Adult growth hormone deficiency – benefits, side effects, and risks of growth hormone replacement
- 1Geriatrics and Extended Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Madigan Health Care System, Tacoma, WA, USA
- 2Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology, and Nutrition, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, University of Washington School of Medicine, Tacoma, WA, USA
- 3Division of Endocrinology, Diabetes, and Metabolism, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
Deficiency of growth hormone (GH) in adults results in a syndrome characterized by decreased muscle mass and exercise capacity, increased visceral fat, impaired quality of life, unfavorable alterations in lipid profile and markers of cardiovascular risk, decrease in bone mass and integrity, and increased mortality. When dosed appropriately, GH replacement therapy (GHRT) is well tolerated, with a low incidence of side effects, and improves most of the alterations observed in GH deficiency (GHD); beneficial effects on mortality, cardiovascular events, and fracture rates, however, remain to be conclusively demonstrated. The potential of GH to act as a mitogen has resulted in concern over the possibility of increased de novo tumors or recurrence of pre-existing malignancies in individuals treated with GH. Though studies of adults who received GHRT in childhood have produced conflicting reports in this regard, long-term surveillance of adult GHRT has not demonstrated increased cancer risk or mortality.
Adult growth hormone deficiency (AGHD) results in a clinical syndrome characterized by alterations in body composition, diminished aerobic exercise capacity and quality of life (QoL), and adverse changes in lipid and carbohydrate metabolism and cardiovascular function (Hazem et al., 2012). A growing body of evidence shows increased mortality in untreated AGHD patients (Rosén and Bengtsson, 1990). Treatment of AGHD patients with growth hormone replacement therapy (GHRT) normalizes many of these signs and symptoms, improves QoL, and may possibly enhance longevity (Rosén and Bengtsson, 1990; Hazem et al., 2012). Although a theoretical increased risk of developing new or recurrent neoplasms has been suggested in some studies evaluating adults who had been treated for GHD as children, this increase has not been found in most studies of treatment in patients with adult-onset GHD (Svensson and Bengtsson, 2009).
Identifying GHD in adults can be difficult due to similarities with normal senescence. Due to the lack of specific biomarkers for GHD, provocative biochemical testing is necessary to diagnose AGHD with adequate accuracy, but currently available tests are complex and may have significant side effects. A novel approach to diagnosis of AGHD has been the use of ghrelin mimetic GH secretagogues. These tests may offer a safe and reliable alternative to the insulin tolerance test (ITT) or the glucagon stimulation test (GST) for diagnosing AGHD.
Safety with long-term use and the cost effectiveness of GHRT have not been clearly determined in past studies. In addition, a growing incidence of acquired GHD related to traumatic brain injury (TBI) presents a new sub-population of GHD patients and consequently potentially increased numbers seeking treatment.
This review summarizes current understanding of the benefits and possible risks of GHRT, as well as recommendations for testing for GHD in adults, appropriate dosing, and monitoring for efficacy and cost effectiveness of GHRT.
Many of the clinical features of AGHD resemble aspects of normal aging. AGHD is a clinical syndrome associated with alterations in body composition with reduced bone and muscle mass, diminished exercise performance and cardiac capacity, and altered lipid metabolism with increase in adiposity (Kargi and Merriam, 2011). AGHD has also been associated with impaired cognition as well as having psychological impact (Deijen et al., 2011). All these features result in decreased QoL. The syndrome of AGHD may contribute to the increase in morbidity and mortality among patients with hypopituitarism.
Three nationwide registries in Denmark using uniform standardized criteria to diagnose adult-onset GHD estimated 19 cases per million for males and 14.2 cases per million for females, with an increasing incidence in age with males but not with females. Those individuals age 45 and older demonstrated the gender disparity not seen in younger patient populations. AGHD has been estimated to affect 1 per 100,000 people annually, while its incidence rate is approximately 2 per 100,000 when child-onset GHD individuals transition to adulthood (Stochholm et al., 2006).
Prevalence and Etiology
Approximately 6,000 new cases of adults with GHD are diagnosed each year in the US. Some, 15–20% of those cases represent the continuation of child-onset GHD into maturity; the remainder have adult-onset GHD resulting from damage to the hypothalamic-pituitary axis (Gharib et al., 1998). Such damage most commonly arises from pituitary or peri-pituitary tumors, or by their treatment. Pituitary adenomas and their treatment account for nearly two-thirds of AGHD cases (Bates et al., 1996).
In addition to tumors and those adults who transition from child-onset GHD, a growing number of cases of GHD have been reported after TBI (Schneider et al., 2007). Most cases of GHD and other post-traumatic hypopituitarism (PTHP) have been diagnosed within 1 year of trauma, but there have been cases that developed nearly 40 years later (Edwards and Clark, 1986; Gunn et al., 1991) leading to speculation that unless patients were specifically questioned about past head trauma, many of these cases had been classified as idiopathic (Benvenga et al., 2000).
The mechanism of GHD or other hypopituitary disorders resulting from TBI is not clearly understood, but may reflect both hypothalamic and pituitary damage as well as disruption of hypothalamic-portal transport of growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) and other regulatory peptides. It is thought that injury to the somatotrophs in the anterior pituitary, where GH is produced and released, may predispose these cells to anoxia, vascular insufficiency, or stalk injury. The long hypophysial vessels, which provide oxygen and nutrients to the anterior pituitary and the portal capillaries in the stalk, which transport hypothalamic regulatory peptides, are both highly vulnerable to traumatic injury, resulting in disrupted portal transport of GHRH or even anterior lobe infarction. Direct injury to the pituitary gland, resulting in edema of the diaphragma sella, can also result in anterior lobe infarction. Injuries to the hypothalamus, anterior pituitary, or pituitary stalk have been reported in 26–86% of patients who have died from TBI during autopsy (Daniel et al., 1959; Ceballos, 1966; Kornblum and Fisher, 1969; Crompton, 1971; Pierucci et al., 1971). In more recent studies, preliminary data suggests a possible association of certain apolipoprotein E polymorphisms with the development of TBI-induced pituitary dysfunction (Tanriverdi et al., 2008). The prevalence of post-traumatic AGHD can range from 9 to 28%; but this range may be severely underestimated, since many of studies have relied on insensitive biomarkers such as insulin growth factor-1 (IGF-1) to screen for GHD. This variation highlights the challenges for the accurate diagnosis of GHD in this sub-population (Bondanelli et al., 2004; Dimopoulou et al., 2004; Lieberman et al., 2008).
Traumatic injury is the leading cause of death and disability in young adults (Klasbeek et al., 1980; National Institutes of Health, 1998; van Baalen et al., 2003). It is estimated that 0.6–1.9 million dollars per person to over 5 million persons living with the sequelae of TBI is spent in overall healthcare costs and associated loss of productivity (McGregor and Pentland, 1997; Masel, 2004). TBI has been called the “signature injury” of the current wars in Southwest Asia. Over 10–20% of service members returning from a combat deployment have reported suffering at least one blast injury (Terrio et al., 2009). Fatigue, depression, irritability, cognitive impairment, and decreased QoL; symptoms associated with GHD, resemble another characteristic invisible injury of combat; post-traumatic stress disorder. As many as 25% of TBI survivors may go undiagnosed, which may contribute to long-term adverse consequences of untreated GHD. The implications of post-traumatic induced GHD demand a clear consensus for diagnosis, treatment, and management in this sub-population.
Clinical Features of GHD
The function of several organ systems is directly altered by the loss of the physiologic effects of GH. Acquired isolated GHD is characterized by weight gain, increased fat mass, and decreased lean body mass (LBM). AGHD patients have 7% higher total body fat, with similarly decreased LBM (Cuneo et al., 1992; Carroll et al., 1998). Central adiposity lends to increased waist:hip ratio. In addition, triglyceride levels are increased and high density lipoprotein (HDL) levels decreased. This alteration in lipid levels may explain, in part, the observation of increased intima-medial wall thickness (IMT), as measured by carotid ultrasonography, in this population (Leonsson et al., 2002; Murata et al., 2003; Abs et al., 2006). These factors may contribute to the increased incidence of cardiovascular mortality seen in patients with GHD.
Decreased muscle mass and strength are also present in GHD patients. In the heart, these changes are manifested by reduction in left ventricular mass, decreased fractional shortening of cardiac myocytes, and decreased cardiac output. Such abnormalities may contribute to the decline in exercise capacity. Amato et al. (1993) demonstrated a reduction in exercise capacity by 20–25% in GHD patients compared to normal controls. In addition, cortical bone density and trabecular bone density measurements in GHD patients were 2.8 and 1.5 SD, respectively, below the mean age and sex matched controls (Amato et al., 1993; O’Halloran et al., 1993).
Patients with GHD appear to have impaired psychological well-being and potentially significant neuropsychiatric manifestations, such as difficulty concentrating and memory impairment (McGauley et al., 1990). The psychological general well-being (PGWB) scale was adapted by McKenna et al. (1999) to determine a measurable index of six dimensions of subjective well-being or distress. A version of the QoL-assessment of growth hormone deficiency in adults (QoL-AGHDA) questionnaire is shown in Table 1. Reduced vitality, fatigue, social isolation, and depression were consistently reported on self-rated questionnaires (Dupuy, 1984; McKenna et al., 1999). Other tools like the KIMS patient life situation form (KIMS PLSF) (Moock et al., 2009), Euro-QoL, EQ-5D (EuroQoL Group, 1990), and Nottingham health profile (NHP) (Hunt et al., 1981) have been developed to measure QoL and assess psychological well being (Hunt and McKenna, 1992; Saller et al., 2006; Koltowska-Häggström et al., 2009). It is unclear however whether this impairment in psychological well being is due specifically to reduced levels of GHD.
Table 1. Adult growth hormone deficiency quality of life assessment (QoL-AGHDA) (reproduced from McKenna et al., 1999).
