Sec. Molecular Innate Immunity
Volume 6 - 2015 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2015.00323
Nano-synthetic devices in leishmaniasis: a bioinformatics approach
- National Centre for Cell Science, Savitribai Phule Pune University Campus, Pune, India
Synthetic biology is an investigative and constructive means of understanding the complexities of biology. Substantial progress in the fields has resulted in the creation of synthetic gene circuits, which when uploaded into the appropriate nanoliposomal vehicle, can be used for a tunable response in a cell. These tunable elements can be applied to treat diseased condition for a transition to a healthy state. Though in its nascent stage of development synthetic biology is beginning to use its constructs to bring engineering approaches into biomedicine for treatment of infectious disease leishmaniasis.
In the twentieth century, Feynman’s “There is plenty of room at the bottom” lecture for the meeting of American Physical Society at Caltech (1959) opened a firework of intellectual concepts to a wide range of themes within physics and wherever physics was involved. This lecture laid the foundation of creating nano sized entities that could be useful for human welfare. Alongside, people in the creative industry were coming up with crazy stories that brought up the Hollywood science fiction movie Fantastic Voyage in 1966 with illustrations of nanorobots with medical abilities. These could excavate plaque in clogged blood vessels, locate pathogens, and inject materials into the red blood cells. These conveyed that nanomedicine could be the “next” big step to cure diseases with precision (1). But it was only with the invention of scanning tunneling microscope in 1981; almost 15 years of Feynman’s Caltech lecture that nanotechnology emerged as a major research discipline. Since then nano sized materials have made their impact in almost all facets of human life; of particular mention is its contribution to medicine. Man-made nanoscale systems match the scale of the physiological working levels in biology and therefore have great relevance to its application in the field. A variety of nanoscale materials are being used in medical and clinical research as detectors, targeted drug delivery vehicles, in drug screening, imaging, and diagnosis (2). With advances in nanotechnology, today’s nanomedicine come packed in surface modified nanocarriers having immense therapeutic potential due to their targeted action and biocompatibility; and are available in the market (3) (Table 1A). Also previously inaccessible areas of the body can be made accessible by propelling the nanodevices by a variety of fuel and fuel free driven technologies to deliver therapeutic and diagnostic agents (4) (Table 1B).
Table 1. (A) Nanomedicines; (B) Propelling systems applied to nanodevices; (C) Biomolecules as nanostructures in therapeutics.
Nanotechnology to medicine is becoming more promising as biocompatible materials like proteins, RNA, and DNA (Table 1C) are being molded into nano cargoes with targeting scaffolds for targeted delivery systems (11–18). These natural polymers have the tendency to self-assemble into versatile nanostructures using the information encoded within their defined sequence. Of all these DNA seems to be superior as it has the structural and functional information encoded within it and a variety of DNA manipulating enzymes provide the much needed tool box required to design a myriad of DNA nanostructures (16). DNA via controlled assembly can be nano-engineered to one-dimensional (1D), two-dimensional, and 3D DNA nanostructures. DNA hybridization to short “stapler” DNA is a versatile method to construct DNA origami nanostructures (18). Proteins and RNA are genetically encoded into DNA sequence and therefore DNA sequences encoded with desired nano functionality can be regarded the “one in all” biocompatible material for expressing nanostructure within a cellular chassis. It can be regarded as an aspect of synthetic biology, as using defined DNA sequences, hybrid (protein–RNA–DNA) nanostructures can be designed and fabricated that do not exist in nature; idealizing with the mainframe concept of synthetic biology. This will not only add to the wide range of functionalizing the nanostructure but also will aid in the multistage nanoassembly systems (19). Thus, we can say that DNA has come a long way from just being an entity to be studied in genetics to a multimodal nanomachine with wide applications in bionanomedicine.
