Melissa L. Erickson
Nathan T. Jenkins
Kevin K. McCully- 1Department of Pathobiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH, United States
- 2Department of Kinesiology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States
We discuss a novel hypothesis: the effect size of postmeal exercise for attenuating postprandial glucose will be a function of the exercise bout vs. the size of the postprandial glucose response, specifically peak and duration of the postprandial glucose excursion.
Introduction
Hyperglycemia is a hallmark feature of type 2 diabetes. Sustained high glucose concentrations play a central role in the development of diabetes-related complications (1). Importantly, restoration of glycemic control reduces cardiovascular disease (2). Thus, the primary goal of type 2 diabetes treatment is to achieve and maintain glycemic control. While various therapeutic options are available, glycemic control remains challenging. For example, the long-term performance of hypoglycemic agents is unsatisfactory (2–4).
Traditional markers for glycemic control include fasting glucose, hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C), and postprandial glucose. The gold standard for assessing glycemic control is HbA1C, which represents a 3-month average of glucose exposure. Postprandial glucose is gaining more recognition as a key glycemic target for therapeutic intervention, as multiple lines of evidence support its use as a clinical marker. Epidemiological studies have shown that postprandial glucose is a better cardiovascular disease predictor than HbA1C (5–7), as well as fasting glucose (8). In addition, interventional studies have shown that reducing postprandial glucose improves glycemic control (9) and leads to reductions in cardiovascular disease risk in people with type 2 diabetes (10).
Due to the growing body of evidence supporting the link between postprandial glucose and cardiovascular disease, the International Diabetes Federation (IDF) published guidelines for postmeal glucose management. Specifically, the target glucose value 1–2 h after meal ingestion is 160 mg/dL (9.0 mmol/L) (11). Recommendations for treatment of postprandial glucose include pharmacologic and non-pharmacological strategies (11). Interestingly, exercise was not described as a treatment option in the IDF recommendation.
Exercise has been shown to be important for both prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes, and the American Diabetes Association and American College of Sports Medicine have developed exercise guidelines for people with type 2 diabetes (12). However, these guidelines are not specific to postprandial glucose, and they do not mention exercise timing in relation to meal ingestion. The lack of attention to exercise timing in treatment guidelines highlights a need for more research on postmeal exercise and its effects on diabetes-related outcomes.
Postprandial exercise has been shown to be safe (13) and effective in people with type 2 diabetes (Figure 1) (14). Exercise acutely increases glucose uptake in skeletal muscle. This occurs through an insulin-independent process (15, 16) and, therefore, is applicable to type 2 diabetes. Muscle contraction serves as a signal for GLUT-4 receptor translocation on the skeletal muscle plasma membrane (17). GLUT-4 receptors are responsible for transporting glucose from systemic circulation and into skeletal muscle. This effect occurs after just a single bout of exercise, meaning the glucose-lowering effects can be realized immediately (17). Furthermore, the acute nature of this response indicates that long-term training adaptations are not necessary for beneficial effects on blood glucose to occur. The optimal timing for postmeal exercise has been suggested to be 30 min after the start of a meal (18). This is because peak postmeal glucose values typically occur within 90 min (19), and initiating exercise during this time window will blunt peak glucose excursions protecting the endothelial wall from pro-atherogenic glucose concentrations.
Figure 1. Continuous glucose monitoring data during the postprandial phase of both sedentary and postmeal exercise conditions after a standardized meal in the same individual. Figure has been adapted from previously published works (20). American Physiological Society, permissions for reuse not required due to original authorship.
Effective Exercise Considers Glucose Levels
A key characteristic of type 2 diabetes is an exaggerated glucose response to a meal, and studies using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) have shown that glucose excursions in people with type 2 diabetes are well above those of non-diabetic controls, even when treated with hypoglycemic agents (21, 22). An optimal postprandial glucose treatment will produce a glucose response that mimics normal glucose tolerance. Measurable parameters of the postprandial glucose response that can be used for interventional guidance include glucose peak and duration of elevation. Those with normal glucose tolerance do not exceed 140 mg/dL and glucose levels return to preprandial levels after 2 h. Given these parameters, postmeal exercise can be strategically applied to lower peak glucose as well as time of elevation, thus resembling normal glycemic control. Effective exercise for type 2 diabetes requires balance, in that, clinically meaningful glucose reductions should be pursued, while minimizing risk for hypoglycemia (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Indicates optimal range of postprandial glucose control. The upper glucose bound is set by the International Diabetes Federation Guidelines, while the lower glucose bound is defined by hypoglycemic risk. Continuous glucose monitoring data are representative of a 24-h glucose profile of an individual with type 2 diabetes. Summary data have been published previously (23).
