Sec. Experimental Endocrinology
Volume 9 - 2018 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2018.00437
KISS1/KISS1R in Cancer: Friend or Foe?
- 1Department of Medicine, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
- 2Child Health Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
- 3Division of Surgical Oncology, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, Canada
- 4Department of Pediatrics, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
- 5Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, United States
The KISS1 gene encodes KISS1, a protein that is rapidly processed in serum into smaller but biologically active peptides called kisspeptins (KPs). KISS1 and the KPs signal via the G-protein coupled receptor KISS1R. While KISS1 and KPs are recognized as potent positive regulators of the reproductive neuroendocrine axis in mammals, the first reported role for KISS1 was that of metastasis suppression in melanoma. Since then, it has become apparent that KISS1, KPs, and KISS1R regulate the development and progression of several cancers but interestingly, while these molecules act as suppressors of tumorigenesis and metastasis in many cancers, in breast and liver cancer they function as promoters. Thus, they join a small but growing number of molecules that exhibit dual roles in cancer highlighting the importance of studying cancer in context. Given their roles, KISS1, KPs and KISS1R represent important molecules in the development of novel therapies and/or as prognostic markers in treating cancer. However, getting to that point requires a detailed understanding of the relationship between these molecules and different cancers. The purpose of this review is therefore to highlight and discuss the clinical studies that have begun describing this relationship in varying cancer types including breast, liver, pancreatic, colorectal, bladder, and ovarian. An emerging theme from the reviewed studies is that the relationship between these molecules and a given cancer is complex and affected by many factors such as the micro-environment and steroid receptor status of the cancer cell. Our review and discussion of these important clinical studies should serve as a valuable resource in the successful development of future clinical studies.
Cancer is the second leading cause of mortatility and accounts for about 1 in every 6 deaths globally (http://www.who.int). At any time in development, the body contains abnormal cells with malignant potential or neoplastic characteristics. In the healthy host, these cells are detected, and destroyed by the immune system. However, under various physiological conditions these cells can escape the body's immune surveillance resulting in life-threatening tumorigenesis and deadly metastatic disease. The body produces molecules that can either inhibit
or promote the development of a tumor and its metastatic potential and identifying and studying these factors are essential in the treatment of cancer. In 1996, Welch and colleagues at The Pennsylvania State University College of Medicine, Hershey, Pennsylvania, conducted studies to identify the gene(s) responsible for the suppression of metastasis in chromosome 6/melanoma cell hybrids. Their brilliant work led to the discovery of a novel cDNA-designated KiSS-1 (1). This name was chosen to indicate that the cDNA encoded a metastasis suppressor sequence and also to recognize its discovery in the town of Hershey, Pennsylvania, the home of world-famous Hershey's chocolates known as Kisses. Out of that discovery and clever branding was born the era of kisspeptin biology.
In the original study from the Welch laboratory, Lee et al. (1) reported that among a panel of melanoma cells, KiSS-1 (later renamed KISS1) was expressed only in non-metastatic melanoma cells and when exogenous KISS1 was expressed in C8161 melanoma cells, metastasis was suppressed in an expression-dependent manner. Thus, they concluded that KISS1 suppresses the metastatic potential of malignant melanoma cell. Since this initial study (1), KISS1 (145 amino acid), the primary and full-length product of the KISS1 gene and its derivatives (54, 14, 13, and 10 amino acids) called kisspeptins, as well as their cognate receptor KISS1R (previously called GPR54), have been reported to exhibit anti-metastatic and/or anti-tumoral roles in numerous cancers e.g., bladder (2, 3), ovary (4), colorectal (5–7), pancreas (8), pituitary (9), prostate (10), and thyroid (11), as previously reviewed (6, 12–14). Mechanistically, these molecules may exert their anti-metastatic effect on these cancers via a repression of matrix metalloproteinase MMP-9 activity and inhibition of cancer cell migration and invasion (14, 15). Interestingly, based on studies conducted on the human breast carcinoma MDA-MB-435 cell line, KISS1 was also reported to suppress breast cancer metastasis (16). However, it is now recognized that MDA-MB-435 cells display a gene expression profile more closely resembling melanoma cancer cells, raising the possibility that these are melanoma and not breast cancer cells (17, 18). Based on the use of established cell models of breast cancer and breast cancer patient data, several studies from our laboratories (19, 20–22), and those of others (23–25) would later show that KISS1 and its receptor KISS1R, in striking contrast to most cancers, promote breast cancer invasion, and metastasis.
The finding that the same molecule can act as both a promoter and suppressor of tumorigenesis and metastasis is not unique to KISS1 or KISS1R as other molecules such as NFκB (26), c-Myc (27), AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) (28), transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) (29), SKY (30), and hyaluronidase (31) have been reported to play dual roles. Growing evidence suggest that the role any of these molecules assumes is dependent on many factors including the cancer type (e.g., melanoma vs. breast), stage of development (e.g., pre-malignant vs. malignant) and composition of its microenvironment (e.g., steroidal milieu and the absence and presence of other signaling molecules that might facilitate suppressor or promoter pathways). Thus, it is pivotal to study cancer in context (32). To date, in addition to playing a promoter role in breast cancer metastasis, KISS1 and KISS1R also appear to promote hepatic cell carcinoma (33).
Since the seminal discovery that KISS1 regulates metastasis of melanoma cells (1), a large and growing body of studies has described roles for KISS1 and KISS1R mRNA and protein in regulating tumor growth and metastasis (6, 12–14). These studies are of tremendous importance as we forge forward toward developing these molecules as either prognostic markers and/or therapeutic targets in the treatment of various types of cancers. The goal of this review is therefore to summarize and discuss the key clinical evidence in support of the finding that KISS1 and KISS1R act as both promoter and suppressor of tumorigenesis and metastasis (Table 1).
Metastasis Promoter Roles
Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer related deaths in women world-wide and metastasis is responsible for the majority of cancer deaths (44). Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) comprises a heterogeneous group of tumors defined as a basal-like subtype lacking estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1), progesterone receptor (PGR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (ERBB2) (45). TNBC represents 15–20% of all breast cancers and occurs frequently in women under 50 years of age, in women with African ancestry or in Hispanic women. Unfortunately, these patients do not benefit from hormone receptor or HER2-targeted therapies, leaving chemotherapy as the main systemic treatment option (45). The prognosis for TNBC patients remains poor since patients are often high grade and either metastatic at time of diagnosis or succumb to metastasis within 3 years of diagnosis (45).
