Skip to main content

CASE REPORT article

Front. Immunol., 29 June 2022
Sec. Autoimmune and Autoinflammatory Disorders

A Massive Number of Extracellular Tropheryma whipplei in Infective Endocarditis: A Case Report and Literature Review

Nadji Hannachi,&#x;Nadji Hannachi1,2†Florent Arregle,&#x;Florent Arregle3,4†Hubert Lepidi,Hubert Lepidi1,5Jean-Pierre BaudoinJean-Pierre Baudoin1Frdrique GourietFrédérique Gouriet1Hlne Martel,Hélène Martel3,4Sandrine HubertSandrine Hubert4Benoit DesnuesBenoit Desnues1Alberto RiberiAlberto Riberi6Jean-Paul CasaltaJean-Paul Casalta1Gilbert Habib,Gilbert Habib1,4Laurence Camoin-Jau,*Laurence Camoin-Jau1,7*
  • 1Aix Marseille Univ, IRD, APHM, MEPHI, IHU Méditerranée infection, Marseille, France
  • 2Département de Pharmacie, Faculté de Médecine, Université Ferhat Abbas Sétif I, Sétif, Algeria
  • 3IHU Méditerranée Infection, département d'infectiologie, Marseille, France
  • 4Département de cardiologie, la Timone Hospital, AP-HM, Marseille, France
  • 5Laboratoire d’anatomie et de cytologie pathologique, la Timone Hospital, AP-HM, Marseille, France
  • 6Department of Cardiac Surgery, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
  • 7Laboratoire d’Hématologie, La Timone Hospital, APHM, Marseille, France

Whipple’s disease (WD) is a chronic multisystemic infection caused by Tropheryma whipplei. If this bacterium presents an intracellular localization, associated with rare diseases and without pathognomonic signs, it is often subject to a misunderstanding of its physiopathology, often a misdiagnosis or simply an oversight. Here, we report the case of a patient treated for presumed rheumatoid arthritis. Recently, this patient presented to the hospital with infectious endocarditis. After surgery and histological analysis, we discovered the presence of T. whipplei. Electron microscopy allowed us to discover an atypical bacterial organization with a very large number of bacteria present in the extracellular medium in vegetation and valvular tissue. This atypical presentation we report here might be explained by the anti-inflammatory treatment administrated for our patient’s initial diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis.

Introduction

Whipple’s disease is a rare multiorgan infective disease caused by an intracellular bacterium, named Tropheryma whipplei. Classically, the disease is characterized by weight loss, fever, abdominal pain, diarrhea, polyarthralgia, and lymphadenopathy (1). Infectious endocarditis (IE) caused by T. whipplei is rare but represents the most frequent cardiovascular manifestation of T. whipplei infection (2). It is now considered to be one of the agents responsible for blood culture-negative endocarditis (3). Analysis of the infected valve reveals vegetations, valvular inflammation, and the presence of T. whipplei, mainly observed in monocyte–macrophage cells (4).

We described here a case of a patient treated with anti-interleukin-6, methotrexate, and corticosteroid for his presumed rheumatoid arthritis for 2 years, who was then operated for T. whipplei IE. Interestingly, we report particular features in histology and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), notably an abundant presence, mainly in an extracellular environment of T. whipplei.

Case Description

Patient Presentation

A 69-year-old Caucasian man was referred to our tertiary center for suspicion of native aortic valve IE. He had a history of suspected seronegative rheumatoid arthritis for 2 years with a predominantly rhizomelic localization and was treated with oral corticosteroids, methotrexate, and anti-interleukin-6 (tocilizumab). He was retired from an earthmoving company. The patient was in his usual state of health until 4 days prior to admission when he presented with dizziness. He presented to the emergency department of the nearest hospital where neurologic examination revealed a cerebellar syndrome. The patient had no other symptoms, particularly no fever. Brain MRI showed small ischemic lesions in multiple cerebral territories. Due to a suspected cardioembolic event, transthoracic echocardiography was performed and revealed the presence of significant mobile vegetation on the native aortic valve. The patient was immediately transferred to a tertiary center with cardiac surgery. At admission, his temperature was 37.4°C, blood pressure 112/75 mmHg, heart rate 56 bpm, and oxygen saturation 97%. The patient had no symptoms or clinical signs of heart failure. Neurological examination showed persistence of cerebellar syndrome with dizziness and ataxia of the right upper limb but no motor impairments or sensory disorders. Physical examination revealed no signs of arthritis, but the patient reported morning stiffness in the shoulders and hips. Laboratory tests performed on admission showed a mild inflammatory reaction with a white cell count of 13,000 per microliter and a C-reactive protein level of 7.8 mg/L.

