Mini Review ARTICLE
Gene expression profiling of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells – searching for molecular regulators of tolerogenicity
- 1Immune Regulation and Tolerance Research Group, Programa Disciplinario de Inmunología, Instituto de Ciencias Biomédicas (ICBM), Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
- 2Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy (IMII), Santiago, Chile
The ability of dendritic cells (DCs) to initiate and modulate antigen-specific immune responses has made them attractive targets for immunotherapy. Since DC research in humans is limited by the scarcity of DC populations in the blood circulation, most of our knowledge about DC biology and function has been obtained in vitro from monocyte-derived DCs (moDCs), which can be readily generated in sufficient numbers and are able to differentiate into distinct functional subsets depending on the nature of stimulus. In particular, moDCs with tolerogenic properties (tolDCs) possess great therapeutic potential for the treatment of autoimmune diseases. Several protocols have been developed to generate tolDCs in vitro, able to reinstruct auto-reactive T cells and to promote regulatory cells. While ligands and soluble mediators, by which DCs shape immune responses, have been vastly studied, the intracellular pathways and transcriptional regulators that govern tolDC differentiation and function are poorly understood. Whole-genome microarrays and proteomics provide useful strategies to dissect the complex molecular processes that promote tolerogenicity. Only few attempts have been made to understand tolDC biology through a global view on “omics” profiles. So far, the identification of a common regulator of tolerogenicity has been hampered by the fact that each protocol, used for tolDC generation, targets distinct signaling pathways. Here, we review the progress in understanding the transcriptional regulation of moDC differentiation, with a special focus on tolDCs, and highlight candidate molecules that might be associated with DC tolerogenicity.
Dendritic cells (DCs) are professional antigen-presenting cells that direct specific immune responses according to the nature of captured antigens and environmental stimuli (1, 2). They form a heterogeneous group, comprising plasmacytoid DCs, CD1c+ and CD141+ myeloid DCs, originating from a common DC precursor (3), as well as inflammatory DCs, that differentiate from monocytes under inflammatory conditions (4).
Immature DCs continuously sample antigen, but represent poor inducers of immune responses (2). Upon recognition of pathogen- or danger-associated patterns and integration of pro-inflammatory signals from the environment, DCs undergo a maturation process, which enables them to migrate toward lymphoid tissues and initiate antigen-specific T cell responses (5, 6). DCs instruct T cells through the presentation of antigen peptides on major histocompatibility complexes (MHC), co-stimulation, and the secretion of T cell-attracting chemokines and cytokines promoting T cell expansion and differentiation into effector cells with a particular cytokine profile (7). DCs are also able to induce and maintain tolerance to harmless and self-antigens, through deletion of auto-reactive T cells, induction of anergy, and/or generation of regulatory T cells (Tregs) (8–11).
In vitro, DCs can be differentiated from human peripheral blood monocytes in the presence of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and interleukin (IL)-4 (12). Human myeloid and plasmacytoid DC subsets can be obtained from CD34+ cord blood progenitors in stromal cell-containing cultures, supplemented with Flt3L, stem cell factor, and GM-CSF (13). Here, we focus on monocyte-derived DCs (moDCs), which are closely related to inflammatory DCs (4), and represent the model of choice for studies on human DC biology and function, and the design of cell-based immunotherapies targeting antigen-specific immune responses (14–17). Autologous moDCs can be easily obtained in sufficient numbers from peripheral blood of patients, and either matured/activated to induce immunogenic properties (15), or modulated to promote immunoregulatory functions (18, 19).
Several protocols have been developed for the in vitro generation of human moDCs with tolerogenic properties (tolDCs), able to silence or reprogram auto-reactive T cells and induce regulatory lymphocytes (18, 20, 21). Their immunoregulatory function has been corroborated in vivo in rodent models of autoimmune diseases (22–26), and first clinical trials using autoantigen-pulsed tolDCs in patients with autoimmune disorders confirmed their safety and efficacy (27, 28). Studies on the mechanisms, by which tolDCs modulate T cell responses, indicate that cell-contact via co-stimulatory/co-inhibitory signals (29), and anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-10 and TGF-β (30) are required for tolerance induction. However, the intracellular molecular processes that govern DC differentiation toward a tolerogenic profile are scarcely understood (31).
Microarray technology allows the exploration of genome-wide changes during DC differentiation, maturation, and modulation (32–34). In some studies, microarray data are complemented by proteome-based strategies such as two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis (2D-DIGE) and mass spectrometry (35–37).
Here, we review recent findings in gene expression analysis of moDCs, with special focus on approaches to unveil the molecular basis of DC tolerogenicity.
Transcriptional Changes during Dendritic Cell Differentiation from Monocytes
Gene expression studies of monocytes and moDCs revealed that differentiation of monocytes into DCs leads to the downregulation of genes encoding monocyte markers like CD14 and CD163, genes associated with cell adhesion and motility (E-cadherin, galectin-2, PECAM1/CD31, ICAM1/CD54), and signal transduction/growth control (JAK3, GBP2, DUSP6, MAP3K8), as well as genes encoding the chemokines CXCL8/IL-8, CXCL3/MIP-2β, and CCL4/MIP-1β, the cytokines and cytokine receptors tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, IL-15, IL-6, IL-6R, IL13RA1, IL10RA, and TGFBR3, and the transcriptional regulators IRF7A, ERF2, FOSB, KLF9, GATA2, JUNB, and NFKBIA (32, 35, 36). By contrast, genes encoding proteins related to pattern recognition and antigen uptake (MRC1, FcγRII/CD32, NOD1), antigen processing and presentation (LAMP1, HLA-DPA1, HLA-DQA2, CD1a), and co-stimulation (CD83, CD86) were upregulated, together with genes encoding growth factors (TGF-β1, CSF1), cytokines and their receptors (IL-1β, TNFR2, IL1R1), lymphocyte attracting chemokines (CCL13/MCP-4, CCL17/TARC, CCL18/PARC, CCL22/MDC) and chemokine receptors (CCR5, CCRL2), enzymes and carriers of lipid metabolism (ALOX15, LIPA, CYP27A1), adenosine receptors (ADORA1, ADORA2B), signaling molecules (RAP1GAP, IP3KB, TRAF3), and transcription factors IRF4, C/EBP–α, PPAR-γ, p53, and c-myc (32, 35, 36).
