ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Cardiovasc. Med., 18 January 2022

Sec. Cardiovascular Epidemiology and Prevention

Volume 8 - 2021 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.800458

Serum Chloride Level Is Associated With Abdominal Aortic Calcification

  • 1. Department of Thoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China

  • 2. Department of Health Care Management, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China

Article metrics

View details

7

Citations

3,2k

Views

1,4k

Downloads

Abstract

Background:

Abdominal aortic calcification is a potentially important independent risk factor for cardiovascular health. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between serum chloride level and abdominal artery calcification.

Methods:

We obtained the data of 3,018 individuals from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey database and analyzed the relationship between serum chloride and abdominal artery calcification. We performed stratified and single factor analysis, multiple equation regression analysis, smooth curve fitting, and threshold effect and saturation effect analysis. R and EmpowerStats were used for data analysis.

Results:

Serum chloride is independently related to the AAC total 24 score (AAC-24). The smooth curves fitted were all inverted-U shaped. Below a cutoff value of 92 mmol/L, increase in serum chloride level was associated with increase in AAC-24; however, above that cutoff, increase in serum chloride level was associated with decrease in AAC-24.

Conclusions:

At serum levels below 92 mmol/L, chloride is a risk factor for abdominal aortic calcification but levels above 92 mmol/L appear to protect against abdominal aortic calcification.

Introduction

Aortic calcification is a risk marker for cardiovascular diseases such as coronary artery disease and stroke (14). Factors known to be strongly associated with abdominal aortic calcification (AAC) include old age, chronic kidney disease, sex, diabetes mellitus (5), and osteoporosis (6, 7). Several other factors are also probably involved; their identification is essential for effective prevention of AAC.

Serum chloride level has complex effects in humans. It is associated with several diseases, including hypertension (8), heart failure (9), acute pancreatitis (10), acute kidney injury (10), chronic kidney disease (11), pulmonary arterial hypertension (11), cardiorenal syndrome (12), and neuromyelitis optica (13). Changes in serum chloride level—especially increase in serum level—during hospitalization has been shown to be associated with increased in-hospital mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease and pulmonary arterial hypertension (11, 14). In addition, there are studies showing that lanthanum chloride influences bovine vascular smooth muscle cell calcification bi-directionally (15) and that magnesium chloride can block tissue valve calcification (16). However, the relationship between serum chloride and AAC in humans has not been well-studied. We speculate that serum chloride could be one such factor.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between serum chloride and abdominal aortic calcification using a representative sample of elderly individuals from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) (17).

Materials and Methods

Study Population

The study population was selected from the database of the NHANES—a population-based cross-sectional survey designed to collect information about the health and nutrition of the population of the US. The project surveys a nationally representative sample each year. These populations are located in counties across the country. NHANES interviews collect demographic, socioeconomic, dietary, and health-related information. Physical examinations conducted during the survey include physiological measurements and laboratory examinations (18).

In this study, we retrospectively analyzed the data recorded for the period 2013–2014, which represents one cycle of the NHANES. From among the 10,175 individuals registered in the NHANES database during this period, we eliminated 7,035 because of missing data on AAC Total 24 score (AAC-24) and another 122 because of missing data on serum chloride level. The data of the remaining 3,018 individuals were included in this analysis. Figure 1 is a flowchart for screening participants.

Figure 1

Figure 1

Flowchart of screening participants.

Ethics Statement

This study was approved by the Ethics Review Board of the National Center for Health Statistics. Informed consent was not considered necessary as this was an analysis of a database.

Variables

The exposure variable for this study was serum chloride level (mmol/L). Blood specimens were processed and stored in the mobile examination center laboratory, and shipped to the Johns Hopkins University Lipoprotein Analytical Laboratory for analysis. The outcome variable was AAC-24, which was used to describe the amount of calcification. Several studies have shown that lateral spine images obtained with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for vertebral fracture assessment can detect AAC with reasonably good sensitivity and specificity. The image resolution of lateral spine scans obtained with DXA is close that of a standard radiograph, and radiation exposure is much lower (19, 20). For scoring AAC-24, the anterior and posterior aortic walls were each divided into four segments, corresponding to the areas in front of lumbar vertebrae L1–L4. Within each of the eight segments, aortic calcification was recognized visually as either a diffused white stippling of the anterior and/or posterior aortic walls, or as white linear calcification of the anterior and/or posterior walls. Aortic calcification was scored as “0” if there was no calcification in that segment; “1” if one-third or less of the aortic wall in that segment was calcified; “2” if more than one-third but <two-thirds was calcified; or “3” if more than two-thirds was calcified. The scores were obtained separately for the anterior and posterior aortic wall; thus, the score at each vertebral level ranged from “0” to “6,” and the total score from “0” to “24” (20, 21), see Supplementary Table S1 for details of AAC-24 calculations.

The categorical variables included as covariates in our analysis were sex, race/ethnicity, and education level. The continuous covariates included in our analysis were age, body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, total serum calcium (mmol/L), serum cholesterol (mmol/L), serum albumin (g/L), serum glucose, and refrigerated serum glucose (mmol/L). All data on serum chloride, AAC-24 score, and the covariates are available at http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/.

