Sec. NK and Innate Lymphoid Cell Biology
Volume 14 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2023.1229417
Editorial: Translating NK cell scientific research to clinical product manufacturing
- 1Experimental Immunology & Cell Therapy, Department of Pediatrics, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
- 2Frankfurt Cancer Institute, Goethe University, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- 3German Cancer Consortium (DKTK) and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Partner Site Frankfurt/Mainz, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
- 4Glycostem Therapeutics B.V., Oss, Netherlands
- 5Transfusion Medicine, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden and Institute for Transfusion Medicine Dresden, German Red Cross Blood Donation Service North-East, Dresden, Germany
- 6Department of Pediatrics, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
Editorial on the Research Topic
Translating NK cell scientific research to clinical product manufacturing
Natural Killer (NK) cells have a unique role of detecting and destroying malignant and virus infected cells (1) as a part of the immune system. The role of NK cells in the treatment of leukemia has been demonstrated in the context of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (2, 3). These findings supported the use of allogeneic NK cells for treatment of patients and clinical responses by adoptive NK cell therapy have been observed [(4-7) reviewed in Lamers-Kok (8)].
Furthermore, during the last decade, genetic modifications of immune cells, namely T lymphocytes, to express chimeric antigen receptors have resulted in breakthrough clinical advancements in previously incurable B cell malignancies. Today, several CAR-T cell therapies have obtained marketing authorization and have become standard of care. In an effort to expand this clinical success achieved in liquid cancers to also solid cancers, NK cells have regained considerable interest as alternative “CAR-drivers”. NK cells have several attributes that make them an attractive effector cell for CAR-targeted cancer immunotherapies, especially when such treatments have to be made available to large cohorts suffering from more frequent malignancies, such as lung cancer, breast cancer and ovarian cancer. I) NK cells do not elicit GvHD reactions and are therefore a potential source for targeted - but with regard to the patient “undirected” - allogeneic off-the-shelf cell therapies; II) NK cells, in contrast to CAR-T cells, do not secrete IL-6, a hallmark cytokine causing severe complications described as cytokine release syndrome (CRS); III) NK cells may be able to activate the patient´s own immune system via dendritic and bystander T cells, which could potentially result in a long-lasting anti-tumor vaccine effect.
However, compared to CAR-T cells, CAR-NK cells are currently subjected to fewer clinical trials and the observed clinical benefits have been marginal. Nevertheless, the group around Winfried Wels from Frankfurt/Main, Germany, has established remarkable safety of intracranial injections of Her2 CAR-engineered NK-92 cells in patients with relapsed glioblastoma (9), and Rezvani and colleagues from MD Anderson, Houston, showed that systemic infusions of CD19 CAR engineered primary NK cells in patients with B cell malignancies resulted in signs of clinical benefit and NK cell persistence (10).
There are several shortfalls that can explain why NK cells did not quite keep up with the expectations yet, when it comes to CAR-effector cell based treatments. In contrast to T lymphocytes, NK cells are difficult to genetically engineer and, higher cell dosages have to be given initially, since NK cells do not clonally expand as extensively in vivo.
With this Research Topic all devoted to the translation of NK cell based therapies into the clinic and to address above mentioned shortcomings of NK cells, Frontiers in Immunology provides an up-to-date insight in NK manufacturing, genetic engineering and the latest clinical development.
In the article by Johnson et al., NK Cloudz - a dissolvable polymer-based microsphere platform - was developed as an alternative to a feeder cell approach to expand NK cells. The authors demonstrated that a combination of NK Cloudz, a G-Rex6M culture vessel, and GMP Human Platelet Lysate could expand NK cells by almost 400-fold in 10 days from a PBMC starting population. In the work of Oyer et al., they reported that PM21-particle expanded NK cells (PM21-NK cells) can be cryopreserved for off-the-shelf approaches without losing their cytotoxicity and effector functions in vitro and in vivo.
In the work by Dezfouli et al., Hsp70 peptide (TKD)/IL-2-stimulated NK cells and anti-Hsp70 CAR T cells demonstrated comparable anti-tumor effects against colorectal cancer cells, albeit with somewhat differing kinetics. Thus, TKD/IL-2-stimulated NK cells, as well as anti-Hsp70 CAR T cells, provide a promising direction to target mHsp70, which is frequently and specifically expressed on the cell surface of many different cancers other than colorectal cancers. In the study by Soldierer et al., further optimizations in CAR-NK manufacturing for off-the-shelf applications were presented, including different internal promotors for lentiviral CAR vectors, lentiviral pseudotypes, viral entry enhancers, and IL-15 signaling. Coupled with the natural cytotoxicity of NK cells and the lack of graft-versus-host disease potential, testing of these CAR-NK cells for adoptive immunotherapy is warranted.