We propose that the effectiveness of exercise will be dependent on the postprandial glucose response, including the glucose peak and duration of elevation. Larger amplitude, longer duration glucose excursions will require more intervention than smaller, shorter glucose excursions to produce a normoglycemic pattern. Therefore, the measurable effect size of an exercise bout will be dependent on the glycemic excursion itself, in that, a higher and longer excursion will experience less reduction from the same exercise bout compared to a smaller and shorter excursion (Figure 3). This concept is supported by quantitative comparisons of our previous work. In two distinct studies, we used CGM to assess the effects of postmeal exercise on postprandial glucose excursions in those treated with metformin (20), as well as those treated with more advanced T2D requiring metformin plus additional hypoglycemic agents (23).
Figure 3. Theoretical depiction. Solid line represents sedentary condition and dashed line represents postmeal exercise condition. (A) Displays larger effect size for postmeal exercise-induced glucose reduction in a smaller, shorter excursion. (B) Displays smaller effect size for a higher, longer glucose excursion.
We observed different effect sizes for postmeal exercise-induced reductions in 2-h glucose peak, including a large effect size (0.81) in individuals treated with only metformin (20) vs. a moderate effect size (0.56) in those treated with additional hypoglycemic agents (23). We propose that these differential results can be explained by two key differences among studies, including (1) differences in the applied exercise bout, as well as (2) differences in the amplitude of the postprandial glucose peak. The larger effect size was observed in the study that applied the larger exercise stimulus, i.e., exercise that was longer in duration (50 vs. 30 min) and modestly higher in intensity (60% VO2 max vs. 50% VO2 max). In addition, the amplitude of the 2-h glucose peak measured in the control condition was lower in the metformin study participants compared to that of the metformin plus add-on hypoglycemic agent study participants (12.0 vs. 14.5 mmol/L, respectively), indicative of an easier glucose “target” for reduction. This comparison suggests that a larger exercise stimulus (longer in duration, higher in intensity) applied to the smaller glucose peak resulted in a more effective strategy for glucose attenuation. One interpretation of this comparison is that the effectiveness of a postmeal exercise bout is a function of the amount of exercise vs. the size of the glucose peak.
To further explore this concept, a second comparison of the two studies was completed. The aim of this analysis was to use CGM data to quantify the amount of time exercising vs. the amount of time spent in postprandial hyperglycemia. This can be thought of as the percentage of time in which the glucose excursion was being intervened upon by exercise. This analysis revealed differences among our two studies. The percentage of time that was “treated” by exercise was 34% in the metformin study (20), vs. only 16% in the add-on therapy (23). These findings are consistent with the measured effect sizes, in that the larger effect size corresponded with the larger percentage of treated time (ES: 0.81; 34% of time was “treated” with exercise) and the smaller effect size corresponded with the small percentage of treated time (ES: 0.56; 16% of time was “treated” with exercise). These findings further support the concept that the effectiveness of exercise will be a function of the exercise bout vs. the size of the postprandial glucose response.
Significant glucose reductions have been reported in people with type 2 diabetes using a large variety of exercise strategies. This includes continuous (24, 25) and interval protocols (20, 23). In addition, various durations (20–60 min) and intensities have been shown to be effective (26, 27). Furthermore, multiple modes of exercise have been used including walking and cycling (24, 25). More recently, high-intensity interval training has been shown to be a promising approach for improving health outcomes in the people with type 2 diabetes (28–30). Taken together, these studies show there are numerous strategies to prescribe exercise. It is currently not clear if one variable is more important than another for postprandial glucose control. However, in the case of postmeal exercise approaches, it seems evident that maximizing the glucose-lowering power of an exercise bout will require taking the size of the glucose excursion itself, into account.