Spanning a little over one decade, several studies have highlighted a detrimental role for KISS1/KISS1R in breast cancer. Martin et al. (34) first demonstrated that KISS1 mRNA and protein levels were found to be elevated in ERα-negative invasive ductal carcinoma compared to ERα-positive tumors, demonstrating their positive correlation with tumor progression and poor patient prognosis. This study also revealed that breast tumors that were positive for lymph node metastasis showed higher KISS1 levels compared to the lymph node negative tumors. Using immunohistochemistry, studies have shown that KISS1 and KISS1R is localized within the ductal carcinoma in situ and in invasive ductal carcinoma, and that there was higher cytoplasmic staining in tumors as well as surrounding cells, compared to normal tissue (19, 34, 35). Marot et al. (23) demonstrated that patients with high KISS1 and KISS1R expression in breast tumors had the shortest relapse-free survival relative to tumors expressing low levels of these genes. This study showed that treatment of ERα-positive MCF7 and T47D breast cancer cells with tamoxifen, a selective estrogen receptor modulator (with antagonistic role in breast tissue), stimulated KISS1/KISS1R expression, implicating that ERα signaling downregulates KISS/KISS1R levels. This negative regulation of KISS/KISS1R expression by ERα is well-documented in the ARC KISS1 neurons in the hypothalamus (46). Along with the results reported by Martin et al. it appears that the increase in KISS1R correlates better with a metastatic capacity rather than with tumor growth. Next, Papaoiconomou et al. (35) found higher expression of KISS1 and KISS1R protein in breast cancer tissues (ductal carcinomas and lobar carcinomas) compared to non-cancerous fibrocystic mammary tissues. However, a significant correlation was not found between KISS1 and KISS1R expression and tumor grade, tumor size, lymph node positivity, histological type or ER status, results possibly due to the study's small sample size (n = 43).
Recently, we demonstrated that KISS1/KISS1R mRNA and protein expression was upregulated in primary TNBC tumor biopsies compared to healthy breast tissue (19) (Table 1). We found localization of KISS1 and KISS1R in invasive ductal carcinoma tumors using immunostaining. Furthermore, immunolocalization of endogenous KISS1R was found to be enhanced at the leading edge of migratory tumor cells (21). We also demonstrated that KISS1R signaling induces the drug resistant phenotype in TNBC cells, by inducing the expression of efflux drug transporter, breast cancer resistance protein (ABCG2) and by activating the tyrosine kinase, AXL (19). The P13K/AKT and Ras/ERK pathways are the most dysregulated signaling cascades in human carcinomas that are related to tumor drug resistance, survival, and proliferation (47). We found that KISS1R signaling in the drug-resistant cells led to an increase in the expression of AKT, ERK, and the anti-apoptotic protein, survivin. Specifically we and others found that ERα negatively regulates KISS1 (23), KISS1R expression and KISS1R-induced cell invasion (21). This may, in part, account for switching from the metastasis suppressor to metastasis promoter roles of the KISS1/KISS1R system in breast cancer. Thus, when ERα expression is lost (e.g., in TNBC), this results in increased transcription of KISS1/KISS1R, and increased receptor signaling and the induction of epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), allowing epithelial cells to acquire invasive characteristics (14). KISS1R signaling stimulates TNBC cell invasion by inducing invadopodia formation by activating key invadopodia proteins, cortactin, cofilin, and membrane type I matrix metalloproteases (MT1-MMP), via a β-arrestin2, and ERK1/2-dependent mechanism (20). Additionally, KISS1R signaling can activate the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) to promote TNBC invasion, via a β-arrestin2 and MMP-9 pathway (22). Interestingly, it appears that KISS1/KISS1R also mediate the effects of pro-invasive factors in TNBC, as it was recently reported that TGFβ-induced cancer cell invasion is dependent on KISS1 (25). Downregulation of KISS1 blocked TGFβ-mediated cancer cell invasion as well as MMP-9 expression and activity in TNBC cells, but not ERα-positive breast cancer cells. Through an immunohistochemical analysis of a tumor microarray, this study also showed that lymph node positive status is associated with high KISS1 protein levels.
In additional support for the pro-metastatic roles of KISS1R in breast cancer, a landmark study by Cho et al. (24) provided in vivo evidence that relative to wild-type mice, Kiss1r heterozygosity triggered a haploinsufficient phenotype where breast tumor initiation, growth and metastasis were delayed. This study also demonstrated that KISS1/KISS1R signaling occurs in an autocrine manner in breast epithelial cells to promote in breast tumor development in an animal model. Consistent with these findings, we observed that kisspeptin treatment of normal human mammary epithelial MCF10A cells induced cell transformation, resulting in a malignant phenotype. Kisspeptin treatment or exogenous expression of KISS1R in MCF10A cells induced EMT and stimulated cell invasiveness by inducing the expression of mesenchymal markers (N-cadherin, Snail/Slug) and loss of E-cadherin from cell-cell junctions (21). Finally, we also reported that in chick embryo assays, ERα-negative SKBR3 breast cancer cells expressing exogenous KISS1R exhibited increased invasion (21). Taken together, these in vitro, animal model studies and clinical findings provide substantial support that KISS1 and KISS1R promote metastasis in breast cancer.
Primary liver cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer deaths in the world where its incidence has increased by 75% between 1990 and 2015 (48). In the US, liver cancer cases have more than tripled since 1980, and cancer death rates have increased by almost 3% per year since 2000 (www.cancer.org), despite the reducing incidence of chronic hepatitis infections. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for ~90% of primary liver cancers, and in the last decade the development of this cancer has been linked to obesity-related metabolic syndrome which is on the rise world-wide (49).
