Impact Factor 3.634 | CiteScore 3.51
More on impact ›

Case Report ARTICLE

Front. Endocrinol., 06 June 2018 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00292

First Prenatal Diagnosis of a Niemann–Pick Disease Type C2 Revealed by a Cystic Hygroma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

  • 1UMF, Carol Davila, Bucharest, Romania
  • 2St. John Hospital, Bucur Maternity, Bucharest, Romania
  • 3Filantropia Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania
  • 4Faculty of Medicine, Transilvania University of Brasov, Brasov, Romania

Background: The importance of fetal nuchal translucency was highlighted in the early 1990s as a useful first-trimester marker to identify fetal chromosomal abnormalities. Here, we report the prenatal diagnosis of a fetus with Niemann–Pick disease type C initially identified by first-trimester ultrasonographic markers and eventually confirmed by extensive genetic evaluation.

Case presentation: The fetus of a 30-year-old woman exhibited a cystic hygroma in the first trimester of pregnancy. The woman underwent chorionic villus sampling with extensive genetic investigations to identify the genetic cause of the ultrasonographic findings. Owing to normal karyotype results, further evaluation of 1,024 genes underlying structural abnormalities was performed. This test identified a homozygous mutation of the NPC2 gene (OMIM 601015), which has been reported to be pathogenic and responsible for Niemann–Pick disease type C2 (NPD-C2). Genetic evaluation of the parents found them to be carriers. Considering the poor prognosis, the parents decided to terminate the pregnancy. Ultrasonographic screening during the subsequent pregnancy showed normal findings; however, molecular testing for the previous familial mutation c.441 + 1G>A identified the fetus as homozygous for this mutation. Therefore, the parent chose to terminate the subsequent pregnancy as well.

Conclusion: We report the first prenatal diagnosis of NPD-C2 based on a cystic hygroma found during the first trimester of pregnancy as the sole indicator.

Introduction

In the early 1990s, Nicolaides et al. revealed the importance of fetal nuchal translucency (NT) as a first-trimester indicator of fetal chromosomal abnormalities (1). Since then, more than 2,000 articles have been published describing NT as a first-trimester prenatal diagnostic indicator of different chromosomal or monogenic diseases, including metabolic disorders. Herein, we report the prenatal diagnosis of Niemann–Pick disease type C2 (NPD-C2), initially identified by this first-trimester ultrasonographic anomaly and subsequently confirmed by extensive genetic evaluation.

Case Presentation

A 30-year-old woman was referred to her obstetrician for pregnancy monitoring. The first ultrasonographic examination confirmed a 7-week pregnancy. She had delivered one child after a previous normal pregnancy and had no history of abortion. Routine biochemical tests yielded normal red blood cell count, hemoglobin level, renal and hepatic function, and blood sugar level values for a woman in the first trimester of pregnancy. First-trimester ultrasonographic screening for chromosomal anomalies revealed a large NT of 6.4–7 mm, with thin septae limited to the back of the fetus; the nasal bone was present, and normal blood flow was observed through the ductus venosus and tricuspid valve (Figure 1).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Ultrasonographic images of the fetus.

The management of the case and challenges presented are detailed in Table 1.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. The diagnostic steps and challenges.

The combined risk for trisomies 21, 13, and 18 was 1/560, but considering the known association between these heterogeneous genetic syndromes and cystic hygroma, prenatal screening was recommended.

Karyotype analysis and DNA extraction from chorionic villi were performed. Owing to the normal results of the karyotype and multiple genetic syndromes associated with increased NT, we pursued next-generation sequencing of 1,024 genes that have been associated with several structural abnormalities; this identified the known homozygous pathogenic mutation c.441 + 1G>A of the NPC2 gene (NM_006432.3, OMIM 601015). The mutation has been reported in international databases as pathogenic (3) and responsible for NPD-C2. Genetic testing of the parents and the previous offspring revealed that they were both heterozygous (carriers) for the abovementioned mutation, although their first child was not affected (Figure 2).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. The family pedigree [according to Ref. (2)].