Complementary Effects of Drugs and Exercise
Hypoglycemic agents are a mainstay in type 2 diabetes treatment. Thus, the combined effects of hypoglycemic agents and exercise should remain a high priority for future investigations. Metformin is the first-line therapy (31) for the prevention and treatment of type 2 diabetes. During disease progression, a variety of hypoglycemic agents can be used for glycemic control. Currently, there are nine available FDA-approved classes of oral hypoglycemic agents (32) and several injectable agents. Some drug classes specifically target and reduce postprandial glucose, including α-glucosidase inhibitors, DPP-4 inhibitors, glinides, GLP-1 derivatives, short-acting sulfonylureas, and insulin regimens (31). All of these medications are recommended to be taken along with regular exercise.
The target tissues and mechanisms of action widely vary among drug classes. Subsequently, these drug classes have differing effects on the 24-h glycemic profile. Some drugs effectively lower fasting glucose, while others target postprandial glucose. Postmeal exercise may be an effective complement to these agents. In fact, the combination of postmeal exercise and hypoglycemic agents has been shown to produce further glucose-lowering effects compared to drug treatment alone (20, 23). Additional experimental studies are needed to determine the interactive effects of postmeal exercise among various drug classes. This will involve appropriately timing medication and exercise in order to avoid hypoglycemia.
Insulin and insulin-analog regimens have been specifically designed to reduce postprandial glucose. Incorporation of postmeal exercise alongside insulin therapy may also have beneficial health effects. If postmeal exercise is effective enough, it could potentially lead to a reduction in insulin dose. A study in participants with type 1 diabetes found that prolonged walking (~40–50 km) led to profound reductions in insulin administration (26%) compared to a sedentary day (33). Future studies should investigate the effectiveness of more feasible exercise strategies, including postmeal exercise, as a complementary treatment to insulin.
For safety reasons, optimal diabetes treatments should have a low probability for eliciting hypoglycemia. The counter-regulatory response is a natural physiological process that defends against hypoglycemia, and this can occur if glucose falls too low during exercise. The counter-regulatory release of hormones into the circulation, including glucagon, catecholamines (epinephrine and norepinephrine), cortisol, and growth hormone is triggered when glucose drops below 3.8 mmol/L (34). This effect has been demonstrated experimentally in people with type 2 diabetes (25, 35) and should remain a consideration with prescribing exercise alongside hypoglycemic agents.
Glucose-Guided Approach
Our current hypothesis that the effectiveness of an exercise bout will be dependent on the size of the glucose excursion itself. Therefore, optimal exercise approaches will require knowledge of glucose values in real time. One commonly used approach is self-monitoring capillary glucose with finger sticks and glucometers. When timed correctly, this method can be used to assess acute fluctuations in glucose after meals. In addition, CGM will likely play an important role. CGM technology uses a small probe within the subcutaneous tissue that samples and measures glucose concentrations in the interstitial fluid. Future studies should determine the most effective and feasible approach for glucose-guided exercise prescriptions, which may involve a hybrid approach of glucometers and CGM.
Conclusion
Improving the treatment of type 2 diabetes is a major health care need. Taming postprandial glucose excursions can be accomplished by exercising after meals. The effectiveness of an exercise bout for lowering glucose will be dependent upon the size (peak and duration) of the postprandial glucose excursion. Larger excursions necessitate more aggressive intervention, while smaller excursions are easier targets for attenuation. Glucose monitoring techniques, such as glucometers and CGM technology, may have an important role in quantifying the effectiveness of exercise bouts.
Author Contributions
ME, NJ, and KM developed ideas. ME drafted manuscript. NJ and KM edited and approved manuscript.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
The dissertation entitled “Effects of postmeal exercise and hypoglycemic agents on postprandial glucose excursions” informed concepts presented here (36).
