Original Research ARTICLE
Outer Membrane Vesicles Prime and Activate Macrophage Inflammasomes and Cytokine Secretion In Vitro and In Vivo
- 1Oral Health CRC, Melbourne Dental School, Bio21 Institute, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
- 2Department of Molecular and Translational Science, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
Outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) are proteoliposomes blebbed from the surface of Gram-negative bacteria. Chronic periodontitis is associated with an increase in subgingival plaque of Gram-negative bacteria, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, and Tannerella forsythia. In this study, we investigated the immune-modulatory effects of P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia OMVs on monocytes and differentiated macrophages. All of the bacterial OMVs were phagocytosed by monocytes, M(naïve) and M(IFNγ) macrophages in a dose-dependent manner. They also induced NF-κB activation and increased TNFα, IL-8, and IL-1β cytokine secretion. P. gingivalis OMVs were also found to induce anti-inflammatory IL-10 secretion. Although unprimed monocytes and macrophages were resistant to OMV-induced cell death, lipopolysaccharide or OMV priming resulted in a significantly reduced cell viability. P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia OMVs all activated inflammasome complexes, as monitored by IL-1β secretion and ASC speck formation. ASC was critical for OMV-induced inflammasome formation, while AIM2−/− and Caspase-1−/− cells had significantly reduced inflammasome formation and NLRP3−/− cells exhibited a slight reduction. OMVs were also found to provide both priming and activation of the inflammasome complex. High-resolution microscopy and flow cytometry showed that P. gingivalis OMVs primed and activated macrophage inflammasomes in vivo with 80% of macrophages exhibiting inflammasome complex formation. In conclusion, periodontal pathogen OMVs were found to have significant immunomodulatory effects upon monocytes and macrophages and should therefore influence pro-inflammatory host responses associated with disease.
Chronic periodontitis is an inflammatory disease of the periodontal tissues associated with an increase in Gram-negative bacteria within the subgingival plaque biofilm; in particular, proportional increases in the pathogenic species Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, and Tannerella forsythia (1–3). During disease progression various bacterial virulence factors, including outer membrane vesicles (OMVs), are released from the subgingival plaque into the subjacent connective tissue where they induce a pro-inflammatory host response (4). Periodontal pathogen OMVs are closed proteoliposomes composed of lipopolysaccharide, lipoproteins, nucleic acids (DNA and RNA), peptidoglycan, porins, and receptors (5–9), which are known to disrupt tight junctions in epithelial monolayers, induce neutrophil and macrophage recruitment, and stimulate strong pro-inflammatory cytokine responses from various host cells (10–12). While inflammation is an important component of the host defense, persistent and dysregulated inflammation provides a nutritionally favorable environment for oral pathogenic bacteria adhered to the tooth root in a periodontal pocket and is largely responsible for the tissue and bone destruction that characterizes periodontitis (13).
Monocytes and macrophages are known to shape the host immune response to bacterial infection through phagocytosis, antigen presentation, and cytokine production. Gingival tissue biopsies from periodontitis patients have shown elevated numbers of macrophages and higher concentrations of nitric oxide synthase and pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, TNFα, IL-8, IL-6, and MIP-1α, which serve to promote inflammation and recruit additional immune cells to the site of infection (14–16). IL-1 family cytokines are significant contributors to inflammation and bone loss during chronic periodontitis and have been correlated with the severity of disease (17, 18). The maturation and secretion of IL-1β is mediated by powerful multiprotein complexes termed inflammasomes, which are found in the cytosol of myeloid cells (19). Inflammasome-induced IL-1β secretion requires two signaling events, an initial “cell priming” through NF-κB to mediate synthesis of pro-IL-1β and a second “triggering” event induced by cell surface or cytosolic receptor recognition of pathogen- or damage-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs/DAMPs) that initiate oligomerization of inflammasome components to form an enzymatic complex that results in the proteolytic maturation and secretion of IL-1β (20). Intriguingly, bacterial OMVs are known to bind to mammalian cells and through a number of mechanisms be rapidly internalized, thus OMVs would deliver PAMPs to both cell surface and cytosolic receptors (21) Several classes of inflammasome exist, including the NLR subsets NLRP1, NLRP3, and NLRC4, of which NLRP3 is the best studied. NLRP3 formation is known to be triggered by a wide range of external and internal stimuli, which prime and activate the inflammasome through signal transduction pathways (22, 23). Direct cytosolic contact with bacterial PAMPs or other stimuli is not necessary to activate the NLRP3 inflammasome (22). The alternative AIM2 inflammasome is stimulated by cytosolic double-stranded DNA, which may be of viral or bacterial origin or resulting from disruption of the nuclear envelope (24). Inflammasome activation also triggers a form of inflammatory cell death, termed pyroptosis, which promotes the rapid release of cytosolic contents (including IL-1β) primarily due to Caspase-1-induced pores in the cell membrane (25), although other caspases are also known to perform this role (26). Gasdermin-D has recently been identified as a major pore-forming protein (27, 28) and can be cleaved by Caspases 1, 4, 5, and 11 to mediate pyroptotic cell death (29). Pyroptosis is an antimicrobial response that not only eliminates intracellular niches for pathogens but can also cause tissue injury, accelerate bacterial dissemination, and inhibit bacterial clearance from tissues (30). Recently, inflammasome components Caspase-1, NLRP3, and AIM2 have been shown to be upregulated in the gingival tissue of periodontitis patients, suggesting that macrophage inflammasome activation may play a significant role in periodontal immune responses (31).
Circulating blood monocytes are differentiated into phenotypically diverse macrophage classes when recruited into periodontal tissues by the early inflammatory response (32). The classic inflammatory M[IFNγ + lipopolysaccharide (LPS)] macrophage, formerly known as M1, is differentiated by early IFNγ exposure followed by TLR ligation, while anti-inflammatory M(IL-4) macrophages, formerly known as M2, are differentiated by IL-4 or IL-13 cytokine exposure (32, 33). This well adapted flexibility allows macrophages to promote, control, or resolve inflammation as required in host tissues. We have shown that M(IFNγ + LPS) macrophages are the dominant infiltrating macrophage in mouse periodontitis models followed by monocytes and undifferentiated M(naïve) class macrophages and are crucial for disease progression (34). Despite their pathogenic potential, few studies have explored the effects of periodontal pathogen OMVs on monocytes and macrophages. P. gingivalis OMVs are reported to induce nitric oxide production (35) and foam cell formation in macrophages (36). Yet gingipains on P. gingivalis OMVs are also reported to promote immune evasion by the proteolytic degradation of membrane-bound LPS receptor CD14 on human macrophages (37). T. forsythia OMVs are known to induce pro-inflammatory cytokine release from macrophages and periodontal fibroblast cell lines (38). While no study to date has explored the effects of T. denticola OMVs on macrophages or monocytes, outer membrane lipoproteins, and lipooligosaccharide, known to be present on T. denticola OMVs (39), have been shown to stimulate nitric oxide production and strong pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion (TNFα and IL-1β) in murine macrophages (40). To facilitate the development of new therapies for periodontal disease it is vital to understand how inflammation is initiated, controlled, and resolved by immune-modulatory cells in response to bacterial products. The aim of this study was to investigate the interactions between monocytes/macrophages and OMVs derived from oral pathogens.
Materials and Methods
The objective of this study was to observe the immunomodulatory effects of periodontal OMVs upon THP-1 cells (in vitro) and peritoneal macrophages extracted from C57BL/6 J mice (ex vivo and in vivo). To assess THP-1 monocyte/macrophage interactions we developed in vitro OMV binding, phagocytosis, cytokine secretion, and inflammasome activation assays. All in vitro experiments were performed at least three times with triplicate samples, data collection was stopped when comparable results were found throughout three experiments.
To evaluate the inflammatory potential of OMVs in vivo we compared the stimulation of C57BL/6 J mice treated with intraperitoneal injections of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), Escherichia coli LPS, or P. gingivalis OMVs. The sample size was selected on the basis of previous data to allow reliable detection of OMV-induced inflammasome formation. Mice were randomized for inclusion in each of the treatment arms. All mice were included for analysis. Investigators were aware of the allocation sequence, and data were collected and processed in groups, PBS-treated mice then LPS-treated mice, and OMV-treated mice. Inflammasome activation was determined using IL-1β secretion, ASC localization by flow cytometry and high resolution microscopy.
Bacterial Cultures and Growth Conditions
All bacterial strains were obtained from the Melbourne Dental School culture collection. P. gingivalis W50 was maintained on horse blood agar, comprised of 4% w/v Blood Agar Base No. 2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, SA, Australia) supplemented with 10% v/v defibrinated horse blood (Equicell, Australia) and 1% w/v menadione (Sigma-Aldrich, NSW, Australia) in a MK3 Anaerobic Workstation (Don Whitley Scientific Limited, NSW, Australia) at 37°C with a gas composition of 5% v/v H2, 10% v/v CO2 in N2 (BOC Gases Australia, NSW, Australia). P. gingivalis W50 was cultured in volumes of 800 mL in 3.7% w/v Bacto Brain Heart Infusion media broth (BD, NSW, Australia) supplemented with 0.5% w/v hemin (Merck Millipore, VIC, Australia) and 0.1% w/v cysteine (Sigma-Aldrich, NSW, Australia). Bacteria were grown to late exponential phase at 37°C under anaerobic conditions to an optical density of 1.0 at 600 nm.
Treponema denticola ATCC 35405 was cultured in volumes of 400 mL of Oral Bacteria Growth Media comprised of 1.25% w/v Bacto Brain Heart Infusion media broth, 1% w/v tryptic soy broth (BD, NSW, Australia), 0.75% w/v yeast extract (Thermo Fisher Scientific, SA, Australia), 0.2% w/v sodium chloride (VWR International, QLD, Australia), 0.2% w/v ascorbic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, NSW, Australia), 0.2% w/v d-glucose (Chem Supply, SA, Australia), 0.1% w/v pyruvic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, NSW, Australia), 0.05% w/v sodium thioglycolate (Sigma-Aldrich, NSW, Australia), and 0.025% w/v asparagines (Sigma-Aldrich, NSW, Australia) supplemented with 0.2% w/v sodium bicarbonate (Chem Supply, SA, Australia), 0.2% g ammonium sulfate (Chem Supply, SA, Australia), 0.1% w/v cysteine, 0.6% w/v thiamine pyrophosphate (Sigma-Aldrich, NSW, Australia), 0.5% w/v hemin, 0.05% w/v menadione, 2.5% v/v heat-inactivated Rabbit Serum (Sigma-Aldrich, NSW, Australia) filtered using a Vivaspin 10 kDa MWCO (GE HealthCare Life Sciences, NSW, Australia) at 8,000 × g for 1 h at 4°C, and 0.0025% v/v volatile fatty acid mix containing 0.5% v/v isobutyric acid, 0.5% v/v dl-1-methylbutyric acid, 0.5% v/v isovaleric acid, and 0.5% v/v valeric acid in 0.1 M potassium hydroxide.
