Original Research ARTICLE
Allogeneic HSCT for Autoimmune Diseases: A Retrospective Study From the EBMT ADWP, IEWP, and PDWP Working Parties
- 1Unit of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
- 2EBMT Paris Study Office/CEREST-TC - Department of Haematology, Saint Antoine Hospital - INSERM UMR 938 - Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France
- 3Department of Bone Marrow Transplantation, Great Ormond Street Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- 4Great North Childrens' Hospital, Institute of Cellular Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
- 5Divisione Ematologia e Trapianto di Midollo, IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST, Genova, Italy
- 6Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Dresden, Germany
- 7Department of Haematology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
- 8IEWP-EBMT Chair: Department of Pediatrics, University Medical Centre, Leiden, Netherlands
- 9Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- 10PDWP-EBMT Chair; Division for SCT and Immunology, Department for Children and Adolescents, Frankfurt, Germany
- 11Unité de Médecine Interne: Maladies Auto-immunes et Pathologie Vasculaire (UF 04), Hôpital St-Louis, AP-HP, Paris, France
- 12Centre de Référence des Maladies Auto-Immunes Systémiques Rares d'Ile-de-France, Filière FAI2R, Paris, France
- 13EA 3518, Université Denis Diderot, Paris, France
- 14Department of Internal Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
- 15ADWP-EBMT Chair; Department of Haematology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, United Kingdom
Background: This retrospective study assessed the use and long-term outcome of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) in patients with severe autoimmune diseases (ADs), reported to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry.
Methods: Between 1997 and 2014, 128 patients received allogeneic HSCT for various hematological (n = 49) and non-hematological (n = 79) refractory ADs. The median age was 12.7 years (0.2–62.2). Donors were syngeneic for seven, matched related for 46, unrelated for 51, haploidentical for 15, and cord blood for nine patients.
Results: The incidence of grades II-IV acute graft-vs.-host disease (GvHD) was 20.8% at 100 days. Cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD was 27.8% at 5-years. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 12.7% at 100-days. Overall survival (OS) and Progression-Free Survival (PFS) were 70.2 and 59.4% at 5-years, respectively. By multivariate analysis, age <18 years, males, and more recent year of transplant were found to be significantly associated with improved PFS. Reduced conditioning intensity was associated with a lower NRM. On a subgroup of 64 patients with detailed information a complete clinical response was obtained in 67% of patients at 1-year.
Conclusions: This large EBMT survey suggests the potential of allogeneic HSCT to induce long-term disease control in a large proportion of refractory ADs, with acceptable toxicities and NRM, especially in younger patients.
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a potentially curative standard treatment for a variety of malignant and non-malignant disorders (1). During the last decade major changes have occurred in the field of HSCT (1–5). Limitations for the transplant procedures have been modified because of the introduction of less aggressive conditioning regimens, improved patient selection, better supportive care, and recent advances in graft-vs.-host disease (GvHD) prophylaxis, thus representing an intriguing approach for patients affected by non-malignant disorders and autoimmune diseases (ADs) (6–16).
Several studies have investigated the potential application of autologous and allogeneic HSCT to control otherwise resistant disease activity in severe ADs (9, 17, 18). In particular, the rationale for autologous HSCT in ADs has been to ablate and reset the autoreactive immune system (9, 18–20). However, some patients may develop disease flares resulting either from incomplete eradication of autoreactive memory cells or re-induction of autoimmunity driven by genetic predisposition (9, 20).
For patients with refractory ADs, allogeneic HSCT offers a more potent eradication of autoreactive cells, achieved through the conditioning regimen, combined with the replacement by a new donor immune system, with the potential to develop tolerance to both allo- and auto-antigens (21–23). Nevertheless, allogeneic HSCT has been a rare treatment option for ADs compared with autologous HSCT (18, 24–31). The area where allogeneic HSCT has mostly been used has been immune cytopenia (27). Some patients clearly benefited from this treatment (31), despite considerable toxicity and non-relapse mortality (NRM) reported in the past (9, 18). The rationale for the use of allogeneic HSCT has gained additional traction more recently, as monogenic defects associated with autoimmunity and immunodeficiency have been identified (32–37).
The European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Autoimmune Diseases (ADWP), Inborn Errors (IEWP) and Pediatric (PDWP) Working Parties conducted a retrospective survey to analyze long-term disease outcome and toxicity of allogeneic HSCT in refractory ADs patients.
This study is a retrospective multicenter study analyzing EBMT registry data. Additional information was collected using a specific questionnaire. The study was approved by the ADWP and participating EBMT centers reported data from patients affected by ADs (hematological and non-hematological ADs), including those with autoinflammatory and genetic components, who had been treated with allogeneic HSCT from the first registration in 1997 to the end of 2014. Patients with a previous allogeneic HSCT for a conventional hematological indication have been included. Patients transplanted for a malignant hematological disease with a concomitant AD were excluded from the analysis. All EBMT teams are required to obtain signed informed consent for transfer of anonymized data via standardized minimal essential data forms in accordance with data protection regulations.