At protein level, the chaperones HSP27 and GRP78, as well as proteins involved in Ca2+-binding (S100A9/MRP14, S100A8/MRP8), fatty acid binding (FABP4, FABP5, acyl-CoA-binding protein), cell signaling (GNAI2, ANXA2), oxidative stress (PRDX3, SOD2), and cell structure (vimentin) were found to be upregulated in DCs (35, 36).
Changes in Gene Expression Profiles upon Dendritic Cell Maturation
Several stimuli are used to induce maturation of DCs in vitro, including pro-inflammatory cytokines and microbial products, leading to morphological changes, upregulation of MHC, and co-stimulatory molecules, as well as characteristic chemokine and cytokine profiles (38–42).
Gene expression studies confirmed that previously described markers of mature DCs, such as the co-stimulatory/co-activating molecules CD86, CD83, and CD40, the cell adhesion molecules ICAM1/CD54 and CD49d, the lymph node homing-mediating chemokine receptors CCR7 and CXCR4, and the pro-inflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 were upregulated at transcriptional level, too, regardless of whether maturation was induced by cytokines or pathogen-derived stimuli (38–42). Similarly, transcriptome studies revealed a characteristic chemokine pattern in mature DCs, including the upregulation of CCL2/MIP-1α, CCL8/PARC, CCL17/TARC, CCL22/MDC, CXCL8/IL-8, CXCL9/MIG, CXCL10/IP-10, and CXCL11/I-TAC transcripts (38–42). The global view on gene expression profiles uncovered also differences in transcriptional patterns of moDCs matured with distinct stimuli, despite comparable morphology and phenotype (43). For example, TNF-α-matured DCs exhibit a transcriptional profile similar to immature DCs, characterized by the upregulation of transcripts associated with pattern recognition and phagocytosis (CD209, CD205, FCGRIIB, FCAR, FCER2, C1QA), cell adhesion (CD97, integrin β2/CD18, CD11b), transcriptional regulation (NFKBIA, EGR1), and tryptophan catabolism (IDO) (35, 36). Interferon (IFN)-α-matured DCs, in contrast, display an upregulation of genes encoding maturation-associated proteins (several HLA molecules, LAMP3), transcription factors of the IFN pathway (STAT1, IRF7), components of the antiviral response (PKR, Mx1, TRAIL, granzyme, caspase 1), as well as proteins related to TLR signaling (TLR2, TLR3, MyD88) (43, 44).
Oligonucleotide microarrays of human moDCs, matured by the exposure to bacteria, fungi, viruses, or their components, revealed not only pathogen-specific maturation programs but also a common core response to all pathogens (45, 46). This core response comprises the downregulation of genes encoding pathogen recognition and phagocytosis receptors (MMR, AP2M1), and the upregulation of genes involved in antigen processing and presentation (HLA, LMP2, TAP1, TAP2), signaling (MyD88, lyn), and migration (fascin), as well as those encoding transcription factors (IRF1, IRF7, STAT1), chemokines required for the recruitment of innate immune cells (CCL3/MIP-1α, CCL4/MIP-1β, CCL5/RANTES), and molecules involved in the killing of invasive microorganisms (SOD2, thioredoxin) (45, 46). Serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE) in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-matured DCs vs. immature DCs additionally revealed an upregulation of genes encoding the chemokines CCL18/PARC and CCL19/MIP-3β/ELC, LAMP3, related to antigen processing and presentation, as well as genes associated with cytokine signaling pathways (IL27B/EBI3, IFI27, ISG20), and protein serine/threonine kinase activity (MAP4K3, STK4) (47).
Kinetic analysis of global gene expression during human DC maturation, induced by bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and IFN-γ, or CD40 ligation, revealed a temporally coordinated transcriptional program: transcripts encoding pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines that guide immune cells to the sites of inflammation (CCL4/MIP-1β, CXCL2/MIP-2α) were early induced upon maturation, followed by an increase of transcripts encoding T cell-attracting chemokines (CCL5/RANTES, CCL15/MIP-1δ), and late upregulation of genes related to survival (CLU, IAP-C, GADD45A), lysosomal function (LAMP3) and response to chemical stimuli (MT1E, MT1G) (33, 48). By contrast, genes encoding the aforementioned maturation markers, proteins involved in antigen processing and presentation (MHCI, TAP1, TAP2), the transcription factors IRF4 and IRF8, and the oxidative stress-associated molecules SOD2 and MT2A were upregulated at a constant level throughout maturation (33, 48).
Maturation induced by a standard cytokine cocktail containing TNF-α, IL-1β, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and IL-6, or an alternative cocktail, containing TNF-α, IL-1β, IFN-α, IFN-γ, and poly (I:C), increases the transcription of the co-inhibitor PD-L1, cell adhesion molecules (LFA3/CD58, PSGL1/CD162), cytokine receptors (IL-6Rβ/gp130, IL-2Rγ/CD132, IL4RA/CD124, IL7RA/CD127, IL15RA), transcriptional regulators (RelB, NFKBIA, IRF1, RUNX3), apoptosis regulators (TNFAIP3, TNFAIP6, CFLAR), and enzymes SOD2 and IDO (49, 50). An integrated transcriptomic and proteomic analysis of cytokine-matured DCs identified five major pathways that were differentially regulated during DC maturation, at both RNA and protein levels, comprising cell adhesion, TLR signaling, PPAR signaling and lipid metabolism (PIK3R1, ACSL4, GK, DBI), migration, and cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction (CSF2RA, PTK2B), accompanied by the upregulation of transcription factors NFKB1, NFKB2, and RELA (37).