Considering the poor prognosis, the parents decided to terminate the pregnancy at 16 weeks, which was uneventful.

Six months later, the patient presented with a new pregnancy at a gestational age of 11 + 3 weeks. Ultrasonographic screening showed normal findings, with an NT of 6 mm. Chorionic villus sampling was performed due to the high recurrence risk of Niemann–Pick disease. The karyotype was found to be normal. However, molecular testing revealed that the fetus was homozygous for the previously identified familial mutation c.441 + 1G>A; hence, the pregnancy was terminated at 14 weeks.

Discussion

Niemann reported a child with hepatosplenomegaly and rapid neurodegeneration who died in early childhood (4). He described this illness as different from the storage disease described by Philippe Gaucher in 1882. Later, Pick defined the pathology of the disease, in which foam cells infiltrated peripheral tissues (5). Klenk discovered that tissue levels of sphingomyelin are elevated in this disorder (6). Since then, three different types of the disease, Niemann–Pick disease type A (NPD-A), Niemann–Pick disease type B (NPD-B), and Niemann–Pick disease type C (NPD-C), have been identified. Roscoe Brady discovered acid sphingomyelinase deficiency in 1966 and classified Niemann–Pick diseases into types A and B according to biochemistry; however, the enzymatic deficiency associated with type C disease remained uncertain (7).

Niemann–Pick disease type A was described as the acute neuronopathic form. NPD-B is pan-ethnic, with a later onset than NPD-A as well as less severity. The overall prevalence of types A and B combined is estimated to be 1:250,000, although NPD-A is highest among Ashkenazi Jews (approximately 1 per 70–100 persons) (8). The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics recommends routine carrier screening for the following nine disorders in this population: Tay–Sachs disease, Canavan disease, cystic fibrosis, familial dysautonomia, mucolipidosis IV, NPD-A, Fanconi anemia group C, Bloom syndrome, and Gaucher disease, owing to carrier detection rates as high as ≥90% and population carrier frequencies of ≥1% (9).

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Genetics also recommends that all Ashkenazi Jews undergo routine carrier screening for four of the most common genetic disorders that are either lethal or associated with significant morbidity: Tay–Sachs disease, Canavan disease, cystic fibrosis, and familial dysautonomia, and also suggests screening with an expanded panel that adds testing for Bloom syndrome, familial hyperinsulinemia, Fanconi anemia group C, Gaucher disease, glycogen storage disease type I, Joubert syndrome, Maple syrup urine disease, mucolipidosis IV, NPD-A, and Usher syndrome (10).

Generally, Niemann–Pick disease is initially suspected upon the observation of variable phenotypic manifestations, but the final diagnoses of NPD-A and NPD-B are based on the identification of acid sphingomyelinase deficiency. The definitive diagnosis of NPD-C requires the demonstration of abnormal intracellular cholesterol trafficking by the impaired response to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol loading in cultured fibroblasts (11).

Using the landmark criteria for identifying Niemann–Pick disease as described by Crocker and Farber in 1958 (12), Crocker first identified NPD-C in 1961 (13). NPD-C can be diagnosed from the perinatal period until late adulthood (14), and its estimated prevalence is approximately 1:100,000 in Europe. More than 85% of patients have systemic involvement of the liver, spleen, or lung before neurological symptoms manifest. For NPD-C, two genotypes related to mutations in the NPC1 gene (NPD-C1) or the NPC2 gene (NPD-C2) have been identified (15).