Transesophageal echocardiography was performed and confirmed the presence of a large (16 mm length) mobile vegetation on the aortic valve (left coronary cusp) with moderate aortic regurgitation. There was no sign of aortic root abscess or other valve involvement.

Microbial Investigations and Treatment

As for each patient presenting in our center with suspicion of IE, we performed a standardized diagnostic test including blood cultures, serological testing for fastidious bacteria, immunological blood tests, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from EDTA blood for the detection of bacteria including Bartonella species, Coxiella burnetii, Enterococcus faecalis, Enterococcus faecium, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus gallolyticus, Streptococcus oralis, and T. whipplei. Blood test and PCR were performed for Enterococcus spp., E. coli, and Staphylococcus spp. (5). Blood cultures remained sterile and the diagnosis of blood culture-negative IE was made. An antibiotic therapy combining vancomycin and imipenem has been implemented. A cerebral cardiac and thoraco-abdominal CT scan was performed and ruled out other embolic localization. PET-CT did not reveal valvular hypermetabolism. On the fourth day after admission, PCR on blood showed positivity for T. whipplei, which was further confirmed on a second sample of blood. The reaction conditions and the primers were previously described by our team (6). PCR for T. whipplei in urine and stool was negative but showed positivity from a saliva sample. Antibiotic treatment was changed to an oral combination of doxycycline 100 mg twice daily and hydroxychloroquine 200 mg three times daily for a duration of at least 1 year. Due to the persistence of supracentimetric vegetation and cerebral embolism, an indication of valvular surgery was retained. The patient underwent aortic valve replacement with bioprosthesis 2 weeks after admission. PCR for T. whipplei on valvular tissue was positive and pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of T. whipplei IE. Postoperative evolution was simple and the patient was discharged 2 weeks after surgery. The patient had no family antecedents for T. whipplei IE.

Pathological Analysis

A formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded valve sample was cut to 3-μm thickness and stained with hematoxylin–eosin–saffron. Serial sections were also obtained to perform special stains and immunohistochemical investigations. Special stains were used for the detection of bacteria and fungi, including diastase-digested periodic-acid Schiff (PAS), Giemsa, Brown–Hopps/Brown–Brenn Gram, Grocott-Gomori methenamine silver, Warthin-Starry, and Ziehl–Neelsen acid-fast stains. Immunohistochemical analysis was performed with a rabbit anti-T. whipplei antibody used at a 1:2,000 dilution, as previously described (7). The immunohistological procedure employed the Ventana Benchmark autostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc., Tucson, AZ, USA). A negative control was performed with normal rabbit serum.

Tropheryma whipplei-infected aortic valve showed typical histologic features related to infective endocarditis, with vegetation and inflammatory infiltrates in fibrotic tissue (Figures 1A, B). Mononuclear cell inflammatory infiltrates were dense and focal, mainly composed of foamy macrophages and lymphocytes. The foamy histiocytes were stuffed with a dense, granular material that was strongly positive on PAS staining and resistant to diastase (Figure 1C). Moreover, a massive PAS-positive deposit material was also observed in the valvular connective tissue with an extracellular location (Figure 1D). Using the rabbit anti-T. whipplei antibody, bacilli were identified in valve tissue by immunostaining. The distribution pattern of immunoreactivity seen with the polyclonal antibody was similar to that observed with the PAS staining. Bacilli were observed as immunopositive material, both in foamy macrophage cytoplasm and in extracellular location (Figures 1D–F).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1 Pathological analysis. (A, B) Aortic valve with Whipple’s endocarditis: superficial vegetation and fibrosis of the connective valve tissue and mononuclear inflammatory cell infiltrate with numerous foamy macrophages near the vegetation (A, arrow) and with large eosinophilic deposits in the connective valve tissue (arrowheads, B) (hematoxylin–eosin–saffron, original magnification ×100 and ×100, respectively). (C, D) Foamy macrophages containing the characteristic inclusion bodies (C, arrow) and with massive extracellular detection of bacilli with the PAS stain (D, arrowheads) (PAS staining, original magnification ×100 and ×100, respectively). (E, F) Immunohistochemical detection of Tropheryma whipplei: bacilli are packed as coarse granular immunopositive material in foamy macrophage cytoplasm (E, arrow) and in an extracellular location in the connective valve tissue in massive number (F, arrowheads) (polyclonal rabbit anti-T. whipplei antibody used at a dilution of 1:2,000 with Mayer’s hemalum counterstain, original magnification ×100 and ×100, respectively).