Tannerella forsythia ATCC 43037 was cultured in volumes of 400 mL in tryptic soy broth with yeast extract and vitamin K (TSBYK), comprised of 1.85% w/v Bacto Brain Heart Infusion media broth, 1.5% w/v tryptic soy broth, and 1.0% w/v yeast extract supplemented with 0.1% w/v cysteine, 0.1% N-acetylmuramic acid (Sigma-Aldrich, NSW, Australia), 0.5% w/v hemin, 0.05% menadione, and 5% v/v heat-inactivated fetal calf serum (HI-FCS) filtered using a Vivaspin 10 kDa MWCO (GE HealthCare Life Sciences, NSW, Australia) at 8,000 × g for 1 h at 4°C.
OMV Preparation and Enumeration
Isolation and Enrichment of Highly Purified OMVs
Highly purified OMVs were isolated and enriched using ultracentrifugation, tangential flow filtration, and density gradient separation as previously described (39). Briefly, bacteria were grown to late exponential phase and removed from culture supernatant by centrifugation. The collected supernatant was filtered (0.22 µm) and then concentrated through a 100-kDa filter using tangential flow filtration. The collected concentrate was centrifuged at 100,000 × g for 2 h at 4°C to yield a crude OMV preparation. The crude OMVs were then separated from membrane fragments and other contaminates by a discontinuous OptiPrep™ (Sigma-Aldrich, NSW, Australia) gradient at 150,000 × g for 16 or 48 h. Gradient fractions containing the purified OMVs were pooled and washed with 0.01 M PBS (Sigma-Aldrich, NSW, Australia) and stored at 4°C for short-term storage (<14 days) and −80°C for long-term storage (>14 days).
Purified OMVs were counted using PKH-26 Red Fluorescent Cell Linker (Sigma-Aldrich, NSW, Australia) and an Apogee A50-Micro Flow Cytometer calibrated with Apogee Flow Systems Calibration Beads (1.6 µm for Red Laser, 1,030 eV/μL) as previously described (39). The Apogee A50-Micro Flow Cytometer was kindly provided by Prof Frank Caruso (University of Melbourne, Australia).
OMV to Cell Binding Assays
The human monocyte cell line THP-1 was cultured in complete Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM, 10% v/v fetal calf serum, 3.5% v/v glucose, 1% v/v Pen/Strep, 1% v/v l-Glut) in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C. Cells were used in their native monocyte cell form or differentiated into M(naïve) and M(IFNγ) macrophage-like cells by treatment with 5 nM of phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) for 48 h [M(naïve)] and an additional 24 h treatment with 100 ng/mL of human IFNγ [M(IFNγ)]. Cells were seeded into 96-well flat-bottom tissue culture plates at a volume of 200 µL per well (1 × 105 cells per well). THP-1 cells were incubated with P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia OMVs labeled with lipid intercalating dye PKH-26 according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Vesicles were added at OMV to cell ratios of 10:1, 50:1, and 100:1. Following incubation at 37°C for 60 min in a 5% CO2 incubator, cell media were removed, the cells were removed by trypsin EDTA solution (Sigma-Aldrich, NSW, Australia), washed and resuspended in PBS, and the level of binding determined using flow cytometry methods previously described (41).
OMV Phagocytosis Assays
THP-1 cells were seeded into 96-well flat-bottom tissue culture plates at a volume of 200 µL per well (1 × 105 cell per well). THP-1 cells were incubated with P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia OMVs labeled with pH-sensitive dye pHrodo Red, succinimidyl ester (Life Technologies, Australia) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Vesicles were added at OMV to cell ratios of 10:1, 50:1, and 100:1. Following incubation at 37°C for 60 min in a 5% CO2 incubator, cell medium was removed, the cells were released by trypsin EDTA solution (Sigma-Aldrich, NSW, Australia), washed and resuspended in PBS, and the level of phagocytosis determined using flow cytometry as above.
NF-κB Activation Assays
THP-Blue cells (Invivogen, USA) are characterized by the stable integration of an NF-κB-inducible SEAP reporter gene that induces the secretion of alkaline phosphatase following cell stimulation by pattern recognition receptor (PRR) agonists. THP-Blue cells were grown at 37°C in an anaerobic chamber in complete DMEM (10% v/v fetal calf serum, 3.5% v/v glucose, 1% v/v Pen/Strep, and 1% v/v l-Glut). Cells were removed from culture flasks (Corning, VIC, Australia) by gentle tapping and counted using a Z1 Coulter Particle Counter (Beckman Coulter, NSW, Australia). A flat bottomed 96-well plate (Interpath Services, VIC, Australia) was seeded with 2 × 104 cells per well in 200 µL of complete DMEM, differentiated into M(naïve) and M(IFNγ) macrophages as above, and incubated for 24 h at 37°C under anaerobic conditions. Supernatant was aspirated and 200 µL of fresh, warmed DMEM added. THP-Blue cells were challenged with 20 µL of OMVs in PBS starting at 1.0 × 1010 OMV/well in fivefold serial dilutions. E. coli LPS (Invivogen, USA) at 10 µg/mL was used as a positive control according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Following 20 h of incubation, 50 µL of supernatant was removed from each well and added to a clean 96-well plate with 150 µL of Quanti-Blue (Invivogen, USA). Alkaline phosphatase activity was determined at 620 nm on a spectrophotometer.
Cytokine Production Assays
THP-1 cells [monocyte, M(naïve), and M(IFNγ)] were incubated with OMVs for 60 min as per OMV to cell binding assays (above). Following the 60 min incubation, culture fluid was removed, cell monolayers were washed with media, and incubated for a further 24 h in the absence of OMVs as described previously (4). After the second incubation period, supernatant was collected and centrifuged at 800 × g for 5 min at room temperature to remove remaining cells. Cytokine/chemokine secretion was measured using human TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-8, and IL-10 ELISA Kits (Jomar Life Research, VIC, Australia) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
THP-1 and OMV Cytotoxicity Assays
THP-1 cells (both unprimed and primed with P. gingivalis OMVs at 100 ng protein/mL for 4 h) were treated with unlabeled OMVs in cell suspension at the cell concentration and OMV to cell ratios indicated above. OMV-induced cytotoxicity was determined following 4 h of OMV incubation by trypan blue exclusion using a Z1 Coulter Particle Counter (Beckman Coulter, NSW, Australia) as previously described (42).
In Vitro Inflammation Activation
THP-1 IL-1β ELISA
THP-1 cells were seeded in 96-well flat-bottom tissue culture plates at 1 × 105 cells/well in 200 µL. Cells were primed with E. coli LPS (100 ng/mL), P. gingivalis LPS (100 ng/mL), T. denticola LPS (100 ng/mL), T. forsythia LPS (100 ng/mL), P. gingivalis OMVs (100 ng protein/mL), T. denticola OMVs (100 ng protein/mL), T. forsythia OMVs (100 ng protein/mL), or left unprimed for 4 h at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. Cells were then stimulated with positive inflammasome activation controls Nigericin (10 µM) (Invivogen, USA), Silica (125 mg/mL) (US Silica, USA), or transfected with Poly(dAdT) (250 ng/mL) (Invitrogen, USA) using lipofectamine LTX (Invivogen, USA) as per the manufacturer’s instructions for a further 6 h. Primed cells were also treated with P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia OMVs at OMV: cell ratios of 10:1, 50:1, and 100:1 for 6 h or E. coli, P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia LPS (100 µg/mL) for 6 h. Cellular supernatants were collected and analyzed for IL-1β secretion by a human IL-1β ELISA Kit (Jomar Life Research, VIC, Australia) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
THP-1 ASC Antibody Flow Cytometry and Imaging
Inflammasome formation was confirmed visually and by flow cytometry using ASC-specific antibody ASC (N-15)-R: sc-22514-R (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and secondary antibody Alexa Fluor 488 goat anti-rabbit IgG (Santa Cruz Biotechnology) as previously described (43, 44). Briefly, THP-1 monocytes, M(naïve), and M(IFNγ)-differentiated cells were primed with P. gingivalis OMVs (100 ng protein/mL) for 4 h and then gently removed mechanically from culture plates using 15 mL PBS through a 10 mL pipet equipped with a 21 G needle (Terumo). Cells were spun (400 × g × 5 min) and resuspended in 500 µL RPMI 1640 medium (Sigma) without HI-FCS. THP-1 cells were then treated with P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia OMVs for 45 min, fixed with 2 mL of 100% ethanol for 15 min, and immunostained with primary and secondary antibodies.
Stained cells were assessed by flow cytometry using an appropriate laser for the excitation and filter sets for emission of Alexa Fluor 488. Data were analyzed first by creating a scatter gate around the main cell population (SSC-area versus FSC-area dot plot) to exclude debris and outlying events. Scatter gate events were then singlet gated to exclude cell doublets (FSC-width versus FSC-area dot plot). Singlet gate events were plotted by whole cell fluorescence (using empty channel BV 421-A) and ASC (FITC)-area, to observe increased in ASC fluorescence.
To assess fluorescent ASC accumulation by microscopy, fixed and ASC antibody-labeled cells were further stained with DAPI as previously described (45) to visualize cell DNA. Stained cells were stored in diamond antifade (Life Technologies) overnight and imaged on an OMX V4 Blaze super-resolution microscope (Deltavision) to observe fluorescent ASC specks.
IL-1β ELISA of Immortalized Bone Marrow-Derived Macrophage (IBMDM) Knockout Cell Lines
Specific inflammasome activation pathways were determined using wild-type, Caspase 1, ASC, NLRP3, and AIM2 knockout IBMDM cell lines. IBMDM cells were cultured in complete DMEM (10% v/v fetal calf serum, 3.5% v/v Glucose, 1% v/v Pen/Strep, and 1% v/v l-Glut) in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37°C. Cells were seeded in 96-well flat-bottom tissue culture plates at 1 × 105 cells/well in 200 µL, primed with E. coli LPS (100 ng/mL) 4 h at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator, and 6-h inflammasome activation assays performed as above.
