Impact Factor 4.716 | CiteScore 4.71
More on impact ›

Editorial ARTICLE Provisionally accepted The full-text will be published soon. Notify me

Front. Immunol. | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01714

Editorial: ‘Functional Relevance of Tetraspanins in the Immune System’

  • 1Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Spain
  • 2Severo Ochoa Molecular Biology Center (CSIC-UAM), Spain
  • 3Severo Ochoa Molecular Biology Center (CSIC-UAM), Spain
  • 4Department of Tumor Immunology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Netherlands

Tetraspanins, members of the superfamily of four-transmembrane proteins, are evolutionary highly conserved membrane proteins that function as membrane-organizers (Hemler ME, 2005; Charrin S et al., 2009; Van Deventer SJ et al., 2017). Immune cells express thousands of different membrane proteins (including adhesion receptors, uptake receptors, major histocompatibility molecules, enzymes, cytokine receptors and others) that all need to be correctly localized in time and space at the cell surface. Tetraspanins specifically interact in cis with various immune receptors by forming multimolecular complexes (tetraspanin-enriched microdomains, TEMs) that can initiate immune cell signaling (Tarrant JM et al., 2003; Levy S and Shoham T, 2005). Thereby, tetraspanins control fundamental immune cell functions, including adhesion, pathogen uptake, immunological synapse formation and proliferation. Tetraspanin-deficiency in mouse models and patients results in different immunological defects (Miranti C et al., 2014). This Review Topic provides a timely overview of the biological importance of tetraspanin-induced membrane organization in the immune system and the latest insights in targeting tetraspanins as novel drugs for infectious disease and cancer.
Immune cells are the fastest migrating cells in our body that depend on tight cooperation of different adhesion molecules (integrins, selectins, immunoglobulin superfamily members) and chemokine receptors to patrol for pathogens and reach inflammatory sites. For integrins, it has been well-established that clustering (avidity) and conformational change (affinity) both underlie activation. Tetraspanins are well-defined interaction partners for integrins (Berditchevski F et al., 2001; Charrin S et al., 2009) that control adhesion and migration of lymphocytes, dendritic cells (Gartlan KH et al., 2013) and neutrophils (Wee JL et al., 2015). Mark Wright and colleagues discuss the functional roles of tetraspanins in leukocytes and endothelial cells during transmigration from the circulation into tissues (Yeung L et al., 2018). Most tetraspanins (CD9, CD37, CD81, and CD151) promote lymphoid and myeloid cell adhesion and migration through functional interaction with 1 and 2 integrins. In this regard, CD9 regulates the adhesive capacity of integrin α5β1 by modulating its association with the membrane protease ADAM17 on the cell surface (Machado-Pineda Y et al., 2018). CD9 is also required for myeloid cell migration in a murine colitis model shown by decreased neutrophil and macrophage infiltration in colonic tissue from CD9-deficient mice (Saiz ML et al., 2017). In contrast, tetraspanin CD82 in dendritic cells reduces cell motility through regulation of cytoskeletal proteins, e.g., RhoA. It is not known whether CD82 directly interacts with Rho GTPases, in line with the identified interaction between CD81 and Rac1 (Tejera E et al., 2013), or alternatively that CD82 regulates the cytoskeleton via interacting with ezrin/radixin/moesin (ERM) proteins. Besides directly interacting with adhesion molecules, tetraspanins have been reported to control the activity of membrane metalloproteases that can induce cleavage of adhesion receptors. For example, CD9 inhibits the shedding activity of ADAM17 and thereby supports ALCAM-dependent adhesion in antigen-presenting cells as discussed by Carlos Cabañas and co-workers (Reyes R et al., 2018). In line with this, tetraspanins of the TspanC8 subgroup, containing eight cysteine residues in their large extracellular loops, are required for ADAM10 exit from the endoplasmic reticulum and trafficking to the cell surface or other membrane compartments (Dornier E et al., 2012; Haining EJ et al., 2012). ADAM10 is well characterized as the ligand-dependent activator of Notch proteins, and Mike Tomlinson and colleagues discuss how TspanC8 members (Tspan5, Tspan10, Tspan14, Tspan15, Tspan17, and Tspan33) may control ADAM10 activity on myeloid and lymphoid cells in a specific manner (Matthews AL et al., 2018). The most highly expressed TspanC8 in human and mouse T cells is Tspan14, followed by Tspan5 and Tspan17. Since both Tspan14 and Tspan5 promote Notch signaling, it is hypothesized that ADAM10 will have a major role in thymocyte development. Human and mouse B cells express high levels of Tspan33 and Tspan14, respectively, which may regulate Notch2 signaling and/or shedding of other ADAM10 ligands, such as CD23 (the IgEεRII). Some of these questions can be addressed by investigating newly generated Tspan14 and Tspan5-knockout mice. The authors also propose that targeting individual TspanC8 members may provide a novel therapeutic approach for ADAM10-associated diseases (leukemia, asthma, atherosclerosis, and Alzheimer’s disease) without the toxicity of global ADAM10 inhibition.