The following variables were analyzed from the EBMT database: patient gender, patient age at transplantation, disease classification at time of diagnosis according to primary disease established criteria, conditioning regimen, graft characteristics, incidence of acute, and chronic GvHD.
In addition, long-term side effects (secondary autoimmune disease or malignancy, viral reactivations), previous and post-transplant treatments, and disease status at last follow-up were analyzed in the subgroup of 64 patients with completed questionnaires. Disease characteristics (severity, refractoriness to standard treatments, revision and reclassification of all diagnoses in view of the spectrum of pediatric ADs, including those with autoinflammatory and overlap with other genetic diseases and inborn errors) were assessed by local physician.
All outcomes were measured from the time of stem cell infusion.
Engraftment was defined as a persistent blood cells count above a predefined level (neutrophils >0.5 × 109/l per three consecutive days and platelets >20 × 109/l, unsupported by transfusions, for 3 days), starting from the day of transplantation. Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as survival without evidence of disease reactivation.
The response to transplant for immune cytopenia was defined according to the following criteria: complete remission (CR) for the normalization of blood counts with hemoglobin >12 g/dL, neutrophils >1.5 × 109/L and platelets >150 × 109/L; partial remission (PR) for hemoglobin >8 and ≤12 g /dl, neutrophils >0.5 × 109/L, and ≤1.5 × 109/L and platelets >50 × 109/L and ≤150 × 109/L; active disease for level ≤8 g /dl, neutrophils ≤0.5 × 109/L and platelets ≤50 × 109/L) (30). For AD other than cytopenias response was assessed by local physician based on the following classification: complete remission in the absence of all clinical and laboratory autoimmune disease activity); partial remission for low disease activity with persistence of minor disease specific symptoms; active disease in case of no response or response not fulfilling CR/PR criteria. Failure to respond was assessed according to the above criteria by the local physician in charge of the AD based on an inability to achieve a PR or CR at any time point. Major relapse was assessed according to the above criteria by the local physician in charge of the AD based on progression from a CR or PR to active disease. Minor relapse was assessed according to the above criteria by the local physician in charge of the AD based on progression from a CR to a PR. These criteria applied irrespective of the AD (i.e., include immune cytopenias).
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from allogeneic HSCT to death, regardless of the cause. NRM was defined as death without evidence of relapse or progression.
The probabilities of OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cumulative incidence was used to estimate the following endpoints: NRM, relapse incidence (RI), acute and chronic GvHD, to accommodate for competing risks. To study acute and chronic GvHD, we considered relapse and death to be competing events.
Multivariate analysis included all variable associated with one endpoint in univariate analysis: AD diagnosis (hematological vs. non-hematological diseases), sex, age at HSCT (cut-off 18 years), donor type (matched related donor vs. others), year of HSCT (before or after 2009), conditioning regimen (myeloablative vs. reduced-intensity conditioning) and GvHD prophylaxis (ex-vivo or in-vivo T-cell depletion). Results were expressed as the hazard ratio (HR) with the 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 24.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and R 3.4.0 (38).
Overall Population and Main Transplant Outcomes
Patients and HSCT Characteristics
Between 1997–2014 inclusive, 128 patients received allogeneic HSCT for various hematological (n = 49) and non-hematological (n = 79) refractory AD. Disease and transplant characteristics are summarized in Tables 1, 2. Patients were treated at 63 centers in 21 countries (Table 3).
The median age of patients at HSCT was 12.7 years (range 0.2–62.2). Eighteen patients received a previous transplant, mainly autologous HSCT (n = 15). Median time from diagnosis to transplant was 3.8 years (range 0.01–27.2). Median follow-up was 49 months (range 21–87).
Donors were matched related donors (MRD) for 46 patients, unrelated donors (UD) for 51, mismatched related donor (MMRD) for 15, unrelated cord blood for nine, and syngeneic for seven patients.
The graft source was peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) in 67, bone marrow (BM) in 52, and cord blood in nine patients.
Conditioning was classified (39) as myeloablative (MAC) in 74 and reduced-intensity (RIC) in 48 patients. Total body irradiation (TBI) was included in the conditioning regimen for 15 patients. Busulfan-based regimen was used in 35 patients, while 24 patients received a treosulfan-based regimen.
Ex-vivo T-cell depletion (TCD) was performed in 14 cases. Serotherapy with anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) was given in 41 patients and with alemtuzumab in 46 patients. Post-transplant GvHD prophylaxis was given in 115 patients, mainly based on cyclosporine, associated either with methotrexate (27%) or mycophenolate mofetil (41%).