IL-1β Western Blot
THP-1 inflammasome assays were performed as above with the following secondary activating signals; positive control Nigericin and P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia OMVs for 6 h. Cellular supernatants were collected and the remaining cells washed with PBS and lysed using 100 µL Cell Lysis Buffer [15 mL MilliQ with 0.5% w/v SDS, 0.05 M TrisCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol, 0.5% Triton X, and 1 Complete Mini Protease Inhibitor Cocktail Tablet (Roche Diagnostics, Germany)] on ice for 30 min and centrifuged 600 × g × 10 min to collect the resulting supernatant. Cell lysate or supernatant samples (10 µg) were precipitated for SDS-PAGE, as previously described (46) by addition of trichloroacetic acid to a final concentration of 10% (v/v) and incubated 20 min at 4°C. Precipitated proteins were collected by centrifugation (10 min, 16,000 × g), resuspended in 20 µl reducing sample buffer [10% (w/v) SDS, 0.05% (w/v) bromophenol blue, 25% (v/v) glycerol, and 0.05% (v/v) 2-mercaptoethanol], and the pH adjusted with the addition of 10 µl of 1.5 M Tris/HCl, pH 8.0, and then heated for 5 min at 100°C, prior to loading on to precast 12% v/v acrylamide gels. Western blots were performed as previously described (47). Briefly, the primary antibody Anti-IL-1β Armenian Hamster IgG (eBioScience) was used at a 1:1,000 dilution, secondary antibody Anti-Arm Hamster IgG Biotin (eBioScience) was used at a 1:2,000 dilution, and Avidin-HRP (Thermo Fisher Scientific, SA, Australia) was used at a 1:2,000 dilution. The proteins determined by Western blot analysis were compared to purified IL-1β (Jomar Life Research, VIC, Australia) controls included on each gel and identified on the basis of MW.
In Vivo Inflammasome Activation
All animal experimental procedures were carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Australian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes. The protocols for the experiments were approved by The University of Melbourne Ethics Committee for Animal Experimentation (approval number 1212363). Mice (6–8 weeks) C57BL/6 J were obtained from Department of Medicine, Royal Melbourne Hospital, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
To evaluate the priming efficacy of P. gingivalis OMVs in vivo 38 mice were divided into three groups; the control group (N = 6) that received an intraperitoneal injection of PBS (100 µL), the LPS-primed group (N = 16) that received an intraperitoneal injection of E. coli LPS (100 µL of 1 µg/mL), and the OMV-primed group (N = 16) that received an intraperitoneal injection of P. gingivalis OMVs (100 µL of 1 µg protein/mL). Following 72 h the control group received a second intraperitoneal injection of PBS. The LPS- and OMV-primed groups were divided into four subgroups to be treated with nigericin, silica, OMVs, or left untreated. Untreated subgroups, LPS-Untreated (N = 4), and OMV-Untreated (N = 4) received an intraperitoneal injection of PBS (100 µL). Nigericin-treated subgroups, LPS-Nigericin (N = 4) and OMV-Nigericin (N = 4), received an intraperitoneal injection of nigericin (100 µL of 0.2 mM). Silica-treated subgroups, LPS-Silica (N = 4) and OMV-Silica (N = 4), received an intraperitoneal injection of silica (100 µL of 0.5 mg/mL). OMV-treated subgroups, LPS-OMV (N = 4) and OMV-OMV (N = 4), received an intraperitoneal injection of P. gingivalis OMVs (100 µL of 1 mg protein/mL). Fifteen minutes post injection mice were killed and intraperitoneal cells harvested with 5 mL PBS. Intraperitoneal cells were collected by centrifugation (600 × g × 10 min at room temperature) and resuspended in 1 mL of RPMI 1640 medium without HI-FCS.
Immune Cell Counts and Composition of Intraperitoneal Washes
Intraperitoneal washes were analyzed by flow cytometry using fluorescent antibodies against F4/80 and CD11b, Ly6G, CD11c, TCRb, and CD19 to identify macrophage (F4/80 and CD11b), neutrophil (Ly6G), dendritic cell (CD11c), T cell (TCRb), and B cell (CD19) populations, respectively. Total cell counts were determined using a Z1 Coulter Particle Counter (Beckman Coulter, NSW, Australia) and hemocytometer.
IL-1β Secretion by In Vitro Primed and Ex Vivo Activated Intraperitoneal Macrophages
Following centrifugation and resuspension in complete DMEM, intraperitoneal samples were incubated for 6 h at 37°C. Intraperitoneal cells from naive mice (unprimed and unactivated) were also cultured overnight at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator on 96-well tissue culture plates to allow the adherence of macrophages. Unbound cells were removed and the adhered macrophages primed for 4 h with P. gingivalis OMVs (100 ng protein/mL) then stimulated with nigericin, silica, P. gingivalis, T. denticola, or T. forsythia OMVs at OMV:cell ratios of 10:1, 50:1, and 100:1 for 6 h. Cellular supernatants of intraperitoneal samples and cultured macrophages were collected and analyzed for IL-1β secretion by a human IL-1β ELISA Kit (Jomar Life Research, VIC, Australia) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
In Vivo Intraperitoneal Cell Inflammasome Detection by ASC Antibody Flow Cytometry and Microscopy
Inflammasome formation was confirmed by flow cytometry using ASC-specific antibody ASC (N-15)-R: sc-22514-R as above for THP-1 cells (see THP-1 ASC Antibody Flow Cytometry and Imaging) and described previously (43, 44). Washes were additionally stained with F4/80 and CD11b to correlate ASC inflammasome specks with macrophage populations.
The abovementioned methods were statistically analyzed using Student’s t-test with a minimum size of three biological replicates with three technical replicates. Significant differences were determined as p < 0.05. Error bars represent the SEM of each data subset.
Host Monocytes and Macrophages Bind and Phagocytose Periodontal OMVs
To investigate early OMV interactions with THP-1 monocytes, M (naïve), and differentiated M (IFNγ) macrophages, OMVs from P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia were labeled with lipid fluorescent dye PKH26 and binding determined by flow cytometry. Periodontal bacteria OMVs were found to bind to monocytes, PMA-treated M(naïve), and cytokine-treated M(IFNγ) macrophages in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 1). P. gingivalis OMVs bound more cells in higher numbers [as determined by mean fluorescence intensity (MFI)] than either T. denticola (p < 0.005) or T. forsythia OMVs (p < 0.01) (Figure 1). M(naïve) and M(IFNγ) macrophages were capable of binding OMVs with far greater affinity than undifferentiated monocytes (p < 0.01) (Figure 1). Of the three pathogens P. gingivalis OMVs demonstrated the greatest affinity for THP-1 cells, both in percentage cell binding (Figures 1A,C,E) and MFI (Figures 1B,D,F). While T. denticola and T. forsythia OMVs interacted with monocytes to a similar degree (Figure 1A), T. denticola OMVs were found to bind M(naïve) macrophages to a higher level (p < 0.05) (Figure 1C), while T. forsythia OMVs had higher binding to M(IFNγ) macrophages (p < 0.05) (Figure 1E). Both T. denticola and T. forsythia OMVs bound THP-1 cells poorly as indicated by MFI (Figures 1B,D,F).
Figure 1. Periodontal pathogen outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) bind THP-1 cell subsets. Cell binding assays were performed with THP-1 cell suspensions of monocytes and monolayers of M(naïve) and M(IFNγ) macrophages incubated with PKH26-labeled Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, and Tannerella forsythia OMVs at three OMV to cell ratios (10:1, 50:1, and 100:1). Cells were incubated for 60 min, washed, and OMV binding determined by flow cytometry. Results are expressed as the percentage of THP-1 cells with at least one bound OMV (A,C,E) or the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of each sample (B,D,F), which indicates the quantity of OMVs bound per cell. Data are represented as mean ± SEM of three replicates. *represents a result significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the fluorescence of untreated cells.
Phagocytosis of OMVs was determined by labeling OMVs with the pH-sensitive dye pHrodo, which increases fluorescent intensity in the low pH conditions within a phagolysosome. OMVs from all periodontal pathogens were phagocytosed in a dose-dependent manner both in percentage cell binding (Figures 2A,C,E) and MFI (Figures 2B,D,F). While percentage phagocytosis was equal among cell types, MFI revealed M(naïve) and M(IFNγ) were more proficient at phagocytosis than monocytes; M(IFNγ) cells produced the highest MFI (p < 0.01), followed by M(naïve) cells (p < 0.01) (Figures 2B,D,E). T. forsythia OMVs were phagocytosed to the greatest degree (p < 0.001), as observed by both percentage phagocytosis and MFI, followed by P. gingivalis (p < 0.001) and T. denticola OMVs (p < 0.01) (Figure 2).
Figure 2. Periodontal pathogen outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) are phagocytosed by THP-1 cell subsets. Cell phagocytosis assays were performed with THP-1 cell suspensions (monocytes) and monolayers [M(naïve) and M(IFNγ)] incubated with pHrodo-labeled Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, and Tannerella forsythia OMVs at three OMV to cell ratios (10:1, 50:1, and 100:1). Cells were incubated for 60 min, washed, and OMV phagocytosis determined by flow cytometry. Results are expressed as the percentage of THP-1 cells with at least one bound OMV (A,C,E) or the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of each sample (B,D,F), which indicates the quantity of OMVs bound per cell. Data are represented as mean ± SEM of three replicates. *represents a result significantly higher (p < 0.05) than the fluorescence of untreated cells.
OMVs from Periodontal Pathogens Differentially Activate THP-Blue NF-κB Reporter Cells
To determine if OMV binding induced NF-κB activation, a THP-Blue NF-κB activation reporter cell line was incubated with OMVs. THP-Blue are human monocytic cells stably expressing an NF-κB-inducible SEAP reporter construct. NF-κB was strongly activated by P. gingivalis OMVs (p < 0.001), moderately activated by T. forsythia OMVs (p < 0.01), and mildly activated by T. denticola OMVs (p < 0.05) (Figure 3). Significant differences were, however, observed between the activation of differentiated THP-Blue cells, by periodontal OMVs. P. gingivalis OMVs were potent activators of NF-κB in monocytes (p < 0.001) and M(IFNγ) macrophages (p < 0.001) compared to T. denticola and T. forsythia OMVs (Figure 3). T. forsythia OMVs had a lower ED50 (p < 0.01) than T. denticola for all THP-1 subsets tested (Figure 3). M(naive) macrophages were found to be equally activated by P. gingivalis OMVs and T. forsythia OMVs, which had significantly lower ED50s (p < 0.01) compared to T. denticola OMV NF-κB activation (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Periodontal pathogen outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) differentially activate NF-κB in THP-1-differentiated cells. THP-Blue cells [monocytes, M(naïve) and M(IFNγ) cell subsets] were incubated with either Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, or Tannerella forsythia OMVs (in fivefold dilutions) or positive control ligands Pam3CSK4 and lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-EB. Alkaline phosphatase secretion was determined with Quanti-Blue after 20 h incubation at 620 nm on a spectrophotometer. Data are represented as mean ± SEM of three biological replicates and results are presented as the number of OMVs required to achieve ED50. All Pam3CSK4 and LPS-EB controls gave positive results and were not included in the final data.