Diagnosis of GHD
Given the lack of specific clinical marker for GHD in adults, biochemical confirmation of the diagnosis is essential and usually entails a stimulation test with a substance that triggers a rise in GH in normals. Because the specificity of all available tests is imperfect, testing should be reserved for those patients whose clinical presentation would yield a high pre-test probability of GHD, or if there is evidence of other pituitary-dependent hormones that would put them at risk of GHD, in order to decrease the rate of false positives.
Testing is indicated for patients with structural disease affecting the hypothalamus or pituitary, history of prior surgery to these areas, history of head trauma or subarachnoid hemorrhage, or documented deficiencies in other pituitary hormones (Cook et al., 2009; Molitch et al., 2011). Low levels of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) levels can be diagnostic in severe GHD, but since IGF-I is often normal in AGHD, it is often necessary to confirm diagnosis with provocative testing (Kargi and Merriam, 2013).
Hartman et al. (2002) reported that total IGF-I concentrations less than 84 mcg/L (11 nmol/L) in the presence of three or more pituitary hormone deficiencies the diagnosis of GHD can be made with 95% accuracy. IGF-I bioactivity however may be even more sensitive than total IGF-I levels, demonstrating a CI of 81.9 versus 63.8% in GHD patients (Varewijck et al., 2011). With these notable exceptions, provocative testing is still warranted in that nearly 58.5% of severely GHD patient have total IGF-I levels within age-related normal range (Cianfarani et al., 2005). Age, gender, and obesity interplay in IGF-I concentrations in GHD patients. There is an overlap of age-related decline in IGF-I levels in normal subjects and GHD patients with increasing age. GHD patients demonstrated 4% (n = 48), 30% (n = 61), and 40% (n = 43) IGF-I levels within the normal range limits for 20–39, 40–59, and over 60 years of age, respectively (Hilding et al., 1999). Prior reports have shown a much higher percentage of overlap, with range 34.8, 60.8, and 84.5% total IGF-I levels above the age-related third percentile limits for the same age ranges (Cianfarani et al., 2005). IGF-I levels are generally lower in female GHD patients versus male counterparts, but the exact mechanism is unclear and warrants further investigation (Fisker et al., 1999).
The ITT is still considered the “gold standard” diagnostic test for GHD, and should be considered as the initial test, unless there are contraindications to its use. Because it induces hypoglycemia, it is contraindicated in patients with coronary artery disease, seizures, and in the elderly (Biller et al., 2002).
The combination of GHRH with arginine (GHRH + ARG) was endorsed by several consensus guidelines as a comparably accurate alternative to ITT, especially when ITT is contraindicated (Aimaretti et al., 1998; Ho and Participants, 2007; Yuen et al., 2009). However, in 2008 EMD Serono, Inc. discontinued the manufacture of GHRH (Geref®) in the US. The unavailability of GHRH increased the need for identifying reliable alternative GH stimulation tests to diagnose AGHD with similar accuracy when ITT is contraindicated or logistically difficult to perform.
Several studies have since shown that the GST is as reliable as the ITT in discriminating GH-deficient and normal adults (Spathis et al., 1974; Conceição et al., 2003; Yuen et al., 2009). Gomez et al. and Conceicao et al. demonstrated that the glucagon test reliably identified controls and GHD patients. Using a peak GH level of 3 ng/mL as a cutoff provided the best sensitivity (100 and 97%, respectively) and specificity (100 and 88%, respectively) by receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis (Gómez et al., 2002; Conceição et al., 2003; Berg et al., 2010; Yuen, 2011). The study of Berg et al. (2010) reported somewhat lower accuracy – 95% sensitivity and 79% specificity with a cutoff set at 2.5 ng/mL, most likely reflecting a difference in the subject population tested.
Growth hormone secretagogues, such as ghrelin and ghrelin mimetics (hexarelin, macimorelin, and GH-releasing peptide 2 and 6 – all currently still investigational) have also been studied for use in diagnosing AGHD. With macimorelin, an orally active GH secretagogue, a recent study reported that peak GH (an optimal cut point of 2.7 ng/mL) offered 82% sensitivity, 92% specificity, and 87% accuracy (Garcia et al., 2013). In general macimorelin was well tolerated; and compared to other stimulation tests, GH responses were rapid and the test does not require parental administration of agents.
Consensus guidelines for the evaluation of adult GHD state that any of these dynamic tests can be used to diagnose GHD, including the ITT, the GST, the combined GHRH–ARG test (where available), and likely the ghrelin mimetics when further validated. Age, gender, and BMI may blunt the response of some stimulatory tests. Further investigation is warranted in determining the best cut off values to enhance the sensitivity in diagnosing GHD in this subset population (Colao et al., 2009). Table 3 provides a comparison chart for GH provocative tests.
Table 3. Comparison of GH Provocative Tests (Kargi and Merriam, 2013).
Treatment of GHD; Benefits of GHRT
There is a general consensus that many of the metabolic and psychological abnormalities associated with GHD can be reversed with GH replacement. Lower doses of GH may decrease the incidence of side effects from GHRT, while still achieving a clinical response to therapy (Chein et al., 1999; Ahmad et al., 2001). Treatment with GH results in profound changes in body composition, especially in reduced fat mass, and an increase in LBM. The decline in fat mass is most significant in visceral and trunk locations (9% reduction, compared with placebo-treated patients who have a mean 4.3% increase in visceral fat mass over 6 months), suggesting that GHRT may reverse the central adiposity associated with GHD and potentially reduce the increased cardiovascular risk that this body composition carries (Beauregard et al., 2008). The increase in LBM is smaller than the reduction in fat mass, but appears to be more sustained (Al-Shoumer et al., 1996; Hoffman et al., 2004a; Götherström et al., 2009).
An overall beneficial effect on serum lipid profile (reduction in total and LDL cholesterol and improvement in HDL cholesterol) has been noted with GHRT in some studies, but data are inconsistent (Florakis et al., 2000; Maison et al., 2004). When GHRT is added to lipid management therapy with HMG CoA reductase inhibitors (statins), it may promote a synergistic effect (Monson et al., 2007). The reduction in atherosclerosis with use of GHRT has been assessed by several studies evaluating carotid IMT (Pfeifer et al., 1999; Leonsson et al., 2002; Murata et al., 2003; Colao et al., 2008). In addition, GHRT has demonstrated improvement in pro-inflammatory and other cardiovascular risk markers, including C-reactive protein, apolipoprotein B, and homocysteine levels (Sesmilo et al., 2000, 2001).
Growth hormone replacement has a positive effect on left ventricular mass, interventricular septal and left ventricular posterior wall thickness, left ventricular ejection diastolic diameters, and stroke volume, via echocardiographic evaluation in adults with GHD (Maison and Chanson, 2003). It improves both exercise capacity and cardiac function (Widdowson and Gibney, 2008). These patients demonstrated increased oxygen uptake and power output with cycle ergometry with increased skeletal muscle mass and aerobic capacity.
Growth hormone replacement therapy results in a biphasic change in bone mineral density (BMD), with an initial 6–12 months period of increased bone resorption followed by an overall increase in bone mass. After long-term treatment, BMD continues to rise even 18–24 months after discontinuation of GHRT (Baum et al., 1996; Johannsson et al., 1996; Biller et al., 2000). Typically a 4–10% increase in BMD has been reported, with generally greater effects in vertebral trabecular bone compared to femoral sites (Baum et al., 1996; Biller et al., 2000; Shalet et al., 2003). In general individuals with the most severe bone loss had the greatest positive response to treatment, and BMD in men responded to a greater degree than BMD in women, perhaps reflecting estrogen-mediated inhibition of GH action through stimulation of suppressor of cytokine signaling-2 (socs2) (Johannsson et al., 1996; Drake et al., 2001; Bex et al., 2002).
There appears to be no single factor that completely accounts for the increased mortality seen in untreated GHD adults when compared to age and sex matched controls (Rosén and Bengtsson, 1990; Hazem et al., 2012). The two most prominent causes of premature mortality in GHD patients are cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease. Despite several studies of the effects of chronic GH replacement on mortality, the evidence of increased longevity is still not strong enough to be conclusive (van Bunderen et al., 2011; Gaillard et al., 2012).
The majority of GHD patients report enhanced QoL after starting GHRT as assessed both by self-rating questionnaires and by objective measures such as days absent from work and economic success. The severity of QoL impairment before therapy with GH is the strongest predictor of treatment response (Murray et al., 1999). QoL measures improve as soon as 3 months after initiating GHRT, and long-term studies shows a continued benefit for 10 years (Drake et al., 1998; Gilchrist et al., 2002; Rosilio et al., 2004).
Indications for GH Replacement
Prior to 1996 the use of GH in the US was limited to promoting statural growth in children with confirmed GHD; its use to promote growth in other conditions associated with short stature, such as Turner syndrome, was approved subsequently. It has only been in the past 20 years that compelling evidence for a clinical syndrome in adults with GHD has been published and widely accepted. While several consensus guidelines have been published on the management of AGHD with GH replacement, the optimal criteria to select patients who might best benefit from treatment remains controversial, and practices vary among individual practitioners and countries.
In general it is recommended that only adults with confirmed GHD based on published criteria be evaluated for treatment. Individuals most likely to benefit from GH replacement include those with severe GHD, defined by GH provocative testing response and serum IGF-I levels. Other appropriate indications for initiation of GHRT are osteopenia, adverse cardiovascular risk profile, and reduced QoL, as measured from validated QoL questionnaires. Continuation of therapy is generally recommended for adolescents transitioning to adulthood even after completion of linear growth, to allow full skeletal and muscle maturation, which can continue for a further decade (Bex et al., 2002; Baroncelli et al., 2003; Shalet et al., 2003; Underwood et al., 2003). Discontinuation of GHRT based on reaching final adult height in this transitioning population of GHD patients has also been associated with worsening of lipoprotein profiles, body composition, and QoL scores (Underwood et al., 2003; Mauras et al., 2005) GH therapy in this population should therefore be interrupted as briefly as possible, optimally only for re-testing to confirm persistent GHD.
