MINI REVIEW article

Front. Cell Dev. Biol., 31 January 2024

Sec. Stem Cell Research

Volume 12 - 2024 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2024.1331074

Epigenetic regulation in adult neural stem cells

  • 1. School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai, China

  • 2. Zhenhai Lianhua Hospital, Ningbo City, Zhejiang, China

  • 3. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Lihuili Hospital Affiliated to Ningbo University, Ningbo City, Zhejiang, China

Article metrics

View details

11

Citations

5,5k

Views

1,5k

Downloads

Abstract

Neural stem cells (NSCs) exhibit self-renewing and multipotential properties. Adult NSCs are located in two neurogenic regions of adult brain: the ventricular-subventricular zone (V-SVZ) of the lateral ventricle and the subgranular zone of the dentate gyrus in the hippocampus. Maintenance and differentiation of adult NSCs are regulated by both intrinsic and extrinsic signals that may be integrated through expression of some key factors in the adult NSCs. A number of transcription factors have been shown to play essential roles in transcriptional regulation of NSC cell fate transitions in the adult brain. Epigenetic regulators have also emerged as key players in regulation of NSCs, neural progenitor cells and their differentiated progeny via epigenetic modifications including DNA methylation, histone modifications, chromatin remodeling and RNA-mediated transcriptional regulation. This minireview is primarily focused on epigenetic regulations of adult NSCs during adult neurogenesis, in conjunction with transcriptional regulation in these processes.

Introduction

Adult neurogenesis is a process that generates functional neurons and glial cells from adult neural stem cells (NSCs) (Ming and Song, 2011; Hsieh and Zhao, 2016; Kuhn et al., 2018; Cope and Gould, 2019; Bond et al., 2021). There are two neurogenic regions in adult mouse brain, the ventricular-subventricular zone (V-SVZ) located in the lateral ventricle and the subgranular zone (SGZ) located in the dentate gyrus (DG) of hippocampus (Bond et al., 2021; Kobayashi and Kageyama, 2021). Adult NSCs at the DG niche often adopt a radial glial morphology and thus they are also called radial glia-like neural stem cells (RGLs), whereas those at the V-SVZ niche are termed B cells (Bond et al., 2021). The adult NSCs in V-SVZ have embryonic origin and enter a quiescence state during embryonic development. They are reactivated by both intrinsic and extrinsic signals before they give rises to neurons and small populations of glial cells (Delgado et al., 2021). First, they generate intermediate progenitor cells (IPCs), which undergo further differentiation to become immature neurons called neuroblasts (Lim and Alvarez-Buylla, 2016). Neuroblasts are precursors of neural cells. They migrate through the rostral migratory stream (RMS) to the olfactory bulb (OB) where they turn into mature inhibitory interneurons that are essential for olfaction. Occasionally adult NSCs located in the V-SVZ region can also give rise to oligodendrocytes which subsequently migrate to the corpus callosum and striatum where they further differentiate into myelinated or unmyelinated oligodendrocytes. The adult NSCs in the SGZ region are located in the granular cell layer and hilus of the dentate gyrus (Vicidomini et al., 2020; Kobayashi and Kageyama, 2021). These adult NSCs are released from the quiescent state in response to neural activity and environmental factors surrounding the niche of adult NSCs. They enter dentate migratory stream (DMS) to cross the granular cell layer radially before they give rise to IPCs, which in turn become neuroblasts and undergo further differentiation in the CA3 region of the hippocampus. They are integrated into the existing neural circuits to induce plasticity with important functions in cognition such as learning and memory (Goncalves et al., 2016). A small number of NSCs in SGZ can also migrate to the hilus and granular layers of hippocampus to generate oligodendrocytes and astrocytes. In summary, adult NSCs may remain quiescent to maintain a pool of stem cells in the V-SVZ and SGZ regions. They may undergo proliferation, differentiation, migration and integration into existing neural circuits to function as mature neurons. Besides neurons, NSCs may also give rise to glial cells (Figure 1; Figure 2).

FIGURE 1

FIGURE 2

Balancing maintenance and differentiation of adult NSCs is controlled by both intrinsic and extrinsic signals. Intrinsic signals include some key transcription factors produced in the NSCs and IPCs that are important for maintenance and/or differentiation of these cells, whereas extrinsic signals generally refer to growth factors and neurotrophins secreted in the surrounding niche (Covic et al., 2010; Matsubara et al., 2021). There are a lot of studies indicating the important roles of transcription factors in NSCs and their neural development (Harada et al., 2021; Fong et al., 2022; Guo et al., 2022; Li et al., 2022; Qin et al., 2022; Fan et al., 2023). Epigenetic modifications in response to both kinds of signals are crucial for maintaining the quiescence state of NSCs and dictating their cell lineage differentiation by spatial and temporal regulation in expression of some key factors in the NSCs (Yao et al., 2016). These epigenetic regulations are mediated through DNA methylation, histone modifications, chromatin remodeling, and non-coding RNAs, etc. This review primarily focuses on epigenetic and transcriptional regulations of adult NSCs located in the V-SVZ and SGZ of the adult mouse brain, together with some referenced studies in mouse embryos or cell culture in support of the findings and conclusions in adult mice (see below).

DNA methylation

Cytosine DNA methylation is essential for mammalian development by regulating lineage commitment in cell differentiation in embryos or stem cells (Li and Zhang, 2014; Dor and Cedar, 2018; Zeng and Chen, 2019; Chen and Zhang, 2020). It is altered in many human diseases including neurological diseases (Hamidi et al., 2015; Xie et al., 2023). It occurs primarily at the CpG sites in mammals, with S-adenyl methionine (SAM) as the donor (Zeng and Chen, 2019; Chen and Zhang, 2020). In the human and mouse brains, DNA methylation also occurs at the CpH sites (H = A, C or T), with generally much lower frequencies compared with those of CpG methylation (Guo et al., 2014).

DNA methylation is catalyzed by DNA methyltransferase (DNMT). The mammalian DNMT family mainly consists of DNMT1, DNMT3A and DNMT3B. Among them, DNMT3A and 3B are the major DNMTs for de novo DNA methylation, while DNMT1 is primarily involved in the maintenance DNA methylation (Chen and Zhang, 2020). DNMT1 is highly expressed in the central nervous system (CNS) of both mouse embryos and postnatal mice. It is crucial for neurogenesis as well as survival of newly generated neurons in SGZ although it does not appear to be required for the existing mature neurons (Noguchi et al., 2015; Cui and Xu, 2018). Dnmt3a is expressed in the NSCs of the SVZ of the mouse embryonic brain from E10.5 until E17.5, whereas Dnmt3b expression is detected in the ventricular zone of the brain in mouse embryos from E10.5 to E13.5 (Feng et al., 2005). Expression of both genes decreases postnatally. Nevertheless, loss of DNMT3A results in reduced number of newborn neurons in the SVZ and SGZ regions of the postnatal mouse brain (Wu et al., 2010). DNMT3A is shown to bind to the intergenic regions as well as across the transcribed regions or gene bodies of lowly expressed genes in newborn pups, in which DNA methylation occurs at the CpA sites of these regions that is required for fine-tuning of neuronal subtype-specific transcription in the adult brain (Stroud et al., 2017). DNMT3A and DNMT3B are also associated with the enhancers and gene bodies of the neuronal target genes in adult neurogenesis to establish neuron-specific methylomes and gene expression patterns that are essential for maturation and integration of newborn neurons in the adult brain (Zocher et al., 2021). They do not appear to affect proliferation or cell fate specification of newborn neurons in the adult hippocampus though. Interestingly, growth of dendrites and synaptogenesis are impaired when both DNMT3A and DNMT3B are ablated in adult NSCs, which causes learning and memory defects in the hippocampus (Zocher et al., 2021). In addition, phosphorylation of DNA methylation binding protein MeCP2 by Aurora kinase B is required for balancing proliferation and differentiation of NSCs in the adult brain through NOTCH signaling pathway (Li et al., 2014).