Bioinformatics Approaches Applied to BioNanotechnology
Post Genomics Era, Bioinformatics has taken the center stage in storing, managing, visualizing, and retrieval of loads of data that can be systematically dealt for understanding the complexities in biology. Similarly, the information generated in nanotechnology should be catered to by developing new bioinformatics and computational tools that may be critical in designing, modeling, simulation, and visualization of bionanosystems that may arise with amalgamation of synthetic biology and nanotechnology. As of now, nanotechnology is relatively new in biology and the data that comes from experiments and modeling studies is scattered. It is only recently that efforts like the Investigation Study Assay (ISA) tab-delimited (TAB) format (ISA-TAB-Nano) (24), Cancer Nanotechnology Laboratory (caNanoLab) (25) are being directed to build databases for nanotechnology derived data. Curation of the data in nanotechnology databases is important as experimental conditions to obtain the nanomaterial and its application can affect the actual data measurement. Nanomaterial registry (26) has developed a method for combinatorial analysis and curation of these datasets for characterized nanomaterials. Similarly, tools for visualization, molecular modeling, docking, QSAR, and Designing Biomolecular nanostructures are available (27).
For synthetic biology assisted nanotechnology, the major advantage of an advanced computational tool will be aiding and conceptualizing novel nanodesign with the option of exploring many structural options and their stability statistical analysis (28, 29). The raw sequences required for nanostructure design can be culled from the many databases available in the public domain like the GenBank, EMBL, UniProt, RNACentral, etc. These raw sequences can be further modified as per the demands of the structural determinants of the conceptualized bionanostructure. Further statistical analysis of these predicted structure helps in validating their stability, robustness, and evolvability. Many state of the art mathematical packages are available like MATLAB® and Bioconductor that can perform various statistical analyses on the given dataset.
Synthetic-DNA nanotechnology must be applied to infectious disease like leishmaniasis. Leishmaniasis is one of the most neglected tropical diseases of the world, killing almost 20,000–300,000 people in the developing countries. Many drugs have been made and are still being discovered, but the protozoan re-emerges showing drug resistance to the effective medications. Nanotechnology has just managed to show its promise in developing a liposomal formulation called amphotericin B for leishmaniasis, which is available in the market, but has serious side effects and is not cost effective in developing countries (30). Initial, nanodelivery systems for delivering chemotherapeutics were nanodisks impregnanted with amphotericin B, polymeric-nanoparticle loaded with pentamidine, primaquine, and niosomes (31), which still need validation at the clinical level. There is an urgent need to take up assignments to use effective nanotechnology devices in combating this infectious disease. DNA nanostructures have shown promise in treating cancer and many of them very well could come into clinical trials in the near future. But a lot needs to be done as far as infectious diseases are concerned. DNA nanotechnology and its potentials can be tapped in infectious disease for immunostimulation and vaccine preparation.
Nanotechnology for Leishmaniasis
Leishmania are susceptible to complement-mediated lysis during the promastigote stage of their life cycle. This form of the parasite is found immediately after injection into the host’s blood stream by a sandfly vector. These parasites can coat themselves with C3b complement that act as opsonins to gain entry into macrophages where they can survive intracellular killing. These brief window periods of complement susceptibility could be exploited to kill parasites with aptamers by coupling to complement-mediated lysis (32). Aptamers can be linked to DNA or proteins that confer polyvalent functionalities, one being cell internalizing capability that only targets a particular cell population and deliver their therapeutic cargos specifically into the cell, in leishmaniasis the promastigotes, this may enhanced therapeutic efficacy and reduce cellular toxicity. Also, DNA nanoscaffolding of aptamers may make them resistant to serum nucleases and impart lower immunogenicity.
Macrophage M1 to M2 differentiation is the bottleneck for a proinflammatory response in many of the infectious disease. In leishmaniasis too, since the protozoan resides within the macrophages, it blocks its transformation to M2 type and silences the immune alarming system for an inflammatory response deciding the pathogenesis in disease outcome. Self-assembled nanostructures with that extracellular matrix (ECM) mimicking capability may also display biological signals together, which can help modify and instruct cell behavior. Structurally, programmable nanostructures can also modify signaling components and DNA nanostructures as artificial scaffolds can be used to control cell behavior. If these DNA nanostructures can be coassembled with peptides having biological epitopes for cell receptors that can act as signal for cell differentiation (33). Such co-assemblies investigation formed could be capable of guiding the differentiation of M1 to M2 macrophages.
