Toll-like receptor signaling pathways
- Laboratory of Molecular Immunobiology, Graduate School of Biological Sciences, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Ikoma, Japan
Toll-like receptors (TLRs) play crucial roles in the innate immune system by recognizing pathogen-associated molecular patterns derived from various microbes. TLRs signal through the recruitment of specific adaptor molecules, leading to activation of the transcription factors NF-κB and IRFs, which dictate the outcome of innate immune responses. During the past decade, the precise mechanisms underlying TLR signaling have been clarified by various approaches involving genetic, biochemical, structural, cell biological, and bioinformatics studies. TLR signaling appears to be divergent and to play important roles in many aspects of the innate immune responses to given pathogens. In this review, we describe recent progress in our understanding of TLR signaling regulation and its contributions to host defense.
The innate immune system employs germline-encoded pattern-recognition receptors (PRRs) for the initial detection of microbes. PRRs recognize microbe-specific molecular signatures known as pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) and self-derived molecules derived from damaged cells, referred as damage-associated molecules patterns (DAMPs). PRRs activate downstream signaling pathways that lead to the induction of innate immune responses by producing inflammatory cytokines, type I interferon (IFN), and other mediators. These processes not only trigger immediate host defensive responses such as inflammation, but also prime and orchestrate antigen-specific adaptive immune responses (1). These responses are essential for the clearance of infecting microbes as well as crucial for the consequent instruction of antigen-specific adaptive immune responses.
Mammals have several distinct classes of PRRs including Toll-like receptors (TLRs), RIG-I-like receptors (RLRs), Nod-like receptors (NLRs), AIM2-like receptors (ALRs), C-type lectin receptors (CLRs), and intracellular DNA sensors such as cGAS (2, 3). Among these, TLRs were the first to be identified, and are the best characterized. The TLR family comprises 10 members (TLR1–TLR10) in human and 12 (TLR1–TLR9, TLR11–TLR13) in mouse. TLRs localize to the cell surface or to intracellular compartments such as the ER, endosome, lysosome, or endolysosome, and they recognize distinct or overlapping PAMPs such as lipid, lipoprotein, protein, and nucleic acid. Each TLR is composed of an ectodomain with leucine-rich repeats (LRRs) that mediate PAMPs recognition, a transmembrane domain, and a cytoplasmic Toll/IL-1 receptor (TIR) domain that initiates downstream signaling. The ectodomain displays a horseshoe-like structure, and TLRs interact with their respective PAMPs or DAMPs as a homo- or heterodimer along with a co-receptor or accessory molecule (4). Upon PAMPs and DAMPs recognition, TLRs recruit TIR domain-containing adaptor proteins such as MyD88 and TRIF, which initiate signal transduction pathways that culminate in the activation of NF-κB, IRFs, or MAP kinases to regulate the expression of cytokines, chemokines, and type I IFNs that ultimately protect the host from microbial infection. Recent studies have revealed that proper cellular localization of TLRs is important in the regulation of the signaling, and that cell type-specific signaling downstream of TLRs determines particular innate immune responses. Here, we summarize recent progress on TLR signaling pathways and their contributions to host defense responses.
PAMP Recognition by TLRs
TLRs are expressed in innate immune cells such as dendritic cells (DCs) and macrophages as well as non-immune cells such as fibroblast cells and epithelial cells. TLRs are largely classified into two subfamilies based on their localization, cell surface TLRs and intracellular TLRs. Cell surface TLRs include TLR1, TLR2, TLR4, TLR5, TLR6, and TLR10, whereas intracellular TLRs are localized in the endosome and include TLR3, TLR7, TLR8, TLR9, TLR11, TLR12, and TLR13 (5, 6).
Cell surface TLRs mainly recognize microbial membrane components such as lipids, lipoproteins, and proteins. TLR4 recognizes bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS). TLR2 along with TLR1 or TLR6 recognizes a wide variety of PAMPs including lipoproteins, peptidoglycans, lipotechoic acids, zymosan, mannan, and tGPI-mucin (5). TLR5 recognizes bacterial flagellin (2). TLR10 is pseudogene in mouse due to an insertion of a stop codon, but human TLR10 collaborates with TLR2 to recognize ligands from listeria (7). TLR10 can also sense influenza A virus infection (8).
