Impact Factor 5.511
2017 JCR, Clarivate Analytics 2018

Among the world's top 10 most-cited Immunology journals

Original Research ARTICLE

Front. Immunol., 18 December 2018 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2018.02970

Oral Passive Immunization With Plasma-Derived Polyreactive Secretory-Like IgA/M Partially Protects Mice Against Experimental Salmonellosis

  • 1R&D Laboratory, Division of Immunology and Allergy, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Épalinges, Switzerland
  • 2Research Department, CSL Behring AG, Bern, Switzerland

Secretory immunoglobulins have a critical role in defense of the gastrointestinal tract and are known to act by preventing bacterial acquisition. A stringent murine model of bacterial infection with Salmonella enterica Typhimurium was used to examine protection mediated by oral passive immunization with human plasma-derived polyreactive IgA and IgM antibodies (Abs) reconstituted as secretory-like immunoglobulins (SCIgA/M). This reagent has been shown to trigger Salmonella agglutination and to limit the entry of bacterium into intestinal Peyer's patches via immune exclusion. We now demonstrate that upon administration into ligated intestinal loops, SCIgA/M properly anchors in the mucus and is protected from degradation to a better extent that IgA/M or IgG. Moreover, prophylactic oral administration of SCIgA/M before intragastric infection of mice with a virulent strain of S. enterica Typhimurium allows to protect infected animals, as reflected by reduced colonization of both mucosal and systemic compartments, and conserved integrity of intestinal tissues. In comparison with IgA/M or IgG administration, SCIgA/M provided the highest degree of protection. Moreover, such protective efficacy is also observed after therapeutic oral delivery of SCIgA/M. Either prophylactic or therapeutic treatment with passively delivered SCIgA/M ensured survival of up to 50% of infected mice, while untreated animals all died. Our findings unravel the potential of oral passive immunization with plasma-derived polyreactive SCIgA/M Abs to fight gastrointestinal infections.

Introduction

Protection of mucosal surfaces against colonization and possible entry and invasion by microbes is provided by a combination of constitutive, non-specific substances (mucus, lysozyme, and defensins), and by specific cellular and molecular immune mechanisms including secretory immunoglobulins (SIgs) (1, 2). In vivo, experimental and clinical resistance to infection can be correlated with specific SIgA antibodies (Abs) serving as an immunological barrier at mucosal surfaces (3, 4). They are produced by plasma cells in the basolateral part of the epithelium as dimeric molecules thanks to the presence of the J-chain. IgA are transported across the epithelial barrier to the lumen by a specific receptor that after cleavage remains linked to IgA and forms the secretory component (SC). Association of dimeric IgA with SC leads to SIgA generation. It is thought that agglutination, immobilization, and neutralization of pathogens at mucosal surfaces is facilitated by the multivalency of SIgA (5, 6) and the presence of the SC (7). IgM offers a higher multivalency due to its pentameric structure. Presence of the J-chain on IgM allows also for the binding of SC and the generation of SIgM that are released in the lumen similarly to SIgA. In patients with IgA-deficient individuals, SIgM seem to serve as a surrogate of SIgA (8) acting via a similar protective mechanism (9). However, its assessment in vivo is missing.

The lack of effective vaccines against several infectious agents, the emergence of new pathogenic strains, and problems associated with antibiotic resistance, has led to a renewed interest for passive immunization consisting of the exogenous delivery of Abs as prophylactic and therapeutic agents. In emergency situations that cannot wait for a vaccine to induce protective immunity, direct intervention with biologically active Ab molecules to the affected site represents the basis for topical immunotherapy (10). Such a strategy relying on intravenous injection of polyreactive IgG preparations (IVIg) has already proven of high value in the case of severe systemic infections (11). Because neutralization of microbes at mucosal surfaces is largely mediated by SIgs, application along the gastrointestinal tract of purified plasma-derived polyreactive IgA and IgM reconstituted in SIgs (12) (SCIgA/M) deserves appraisal as an anti-pathogen approach. Such preparations are derived from a pool of plasma from thousands of donors and therefore contain both natural polyreactive Abs known to interact with/control pathogenic micro-organisms (1315) and a repertoire of polyspecificities to pathogens due to the natural history of infections that the donors have been exposed to (16).

We have previously established that secretory-like IgA and IgM (SCIgA/M) had the capacity to interact with the enteropathogen Salmonella enterica Typhimurium and promoted the formation of large aggregates of this particular bacterium (17). Upon oral administration of immune complexes, immune exclusion of the pathogen by SCIgA, and SCIgM Abs resulted in reduced local infection in the gut and diminished systemic dissemination (17). Fulfillment of these essential prerequisites indicates that the exogenously delivered Ab molecules exhibit the same functional features as locally secreted endogenous Abs in the harsh gut environment.

Using a stringent experimental mouse model of S. enterica Typhimurium (St) gut infection, we demonstrate that two prophylactic oral administrations of SCIgA/M given 8 and 24 h prior to infection with a lethal dose of St reduces tissue bacterial load and mortality rate more efficiently than polymeric IgA/M or IgG. In the more demanding therapeutic setting, one single dose of SCIgA/M proved efficacious when delivered orally 1 or 8 h post-infection. Intrinsic stability and proper mucosal tethering of SCIgA/M caused the difference in efficacy, and marks this particular molecular form as that with optimal functionality for oral immunotherapeutic intervention.

Materials and Methods

Preparation of Human Plasma-Derived Abs

Purified human plasma-derived IgA/M and SCIgA/M were prepared as published (17). Privigen (CSL Behring) was used as the source of purified human plasma-derived IgG. For visualization in vivo, Ab preparations were labeled with indocyanin 5 (Cy5) fluorescent dye (Innova Biosciences Ltd).

Bacterial Strain and Culture Conditions

SL1344 [a streptomycin-resistant virulent strain of S. enterica serovar Typhimurium (18); abbreviated St all along the paper] was grown in Luria-Bertani broth containing 90 μg/ml streptomycin (Sigma-Aldrich) and used at mid-log growth phase. Bacterial density was determined on the basis that 1 OD600nm corresponds to 9.5 × 108 CFU/ml. The inoculation dose was verified by plating 10-fold serial dilutions on agar plates.

Mice

Four week-old female BALB/c mice were obtained from Charles River Laboratories (L'Arbresle, France) and used at the age of 7–8 weeks. They were housed in the animal facility of the Lausanne University State Hospital under standard conditions. All experiments were approved by the State Veterinary Office, Lausanne, Switzerland (permit number VD2880) and performed in strict accordance to the guidelines of the animal experimentation law (SR 455.163) of the Swiss Federal Government.

Ligated Intestinal Loops and Analysis of Tissue Sections

Ligated intestinal loops were prepared (19), and 100 μl of a solution containing 10 μg of Cy5-labeled SCIgA/M, IgA/M, or IgG were delivered into the lumen. Mice were sacrificed 6 h later (i.e., the maximal incubation time allowed by the State Veterinary Office), the intestinal segment was removed, fixed in 500 μl of PBS-4% paraformaldehyde (Fluka) for 2 h at 4°C, and further processed as described (20). Tissue sections were labeled with rabbit anti-mouse/human-MUC-2 IgG (1/50; Santa-Cruz Biotechnology), followed by AlexaFluor647-labeled goat anti-rabbit IgG (1/200; Life Technologies). Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI. Laser scanning confocal microscopy images were obtained using a Leica SP5 microscope in multi-track mode. Raw images were analyzed and processed with Imaris 8 software to generate 3D reconstitutions. One representative tissue section, out of at least 2 independent experiments (several sections per experiments), is displayed for each condition.

Ab Degradation Assay

The in vitro degradation assay was performed as described (21). Detection of the reduced form of the heavy chain of each Ab mixture was performed by immunoblotting using goat anti-human alpha chain (1/1,000; Cappel), followed by HRP-labeled rabbit anti-goat Ab (1/4,000; Sigma-Aldrich), or biotinylated anti-human mu chain (1/1,000; KPL) or biotinylated anti-human gamma chain (1/1,000; Sigma-Aldrich) sera, followed by Extravidin-HRP (1/4,000; Sigma-Aldrich). The relative quantification of intact heavy chains following degradation as compared to the initial condition (0 h) has been performed with Fusion FX7 software (Vilber Lourmat). Displayed blots are examples of one particular experiment out of at least three that have been compiled for the quantification analysis shown in the Table 2.

For the in vivo degradation assay, 2 μg of unlabeled Abs in 20 μl of PBS were injected in a mouse ligated intestinal loop. After 6 h, mice were sacrificed, the loop's tissue and luminal content were collected and cut into small pieces. The samples were incubated in 50 mM HCl and CompleteTM protease inhibitor (Roche Applied Science) for 16 h at 4°C under gentle shaking, then centrifuged for 10 min at 2,350 × g. The clear supernatant was collected and stored at −20°C prior to use. To ensure equivalent samples loading, the concentration of Abs was determined through measurement by ELISA of stable anti-human kappa chain signal (21). SDS-PAGE and immunoblot analyses were performed as for the in vitro assay. The relative quantification of degraded heavy chains signals as compared to the total heavy chain signals has been performed with Fusion FX7 software (Vilber Lourmat). Displayed blots are examples of one particular experiment out of at least three that have been compiled for the quantification analysis.

Oral Infection of Mice and Passive Administration of Ab

Mice were orally infected with 2 × 107 (to assess bacterial entry in prophylactic and therapeutic settings), 2 × 106 (to assess bacterial entry in therapeutic settings), and 2 × 106 (to determine survival in prophylactic and therapeutic settings) St using a round tip stainless steel needle (22) (Table 1). In the prophylactic setting, 10 mg of plasma-derived polyreactive SCIgA/M, IgA/M, or IgG were orally administered 24 h and 8 h prior to bacteria infection. In the therapeutic setting, 10 mg of SCIgA/M were orally administered 1 h or 8 h post-infection. Bacterial loads in Peyer's patches, mesenteric lymph nodes, spleen, and liver were assessed 6 days post-infection by plating serial dilutions of tissue lysates (22). Weight of mice and disease score (23) based on fur ruffling, activity, posture, eye/nose discharge, and aspect of feces were recorded on a daily basis. A compilation of data from three (bacterial entry) or two (survival) independent experiments is displayed.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Oral infection of mice and passive administration of Abs.

Histological Analysis of Intestinal Tissues

At sacrifice, 1-cm sections of jejunum were collected, fixed in paraformaldehyde, and cut into 5 parts before embedding in paraffin. Seven micrometer sections were then prepared and stained with hematoxylin and eosin to assess tissue integrity. At least 10 tissue sections per animal were observed with an Axio Imager Z1 microscope (Zeiss). One representative tissue section is displayed for each condition.

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Prism software (GraphPad Software, Inc., La Jolla, CA). Bars represent median of each experimental group. The unpaired, non-parametric Mann–Whitney test, or the Kruskal–Wallis test, corrected with Dunn's test for multiple comparisons, was applied to compare experimental groups with the “no Ab” condition, or SCIgA/M vs. IgA/M. For survival experiments, the Kaplan-Meier curves were calculated and a log-rank test was used to compare the survival curves. ns, non-significant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.

Results

Plasma-Derived Polyreactive (SC)Ig/AM Is Stable in the Intestinal Environment

The prerequisite for efficient humoral protection in the gut is the ability of the Ab to interact with the mucus to limit its elimination, and to resist to degradation by local proteases. To assess bio-distribution, Cy5-labeled SCIgA/M, IgA/M, or IgG Ab preparations were injected into a ligated intestinal loop and incubated for 6 h prior to section preparation and staining for MUC-2, a constituent of the mouse intestinal mucus. Analysis by laser scanning confocal microscopy revealed numerous SCIgA/M-corresponding bright red fluorescent spots embedded within the MUC-2-positive areas overlying the epithelial cell layer (Figure 1A). Less numerous and much weaker signals were observed following administration of IgA/M or IgG in the ligated intestinal loop. This indicates a reduced capacity of these two Ab preparations to anchor in the mucus layer, consistent with the essential role of SC in tethering polymeric Igs within mucus (7), and with the higher susceptibility to protease-mediated degradation for non-secretory-like Igs in such an environment.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Location and stability of Ab preparations in the gastrointestinal tract. (A) Tissue sections prepared from mouse ligated intestinal loops 1.5 h post-administration with either Cy5-labeled IgA/M, SCIgA/M, or IgG appearing in red. Sections were further stained with anti-MUC-2 antiserum and DAPI to detect mucus and cell nuclei prior to analysis by laser scanning confocal microscopy. Examples of typical results of more than five samples are shown. L, Lumen. Magnification, x 40 for all panels. (B) In vitro digestion patterns observed at three time points of IgA/M, SCIgA/M, and IgG incubated with intestinal washes, as assayed by immunodetection of the respective heavy chain under reducing conditions. In (B,C), the position of the intact alpha, mu, and gamma chains is indicated by an asterisk. (C) IgA/M, SCIgA/M, or IgG incubated for 6 h in a ligated intestinal loop were recovered as described in Materials and Methods, and analyzed as under (B).

To address this possibility, the stability of the same set of Abs was examined by testing their sensitivity to mouse intestinal washes. After 2 h of incubation in intestinal washes, immunoblots performed in reducing conditions indicated the presence of intact alpha chain and some degradation products (Figure 1B and Table 2). After overnight incubation, more intact alpha chain signals were recovered for SCIgA/M preparations as compared to IgA/M, consistent with the protective role ensured by SC (21). The lesser sensitivity of mu chain to proteases in intestinal washes (24) imposed to prolong digestion for up to 48 h; the presence of SC in SCIgA/M reduced the conversion of the mu chain into degraded species (Figure 1B and Table 2). In contrast, when IgG was analyzed, the gamma chain was already largely degraded after as few as 2 h, and almost no signal could be detected after 16 h. Experiments performed in vivo in ligated intestinal loops showed that the degradation of alpha and mu chains from SCIgA/M and IgA/M was very partial, with slightly less degradation for SCIgA/M. The proportions of degraded materials were 43.9 ± 12.3% of alpha chain and 25.4 ± 16.9% for mu chain (SCIgA/M) as compared to 66.4 ± 20.0% for alpha chain and 53.6 ± 6.3% for mu chain (IgA/M). Analysis of IgG resulted in the appearance of a signal well below the expected molecular weight of native gamma chain (Figure 1C), representing 57.5 ± 11.7% of gamma chain. Due to the digestion time limited to 6 h for in vivo experiments (see Materials and Methods), the presence of SC in SCIgA/M led to a limited advantage in stability over IgA/M.

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Quantification of intact heavy chains in the in vitro degradation assay.

Together, these data demonstrate that after administration in the intestinal environment, the SCIgA/M preparation, as compared to IgA/M and IgG, combines the most optimal anchoring and stability properties, two parameters that have been associated with protective efficacy in the gut.

Protection Against Salmonella Infection Is Best Mediated by Prophylactic Oral Administration of SCIgA/M

To test the biological activity of SCIgA/M, as well as the importance of SC in the preparation, prophylactic oral administration of 10 mg of SCIgA/M, IgA/M and IgG (as control) was performed at 24 h and 8 h before intragastric inoculation with 2 × 107 CFUs of St. Mice were kept for 6 days post-infection, and the protective efficacy of the Abs was assessed at this time by measuring the local intestinal and distant systemic bacterial load. Prophylactic passive immunization with SCIgA/M turned out to be the most potent at reducing the bacterial load in Peyer's patches, mesenteric lymph nodes, the spleen, and the liver of infected mice (Figure 2A). Physiological symptoms of infection including weight loss and disease score were best reduced upon SCIgA/M administration (Figure 2B). IgA/M showed some efficacy, as reflected by a significantly weaker disease score in comparison with untreated-infected mice. A direct comparison between SCIgA/M and IgA/M demonstrated a clear trend toward a better protective effect of the former (p = 0.0040 for Peyer's patches, p = 0.0625 for mesenteric lymph nodes, p = 0.0625 for the spleen, p = 0.8633 for the liver, p = 0.0019 for weight loss and p = 0.1110 for disease scores). For all parameters assessed, prophylactic treatment with IgG yielded no sign of improvement of the animal's health status at day 6 post-infection (Figure 2B).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Prophylactic administration of SCIgA/M preparation limits St entry and reduces symptoms. (A) Bacterial counts measured in Peyer's patches (PPs), mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs), spleen, and liver 6 days post-infection by oral administration of 2 × 107 St into mice prophylactically treated with Ab preparations. (B) Weight loss and disease score (see section Materials and Methods) determined at day 6 post-infection as a function of the Ab preparation administered prophylactically. Each panel compiles the results of three independent experiments, conducted with 3 mice per group. (C) Histologic examination (hematoxylin and eosin staining) of intestinal tissue sections obtained from infected mice 6 days post-administration with a single dose of either 2 × 107 St alone, or in the presence of prophylactically applied Ab preparation. Typical patterns for “No Ab”/IgG (left) and IgA/M/SCIgA/M (right) representative of more than 10 sections. L, Lumen; V, Villus. Magnification, x 20 for all images. ns, non-significant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.

St infection and its associated inflammatory response are known to damage the intestinal epithelium, leading to additional alteration of the gut function. Consistent with its capacity to limit infection, prophylactic administration of SCIgA/M, and to a lesser extent IgA/M, contributed to largely maintain the architecture of the intestinal tissue 6 days post-infection. As depicted in Figure 2C, histological analysis of intestinal tissue showed preserved integrity of the epithelium, with only limited shortening of the villi. In comparison, untreated-infected or IgG treated-infected mice exhibited important tissue damages as reflected by the massive destruction of the intestinal villus structure (Figure 2C).

SCIgA/M Delays Disease Progression and Improves Survival of Infected Mice

The correlation between the residual bacterial load and the possible effect on the survival is important to validate protection. To address this issue, the experimental focus was put on animals having received prophylactically the best protective candidate Ab, i.e., SCIgA/M at a dose of 10 mg given orally 24 h and 8 h prior to infection with 2 × 106 St. In contrast to control animals rapidly losing weight and reaching a high disease score (Figures 3A,B), 5 out of 7 treated-infected mice showed a delay in symptom progression. When looking at the survival rate, all untreated mice died within 9 days post-infection (Figure 3C), while 3 out of 7 survived after having received SCIgA/M. Overall, prophylactic passive administration of the SCIgA/M preparation has the ability to protect mice from subsequent oral infection by lethal doses of St via multiple modes of action including reduction of the bacterial load in tissues, maintenance of the epithelium architecture, and delay of disease progression or complete healing.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Prophylactic administration of SCIgA/M preparation promotes mouse survival. Time-dependent follow-up of mice infected with 2 × 106 St post-prophylactic treatment (24 and 8 h) with oral delivery of the SCIgA/M preparation. Each depicted curve represents one individual mouse analyzed for weight loss (A) and disease scores (B). Sacrifice (depicted by a ) of mice having lost ≥20% of their initial weight was done to comply with the Veterinary Office's permit to conduct animal experiments. Each panel compiles the results of 2 independent experiments. (C) Survival curves resulting from the compilation of all mice in either the St alone group (red circles) or the prophylactically treated (SCIgA/M, St) group (green circles). **p < 0.01.

Therapeutic Oral Administration of SCIgA/M Protects Against Salmonella Infection

The promising results obtained in the prophylactic setting prompted us to assess the therapeutic protective efficacy of SCIgA/M. When 2 × 107 St were used to orally infect mice, administration of 10 mg SCIgA/M 1 h later was able to significantly reduce the bacterial load in mice recovered at day 6 post-infection in both intestinal (Peyer's patches and mesenteric lymph nodes) and systemic (spleen and liver) tissues (Figure 4A). Weight loss and disease score of treated mice were less pronounced as compared to untreated animals (Figure 4B). However, oral treatment performed 8 h post-infection did not result in reduction of the infection (data not shown), most likely due to the amount of bacteria that had rapidly moved across the epithelium prior to Ab treatment. We thus sought to assess the protective efficacy of therapeutically applied SCIgA/M with 10-fold less St, a dose that remains lethal between days 9 and 11 (see Figures 3C, 5A). Initial oral infection with 2 × 106 St followed by oral delivery of 10 mg SCIgA/M 1 h later largely reduced the number of St 6 days post-infection in either local or systemic compartments (Figure 4C). Under these experimental conditions, delaying the time of SCIgA/M administration to 8 h post-infection kept diminishing the bacterial load significantly (Figure 4C). This translated into improved status of the treated mice as compared to control animals, resulting in less weight loss and a lower disease score (Figure 4D).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Therapeutic administration of SCIgA/M limits St entry and reduces symptoms (A) Bacterial counts measured 6 days post-infection with 2 × 107 St in Peyer's patches (PPs), mesenteric lymph nodes (MLNs), spleen, and liver from mice orally administered SCIgA/M 1 h after oral infection. (B) Weight loss and disease scores (see Materials and Methods) determined at day 6 post-infection of mice treated therapeutically with SCIgA/M as in (A). (C,D) Same experiments as in (A,B) with infection performed with 2 × 106 St, followed by subsequent therapeutic oral administration of SCIgA/M 1 or 8 h after oral infection. Each panel compiles the results of 3 independent experiments, conducted with 3 mice per group. ns, non-significant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Therapeutic administration of SCIgA/M preparation promotes mouse survival Time-dependent follow-up of mice infected with 2 × 106 St prior to therapeutic treatment carried out 8 h post-infection with a single dose of the SCIgA/M preparation. Each depicted curve represents one individual mouse analyzed for weight loss (A) and disease scores (B). Sacrifice (depicted by a ) of mice having lost ≥20% of their initial weight was done to comply with the Veterinary Office's permit to conduct animal experiments. Each panel compiles the results of 2 independent experiments. (C) Survival curves resulting from the compilation of all mice in either the St alone group (red circles) or the therapeutically treated (St, SCIgA/M) group (green circles). **p < 0.01.

The protective efficacy of a single dose of SCIgA/M assessed at day 6 post-infection led us to hypothesize that therapeutic application of these polyreactive Abs may have a positive effect on the survival of mice post-infection. We therefore orally infected mice with 2 × 106 St, and applied 10 mg of SCIgA/M 8 h later; the weight, the disease score and the survival of animals were subsequently recorded for 20 days. In the untreated control group, mice rapidly lost weight (Figure 5A) and demonstrated signs of disease (Figure 5B), leading to the death of all mice at day 11 post-infection (Figure 5C). In contrast, 4 out of 8 animals therapeutically treated with one oral administration of 10 mg SCIgAM remained healthy for up to 20 days after infection. Protected mice did not lose weight nor exhibit signs of disease more pronounced than fur ruffling (Figure 5C). The other half died from the infection, but displayed a delay in both weight loss and the disease score's evolution, as compared to control mice, hence leading to prolonged survival.

Altogether, our data demonstrate that a single oral therapeutic administration of polyreactive SCIgA/M at a time when St infection is already ongoing entails the reduction of the intestinal and systemic bacterial load and of the symptoms associated with infection. Such a reduced invasiveness results in too little colonization to cause fatal infection in 50% of infected mice, comparing with 100% mortality in the absence of therapeutic SCIgA/M.

Discussion

For thousands of generations, mammals have exploited the benefits of transferring colostrum- and breast milk-derived Abs to newborns to ensure protection early in life via the large repertoire associated with the mother's previous exposure to environmental pathogens (2528). This evolution-related way of providing protective Abs finds its current application in systemic passive immunotherapy with polyclonal blood-based, or monoclonal Abs, mostly IgGs (2931). While efficacy has been demonstrated in several human clinical trials at the systemic level (3236), examples of successful protection of mucosal surfaces by local application of purified IgA (37, 38) or SIgA (39, 40) are not plethora in the literature. Besides, such studies were performed with monoclonal Abs only, while examples with SIgM are missing. The rationale of our strategy, which relies on the use of plasma-derived polyreactive SCIgA and SCIgM delivered by the oral route, is based on the close clonal relationship between mucosal and systemic plasma cells (41). In addition, circulating IgA+ plasma cells originate from mucosal immune inductive sites and disseminate systemically (42), resulting in the production of polymeric IgA in the blood. In support of this, we have observed that such antibody molecules recovered from plasma samples bind to SC (12). This ensures efficient recognition and control of enteropathogens both at their site of entry and following systemic dissemination. These two important features expected for mucosal passive immunization are observed following prophylactic or therapeutic intervention with SCIgA/M.

Exogenous mucosal delivery along the gastrointestinal tract implies that the optimal molecular form of the Ab is administered, i.e., SIgs. In support of their use for local passive immunization, natural SIgA molecules display high in vitro stability upon exposure to intestinal washes rich in proteases (21). Consistent with this, the current study shows that the lack of SC reduces the stability of either plasma-derived IgA or IgM in vivo and precludes proper anchoring within mucus. Such biochemical features are crucial to ensure optimal functionality of the SCIgA/M preparation toward enteropathogens, as this is demonstrated inhere in prophylactic and therapeutic tratments against Salmonella. In this context, control of the infection is known to occur via immune exclusion which is based on agglutination, enchained growth or both depending on the local concentration of bacteria in the infected intestine (17, 43). Interestingly, even though endogenous vaccine-induced high-avidity IgA Abs seem highly potent at controlling Salmonella infection (43), exogenous delivery of polyreactive SIgs displays a promising level of protection. When assessed individually, we found that purified SCIgA or SCIgM significantly decreased the weight loss and disease score in infected animals, with SCIgM showing the best performance (GB, unpublished data). This suggests that polyreactive SIgM contributes to mucosal protection, and provides a molecular explanation as to why the Ab can compensate for SIgA in IgA-deficient individuals (44).

In contrast to maternal IgG possibly protected in the colostrum/milk environment, passive delivery along the oral route of this isotype in a purified form did not show any positive impact on bacterial entry and dissemination. Based on our results, the absence of protection after oral passive administration of IgG can be attributed to the inadequate immunoglobulin isotype and/or the instability of the Ab in the gut, further arguing in favor of the use of polymeric and optimally secretory Igs. A logical development of the study that already shows efficacy after a single-dose in the therapeutic setting will involve multiple experimental refinements requiring that different doses of both the Ab and Salmonella be tested with various kinetics of administration; we find it fair to say that such a demanding development is beyond the scope of this proof-of-concept study.

Due to their intrinsic polyreactivity toward a broad range of antigens, human plasma-derived polymeric Igs are somehow “ready-to-be-used,” in contrast to humanized or chimeric specific monoclonal Abs, which may need to be combined to cover a sufficient diversity of recognition patterns. Another drawback, selection pressure on a particular bacterial antigen by repeated administration of a monoclonal Ab may favor mutation on one hand, and give growth advantage to other co-infecting microbes on another hand. While the technology to ensure production of monoclonal IgG of defined specificity is well-established, generation of polymeric IgA/IgM-secreting clones is not an obvious task and may turn out to be pricy. In contrast, the identification of modern biotechnology-based processes allows the recovery of hundreds of gram amounts of biologically active SIg molecules. For all these reasons, plasma-derived IgA/M molecules thus appear a relevant alternative for future human applications. Further, features including natural pattern of glycosylation will not induce possible inhibitory human anti-mouse Ab responses, in particular along the gastrointestinal tract known to be a tolerance-prone environment. The absence of overreaction toward non-self proteins such as biotechnology-derived pharmaceuticals will thus not represent a problem with orally administered SCIgA/M. Moreover, the lack of activation of the complement cascade by SIgA (45, 46), restriction of both SIgA and SIgM in the intestinal lumen, and local complement regulatory proteins (47) should ensure absent or strongly reduced inflammation in the gut. In addition, naturally existing plasma-derived polyreactive Abs have a very low risk of technological failure during the development process, and problems associated with species matching for human application can be excluded. Another obvious advantage lies in the intrinsic capability of mucosally applied Ab preparations to neutralize the pathogen at a very early stage of infection, or even prior to the initiation of the infection. Data presented in this study bring valuable elements as to the Ab isotypes, which need to be delivered to remain active when facing a massive infection along the gastrointestinal tract. Finally, although addition or recombinant SC necessary for optimal function will have to be considered, its production via CHO cells does not represent a bottleneck anymore.

The natural protection offered by passive immunization has already provided the physicians with the opportunity to envisage treatments against mucosal infectious agents with Ab-enriched milk, serum, or egg yolk preparations (48). The emergence of bacterial strains resistant to multiple antibiotics and the major progresses made in Ab engineering give strong arguments to thrive implementation of passive immunization. The present study supports the notion that plasma-derived polyreactive SCIgA and SCIgM may contribute to fulfill this health need.

Author Contributions

BC, CV, AS, and GB designed the experiments. JM and GB performed research and analyzed data. ML provided reagents. BC, CV, and GB wrote the manuscript. All authors have read, critically revised, and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Swiss Science Research Foundation (3100–156806 to BC). GB was supported through a research agreement with CSL Behring AG, Bern, Switzerland.

Conflict of Interest Statement

ML, CV, and AS are employees of CSL Behring AG.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

IgA/M, plasma-derived polyreactive IgA and IgM; SIgs, secretory immunoglobulins; SC, secretory component; SCIgA/M, secretory-like IgA/M; St, Salmonella enterica Typhimurium strain SL1344.

References

1. Chairatana P, Nolan EM. Defensins, lectins, mucins, and secretory immunoglobulin A: microbe-binding biomolecules that contribute to mucosal immunity in the human gut. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol. (2017) 52:45–56. doi: 10.1080/10409238.2016.1243654

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Mantis NJ, Rol N, Corthesy B. Secretory IgA's complex roles in immunity and mucosal homeostasis in the gut. Mucosal Immunol. (2011) 4:603–11. doi: 10.1038/mi.2011.41

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Corthesy B. Role of secretory IgA in infection and maintenance of homeostasis. Autoimmun Rev. (2013) 12:661–5. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2012.10.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Strugnell RA, Wijburg OL. The role of secretory antibodies in infection immunity. Nat Rev Microbiol. (2010) 8:656–67. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2384

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Mathias A, Longet S, Corthesy B. Agglutinating secretory IgA preserves intestinal epithelial cell integrity during apical infection by Shigella flexneri. Infect Immun. (2013) 81:3027–34. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00303-13

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Levinson KJ, De Jesus M, Mantis NJ. Rapid effects of a protective O-polysaccharide-specific monoclonal IgA on Vibrio cholerae agglutination, motility, and surface morphology. Infect Immun. (2015) 83:1674–83. doi: 10.1128/IAI.02856-14

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Phalipon A, Cardona A, Kraehenbuhl JP, Edelman L, Sansonetti PJ, Corthesy B. Secretory component: a new role in secretory IgA-mediated immune exclusion in vivo. Immunity (2002) 17:107–15. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(02)00341-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Brandtzaeg P. Mucosal immunity: induction, dissemination, and effector functions. Scand J Immunol. (2009) 70:505–15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.2009.02319.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Zhou ZH, Zhang Y, Hu YF, Wahl LM, Cisar JO, Notkins AL. The broad antibacterial activity of the natural antibody repertoire is due to polyreactive antibodies. Cell Host Microbe (2007) 1:51–61. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2007.01.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Virdi V, Juarez P, Boudolf V, Depicker A. Recombinant IgA production for mucosal passive immunization, advancing beyond the hurdles. Cell Mol Life Sci. (2016) 73:535–45. doi: 10.1007/s00018-015-2074-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Perez EE, Orange JS, Bonilla F, Chinen J, Chinn IK, Dorsey M, et al. Update on the use of immunoglobulin in human disease: a review of evidence. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2017) 139:S1–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.09.023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Longet S, Miled S, Lotscher M, Miescher SM, Zuercher AW, Corthesy B. Human plasma-derived polymeric IgA and IgM antibodies associate with secretory component to yield biologically active secretory-like antibodies. J Biol Chem. (2013) 288:4085–94. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.410811

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Gunti S, Notkins AL. Polyreactive antibodies: function and quantification. J Infect Dis. (2015) 212 (Suppl. 1):S42–6. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiu512

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Wijburg OLC, Uren TK, Simpfendorfer K, Johansen F-E, Brandtzaeg P, Strugnell RA. Innate secretory antibodies protect against natural Salmonella typhimurium infection. J Exp Med. (2006) 203:21–6. doi: 10.1084/jem.20052093

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Fransen F, Zagato E, Mazzini E, Fosso B, Manzari C, El Aidy S, et al. BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice differ in polyreactive IgA abundance, which impacts the generation of antigen-specific IgA and microbiota diversity. Immunity (2015) 43:527–40. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.08.011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Krause I, Wu R, Sherer Y, Patanik M, Peter JB, Shoenfeld Y. In vitro antiviral and antibacterial activity of commercial intravenous immunoglobulin preparations–a potential role for adjuvant intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in infectious diseases. Transfus Med. (2002) 12:133–9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3148.2002.00360.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Bioley G, Monnerat J, Lotscher M, Vonarburg C, Zuercher A, Corthesy B. Plasma-derived polyreactive secretory-like IgA and IgM opsonizing Salmonella enterica Typhimurium reduces invasion and gut tissue inflammation through agglutination. Front Immunol. (2017) 8:1043. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01043

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Hoiseth SK, Stocker BA. Aromatic-dependent Salmonella typhimurium are non-virulent and effective as live vaccines. Nature (1981) 291:238–9. doi: 10.1038/291238a0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Rey J, Garin N, Spertini F, Corthesy B. Targeting of secretory IgA to Peyer's patch dendritic and T cells after transport by intestinal M cells. J Immunol. (2004) 172:3026–33. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.5.3026

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Kadaoui KA, Corthesy B. Secretory IgA mediates bacterial translocation to dendritic cells in mouse Peyer's patches with restriction to mucosal compartment. J Immunol. (2007) 179:7751–7. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.179.11.7751

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Crottet P, Corthesy B. Secretory component delays the conversion of secretory IgA into antigen-binding competent F(ab')2: a possible implication for mucosal defense. J Immunol. (1998) 161:5445–53.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

22. Pigny F, Lassus A, Terrettaz J, Tranquart F, Corthesy B, Bioley G. Intranasal vaccination with salmonella-derived serodominant secreted effector protein B associated with gas-filled microbubbles partially protects against gut infection in mice. J Infect Dis. (2016) 214:438–46. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiw162

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Acred P, Hennessey TD, MacArthur-Clarck JA, Merrikin DJ, Ryan DM, Smulders HC, et al. Guidelines for the welfare of animals in rodent protection tests: a report from the rodent protection test working party. Lab Animals (1994) 28:13–8. doi: 10.1258/002367794781065870

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Longet S, Vonarburg C, Lotscher M, Miescher S, Zuercher A, Corthesy B. Reconstituted human polyclonal plasma-derived secretory-like IgM and IgA maintain the barrier function of epithelial cells infected with an enteropathogen. J Biol Chem. (2014) 289:21617–26. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.549139

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Eibl MM, Wolf HM, Furnkranz H, Rosenkranz A. Prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis in low-birth-weight infants by IgA-IgG feeding. N Engl J Med. (1988) 319:1–7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198807073190101

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Lohman-Payne B, Slyker J, Rowland-Jones SL. Immune-based approaches to the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV-1: active and passive immunization. Clin Perinatol. (2010) 37:787–805. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2010.08.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Hassiotou F, Geddes DT. Immune cell-mediated protection of the mammary gland and the infant during breastfeeding. Adv Nutr. (2015) 6:267–75. doi: 10.3945/an.114.007377

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Abu-Raya B, Smolen KK, Willems F, Kollmann TR, Marchant A. Transfer of maternal antimicrobial immunity to HIV-exposed uninfected newborns. Front Immunol. (2016) 7:338. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00338

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Chow SK, Casadevall A. Monoclonal antibodies and toxins–a perspective on function and isotype. Toxins (2012) 4:430–54. doi: 10.3390/toxins4060430

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Casadevall A, Pirofski LA. The Ebola epidemic crystallizes the potential of passive antibody therapy for infectious diseases. PLoS Pathog. (2015) 11:e1004717. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004717