Ten-eleven translocation (TET) proteins are α-ketoglutarate-dependent and Fe2+-dependent dioxygenases that catalyze conversion of 5-methylcytosine (5 mC) to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC), which ultimately leads to DNA demethylation (He et al., 2011; Ito et al., 2011; Wu and Zhang, 2017; Xu and Bochtler, 2020). There are three TET proteins in mammals, namely TET1, TET2 and TET3. Although it is much less abundant than 5 mC in most cell types, 5hmC is relatively enriched in the brain (Santiago et al., 2014; MacArthur and Dawlaty, 2021). TET1 may participate in SGZ neurogenesis by regulating NSC proliferation and differentiation as well as cognition in adult mice (Zhang et al., 2013). Knockdown of Tet1 causes promoter hypermethylation in the Dll3 (Delta-like 3) and Notch1 genes that leads to inhibition of NOTCH signaling pathway and results in decreased NSC proliferation (Chen et al., 2021). Similarly, TET1 can also affect neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus by modulating miR-124 expression (Choi et al., 2019). Hippocampal aging is accompanied by reduction in the TET2 protein and 5hmC levels, and Tet2 knockdown causes impairment of neural regeneration and cognitive function. In contrast, restoration of TET2 in the mature adult hippocampus can rescue these brain defects in the hippocampus (Gontier et al., 2018). Loss of TET3 causes proliferation and differentiation defects in neural progenitor cells. Intriguingly, TET3 has been shown to maintain the stem cell pool of the V-SVZ region by binding directly to the Snrpn gene and represses its transcription from the paternal allele (Montalban-Loro et al., 2019).

In mammals, DNA methylation plays an important role in genomic imprinting characterized by parent-of-origin-dependent mono-allelic expression (Li, 2013; Barlow and Bartolomei, 2014; Monk et al., 2019; Tucci et al., 2019; Bartolomei et al., 2020). Genomic imprinting has been implicated in regulating dosage-sensitive gene expression in the neurogenic niche (Montalban-Loro et al., 2015; Perez et al., 2016; Lozano-Urena et al., 2017). So far, about 200 known imprinted genes have been discovered to exhibit parent-of-origin–dependent monoallelic expression patterns (Tucci et al., 2019; Xu et al., 2022). Tissue-specific imprinting has been observed for some imprinted genes such as the Ube3a imprinted gene at the Snrpn imprinted region that shows mono-allelic expression in the brain but not in the other organs (Hsiao et al., 2019; Jiang et al., 2021). It is not expressed in the embryos either. Normally, Dlk1 is almost exclusively expressed from the paternal allele in mouse embryos, whereas it is bi-allelically expressed in the NSCs and niche astrocytes in the adult V-SVZ and SGZ regions (Ferron et al., 2011; Montalban-Loro et al., 2021). The Dlk1 gene expresses multiple transcript isoforms encoding membrane-bound and secreted proteins of DLK1. It is reported that the secreted DLK1 by niche astrocytes interacts with its membrane-bound DLK1 present on NSCs, which is important for neurogenesis and cognition (Montalban-Loro et al., 2021). The imprinted Igf2 gene is expressed solely from the paternal allele in the NSCs of SGZ that encodes an autocrine factor to prevent NSCs from apoptosis. In contrast, biallelic expression of Igf2 is observed in the cerebrospinal fluid and endothelial cells of V-SVZ (Ferron et al., 2015). It is possible that dosage-sensitive transcriptional regulation of Igf2 through its imprinted expression may be crucial for adult neurogenesis. Interestingly, IGF2 is also important for terminal differentiation of NSCs into neurons, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes through regulation of another imprinted gene Cdkn1c encoding a cell-cycle inhibitor p57 (Lozano-Urena et al., 2023). Thus, DNA methylation plays diverse and important roles in the maintenance, proliferation and differentiation of NSCs.

Histone post-translational modification

Histone post-translational modifications (PTMs) refer to the covalent chemical modification on histone proteins, including acetylation, methylation, ubiquitination, phosphorylation, ribosylation, and SUMOylation, etc. (Bannister and Kouzarides, 2011; Suganuma and Workman, 2018; Talbert et al., 2019; Millan-Zambrano et al., 2022). Many transcription factors are known to be important for CNS development and adult neurogenesis. Histone PTMs facilitate recruitment of these transcription factors to their binding sites on chromatin to promote transcriptional activation or repression in the brain (Adam and Harwell, 2020; Chen and Zhang, 2020). Histone acetylation catalyzed by histone acetyltransferases (HATs) is a marker of transcriptional activation, whereas deacetylation catalyzed by histone deacetylases (HDACs) inhibits transcription. QKF, a member of the MYST family of HAT, is highly expressed in the adult V-SVZ. Its loss causes reduced neuroblast migration through RMS, and accordingly fewer interneurons can reach OB (Merson et al., 2006; Sheikh et al., 2012). TRRAP-mediated histone acetylation regulates SP1-dependent transcription in adult neurogenesis, and TRRAP deletion inhibits self-renewal and differentiation potentials of adult NSCs (Yin et al., 2023). Furthermore, activation of adult NSCs is shown to be dependent on regulation of histone acetylation via ATP-citrate lyase (Liu et al., 2023b). In contrast, HDACs remove acetyl groups from histones to repress transcription (Chen and Zhang, 2020; Li et al., 2020). There are eighteen known HDACs that are classified into four groups (Class I, Class II, Class III and Class IV). HDAC2 and HDAC3 belong to class I HDACs. HDAC2 is shown to be required for transcriptional silencing during neuronal differentiation in adult neurogenesis, and its loss results in death of neurons at the maturation stages during adult neurogenesis (Jawerka et al., 2010). HDAC3 regulates proliferation and cell cycle progression in adult neurogenesis mainly through acetylation of G2/M cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (CDK1) (Jiang and Hsieh, 2014). HDAC5 belongs to class II HDACs and it is reported to interact with the orphan nuclear receptor TLX, a transcription factor necessary for NSC proliferation and self-renewal in cell culture (Sun et al., 2007). This interaction causes transcriptional repression of some TLX target genes in cell cycle regulation, including the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor p21 and the tumor suppressor gene pten in the NSC cell culture experiments (Sun et al., 2007). Class III HDACs consist of sirtuins such as SIRT1 and SIRT5 that are required for cell fate determination of adult NSCs and maintenance of the nervous system during aging, although the specific mechanism is still unclear (Rafalski and Brunet, 2011; Herskovits and Guarente, 2014; Santos et al., 2021). HDAC11 is the only member of Class IV HDAC family that is currently known to act in neuronal maturation by regulating dendritic length and complexity (Nunez-Alvarez and Suelves, 2022).

Histone methylation modification is catalyzed by histone methyltransferases (HMTs), with methyl group added onto the lysine (K) and arginine (R) residues. These may be either transcriptional activation marks or repression marks (Bedford and Clarke, 2009; Guccione and Richard, 2019; Jambhekar et al., 2019; Morgan and Shilatifard, 2020). Polycomb (PcG) proteins are important for formation of some repressive chromatin marks. There are two types of PcG complexes: polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) and polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2) (Almeida et al., 2020; Blackledge and Klose, 2021). Both PRC complexes regulate chromatin accessibility and expression of region-specific transcription factors in NPC differentiation and brain regionalization (Eto and Kishi, 2021). EZH2 is a key member of PRC2 that catalyzes H3K27me3 formation. It is expressed in the V-SVZ and SGZ of adult mice, and loss of EZH2 in these regions affects both differentiation and maintenance of neural stem cells and progenitor cells (Rhodes et al., 2018). MLL1 is an HMT of the Trithorax (TrxG) complex, and it is required for neurogenesis in V-SVZ by regulating transcription factor DLX2 (Lim et al., 2009). MLL1-deficient NSCs in SGZ can survive and proliferate. And they can differentiate into glial cell lineages, but their neuronal differentiation potential is severely impaired. MLL1 is also required for maintaining NSC positional identity through regulation of region-specific transcription factors such as NKX2-1 (Delgado et al., 2020). Without MLL1, expression of some dorsal identity genes increases in the neurons derived from adult NSCs. SETD4, an H4K20me3 writer, maintains the NSC population in the adult brain, and loss of SETD4 leads to depletion of adult NSCs in the mutant mice (Cai et al., 2022). In contrast, lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) that catalyzes histone lysine demethylation is required for NSC proliferation. It is recruited by TLX to suppress expression of its target genes after removal of activation methylation marks (Sun et al., 2010). JMJD3, a histone H3 lysine 27 (H3K27) demethylase, regulates the Dlx2 enhancer during NSC differentiation (Park et al., 2014).

