Your new experience awaits. Try the new design now and help us make it even better

CASE REPORT article

Front. Immunol., 18 July 2025

Sec. Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2025.1635589

Glofitamab treatment of Richter transformation with isolated central nervous system involvement: a case report

Kang Lu&#x;Kang LuPing Chen&#x;Ping ChenXiaohui ZhangXiaohui ZhangWeicheng ZhengWeicheng ZhengLiying ZhangLiying ZhangXuemei WuXuemei WuBingzong Li*Bingzong Li*
  • Department of Hematology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a common subtype of Richter transformation (RT) in chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), accounting for 90–95% of all transformation cases. However, RT with isolated cerebral involvement is rare. Herein, we report the case of a 67-year-old man with DLBCL that transformed from CLL during obinutuzumab treatment. This patient developed RT with only central nervous system (CNS) involvement and no systemic features. After undergoing single-agent treatment with the CD20×CD3 bispecific antibody glofitamab, the patient regained consciousness and improved clinically. Although only one successful case has been presented, glofitamab may be considered a promising therapeutic option for patients with RT and isolated CNS involvement.

Introduction

Richter transformation (RT) is a rare clinicopathological condition characterised by progressing indolent haematologic malignancies, such as chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL), to aggressive lymphomas, often accompanied by marked multifocal lymphadenopathy and clinical deterioration. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common manifestation of RT in CLL, accounting for 90–95% of transformed cases (1). Other malignancies, including Hodgkin’s lymphoma and hairy cell leukaemia, have also been sporadically reported (2). RT incidence is low, occurring in 2–10% of patients with CLL, with an annual transformation rate of 0.5% (3). However, once RT develops, treatment becomes challenging. Compared with de novo DLBCL, CLL-transformed DLBCL exhibits increased chemoresistance and shortened survival (4).

Approximately one-third of de novo DLBCL originates from extra-nodal sites such as the gastrointestinal tract, skin, and central nervous system (CNS) (5). However, extra-nodal involvement in DLBCL-type RT is rare, especially isolated CNS involvement, with a low incidence of 0.03% (6). There are only few reports of RT with isolated CNS involvement in the literature. We found only 23 clearly reported cases since 1988 (Table 1). The prognosis of these patients is typically poor. Intracranial lesions result in a gradual decline in cognitive function, with most patients succumbing within 1 year. There is no standard treatment regimen for RT developing in the CNS. However, drugs that can cross the blood–brain barrier (BBB) should be prioritised. Therapeutic regimens for primary CNS lymphoma have been applied to most cases of RT with CNS involvement, including high-dose methotrexate (MTX)-based immunochemotherapy, followed by consolidation treatment with autologous stem cell transplantation or whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT). However, 15–25% of patients do not respond to high-dose MTX-based chemotherapy and 25–50% experience relapse after the initial response; it is noted that relapse rates are higher among older patients (7). Therefore, new treatment strategies for patients with RT involving the CNS need to be explored.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Reported cases of Richter transformation with isolated central nervous system involvement.

Herein, we report a case of CLL transformation into DLBCL with isolated CNS involvement during orelabrutinib therapy and aim to present glofitamab as a potential therapeutic option for these patients.

