Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Immunol., 19 December 2023
Sec. Molecular Innate Immunity
This article is part of the Research Topic Regulation of the Phenotype and Function of Human Macrophages and Dendritic Cells by Exogenous Immunomodulators View all 7 articles

Editorial: Regulation of the phenotype and function of human macrophages and dendritic cells by exogenous immunomodulators

  • 1Department of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Sciences, University of Balamand, Al Koura, Lebanon
  • 2Istituto per la Ricerca e l’Innovazione Biomedica, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Palermo, Italy

Macrophages (Mφs) and dendritic cells (DCs) are vital cellular components of the innate immune system whereby they play a central role in tailoring immune responses during states of homeostasis or disease. Mφ and DC responses rely on an array of extrinsic factors that are present in the cellular microenvironment. Therefore, manipulating the extracellular environment through the use of exogenous immunomodulators represents a viable and an innovative strategy to tweak Mφ and DC functions towards eliciting desirable immune responses. Accordingly, the effects of multiple categories of exogenous immunomodulators have been previously evaluated on human immune cells and these include, but are not restricted to, heat-killed mycobacteria (1, 2), phytochemicals (3), biomaterials (4) and toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists (5). In the current Research Topic, six original research articles tackle the aspect of employing previously unexplored exogenous immunomodulators aimed at regulating numerous Mφ- and DC-related activities.

Mφs are distinctly categorized into two types, M1 and M2, in relation to their polarization state. While M1-Mφs display a pro-inflammatory phenotype and retain potent tumoricidal and microbicidal capabilities, M2-Mφs show an anti-inflammatory phenotype and facilitate tumor growth, metastasis development, tissue remodeling and wound healing (6). Gunalp et al. unveil the ability of tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) to drive the polarization of human monocyte-derived Mφs (MDMs) towards the M1-Mφ pro-inflammatory phenotype via upregulating the expression (both at the mRNA and protein levels) of classical and novel M1-Mφ markers on M0-Mφs (unpolarized), M1-Mφs, and different M2-Mφ subtypes without compromising cellular viability. Further functional analysis of TRAIL-treated M1-Mφs shows that these cells exhibit an augmented cytotoxic effect against the acute myeloid leukemia U937 cell line as compared to untreated M1-Mφs. Moreover, this study finds significant positive associations between TRAIL expression and the expression of M1 markers in the tumor microenvironment of ovarian cancer and sarcoma patients as well as the overall survival of a subcategory of those patients who have abundant Mφs in their tumor microenvironment.

Modulation of Mφ function constitutes an immunotherapeutic approach for preventing or treating inflammatory conditions. The fusion protein rFlaA : Betv1, which comprises the adjuvant, flagellin A from Listeria monocytogenes, and the key birch pollen allergen Bet v 1, has been previously reported to dampen allergen-induced Th2 inflammation by regulating the release of pro-inflammatory (IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α) and anti-inflammatory (IL-10) cytokines by mouse macrophages (7). In their original research article, Lin et al. identify NLRC4 and NLRP3 inflammasomes as essential mediators and modulators of rFlaA : Betv1-induced release of IL-1 β and other pro-inflammatory cytokines by human THP-1-derived Mφs. The authors also demonstrate that rFlaA : Betv1-induced IL-1β secretion from Mφs is highly dependent on NFκB and SAPK/JNK signaling pathways.

The anti-inflammatory effects of cannabinoids have been documented in several in vitro and in vivo studies (8). In line with this, Perez-Diego et al. investigate the mechanisms through which the synthetic cannabinoid, WIN55,212-2, induces its anti-inflammatory effects on various human myeloid cells. Interestingly, the authors find that human monocyte-derived DCs (MDDCs), differentiated in the presence of WIN55,212-2, produce a tolerogenic DC type that is characterized by its diminished responses to LPS and by its capacity to prime Tregs. Results also show that WIN55,212-2 perturbs the polarization of human THP-1-derived Mφs and MDMs towards the pro-inflammatory M1-Mφ type via impairing the LPS-induced intracellular metabolic and epigenetic reprogramming of Mφs. This leads to the inhibition of their pro-inflammatory cytokines secretion, pyroptosis and inflammasome activation.

Plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) are professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs) able of playing an important role in directing the immune response to antigens. TLR-activated pDCs exhibit robust IFN-α production and promote both innate and adaptive immune responses. PDCs respond to viral infections (DNA and RNA) by producing large quantities of IFN-α through the stimulation of TLR7 and TLR9 (9). Mechanistically, transcription of the IFN-α gene results in activating the transcription of pro-inflammatory cytokines (10). In viral infections, type I IFNs are known to play a protective role though there is growing evidence that chronic secretion of IFN-α results in pathological inflammation (11) and autoimmune diseases such as SLE (12). However, it is still unclear which mechanism controls pDCs’ selective cytokine production. One possibility could be related to the localization process of TLR7 and TLR9 agonists in intracellular compartments. Two original research articles shed light on the molecular mechanisms of the bifurcated cytokines responses to TLR7 and TLR9 agonists in pDCs (Wiest et al. and Wiest et al.). EGA (4-bromobenzaldehyde N-(2,6-dimethylphenyl)semicarbazone), an inhibitor of endosomal trafficking, is used in these studies to assess its disruptive effects on TLR7/9 agonist-induced cytokine responses in pDCs from healthy donors and SLE patients. The results herein highlight that EGA can decrease the expression of IFN-α in cells from healthy donors and SLE patients by TRL7 and TLR9 agonists. EGA works by reducing the localization of TRL7 and TLR9 agonists in late endosomes/lysosomal compartments without altering the retention of agonists in early/recycling endosomes. Mechanistically, EGA treatment decreases phosphorylation of IKKα/β, STAT1, and p38, and prolongs degradation of IκBα. The conclusion supported by these studies is that lysosome associated membrane protein-1 positive (LAMP1+) compartments (late/lysosomes) are important for the expression of IFNα by pDCs. Therefore, inhibitors of this process, such as EGA, may be beneficial in the future treatment of inflammatory diseases associated with type 1 IFNs.