Other histone modifications also play crucial roles in neurogenesis. BMI1 that is a member of the PcG family proteins and a component of polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1), cooperates with RING1, another component of PRC1, in ubiquitination of K119 of H2A. Loss of Bmi1 affects self-renewal of NSCs in the SVZ of adult mice partly through deregulation of cell cycle inhibitors such as p16Ink4a and P19Arf (Pardal et al., 2005). There are some well-documented studies regarding the important functions of other components of PRC1 such as RYBP, YAF2, PCGF5 and PCGF6 in neural differentiation from mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) or from human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) (Yao et al., 2018; Lan et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2023a). It is worth noting that RING1 (also called PCGF1) is required for neuronal subtype specification in the enteric nervous system of adult mouse (Putra et al., 2023). Nevertheless, it awaits further investigation if they may play similar roles in adult NSCs.

Taken together, histone modifications catalyzed by different enzymes are important for adult neurogenesis that can either activate or repress key target genes required for proper neurogenesis.

Chromatin remodeling

Chromatin-remodeling complexes contain ATPases to modulate chromatin structure and gene expression (Becker and Workman, 2013; Hota and Bruneau, 2016; Ahmad et al., 2022). In mammals, they can be divided into four major subfamilies based on the characteristics of their ATPase catalytic domains: BAF (SWI/SNF), ISWI, CHD/NuRD and INO80/SWR (Hota and Bruneau, 2016). Bcl11b/Ctip2 encodes a subunit of BAF regulating survival, differentiation as well as circuit integration of the granule neurons generated from SGZ. Loss of Ctip2 expression in the adult hippocampus and dentate gyrus results in reduced proliferation and differentiation of NSCs (Simon et al., 2012; Simon et al., 2016). Deletion of BRG1 in the BAF family, which directly interacts with the transcription factor PAX6, causes differentiation of adult NSCs into ependymal lineages in the V-SVZ, whereas migrating neuroblasts become glial cells in the RMS during their migration to OB (Ninkovic et al., 2013). BRG1 is also involved in the maintenance and proliferation of hippocampal progenitor cells through regulation of the p53-p21 axis (Petrik et al., 2015). Loss of BAF170, another subunit of the BAF complex, results in premature differentiation of NSCs into astrocytes in the SGZ that causes depletion of NSCs (Tuoc et al., 2017). CHD7, a member of the CHD family, maintains the NSC quiescent status in the hippocampal SGZ through induced expression of Hes5, a target gene of NOTCH signaling (Jones et al., 2015). It is required for expression of SOX4 and SOX11, two transcription factors necessary for neuronal differentiation (Feng et al., 2013). Taken together, chromatin-remodeling complexes are required for neurogenesis by modulating chromatin structure and gene expression.

Nucleosome and chromatin organization

Nucleosome positioning affects transcription. It is also important for neural development. Indeed, high-mobility group nucleosomal binding domain 2 (HMGN2) was shown to be expressed in the SVZ and SGZ regions of adult mouse brain and loss of HMGN2 caused reduced self-renewal and increased differentiation of adult NSCs, which resulted in microcephaly (Gao et al., 2020). There was correlation between nucleosome occupancy and histone modifications in the genome, and there was also an increase in average length of the nucleosomes in the differentiated neuronal cells derived from mouse ESCs (Teif et al., 2012). Nucleosome positioning may be also important for neural differentiation from human iPSCs, with an increase in the number of positioned nucleosomes as well as repositioning of nucleosomes upon differentiation of human iPSCs (Harwood et al., 2019). CTCF is an important regulator in enhancer-promoter interactions and 3D genome organization necessary for proper gene expression (Ghirlando and Felsenfeld, 2016; Chen and Long, 2023). It is required for embryonic neural development and neural differentiation from mouse and human ESCs (Bonev et al., 2017; Modrek et al., 2017; Arzate-Mejia et al., 2018; Pekowska et al., 2018; Kubo et al., 2021; Dong et al., 2022). However, it remains to be tested if similar nucleosome positioning and CTCF-mediated 3D chromatin organization effects may be observed in the process of neural differentiation of the adult NSCs.

Non-coding RNAs

Non-coding RNA (ncRNA) does not appear to encode any long peptide in its sequence (Chen and Rechavi, 2022; Nojima and Proudfoot, 2022; van Zonneveld et al., 2023). However, some ncRNAs have been shown to display important biological functions in many cellular processes including neural development (Soutschek and Schratt, 2023). Huge numbers of ncRNAs have been discovered and millions of ncRNAs may exist in the mammalian genome. There are a few known kinds of ncRNAs such as microRNAs (miRNAs) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs).

One of the first discovered ncRNAs is miRNA that contains a small single-stranded RNA molecule with approximately 22 nucleotides in length (Shang et al., 2023). More than one thousand miRNAs have been discovered in mouse or humans. In mammals miRNA usually targets the 3′UTR of mRNAs with imperfect complementary to cause translational inhibition, whereas it may trigger transcriptional repression or RNA degradation with nearly perfect complementation to its targets in plants (Chen and Rechavi, 2022). miR124 is one of highly abundant miRNAs present in the brain (Sun et al., 2013). It targets Sox9, a key transcription factor in neural development, to regulate neural regeneration in the V-SVZ region during the transition from IPCs to neuroblasts (Cheng et al., 2009). EZH2 is targeted by miR137, another miRNA, to regulate NSC proliferation and differentiation which is under the control of MeCP2 and SOX2 (Szulwach et al., 2010). It has been shown that miR137 plays a role in neuronal maturation and dendritic morphogenesis by targeting MIB1 in the ubiquitin-regulated pathway (Smrt et al., 2010). Another miRNA miR184 which is regulated by MBD1 promotes proliferation but inhibits differentiation of NSCs (Liu et al., 2010). A cluster of six miRNAs have been shown to be required for NSC proliferation at the expense of oligodendrocytes (Favaloro et al., 2022).

Generally, lncRNAs are more than 200 nucleotides in length, with no obviously translated protein product (Yao et al., 2019; Andergassen and Rinn, 2022; Nojima and Proudfoot, 2022; Mattick et al., 2023). There are hundreds of thousands of lncRNAs in mammals. The imprinted H19 gene product is the first discovered lncRNA (Brannan et al., 1990; Bartolomei et al., 1991). Xist involved in mammalian X chromosome inactivation is another well-known founding member of lncRNAs (Loda et al., 2022). LncRNAs may regulate gene expression in a tissue-specific pattern (Ernst and Morton, 2013; Zhang et al., 2019; Statello et al., 2021). They are prevalently expressed in the brain that contains the highest number of tissue-specific lncRNAs (Francescatto et al., 2014; Washietl et al., 2014; Ninou et al., 2021). Depletion of two lncRNAs, Six3os and Dlx1as, in the NPCs of the adult V-SVZ region results in increased astrocyte differentiation at the expense of neurons (Ramos et al., 2013). The lncRNA Pnky interacts with PTBP1 to regulate neural differentiation from NSCs in vivo, and Pnky knockdown increases neural commitment in differentiation of NSCs (Ramos et al., 2015). However, further studies are needed to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of lncRNAs in transcriptional regulation of adult NSCs.