Engraftment and Graft Rejection
All except seven patients experienced sustained donor cell engraftment.
Engraftment (see Methods) was obtained in all patients within a median of 14.5 days from HSCT, both for neutrophils and platelets. Graft failure was reported in seven patients, thus resulting in an overall primary graft failure rate of 5.5%.
In all, 53 out of 128 patients developed acute GvHD, and the incidence of grades II-IV acute GvHD was 20.8% (95% CI: 14.1–28.5) at 100-days. Nine patients reported grades III-IV acute GvHD. Cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD was 27.8% (95% CI: 19.3–36.9) at 5-years.
Survival and Risk Factors for Outcome
Relapse incidence (Figure 1) was 18.1 % (95% CI: 11.4–26.1) at 3-years and 20% (95% CI: 12.6–28.7) at 5-years. PFS was 59.4% at 5-years (95% CI: 49.9–69). NRM (Figure 2) was 12.7% (95% CI: 7.6–19.2) at 100-days, and 20.5% at 5-years (95% CI: 13.8–28.2). The OS was 70.2% (95% CI: 61.5–78.9) at 5-years.
Figure 1. Relapse incidence (RI) and progression-free survival (PFS). RI and PFS in overall population (n = 128) are shown in (A,B) respectively.
Figure 2. OS and cumulative incidence of NRM. OS and cumulative incidence of NRM in overall population (n = 128) are shown in (A,B), respectively.
Significant associations were observed by univariate analysis. Higher NRM (28.7 vs. 12.3%; p = 0.02) and lower PFS (49 vs. 73.3%; p = 0.02) were registered in females. Adult patients presented higher RI (31.2% vs. 10.3%; p = 0.002), lower PFS (46.8 vs. 69.8%; p = 0.009) and higher rates of acute GvHD (42.2 vs. 21.3%; p = 0.005) as compared with children. A more recent year of transplant was associated with higher PFS (71.6 vs. 50.4%; p = 0.008) and lower rates of acute GvHD (16.3 vs. 38.8%; p = 0.007). Non-hematological disorders showed a trend toward a better OS (77.9 vs. 62.9%; p = 0.05). Lower rates of chronic GvHD were reported in HSCT from MRD (11.7 vs. 26%; p = 0.04). No significant association was reported for ATG or alemtuzumab.
A multivariate analysis (Table 4) of prognostic factors was performed. Age more than 18 years was associated with a higher RI (HR: 3.72; 95% CI: 1.38–10; p = 0.009), a higher incidence of chronic GvHD (HR: 3.75; 95% CI: 1.67–8.39; p = 0.001) and a lower PFS (HR: 2.07; p = 0.02). A more recent year of transplant was associated with a lower NRM (HR: 0.86; p = 0.003 and chronic GvHD (HR: 0.88; p = 0.009); a better PFS (HR: 0.9; p = 0.01) and OS (HR: 0.89; p = 0.003). Females were associated with a higher NRM (HR: 3.94; p = 0.008) and lower PFS (HR: 2.5; p = 0.009) and OS (HR: 2.61; p = 0.02). RIC regimen was associated with a lower NRM (HR: 0.31; p = 0.02). MRD was associated with a lower incidence of acute GvHD (HR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.08–0.75; p = 0.01). There was no significant association with diagnosis and centers.
Subgroup of 64 Patients With Additional Information
Among the total 128 patients who received allogeneic HSCT between 1997 and 2014, we received detailed questionnaires on long-term outcomes from 64 patients. These patients were treated at 24 centers in 13 countries (United Kingdom, Italy, Germany, Spain, Russia, Belgium, France, Switzerland, Turkey, Hungary, Lebanon, Canada and Czech Republic).
Disease characteristics for this cohort of patients are shown in Table 5; in view of the spectrum of pediatric ADs, including those with autoinflammatory and overlap with other genetic diseases and inborn errors, all diagnoses were reviewed and classified accordingly.
The diagnosis of AD was hematological (n = 21) and non-hematological (n = 43), among pediatric (n = 45) and adult (n = 19) populations. The median age of patients at HSCT was 11.14 years (range 1.22–51.57).
All patients were refractory to previous immunosuppressive therapies (median of four lines of treatments, range 1–13), including cyclophosphamide (n = 16), biological therapies (n = 41, including rituximab in 20 patients and infliximab in 14), cytotoxic drugs (n = 30), oral immunosuppression (n = 37), intravenous immunosuppression (n = 22), and others (n = 29). Median time from diagnosis to transplant was 5 months (range 0.3–27).
Eight patients (12%) had received a previous autologous transplant. Two patients received an allogeneic HSCT for a conventional hematological indication in the past (Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma and Severe Aplastic Anemia).
