KurachiY. (2010). How is the highly positive endocochlear potential formed? the specific architecture of the stria vascularis and the roles of the ion-transport apparatus. Pflugers Arch. Eur. J. Physiol.459, 521–533. 10.1007/s00424-009-0754-z
20
HosslerF. E.AvilaF. C.MusilG. (2002a). Na+,K+-ATPase activity and ultrastructural localization in the tegmentum vasculosum in the cochlea of the duckling. Hear. Res.164, 147–154. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11950534/(Accessed November 20, 2022).
21
HosslerF. E.OlsonK. R.MusilG.McKameyM. I. (2002b). Ultrastructure and blood supply of the tegmentum vasculosum in the cochlea of the duckling. Hear. Res.164, 155–165. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11950535/(Accessed November 20, 2022).
22
IshiyamaE.CuttR. A.KeelsE. W. (1970). Ultrastructure of the tegmentum vasculosum and transitional zone. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol.79, 998–1009. Available at: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/000348947007900520 (Accessed October 24, 2022).
23
JahnkeV.LundquistP. G.WersällJ. (1969). Some morphological aspects of sound perception in birds. Acta Otolaryngol.67, 583–601. 10.3109/00016486909125485
24
JarvisE. D.MirarabS.AbererA. J.LiB.HoudeP.LiC.et al (2014). Whole-genome analyses resolve early branches in the tree of life of modern birds. Science80, 3461320–3461331. Available at: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.1253451 (Accessed November 22, 2022).
25
KimuraR. S.SchuknechtH. F. (2009). The ultrastructure of the human stria vascularis. PART I. 69, 415–427. Available at: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/00016487009123387 (Accessed November 7, 2022).10.3109/00016487009123387
26
KitajiriS. I.FuruseM.MoritaK.Saishin-KiuchiY.KidoH.ItoJ.et al (2004). Expression patterns of claudins, tight junction adhesion molecules, in the inner ear. Hear. Res.187, 25–34. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/14698084/. (Accessed December 5, 2022). 10.1016/s0378-5955(03)00338-1
27
KolmerW. (1928). Die Innervation des Tegmentum Vasculosum des Vogellabyrinthes. Anut. Bnz.66 (1), 42.
28
KöpplC.ManleyG. A. (2019). A functional perspective on the evolution of the cochlea. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med.9, a033241. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30181353/. (Accessed January 29, 2022). 10.1101/cshperspect.a033241
29
KöpplC.WilmsV.RussellI. J.NothwangH. G. (2018). Evolution of endolymph secretion and endolymphatic potential generation in the vertebrate inner ear. Brain. Behav. Evol.92, 1–31. (Accessed November 3, 2022). Available at: https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=d9fea06d-7e53-4dc4-be02-3f6dfc5a73a0. 10.1159/000494050
30
KöpplC. (2022). “Avian hearing,” in Sturkie’s avian physiology, 159–177.
31
KuhnA. (1881). Ueber das häutige Labyrinth der Reptilien. Arch. für Mikrosk. Anat.20, 271–361. 10.1007/bf02952650
32
KuijpersW.HoubenN. M. D.BontingS. L. (1970). Distribution and properties of ATPase activities in the cochlea of the chicken. Comp. Biochem. Physiol.36, 669–676. 10.1016/0010-406x(70)90525-6
33
LeakeP. A. (1977). SEM observations of the cochlear duct in Caiman crocodilus. Proc. Work. Biomed. Appl. - Sem. Stud. Sens. OrgansII (II), 437–444.
34
LiH.StaxängK.HodikM.MelkerssonK. G.Rask-AndersenM.Rask-AndersenH. (2022). Regeneration in the auditory organ in Cuban and african dwarf crocodiles (Crocodylus rhombifer and Osteolaemus tetraspis) can we learn from the crocodile how to restore our hearing?Front. Cell Dev. Biol.10, 934571. 10.3389/fcell.2022.934571
35
LiuW.Schrott-FischerA.GlueckertR.BenavH.Rask-AndersenH. (2017). The human “cochlear battery” – claudin-11 barrier and ion transport proteins in the lateral wall of the cochlea. Front. Mol. Neurosci.10, 239. 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00239
36
ManleyG. A. (1970). Frequency sensitivity of auditory neurons in the Caiman cochlear nucleus. Z. Vgl. Physiol.66, 251–256. 10.1007/bf00297828
37
ManleyG. A. (2012). Evolutionary paths to mammalian cochleae. JARO - J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.13, 733–743. 10.1007/s10162-012-0349-9
38
MasonM. J.SegenhoutJ. M.Cobo-CuanA.QuinonesP. M.van DijkP. (2015). The frog inner ear: Picture perfect?JARO J. Assoc. Res. Otolaryngol.16, 171–188. Available at:/pmc/articles/PMC4368649/. (Accessed November 4, 2022). 10.1007/s10162-015-0506-z
39
NinF.HibinoH.DoiK.SuzukiT.HisaY.KurachiY.et al (2008). The endocochlear potential depends on two K+ diffusion potentials and an electrical barrier in the stria vascularis of the inner ear. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.105, 1751–1756. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18218777/(Accessed December 21, 2022).
