Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Immunol.
Sec. Comparative Immunology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1411544

Comparative studies on the intestinal health of wild and cultured ricefield eel (Monopterus albus)

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China
  • 2 University of Chittagong, Chittagong, Chittagong, Bangladesh
  • 3 Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), Wuhan, Hubei Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Fish intestinal health under intensive aquaculture mode plays an important role in the growth, development and immune function. The present study was aimed to systematically investigate the differences of intestinal health between wild and cultured Monopterus albus by biochemical parameters, histomorphology and molecular biology. Fifteen healthy M. albus per group with average body weight of 45 g were sampled to analyze intestinal health parameters. Compared with the wild fish, the cultured M. albus in foregut had lower trypsin, lipase, SOD, CAT and T-AOC and GSH-Px activities (P<0.05), and higher amylase activity and MDA content (P<0.05). The villus circumferences and goblet cells in cultured group were significantly lower than those in wild group (P<0.05). In addition, the cultured fish showed lower relative expression levels of occludin, zo-1, zo-2, claudin-12, claudin-15, mucin5, mucin15, lysozyme, complement 3, il-10, tgf-β1, tgf-β2 and tgf-β3 (P<0.05), and higher il-1β, il-6, il-8, tnf-a and ifnγ mRNA expressions than those of wild fish (P<0.05). In term of gut microbiota, the cultured group at the phylum level displayed higher percentages of Chlamydiae and Spirochaetes, and lower percentages of Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, Actinobacteria, Cyanobacteria and Verrucomicrobia compared to the wild group (P<0.05). At the genus level, higher abundances of Pseudomonadaceae_Pseudomonas and Spironema, and lower abundances of Lactococcus and Cetobacterium were observed in the cultured group than wild group (P<0.05). To our knowledge, this is the first investigation of the intestinal health status between wild and cultured M. albus in terms of biochemistry, histology, and molecular biology levels. Overall, present study showed significant differences in intestinal health between wild and cultured M. albus, and the main manifestations that wild M. albus had higher intestinal digestion, antioxidant capacity, and intestinal barrier functions than cultured M. albus. These results would provide theoretical basis for the subsequent upgrading of healthy aquaculture technology and nutrient regulation of intestinal health of cultured M. albus.

    Keywords: Monopterus albus, Intestinal health, Gut barrier, intestinal microbiota, Intestinal tissue morphology

    Received: 04 Apr 2024; Accepted: 21 May 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Yang, Yuan, Rahman, Lv, Huang, Hu and Zhou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Quan Yuan, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China
    Wenzong Zhou, Shanghai Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shanghai, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.