Introduction
Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a group of conditions that happen concurrently which increases the risks of stroke, cardiovascular diseases, and type 2 diabetes. These conditions include elevated blood pressure, excessive waist fat, high blood sugar, and abnormal triglyceride or cholesterol levels. The increasing rate of MetS is becoming a health problem worldwide (Rochlani et al., 2017). MetS and its components are caused by the complex interactions between various genetic, behavioral, and environmental factors, whose detailed mechanistic understanding is unclear. Previously, significant advances have been made in identifying the genetic determinants, epigenetic alterations, and proteomic/metabolic networks that play essential roles in the etiology and progression of MetS (Dizaji, 2018). However, we are still uncertain about what environmental and lifestyle triggers the onset and progression of the individual’s abnormal metabolic alterations. As such, the genetic heritability of the MetS only ranges from 10 to 30%, indicating both genetic and environmental factors play essential roles (Musani et al., 2017). Although several contributing factors have been raised, such as insulin resistance, chronic inflammation, adipose tissue dysfunction, oxidative stress, microbiome imbalance, and circadian rhythm disorders, it is challenging to clarify which of them are triggers or results of MetS (Xu et al., 2018).
The exposome concept was first introduced in 2005, which aims to investigate the relationships between the external exposures and internal -omes in the progression and occurrence of the disease, which can be an essential complement to the conventional etiology studies which primarily have focused on genetics (Wild, 2005). The comprehensive exposome refers to the total exposure in all life courses from conception onwards, and exposomics investigates external and internal exposures and how they collectively determine health and disease risks (Vermeulen et al., 2020). Practically, a detailed protocol that merges exposure monitoring devices and experimental pipelines to determine abiotic and biotic external exposome on the personal level has already been implemented (Jiang et al., 2018, Jiang et al., 2021). The exposomics research includes the studies of the external and internal exposome and investigating how they holistically impact human health and disease risks. Exposome-wide association study (EWAS) provides novel insight for investigating the roles and relationships of diverse chemical, biological, and physical exposures in the entire life process, the key developmental stages of the disease, and the etiology and progression across generations (Li et al., 2019). Specifically, EWAS usually applied advanced analytic methodologies to find the significant associations between phenotypes and the exposome (Patel, 2019). It is a data-driven approach that can fit the application of both population health and individual differences so that the complex relationship between external and internal environments as well as the life-course environmental health can be systematically explored (Chung et al., 2019). Overall, this article aims to outline the feasibility of leveraging the interdisciplinary EWAS to understand MetS in more depth, focusing on the interactions between different types of environmental exposures and internal physiological factors, and underlying mechanisms in the pathogenesis of MetS and its components such as cardiovascular disease (Juarez et al., 2020).
Chemical Exposures and MetS
Chemical exposures through different pathways have been found to have pervasive interactions with human metabolites, and increasing evidence is demonstrating that exposures to certain chemicals in our environment play vital roles in the pathophysiology and etiology of metabolic diseases. Also, exposures that occur in early life may have a more profound impact on the lifetime risk of MetS. For instance, exposures to a range of environmental contaminants can contribute to the development of MetS, such as various agrochemicals, pharmaceuticals and personal care products, food toxins, flame retardants, and heavy metals, and certain of them present endocrine-disrupting characters (De Long and Holloway, 2017; Silva et al., 2020). Endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) mimic the structures of hormones, which disrupt the normal functions of human metabolism, including various metabolically active essential organs. In addition, the epigenetic alterations caused by EDCs can permanently change the epigenome in the germline, thereby passing the changes to offspring. The metabolic effect of this multi-disruption is the underpinnings of metabolic diseases, which are clinically manifested as MetS and its components (Papalou et al., 2019). However, since the conventional risk assessment procedure is based on the toxicity of a single stressor or a single group of stressors, it is not suitable for capturing multiple environmental exposures in combination and at low doses (Gao et al., 2018; Gao, 2021). Though the traditional risk assessments assume that each chemical stressor individually acts in a dose-response linear relationship, research is already demonstrating that the combined effect of EDCs is not simply the sum of individual toxicities and does not follow the linear rule (Le Magueresse-Battistoni et al., 2018). Therefore, EWAS studies may have the ability to discover the complex relationships between multiple stressors and identify the key environmental chemical exposures that trigger MetS.
