There was an error in Table 1 and its caption as published. The author mistakenly identified Table 2 as Table 1 which resulted in both table contents being similar. The corrected Table 1 and its caption appear below.
Table 1
| Hospital day(s) | Timepoints | Significant clinical events |
|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | 10:00 | The patient was treated at a local hospital because of symptoms of chest tightness and dizziness; |
| 15:00 | The patient suddenly syncope and then had an in-hospital cardiac arrest, bedside CPR was immediately initiated; | |
| 15:40 | The patient temporarily recovered ROSC; | |
| 15:50 | The patient had cardiac arrest again, and bedside CPR was initiated immediately | |
| 15:55 | The patient recovered ROSC and relied on high-dose vasopressors to maintain vital signs; | |
| 19:00 | The ECMO team arrived at the local hospital and assessed the indications for ECMO; | |
| 19:25 | ECMO operation at 3,200r/min, Flow 3.5l/min, gas flow rate 4/min | |
| 21:00 | CTPA revealing multiple emboli in the main trunk of the right pulmonary artery and its branches | |
| Day 3 | 10:00 | CTPA showed partial resolution of the emboli in the right pulmonary artery and its branches |
| Day 13 | 10:00 | CTPA demonstrated significant resolution of the emboli in the main trunk of the right pulmonary artery with good contrast filling |
Hospitalization timeline of the patient and the significant clinical events in Case 1.
The original version of this article has been updated.
Statements
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Summary
Keywords
pulmonary embolism-diagnosis, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), thrombolysis, cardiac arrest (CA), disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC)
Citation
Qiu F, Song B, Chen L and Hong J (2025) Correction: Case report: Does extracorporeal membrane oxygenation treatment for acute pulmonary embolism-induced respiratory and cardiac arrest still require thrombolysis?. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 12:1634497. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1634497
Received
24 May 2025
Accepted
05 June 2025
Published
20 June 2025
Approved by
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland
Volume
12 - 2025
Updates
Copyright
© 2025 Qiu, Song, Chen and Hong.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Fangfang Qiu zysyicu1991@zju.edu.cn
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.