The leishmanial parasite PAMPS mainly the LPGs are recognized by TLR2 and TLR4, which initiates an initial but a very short time spanning TLR-mediated inflammatory response. But using the many survival strategies the parasite affects the TLR signaling and subverts the inflammatory response. The endosomal TLRs can come to the rescue, if they are activated with appropriate signal for disease resolving response. CpG nanostructures directed to the endosomes can be utilized for the activation of innate immune response. The endosomal TLR3, TLR7/8, or TLR9 recognizes exogenous or endogenous RNA/DNA in endosomal vesicles. Bacterial and viral DNAs harbor CpG motifs with much higher frequency compared with mammalian DNA and have the capability to activate the endosomal TLR signaling (34). The activated TLR9 in macrophages can then secrete proinflammatory cytokines and type I. Soluble DNA nanostructures can be used for the targeted delivery of CpG DNA to TLR9-positive cells targeted to the macrophages harboring the leishmanial parasites.
Leishmania also has the capability to inhibit apoptosis of the resident macrophages. Apoptosis can be induced in the macrophages by using the biomimetic material platform composed of self-assembling hybrid nanoconjugates as a therapeutic system. Apoptosis is induced by clustering of CD20 within lipid rafts. If these CD20-bound antibodies are hyper-cross-linked by Fc receptor (FcR) on macrophages they can be made to undergo apoptosis. These are termed as “drug-free macromolecular therapeutics” due to the absence of low-molecular-weight drugs that often show side effects (35). In this way, apoptosis induction could be made direct and specific toward the innate immune response for intracellular killing of the leishmanial parasite.
The leishmanial parasite is known for its ability to modulate the innate immune signaling for its safe intracellular survival. DNA–protein nanoscaffolds can be used for modulators of immune signaling with in the macrophages. Earlier work have used RNA as scaffolding device within bacterial cells with capabilities for increased H2 production by varying the relative geometries of the enzymes with in the cell (36). Through rational design, both DNA and RNA can be used to create 1D, 2D, and 3D structures, allowing stable and rigid arrangements of enzymes for favorable substrate channeling (37). Similarly, in leishmaniasis, the innate immune signaling can be channelized for a proinflammatory response by orienting the signaling molecules using DNA–RNA scaffolding machinery.
Vaccine development in leishmaniasis is another major area where DNA nanotechnology may have an important contribution. Till date, many efforts have been undertaken to develop a successful vaccine, but realizing them into the clinics has been a bottle neck. Whole cell killed, attenuated, subunit vaccines have been developed in the past. Liposomal soluble Leishmania antigen incorporated CpG has also been tested in mouse model of cutaneous leishmaniasis, and generated significant levels of protection. Recombinant proteins using virus as a delivery vehicles have also been tested as vaccines in preclinical studies (38). Recent efforts are being made to assemble multiple adjuvant elements on a DNA nanostructure, increasing their immunostimulation capacity, highlighting the potential of DNA nanostructures to serve as new platforms for vaccine construction. Tetrahedral DNA nanostructure has been used as scaffold to assemble a model antigen, streptavidin (STV), and a representative adjuvant, CpG oligo-deoxynucleotides (ODN), into a synthetic vaccine complex, which elicits antibody response against the model antigen, STV. Programmable DNA nanostructures provide an excellent platform for construction of vaccines with multivalency and three-dimensional configuration. The three-dimensional arrangement of each of the immunogenic components can be readily controlled through the rational design of the scaffold sequences (39). Strong antigenic proteins from leishmanial parasite can be picked up for conjugation with DNA nanostructures for vaccine development (40).
Taken together, understanding the parasite–host interaction at the systems level and picking up the nuances in the interaction network may aid synthetic device construction. A combinatorial treatment strategy, with available drugs and novel nanostructures, may be designed rationally for the treatment of leishmaniasis. Such strategies may help overcome drug resistance and act as supportive mechanism to block the functional redundancies serving as an escape route for parasite survival (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Programmable synthetic constructs can be used to assemble nanostructures within living cells in a controlled fashion for leishmanicidal effects; (A) Raw sequence data of proteins, DNA, and RNA can be retrieved from databases; (B) Raw sequence data analysis for selection of a good sequence for nanostructure design followed by designing, modeling, simulation, and visualization of bionanosystems; (C) Computational analysis of the nanostructures for stability, robustness, and evolvability; (D) Generating sequence for tailor made nano-synthetic constructs; (E) Selection of a suitable chassis microorganism for uploading the synthetic construct; (F) Optimum chassis uploaded with the construct for the synthesis of combinatorial nanostructures; (G) Application of the nanostructures in the form of vaccines, aptamers, immune modulators to leishmanial parasite for a leishmanicidal effect.