Initiation and Monitoring of GH Treatment
Unlike pediatric GH treatment, often dosed in micrograms/kilograms of body weight/day, currently recommended GH replacement dosing in adults is individualized independent of weight, taking into account the patient’s age, gender, and estrogen status (Johannsson et al., 1997a; Hoffman et al., 2004b). Initiating therapy at low doses (total dose 0.2–0.4 mg/day SC) decreases the likelihood of developing common side effects like joint stiffness, arthralgias, myalgias, paresthesias, and peripheral edema, with fluid retention. The dose should be titrated at 6–8 week intervals based on clinical response, while avoiding side effects and monitoring serum IGF-I levels. Achieving a target in the upper half of normal age adjusted IGF-I range is desired. It is reasonable to start with higher doses (0.4–0.5 mg/day) in patients less than 30 years of age, but older patients (greater than 60 years of age) should be started on lower doses (0.1–0.2 mg/day) and titrated more slowly to minimize occurrence of side effects. Some childhood-onset AGHD patients with very low pre-treatment IGF-I may develop GH side effects but still not reach mid-normal levels despite high GH doses.
Women taking oral estrogen replacement may require higher doses of GHRT, presumably because oral estrogen inhibits liver IGF-I production and secretion by a first pass effect (Weissberger et al., 1991). No dose adjustment is usually needed in patients on moderate doses of transdermal estrogen.
Once dosing is stabilized, clinical evaluation and assessment for side effects along with measurement of IGF-I levels should be performed at 6 month intervals. Fasting lipid profiles and fasting glucose levels should be checked annually and after any GH dose increase. Blood pressure, weight, waist circumference, and BMI should be checked annually and at each clinic visit. Baseline bone DEXA scan should be performed and then rechecked every 2 years if the baseline is abnormal. Optimally QoL measures should be assessed at baseline and then at least annually while on GHRT to monitor treatment response (Cook et al., 2009; Koltowska-Häggström et al., 2009).
The duration of treatment for AGHD has not been defined. If therapy is tolerated, with a good clinical response to treatment noted, then there is no particular reason to discontinue therapy. Conversely if there is no perceived or biochemical benefit of treatment after at least 1 year of therapy, then stopping GHRT may be appropriate.
Table 4. Factors that may affect GH dosing [adapted from AACE 2009 (Cook et al., 2009)].
Table 5. Recommendations for GH replacement therapy in AGHD (adapted from Cook et al., 2009).
Novel GH Formulations and Analogs
Traditional treatment of GHD has been with the use of daily subcutaneous injections of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH). This schedule however, is too infrequent to reproduce the multiple daily pulses of normal endogenous GH secretion, and too frequent to be convenient for many patients, raising concerns about adherence to treatment, which can lead to reduced efficacy. Although rhGH when injected SC has a circulating half-life of 5 h and is rapidly cleared by the liver and kidney, studies have demonstrated comparable growth velocity and IGF-I levels with continuous infusion pump therapy (Jørgensen et al., 1990; Laursen et al., 1993, 1995, 2001; Tauber et al., 1993). This suggests that longer-acting GH formulations and analogs, although even more unphysiologic than daily injections, could be effective for AGHD treatment.
A number of brands and formulations of rhGH are available; in the US, GH preparations are available as lyophilized powder in vials for reconstitution (Humatrope®, Nutropin®, Serostim®, Saizen®, Zorbtive®, Tev-Tropin®, and Omnitrope®); in two chamber cartridges requiring reconstitution (Genotropin® and Saizen®); as a liquid in prefilled cartridges (Norditropin®, Humatrope®, Nutropin AQ®, Saizen®, and Omnitrope®); or as prefilled single-dose (Genotropin Miniquick®) or multi-dose pens (e.g., Norditropin® Flexpro®, Norditropin®, Nordi-Flex®, Nutropin AQ® – Nuspin™, or Omnitrope® 5 or 10 mg pens). Those with preservative-free diluents must be used within 24 h of reconstitution, but others can be stored unrefrigerated for 14–28 days (Nutropin, 2006, 2008; Saizen, 2007; Serostim, 2007; Tev-Tropin, 2007; Genotropin, 2009; Humatrope, 2009; Zorbtive, 2009; Norditropin, 2010; Omnitrope, 2010).
Besides daily GH, several longer-acting GH formulations and analogs have been developed. The most fully studied sustained-release formulation thus far is encapsulation of GH into biodegradable polylactic acid-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) microspheres, which showed sustained GH release profile for 1 month (Johnson et al., 1997; Park et al., 2010). Nutropin Depot® was the first GH delivery system launched using the PLGA microsphere system, but was later taken off the market due to the high injection volumes and large-bore needles required, along with business concerns over the manufacture (Govardhan et al., 2005).
A GH-loaded hyaluronate microparticle (LB03002) was developed and launched in Korea by LG Life Sciences in 2007. This once a-week injection is currently the single commercially available sustained-release formulation of GH, at present approved only in that country. In global Phase III study, treatment with LB03002 for 26 or 52 weeks in adults with GHD demonstrated a sustained reduction of fat mass and other body composition parameters, and was generally well tolerated with a good safety profile (Biller et al., 2010; Péter et al., 2012).
PEGylation (the attachment of polyethylene glycol, PEG) has also been used to extend the half-life of rhGH. The first PEGylated rhGH (PHA-794428) was discontinued due to safety concerns related to local injection-site lipoatrophy (Touraine et al., 2009). Two other longer-acting GH extension peptides using either albumin or an hCG-derived extension sequence are also in development.
VRS-317 is a novel rhGH fusion protein (addition of hormonally inert and relatively non-allergenic N- and C-terminal amino acids extend the half-life of rhGH) that may provide a monthly dosing option in GHD patients. In animal subjects, VRS-317 had a half-life of approximately 110 h, and produced a sustained IGF-I response for 1 month after a single dose. A Phase I trial of VRS-317 in GHD adults has recently been completed. Preliminary data show achievement of graded responses of IGF-1 at doses lower than those typically used with daily rhGH, with no significant drug related adverse events reported over the course of 1 month (Bailey et al., 2012; Cleland et al., 2012). If these early results are confirmed in multi-dose studies, monthly dosing could lead to increased adherence and convenience.
Side Effects and Risks, and Long-Term Safety Concerns
The most common side effects of GH treatment in GHD adults result from fluid retention, with peripheral edema, arthralgias, carpal tunnel syndrome, paresthesias, and worsening of glucose tolerance. These hormonal side effects generally respond to dose reduction. Older and more obese patients are more susceptible to side effects from GH treatment. In studies using higher than recommended doses of GH, more frequent adverse outcomes have been observed (Johannsson et al., 1997a; Hoffman et al., 2004b).
Benign intracranial hypertension (pseudotumor cerebri) has been linked to GH treatment in children (Malozowski and Stadel, 1995) but is rare in adults, with only one case reported (Malozowski et al., 1993). Gynecomastia has been reported in normal elderly individuals receiving GH in high doses (Cohn et al., 1993; Blackman et al., 2002).
Another rare but reported complication of GH therapy is macular edema in non-diabetic patients. Koller et al. (1998) reported two non-diabetic patients: one a non-obese 11-year-old girl receiving GHRT for Turner’s syndrome presenting with neovascularization, and an obese 31-year-old male who had traumatic hypothalamic injury and was started on GHRT 14 months prior to presenting with decreased visual acuity. Of note, both cases had their GH dose increased just prior to the onset of this complication.
Early clinical trials reported insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus in patients receiving GHRT. These small initial studies reported impaired fasting glucose and insulin levels within the first year of GH therapy (Beshyah et al., 1994; Salomon et al., 1994; al-Shoumer et al., 1998). In addition, data from the Pfizer International Growth Database (KIGS) indicate that GH therapy in children may give rise to an increased incidence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, heightening the concern for adults with GHD receiving similar treatment (Cutfield et al., 2000). Many of the early AGHD studies used weight-based dosing derived from pediatric practice, and these fluid retention and hyperglycemic side effects have become much less frequent as adult practice has shifted to individualized dosing starting with lower doses and gradually titrating upwards until target responses, benefits, or side effects are encountered. Perhaps for this reason, long-term GH replacement in adult patients with GHD has not usually led to abnormal levels of plasma glucose or glycosylated hemoglobin (Bengtsson et al., 2002). In fact, some studies of titrated GH replacement for AGHD have been shown to improve insulin sensitivity, at least in patients with features consistent with metabolic syndrome (Johannsson et al., 1997b), suggesting that improved body composition can at least partially counter the direct anti-insulin actions of GH, although in non-obese subjects the net effect of GH treatment is usually a mild increase in fasting glucose and/or insulin within the normal range. Insulin sensitivity varies based on the patient’s genetic predisposition, age, and body composition (Hoffman et al., 2004a). Diabetes is not an absolute contraindication to GHRT, but in individuals with diabetes or predisposed to developing diabetes, it is recommended to titrate the dose of GH even more slowly than in other patients, and to adjust anti-diabetic medications as warranted to maintain glucose homeostasis.
The generally benign side effect profile of replacement doses of GH cannot be extrapolated to supraphysiologic dosing intended to overcome GH resistance or to reverse catabolism. Takala et al. (1999) reported increased mortality in parallel studies conducted on critically ill patients treated with much higher doses of GH (5.3–8 mg/day), more than 10-fold the doses often used in adult GH replacement. Reasoning that these patients had resistance to GH based on high GH levels but low serum IGF-I and IGF-binding protein-3 concentrations, due to increased protein catabolism and negative nitrogen balance, these investigators attempted to reverse this catabolic state; but instead found a near-doubling of the already high in-hospital death rate, though with no single mechanism to which the increased mortality could be attributed. Non-fatal fluid retention, which can be significant, is also more commonly associated with high GH doses, particularly in older patients (70% in Finnish study were 55 years of age and older and 75% in the multinational study) (Johannsson et al., 1997a; Hoffman et al., 2004b).
