A Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia With Tramadol Ameliorates Postpartum Depression in High-Risk Woman After Cesarean Section: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Background: Postpartum depression (PPD) is a severe psychiatric disorder. Its risk is associated with the cesarean section (CS). Currently, there are few early intervention strategies for these women with PPD who underwent CS.

Methods: This was a parallel-group randomized controlled trial of singleton pregnant women who underwent elective CS in a tertiary referral hospital in China from October, 2017 to September, 2019. After operation, patients received randomly tramadol patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA; 4 mg/ml; TRA group), hydromorphone PCIA (0.04 mg/ml; HYD group), or ropivacaine patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA; 1.5 mg/ml; ROP group) for 48 h in a 1:1:1 ratio. Total blinding during hospitalization was not feasible due to differences between the PCEA and PCIA treatments. All investigators who performed the follow-up were blinded to the group assignment.

Outcomes: A total of 1,230 patients were enrolled for eligibility. Intention-to-treat analysis showed reduced incidence of PPD in the TRA group (n = 27 [6.6%]) than that in the HYD (10.2%, OR 1.62, 95% CI 0.98~2.68; p = 0.059) and ROP groups (10.5%, OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.01~2.75; p = 0.046) at 4 weeks post-operation, however, the difference was not statistically significant (Bonferroni corrected p = 0.118, p = 0.098, respectively). Subgroup analysis in high-risk women (preoperative Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale [EPDS] ≥10) showed a significantly lower incidence of PPD in the TRA group (16.5%) than in the HYD (32.6%) and ROP groups (30.9%) (Bonferroni corrected p = 0.022 and p = 0.038, respectively). The per-protocol analysis yielded similar results. Reported adverse events (AEs) were mostly mild. None of the women or infant discontinued treatment due to AEs.

Conclusions: Tramadol PCIA after CS in high-risk women can help to reduce the risk of PPD at 4 weeks after elective CS.

Clinical Trial Registration:https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03309163?term=ETPPD&draw=2&rank=1; ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03309163).

Introduction

Postpartum depression (PPD) is a severe psychiatric disorder that occurs during the perinatal period or within 4 weeks after delivery (1). Its prevalence in developed countries is ~10% (2) and has reached 11.8–15.7% in China (3–5). The cesarean delivery rate in China was 36.7% in 2018 (6), which is more than twice above the recommended level (7). Studies have suggested that cesarean delivery was associated with the risk of PPD (8, 9). Without intervention, PPD may persist up to 2 years beyond the postpartum period and ~40% of affected women will have a relapse in subsequent pregnancies (10).

Common treatments for PPD include pharmacological and psychological therapy. However, a study reported that the use of antidepressants, especially selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), during pregnancy represented differences in teratogenic activity to the infants (11). Hence, most women are unwilling to receive antidepressants during the perinatal period. Physicians may also be hesitant to prescribe antidepressants (12) or prescribe insufficient doses in consideration of fetal and infant exposure to the medications (13). Recently, a novel antidepressant has been shown to relieve PPD (14). However, it was only effective after the onset of PPD. Although, psychological therapies may be as effective as early interventions for PPD, they have limited popularity and acceptability among patients (15), especially in developing countries. Furthermore, patients usually seek medical attention only when the symptoms become severe. These challenges hinder women from receiving timely and proper treatment during the perinatal period.

Postoperative pain is a risk factor for PPD (16). Patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCIA) is one of the most commonly used methods for postoperative pain management (17). Tramadol, a commonly used medication after CS in China, is a weak μ-opioid receptor agonist that is effective and well-tolerated for relieving postoperative pain (18, 19). It also inhibits serotonin and norepinephrine uptake, similar to tricyclic antidepressants (20–22). In addition, only ~0.1% of tramadol and its metabolites are detected in the breast milk (18), and the relative infant doses are within the safety level for breastfeeding (23, 24). Tramadol has been shown to have antidepressant-like effects in animal studies (25–27). Our pilot trial (19) found that tramadol PCIA following CS reduced the incidence of depression in the early postpartum period. However, there is limited research on early intervention with tramadol to prevent PPD.