The graft source was PBSCs in 38, BM in 24, and cord blood in two patients. Donor sources were as follows; 41% MRD (n = 26), 42% UD (n = 27), 9% MMRD (n = 6), 5% syngeneic (n = 3), and 3% cord blood (n = 2). Median CD34+ and CD3+ cell doses infused were 6.52 × 106/Kg and 192.1 × 106/Kg, respectively.
Conditioning was MAC in 35 and RIC in 29 patients. A fludarabine-based regimen was used in 50 (80%) patients, in association with treosulfan for 17 patients, melphalan for 14 patients, and cyclophosphamide for 11 patients. Nine patients received TBI. Ex-vivo TCD was performed in seven cases. Serotherapy with ATG was given in 16 patients, while 30 patients received alemtuzumab. Post-transplant GvHD prophylaxis was cyclosporine-based for the majority of patients (n = 54), with the addition of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in 33 cases; four patients received tacrolimus, and two patients were treated with sirolimus.
The incidence of grades II-IV acute GvHD was 16.4% (95% CI: 8.4–26.8) at 100-days; severe acute GvHD was reported only in four patients. Cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD was 32.5% (95% CI: 20.8–44.8) at 5-years; extensive manifestations of chronic GvHD were reported in 11 patients. In univariate analysis the incidence of chronic GvHD was significantly lower in patients receiving in-vivo TCD (24.3 vs. 52.9%; p = 0.02).
Secondary autoimmune diseases
Seven patients (11.3%) developed secondary autoimmune diseases, distinct from their primary disease, at a median time of 15 months (7.9–43.8), including autoimmune thrombocytopenia (n = 1), autoimmune thyroid diseases (n = 3), psoriasis (n = 1), autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA n = 1), Guillain-Barré syndrome (n = 1), and other secondary AD not otherwise specified (n = 1).
One case of new malignancy (lymphoma) was reported at 62 months post-transplant.
Viral reactivations were reported in a total of 33 patients, including Cytomegalovirus (CMV; n = 14), Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV; n = 10), Adenovirus (n = 5), polyoma BK virus (n = 3; hemorrhagic cystitis in two cases), Herpes Simplex Virus (HSV, n = 2), Human Herpesvirus 6 (HHV6; n = 3), and Varicella-Zoster Virus (VZV; n = 2). Seven cases of invasive fungal infection were reported (on which one aspergillosis and three candidiasis). Ten bacterial infections (only four patients developed infection from Gram-negative bacteria) were observed and five patients developed pneumonia. Renal failure was reported in four cases. Other adverse events were reported in the long-term follow-up of these patients: severe post-transplant lymphopenia (n = 1), severe osteopenia (n = 2; possibly due to prolonged previous treatment with steroids), renal plus liver impairment (n = 1), cerebral hemorrhage (n = 1), chronic lung disease (n = 1), multi-organ failure (MOF; n = 2).
Long-Term Response to Treatment
At the time of transplantation, all patients had active disease refractory to standard therapy. Median follow-up was 67 months (IQR 36.5–104 months). At 100 days post-HSCT, response was achieved in 79% of patients (complete remission in 39 patients, partial remission in 10 patients). At the last follow-up complete clinical response of refractory AD was obtained in 67.2% of patients (n = 43), while partial remission was reported in 6.3% (n = 4).
Incidence of relapse/progression was 20.3% (95% CI: 10.6–32.2) at 5 years, with no differences between immune cytopenia (16.2%) and other ADs (20.6%). Post-HSCT autoimmune disease specific treatment was required for 12 patients, mainly based on steroids (n = 7), in combination with rituximab (n = 2), intravenous immunoglobulins (n = 1), bortezomib (n = 1), MMF (n = 2), cyclophosphamide (n = 1). Adalimumab (n = 1), plasmapheresis (n = 1) or second allogeneic HSCT (n = 1) were also reported.
At last follow-up 39 patients are progression and immunosuppression-free survivors.
Results confirmed those found in the entire population. OS was 76% at 5-year (95% CI: 64.8–87.3). The primary cause of death was divided between disease (progression of AD; n = 6), NRM (n = 9; seven patients succumbed to infections, and two with MOF). All causes of death classified by local physician as NRM, were related to drug toxicity and transplant; none of these patients experienced disease recurrence or received AD specific treatment after HSCT. Cumulative incidence of NRM was 14.9% at 5-year (95% CI: 7.3–25.1) and PFS was 64.8% at 5-year (95% CI: 52.1–77.6).
By univariate analysis, there was no significant differences between immune cytopenia and other ADs in terms of RI (16.2 vs. 18.6%, respectively, p = 0.91), OS (76.2 vs. 79.9%), respectively, p = 0.59) and PFS (73.8 vs. 64.3%, p = 0.63). A more recent year of transplant, after 2009, was significantly associated with improved outcomes: higher PFS (76.3 vs. 55.6%; p = 0.03), higher OS (90.7 vs. 64.3%; p = 0.005), and lower rates of chronic GvHD (19 vs. 48.1%; p = 0.01).