There is no evidence that GH replacement in adults increases the risk of de novo or recurrent malignancy. For survivors of childhood cancer, GH treatment may further slightly increase the already increased risk of developing a second neoplasm, although this increase was not seen in the large Childhood Cancer Survival Study (Sklar et al., 2002). However, there are no comparable data for adult GHRT. Most of the concerns about increased cancer rates in GHD patients treated with GH have primarily focused on observational data on survivors of childhood leukemia, in whom cranial irradiation frequently leads to GHD. These reports may be misleading however, since it is not clear if tumor development noted reflected a new or recurrent malignancy, or due to irradiation or other past treatment of existing tumors (Swerdlow et al., 2002). Notably, pediatric patients with “idiopathic” GHD did not have an increase in new tumor growth when treated with GH (Fradkin et al., 1993).
Despite the overall lack of a signal for increased risk, case reports and a minority of series have noted development of cancers after treatment with GH. Magnavita et al. (1996) reported a case of a semi-professional cyclist who developed Hodgkin’s lymphoma nearly 4 years after several supra-therapeutic courses of GH. Swerdlow et al. (2002) reported an increased incidence of cancer formation in a cohort study of 1,848 patients in the UK treated with GH from 1959 to 1985. Cancer incidence was assessed in 1995 and again in 2000. Despite the author’s assertion that there was a high incidence of cancer and mortality associated with cancer, the total number of cancer diagnoses in the cohort was only 12 – 2 colon cancer, 2 Hodgkin’s lymphoma, 2 bone cancer, and 1 each from mouth, liver, bile duct, cervix, ovary, and testis. Only the first two increases were statistically significant. Of note, one patient who developed colon cancer may have had familial polyposis. Despite the small number of cancer cases, there is an epidemiological association of cancer rates in the setting of increased IGF-I levels but not of IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), resulting in a high IGF-1 to IGFBP-3 ratio (Grimberg and Cohen, 1999; Shim and Cohen, 1999; Cohen et al., 2000). IGF-1 has been detected in colorectal cancers and is a strong stimulator of colorectal cancer cell proliferation in vitro (Lahm et al., 1994), but GH treatment usually results in increases in both IGF-I and IGFBP-3. There is no information on IGF-1 and IGFBP-3 measurements in the Swerdlow report. The British patients in this cohort were given high GH doses 2–3 times per week versus current use of lower daily dosing, and this difference may also have played a role in these findings. Data are currently lacking demonstrating whether current GH dosing regimens promote any tumor recurrence or re-growth (Frajese et al., 2001; Hatrick et al., 2002; Chung et al., 2005, 2008; Jostel et al., 2005; Karavitaki et al., 2006; Buchfelder et al., 2007; Arnold et al., 2009; Olsson et al., 2009).
Growth hormone is a mitogen, however, and despite several studies that show no demonstrated increased risk of malignancy with GHRT, the use of GH is contraindicated in active malignancy out of concern it might accelerate the growth of an existing neoplasm (Frajese et al., 2001; Hatrick et al., 2002; Chung et al., 2005, 2008; Jostel et al., 2005; Karavitaki et al., 2006; Buchfelder et al., 2007; Arnold et al., 2009; Olsson et al., 2009). GH therapy should be stopped in all patients with active malignancy until the underlying condition is controlled.
Use of GH in Non-GHD Adults: Normal Aging and Competitive Sports
After achieving linear growth and full reproductive maturation, GH levels begin to decline; primarily from reduced hypothalamic secretion of GH-releasing hormone, which leads to lower GH levels and reduction in serum IGF-I levels. These normal age-related GH and serum IGF-I reductions are associated with age-related changes that are similar to the signs and symptoms seen in GHD adults. Based on this decline and in alterations in body composition, strength, and aerobic capacity that are also similar to those observed in AGHD, though less severe, interest was piqued in using GH therapy in healthy older patients. In 1990, Rudman et al. (1990) reported reduced fat mass, increased muscle mass and increased lumbar vertebral bone density in healthy men, age 60 and older, after 6 months of GH use compared to untreated controls. Although no functional outcomes were reported, this paper received wide publicity and led to subsequent studies looking to confirm the possible anti-aging benefits of GH in healthy seniors, as well as to rapid proliferation of anti-aging clinics offering GH to middle-aged as well as older clients, even in the absence of any confirmatory results.
Liu et al. conducted a systematic review of 31 articles looking at 18 separate studies of GH treatment outcomes in healthy older individuals. They concluded that only minimal body composition changes (2.1 kg reduction in fat mass, 2.1 kg increase in LBM, and 0.29 mmol/L reduction in total cholesterol) without significant change in bone density, other serum lipid levels or decrease in body weight was seen with GH use. However, a higher number of adverse events (edema, arthralgias, gynecomastia, development of impaired fasting glucose, and diabetes) were reported (Liu et al., 2007).
Blackman et al. (2002) evaluated effects of GH and/or sex steroid treatment in older men and women in a 2-by-2 placebo-controlled study. They reported that GH alone and GH with testosterone similarly resulted in reduced fat mass and increased LBM. Testosterone alone or the combination of GH with testosterone improved strength and exercise capacity whereas GH use alone did not. Adverse effects were similar with and without sex steroids; except for a higher rate of fasting glucose intolerance or diabetes in men treated with GH only. These investigators initially attempted to use GH doses similar to those employed by Rudman and colleagues (Rudman et al., 1990; Blackman et al., 2002), but were forced to reduce them by nearly 2/3 due to severe side effects. The reasons for the lack of side effects in the Rudman report are not clear.
Reports of effects of GH on BMD in non-GHD normal aging are conflicting. Holloway et al. (1997) found statistically significant improvement in BMD in postmenopausal women treated with GH, but concluded that the gains were substantially less than what is seen with bisphosphonates or estrogenic hormone therapy, with a higher incidence of adverse events. However, other studies did not demonstrate BMD increase with GH treatment in this population (Gurlek and Gedik, 2001; Christmas et al., 2002).
Metformin and GH did not appear to be superior to metformin alone in reducing total body fat or waist circumference in older patients with metabolic syndrome and elevated fasting plasma glucose levels (Herrmann et al., 2004).
In a placebo-controlled study, Baker et al. (2012) demonstrated favorable effects on cognition in both healthy older adults and those with amnestic minimal cognitive impairment (MCI) with 20 weeks of daily self-injection with a degradation-protected GHRH analog to boost GH secretion. Treatment with GHRH, which boosted GH secretion and IGF-I levels resulted in improvements in executive functioning and verbal memory. Visual memory was not enhanced. Though GHRH was generally well tolerated, subjects on active treatment were twice as likely to have adverse effects, usually mild, compared to those in the placebo arm.
Thus the use of GH to counter some effects of normal aging is still highly controversial. Most studies have shown some improvements in body composition, but failed to show an increase in cardiovascular endurance or muscle strength (Blackman et al., 2002; Liu et al., 2007). Additionally more adverse events were reported in the GH treatment groups. Given that both the baseline and target differ from AGHD, with baseline levels that although lower than in young normals are higher than in GHD, and target levels above age-matched normals and similar to those in healthy young adults. It is unclear if the mix of benefits, side effects, and risks will be similar to those in AGHD, particularly with use over longer durations than the maximum 1 year in current controlled studies. Thus GH treatment in otherwise healthy seniors cannot be recommended other than in controlled clinical research studies, and its use for anti-aging purposes is currently prohibited by US Federal law, 21 U.S.C. §333(e), making GH the only legal drug for which off-label prescribing is illegal in two circumstances. The other prohibition is for use to boost athletic performance.
Anecdotal evidence suggests that GH and IGF-I are frequently abused by athletes for their anabolic and lipolytic properties. GH has been touted to achieve faster recovery from injury and enhance ergogenicity, although there is no evidence that GH or IGF-I actually improves competitive performance in young healthy adults (Healy and Russell-Jones, 1997; Holt and Sonksen, 2008; Liu et al., 2008; Baumann, 2012). Conducting randomized controlled clinical trials is challenging, due to frequent concomitant use of insulin and anabolic steroids. GH and IGF-I appear on many lists of prohibited substances in competition, and their use is banned by the World Anti-doping Agency (WADA). As noted, in the US, administration of GH (but not IGF-I, GHRH, or ghrelin mimetic GH secretagogues) to enhance athletic performance is legally prohibited, though rarely prosecuted; legal proceedings have generally been based on false testimony about its use rather than the use itself. GH may be appealing to athletes seeking an edge; given its short half-life in circulation its abuse is difficult to detect except in extremely high doses (Baumann, 2012). Increased IGF-I stimulated by GH self-administration does not qualitatively differ from that which is supported by endogenous GH. Although synthetic GH contains just one molecular weight isoform, while endogenous GH secretion is a mix of 20 and 22 kD isoforms, it is rapidly cleared from the circulation and so testing needs to be done within just hours after dosing (Baumann, 2012). Liu et al. (2008) conducted a systematic review of 27 randomized, controlled trials involving 303 young, lean, physically fit subjects receiving GH at an average dose of 2.5 mg/day, a 5- to 10-fold excess over the physiological GH production rate. As expected, body composition changes (increase LBM and reduced fat mass) were noted, but there were no differences in strength or exercise capacity between those taking GH and those not. One of the limitations he noted in these studies was the shorter duration of use and lower dose of GH compared to what is typically abused by athletes. The typical side effects associated with GH overdose (edema, arthralgias, carpal tunnel syndrome, and sweating) were observed in 15–44% of the participants (Holt and Sonksen, 2008).
Managed care payers should utilize evidence-based review to determine appropriate criteria for reimbursement for GH therapy. Despite the positive effects of GH replacement treatment on body composition and markers of cardiovascular disease in adults with GHD, it is difficult to measure the therapeutic benefits of GHRT with precision after linear growth has been completed. In addition, despite multiple studies, data showing that GHRT in GHD adults actually reduces mortality are still inconclusive (Frajese et al., 2001). With the lack of other effective treatment outcome measures, the use of “softer” endpoints such as QoL, have been used to justify the cost effectiveness of GHRT.