To date, few studies have examined the role of KISS1/KISS1R in HCC and the findings have been contradictory. Ikeguchi et al. (33) first showed that KISS1 and KISS1R mRNA were overexpressed (22 and 43%, respectively) in surgically resected HCC samples, compared to non-cancerous liver and this was positively associated with disease progression and poor survival. Since none of the patients received preoperative chemotherapy or radiation therapy, the increase in KISS1/KISS1R levels was likely the direct result of the disease (33). In agreement with these findings, Schmid et al. (36) reported that in HCC patients who underwent liver transplantation had a worsened clinical outcome that correlated with elevated KP-54 expression, as assessed by immunohistochemistry. In contrast to these studies, Shengbing et al. (37) reported that KISS1 protein expression is lost in HCC, thus suggesting tumor suppressive roles in HCC. The authors examined the expression of MMP-9, a key driver of metastasis and report a negative association of KISS1 with MMP-9 in HCC (37). It remains unclear why the discrepancy exists among these studies, highlighting the need for further interrogation.
Metastasis Suppressor Roles
Pancreatic cancer remains a lethal disease since at the time of diagnosis most patients with pancreatic cancer have locally advanced tumors and/or metastases. While surgery represents the only curative treatment, just 10–15% of pancreatic cancer patients have resectable disease (50). Studies have shown that KISS1 and KISS1R are expressed in the pancreatic islets, in the endocrine alpha and beta cells, and regulates glucose stimulated insulin secretion (51, 52). Interestingly, in cancers such as pancreatic, ovarian, and colorectal cancer, a new facet in the relationship between KISS1/KISS1R and these cancers was uncovered. Namely, the expression of these proteins is high in the early stages of the disease but progressively become diminished with the advancement of the cancer. This observation is highlighted in some of the following studies but, as discussed, this requires further investigation.
Masui et al. (8) demonstrated that in pancreatic cancer patients, tumor KISS1 levels were significantly higher compared to normal tissue (n = 30). The authors also compared KISS1R mRNA levels in cancer and matched normal tissues from each patient (n = 5) and found that the receptor expression was higher in cancer tissue compared to the adjacent normal in all paired samples. Nagai et al. made similar observations among 53 pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma tissues, reporting strong immunostaining of KP-54 and KISS1R in tumors (38). They found that tumors that were negative for both KP-54 and KISS1R expression were significantly larger than tumors that were positive. Furthermore, they found that expression of KP-54 and KISS1R was associated with longer survival and recurrence was less frequent in patients who had KP-54-positive tumors compared with those who had KP-54-negative tumors. Plasma KP-54 levels were also measured in 23 patients; however, no significant difference in survival was found between the patients with high and low plasma levels. The lack of clinicopathological data for these patients as well as the absence of data on the KP-54 levels in healthy controls complicate the full interpretation of these findings.
Since KISS1 is expressed at reduced levels in advanced pancreatic cancer, McNally et al. (53) hypothesized that re-expression of KISS1 would reduce metastases. Pancreatic cell lines such as BxPC-3, PANC-1 and SUIT-2 express low levels of endogenous KISS1, thus KISS1 was overexpressed in a metastatic subclone of the SUIT-2 pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell line, S2VP10. SCID mice were implanted orthotopically with S2VP10L-KISS1 cells. Analyses of these mice revealed that mice bearing S2VP10L-KISS1 tumors developed fewer liver (98%) and lung (99%) metastases than control mice implanted with S2VP10L cells only expressing the empty KISS1 cloning vector. Based on the results, the authors concluded that KISS1 therapy might prove beneficial in suppressing the metastasis of pancreatic cancer.
It is important to note that the relationship between KISS1/KISS1R and pancreatic cancer requires further investigation as a study by Wang et al. (54) reported that the plasma KP-54 levels in pancreatic cancer patients were significantly higher when compared with healthy volunteers. However, a significant relationship was not found between KP-54 levels and clinicopathological factors such as tumor size, invasion, lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer in Europe and the US, and 30% of patients have metastasis at diagnosis (55, 56). A decrease in this cancer mortality rate has been observed in countries where screening and improved treatments exist (57). Current treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer are considered palliative, but include combination of cytotoxic therapy as well as targeted therapy with anti-EGFR and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor. These treatments have significantly improved the progression-free survival of patients with metastatic CRC, which ranges from 22 to 29 months (58). However, many patients progress as tumors acquire resistance to therapies. Since CRC is a heterogeneous disease, there is a critical need for the discovery of novel biomarkers, to identify patients who will most likely benefit from treatment.
Okugawa et al. (5) conducted one of the first studies to determine the expression of KISS1 mRNA and protein in 175 colorectal tumors and adjacent normal tissues from patients undergoing surgery, none of which received neo-adjuvant therapy. Kaplan-Meir survival studies indicated that patients with tumors with low KISS1 mRNA expression had poorer prognosis and exhibited lymph node metastasis, in comparison to patients with tumors that had high KISS1 levels. Using multivariate analysis, the authors concluded that decreased expression of KISS1 is a significant independent prognostic marker. Although not quantified, immunodetection of KISS1 using an antibody raised against amino acids 46–146 revealed that KISS1 was highly expressed in primary CRC and in early stages of the disease and decreased in advanced stage-tumors. Canbay et al. (39) using a commercially available enzyme-immunoassay, measured plasma KP-54 levels in blood samples from 81 CRC patients and 59 age matched healthy controls. This study found plasma KP-54 levels were significantly higher in CRC patients (86.2 ± 20.5 ng/ml) than in controls (49 ± 12.7 ng/ml). They also found that KP-54 levels were significantly correlated with nodal involvement of CRC leading the authors to propose using plasma KP-54 as a predictive marker for lymph node metastases of CRC.
Ji et al. (6) examined KISS1 and KISS1R transcripts in 94 samples from colorectal cancer tissues and 80 samples from normal tissue and found that the expression of KISS1 had a negative correlation with Duke's staging, TMN staging, tumor size and lymph node metastasis. KISS1R was also reduced and low KISS1R expression was linked to poor prognosis in patients. Remarkably, patients who were undergoing chemo/radiotherapy showed a higher expression of KISS1R compared to the patients without radiotherapy. Mechanistically, KISS1 regulates CRC cell invasion by reducing the secretion and activity of MMP-9 in an ERK-dependent manner (6, 59). Chen et al. (7) also found that a decrease in KISS1 expression and KP-54 protein expression correlated with an increased depth of invasion and lymph node metastasis in 126 CRC patients compared to 142 normal controls. To understand why KISS1 expression was reduced, they investigated whether KISS1 was inactivated by epigenetic mechanisms. By looking at the genomic methylation patterns of KISS1, they discovered hypermethylation of KISS1 in 88.33% (105/126) of CRC samples; this was significantly higher than the rate observed in normal colorectal tissues (9/142). The DNA methyltransferase inhibitor azacitinde (5-Aza-2-deoxycytidine) was able to restore KISS1 expression and the corresponding reduction of CRC cell invasion. These findings suggest that KISS1 is epigenetically modified in CRC, however further studies are required to better understand the potential role of KISS1 hypermethylation in the progression of colorectal cancer.