Challenges: Computation in Nano-Synthetic Biology for Leishmaniasis
Since the first genome of Leishmania species was released in 2005, four more species have been sequenced (39) and databases like GeneDB and LeishCyc are available, which store data pertaining to the genome and metabolic pathways in Leishmania. Nanotechnology being applied to treat leishmaniasis is a relatively new area of research and a lot still needs to be done to set up merge the available datasets with new data that will arise when nanotechnology will be applied to various aspects of the leishmanial disease. Due to lack of information, the major research challenges are
• Finding new reference nanomaterials using proteins, RNA, and DNA against the leishmanial parasite
• Improved characterization of these nanomaterial
• Standardizing the experimental setup with reproducible sensitivity and accuracy
• Quantify and negate any error in protocols used to produce the data.
Nanotechnology when applied to leishmaniasis may raise numerous challenges due to the complexity associated with the life cycle of the parasite, its interaction with the host, its genome annotation are still not delineated. Moreover, significant investment in informatics is required to accelerate current research in understanding such a complex protozoan disease. Though Leishmania post-genomic research projects, have transformed the way the parasite is treated, for nanotechnological application, computational models, and algorithm for simulations of predicted annotated genome of Leishmania, needs a new approach.
As we move toward understanding the complexities associated in a diseased condition, better are the chances of discovering novel concepts and targets for drug delivery and treatment. We envisage that nano-synthetic biology might revolutionize the current biomedical science and the treatment technology in future making the illustrations of the Fantastic Voyage a reality.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The authors would like to thank Department of Science and Technology, Ministry of Science and Technology, Government of India for funding the work (SB/FT/LS400/2012). MM acknowledges the Senior Research Fellowship from Council of Scientific and Industrial Research, New Delhi. The authors would also like to thank the Director, National Centre for Cell Science (NCCS), Pune for supporting the Bioinformatics and High Performance Computing Facility at NCCS, Pune, India.
caNanoLab, cancer nanotechnology laboratory; ECM, extra cellular matrix; ISA-TAB-Nano, investigation study assay tab-delimited format; ODN, oligo-deoxynucleotides; PAMAM, poly (amidoamine); PAMP, pathogen associated molecular patterns; PEG, polyethylene glycol; QSAR, quantitative structure–activity relationship; SNAPL, stable nucleic acid lipid particle; STV, streptavidin; TLR, toll like receptors.
5. Manesh KM, Cardona M, Yuan R, Clark M, Kagan D, Balasubramanian S, et al. Template-assisted fabrication of salt-independent catalytic tubular microengines. ACS Nano (2010) 4(4):1799–804. doi:10.1021/nn1000468
6. Balasubramanian S, Kagan D, Hu CM, Campuzano S, Lobo-Castañon MJ, Lim N, et al. Micromachine-enabled capture and isolation of cancer cells in complex media. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl (2011) 50(18):4161–4. doi:10.1002/anie.201100115
7. Zhang L, Petit T, Lu Y, Kratochvil BE, Peyer KE, Pei R, et al. Controlled propulsion and cargo transport of rotating nickel nanowires near a patterned solid surface. ACS Nano (2010) 4(10):6228–34. doi:10.1021/nn101861n
8. Pouponneau P, Bringout G, Martel S. Therapeutic magnetic microcarriers guided by magnetic resonance navigation for enhanced liver chemoembilization: a design review. Ann Biomed Eng (2014) 42(5):929–39. doi:10.1007/s10439-014-0972-1