Intracellular TLRs recognize nucleic acids derived from bacteria and viruses, and also recognize self-nucleic acids in disease conditions such as autoimmunity (9). TLR3 recognizes viral double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), small interfering RNAs, and self-RNAs derived from damaged cells (10–12). TLR7 is predominantly expressed in plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) and recognizes single-stranded (ss)RNA from viruses. It also recognizes RNA from streptococcus B bacteria in conventional DCs (cDCs) (13). Human TLR8 responds to viral and bacterial RNA (14). Structural analysis revealed that unstimulated human TLR8 exists as a preformed dimer, and although the Z-loop between LRR14 and LRR15 is cleaved, the N- and C-terminal halves remain associated with each other and participate in ligand recognition and dimerization. Ligand binding induces reorganization of the dimer to bring the two C termini into close proximity (15). TLR13 recognizes bacterial 23S rRNA (16–18) and unknown components of vesicular stomatitis virus (19). TLR9 recognizes bacterial and viral DNA that is rich in unmethylated CpG-DNA motifs; it also recognizes hemozoin, an insoluble crystalline byproduct generated by Plasmodium falciparum during the process of detoxification after host hemoglobin is digested (20). TLR11 is localized in the endolysosome and recognizes flagellin (21) or an unknown proteinaceous component of uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) as well as a profilin-like molecule derived from Toxoplasma gondii (22). TLR12 is predominantly expressed in myeloid cells and is highly similar to TLR11 and recognizes profilin from T. gondii (23). TLR12 functions either as a homodimer or a heterodimer with TLR11 (24, 25).
Trafficking of TLRs
All TLRs are synthesized in the ER, traffic to the Golgi, and are recruited to the cell surface or to intracellular compartments such as endosomes. Intracellular localization of TLRs is thought to be critical for ligand recognition as well as for preventing TLRs from coming into contact with self-nucleic acids, which could cause autoimmunity (26–29). The multi-pass transmembrane protein UNC93B1 controls the trafficking of intracellular TLRs from the ER to endosomes. Interestingly, UNC93B1 regulates excessive TLR7 activation by employing TLR9 to counteract TLR7. This was demonstrated by experiments in mice harboring an amino acid substitution (D34A) in UNC93B1, which exhibit a TLR7-hyperreactive and TLR9-hyporeactive phenotype associated with TLR7-dependent systemic lethal inflammation. Thus, a optimizing the balance between TLR7 and TLR9 is a potential mechanism for regulating autoimmunity (30). TLR trafficking is also controlled by the ER-resident protein PRAT4A, which regulates the exit of TLR1, TLR2, TLR4, TLR7, and TLR9 from the ER and their trafficking to the plasma membrane and endososmes (31). gp96, a member of the ER-resident heat-shock protein 90 family, functions as a general chaperone for most TLRs, including cell surface TLR1, TLR2, TLR4, and TLR5 and intracellular TLR7 and TLR9 (32).
In the endosome, nucleic acid-sensing TLRs undergo proteolytic cleavage by cathepsins B, S, L, H, and K and asparginyl endopeptidase to attain a functional form that mediates ligand recognition and initiates signaling (33–35). However, the N-terminal region of TLR9 is required for CpG-DNA recognition and binding (36). Interestingly, a recent study suggests that the N-terminal cleaved fragment (TLR9N) remains associated with truncated TLR9 (TLR9C) to form a complex, which acts as a functional DNA sensor (37).
Contribution of TIR Domain-Containing Adaptors to TLR Signaling
Individual TLRs differentially recruit members of a set of TIR domain-containing adaptors such as MyD88, TRIF, TIRAP/MAL, or TRAM. MyD88 is utilized by all TLRs and activates NF-κB and MAPKs for the induction of inflammatory cytokine genes. TIRAP is a sorting adaptor that recruits MyD88 to cell surface TLRs such as TLR2 and TLR4 (Figure 1). However, a recent study demonstrated that TIRAP also participates in signaling through endosomal TLRs such as TLR9. The lipid-binding domain of TIRAP binds to PI(4,5)P2 at the plasma membrane and to PI(3)P on endosomes, which mediates the formation of functional TLR4 and TLR9 signaling complexes at their respective sites. Thus, TIRAP associates with both cell surface and endosomal TLRs by binding to different lipids (38). However, a high concentration of TLR9 agonists activates cells in the absence of TIRAP, suggesting that TIRAP is required for TLR9 signaling in natural situations such as HSV-1 infection (39).
Figure 1. TLR signaling in cDCs, macrophages, and MEFs. TLR4 localize to the cell surface, and TLR3 localize in the endosome compartment. Homo- or heterodimer formation initiates signaling to the two major downstream adaptor proteins, MyD88 and TRIF. TIRAP conducts the signal from TLR4 to MyD88, and TRAM mediates the signal from TLR4 to TRIF. TLR engagement induces formation of the Myddosome, which is based on MyD88 and also contains IRAK1 and IRAK4. IRAK1 activation induces TRAF6 activation following K63-linked polyubiquitination on TRAF6 itself and TAK1. TAK1 activation leads to the activation of IKK complex-NF-κB and MAPKs. MAPK activation leads to AP1s transcription factor activation. TRAF6 promotes ECSIT ubiquitination, resulting in increased mitochondrial and cellular ROS generation. TLR engagement also induces TRIF activation following TRAF6 and TRAF3 recruitment. TRAF6 recruits RIP-1, which activates the TAK1 complex following MAPK activation. RIP-1 activation regulates ubiquitination by Pellino-1. Pellino-1 regulates IRF3 activation by binding to DEAF-1. TRAF3 recruits TBK1 and IKKi for IRF3 phosphorylation. PtdIns5P from PIKfyve facilitates complex formation between TBK1 and IRF3. Several negative regulators modulate TLR signaling, by inhibiting either signaling complex formation or ubiquitination. MyD88 is suppressed by ST2825, NRDP-1, SOCS1, and Cbl-b; TRIF is suppressed by SARM and TAG; TRAF3 is suppressed by SOCS3 and DUBA; and TRAF6 is suppressed by A20, USP4, CYLD, TANK, TRIM38, and SHP. NF-κB is suppressed by Bcl-3, IκBNS, Nurr1, ATF3, and PDLIM2, while IRF3 activation is negatively regulated by Pin1 and RAUL.