The existence of NPD-C as a distinct entity remained disputed until a decisive diagnosis was made in Roscoe Brady’s laboratory by Pentchev et al. (16). Pentchev et al. redefined the biochemical and pathological phenotypes of the NPC by discovering unusual oxysterols on the protein, which was critical to understanding the progress of this disease (17). Cultured fibroblasts and other tissues from individuals with NPD-C demonstrated highly variable levels of acid sphingomyelinase activity (18, 19). In terms of NPD-C pathogenesis, it was observed that the NPC1 and NPC2 proteins bind to cholesterol derived from endocytosed lipoproteins and transport it to the lysosomal membrane (20). Genetic defects in NPC1 and NPC2 are responsible for neurodegenerative disorders characterized by the accumulation of cholesterol and other lipids in lysosomes (21). Freeze-fracture electron microscopy demonstrated that the NPC yeast orthologs Ncr1p and Npc2p are vital for the formation and expansion of raft-like domains in the vacuolar membrane in the stationary and acute nitrogen starvation phases. Furthermore, the multivesicular body pathway has an important role in inducing microautophagy in response to acute nitrogen starvation. These data show that NPC proteins promote microautophagy in the stationary phase and under nitrogen starvation conditions, thereby increasing sterol levels in the limiting membrane of the vacuole (22).

Data from patients reported to date allow for the following conclusions to be derived: (1) the combination of clinical features found in patients with NPD-C is unique but not pathognomonic for juvenile dystonic lipidosis; (2) NPD-C can be initially identified by the examination of nerve bundle fibroblasts with electron microscopy, but definitive diagnosis requires determining the lipid profile from a liver or spleen biopsy in the absence of demonstrable enzymatic deficiency; (3) intralysosomal storage differs between the central nervous system and the spleen; and (4) juvenile dystonic lipidosis represents a juvenile variant of NPD-C (23).

Prenatal testing for pregnancies at risk of NPD-A or NPD-B includes measuring sphingomyelinase activity in amniotic fibroblasts (24, 25). Screening for population-specific mutations is feasible for individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish and North African descent (26); however, as mentioned earlier, there are two separate disease gene loci for NPD-C, the NPC1 gene on chromosome 18q11-q12, and the NPC2 gene (also called the HE1 gene) on chromosome 14q24.3 (2729).

Ultrasonographic examination of fetuses and placentas plays a major role in the diagnosis of metabolic disorders (30). The known metabolic disorders associated with non-immune hydrops are Gaucher disease, GM1 gangliosidosis type 1, Hurler syndrome, and mucolipidosis type I. In 1990, Meizner et al. reported an association of non-immune hydrops fetalis with Niemann–Pick disease for the first time. Ultrasonographic, biochemical, and histochemical studies of the placentas of four unrelated women carrying fetuses afflicted with NPD-A, who underwent prostaglandin-induced abortions at approximately the 19th week of gestation, demonstrated sphingomyelin accumulation. This indicates the essential role of the enzyme sphingomyelinase in the early stages of gestation (31).

In 2016, Colin et al. presented the third worldwide case of an in utero NPC diagnosis. Ultrasonographic screening at 22 weeks of gestation detected fetal ascites, and hepatomegaly and splenomegaly progressively appeared. There were no signs of placentomegaly or hydrops fetalis. The diagnosis of NPD-C was prenatally confirmed by the filipin test, NPC1 sequencing, and a multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification assay, which revealed a maternal missense mutation (c.2608T>C; p.Ser870Pro) and a paternal deletion of exons 5–25 (32). This prenatal case of NPC suggests that even in the absence of a family history of hydrops fetalis, Niemann–Pick disease should be considered a possible diagnosis. To the best of our knowledge, there have been no reported NPC diagnoses in utero during the first trimester of pregnancy.

The only study that aimed to assess the association between inherited metabolic disorders and NT measurements was by De Biasio et al. in 2006. They observed 13 fetuses afflicted with Gaucher disease, glycogenosis type II, mucopolysaccharidosis type I, Krabbe disease, metachromatic leukodystrophy, mucopolysaccharidosis type II, NPD-A, Pelizaeus–Merzbacher disease, and sialidosis, and concluded that an increased NT was found only in one fetus with trisomy 21 but without mucopolysaccharidosis type II. Thus, the NT in early pregnancy might be normal even in fetuses afflicted with conditions known to be associated with non-immune hydrops fetalis (33).