RNA methylation

There are already more than 100 different kinds of known RNA modifications. RNA methylation is among the most common RNA modifications that may play important roles in neural development (Yoon et al., 2018). Without an rRNA methyltransferase FBL, neural differentiation and neuronal progression from NSCs is inhibited in mouse embryos because there is reduced translation of EZH2 and KDM6b (Wu et al., 2022). YTHDF2, an m6A reader, is required for self-renewal and neural differentiation of embryonic NSCs in mouse through RNA degradation (Li et al., 2018). It has also been shown that FMRP is a reader for m6A modified mRNAs and promotes their nuclear export in order to fulfill their roles in cell cycle progression and maintenance of neural progenitors derived from NSCs in mouse embryos (Edens et al., 2019). These findings may need to be tested and confirmed in adult NSCs. Interestingly, ablation of METTL1 inhibits m7G RNA methylation and causes reduced hippocampal neurogenesis from NSCs in adult mice (Li et al., 2023). Therefore, at least some RNA methylation seems to be important for adult NSCs.

Perspectives

The stem cell state of adult NSCs is maintained by both intrinsic factors and extrinsic signals. Through spatial and temporal regulation of expression of key transcription factors and signaling pathway modulators, many epigenetic regulators have already been shown to be required for maintenance of NSCs in the adult brain. They also play important roles in balancing proliferation and differentiation of NSCs in adult neural development. Interestingly, the epigenetic modifications established during early development may exert significant influence on neurogenesis in the adult brain. Consistent with this, adult NSCs are thought to be derived from embryonic radial glial (RG) cells and reversibly enter the quiescent state after they exit cell cycle. This also implies that the impact of epigenetic modifications established during early development may need to be taken into account in analyses of the mechanisms underlying maintenance, proliferation and differentiation of adult NSCs.

DNA and RNA methylation, histone modifications, chromatin remodeling, nucleosome positioning, 3D chromatin organization as well as non-coding RNAs may function in distinct pathways to ensure adult neurogenesis to progress in an orderly fashion. As shown in other cells and model systems, these epigenetic modifications do not act alone and may indeed function synergistically in order for adult NSCs to attain various cellular states. The cross-talk among different epigenetic modifications may be important for integration of intrinsic and extrinsic factors in cell fate transition of adult NSCs. Furthermore, there are a lot more epigenetic modifications that have yet to be discovered, and undoubtably some of them may be involved in regulation of adult NSCs. It remains to be explored how other new epigenetic modifications may modulate adult NSCs. It is also important to examine how many transcription factors and epigenetic regulators may share their functions in the adult NSCs in the V-SVZ and SGZ regions (Figure 1; Figure 2). It remains to be tested if these findings may be applicable to adult NSCs in human brains.

Despite much progresses in adult NSCs over the last few decades, it is not that clear how adult NSCs maintain their quiescent cellular state and how external signals and intrinsic factors drive them to re-enter cell cycle and give rise to different cell lineages before integration into the neural circuits. Application of high-throughput technologies in epigenetic research such as RNA-seq, WGBS, ChIP-seq and ATAC-seq, in combination with single cell analyses, will help us to better understand dynamic transcriptional regulation of adult NSCs in their cell fate transition and specification. It is still in the infancy stage to uncover epigenetic regulators and modifications in adult NSCs and their roles in adult neurogenesis and neural plasticity.

Statements

Author contributions

JS: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. ZiW: Writing–review and editing. ZhW: Writing–review and editing. GS: Funding acquisition, Writing–review and editing. XL: Writing–review and editing, Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing–original draft.

Funding

The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. The work in the authors’ laboratories has been supported by the grant from Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (22WZ2503400) to XL, the grant from Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (G2023013054) to XL and the major key project of Ningbo medical and health team (2022030107) to GS.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

XL has declared that he is an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1

    AdamM. A.HarwellC. C. (2020). Epigenetic regulation of cortical neurogenesis; orchestrating fate switches at the right time and place. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.63, 146–153. 10.1016/j.conb.2020.03.012

  • 2

    AhmadK.HenikoffS.RamachandranS. (2022). Managing the steady state chromatin landscape by nucleosome dynamics. Annu. Rev. Biochem.91, 183–195. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-032620-104508

  • 3

    AlmeidaM.BownessJ. S.BrockdorffN. (2020). The many faces of Polycomb regulation by RNA. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.61, 53–61. 10.1016/j.gde.2020.02.023

  • 4

    AndergassenD.RinnJ. L. (2022). From genotype to phenotype: genetics of mammalian long non-coding RNAs in vivo. Nat. Rev. Genet.23, 229–243. 10.1038/s41576-021-00427-8

  • 5

    Arzate-MejiaR. G.Recillas-TargaF.CorcesV. G. (2018). Developing in 3D: the role of CTCF in cell differentiation. Development145, dev137729. 10.1242/dev.137729

  • 6

    BannisterA. J.KouzaridesT. (2011). Regulation of chromatin by histone modifications. Cell Res.21, 381–395. 10.1038/cr.2011.22

  • 7

    BarlowD. P.BartolomeiM. S. (2014). Genomic imprinting in mammals. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.6, a018382. 10.1101/cshperspect.a018382

  • 8

    BartolomeiM. S.OakeyR. J.WutzA. (2020). Genomic imprinting: an epigenetic regulatory system. PLoS Genet.16, e1008970. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1008970

  • 9

    BartolomeiM. S.ZemelS.TilghmanS. M. (1991). Parental imprinting of the mouse H19 gene. Nature351, 153–155. 10.1038/351153a0

  • 10

    BeckerP. B.WorkmanJ. L. (2013). Nucleosome remodeling and epigenetics. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.5, a017905. 10.1101/cshperspect.a017905

  • 11

    BedfordM. T.ClarkeS. G. (2009). Protein arginine methylation in mammals: who, what, and why. Mol. Cell33, 1–13. 10.1016/j.molcel.2008.12.013

  • 12

    BlackledgeN. P.KloseR. J. (2021). The molecular principles of gene regulation by Polycomb repressive complexes. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.22, 815–833. 10.1038/s41580-021-00398-y

  • 13

    BondA. M.MingG. L.SongH. (2021). Ontogeny of adult neural stem cells in the mammalian brain. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol.142, 67–98. 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2020.11.002

  • 14

    BonevB.Mendelson CohenN.SzaboQ.FritschL.PapadopoulosG. L.LublingY.et al (2017). Multiscale 3D genome rewiring during mouse neural development. Cell171, 557–572. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.043

  • 15

    BrannanC. I.DeesE. C.IngramR. S.TilghmanS. M. (1990). The product of the H19 gene may function as an RNA. Mol. Cell Biol.10, 28–36. 10.1128/mcb.10.1.28

  • 16

    CaiS. L.YangY. S.DingY. F.YangS. H.JiaX. Z.GuY. W.et al (2022). SETD4 cells contribute to brain development and maintain adult stem cell reservoir for neurogenesis. Stem Cell Rep.17, 2081–2096. 10.1016/j.stemcr.2022.07.017

  • 17

    ChenL. F.LongH. K. (2023). Topology regulatory elements: from shaping genome architecture to gene regulation. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.83, 102723. 10.1016/j.sbi.2023.102723

  • 18

    ChenW.LiuN.ShenS.ZhuW.QiaoJ.ChangS.et al (2021). Fetal growth restriction impairs hippocampal neurogenesis and cognition via Tet1 in offspring. Cell Rep.37, 109912. 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109912

  • 19

    ChenX.RechaviO. (2022). Plant and animal small RNA communications between cells and organisms. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.23, 185–203. 10.1038/s41580-021-00425-y

  • 20

    ChenZ.ZhangY. (2020). Role of mammalian DNA methyltransferases in development. Annu. Rev. Biochem.89, 135–158. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-103019-102815

  • 21

    ChengL. C.PastranaE.TavazoieM.DoetschF. (2009). miR-124 regulates adult neurogenesis in the subventricular zone stem cell niche. Nat. Neurosci.12, 399–408. 10.1038/nn.2294