Tetraspanins on antigen-presenting cells control multiple different functions, including cell migration, pathogen uptake, MHC trafficking, immunological synapse formation and antigen-presentation as reviewed by the group of Francisco Sanchez-Madrid (Saiz ML et al., 2018). In B cells, tetraspanins (CD37, CD53, CD81) are essential for B cell receptor signaling, antibody production and cytokine secretion (Zou F et al., 2018). Interestingly, CD37-deficiency leads to spontaneous B cell lymphoma formation in mice, and patients with CD37-deficient B cell lymphomas have inferior clinical outcome than patients with CD37-positive lymphomas (De Winde CM et al., 2016).
The pathogenesis of different infectious diseases is also influenced by different tetraspanin proteins (van Spriel AB and Figdor CG, 2010). Besides adhesion and signaling, tetraspanins have been related to different membrane fusion events. The group of Peter Monk has explored the role of different tetraspanin members in membrane fusion of monocytic cells in response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection (Champion TC et al., 2018). Tetraspanins can also interfere with different stages of the virus replication cycle. Luise Florin and Thorsten Lang evaluate how viruses exploit TEMs for viral entrance into cells, and subsequent budding and egress (Florin L and Lang T, 2018). Some viruses use specific tetraspanins as receptors (for example CD151-HPV, CD81-HCV) and by compartmentalizing host entry factors. In addition, viral envelope proteins accumulate in TEMs during morphogenesis, and induce large assemblies of tetraspanins and viral transmembrane proteins to facilitate budding. For example, tetraspanins (CD9, CD63, CD81, CD82) can be incorporated into the enveloping membrane of virions, such as HIV, feline immunodeficiency virus, influenza or hepatitis A virus, indicating that TEMs directly stimulate virus budding and exit. New evidence shows that HIV-1 replication is stimulated by CD81 through its direct interaction with the deoxynucleoside triphosphate phosphohydrolase SAMHD1 (Rocha-Perugini V et al., 2017). Maria Yanez-Mo and co-workers elaborate on the mechanisms underlying tetraspanin regulation of HIV-1 replication, which may be exploited to develop tetraspanin-based therapeutics as a novel strategy to restrict HIV-1 infection (Suárez H et al., 2018).
Given the plethora of immune functions that are controlled by tetraspanins, it is maybe not surprising that tetraspanins are important in anti-tumor immune responses. Even though this field is rather unexplored, tetraspanins expressed by immune suppressive cells (such as regulatory T cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells) can control immune responses within the tumor microenvironment as discussed by Fleur Schaper and Annemiek van Spriel (Schaper F and Van Spriel AB, 2018). In addition, tetraspanins have been shown to modulate cancer metastasis indirectly through exosomes, and by regulating cellular interactions in the immune system as reflected on by Felipe Vences-Catalán and Shoshana Levy (Vences-Catalán F and Levy S, 2018).
Taken together, although broad in function, the underlying mechanism by which different tetraspanins accomplish their function is highly similar. Through their lateral molecular interactions with immune receptors, enzymes and/or signaling proteins, tetraspanins are in charge of organizing the protein landscape at the plasma membrane of immune cells. Evidence is now accumulating that these protein interactions are dynamic and likely change upon cell activation. Future research should provide better insight into the 1) specificity versus redundancy of individual tetraspanins on immune cell function, and 2) molecular mechanisms underlying TEM formation and coupling to signaling transduction pathways. The potency of targeting tetraspanins is currently under investigations at the (pre-)clinical level as novel therapeutics for cancer, infectious diseases and auto-immunity disorders (Hemler ME, 2008; Beckwith KA et al., 2015).

Keywords: tetraspanin, immune cell, Infection, Vaccine, Cell Membrane

Received: 07 Jun 2019; Accepted: 09 Jul 2019.

Edited by:

Florent Ginhoux, Singapore Immunology Network (A*STAR), Singapore

Copyright: © 2019 Cabañas, Yáñez-Mó and van Spriel. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

* Correspondence: Prof. Carlos Cabañas, Spanish National Research Council (CSIC), Madrid, Spain,