In the Mini Review by Gurney et al., the complex interactions were reported that exist between feeder cells and both viral and emerging non-viral genome editing technologies in NK cell engineering. They focus on two established clinical-grade feeder systems: Epstein-Barr virus transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines and genetically engineered K562.mbIL21.4-1BBL feeder cells. In the review by Boyd-Gibbins et al., insights in NK cell manufacturing of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) and purified NK cell extracellular vesicles (NKEVs) are provided, including the discussion if NKEV reproduce key functions of their parent NK cells and can be developed into a standalone therapeutic with reduced immunogenicity compared to cell therapies. The authors discuss the role iPSC technology might play in both NK cell manufacturing and NKEV development. Ruppel et al. provided a technological overview on tailoring design and signaling for CAR-NK cells in cancer therapy. The authors explore different CAR formats and modifications to optimize NK cell-mediated signaling, and also challenges beyond NK cell engineering, including expansion and manufacturing. The article by Tarannum et al. presents an up-to-date review on innovative strategies to improve the clinical application of NK cell-based immunotherapy, addressing key challenges that need to be solved for effective translation of NK cell research into clinical applications, including in vitro expansion, in vivo persistence, infiltration to the tumor site, and prevention of exhaustion.
Finally, while prior studies of NK cell therapy generally had short follow-up time on patients with clinical response, the report by Parisi et al. reported definitive evidence that donor-derived alloreactive KIR-ligand-mismatched NK cells can result in durable control of acute myeloid leukemia for more than 10 years. In recipients with a dose of infused alloreactive NK cells >2 x10^5/kg, the 5-year disease-free survival beyond first morphological complete remission was >60%.
Collectively, these clinical data and the exciting technological advances described in this series of articles pave the way for next generation of GMP manufacturing and clinical applications.
EU, WL, TT and VH edited the submissions to the Research Topic, summarized the conclusions and wrote the editorial. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
The authors thank all contributing authors of the manuscripts submitted, all pioneers of early NK cell research and translational approaches.
Conflict of interest
Author VH was employed by Glycostem Therapeutics B.V. WL is a part-time employee of Miltenyi BioMedicine. EU is Advisory Board member of Phialogics and has sponsored research projects with Gilead and BMS.
The remaining author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
2. Ruggeri L, Capanni M, Urbani E, Perruccio K, Shlomchik WD, Tosti A, et al. Effectiveness of donor natural killer cell alloreactivity in mismatched hematopoietic transplants. Science (2002) 295(5562):2097–100. doi: 10.1126/science.1068440
3. Ruggeri L, Mancusi A, Burchielli E, Capanni M, Carotti A, Aloisi T, et al. NK cell alloreactivity and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Blood Cells Mol Dis (2008) 40(1):84–90. doi: 10.1016/j.bcmd.2007.06.029
4. Miller JS, Soignier Y, Panoskaltsis-Mortari A, McNearney SA, Yun GH, Fautsch SK, et al. Successful adoptive transfer and in vivo expansion of human haploidentical NK cells in patients with cancer. Blood (2005) 105(8):3051–7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-07-2974
5. Rubnitz JE, Inaba H, Ribeiro RC, Pounds S, Rooney B, Bell T, et al. NKAML: a pilot study to determine the safety and feasibility of haploidentical natural killer cell transplantation in childhood acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol (2010) 28(6):955–9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.4590
6. Parisi S, Lecciso M, Ocadlikova D, Salvestrini V, Ciciarello M, Forte D, et al. The more, the better: "go the right thing" for natural killer immunotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia. Front Immunol (2017) 8:1330. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01330
7. Dolstra H, Roeven MWH, Spanholtz J, Hangalapura BN, Tordoir M, Maas F, et al. Successful transfer of umbilical cord blood CD34+ hematopoietic stem and progenitor-derived NK cells in older acute myeloid leukemia patients. Clin Cancer Res (2017) 23(15):4107–18. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2981
8. Lamers-Kok N, Panella D, Georgoudaki AM, Liu H, Özkazanc D, Kučerová L, et al. Natural killer cells in clinical development as non-engineered, engineered, and combination therapies. J Hematol Oncol (2022) 15(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s13045-022-01382-5
9. Burger MC, Forster MT, Romanski A, Straßheimer F, Macas J, Zeiner PS, et al. Intracranial injection of NK cells engineered with a HER2-targeted chimeric antigen receptor in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol (2023) 6:noad087. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/noad087
Keywords: Natural Killer cells, cell therapy, ATMP, good manufacturing practice (GMP), tumor therapy, manufacturing, NK cells
Citation: Ullrich E, Huppert V, Tonn T and Leung W (2023) Editorial: Translating NK cell scientific research to clinical product manufacturing. Front. Immunol. 14:1229417. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1229417
Received: 26 May 2023; Accepted: 07 June 2023;
Published: 23 August 2023.
Edited and Reviewed by:Marina Cella, Washington University in St. Louis, United States
Copyright © 2023 Ullrich, Huppert, Tonn and Leung. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.