When thin septae are present inside the cervix along with fluid accumulation, differential diagnosis includes an enlarged NT and cystic hygroma. Cystic hygroma or hygroma colli involves the abnormal accumulation of fluid in the region of the fetal neck (34); its diagnosis via ultrasonography is based on a bilateral, mostly symmetric, cystic structure present in the occipitocervical region, with the lesion either septated by internal trabeculae or non-septated (35). Our ultrasonographic findings revealed the presence of fluid accumulation at the level of the fetal neck that was 6 mm in length with thin septae and no evidence of lateral accumulation. In such cases, it is disputed whether the presence of septae alone can differentiate between increased NT and cystic hygroma (36). Other studies found that cystic hygroma is more likely to be associated with genetic anomalies than increased NT, although both conditions require genetic tests for diagnosis (37).

In our case, the cystic hygroma was the main finding that prompted the prenatal diagnosis of NPD-C2. This was of particular importance considering the mother’s first-born child was unaffected. Determining the carrier status of both parents made possible the diagnosis of the disease in the subsequent pregnancy despite the fetus’ normal appearance on ultrasonography.

Regarding future pregnancies, the family was informed of that there was a 25% chance of transmitting the genetic anomaly to a subsequent fetus, and that preimplantational diagnosis is the only option to avoid another afflicted child. The couple refused in vitro fertilization and preimplantational diagnosis for personal and social reasons.

Concluding Remarks

Cystic hygroma in the first trimester was associated with fetal chromosomal or structural anomalies; however, there have been no published reports on the association of NT/CH with NPD-C to date. We describe a fetus in which NPD-C2 was diagnosed in the first trimester based solely on an abnormal NT appearance, which allowed the screening and detection of this disease during the patient’s subsequent pregnancy despite a normal NT.

Availability of Data and Materials

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Ethics Statement

Written consent was obtained from the patient. The patient consented to the publication of medical data (including figures from diagnostic imaging results and from histological examination results).

Author Contributions

All the authors materially participated in this work; have read and approved the final manuscript. LP and FN carried out the clinical genetic examination of the patient; contributed to the clinical description and molecular genetic description; and conceived, designed, and evaluated the molecular genetic investigation. R-MS and MM co-wrote the manuscript and revised it critically for important intellectual content and for appropriate language.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

NPD-A, Niemann–Pick disease type A; NPD-B, Niemann–Pick disease type B; NPD-C, Niemann–Pick disease type C; NPD-C2, Niemann–Pick type C2; NT, nuchal translucency.

References

1. Nicolaides KH, Azar G, Byrne D, Mansur C, Marks K. Fetal nuchal translucency: ultrasound screening for chromosomal defects in first trimester of pregnancy. BMJ (1992) 304(6831):867–9. doi:10.1136/bmj.304.6831.867

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Bennet RL, Steinhaus KA, Uhrich SB, O’Sullivan CK, Resta RG, Lochner-Doyle D, et al. Recommendations for standardized human pedigree nomenclature. Am J Hum Genet (1995) 56(5):745–52.

Google Scholar

3. Cupidi C, Frangipane F, Gallo M, Clodomiro A, Colao R, Bernardi L, et al. Role of Niemann-Pick type C disease mutations in dementia. J Alzheimers Dis (2017) 55(3):1249–59. doi:10.3233/JAD-160214

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Niemann A. Ein unbekanntes Krankheitsbild. Jahrb Kinderheilkd (1914) 79:1–10. [in German]

Google Scholar

5. Pick L. Der morbus gaucher und die ihm ähnlichen krankheiten (die lipoidzellige splenohepatomegalie typus Niemann und die diabetische lipoidzellenhypoplasie der milz). Ergeb. Inn. Med Kinderheilkd (1926) 29:519–627. [in German]

Google Scholar

6. Klenk E. Über die Natur der Phosphatide und anderer Lipide des Gehirns und der Leber bei der Niemann-Pick’schen Krankheit. Z Physiol Chem (1935) 235:24–5. doi:10.1515/bchm2.1935.235.1-2.24 [in German]

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Brady RO, Kanfer JN, Mock MB, Fredrickson DS. The metabolism of sphingomyelin. II. Evidence of an enzymatic deficiency in Niemann-Pick disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (1966) 55:366–9. doi:10.1073/pnas.55.2.366

