Impact Factor 5.085 | CiteScore 5.4
More on impact ›

Original Research ARTICLE

Front. Immunol., 08 September 2020 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.02124

Role of the Intracellular Sodium Homeostasis in Chemotaxis of Activated Murine Neutrophils

Karolina Najder1*, Micol Rugi1,2, Mégane Lebel3, Julia Schröder1, Leonie Oster1, Sandra Schimmelpfennig1, Sarah Sargin1, Zoltán Pethő1, Etmar Bulk1 and Albrecht Schwab1
  • 1Institute of Physiology II, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
  • 2University of Florence, Florence, Italy
  • 3University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada

The importance of the intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) in neutrophil function has been intensely studied. However, the role of the intracellular Na+ concentration ([Na+]i) which is closely linked to the intracellular Ca2+ regulation has been largely overlooked. The [Na+]i is regulated by Na+ transport proteins such as the Na+/Ca2+-exchanger (NCX1), Na+/K+-ATPase, and Na+-permeable, transient receptor potential melastatin 2 (TRPM2) channel. Stimulating with either N-formylmethionine-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLF) or complement protein C5a causes distinct changes of the [Na+]i. fMLF induces a sustained increase of [Na+]i, surprisingly, reaching higher values in TRPM2−/− neutrophils. This outcome is unexpected and remains unexplained. In both genotypes, C5a elicits only a transient rise of the [Na+]i. The difference in [Na+]i measured at t = 10 min after stimulation is inversely related to neutrophil chemotaxis. Neutrophil chemotaxis is more efficient in C5a than in an fMLF gradient. Moreover, lowering the extracellular Na+ concentration from 140 to 72 mM improves chemotaxis of WT but not of TRPM2−/− neutrophils. Increasing the [Na+]i by inhibiting the Na+/K+-ATPase results in disrupted chemotaxis. This is most likely due to the impact of the altered Na+ homeostasis and presumably NCX1 function whose expression was shown by means of qPCR and which critically relies on proper extra- to intracellular Na+ concentration gradients. Increasing the [Na+]i by a few mmol/l may suffice to switch its transport mode from forward (Ca2+-efflux) to reverse (Ca2+-influx) mode. The role of NCX1 in neutrophil chemotaxis is corroborated by its blocker, which also causes a complete inhibition of chemotaxis.

Introduction

Neutrophil migration, adhesion, neutrophil extracellular trap formation, bacterial killing, and production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) require coordinated ion fluxes (16). Ca2+ is among the best studied ions in this context (7, 8). It is a potent, multifunctional second messenger and its increase in the cytoplasm is a hallmark of neutrophil activation. An increase of the intracellular Ca2+ concentration ([Ca2+]i) is caused by release of Ca2+ from intracellular stores and by receptor- or store-operated Ca2+ entry (ROCE or SOCE, respectively). This relies to a large extent on transient receptor potential (TRP) and Orai channels present in the plasma membrane of neutrophils (913). Ca2+ influx was shown to be a necessary factor in neutrophil chemotaxis almost half century ago (14), but only recently the changes in [Ca2+]i and its intracellular gradient was visualized and confirmed as a decisive factor in neutrophil chemotaxis (15). A gradient of the [Ca2+]i was also shown to be modulated by TRPC1 channel in murine neutrophils (4). TRPC1 knock-out and its effect on Ca2+ homeostasis hinders neutrophil response to N-formylmethionine-leucyl-phenylalanine (fMLF).

However, an increase of the [Ca2+]i is not the only ionic event upon cell stimulation. Neutrophil activation with fMLF leads also to an increase of the intracellular Na+ concentration ([Na+]i) (16). Importantly, the extracellular Na+ concentration ([Na+]o) also influences the [Na+]i. In normal tissue [Na+]o equals its concentration in blood (~145 mM), but it can be lower in conditions like hypoxia (17, 18). In inflammation and tumor the [Na+]o is usually increased (19, 20).

There are several Na+ transport proteins, which can account for the cell responses to changes of the extracellular ion composition or stimulation with chemoattractant. One of them is the non-selective transient receptor potential melastatin 2 (TRPM2) cation channel, which is highly expressed in neutrophils (21). Due to its presumed role as a ROS sensor, TRPM2 emerged as a putative mediator of inflammatory responses in monocytes and neutrophils (22). However, the role of TRPM2 in immune cells is rather complex (23, 24). Whether the channel has a pro- or anti-inflammatory function is still disputed, especially regarding neutrophil migratory abilities (8, 22, 23, 25). Moreover, the pH sensitivity of TRPM2 also raises the question whether the channel is still active in the acidic microenvironment of an inflammation (2628).

Another Na+ transport protein, Na+/Ca2+-exchanger 1 (NCX1) stands for one of the major Ca2+ extrusion mechanisms in many cell types (29). It removes one Ca2+ in exchange for 3 Na+ ions transported into the cell (forward mode). Depending on the ion concentrations and membrane potential, it can also operate in reverse (Ca2+ influx) mode. Subtle changes of the ion composition and/or cell membrane potential are sufficient to alternate the NCX1 modes. In neutrophils, NCX1 was shown to contribute to Ca2+ influx (30) and membrane repolarization (31).

Finally, the activity of the NADPH-oxidase 2 (NOX2) leads to release of protons into the cytoplasm. In activated neutrophils, phosphorylation of NOX2 subunits leads to enzyme activation and assembly in the plasma membrane or in membranes of secondary granules (32, 33). Active NOX2 depolarizes the membrane through electron extrusion (3436). The subsequent H+ removal is mediated not only by H+ channels and pumps but also by using the driving force of the Na+ gradient which fuels the Na+/H+- exchanger (NHE1) (37). Depolarization of the membrane also affects the electrogenic activity of the NCX1, which in effect moves one positive charge in or out of the cell affecting also Ca2+ flux (29). This further supports the importance of Na+ homeostasis in neutrophil function.

Using two end-target chemoattractants, fMLF (formylated peptide) and C5a (complement molecule) we analyzed neutrophil chemotaxis and changes of the [Na+]i in neutrophils. For the first time, we show that neutrophil chemotaxis is modulated by the extra- and intracellular Na+ concentration. We suggest that proteins expressed in neutrophils and involved in Na+ homeostasis, especially NCX1, may contribute to neutrophil response upon chemoattractant stimulation. Also, knock-out of the Na+-permeable TRPM2 channel results in altered neutrophil [Na+]i, likely by indirectly modulating NCX1. The involvement of TRPM2 channel in neutrophil function in physiological conditions is rather minor, but may be decisive in an inflammatory environment.

Materials and Methods

Reagents

Reagents were purchased from SigmaAldrich®, Steinheim, Germany if not indicated otherwise.

Animals

TRPM2−/− mice were generated in a C57BL/6J background as described previously (22). TRPM2+/+ and TRPM2−/− mice were derived from heterozygous mating. PCR using genomic DNA as template was performed to confirm the genotypes. C57BL/6J, TRPM2+/+ and littermate TRPM2−/− mice (8–12 weeks of age) were used in the study. Mice were euthanized by cervical dislocation. Experimental protocols were approved by the local committee for animal care with permit number: 84-02.05.50.15.010.

Cell Culture

Myelomonocytic leukemia cells (WEHI-3B) were cultured in bicarbonate-buffered Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM, Merck Chemicals GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) medium supplemented with 4 mM L-glutamine, 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Gibco/ThermoFisher Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany), 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (Biochrom, Berlin, Germany) at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Four days after cells reached confluence, the supernatant was collected, filtered and stored at −20°C. Since bone-marrow derived cells comprise also undifferentiated progenitors, medium from cultivated WEHI-3B cells served as a source rich in G-CSF and Il-3 and was used for neutrophil differentiation (38).