In addition to EDCs, it was found that long-term exposures to particulate matter and air pollutants were positively correlated with the prevalence of MetS in adolescents and children (Zhang et al., 2021a). For instance, an environmental epidemiology study found strong associations between air pollutants and impaired fasting glycemia, and associations between air pollutants and waist-circumference-based obesity, suggesting that chronic exposures to air pollutants may lead to MetS by specifically impacting insulin resistance of the individuals (Eze et al., 2015). This result is consistent with other epidemiology studies, showing the positive associations between ambient air pollution and MetS (Yang et al., 2018; Hou et al., 2020). However, which airborne chemicals contribute to MetS requires further investigation. As such, EWAS studies provide the possibilities to study the associations between the chemical exposures and MetS, generating various testable hypotheses for validating by in vivo and in vitro experiments.
Microbial Exposures and MetS
Although the COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically increased the concerns of human exposures to biotic agents in the environment, the links between possible pathogens and MetS have been understudied. Specifically, limited research showed the possible relationships between microbial exposures/infections and MetS. A study showed that pathogen burden presented strong associations with insulin resistance, especially with enterovirus and Chlamydia pneumoniae seropositivity, which means that multiple pathogens exposures may lead to low-level and chronic inflammation and then insulin resistance (Fernández-Real et al., 2006). Another study found that long-term exposure to the toxins produced by Staphylococcus aureus can cause rabbits to develop glucose intolerance, insulin resistance, and systemic inflammation, which are the symptoms of MetS (Vu et al., 2015). Finally, respiratory viral infections have been associated with type 2 diabetes (Chen et al., 2012) and in at least one case of DNA methylation alterations at metabolic genes were associated with glucose dysregulation (Chen et al., 2018).
In addition to studies of inhalation and dermal exposures to microbes associated with MetS, a larger set of studies have focused on studying the possible ingestion exposures of microbes, gut microbiota, and MetS. Specifically, many studies have examined the potential impact of the gut microbiota on MetS and its relationship with the host metabolism (Dabke et al., 2019) and both animal and human studies have revealed mechanistic links. These relationships include participation in metabolic processes and energy homeostasis, interference with the renin-angiotensin system, and modulation of the host immune system and inflammation. Altering the gut microbiota via probiotics, prebiotics, or other dietary interventions may have beneficial effects to mediate MetS (Mazidi et al., 2016). For example, heat-inactivated Akkermansia muciniphila helps to relieve the symptoms of MetS in obese and overweight individuals (Dizaji, 2018). In general, the relationships between the biological exposures via various exposure pathways and MetS could be further investigated in the future by EWAS studies, along with their interactions with hosts’ microbiome and dietary intake.
Physical Exposures and MetS
In addition to biotic and abiotic exposome, physical stressors such as noise, heat, and radiation may lead to MetS or exacerbate metabolic diseases. Several epidemiology studies have shown that noise exposures were positively associated with MetS and its components, and increased the risks of MetS (Huang et al., 2020; Li et al., 2021). A similar study also found traffic-related noise and NOx exposures were associated with MetS and its components (Yu et al., 2020). In addition, an in vivo study based on the rat model showed that chronic noise exposures may cumulatively alter the occurrence and development of diabetes since those exposures can change the composition of the gut microbiota and induce intestinal inflammation (Cui et al., 2016).
In terms of heat exposure, exposure to exertional heatstroke in female mice led to delayed cardiac metabolic disorders and impact long-term cardiovascular health (Laitano et al., 2020). Moreover, the intracellular expression levels of heat shock proteins may play vital roles in the pathogenesis of MetS (Sabbah et al., 2019). Similarly, another animal model study found insufficient heat stress response may be the basis of susceptibility to MetS (Rogers et al., 2016). Finally, research also found anthropogenic heat emissions were positively correlated with MetS, and this correlation changed with age (Cong et al., 2021).