TRIF is recruited to TLR3 and TLR4 and promotes an alternative pathway that leads to the activation of IRF3, NF-κB, and MAPKs for induction of type I IFN and inflammatory cytokine genes. TRAM is selectively recruited to TLR4 but not TLR3 to link between TRIF and TLR4. TLR3 directly interacts with TRIF, and this interaction requires phosphorylation of the two tyrosine residues in the cytoplasmic domain of TLR3 by the epidermal growth factor ErbB1 and Btk (40, 41). Collectively, depending on the adaptor usage, TLR signaling is largely divided into two pathways: the MyD88-dependent and TRIF-dependent pathways.
After TLR engagement, MyD88 forms a complex with IRAK kinase family members, referred to as the Myddosome (Figure 1) (42). During Myddosome formation, IRAK4 activates IRAK1, which is then autophosphorylated at several sites (43) and released from MyD88 (44). IRAK1 associates with the RING-domain E3 ubiquitin ligase TRAF6. TRAF6, along with ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UBC13 and UEV1A, promotes K63-linked polyubiquitination of both TRAF6 itself and the TAK1 protein kinase complex. TAK1 is a member of the MAPKKK family and forms a complex with the regulatory subunits TAB1, TAB2, and TAB3, which interact with polyubiquitin chains generated by TRAF6 to drive TAK1 activation (45, 46). Although the mechanisms of TAK1 activation within this complex remain unclear, K63-linked ubiquitination or close proximity-dependent transphosphorylation may be responsible for TAK1 activation. TAK1 then activates two different pathways that lead to activation of the IKK complex-NF-κB pathway and -MAPK pathway. The IKK complex is composed of the catalytic subunits IKKα and IKKβ and the regulatory subunit NEMO (also called IKKγ). TAK1 binds to the IKK complex through ubiquitin chains, which allows it to phosphorylate and activate IKKβ. The IKK complex phosphorylates the NF-κB inhibitory protein IκBα, which undergoes proteasome degradation, allowing NF-κB to translocate into the nucleus to induce proinflammatory gene expression. TAK1 activation also results in activation of MAPK family members such as ERK1/2, p38 and JNK, which mediates activation of AP-1 family transcription factors or stabilization of mRNA to regulate inflammatory responses (2, 5).
TAK1 deficiency in mouse embryonic fibroblast cells (MEFs) reduces phosphorylation of IKKs, p38, and JNK after LPS stimulation. However, TLR4-mediated IKK, p38, and JNK activation and cytokine induction are increased in neutrophils derived from TAK1-deficient mice, suggesting a cell type-specific role for TAK1 in TLR signaling (47). Furthermore, the physiological roles of TAB proteins in TLR signaling also remain controversial: TAB1- or TAB2-deficient mice do not show any abnormality in TLR signaling pathways (48), and mice doubly deficient for TAB2 and TAB3 also exhibit normal cytokine production after TLR simulation in MEFs and macrophages (49). TAB family proteins may therefore compensate for each other in TLR signaling.
TLR2 and TLR4 ligations in macrophages increase the production of mitochondrial ROS for bactericidal action and recruit mitochondria to phagosomes (50). TRAF6 is translocated to mitochondria following bacterial infection, where it interacts with ECSIT. TRAF6 promotes ECSIT ubiquitination, resulting in increased mitochondrial and cellular ROS generation.
TRIF interacts with TRAF6 and TRAF3. TRAF6 recruits the kinase RIP-1, which in turn interacts with and activates the TAK1 complex, leading to activation of NF-κB and MAPKs and induction of inflammatory cytokines (Figure 1). In contrast, TRAF3 recruits the IKK-related kinases TBK1 and IKKi along with NEMO for IRF3 phosphorylation. Subsequently, IRF3 forms a dimer and translocates into the nucleus from the cytoplasm, where it induces the expression of type I IFN genes (2, 5).
The Pellino family E3 ubiquitin ligases are implicated in TLR signaling (51). Pellino-1-deficient mice display impaired TRIF-dependent NF-κB activation and cytokine production (52). Pellino-1 is phosphorylated by TBK1/IKKi and thereby facilitates ubiquitination of RIP-1, suggesting that Pellino-1 mediates TRIF-dependent NF-κB activation by recruiting RIP-1. Furthermore, Pellino-1 regulates IRF3 activation by binding to DEAF-1, a transcription factor that facilitates binding of IRF3 to the IFNβ promoter (51).
