Marta Lombò
Gilda Cobellis
Francesco Manfrevola- 1Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
- 2Department of Experimental Medicine, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, Naples, Italy
Editorial on the Research Topic
Sperm epigenetic code: implications in reproductive health and paternal contribution to embryo development
For decades, the study of human reproduction and offspring health has predominantly focused on the maternal contribution to embryo development, often overlooking the molecular complexity of spermatozoa, traditionally considered merely as vectors of paternal genetic information. However, growing evidence reveals that spermatozoa deliver a sophisticated repertoire of epigenetic marks - including DNA methylation patterns, histone post-translational modifications (HPTMs) and RNA cargo - that play crucial roles in defining male reproductive health, embryo development and intergenerational inheritance (Hammoud et al., 2009; Hammoud et al., 2011; Luense et al., 2016; Yamaguchi et al., 2018; Chioccarelli et al., 2020; Martinez et al., 2023). The Research Topic “Sperm Epigenetic Code: Implications in Reproductive Health and Paternal Contribution to Embryo Development” provides multidisciplinary insights into the establishment and maintenance of sperm epigenetic landscape. Since harmful perturbations in the sperm epigenome have been consistently linked to altered sperm quality, male infertility and compromised offspring health, these Research Topic are extensively addressed in this Research Topic.
Dodd and Luense have contributed a review article focused on the role of paternal histones in male reproductive health and early embryogenesis. Despite the genome-wide histone-to-protamines replacement during spermatogenesis, a small subset of histones is retained in mature spermatozoa and marks critical genes potentially involved in early embryo development (Brykczynska et al., 2010; Erkek et al., 2013; Jung et al., 2017; Yoshida et al., 2018). Their review highlights growing evidence that aberrant sperm histone epigenetic marks (particularly histone acetylation and methylation pattern) are associated with multiple male infertility conditions (e.g., asthenoteratozoospermia and asthenozoospermia) as well as impaired embryogenesis, underscoring their importance as key paternal-derived epigenetic regulators. In this context, a crucial determinant for the proper establishment of sperm epigenetic code consists in the chromatin remodeling which arises during spermiogenesis. The hyperacetylation of lysine residues on histone H4 (notably H4K5, H4K8, H4K12, and H4K16) underlie the histone-to-protamine exchange in elongating spermatids. Precise regulation of these histone PTMs is indispensable for the acquisition of a functional paternal epigenome. In this regard, Porreca et al. have provided novel insights into the mechanistic involvement of histone -acetyltransferases (HATs) and -deacetylases (HDACs) in modulating H4 hyperacetylation. By exploiting the cannabinoid receptor 1 (CB1) knockout mice (Cb1−/−) as a model of impaired histone displacement, the authors demonstrate how the aberrant interaction between deacetylase SIRT1 and the MOF acetyltransferase disrupts MOF-dependent H4K16 acetylation in elongating spermatids, leading to defective histone displacement and production of spermatozoa with abnormally retained chromatin H3-binding sites.
The sperm epigenetic code is responsive to external environmental and lifestyle stressors such as pollutants, diet, stress and smoking (Chioccarelli et al., 2010; Pastore et al., 2024). In this light, the work of Porreca et al. also clarifies the putative adverse effects on sperm epigenetic landscape deriving from cannabis use. Mounting evidence suggests that alterations in the sperm epigenetic marks, such as DNA methylation, sperm-borne small RNAs, and histone PTMs (particularly acetylation of histones H3 and H4) may arise from metabolic disorders and environmental contaminants and can be transmitted to the following generations (Akhatova et al., 2025; Ma et al., 2020; Lombó et al., 2019; Al Khaled et al., 2018; Hammer et al., 2021; Yuan et al., 2017; Rothstein et al., 2017; Lismer et al., 2020; Terashima et al., 2015; Swanson et al., 2020; Chen et al., 2016). Hence, the study by Pastore et al. sheds light on the intergenerational transmission of dysmetabolic traits via paternal inheritance. Investigating paternal obesity induced by a high-fat diet (HFD), the authors examined how the obesity condition influences sperm quality and offspring health, also assessing the protective potential of antioxidant supplementation with N-acetylcysteine (NAC). While NAC mitigated paternal metabolic dysfunction and improved sperm parameters, it failed to prevent the inheritance of epigenetic alterations lying behind metabolic disorders, as offspring of HFD-fed fathers exhibited persistent metabolic impairments (glucose intolerance and diabetic phenotype) and aberrant DNA methylation at epigenetically controlled loci as IGFII/H19 and cyp19a1. Complementing these findings, Hussain et al. provide a review on the role of redox signaling and metabolism in male reproductive functions, emphasizing the epigenetic responsiveness to toxicant exposure. The documented effects include alterations in sperm DNA methylation and histone H3 methylation patterns, reported to be trans-generationally inherited and capable to impair testicular function and semen quality across multiple generations. The review article by Aljabali et al., unveils how paternal environmental exposures—including stress, high-fat diet, and toxicants—affect sperm-borne epigenetic signals involved in developmental programming of sexual dimorphism. The authors describe a plethora of sperm-derived epigenetic alterations—including disrupted DNA methylation and differential small non-coding RNA (sncRNA) profiles—that contribute to sex-specific developmental anomalies. Notably, these changes arise as early as the preimplantation stage, underscoring the critical role for the paternal epigenome in driving sexually dimorphic developmental trajectories.
