GENERAL COMMENTARY article
Sec. Clinical Diabetes
Volume 14 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1256555
Commentary: Is preclinical diabetic retinopathy in diabetic nephropathy individuals more severe?
- Yotsuya-sanchome Ekimae Eye Clinic, Tokyo, Japan
by Yao H and Li Z (2023) Front. Endocrinol. 14:1144257. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1144257
We read the recent publication by Yao and Li [Yao H, Li Z. Is preclinical diabetic retinopathy in diabetic nephropathy individuals more severe?. Front. Endocrinol. (2023) 14:1144257] with considerable interest (1). The authors concluded that preclinical diabetic retinopathy (DR) may be more severe in individuals with diabetic nephropathy (DN) than in non-diabetic nephropathy (NDN) individuals with regard to microvascular and microstructural impairment. Moreover, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) may be a good indicator of retinal microvascular impairment (1). In addition to reading the study by Yao and Li, we have been investigating the association between diabetic eye disease (including the diagnostic or therapeutic agents for the disease) and DN for many years and have published several related papers (2–7). We support and appreciate the authors’ work and agree with their conclusions but have some concerns about their methods and results. Therefore, we would like to provide critical comments on these issues.
2 Is this a matched case–control study?
In the patient demographics summarized in Table 1 of the article, the two groups (NDN and DN groups) had exactly the same numbers of cases and male-to-female ratios (NDN versus DN: case: 44 versus 44; male-to-female ratio: 30:16 versus 30:16). Age and HbAlc levels were also fairly consistent between the two groups (age: 58.86 ± 11.60 versus 59.80 ± 12.55; HbAlc levels: 8.96 ± 2.88 versus 8.91 ± 1.89). The study design seemed to be an age-, sex-, and HbAlc level-matched pair case–control study (exact matching, with a ratio of 1:1). However, in the Methods section, the authors wrote that the study design was a retrospective case–control study. Moreover, the authors did not state anywhere in the article that controls included age, sex, and HbAlc levels matched in a ratio of 1:1. Therefore, there was insufficient disclosure of information about the statistical methods. If this was a matched pair case–control study, the authors should have described the correct study design, as in the study by Karat et al. (8).
3 Is the number of patients correct?
The authors stated that this study included 88 eyes of 88 patients (44 NDN and 44 DN). However, the numbers of male and female patients in Table 1 were 46 in each group; this exceeds the number of cases reported. Similarly, the number of diabetic mellitus therapy regimen of the DN group in Table 1 also appears to be discordant. We are concerned that similar miscalculations may have occurred in the data for other major outcomes. Therefore, we recommend that the authors reexamine the data of their study to determine whether the continuous variables were over- or underestimated.
Data from our previous studies indicate that a decline in eGFR could have a detrimental impact on DR, and the study by Yao and Li confirmed our hypothesis. However, several of the issues that we have pointed out have compromised the quality of their manuscript. Therefore, we hope the authors provide responses to these issues that satisfy the readers.
YK: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Conflict of interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
2. Kameda Y, Babazono T, Haruyama K, Iwamoto Y, Kitano S. Renal function following fluorescein angiography in diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease. Diabetes Care (2009) 32:e31. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1692
3. Kameda Y, Hirose A, Iida T, Uchigata Y, Kitano S. Giant retinal pigment epithelial tear associated with fluid overload due to end-stage diabetic kidney disease. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep (2017) 5:44–7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajoc.2016.11.004
4. Kameda Y, Babazono T, Uchigata Y, Kitano S. Renal function after intravitreal administration of vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors in patients with diabetes and chronic kidney disease. J Diabetes Investig (2018) 9:937–9. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12771
5. Kameda Y, Hanai K, Uchigata Y, Babazono T, Kitano S. Vitreous hemorrhage in diabetes patients with proliferative diabetic retinopathy undergoing hemodialysis. J Diabetes Investig (2020) 11:688–92. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13161
6. Kameda Y, Saeki T, Hanai K, Suzuki Y, Uchigata Y, Babazono T, et al. Is chronic kidney disease affecting the postoperative complications of vitrectomy for proliferative diabetic retinopathy? J Clin Med (2021) 10:5309. doi: 10.3390/jcm10225309
7. Kameda Y, Suzuki Y, Sugai M, Ishinabe K, Fukuoka N. Comment on: Long-term hemodialysis improved and stabilized diabetic macular edema: two case reports. Int J Ophthalmol (2022) 15:1891–2. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2022.11.25
8. Karat S, Lobo AC, Satish D, Devaraj R, Manjooran RR, Nithyanandam S. Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus exacerbated by COVID-19-induced inflammation is the risk factor for COVID-19-associated rhino-orbito-cerebral mucormycosis: A matched pair case-control study. Indian J Ophthalmol (2022) 70:3096–101. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_448_22
Keywords: diabetic retinopathy, diabetic nephropathy, retinal microvascular impairment, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), case-control study
Citation: Kameda Y (2023) Commentary: Is preclinical diabetic retinopathy in diabetic nephropathy individuals more severe?. Front. Endocrinol. 14:1256555. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1256555
Received: 11 July 2023; Accepted: 07 September 2023;
Published: 22 September 2023.
Edited by:Xuebin Fu, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, United States
Reviewed by:Triantafyllos Didangelos, University General Hospital of Thessaloniki AHEPA, Greece
Copyright © 2023 Kameda. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yusuke Kameda, firstname.lastname@example.org