Periodontal OMVs Induce Pro-inflammatory Cytokine Production in Host Macrophages
The NF-κB pathway has long been considered a key signaling pathway for the secretion of many cytokines and chemokines. We, therefore, examined how NF-κB activation by OMVs observed in monocytes, M(naïve), and M(IFNγ) cells translated to cytokine secretion. Undifferentiated monocytes, M(naïve), and M(IFNγ) cells were incubated with P. gingivalis, T. denticola, or T. forsythia OMVs and cytokine secretion determined by ELISA assays. Pro-inflammatory cytokines TNFα, IL-1β, and chemokine IL-8 were produced by monocytes, M(naïve), and M(IFNγ) cells after stimulation with all periodontal bacteria OMVs (p < 0.05) (Figures 4A–I). In all cases, M(naïve) and M(IFNγ) macrophages secreted the highest cytokine concentrations in response to OMVs; IL-8 and TNFα were produced in the highest concentrations followed by IL-1β secretion (Figure 4). In monocytes, T. forsythia OMVs induced the greatest TNFα secretion (p < 0.001) followed by T. denticola (p < 0.005) and P. gingivalis (p < 0.05) (Figure 4A). In M(naive) cells, TNFα responses to T. denticola and T. forsythia OMVs were very similar, while responses to P. gingivalis OMVs were significantly less at the 50:1 and 100:1 OMV to cell ratios (p < 0.05) (Figure 4B). M(IFNγ) cells incubated with T. forsythia OMVs secreted the greatest amount of TNFα, followed by T. denticola and P. gingivalis (Figure 4C). Interestingly, increasing concentrations of OMVs were observed to induce less TNFα secretion in all THP-1 cell subsets to all OMV stimuli (Figures 4A–C).
Figure 4. Periodontal pathogen outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) induce cytokine release from THP-1 cell subsets. THP-1 cytokine responses to Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, and Tannerella forsythia were determined following a 60 min incubation of OMVs (10:1, 50:1, and 100:1 OMV to cell ratios) on a THP-1 suspension (monocytes) or cell monolayer [M(naïve) and M(IFNγ)], followed by a 20-h incubation at 37°C. Results are expressed as picograms per milliliter of cytokine/chemokine TNFα (A–C), IL-1β (D–F), IL-8 (G–I), and IL-10 (J–L) in the resulting supernatant. Data are represented as mean ± SEM of three replicates. *represents a significant (p < 0.05) increase from the cytokine secretion of unstimulated cells.
Similar to TNFα secretion, increasing P. gingivalis OMV concentrations induced decreasing IL-1β and IL-8 secretion in all host cell subsets, whereas increasing T. denticola and T. forsythia OMV concentrations incubated with host cells induced higher IL-1β and IL-8 secretion (Figures 4D–I). In monocytes, T. denticola induced the highest secretion of IL-1β, followed by T. forsythia and P. gingivalis (Figure 4D). M(naïve) macrophages incubated with T. forsythia OMVs secreted the highest amount of IL-1β, T. denticola OMVs (50:1 and 100:1) induced a similar response to P. gingivalis OMVs at 10:1, although the 50:1 and 100:1 ratios were significantly lower (p < 0.05) (Figure 4E). M(IFNγ) macrophages incubated with T. forsythia OMVs secreted the highest amount of IL-1β, followed by T. denticola and P. gingivalis (Figure 4F). Significant IL-8 secretion (p < 0.05) was only detected in monocytes at the highest T. denticola and T. forsythia OMV ratios (100:1) and the lowest P. gingivalis OMV ratio (10:1) (Figure 4G). In M(naïve) and M(IFNγ) macrophages, significant IL-8 was secreted after incubation with T. denticola and T. forsythia OMVs at all OMV to cell ratios but only by 10:1 P. gingivalis OMVs (Figures 4H,I).
Porphyromonas gingivalis OMVs were capable of inducing anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 in a dose-dependent manner (p < 0.05) at all OMV to cell ratios for M(naïve) and M(IFNγ) macrophages, but only the 50:1 and 100:1 ratios for monocytes (Figures 4J–L). T. denticola and T. forsythia OMVs did not induce IL-10 secretion at any OMV to cell ratio from any THP-1 subtype (Figures 4J–L).
OMV-Induced Cytotoxicity Differs Between Unprimed and Primed THP-1 Cells
Outer membrane vesicle-induced reduction of cell viability of THP-1 macrophages was observed by the exclusion of trypan blue and viable cell counts using a hemocytometer. Viable cell counts decreased in a dose-dependent manner when THP-1 cell suspensions [monocytes, M(naïve) and M(IFNγ)] were exposed to T. denticola OMVs (at 50:1 and 100:1 OMV to cell ratios) and T. forsythia OMVs (at the 100:1 ratio) (p < 0.05), while P. gingivalis OMVs were observed to have no cytotoxic effects under these conditions (Figures 5A,C,E).
Figure 5. Periodontal outer membrane vesicle (OMV) cytotoxicity differs between unprimed and primed THP-1 cells. Cytotoxicity assays were performed on THP-1 monocytes, M(naïve), and M(IFNγ) macrophages left unprimed (A,C,E) or primed for 3 h with a low dose of Porphyromonas gingivalis OMVs (B,D,F). Cells were treated with periodontal OMVs in increasing OMV to cell ratios (10:1, 50:1, and 100:1) in cell suspension for 4 h. Cell viability was determined by trypan blue exclusion and deteriorating cell counts determined by hemocytometer and a Z1 Coulter Particle Counter. Results are displayed as the number of remaining viable cells after 4 h. Data are represented as mean ± SEM of three replicates. *represents a significant (p < 0.05) decrease from the count of untreated cells.
We further investigated OMV-induced reduction of cell viability of primed THP-1 cell subsets. Upon incubation with P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia OMVs the primed THP-1 subsets had significantly (p < 0.05) less viable cells as compared to control and unprimed THP-1 cells (Figures 5B,D,F). In primed monocytes, all periodontal OMVs induced significant and comparable reductions in viable cells at the 10:1 and 50:1 ratios, while P. gingivalis OMVs induced the greatest viable cell reduction at 100:1 (p < 0.05) (Figure 5B). In primed M(naïve) macrophages, T. forsythia OMVs induced the greatest reduction in viable cells at all OMV to cell ratios, followed by P. gingivalis and T. denticola OMVs (Figure 5D). In primed M(IFNγ) macrophages, P. gingivalis OMVs stimulated a significant reduction in viable cells at all ratios; whereas T. denticola and T. forsythia OMVs stimulated significant viable cell decreases (p < 0.05) at 100:1 and 50:1 (Figure 5F). Intriguingly, there was no increase in apoptosis or necrosis in the unprimed or primed THP-1 cells upon incubation with any of the periodontal pathogen OMVs.
Periodontal OMVs Induce Inflammasome Activation in THP-1 Monocytes/Macrophages
The capacity of periodontal OMVs to induce NF-κB activation, IL-1β secretion, and priming-dependent cell death in cytotoxicity assays was suggestive of inflammasome activation, we therefore explored the ability of OMVs to induce inflammasome activation in THP-1 cell subsets. Several NF-κB stimulating moieties were trialed for their capacity to prime THP-1 cell subsets prior to inflammasome activation. Priming THP-1 cells with E. coli LPS, P. gingivalis LPS, or P. gingivalis OMVs for 4 h was found to significantly increase (p < 0.05) nigericin-, silica-, and Poly(dA:dT)-induced IL-1β secretion from monocytes, M(naïve), and M(IFNγ) macrophages compared to unprimed cells (Figure 6). Priming with T. denticola and T. forsythia LPS and OMVs did not induce IL-1β secretion above unprimed cells (Figure 6). Poly(dA:dT) was found to be only an effective inflammasome activator for primed THP-1 monocytes, M(naïve) and M(IFNγ) cells (Figure 6). LPS although a strong inflammasome priming agent was found to be a weak activator for inflammasomes, with only high concentrations of LPS E. coli and P. gingivalis inducing inflammasome activation in primed M(IFNγ) cells M(naive) cells (Figures 6B,C). LPS extracted from T. denticola and T. forsythia was found to not be able to induce inflammasome activation (Figure 6).
Figure 6. Porphyromonas gingivalis outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) and lipopolysaccharide (LPS) are priming agents for macrophage inflammasome activation. THP-1 monocytes (A), M(naïve) (B), and M(IFNγ) (C) macrophages were primed for 3 h with Escherichia coli, P. gingivalis, Treponema denticola, and Tannerella forsythia LPS and OMVs or left unprimed. Cells were then stimulated with positive controls nigericin, silica, and Poly(dA:dT) or E. coli, P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia LPS as required to match the priming material. Cellular supernatants were collected and IL-1β secretion detected by ELISA. Data are represented as mean ± SEM of three replicates. *represents a significant (p < 0.05) increase from the IL-1β secretion of untreated cells.
In comparing unprimed cells, M(naïve) and M(IFNγ) macrophages produced 5–10-fold more IL-1β than monocytes (p < 0.001) (Figure 6). P. gingivalis LPS was found to be just as effective as E. coli LPS in priming all cell types for inflammasome activation, while P. gingivalis OMV priming resulted in a stronger nigericin-dependent response in monocytes (p < 0.001) and a weaker Poly(dA:dT) response in M (naive) cells (p < 0.05) (Figure 6). P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia OMVs all induced comparable dose-dependent inflammasome activation (as determined by IL-1β secretion) in P. gingivalis OMV-primed monocytes, M(naive), and M(IFNγ) macrophages (p < 0.05) (Figures 7A–C).