40
OesterleE. C.CunninghamD. E.RubelE. W. (1992). Ultrastructure of hyaline, border, and vacuole cells in chick inner ear. J. Comp. Neurol.318, 64–82. 10.1002/cne.903180105
41
PadianK.HornerJ. R. (2004). Dinosaur physiology. Dinosaur. Second Ed., 660–671. Available at: https://academic.oup.com/california-scholarship-online/book/28516/chapter/230230257 (Accessed November 22, 2022).
42
PfaffC.SchultzJ. A.SchellhornR. (2019). The vertebrate middle and inner ear: A short overview. J. Morphol.280, 1098–1105. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jmor.20880 (Accessed March 5, 2022).
43
PritchardU. (1881). Phil Trans. Roy. Soc. L. B172, 267–283.
44
Rask-AndersenH.TylstedtS.KinneforsA.IllingR. (2000). Synapses on human spiral ganglion cells: A transmission electron microscopy and immunohistochemical study. Hear. Res.141, 1–11. 10.1016/s0378-5955(99)00179-3
45
RetziusG. (1881). Das Gehörorgan der Wirbelthiere I: morphologisch-histologische Studien. Das Gehörorgan der Fische und Amphibien. Stockholm: Samson and Wallin.
46
RetziusG. (1884). Das gehörorgan der Wirbelthiere II. morphologisch-histologische studien. Das gehörorgan der reptilen. Stockholm: Samson and Wallin. Der Vögel and Der Säugethiere.
47
Rodriguez EchandiaE. L.BurgosM. H. (1965). The fine structure of the stria vascularis of the Guinea-pig inner ear. Z. für Zellforsch. Mikrosk. Anat.67, 600–619. 10.1007/bf00340327
48
RosenhallU. (1971). Morphological patterns of the organ of Corti in birds. Arch. Klin. Exp. Ohren. Nasen. Kehlkopfheilkd.200, 42–63. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4940463/. (Accessed January 29, 2022). 10.1007/BF00302189
49
RussellI. J.CodyA. R.RichardsonG. P. (1986). The responses of inner and outer hair cells in the basal turn of the Guinea-pig cochlea and in the mouse cochlea grown in vitro. Hear. Res.22, 199–216. 10.1016/0378-5955(86)90096-1
50
RussellI. J. (1983). Origin of the receptor potential in inner hair cells of the mammalian cochlea-evidence for Davis’ theory. Nature301, 334–336. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6823305/. (Accessed November 8, 2022). 10.1038/301334a0
51
SaltA. N.MelicharI.ThalmannR. (1987). Mechanisms of endocochlear potential generation by stria vascularis. Laryngoscope97, 984–991. 10.1288/00005537-198708000-00020
52
SatohN. (1917). Der histologische Bau der Vogelschnecke und ihre Schädigung durch akustische Reize und durch Detonation.
53
SauerG.RichterC. P.KlinkeR. (1999). Sodium, potassium, chloride and calcium concentrations measured in pigeon perilymph and endolymph. Hear. Res.129, 1–6.
54
SchmidtR. S.FernandezC. (1962). Labyrinthine DC potentials in representative vertebrates. J. Cell. Comp. Physiol.59, 311–322. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jcp.1030590311 (Accessed October 17, 2022).
55
SchmidtR. S. (1963). Types of endolymphatic potentials. Comp. Biochem. Physiol.10, 83–87. 10.1016/0010-406x(63)90105-1
56
SchultzJ. A.ZellerU.LuoZ. X. (2017). Inner ear labyrinth anatomy of monotremes and implications for mammalian inner ear evolution. J. Morphol.278, 236–263. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/jmor.20632 (Accessed February 27, 2022).