Statistical Analysis

We performed weighted and variance estimation analyses to account for significant variance in our data set. Weighted multiple logistic regression models were used to assess the association between serum chloride and AAC-24. Weighted chi-square test was used to analyze differences in categorical variables between groups, and a weighted linear regression model was used to analyze differences in continuous variables. Stratified multiple regression was used for subgroup analysis. In addition, smooth curve fitting and generalized additive models were used to address the non-linear relationship between serum chloride and AAC-24. A recursive algorithm was used to calculate the inflection point in the relationship between serum chloride and AAC-24 when non-linearity was detected, with a bi-segmented linear regression model on either side of the inflection point. Data analysis was performed using R 3.6.3 (http://www.r-project.org) and EmpowerStats (www.empowerstats.net, X&Y Solutions Inc., Boston, MA, USA). P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Serum chloride was divided into three tertile groups: low: ≥87 mmol/L to 103 mmol/L; medium: ≥103 mmol/L to <105 mmol/L; and high: ≥105 mmol/L to <119 mmol/L. As Table 1 shows, there were significant differences in baseline characteristics between the three tertile groups. Mean age, systolic blood pressure, serum cholesterol, serum albumin, serum calcium, and serum glucose were all significantly higher in the low tertile group than in the other tertile groups. AAC-24 was lowest in the medium tertile group. Mean BMI was highest in the high tertile group. Race/ethnicity, sex, and diastolic blood pressure were not significantly different between the three tertile groups.

Table 1

Chloride (mmol/L)TotalLowMiddleHighP-value
(≥87 to 103)(≥103 to <105)(≥105 to ≤119)
AAC total 24 score1.473 ± 3.2852.130 ± 3.9311.112 ± 2.8011.339 ± 3.120<0.00001
Chloride (mmol/L)104.044 ± 2.814100.478 ± 2.052103.528 ± 0.499106.387 ± 1.475<0.00001
Age (years)57.425 ± 11.55058.313 ± 11.73056.888 ± 11.20457.273 ± 11.6400.03528
BMI (kg/m2)28.541 ± 5.50428.177 ± 5.28528.116 ± 5.45129.024 ± 5.6190.00007
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)125.193 ± 17.671127.551 ± 18.216123.346 ± 17.565125.024 ± 17.2600.00002
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)71.104 ± 12.33471.835 ± 12.60270.940 ± 11.21670.788 ± 12.8390.17506
Total calcium (mmol/L)2.364 ± 0.0902.385 ± 0.0932.366 ± 0.0772.349 ± 0.093<0.00001
Cholesterol (mmol/L)5.085 ± 1.1075.203 ± 1.1735.142 ± 1.1094.982 ± 1.0580.00001
Albumin (g/L)42.508 ± 3.01543.138 ± 3.35042.809 ± 2.71541.958 ± 2.901<0.00001
Glucose, refrigerated serum (mmol/L)5.913 ± 2.2586.603 ± 3.5705.651 ± 1.5735.695 ± 1.464<0.00001
Gender (%)0.09330
Male48.29251.60647.76946.766
Female51.70848.39452.23153.234
Race/Hispanic origin (%)0.58950
   Mexican American6.9856.5706.7337.383
   Other Hispanic4.5964.3614.2334.965
   Non-Hispanic white71.45272.77373.10269.636
   Non-Hispanic black9.7759.3998.35310.911
   Other races (a)7.1926.8977.5787.106
Education level (%)0.04164
    <9th grade4.9974.8694.9685.088
   9–11th grade (b)10.2299.1149.60011.265
   High school graduate (c)21.78422.15620.38322.486
   Some college or AA degree30.04130.94427.48831.194
   College graduate or above32.9532.91737.56229.969

Baseline characteristics of participants (N = 3,018).

(a) Including Multi-Racial; (b) Includes 12th grade with no diploma; (c) GED or equivalent. BMI, Body mass index. Weighted by: Full sample mobile examination center exam weight. Mean +/- standard deviation for: AAC total 24 score, chloride, age, BMI, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, total calcium, cholesterol, albumin, glucose, refrigerated serum. P value was calculated using weighted linear regression model. % For: gender, race/ethnicity, race/Hispanic origin, education level. P value was calculated using weighted chi-square test.

Table 2 shows the results of univariate analysis. Beta value >0 indicates that the factor is a risk factor for AAC, and beta value <0 indicates that the factor is a protective factor. Compared with the low tertile group of serum chlorine levels, the β value (CI) of the serum chlorine level middle tertile group is −1.017 (−1.333, −0.702), and the β value of the serum chlorine level high tertile group is −0.791 (−1.079, −0.502). P values are <0.001. The beta value, P value, 95% confidence interval and P for trend value of different covariates are shown in Table 2 (gender, age, race/Hispanic origin, education level recoded, BMI, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, total calcium, cholesterol, albumin, glucose, refrigerated serum).