Recently, IRF3 activation was demonstrated to be regulated by an inositol lipid, PtdIns5P. PtdIns5P binds to both IRF3 and TBK1, and thus facilitates complex formation between TBK1 and IRF3. The accessibility of TBK1 to IRF3 mediated by PtdIns5P likely causes IRF3 phosphorylation in a closely proximal manner. Furthermore, PIKfyve was identified as a kinase responsible for production of PtdIns5P during virus infection (53).
Balanced Activation between MyD88- and TRIF-Dependent Pathways
TLR4 activates both the MyD88-dependent and TRIF-dependent pathways. Activation of these pathways is controlled by several molecules to induce appropriate responses. Balanced production of inflammatory cytokines and type I IFN may be important for controlling tumor cell growth and autoimmune diseases.
TRAF3 was shown to be incorporated into the MyD88 complex as well as the TRIF complex in TLR4 signaling. TRAF3 within the MyD88 complex is then degraded, which causes TAK1 activation. Thus, in addition its role in promoting TRIF-dependent pathway activation, TRAF3 has a role in inhibiting the MyD88-dependent pathway. NRDP-1, an E3 ubiquitin ligase, binds and ubiquitinates MyD88 and TBK1, inducing the degradation of MyD88 and augmenting the activation of TBK1, which attenuates inflammatory cytokine production and induces preferential type I IFN production, respectively (54).
MHC class II molecules that are localized in endosomes in antigen-presenting cells interact with the tyrosine kinase Btk via the costimulatory molecule CD40 and maintain Btk activation. Activated Btk interacts with MyD88 and TRIF to promote the activation of the MyD88-dependent and TRIF-dependent pathways and thus to enhance production of inflammatory cytokines and type I IFNs, respectively (55).
TLR7 and TLR9 Signaling in Plasmacytoid DCs
Plasmacytoid DCs are a subset of DCs with the capacity to secrete vast amounts of type I IFN in response to viral infection (Figure 2) (2, 5). In pDCs, TLR7 and TLR9 serve as primary sensors for RNA and DNA viruses, respectively. Interestingly, the production of type I IFN by pDCs relies on a complex containing MyD88 and IRF7. This complex also contains TRAF3, TRAF6, IRAK4, IRAK1, IKKα, OPNi, and Dock2 (56, 57). Within this complex, IRF7 is phosphorylated by IRAK1 and/or IKKα and translocates into the nucleus to regulate the expression of type I IFN. Moreover, MyD88-IRAK4-TRAF6 complex drives NF-κB-dependent inflammatory cytokine induction. The signaling complex containing MyD88-IRAK1-TRAF6-IRF7 is formed within lipid bodies by the IFN-inducible Viperin, which activates IRAK1 by lysine 63-linked ubiquitination (58). It is notable that TLR9 signals through different cellular compartments that induce either MyD88-IRF7-dependent type I IFN or MyD88- NF-κB -dependent inflammatory cytokines (59). TLR9 initially traffics to VAMP3-positive early endosomes after CpG-DNA stimulation, where it triggers MyD88-IRAK4-TRAF6-dependent NF-κB activation. TLR9 then traffics to LAMP2-positive lysosome-related organelles (LROs), where it incorporates TRAF3 to activate IRF7 and induce type I IFN (Figure 2). AP3 has been shown to bind to TLR9 and control the trafficking of TLR9 to LROs, and is required for type I IFN induction (28). However, AP3 is not required for TLR9-dependent type I IFN induction triggered by DNA-antibody immune complexes (ICs) in pDCs. The intracellular compartment initiating type I IFN induction by DNA-antibody ICs is regulated by the autophagy pathway (60). Thus, pDCs have diverse cargoes for ligand recognition and triggering downstream signaling pathways.
Figure 2. Intracellular TLR signaling and trafficking in pDCs. Activation of TLR7 or TLR9 in pDCs recruits MyD88 following IRAK4 recruitment. The MyD88 complex also contains TRAF3, TRAF6, IRAK4, IRAK1, IKKα, OPNi, and Dock2. MyD88 directly or indirectly recruits IRF7 to be phosphorylated by IKKα and/or IRAK1. Localization of TLR7 and 9 is controlled by UNC93B1, PRAT4A, and AP3, which traffic TLRs from the ER to the endosome or the lysosome-related organelle (LRO). In the endosome, TLRs are converted to their mature forms by cathepsins, which cleave LRRs in the ectodomain. pDCs utilize a distinct signaling pathway from that in cDCs or macrophages to induce the synthesis of large amount of type I IFNs. gp96, a member of the ER-resident heat-shock protein 90 family, functions as a general chaperone for most TLRs.
Other IRFs in TLR Signaling
In addition to IRF3 and IRF7, several other IRFs participate in TLR signaling. IRF1 interacts with MyD88 and contributes to TLR9-mediated cytokine production in the presence of IFNγ (61), while IRF5 is involved in the MyD88-dependent signaling pathway for inducing inflammatory cytokine production (62). IRF8 was proposed to be essential for TLR9-MyD88-dependent activation of NF-κB in pDCs (63). However, a subsequent analysis of IRF8-deficient mice demonstrated that IRF8 is involved in the second phase of feedback type I IFN production after treatment of DCs with TLR agonists (64).