Urinary bladder cancer is the ninth most common malignant disease and the 13 most common cause of cancer-related death in the world. In bladder cancer, in situ hybridization studies revealed that KISS1 expression was significantly decreased or lost in invasive bladder tumors (n = 173) compared with their respective normal urothelium (n = 25) (40). Patients (n = 69) with lower KISS1 expression in bladder tumors showed a significant association with worse overall survival. KISS1 expression was significantly lower in bladder tumors with vascular invasion compared with normal urothelium. Furthermore, in this study, the authors observed that all bladder tumors developing distant metastases showed a complete loss of KISS1.
As observed in CRC, KISS1 was found to be hypermethylated in over 83% of 804 primary bladder tumors (2). This study also revealed that the epigenetic-induced loss of KISS1 expression was associated with poor survival and suggested that KISS1 levels have predictive value in identifying patients with poor outcome. Takeda et al. (3) examined KISS1 and KISS1R expression in 151 bladder cancer patients to determine their prognostic significance and reported that KISS1 immunoreactivity was significantly decreased in advanced stages of bladder cancer and inversely associated with tumor grade and stage. However, no association in KISS1R expression was found with disease progression. Moreover, this study demonstrated that KP-54 treatment significantly reduced the invasiveness of bladder cancer cells and lung metastasis in a metastasis animal model by inhibiting the expression and activity of MMP-9 via blockage of the nuclear translocation of NF-kB, a transcriptional regulator of MMP-9. Thus, this study provided pre-clinical evidence that KP-54 treatment may be an effective inhibitor of metastasis in urothelial carcinoma. Multivariate analysis revealed that KISS1 expression was an independent predictor of bladder cancer metastasis and overall patient survival. Thus, these studies strongly suggest that KISS1 expression in bladder tumors might be a biomarker of disease, especially for predicting the occurrence of metastases in highly aggressive urothelial carcinoma.
Ovarian cancer is a commonly diagnosed cancer worldwide and causes more deaths than any other cancer of the female reproductive system. It ranks among the top five deadliest cancers in most countries (48) and in the United States alone, each year about 20,000 women are diagnosed with ovarian cancer (60). KISS1 expression levels have also been linked to survival in ovarian cancer patients as reported in several studies. Hata et al. (61) observed that ovarian cancer patients exhibiting elevated levels of KISS1/KISS1R expression, as detected by quantitative PCR, had favorable prognosis using COX regression analysis in a cohort of 76 patients. Cao et al. (62) reported that KISS1 expression was significantly higher in 40 pre-operative epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) primary tumors compared to 20 uterine fibroids used as normal tissue. The presence of metastasis and tumor size was negatively associated with pre-operative KISS1 expression; patients with low KISS1 expression had shorter survival time than those with high expression. (62).
In addition to the mRNA expression studies described above, protein levels were also assessed in primary ovarian tumors. Interestingly, while the former study reported high KISS1 levels in pre-operative EOC primary tumors, Yu et al. (42) found that KISS1 immunostaining was much lower in 207 primary EOC biopsies compared to control biopsies (60 benign tumors, serous- or mucinous-cystadenoma). Nevertheless, Kaplan-Meir survival data indicated that patients with EOC KISS1-negative tissues had a lower survival rate compared to KISS1-positive patients, and among these patients, KISS1 protein expression was inversely associated with tumor grade and stage. Similarly, in the largest study of ovarian biopsies done to date, Prentice et al. (4) conducted an immunohistochemical analysis of KISS1 and KISS1R on a tissue microarray consisting of 518 ovarian carcinomas and found that strong KISS1 and KISS1R immunoreactivity was significantly associated with favorable prognosis and overall survival.
To determine whether circulating levels of plasma kisspeptins are dependent on the stage of ovarian cancer, Jayasena et al. (43) measured the levels of plasma kisspeptin concentration in 31 patients with ovarian carcinoma (Stages I to IV) and 31 healthy volunteers, using an in-house radioimmunoassay. They found that the mean kisspeptin concentration in the patients with stage I was significantly higher, compared with the patients with ovarian carcinoma of stages 2 to 4 vs. controls: 25.1 ±15.2) pmol/L (stage 1), 11.8 ±10.3 pmol/L (stages 2 to 4), and 13.1 ±6.92 pmol/L (controls). Thus, stage 1 patients had an increased plasma level compared to the control and stages 2–4. Larger studies are required to further examine the relationship between plasma kisspeptins and ovarian cancer. Based on the various ovarian cancer studies, the independent findings propose that KISS1/KISS1R protein levels could be used as prognostic biomarkers of disease progression in ovarian cancer.
Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer mortality in men of 40 years of age and older (63). Currently, chronically administered gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor (GnRH-R) agonists, which induce androgen deprivation, represent the primary clinical tools used for treating prostate cancer (64). Kisspeptin is powerful trigger of GnRH secretion and thereby a key positive regulator of the hypothalamus-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis. Studies have shown that administration of potent and long-acting kisspeptin agonists decreased serum testosterone levels by suppressing the HPG axis in rats and humans (65–67). Thus, it would be interesting to see if treating patients with kisspeptin agonists and antagonsits results in regression of prostate tumors and better outcome.
To determine whether KISS1 also has direct anti-metastatic activity in prostate cancer cells, Wang et al. examined KISS1 protein expression in 253 prostate tissue samples (normal tissue and prostate cancer) and found that KISS1 expression correlated negatively with clinical staging (10). Interestingly, in another study it was observed that there was no significant difference in plasma kisspeptin levels in 92 prostate cancer patients compared to healthy subjects (68). In addition to the prostate tissue samples, Wang et al. also measured KISS1 and KISS1R expression in metastatic human prostate cancer cell lines and observed that decreased mRNA expression correlated with increased metastatic ability of these cancer cell lines (10).