References
1. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. N Engl J Med (1993) 329(14):977–86. doi:10.1056/nejm199309303291401
2. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Lancet (1998) 352(9131):837–53. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07019-6
3. Turner RC, Cull CA, Frighi V, Holman RR. Glycemic control with diet, sulfonylurea, metformin, or insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: progressive requirement for multiple therapies (UKPDS 49). UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. JAMA (1999) 281(21):2005–12. doi:10.1001/jama.281.21.2005
4. DeFronzo RA. Current issues in the treatment of type 2 diabetes. Overview of newer agents: where treatment is going. Am J Med (2010) 123(3 Suppl):S38–48. doi:10.1016/j.amjmed.2009.12.008
5. Jackson CA, Yudkin JS, Forrest RD. A comparison of the relationships of the glucose tolerance test and the glycated haemoglobin assay with diabetic vascular disease in the community. The Islington Diabetes Survey. Diabetes Res Clin Pract (1992) 17(2):111–23. doi:10.1016/0168-8227(92)90156-L
6. de Vegt F, Dekker JM, Ruhe HG, Stehouwer CD, Nijpels G, Bouter LM, et al. Hyperglycaemia is associated with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the Hoorn population: the Hoorn Study. Diabetologia (1999) 42(8):926–31. doi:10.1007/s001250051249
7. Meigs JB, Nathan DM, D’Agostino RB Sr, Wilson PW. Fasting and postchallenge glycemia and cardiovascular disease risk: the Framingham Offspring Study. Diabetes Care (2002) 25(10):1845–50. doi:10.2337/diacare.25.10.1845
8. Glucose tolerance and mortality: comparison of WHO and American Diabetes Association diagnostic criteria. The DECODE Study Group. European Diabetes Epidemiology Group. Diabetes Epidemiology: collaborative analysis of diagnostic criteria in Europe. Lancet (1999) 354(9179):617–21. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(98)12131-1
9. Holman RR, Thorne KI, Farmer AJ, Davies MJ, Keenan JF, Paul S, et al. Addition of biphasic, prandial, or basal insulin to oral therapy in type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med (2007) 357(17):1716–30. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa075392
10. Hanefeld M, Cagatay M, Petrowitsch T, Neuser D, Petzinna D, Rupp M. Acarbose reduces the risk for myocardial infarction in type 2 diabetic patients: meta-analysis of seven long-term studies. Eur Heart J (2004) 25(1):10–6. doi:10.1016/S0195-668X(03)00468-8
11. National Diabetes Statistics Report, 2014: Estimates of Diabetes and Its Burden in the United States. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2014).
12. Colberg SR, Sigal RJ, Fernhall B, Regensteiner JG, Blissmer BJ, Rubin RR, et al. Exercise and type 2 diabetes: the American College of Sports Medicine and the American Diabetes Association: joint position statement. Diabetes Care (2010) 33(12):e147–67. doi:10.2337/dc10-9990
13. Gaudet-Savard T, Ferland A, Broderick TL, Garneau C, Tremblay A, Nadeau A, et al. Safety and magnitude of changes in blood glucose levels following exercise performed in the fasted and the postprandial state in men with type 2 diabetes. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil (2007) 14(6):831–6. doi:10.1097/HJR.0b013e3282efaf38
14. Chacko E. Why exercise before breakfast may not be for diabetes patients. Conn Med (2014) 78(9):517–20.
15. Ploug T, Galbo H, Richter EA. Increased muscle glucose uptake during contractions: no need for insulin. Am J Physiol (1984) 247(6 Pt 1):E726–31.
16. Richter EA, Ploug T, Galbo H. Increased muscle glucose uptake after exercise. No need for insulin during exercise. Diabetes (1985) 34(10):1041–8. doi:10.2337/diabetes.34.10.1041
17. Goodyear LJ, Kahn BB. Exercise, glucose transport, and insulin sensitivity. Annu Rev Med (1998) 49:235–61. doi:10.1146/annurev.med.49.1.235
18. Haxhi J, Scotto di Palumbo A, Sacchetti M. Exercising for metabolic control: is timing important? Ann Nutr Metab (2013) 62(1):14–25. doi:10.1159/000343788
19. Daenen S, Sola-Gazagnes A, M’Bemba J, Dorange-Breillard C, Defer F, Elgrably F, et al. Peak-time determination of post-meal glucose excursions in insulin-treated diabetic patients. Diabetes Metab (2010) 36(2):165–9. doi:10.1016/j.diabet.2009.12.002