Isolation of Murine Neutrophils

Mouse bone marrow was prepared from femurs and tibiae. Hind limbs were sterilized with 70% ethanol and dissected bones were flushed via a 0.4 mm needle with Ca2+/Mg2+-free HBSS (HBSS−/−, Merck Chemicals GmbH, Darmstadt, Germany) containing 25 mM HEPES and 10% FBS. Bone marrow cell suspension was dispersed and filtered with a 70 μm cell strainer and centrifuged at 4°C, 200 g for 10 min. Pelleted cells were resuspended in 1 ml HBSS−/− with 25 mM HEPES and put on Histopaque®1077/1119 layers. Cells were then centrifuged at 400 g, for 30 min. The layer of granulocytes was taken and washed twice in HBSS−/− with 25 mM HEPES and 10% FBS (centrifuged at 4°C, 200 g, 10 min). We use HBSS−/− for isolating and processing the neutrophils to avoid neutrophil attaching to the labware. Cells were resuspended in bicarbonate-buffered RPMI-1640 medium with L-glutamine, 10% FBS, 10% WEHI-3B-conditioned medium, 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin. Cell suspension was put in 10 cm Petri dishes and incubated overnight at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2.

Measurements of the [Na+]i

Ibidi μ-Slides I (ibidi GmbH, Gräfelfing, Germany) were used for sodium measurements. Slides were coated with 1 μg/cm2 fibronectin for 1 h at RT and washed twice with HEPES-buffered Ringer's solution (140 mM NaCl, 5.4 mM KCl, 1.2 mM CaCl2, 0.8 mM MgCl2, 10 mM HEPES, 5.5 mM glucose, pH 7.4) before the experiments. When experiments were done with a Ringer's solution with 72 or 5 mM Na+, we isosmotically replaced NaCl by 68 and 135 mM NMDG-Cl, respectively. Neutrophils were resuspended in 2 ml Ringer's solution and about 1 × 106 cells were used for a single experiment. Cells were incubated with 5 μM Asante NaTRIUM Green-2 AM dye (ANG-2 AM) (TEFLabs Inc., Austin, USA) in Ringer's solution for 1 h at RT, put onto μ-Slides and allowed to adhere at 37°C for 10 min. The slide was washed twice with 1 ml pre-warmed Ringer's solution and mounted on the Axiovert 200 microscope (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany) connected to the perfusion system, monochromator (Visitron System, Puchheim, Germany) and CCD camera (pco.edge 5.5) (PCO AG, Kelheim, Germany). A 100× oil objective (Plan Apo) was used for the observation. The filter set consisted of a T525lpxr beam splitter and an ET560/50m emission filter (Chroma Technology GmbH, Olching, Germany). Image acquisition was controlled by VisiView software (Visitron Systems GmbH, Puchheim, Germany). Excitation wavelength was set to 520 nm with 200 ms exposure time, binning 2. Images were acquired in 20 s intervals.

Experiments started after a short superfusion period with Ringer's solution until cells showed a stable fluorescent signal before the experimental solutions were applied. Where indicated, neutrophils were stimulated with 1 μM fMLF or 60 nM C5a in the superfusion solution or treated with 100 μM ouabain to inhibit the Na+/K+-ATPase and/or 10 μM KB-R7943 to inhibit the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger. Each assay lasted 10 min and was followed by a calibration. To this end, cells were sequentially superfused with solutions of different Na+ concentrations. Standard solutions were prepared by mixing equimolar NMDG-Cl (Na+-free) and Na+-containing solutions. 0, 10, and 20 mM Na+ solutions were used and ionic concentrations were verified with ABL800 blood analyzer (Radiometer Medical ApS, Brønshøj, Denmark). All calibration solutions contained 50 μM amphotericin B to permeabilize the membranes and 100 μM ouabain to inhibit the Na+/K+-ATPase. Experiments were conducted at 37°C. Acquired time-lapse stacks were analyzed using ImageJ software. After background subtraction, the total projected area and fluorescence of the cells in the field of view were analyzed (≥5 cells for each N; N = 3). The product of area and intensity was then compared with linear standard curves derived from the calibration values for each cell.

Measurements of the [Ca2+]i

Ibidi μ-Slides I (ibidi GmbH, Gräfelfing, Germany) were prepared as described above [see section Measurements of the [Na+]i]. About 1 × 106 neutrophils were used for each experiment. Cells were incubated with 3 μM Fura-2 AM (Biomol GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) for 25 min at 4°C in the dark. After incubation, neutrophils were seeded onto Ibidi μ-Slides I and incubated for 10 min in a warming cabinet and then washed with pre-warmed Ringer's solution. Measurements were performed with the same superfusion system as described above [see section Measurements of the [Na+]i]. 40× oil objective, beam splitter 400dclp and D510/40m emission filter (Chroma Technology GmbH, Olching, Germany) were used. Experiments were conducted at 37°C. Two excitation wavelengths were applied: 340 and 380 nm with 100 ms exposure time each, binning 2. Emission was measured at 510 nm. Acquisition was set for every other 20 s. Neutrophils were firstly superfused with Ringer's solution followed by Na+-free solution (140 mM NMDG-Cl). In next experimental phase, cells were either superfused with 1 μM fMLF only, or 1 μM fMLF with 10 μM KB-R7943. Each experiment was calibrated by applying Ringer's solution containing 1 μM ionomycin with 5 mM Ca2+ or Ca2+-free solution with 5 mM EGTA. Fluorescence intensity for each excitation wavelength for cells in the field of view was analyzed using VisiView software (Visitron Systems GmbH, Puchheim, Germany). Intensity values were background corrected and absolute values were calculated as described before (39).

Chemotaxis Assays in a 3D Collagen Matrix

For chemotaxis assays, ibidi μ-Slides Chemotaxis 2D/3D (ibidi GmbH, Gräfelfing, Germany) were used as described previously (40). Slides were coated with 1 μg/cm2 fibronectin (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) for 1 h. Following overnight incubation cells were resuspended in HEPES-buffered Ringer's solution (140 mM NaCl or 72 mM Na+ and 68 mM NMDG-Cl, 5.4 mM KCl, 1.2 mM CaCl2, 0.8 mM MgCl2, 10 mM HEPES, 5.5 mM glucose; pH 7.4) and seeded in a three-dimensional collagen I (2.1 mg/ml) (Corning®, Kaiserslautern, Germany) matrix in HBSS+/+. The chemotactic gradients were built by adding the attractants to one of the chambers. Two end-target chemoattractants were used in our chemotaxis assays: fMLF (1 μM) and (recombinant murine) C5a (60 nM) (Bio-Techne GmbH, Wiesbaden-Nordenstadt, Germany). Optimal chemoattractant concentrations were chosen based on neutrophil chemotaxis indices (CI) obtained in experiments with increasing concentrations of fMLF (10, 100 nM, 1, 33 μM) and C5a (6, 60, 370 nM). Live-cell imaging was performed using phase-contrast microscopy and video cameras (models XC-ST70CE and XC-77CE) at 37°C. Using HiPic Image acquisition software (Hamamatsu Photonics, Herrsching am Ammersee, Germany) time-lapse settings were set for every 5 s for 30 min. Acquired stacks were analyzed with Amira software (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany). Amira files were evaluated using ImageJ (National Institutes of Health, Maryland, USA) and a self-made plugin (courtesy of Peter Dieterich, Dresden). Cell velocity was calculated by applying a three-point difference quotient and CI was calculated as the migration in the direction of the chemical gradient divided by the total path length (4, 8, 40, 41).