Various studies have found that high doses of ionizing radiation can cause adverse metabolic and circulatory effects, while low-dose radiation was causally related to circulatory diseases, and the effects were modulated by stress, inflammatory, and immune responses of the individual (Tapio et al., 2021). In addition, radiation therapy may cause MetS. As such, a study showed that MetS could be a sequela of radiation exposure among childhood brain tumor survivors (Cooksey et al., 2019). Similarly, survivors of neuroblastoma and nephroblastoma have been found to have increased risks of developing MetS components, especially for those who had abdominal irradiation (van Waas et al., 2012). Overall, these different studies have demonstrated the possible links between noise, heat, and radiation exposures and the pathogenesis of MetS. However, the related underlying mechanisms require further investigation using additional in vitro and in vivo experiments.
Psychosocial Exposures and MetS
Psychosocial assessments can be used in exposure science to decode the exposome triggers of MetS as well. Mental health has been shown to affect MetS (Zhang et al., 2021b). For example, an epidemiology study found the increased prevalence of MetS was significantly associated with higher levels of depression, hostility, anger, and pessimism, and additional adjustment for potential biological mediators had little impact on these associations. Those results can be explained in part by differences in health behaviors and socioeconomic status (Cohen et al., 2010). Similarly, a study found that after adjusting for demographic and lifestyle variables, negative life events and insufficient emotional support may increase the chance of developing MetS. The associations between depression and MetS were found in whites, and anxiety symptoms were significantly related to male MetS. The psychosocial risk index score was positively correlated with the likelihood of suffering from MetS as well (Vogelzangs et al., 2007). Specifically, dysfunctional social networks and experiencing major adverse life events were found to be the potential risk factors for MetS in women, and stress responses (e.g., excessive fatigue and insomnia) may play more significant roles in the development of MetS in men (Pedersen et al., 2016). Furthermore, another study conducted a meta-analysis to determine the association between MetS and psychological stress. The results showed the adults in the low-stress group were 45% less likely to have MetS compared with the adults in the high-stress group with the controls of known covariates. Also, the subsequent meta-analysis based on cross-sectional studies showed that perceived stress had the weakest impact while occupational stress had the strongest impact on MetS (Kuo et al., 2019). In short, significant associations between the psychosocial factors and MetS have been reported, although in all cases the underlying mechanisms are unclear.
Discussion
In the past decades, various breakthroughs have been made in the identification of internal determinants of MetS which may only play partial roles in the pathophysiology of MetS and its components. Currently, clearly identifying the triggers of personal MetS and accurately predicting personal MetS risk still cannot be achieved. Therefore, determining the environmental factors that are related to MetS, and impact their onset and progression of MetS are highly demanded. Based on the reviewed references in this article, it has been shown that MetS could be caused by the complex interactions between the exposome and the human genome. However, since major current studies are environmental epidemiological studies, the link between these environmental exposures and -omics level studies in relation to MetS remains unclear. Further in vivo and in vitro studies by leveraging multi-omics approaches (especially metabolomics, lipidomics, and proteomics) are necessary to discover the underlying mechanisms of how environmental factors contribute to MetS. For instance, the application of -omics approaches could help us better understand the individual susceptibility, variability, and risks of MetS, and further advance the research on endocrine disruptors (Messerlian et al., 2017).
Furthermore, utilizing the exposomics approach to reveal unknown environmental factors that cause MetS and EWAS to prioritize all the MetS-related environmental factors would be promising to provide the testable hypotheses for experimental validations (Gao et al., 2021). Nevertheless, the technical barriers in multi-omics and exposomics research do exist, such as the technological challenges on chemical and biological agents identifications (David et al., 2021), the bioinformatics challenges related to the computational throughput and workflows, and the high financial costs of such exposomics cohort study. Fortunately, the results from current large environmental health studies and exposomics related international consortiums including the Global Exposome Harmonization project and others such as the HELIX project provided some insights for future research (Stratakis et al., 2020; Maitre et al., 2021).