Previous studies have pointed out to the profound negative impact of the hypoxic tumor microenvironment on various functional features of tumor-resident DCs (13). Bhatt et al. investigate whether O2-cryogels, an O2-releasing biomaterial, can prevent hypoxia-induced suppression of human DC functions. Study results indicate that exposure of human MDDCs to O2-cryogels counterbalances hypoxia-induced inhibition of antigen uptake, maturation state and migratory activity in DCs. Moreover, O2-cryogels possess immunomodulatory properties that preserve DC’s capacity to efficiently prime naive T cells under hypoxic conditions and, consequently, induce their activation and proliferation.

In summary, this Research Topic provides a deep insight into the effects induced by novel exogenous immunomodulators on human Mφs and DCs and subsequently shaping immune responses. The use of such types of exogenous immunomodulators holds a promising therapeutic strategy for treating inflammatory disorders and cancer.

Author contributions

SB: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. GB: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. NL: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Bazzi S, El-Darzi E, McDowell T, Modjtahedi H, Mudan S, Achkar M, et al. Defining genome-wide expression and phenotypic contextual cues in macrophages generated by granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor, macrophage colony-stimulating factor, and heat-killed mycobacteria. Front Immunol (2017) 8:1253. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01253

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Bazzi S, Modjtahedi H, Mudan S, Achkar M, Akle C, Bahr GM. Immunomodulatory effects of heat-killed Mycobacterium obuense on human blood dendritic cells. Innate Immun (2017) 23:592–605. doi: 10.1177/1753425917727838

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Behl T, Kumar K, Brisc C, Rus M, Nistor-Cseppento DC, Bustea C, et al. Exploring the multifocal role of phytochemicals as immunomodulators. BioMed Pharmacother (2021) 133:110959. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.110959

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Yousefpour P, Ni K, Irvine DJ. Targeted modulation of immune cells and tissues using engineered biomaterials. Nat Rev Bioeng (2023) 1:107–24. doi: 10.1038/s44222-022-00016-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Mifsud EJ, Tan ACL, Jackson DC. TLR agonists as modulators of the innate immune response and their potential as agents against infectious disease. Front Immunol (2014) 5:79. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00079

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Martinez FO, Gordon S. The M1 and M2 paradigm of macrophage activation: time for reassessment. F1000Prime Rep (2014) 6:13–3. doi: 10.12703/P6-13

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Lin Y, Papp G, Miskey C, Fiedler A, Goretzki A, Wolfheimer S, et al. The flagellin: allergen fusion protein rFlaA: betv1 induces a myD88- and MAPK-dependent activation of glucose metabolism in macrophages. Cells (2021) 10:2614. doi: 10.3390/cells10102614

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Anil SM, Peeri H, Koltai H. Medical cannabis activity against inflammation: active compounds and modes of action. Front Pharmacol (2022) 13:908198. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.908198

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Megjugorac NJ, Young HA, Amrute SB, Olshalsky SL, Fitzgerald-Bocarsly P. Virally stimulated plasmacytoid dendritic cells produce chemokines and induce migration of T and NK cells. J Leukoc Biol (2004) 75:504–14. doi: 10.1189/jlb.0603291

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Honda K, Ohba Y, Yanai H, Negishi H, Mizutani T, Takaoka A, et al. Spatiotemporal regulation of MyD88-IRF-7 signalling for robust type-I interferon induction. Nature (2005) 434:1035–40. doi: 10.1038/nature03547

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Kopitar-Jerala N. The role of interferons in inflammation and inflammasome activation. Front Immunol (2017) 8:873. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00873

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Ronnblom L, Alm GV. A pivotal role for the natural interferon alpha-producing cells (plasmacytoid dendritic cells) in the pathogenesis of lupus. J Exp Med (2001) 194:59. doi: 10.1084/jem.194.12.f59

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Paardekooper LM, Vos W, van den Bogaart G. Oxygen in the tumor microenvironment: effects on dendritic cell function. Oncotarget (2019) 10:883–96. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.26608

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: dendritic cell, macrophage, immunomodulation, anti-inflammatory, hypoxia, toll-like receptor

Citation: Bazzi S, Bahr GM and Lampiasi N (2023) Editorial: Regulation of the phenotype and function of human macrophages and dendritic cells by exogenous immunomodulators. Front. Immunol. 14:1353765. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1353765

Received: 11 December 2023; Accepted: 13 December 2023;
Published: 19 December 2023.

Edited and Reviewed by:

Francesca Granucci, University of Milano-Bicocca, Italy

Copyright © 2023 Bazzi, Bahr and Lampiasi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Nadia Lampiasi, nadia.lampiasi@irib.cnr.it

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.