To understand how kisspeptin might exert direct anti-metastatic effects in prostate cancer, KISS1 was re-expressed in PC3M cells that lack KISS1 and this resulted in an inhibition of cell migration and invasion and re-sensitization of cells to chemotherapeutics (10). Another study showed that KISS1R signaling induced the activation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 2α kinase 2 (EIF2AK2) in prostate cancers and thereby inhibited cell growth and metastasis (69). Clearly, kisspeptin can act on prostate cancer cells both indirectly via the HPG axis and directly, thus its clinical value in treating prostate cancer is very promising and awaits further studies.
Lung cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of death in men (57). Zheng et al. showed that the expression of KISS1 was higher in stage I-II compared to stage III-IV and therefore showed an inverse relationship between KISS1 expression and progression of non-small cell lung cancer (NSLCL). KISS1 expression was also higher in the primary tumors compared to the second metastatic site, again showing that KISS1 functions as a metastasis suppressor (70). In another study by Sun et al. the authors analyzed the expression of KISS1 and KISS1R in 28 patients and found that KISS1/KISS1R expression was higher in stage III compared to stage IV, again demonstrating an inverse relationship between KISS1/KISS1R expression and progression of NSCLC (71). Karapanagiotou et al. measured circulating levels of kisspeptin in 96 NSCLC patients (76 with metastatic disease and 21 with locally advanced disease) and detected no difference in plasma kisspeptin levels between NSCLC patients and healthy volunteers or between locally advanced and metastatic disease patients (72). The finding is reminiscent of that seen in prostate cancer where at the cellular level while KISS1 and KISS1R expression correlated with the disease, serum kisspeptin did not (10, 68).
Concluding Remarks and Perspective
KISS1 and KISS1R clearly play important roles in regulating the progression of cancers. However, the roles (that is, suppressor or promoter) these molecules play are cancer context-specific and may be further modulated by other factors such as the micro-environment. Thus, as highlighted in this review, the discrepancies reported among some studies analyzing the same cancer type is not entirely surprising. Discrepancies may also be the result of different experimental procedures and use of different reagents. In particular, the use of different antibodies might be a major culprit. It is well known that many of the commercially-available KISS1R antibodies in use are not highly specific and thus, if proper and detailed antibody control studies are not conducted, some results might be incorrectly interpreted. For example, antibody specificity should be verified using knock-out and/or knock-down approaches, as we have employed in our studies (20). Additionally, it is important to know whether a given antibody detects the full length KISS1 or smaller peptides. It remains possible that the full-length protein might have one relationship with the given cancer (for e.g., high KISS1 is associated with higher survival rates) while the peptides may have the opposite relationship. Thus, in addition to assessing protein levels, it is important to investigate changes in KISS1/KISS1R transcript levels as well. Positive correlation between mRNA and protein data strengthens a given study. The lack of clinicopathological parameters such as whether patients received neo-adjuvant chemotherapy or whether the primary tumor was surgically removed or left in place can also greatly complicate the interpretation of the results leading to discrepant findings and conclusions. Additionally, the size of clinical cohorts remains a great challenge and care must be placed on the over-interpretation of data based on small clinical populations. Nevertheless, even small cohorts have their utility in helping to design larger cohort studies.
To summarize, in the cancers where KISS1 is thought to function as a tumor suppressor, clinical analysis of KISS1/KISS1R expression patterns suggests two general scenarios. It is possible that there is an initial upregulation of KISS1/KISS1R expression to suppress tumor progression (for example, as seen in pancreatic and ovarian cancers). KISS1/KISS1R expression is high in early stages of the disease and patients with high gene expression had longer survival and better prognosis. In colorectal, bladder and renal cell carcinoma, KISS1 expression is decreased (likely due to hypermethylation), and this was associated with lower survival rates and increase in metastasis. In breast cancer, such as TNBC where ERα is lacking, KISS1/KISS1R expression is elevated in tumors, and this pathway appears to promote tumor growth and metastasis and is associated with poor patient outcome. However, several questions remain unanswered. For example, does circulating plasma kisspeptin modify cancerous tissue? Do tumors produce kisspeptin in situ? Is the expression of KISS1/KISS1R associated with an earlier or later development of cancer? Do normal cells produce kisspeptin to minimize metastasis? Further studies are warranted to study the KISS1/KISS1R signaling pathway in each cancer type.
In conclusion, despite the limitations of some clinical studies, it remains abundantly clear that KISS1 and KISS1R play important roles in regulating the progression of cancers and the molecules have the strong potential to be used in developing novel therapies and/or as prognostic markers in treating cancer, the second most deadly disease worldwide.
MoB is the senior author on this manuscript. She helped with manuscript preparation and identification of the topics to cover. SG wrote the manuscript. SR, MuB, and AB assisted with manuscript preparation and provided critical feedback, especially with the clinical aspects.
This work was supported in part with funds from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR grant PJT-14882, Rutgers Grant transfer agreement #42356, SG) awarded to MoB and MuB. Support for this article was provided in part by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation; views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views of the Foundation.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
AMPK, AMP-activated protein kinase; BCRP, Breast cancer resistance protein; CRC, Colorectal cancer; DAG, Diacylglycerol; EGFR, Epidermal growth factor receptor; EMT, Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition; ESR1, Estrogen receptor alpha; EOC, Epithelial ovarian cancer; HER2, Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2; HCC, Hepatocellular carcinoma; HPG, Hypothalamus-pituitary-gonadal; KP, Kisspeptin; KISS1R, Kisspeptin receptor; MMP, Matrix metalloproteinases; PGR, Progesterone receptor; RCC, Renal cell carcinoma; TGF-β, transforming growth factor β; TNBC, Triple negative breast cancer.