Table 2

Statistics (%)AAC total 24 score (β (95%CI) P-value)
Chloride (mmol/L) tertiles
   ≧87 to 103773 (25.613%)0
   ≧103 to <105851 (28.197%)−1.017 (−1.333, −0.702) <0.00001
   ≧105 to ≦1191,394 (46.190%)−0.791 (−1.079, −0.502) <0.00001
P for trend<0.001
Gender
   Male1,454 (48.178%)0
   Female1,564 (51.822%)0.138 (−0.097, 0.372) 0.25020
P for trend0.250
Age (years) tertiles
   40–50942 (31.213%)0
   51–631,009 (33.433%)0.574 (0.314, 0.835) 0.00002
   64–801,067 (35.355%)2.905 (2.632, 3.179) <0.00001
P for trend<0.001
Race/Hispanic origin
   Mexican American400 (13.254%)0
   Other Hispanic286 (9.476%)0.158 (−0.544, 0.861) 0.65815
   Non-Hispanic white1,339 (44.367%)0.785 (0.322, 1.249) 0.00090
   Non-Hispanic black577 (19.119%)0.191 (−0.388, 0.770) 0.51888
   Other races (a)416 (13.784%)0.498 (−0.123, 1.119) 0.11602
P for trend0.339
Education level recoded
    <9th grade282 (9.344%)0
   9–11th grade (b)407 (13.486%)0.031 (−0.607, 0.668) 0.92446
   High school graduate (c)683 (22.631%)0.080 (−0.499, 0.660) 0.78611
   Some college or AA degree851 (28.197%)−0.206 (−0.770, 0.358) 0.47470
   College graduate or above795 (26.342%)−0.657 (−1.218, −0.096) 0.02174
P for trend<0.001
BMI (kg/m2) tertiles
   14.200–25.700990 (33.044%)0
   25.800–30.2001,007 (33.611%)0.072 (−0.217, 0.360) 0.62669
   30.300–51.200999 (33.344%)−0.469 (−0.757, −0.181) 0.00143
P for trend0.001
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) tertiles
   74–116899 (32.490%)0
   118–130860 (31.081%)0.272 (−0.018, 0.563) 0.06639
   132–2281,008 (36.429%)1.484 (1.193, 1.775) <0. 00001
P for trend<0.001
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) tertiles
   0–64760 (27.467%)0
   66–74981 (35.454%)−0.929 (−1.234, −0.623) <0.00001
   76–1221,026 (37.080%)−1.395 (−1.699, −1.091) <0.00001
P for trend<0.001
Total calcium (mmol/L) tertiles
   1.900–2.300859 (28.643%)0
   2.325–2.3751,009 (33.645%)0.148 (-0.152, 0.448) 0.33342
   2.400–3.0001,131 (37.713%)0.445 (0.151, 0.739) 0.00302
P for trend0.002
Cholesterol (mmol/L) tertiles
   2.069–4.5511,000 (33.156%)0
   4.577–5.456997 (33.057%)−0.571 (−0.860, −0.283) 0.00011
   5.482–16.5251,019 (33.786%)−0.516 (−0.804, −0.229) 0.00043
P for trend<0.001
Albumin (g/L) tertiles
   24.000–40.000800 (26.508%)0
   41.000–43.0001,187 (39.331%)−0.033 (−0.339, 0.274) 0.83492
   44.000–54.0001,031 (34.162%)−0.200 (−0.509, 0.110) 0.20581
P for trend0.174
Glucose, refrigerated serum (mmol/L) tertiles
   2.720–5.050955 (31.643%)0
   5.110–5.7701,048 (34.725%)0.119 (−0.161, 0.399) 0.40529
   5.830–32.0301,015 (33.632%)0.946 (0.655, 1.237) <0.00001
P for trend<0.001

Univariate analysis for AAC total 24 score.

(a) Including Multi-Racial; (b) Includes 12th grade with no diploma; (c) GED or equivalent. Weighted by: Full sample mobile examination center exam weight. AAC, Abdominal Aortic Calcification; CI, confidence interval; BMI, Body mass index.

Table 3 shows the results of stratified analysis between serum chloride and AAC-24. The medium and high serum chloride groups were all negative by using the low serum chloride group as a reference. The absolute value of beta for female in the middle and high serum chloride groups were higher than those for male. The absolute value of beta was highest in the other Hispanic group, followed by the non-Hispanic White group and the Mexican-American group. In the stratification of different education levels, the absolute value of beta was highest in the <9th grade group. In the age stratification, the 64–80-year age-group had the highest absolute value of beta, which was significantly higher than the other age-groups. The absolute value of beta was maximum in the 0–64 mmHg diastolic blood pressure group. The absolute value of beta was maximum in the 1.9–2.3 mmol/L total calcium group. The absolute value of beta was maximum in the 4.577–5.456 mmol/L total cholesterol group. The absolute value of beta was maximum in the 24–40 g/L serum albumin group. The absolute value of beta was maximum in the 5.11–5.77 mmol/L refrigerated serum glucose group.