Figure 7. Periodontal outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) prime and activate inflammasome formation in vitro. THP-1 monocytes (A), M(naïve) (B), and M(IFNγ) (C) macrophages were primed with Porphyromonas gingivalis OMVs for 3 h then stimulated with either positive controls nigericin, silica, and Poly(dA:dT) or P. gingivalis, Treponema denticola, and Tannerella forsythia OMVs. Data are represented as mean ± SEM of three replicates. *represents a significant (p < 0.05) increase from the IL-1β secretion of untreated cells. (D) IL-1β western blots were performed on P. gingivalis OMV-primed (3 h) M(naïve) cell supernatant and cell lysate following treatment with nigericin, P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia OMVs. (E) ASC speck formation was detected by flow cytometry for THP-1 monocytes, M(naïve), and M(IFNγ) macrophages stimulated with P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia OMVs. OMV-induced increases in ASC fluorescence intensity were captured by the percentage of ASC+ cells over baseline background values, based on contour plots depicting ASC fluorescence (FITC-A) vs whole cell autofluorescence (BV421-A). Resting and nigericin controls displayed are from M(naïve) cells. (F) Wild-type immortalized bone marrow-derived macrophage (IBMDM) and NLRP3−/−, AIM2−/−, ASC−/−, and Caspase 1−/− knockout IBMDM strains were primed with Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (4 h) and treated with positive controls nigericin, silica, and Poly(dA:dT) or P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia OMVs. Results are presented as a qualitative indication (+ to ++++) of IL-1β secretion significantly greater (p < 0.05) than that of unstimulated IBMDM cells and a percentage decrease in IL-1β secretion as compared to secretion from wild-type IBMDM (see Figure 8).
As pro-IL-1β can be released by dying cells in the absence of inflammasome activation and be detected as a false-positive signal by ELISA, IL-1β Western blots were performed to distinguish between pro-IL-1β (32 kDa) and mature IL-1β (17 kDa). Pro-IL-1β and mature IL-1β were found in the cell lysate of primed M (naive) cells and increased following nigericin, P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia OMV treatment (Figure 7D). Mature IL-1β was found in much higher concentrations, predominately in the cell supernatant, and was greatly increased following all OMV treatments (Figure 7D).
Outer membrane vesicle-induced inflammasome formation was further confirmed by utilizing a newly developed flow cytometry method to detect ASC speck formation in macrophage cells (44). A gating strategy was designed to capture whole cells undergoing ASC speck formation and to exclude pyroptotic bodies and non-cellular fluorescent debris. This gating strategy was adopted as it provided consistent results when applied to both in vitro THP-1 cells and in vivo peritoneal macrophages. Fixed and ASC antibody-stained THP-1 monocytes, M(naive), and M(IFNγ) cells were gated by cell size, cell singlets, and finally ASC antibody fluorescence (Whole Cell Fluorescence vs. ASC) to observe increases in the fluorescent signal indicative of ASC speck formation. Background ASC fluorescence [in M(naïve) cells] was recorded at approximately 5.55% and increased to 17.47% with the addition of positive control nigericin (Figure 7E). Increases in ASC fluorescence of 31.66, 12.22 and 9.49% were observed in monocytes stimulated with P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia OMVs, respectively (Figure 7E). P. gingivalis OMVs induced less ASC fluorescence in M(naïve) (20.61%) and M(IFNγ) (23.33%) macrophages compared with monocytes, whereas T. denticola and T. forsythia OMVs induced similar levels of speck formation in all cell types (Figure 7E).
Immortalized bone marrow-derived macrophages generated from individual inflammasome gene-deficient mice (48) were used to identify the inflammasome activation pathways stimulated by periodontal OMVs. Wild-type IBMDMs were significantly stimulated (as determined by IL-1β secretion) by nigericin, silica, Poly(dA:dT), P. gingivalis, and T. forsythia OMVs at all OMV to cell ratios and T. denticola OMVs at the higher 50: 1 and 100: 1 ratios (p < 0.05) (Figures 7F and 8A). NLRP3−/− IBMDM cells were not activated by nigericin or silica controls but were activated by Poly(dA:dT), while P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia OMVs induced inflammasome activation similar to wild-type IBMDMs (Figures 7F and 8B). AIM2−/− IBMDMs did not respond to Poly(dA:dT) and were significantly less (p < 0.05) activated by P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia OMVs, nigericin and silica as compared to wild-type IBMDMs (Figures 7F and 8C). Importantly, ASC−/− IBMDMs were not activated by P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia OMVs or controls nigericin, silica, and Poly(dA:dT) (Figures 7F and 8D). Finally, Caspase 1−/− IBMDMs had significantly (p < 0.001) lower levels of inflammasome activation for P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia OMVs and controls compared to wild-type IBMDM cells (Figures 7F and 8E). Taken together, these results suggest that periodontal OMVs can activate ASC-dependent inflammasome complexes such as NLRP3 and AIM2.
Figure 8. Inflammasome activation in immortalized bone marrow-derived macrophages (IBMDM) knockout cell lines. Wild-type IBMDM and NLRP3−/−, AIM2−/−, ASC−/−, and Caspase 1−/− knockout IBMDM strains were primed with Porphyromonas gingivalis outer membrane vesicles (OMVs, 3 h) and treated with positive controls nigericin, silica, and Poly(dA:dT) or P. gingivalis, Treponema denticola, and Tannerella forsythia OMVs at OMV:cell ratios of 10:1, 50:1, and 100:1 for 6 h. Cellular supernatants were collected and IL-1β secretion detected by an IL-1β ELISA Kit. Data are represented as mean ± SEM of three replicates. *represents a significant (p < 0.05) increase from the IL-1β secretion of untreated cells.
P. gingivalis OMVs Induce Inflammasome Activation In Vivo
Periodontal OMVs were capable of activating inflammasomes in THP-1 monocytes/macrophages, this virulence characteristic was further confirmed in primary murine macrophages extracted from intraperitoneal washes. Initially unprimed peritoneal macrophages were cultured overnight and primed ex vivo with P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia OMVs. Primary macrophages were found to have strong responses (determined by IL-1β secretion) after activation with nigericin and silica controls (p < 0.001) (Figure 9A). Activation with P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia OMVs all induced significant (p < 0.05) and comparable dose-dependent IL-1β secretion indicative of inflammasome activation (Figure 9A).
Figure 9. Porphyromonas gingivalis outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) prime and activate inflammasome formation in vivo. (A) Intraperitoneal cells from naive mice (unprimed and unactivated) were cultured overnight and stimulated ex vivo with nigericin, silica, P. gingivalis, Treponema denticola, or Tannerella forsythia OMVs, IL-1β secretion was determined by ELISA. (B) For in vivo inflammasome activation C57BL/6 J mice received intraperitoneal injections of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, naïve), Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide, or P. gingivalis OMVs 72 h prior to harvest to recruit immune cells to the peritoneal cavity. A second intraperitoneal injection of PBS, silica, nigericin, or P. gingivalis OMVs was administered 15 min prior to killing to active inflammasomes in peritoneal macrophages, IL-1β secretion was determined by ELISA. Data are represented as mean ± SEM of three replicates. *represents a significant (p < 0.05) increase from the IL-1β secretion of naive cells. (C) Microscopy was used to visually observe the dense accumulation of the inflammasome component ASC (green) in DAPI stained (blue) peritoneal macrophages primed and treated with P. gingivalis OMVs. (D) Inflammasome formation was confirmed by flow cytometry using ASC-specific antibody and macrophage markers (F4/80 and CD11b). For full gating strategy see Figure 10. Flow cytometry data display ASC-positive events plotted on a FITC area versus BV421 area (whole cell autofluorescence channel) dot plot.
We further investigated the capacity of P. gingivalis OMVs to induce inflammasome activation in vivo by injecting P. gingivalis OMVs, E. coli LPS, or PBS into the peritoneal cavity of mice. Three days post injection the peritoneal cell infiltrate was harvested and characterized. P. gingivalis OMV-injected (primed) mice had significantly increased cellular infiltrate (cells/mL) compared to E. coli LPS-primed or PBS-injected mice (Figure 10A). Both P. gingivalis OMVs and E. coli LPS resulted in a similar cell population phenotype dominated by macrophages, which was significantly higher than PBS-injected mice (naive) (Figure 10B).
Figure 10. Analysis of ASC speck formation in peritoneal macrophages (in vivo activation). C57BL/6 J mice received intraperitoneal injections of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, naïve), Escherichia coli lipopolysaccharide (LPS), or Porphyromonas gingivalis outer membrane vesicles (OMVs) 72 h prior to harvest to recruit immune cells to the peritoneal cavity. Intraperitoneal washes were counted using a Z1 Coulter Particle Counter to observe increase in cell recruitment following LPS and OMV priming (A). Data are represented as mean ± SEM of three replicates. *represents a significant (p < 0.05) increase in cell counts from naïve washes. Following harvest intraperitoneal cells were analyzed by flow cytometry using fluorescent antibodies against F4/80 and CD11b, Ly6G, CD11c, TCRb, and CD19 to identify macrophage, neutrophil, dendritic cell, T cell and B cell populations, respectively (B). Results in pie charts are expressed as the percentage of each detectable cell type in peritoneal samples and do not include cells outside these categories. Following a second intraperitoneal injection of PBS, nigericin, silica, or P. gingivalis OMVs, ASC speck formation in peritoneal macrophages was determined by flow cytometry. (C) CD11b- and F4/80-positive macrophages are selected from other peritoneal cells with a scatter gate. (D) Events within the scatter gate are plotted on a SSC-area versus FSC-area dot plot, the predominant population of ethanol-fixed cells are selected with a scatter gate. (E) Events within the scatter gate are plotted on a FSC-width versus FSC-area dot plot and single cells are selected with a singlet gate. (F) Single cells are plotted on a FITC-area versus BV421-area dot plot and a gate created to capture ASC fluorescence greater than that of the secondary antibody control. This population represent non-specific ASC antibody binding to peritoneal macrophages. (G) This population represents peritoneal cells which have been LPS primed in vivo but not activated. (H) This population represents peritoneal cells which have been LPS primed and P. gingivalis OMV activated. In this cell set diffuse ASC has condensed into single bright specks, increasing the detectable ASC fluorescence and indicating inflammasome activation. Data presented here were collected on a BD LSRFortessa X20 flow cytometer.