Reverse Transcription and Quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)

Total RNA was isolated using TRIzol reagent and chloroform phase separation (ThermoFisher Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany). The RNA concentration was measured with a spectrophotometer and 2 μg of total RNA were reverse transcribed. SuperScript™ III Reverse Transcriptase (ThermoFisher Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany) was used for the reaction. cDNA samples were diluted in water to the final volume of 50 μl. For qPCR analysis, 2 μl of cDNA template was used in 10 μl of final reaction solution. PowerUp™ SYBR™ Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems®/ThermoFisher Scientific, Darmstadt, Germany) was used for qPCR. We applied the following reaction protocol: an initial hold step (95°C, 10 min) and 40 cycles of a three-step amplification (95°C, 30 s; 55°C, 25 s; 72°C, 60 s). An additional melting curve stage was implemented for product control. Murine 18S rRNA transcript (m18S rRNA) served as endogenous reference. We used the following forward and reverse primers: 5′-GTA ACC CGT TGA ACC CCA TT-3′ and 5′- CCA TCC AAT CGG TAG TAG CG- 3′ (42). NCX1 primers were designed to span the region of alternative splicing specific for BD exons specific for NCX1.3 and NCX1.7 (43) (also: GenBank: AF108396.1). Forward and reverse primer sequences were: 5′- TCT CCC TTG TGC TTG AGG AAC-3′ and 5′- AGC CAC CTT TCA ATC CTC TTC T-3′. NCX1 mRNA expression was calculated from mean Ct values of technical duplicates and subtraction of mean Ct for 18S rRNA transcript (ΔCt). Values transformed to 2−ΔCt were used for statistical analysis. Relative normalized transcript expression in TRPM2−/− neutrophils was calculated in relation to TRPM2+/+ (2−ΔΔCt) (44).

Statistical Analysis

All data is shown as mean ± SEM. For comparison between two groups, statistical analysis was performed using a two-tailed Student's t-test or Mann-Whitney U-test when data was not normally distributed. In experiments comparing more than 2 groups 1-way ANOVA or repeated measures ANOVA was used, with Tukey or Dunn post-hoc tests. For all tests, p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. “N” stands for number of animals and “n” designates number of single cells analyzed.

Results

fMLF Stimulation Causes a Sustained Increase of the [Na+]i in TRPM2+/+ and TRPM2–/– Neutrophils

Like most chemoattractant receptors, fMLF receptor (FPR1) activation leads to Ca2+ store release and an increase of the [Ca2+]i (45). Further Ca2+ influx is mediated by opening of plasma membrane channels, among others non-selective TRP channels, allowing for concurrent Na+ influx. TRPM2 not only allows Ca2+ and Na+ influx, but its gating mechanism requires Ca2+ ions and an increase of cytoplasmic ADP-ribose (46, 47). It seems that an increased [Ca2+]i would serve as a constant positive feedback. However, at the same time, the resulting membrane depolarization dampens cation influx. The high [Ca2+]i may also promote NCX1 forward mode in order to resolve the neutrophil activation. The activity and role of NCX1 in neutrophils, however, has not been determined unequivocally (30, 31). TRPM2 and NCX1 are highly dependent on the intra- and extracellular ionic composition. It is known that the rise of the [Ca2+]i upon fMLF stimulation is somewhat diminished in TRPM2−/− neutrophils (22, 48) which in turn may influence the NCX1 activity.

Previous experiments studying the [Na+]i upon fMLF stimulation in human neutrophils showed an increase by about 8.5 ± 3.2 mM Na+ within 5 min (16). Using the novel Na+ indicator, ANG-2 AM, we compared the time course of changes of the [Na+]i in murine TRPM2+/+ and TRPM2−/− neutrophils over a 10 min time span. Knowing that TRPM2 is permeable for both Ca2+ and Na+ ions, we assumed that in the absence of the channel the increase of [Na+]i will be hampered. However, this is not the case. A steady increase of the [Na+]i is observed in both genotypes with the [Na+]i reaching higher values in TRPM2−/− neutrophils within 10 min (15.6 ± 0.9 vs. 13.1 ± 0.6) (Figure 1). This difference is mainly due to the earlier rise of the [Na+]i as determined by repeated measures ANOVA. There is a significant increase of the [Na+]i in TRPM2−/− neutrophils after 6 min and only after 8 min in the presence of channel. This suggests that the channel prevents the rapid increase of the [Na+]i during the first minute of fMLF stimulation. In the absence of the TRPM2 due to possible diminished membrane depolarization, Na+ influx can be facilitated and mediated through other transport proteins.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. [Na+]i upon fMLF stimulation in TRPM2+/+ and TRPM2−/− neutrophils. fMLF stimulation leads to an increase of the [Na+]i in neutrophils. The increase of the [Na+]i is attenuated in the presence of TRPM2 channels. Repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze whether time points of significant increase of the [Na+]i differ between genotypes. It is evident that the earlier concentration rise leads to higher [Na+]i after 10 min in TRPM2−/− neutrophils. One micromolar fMLF was added at t = 0. For TRPM2+/+: N = 3, n = 23; for TRPM2−/−: N = 3, n = 24.

C5a Stimulation Causes a Rapid, but Transient Increase of the [Na+]i in TRPM2+/+ and TRPM2–/– Neutrophils

C5a is an end-target chemoattractant and its mechanism of action after binding to C5aR resembles to a large extent the molecular pathway of FPR1 activation (45). C5aR1 also activates a phospholipase C β signaling pathway causing an increase of the [Ca2+]i (45, 49). To our knowledge, there is no data showing the [Na+]i in neutrophils upon C5a stimulation.

Although C5a and fMLF employ similar signaling pathways, the temporal changes of the [Na+]i upon C5a stimulation differ from those induced by fMLF (Figure 2). The most striking difference is that the [Na+]i increases only transiently upon C5a stimulation. C5a causes a rapid increase of the [Na+]i (+5.6 mM Na+ after 3 min) but in contrast to fMLF, also a fast recovery to the basal level (~11 mM Na+). The curves are similar for TRPM2+/+ and TRPM2−/− neutrophils. There is no significant difference between the genotypes in curve slopes (only slightly faster increase in TRPM2−/− neutrophils) and [Na+]i at the end of the observation. The [Na+]i measurements for fMLF and C5a indicate the different Na+ regulation upon stimulation with these chemoattractants. We therefore tested whether the differences of the [Na+]i may directly or indirectly affect neutrophil function or reflect the fact that FPR1 and C5aR1 cause distinct ionic responses.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. [Na+]i upon C5a stimulation in TRPM2+/+ and TRPM2−/− neutrophils. C5a stimulation causes a rapid and pronounced increase of the [Na+]i, but in contrast to fMLF, the [Na+]i returns to a basal levels within 5 min. The time course of the [Na+]i changes is similar in neutrophils of both genotypes. Sixty nanomolar C5a was added at t = 0. For TRPM2+/+ N = 3, n = 33; for TRPM2−/− N = 3, n = 30.

Impact of Na+ Transport Proteins on the [Na+]i of Neutrophils

The Na+/K+-ATPase and NCX1 are two neutrophil membrane proteins involved in Na+ homeostasis. The Na+/K+-ATPase sustains the Na+ gradient by extruding intracellular Na+ in exchange for extracellular K+ with a stoichiometry of 3:2. NCX1 is also a ubiquitous protein and has varied functions depending on cell type. Its role in activated neutrophils is not yet well-established.

Both transport proteins differ in their affinity and capacity. Constitutively active, high-affinity and low capacity Na+/K+-ATPase is less susceptible to environmental disturbances, but low-affinity high-capacity NCX1 may be critical for the cell under stress conditions. Ouabain is a widely used inhibitor of the Na+/K+-ATPase with anti-inflammatory properties. In neutrophils, ouabain diminishes CD18 expression, but the exact mechanism is not yet described (50).

KB-R7943 is a pharmacological inhibitor of the cardiac NCX1.1 splice variant in forward mode. However, it inhibits both forward and reverse modes of NCX1.3 and NCX1.7 splice variants, which are expressed in many non-excitable cells (IC50 = 2.9 and 2.4 μM, respectively) (51).