Table 3

Y = AAC total 24 scoreSerum chloride tertiles
X = Chloride (mmol/L)LowMiddleHigh
β (95%CI) P valueβ (95%CI) P value
Gender
   MaleReference−0.990 (−1.412, −0.569) <0.0001−0.691 (−1.077, −0.305) 0.0005
   FemaleReference−1.063 (−1.531, −0.595) <0.0001−0.904 (−1.333, −0.476) <0.0001
Race/Hispanic origin
   Mexican AmericanReference−0.681 (−1.272, −0.090) 0.0244−0.656 (−1.189, −0.123) 0.0163
   Other HispanicReference−1.482 (−2.274, −0.690) 0.0003−1.633 (−2.337, −0.930) <0.0001
   Non-Hispanic whiteReference−1.129 (−1.628, −0.630) <0.0001−0.850 (−1.311, −0.388) 0.0003
   Non-Hispanic blackReference−0.133 (−0.760, 0.494) 0.6777−0.274 (−0.818, 0.269) 0.3231
   Other races (a)Reference−1.041 (−1.804, −0.279) 0.0077−0.175 (−0.884, 0.534) 0.6289
Education level
    <9th gradeReference−1.391 (−2.519, −0.263) 0.0163−1.748 (−2.777, −0.718) 0.0010
   9–11th grade (b)Reference−1.135 (−2.096, −0.174) 0.0211−0.622 (−1.481, 0.236) 0.1562
   High school graduate (c)Reference−0.976 (−1.717, −0.235) 0.0101−1.079 (−1.742, −0.416) 0.0015
   Some college or AA degreeReference−1.161 (−1.779, −0.544) 0.0002−0.939 (−1.488, −0.390) 0.0008
   College graduate or aboveReference−0.747 (−1.251, −0.243) 0.0038−0.414 (−0.897, 0.069) 0.0934
BMI (kg/m2) tertiles
   14.200–25.700Reference−1.581 (−2.121, −1.041) <0.0001−0.760 (−1.282, −0.239) 0.0044
   25.800–30.200Reference−0.825 (−1.403, −0.247) 0.0053−0.419 (−0.945, 0.106) 0.1180
   30.300–51.200Reference−0.545 (−1.059, −0.031) 0.0380−1.016 (−1.467, −0.566) <0.0001
Age (years) tertiles
   40–50Reference−0.238 (−0.440, −0.036) 0.0211−0.121 (−0.307, 0.066) 0.2042
   51–63Reference−0.676 (−1.033, −0.320) 0.0002−0.658 (−0.987, −0.328) <0.0001
   64–80Reference−1.836 (−2.619, −1.052) <0.0001−1.378 (−2.080, −0.677) 0.0001
Systolic blood pressure (mmHg) tertiles
   74–116Reference−0.794 (−1.220, −0.367) 0.0003−0.480 (−0.883, −0.076) 0.0200
   118–130Reference−0.928 (−1.451, −0.404) 0.0005−0.923 (−1.403, −0.442) 0.0002
   132–228Reference−0.747 (−1.438, −0.057) 0.0342−0.863 (−1.456, −0.270) 0.0045
Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg) tertiles
   0–64.000Reference−2.141 (−2.958, −1.323) <0.0001−1.925 (−2.662, −1.188) <0.0001
   66.000–74.000Reference−0.943 (−1.481, −0.404) 0.0006−0.540 (−1.036, −0.043) 0.0333
   76.000–122.000Reference−0.339 (−0.698, 0.021) 0.0655−0.508 (−0.836, −0.180) 0.0025
Total calcium (mmol/L) tertiles
   1.900–2.300Reference−1.227 (−1.827, −0.627) <0.0001−1.013 (−1.533, −0.492) 0.0001
   2.325–2.375Reference−0.822 (−1.348, −0.296) 0.0023−0.618 (−1.107, −0.128) 0.0136
   2.400–3.000Reference−1.039 (−1.566, −0.512) 0.0001−0.676 (−1.187, −0.165) 0.0097
Cholesterol (mmol/L) tertiles
   2.069–4.551Reference−1.009 (−1.688, −0.330) 0.0037−0.715 (−1.314, −0.117) 0.0193
   4.577–5.456Reference−1.320 (−1.788, −0.851) <0.0001−1.264 (−1.699, −0.829) <0.0001
   5.482–16.525Reference−0.758 (−1.242, −0.273) 0.0022−0.506 (−0.961, −0.051) 0.0296
Albumin (g/L) tertiles
   24.000–40.000Reference−1.671 (−2.339, −1.003) <0.0001−1.300 (−1.872, −0.728) <0.0001
   41.000–43.000Reference−1.305 (−1.870, −0.740) <0.0001−1.045 (−1.564, −0.526) <0.0001
   44.000–54.000Reference−0.569 (−1.028, −0.111) 0.0151−0.488 (−0.937, −0.040) 0.0332
Glucose, refrigerated serum (mmol/L) tertiles
   2.720–5.050Reference−0.979 (−1.461, −0.497) <0.0001−0.325 (−0.773, 0.123) 0.1557
   5.110–5.770Reference−0.998 (−1.487, −0.510) <0.0001−1.157 (−1.604, −0.711) <0.0001
   5.830–32.030Reference−0.897 (−1.545, −0.250) 0.0067−0.661 (−1.247, −0.075) 0.0274

Stratified analysis between Chloride (mmol/L) and AAC total 24 score.

(a) Including Multi-Racial; (b) Includes 12th grade with no diploma; (c) GED or equivalent. BMI, Body mass index. Weighted by: Full sample mobile examination center exam weight.

Table 4 shows the results of the multiple regression equation analysis. The outcome variable was AAC-24, and the exposure variable was serum chloride. Weighted by: Full sample mobile examination center examination. The crude model was unadjusted; model I adjusted for age, sex, and race/Hispanic origin; model II adjusted for age, sex, race/Hispanic origin, education level, BMI, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, total calcium, cholesterol, albumin, and refrigerated serum glucose; and model III adjusted for age (smooth), sex, race/Hispanic origin, education level, BMI (smooth), systolic blood pressure (smooth), diastolic blood pressure (smooth), total calcium (smooth), cholesterol (smooth), albumin (smooth), and refrigerated serum glucose (smooth). The beta value for model III was −0.110. We stratified by chloride tertiles and, additionally, by the following covariates: sex, age, race/Hispanic origin, education level, BMI, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, total calcium, cholesterol, albumin, and adjusted serum glucose (Table 4).