After 3 days of P. gingivalis OMV, E. coli LPS, or PBS priming, mice were injected with PBS, silica, nigericin, or P. gingivalis OMVs and 15 min later the peritoneal cells were harvested and inflammasome activation determined by IL-1β secretion. In vivo activation by P. gingivalis OMVs induced significantly (p < 0.01) higher IL-1β secretion than positive controls (nigericin and silica) in both LPS-primed and OMV-primed mice (Figure 9B). Nigericin, silica, and P. gingivalis OMVs all induced higher levels of IL-1β than PBS-injected mice (p < 0.05) (Figure 9B).
To confirm in vivo inflammasome activation by P. gingivalis OMVs, peritoneal cells were activated in vivo as above, immediately fixed and stained with ASC-specific antibody. ASC-speck formation was visualized by high-resolution fluorescent microscopy (Figure 9C). Only peritoneal cells primed and activated with P. gingivalis OMVs displayed distinct ASC speck formation, whereas a diffuse ASC fluorescence was observed in PBS-injected controls, indicative of no activation (Figure 9C and Video S1 in Supplementary Material). To quantify in vivo inflammasome activation, fixed and ASC antibody-stained peritoneal macrophages (F4/80+ and CD11b+) were analyzed for ASC-speck formation by flow cytometry (Figure 9D). Peritoneal cells were gated by F4/80 and CD11b fluorescence to identify macrophage populations, and Figures 10C–H describe the gating strategy to identify ASC speck-positive cells. P. gingivalis OMVs were found to induce ASC-speck formation in a significantly higher (p < 0.01) percentage of E. coli LPS (78.86% of cells) and P. gingivalis OMV (80.42% of cells) primed mice compared to PBS-, nigericin-, and silica-injected mice (ranging from 8.47 to 20.17% of cells) (Figure 9D).
Chronic inflammation plays a pivotal role in the progression of periodontal disease, yet the role of periodontal pathogen OMVs in inflammatory immune cells, such as macrophages, is understudied. Due to their nanoparticle size, adhesive, and proteolytic properties, OMVs are capable of migrating through host tissues, disrupting epithelial tight junctions, and delivering bacterial virulence factors to immune cells in underlying tissues (11). In this study, periodontal OMVs were found to interact strongly with monocytes and macrophages, inducing phagocytosis, NF-κB activation, cellular priming, and strong pro-inflammatory responses, including IL-1β secretion and inflammatory cell death via inflammasome activation both in vitro and in vivo.
Porphyromonas gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia OMVs were all found to induce significant and comparable inflammasome activation in primed, differentiated M(naïve), and M(IFNγ) macrophages (as observed by IL-1β secretion) while the activation of undifferentiated monocytes was approximately eightfold less. Although IL-1β ELISA assays are standard in quantifying the inflammasome activity of macrophages, not all IL-1β secretion can be ascribed purely to inflammasome activity, as pro-IL-1β can be released during apoptosis and detected extracellularly. IL-1β western blots confirmed the presence of mature IL-1β in the cell supernatant following OMV treatment and to a lesser extent pro-IL-1β in the cell lysate. Inflammasome activation was also confirmed visually by the localization of ASC fluorescence into the characteristic “speck” formation and via flow cytometry in macrophages. A combination of these techniques confirmed that P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia OMVs activate inflammasome responses in THP-1 monocytes, M(naive), and M(IFNγ) macrophages. We found that particular care must be taken with THP-1 cells during ASC antibody labeling, including the gentle, mechanical detachment of cells (as chemical detachment by trypsin-EDTA severely inhibited speck detection) and the use of FCS-free media during resuspension was critical.
Immortalized bone marrow-derived macrophage-knockout cell lines demonstrated that OMV-induced IL-1β secretion is dependent on the inflammasome component ASC but was only attenuated by the absence of Caspase 1, which may be attributed to its reported functional redundancy with Caspase 8 (26), or the non-canonical activation of Caspase 11 by intracellular LPS (49). E. coli OMVs have recently been shown to act as a delivery system for cytosolic LPS, which binds and activates cytosolic Caspase 11 (as well as Caspase 4 and 5) to trigger Caspase-1-independent pyroptosis through the cleavage of pore forming gasdermin D (50, 51). It is possible that Caspase 1−/− IBMDM cells utilize Caspase 11 to secrete IL-1β during OMV-induced inflammasome activation. However, the OMV/Caspase 11 activation pathway suggested by Vanaja et al. (51) is dependent upon the biological activity of OMV-associated LPS, as OMVs derived from an E. coli mutant lacking hexa-acylated lipid A (MKV15) induced greatly attenuated IL-1β secretion. P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia are known to possess atypical LPS which lacks functional hexa-acylated lipid A and therefore exhibits greatly reduced biological activity compared with E. coli LPS (52–54). We suggest that non-canonical activation of Caspase 11 by P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia LPS is unlikely to be the principle method of OMV-induced inflammasome activation, but is rather one of the many functionally redundant mechanisms through which periodontal pathogen OMVs may induce pyroptotic cell death and IL-1β secretion. AIM2 and (to a far lesser extent) NLRP3 knockout cell lines produced attenuated IL-1β secretion, which indicates that both inflammasome pathways contribute to OMV-induced inflammasome responses. NLRP3 and AIM2 have previously been suggested as the principle inflammasomes involved in P. gingivalis-induced inflammasome activation (31); however, it is possible that alternative inflammasome pathways, such as NLRP1 and NLRC4, may also play a role in OMV-induced IL-1β secretion in macrophages. Importantly, the absence of priming or key inflammasome machinery, such as ASC, abrogated IL-1β secretion in macrophage cells (IBMDMs), indicating that inflammasomes are principally responsible for IL-1β secretion in response to OMVs from each periodontal pathogen.
In investigating the ability of P. gingivalis OMVs to prime and activate inflammasomes in vivo, we observed that P. gingivalis OMVs were highly efficient at recruiting immune cells to the site of injection with a threefold increase over baseline cell numbers, compared to a twofold increase induced by E. coli LPS. Flow cytometry revealed that the phenotypic composition of intraperitoneal cells was predominately macrophages and B cells, most likely to be antibody-producing B1 cells due to their peritoneal location (55, 56). While B cells are capable of immune modulatory cytokine secretion, including IL-2, IL-4, IL-6, IL-10, IFNγ, and TNFα, they are reported to not possess inflammasome machinery and thus are likely minimal contributors to the IL-1β secretion observed from peritoneal cells (57). This was confirmed by flow cytometry where ASC speck formation occurred exclusively in the macrophage populations. P. gingivalis OMV-induced inflammasome activation was confirmed both in vitro and in vivo by ASC speck formation and strong IL-1β secretion from peritoneal macrophages. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first example of inflammasome activation by vesicles and clearly demonstrates the pro-inflammatory potential of P. gingivalis OMVs.
In addition to inflammasome induced IL-1β, periodontal pathogen OMVs were found to induce strong NF-κB activation and stimulate pro-inflammatory cytokine responses through secretion of TNFα and IL-8. PMA-differentiated M(naïve) and M(IFNγ) cells exhibited significantly higher NF-κB activation and cytokine secretion than THP-1 monocytes. This finding agrees with previous studies that have found M(naïve) and M(IFNγ) macrophages to have higher gene expression of NF-κB, TLR2, TLR7, and TLR8 as well as produce higher concentrations of pro-inflammatory (IL-1β, IL-6, and TNFα) and anti-inflammatory (IL-10) cytokines (58, 59) than monocytes. Gingival tissues of chronic periodontitis patients exhibit significantly higher levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, and TNFα than those of periodontally healthy subjects (60, 61), hence it is possible that periodontal pathogen OMVs are contributing to this response. The inflammatory effects of these cytokines have been extensively reviewed and include the activation of neutrophils, T and B lymphocytes, macrophages, natural killer cells, and osteoclasts to promote connective tissue destruction and alveolar bone resorption, the clinical hallmarks of chronic periodontitis (62–64). P. gingivalis OMVs were also found to induce the secretion of IL-10, a potent anti-inflammatory cytokine that is also significantly upregulated in the gingival crevicular fluid of periodontitis patients (65) and is known to suppress the synthesis of pro-inflammatory cytokines from various cell types (66, 67). While most OMV-induced cytokine responses increased in a dose-dependent manner, inverse cytokine responses were observed for P. gingivalis (TNFα, IL-1β, and IL-8), T. denticola (TNFα), and T. forsythia OMVs (TNFα), where cytokine secretion decreased with increasing OMV to cell ratios. As P. gingivalis OMVs were observed to stimulate NF-κB activation in THP-1 cells [to a greater degree in monocytes and M(IFNγ) macrophages than either T. denticola or T. forsythia OMVs] and the declining responses were not associated with an increase in cell death, this phenomenon may be an example of inflammatory anergy. Inflammatory anergy is a decreased or inhibited inflammatory response in monocytes and macrophages and is thought to be a protective mechanism to prevent detrimental inflammation in the presence of excessive LPS stimulation (68, 69). Also known as LPS tolerance, anergy is stimulated in monocytes by secondary contact with endotoxin and is generally associated with the upregulation of IL-10 synthesis (69), as observed for P. gingivalis OMVs in this study. Several studies have reported P. gingivalis OMV-mediated tolerance in monocyte/macrophage cell lines, in which pro-inflammatory responses (TNFα and IL-1β) to E. coli LPS or live P. gingivalis were greatly inhibited by previous exposure to OMVs (37, 70). Such differential responses benefit the host by minimizing the inflammatory damage induced by high OMV/bacterial concentrations and prolonged or repeated exposure, but may also benefit bacterial persistence by inhibiting bacterial clearance.