Case report

A 67-year-old man with no personal or family history of malignant tumours underwent a physical examination at a local hospital on 19 June 2019 for routine blood tests, which revealed leucocytosis (74.21×10^9/L, 95.6% lymphocytes), a haemoglobin level of 136 g/L, and platelet count of 145×10^9/L. At our clinic, imaging revealed bilateral inguinal, axillary, supraclavicular, and cervical lymphadenopathies (regions I, II, and V). Abdominal ultrasonographic findings were unremarkable. However, bone marrow morphology showed dominant proliferation of mature lymphocytes (82%). Bone marrow flow cytometry revealed CD5+, CD10- clonal B cells. Bone marrow biopsy showed active proliferation of nucleated cells in the bone marrow (approximately 80% of the haematopoietic capacity). Lymphocytes, mainly mature small lymphocytes, proliferated significantly and were distributed in a large sheet-like diffuse pattern. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed CD3 (-), CD5 (+), CD10 (-), CD20 vast (+), CD23 vast (+), CyclinD1 (-), PAX- 5 vast (+), SOX-11 (-), CD138 (-), and Ki67 (+ 5%). Chromosomes exhibited a normal karyotype. FISH revealed positive rearrangements of IgH, IgK, and IgL. Therefore, CLL (Binet system stage B, Rai system stage I) was diagnosed and classified as medium risk according to the CLL International Prognostic Index score 3. As the patient had no indications of treatment, regular follow-up visits to the haematology outpatient department were recommended. During the follow-up period, his lymphocyte counts progressively increased. By 13 December 2021, positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) (Figure 1A) revealed slight to moderate abnormal increase in fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) metabolism of multiple abnormally enlarged lymph nodes throughout the body and a slight increase in that of the bilateral humerus and femur bone marrow. Re-examination of the blood routine showed a white blood cell count of 375.5×10^9/L, lymphocyte ratio of 96.4%, haemoglobin level of 105 g/L, and platelet count of 108 g/L. Therefore, orelabrutinib 150 mg QD treatment was initiated. One year later, the patient’s blood was completely normal, and he continued orelabrutinib.

Figure 1
Panel A and B show two PET scans of a torso taken on December 14, 2021, and January 17, 2025, respectively, highlighting differences in darkened areas. Panel C presents multiple composite brain images comparing colored metabolic activity, grayscale structural views, and varied intensity scans, with some areas marked by red arrows.

Figure 1. PET-CT examination. The red arrows indicate the intracranial involved lesion. (A) Multiple systemic foci when diagnosing CLL; (B) Disappearance of systemic foci when diagnosing DLBCL; (C) Lesions of isolated intracranial involvement when diagnosing DLBCL.

In early 2025, the patient developed drowsiness without obvious triggers accompanied by slow movement and apathy, while independently performing daily activities. No dizziness, headache, nausea, vomiting, or limb convulsions were observed. The patient’s Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score was 6 points. Blood tests were unremarkable, but peripheral flow cytometry detected 6.26% CD5+CD10− clonal B cells. Cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) revealed gyri-enhanced abnormal signal foci in the right basal ganglia region, bilateral corona radiata region, temporal lobe, corpus callosum knee, and compression area, suggesting intracranial involvement (Figure 2A). Complete PET-CT (Figures 1B, C) revealed slightly increased FDG metabolism in a few small retroperitoneal lymph nodes (Deauville score, 2 points) and multiple lesions throughout the body that were originally dissipated, including multiple slightly high-density nodules in the brain with abnormally elevated FDG metabolism. The larger tumour was located in the right basal ganglia, and the SUVmax on the higher part was 22.04. Chemical analysis of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) revealed elevated protein levels (1051 mg/L) and normal glucose levels (3.42 mmol/L); cytological analysis of CSF showed a normal total cell count (3×10^6/L), with mostly mature lymphocytes. The negative report on metagenomic next-generation sequencing of CSF ruled out an infection. Lymphoma immunotyping revealed a 70.7% lymphoid population. However, because of the small number of analysable cells, no obvious abnormalities were observed in the cell phenotype. Peripheral blood gDNA revealed pathological mutations SF3B1 p.I704F (2.4%) and DIS3 p.M163Nfs*15 (46.2%). CSF cfDNA revealed pathological mutations MYD88 p.L265P (VAF 22.2%), PRDM1 p.C19Sfs*27 (22.0%), and DIS3 p.M163Nfs*15 (48.1%). On 26 January 2025, a tumour in the right temporal lobe was punctured, and postoperative pathology showed considerable infiltration of lymphocytes. Some tumour cells were enlarged, and the proliferation index was high, suggesting tumour progression to a non-germinal centre DLBCL subtype. Immunohistochemistry results revealed tumour cells CD20 (+), GFAP (-), Ki-67 (90%+), CD79a (+), CD3 (-), CD10 (-), CD5 (-), Cyclin D1 (-), Bcl-2 (a small amount+), Bcl-6 (+), MUM1 (+), C-myc (30%), and TDT (-). Furthermore, clonal IGHV (3-11) gene rearrangements were identified in both peripheral blood and CSF, demonstrating molecular concordance with the patient’s original CLL diagnostic profile. Therefore, DLBCL of the brain was confirmed to be derived from the CLL clone.