Searching Molecular Regulators of Dendritic Cell Tolerogenicity
Generation of Human Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells
Several protocols have been established to obtain human tolDCs with stable tolerogenic features from peripheral blood monocytes, differing in culture duration and nature of modulating agents. Common strategies are the modulation with anti-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-10 (51) or TGF-β (52), immunosuppressive drugs, including dexamethasone (53), rapamycin (54), aspirin (55), the PPAR-γ inhibitor rosiglitazone (56), tacrolimus (57), and the JAK inhibitor tofacitinib (58); natural compounds such as resveratrol (59), curcumine (60), 9-cis-retinoic acid (56), 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (vitD3), either alone (61) or in combination with dexamethasone (62); the HO-1 inducer cobalt protoporphyrin (63), and the NF-κB inhibitor BAY11-7082 (27).
Alternative or partial activation of DCs has been considered as essential for the efficacy of tolDC-based immunotherapy and can be achieved by adding LPS (10, 64, 65), its non-toxic analog monophosphoryl lipid A (66), CD40L (66), or the standard cytokine cocktail for DC maturation (67). This endows tolDCs with enhanced IL-10 production, antigen presentation, and lymph node homing capacity, while preserving a stable tolerogenic profile upon exposure to activating stimuli (68).
Despite the diversity of stimuli used to obtain tolDCs, and although some properties vary amongst protocols, there is a consensus about fundamental features that tolDCs must possess, including low expression of co-stimulatory molecules, high production of anti-inflammatory cytokines, mainly IL-10, and low levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines, as well as the ability to induce T cell hyporesponsiveness or Tregs (67, 69, 70).
Global Gene Expression Profiling of Tolerogenic Dendritic Cells
To date, few studies have attempted to unravel the molecular basis of DC tolerogenicity through transcriptome and proteome profiling (Table 1).
Transcriptome analysis of human tolDCs, obtained by modulation with IL-10 alone or in combination with TGF-β or IL-6, and compared to LPS-matured DCs, revealed an upregulation of 36 common genes in all three tolDC types, belonging to the functional categories of defense response (CD37, CXCL8/IL-8, CXCL1), antigen processing and presentation (CTSB, CTSL, HLA-DOB), TGF-β signaling (TGFB, SMAD3), cell adhesion (THBS1), complement and coagulation cascades (C2), transcription (HOXB5, TRRAP), and lipid metabolism (TBXA2R), while 34 genes were downregulated, including CD48, IL-1A, CCL17/TARC, CD74, CREM, and PRDX5 (69). Upregulation of ENTPD1/CD39 and TRAF6 was specific to IL-10 + TGF-β-treated tolDCs, while the transcription factor ID4 was exclusively upregulated in IL-10-modulated tolDCs (69).
Global gene expression profiles of DCs, treated with IL-10, LPS, or a combination of both, unveiled three functional groups of genes that were regulated by IL-10 alone or in concert with LPS: inhibition of specific immunity and inflammation, tuning of cytokine receptor and G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling, and stimulation of B cell development/function and lymphoid tissue regeneration (71). Compared to LPS, IL-10 alone induced a limited set of genes, encoding proteins related to B cell differentiation and function (SLAM, IL-7, IL-4Rα, PBEF), GPCR signaling (FZD2), and extracellular matrix (versican). In combination with LPS, IL-10 suppressed the expression of the LPS-inducible genes CD86, CD83, IL12, and CCR7. However, a set of genes was uniquely regulated by simultaneous treatment with IL-10 and LPS, including transcripts of intracellular signal transduction molecules (RGS16, JAK1), transcription factors (CEBP, ARNT2, FOXO3), and lymphocyte attracting chemokines (CXCL13/BLC, CCL19) (71).
Ferreira and colleagues explored global molecular changes induced in human moDCs by vitD3 and its analog TX527 through transcriptomic and proteomic approaches, and assigned differentially regulated genes to three functional categories: cytoskeleton structure, protein biosynthesis/proteolysis, and metabolism (73, 75). VitD3 and TX527 reduced the expression of most cytoskeleton proteins, such as fascin, while enhancing the expression of metabolic proteins, e.g., CA2 and FBP1 (73, 75). Protein proteolysis/biosynthesis comprised the main group of proteins that were upregulated in response to TX527, involving translation (eEF1G, eEF2, EIF3S3, EIF4H) and the MHCI/II pathway, particularly CTSD and CTSS, which mediate the degradation of MHCII invariant chain/CD74 (73). Additionally, TX527 treatment increased the expression of stress response proteins, including SOD2, ORP150, HSPD1, and TXNDC4, and proteins of the cellular defense response, such as LTB4 and NCF2 (73).