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Meikle PJ, Hopwood JJ, Clague AE, Carey WF. Prevalence of lysosomal storage disorders. JAMA (1999) 281:249–54. doi:10.1001/jama.281.3.249

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Gross SJ, Pletcher BA, Monaghan KG. Professional practice and guidelines committee. Carrier screening in individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish descent. Genet Med (2008) 10:54–6. doi:10.1097/GIM.0b013e3181776242

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Committee on Genetics. Committee opinion No. 691: carrier screening for genetic conditions. Obstet Gynecol (2017) 129:e41–55. doi:10.1097/AOG.0000000000001952

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Patterson MC, Nordli DR, Dashe JF. Overview of Niemann-Pick disease. Literature Review Current Through: June 2017 (2017). Available from: https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-niemann-pick-disease?search=niemann%20pick&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~33&usage_type=default&display_rank=1

Google Scholar

12. Crocker AC, Farber S. Niemann-Pick disease: a review of eighteen patients. Medicine (1958) 37:1–95. doi:10.1097/00005792-195802000-00001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Crocker AC. The cerebral defect in Tay-Sachs disease and Niemann-Pick disease. J Neurochem (1961) 7:69–80. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.1961.tb13499.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Brady RO, Filling-Katz MR, Barton NW, Pentchev PG. Niemann-Pick disease types C and D. Neurol Clin (1989) 7:75.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

15. Vanier MT. Niemann-Pick disease type C. Orphanet J Rare Dis (2010) 5:16. doi:10.1186/1750-1172-5-16

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Pentchev PG, Comly ME, Kruth HS, Patel S, Proestel M, Weintroub H. The cholesterol storage disorder of the mutant BALB/c mouse. A primary genetic lesion closely linked to defective esterification of exogenously derived cholesterol and its relationship to human type C Niemann-Pick disease. J Biol Chem (1986) 261:2772–7.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

17. Patterson MC, Walkley SU. Niemann-Pick disease, type C and Roscoe Brady. Mol Genet Metab (2017) 120(1–2):34–7. doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2016.11.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Gal AE, Brady RO, Hibbert SR, Pentchev PG. A practical chromogenic procedure for the detection of homozygotes and heterozygous carriers of Niemann-Pick disease. N Engl J Med (1975) 293:632–6. doi:10.1056/NEJM197509252931304

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Vanier MT, Wenger DA, Comly ME, Rousson R, Brady RO, Pentchev PG. Niemann-Pick disease group C: clinical variability and diagnosis based on defective cholesterol esterification. A collaborative study on 70 patients. Clin Genet (1988) 33:331–48. doi:10.1111/j.1399-0004.1988.tb03460.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Kwon HJ, Abi-Mosleh L, Wang ML, Deisenhofer J, Goldstein JL, Brown MS, et al. Structure of N-terminal domain of NPC1 reveals distinct subdomains for binding and transfer of cholesterol. Cell (2009) 137(7):1213–24. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.049

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Rosenbaum AI, Maxfield FR. Niemann-Pick type C disease: molecular mechanisms and potential therapeutic approaches. J Neurochem (2011) 116(5):789–95. doi:10.1111/j.1471-4159.2010.06976.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Takuma T, Megumi F, Tsuyako T, Cheng J, Orii M, Takatori S, et al. Niemann-Pick type C proteins promote microautophagy by expanding raft-like membrane domains in the yeast vacuole. ELife (2017) 6:e25960. doi:10.7554/eLife.25960

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Martin JJ, Lowenthal A, Ceuterick C, Vanier MT. Juvenile dystonic lipidosis (variant of Niemann-Pick disease type C). J Neurol Sci (1984) 66(1):33–45. doi:10.1016/0022-510X(84)90139-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Vanier MT. Prenatal diagnosis of Niemann-Pick diseases types A, B and C. Prenat Diagn (2002) 22:630. doi:10.1002/pd.368

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Wenger DA, Wharton C, Sattler M, Clark C. Niemann-Pick disease: prenatal diagnoses and studies of sphingomyelinase activities. Am J Med Genet (1978) 2:345. doi:10.1002/ajmg.1320020405

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Wasserstein MP, Schuchman EH. Acid sphingomyelinase deficiency. GeneReviews®. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1370 (Accessed: June 18, 2015).