Figure 2
Three sets of brain MRI scans labeled A, B, and C show changes over time. Section A shows pre-treatment images with labeled abnormalities in the left corona radiata, right basal ganglia, and right temporal lobe. Sections B and C, labeled “2nd administration” and “2 cycles,” respectively, show the same brain regions with annotations highlighting changes in the size and appearance of the abnormalities with treatment progression.

Figure 2. Cranial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings. The red arrows indicate the intracranial lesion. (A) MRI scan shows the intracerebral lesions before treatment (including the right temporal lobe, right basal ganglia, and left corona radiata). The marked numbers indicate the size of the lesions; (B) MRI scan after the second administration of glofitamab; (C) MRI scan after two cycles of glofitamab administration. After treatment with glofitamab, the enhanced signal of the lesions on cranial MRI decreased, making it impossible to accurately measure their sizes.

Treatment with the R+MTX+PD-1 regimen (rituximab 700 mg d0+ methotrexate 6 g d1+ Darboshu 200 mg d4) was initiated. After two courses, the patient remained in a coma, and his general condition worsened. Thiotepa (54 mg q3w) and Selinexor (60 mg qw) were administered. The patient’s consciousness did not improve. Considering his own financial situation, the patient did not receive CAR-T therapy. Because the CD20×CD3 bispecific antibody glofitamab has shown significant efficacy and controllable safety in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL who are not suitable for transplantation (8, 9). In addition, individual case reports have shown that glofitamab is effective against CNS lymphoma (10, 11). After careful consideration and with the patient’s informed consent, he was treated with glofitamab, according to the standard stepwise dose escalation protocol. Since the absolute value of B lymphocytes in peripheral blood was only 15 cells/μL, obinutuzumab pretreatment was not administered.

The patient developed grade 1 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) after the first dose of glofitamab, which mainly manifested as a persistent high fever that subsided after symptomatic treatment. No significant adverse events or unexpected complications were observed. After the second administration of glofitamab, the patient’s consciousness improved, the duration of wakefulness was prolonged, and he could engage in simple conversations. The GCS score increased to 15 points. Moreover, lymphoma immune analysis of peripheral blood showed no clonal B cells, suggesting disease remission. Re-examination of the cranial MRI (Figure 2B) showed that the gyrus enhancements in the brain decreased. After two cycles of glofitamab, the brain lesions shrank (Figure 2C). During the follow-up period, no evidence of disease recurrence and progression was observed. Treatment schedule is shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3
Timeline of a patient diagnosed on June 19, 2019, with CLL, progressing to RT on January 26, 2025. Treatments include Orelabrutinib (2022-2025), R-MTX+PD-1 (February 11, 2025), Thiotepa (February 28, 2025), Selinexor (March 4, 2025), and Glofitamab (March 12, 2025) with dosage increments of 2.5mg, 10mg, 30mg, and 30mg.

Figure 3. The timeline of treatment process in this case.

Discussion

Our case highlights the exceptionally rare presentation of RT for isolated CNS-DLBCL during orelabrutinib therapy. Although DLBCL is the predominant RT subtype, cases of isolated CNS involvement are rare, and the prognosis of patients with DLBCL-type RT is typically poor, with a median overall survival of 10 months (6).