1. Lee JH, Miele ME, Hicks DJ, Phillips KK, Trent JM, Weissman BE, et al. KiSS-1, a novel human malignant melanoma metastasis-suppressor gene. J Natl Cancer Inst. (1996) 88:1731–7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/88.23.1731
PubMed Abstract 1. Lee JH, Miele ME, Hicks DJ, Phillips KK, Trent JM, Weissman BE, et al. KiSS-1, a novel human malignant melanoma metastasis-suppressor gene. J Natl Cancer Inst. (1996) 88:1731–7. doi: 10.1093/jnci/88.23.1731
2. Cebrian V, Fierro M, Orenes-Pinero E, Grau L, Moya P, Ecke T, et al. KISS1 methylation and expression as tumor stratification biomarkers and clinical outcome prognosticators for bladder cancer patients. Am J Pathol. (2011) 179:540–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.05.009
3. Takeda T, Kikuchi E, Mikami S, Suzuki E, Matsumoto K, Miyajima A, et al. Prognostic role of KiSS-1 and possibility of therapeutic modality of metastin, the final peptide of the KiSS-1 gene, in urothelial carcinoma. Mol Cancer Ther. (2012) 11:853–63. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-11-0521
4. Prentice LM, Klausen C, Kalloger S, Kobel M, McKinney S, Santos JL, et al. Kisspeptin and GPR54 immunoreactivity in a cohort of 518 patients defines favourable prognosis and clear cell subtype in ovarian carcinoma. BMC Med. (2007) 5:33. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-5-33
5. Okugawa Y, Inoue Y, Tanaka K, Toiyama Y, Shimura T, Okigami M, et al. Loss of the metastasis suppressor gene KiSS1 is associated with lymph node metastasis and poor prognosis in human colorectal cancer. Oncol Rep. (2013) 30:1449–54. doi: 10.3892/or.2013.2558
6. Ji K, Ye L, Ruge F, Hargest R, Mason MD, Jiang WG. Implication of metastasis suppressor gene, Kiss-1 and its receptor Kiss-1R in colorectal cancer. BMC Cancer (2014) 14:723. doi: 10.1186/1471-2407-14-723
7. Chen SQ, Chen ZH, Lin SY, Dai QB, Fu LX, Chen RQ. KISS1 methylation and expression as predictors of disease progression in colorectal cancer patients. World J Gastroenterol (2014) 20:10071–81. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i29.10071
8. Masui T, Doi R, Mori T, Toyoda E, Koizumi M, Kami K, et al. Metastin and its variant forms suppress migration of pancreatic cancer cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2004) 315:85–92. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.01.021
9. Martinez-Fuentes AJ, Molina M, Vazquez-Martinez R, Gahete MD, Jimenez-Reina L, Moreno-Fernandez J, et al. Expression of functional KISS1 and KISS1R system is altered in human pituitary adenomas: evidence for apoptotic action of kisspeptin-10. Eur J Endocrinol. (2011) 164:355–62. doi: 10.1530/EJE-10-0905
10. Wang H, Jones J, Turner T, He QP, Hardy S, Grizzle WE, et al. Clinical and biological significance of KISS1 expression in prostate cancer. Am J Pathol. (2012) 180:1170–8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.11.020
11. Ringel MD, Hardy E, Bernet VJ, Burch HB, Schuppert F, Burman KD, et al. Metastin receptor is overexpressed in papillary thyroid cancer and activates MAP kinase in thyroid cancer cells. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2002) 87:2399. doi: 10.1210/jcem.87.5.8626
12. Ji K, Ye L, Mason MD, Jiang WG. The Kiss-1/Kiss-1R complex as a negative regulator of cell motility and cancer metastasis (Review). Int J Mol Med. (2013) 32:747–54. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2013.1472
13. Bhattacharya M, Babwah AV. Kisspeptin: beyond the brain. Endocrinology (2015) 156:1218–27. doi: 10.1210/en.2014-1915
14. Cvetkovic D, Babwah AV, Bhattacharya M. Kisspeptin/KISS1R system in breast cancer. J Cancer (2013) 4:653–61. doi: 10.7150/jca.7626
15. Chen S, Chen W, Zhang X, Lin S, Chen Z. Overexpression of KiSS-1 reduces colorectal cancer cell invasion by downregulating MMP-9 via blocking PI3K/Akt/NF-kappaB signal pathway. Int J Oncol. (2016) 48:1391–8. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2016.3368
16. Lee JH, Welch DR. Suppression of metastasis in human breast carcinoma MDA-MB-435 cells after transfection with the metastasis suppressor gene, KiSS-1. Cancer Res. (1997) 57:2384–7.