Google Scholar

27. Vanier MT. Phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity in Niemann-Pick disease type C: current knowledge and practical implications. Wien Klin Wochenschr (1997) 109:68–73.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

28. Morris JA, Zhang D, Coleman KG, Nagle J, Pentchev PG, Carstea ED. The genomic organization and polymorphism analysis of the human Niemann-Pick C1 gene. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (1999) 261:493–8. doi:10.1006/bbrc.1999.1070

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Naureckiene S, Sleat DE, Lackland H, Fensom A, Vanier MT, Wattiaux R, et al. Identification of HE1 as the second gene of Niemann-Pick C disease. Science (2000) 290:2298–301. doi:10.1126/science.290.5500.2298

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Schoenfeld A, Abramovici A, Klibanski C, Ovadia J. Placental ultrasonographic biochemical and histochemical studies in human fetuses affected with Niemann-Pick disease type A. Placenta (1985) 6(1):33–43. doi:10.1016/S0143-4004(85)80030-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Meizner I, Levy A, Carmi R, Robinsin C. Niemann-Pick disease associated with nonimmune hydrops fetalis. Am J Obstet Gynecol (1990) 163(1 Pt 1):128–9. doi:10.1016/S0002-9378(11)90685-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Colin E, Barth M, Boussion F, Latour P, Piguet-Lacroix G, Guichet A, et al. In utero diagnosis of Niemann-Pick type C in the absence of family history. JIMD Rep (2016) 28:105–10. doi:10.1007/8904_2015_516

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. De Biasio P, Prefumo F, Casagrande V, Stroppiano M, Venturini PL, Filocamo M. First-trimester fetal nuchal translucency and inherited metabolic disorders. Prenat Diagn (2006) 26(1):77–80. doi:10.1002/pd.1341

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Chen CP, Chien SC. Prenatal sonographic features of Turner syndrome. J Med Ultrasound (2007) 15:251–7. doi:10.1016/S0929-6441(08)60042-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Bianca S, Bartoloni G, Boemi G, Barrano B, Barone C, Cataliotti A, et al. Familial nuchal cystic hygroma without fetal effects: genetic counselling and further evidence for an autosomal recessive subtype. Congenit Anom (2010) 50:139–40. doi:10.1111/j.1741-4520.2010.00273.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Molina FS, Avgidou K, Kagan KO, Poggi S, Nicolaides KH. Cystic hygromas, nuchal edema, and nuchal translucency at 11–14 weeks of gestation. Obstet Gynecol (2006) 107:678–83. doi:10.1097/01.AOG.0000201979.23031.32

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Sanhal C, Mendilcioglu I, Ozekinci M, Yakut S, Merdun Z, Simsek M, et al. Prenatal management, pregnancy and pediatric outcomes in fetuses with septated cystic hygroma. Braz J Med Biol Res (2014) 47(9):799–803. doi:10.1590/1414-431X20143895

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: cystic hygroma, unusual association, Niemann–Pick disease, prenatal diagnosis, homozygous mutation

Citation: Ples L, Sima R-M, Nedelea F and Moga M (2018) First Prenatal Diagnosis of a Niemann–Pick Disease Type C2 Revealed by a Cystic Hygroma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature. Front. Endocrinol. 9:292. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00292

Received: 09 March 2018; Accepted: 17 May 2018;
Published: 06 June 2018

Edited by:

Robert Kenneth Semple, University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Reviewed by:

Zaleha Abdullah Mahdy, National University of Malaysia, Malaysia
Consolato Sergi, University of Alberta Hospital, Canada

Copyright: © 2018 Ples, Sima, Nedelea and Moga. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Romina-Marina Sima, romina.sima@yahoo.es