Standard DLBCL therapies yield long-term remission in 55–60% of de novo cases (12). However, CLL-transformed DLBCL lacks shared molecular features, suggesting its distinction (13). Moreover, the BBB limits the efficacy of systemic chemotherapy in CNS lymphomas, complicating immunotherapy.

High-BBB-penetrant agents remain the mainstay of induction. Our patient failed the R+MTX+PD-1 and salvage regimens (thiotepa/selinexor), but responded to glofitamab, which is approved for relapsed/refractory DLBCL (14). By bridging CD20+ B cells and CD3+ T cells, glofitamab forms a transient immune synapse and activates existing T cells, inducing the T cell-mediated cytotoxicity of malignant B cells in DLBCL. A multicentre Phase I/II trial (NP30179) confirmed that after pre-treatment with obinutuzumab, administering glofitamab as a single agent induced a high response rate in patients with relapsed/refractory DLBCL (9). Additionally, the efficacy and safety of glofitamab combined with other drugs, such as gemcitabine and oxaliplatin, have been verified (15).

Although glofitamab is effective against systemic B-cell lymphoma, the BBB permeability of IgG macromolecules and their role in CNS lymphoma remain to be confirmed. In this case, after switching to glofitamab monotherapy, the patient regained consciousness and the imaging lesions shrank, suggesting glofitamab’s ability in partially crossing the BBB. Moreover, two newly published studies have revealed the great potential of glofitamab in the treatment of patients with primary/secondary CNS lymphoma. Godfrey, et al. (10) found that although the average concentration of glofitamab in the CSF was only 0.1–0.4% of that in the peripheral blood, this low concentration safely alleviated the symptoms of patients with secondary CNS lymphoma. Furthermore, 5% of the CSF samples, which were collected from a patient with primary CNS lymphoma on day 2 after the fifth glofitamab administration, showed an increase in the quantity of CD25 and CD69+ T cells. Moreover, co-incubation with CD20+ lymphoma cells notably enhanced their cytotoxicity (11). The low concentration but high efficacy of glofitamab in CSF is similar to that observed with rituximab, a CD20 monoclonal antibody, indicating that a relatively low BBB penetration rate can demonstrate objective single-agent activity in CNS lymphomas (16). Preclinical studies have shown that the efficacy of CD20 bispecific antibodies is significantly higher than that of rituximab (17). Theoretically, glofitamab only requires a low CSF concentration to alleviate the clinical response in CNS lymphoma. Therefore, when the patient in this case showed no response to the R-MTX-PD1 regimen, clinical manifestations improved after switching to glofitamab.

However, existing clinical trial data show that patients treated with glofitamab have inevitably experienced some adverse events, such as cytokine release syndrome, neutropenia, anaemia, and thrombocytopenia (14). The BBB permeability of glofitamab is low. Considering that even a very low concentration of glofitamab in CSF can relieve the clinical symptoms of patients with primary/secondary CNS lymphoma (10, 11), more clinical studies and experimental data are needed to optimize the administration mode of glofitamab (such as low - dose intrathecal administration via lumbar puncture) to reduce the possibility of adverse drug events.

In summary, we reported a rare case of CLL transforming into isolated CNS-involved DLBCL via RT. The patient’s clinical symptoms improved after glofitamab monotherapy and intracranial lesions decreased, indicating glofitamab’s potential in the treatment of patients with RT and isolated CNS involvement. The follow-up period of this patient was short. Therefore, further clinical data are required to assess the therapeutic efficacy and safety of glofitamab.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Ethics statement

The studies involving humans were approved by ethics committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. The studies were conducted in accordance with the local legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent for participation was not required from the participants or the participants’ legal guardians/next of kin in accordance with the national legislation and institutional requirements. Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.