This article aims to provide an overview of the multidisciplinary exposomics studies linked to MetS, with a primary focus on the environmental exposures and their relationships with MetS. Specifically, relationships have been established between the chemical, microbial, physical, and psychosocial exposures and MetS. However, the interactions between them and their holistic impacts on MetS remain unclear. Therefore, generating a framework for utilizing EWAS to investigate the pathophysiology of MetS and its components would be necessary (Figure 1). Novel exposome monitoring approaches and the analytic methodologies of decoding the interactions between the exposome and genome are needed to investigate the interplay between environmental, lifestyle, and genetic factors, as well as the underlying mechanisms in the etiology of MetS. Specifically, the following aspects related to the exposome and MetS need to be further addressed: 1) large cohort research study how the comprehensive exposome is related to MetS; 2) computational and experimental studies of environmental-gene interactions on MetS; 3) big data analytics of integrating the exposome data with internal multi-omics data that are related to MetS; 4) experimental investigation of exposure biomarkers to reflect the MetS-related environmental exposures and predict MetS progression; and 5) development of robust statistical approaches to analyze the impacts of diverse and dynamic exposures on MetS susceptibility (Plusquin et al., 2019). Despite the current challenges, the exposomics and EWAS could be promising and robust approaches to investigate the etiology and progression of MetS and its components in the future due to the relatively low genetic heritability of these diseases.
FIGURE 1
A conceptual framework of applying exposome-wide association study (EWAS) to investigate metabolic syndrome (MetS). The internal exposome includes but is not limited to all the non-endogenous agents inside the human body such as xenobiotics, their biotransformation products, and foreign biological agents. The Manhattan plot was used to illustrate how EWAS could potentially identify the most MetS-related factors in the exposome. Grey lines represent external-internal interactions; blue lines represent intra-internal interactions; and orange lines represent gene–exposome/microbiome interaction. Not all the relationships are presented.
Statements
Author contributions
PG. conceived the article and drafted the manuscript. MS. revised the manuscript and provided funding support.
Funding
This work was supported by The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust (grant G-2004-03820).
Conflict of interest
MS is a cofounder of Personalis, SensOmics, Qbio, January AI, Filtricine, Protos, NiMo, and Exposomics, and is on the scientific advisory board of Personalis, SensOmics, Qbio, January AI, Filtricine, Protos, NiMo, and Genapsys.
PG declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The handling editor declared a past co-authorship with one of the authors MS.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, orclaim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
1
ChenR.MiasG. I.Li-Pook-ThanJ.JiangL.LamH. Y. K.ChenR.et al (2012). Personal Omics Profiling Reveals Dynamic Molecular and Medical Phenotypes. Cell148, 1293–1307. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.02.009
2
ChenR.XiaL.TuK.DuanM.KukurbaK.Li-Pook-ThanJ.et al (2018). Longitudinal Personal DNA Methylome Dynamics in a Human with a Chronic Condition. Nat. Med.24, 1930–1939. 10.1038/s41591-018-0237-x
3
ChungM. K.Buck LouisG. M.KannanK.PatelC. J. (2019). Exposome-wide Association Study of Semen Quality: Systematic Discovery of Endocrine Disrupting Chemical Biomarkers in Fertility Require Large Sample Sizes. Environ. Int.125, 505–514. 10.1016/j.envint.2018.11.037