Activation of TLR Signaling by Co-Receptors
Recent studies have identified several transmembrane molecules that modulate TLR signaling pathways. CD14, a glycophosphatidylinositol-anchored protein, is a co-receptor with TLR4 and MD-2 for LPS recognition. It induces ITAM-mediated Syk- and PLCγ2-dependent endocytosis to promote TLR4 internalization into endosomes for activation of TRIF-dependent signaling (65). CD14 is also required for TLR7- and TLR9-dependent induction of proinflammatory cytokines (66).
CD36, a protein in the class B scavenger receptor family, acts as a co-receptor for oxidized low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and amyloid-β peptide. Ligand recognition induces the assembly of TLR4/TLR6 heterodimers through Src kinases and consequent sterile inflammation, by inducing inflammatory cytokines and ROS and priming NLRP3 inflammsome activation (67, 68).
TLR signaling is negatively regulated by a number of molecules through various mechanisms to prevent or terminate the excessive immune responses that lead to detrimental consequences associated with autoimmunity and inflammatory diseases. Negative regulators target each of the key molecules in TLR signaling (Figure 1). Activation of the MyD88-dependent pathway is suppressed by ST2825, SOCS1, and Cbl-b, and activation of the TRIF-dependent pathway is suppressed by SARM and TAG (69, 70). These molecules associate with MyD88 or TRIF to prevent them from binding to TLRs or downstream molecules. TRAF3 activation is negatively regulated by SOCS3 and DUBA (71). TRAF6 is targeted by a number of inhibitory molecules such as A20, USP4, CYLD, TANK, TRIM38, and SHP (72–74). TAK1 activation is inhibited by TRIM30α and A20 (75). In addition to these signaling molecules, the transcription factor NF-κB is suppressed by Bcl-3, IκBNS, Nurr1, ATF3, and PDLIM2, while IRF3 activation is negatively regulated by Pin1 and RAUL (76). The stability of mRNAs encoding signaling molecules is regulated by miRNAs such as miR-146a, miR-199a, miR-155, miR-126, miR-21, miR-29, miR-148/152, and miR-466l (74). In addition to the stability of mRNAs for signaling molecules, stability of mRNA for cytokines is regulated by Regnase-1 and TTP (5, 74).
During the past decade, tremendous progress has been made in our understanding of TLR signaling pathways. After genetic studies revealed the contribution of TIR domain-containing adaptor usage, cell biological and biochemical approaches have highlighted the importance of cellular localization of these adaptors in the regulation of downstream signaling. Moreover, numerous reports have demonstrated that TLR trafficking, TLR cleavage, and protein modification of signaling molecules such as ubiquitination and phosphorylation play important roles in the activation of TLR signaling. On the other hand, negative regulators of TLR signaling have been discovered, and their importance in preventing autoimmune and inflammatory diseases is recognized. More recently, much effort has been focused on identifying molecules that are involved in innate immunity through an integrated approach. Indeed, by combining transcriptomics, genetic/chemical perturbations and phosphoproteomics, Polo-like kinases (Plks) 2 and 4 have been found to regulate antiviral responses downstream of TRIF and MyD88 signaling (77). mRNA stability has also attracted attention because it is an important mechanism to regulate TLR-dependent inflammation. For example, the RNase Regnase-1 interacts with IL-6 and IL-12p40 mRNA and degrades them. Regnase-1-deficient macrophages produce large amounts of cytokines after treatment with various TLR ligands, and Regnase-1-deficient mice show elevated autoantibody production (78). Furthermore, it is notable that PAMP variants may activate distinct signaling pathways although they are recognized by the same PRRs. For example, LPS variant such as smooth or rough type activates either MyD88-dependent or TRIF-dependent pathway. These findings suggest that host makes a distinction between different types of LPS-containing bacteria by activating distinct signaling pathways (79).