Using quality adjusted life years (QALY) measures, a cost-utility analysis of GHRT may be feasible. QALY, a frequently used health status index, combines information on the length of life (quantity) and the QoL, where the latter is measured by utilities on a scale that has values of 1 and 0 for full health and death, respectively (Torrance, 1987). The QALY unit is therefore defined as 1 year of life with full health.
Cost-utility analysis based on QALY change is the most widely recognized method in pharmacoeconomic evaluation, and QoL-AGHDA was used by the UK National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) as a potential source of outcomes data for such an evaluation (McKenna et al., 1999). The NICE Committee agreed that the QoL-AGHDA questionnaire is the best validated available evaluation tool for the assessment of both baseline QoL and the effect of treatment in adults with GHD (Table 1), and concluded that a trial of GH treatment could be recommended for adults with GHD who have perceived severe impairment of QoL, as demonstrated by a reported score of at least 11 in the QoL-AGHDA. Upon examination of available evidence, the Committee found that the subgroup of adults with GHD for whom treatment may be clinically justified are those who have an improvement in QoL equivalent to an absolute change of at least seven points over their baseline score. The Committee stated that re-assessment of the need for GH replacement should take place after a trial treatment period of at least 9 months (3 months for dose titration and 6 months for assessment of response). For GH treatment to continue after this trial period, they recommended that one demonstrate a sustained improvement in QoL over the pre-treatment baseline. These recommendations are widely used in determining coverage for GH for patients covered by the National Health Service, but less universally adopted outside the UK.
In the US, many insurers have developed policies that set specific criteria for approved indications for coverage of GH replacement in AGHD and to guide clinicians with appropriate dosing, monitoring, and assessing cost effectiveness of GHRT. Some are evidence-based and follow the recommendations of the 2009 AACE or the 2011 Endocrine Society clinical practice guidelines but others are arbitrary and in some cases at variance with best practices (Cook et al., 2009; Molitch et al., 2011).
Despite absence of the prominent biological marker of linear growth, AGHD has characteristic, if non-specific signs and symptoms. Many of these can be reversed with appropriate GHRT. Determining who should be tested and treated for GHD can be challenging with the relative insensitivity of simple available biochemical markers such as IGF-I. And current dynamic testing procedures are either complex or attended with significant side effects or risks, or both. Reliable and safe alternative diagnostic tools are therefore needed. Stimulation testing using ghrelin mimetics appears promising but is not yet clinically available. Research is ongoing in developing longer-acting and therefore more convenient preparations of GHRT to promote better compliance and clinical efficacy. It appears at this time that cost-benefit and cost effectiveness data for GHRT favors treatment in clinically symptomatic patients with confirmed GHD. Despite the validated beneficial effects of GHRT in adults – including improvements in body composition, lipid profile, QoL and BMD – shown in many studies, some controversies remain with regards to whether long-term use of GH might promote tumor initiation or recurrence.
Conflict of Interest Statement
George R. Merriam has received research grants from Aeterna Zentaris, Lilly, and Versartis and has consulted for Novo Nordisk, Teva, and Theratechnologies. Mary L. Reed and Atil Y. Kargi declare no outside financial interests. The views expressed are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy of the Department of the Army, the Department of Defense, or the US Government.
Abs, R., Feldt-Rasmussen, U., Mattsson, A. F., Monson, J. P., Bengtsson, B. A., Góth, M. I., et al. (2006). Determinants of cardiovascular risk in 2589 hypopituitary GH deficient adults – a KIMS database analysis. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 155, 79–90. doi:10.1530/eje.1.02179
Ahmad, A., Hopkins, M. T., Thomas, J., Ibrahim, H., Fraser, W. D., Vora, J. P., et al. (2001). Body composition and quality of life in adults with growth hormone deficiency; effects of low-dose growth hormone replacement. Clin. Endocrinol. 54, 709–717. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2265.2001.01275.x
Aimaretti, G., Corneli, G., Razzore, P., Bellone, S., Baffoni, C., Arvat, E., and Etalname, A. (1998). Comparison between insulin induced hypoglycemia and growth hormone (GH) releasing hormone + arginine as provocative tests for the diagnosis of GH deficiency in adults. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 83, 1615–1618. doi:10.1210/jc.83.5.1615
al-Shoumer, K. A., Gray, R., Anyaoku, V., Hughes, C., Beshyah, S., Richmond, W., et al. (1998). Effects of four years’ treatment with biosynthetic human growth hormone (GH) on glucose homeostasis, insulin secretion and lipid metabolism in GH-deficient adults. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 48, 795–802. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2265.1998.00460.x
Al-Shoumer, K. A., Page, B., Thomas, E., Murphy, M., Beshyah, S. A., and Johnston, D. G. (1996). Effects of four years’ treatment with biosynthetic human growth hormone (GH) on body composition in GH-deficient hypopituitary adults. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 135, 559–567. doi:10.1530/eje.0.1350559
Amato, G., Carella, C., Fazio, S., La Montagna, G., Cittadini, A., Sabatini, D., et al. (1993). Body composition, bone metabolism, and heart structure and function in growth hormone (GH)-deficient adults before and after GH replacement therapy at low doses. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 77, 1671–1676. doi:10.1210/jc.77.6.1671
Arnold, J. R., Arnold, D. F., Marland, A., Karavitaki, N., and Wass, J. A. (2009). GH replacement in patients with non-functioning pituitary adenoma (nFa) treated solely by surgery is not associated with increased risk of tumour recurrence. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 70, 435–438. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2008.03391.x
Bailey, T., Biller, B. M. K., Conway, G. S., Kipnes, M., Popova-Brkic, V., Yuen, K. C. J., et al. (2012). A phase 1 trial of safety, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of a single dose of a new human growth hormone analogue (VRS-317) for monthly subcutaneous administration in adults with growth hormone deficiency. Endocr. Rev. 33, OR29-3 [03_MeetingAbstracts; The Endocrine Society].
Baker, L. D., Barsness, S. M., Borson, S., Merriam, G. R., Friedman, S. D., Craft, S., et al. (2012). Effects of growth hormone-releasing hormone on cognitive function in adults with mild cognitive impairment and healthy older adults. Arch. Neurol. 69, 1420–1429.
Baroncelli, G. I., Bertelloni, S., Sodini, F., and Saggese, G. (2003). Acquisition of bone mass in normal individuals and in patients with growth hormone deficiency. J. Pediatr. Endocrinol. Metab. 16(Suppl. 2), 327–335.
Baum, H. B., Biller, B. M., Finkelstein, J. S., Cannistraro, K. B., Oppenhein, D. S., Schoenfeld, D. A., et al. (1996). Effects of physiologic growth hormone therapy on bone density and body composition in patients with adult-onset growth hormone deficiency. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 125, 883–890. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-125-11-199612010-00003
Beauregard, C., Utz, A. L., Schaub, A. E., Nachtigall, L., Biller, B. M., Miller, K. K., et al. (2008). Growth hormone decreases visceral fat and improves cardiovascular risk markers in women with hypopituitarism: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 93, 2063–2071. doi:10.1210/jc.2007-2371
Bengtsson, B. A., Sahún, M., Vila, R., Domènech, P., Catalina, P., Soler, J., et al. (2002). The risk of diabetes mellitus in hypopituitary patients on growth hormone substitution. Growth Horm. IGF Res. 12, 302–303.
Berg, C., Meinel, T., Lahner, H., Yuece, A., Mann, K., and Petersenn, S. (2010). Diagnostic utility of the glucagon stimulation test in comparison to the insulin tolerance test in patients following pituitary surgery. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 162, 477–482. doi:10.1530/EJE-09-0824
Beshyah, S., Henderson, A., Niththyanathan, R., Sharp, P., Richmond, W., and Johnston, D. (1994). Metabolic abnormalities in growth hormone deficient adults II: carbohydrate tolerance and lipid metabolism. Endocrinol. Metab. 1, 173–180.
Bex, M., Abs, R., Maiter, D., Beckers, A., Lamberigts, G., and Bouillon, R. (2002). The effects of growth hormone replacement therapy on bone metabolism in adult-onset growth hormone deficiency: a 2-year open randomized controlled multicenter trial. J. Bone Miner. Res. 17, 1081–1094. doi:10.1359/jbmr.2002.17.6.1081
Biller, B., Ji, H. J., and Lee, S. (2010). “Twelve months efficacy and safety novel once-a-week sustained release rhGH (LB03002): a phase III in adults with GH deficiency,“ in Presented at the 92nd Annual Meeting the Endocrine Society (San Diego, CA). ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT 00596037.