This multicenter report presents the largest analysis of long-term outcomes of allogeneic HSCT in a range of severe ADs, including several patients with increasingly characterized monogenic diseases associated with autoimmunity and immunodeficiency (40, 41).
At the last follow-up, in this heterogeneous group of patients with severe and refractory ADs, long-term complete clinical response was obtained in 67.2% of patients. Response was independent of the underlying disease (hematological vs. non-hematological AD). These data required further exploration, possibly within a prospective study.
The majority of patients underwent matched related or unrelated donor HSCT, which is generally considered the lowest risk allogeneic transplant strategy with best outcomes. Overall, NRM was 20.5% at 5-years, but this had plateaued by 2 years post-transplant. These results in patients with refractory and heavily pre-treated diseases (with some patients having already received a previous autologous HSCT) are in keeping with outcomes of allogeneic HSCT in other hematological diseases, and supportive of further exploration for selected patients with high risk ADs with a poor prognosis despite other immunomodulatory treatments including biological therapies and autologous HSCT. Potential candidates could be patients suffering a potentially life-threatening ADs with existing risk factors for an unfavorable outcome from their AD combined with low-risk factors for NRM [younger age, identical sibling or well-matched unrelated donor and low hematopoietic cell transplantation-specific comorbidity index (42)], and, in particular, in ADs with strong genetic predisposition.
Over the several decades, outcomes of allogeneic HSCT across all indications have improved due to a variety of factors, including better patient selection, donor-recipient matching and transplant techniques (1, 2, 13, 15, 16). Likewise, multivariate analysis confirmed chronological improvement in outcomes in our AD study population, especially in younger patients, supporting a “learning curve.” However, in our analysis the intensity of the conditioning regimen had no substantial association with outcomes, and, similarly, we failed to document a strong influence of donor type (between matched and mismatched donors). Nevertheless, the heterogeneity and small numbers of the study population limited the power of these comparisons. This area warrants further exploration given the potential impact of transplant technique and donor-recipient matching on the incidence of short and long-term complications.
In particular, the incidence and type of “late effects” after allogeneic HSCT in this setting is a novel feature of this analysis. Preparative regimens were relatively well-tolerated with limited regimen-related toxicity. Although there was no coordinated prospective comprehensive long-term follow-up within this group of patients, late complications were identified through a detailed questionnaire designed for this retrospective study. The spectrum of complications included 33 viral reactivations and one case of secondary malignancy. We also observed seven cases of a distinct secondary autoimmune disease, which is likely to be above the level reported follow HSCT in other contexts (43–46). A prospective study is necessary to identify the potential risk factors for the development of post-transplant AD, including details about donor chimerism and concomitant GvHD.
GvHD is also an important consideration in non-malignant indications, such as ADs. Reduction of GvHD, and potentially a mitigation of the graft-vs.-tumor (GvT) effect, is often associated with an increase in relapse in patients with hematologic malignancies; however, the occurrence of GvHD is considered an unacceptable toxicity in ADs as a GvT effect is not necessary in non-malignant diseases [9, 17. 31]. We reported an incidence of grades II-IV acute GvHD of 20.8% at 100-days and cumulative incidence of chronic GvHD of 27.8% at 5-year. By promoting bidirectional transplantation tolerance, PT-Cy strategy or alternative graft manipulation strategies (i.e., αβ T cell-depleted grafts) could further improve GvHD rates and broaden the therapeutic possibilities also in patients with ADs (8, 14, 47, 48).
Moreover, animal models at least suggest that remission of experimental AD can be achieved after non-myeloablative conditioning with mixed chimerism (43, 49, 50). Unfortunately, we did not have detailed data about the chimerism status and could not clearly prove the hypothesis that remission is independent of a complete engraftment of the donor immune system. However, with RIC regimens, which generally lead to a state of mixed chimerism in early post HSCT phase, PFS, and relapse incidence were comparable to MAC regimens.
Allogeneic HSCT combines high-dose cytotoxic therapy, donor-vs.-host alloreactivity together with replacement of a dysfunctional immune system by regenerating healthy donor immune system, with potential tolerance to allo- and auto-antigens. It is also reasonable to hypothesize that a subclinical graft-vs.-host reaction might help to eradication autoreactive B and T cells surviving the conditioning regimen, through the so-called graft-vs.-autoimmunity (GvA) effect, which has been observed in animal models (23). Unfortunately, more detailed immunological data, including donor chimerism and post-transplant immune-reconstitution, were not available in this study. In the future, fostering prospective biobanking (51) of ADs patients undergoing HSCT could enable detailed immunological analysis to further elucidate this hypothesis.