The prolonged presence of inflammatory cells may be a significant factor in chronic periodontal tissue destruction, as such several studies have examined the role of host cell death and its inhibition in periodontal disease (71). Four hours of stimulation with P. gingivalis OMVs induced no significant reduction in cell viability of THP-1 cells while T. denticola and T. forsythia OMVs induced minimal cell death of unprimed THP-1 populations. Under these conditions inflammasomes were not activated, hence low IL-1β secretion and minimal pyroptosis. OMV cytotoxicity was greatly increased by priming THP-1 cells with a low concentration of P. gingivalis OMVs. This is likely to be attributable to inflammasome-meditated pyroptosis, in which primed cells are stimulated by a second exposure to form caspase-dependent pores in the cellular membrane, which encourage inflammatory cell death. While previous studies have traditionally utilized E. coli LPS as a priming agent in inflammasome activation experiments, P. gingivalis LPS was found to be just as effective, despite its atypical LPS structure, while T. denticola and T. forsythia counterparts were found not to induce inflammasome priming. Interestingly, while E. coli and P. gingivalis LPS were adequate priming materials, they lacked the ability to provide a strong second signal and fully stimulate inflammasome activation, even when used at high concentrations. P. gingivalis OMVs were more effective than either LPS at priming THP-1 cells, and in addition were also capable of providing the second inflammasome activation signal. We suggest that either the particulate nature of OMVs is critical to inflammasome activation or the stimulation of multiple PRRs (39) has a synergistic effect greater than that of TLR4 stimulation alone. This finding has interesting implications for the role of OMVs in periodontal disease. The nanoparticle-like aspects of OMVs allow them to penetrate and disseminate through tissues, therefore, during infection an OMV concentration gradient will likely occur from the site of bacterial infection in the polymicrobial biofilm adhered to the tooth root. At distal areas from the initial site of infection OMV concentrations will be low enough to prime but not necessarily activate host cells, as disease bloom tissues will be primed by previous exposure to OMVs and the resulting immune responses will consequently be stronger.
All of these pro-inflammatory interactions are dependent upon initial OMV interactions with macrophages. OMVs derived from P. gingivalis, T. denticola, and T. forsythia were found to bind and be phagocytosed by M(naive)- and M(IFNγ)-differentiated THP-1 cells to a greater extent than monocytes; this increased capacity for phagocytosis has been observed in previous studies using whole bacterial cells (45, 72). A comparison of periodontal pathogen OMVs revealed that P. gingivalis OMVs bound all cell types with the greatest affinity, possibly due to the selective enrichment of gingipains on the vesicular surface (9). P. gingivalis gingipains contain adhesin domains known to aid coaggregation and cell binding (73, 74). However, T. forsythia OMVs were more readily phagocytosed than P. gingivalis or T. denticola OMVs in pHrodo phagocytosis assays. This may be attributable to the dependence of pHrodo fluorescence on acidification of the phagolysosome. P. gingivalis whole cells are known to evade phagosomal killing through several pathways including persisting in the cytoplasm and prevention of phagosome–lysosome fusion (75–77). If these mechanisms are shared by P. gingivalis OMVs it would render them partially undetectable by pHrodo but not by PKH-26 fluorescence.
Understanding the process of inflammation, and particularly the activity of key innate immune cells to bacterial virulence factors, is critical to understanding and modulating the progression of chronic periodontitis. This study observed the pathogenic potential of periodontal OMVs to both stimulate and inhibit macrophage pro-inflammatory responses in vitro and in vivo. While T. denticola and T. forsythia OMVs induced predominately pro-inflammatory responses, including TNFα, IL-1β, and IL-8 secretion in unprimed cells and strong inflammasome activation in primed THP-1 macrophages, P. gingivalis OMVs induced variable responses dependent on OMV concentration. Low concentrations of P. gingivalis OMV induced TNFα, IL-1β, and IL-8 secretion in unprimed cells, recruited inflammatory cells (in vivo), and primed macrophages to produce stronger immune responses, inducing both IL-1β secretion and pyroptosis upon second exposure. High concentrations of P. gingivalis OMVs were less inflammatory in unprimed cells due to LPS tolerance and inflammatory anergy but induced strong inflammasome activation upon second exposure. In the pathogenesis of periodontitis, P. gingivalis is generally regarded as the principal or keystone pathogen while T. denticola and T. forsythia are accessory pathogens playing a synergistic or supporting role (78–82). The potent but flexible immune stimulatory effects observed for P. gingivalis OMVs in this study are likely to assist whole cell P. gingivalis in manipulating and dysregulating the host immune response thereby initiating disease, while the pro-inflammatory effects of T. denticola and T. forsythia OMVs are likely to promote disease progression.
All animal experimental procedures were carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Australian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes. The protocols for the experiments were approved by The University of Melbourne Ethics Committee for Animal Experimentation (approval number 1212363).
Conception: JC, NO-S, JL, JH, AM, and ER. Design of the work: JC, NO-S, and AM. Acquisition and analysis: JC, WS, and AP-G. Drafting of work: JC. Writing—review and editing: all authors. Approval of final version: all authors. Accountability agreed: all authors.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that this research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The authors acknowledge Prof. Frank Caruso for the use of the Apogee A50-Micro Flow Cytometer.
This work was supported by the Australian Government, Department of Industry, Innovation and Science, the Australian Dental Research Foundation (ADRF), and the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) project grant APP1101935.
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fimmu.2017.01017/full#supplementary-material.
Video S1. Video of ASC speck formation in peritoneal cells. Microscopy was used to visually observe the dense accumulation of the inflammasome component ASC (green) in DAPI-stained (blue) peritoneal macrophages primed and treated with Porphyromonas gingivalis outer membrane vesicles.
1. Haffajee AD, Cugini MA, Tanner A, Pollack RP, Smith C, Kent RL Jr, et al. Subgingival microbiota in healthy, well-maintained elder and periodontitis subjects. J Clin Periodontol (1998) 25:346–53. doi:10.1111/j.1600-051X.1998.tb02454.x
3. Byrne SJ, Dashper SG, Darby IB, Adams GG, Hoffmann B, Reynolds EC. Progression of chronic periodontitis can be predicted by the levels of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Treponema denticola in subgingival plaque. Oral Microbiol Immunol (2009) 24:469–77. doi:10.1111/j.1399-302X.2009.00544.x
4. O’Brien-Simpson N, Pathirana R, Walker G, Reynolds E. Porphyromonas gingivalis RgpA-Kgp proteinase-adhesin complexes penetrate gingival tissue and induce proinflammatory cytokines or apoptosis in a concentration-dependent manner. Infect Immun (2009) 77:1246–61. doi:10.1128/IAI.01038-08
7. Haurat MF, Aduse-Opoku J, Rangarajan M, Dorobantu L, Gray MR, Curtis MA, et al. Selective sorting of cargo proteins into bacterial membrane vesicles. J Biol Chem (2011) 286:1269–76. doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.185744
8. Nakao R, Hasegawa H, Ochiai K, Takashiba S, Ainai A, Ohnishi M, et al. Outer membrane vesicles of Porphyromonas gingivalis elicit a mucosal immune response. PLoS One (2011) 6:e26163. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0026163
9. Veith PD, Chen YY, Gorasia DG, Chen D, Glew MD, O’Brien-Simpson NM, et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis outer membrane vesicles exclusively contain outer membrane and periplasmic proteins and carry a cargo enriched with virulence factors. J Proteome Res (2014) 13:2420–32. doi:10.1021/pr401227e
10. Srisatjaluk R, Doyle RJ, Justus DE. Outer membrane vesicles of Porphyromonas gingivalis inhibit IFN-gamma-mediated MHC class II expression by human vascular endothelial cells. Microb Pathog (1999) 27:81–91. doi:10.1006/mpat.1999.0287
12. Sharpe SW, Kuehn MJ, Mason KM. Elicitation of epithelial cell-derived immune effectors by outer membrane vesicles of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae. Infect Immun (2011) 79:4361–9. doi:10.1128/IAI.05332-11
14. Mathur A, Michalowicz B, Castillo M, Aeppli D. Interleukin-1 alpha, interleukin-8 and interferon-alpha levels in gingival crevicular fluid. J Periodontal Res (1996) 31:489–95. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0765.1996.tb01414.x
16. Hirose M, Ishihara K, Saito A, Nakagawa T, Yamada S, Okuda K. Expression of cytokines and inducible nitric oxide synthase in inflamed gingival tissue. J Periodontol (2001) 72:590–7. doi:10.1902/jop.2001.72.5.590
17. Masada MP, Persson R, Kenney JS, Lee SW, Page RC, Allison AC. Measurement of interleukin-1 alpha and -1 beta in gingival crevicular fluid: implications for the pathogenesis of periodontal disease. J Periodontal Res (1990) 25:156–63. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0765.1990.tb01038.x
18. Ishihara Y, Nishihara T, Kuroyanagi T, Shirozu N, Yamagishi E, Ohguchi M, et al. Gingival crevicular interleukin-1 and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist levels in periodontally healthy and diseased sites. J Periodontal Res (1997) 32:524–9. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0765.1997.tb00568.x
19. Martinon F, Burns K, Tshopp J. The inflammasome. A molecular platform triggering activation of inflammatory caspases and processing of proIL-beta. Mol Cell (2002) 10:417–26. doi:10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00599-3
20. Netea MG, Nold-Petry CA, Nold MF, Joosten LAB, Opitz B, van der Meer JHM, et al. Differential requirement for the activation of the inflammasome for processing and release of IL-1beta in monocytes and macrophages. Blood (2009) 113:2324–35. doi:10.1182/blood-2008-03-146720
23. Veltman D, Laeremans T, Passante E, Huber HJ. Signal transduction analysis of the NLRP3-inflammasome pathway after cellular damage and its paracrine regulation. J Theor Biol (2017) 415:125–36. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2016.12.016