9. Kagan D, Benchimol MJ, Claussen JC, Chuluun-Erdene E, Esener S, Wang J. Acoustic droplet vaporization and propulsion of perfluorocarbon-loaded microbullets for targeted tissue penetration and deformation. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl (2012) 51(30):7519–22. doi:10.1002/anie.201201902
10. Wang X, Liu P, Yang W, Li L, Li P, Liu Z, et al. Microbubbles coupled to methotrexate-loaded liposomes for ultrasound-mediated delivery of methotrexate across the blood-brain barrier. Int J Nanomedicine (2014) 9:4899. doi:10.2147/IJN.S69845
12. Guo P, Haque F, Hallahan B, Reif R, Li H. Uniqueness, advantages, challenges, solutions, and perspectives in therapeutics applying RNA nanotechnology. Nucleic Acid Ther (2012) 22(4):226–45. doi:10.1089/nat.2012.0350
14. Afonin KA, Viard M, Kagiampakis I, Case CL, Dobrovolskaia MA, Hofmann J, et al. Triggering of RNA Interference with RNA-RNA, RNA-DNA, and DNA-RNA Nanoparticles. ACS Nano (2014) 9(1):251–9. doi:10.1021/nn504508s
15. Shu D, Shu Y, Haque F, Abdelmawla S, Guo P. Thermodynamically stable RNA three way junction for constructing multifunctional nanoparticles for delivery of therapeutics. Nat Nanotechnol (2011) 6:658–67. doi:10.1038/nnano.2011.105
20. Kaba SA, Brando C, Guo Q, Mittelholzer C, Raman S, Tropel D, et al. A nonadjuvanted polypeptide nanoparticle vaccine confers long-lasting protection against rodent malaria. J Immunol (2009) 183(11):7268–77. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0901957
22. Zhou J, Swiderski P, Li H, Zhang J, Neff CP, Akkina R, et al. Selection, characterization and application of new RNA HIV gp 120 aptamers for facile delivery of dicer substrate siRNAs into HIV infected cells. Nucleic Acids Res (2009) 37(9):3094–109. doi:10.1093/nar/gkp185
24. Thomas DG, Gaheen S, Harper SL, Fritts M, Klaessig F, Hahn-Dantona E, et al. ISA-TAB-nano: a specification for sharing nanomaterial research data in spreadsheet-based format. BMC Biotechnol (2013) 13:2. doi:10.1186/1472-6750-13-2
25. Sharon G, George WH, Stephanie AM, Michal L, Mervi H, Juli DK. Cananolab: data sharing to expedite the use of nanotechnology in biomedicine. Comput Sci Discov (2013) 6:014010. doi:10.1088/1749-4699/6/1/014010
33. Stephanopoulos N, Freeman R, North HA, Sur S, Jeong SJ, Tantakitti F, et al. Bioactive DNA-peptide nanotubes enhance the differentiation of neural stem cells into neurons. Nano Lett (2015) 15(1):603–9. doi:10.1021/nl504079q
35. Chu TW, Yang J, Zhang R, Sima M, Kopeček J. Cell surface self-assembly of hybrid nanoconjugates via oligonucleotide hybridization induces apoptosis. ACS Nano (2013) 8(1):719–30. doi:10.1021/nn4053827
37. Chen R, Chen Q, Kim H, Siu KH, Sun Q, Tsai SL, et al. Biomolecular scaffolds for enhanced signaling and catalytic efficiency. Curr Opin Biotechnol (2014) 28:59–68. doi:10.1016/j.copbio.2013.11.007
39. Nirujogi RS, Pawar H, Renuse S, Kumar P, Chavan S, Sathe G, et al. Moving from unsequenced to sequenced genome: reanalysis of the proteome of Leishmania donovani. J Proteomics (2014) 97:48–61. doi:10.1016/j.jprot.2013.04.021
Keywords: Leishmania, synthetic biology, nanotechnology, bioinformatics, nanodevices
Citation: Mol M, Kosey D and Singh S (2015) Nano-synthetic devices in leishmaniasis: a bioinformatics approach. Front. Immunol. 6:323. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00323
Received: 14 April 2015; Accepted: 03 June 2015;
Published: 19 June 2015
Edited by:Brian Golding, McMaster University, Canada
Reviewed by:Anuradha Dube, Central Drug Research Institute, India
Nageswara Rao Reddy Neelapu, Gandhi Institute of Technology and Management, India
Copyright: © 2015 Mol, Kosey and Singh. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Shailza Singh, National Centre for Cell Science, NCCS Complex, SP Pune University Campus, Ganeshkhind, Pune 411007, India, email@example.com; firstname.lastname@example.org