Although PAMP recognition by TLRs is crucial for host defense responses to pathogen infection, aberrant activation of TLR signaling by PAMPs, mutations of TLR signaling molecules, and DAMPs-mediated TLRs signaling activation are responsible for the development of several diseases such as autoimmune, chronic inflammatory, and allergic diseases. Moreover, a link between cancer and TLRs has been proposed. The innate immune activation that caused after anti-cancer drug treatment is reportedly critical for cancer elimination through TLR-mediated recognition of endogenous molecules released from dying cancer cells (80). On the contrary, mutations in molecules involved in TLR signaling are associated with cancer development. Certain types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma acquire oncogenic ability through MyD88 mutation and show aberrant activation of NF-κB, JAK and STAT3 (81). A mutation in A20, which is a negative regulator of TLR signaling, is also associated with B-cell lymphoma development (82, 83). Furthermore, it has been suggested that TBK1 functions as a negative regulator of cell growth in lung cancer (84). In summary, further elucidation of TLR signaling pathways should eventually allow us to manipulate them in strategies to treat various infectious and autoimmune diseases that are intimately associated with innate immune signaling, as well as cancer.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
7. Regan T, Nally K, Carmody R, Houston A, Shanahan F, Macsharry J, et al. Identification of TLR10 as a key mediator of the inflammatory response to listeria monocytogenes in intestinal epithelial cells and macrophages. J Immunol (2013) 191:6084–92. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1203245
8. Lee SM, Kok KH, Jaume M, Cheung TK, Yip TF, Lai JC, et al. Toll-like receptor 10 is involved in induction of innate immune responses to influenza virus infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2014) 111:3793–8. doi:10.1073/pnas.1324266111
11. Bernard JJ, Cowing-Zitron C, Nakatsuji T, Muehleisen B, Muto J, Borkowski AW, et al. Ultraviolet radiation damages self noncoding RNA and is detected by TLR3. Nat Med (2012) 18:1286–90. doi:10.1038/nm.2861
12. Takemura N, Kawasaki T, Kunisawa J, Sato S, Lamichhane A, Kobiyama K, et al. Blockade of TLR3 protects mice from lethal radiation-induced gastrointestinal syndrome. Nat Commun (2014) 5:3492. doi:10.1038/ncomms4492
13. Mancuso G, Gambuzza M, Midiri A, Biondo C, Papasergi S, Akira S, et al. Bacterial recognition by TLR7 in the lysosomes of conventional dendritic cells. Nat Immunol (2009) 10:587–94. doi:10.1038/ni.1733
18. Oldenburg M, Kruger A, Ferstl R, Kaufmann A, Nees G, Sigmund A, et al. TLR13 recognizes bacterial 23S rRNA devoid of erythromycin resistance-forming modification. Science (2012) 337:1111–5. doi:10.1126/science.1220363
20. Coban C, Igari Y, Yagi M, Reimer T, Koyama S, Aoshi T, et al. Immunogenicity of whole-parasite vaccines against Plasmodium falciparum involves malarial hemozoin and host TLR9. Cell Host Microbe (2010) 7:50–61. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2009.12.003
22. Yarovinsky F, Zhang D, Andersen JF, Bannenberg GL, Serhan CN, Hayden MS, et al. TLR11 activation of dendritic cells by a protozoan profilin-like protein. Science (2005) 308:1626–9. doi:10.1126/science.1109893
23. Koblansky AA, Jankovic D, Oh H, Hieny S, Sungnak W, Mathur R, et al. Recognition of profilin by toll-like receptor 12 is critical for host resistance to Toxoplasma gondii. Immunity (2013) 38:119–30. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2012.09.016
24. Andrade WA, Souza Mdo C, Ramos-Martinez E, Nagpal K, Dutra MS, Melo MB, et al. Combined action of nucleic acid-sensing toll-like receptors and TLR11/TLR12 heterodimers imparts resistance to Toxoplasma gondii in mice. Cell Host Microbe (2013) 13:42–53. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2012.12.003
26. Tabeta K, Hoebe K, Janssen EM, Du X, Georgel P, Crozat K, et al. The Unc93b1 mutation 3d disrupts exogenous antigen presentation and signaling via toll-like receptors 3, 7 and 9. Nat Immunol (2006) 7:156–64. doi:10.1038/ni1297
30. Fukui R, Saitoh S, Matsumoto F, Kozuka-Hata H, Oyama M, Tabeta K, et al. Unc93B1 biases toll-like receptor responses to nucleic acid in dendritic cells toward DNA- but against RNA-sensing. J Exp Med (2009) 206:1339–50. doi:10.1084/jem.20082316
31. Takahashi K, Shibata T, Akashi-Takamura S, Kiyokawa T, Wakabayashi Y, Tanimura N, et al. A protein associated with toll-like receptor (TLR) 4 (PRAT4A) is required for TLR-dependent immune responses. J Exp Med (2007) 204:2963–76. doi:10.1084/jem.20071132
32. Yang Y, Liu B, Dai J, Srivastava PK, Zammit DJ, Lefrancois L, et al. Heat shock protein gp96 is a master chaperone for toll-like receptors and is important in the innate function of macrophages. Immunity (2007) 26:215–26. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2006.12.005