4
CohenB. E.PanguluriP.NaB.WhooleyM. A. (2010). Psychological Risk Factors and the Metabolic Syndrome in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: Findings from the Heart and Soul Study. Psychiatry Res.175, 133–137. 10.1016/j.psychres.2009.02.004
5
CongJ.WangL. B.LiuF. J.QianZ. M.McMillinS. E.VaughnM. G.et al (2021). Associations between Metabolic Syndrome and Anthropogenic Heat Emissions in Northeastern China. Environ. Res.204, 111974. 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111974
6
CookseyR.WuS. Y.KlesseL.OdenJ. D.BlandR. E.HodgesJ. C.et al (2019). Metabolic Syndrome Is a Sequela of Radiation Exposure in Hypothalamic Obesity Among Survivors of Childhood Brain Tumors. J. Investig. Med.67, 295–302. 10.1136/jim-2018-000911
7
CuiB.GaiZ.SheX.WangR.XiZ. (2016). Effects of Chronic Noise on Glucose Metabolism and Gut Microbiota-Host Inflammatory Homeostasis in Rats. Sci. Rep.6, 36693. 10.1038/srep36693
8
da SilvaE. B.GaoP.XuM.GuanD.TangX.MaL. Q.et al (2020). Background Concentrations of Trace Metals as, Ba, Cd, Co, Cu, Ni, Pb, Se, and Zn in 214 Florida Urban Soils: Different Cities and Land Uses. Environ. Pollut.264, 114737. 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114737
9
DabkeK.HendrickG.DevkotaS. (2019). The Gut Microbiome and Metabolic Syndrome. J. Clin. Invest.129, 4050–4057. 10.1172/jci129194
10
DavidA.ChakerJ.PriceE. J.BessonneauV.ChetwyndA. J.VitaleC. M.et al (2021). Towards a Comprehensive Characterisation of the Human Internal Chemical Exposome: Challenges and Perspectives. Environ. Int.156, 106630. 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106630
11
De LongN. E.HollowayA. C. (2017). Early-life Chemical Exposures and Risk of Metabolic Syndrome. Dmso10, 101–109. 10.2147/dmso.s95296
12
EzeI. C.SchaffnerE.ForasterM.ImbodenM.von EckardsteinA.GerbaseM. W.et al (2015). Long-Term Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution and Metabolic Syndrome in Adults. PLoS One10, e0130337. 10.1371/journal.pone.0130337
13
Fathi DizajiB. (2018). The Investigations of Genetic Determinants of the Metabolic Syndrome. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Clin. Res. Rev.12, 783–789. 10.1016/j.dsx.2018.04.009
14
Fernández-RealJ.-M.López-BermejoA.VendrellJ.FerriM.-J.RecasensM.RicartW. (2006). Burden of Infection and Insulin Resistance in Healthy Middle-Aged Men. Diabetes Care29, 1058–1064. 10.2337/dc05-2068
15
GaoP.LiH.WilsonC. P.TownsendT. G.XiangP.LiuY.et al (2018). Source Identification of PAHs in Soils Based on Stable Carbon Isotopic Signatures. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technology48, 923–948. 10.1080/10643389.2018.1495983
16
GaoP.ShenX.ZhangX.JiangC.ZhangS.ZhouX.et al (2021). Precision Environmental Health Monitoring by Longitudinal Exposome and Multi-Omics Profiling. 10.1101/2021.05.05.442855
17
GaoP. (2021). The Exposome in the Era of One Health. Environ. Sci. Technol.55, 2790–2799. 10.1021/acs.est.0c07033
18
HouJ.LiuX.TuR.DongX.ZhaiZ.MaoZ.et al (2020). Long-term Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution Attenuated the Association of Physical Activity with Metabolic Syndrome in Rural Chinese Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study. Environ. Int.136, 105459. 10.1016/j.envint.2020.105459
19
HuangT.ChanT.-C.HuangY.-J.PanW.-C. (2020). The Association between Noise Exposure and Metabolic Syndrome: A Longitudinal Cohort Study in Taiwan. Ijerph17, 4236. 10.3390/ijerph17124236
20
JiangC.WangX.LiX.InloraJ.WangT.LiuQ.et al (2018). Dynamic Human Environmental Exposome Revealed by Longitudinal Personal Monitoring. Cell175, 277–291. 10.1016/j.cell.2018.08.060
21