  • 22

    ChoiC.KimT.ChangK. T.MinK. T. (2019). DSCR1-mediated TET1 splicing regulates miR-124 expression to control adult hippocampal neurogenesis. EMBO J.38, e101293. 10.15252/embj.2018101293

  • 23

    CopeE. C.GouldE. (2019). Adult neurogenesis, glia, and the extracellular matrix. Cell Stem Cell24, 690–705. 10.1016/j.stem.2019.03.023

  • 24

    CovicM.KaracaE.LieD. C. (2010). Epigenetic regulation of neurogenesis in the adult hippocampus. Hered. (Edinb)105, 122–134. 10.1038/hdy.2010.27

  • 25

    CuiD.XuX. (2018). DNA methyltransferases, DNA methylation, and age-associated cognitive function. Int. J. Mol. Sci.19, 1315. 10.3390/ijms19051315

  • 26

    DelgadoA. C.Maldonado-SotoA. R.Silva-VargasV.MizrakD.von KanelT.TanK. R.et al (2021). Release of stem cells from quiescence reveals gliogenic domains in the adult mouse brain. Science372, 1205–1209. 10.1126/science.abg8467

  • 27

    DelgadoR. N.ManskyB.AhangerS. H.LuC.AndersenR. E.DouY.et al (2020). Maintenance of neural stem cell positional identity by mixed-lineage leukemia 1. Science368, 48–53. 10.1126/science.aba5960

  • 28

    DongX.GuoR.JiT.ZhangJ.XuJ.LiY.et al (2022). YY1 safeguard multidimensional epigenetic landscape associated with extended pluripotency. Nucleic Acids Res.50, 12019–12038. 10.1093/nar/gkac230

  • 29

    DorY.CedarH. (2018). Principles of DNA methylation and their implications for biology and medicine. Lancet392, 777–786. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31268-6

  • 30

    EdensB. M.VissersC.SuJ.ArumugamS.XuZ.ShiH.et al (2019). FMRP modulates neural differentiation through m(6)a-dependent mRNA nuclear export. Cell Rep.28, 845–854. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.06.072

  • 31

    ErnstC.MortonC. C. (2013). Identification and function of long non-coding RNA. Front. Cell Neurosci.7, 168. 10.3389/fncel.2013.00168

  • 32

    EtoH.KishiY. (2021). Brain regionalization by Polycomb-group proteins and chromatin accessibility. Bioessays43, e2100155. 10.1002/bies.202100155

  • 33

    FanW.Jurado-ArjonaJ.Alanis-LobatoG.PeronS.BergerC.Andrade-NavarroM. A.et al (2023). The transcriptional co-activator Yap1 promotes adult hippocampal neural stem cell activation. EMBO J.42, e110384. 10.15252/embj.2021110384

  • 34

    FavaloroF.DeLeoA. M.DelgadoA. C.DoetschF. (2022). miR-17-92 exerts stage-specific effects in adult V-SVZ neural stem cell lineages. Cell Rep.41, 111773. 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111773

  • 35

    FengJ.ChangH.LiE.FanG. (2005). Dynamic expression of de novo DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b in the central nervous system. J. Neurosci. Res.79, 734–746. 10.1002/jnr.20404

  • 36

    FengW.KhanM. A.BellvisP.ZhuZ.BernhardtO.Herold-MendeC.et al (2013). The chromatin remodeler CHD7 regulates adult neurogenesis via activation of SoxC transcription factors. Cell Stem Cell13, 62–72. 10.1016/j.stem.2013.05.002

  • 37

    FerronS. R.CharalambousM.RadfordE.McEwenK.WildnerH.HindE.et al (2011). Postnatal loss of Dlk1 imprinting in stem cells and niche astrocytes regulates neurogenesis. Nature475, 381–385. 10.1038/nature10229

  • 38

    FerronS. R.RadfordE. J.Domingo-MuelasA.KleineI.RammeA.GrayD.et al (2015). Differential genomic imprinting regulates paracrine and autocrine roles of IGF2 in mouse adult neurogenesis. Nat. Commun.6, 8265. 10.1038/ncomms9265

  • 39

    FongB. C.ChakrounI.IqbalM. A.PaulS.BastasicJ.O'NeilD.et al (2022). The Rb/E2F axis is a key regulator of the molecular signatures instructing the quiescent and activated adult neural stem cell state. Cell Rep.41, 111578. 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111578

  • 40

    FrancescattoM.VitezicM.HeutinkP.SaxenaA. (2014). Brain-specific noncoding RNAs are likely to originate in repeats and may play a role in up-regulating genes in cis. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol.54, 331–337. 10.1016/j.biocel.2014.06.014

  • 41

    GaoX. L.TianW. J.LiuB.WuJ.XieW.ShenQ. (2020). High-mobility group nucleosomal binding domain 2 protects against microcephaly by maintaining global chromatin accessibility during corticogenesis. J. Biol. Chem.295, 468–480. 10.1074/jbc.RA119.010616

  • 42

    GhirlandoR.FelsenfeldG. (2016). CTCF: making the right connections. Genes Dev.30, 881–891. 10.1101/gad.277863.116

  • 43

    GoncalvesJ. T.SchaferS. T.GageF. H. (2016). Adult neurogenesis in the Hippocampus: from stem cells to behavior. Cell167, 897–914. 10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.021

  • 44

    GontierG.IyerM.SheaJ. M.BieriG.WheatleyE. G.Ramalho-SantosM.et al (2018). Tet2 rescues age-related regenerative decline and enhances cognitive function in the adult mouse brain. Cell Rep.22, 1974–1981. 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.001

  • 45

    GuccioneE.RichardS. (2019). The regulation, functions and clinical relevance of arginine methylation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.20, 642–657. 10.1038/s41580-019-0155-x

  • 46

    GuoJ. U.SuY.ShinJ. H.ShinJ.LiH.XieB.et al (2014). Distribution, recognition and regulation of non-CpG methylation in the adult mammalian brain. Nat. Neurosci.17, 215–222. 10.1038/nn.3607

  • 47

    GuoN.McDermottK. D.ShihY. T.ZangaH.GhoshD.HerberC.et al (2022). Transcriptional regulation of neural stem cell expansion in the adult hippocampus. Elife11, e72195. 10.7554/eLife.72195

  • 48

    HamidiT.SinghA. K.ChenT. (2015). Genetic alterations of DNA methylation machinery in human diseases. Epigenomics7, 247–265. 10.2217/epi.14.80

  • 49

    HaradaY.YamadaM.ImayoshiI.KageyamaR.SuzukiY.KuniyaT.et al (2021). Cell cycle arrest determines adult neural stem cell ontogeny by an embryonic Notch-nonoscillatory Hey1 module. Nat. Commun.12, 6562. 10.1038/s41467-021-26605-0

  • 50

    HarwoodJ. C.KentN. A.AllenN. D.HarwoodA. J. (2019). Nucleosome dynamics of human iPSC during neural differentiation. EMBO Rep.20, e46960. 10.15252/embr.201846960

  • 51

    HeY. F.LiB. Z.LiZ.LiuP.WangY.TangQ.et al (2011). Tet-mediated formation of 5-carboxylcytosine and its excision by TDG in mammalian DNA. Science333, 1303–1307. 10.1126/science.1210944

  • 52

    HerskovitsA. Z.GuarenteL. (2014). SIRT1 in neurodevelopment and brain senescence. Neuron81, 471–483. 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.01.028

  • 53

    HotaS. K.BruneauB. G. (2016). ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling during mammalian development. Development143, 2882–2897. 10.1242/dev.128892

  • 54

    HsiaoJ. S.GermainN. D.WildermanA.StoddardC.WojenskiL. A.VillafanoG. J.et al (2019). A bipartite boundary element restricts UBE3A imprinting to mature neurons. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.116, 2181–2186. 10.1073/pnas.1815279116