33. Park B, Brinkmann MM, Spooner E, Lee CC, Kim YM, Ploegh HL. Proteolytic cleavage in an endolysosomal compartment is required for activation of toll-like receptor 9. Nat Immunol (2008) 9:1407–14. doi:10.1038/ni.1669
34. Ewald SE, Engel A, Lee J, Wang M, Bogyo M, Barton GM. Nucleic acid recognition by toll-like receptors is coupled to stepwise processing by cathepsins and asparagine endopeptidase. J Exp Med (2011) 208:643–51. doi:10.1084/jem.20100682
35. Garcia-Cattaneo A, Gobert FX, Muller M, Toscano F, Flores M, Lescure A, et al. Cleavage of toll-like receptor 3 by cathepsins B and H is essential for signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2012) 109:9053–8. doi:10.1073/pnas.1115091109
36. Peter ME, Kubarenko AV, Weber AN, Dalpke AH. Identification of an N-terminal recognition site in TLR9 that contributes to CpG-DNA-mediated receptor activation. J Immunol (2009) 182:7690–7. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0900819
37. Onji M, Kanno A, Saitoh S, Fukui R, Motoi Y, Shibata T, et al. An essential role for the N-terminal fragment of toll-like receptor 9 in DNA sensing. Nat Commun (2013) 4:1949. doi:10.1038/ncomms2949
39. Bonham KS, Orzalli MH, Hayashi K, Wolf AI, Glanemann C, Weninger W, et al. A promiscuous lipid-binding protein diversifies the subcellular sites of toll-like receptor signal transduction. Cell (2014) 156:705–16. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2014.01.019
40. Lee KG, Xu S, Kang ZH, Huo J, Huang M, Liu D, et al. Bruton’s tyrosine kinase phosphorylates toll-like receptor 3 to initiate antiviral response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2012) 109:5791–6. doi:10.1073/pnas.1119238109
41. Yamashita M, Chattopadhyay S, Fensterl V, Saikia P, Wetzel JL, Sen GC. Epidermal growth factor receptor is essential for toll-like receptor 3 signaling. Sci Signal (2012) 5:ra50. doi:10.1126/scisignal.2002581
43. Kollewe C, Mackensen AC, Neumann D, Knop J, Cao P, Li S, et al. Sequential autophosphorylation steps in the interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase-1 regulate its availability as an adapter in interleukin-1 signaling. J Biol Chem (2004) 279:5227–36. doi:10.1074/jbc.M309251200
44. Jiang Z, Ninomiya-Tsuji J, Qian Y, Matsumoto K, Li X. Interleukin-1 (IL-1) receptor-associated kinase-dependent IL-1-induced signaling complexes phosphorylate TAK1 and TAB2 at the plasma membrane and activate TAK1 in the cytosol. Mol Cell Biol (2002) 22:7158–67. doi:10.1128/MCB.22.20.7158-7167.2002
47. Ajibade AA, Wang Q, Cui J, Zou J, Xia X, Wang M, et al. TAK1 negatively regulates NF-kappaB and p38 MAP kinase activation in Gr-1+CD11b+ neutrophils. Immunity (2012) 36:43–54. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2011.12.010
48. Shim JH, Xiao C, Paschal AE, Bailey ST, Rao P, Hayden MS, et al. TAK1, but not TAB1 or TAB2, plays an essential role in multiple signaling pathways in vivo. Genes Dev (2005) 19:2668–81. doi:10.1101/gad.1360605
49. Ori D, Kato H, Sanjo H, Tartey S, Mino T, Akira S, et al. Essential roles of K63-linked polyubiquitin-binding proteins TAB2 and TAB3 in B cell activation via MAPKs. J Immunol (2013) 190:4037–45. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1300173
50. West XZ, Malinin NL, Merkulova AA, Tischenko M, Kerr BA, Borden EC, et al. Oxidative stress induces angiogenesis by activating TLR2 with novel endogenous ligands. Nature (2010) 467:972–6. doi:10.1038/nature09421
53. Kawasaki T, Takemura N, Standley DM, Akira S, Kawai T. The second messenger phosphatidylinositol-5-phosphate facilitates antiviral innate immune signaling. Cell Host Microbe (2013) 14:148–58. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.07.011
54. Wang C, Chen T, Zhang J, Yang M, Li N, Xu X, et al. The E3 ubiquitin ligase Nrdp1 ‘preferentially’ promotes TLR-mediated production of type I interferon. Nat Immunol (2009) 10:744–52. doi:10.1038/ni.1742
55. Liu X, Zhan Z, Li D, Xu L, Ma F, Zhang P, et al. Intracellular MHC class II molecules promote TLR-triggered innate immune responses by maintaining activation of the kinase Btk. Nat Immunol (2011) 12:416–24. doi:10.1038/ni.2015
56. Shinohara ML, Lu L, Bu J, Werneck MB, Kobayashi KS, Glimcher LH, et al. Osteopontin expression is essential for interferon-alpha production by plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Nat Immunol (2006) 7:498–506. doi:10.1038/ni1327
57. Gotoh K, Tanaka Y, Nishikimi A, Inayoshi A, Enjoji M, Takayanagi R, et al. Differential requirement for DOCK2 in migration of plasmacytoid dendritic cells versus myeloid dendritic cells. Blood (2008) 111:2973–6. doi:10.1182/blood-2007-09-112169