When interpreting the results of our analyses, we recognize that there are limitations such as its retrospective nature and the limited number of patients, together with the lack of uniformity in transplant protocols and follow-up process. These findings support the need to conduct prospective clinical trials to further investigate the role of allogeneic HSCT for severe treatment refractory or otherwise poor-risk ADs.
The limits of our study prevent us from addressing a definitive role for this therapeutic strategy as compared to alternative options. However, these results of this EBMT survey suggests the potential of allogeneic HSCT to achieve long-term disease remission in a large proportion of refractory ADs, with predictable toxicities, especially in younger patients, with improved outcomes in recent years.
The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.
This study was approved and supported by the Autoimmune Diseases Working Party (ADWP), Inborn Errors Working Party (IEWP), and Pediatric Working Party (PDWP) of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT).
RG, JS, DF, FC, MBa, MA, TA, AG, and PB designed the study. RG, MBa, ML, FC, and JS performed analysis and interpretation of data. JS, MA, DF, FC, AG, and PB provided scientific advice and supervision. RG, JS, FC, MBa, and ML wrote the article. The EBMT provided resources via the working parties, data office, and registry. All authors have approved the final version of the manuscript and contributed to patient clinical care and data collection.
Conflict of Interest Statement
JS declares honoraria for speaking by Sanofi, Jazz, Janssen, Mallinckrodt, Actelion and Gilead, and IDMC membership for Kiadis Pharma. PB declares research grants from Neovii, Riemser, Medac, advisory board from Novartis, Cellgene, Amgen, Medac, Servier (Institut.), patent and royalties from Medac.
The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The handling editor declared a shared affiliation, though no other collaboration, with one of the authors TA.
1. Duarte RF, Labopin M, Bader P, Basak GW, Bonini C, Chabannon C, et al. Indications for haematopoietic stem cell transplantation for haematological diseases, solid tumours and immune disorders: current practice in Europe, 2019. Bone Marrow Transplant. (2019). doi: 10.1038/s41409-019-0516-2. [Epub ahead of print].
2. Gooley TA, Chien JW, Pergam SA, Hingorani S, Sorror ML, Boeckh M, et al. Reduced mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic-cell transplantation. N Engl J Med. (2010) 363:2091–101. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1004383
3. Bernardo ME, Piras E, Vacca A, Giorgiani G, Zecca M, Bertaina A, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in thalassemia major: results of a reduced-toxicity conditioning regimen based on the use of treosulfan. Blood. (2012) 120:473–6. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-04-423822
5. Passweg JR, Baldomero H, Basak GW, Chabannon C, Corbacioglu S, Duarte R, et al. The EBMT activity survey report 2017: a focus on allogeneic HCT for nonmalignant indications and on the use of non-HCT cell therapies. Bone Marrow Transplant. (2019) doi: 10.1038/s41409-019-0465-9
7. Luznik L, O'donnell PV, Symons HJ, Chen AR, Leffell MS, Zahurak M, et al. HLA-haploidentical bone marrow transplantation for hematologic malignancies using nonmyeloablative conditioning and high-dose, posttransplantation cyclophosphamide. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. (2008) 14:641–50. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2008.03.005
8. Dezern AE, Luznik L, Fuchs EJ, Jones RJ, Brodsky RA. Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide for GVHD prophylaxis in severe aplastic anemia. Bone Marrow Transplant. (2011) 46:1012–3. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2010.213
9. Snowden JA, Saccardi R, Allez M, Ardizzone S, Arnold R, Cervera R, et al. Haematopoietic SCT in severe autoimmune diseases: updated guidelines of the European group for blood and marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. (2012) 47:770–90. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2011.185
10. Bertaina A, Merli P, Rutella S, Pagliara D, Bernardo ME, Masetti R, et al. HLA-haploidentical stem cell transplantation after removal of alphabeta+ T and B cells in children with nonmalignant disorders. Blood. (2014) 124:822–6. doi: 10.1182/blood-2014-03-563817
11. Gupta N, Choudhary D, Sharma SK, Khandelwal V, Dhamija M. Haploidentical hematopoietic SCT for acquired severe aplastic anemia using post-transplant high-dose CY. Bone Marrow Transplant. (2015) 50:155–6. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2014.222
12. Passweg JR, Baldomero H, Bader P, Bonini C, Cesaro S, Dreger P, et al. Hematopoietic SCT in Europe 2013: recent trends in the use of alternative donors showing more haploidentical donors but fewer cord blood transplants. Bone Marrow Transplant. (2015) 50:476–82. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2014.312
13. Finke J, Schmoor C, Bethge WA, Ottinger H, Stelljes M, Volin L, et al. Long-term outcomes after standard graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis with or without anti-human-T-lymphocyte immunoglobulin in haemopoietic cell transplantation from matched unrelated donors: final results of a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Haematol. (2017) 4:e293–e301. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(17)30081-9