As the burden of male infertility continues to rise globally, the urgency to decode the sperm epigenome grows. This emerging Research Topic requires a paradigm shift: moving beyond genetic determinism to embrace a more integrative view of heredity, one that acknowledges the epigenetic memory embedded in the paternal germline. Supporting this notion, Lin et al. provide encouraging evidence that germ cells retain an intrinsic epigenetic memory. The authors demonstrate that although in vitro induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) retain residual gene expression and epigenetic features of their source cell type, this memory is largely erased upon their differentiation into primordial germ cell-like cells (PGCLCs), faithfully recapitulating the epigenetic reprogramming triggered in vivo during embryonic PGC specification. This study confirms a selective germ cell epigenetic memory and holds great promise for reproductive medicine. In line with the concept of paternal epigenetic memory, Capra et al. performed a comparative study in Montbéliarde and Holstein bull sperm. Despite breed-specific epigenetic variations, the authors reveal the presence of conserved methylated regions across the genetically distinct breeds. Such evolutionary conserved epigenetic signature appears essential for maintaining genomic integrity, silencing transposable elements, and regulating key genes required for spermatogenesis and early embryonic development.
In conclusion, the concept of the sperm epigenetic code radically reshapes our understanding on paternal heredity, extending it beyond DNA sequence to include dynamic, heritable, and environmentally sensitive epigenetic modifications. The vulnerability of sperm epigenome to external stressors, alongside rising global infertility rates, underscores the urgent need to integrate epigenetic knowledge into reproductive medicine and public health strategies. Decoding and ultimately modulating the sperm epigenome offers a promising avenue to improve fertility outcomes and safeguard the health of future generations.
Author contributions
ML: Conceptualization, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. GC: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing. FM: Conceptualization, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This research was supported by Italian Ministry of University and Research (Grant PRIN to Gilda Cobellis 2017 and 2022).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Generative AI statement
The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Akhatova, A., Jones, C., Coward, K., and Yeste, M. (2025). How do lifestyle and environmental factors influence the sperm epigenome? Effects on sperm fertilising ability, embryo development, and offspring health. Clin. Epigenetics 17 (1), 7. doi:10.1186/s13148-025-01815-1
Al Khaled, Y., Laqqan, M., Tierling, S., Lo Porto, C., Amor, H., and Hammadeh, M. E. (2018). Impact of cigarette-smoking on sperm DNA methylation and its effect on sperm parameters. Andrologia 50 (4), e12950. doi:10.1111/and.12950
Awe, S., and Renkawitz-Pohl, R. (2010). Histone H4 acetylation is essential to proceed from a histone-to a protamine-based chromatin structure in spermatid nuclei of Drosophila melanogaster. Syst. Biol. Reprod. Med. 56, 44–61. doi:10.3109/19396360903490790
Brykczynska, U., Hisano, M., Erkek, S., Ramos, L., Oakeley, E. J., Roloff, T. C., et al. (2010). Repressive and active histone methylation mark distinct promoters in human and mouse spermatozoa. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 17, 679–687. doi:10.1038/nsmb.1821
Chen, Q., Yan, M., Cao, Z., Li, X., Zhang, Y., Shi, J., et al. (2016). Sperm tsRNAs contribute to intergenerational inheritance of an acquired metabolic disorder. Science 351 (6271), 397–400. doi:10.1126/science.aad7977
Chioccarelli, T., Cacciola, G., Altucci, L., Lewis, S. E., Simon, L., Ricci, G., et al. (2010). Cannabinoid receptor 1 influences chromatin remodeling in mouse spermatids by affecting content of transition protein 2 mRNA and histone displacement. Endocrinology 151, 5017–5029. doi:10.1210/en.2010-0133
Chioccarelli, T., Pierantoni, R., Manfrevola, F., Porreca, V., Fasano, S., Chianese, R., et al. (2020). Histone post-translational modifications and circRNAs in mouse and human spermatozoa: potential epigenetic marks to assess human sperm quality. J. Clin. Med. 9, E640. doi:10.3390/jcm9030640
Erkek, S., Hisano, M., Liang, C. Y., Gill, M., Murr, R., Dieker, J., et al. (2013). Molecular determinants of nucleosome retention at CpG-rich sequences in mouse spermatozoa. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 20, 868–875. doi:10.1038/nsmb.2599