Table 4

OutcomeCrude modelModel IModel IIModel III
β(95%CI) P-valueβ(95%CI) P-valueβ(95%CI) P-valueβ(95%CI) P-value
Total−0.170 (−0.250, −0.091) 0.00003−0.126 (−0.199, −0.053) 0.00074−0.099 (−0.175, −0.023) 0.01116−0.110 (-0.185,−0.036) 0.00383
Chloride (mmol/L) tertiles
   ≧87 to 103−0.219 (−0.353, −0.085) 0.00146−0.092 (−0.213, 0.030) 0.13823−0.076 (−0.206, 0.054) 0.25306−0.096 (-0.225, 0.033) 0.14598
   ≧103 to <1050.037 (−0.341, 0.414) 0.84873−0.090 (−0.443, 0.262) 0.61545−0.076 (−0.456, 0.305) 0.697400.006 (-0.352, 0.363) 0.97578
   ≧105 to ≦119−0.133 (−0.244, −0.022) 0.01895−0.130 (−0.232, −0.028) 0.01251−0.117 (−0.221, −0.012) 0.02872−0.115 (-0.217,−0.013) 0.02676
Gender
   Male−0.108 (−0.167, −0.050) 0.00026−0.131 (−0.184, −0.077) <0.00001−0.110 (−0.169, −0.052) 0.00024−0.130 (-0.188,−0.073) 0.00001
   Female−0.153 (−0.211, −0.094) <0.00001−0.084 (−0.138, −0.030) 0.00235−0.084 (−0.142, −0.026) 0.00434−0.074 (-0.130,−0.017) 0.01062
Age (years) tertiles
   40–50−0.028 (−0.056, 0.001) 0.05629−0.029 (−0.058, −0.001) 0.04592−0.029 (−0.061, 0.003) 0.07154−0.036 (-0.069,−0.004) 0.02966
   51–63−0.116 (−0.164, −0.068) <0.00001−0.117 (−0.165, −0.069) <0.00001−0.107 (−0.160, −0.054) 0.00009−0.113 (-0.166,−0.060) 0.00003
   64–80−0.189 (−0.283, −0.096) 0.00007−0.185 (−0.279, −0.091) 0.00012−0.162 (−0.259, −0.064) 0.00117−0.173 (-0.270,−0.076) 0.00049
Race/Hispanic origin
   Mexican American−0.100 (−0.175, −0.025) 0.00904−0.088 (−0.162, −0.015) 0.01854−0.117 (−0.200, −0.034) 0.00585−0.114 (-0.196,−0.031) 0.00716
   Other Hispanic−0.236 (−0.336, −0.136) <0.00001−0.226 (−0.323, −0.128) <0.00001−0.213 (−0.325, −0.101) 0.00025−0.203 (-0.309,−0.097) 0.00022
   Non-Hispanic white−0.143 (−0.209, −0.076) 0.00003−0.122 (−0.182, −0.062) 0.00007−0.106 (−0.169, −0.042) 0.00117−0.108 (-0.170,−0.045) 0.00082
   Non-Hispanic black−0.062 (−0.137, 0.012) 0.10317−0.041 (−0.112, 0.031) 0.26509−0.087 (−0.167, −0.007) 0.03282−0.070 (-0.150, 0.010) 0.08795
   Other races (a)−0.030 (−0.141, 0.081) 0.597440.001 (−0.101, 0.103) 0.982740.066 (−0.047, 0.179) 0.254660.068 (-0.040, 0.176) 0.21821
Education level
    <9th grade−0.172 (−0.310, −0.035) 0.01426−0.179 (−0.302, −0.057) 0.00434−0.140 (−0.288, 0.008) 0.06434−0.128 (-0.267, 0.012) 0.07474
   9–11th grade (b)−0.069 (−0.184, 0.046) 0.240180.007 (−0.099, 0.113) 0.897630.043 (−0.073, 0.158) 0.468010.003 (-0.111, 0.116) 0.96447
   High school graduate (c)−0.217 (−0.315, −0.119) 0.00002−0.197 (−0.287, −0.108) 0.00002−0.231 (−0.326, −0.136) <0.00001−0.237 (-0.330,−0.143) <0.00001
   Some college or AA degree−0.155 (−0.230, −0.081) 0.00005−0.121 (−0.191, −0.052) 0.00067−0.097 (−0.172, −0.022) 0.01140−0.101 (-0.175,−0.027) 0.00768
   College graduate or above−0.066 (−0.141, 0.008) 0.08267−0.067 (−0.135, 0.000) 0.05176−0.058 (−0.132, 0.015) 0.12143−0.072 (-0.140,−0.004) 0.03872
BMI (kg/m2) tertiles
   14.200–25.700−0.157 (−0.234, −0.081) 0.00006−0.133 (−0.202, −0.064) 0.00016−0.148 (−0.218, −0.078) 0.00004−0.138 (-0.205,−0.070) 0.00007
   25.800–30.200−0.095 (−0.171, −0.020) 0.01370−0.081 (−0.150, −0.011) 0.02268−0.084 (−0.161, −0.007) 0.03195−0.099 (-0.175,−0.022) 0.01212
   30.300–51.200−0.129 (−0.193, −0.066) 0.00007−0.106 (−0.166, −0.046) 0.00052−0.086 (−0.152, −0.020) 0.01088−0.093 (-0.157,−0.029) 0.00444
Systolic blood pressure (mm Hg) tertiles
   74–116−0.081 (−0.145, −0.018) 0.01223−0.062 (−0.120, −0.003) 0.04020−0.054 (−0.116, 0.009) 0.09191−0.057 (-0.119, 0.005) 0.07207
   118–130−0.156 (−0.224, −0.088) <0.00001−0.156 (−0.221, −0.092) <0.00001−0.117 (−0.184, −0.050) 0.00064−0.087 (-0.153,−0.022) 0.00892
   132–228−0.130 (−0.210, −0.050) 0.00147−0.117 (−0.191, −0.043) 0.00191−0.114 (−0.191, −0.037) 0.00402−0.129 (-0.206,−0.051) 0.00112
Diastolic blood pressure (mm Hg) tertiles
   0–64.000−0.315 (−0.419, −0.211) <0.00001−0.250 (−0.344, −0.155) <0.00001−0.231 (−0.331, −0.132) <0.00001−0.243 (-0.340,−0.146) <0.00001
   66.000–74.000−0.075 (−0.147, −0.003) 0.04212−0.062 (−0.129, 0.005) 0.06895−0.047 (−0.115, 0.021) 0.17673−0.040 (-0.108, 0.027) 0.24469
   76.000–122.000−0.076 (−0.124, −0.029) 0.00172−0.071 (−0.116, −0.026) 0.00208−0.052 (−0.102, −0.003) 0.03807−0.053 (-0.102,−0.005) 0.03246
Total calcium (mmol/L) tertiles
   1.900–2.300−0.123 (−0.197, −0.048) 0.00132−0.106 (−0.174, −0.038) 0.00235−0.069 (−0.141, 0.003) 0.05961−0.082 (-0.152,−0.013) 0.02061
   2.325–2.375−0.100 (−0.169, −0.031) 0.00476−0.091 (−0.155, −0.027) 0.00575−0.099 (−0.167, −0.031) 0.00460−0.088 (−0.156, −0.021) 0.01034
   2.400–3.000−0.154 (−0.228, −0.080) 0.00004−0.121 (−0.188, −0.055) 0.00038−0.111 (−0.184, −0.039) 0.00261−0.137 (-0.208,−0.066) 0.00017
Cholesterol (mmol/L) tertiles
   2.069–4.551−0.095 (−0.176, −0.014) 0.02161−0.052 (−0.125, 0.021) 0.16539−0.035 (−0.114, 0.043) 0.38012−0.036 (-0.113, 0.041) 0.36427
   4.577–5.456−0.198 (−0.262, −0.135) <0.00001−0.173 (−0.231, −0.114) <0.00001−0.168 (−0.229, −0.107) <0.00001−0.163 (-0.223,−0.103) <0.00001
   5.482–16.525−0.121 (−0.189, −0.053) 0.00053−0.104 (−0.168, −0.040) 0.00145−0.101 (−0.171, −0.031) 0.00485−0.106 (-0.174,−0.037) 0.00261
Albumin (g/L) tertiles
   24.000–40.000−0.143 (−0.221, −0.065) 0.00033−0.112 (−0.184, −0.041) 0.00219−0.126 (−0.205, −0.047) 0.00175−0.119 (-0.197,−0.040) 0.00306
   41.000–43.000−0.140 (−0.212, −0.067) 0.00016−0.101 (−0.167, −0.034) 0.00299−0.058 (−0.128, 0.012) 0.10603−0.056 (-0.125, 0.012) 0.10476
   44.000–54.000−0.143 (−0.210, −0.075) 0.00004−0.112 (−0.174, −0.049) 0.00046−0.118 (−0.185, −0.052) 0.00052−0.128 (-0.194,−0.061) 0.00017
Glucose, refrigerated serum (mmol/L) tertiles
   2.720–5.050−0.092 (−0.158, −0.026) 0.00627−0.082 (−0.143, −0.021) 0.00814−0.100 (−0.162, −0.039) 0.00150−0.083 (-0.142,−0.025) 0.00549
   5.110–5.770−0.160 (−0.224, −0.097) <0.00001−0.133 (−0.192, −0.074) 0.00001−0.130 (−0.193, −0.067) 0.00006−0.134 (-0.198,−0.070) 0.00005
   5.830–32.030−0.108 (−0.190, −0.025) 0.01038−0.095 (−0.170, −0.020) 0.01305−0.107 (−0.186, −0.028) 0.00819−0.103 (-0.183,−0.023) 0.01171