To further elucidate mechanisms underlying the [Na+]i homeostasis in TRPM2−/− neutrophils, we inhibited Na+/K+-ATPase with 100 μM ouabain and measured the [Na+]i. As expected, the [Na+]i of fMLF-stimulated neutrophils increases to much higher values in the presence of ouabain than in the presence of fMLF alone (Figure 3A vs. Figure 1). However, there is almost no difference between TRPM2+/+ and TRPM2−/− neutrophils (20.9 ± 1 mM vs. 21.7 ± 1.5 mM). This increase confirms the activity of the Na+/K+-ATPase pump, which is responsible for extruding Na+ from the cytosol of neutrophils.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. [Na+]i upon fMLF stimulation and addition of Na+/K+-ATPase and/or NCX1 inhibitor. (A) In TRPM2+/+ and TRPM2−/− neutrophils, inhibition of the Na+/K+-ATPase leads to an increase of the [Na+]i to similar end values. (B) Upon the stimulation with fMLF and inhibition of NCX1, the [Na+]i decreases in TRPM2+/+ but not in TRPM2−/− neutrophils, reaching significantly lower values after 10 min (6.7 ± 0.8 mM vs. 9.8 ± 0.6 mM; p < 0.001). (C) Comparison of the [Na+]i upon fMLF stimulation with Na+/K+-ATPase and NCX1 inhibitors in TRPM2+/+ and TRPM2−/− neutrophils. Following 10 min of stimulation with fMLF, the [Na+]i in TRPM2+/+ and TRPM2−/− neutrophils reaches 16.5 ± 1.2 mM and 25.4 ± 1.7 mM, respectively. fMLF and inhibitors were added at t = 0. N = 3, n ≥ 22.

Using KB-R7943 alone abolishes the fMLF-induced rise of the [Na+]i. In TRPM2+/+ neutrophils, the NCX1 inhibitor lowers the final sodium concentration (Figure 3B). In the absence of TRPM2 channels, fMLF stimulation and NCX1 inhibition lead to a higher final [Na+]i. The time course of the [Na+]i changes is consistent with NCX1 operating in the forward mode in TRPM2+/+ neutrophils during the entire observation period. Initially, TRPM2−/− neutrophils behave identically. However, there is no further decrease of the [Na+]i in TRPM2+/+ neutrophils. This temporal distinction in neutrophil [Na+]i may suggest altered NCX1 function in neutrophils lacking TRPM2 channel.

When neutrophils are superfused with a combination of 1 μM fMLF, 100 μM ouabain and the NCX1 inhibitor KB-R7943 (10 μM), the [Na+]i in TRPM2+/+ neutrophils is lower than with fMLF and ouabain only (from 20.9 ± 1 mM down to 16.5 ± 1.2 mM). In contrast, in TRPM2−/− neutrophils the [Na+]i rises even higher (from 21.7 ± 1.5 mM up to 25.4 ± 1.7 mM) (Figure 3C). This further supports different activity of NCX1 in TRPM2+/+ and TRPM2−/− neutrophils, however, may also indicate the compensatory action of other Na+ transport protein.

Decrease of Extracellular [Na+] Causes a Decrease of the Neutrophil Intracellular [Na+]

To analyze the impact of decreasing the [Na+]o we measured the [Na+]i of neutrophils that were stimulated with fMLF in Ringer's solution with reduced Na+ concentration. Lowering the [Na+]o to 72 or 5 mM causes a fall of the [Na+]i compared to the control situation (Figure 4). One of the possible explanations of these results is that less Na+ is entering the cell via NCX1 activity so that the extrusion of the Na+ ions dominates.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. [Na+]i upon fMLF stimulation in Ringer's solutions with reduced Na+ concentrations. Stimulation of neutrophils with fMLF in Ringer's solution with reduced extracellular [Na+] leads to a decrease of the [Na+]i. For comparison, we replotted the results of TRPM2+/+ neutrophils stimulated in the presence of 140 mM Na+ (gray curve) already depicted in Figure 1. fMLF and solutions of low Na+ were added at t = 0. N = 3, n ≥ 23.

Removal of Extracellular Na+ Causes an Increase of the Neutrophil [Ca2+]i

To further analyze NCX function and elucidate the impact of extracellular Na+ on the intracellular Ca2+ concentration, we superfused neutrophils with a nominally Na+-free Ringer's solution and measured the [Ca2+]i (Figure 5). The nominal removal of extracellular Na+ leads to an increase of the [Ca2+]i which is indicative of NCX1 activity in neutrophils. Subsequent stimulation with fMLF induces a biphasic increase of the [Ca2+]i. A short rapid peak is followed by a subsequent slow increase of the [Ca2+]i. However, inhibition of the NCX1 prevents the rise of the [Ca2+]i and rather leads to a decrease of the [Ca2+]i. This suggests that in a nominally Na+-free solution NCX1 is active in the reverse mode.

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. Intracellular Ca2+ concentration in nominally Na+-free Ringer's solution upon fMLF stimulation with or without NCX1 inhibition. The increase of the [Ca2+]i upon removal of extracellular Na+ indicates the expression and activity of the NCX1. Subsequent stimulation in Na+-free solution leads to a transient increase of the [Ca2+]i followed by sustained rise. Concurrent inhibition of the NCX1 prevents this increase of the [Ca2+]i. N = 3; n ≥ 100.

C5a Causes More Robust Chemotaxis of Murine neutrophils Than fMLF

One of the pivotal neutrophil functions is to rapidly reach the site of injury or inflammation. The ability to follow chemoattractant gradients can be measured in vitro using various migration assays. In our experimental setting, neutrophils were exposed to chemoattractant (1 μM fMLF or 60 nM C5a) gradients after they had been embedded within a 3D collagen I matrix, to mimic their physiological environment in a tissue.

fMLF induces directional migration of neutrophils to a lesser extent than C5a (Figure 6). Both chemoattractants are used in previously established optimal concentrations (data not shown). Cell trajectories and the distance covered toward fMLF over time differ from those in a C5a gradient. Chemotaxis toward C5a is not only more prominent, but also different between the genotypes. TRPM2−/− neutrophils follow the C5a gradient slightly better than TRPM2+/+. This difference, not revealed in our previous studies using three mice of each genotype (8), became apparent after more than doubling the number of mice analyzed. It supports the view that TRPM2 mitigates neutrophil migration (25).

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Trajectories of TRPM2+/+ and TRPM2−/− neutrophils in fMLF and C5a gradients. fMLF induces less robust chemotaxis than C5a as shown by trajectories and mean distances covered toward the chemoattractants. Trajectories are normalized to common starting points, and the thick lines represent the averaged cell path of the entire cell populations. There are no differences between genotypes in the fMLF gradient. In a C5a gradient, TRPM2−/− neutrophils have a higher chemotaxis index (not shown) and cover longer distances toward the chemoattractant (fMLF: TRPM2+/+, N = 7, n = 140, TRPM2−/−, N = 8, n = 160; C5a: TRPM2+/+, TRPM2−/−, N = 6, n = 120).

Lowering the [Na+]o Augments Neutrophil Chemotaxis in fMLF Gradient

Assuming that the differences in neutrophil response may depend on the Na+ homeostasis, we analyzed neutrophil chemotaxis in an fMLF gradient in an isosmotic, low sodium (72 mM Na+) solution. Under these conditions, the neutrophils adapt by lowering their [Na+]i; the [Na+]i reaches only ~10 mM as compared to 13.1 ± 0.6 mM when using the regular Ringer's solution (see Figure 4). It is known that lowering of the [Na+]o does not affect the number of FPR1 receptors in the membrane, but may increase receptor affinity (52). To elucidate whether lower extracellular Na+ is beneficial for neutrophil chemotaxis we compared the chemotaxis index (CI) of fMLF-stimulated neutrophils in 140 and 72 mM [Na+]o.