SEM

SEM analysis was performed on an excised aortic valve consisting in vegetation superposed to a leaflet. As previously described, the valvular tissue was first cut transversally in order to access the internal organization and one-half was further processed for SEM (8). The sample was fixed with glutaraldehyde 2.5% in 0.1 M of sodium cacodylate buffer for 30 min and then rinsed with 0.1 M of sodium cacodylate buffer and distilled water for 1 min each. The sample was dehydrated with increasing ethanol solutions (30%, 50%, 70%, 90%) for 2 min and with 100% ethanol for 5 min. The sample was incubated with ethanol 100%/hexamethyldisilazane (HDMS) 100% in a 1:2 ratio for 5 min. The sample was incubated with 100% of HDMS for 5 min and air-dried for 30 min. It was then mounted with its transverse cut facing upwards on double-sided tape on a clean glass slide and platinum sputter-coated for 40 s at 5 mA (Hitachi MC1000). The observation was made using a SU5000 (Hitachi High-Technologies, Tokyo, Japan) SEM with BSE detector in low-vacuum mode at 15 kV of acceleration voltage, observation mode (spot size 30).

SEM analysis was performed on a valvular piece consisting in vegetation anchored to the valve leaflet (Figure 2A). Clusters of extracellular bacillus-like objects (200 nm × 2 µm) resembling T. whipplei bacteria were found embedded in the leaflet tissue (Figure 2B). Tropheryma whipplei bacteria were also located extracellularly within the vegetation: i) in the peripheral areas of the vegetation, arranged as single cells disseminated within the other elements of the vegetation (Figures 2C–F), and ii) in deeper regions composed exclusively of T. whipplei cells, giving the appearance of “vermicelli” (Figures 2G–I). In these deep foci, T. whipplei cells were densely packed, embedded in an amorphous matrix, and spatially arranged with mixed orientations (Figures 2G–I).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2 Scanning electron microscopy of Tropheryma whipplei vegetation. (A) Low-magnification view of the whole cardiac biopsy piece along its deepness, with vegetation (right) superposed to valve leaflet (left). (B) Zoom-in image of the [B] boxed region in (A) showing a cluster of extracellular T. whipplei cells embedded in the valvular tissue. (C) Zoom-in image of the (C) boxed region in (A) showing extracellular T. whipplei cells (bold arrows) disseminated in a network of thick fibrin bundles and platelets (thick arrow). (D) Zoom-in image of the (D) boxed region in (A) with extracellular T. whipplei cells located in a fishnet-like network of fibrin filaments. (E, F) Zoom-in image of the (E, F) boxed region in (A) containing erythrocytes (E, F), isolated or aggregated platelets (E, F, *), fibrin, and extracellular T. whipplei cells (arrows). (G–I) Zoom-in image of the (G–I) boxed region in (A) depicting a more central region of the vegetation with numerous T. whipplei cells, intermingled with an amorphous matrix and focally organized (G) or more broadly distributed (H, I).

Discussion

We report here a case of a T. whipplei IE, with an atypical bacterial organization having a very large number of bacteria present in the extracellular medium in vegetation and valvular tissue. The native aortic valve was recovered from a patient previously treated with a tritherapy consisting of corticosteroid, methotrexate, and anti-IL-6 (tocilizumab) for his pathology presumed to be rheumatoid arthritis. Compared to other Whipple’s endocarditis described in the literature, this case of Whipple’s endocarditis was morphologically similar, with no extensive vegetations, a slight inflammation with inflammatory infiltrates composed mainly of foamy macrophages, and extensive valvular fibrosis (2, 4). In this case, in agreement with previous reports regarding Whipple’s endocarditis, the organisms were found within the cytoplasm of macrophages observed in the inflammatory infiltrates (1, 4). In contrast, massive numbers of bacilli were also detected in an extracellular location at the microscopic and ultrastructural levels, outside of the cytoplasm of macrophages.