  • 55

    HsiehJ.ZhaoX. (2016). Genetics and epigenetics in adult neurogenesis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.8, a018911. 10.1101/cshperspect.a018911

  • 56

    ItoS.ShenL.DaiQ.WuS. C.CollinsL. B.SwenbergJ. A.et al (2011). Tet proteins can convert 5-methylcytosine to 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine. Science333, 1300–1303. 10.1126/science.1210597

  • 57

    JambhekarA.DhallA.ShiY. (2019). Roles and regulation of histone methylation in animal development. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.20, 625–641. 10.1038/s41580-019-0151-1

  • 58

    JawerkaM.ColakD.DimouL.SpillerC.LaggerS.MontgomeryR. L.et al (2010). The specific role of histone deacetylase 2 in adult neurogenesis. Neuron Glia Biol.6, 93–107. 10.1017/S1740925X10000049

  • 59

    JiangW.ShiJ.ZhaoJ.WangQ.CongD.ChenF.et al (2021). ZFP57 dictates allelic expression switch of target imprinted genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.118, e2005377118. 10.1073/pnas.2005377118

  • 60

    JiangY.HsiehJ. (2014). HDAC3 controls gap 2/mitosis progression in adult neural stem/progenitor cells by regulating CDK1 levels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.111, 13541–13546. 10.1073/pnas.1411939111

  • 61

    JonesK. M.SaricN.RussellJ. P.AndoniadouC. L.ScamblerP. J.BassonM. A. (2015). CHD7 maintains neural stem cell quiescence and prevents premature stem cell depletion in the adult hippocampus. Stem Cells33, 196–210. 10.1002/stem.1822

  • 62

    KobayashiT.KageyamaR. (2021). Lysosomes and signaling pathways for maintenance of quiescence in adult neural stem cells. FEBS J.288, 3082–3093. 10.1111/febs.15555

  • 63

    KuboN.IshiiH.XiongX.BiancoS.MeitingerF.HuR.et al (2021). Promoter-proximal CTCF binding promotes distal enhancer-dependent gene activation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.28, 152–161. 10.1038/s41594-020-00539-5

  • 64

    KuhnH. G.TodaT.GageF. H. (2018). Adult hippocampal neurogenesis: a coming-of-age story. J. Neurosci.38, 10401–10410. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2144-18.2018

  • 65

    LanX.DingS.ZhangT.YiY.LiC.JinW.et al (2022). PCGF6 controls neuroectoderm specification of human pluripotent stem cells by activating SOX2 expression. Nat. Commun.13, 4601. 10.1038/s41467-022-32295-z

  • 66

    LiE.ZhangY. (2014). DNA methylation in mammals. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.6, a019133. 10.1101/cshperspect.a019133

  • 67

    LiH.ZhongX.ChauK. F.SantistevanN. J.GuoW.KongG.et al (2014). Cell cycle-linked MeCP2 phosphorylation modulates adult neurogenesis involving the Notch signalling pathway. Nat. Commun.5, 5601. 10.1038/ncomms6601

  • 68

    LiL.Medina-MenendezC.Garcia-CorzoL.Cordoba-BeldadC. M.QuirogaA. C.Calleja BarcaE.et al (2022). SoxD genes are required for adult neural stem cell activation. Cell Rep.38, 110313. 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110313

  • 69

    LiM.ZhaoX.WangW.ShiH.PanQ.LuZ.et al (2018). Ythdf2-mediated m(6)A mRNA clearance modulates neural development in mice. Genome Biol.19, 69. 10.1186/s13059-018-1436-y

  • 70

    LiP.GeJ.LiH. (2020). Lysine acetyltransferases and lysine deacetylases as targets for cardiovascular disease. Nat. Rev. Cardiol.17, 96–115. 10.1038/s41569-019-0235-9

  • 71

    LiQ.LiuH.LiL.GuoH.XieZ.KongX.et al (2023). Mettl1-mediated internal m(7)G methylation of Sptbn2 mRNA elicits neurogenesis and anti-alzheimer's disease. Cell Biosci.13, 183. 10.1186/s13578-023-01131-2

  • 72

    LiX. (2013). Genomic imprinting is a parental effect established in mammalian germ cells. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol.102, 35–59. 10.1016/B978-0-12-416024-8.00002-7

  • 73

    LimD. A.Alvarez-BuyllaA. (2016). The adult ventricular-subventricular zone (V-SVZ) and olfactory bulb (OB) neurogenesis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol.8, a018820. 10.1101/cshperspect.a018820

  • 74

    LimD. A.HuangY. C.SwigutT.MirickA. L.Garcia-VerdugoJ. M.WysockaJ.et al (2009). Chromatin remodelling factor Mll1 is essential for neurogenesis from postnatal neural stem cells. Nature458, 529–533. 10.1038/nature07726

  • 75

    LiuC.TengZ. Q.SantistevanN. J.SzulwachK. E.GuoW.JinP.et al (2010). Epigenetic regulation of miR-184 by MBD1 governs neural stem cell proliferation and differentiation. Cell Stem Cell6, 433–444. 10.1016/j.stem.2010.02.017

  • 76

    LiuY.HuG.YangS.YaoM.LiuZ.YanC.et al (2023a). Functional dissection of PRC1 subunits RYBP and YAF2 during neural differentiation of embryonic stem cells. Nat. Commun.14, 7164. 10.1038/s41467-023-42507-9

  • 77

    LiuY.WangM.GuoY.WangL.GuoW. (2023b). D-2-hydroxyglutarate dehydrogenase governs adult neural stem cell activation and promotes histone acetylation via ATP-citrate lyase. Cell Rep.42, 112067. 10.1016/j.celrep.2023.112067

  • 78

    LodaA.CollombetS.HeardE. (2022). Gene regulation in time and space during X-chromosome inactivation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.23, 231–249. 10.1038/s41580-021-00438-7

  • 79

    Lozano-UrenaA.Lazaro-CarotL.Jimenez-VillalbaE.Montalban-LoroR.Mateos-WhiteI.Duart-AbadiaP.et al (2023). IGF2 interacts with the imprinted gene Cdkn1c to promote terminal differentiation of neural stem cells. Development150, dev200563. 10.1242/dev.200563

  • 80

    Lozano-UrenaA.Montalban-LoroR.Ferguson-SmithA. C.FerronS. R. (2017). Genomic imprinting and the regulation of postnatal neurogenesis. Brain Plast.3, 89–98. 10.3233/BPL-160041

  • 81

    MacArthurI. C.DawlatyM. M. (2021). TET enzymes and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in neural progenitor cell biology and neurodevelopment. Front. Cell Dev. Biol.9, 645335. 10.3389/fcell.2021.645335

  • 82

    MatsubaraS.MatsudaT.NakashimaK. (2021). Regulation of adult mammalian neural stem cells and neurogenesis by cell extrinsic and intrinsic factors. Cells10, 1145. 10.3390/cells10051145

  • 83

    MattickJ. S.AmaralP. P.CarninciP.CarpenterS.ChangH. Y.ChenL. L.et al (2023). Long non-coding RNAs: definitions, functions, challenges and recommendations. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.24, 430–447. 10.1038/s41580-022-00566-8

  • 84

    MersonT. D.DixonM. P.CollinC.RietzeR. L.BartlettP. F.ThomasT.et al (2006). The transcriptional coactivator Querkopf controls adult neurogenesis. J. Neurosci.26, 11359–11370. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2247-06.2006

  • 85

    Millan-ZambranoG.BurtonA.BannisterA. J.SchneiderR. (2022). Histone post-translational modifications - cause and consequence of genome function. Nat. Rev. Genet.23, 563–580. 10.1038/s41576-022-00468-7

  • 86

    MingG. L.SongH. (2011). Adult neurogenesis in the mammalian brain: significant answers and significant questions. Neuron70, 687–702. 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.05.001

  • 87

    ModrekA. S.GolubD.KhanT.BreadyD.PradoJ.BowmanC.et al (2017). Low-grade astrocytoma mutations in IDH1, P53, and ATRX cooperate to block differentiation of human neural stem cells via repression of SOX2. Cell Rep.21, 1267–1280. 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.10.009