The comparison of protein profiles of tolDCs, modulated with vitD3, dexamethasone, or both, and subsequently activated by CD40L, revealed common functional groups that were regulated in all three tolDC types, but not in CD40L-matured DCs (75). These comprised lipid metabolism, i.e., fatty acid oxidation and elongation in mitochondria, glycerophospholipid metabolism and phospholipid degradation, as well as NRF2-mediated oxidative stress response (75). Protein interaction networks and pathway analysis indicated that vitD3, rather than dexamethasone, has a strong impact on metabolic pathways involving lipids, glucose, and oxidative phosphorylation, as well as on mitochondrial processes, including alterations of the mitochondrial transmembrane potential (75). By contrast, dexamethasone was shown to affect predominantly proteins of the stress response, e.g., HSP71, and induced proteins of glutathione metabolism, acute phase response signaling, and MHCII antigen presentation pathways, including multiple isoforms of CTSB, CTSD, and CTSZ (75). Combined treatment with vitD3 and dexamethasone, which promotes a strong tolerogenic profile regarding the modulation of T cell responses (75), induced a unique protein signature, dominated by the metabolic effect of vitD3 (75). When compared to treatment with each stimulus alone, combination of vitD3 and dexamethasone upregulated proteins involved in the anti-apoptotic response (HSPA9, PYCARD, and ANXA1), protein biosynthesis/proteolysis, protein binding/folding, and immune response (IL1RN, ANXA11, SAMHD1) (75).
Microarray analysis of intracellular processes, induced early during differentiation of monocytes to vitD3-tolDC, revealed an upregulation of genes related to glucose metabolism, tricarboxylic acid cycle, and oxidative phosphorylation, including GLU3, HK3, PFKFB4, PDHA1, LDHA, ATP5A1, and the transcription factor C-MYC (34). Glucose availability and glycolysis, controlled by the PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway, were shown to dictate the induction and maintenance of the tolerogenic phenotype and function in vitD3-modulated tolDCs (34).
Similar results were reported by Malinarich and colleagues, who compared transcriptomes of tolDCs modulated by dexamethasone and vitD3, with or without activation by LPS, to those of immature and LPS-matured DCs (74). This study confirmed the upregulation of catabolic pathways, including oxidative phosphorylation, fatty acid metabolism, and glycolysis, in vitD3-modulated tolDCs compared to immature DCs (74). However, LPS-induced activation was shown to decrease the metabolic plasticity in tolDCs and DCs, mainly by negatively regulating oxidative phosphorylation, without affecting mitochondrial function (74).
Using a different approach, Zimmer and colleagues analyzed proteomes of human moDCs, either modulated with dexamethasone or activated with LPS or peptidoglycan, using DIGE and label-free mass spectrometry to identify putative biomarkers of tolDCs (72). Proteomic analysis uncovered 14 potential marker candidates that were significantly upregulated in tolDCs compared to immature DCs and LPS- or peptidoglycan-matured DCs, including FKBP5, GPX1, C1QA, and STAB1 (72). Evaluation of candidate expression in other tolDC types, modulated by IL-10, rapamycin, vitD3, TGF-β, or Aspergillus oryzae protease, through qPCR and Western blot analysis, revealed substantial heterogenicity. Only ANXA1, CATC, and GILZ were upregulated in all tolDCs subtypes and therefore suggested as tolDC markers (72).
Different tolDC types share main phenotypic and functional characteristics, however, transcriptome and proteome studies demonstrated that each modulatory agent, used to promote tolDCs, induces a distinct transcriptional program in DCs (Table 1). While IL-10 mainly affects immunological processes (71), vitD3 has a major impact on metabolic pathways, involving oxidative phosphorylation, fatty acid, and glucose metabolism (34, 74). By contrast, dexamethasone exerts an influence on glutathione metabolism and upregulates genes related to stress response and redox homeostasis (72, 74, 75). There are only few common molecules found to be upregulated in different tolDC types, including the cytokine IL-1Ra (IL1RN), complement component 1q (C1Q), coagulation factor XIIIa (F13A), thrombospondin-1 (THBS1/TSP1), and superoxide dismutase (SOD2). IL-1Ra competes with IL-1 for binding to the IL-1 receptor, without inducing any intracellular response, and has been shown to inhibit DC maturation as well as T cell activation and polarization (76, 77). C1q was proposed to render DCs tolerogenic, by reducing the expression of co-stimulatory molecules and promoting high levels of immunosuppressive IL-10 and TGF-β (78, 79). F13A+ DCs were shown to produce retinoic acid and induce Foxp3+ Tregs (80). THBS1 is directly associated with tolerance induction, by impairing T effector cell proliferation while promoting Treg generation through ligation with its receptor CD47/IAP (69, 81, 82). Only SOD2 was found to be upregulated in all tolDC types described herein, irrespective of subsequent activation via TLR or CD40 (34, 69, 73, 75). This antioxidative enzyme is also expressed by immature and mature DCs (33, 36, 69), and is crucial for oxidative stress resistance and the regulation of inflammatory processes by attenuating the activity of NF-κB (83, 84). Accordingly, in mice with heterozygous SOD2 deficiency, DCs accumulate reactive oxygen species under stress conditions, secrete higher amounts of IL-6, CXCL1, and CXCL2/MIP-2α, and show an impaired antigen-presenting and co-stimulatory capacity, and decreased TNF-α secretion upon activation (85).
It is to be noted that the expression profiles of tolDCs show some overlap with those of immature DCs, e.g., upregulation of C/EBP, c-myc, p53, and SOD2 transcripts, which might be due to the inhibition of maturation/activation (34, 36). However, the transcriptome and proteome studies described herein unraveled distinctive molecular signatures of tolDCs, indicating that tolerogenic features emerge from a specific transcriptional program, rather than resulting from retention at an immature state.
Knowledge about molecular mechanisms that govern DC differentiation and function has increased due to technological advances. However, molecular switches that “turn on” tolerogenic functions in DCs remain largely unknown. Comparative transcriptome studies confirmed that tolDCs possess a characteristic molecular signature rather than being retained at a phenotypic and functional immature/semi-mature state. Since diverse modulating agents used for the generation of human tolDCs target distinct signaling pathways, the identification of master regulators of DC tolerogenicity has been challenging. Further comparative “omics” studies are required to define which molecules induce an immunoregulatory profile and thus might be used as targets to render DCs tolerogenic and to enhance their stability, longevity, and resistance to stress or pro-inflammatory stimuli for immunotherapeutic application.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The authors thank CONICYT and Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy (IMII) for financial support.