An extracellular location of Whipple bacilli was previously described in tissues, but not in such proportions. Indeed, extracellular forms have already been reported in cultures of this species on cell media of fibroblasts in the form of massive aggregates (9, 10). Also, T. whipplei was previously grown in an axenic culture medium after sequencing and analysis of its genome to find specific metabolic deficiencies, which allowed the authors to design a complete medium culture (11). The presence of extracellular rRNA specific to T. whipplei was described in intestinal biopsies of patients with Whipple’s disease (12). In another study, T. whipplei was detected in the glomerular capsular space and in the tubular lumen in a septuagenarian patient treated with etanercept, an anti-TNF-α drug. This localization was objectified by histology and electron microscopy and confirmed by PCR and specific fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (13). Also, an extracellular form of T. whipplei was reported in a patient with IE who had previously undergone a porcine valve xenograft (14). Here, we provide a description of a massive number of extracellular T. whipplei, in a native aortic valve with IE both in vegetation and in the valvular connective tissue.

The epidemiology of T. whipplei IE is not perfectly elucidated. Nevertheless, a male predominance is clearly reported, with 85% of the cases being men, mainly European, with an average age of 57.1 years (McGee et al., 2018). Asymptomatic carriage is widely reported in healthy subjects compared to immunodeficient patients, in whom the bacterium may be pathological (15). A recent preliminary study showed that immunocompromised children constituted a reservoir for T. whipplei with 77% suffering from acute lymphocytic leukemia (16). In addition, a genetic component cannot be ruled out, since a familial character of the infectious manifestation of T. whipplei has previously been reported. Indeed, Guérin et al. described a French family in which four members had Whipple’s disease. These members expressed a rare mutation in one copy of the gene coding for a protein called interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4), which acts as a switch that activates and deactivates certain genes involved in the body’s response to infection (17).

This atypical presentation reported here might be explained by the anti-inflammatory treatment administrated for our patient’s initial diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis. Here, instead of anti-TNF-α, our patient was treated with anti-IL-6 antibodies. Although the explanation of the mechanism of action is far from being elucidated, we may hypothesize that, similar to anti-TNF-α, tocilizumab might have a reactivating effect on the bacteria. In a recent study, confirmed via intestinal biopsies and sera of patients, Boumaza et al. reported that anti-TNF-α drugs promote the replication of T. whipplei and exacerbate the apoptotic effect exerted by the bacterium on macrophages (18). This might explain the extracellular presence of the bacteria. Anti-TNF-α also allows M2 polarization of macrophages infected with T. whipplei, with a less inflammatory and less bactericidal status than M1 macrophages. In the same study, it is noteworthy that TNF-α and interleukin (IL)-6 secretion increased when macrophages were infected with T. whipplei, but when anti-TNF-α was added, TNF-α secretion decreased, while IL-6 increased. This observation might suggest a different mechanism of action between TNF-α and IL-6 inhibitors in the reactivation of T. whipplei infection (18). In a mouse model evaluating the impact of IL-6 on infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis, an actinobacterium phylogenetically related to T. whipplei, lethal tuberculosis was described when mice were IL-6-deficient mutants (19). Numerous studies have already reported cases of Whipple’s disease or infectious endocarditis in patients who received tocilizumab (2023). However, the involvement of the latter was underestimated, perhaps because it was preceded by anti-TNF-α treatment. Interestingly, in four of the five patients who received tocilizumab in these studies, tocilizumab was the only or the last biologic pro-inflammatory anti-cytokine drug prescribed to them (2023). In our case, the patient had only received tocilizumab as an anti-cytokine biologic drug, thus emphasizing the possible implication of this therapy with the emergence of T. whipplei infection.

In summary, to the best of our knowledge, we report here for the first time a massive number of T. whipplei in an extracellular state in clinical isolates. This atypical presentation should draw the attention of clinicians to the risk of pathological expression of the carriage of T. whipplei during treatment with anti-IL-6.