  • 88

    MonkD.MackayD. J. G.EggermannT.MaherE. R.RiccioA. (2019). Genomic imprinting disorders: lessons on how genome, epigenome and environment interact. Nat. Rev. Genet.20, 235–248. 10.1038/s41576-018-0092-0

  • 89

    Montalban-LoroR.LassiG.Lozano-UrenaA.Perez-VillalbaA.Jimenez-VillalbaE.CharalambousM.et al (2021). Dlk1 dosage regulates hippocampal neurogenesis and cognition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.118, e2015505118. 10.1073/pnas.2015505118

  • 90

    Montalban-LoroR.Domingo-MuelasA.BizyA.FerronS. R. (2015). Epigenetic regulation of stemness maintenance in the neurogenic niches. World J. Stem Cells7, 700–710. 10.4252/wjsc.v7.i4.700

  • 91

    Montalban-LoroR.Lozano-UrenaA.ItoM.KruegerC.ReikW.Ferguson-SmithA. C.et al (2019). TET3 prevents terminal differentiation of adult NSCs by a non-catalytic action at Snrpn. Nat. Commun.10, 1726. 10.1038/s41467-019-09665-1

  • 92

    MorganM. A. J.ShilatifardA. (2020). Reevaluating the roles of histone-modifying enzymes and their associated chromatin modifications in transcriptional regulation. Nat. Genet.52, 1271–1281. 10.1038/s41588-020-00736-4

  • 93

    NinkovicJ.Steiner-MezzadriA.JawerkaM.AkinciU.MasserdottiG.PetriccaS.et al (2013). The BAF complex interacts with Pax6 in adult neural progenitors to establish a neurogenic cross-regulatory transcriptional network. Cell Stem Cell13, 403–418. 10.1016/j.stem.2013.07.002

  • 94

    NinouE.MichailA.PolitisP. K. (2021). Long non-coding RNA lacuna regulates neuronal differentiation of neural stem cells during brain development. Front. Cell Dev. Biol.9, 726857. 10.3389/fcell.2021.726857

  • 95

    NoguchiH.KimuraA.MuraoN.MatsudaT.NamihiraM.NakashimaK. (2015). Expression of DNMT1 in neural stem/precursor cells is critical for survival of newly generated neurons in the adult hippocampus. Neurosci. Res.95, 1–11. 10.1016/j.neures.2015.01.014

  • 96

    NojimaT.ProudfootN. J. (2022). Mechanisms of lncRNA biogenesis as revealed by nascent transcriptomics. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.23, 389–406. 10.1038/s41580-021-00447-6

  • 97

    Nunez-AlvarezY.SuelvesM. (2022). HDAC11: a multifaceted histone deacetylase with proficient fatty deacylase activity and its roles in physiological processes. FEBS J.289, 2771–2792. 10.1111/febs.15895

  • 98

    PardalR.MolofskyA. V.HeS.MorrisonS. J. (2005). Stem cell self-renewal and cancer cell proliferation are regulated by common networks that balance the activation of proto-oncogenes and tumor suppressors. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol.70, 177–185. 10.1101/sqb.2005.70.057

  • 99

    ParkD. H.HongS. J.SalinasR. D.LiuS. J.SunS. W.SgualdinoJ.et al (2014). Activation of neuronal gene expression by the JMJD3 demethylase is required for postnatal and adult brain neurogenesis. Cell Rep.8, 1290–1299. 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.07.060

  • 100

    PekowskaA.KlausB.XiangW.SeverinoJ.DaigleN.KleinF. A.et al (2018). Gain of CTCF-anchored chromatin loops marks the exit from naive pluripotency. Cell Syst.7, 482–495. 10.1016/j.cels.2018.09.003

  • 101

    PerezJ. D.RubinsteinN. D.DulacC. (2016). New perspectives on genomic imprinting, an essential and multifaceted mode of epigenetic control in the developing and adult brain. Annu. Rev. Neurosci.39, 347–384. 10.1146/annurev-neuro-061010-113708

  • 102

    PetrikD.LatchneyS. E.MasiulisI.YunS.ZhangZ.WuJ. I.et al (2015). Chromatin remodeling factor Brg1 supports the early maintenance and late responsiveness of nestin-lineage adult neural stem and progenitor cells. Stem Cells33, 3655–3665. 10.1002/stem.2215

  • 103

    PutraB. P.ItoK.CirilloC.SunardiM.KosekiH.UesakaT.et al (2023). Pcgf1 gene disruption reveals primary involvement of epigenetic mechanism in neuronal subtype specification in the enteric nervous system. Dev. Growth Differ.65, 461–469. 10.1111/dgd.12880

  • 104

    QinS.YuanY.HuangX.TanZ.HuX.LiuH.et al (2022). Topoisomerase IIA in adult NSCs regulates SVZ neurogenesis by transcriptional activation of Usp37. Nucleic Acids Res.50, 9319–9338. 10.1093/nar/gkac731

  • 105

    RafalskiV. A.BrunetA. (2011). Energy metabolism in adult neural stem cell fate. Prog. Neurobiol.93, 182–203. 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.10.007

  • 106

    RamosA. D.AndersenR. E.LiuS. J.NowakowskiT. J.HongS. J.GertzC.et al (2015). The long noncoding RNA Pnky regulates neuronal differentiation of embryonic and postnatal neural stem cells. Cell Stem Cell16, 439–447. 10.1016/j.stem.2015.02.007

  • 107

    RamosA. D.DiazA.NelloreA.DelgadoR. N.ParkK. Y.Gonzales-RoybalG.et al (2013). Integration of genome-wide approaches identifies lncRNAs of adult neural stem cells and their progeny in vivo. Cell Stem Cell12, 616–628. 10.1016/j.stem.2013.03.003

  • 108

    RhodesC. T.ZuninoG.HuangS. A.CardonaS. M.CardonaA. E.BergerM. S.et al (2018). Region specific knock-out reveals distinct roles of chromatin modifiers in adult neurogenic niches. Cell Cycle17, 377–389. 10.1080/15384101.2018.1426417

  • 109

    SantiagoM.AntunesC.GuedesM.SousaN.MarquesC. J. (2014). TET enzymes and DNA hydroxymethylation in neural development and function - how critical are they?Genomics104, 334–340. 10.1016/j.ygeno.2014.08.018

  • 110

    SantosS. S.MoreiraJ. B.CostaM.RodriguesR. S.SebastiãoA. M.XapelliS.et al (2021). The mitochondrial antioxidant Sirtuin3 cooperates with lipid metabolism to safeguard neurogenesis in aging and depression. Cells11, 90. 10.3390/cells11010090

  • 111

    ShangR.LeeS.SenavirathneG.LaiE. C. (2023). microRNAs in action: biogenesis, function and regulation. Nat. Rev. Genet.24, 816–833. 10.1038/s41576-023-00611-y

  • 112

    SheikhB. N.DixonM. P.ThomasT.VossA. K. (2012). Querkopf is a key marker of self-renewal and multipotency of adult neural stem cells. J. Cell Sci.125, 295–309. 10.1242/jcs.077271

  • 113

    SimonR.BaumannL.FischerJ.SeigfriedF. A.De BruyckereE.LiuP.et al (2016). Structure-function integrity of the adult hippocampus depends on the transcription factor Bcl11b/Ctip2. Genes Brain Behav.15, 405–419. 10.1111/gbb.12287

  • 114

    SimonR.BrylkaH.SchweglerH.VenkataramanappaS.AndratschkeJ.WiegreffeC.et al (2012). A dual function of Bcl11b/Ctip2 in hippocampal neurogenesis. EMBO J.31, 2922–2936. 10.1038/emboj.2012.142

  • 115

    SmrtR. D.SzulwachK. E.PfeifferR. L.LiX.GuoW.PathaniaM.et al (2010). MicroRNA miR-137 regulates neuronal maturation by targeting ubiquitin ligase mind bomb-1. Stem Cells28, 1060–1070. 10.1002/stem.431