Relationship between serum chloride and abdominal aortic calcification (multiple regression equation analysis).

(a) Including Multi-Racial; (b) Includes 12th grade with no diploma; (c) GED or equivalent. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; ACC, abdominal aortic calcification; BMI, Body mass index. Weighted by: Full sample mobile examination center exam weight. Outcome variable: AAC total 24 score. Exposure variable: serum chloride. The crude model is not adjusted. Model I adjusted for age, gender, and race/Hispanic origin. Model II adjusted for age, gender, race/Hispanic origin, education level, BMI, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, total calcium, cholesterol, albumin and refrigerated serum glucose. Model III adjusted for age (smooth), gender, race/Hispanic origin, education level, BMI (smooth), systolic blood pressure (smooth), diastolic blood pressure (smooth), total calcium (smooth), cholesterol (smooth), albumin (smooth) and refrigerated serum glucose (smooth).

Figure 2 shows the smooth fitting curves of serum chloride and AAC-24. The curve increases first and then decreases gradually, with inflection point being at serum chloride level of 92 mmol/L. We also analyzed the threshold effect and saturation effect using serum chloride of 92 mmol/L as the fold point (Table 5). Weighted by: Full sample mobile examination center exam weight. Outcome variable: AAC-24. Exposure variable: serum chloride (mmol/L). Table 5 shows the adjustment covariates 5. Model I showed a straight-line effect, with a beta value of −0.099 and P < 0.0001. Model II: serum chloride equal to 92 mmol/L was used as the fold point, and the results were statistically significant. Log likelihood ratio tests 0.003. The curve rose after 113 mmol/L. We performed the threshold effect and saturation effect analysis with 113, 114, and 115 mmol/L as folding points; the results are presented in Supplementary Tables S2S4, respectively. However, the P values after folding point were all >0.05. Figures 3, 4 show the smoothed fitted curves of serum chloride and AAC-24, stratified by different covariates. The curves differed across different strata of individual covariates.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Association between serum chloride and abdominal aortic calcification. The red line represents the smooth curve fit between the variables. The blue bar represents the 95% confidence interval of the fit. Weighted by: full sample mobile examination center examination weight. Adjusted for age (smooth), sex, race/Hispanic origin, education level, BMI (smooth), systolic blood pressure (smooth), diastolic blood pressure (smooth), total calcium (smooth), cholesterol (smooth), albumin (smooth), and refrigerated serum glucose (smooth). (A) Scatter plot of curve fit. (B) Solid line plot of curve fit.

Table 5

OutcomeAAC total 24 score
β (95%CI) P-value
Model I
A straight-line effect−0.099 (−0.139, −0.059) <0.0001
Model II
Fold points (K)92
   < K-segment effect 11.292 (0.430, 2.154) 0.0033
   >K-segment effect 2−0.114 (−0.155, −0.073) <0.0001
   Effect size difference of 2 vs. 1−1.406 (−2.276, −0.536) 0.0015
Equation predicted values at break points3.257 (2.710, 3.803)
Log likelihood ratio tests0.003

Analysis of threshold effect and saturation effect with 92 mmol/L as cutoff serum chloride value point.

CI, confidence interval; ACC, abdominal aortic calcification. Weighted by: Full sample mobile examination center exam weight. Outcome variable: AAC total 24 score. Exposure variable: serum chloride (mmol/L). Adjusted for age (smooth), gender, race/Hispanic origin, education level, BMI (smooth), systolic blood pressure (smooth), diastolic blood pressure (smooth), total calcium (smooth), cholesterol (smooth), albumin (smooth) and refrigerated serum glucose (smooth).