Biller, B. M., Samuels, M. H., Zagar, A., Cook, D. M., Arafah, B. M., Bonert, V., et al. (2002). Sensitivity and specificity of six tests for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 87, 2067–2079. doi:10.1210/jc.87.5.2067
Biller, B. M., Sesmilo, G., Baum, H. B., Hayden, D., Schoenfeld, D., and Klibanski, A. (2000). Withdrawal of long-term physiological growth hormone (GH) administration: differential effects on bone density and body composition in men with adult onset GH deficiency. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 85, 970–976. doi:10.1210/jc.85.3.970
Blackman, M. R., Sorkin, J. D., Münzer, T., Bellantoni, M. F., Busby-Whitehead, J., Stevens, T. E., et al. (2002). Growth hormone and sex steroid administration in healthy aged women and men: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288, 2282–2292. doi:10.1001/jama.288.18.2282
Bondanelli, M., De Marinis, L., Ambrosio, M. R., Monesi, M., Valle, D., Zatelli, M. C., et al. (2004). Occurrence of pituitary dysfunction following traumatic brain injury. J. Neurotrauma 21, 685–696. doi:10.1089/0897715041269713
Buchfelder, M., Kann, P. H., Wüster, C., Tuschy, U., Saller, B., Brabant, G., et al. (2007). Influence of GH substitution therapy in deficient adults on the recurrence rate of hormonally inactive pituitary adenomas: a case control study. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 157, 149–156. doi:10.1530/EJE-07-0164
Carroll, P., Christ, E. R., Bengtsson, B. A., Carlsson, L., Christiansen, J. S., Clemmons, D., et al. (1998). Growth hormone deficiency in adulthood and the effects of growth hormone replacement: a review. Growth Hormone Research Society Scientific Committee. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 83, 382–395. doi:10.1210/jc.83.2.382
Christmas, C., O’Connor, K. G., Harman, S. M., Tobin, J. D., Münzer, T., Bellantoni, M. F., et al. (2002). Growth hormone and sex steroid effects on bone metabolism and bone mineral density in healthy aged women and men. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 57, 12–18. doi:10.1093/gerona/57.1.M12
Chung, T. T., Drake, W. M., Evanson, J., Walker, D., Plowman, P. N., Chew, S. L., et al. (2005). Tumour surveillance imaging in patients with extrapituitary tumours receiving growth hormone replacement. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 63, 274–279. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2005.02338.x
Chung, T. T., Evanson, J., Walker, D., Akker, S. A., Besser, G. M., Monson, J. P., et al. (2008). Safety of GH replacement in hypopituitary patients with nonirradiated pituitary and peripituitary tumours. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 68, 965–969. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2007.03135.x
Cleland, J. L., Geething, N. C., Moore, J. A., Rogers, B. C., Spink, B. J., Wang, C. W., et al. (2012). A novel long-acting human growth hormone fusion protein (VRS-317): enhanced in vivo potency and half-life. J. Pharm. Sci. 101, 2744–2754. doi:10.1002/jps.23229
Cohn, L., Feller, A. G., Draper, M. W., Rudman, I. W., and Rudman, D. (1993). Carpal tunnel syndrome and gynaecomastia during growth hormone treatment of elderly men with low circulating IGF-I concentrations. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 39, 417–425. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.1993.tb02388.x
Colao, A., Di Somma, C., Savastano, S., Rota, F., Savanelli, M. C., Aimaretti, G., et al. (2009). A reappraisal of diagnosing GH deficiency in adults: role of gender, age, waist circumference, and body mass index. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 94, 4414–4422. doi:10.1210/jc.2009-1134
Colao, A., Di Somma, C., Spiezia, S., Savastano, S., Rota, F., Savanelli, M. C., et al. (2008). Growth hormone treatment on atherosclerosis: results of a 5-year open, prospective, controlled study in male patients with severe growth hormone deficiency. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 93, 3416–3424. doi:10.1210/jc.2007-2810
Cook, D. M., Yuen, K. C., Biller, B. M., Kemp, S. F., and Vance, M. L. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. (2009). American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists medical guidelines for clinical practice for growth hormone use in growth hormone deficient adults and transition patients – 2009 update. Endocr. Pract. 5(Suppl. 2), 1–29. doi:10.4158/EP.15.S2.1
Cutfield, W. S., Wilton, P., Bennmarker, H., Albertsson-Wikland, K., Chatelain, P., Ranke, M. B., et al. (2000). Incidence of diabetes mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance in children and adolescents receiving growth-hormone treatment. Lancet 355, 610–613. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(99)04055-6
Dimopoulou, I., Tsagarakis, S., Theodorakopoulou, M., Douka, E., Zervou, M., Kouyialis, A. T., et al. (2004). Endocrine abnormalities in critical care patients with moderate-to-severe head trauma: incidence, pattern and predisposing factors. Intensive Care Med. 30, 1051–1057. doi:10.1007/s00134-004-2257-x
Drake, W. M., Coyte, D., Camacho-Hübner, C., Jivanji, N. M., Kaltsas, G., Wood, D. F., et al. (1998). Optimizing growth hormone replacement therapy by dose titration in hypopituitary adults. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 83, 3913–3919. doi:10.1210/jc.83.11.3913
Drake, W. M., Rodríguez-Arnao, J., Weaver, J. U., James, I. T., Coyte, D., Spector, T. D., et al. (2001). The influence of gender on the short- and long-term effects of growth hormone replacement on bone metabolism and bone mineral density in hypopituitary adults: a 5-year study. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 54, 525–532. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2265.2001.01246.x
Dupuy, H. J. (1984). “The psychological general well-being (PGWB) index,” in Assessment of Quality of Life in Clinical Trials of Cardiovascular Therapies, eds N. K. Wenger, M. E. Mattson, C. F. Furberg, and J. Elinson (New York: Le Jacq Publishing), 170–183.
Fisker, S., Jorgensen, J. O., Vahl, N., Orskov, H., and Christiansen, J. S. (1999). Impact of gender and androgen status on IGF-I levels in normal and GH-deficient adults. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 141, 601–608. doi:10.1530/eje.0.1410601
Florakis, D., Hung, V., Kaltsas, G., Coyte, D., Jenkins, P. J., Chew, S. L., et al. (2000). Sustained reduction in circulating cholesterol in adult hypopituitary patients given low dose titrated growth hormone replacement: a two year study. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 53, 453–459. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2265.2000.01108.x
Fradkin, J. E., Mills, J. L., Schonberger, L. B., Wysowski, D. K., Thomson, R., Durako, S. J., et al. (1993). Risk of leukemia after treatment with pituitary growth hormone. JAMA 270, 2829–2832. doi:10.1001/jama.1993.03510230067037
Frajese, G., Drake, W. M., Loureiro, R. A., Evanson, J., Coyte, D., Wood, D. F., et al. (2001). Hypothalamopituitary surveillance imaging in hypopituitary patients receiving long-term GH replacement therapy. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 86, 5172–5175. doi:10.1210/jc.86.11.5172
Gaillard, R. C., Mattsson, A. F., Akerblad, A. C., Bengtsson, B. A., Cara, J., Feldt-Rasmussen, U., et al. (2012). Overall and cause-specific mortality in GH-deficient adults on GH replacement. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 166, 1069–1077. doi:10.1530/EJE-11-1028
Garcia, J., Swerdloff, R., Wang, C., Kyle, M., Kipnes, M., Biller, B., et al. (2013). Oral macimorelin (AEZS-130) – stimulated growth hormone (GH) test: validation of a novel test for the diagnosis of adult growth hormone deficiency. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. (in press). doi:10.1210/jc.2013-1157
Gharib, H., Saenger, P. H., Zimmerman, D., Baskin, H. J., Bengtsson, B.-A., Dickey, R. A., et al. (1998). AACE clinical practice guidelines for growth hormone use in adults and children. Endocr. Pract. 4, 165.
Gilchrist, F. J., Murray, R. D., and Shalet, S. M. (2002). The effect of long-term untreated growth hormone deficiency (GHD) and 9 years of GH replacement on the quality of life (QoL) of GH-deficient adults. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 57, 363–370. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2265.2002.01608.x
Gómez, J. M., Espadero, R. M., Escobar-Jiménez, F., Hawkins, F., Picó, A., Herrera-Pombo, J. L., et al. (2002). Growth hormone release after glucagon as a reliable test of growth hormone assessment in adults. Clin. Endocrinol. 56, 329–334. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2265.2002.01472.x
Götherström, G., Elbornsson, M., Stibrant-Sunnerhagen, K., Bengtsson, B. A., Johannsson, G., and Svensson, J. (2009). Ten years of growth hormone (GH) replacement normalizes muscle strength in GH-deficient adults. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 94, 809–816. doi:10.1210/jc.2008-1538
Govardhan, C., Khalaf, N., Jung, C. W., Simeone, B., Higbie, A., Qu, S., et al. (2005). Novel long-acting crystal formulation of human growth hormone. Pharm. Res. 22, 1461–1470. doi:10.1007/s11095-005-6021-x
Gunn, I. R., Beastall, G. H., Matthews, D. M., and Bath, J. C. (1991). Post-traumatic hypothalamic-pituitary dysfunction presenting with biochemical features of primary hypothyroidism. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 28, 327–330.
Gurlek, A., and Gedik, O. (2001). Endogenous sex steroid, GH and IGF-I levels in normal elderly men: relationships with bone mineral density and markers of bone turnover. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 24, 408–414.
Hartman, M. L., Crowe, B. J., Biller, B. M., Ho, K. K., Clemmons, D. R., Chipman, J. J., et al. (2002). Which patients do not require a GH stimulation test for the diagnosis of adult GH deficiency? J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 87, 477–485. doi:10.1210/jc.87.2.477
Hatrick, A. G., Boghalo, P., Bingham, J. B., Ayres, A. B., Sonksen, P. H., and Russell-Jones, D. L. (2002). Does GH replacement therapy in adult GH-deficient patients result in recurrence or increase in size of pituitary tumours? Eur. J. Endocrinol. 146, 807–811. doi:10.1530/eje.0.1460807
Hazem, A., Elamin, M. B., Bancos, I., Malaga, G., Prutsky, G., Domecq, J. P., et al. (2012). Body composition and quality of life in adults treated with GH therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 166, 13–20. doi:10.1530/EJE-11-0558
Herrmann, B. L., Berg, C., Vogel, E., Nowak, T., Renzing-Koehler, K., Mann, K., et al. (2004). Effects of a combination of recombinant human growth hormone with metformin on glucose metabolism and body composition in patients with metabolic syndrome. Horm. Metab. Res. 36, 54–61. doi:10.1055/s-2004-814199
Hilding, A., Hall, K., Wivall-Helleryd, I. L., Sääf, M., Melin, A. L., and Thorén, M. (1999). Serum levels of insulin-like growth factor I in 152 patients with growth hormone deficiency, aged 19-82 years, in relation to those in healthy subjects. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 84, 2013–2019. doi:10.1210/jc.84.6.2013
Ho, K. K., and Participants, G. H. D. C. W. (2007). Consensus guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of adults with GH deficiency II: a statement of the GH Research Society in association with the European Society for Pediatric Endocrinology, Lawson Wilkins Society, European Society of Endocrinology, Japan Endocrine Society, and Endocrine Society of Australia. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 157, 695–700.