  • 116

    SoutschekM.SchrattG. (2023). Non-coding RNA in the wiring and remodeling of neural circuits. Neuron111, 2140–2154. 10.1016/j.neuron.2023.04.031

  • 117

    StatelloL.GuoC. J.ChenL. L.HuarteM. (2021). Gene regulation by long non-coding RNAs and its biological functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.22, 96–118. 10.1038/s41580-020-00315-9

  • 118

    StroudH.SuS. C.HrvatinS.GrebenA. W.RenthalW.BoxerL. D.et al (2017). Early-life gene expression in neurons modulates lasting epigenetic states. Cell171, 1151–1164. 10.1016/j.cell.2017.09.047

  • 119

    SuganumaT.WorkmanJ. L. (2018). Chromatin and metabolism. Annu. Rev. Biochem.87, 27–49. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-062917-012634

  • 120

    SunA. X.CrabtreeG. R.YooA. S. (2013). MicroRNAs: regulators of neuronal fate. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.25, 215–221. 10.1016/j.ceb.2012.12.007

  • 121

    SunG.AlzayadyK.StewartR.YeP.YangS.LiW.et al (2010). Histone demethylase LSD1 regulates neural stem cell proliferation. Mol. Cell Biol.30, 1997–2005. 10.1128/MCB.01116-09

  • 122

    SunG.YuR. T.EvansR. M.ShiY. (2007). Orphan nuclear receptor TLX recruits histone deacetylases to repress transcription and regulate neural stem cell proliferation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.104, 15282–15287. 10.1073/pnas.0704089104

  • 123

    SzulwachK. E.LiX.SmrtR. D.LiY.LuoY.LinL.et al (2010). Cross talk between microRNA and epigenetic regulation in adult neurogenesis. J. Cell Biol.189, 127–141. 10.1083/jcb.200908151

  • 124

    TalbertP. B.MeersM. P.HenikoffS. (2019). Old cogs, new tricks: the evolution of gene expression in a chromatin context. Nat. Rev. Genet.20, 283–297. 10.1038/s41576-019-0105-7

  • 125

    TeifV. B.VainshteinY.Caudron-HergerM.MallmJ. P.MarthC.HoferT.et al (2012). Genome-wide nucleosome positioning during embryonic stem cell development. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol.19, 1185–1192. 10.1038/nsmb.2419

  • 126

    TucciV.IslesA. R.KelseyG.Ferguson-SmithA. C.Erice ImprintingG. (2019). Genomic imprinting and physiological processes in mammals. Cell176, 952–965. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.043

  • 127

    TuocT.DereE.RadyushkinK.PhamL.NguyenH.TonchevA. B.et al (2017). Ablation of BAF170 in developing and postnatal dentate gyrus affects neural stem cell proliferation, differentiation, and learning. Mol. Neurobiol.54, 4618–4635. 10.1007/s12035-016-9948-5

  • 128

    van ZonneveldA. J.ZhaoQ.RotmansJ. I.BijkerkR. (2023). Circulating non-coding RNAs in chronic kidney disease and its complications. Nat. Rev. Nephrol.19, 573–586. 10.1038/s41581-023-00725-w

  • 129

    VicidominiC.GuoN.SahayA. (2020). Communication, cross talk, and signal integration in the adult hippocampal neurogenic niche. Neuron105, 220–235. 10.1016/j.neuron.2019.11.029

  • 130

    WashietlS.KellisM.GarberM. (2014). Evolutionary dynamics and tissue specificity of human long noncoding RNAs in six mammals. Genome Res.24, 616–628. 10.1101/gr.165035.113

  • 131

    WuH.CoskunV.TaoJ.XieW.GeW.YoshikawaK.et al (2010). Dnmt3a-dependent nonpromoter DNA methylation facilitates transcription of neurogenic genes. Science329, 444–448. 10.1126/science.1190485

  • 132

    WuQ.ShichinoY.AbeT.SuetsuguT.OmoriA.KiyonariH.et al (2022). Selective translation of epigenetic modifiers affects the temporal pattern and differentiation of neural stem cells. Nat. Commun.13, 470. 10.1038/s41467-022-28097-y

  • 133

    WuX.ZhangY. (2017). TET-mediated active DNA demethylation: mechanism, function and beyond. Nat. Rev. Genet.18, 517–534. 10.1038/nrg.2017.33

  • 134

    XieJ.XieL.WeiH.LiX. J.LinL. (2023). Dynamic regulation of DNA methylation and brain functions. Biol. (Basel)12, 152. 10.3390/biology12020152

  • 135

    XuG. L.BochtlerM. (2020). Reversal of nucleobase methylation by dioxygenases. Nat. Chem. Biol.16, 1160–1169. 10.1038/s41589-020-00675-5

  • 136

    XuZ.ShiJ.ZhangY.LiuY.ZhaoJ.ChenQ.et al (2022). Zfp57 exerts maternal and sexually dimorphic effects on genomic imprinting. Front. Cell Dev. Biol.10, 784128. 10.3389/fcell.2022.784128

  • 137

    YaoB.ChristianK. M.HeC.JinP.MingG. L.SongH. (2016). Epigenetic mechanisms in neurogenesis. Nat. Rev. Neurosci.17, 537–549. 10.1038/nrn.2016.70

  • 138

    YaoM.ZhouX.ZhouJ.GongS.HuG.LiJ.et al (2018). PCGF5 is required for neural differentiation of embryonic stem cells. Nat. Commun.9, 1463. 10.1038/s41467-018-03781-0

  • 139

    YaoR. W.WangY.ChenL. L. (2019). Cellular functions of long noncoding RNAs. Nat. Cell Biol.21, 542–551. 10.1038/s41556-019-0311-8

  • 140

    YinB. K.LazaroD.WangZ. Q. (2023). TRRAP-mediated acetylation on Sp1 regulates adult neurogenesis. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J.21, 472–484. 10.1016/j.csbj.2022.12.024

  • 141

    YoonK. J.VissersC.MingG. L.SongH. (2018). Epigenetics and epitranscriptomics in temporal patterning of cortical neural progenitor competence. J. Cell Biol.217, 1901–1914. 10.1083/jcb.201802117

  • 142

    ZengY.ChenT. (2019). DNA methylation reprogramming during mammalian development. Genes (Basel)10, 257. 10.3390/genes10040257

  • 143

    ZhangR. R.CuiQ. Y.MuraiK.LimY. C.SmithZ. D.JinS.et al (2013). Tet1 regulates adult hippocampal neurogenesis and cognition. Cell Stem Cell13, 237–245. 10.1016/j.stem.2013.05.006

  • 144

    ZhangX.WangW.ZhuW.DongJ.ChengY.YinZ.et al (2019). Mechanisms and functions of long non-coding RNAs at multiple regulatory levels. Int. J. Mol. Sci.20, 5573. 10.3390/ijms20225573

  • 145

    ZocherS.OverallR. W.Berdugo-VegaG.RundN.KarasinskyA.AdusumilliV. S.et al (2021). De novo DNA methylation controls neuronal maturation during adult hippocampal neurogenesis. EMBO J.40, e107100. 10.15252/embj.2020107100

Summary

Keywords

neural stem cell (NSC), epigenetic, transcription, adult brain, DNA methylation

Citation

Shi J, Wang Z, Wang Z, Shao G and Li X (2024) Epigenetic regulation in adult neural stem cells. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 12:1331074. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1331074

Received

31 October 2023

Accepted

12 January 2024

Published

31 January 2024

Volume

12 - 2024

Edited by

Noriaki Sasai, Nara Institute of Science and Technology (NAIST), Japan

Reviewed by

Yuyao Tian, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States

Kaimeng Huang, Dana–Farber Cancer Institute, United States

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Zhijun Wang, ; Guofeng Shao, ; Xiajun Li,

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics