In the original article, there was an error “Two major sulfoglycolytic pathways, the sulfo-Embden–Meyerhof–Parnas pathway (originally found in E. coli) and the sulfo-Entner–Doudoroff pathway (originally found in Pseudomonas putida SQ1) (Roy et al., 2003; Denger et al., 2014), have been shown to degrade SQ in certain marine bacteria (Roy et al., 2003). These pathways are analogous to the classic glycolysis pathways (Figure 2) (Felux et al., 2015). The sulfo-Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas pathway and the sulfo-Entner-Doudoroff pathway yield the C3-organosulfonate products DHPS and sulfolactate (Figure 2), respectively (Roy et al., 2003; Denger et al., 2014).”
A correction has been made to “BIOCHEMICAL REACTION NETWORK FOR ORGANIC SULFUR,” “Sulfonate Metabolisms,” “Paragraph Number 1”:
“SQ has been shown to be degraded by certain aerobic as well as anaerobic bacteria (Roy et al., 2003; Denger et al., 2012, 2014; Felux et al., 2015; Burrichter et al., 2018) and two major sulfoglycolytic pathways, the sulfo-Embden-Meyerhof-Parnas pathway (originally found in E. coli) and the sulfo-Entner-Doudoroff pathway (originally found in Pseudomonas putida SQ1) have been described (Denger et al., 2014; Felux et al., 2015). These pathways are analogous to the classic glycolysis pathways (Figure 2) (Felux et al., 2015). Bacterial SQ degradation yields the C3-organosulfonate products DHPS and sulfolactate (Figure 2) (Roy et al., 2003; Denger et al., 2012, 2014; Felux et al., 2015; Burrichter et al., 2018).”
And the (Denger et al., 2012) citation has now been inserted in.
The authors state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
References
1
BurrichterA.DengerK.FranchiniP.HuhnT.MüllerN.SpitellerD.et al. (2018). Anaerobic degradation of the plant sugar sulfoquinovose concomitant with H2S production: Escherichia coli K-12 and Desulfovibrio sp. strain DF1 as co-culture model. Front. Microbiol. 9:2792. 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02792
2
DengerK.HuhnT.HollemeyerK.SchleheckD.CookA. M. (2012). Sulfoquinovose degraded by pure cultures of bacteria with release of C3-organosulfonates: complete degradation in two-member communities. FEMS. Microbiol. Lett. 328, 39–45. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02477.x
3
DengerK.WeissM.FeluxA.SchneiderA.MayerC.SpitellerD.et al. (2014). Sulphoglycolysis in Escherichia coli K-12 closes a gap in the biogeochemical sulphur cycle. Nature507, 114–117. 10.1038/nature12947
4
FeluxA.SpitellerD.KlebensbergerJ.SchleheckD. (2015). Entner– doudoroff pathway for sulfoquinovose degradation in Pseudomonas putida SQ1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 4298–4305. 10.1073/pnas.1507049112
5
RoyA. B.HewlinsM. J. E.EllisA. J.HarwoodJ. L.WhiteG. F. (2003). Glycolytic breakdown of sulfoquinovose in bacteria: a missing link in the sulfur cycle. Appl. Environ. Microbiol.69, 6434–6441. 10.1128/AEM.69.11.6434
Summary
Keywords
microbe, organic sulfur, gene, sulfur cycle, transformation
Citation
Tang K (2020) Corrigendum: Chemical Diversity and Biochemical Transformation of Biogenic Organic Sulfur in the Ocean. Front. Mar. Sci. 7:280. doi: 10.3389/fmars.2020.00280
Received
13 March 2020
Accepted
07 April 2020
Published
15 May 2020
Volume
7 - 2020
Edited by
Jose M. Gonzalez, University of La Laguna, Spain
Reviewed by
David Schleheck, University of Konstanz, Germany
Updates
Copyright
© 2020 Tang.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Kai Tang tangkai@xmu.edu.cn
This article was submitted to Aquatic Microbiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Marine Science
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.