Hoffman, A., Kuntze, J. E., Baptista, J., Baum, H. B., Baumann, G. P., Biller, B. M., et al. (2004a). Growth hormone replacement therapy in adult-onset GH deficiency: effects on body composition in men and women in a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 89, 2048–2056. doi:10.1210/jc.2003-030346
Hoffman, A. R., Strasburger, C. J., Zagar, A., Blum, W. F., Kehely, A., Hartman, M. L., et al. (2004b). T002 Study Group. Efficacy and tolerability of an individualized dosing regimen for adult growth hormone replacement therapy in comparison with fixed body weight-based dosing. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 89, 3224–3233. doi:10.1210/jc.2003-032082
Holloway, L., Kohlmeier, L., Kent, K., and Marcus, R. (1997). Skeletal effects of cyclic recombinant human growth hormone and salmon calcitonin in osteopenic postmenopausal women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 82, 1111–1117. doi:10.1210/jc.82.4.1111
Johannsson, G., Rosén, T., and Bengtsson, B. A. (1997a). Individualized dose titration of growth hormone (GH) during GH replacement in hypopituitary adults. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 47, 571–581. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2265.1997.3271123.x
Johannsson, G., Mårin, P., Lönn, L., Ottosson, M., Stenlöf, K., Björntorp, P., et al. (1997b). Growth hormone treatment of abdominally obese men reduces abdominal fat mass, improves glucose and lipoprotein metabolism and reduces diastolic blood pressure. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 82, 727–734. doi:10.1210/jc.82.3.727
Johannsson, G., Rosén, T., Bosaeus, I., Sjöström, L., and Bengtsson, B. A. (1996). Two years of growth hormone (GH) treatment increases bone mineral content and density in hypopituitary patients with adult-onset GH deficiency. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 81, 2865–2873. doi:10.1210/jc.81.8.2865
Johnson, O. L., Jaworowicz, W., Cleland, J. L., Bailey, L., Charnis, M., Duenas, E., et al. (1997). The stabilization and encapsulation of human growth hormone into biodegradable microspheres. Pharm. Res. 14, 730–735. doi:10.1023/A:1012142204132
Jørgensen, J. O., Møller, N., Lauritzen, T., and Christiansen, J. S. (1990). Pulsatile versus continuous intravenous administration of growth hormone (GH) in GH-deficient patients: effects on circulating insulin-like growth factor-I and metabolic indices. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 70, 1616–1623. doi:10.1210/jcem-70-6-1616
Jostel, A., Mukherjee, A., Hulse, P. A., and Shalet, S. M. (2005). Adult growth hormone replacement therapy and neuroimaging surveillance in brain tumour survivors. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 62, 698–705. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2005.02282.x
Karavitaki, N., Warner, J. T., Marland, A., Shine, B., Ryan, F., Arnold, J., et al. (2006). GH replacement does not increase the risk of recurrence in patients with craniopharyngioma. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 64, 556–560. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2006.02508.x
Kargi, A., and Merriam, G. (2011). Chapter 2 – age-related changes in the growth hormone axis, and growth hormone therapy in the elderly. Endotext, ed. L. DeGroot. Available at: http://www.endotext.org/aging/aging2/agingframe2.htm/ [accessed February 15, 2013]
Koller, E. A., Green, L., Gertner, J. M., Bost, M., and Malozowski, S. N. (1998). Retinal changes mimicking diabetic retinopathy in two nondiabetic, growth hormone-treated patients. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 83, 2380–2383. doi:10.1210/jc.83.7.2380
Koltowska-Häggström, M., Mattsson, A. F., and Shalet, S. M. (2009). Assessment of quality of life in adult patients with GH deficiency: KIMS contribution to clinical practice and pharmacoeconomic evaluations. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 161, S51–S64. doi:10.1530/EJE-09-0266
Lahm, H., Amstad, P., Wyniger, J., Yilmaz, A., Fischer, J. R., Schreyer, M., et al. (1994). Blockade of the insulin-like growth-factor-I receptor inhibits growth of human colorectal cancer cells: evidence of a functional IGF-II mediated autocrine loop. Int. J. Cancer 58, 452–459. doi:10.1002/ijc.2910580325
Laursen, T., Gravholt, C. H., Heickendorff, L., Drustrup, J., Kappelgaard, A. M., Jørgensen, J. O., et al. (2001). Long-term effects of continuous subcutaneous infusion versus daily subcutaneous injections of growth hormone (GH) on the insulin-like growth factor system, insulin sensitivity, body composition, and bone and lipoprotein metabolism in GH-deficient adults. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 86, 1222–1228. doi:10.1210/jc.86.3.1222
Laursen, T., Jørgensen, J. O., Jakobsen, G., Hansen, B. L., and Christiansen, J. S. (1995). Continuous infusion versus daily injections of growth hormone (GH) for 4 weeks in GH-deficient patients. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 80, 2410–2418. doi:10.1210/jc.80.8.2410
Laursen, T., Jørgensen, J. O., Susgaard, S., Møller, J., and Christiansen, J. S. (1993). Subcutaneous absorption kinetics of two highly concentrated preparations of recombinant human growth hormone. Ann. Pharmacother. 27, 411–415.
Leonsson, M., Hulthe, J., Oscarsson, J., Johannsson, G., Wendelhag, I., Wikstrand, J., et al. (2002). Intima-media thickness in cardiovascularly asymptomatic hypopituitary adults with growth hormone deficiency: relation to body mass index, gender, and other cardiovascular risk factors. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 57, 751–759. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2265.2002.01663.x
Lieberman, S. A., Oberoi, A. L., Gilkison, C. R., Masel, B. E., and Urban, R. J. (2008). Prevalence of neuroendocrine dysfunction in patients recovering from traumatic brain injury. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 86, 2752–2756. doi:10.1210/jc.86.6.2752
Liu, H., Bravata, D. M., Olkin, I., Friedlander, A., Liu, V., Roberts, B., et al. (2008). Systematic review: the effects of growth hormone on athletic performance. Ann. Intern. Med. 148, 747–758. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-148-10-200805200-00215
Liu, H., Bravata, D. M., Olkin, I., Nayak, S., Roberts, B., Garber, A. M., et al. (2007). Systematic review: the safety and efficacy of growth hormone in the healthy elderly. Ann. Intern. Med. 146, 104–115. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-146-2-200701160-00005
Magnavita, N., Teofili, L., and Leone, G. (1996). Hodgkin’s Lymphoma in a cyclist treated with growth hormone. Am. J. Hematol. 52, 65–66. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-8652(199605)52:1<65::AID-AJH16>3.0.CO;2-6
Maison, P., Griffin, S., Nicoue-Beglah, M., Haddad, N., Balkau, B., Chanson, P., et al. (2004). Impact of growth hormone (GH) treatment on cardiovascular risk factors in GH-deficient adults: a metaanalysis of blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled trials. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 89, 2192–2199. doi:10.1210/jc.2003-030840
Malozowski, S., and Stadel, B. V. (1995). Benign intracranial hypertension in children with growth hormone deficiency treated with growth hormone. J. Pediatr. 126, 996–999. doi:10.1016/S0022-3476(95)70232-6
Malozowski, S., Tanner, L. A., Wysowski, D., and Fleming, G. A. (1993). Growth hormone, insulin-like growth factor I, and benign intracranial hypertension. N. Engl. J. Med. 329, 665–666. doi:10.1056/NEJM199308263290917
Mauras, N., Pescovitz, O. H., Allada, V., Messig, M., Wajnrajch, M. P., Lippe, B., et al. (2005). Transition Study Group 2005. Limited efficacy of growth hormone (GH) during transition of GH-deficient patients from adolescence to adulthood: a phase III multicenter, double-blind, randomized two-year trial. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 90, 3946–3955. doi:10.1210/jc.2005-0208
McGauley, G. A., Cuneo, R. C., Salomon, F., and Sönksen, P. H. (1990). Psychological well-being before and after growth hormone treatment in adults with growth hormone deficiency. Horm. Res. 33(Suppl. 4), 52–54. doi:10.1159/000181584
McKenna, S. P., Doward, L. C., Alonso, J., Kohlmann, T., Niero, M., Prieto, L., et al. (1999). The QoL-AGHDA: an instrument for the assessment of quality of life in adults with growth hormone deficiency. Qual. Life Res. 8, 373–383. doi:10.1023/A:1008884703919
Molitch, M. E., Clemmons, D. R., Malozowski, S., Merriam, G. R., and Vance, M. L. Endocrine Society. (2011). Evaluation and treatment of adult growth hormone deficiency: an Endocrine Society clinical practice guideline. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 96, 1587–1609. doi:10.1210/jc.2011-0179
Monson, J. P., Jönsson, P., Koltowska-Häggström, M., and Kourides, I. (2007). Growth hormone (GH) replacement decreases serum total and LDL-cholesterol in hypopituitary patients on maintenance HMG CoA reductase inhibitor (statin) therapy. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 67, 623–628.