TRPM2+/+ neutrophils follow the fMLF gradient better when the Na+ concentration is reduced to 72 mM (Figures 7, 8). The CI of TRPM2+/+ is increased in solution of reduced Na+, TRPM2−/− neutrophils, however, cover longer distances, which is evident by more “spread” trajectories (Figure 7) and higher velocity (Figure 8). These results indicate that in the presence of the TRPM2 channel, lower [Na+]i improves neutrophil directionality. However, in the absence of the channel, only random cell migration is increased.

FIGURE 7
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 7. Neutrophil migratory parameters in an fMLF gradient and 72 mM extracellular sodium. Cell trajectories and mean distances covered toward fMLF (TRPM2+/+, N = 3, n = 60, TRPM2−/−, N = 4, n = 80).

FIGURE 8
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 8. Neutrophil chemotaxis indices and velocity upon stimulation with fMLF in different [Na+]o. Comparison of chemotaxis indices and mean velocities in low and physiological [Na+]o. In the lower sodium concentration, TRPM2+/+ neutrophils follow the fMLF gradient better, but TRPM2−/− neutrophils, despite increased velocity, show no improvement in chemotaxis (TRPM2+/+, N = 3, n = 60, TRPM2−/−, N = 4, n = 80).

Blocking the Na+/K+-ATPase and NCX1 Restrains Neutrophil Chemotaxis

To analyze the consequences of the increased [Na+]i in C5a-stimulated neutrophils, we inhibited the Na+/K+-ATPase of neutrophils with 100 μM ouabain (Figure 9). Inhibition of the Na+/K+-ATPase diminishes neutrophil chemotaxis. Surprisingly, mean velocity values are very similar to those upon C5a stimulation only (ctrl). Addition of 10 μM KB-R7943 strongly impedes neutrophil chemotaxis and velocity.

FIGURE 9
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 9. Neutrophil chemotaxis indices and velocity upon stimulation with C5a and inhibition of Na+/K+-ATPase or NCX1. Na+/K+-ATPase and NCX1 inhibitors almost completely abrogate neutrophil chemotaxis. Inhibiting NCX1 with KB-R7943 affects neutrophil velocity much stronger than ouabain. For clarity, only the significant difference between velocity values using inhibitors is shown (N = 3, n = 60).

NCX1 Splice Variants Containing BD Exons Are Expressed in Neutrophils

KB-R7943 was developed as a reverse mode NCX1 inhibitor, although it can also inhibit the forward mode. The IC50 of forward mode inhibition depends on the NCX1 splice variants (51, 53). Splice variants containing BD exons [predominantly NCX1.3, NCX1.7 (51)] are almost completely inhibited in the forward mode by the concentration used in our [Na+]i measurements (10 μM KB-R7943). To confirm the presence of NCX1 splice variants sensitive to inhibition of both modes, we analyzed the expression of BD exons by means of qPCR. As shown in Figure 10, the BD transcript is expressed in both neutrophil genotypes. Expression values calculated by housekeeping gene Ct value subtraction and conversion to 2−ΔCt expression level do not differ (p = 0.19, data not shown) and normalized relative expression (2−ΔΔCt) is not different in neutrophils from both genotypes.

FIGURE 10
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 10. mRNA expression of NCX1 region of alternative splicing containing BD exons. NCX1 splice variants sensitive to inhibition with 10 μM KB-R7943 in reverse and forward mode are expressed in neutrophils (N = 3).

[Na+]i Is a Factor Involved in Neutrophil Chemotaxis

Finally, taking under consideration all chemotaxis assays and [Na+]i measurements performed under similar conditions, we observed a correlation between the [Na+]i and neutrophil chemotaxis index (Figure 11). The higher [Na+]i is associated with lower CI. In contrast, there is only a minor impact of the [Na+]i on cell velocity. Thus, chemotaxis appears to be exquisitely sensitive to changes of the [Na+]i which in neutrophils is controlled by Na+-transport proteins presumably, to the large extent by NCX1.

FIGURE 11
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 11. Chemotaxis and mean velocity values plotted against the respective [Na+]i after 10 min of chemoattractant stimulation. Summary of [Na+]i and chemotaxis index in TRPM2+/+ and TRPM2−/− neutrophils following stimulation with fMLF or C5a. The curves reveal an inverse correlation between the [Na+]i and neutrophil chemotaxis (Pearson's correlation coefficient (r = −0.9584; p = 0.0026)). Neutrophil velocity seems to be affected to a lesser extent by [Na+]i (with Pearson's correlation coefficient (r = −0.8307; p = 0.0405)). Dotted lines represent confidence intervals (95%). CI and velocity values from respective assays are encircled and described.

Discussion

The intracellular Na+ homeostasis in neutrophils is tightly coupled with Ca2+ and H+ fluxes. Since the concentrations of these ions change drastically when neutrophils are activated, it is not a surprise that Na+-transport proteins also play a role in neutrophil function.

Studies on NCX1 in neutrophils show that the exchanger partially contributes to Ca2+ influx in activated neutrophils (30, 31). Membrane potential as well as the extra- and intracellular concentrations of Na+ and Ca2+ ions determine the NCX1 transport mode. Neutrophil stimulation or the harsh inflammatory extracellular environment cause alterations of the above-mentioned variables. Importantly, only slight changes of the [Na+]i in neutrophils or of their membrane potential, determine NCX1 mode and thus, its consequence for Na+/Ca2+ homeostasis. Assuming the neutrophil resting membrane potential to be at −60 mV (54), a [Na+]o of 140 mM and a free intra-/extracellular [Ca2+] of 100 nM/1.2 mM, respectively, an increase of the [Na+]i from 12 to 13 mM results in a driving force for NCX1 reverse mode as calculated from ΔGNCX (55). At [Na+]i = 11 mM, a depolarization of the membrane potential to−47 mV also leads to mode switch (29). In our studies, we show that neutrophil [Na+]i is remarkably close to the values which determine NCX1 modes. Therefore, we presume that already slight differences of the [Na+]i in TRPM2+/+ and TRPM2−/− neutrophils may in some circumstances affect neutrophil behavior, likely due to altered NCX-mediated Ca2+ influx. The contribution of NCX to Ca2+ influx may become even more important during the respiratory burst of primed, maximally stimulated neutrophils when their membrane potential may be as high as +60 mV (56).

Despite the fact that Na+ is the electrolyte with the highest concentration in the plasma and the interstitial fluid, there is only scarce data on the Na+ homeostasis in neutrophils. Previous studies using neutrophils and differentiated HL-60 cells have shown a rise of the [Na+]i upon fMLF stimulation. Researchers concluded that influx of both Ca2+ and Na+ is pivotal for neutrophil exocytosis and production of O2- (16, 57). In many cell types, an increased [Na+]i is associated with pathological conditions like ischemia and excessive ROS production (58), but the consequences of the [Na+]i rise for neutrophil chemotaxis were left unexplored.

By elucidating the changes of the [Na+]i in neutrophils, we may now suggest that Na+ transport proteins contribute to alternations in [Ca2+]i and neutrophil chemotaxis. In this context it was intriguing to observe that the [Na+]i rises more strongly in TRPM2−/− than in WT neutrophils following fMLF stimulation.

Putative explanation could be based on the TRPM2 involvement in the regulation of neutrophil membrane potential. We can hypothesize that upon fMLF stimulation, the lack of the channel renders neutrophil membrane permissive for Na+ influx, but it is not the case upon C5a stimulation. Chemoattractant's different impact on the neutrophil membrane potential may result in somewhat surprising outcomes.