Hammer, B., Kadalayil, L., Boateng, E., Buschmann, D., Rezwan, F. I., Wolff, M., et al. (2021). Preconceptional smoking alters spermatozoal miRNAs of murine fathers and affects offspring’s body weight. Int. J. Obes. Lond. 45 (8), 1623–1627. doi:10.1038/s41366-021-00798-2
Hammoud, S. S., Nix, D. A., Zhang, H., Purwar, J., Carrell, D. T., and Cairns, B. R. (2009). Distinctive chromatin in human sperm packages genes for embryo development. Nature 460, 473–478. doi:10.1038/nature08162
Hammoud, S. S., Nix, D. A., Hammoud, A. O., Gibson, M., Cairns, B. R., and Carrell, D. T. (2011). Genome-wide analysis identifies changes in histone retention and epigenetic modifications at developmental and imprinted gene loci in the sperm of infertile men. Hum. Reprod. 26 (9), 2558–2569. doi:10.1093/humrep/der192
Jung, Y. H., Sauria, M. E. G., Lyu, X., Cheema, M. S., Ausio, J., Taylor, J., et al. (2017). Chromatin states in mouse sperm correlate with embryonic and adult regulatory landscapes. Cell Rep. 18, 1366–1382. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2017.01.034
Lismer, A., Siklenka, K., Lafleur, C., Dumeaux, V., and Kimmins, S. (2020). Sperm histone H3 lysine 4 trimethylation is altered in a genetic mouse model of transgenerational epigenetic inheritance. Nucleic Acids Res. 48 (20), 11380–11393. doi:10.1093/nar/gkaa712
Lombó, M., Fernández-Díez, C., González-Rojo, S., and Herráez, M. P. (2019). Genetic and epigenetic alterations induced by bisphenol A exposure during different periods of spermatogenesis: from spermatozoa to the progeny. Sci. Rep. 9, 18029. doi:10.1038/s41598-019-54368-8
Luense, L. J., Wang, X., Schon, S. B., Weller, A. H., Lin Shiao, E., Bryant, J. M., et al. (2016). Comprehensive analysis of histone post-translational modifications in mouse and human male germ cells. Epigenetics Chromatin 9, 24. doi:10.1186/s13072-016-0072-6
Ma, L., Yu, H., Wang, X., Li, D., Zhang, Y., Pei, X., et al. (2020). The effects of maternal exposure to BPA during pregnancy on the male reproductive system and the testicular microRNA expression profile. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 27 (14), 17290–17302. doi:10.1007/s11356-020-08156-x
Martinez, G., Cappetta, D., Telesca, M., Urbanek, K., Castaldo, G., Dhellemmes, M., et al. (2023). Cytochalasin D restores nuclear size acting on F-actin and IZUMO1 localization in low-quality spermatozoa. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 19 (7), 2234–2255. doi:10.7150/ijbs.77166
Pastore, A., Badolati, N., Manfrevola, F., Sagliocchi, S., Laurenzi, V., Musto, G., et al. (2024). Pre-conceptional paternal diet impacts on offspring testosterone homoeostasis via epigenetic modulation of cyp19a1/aromatase activity. NPJ Metab. Health Dis. 2 (1), 8. doi:10.1038/s44324-024-00011-8
Rothstein, M. A., Harrell, H. L., and Marchant, G. E. (2017). Transgenerational epigenetics and environmental justice. Environ. Epigenetics 3 (3), dvx011. doi:10.1093/eep/dvx011
Swanson, G. M., Estill, M., Diamond, M. P., Legro, R. S., Coutifaris, C., Barnhart, K. T., et al. (2020). Human chromatin remodeler cofactor, RNA interactor, eraser and writer sperm RNAs responding to obesity. Epigenetics 15 (1–2), 32–46. doi:10.1080/15592294.2019.1644880
Terashima, M., Barbour, S., Ren, J., Yu, W., Han, Y., and Muegge, K. (2015). Effect of high fat diet on paternal sperm histone distribution and male offspring liver gene expression. Epigenetics 10 (9), 861–871. doi:10.1080/15592294.2015.1075691
Yamaguchi, K., Hada, M., Fukuda, Y., Inoue, E., Makino, Y., Katou, Y., et al. (2018). Re-Evaluating the localization of sperm-retained histones revealed the modification-dependent accumulation in specific genome regions. Cell Rep. 23, 3920–3932. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.05.094
Yoshida, K., Muratani, M., Araki, H., Miura, F., Suzuki, T., Dohmae, N., et al. (2018). Mapping of histone-binding sites in histone replacement-completed spermatozoa. Nat. Commun. 9, 3885. doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06243-9
Keywords: sperm epigenetics, male infertility, fertilization, epigenetic inheritance, offspring health, paternal lifestyle, spermatogenesis
Citation: Lombò M, Cobellis G and Manfrevola F (2025) Editorial: Sperm epigenetic code: implications in reproductive health and paternal contribution to embryo development. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 13:1666435. doi: 10.3389/fcell.2025.1666435
Received: 15 July 2025; Accepted: 28 July 2025;
Published: 01 September 2025.
Edited and reviewed by:
Shao-Chen Sun, Nanjing Agricultural University, ChinaCopyright © 2025 Lombò, Cobellis and Manfrevola. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Gilda Cobellis, Z2lsZGEuY29iZWxsaXNAdW5pY2FtcGFuaWEuaXQ=