JiangC.ZhangX.GaoP.ChenQ.SnyderM. (2021). Decoding Personal Biotic and Abiotic Airborne Exposome. Nat. Protoc.16, 1129–1151. 10.1038/s41596-020-00451-8
22
JuarezP. D.HoodD. B.SongM.-A.RameshA. (2020). Use of an Exposome Approach to Understand the Effects of Exposures from the Natural, Built, and Social Environments on Cardio-Vascular Disease Onset, Progression, and Outcomes. Front. Public Health8, 379. 10.3389/fpubh.2020.00379
23
KuoW. c.BratzkeL. C.OakleyL. D.KuoF.WangH.BrownR. L. (2019). The Association between Psychological Stress and Metabolic Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis. Obes. Rev.20, 1651–1664. 10.1111/obr.12915
24
LaitanoO.GarciaC. K.MattinglyA. J.RobinsonG. P.MurrayK. O.KingM. A.et al (2020). Delayed Metabolic Dysfunction in Myocardium Following Exertional Heat Stroke in Mice. J. Physiol.598, 967–985. 10.1113/jp279310
25
Le Magueresse-BattistoniB.VidalH.NavilleD. (2018). Environmental Pollutants and Metabolic Disorders: The Multi-Exposure Scenario of Life. Front. Endocrinol.9, 582. 10.3389/fendo.2018.00582
26
LiJ.LiX.ZhangS.SnyderM. (2019). Gene-Environment Interaction in the Era of Precision Medicine. Cell177, 38–44. 10.1016/j.cell.2019.03.004
27
LiW.RuanW.YiG.ChenZ.WangD. (2021). Association of Noise Exposure with Risk of Metabolic Syndrome: Evidence from 44,698 Individuals. Diabetes Res. Clin. Pract.178, 108944. 10.1016/j.diabres.2021.108944
28
MaitreL.BustamanteM.Hernández-FerrerC.ThielD.LauC.-H.SiskosA.et al (2021). Multi-omics Signatures of the Human Early Life Exposome. 10.1101/2021.05.04.21256605
29
MazidiM.RezaieP.KengneA. P.MobarhanM. G.FernsG. A. (2016). Gut Microbiome and Metabolic Syndrome. Diabetes Metab. Syndr. Clin. Res. Rev.10, S150–S157. 10.1016/j.dsx.2016.01.024
30
MesserlianC.MartinezR. M.HauserR.BaccarelliA. A. (2017). ‘Omics' and Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals - New Paths Forward. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol.13, 740–748. 10.1038/nrendo.2017.81
31
MusaniS. K.MartinL. J.WooJ. G.OlivierM.GurkaM. J.DeBoerM. D. (2017). Heritability of the Severity of the Metabolic Syndrome in Whites and Blacks in 3 Large Cohorts. Circ. Cardiovasc. Genet.10, e001621. 10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.116.001621
32
PapalouO.KandarakiE. A.PapadakisG.Diamanti-KandarakisE. (2019). Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals: An Occult Mediator of Metabolic Disease. Front. Endocrinol.10, 112. 10.3389/fendo.2019.00112
33
PatelC. J. (2019). Exposome-Wide Association Studies: A Data-Driven Approach for Searching for Exposures Associated with Phenotype. Unraveling the Exposome, 1, 315–336. 10.1007/978-3-319-89321-1_12
34
PedersenJ. M.LundR.AndersenI.ClarkA. J.PrescottE.RodN. H. (2016). Psychosocial Risk Factors for the Metabolic Syndrome: A Prospective Cohort Study. Int. J. Cardiol.215, 41–46. 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.04.076
35
PlusquinM.SaenenN. D.NawrotT. S. (2019). Epigenetics and the Exposome. Unraveling the Exposome, 1, 127–146. 10.1007/978-3-319-89321-1_5
36
RochlaniY.PothineniN. V.KovelamudiS.MehtaJ. L. (2017). Metabolic Syndrome: Pathophysiology, Management, and Modulation by Natural Compounds. Ther. Adv. Cardiovasc. Dis.11, 215–225. 10.1177/1753944717711379
37
RogersR. S.MorrisE. M.WheatleyJ. L.ArcherA. E.McCoinC. S.WhiteK. S.et al (2016). Deficiency in the Heat Stress Response Could Underlie Susceptibility to Metabolic Disease. Diabetes65, 3341–3351. 10.2337/db16-0292
38
SabbahN. A.RezkN. A.SaadM. S. S. (2019). Relationship between Heat Shock Protein Expression and Obesity with and without Metabolic Syndrome. Genet. Test. Mol. Biomarkers23, 737–743. 10.1089/gtmb.2019.0062
39