Unfortunately, the unexpected [Na+]i rise upon fMLF stimulation in TRPM2−/− neutrophils remains unexplained. Also, there is no impact of the higher [Na+]i on TRPM2−/− chemotaxis in fMLF gradient. The prominent increase of [Na+]i upon KB-R7943 and ouabain treatment in TRPM2−/−, but not in WT neutrophils suggests altered NCX1 activity, however this assumption needs to be corroborated. Upon C5a stimulation, despite similar [Na+]i courses, TRPM2−/− neutrophils migrate further in chemoattractant direction. The complexity of mechanisms allow us only to speculate and the detailed explanation requires additional studies. Our ongoing and future analysis of absolute neutrophil membrane potential values may shed some light on this matter. We presume that channel knock out results in altered membrane potential and/or compensatory activities of other ion transport proteins (presumably NCX1). Worth noting, TRPM2−/− neutrophils often display slightly higher basal [Na+]i. Whether this is caused by permissive resting membrane potential or for e.g., different basal NCX1 activity is yet to be explored.

Despite the outlying results of the neutrophils lacking TRPM2 channel, in our view, Na+ indirectly affects neutrophil migration (via Ca2+ modulation) and may directly and specifically affect neutrophil chemotaxis (directed migration).

Two chemoattractants, fMLF and C5a, differently influence the [Na+]i and neutrophil chemotaxis, supporting our assumptions about a role of Na+ ions in directed migration of neutrophils. A sustained increase of the [Na+]i upon fMLF stimulation correlates with worse chemotaxis. On the contrary, C5a induces only a transient increase of the [Na+]i with rapid recovery to the basal [Na+]i, which coincides with efficient chemotaxis. The notion that the [Na+]i is more critical for chemotaxis rather than for migration itself is supported by the fact that inhibiting the Na+/K+-ATPase abolishes neutrophil chemotaxis almost completely, but has a much lesser impact on neutrophil velocity. Thus, despite obvious Na+ influence on Ca2+ homeostasis, we suggest the distinct roles of Na+ and Ca2+ ions in neutrophil function. We propose that Na+ gradients may strongly influence neutrophil directionality, while Ca2+ is pivotal for neutrophil migration.

This leads to another, yet still quite speculative explanation for the importance of the Na+ homeostasis for neutrophil chemotaxis. It relates to the fact that type A GPCRs including chemoattractant receptors are allosterically inhibited by Na+ bound to the receptor protein. GPCRs are constitutively active, but Na+ ions keep the receptors in an inactive state. This was also shown for FPR and C5R1 where Na+ ions act as an allosteric inverse agonist (59). Upon binding of the ligand, e.g., fMLF, Na+ has to leave its binding site in the GPCR in order to allow its full activation. One could therefore speculate that local changes of the Na+ concentration and thereby changes of the transmembranous Na+ gradient can modulate the activity of chemoattractant receptors (60). However, so far it is unknown whether the transmembranous Na+ gradient and/or the cell membrane potential contribute to this unbinding step. If this were the case, our results could be interpreted such that the lower [Na+]i following the stimulation with C5a activation would help to remove allosteric inhibition and allow a stronger receptor activation than after stimulation with fMLF. Consequently, chemotaxis toward C5a is more efficient.

In our view the [Na+]i impacts indirectly on neutrophil migration and chemotaxis by regulating the NCX1. When NCX1 is inhibited, neutrophil migration is severely impaired. A likely explanation for the importance of the NCX1 function is its role in maintaining the proper gradients of the intracellular Ca2+ concentration that are found in many migrating cells including neutrophils (4, 5). However, the use of inhibitors has several caveats. KB-R7943, a presumed inhibitor of NCX1, was shown to have off-targets. At concentrations used in our studies, KB-R7943 also may inhibit TRPC channels expressed in neutrophil such as TRPC3 and TRPC6. This leads to diminished Ca2+ influx, what can be partially the cause of the [Ca2+]i drop upon KB-R7943 addition to fMLF-stimulated neutrophils as shown in Figure 5. In astrocytes, KB-R7943 was also shown to inhibit SOCE (61). With these assumptions, we cannot dismiss the possibility that the used inhibitor affects neutrophil migration through several targets. On the other hand, we showed previously that Ca2+ signaling of murine neutrophils is independent of TRPC6 channels (40) and that TRPC3 channel mRNA is expressed only at a very low level (4). Moreover, ion substitution assays as well as the measurements of the [Na+]i and the [Ca2+]i provide strong support for NCX1 expression and activity in neutrophils and show that Na+ influences [Ca2+]i and neutrophil response. The novel assumption derived from our studies is that although Na+ fluxes (or the NCX1 activity) affect important Ca2+ homeostasis, the former seems to be pivotal for the directed neutrophil migration. Moreover, according to our findings, altered [Na+]o in inflammation and tumor environment may be considered as a factor, which (even if indirectly) modulates neutrophil migration and chemotaxis.

Besides Na+ and Ca2+ transport, neutrophil activation induces H+ flux. Transient neutrophil intracellular acidification and depolarization are due to NOX2 activity and resolved predominantly by Hv1 channel (62, 63). However, another Na+-dependent exchanger, NHE1, contributes to the electroneutral removal of H+. NHE1 was shown to be involved in production of arachidonic acid derivatives in neutrophils (64) and polarization of migrating cells (65, 66). Our own studies show that NHE1 contributes to neutrophil chemotaxis and regulation of intracellular pH (pHi) (unpublished data). This Na+-dependent pHi regulation has to be considered when interpreting the [Ca2+]i changes upon Na+ removal. The anticipated decrease pHi may have caused an inhibition of NCX1 and thereby caused an only transient increase of the [Ca2+]i shown in Figure 5.

Taken together, our study shows that TRPM2 channels have a subtle impact on neutrophil migration and chemotaxis by paradoxically regulating the [Na+]i of neutrophils. However, the exact mechanism of [Na+]i regulation by TRPM2, requires further studies. On the other hand, NCX1 activity and its driving force, the transmembranous Na+ gradient, appears to be an important factor for neutrophil function. The complexity of the mechanisms in which Na+ is involved, does not allow for simple assumptions. However, the present and future studies will help to understand the interwoven aspects of ionic homeostasis in activated neutrophils.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated for this study are available on request to the corresponding author.

Ethics Statement

The animal study was reviewed and approved by Landesamt für Natur, Umwelt und Verbraucherschutz NRW permit number: 84-02.05.50.15.010.

Author Contributions

KN, MR, ML, JS, LO, SSc, SSa, ZP, and EB performed the experiments. KN made statistical analyses. KN and AS designed the study and wrote the manuscript. All authors edited the manuscript and approved the submitted version.

Funding

KN was supported by a fellowship from the CIMIMPRS graduate school. MR was supported by the Marie Skłodowska-Curie Innovative Training Network (Grant Agreement number: 813834 - pHioniC - H2020-MSCA-ITN-2018). AS thanks the support from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG; SCHW 407/17-1), Cells-in-Motion Cluster of Excellence (EXC 1003-CiM), University of Münster, Germany, and IZKF Münster (Schw2/020/18).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to all members of Institute of Physiology II, Münster, especially to the excellent technical assistants Ilka Neumann and Sergej Handel. We would like to also thank Otto Lindemann and Ivan Liashkovich for their expertise and support.