This work was funded by FONDECYT-Chile 1140553, FONDECYT-Chile 3150453 (KS), FONDECYT-Chile 21130701 (PGG), Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy P09-016-F and Fundación Ciencia Translacional from Chile.
4. Segura E, Touzot M, Bohineust A, Cappuccio A, Chiocchia G, Hosmalin A, et al. Human inflammatory dendritic cells induce Th17 cell differentiation. Immunity (2013) 38(2):336–48. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2012.10.018
7. Kalinski P, Hilkens CM, Wierenga EA, Kapsenberg ML. T-cell priming by type-1 and type-2 polarized dendritic cells: the concept of a third signal. Immunol Today (1999) 20(12):561–7. doi:10.1016/S0167-5699(99)01547-9
8. Bakdash G, van Capel TMM, Mason LMK, Kapsenberg ML, de Jong EC. Vitamin D3 metabolite calcidiol primes human dendritic cells to promote the development of immunomodulatory IL-10-producing T cells. Vaccine (2014) 32(47):6294–302. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2014.08.075
9. Brenk M, Scheler M, Koch S, Neumann J, Takikawa O, Hacker G, et al. Tryptophan deprivation induces inhibitory receptors ILT3 and ILT4 on dendritic cells favoring the induction of human CD4+CD25+ Foxp3+ T regulatory cells. J Immunol (2009) 183(1):145–54. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0803277
10. Anderson AE, Sayers BL, Haniffa MA, Swan DJ, Diboll J, Wang XN, et al. Differential regulation of naive and memory CD4+ T cells by alternatively activated dendritic cells. J Leukoc Biol (2008) 84(1):124–33. doi:10.1189/jlb.1107744
11. Steinbrink K, Graulich E, Kubsch S, Knop J, Enk AH. CD4(+) and CD8(+) anergic T cells induced by interleukin-10-treated human dendritic cells display antigen-specific suppressor activity. Blood (2002) 99(7):2468–76. doi:10.1182/blood.V99.7.2468
12. Sallusto F, Lanzavecchia A. Efficient presentation of soluble antigen by cultured human dendritic cells is maintained by granulocyte/macrophage colony/stimulating factor plus interleukin 4 and downregulated by tumor necrosis factor alpha. J Exp Med (1994) 179(4):1109–18.
13. Lee J, Breton G, Oliveira TY, Zhou YJ, Aljoufi A, Puhr S, et al. Restricted dendritic cell and monocyte progenitors in human cord blood and bone marrow. J Exp Med (2015) 212(3):385–99. doi:10.1084/jem.20141442
15. Kalinski P, Wieckowski E, Muthuswamy R, de Jong E. Generation of stable Th1/CTL-, Th2-, and Th17-inducing human dendritic cells. Methods Mol Biol (2010) 595:117–33. doi:10.1007/978-1-60761-421-0_7
18. Torres-Aguilar H, Sanchez-Torres C, Jara LJ, Blank M, Shoenfeld Y. IL-10/TGF-beta-treated dendritic cells, pulsed with insulin, specifically reduce the response to insulin of CD4+ effector/memory T cells from type 1 diabetic individuals. J Clin Immunol (2010) 30(5):659–68. doi:10.1007/s10875-010-9430-5
19. Raïch-Regué D, Grau-López L, Naranjo-Gómez M, Ramo-Tello C, Pujol-Borrell R, Martínez-Cáceres E, et al. Stable antigen-specific T-cell hyporesponsiveness induced by tolerogenic dendritic cells from multiple sclerosis patients. Eur J Immunol (2012) 42(3):771–82. doi:10.1002/eji.201141835
20. Boks MA, Kager-Groenland JR, Haasjes MS, Zwaginga JJ, van Ham SM, ten Brinke A. IL-10-generated tolerogenic dendritic cells are optimal for functional regulatory T cell induction–a comparative study of human clinical-applicable DC. Clinical Immunol (2012) 142(3):332–42. doi:10.1016/j.clim.2011.11.011
21. Bosma BM, Metselaar HJ, Nagtzaam NM, de Haan R, Mancham S, van der Laan LJ, et al. Dexamethasone transforms lipopolysaccharide-stimulated human blood myeloid dendritic cells into myeloid dendritic cells that prime interleukin-10 production in T cells. Immunology (2008) 125(1):91–100. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2567.2008.02824.x
22. Sato K, Yamashita N, Baba M, Matsuyama T. Modified myeloid dendritic cells act as regulatory dendritic cells to induce anergic and regulatory T cells. Blood (2003) 101(9):3581–9. doi:10.1182/blood-2002-09-2712
23. Ferreira GB, van Etten E, Verstuyf A, Waer M, Overbergh L, Gysemans C, et al. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D3 alters murine dendritic cell behaviour in vitro and in vivo. Diabetes Metab Res Rev (2011) 27(8):933–41. doi:10.1002/dmrr.1275
24. Iruretagoyena MI, Sepúlveda SEE, Lezana JP, Hermoso M, Bronfman M, Gutiérrez MA, et al. Inhibition of nuclear factor-kappa B enhances the capacity of immature dendritic cells to induce antigen-specific tolerance in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. J Pharmacol Exp Ther (2006) 318(1):59–67. doi:10.1124/jpet.106.103259
25. Salazar L, Aravena O, Abello P, Escobar A, Contreras-Levicoy J, Rojas-Colonelli N, et al. Modulation of established murine collagen-induced arthritis by a single inoculation of short-term lipopolysaccharide-stimulated dendritic cells. Ann Rheum Dis (2008) 67(9):1235–41. doi:10.1136/ard.2007.072199
26. Stoop JN, Harry RA, von Delwig A, Isaacs JD, Robinson JH, Hilkens CM. Therapeutic effect of tolerogenic dendritic cells in established collagen-induced arthritis is associated with a reduction in Th17 responses. Arthritis Rheum (2010) 62(12):3656–65. doi:10.1002/art.27756