StratakisN.ContiD. V.BorrasE.SabidoE.RoumeliotakiT.PapadopoulouE.et al (2020). Association of Fish Consumption and Mercury Exposure during Pregnancy with Metabolic Health and Inflammatory Biomarkers in Children. JAMA Netw. Open3, e201007. 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.1007
40
TapioS.LittleM. P.KaiserJ. C.ImpensN.HamadaN.GeorgakilasA. G.et al (2021). Ionizing Radiation-Induced Circulatory and Metabolic Diseases. Environ. Int.146, 106235. 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106235
41
van WaasM.NeggersS. J.RaatH.van RijC. M.PietersR.van den Heuvel-EibrinkM. M. (2012). Abdominal Radiotherapy: A Major Determinant of Metabolic Syndrome in Nephroblastoma and Neuroblastoma Survivors. PLoS ONE7, e52237. 10.1371/journal.pone.0052237
42
VermeulenR.SchymanskiE. L.BarabásiA.-L.MillerG. W. (2020). The Exposome and Health: Where Chemistry Meets Biology. Science367, 392–396. 10.1126/science.aay3164
43
VogelzangsN.BeekmanA. T.KritchevskyS. B.NewmanA. B.PahorM.YaffeK.et al (2007). Psychosocial Risk Factors and the Metabolic Syndrome in Elderly Persons: Findings from the Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. Journals Gerontol. Ser. A: Biol. Sci. Med. Sci.62, 563–569. 10.1093/gerona/62.5.563
44
VuB. G.StachC. S.KulhankovaK.Salgado-PabónW.KlingelhutzA. J.SchlievertP. M. (2015). Chronic Superantigen Exposure Induces Systemic Inflammation, Elevated Bloodstream Endotoxin, and Abnormal Glucose Tolerance in Rabbits: Possible Role in Diabetes. mBio6, e02554. 10.1128/mbio.02554-14
45
WildC. P. (2005). Complementing the Genome with an “Exposome”: the Outstanding challenge of Environmental Exposure Measurement in Molecular Epidemiology. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.14, 1847–1850. 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-05-0456
46
XuH.LiX.AdamsH.KubenaK.GuoS. (2018). Etiology of Metabolic Syndrome and Dietary Intervention. Ijms20, 128. 10.3390/ijms20010128
47
YangB.-Y.QianZ.LiS.FanS.ChenG.SybergK. M.et al (2018). Long-term Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution (Including PM1) and Metabolic Syndrome: The 33 Communities Chinese Health Study (33CCHS). Environ. Res.164, 204–211. 10.1016/j.envres.2018.02.029
48
YuY.PaulK.ArahO. A.MayedaE. R.WuJ.LeeE.et al (2020). Air Pollution, Noise Exposure, and Metabolic Syndrome - A Cohort Study in Elderly Mexican-Americans in Sacramento Area. Environ. Int.134, 105269. 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105269
49
ZhangJ.-S.GuiZ.-H.ZouZ.-Y.YangB.-Y.MaJ.JingJ.et al (2021a). Long-term Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution and Metabolic Syndrome in Children and Adolescents: A National Cross-Sectional Study in China. Environ. Int.148, 106383. 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106383
50
ZhangX.GaoP.SnyderM. P. (2021b). The Exposome in the Era of the Quantified Self. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Data Sci.4, 255–277. 10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-012721-122807
Summary
Keywords
type 2 dabetes, exposome-wide association study, pathophysiology, etiology, multi-omics analyses, exposomics, metabolic sydrome
Citation
Gao P and Snyder M (2021) Exposome-wide Association Study for Metabolic Syndrome. Front. Genet. 12:783930. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.783930
Received
27 September 2021
Accepted
12 November 2021
Published
07 December 2021
Volume
12 - 2021
Edited by
Baoxu Pang, Leiden University Medical Center, Netherlands
Reviewed by
Miryoung Lee, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, United States
Updates
Copyright
© 2021 Gao and Snyder.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Peng Gao, gaop@stanford.edu
This article was submitted to Computational Genomics, a section of the journal Frontiers in Genetics
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.