References

1. Akong-Moore K, Chow OA, Von Köckritz-Blickwede M, Nizet V. Influences of chloride and hypochlorite on neutrophil extracellular trap formation. PLoS ONE. (2012) 7:e42984. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042984

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Dixit N, Simon SI. Chemokines, selectins and intracellular calcium flux: temporal and spatial cues for leukocyte arrest. Front Immunol. (2012) 3:188. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00188

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Foote JR, Behe P, Frampton M, Levine AP, Segal AW. An exploration of charge compensating ion channels across the phagocytic vacuole of neutrophils. Front Pharmacol. (2017) 8:728. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2017.00728

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Lindemann O, Strodthoff C, Horstmann M, Nielsen N, Jung F, Schimmelpfennig S, et al. TRPC1 regulates FMLF-stimulated migration and chemotaxis of neutrophil granulocytes. Biochim Biophys Acta. (2015) 1853:2122–30. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2014.12.037

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Schwab A, Fabian A, Hanley PJ, Stock C. Role of ion channels and transporters in cell migration. Physiol Rev. (2012) 92:1865–913. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00018.2011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Sha'afi RI, Molski TF. Role of ion movements in neutrophil activation. Annu Rev Physiol. (1990) 52:365–79. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.52.030190.002053

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Immler R, Simon SI, Sperandio M. Calcium signalling and related ion channels in neutrophil recruitment and function. Eur J Clin Investig. 48(Suppl 2):e12964. doi: 10.1111/eci.12964

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Najder K, Musset B, Lindemann O, Bulk E, Schwab A, Fels B. The function of TRP channels in neutrophil granulocytes. Pflugers Archiv Eur J Physiol. (2018) 470:1017–33. doi: 10.1007/s00424-018-2146-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Pantaler E, Lückhoff A. Inhibitors of TRP channels reveal stimulus-dependent differential activation of Ca2+ influx pathways in human neutrophil granulocytes. Naunyn Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol. (2009) 380:497–507. doi: 10.1007/s00210-009-0464-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Ribeiro D, Freitas M, Rocha S, Lima JLFC, Carvalho F, Fernandes E. Calcium pathways in human neutrophils—the extended effects of thapsigargin and ML-9. Cells. (2018) 7:204. doi: 10.3390/cells7110204

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Bréchard S, Tschirhart EJ. Regulation of superoxide production in neutrophils: role of calcium influx. J Leukocyte Biol. (2008) 84:1223–37. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0807553

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Schaff UY, Dixit N, Procyk E, Yamayoshi I, Tse T, Simon SI. Orai1 regulates intracellular calcium, arrest, and shape polarization during neutrophil recruitment in shear flow. Blood. (2010) 115:657–66. doi: 10.1182/blood-2009-05-224659

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Yin J, Michalick L, Tang C, Tabuchi A, Goldenberg N, Dan Q, et al. Role of transient receptor potential vanilloid 4 in neutrophil activation and acute lung injury. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. (2016) 54:370–83. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2014-0225OC

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Boucek MM, Snyderman R. Calcium influx requirement for human neutrophil chemotaxis: inhibition by lanthanum chloride. Science. (1976) 193:905–7. doi: 10.1126/science.948752

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Beerman RW, Matty MA, Au GG, Looger LL, Choudhury KR, Keller PJ, et al. Direct in vivo manipulation and imaging of calcium transients in neutrophils identify a critical role for leading-edge calcium flux. Cell Rep. (2015) 13:2107–17. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.11.010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Wenzel-Seifert K, Krautwurst D, Musgrave I, Seifert R. Thapsigargin activates univalent- and bivalent-cation entry in human neutrophils by a SK&F I3 96365- and Gd3+-sensitive pathway and is a partial secretagogue: involvement of pertussis-toxin-sensitive G-proteins and protein phosphatases 1/2A and 2B in the signal-transduction pathway. Biochem J. (1996) 314:679–86. doi: 10.1042/bj3140679

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Silver IA. Measurement of PH and ionic composition of pericellular sites. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. (1975) 271:261–72.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

18. Kessler M, Höper J, Krumme BA. Monitoring of tissue perfusion and cellular function. Anesthesiology. (1976) 45:184–97. doi: 10.1097/00000542-197608000-00007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Leslie TK, James AD, Zaccagna F, Grist JT, Deen S, Kennerley A, et al. Sodium homeostasis in the tumour microenvironment. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer. (2019) 1872:188304. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2019.07.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Jantsch J, Schatz V, Friedrich D, Schröder A, Kopp C, Siegert I, et al. Cutaneous Na+ storage strengthens the antimicrobial barrier function of the skin and boosts macrophage-driven host defense. Cell Metab. (2015) 21:493–501. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2015.02.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Heiner I, Eisfeld J, Halaszovich CR, Wehage E, Jüngling E, Zitt C, et al. Expression profile of the transient receptor potential (TRP) family in neutrophil granulocytes: evidence for currents through long TRP channel 2 induced by ADP-ribose and NAD. Biochem J. (2003) 371(Pt 3):1045–53. doi: 10.1042/bj20021975

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Yamamoto S, Shimizu S, Kiyonaka S, Takahashi N, Wajima T, Hara Y, et al. TRPM2-Mediated Ca2+ influx induces chemokine production in monocytes that aggravates inflammatory neutrophil infiltration. Nat Med. (2008) 14:738–47. doi: 10.1038/nm1758

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Miller BA, Cheung JY. TRPM2 protects against tissue damage following oxidative stress and ischaemia-reperfusion. J Physiol. (2016) 594:4181–91. doi: 10.1113/JP270934

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Zhan KY, Yu PL, Liu CH, Luo JH, Yang W. Detrimental or beneficial: the role of TRPM2 in ischemia/reperfusion injury. Acta Pharmacol Sin. (2016) 37:4–12. doi: 10.1038/aps.2015.141

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Wang G, Cao L, Liu X, Sieracki NA, Di A, Wen X, et al. Oxidant sensing by TRPM2 inhibits neutrophil migration and mitigates inflammation. Dev Cell. (2016) 38:453–62. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.07.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Starkus JG, Fleig A, Penner R. The calcium-permeable non-selective cation channel TRPM2 is modulated by cellular acidification. J Physiol. (2010) 588(Pt 8):1227–40. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2010.187476

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Du J, Xie J, Yue L. Modulation of TRPM2 by acidic ph and the underlying mechanisms for PH sensitivity. J General Physiol. (2009) 134:471–88. doi: 10.1085/jgp.200910254

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Lardner A. The effects of extracellular ph on immune function. J Leukocyte Biol. (2001) 69:522–30. doi: 10.1189/jlb.69.4.522

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Blaustein MP, Lederer WJ. Sodium/calcium exchange: its physiological implications. Physiol Rev. (1999) 79:763–854. doi: 10.1152/physrev.1999.79.3.763

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Simchowitz L, Cragoe EJ Jr. Na+/Ca2+ exchange in human neutrophils. Am J Physiol. (1988) 254:C150–64. doi: 10.1152/ajpcell.1988.254.1.C150

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Tintinger GR, Anderson R. Counteracting effects of NADPH oxidase and the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger on membrane repolarisation and store-operated uptake of Ca2+ by chemoattractant-activated human neutrophils. Biochem Pharmacol. (2004) 67:2263–71. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2004.02.029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Singel KL, Segal BH. NOX2-dependent regulation of inflammation. Clin Sci. (2016) 130:479–90. doi: 10.1042/CS20150660

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Lacy P, Abdel-Latif D, Steward M, Musat-Marcu S, Man SF, Moqbel R. Divergence of mechanisms regulating respiratory burst in blood and sputum eosinophils and neutrophils from atopic subjects. J Immunol. (2003) 170:2670–9. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.170.5.2670

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. DeCoursey TE, Morgan D, Cherny VV. The voltage dependence of NADPH oxidase reveals why phagocytes need proton channels. Nature. (2003) 422:531–4. doi: 10.1038/nature01523

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Demaurex N, Petheö GL. Electron and proton transport by NADPH oxidases. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci. (2005) 360:2315–25. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2005.1769

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Musset B, Cherny VV, Morgan D, DeCoursey TE. The intimate and mysterious relationship between proton channels and NADPH oxidase. FEBS Lett. (2009) 583:7–12. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2008.12.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Fukushima T, Waddell TK, Grinstein S, Goss GG, Orlowski J, Downey GP. Na+/H+ exchange activity during phagocytosis in human neutrophils: role of fcgamma receptors and tyrosine kinases. J Cell Biol. (1996) 132:1037–52. doi: 10.1083/jcb.132.6.1037

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Williams N, Eger RR, Moore MA, Mendelsohn N. Differentiation of mouse bone marrow precursor cells into neutrophil granulocytes by an activity separation from WEHI-3 cell-conditioned medium. Differentiation. (1978) 11:59–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-0436.1978.tb00970.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Dreval V, Dieterich P, Stock C, Schwab A. The role of Ca2+ transport across the plasma membrane for cell migration. Cell Physiol Biochem. (2005) 16:119–26. doi: 10.1159/000087738