57
ShirleyM. H.BurtnerB.OslislyR.SebagD.TestaO. (2017). Diet and body condition of cave-dwelling dwarf crocodiles (Osteolaemus tetraspis, Cope 1861) in Gabon. Afr. J. Ecol.55, 411–422. 10.1111/aje.12365
58
SmithC. A.TakasakaT. (1971). Auditory receptor organs of reptiles, birds, and mammals. Contrib. Sens. Physiol.5, 129–178. 10.1016/b978-0-12-151805-9.50010-9
59
SmithC. A. (1957). XLII structure of the stria vascularis and the spiral prominence. Ann. Otol. Laryngol.66, 521–536. 10.1177/000348945706600222
60
SpicerS. S.SchulteB. A. (1996). The fine structure of spiral ligament cells relates to ion return to the stria and varies with place-frequency. Hear. Res.100, 80–100. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8922982. 10.1016/0378-5955(96)00106-2
61
SziklaiI.FerraryE.HornerK. C.SterkersO.AmielC. (1992). Time-related alteration of endolymph composition in an experimental model of endolymphatic hydrops. Laryngoscope102, 431–438. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1288/00005537-199204000-00011 (Accessed November 4, 2022).
62
TakasakaT.SmithC. A. (1971). The structure and innervation of the pigeon’s basilar papilla. J. Ultrasructure Res.35, 20–65. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/4102964/. (Accessed January 29, 2022). 10.1016/s0022-5320(71)80141-7
63
TanakaK.SmithC. A. (1978). Structure of the chicken’s inner ear: SEM and TEM study. Am. J. Anat.153, 251–271. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/707316/. (Accessed February 26, 2022). 10.1002/aja.1001530206
64
TaplinL. E.GriggG. C. (1981). Salt glands in the tongue of the estuarine crocodile Crocodylus porosus. Sci. (80-. )212, 1045–1047. Available at: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.212.4498.1045 (Accessed November 6, 2022).
65
TasakiI.SpyropoulosC. S. (1959). Stria vascularis as source of endocochlear potential. J. Neurophysiol.22, 149–155. 10.1152/jn.1959.22.2.149
66
von DüringM.KarduckA.RichterH. G. (1974). The fine structure of the inner ear in caiman crocodilus. Z. Anat. Entwicklungsgesch.145, 41–65. 10.1007/BF00519125
67
WangemannP. (1995). Comparison of ion transport mechanisms between vestibular dark cells and strial marginal cells. Hear. Res.90, 149–157. 10.1016/0378-5955(95)00157-2
68
WangemannP. (2002). K+ cycling and the endocochlear potential. Hear. Res.165, 1–9. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12031509/. (Accessed April 7, 2022). 10.1016/s0378-5955(02)00279-4
69
WilmsV.KöpplC.SöffgenC.HartmannA. M.NothwangH. G. (2016). Molecular bases of K+ secretory cells in the inner ear: Shared and distinct features between birds and mammals. Sci. Rep.6, 34203. Available at: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27680950/. (Accessed October 19, 2022). 10.1038/srep34203
70
WilsonJ. P.SmoldersJ. W. T.KlinkeR. (1985). Mechanics of the basilar membrane in Caiman crocodilus. Hear. Res.18, 1–14. 10.1016/0378-5955(85)90105-4
71
YoshiharaT.FerminC. D.IgarashiM. (1987). Localization of Na+, K+-ATPase activity in the tegmentum vasculosum of the chick cochlea. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol.243, 401–402. 10.1007/BF00464651
Summary
Keywords
crocodilian, electron microscopy, auditory organ, stria vascularis, gap junctions crocodiles and stria vascularis
Citation
Li H, Staxäng K, Hodik M, Melkersson K-G and Rask-Andersen H (2023) The ultrastructure of a stria vascularis in the auditory organ of the cuban crocodile (Crocodylus rhombifer). Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 11:1129074. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2023.1129074
Received
21 December 2022
Accepted
06 February 2023
Published
20 February 2023
Volume
11 - 2023
Edited by
Michael Schubert, UMR7009 Laboratoire de Biologie du Développement de Villefranche sur Mer, France
Reviewed by
Grace Capshaw, Johns Hopkins University, United States
Christine Koeppl, University of Oldenburg, Germany
Bernd Fritzsch, The University of Iowa, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2023 Li, Staxäng, Hodik, Melkersson and Rask-Andersen.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Helge Rask-Andersen, helge.raskandersen@gmail.com
This article was submitted to Evolutionary Developmental Biology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.