Moock, J., Albrecht, C., Friedrich, N., Völzke, H., Nauck, M., Koltowska-Haggström, M., et al. (2009). Health-related quality of life and IGF-1 in GH-deficient adult patients on GH replacement therapy: analysis of the German KIMS data and the Study of Health in Pomerania. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 160, 17–24. doi:10.1530/EJE-08-0738
Murata, M., Kaji, H., Mizuno, I., Sakurai, T., Iida, K., Okimura, Y., et al. (2003). A study of carotid intima-media thickness in GH deficient adults during onset among adults and children. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 148, 333–338. doi:10.1530/eje.0.1480333
Murray, R. D., Skillicorn, C. J., Howell, S. J., Lissett, C. A., Rahim, A., Smethurst, L. E., et al. (1999). Influences on quality of life in GH deficient adults and their effect on response to treatment. Clin. Endocrinol. (Oxf.) 51, 565–573. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2265.1999.00838.x
O’Halloran, D. J., Tsatsoulis, A., Whitehouse, R. W., Holmes, S. J., Adams, J. E., and Shalet, S. M. (1993). Increased bone density after recombinant human growth hormone (GH) therapy in adults with isolated GH deficiency. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 76, 1344–1348. doi:10.1210/jc.76.5.1344
Olsson, D. S., Buchfelder, M., Schlaffer, S., Bengtsson, B. A., Jakobsson, K. E., Johannsson, G., et al. (2009). Comparing progression of non-functioning pituitary adenomas in hypopituitarism patients with and without long-term GH replacement therapy. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 161, 663–669. doi:10.1530/EJE-09-0572
Park, M. R., Chun, C., Ahn, S. W., Ki, M. H., Cho, C. S., and Song, S. C. (2010). Sustained delivery of human growth hormone using a polyelectrolyte complex loaded thermosensitive polyphosphazene hydrogel. J. Control. Release. 147, 359–367. doi:10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.07.126
Péter, F., Bidlingmaier, M., Savoy, C., Ji, H. J., and Saenger, P. H. (2012). Three-year efficacy and safety of LB03002, a once-weekly sustained-release growth hormone (GH) preparation, in prepubertal children with GH deficiency (GHD). J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 97, 400–407. doi:10.1210/jc.2011-2234
Pfeifer, M., Verhovec, R., Zizek, B., Prezelj, J., Poredos, P., and Clayton, R. N. (1999). Growth hormone (GH) treatment reverses early atherosclerotic changes in GH-deficient adults. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 84, 453–457. doi:10.1210/jc.84.2.453
Rosilio, M., Blum, W. F., Edwards, D. J., Shavrikova, E. P., Valle, D., Lamberts, S. W., et al. (2004). Long-term improvement of quality of life during growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy in adults with GH deficiency, as measured by questions on life satisfaction-hypopituitarism (QLS-H). J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 89, 1684–1693. doi:10.1210/jc.2003-030134
Rudman, D., Feller, A. G., Nagraj, H. S., Gergans, G. A., Lalitha, P. Y., Goldberg, A. F., et al. (1990). Effects of human growth hormone in men over 60 years old. N. Engl. J. Med. 323, 1–6. doi:10.1056/NEJM199007053230101
Saller, B., Mattsson, A. F., Kann, P. H., Koppeschaar, H. P., Svensson, J., Pompen, M., et al. (2006). Healthcare utilization, quality of life and patient-reported outcomes during two years of growth hormone (GH) replacement therapy in GH-deficient adults – comparison between Sweden, The Netherlands and Germany. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 15, 843–850. doi:10.1530/eje.1.02149
Salomon, F., Cuneo, R. C., Umpleby, A. M., and Sönksen, P. H. (1994). Interactions of body fat and muscle mass with substrate concentrations and fasting insulin levels in adults with growth hormone deficiency. Clin. Sci. 87, 201–206.
Schneider, H. J., Kreitschmann-Andermahr, I., Ghigo, E., Stalla, G. K., and Agha, A. (2007). Hypothalamopituitary dysfunction following traumatic brain injury and aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: a systematic review. JAMA 298, 1429–1438. doi:10.1001/jama.298.12.1429
Sesmilo, G., Biller, B. M., Llevadot, J., Hayden, D., Hanson, G., Rifai, N., et al. (2000). Effects of growth hormone administration on inflammatory and other cardiovascular risk markers in men with growth hormone deficiency. A randomized, controlled clinical trial. Ann. Intern. Med. 133, 111–122. doi:10.7326/0003-4819-133-2-200007180-00010
Sesmilo, G., Biller, B. M., Llevadot, J., Hayden, D., Hanson, G., Rifai, N., et al. (2001). Effects of growth hormone (GH) administration on homocysteine levels in men with GH deficiency: a randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 86, 1518–1524. doi:10.1210/jc.86.4.1518
Shalet, S. M., Shavrikova, E., Cromer, M., Child, C. J., Keller, E., Zapletalová, J., et al. (2003). Effect of growth hormone (GH) treatment on bone in postpubertal GH-deficient patients: a 2-year randomized, controlled dose-ranging study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 88, 4124–4129. doi:10.1210/jc.2003-030126
Sklar, C. A., Mertens, A. C., Mitby, P., Occhiogrosso, G., Qin, J., Heller, G., et al. (2002). Risk of disease recurrence and second neoplasms in survivors of childhood cancer treated with growth hormone: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 87, 3136–3141. doi:10.1210/jc.87.7.3136
Spathis, G. S., Bloom, S. R., Jeffcoate, W. J., Millar, J. G., Kurtz, A., Pyasena, M. R., et al. (1974). Subcutaneous glucagon as a test of the ability of the pituitary to secrete GH and ACTH. Clin. Endocrinol. 3, 175–186. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.1974.tb01793.x
Stochholm, K., Gravholt, C. H., Laursen, T., Jørgensen, J. O., Laurberg, P., Andersen, M., et al. (2006). Incidence of GH deficiency – a nationwide study. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 155, 61–71. doi:10.1530/eje.1.02191
Swerdlow, A. J., Higgins, C. D., Adlard, P., and Preece, M. A. (2002). Risk of cancer in patients treated with human pituitary growth hormone in the UK, 1959-85: a cohort study. Lancet 360, 273–277. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(02)09519-3
Takala, J., Ruokonen, E., Webster, N. R., Nielsen, M. S., Zandstra, D. F., Vundelinckx, G., et al. (1999). Increased mortality associated with growth hormone treatment in critically ill adults. N. Engl. J. Med. 341, 785–792. doi:10.1056/NEJM199909093411102
Tanriverdi, F., Taheri, S., Ulutabanca, H., Caglayan, A. O., Ozkul, Y., Dundar, M., et al. (2008). Apolipoprotein E3/E3 genotype decreases the risk of pituitary dysfunction after traumatic brain injury due to various causes: preliminary data. J. Neurotrauma 25, 1071–1077. doi:10.1089/neu.2007.0456
Tauber, M., De Bouet Du Portal, H., Sallerin-Caute, B., Rochiccioli, P., and Bastide, R. (1993). Differential regulation of serum growth hormone (GH)-binding protein during continuous infusion versus daily injection of recombinant human GH in GH-deficient children. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 76, 1135–1139. doi:10.1210/jc.76.5.1135
Terrio, H., Brenner, L. A., Ivins, B. J., Cho, J. M., Helmick, K., Schwab, K., et al. (2009). Traumatic brain injury screening: preliminary findings in a US Army Brigade Combat Team. J. Head Trauma Rehabil. 24, 14–23. doi:10.1097/HTR.0b013e31819581d8
Touraine, P., D’Souza, G. A., Kourides, I., Abs, R., Barclay, P., Xie, R., et al. (2009). GH Lipoatrophy Study Group. Lipoatrophy in GH deficient patients treated with a long-acting pegylated GH. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 161, 533–540. doi:10.1530/EJE-09-0422
Underwood, L. E., Attie, K. M., and Baptista, J. Genentech Collaborative Study Group. (2003). Genentech Collaborative Study Group 2003. Growth hormone (GH) dose-response in young adults with childhood-onset GH deficiency: a two-year, multicenter, multiple-dose, placebo-controlled study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 88, 5273–5280. doi:10.1210/jc.2003-030204
van Baalen, B., Odding, E., Maas, A. I., Ribbers, G. M., Bergen, M. P., and Stam, H. J. (2003). Traumatic brain injury: classification of initial severity and determination of functional outcome. Disabil. Rehabil. 25, 9–18. doi:10.1080/dre.18.104.22.168
van Bunderen, C. C., van Nieuwpoort, I. C., Arwert, L. I., Heymans, M. W., Franken, A. A., Koppeschaar, H. P., et al. (2011). Does growth hormone replacement therapy reduce mortality in adults with growth hormone deficiency? Data from the Dutch National Registry of Growth Hormone Treatment in adults. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 96, 3151–3159. doi:10.1210/jc.2011-1215
Varewijck, A. J., Lamberts, S. W., Uitterlinden, P., Hofland, L. J., and Janssen, J. A. (2011). IGF-I bioactivity better reflects growth hormone deficiency than total IGF-I. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 96, 2248–2254. doi:10.1210/jc.2011-0051
Weissberger, A. J., Ho, K. K., and Lazarus, L. (1991). Contrasting effects of oral and transdermal routes of estrogen replacement therapy on 24-hour growth hormone (GH) secretion, insulin-like growth factor I, and GH-binding protein in postmenopausal women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 72, 374–381. doi:10.1210/jcem-72-2-374
Widdowson, W., and Gibney, J. (2008). The effect of growth hormone replacement on exercise capacity in patients with GH deficiency: a metaanalysis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 93, 4413–4417. doi:10.1210/jc.2008-1239
Yuen, K. C., Biller, B. M., Molitch, M. E., and Cook, D. M. (2009). Clinical review: is lack of recombinant growth hormone (GH)-releasing hormone in the United States a setback or time to consider glucagon testing for adult GH deficiency? J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 94, 2702–2707. doi:10.1210/jc.2009-0299
Keywords: growth hormone, adult growth hormone deficiency, growth hormone risks, insulin-like growth factor-I, IGF-I, growth hormone treatment
Citation: Reed ML, Merriam GR and Kargi AY (2013) Adult growth hormone deficiency – benefits, side effects, and risks of growth hormone replacement. Front. Endocrinol. 4:64. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2013.00064
Received: 29 March 2013; Paper pending published: 23 April 2013;
Accepted: 18 May 2013; Published online: 04 June 2013.
Edited by:Nicholas A. Tritos, Massachusetts General Hospital, USA
Reviewed by:Akira Shimatsu, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Japan
Laurence Katznelson, Stanford University, USA
Copyright: © 2013 Kargi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc. Mary L. Reed and George R. Merriam are US government authors and their work is not subject to copyright.
*Correspondence: Mary L. Reed, Geriatrics and Extended Care, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Madigan Health Care System, A-182 GEC, Tacoma, WA, USA e-mail: email@example.com;
George R. Merriam, Division of Metabolism, Endocrinology, and Nutrition, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, University of Washington School of Medicine, A-151, Tacoma, WA 98493, USA e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org