27. Benham H, Nel HJ, Law SC, Mehdi AM, Street S, Ramnoruth N, et al. Citrullinated peptide dendritic cell immunotherapy in HLA risk genotype-positive rheumatoid arthritis patients. Sci Transl Med (2015) 7(290):290ra87. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aaa9301
28. Giannoukakis N, Phillips B, Finegold D, Harnaha J, Trucco M. Phase I (safety) study of autologous tolerogenic dendritic cells in type 1 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care (2011) 34(9):2026–32. doi:10.2337/dc11-0472
29. Yamazaki S, Iyoda T, Tarbell K, Olson K, Velinzon K, Inaba K, et al. Direct expansion of functional CD25+ CD4+ regulatory T cells by antigen-processing dendritic cells. J Exp Med (2003) 198(2):235–47. doi:10.1084/jem.20030422
30. Gárate D, Rojas-Colonelli N, Peña C, Salazar L, Abello P, Pesce B, et al. Blocking of p38 and transforming growth factor β receptor pathways impairs the ability of tolerogenic dendritic cells to suppress murine arthritis. Arthritis Rheum (2013) 65(1):120–9. doi:10.1002/art.37702
31. Schinnerling K, Soto L, Garcia-Gonzalez P, Catalan D, Aguillon JC. Skewing dendritic cell differentiation towards a tolerogenic state for recovery of tolerance in rheumatoid arthritis. Autoimmun Rev (2015) 14(6):517–27. doi:10.1016/j.autrev.2015.01.014
32. Yang AX, Chong N, Jiang Y, Catalano J, Puri RK, Khleif SN. Molecular characterization of antigen-peptide pulsed dendritic cells: immature dendritic cells develop a distinct molecular profile when pulsed with antigen peptide. PLoS One (2014) 9(1). doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0086306
33. Jin P, Han TH, Ren J, Saunders S, Wang E, Marincola FM, et al. Molecular signatures of maturing dendritic cells: implications for testing the quality of dendritic cell therapies. J Transl Med (2010) 8:4. doi:10.1186/1479-5876-8-4
34. Ferreira GB, Vanherwegen AS, Eelen G, Gutierrez AC, Van Lommel L, Marchal K, et al. Vitamin D3 induces tolerance in human dendritic cells by activation of intracellular metabolic pathways. Cell Rep (2015) 10(5):711–25. doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2015.01.013
35. Angénieux C, Fricker D, Strub J-M, Luche S, Bausinger H, Cazenave J-P, et al. Gene induction during differentiation of human monocytes into dendritic cells: an integrated study at the RNA and protein levels. Funct Integr Genomics (2001) 1(5):323–9. doi:10.1007/s101420100037
36. Le Naour F, Hohenkirk L, Grolleau A, Misek DE, Lescure P, Geiger JD, et al. Profiling changes in gene expression during differentiation and maturation of monocyte-derived dendritic cells using both oligonucleotide microarrays and proteomics. J Biol Chem (2001) 276(21):17920–31. doi:10.1074/jbc.M100156200
37. Buschow SI, Lasonder E, van Deutekom HW, Oud MM, Beltrame L, Huynen MA, et al. Dominant processes during human dendritic cell maturation revealed by integration of proteome and transcriptome at the pathway level. J Proteome Res (2010) 9(4):1727–37. doi:10.1021/pr9008546
38. Massa C, Thomas C, Wang E, Marincola F, Seliger B. Different maturation cocktails provide dendritic cells with different chemoattractive properties. J Transl Med (2015) 13(Suppl 1):175. doi:10.1186/s12967-015-0528-7
39. Ten Brinke A, Karsten ML, Dieker MC, Zwaginga JJ, van Ham SM. The clinical grade maturation cocktail monophosphoryl lipid A plus IFNgamma generates monocyte-derived dendritic cells with the capacity to migrate and induce Th1 polarization. Vaccine (2007) 25(41):7145–52. doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.07.031
40. Zhu M, Xu W, Su H, Huang Q, Wang B. Addition of CpG ODN and Poly (I: C) to a standard maturation cocktail generates monocyte-derived dendritic cells and induces a potent Th1 polarization with migratory capacity. Hum Vaccin immunother (2015) 11(7):1596–605. doi:10.1080/21645515.2015.1046659
41. Castiello L, Sabatino M, Jin P, Clayberger C, Marincola FM, Krensky AM, et al. Monocyte-derived DC maturation strategies and related pathways: a transcriptional view. Cancer Immunol Immunother (2011) 60(4):457–66. doi:10.1007/s00262-010-0954-6
42. Han TH, Jin P, Ren J, Slezak S, Marincola FM, Stroncek DF. Evaluation of 3 clinical dendritic cell maturation protocols containing lipopolysaccharide and interferon-gamma. J Immunother (2009) 32(4):399–407. doi:10.1097/CJI.0b013e31819e1773
43. Korthals M, Safaian N, Kronenwett R, Maihofer D, Schott M, Papewalis C, et al. Monocyte derived dendritic cells generated by IFN-alpha acquire mature dendritic and natural killer cell properties as shown by gene expression analysis. J Transl Med (2007) 5:46. doi:10.1186/1479-5876-5-46
44. Moschella F, Bisikirska B, Maffei A, Papadopoulos KP, Skerrett D, Liu Z, et al. Gene expression profiling and functional activity of human dendritic cells induced with IFN-alpha-2b: implications for cancer immunotherapy. Clin Cancer Res (2003) 9(6):2022–31.