20. Erickson ML, Little JP, Gay JL, McCully KK, Jenkins NT. Postmeal exercise blunts postprandial glucose excursions in people on metformin monotherapy. J Appl Physiol (1985) (2017) 123(3):444–50. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00213.2017
21. Praet SF, Manders RJ, Meex RC, Lieverse AG, Stehouwer CD, Kuipers H, et al. Glycaemic instability is an underestimated problem in type II diabetes. Clin Sci (Lond) (2006) 111(2):119–26. doi:10.1042/cs20060041
22. van Dijk JW, Manders RJ, Hartgens F, Stehouwer CD, Praet SF, van Loon LJ. Postprandial hyperglycemia is highly prevalent throughout the day in type 2 diabetes patients. Diabetes Res Clin Pract (2011) 93(1):31–7. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2011.03.021
23. Erickson ML, Little JP, Gay JL, McCully KK, Jenkins NT. Effects of postmeal exercise on postprandial glucose excursions in people with type 2 diabetes treated with add-on hypoglycemic agents. Diabetes Res Clin Pract (2017) 126:240–7. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2017.02.015
24. Poirier P, Mawhinney S, Grondin L, Tremblay A, Broderick T, Cleroux J, et al. Prior meal enhances the plasma glucose lowering effect of exercise in type 2 diabetes. Med Sci Sports Exerc (2001) 33(8):1259–64. doi:10.1097/00005768-200108000-00003
25. Colberg SR, Zarrabi L, Bennington L, Nakave A, Thomas Somma C, Swain DP, et al. Postprandial walking is better for lowering the glycemic effect of dinner than pre-dinner exercise in type 2 diabetic individuals. J Am Med Dir Assoc (2009) 10(6):394–7. doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2009.03.015
26. Larsen JJ, Dela F, Madsbad S, Galbo H. The effect of intense exercise on postprandial glucose homeostasis in type II diabetic patients. Diabetologia (1999) 42(11):1282–92. doi:10.1007/s001250051440
27. Manders RJ, Van Dijk JW, van Loon LJ. Low-intensity exercise reduces the prevalence of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes. Med Sci Sports Exerc (2010) 42(2):219–25. doi:10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181b3b16d
28. Little JP, Francois ME. High-intensity interval training for improving postprandial hyperglycemia. Res Q Exerc Sport (2014) 85(4):451–6. doi:10.1080/02701367.2014.963474
29. Kearney ML, Thyfault JP. Exercise and postprandial glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. Curr Diabetes Rev (2016) 12(3):199–210. doi:10.2174/1573399811666150615112441
30. Nieuwoudt S, Fealy CE, Foucher JA, Scelsi AR, Malin SK, Pagadala MR, et al. Functional high intensity training improves pancreatic beta-cell function in adults with type 2 diabetes. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab (2017) 313(3):E314–E320. doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00407.2016
31. Standards of medical care in diabetes – 2014. Diabetes Care (2014) 37(Suppl 1):S14–80. doi:10.2337/dc14-S014
32. Tran L, Zielinski A, Roach AH, Jende JA, Householder AM, Cole EE, et al. The pharmacologic treatment of type 2 diabetes: oral medications. Ann Pharmacother (2015) 49(5): 540–56. doi:10.1177/1060028014558289
33. van Dijk JW, Eijsvogels TM, Nyakayiru J, Schreuder TH, Hopman MT, Thijssen DH, et al. Glycemic control during consecutive days with prolonged walking exercise in individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Res Clin Pract (2016) 117:74–81. doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2016.04.053
34. Peirce NS. Diabetes and exercise. Br J Sports Med (1999) 33(3):161–72; quiz 163–72, 222. doi:10.1136/bjsm.33.3.161
35. Kjaer M, Hollenbeck CB, Frey-Hewitt B, Galbo H, Haskell W, Reaven GM. Glucoregulation and hormonal responses to maximal exercise in non-insulin-dependent diabetes. J Appl Physiol (1985) (1990) 68(5):2067–74.
Keywords: postmeal exercise, postprandial glucose, type 2 diabetes, continuous glucose monitoring, glycemic control
Citation: Erickson ML, Jenkins NT and McCully KK (2017) Exercise after You Eat: Hitting the Postprandial Glucose Target. Front. Endocrinol. 8:228. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2017.00228
Received: 19 June 2017; Accepted: 22 August 2017;
Published: 19 September 2017
Edited by:
Kristian Karstoft, University of Copenhagen, DenmarkReviewed by:
Barry Braun, Colorado State University, United StatesCarmine Grieco, Colorado Mesa University, United States
Copyright: © 2017 Erickson, Jenkins and McCully. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Melissa L. Erickson, ericksm@ccf.org