Data Availability Statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics Statement

Written informed consent was obtained from the individual for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author Contributions

FA, HL, FG, HM, SH, AR, J-PC, and GH took care of the patient. NH, HL, J-PB, GH, and LC-J did the investigations. NH, FA, HL, GH, and LC-J contributed to the collection of the patient’s medical history. NH, HL, and J-PB provided the figures. The study was designed by NH, FA, GH, and LC-J. Data were interpreted by all authors. The scientific literature search was done by NH, FA, J-PB, BD, GH, and LC-J. NH, FA, HL, J-PB, GH, and LC-J wrote the manuscript. All the other authors commented on and contributed to the final version of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Fenollar F, Puéchal X, Raoult D. Whipple’s Disease. N Engl J Med (2007) 356:55–66. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra062477

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Fenollar F, Célard M, Lagier JC, Lepidi H, Fournier PE, Raoult D. Tropheryma Whipplei Endocarditis. Emerg Infect Dis (2013) 11:1721–30. doi: 10.3201/eid1911.121356

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Fournier P-E, Gouriet F, Casalta JP, Lepidi H, Chaudet H, Thuny F, et al. Blood Culture-Negative Endocarditis: Improving the Diagnostic Yield Using New Diagnostic Tools. Medicine (Baltimore) (2017) 96(47):e8392. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000008392

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Lepidi H, Fenollar F, Dumler JS, Gauduchon V, Chalabreysse L, Bammert A, et al. Cardiac Valves in Patients With Whipple Endocarditis: Microbiological, Molecular, Quantitative Histologic and Immunohistochemical Studies of 5 Patients. J Infect Dis (2004) 190:935–45. doi: 10.1086/422845

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Habib G, Lancellotti P, Antunes MJ, Bongiorni MG, Casalta JP, Del Zotti F, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the Management of Infective Endocarditis: The Task Force for the Management of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). Eur Heart J (2015) 36(44):3075–128. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv319

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Fournier PE, Thuny F, Richet H, Lepidi H, Casalta JP, Arzouni JP, et al. Comprehensive Diagnostic Strategy for Blood Culture-Negative Endocarditis: A Prospective Study of 819 New Cases. Clin Infect Dis (2010) 51(2):131–40. doi: 10.1086/653675

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Raoult D, La Scola B, Lecocq P, Lepidi H, Fournier PE. Culture and Immunological Detection of Tropheryma Whippelii From the Duodenum of a Patient With Whipple Disease. JAMA (2001) 285:1039–43. doi: 10.1001/jama.285.8.1039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Hannachi N, Lepidi H, Fontanini A, Takakura T, Bou-Khalil J, Gouriet F, et al. A Novel Approach for Detecting Unique Variations Among Infectious Bacterial Species in Endocarditic Cardiac Valve Vegetation. Cells (2020) 9(8):1899. doi: 10.3390/cells9081899

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Marth T. Tropheryma Whipplei, Immunosuppression and Whipple's Disease: From a Low-Pathogenic, Environmental Infectious Organism to a Rare, Multifaceted Inflammatory Complex. Dig Dis (2015) 33(2):190–9. doi: 10.1159/000369538

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Dolmans RA, Boel CH, Lacle MM, Kusters JG. Clinical Manifestations, Treatment, and Diagnosis of Tropheryma Whipplei Infections. Clin Microbiol Rev (2017) 30(2):529–55. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00033-16

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Renesto P, Crapoulet N, Ogata H, La Scola B, Vestris G, Claverie JM, et al. Genome-Based Design of a Cell-Free Culture Medium for Tropheryma Whipplei. Lancet (2003) 362(9382):447–9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)14071-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Fredricks DN, Relman DA. Localization of Tropheryma Whippelii rRNA in Tissues From Patients With Whipple's Disease. J Infect Dis (2001) 183(8):1229–37. doi: 10.1086/319684

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Moter A, Janneck M, Wolters M, Iking-Konert C, Wiessner A, Loddenkemper C, et al. Potential Role for Urine Polymerase Chain Reaction in the Diagnosis of Whipple's Disease. Clin Infect Dis (2019) 68(7):1089–97. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy664