45. Huang Q, Liu D, Majewski P, Schulte LC, Korn JM, Young RA, et al. The plasticity of dendritic cell responses to pathogens and their components. Science (2001) 294(5543):870–5. doi:10.1126/science.294.5543.870
47. Hashimoto SI, Suzuki T, Nagai S, Yamashita T, Toyoda N, Matsushima K. Identification of genes specifically expressed in human activated and mature dendritic cells through serial analysis of gene expression. Blood (2000) 96(6):2206–14.
48. Tureci O, Bian H, Nestle FO, Raddrizzani L, Rosinski JA, Tassis A, et al. Cascades of transcriptional induction during dendritic cell maturation revealed by genome-wide expression analysis. FASEB J (2003) 17(8):836–47. doi:10.1096/fj.02-0724com
49. Moller I, Michel K, Frech N, Burger M, Pfeifer D, Frommolt P, et al. Dendritic cell maturation with poly(I:C)-based versus PGE2-based cytokine combinations results in differential functional characteristics relevant to clinical application. J Immunother (2008) 31(5):506–19. doi:10.1097/CJI.0b013e318177d9e5
50. Dietz AB, Bulur PA, Knutson GJ, Matasic R, Vuk-Pavlovic S. Maturation of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells studied by microarray hybridization. Biochem Biophys Res Commun (2000) 275(3):731–8. doi:10.1006/bbrc.2000.3372
52. Fogel-Petrovic M, Long JA, Misso NL, Foster PS, Bhoola KD, Thompson PJ. Physiological concentrations of transforming growth factor beta1 selectively inhibit human dendritic cell function. Int Immunopharmacol (2007) 7(14):1924–33. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2007.07.003
53. Xia CQ, Peng R, Beato F, Clare-Salzler MJ. Dexamethasone induces IL-10-producing monocyte-derived dendritic cells with durable immaturity. Scand J Immunol (2005) 62(1):45–54. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3083.2005.01640.x
54. Fedoric B, Krishnan R. Rapamycin downregulates the inhibitory receptors ILT2, ILT3, ILT4 on human dendritic cells and yet induces T cell hyporesponsiveness independent of FoxP3 induction. Immunol Lett (2008) 120(1–2):49–56. doi:10.1016/j.imlet.2008.06.009
55. Buckland M, Jago C, Fazekesova H, George A, Lechler R, Lombardi G. Aspirin modified dendritic cells are potent inducers of allo-specific regulatory T-cells. Int Immunopharmacol (2006) 6(13–14):1895–901. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2006.07.008
56. Zapata-Gonzalez F, Rueda F, Petriz J, Domingo P, Villarroya F, de Madariaga A, et al. 9-cis-Retinoic acid (9cRA), a retinoid X receptor (RXR) ligand, exerts immunosuppressive effects on dendritic cells by RXR-dependent activation: inhibition of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma blocks some of the 9cRA activities, and precludes them to mature phenotype development. J Immunol (2007) 178(10):6130–9.
57. Orange DE, Blachere NE, Fak J, Parveen S, Frank MO, Herre M, et al. Dendritic cells loaded with FK506 kill T cells in an antigen-specific manner and prevent autoimmunity in vivo. Elife (2013) 2:e00105. doi:10.7554/eLife.00105
58. Kubo S, Yamaoka K, Kondo M, Yamagata K, Zhao J, Iwata S, et al. The JAK inhibitor, tofacitinib, reduces the T cell stimulatory capacity of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells. Ann Rheum Dis (2013) 73(12):2192–8. doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2013-203756
59. Svajger U, Obermajer N, Jeras M. Dendritic cells treated with resveratrol during differentiation from monocytes gain substantial tolerogenic properties upon activation. Immunology (2010) 129(4):525–35. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2567.2009.03205.x
60. Rogers NM, Kireta S, Coates PT. Curcumin induces maturation-arrested dendritic cells that expand regulatory T cells in vitro and in vivo. Clin Exp Immunol (2010) 162(3):460–73. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2249.2010.04232.x
61. Penna G, Adorini L. 1 Alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 inhibits differentiation, maturation, activation, and survival of dendritic cells leading to impaired alloreactive T cell activation. J Immunol (2000) 164(5):2405–11. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.164.5.2405
62. Harry RA, Anderson AE, Isaacs JD, Hilkens CM. Generation and characterisation of therapeutic tolerogenic dendritic cells for rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis (2010) 69(11):2042–50. doi:10.1136/ard.2009.126383
64. Unger WW, Laban S, Kleijwegt FS, van der Slik AR, Roep BO. Induction of Treg by monocyte-derived DC modulated by vitamin D3 or dexamethasone: differential role for PD-L1. Eur J Immunol (2009) 39(11):3147–59. doi:10.1002/eji.200839103
65. Lan YY, Wang Z, Raimondi G, Wu W, Colvin BL, de Creus A, et al. “Alternatively activated” dendritic cells preferentially secrete IL-10, expand Foxp3+CD4+ T cells, and induce long-term organ allograft survival in combination with CTLA4-Ig. J Immunol (2006) 177(9):5868–77. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.177.9.5868
66. Garcia-Gonzalez P, Morales R, Hoyos L, Maggi J, Campos J, Pesce B, et al. A short protocol using dexamethasone and monophosphoryl lipid A generates tolerogenic dendritic cells that display a potent migratory capacity to lymphoid chemokines. J Transl Med (2013) 11:128. doi:10.1186/1479-5876-11-128
67. Naranjo-Gomez M, Raich-Regue D, Onate C, Grau-Lopez L, Ramo-Tello C, Pujol-Borrell R, et al. Comparative study of clinical grade human tolerogenic dendritic cells. J Transl Med (2011) 9:89. doi:10.1186/1479-5876-9-89