Author contributions

KL: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Visualization, Conceptualization, Investigation. PC: Writing – review & editing, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Methodology, Resources, Conceptualization. XZ: Writing – original draft, Data curation, Formal Analysis, Resources, Visualization. WZ: Writing – original draft, Data curation, Methodology, Resources. LZ: Writing – original draft, Methodology, Validation, Conceptualization. XW: Writing – original draft, Validation, Visualization. BL: Writing – review & editing, Resources, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Validation, Conceptualization.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. This work was supported by Suzhou Medical and Health Technology Innovation Program (grant number: SKY2023168).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Abbreviations

DLBCL, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; RT, Richter transformation; CLL, chronic lymphocytic leukaemia; CNS, central nervous system; BBB, blood-brain barrier; MTX, methotrexate; WBRT, whole brain radiation therapy; PET-CT, positron emission tomography-computed tomography; FDG, fluorodeoxyglucose; GCS, Glasgow Coma Scale; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; CRS, cytokine release syndrome.

References

1. Swerdlow S, Campo E, Harris N, Jaffe E, Pileri S, Stein H, et al. WHO Classification of Tumours of Haematopoietic and Lymphoid Tissues, 4th. LYON, France: WHO (2017). Available online at: https://www.iarc.who.int/news-events/who-classification-of-tumours-of-haematopoietic-and-lymphoid-tissues-2/. (Accessed May 5, 2025).

Google Scholar

2. Janjetovic S, Bernd HW, Bokemeyer C, and Fiedler W. Hodgkin’s lymphoma as a rare variant of Richter’s transformation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: A case report and review of the literature. Mol Clin Oncol. (2016) 4:390–2. doi: 10.3892/mco.2016.727

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Tadmor T and Levy I. Richter transformation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia: update in the era of novel agents. Cancers. (2021), 13(20):5141. doi: 10.3390/cancers13205141

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Broséus J, Hergalant S, Vogt J, Tausch E, Kreuz M, Mottok A, et al. Molecular characterization of Richter syndrome identifies de novo diffuse large B-cell lymphomas with poor prognosis. Nat Commun. (2023) 14:309. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34642-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Ollila TA and Olszewski AJ. Extranodal diffuse large B cell lymphoma: molecular features, prognosis, and risk of central nervous system recurrence. Curr Treat Options Oncol. (2018) 19:38. doi: 10.1007/s11864-018-0555-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Elnair R, Ellithi M, Kallam A, Shostrom V, and Bociek RG. Outcomes of Richter’s transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL): an analysis of the SEER database. Ann Hematol. (2021) 100:2513–9. doi: 10.1007/s00277-021-04603-y

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Ferreri AJM, Calimeri T, Cwynarski K, Dietrich J, Grommes C, Hoang-Xuan K, et al. Primary central nervous system lymphoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. (2023) 9:29. doi: 10.1038/s41572-023-00439-0

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Song YQ, Zhang HL, Huang HQ, Zhang QY, Jing HM, Wang C, et al. Glofitamab monotherapy demonstrates high complete response rates and manageable safety in Chinese patients with relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and ≥2 prior therapies. Blood. (2022) 140:12050–51. doi: 10.1182/blood-2022-157544

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Dickinson MJ, Carlo-Stella C, Morschhauser F, Bachy E, Corradini P, Iacoboni G, et al. Glofitamab for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. New Engl J Med. (2022) 387:2220–31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2206913

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Godfrey JK, Gao L, Shouse G, Song JY, Pak S, Lee B, et al. Glofitamab stimulates immune cell infiltration of CNS tumors and induces clinical responses in secondary CNS lymphoma. Blood. (2024) 144:457–61. doi: 10.1182/blood.2024024168

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Wang W, Chen M, Li J, Liu J, Wang T, Song Q, et al. Glofitamab induces deep and rapid response in relapsed primary central nervous system lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. (2025), 1–6. doi: 10.1080/10428194.2025.2484365