58. Saitoh T, Satoh T, Yamamoto N, Uematsu S, Takeuchi O, Kawai T, et al. Antiviral protein viperin promotes toll-like receptor 7- and toll-like receptor 9-mediated type I interferon production in plasmacytoid dendritic cells. Immunity (2011) 34:352–63. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2011.03.010
60. Henault J, Martinez J, Riggs JM, Tian J, Mehta P, Clarke L, et al. Noncanonical autophagy is required for type I interferon secretion in response to DNA-immune complexes. Immunity (2012) 37:986–97. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2012.09.014
61. Negishi H, Fujita Y, Yanai H, Sakaguchi S, Ouyang X, Shinohara M, et al. Evidence for licensing of IFN-gamma-induced IFN regulatory factor 1 transcription factor by MyD88 in toll-like receptor-dependent gene induction program. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA (2006) 103:15136–41. doi:10.1073/pnas.0607181103
62. Takaoka A, Yanai H, Kondo S, Duncan G, Negishi H, Mizutani T, et al. Integral role of IRF-5 in the gene induction programme activated by toll-like receptors. Nature (2005) 434:243–9. doi:10.1038/nature03308
63. Tsujimura H, Tamura T, Kong HJ, Nishiyama A, Ishii KJ, Klinman DM, et al. Toll-like receptor 9 signaling activates NF-kappaB through IFN regulatory factor-8/IFN consensus sequence binding protein in dendritic cells. J Immunol (2004) 172:6820–7. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.172.11.6820
64. Tailor P, Tamura T, Kong HJ, Kubota T, Kubota M, Borghi P, et al. The feedback phase of type I interferon induction in dendritic cells requires interferon regulatory factor 8. Immunity (2007) 27:228–39. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2007.06.009
67. Stewart CR, Stuart LM, Wilkinson K, Van Gils JM, Deng J, Halle A, et al. CD36 ligands promote sterile inflammation through assembly of a toll-like receptor 4 and 6 heterodimer. Nat Immunol (2010) 11:155–61. doi:10.1038/ni.1836
68. Sheedy FJ, Grebe A, Rayner KJ, Kalantari P, Ramkhelawon B, Carpenter SB, et al. CD36 coordinates NLRP3 inflammasome activation by facilitating intracellular nucleation of soluble ligands into particulate ligands in sterile inflammation. Nat Immunol (2013) 14:812–20. doi:10.1038/ni.2639
69. Palsson-McDermott EM, Doyle SL, Mcgettrick AF, Hardy M, Husebye H, Banahan K, et al. TAG, a splice variant of the adaptor TRAM, negatively regulates the adaptor MyD88-independent TLR4 pathway. Nat Immunol (2009) 10:579–86. doi:10.1038/ni.1727
70. Han C, Jin J, Xu S, Liu H, Li N, Cao X. Integrin CD11b negatively regulates TLR-triggered inflammatory responses by activating Syk and promoting degradation of MyD88 and TRIF via Cbl-b. Nat Immunol (2010) 11:734–42. doi:10.1038/ni.1908
73. Yuk JM, Shin DM, Lee HM, Kim JJ, Kim SW, Jin HS, et al. The orphan nuclear receptor SHP acts as a negative regulator in inflammatory signaling triggered by toll-like receptors. Nat Immunol (2011) 12:742–51. doi:10.1038/ni.2064
75. Shi M, Deng W, Bi E, Mao K, Ji Y, Lin G, et al. TRIM30 alpha negatively regulates TLR-mediated NF-kappa B activation by targeting TAB2 and TAB3 for degradation. Nat Immunol (2008) 9:369–77. doi:10.1038/ni1577
76. Saitoh T, Tun-Kyi A, Ryo A, Yamamoto M, Finn G, Fujita T, et al. Negative regulation of interferon-regulatory factor 3-dependent innate antiviral response by the prolyl isomerase Pin1. Nat Immunol (2006) 7:598–605. doi:10.1038/ni1347
77. Chevrier N, Mertins P, Artyomov MN, Shalek AK, Iannacone M, Ciaccio MF, et al. Systematic discovery of TLR signaling components delineates viral-sensing circuits. Cell (2011) 147:853–67. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.022
78. Matsushita K, Takeuchi O, Standley DM, Kumagai Y, Kawagoe T, Miyake T, et al. Zc3h12a is an RNase essential for controlling immune responses by regulating mRNA decay. Nature (2009) 458:1185–90. doi:10.1038/nature07924
82. Compagno M, Lim WK, Grunn A, Nandula SV, Brahmachary M, Shen Q, et al. Mutations of multiple genes cause deregulation of NF-kappaB in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Nature (2009) 459:717–21. doi:10.1038/nature07968
Keywords: TLRs, signal transduction, NF-κB, IRFs, adaptors
Citation: Kawasaki T and Kawai T (2014) Toll-like receptor signaling pathways. Front. Immunol. 5:461. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00461
Received: 06 August 2014; Paper pending published: 14 August 2014;
Accepted: 09 September 2014; Published online: 25 September 2014.
Edited by:Anton G. Kutikhin, Russian Academy of Medical Sciences, Russia
Reviewed by:Uwe-Karsten Hanisch, University of Göttingen, Germany
George Trendelenburg, Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany
Copyright: © 2014 Kawasaki and Kawai. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Taro Kawai, Laboratory of Molecular Immunobiology, Graduate School of Biological Sciences, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, 8916-5 Takayama, Ikoma, Nara 630-0192, Japan e-mail: email@example.com