68. Anderson AE, Swan DJ, Sayers BL, Harry RA, Patterson AM, von Delwig A, et al. LPS activation is required for migratory activity and antigen presentation by tolerogenic dendritic cells. J Leukoc Biol (2009) 85(2):243–50. doi:10.1189/jlb.0608374
69. Torres-Aguilar H, Aguilar-Ruiz SR, Gonzalez-Perez G, Munguia R, Bajana S, Meraz-Rios MA, et al. Tolerogenic dendritic cells generated with different immunosuppressive cytokines induce antigen-specific anergy and regulatory properties in memory CD4+ T cells. J Immunol (2010) 184(4):1765–75. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0902133
70. Chamorro S, Garcia-Vallejo JJ, Unger WW, Fernandes RJ, Bruijns SC, Laban S, et al. TLR triggering on tolerogenic dendritic cells results in TLR2 up-regulation and a reduced proinflammatory immune program. J Immunol (2009) 183(5):2984–94. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0801155
71. Perrier P, Martinez FO, Locati M, Bianchi G, Nebuloni M, Vago G, et al. Distinct transcriptional programs activated by interleukin-10 with or without lipopolysaccharide in dendritic cells: induction of the B cell-activating chemokine, CXC chemokine ligand 13. J Immunol (2004) 172(11):7031–42. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.172.11.7031
72. Zimmer A, Bouley J, Le Mignon M, Pliquet E, Horiot S, Turfkruyer M, et al. A regulatory dendritic cell signature correlates with the clinical efficacy of allergen-specific sublingual immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol (2012) 129(4):1020–30. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2012.02.014
73. Ferreira GB, van Etten E, Lage K, Hansen DA, Moreau Y, Workman CT, et al. Proteome analysis demonstrates profound alterations in human dendritic cell nature by TX527, an analogue of vitamin D. Proteomics (2009) 9(14):3752–64. doi:10.1002/pmic.200800848
74. Malinarich F, Duan K, Hamid RA, Bijin A, Lin WX, Poidinger M, et al. High mitochondrial respiration and glycolytic capacity represent a metabolic phenotype of human tolerogenic dendritic cells. J Immunol (2015) 194(11):5174–86. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1303316
75. Ferreira GB, Kleijwegt FS, Waelkens E, Lage K, Nikolic T, Hansen DA, et al. Differential protein pathways in 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin d(3) and dexamethasone modulated tolerogenic human dendritic cells. J Proteome Res (2012) 11(2):941–71. doi:10.1021/pr200724e
76. Bros M, Jährling F, Renzing A, Wiechmann N, Dang N-A, Sutter A, et al. A newly established murine immature dendritic cell line can be differentiated into a mature state, but exerts tolerogenic function upon maturation in the presence of glucocorticoid. Blood (2007) 109(9):3820–9. doi:10.1182/blood-2006-07-035576
77. Corrigall VM, Bodman-Smith MD, Brunst M, Cornell H, Panayi GS. Inhibition of antigen-presenting cell function and stimulation of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells to express an antiinflammatory cytokine profile by the stress protein BiP: relevance to the treatment of inflammatory arthritis. Arthritis Rheum (2004) 50(4):1164–71. doi:10.1002/art.20134
80. Guilliams M, Crozat K, Henri S, Tamoutounour S, Grenot P, Devilard E, et al. Skin-draining lymph nodes contain dermis-derived CD103(-) dendritic cells that constitutively produce retinoic acid and induce Foxp3(+) regulatory T cells. Blood (2010) 115(10):1958–68. doi:10.1182/blood-2009-09-245274
81. Grimbert P, Bouguermouh S, Baba N, Nakajima T, Allakhverdi Z, Braun D, et al. Thrombospondin/CD47 interaction: a pathway to generate regulatory T cells from human CD4+ CD25− T cells in response to inflammation. J Immunol (2006) 177(6):3534–41. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.177.6.3534
82. Masli S, Turpie B, Streilein JW. Thrombospondin orchestrates the tolerance-promoting properties of TGFbeta-treated antigen-presenting cells. Int Immunol (2006) 18(5):689–99. doi:10.1093/intimm/dxl006
83. Kamiński MM, Röth S, Sass S, Sauer SW, Krammer PH, Gülow K. Manganese superoxide dismutase: a regulator of T cell activation-induced oxidative signaling and cell death. Biochimi Biophys Acta (2012) 1823(5):1041–52. doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2012.03.003
84. Ishihara Y, Takemoto T, Itoh K, Ishida A, Yamazaki T. Dual role of superoxide dismutase 2 induced in activated microglia: oxidative stress tolerance and convergence of inflammatory responses. J Biol Chem (2015) 290(37):22805–17. doi:10.1074/jbc.M115.659151
85. Scheurmann J, Treiber N, Weber C, Renkl AC, Frenzel D, Trenz-Buback F, et al. Mice with heterozygous deficiency of manganese superoxide dismutase (SOD2) have a skin immune system with features of “inflamm-aging”. Arch Dermatol Res (2014) 306(2):143–55. doi:10.1007/s00403-013-1389-7
Keywords: tolerogenic dendritic cells, microarray, transcriptome, proteome, signaling
Citation: Schinnerling K, García-González P and Aguillón JC (2015) Gene expression profiling of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells – searching for molecular regulators of tolerogenicity. Front. Immunol. 6:528. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00528
Received: 02 August 2015; Accepted: 28 September 2015;
Published: 19 October 2015
Edited by:Daniel Hawiger, Saint Louis University, USA
Reviewed by:Kristin Tarbell, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, USA
Muriel Moser, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium
Copyright: © 2015 Schinnerling, García-González and Aguillón. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Juan Carlos Aguillón, email@example.com
†Katina Schinnerling and Paulina García-González have contributed equally to this work.