14. Mussetti A, Greco R, Peccatori J, Corradini P. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide, a promising anti-graft versus host disease prophylaxis: where do we stand? Expert Rev Hematol. (2017) 10:479–92. doi: 10.1080/17474086.2017.1318054
15. Ruggeri A, Labopin M, Bacigalupo A, Afanasyev B, Cornelissen JJ, Elmaagacli A, et al. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide for graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis in HLA matched sibling or matched unrelated donor transplant for patients with acute leukemia, on behalf of ALWP-EBMT. J Hematol Oncol. (2018) 11:40. doi: 10.1186/s13045-018-0586-4
16. Bonifazi F, Solano C, Wolschke C, Sessa M, Patriarca F, Zallio F, et al. Acute GVHD prophylaxis plus ATLG after myeloablative allogeneic haemopoietic peripheral blood stem-cell transplantation from HLA-identical siblings in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia in remission: final results of quality of life and long-term outcome analysis of a phase 3 randomised study. Lancet Haematol. (2019) 6:e89–e99. doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(18)30214-X
18. Snowden JA, Badoglio M, Labopin M, Giebel S, Mcgrath E, Marjanovic Z, et al. Evolution, trends, outcomes, and economics of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in severe autoimmune diseases. Blood Adv. (2017) 1:2742–55. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017010041
19. Gratwohl A, Passweg J, Bocelli-Tyndall C, Fassas A, Van Laar JM, Farge D, et al. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for autoimmune diseases. Bone Marrow Transplant. (2005) 35:869–79. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1704892
21. Burt RK, Slavin S, Burns WH, Marmont AM. Induction of tolerance in autoimmune diseases by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: getting closer to a cure? Blood. (2002) 99:768–84. doi: 10.1182/blood.V99.3.768
22. Herrmann MM, Gaertner S, Stadelmann C, Van Den Brandt J, Boscke R, Budach W, et al. Tolerance induction by bone marrow transplantation in a multiple sclerosis model. Blood. (2005) 106:1875–83. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-12-4607
23. Van Wijmeersch B, Sprangers B, Rutgeerts O, Lenaerts C, Landuyt W, Waer M, et al. Allogeneic bone marrow transplantation in models of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: evidence for a graft-versus-autoimmunity effect. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. (2007) 13:627–37. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2007.03.001
25. Oyama Y, Traynor AE, Barr W, Burt RK. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation for autoimmune diseases: nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens. Bone Marrow Transplant. (2003) 32 (Suppl. 1):S81–3. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1703950
26. Passweg JR, Rabusin M, Musso M, Beguin Y, Cesaro S, Ehninger G, et al. Haematopoetic stem cell transplantation for refractory autoimmune cytopenia. Br J Haematol. (2004) 125:749–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.04978.x
27. Daikeler T, Hugle T, Farge D, Andolina M, Gualandi F, Baldomero H, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic SCT for patients with autoimmune diseases. Bone Marrow Transplant. (2009) 44:27–33. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2008.424
28. Pasquini MC, Griffith LM, Arnold DL, Atkins HL, Bowen JD, Chen JT, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple sclerosis: collaboration of the CIBMTR and EBMT to facilitate international clinical studies. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. (2010) 16:1076–83. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.03.012
29. Sullivan KM, Muraro P, Tyndall A. Hematopoietic cell transplantation for autoimmune disease: updates from Europe and the United States. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. (2010) 16:S48–56. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.10.034
30. Rabusin M, Snowden JA, Veys P, Quartier P, Dalle JH, Dhooge C, et al. Long-term outcomes of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for severe treatment-resistant autoimmune cytopenia in children. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. (2013) 19:666–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2012.12.008
33. Slatter MA, Engelhardt KR, Burroughs LM, Arkwright PD, Nademi Z, Skoda-Smith S, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for CTLA4 deficiency. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2016) 138:615–619 e611. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.01.045
34. Leiding JW, Okada S, Hagin D, Abinun M, Shcherbina A, Balashov DN, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with gain-of-function signal transducer and activator of transcription 1 mutations. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2017) 141:704–717.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.03.049
35. Seidel MG, Bohm K, Dogu F, Worth A, Thrasher A, Florkin B, et al. Treatment of severe forms of LPS-responsive beige-like anchor protein deficiency with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2017) 141:770–5.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.04.023