Figure 3

Figure 3

Association between serum chloride and abdominal aortic calcification, stratified by covariates (sex, age, race/Hispanic origin, education level, BMI, systolic blood pressure). Weighted by: full sample mobile examination center examination weight. Adjusted for age (smooth), sex, race/Hispanic origin, education level, BMI (smooth), systolic blood pressure (smooth), diastolic blood pressure (smooth), total calcium (smooth), cholesterol (smooth), albumin (smooth), and refrigerated serum glucose (smooth). (A) Stratified by sex. (B) Stratified by age tertiles. (C) Stratified race/Hispanic origin. (D) Stratified by education level. (E) Stratified by BMI tertiles. (F) Stratified by systolic blood pressure tertiles.

Figure 4

Figure 4

Association between serum chloride and abdominal aortic calcification, stratified by covariates (diastolic blood pressure, total calcium, cholesterol, albumin, refrigerated serum glucose). Weighted by: full sample mobile examination center exam weight. Adjusted for age (smooth), sex, race/Hispanic origin, education level, BMI (smooth), systolic blood pressure (smooth), diastolic blood pressure (smooth), total calcium (smooth), cholesterol (smooth), albumin (smooth), and refrigerated serum glucose (smooth). (A) Stratified by diastolic blood pressure tertiles. (B) Stratified by total calcium tertiles. (C) Stratified cholesterol tertiles. (D) Stratified by albumin tertiles. (E) Stratified by refrigerated serum glucose tertiles. (F) Stratified by refrigerated serum glucose (dichotomous).

Discussion

The relationship between serum chloride and aortic calcification has not received enough attention. Some studies have found that the Wnt/β-Catenin pathway is involved in arterial calcification via regulation of the osteoprotegerin)/receptor activator of NF-κ B ligand system. The Wnt/β-Catenin pathway is activated or inhibited by lithium chloride in vitro and in vivo (22), implying that chloride may be associated with arterial calcification. Chloride is the cause of arterial calcification. Elastin, a structural protein present in abundance in the arterial wall, is prone to calcification in many diseases; meanwhile, aluminum chloride–pretreated elastin has been shown to be completely resistant to calcification (23, 24). However, none of these earlier studies have directly shown that chloride is associated with arterial calcification; moreover, some of the studies were in animal aortas (23, 24). In this study, we therefore aimed to investigate the association between serum chloride and AAC. We found that serum chloride is independently related to the AAC-24. For serum chloride levels lower than 92 mmol/L, the AAC-24 increased as serum chloride increased, indicating increased risk for calcification; however, for serum chloride levels >92 mmol/L, the AAC-24 decreased as serum chloride increased, indicating a protective effect.

Our large sample size allowed subgroup analysis. When refrigerated serum glucose was 5.38–32.03 mmol/L, the smooth fitting curve between serum chloride and AAC-24 was inverted-U shaped, which is similar to the overall fitting curve between serum chloride and AAC-24, but the inflection point was >92 mmol/L. In the low serum glucose group (2.72–5.33 mmol/L), there was a downward fitting curve. In the low age triad (40–50 years), the smooth fitting curve between serum chloride and AAC-24 score was flat. The smooth fitting curves of low systolic blood pressure (74–116 mmHg) and high systolic blood pressure (76–122 mmHg) were flat.

Since we used a nationally representative sample, our findings are generalizable to the whole US population. Our results suggest that serum chloride levels in adults should be maintained at an appropriate level, and that control of serum chloride level could be a new method for the prevention and control of peripheral artery calcification. Appropriate and individualized measures for prevention for AAC may have to be developed for different ethnic populations, sexes, and age-groups.

It is important to recognize the limitations of our research. First, because of the cross-sectional design of our study, a causal relationship between adult serum chloride level and AAC-24 cannot be inferred. Second, confounding factors not analyzed in this study may affect the results. Third, no attempt has been made to clarify the mechanism by which serum chloride affects abdominal aortic calcification. Fourth, it would be more convincing if the range of the lowest and highest values of serum chloride among the participants examined were larger.

Conclusions

Below a cutoff value of 92 mmol/L, serum chloride appears to be a risk factor for development of abdominal aortic calcification, but serum levels >92 mmol/L may protect against abdominal aortic calcification. Thus, detection of serum chlorine detection could be a simple and accurate method for screening individuals for risk of abdominal aorta calcification and cardiovascular disease.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81860379 and 82160410) and the Science and Technology Planning Project at the Department of Science and Technology of Jiangxi Province, China (20171BAB 205075).

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Statements

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary Material.

Ethics statement

This study was approved by the Ethics Review Board of the National Center for Health Statistics. Informed consent was not considered necessary as this was an analysis of a database.

Author contributions

SH, JP, and YW contributed to data collection, analysis, and writing of the manuscript. SH, TL, WZ, JY, DZ, YZ, SW, QG, LS, DY, JP, YW, and JX contributed to study design and writing of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgments

We hereby thank the participants for their time and energy in the data collection phase of NHANES project.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2021.800458/full#supplementary-material

    Abbreviations

  • AAC-24

    AAC total 24 score

  • ACC

    abdominal aortic calcification

  • BMI

    body mass index

  • DXA

    dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry

  • NHANES

    National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

References

  • 1.

    ImaokaYOhiraMNakanoRShimizuSKurodaSTaharaHet al. Impact of abdominal aortic calcification among liver transplantation recipients. Liver Transpl. (2019) 25:7987. 10.1002/lt.25311

  • 2.

    HollanderMHakAEKoudstaalPJBotsMLGrobbeeDEHofmanAet al. Comparison between measures of atherosclerosis and risk of stroke: the Rotterdam Study. Stroke. (2003) 34:236772. 10.1161/01.STR.0000091393.32060.0E

  • 3.

    WilsonPWKauppilaLIO'DonnellCJKielDPHannanMPolakJMet al. Abdominal aortic calcific deposits are an important predictor of vascular morbidity and mortality. Circulation. (2001) 103:152934. 10.1161/01.CIR.103.11.1529

  • 4.

    van der MeerIMBotsMLHofmanA. del Sol AI, van der Kuip DA, Witteman JC. Predictive value of noninvasive measures of atherosclerosis for incident myocardial infarction: the Rotterdam Study. Circulation. (2004) 109:108994. 10.1161/01.CIR.0000120708.59903.1B

  • 5.