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Lindemann O, Umlauf D, Frank S, Schimmelpfennig S, Bertrand J, Pap T, et al. TRPC6 regulates CXCR2-mediated chemotaxis of murine neutrophils. J Immunol. (2013) 190:5496–505. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201502

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Storck H, Hild B, Schimmelpfennig S, Sargin S, Nielsen N, Zaccagnino A, et al. Ion channels in control of pancreatic stellate cell migration. Oncotarget. (2017) 8:769–84. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13647

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Lu Y, Zhang C, Chen YH, Wang H, Zhang ZH, Chen X, et al. Immature mice are more susceptible than adult mice to acetaminophen-induced acute liver injury. Sci Rep. (2017) 7:1–11. doi: 10.1038/srep42736

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Van Eylen F, Bollen A, Herchuelz A. NCX1 Na/Ca exchanger splice variants in pancreatic islet cells. J Endocrinol. (2001) 168:517–26. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1680517

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2-ΔΔCT method. Methods. (2001) 25:402–8. doi: 10.1006/meth.2001.1262

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Newton K, Dixit VM. Signaling in innate immunity and inflammation. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. (2012) 4:a006049. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a006049

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Perraud AL, Takanishi CL, Shen B, Kang S, Smith MK, Schmitz C, et al. Accumulation of free ADP-ribose from mitochondria mediates oxidative stress-induced gating of TRPM2 cation channels. J Biol Chem. (2005) 280:6138–48. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M411446200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Wang L, Fu TM, Zhou Y, Xia S, Greka A, Wu H. Structures and gating mechanism of human TRPM2. Science. (2018) 362:eaav4809. doi: 10.1126/science.aav4809

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Qian X, Zhao H, Chen X, Li J. Disruption of transient receptor potential melastatin 2 decreases elastase release and bacterial clearance in neutrophils. Innate Immunity. (2018) 24:122–30. doi: 10.1177/1753425918759181

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Pellas TC, Boyar W, van Oostrum J, Wasvary J, Fryer LR, Pastor G, et al. Novel C5a receptor antagonists regulate neutrophil functions in vitro and in vivo. J Immunol. (1998) 160:5616–21.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

50. de Vasconcelos DI, Leite JA, Carneiro LT, Piuvezam MR, de Lima MR, de Morais LC, et al. Anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive activity of ouabain in mice. Mediat Inflamm. (2011). 2011:912925. doi: 10.1155/2011/912925

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Hamming KS, Soliman D, Webster NJ, Searle GJ, Matemisz LC, Liknes DA, et al. Inhibition of β-cell sodium-calcium exchange enhances glucose-dependent elevations in cytoplasmic calcium and insulin secretion. Diabetes. (2010) 59:1686–93. doi: 10.2337/db09-0630

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Zigmond SH, Woodworth A, Daukas G. Effects of sodium on chemotactic peptide binding to polymorphonuclear leukocytes. J Immunol. (1985) 135:531–6.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

53. Watano T, Kimura J, Morita T, Nakanishi H. A novel antagonist, No. 7943, of the Na+/Ca2+ exchange current in guinea-pig cardiac ventricular cells. Br J Pharmacol. (1996) 119:555–63. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1996.tb15708.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Kuroki M, Kamo N, Kobatake Y, Okimasu E, Utsumi K. Measurement of membrane potential in polymorphonuclear leukocytes and its changes during surface stimulation. BBA Biomembranes. (1982) 693:326–34. doi: 10.1016/0005-2736(82)90439-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Baartscheer A, Schumacher CA, Coronel R, Fiolet JW, Fiolet. The driving force of the Na+/Ca2+-exchanger during: metabolic inhibition. Front Physiol. (2011) 2:10. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2011.00010

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Jankowski A, Grinstein S. A noninvasive fluorimetric procedure for measurement of membrane potential. Quantification of the NADPH oxidase-induced depolarization in activated neutrophils. J Biol Chem. (1999) 274:26098–104. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.37.26098

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Krautwurst D, Seifert R, Hescheler J, Schultz G. Formyl peptides and ATP stimulate Ca2+ and Na+ inward currents through non-selective cation channels via G-proteins in dibutyryl cyclic AMP-differentiated HL-60 cells. Involvement of Ca2+ and Na+ in the activation of -glucuronidase release and superoxide. Biochem J. (1992) 288:1025–35. doi: 10.1042/bj2881025

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Coppini R, Ferrantini C, Mazzoni L, Sartiani L, Olivotto I, Poggesi C, et al. Regulation of intracellular Na+ in health and disease: pathophysiological mechanisms and implications for treatment. Glob Cardiol Sci Pract. (2013) 2013:30. doi: 10.5339/gcsp.2013.30

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. Seifert R, Wenzel-Seifert K. Constitutive activity of g-proteins-coupled receptors: cause of disease and common property of wild-type receptors. Naunyn Schmiedeberg's Arch Pharmacol. (2002) 366:381–416. doi: 10.1007/s00210-002-0588-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Zarzycka B, Zaidi SA, Roth BL, Katritch V. Harnessing ion-binding sites for GPCR pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev. (2019) 71:571–95. doi: 10.1124/pr.119.017863

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Arakawa N, Sakaue M, Yokoyama I, Hashimoto H, Koyama Y, Baba A, et al. KB-R7943 inhibits store-operated Ca2+ entry in cultured neurons and astrocytes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. (2000) 279:354–7. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.2000.3968

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Henderson LM, Chappell JB, Jones OT. Superoxide generation by the electrogenic NADPH oxidase of human neutrophils is limited by the movement of a compensating charge. Biochem J. (1988) 255:285–90.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

63. Antoun El C, Okochi Y, Sasaki M, Arnaudeau S, Okamura Y, Demaurex N. VSOP/Hv1 proton channels sustain calcium entry, neutrophil migration, and superoxide production by limiting cell depolarization and acidification. J Exp Med. (2010) 207:129–39. doi: 10.1084/jem.20091837

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

64. Osaki M, Sumimoto H, Takeshige K, Cragoe EJ Jr, Hori Y, Minakami S. Na+/H+ exchange modulates the production of leukotriene B4 by human neutrophils. Biochem J. (1989) 257:751–8. doi: 10.1042/bj2570751

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

65. Frantz C, Karydis A, Nalbant P, Hahn KM, Barber DL. Positive feedback between Cdc42 activity and H+ efflux by the Na-H exchanger NHE1 for polarity of migrating cells. J Cell Biol. (2007) 179:403–10. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200704169

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

66. Klein M, Seeger P, Schuricht B, Alper SL, Schwab A. Polarization of Na+/H+ and Cl–/HCO3– exchangers in migrating renal epithelial cells. J General Physiol. (2000) 115:599–608. doi: 10.1085/jgp.115.5.599

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: neutrophil, chemotaxis, intracellular sodium, NCX1, TRP channels

Citation: Najder K, Rugi M, Lebel M, Schröder J, Oster L, Schimmelpfennig S, Sargin S, Pethő Z, Bulk E and Schwab A (2020) Role of the Intracellular Sodium Homeostasis in Chemotaxis of Activated Murine Neutrophils. Front. Immunol. 11:2124. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.02124

Received: 29 January 2020; Accepted: 05 August 2020;
Published: 08 September 2020.

Edited by:

Paige Lacy, University of Alberta, Canada

Reviewed by:

Andreas Lückhoff, RWTH Aachen University, Germany
Leo Koenderman, Utrecht University, Netherlands
Roland Immler, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, Germany

Copyright © 2020 Najder, Rugi, Lebel, Schröder, Oster, Schimmelpfennig, Sargin, Pethő, Bulk and Schwab. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Karolina Najder, karolina.najder@uni-muenster.de