17. Ellison G, Klinowska T, Westwood RF, Docter E, French T, Fox JC. Further evidence to support the melanocytic origin of MDA-MB-435. Mol Pathol. (2002) 55:294–9. doi: 10.1136/mp.55.5.294
18. Ross DT, Scherf U, Eisen MB, Perou CM, Rees C, Spellman P, et al. Systematic variation in gene expression patterns in human cancer cell lines. Nat Genet. (2000) 24:227–35. doi: 10.1038/73432
19. Blake A, Dragan M, Tirona RG, Hardy DB, Brackstone M, Tuck AB, et al. G protein-coupled KISS1 receptor is overexpressed in triple negative breast cancer and promotes drug resistance. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:46525. doi: 10.1038/srep46525
20. Goertzen CG, Dragan M, Turley E, Babwah AV, Bhattacharya M. KISS1R signaling promotes invadopodia formation in human breast cancer cell via beta-arrestin2/ERK. Cell Signal. (2016) 28:165–176. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2015.12.010
21. Cvetkovic D, Dragan M, Leith SJ, Mir ZM, Leong HS, Pampillo M, et al. KISS1R induces invasiveness of estrogen receptor-negative human mammary epithelial and breast cancer cells. Endocrinology (2013) 154:1999–2014. doi: 10.1210/en.2012-2164
22. Zajac M, Law J, Cvetkovic DD, Pampillo M, McColl L, Pape C, et al. GPR54 (KISS1R) transactivates EGFR to promote breast cancer cell invasiveness. PLoS ONE (2011) 6:e21599. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0021599
23. Marot D, Bieche I, Aumas C, Esselin S, Bouquet C, Vacher S, et al. High tumoral levels of Kiss1 and G-protein-coupled receptor 54 expression are correlated with poor prognosis of estrogen receptor-positive breast tumors. Endocr Relat Cancer (2007) 14:691–702. doi: 10.1677/ERC-07-0012
24. Cho SG, Wang Y, Rodriguez M, Tan K, Zhang W, Luo J, et al. Haploinsufficiency in the prometastasis Kiss1 receptor Gpr54 delays breast tumor initiation, progression, and lung metastasis. Cancer Res. (2011) 71:6535–46. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-0329
25. Tian J, Al-Odaini AA, Wang Y, Korah J, Dai M, Xiao L, et al. KiSS1 gene as a novel mediator of TGFbeta-mediated cell invasion in triple negative breast cancer. Cell Signal. (2018) 42:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2017.10.002
26. Perkins ND. NF-kappaB: tumor promoter or suppressor? Trends Cell Biol. (2004) 14:64–9. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2003.12.004
27. Uribesalgo I, Benitah SA, Di Croce L. From oncogene to tumor suppressor: the dual role of Myc in leukemia. Cell Cycle (2012) 11:1757–64. doi: 10.4161/cc.19883
28. Zadra G, Batista JL, Loda M. Dissecting the dual role of AMPK in cancer: from experimental to human studies. Mol Cancer Res. (2015) 13:1059–72. doi: 10.1158/1541-7786.MCR-15-0068
29. Bachman KE, Park BH. Duel nature of TGF-beta signaling: tumor suppressor vs. tumor promoter. Curr Opin Oncol. (2005) 17:49–54. doi: 10.1097/01.cco.0000143682.45316.ae
30. Krisenko MO, Geahlen RL. Calling in SYK: SYK's dual role as a tumor promoter and tumor suppressor in cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta (2015) 1853:254–63. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.10.022
31. Lokeshwar VB, Cerwinka WH, Isoyama T, Lokeshwar BL. HYAL1 hyaluronidase in prostate cancer: a tumor promoter and suppressor. Cancer Res. (2005) 65:7782–9. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1022
32. Mina J. Bissell: Context Matters. Trends Cancer (2015) 1:6–8. doi: 10.1016/j.trecan.2015.08.009
33. Ikeguchi M, Hirooka Y, Kaibara N. Quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction analysis for KiSS-1 and orphan G-protein-coupled receptor (hOT7T175) gene expression in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. (2003) 129:531–5. doi: 10.1007/s00432-003-0469-z
34. Martin TA, Watkins G, Jiang WG, KiSS-1 expression in human breast cancer. Clin Exp Metast. (2005) 22:503–11. doi: 10.1007/s10585-005-4180-0
35. Papaoiconomou E, Lymperi M, Petraki C, Philippou A, Msaouel P, Michalopoulou F, et al. Kiss-1/GPR54 protein expression in breast cancer. Anticancer Res. (2014) 34:1401–7.
36. Schmid K, Wang X, Haitel A, Sieghart W, Peck-Radosavljevic M, Bodingbauer M, et al. KiSS-1 overexpression as an independent prognostic marker in hepatocellular carcinoma: an immunohistochemical study. Virchows Arch. (2007) 450:143–9. doi: 10.1007/s00428-006-0352-9
37. Shengbing Z, Feng LJ, Bin W, Lingyun G, Aimin H. Expression of KiSS-1 gene and its role in invasion and metastasis of human hepatocellular carcinoma. Anat Rec (Hoboken) (2009) 292:1128–34. doi: 10.1002/ar.20950
38. Nagai K, Doi R, Katagiri F, Ito T, Kida A, Koizumi M, et al. Prognostic value of metastin expression in human pancreatic cancer. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. (2009) 28:9. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-28-9
39. Canbay E, Ergen A, Bugra D, Yamaner S, Eraltan IY, Buyukuncu Y, et al. Kisspeptin-54 levels are increased in patients with colorectal cancer. World J Surg. (2012) 36:2218–24. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1636-7
40. Sanchez-Carbayo M, Capodieci P, Cordon-Cardo C. Tumor suppressor role of KiSS-1 in bladder cancer: loss of KiSS-1 expression is associated with bladder cancer progression and clinical outcome. Am J Pathol. (2003) 162:609–17. doi: 10.1016/S0002-9440(10)63854-0
41. Shoji S, Tang XY, Umemura S, Itoh J, Takekoshi S, Shima M, et al. Metastin inhibits migration and invasion of renal cell carcinoma with overexpression of metastin receptor. Eur Urol. 55:441–9 (2009). doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2008.02.048
42. Yu L, Zhu B, Wu S, Zhou L, Song W, Gong X, et al. Evaluation of the correlation of vasculogenic mimicry, ALDH1, KiSS-1, and MACC1 in the prediction of metastasis and prognosis in ovarian carcinoma. Diagn Pathol. (2017) 12:23. doi: 10.1186/s13000-017-0612-9
43. Jayasena CN, Comninos AN, Januszewski A, Gabra H, Taylor A, Harvey RA, et al. Plasma kisspeptin: a potential biomarker of tumor metastasis in patients with ovarian carcinoma. Clin Chem. (2012) 58:1061–3. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2011.177667
44. Akram M, Iqbal M, Daniyal M, Khan AU. Awareness and current knowledge of breast cancer. Biol Res. (2017) 50:33. doi: 10.1186/s40659-017-0140-9
45. Foulkes WD, Smith IE, Reis-Filho JS, Triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. (2010) 363:1938–48. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1001389
46. Smith JT, Cunningham MJ, Rissman EF, Clifton DK, Steiner RA. Regulation of Kiss1 gene expression in the brain of the female mouse. Endocrinology (2005) 146:3686–92. doi: 10.1210/en.2005-0488
47. Davis JM, Navolanic PM, Weinstein-Oppenheimer CR, Steelman LS, Hu W, Konopleva M, et al. Raf-1 and Bcl-2 induce distinct and common pathways that contribute to breast cancer drug resistance. Clin Cancer Res. (2003) 9:1161–70.
48. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer (2015) 136: E359–86. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210
49. Gan L, Liu Z, Sun C. Obesity linking to hepatocellular carcinoma: a global view. Biochim Biophys Acta (2018) 1869:97–102. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2017.12.006
50. Schneider G, Siveke JT, Eckel F, Schmid RM. Pancreatic cancer: basic and clinical aspects. Gastroenterology (2005) 128:1606–25. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.04.001
51. Hauge-Evans AC, Richardson CC, Milne HM, Christie MR, Persaud SJ, Jones PM. A role for kisspeptin in islet function. Diabetologia (2006) 49:2131–5. doi: 10.1007/s00125-006-0343-z
52. Song WJ, Mondal P, Wolfe A, Alonso LC, Stamateris R, Ong BW, et al. Glucagon regulates hepatic kisspeptin to impair insulin secretion. Cell Metab. (2014) 19:667–81. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2014.03.005
53. McNally LR, Welch DR, Beck BH, Stafford LJ, Long JW, Sellers JC, et al. KISS1 over-expression suppresses metastasis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in a xenograft mouse model. Clin Exp Metastasis (2010) 27:591–600. doi: 10.1007/s10585-010-9349-5
54. Wang CH, Qiao C, Wang RC, Zhou WP. KiSS1mediated suppression of the invasive ability of human pancreatic carcinoma cells is not dependent on the level of KiSS1 receptor GPR54. Mol Med Rep. (2016) 13:123–9. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2015.4535
55. Schmoll HJ, Van Cutsem E, Stein A, Valentini V, Glimelius B, Haustermans K, et al. ESMO Consensus Guidelines for management of patients with colon and rectal cancer. a personalized approach to clinical decision making. Ann Oncol. (2012) 23:2479–516. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mds236
56. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fedewa SA, Ahnen DJ, Meester GS, Barzi A, et al. Colorectal cancer statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. (2017) 67:177–193. doi: 10.3322/caac.21395
57. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. (2015) 65:87–108. doi: 10.3322/caac.21262
58. Van Cutsem E, Cervantes A, Nordlinger B, Arnold D, E.Group GW. Metastatic colorectal cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. (2014) 25(Suppl. 3): iii1–9. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu260
59. Zhu C, Takasu C, Morine Y, Bando Y, Ikemoto T, Saito Y, et al. KISS1 associates with better outcome via inhibiting matrix metalloproteinase-9 in colorectal liver metastasis. Ann Surg Oncol. (2015) 22(Suppl. 3): S1516–23. doi: 10.1245/s10434-015-4891-7
60. Chan JK, Chow S, Bhowmik S, Mann A, Kapp DS, Coleman RL. Metastatic gynecologic malignancies: advances in treatment and management. Clin Exp Metastasis (2018). doi: 10.1007/s10585-018-9889-7
61. Hata K, Dhar DK, Watanabe Y, Nakai H, Hoshiai H. Expression of metastin and a G-protein-coupled receptor (AXOR12) in epithelial ovarian cancer. Eur J Cancer (2007) 43:1452–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.03.004
62. Cao F, Chen L, Liu M, Lin W, Ji J, You J, et al. Expression of preoperative KISS1 gene in tumor tissue with epithelial ovarian cancer and its prognostic value. Medicine (Baltimore) (2016) 95:e5296. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000005296
63. Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. (2016) 66:7–30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332
64. Salciccia S, Gentilucci A, Cattarino S, Sciarra A. GNRH-agonist or antagonist in the treatment of prostate cancer: a comparision based on oncological results. Urologia (2016) 83:173–178. doi: 10.5301/uro.5000194
65. Matsui H, Masaki T, Akinaga Y, Kiba A, Takatsu Y, Nakata D, et al. Pharmacologic profiles of investigational kisspeptin/metastin analogues, TAK-448 and TAK-683, in adult male rats in comparison to the GnRH analogue leuprolide. Eur J Pharmacol. (2014) 735:77–85. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2014.03.058
66. MacLean DB, Matsui H, Suri A, Neuwirth R, Colombel M. Sustained exposure to the investigational Kisspeptin analog, TAK-448, down-regulates testosterone into the castration range in healthy males and in patients with prostate cancer: results from two phase 1 studies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2014) 99:E1445–53. doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-4236
67. Millar RP, Babwah AV. K ISS1R: Hallmarks of an effective regulator of the neuroendocrine axis. Neuroendocrinology (2015) 101:193–210. doi: 10.1159/000381457
68. Curtis AE, Murphy KG, Chaudhri OB, Ramachandran R, Young AM, Waxman J, et al. Kisspeptin is released from human prostate cancer cell lines but plasma kisspeptin is not elevated in patients with prostate cancer. Oncol Rep. (2010) 23:1729–34. doi: 10.3892/or_00000818
69. Kim TH, Cho SG. Kisspeptin inhibits cancer growth and metastasis via activation of EIF2AK2. Mol Med Rep. (2017) 16:7585–7590. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2017.7578
70. Zheng S, Chang Y, Hodges KB, Sun Y, Ma X, Xue Y, et al. Expression of KISS1 and MMP-9 in non-small cell lung cancer and their relations to metastasis and survival. Anticancer Res. (2010) 30:713–8.
71. Sun YB, Xu S. Expression of KISS1 and KISS1R (GPR54) may be used as favorable prognostic markers for patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Int J Oncol. (2013) 43:521–30. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2013.1967
72. Karapanagiotou EM, Dilana KD, Gkiozos I, Gratsias I, Tsimpoukis S, Polyzos A, et al. Metastin is not involved in metastatic potential of non-small cell lung cancer. Med Oncol. (2011) 28:559–64. doi: 10.1007/s12032-010-9466-7
Keywords: kisspeptin, KISS1R, cancer, metastasis, prognostic marker, metastasis promoter, metastasis suppressor
Citation: Guzman S, Brackstone M, Radovick S, Babwah AV and Bhattacharya MM (2018) KISS1/KISS1R in Cancer: Friend or Foe?. Front. Endocrinol. 9:437. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00437
Received: 01 March 2018; Accepted: 16 July 2018;
Published: 03 August 2018.
Edited by:William Henry Colledge, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom
Reviewed by:Justo P. Castaño, Instituto Maimonides de Investigación Biomédica de Cordoba (IMIBIC), Spain
Chad D. Foradori, Auburn University, United States
Takashi Yazawa, Asahikawa Medical University, Japan
Copyright © 2018 Guzman, Brackstone, Radovick, Babwah and Bhattacharya. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Moshmi M. Bhattacharya, email@example.com