Figure 1 of the article Comparative evaluation of DNase-seq footprint identification strategies, by Barozzi et al. (2014) contained a minor mistake, which we correct here. In panel E, the y axis ranges from 0.5 to 1 and not from 0 to 1 as indicated in the original figure. We resubmit a corrected version of Figure 1.
Figure 1
Statements
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
BarozziI.BoraP.MorelliM. J. (2014). Comparative evaluation of DNase-seq footprint identification strategies. Front. Genet. 5:278. 10.3389/fgene.2014.00278
Summary
Keywords
DNase-seq, footprinting, gene regulatory networks, bioinformatics tools and databases, comparison of methods
Citation
Barozzi I, Bora P and Morelli MJ (2014) Corrigendum: Comparative evaluation of DNase-seq footprint identification strategies. Front. Genet. 5:320. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2014.00320
Received
26 August 2014
Accepted
26 August 2014
Published
19 September 2014
Volume
5 - 2014
Edited and reviewed by
Mark D. Robinson, University of Zurich, Switzerland
Copyright
© 2014 Barozzi, Bora and Morelli.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: marco.morelli@iit.it
This article was submitted to Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Genetics.
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.