36. Barzaghi F, Amaya Hernandez LC, Neven B, Ricci S, Kucuk ZY, Bleesing JJ, et al. Long-term follow-up of IPEX syndrome patients after different therapeutic strategies: an international multicenter retrospective study. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2018) 141:1036–49 e1035. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.10.041
37. Silva MFJ, Ladomenou F, Carpenter B, Chandra S, Sedlacek P, et al. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for severe, refractory juvenile idiopathic arthritis. Blood Adv. (2018) 2:777–86. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017014449
38. R Core Team (2017). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available online at: https://www.R-project.org/
39. Bacigalupo A, Ballen K, Rizzo D, Giralt S, Lazarus H, Ho V, et al. Defining the intensity of conditioning regimens: working definitions. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. (2009) 15:1628–33. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2009.07.004
40. Bousfiha A, Jeddane L, Picard C, Ailal F, Bobby Gaspar H, Al-Herz W, et al. The 2017 IUIS phenotypic classification for primary immunodeficiencies. J Clin Immunol. (2018) 38:129–43. doi: 10.1007/s10875-017-0465-8
41. Picard C, Bobby Gaspar H, Al-Herz W, Bousfiha A, Casanova JL, Chatila T, et al. International union of immunological societies: 2017 primary immunodeficiency diseases committee report on inborn errors of immunity. J Clin Immunol. (2018) 38:96–128. doi: 10.1007/s10875-017-0464-9
43. Lambertenghi-Deliliers GL, Annaloro C, Della Volpe A, Oriani A, Pozzoli E, Soligo D. Multiple autoimmune events after autologous bone marrow transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. (1997) 19:745–7. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1700711
44. Hequet O, Salles G, Ketterer N, Espinouse D, Dumontet C, Thieblemont C, et al. Autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura after autologous stem cell transplantation. Bone Marrow Transplant. (2003) 32:89–95. doi: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1704073
45. O'brien TA, Eastlund T, Peters C, Neglia JP, Defor T, Ramsay NK, et al. Autoimmune haemolytic anaemia complicating haematopoietic cell transplantation in paediatric patients: high incidence and significant mortality in unrelated donor transplants for non-malignant diseases. Br J Haematol. (2004) 127:67–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.2004.05138.x
46. Loh Y, Oyama Y, Statkute L, Quigley K, Yaung K, Gonda E, et al. Development of a secondary autoimmune disorder after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for autoimmune diseases: role of conditioning regimen used. Blood. (2007) 109:2643–548. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-07-035766
47. Bertaina A, Zecca M, Buldini B, Sacchi N, Algeri M, Saglio F, et al. Unrelated donor vs HLA-haploidentical alpha/beta T-cell- and B-cell-depleted HSCT in children with acute leukemia. Blood. (2018) 132:2594–607. doi: 10.1182/blood-2018-07-861575
48. Gaziev J, Isgro A, Sodani P, Paciaroni K, De Angelis G, Marziali M, et al. Haploidentical HSCT for hemoglobinopathies: improved outcomes with TCRalphabeta(+)/CD19(+)-depleted grafts. Blood Adv. (2018) 2:263–70. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017012005
49. Burt RK, Oyama Y, Verda L, Quigley K, Brush M, Yaung K, et al. Induction of remission of severe and refractory rheumatoid arthritis by allogeneic mixed chimerism. Arthritis Rheum. (2004) 50:2466–70. doi: 10.1002/art.20451
50. Smith-Berdan S, Gille D, Weissman IL, Christensen JL. Reversal of autoimmune disease in lupus-prone New Zealand black/New Zealand white mice by nonmyeloablative transplantation of purified allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells. Blood. (2007) 110:1370–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-03-081497
51. Alexander T, Bondanza A, Muraro PA, Greco R, Saccardi R, Daikeler T, et al. SCT for severe autoimmune diseases: consensus guidelines of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation for immune monitoring and biobanking. Bone Marrow Transplant. (2015) 50:173–80. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2014.251
Keywords: allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, autoimmune diseases, long-term outcome, hematological autoimmune diseases, non-hematological autoimmune diseases
Citation: Greco R, Labopin M, Badoglio M, Veys P, Furtado Silva JM, Abinun M, Gualandi F, Bornhauser M, Ciceri F, Saccardi R, Lankester A, Alexander T, Gennery AR, Bader P, Farge D and Snowden JA (2019) Allogeneic HSCT for Autoimmune Diseases: A Retrospective Study From the EBMT ADWP, IEWP, and PDWP Working Parties. Front. Immunol. 10:1570. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01570
Received: 11 May 2019; Accepted: 24 June 2019;
Published: 04 July 2019.
Edited by:Olaf Penack, Charité Medical University of Berlin, Germany
Reviewed by:Sergio Querol, Banc de Sang i Teixits, Spain
Miguel Angel Diaz, Niño Jesús University Children's Hospital, Spain
Copyright © 2019 Greco, Labopin, Badoglio, Veys, Furtado Silva, Abinun, Gualandi, Bornhauser, Ciceri, Saccardi, Lankester, Alexander, Gennery, Bader, Farge and Snowden. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Raffaella Greco, email@example.com