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Dodero A, Guidetti A, Tucci A, Barretta F, Novo M, Devizzi L, et al. Dose-adjusted EPOCH plus rituximab improves the clinical outcome of young patients affected by double expressor diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Leukemia. (2019) 33:1047–51. doi: 10.1038/s41375-018-0320-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Fabbri G, Khiabanian H, Holmes AB, Wang J, Messina M, Mullighan CG, et al. Genetic lesions associated with chronic lymphocytic leukemia transformation to Richter syndrome. J Exp Med. (2013) 210:2273–88. doi: 10.1084/jem.20131448

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Shirley M. Glofitamab: first approval. Drugs. (2023) 83:935–41. doi: 10.1007/s40265-023-01894-5

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Abramson JS, Ku M, Hertzberg M, Huang HQ, Fox CP, Zhang H, et al. Glofitamab plus gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GemOx) versus rituximab-GemOx for relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (STARGLO): a global phase 3, randomised, open-label trial. Lancet (London England). (2024) 404:1940–54. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)01774-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Rubenstein JL, Combs D, Rosenberg J, Levy A, McDermott M, Damon L, et al. Rituximab therapy for CNS lymphomas: targeting the leptomeningeal compartment. Blood. (2003) 101:466–8. doi: 10.1182/blood-2002-06-1636

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Herter S, Herting F, Mundigl O, Waldhauer I, Weinzierl T, Fauti T, et al. Preclinical activity of the type II CD20 antibody GA101 (obinutuzumab) compared with rituximab and ofatumumab in vitro and in xenograft models. Mol Cancer Ther. (2013) 12:2031–42. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-1182

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Lane PK, Townsend RM, Beckstead JH, and Corash L. Central nervous system involvement in a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (Richter's syndrome), with concordant cell surface immunoglobulin isotypic and immunophenotypic markers. Am J Clin Pathol. (1988) 89(2):254–9. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/89.2.254

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. O'Neill BP, Habermann TM, Banks PM, O'Fallon JR, and Earle JD. Primary central nervous system lymphoma as a variant of Richter's syndrome in two patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cancer. (1989) 64(6):1296–300. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19890915)64:6<1296::aid-cncr2820640621>3.0.co;2-e

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Bayliss KM, Kueck BD, Hanson CA, Matthaeus WG, and Almagro UA. Richter's syndrome presenting as primary central nervous system lymphoma. Transformation of an identical clone. Am J Clin Pathol. (1990) 93(1):117–23. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/93.1.117

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Mahé B, Moreau P, Bonnemain B, Letortorec S, Menegali D, Bourdin S, et al. Isolated Richter's syndrome of the brain: two recent cases. Nouvelle revue francaise d'hematologie. (1994) 36(5):383–5.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

22. Agard G, Hamidou M, Leautez S, Garand R, and Grolleau JY. Localisation neuroméningée d'un syndrome de Richter. La Revue de Médecine Interne. (1999) 20(1):64–7. doi: 10.1016/S0248-8663(99)83011-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Robak T, Joanna G-T, Krzysztof T, Krzysztof J, Paweł R, Radzisław K, et al. Richter's Syndrome in the Brain First Manifested as an Ischaemic Stroke. Leuk Lymphoma. (2004) 45(6):1261–7. doi: 10.1080/10428190310001638823

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Resende LS, Bacchi CE, Resende LA, Gabarra RC, and Niéro-Melo L. Isolated Richter's syndrome in central nervous system: case report. Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria. (2005) 63(2b):530–1. doi: 10.1590/s0004-282x2005000300031

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Ghofrani M, Tantiwongkosi B, Smith AS, and Wasdahl DA. Richter transformation of chronic lymphocytic leukemia presenting as a dural-based non-hodgkin lymphoma mass. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. (2007) 28(2):318–20.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