26. Antonopoulos C, Russo HM, El Sanadi C, Martin BN, Li X, Kaiser WJ, et al. Caspase-8 as an effector and regulator of NLRP3 inflammasome signaling. J Biol Chem (2015) 290:20167–84. doi:10.1074/jbc.M115.652321
27. Aglietti RA, Estevez A, Gupta A, Ramirez MG, Liu PS, Kayagaki N, et al. GsdmD p30 elicited by caspase-11 during pyroptosis forms pores in membranes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A (2016) 113:7858–63. doi:10.1073/pnas.1607769113
32. Das A, Sinha M, Datta S, Abas M, Chaffee S, Sen C, et al. Review: monocyte and macrophage plasticity in tissue repair and regeneration. Am J Pathol (2015) 185:2596–606. doi:10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.06.001
34. Lam R, O’Brien-Simpson N, Lenzo J, Holden J, Brammar G, Walsh K. Macrophage depletion abates Porphyromonas gingivalis induced alveolar bone resorption in mice. J Immunol (2014) 193:2349–62. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1400853
37. Duncan L, Yoshioka M, Chandad F, Grenier D. Loss of lipopolysaccharide receptor CD14 from the surface of human macrophage-like cells mediated by Porphyromonas gingivalis outer membrane vesicles. Microb Pathog (2004) 36:319–25. doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2004.02.004
38. Friedrich V, Gruber C, Nimeth I, Pabinger S, Sekot G, Posch G, et al. Outer membrane vesicles of Tannerella forsythia: biogenesis, composition, and virulence. Mol Oral Microbiol (2015) 30:451–73. doi:10.1111/omi.12104
39. Cecil JD, O’Brien-Simpson NM, Lenzo JC, Holden JA, Chen YY, Singleton W, et al. Differential responses of pattern recognition receptors to outer membrane vesicles of three periodontal pathogens. PLoS One (2016) 11:e0151967. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0151967
41. Pathirana RD, O’Brien-Simpson NM, Visvanathan K, Hamilton JA, Reynolds EC. Flow cytometric analysis of adherence of Porphyromonas gingivalis to oral epithelial cells. Infect Immun (2007) 75:2484–92. doi:10.1128/IAI.02004-06
42. Lenzo JC, O’Brien-Simpson NM, Orth RK, Mitchell HL, Dashper SG, Reynolds EC. Porphyromonas gulae has similar virulence and immunological characteristics to the human periodontal pathogen Porphyromonas gingivalis. Infect Immun (2016) 84:2575–85. doi:10.1128/IAI.01500-15
43. Sester DP, Thygesen SJ, Sagulenko V, Vajjhala PR, Cridland JA, Vitak N, et al. A novel flow cytometric method to assess inflammasome formation. J Immunol (2015) 194:455–62. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1401110
44. Sester DP, Zamoshnikova A, Thygesen SJ, Vajjhala PR, Cridland SO, Schroder K, et al. Assessment of inflammasome formation by flow cytometry. Curr Protoc Immunol (2016) 114:1–29. doi:10.1002/cpim.13
45. Lam RS, O’Brien-Simpson NM, Holden JA, Lenzo JC, Fong SB, Reynolds EC. Unprimed, M1 and M2 macrophages differentially interact with Porphyromonas gingivalis. PLoS One (2016) 11:e0158629. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0158629
46. Pathirana RD, O’Brien-Simpson NM, Veith PD, Riley PF, Reynolds EC. Characterization of proteinase-adhesin complexes of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Microbiology (2006) 152:2381–94. doi:10.1099/mic.0.28787-0
47. Dashper SG, O’Brien-Simpson NM, Bhogal PS, Franzmann AD, Reynolds EC. Purification and characterization of a putative fimbrial protein/receptor of Porphyromonas gingivalis. Aust Dent J (1998) 43:99–104. doi:10.1111/j.1834-7819.1998.tb06097.x
48. Hornung V, Bauernfeind F, Halle A, Samstad E, Kono H, Rock K, et al. Silica crystals and aluminum salts activate the NALP3 inflammasome through phagosomal destabilization. Nat Immunol (2008) 9:847–56. doi:10.1038/ni.1631
49. Kayagaki N, Wong MT, Stowe IB, Ramani SR, Gonzalez LC, Akashi-Takamura S, et al. Noncanonical inflammasome activation by intracellular LPS independent of TLR4. Science (2013) 341:1246–9. doi:10.1126/science.1240248
51. Vanaja SK, Russo AJ, Behl B, Banerjee I, Yankova M, Deshmukh SD, et al. Bacterial outer membrane vesicles mediate cytosolic localization of LPS and caspase-11 activation. Cell (2016) 165:1106–19. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.04.015
52. Schultz CP, Wolf V, Lange R, Mertens E, Wecke J, Naumann D, et al. Evidence for a new type of outer membrane lipid in oral spirochete Treponema denticola: functioning permeation barrier without lipopolysaccharides. J Biol Chem (1998) 273:15661–6. doi:10.1074/jbc.273.25.15661
53. Herath TDK, Darveau RP, Seneviratne CJ, Wang C-Y, Wang Y, Jin L. Tetra- and penta-acylated lipid A structures of Porphyromonas gingivalis LPS differentially activate TLR4-mediated NF-κB signal transduction cascade and immuno-inflammatory response in human gingival fibroblasts. PLoS One (2013) 8:e58496. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058496
54. Posch G, Andrukhov O, Vinogradov E, Lindner B, Messner P, Holst O, et al. Structure and immunogenicity of the rough-type lipopolysaccharide from the periodontal pathogen Tannerella forsythia. Clin Vaccine Immunol (2013) 20:945–53. doi:10.1128/CVI.00139-13
55. Haas KM, Poe JC, Steeber DA, Tedder TF. B-1a and B-1b cells exhibit distinct developmental requirements and have unique functional roles in innate and adaptive immunity to S. pneumoniae. Immunity (2005) 23:7–18. doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2005.04.011
58. Gmiterek A, Kłopot A, Wójtowicz H, Trindade S, Olczak M, Olczak T. Immune response of macrophages induced by Porphyromonas gingivalis requires HmuY protein. Immunobiology (2016) 221:1382–94. doi:10.1016/j.imbio.2016.07.007
61. Yoshimura A, Hara Y, Kaneko T, Kato I. Secretion of IL-1 beta, TNF-alpha, IL-8 and IL-1a by human polymorphonuclear leukocytes in response to lipopolysaccharides from periodontopathic bacteria. J Periodontal Res (1997) 32:279–86. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0765.1997.tb00535.x
63. Silva TA, Garlet GP, Fukada SY, Silva JS, Cunha FQ. Chemokines in oral inflammatory diseases: apical periodontitis and periodontal disease. J Dent Res (2007) 86:306–19. doi:10.1177/154405910708600403
66. Berg D, Ralf K, Rajewsky K. Interleukin-10 is a central regulator of the response to LPS in murine models of endotoxic shock and the Schwartzman reaction but not to endotoxin tolerance. J Clin Invest (1995) 96:2339–47. doi:10.1172/JCI118290
67. Zhang Q, Chen B, Yan F, Guo J, Zhu X, Ma S, et al. Interleukin-10 inhibits bone resorption: a potential therapeutic strategy in periodontitis and other bone loss diseases. Biomed Res Int (2014) 2014:284836. doi:10.1155/2014/284836
68. Seatter SC, Li MH, Bubrick MP, West MA. Endotoxin pretreatment of human monocytes alters subsequent endotoxin-triggered release of inflammatory mediators. Shock (1995) 3:252–8. doi:10.1097/00024382-199504000-00002
69. Williams MA, Withington S, Newland AC, Kelsey SM. Monocyte anergy in septic shock is associated with a predilection to apoptosis and is reversed by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor ex vivo. J Infect Dis (1998) 178:1421–33. doi:10.1086/314447
70. Waller T, Kesper L, Hirschfeld J, Dommisch H, Kolpin J, Oldenburg J, et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis outer membrane vesicles induce selective tumor necrosis factor tolerance in a toll-like receptor 4 and mTOR-dependent manner. Infect Immun (2016) 84:1194–204. doi:10.1128/IAI.01390-15
72. Shiratsuchi H, Basson MD. Extracellular pressure stimulates macrophage phagocytosis by inhibiting a pathway involving FAK and ERK. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol (2004) 286:C1358–66. doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00553.2003
73. Pike RN, Potempa J, McGraw W, Coetzer TH, Travis J. Characterization of the binding activities of proteinase-adhesin complexes from Porphyromonas gingivalis. J Bacteriol (1996) 178:2876–82. doi:10.1128/jb.178.10.2876-2882.1996
74. Ito R, Ishihara K, Shoji M, Nakayama K, Okuda K. Hemagglutinin/Adhesin domains of Porphyromonas gingivalis play key roles in coaggregation with Treponema denticola. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol (2010) 60:251–60. doi:10.1111/j.1574-695X.2010.00737.x
75. Giacona MB, Papapanou PN, Lamster IB, Rong LL, D’Agati VD, Schmidt AM, et al. Porphyromonas gingivalis induces its uptake by human macrophages and promotes foam cell formation in vitro. FEMS Microbiol Lett (2004) 241:95–101. doi:10.1016/j.femsle.2004.10.009
76. Hajishengallis G, Wang M, Harokopakis E, Triantafilou M, Triantafilou K. Porphyromonas gingivalis fimbriae proactively modulate beta2 integrin adhesive activity and promote binding to and internalization by macrophages. Infect Immun (2006) 74:5658–66. doi:10.1128/IAI.00784-06
77. Polak D, Shapira L, Weiss EI, Houri-Haddad Y. Virulence mechanism of bacteria in mixed infection: attenuation of cytokine levels and evasion of polymorphonuclear leukocyte phagocytosis. J Periodontol (2013) 84:1463–8. doi:10.1902/jop.2012.120528
78. Hajishengallis G, Liang S, Payne MA, Hashim A, Jotwani R, Eskan MA, et al. Low-abundance biofilm species orchestrates inflammatory periodontal disease through the commensal microbiota and complement. Cell Host Microbe (2011) 10:497–506. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2011.10.006
79. Orth RK, O’Brien-Simpson NM, Dashper SG, Reynolds EC. Synergistic virulence of Porphyromonas gingivalis and Treponema denticola in a murine periodontitis model. Mol Oral Microbiol (2011) 26:229–40. doi:10.1111/j.2041-1014.2011.00612.x
80. Hajishengallis G, Lamont RJ. Beyond the red complex and into more complexity: the polymicrobial synergy and dysbiosis (PSD) model of periodontal disease etiology. Mol Oral Microbiol (2012) 27:409–19. doi:10.1111/j.2041-1014.2012.00663.x
81. Zhu Y, Dashper SG, Chen YY, Crawford S, Slakeski N, Reynolds EC. Porphyromonas gingivalis and Treponema denticola synergistic polymicrobial biofilm development. PLoS One (2013) 8:e71727. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0071727
Keywords: outer membrane vesicles, macrophages, inflammasomes, Porphyromonas gingivalis, Treponema denticola, Tannerella forsythia, periodontitis
Citation: Cecil JD, O’Brien-Simpson NM, Lenzo JC, Holden JA, Singleton W, Perez-Gonzalez A, Mansell A and Reynolds EC (2017) Outer Membrane Vesicles Prime and Activate Macrophage Inflammasomes and Cytokine Secretion In Vitro and In Vivo. Front. Immunol. 8:1017. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01017
Received: 12 May 2017; Accepted: 08 August 2017;
Published: 25 August 2017
Edited by:Massimo Gadina, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, United States
Reviewed by:Krzysztof Guzik, Jagiellonian University, Poland
Alberto Baroja-Mazo, Murcia’s Biohealth Research Institute, Spain
Copyright: © 2017 Cecil, O’Brien-Simpson, Lenzo, Holden, Singleton, Perez-Gonzalez, Mansell and Reynolds. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Eric C. Reynolds, email@example.com
†These authors are co-first authors.