    JayalathRWManganSHGolledgeJ. Aortic calcification. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. (2005) 30:47688. 10.1016/j.ejvs.2005.04.030

  • 6.

    GolledgeJ. Abdominal aortic calcification: clinical significance, mechanisms and therapies. Curr Pharm Des. (2014) 20:58348. 10.2174/1381612820666140212195309

  • 7.

    RodríguezAJLeowKSzulcPScottDEbelingPSimMet al. Abdominal aortic calcification, bone mineral density and fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. BMJ Open. (2019) 9:e026232. 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026232

  • 8.

    KawadaT. Effect of serum chloride on mortality in hypertensive patients. Hypertension. (2014) 63:e14. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.02877

  • 9.

    GrodinJLSimonJHachamovitchRWuYJacksonGHalkarMet al. Prognostic role of serum chloride levels in acute decompensated heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2015) 66:65966. 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.06.007

  • 10.

    MaoWWuJZhangHZhouJYeBLiGet al. Increase in serum chloride and chloride exposure are associated with acute kidney injury in moderately severe and severe acute pancreatitis patients. Pancreatology. (2019) 19:13642. 10.1016/j.pan.2018.11.006

  • 11.

    KhatriMZitovskyJLeeDNayyarKFazzariMGrantC. The association between serum chloride levels and chronic kidney disease progression: a cohort study. BMC Nephrol. (2020) 21:165. 10.1186/s12882-020-01828-3

  • 12.

    KazoryACostanzoMR. The dynamic relationship between serum chloride and cardiorenal syndrome. Rev Cardiovasc Med. (2020) 21:259. 10.31083/j.rcm.2020.01.6

  • 13.

    AkaishiTTakahashiTHimoriNTakeshitaTNakazawaTAokiMet al. Chloride imbalance is involved in the pathogenesis of optic neuritis in neuromyelitis optica. J Neuroimmunol. (2018) 320:98100. 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2018.03.010

  • 14.

    ThongprayoonCCheungpasitpornWHansrivijitPThirunavukkarasuSChewcharatAMedauraJet al. Association of serum chloride level alterations with in-hospital mortality. Postgrad Med J. (2020) 96:7316. 10.1136/postgradmedj-2019-137270

  • 15.

    ZhaoWHGouBDZhangTLWangK. Lanthanum chloride bidirectionally influences calcification in bovine vascular smooth muscle cells. J Cell Biochem. (2012) 113:177686. 10.1002/jcb.24049

  • 16.

    MyersDJ. The effect of potassium phosphate, magnesium chloride and T6 as blocking agents on tissue valve calcification. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). (1990) 31:130.

  • 17.

    AhluwaliaNDwyerJTerryAMoshfeghAJohnsonC. Update on NHANES dietary data: focus on collection, release, analytical considerations, and uses to inform public policy. Adv Nutr. (2016) 7:12134. 10.3945/an.115.009258

  • 18.

    CurtinLRMohadjerLKDohrmannSMMontaquilaJMKruszan-MoranDMirelLBet al. The national health and nutrition examination survey: sample design, 1999–2006. Vital Health Stat 2. (2012) 139.

  • 19.

    SchousboeJTWilsonKEKielDP. Detection of abdominal aortic calcification with lateral spine imaging using DXA. J Clin Densitom. (2006) 9:3028. 10.1016/j.jocd.2006.05.007

  • 20.

    SchousboeJTLewisJRKielDP. Abdominal aortic calcification on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry: methods of assessment and clinical significance. Bone. (2017) 104:91100. 10.1016/j.bone.2017.01.025

  • 21.

    KauppilaLIMcAlindonTEvansSWilsonPWKielDFelsonDT. Disc degeneration/back pain and calcification of the abdominal aorta. A 25-year follow-up study in Framingham. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). (1997) 22:16427. discussion 8–9. 10.1097/00007632-199707150-00023

  • 22.

    NieBZhangSYGuanSMZhouSQFangX. Role of Wnt/β-catenin pathway in the arterial medial calcification and its effect on the OPG/RANKL system. Curr Med Sci. (2019) 39:2836. 10.1007/s11596-019-1996-4

  • 23.

    VyavahareNOgleMSchoenFJLevyRJ. Elastin calcification and its prevention with aluminum chloride pretreatment. Am J Pathol. (1999) 155:97382. 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)65197-8

  • 24.

    VyavahareNRHirschDLernerEBaskinJZZandRSchoenFJet al. Prevention of calcification of glutaraldehyde-crosslinked porcine aortic cusps by ethanol preincubation: mechanistic studies of protein structure and water-biomaterial relationships. J Biomed Mater Res. (1998) 40:57785. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(19980615)40:4<577::AID-JBM9>3.0.CO;2-C

Summary

Keywords

serum chloride, abdominal aortic calcification, association, multiple equation regression analysis, smooth curve fitting

Citation

Hu S, Lan T, Wang S, Su L, Zou S, Ye J, Zhang Y, Zhang D, Guo Q, Zhang W, Yu D, Xu J, Wei Y and Peng J (2022) Serum Chloride Level Is Associated With Abdominal Aortic Calcification. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 8:800458. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.800458

Received

23 October 2021

Accepted

16 December 2021

Published

18 January 2022

Volume

8 - 2021

Edited by

Chien-Te Lee, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan

Reviewed by

Zhexue Qin, Xinqiao Hospital, China; Francesca Bartoli-Leonard, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, United States

Updates

Copyright

*Correspondence: Yiping Wei Jinhua Peng

†These authors have contributed equally to this work

This article was submitted to Cardiovascular Epidemiology and Prevention, a section of the journal Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine

Disclaimer

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Outline

Figures

Cite article

Copy to clipboard


Export citation file


Share article

Article metrics