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Zeitlin L, Geisbert JB, Deer DJ, Fenton KA, Bohorov O, Bohorova N, et al. Monoclonal antibody therapy for Junin virus infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2016) 113:4458–63. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1600996113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Tjellstrom B, Stenhammar L, Eriksson S, Magnusson KE. Oral immunoglobulin A supplement in treatment of clostridium difficile enteritis. Lancet (1993) 341:701–2. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)90477-X

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Cone LA, Lopez C, Tarleton HL, Jodoin VD, Taylor M, Gade-Andavolu R, et al. A durable response to relapsing Clostridium difficile colitis may require combined therapy with high-dose oral vancomycin and intravenous immune globulin. Infect Dis Clin Pract. (2006) 14:217–20. doi: 10.1097/01.idc.0000222619.48650.d2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Di Rosa R, Pietrosanti M, Luzi G, Salemi S, D'Amelio R. Polyclonal intravenous immunoglobulin: an important additional strategy in sepsis? Eur J Intern Med. (2014) 25:511–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2014.05.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Shapiro RS, Borte M. 7th International Immunoglobulin Conference: immunoglobulin in clinical practice. Clin Exp Immunol. (2014) 178 (Suppl. 1):65–6. doi: 10.1111/cei.12515

CrossRef Full Text

36. Heming N, Lamothe L, Ambrosi X, Annane D. Emerging drugs for the treatment of sepsis. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs (2016) 21:27–37. doi: 10.1517/14728214.2016.1132700

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Phalipon A, Kaufmann M, Michetti P, Cavaillon JM, Huerre M, Sansonetti P, et al. Monoclonal immunoglobulin A antibody directed against serotype-specific epitope of Shigella flexneri lipopolysaccharide protects against murine experimental shigellosis. J Exp Med. (1995) 182:769–78. doi: 10.1084/jem.182.3.769

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Weltzin R, Monath TP. Intranasal antibody prophylaxis for protection against viral disease. Clin Microbiol Rev. (1999) 12:383–93. doi: 10.1128/CMR.12.3.383

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Ma JK, Hikmat BY, Wycoff K, Vine ND, Chargelegue D, Yu L, et al. Characterization of a recombinant plant monoclonal secretory antibody and preventive immunotherapy in humans. Nat Med. (1998) 4:601–6. doi: 10.1038/nm0598-601

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Hutchings AB, Helander A, Silvey KJ, Chandran K, Lucas WT, Nibert ML, et al. Secretory immunoglobulin A antibodies against the sigma1 outer capsid protein of reovirus type 1 Lang prevent infection of mouse Peyer's patches. J Virol. (2004) 78:947–57. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.2.947-957.2004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Iversen R, Snir O, Stensland M, Kroll JE, Steinsbo O, Korponay-Szabo IR, et al. Strong clonal relatedness between serum and gut IgA despite different plasma cell origins. Cell Rep. (2017) 20:2357–67. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.08.036

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Mei HE, Yoshida T, Sime W, Hiepe F, Thiele K, Manz RA, et al. Blood-borne human plasma cells in steady state are derived from mucosal immune responses. Blood (2009) 113:2461–9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-04-153544

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Moor K, Diard M, Sellin ME, Felmy B, Wotzka SY, Toska A, et al. High-avidity IgA protects the intestine by enchaining growing bacteria. Nature (2017) 544:498–502. doi: 10.1038/nature22058

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Brandtzaeg P, Karlsson G, Hansson G, Petruson B, Bjorkander J, Hanson LA. The clinical condition of IgA-deficient patients is related to the proportion of IgD- and IgM-producing cells in their nasal mucosa. Clin Exp Immunol. (1987) 67:626–36.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

45. Russell MW, Reinholdt J, Kilian M. Anti-inflammatory activity of human IgA antibodies and their Fab alpha fragments: inhibition of IgG-mediated complement activation. Eur J Immunol. (1989) 19:2243–9. doi: 10.1002/eji.1830191210

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Nikolova EB, Tomana M, Russell MW. All forms of human IgA antibodies bound to antigen interfere with complement (C3) fixation induced by IgG or by antigen alone. Scand J Immunol. (1994) 39:275–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3083.1994.tb03371.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Berstad AE, Brandtzaeg P. Expression of cell membrane complement regulatory glycoproteins along the normal and diseased human gastrointestinal tract. Gut (1998) 42:522–9. doi: 10.1136/gut.42.4.522

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Corthesy B. Recombinant secretory immunoglobulin A in passive immunotherapy: linking immunology and biotechnology. Curr Pharm Biotechnol. (2003) 4:51–67. doi: 10.2174/1389201033378020

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: passive immunization, secretory IgA, secretory IgM, Salmonella, protection

Citation: Corthésy B, Monnerat J, Lötscher M, Vonarburg C, Schaub A and Bioley G (2018) Oral Passive Immunization With Plasma-Derived Polyreactive Secretory-Like IgA/M Partially Protects Mice Against Experimental Salmonellosis. Front. Immunol. 9:2970. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02970

Received: 21 August 2018; Accepted: 03 December 2018;
Published: 18 December 2018.

Edited by:

Fabio Bagnoli, GlaxoSmithKline, Italy

Reviewed by:

Jason Kindrachuk, University of Manitoba, Canada
Michael Kogut, Agricultural Research Service, United States Department of Agriculture, United States

Copyright © 2018 Corthésy, Monnerat, Lötscher, Vonarburg, Schaub and Bioley. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Gilles Bioley, gbioley@gmail.com