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Dreier J, Szabados F, von Herbay A, Kröger T, Kleesiek K. Tropheryma Whipplei Infection of an Acellular Porcine Heart Valve Bioprosthesis in a Patient Who did Not Have Intestinal Whipple's Disease. J Clin Microbiol (2004) 42(10):4487–93. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.10.4487-4493.2004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Boumaza A, Ben Azzouz E, Arrindell J, Lepidi H, Mezouar S, Desnues B. Whipple's Disease and Tropheryma Whipplei Infections: From Bench to Bedside. Lancet Infect Dis (2022) S1473-3099(22):00128–1. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00128-1

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Shams S, Niloofar R, Beltrame A, Moro L, Piubelli C, Amiri FB, et al. Tropheryma Whipplei Intestinal Colonization in Immunocompromised Children in Iran: A Preliminary Study. Future Microbiol (2021) 16:1161–6. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2021-0091

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Guérin A, Kerner G, Marr N, Markle JG, Fenollar F, Wong N, et al. IRF4 Haploinsufficiency in a Family With Whipple's Disease. eLife (2018) 7:e32340. doi: 10.7554/eLife.32340

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Boumaza A, Mezouar S, Bardou M, Raoult D, Mège JL, Desnues B. Tumor Necrosis Factor Inhibitors Exacerbate Whipple's Disease by Reprogramming Macrophage and Inducing Apoptosis. Front Immunol (2021) 12:667357. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.667357

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Ladel CH, Blum C, Dreher A, Reifenberg K, Kopf M, Kaufmann SH. Lethal Tuberculosis in Interleukin-6-Deficient Mutant Mice. Infect Immun (1997) 65(11):4843–9. doi: 10.1128/iai.65.11.4843-4849.1997

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Alozie A, Zimpfer A, Köller K, Westphal B, Obliers A, Erbersdobler A, et al. Arthralgia and Blood Culture-Negative Endocarditis in Middle Age Men Suggest Tropheryma Whipplei Infection: Report of Two Cases and Review of the Literature. BMC Infect Dis (2015) 15:339. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1078-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Ramos JM, Pasquau F, Galipienso N, Valero B, Navarro A, Martinez A, et al. Whipple’s Disease Diagnosed During Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha Treatment: Two Case Reports and Review of the Literature. J Med Case Rep (2015) 9:165. doi: 10.1186/s13256-015-0632-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Glaser C, Rieg S, Wiech T, Scholz C, Endres D, Stich O, et al. Whipple's Disease Mimicking Rheumatoid Arthritis can Cause Misdiagnosis and Treatment Failure. Orphanet J Rare Dis (2017) 12(1):99. doi: 10.1186/s13023-017-0630-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Razanamahery J, Humbert S, Gil H, Bouiller K, Magy-Bertrand N. Tropheryma Whipplei Infection Mimicking Giant Cell Arteritis Flare in a Patient Treated With Interleukin-6 Receptor Blocker Tocilizumab. Clin Exp Rheumatol (2020) 38 Suppl 124(2):245–6.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

24. McGee M, Brienesse S, Chong B, Levendel A, Lai K. Tropheryma Whipplei Endocarditis: Case Presentation and Review of the Literature. Open Forum Infect Dis (2018) 6(1):ofy330. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy330

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Tropheryma whipplei, infectious endocarditis, rheumatoid arthritis, tocilizumab, electron microscopy

Citation: Hannachi N, Arregle F, Lepidi H, Baudoin J-P, Gouriet F, Martel H, Hubert S, Desnues B, Riberi A, Casalta J-P, Habib G and Camoin-Jau L (2022) A Massive Number of Extracellular Tropheryma whipplei in Infective Endocarditis: A Case Report and Literature Review. Front. Immunol. 13:900589. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.900589

Received: 25 April 2022; Accepted: 25 May 2022;
Published: 29 June 2022.

Edited by:

Jens Dieter Thiel, Medical University of Graz, Austria

Reviewed by:

Saeed Shams, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Iran
Jacinta Bustamante, Université Paris Descartes, France
Verena Moos, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Germany

Copyright © 2022 Hannachi, Arregle, Lepidi, Baudoin, Gouriet, Martel, Hubert, Desnues, Riberi, Casalta, Habib and Camoin-Jau. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Laurence Camoin-Jau, laurence.camoin@ap-hm.fr

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.