26. Bagic A, Lupu VD, Kessler CM, and Tornatore C. Isolated Richter's transformation of the brain. J Neurooncol. (2007) 83(3):325–8. doi: 10.1007/s11060-007-9334-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Almhanna K, Wongchaowart N, and Sweetenham J. Intracerebral Hodgkin's lymphoma in a patient with chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma: a case report and literature review. Cancer investigation. (2009) 27(2):215–20. doi: 10.1080/07357900802189824

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Fløisand Y, Delabie J, Fosså A, Helseth E, Jacobsen EA, Rolke J, et al. Richter syndrome presenting as a solitary cerebellar tumor during first-line treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. (2011) 52(10):2007–9. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2011.580480

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Stuplich M, Mayer K, Kim Y, Thanendrarajan S, Simon M, Schäfer N, et al. Richter syndrome and brain involvement: low-grade lymphoma relapsing as cerebral high-grade lymphoma. Acta haematologica. (2012) 127(2):93–5. doi: 10.1159/000334068

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Ishida F, Nakazawa H, Takezawa Y, Matsuda K, Asano N, Sano K, et al. Richter transformation in the brain from chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Exp Hematop: JCEH. (2013) 53(2):157–60. doi: 10.3960/jslrt.53.157

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Jain P, Benjamini O, Pei L, Caraway NP, Landon G, Kim S, et al. Central nervous system Richter's transformation and parvovirus B19 infection. Leuk Lymphoma. (2013) 54(9):2070–2. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2013.765565

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Xu L, Song JC, Sun XH, Gao ZF, Lv L, and Zhu J. Richter's syndrome of the central nervous system diagnosed concurrently with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia: A case report and literature review. Medicine. (2018) 97(41):e12701. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000012701

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Pinto AL, Ferreira G, Carda JP, Gomes M, and Ribeiro ML. Isolated Richter's syndrome of the brain: diagnosis in the eye of the beholder. Ann Hematol. (2018) 97(8):1509–11. doi: 10.1007/s00277-018-3322-9

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Cetintepe T, Kobak FG, and Bener S. Isolated Richter's transformation in central nervous system in a patient with refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Indian J Cancer. (2021) 58(3):428–30. doi: 10.4103/ijc.IJC_31_19

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Pronello E, Mo F, Gottardi D, Palmiero R, Bertero L, Lanotte M, et al. Richter's Syndrome of the Central Nervous System. Can J Neurol Sci. (2021) 48(6):889–92. doi: 10.1017/cjn.2020.281

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Nato Y, Nagaharu K, Inoue K, Yabu K, Sawaki A, Shiotani T, et al. An experience with ibrutinib monotherapy for Richter's syndrome isolated in the central nervous system. J Clin Exp Hematop: JCEH. (2022) 62(4):238–41. doi: 10.3960/jslrt.22017

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Wang W, Zhang Y, Zhao D, Zhang W, and Zhou D. Richter's syndrome in central nervous system with MYD88L265P and CD79b mutation responded well to ibrutinib containing chemotherapy: a case report and review of the literature. Ann Hematol. (2022) 101(8):1869–72. doi: 10.1007/s00277-022-04827-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: glofitamab, Richter transformation, DLBCL, isolated central nervous system involvement, case report

Citation: Lu K, Chen P, Zhang X, Zheng W, Zhang L, Wu X and Li B (2025) Glofitamab treatment of Richter transformation with isolated central nervous system involvement: a case report. Front. Immunol. 16:1635589. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1635589

Received: 26 May 2025; Accepted: 25 June 2025;
Published: 18 July 2025.

Edited by:

Tamar Tadmor, Technion Israel Institute of Technology, Israel

Reviewed by:

Wenqi Zhang, Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, China
Ofrat Beyar Katz, Rambam Health Care Campus, Israel

Copyright © 2025 Lu, Chen, Zhang, Zheng, Zhang, Wu and Li. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Bingzong Li, bGJ6d3owOTA3QGhvdG1haWwuY29t

These authors have contributed equally to this work

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.