We hypothesize that PCIA with tramadol after CS would be reduce the risk of PPD, which may be a rational treatment option for patients facing the dual challenge of PPD and postoperative pain. We conducted a randomized clinical trial (RCT) to examine the effects of tramadol PCIA vs. hydromorphone PCIA and ropivacaine patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) on PPD in women who underwent CS.

Materials and Methods

Trial Design

This was a prospective, parallel-group RCT of Chinese patients who underwent elective CS in a tertiary referral hospital (The Second Affiliated Hospital of the Army Medical University) in Chongqing, China between 15 October 2017 and 5 September 2019 (Figure 1). The study design and methods were previously published (28). The study protocol was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Second Affiliated Hospital, Army Military Medical University (Approval ID: 2017–026) and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier NCT03309163).

Figure 1

Participants

Written informed consent was obtained from all patients in the ward after admission to the hospital and prior to the initiation of any research procedures. All participants were the singleton full-term pregnant women in an aged 20–40 years. Inclusion criteria were aged 20–40 years; American Society of Anesthesiologists class II; singleton full-term pregnant women who received elective CS (eCS) and voluntary postoperative controlled analgesia; and consented to participate in the study. Exclusion criteria included history of diagnosed mental disorders, prior use of psychiatric medication or psychotropic substances; history of neurological diseases such as epilepsy; history of previously diagnosed depression; with suicidal ideations or history of suicide; history of drug, alcohol or opioid abuse; received monoamine oxidase inhibitor treatment at present or in the past 14 days; participated in other clinical studies; with severe heart disease, brain disease, liver disease, or kidney disease; with allergies to tramadol or opioids; with any contraindication to combined spinal-epidural anesthesia (CSEA); and inability to communication or cooperate.

At the time of preoperative recruitment, patients were screened and eligible patients were recruited into the study and the study procedures were explained to them before beginning the study. Patients were assessed by professionally trained researchers using the patient self-report Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS), a commonly used instrument for screening perinatal depression (29, 30), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD-7) questionnaire, a common tool for screening GAD in general hospitals in China (GAD-7 score > 9 indicates the presence of GAD) (31, 32). All eligible participants were monitored according to routine practice after entering the operating room. Then, a standardized CS under standard CSEA was carried out for each patient by an experienced anesthesiologist and obstetrician. After the operation, the participants received PCIA or PCEA immediately and were monitored in the obstetrics intensive care unit for 6 h before returning to the general ward.

Randomization and Blinding

Depression during pregnancy is a critical risk factor for PPD (33, 34). Therefore, an preoperative EPDS ≥ 10, a recommended cut-off score for screening depressive illness in the Chinese general postnatal population (30), was used as the stratification factor in the randomization process. And we defined these women with preoperative EPDS > 10 as a high-risk group. We used a computer-generated randomization sequence to randomly allocate patients in a 1:1:1 ratio into three analgesia groups by stratified block randomization.

Although, it is not feasible to completely blind patients or investigators during operation and hospitalization due to the apparent difference between PCEA and PCIA, the investigators who conducted postoperative and long-term follow-ups were blinded to the group assignment. Participants, care providers, and investigators were blinded to the assignment of the two PCIA groups. Moreover, statisticians were blinded to the group assignment until the analysis of the research outcomes was completed.

Interventions

A primary control group (hydromorphone [HYD] PCIA, Renfu, China, 0.04 mg/ml) and a second control group (ropivacaine [ROP] PCEA, AstraZeneca, Sweden, 1.5 mg/ml) were set up in parallel to the experimental group (tramadol [TRA] PCIA, Gran tai, Germany, 4 mg/ml with a maximum daily dose of 400 mg). The above three treatments were diluted in 0.9% saline. The patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) pumps were programmed to administer a background infusion at 4.0 ml/h, with PCIA dose of 1 ml, PCEA dose of 4 ml, lockout period of 15 min, and maintenance duration of 48 h. Immediately after the operation, the PCA medications were administered for 48 h. When inadequate analgesia occurred (resting pain visual analog score [VAS] > 40) (35), patients were given a time-parameter setting adjustment for the PCA pump or were supplemented with the medications in the respective groups until the VAS score was ≤ 30.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome

The primary outcome was the incidence of PPD at 4 weeks after eCS. assessed using the EPDS, and diagnosed with the American Psychiatric Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) (1) by a professional psychiatrist.

Secondary Outcomes

Secondary outcomes included the incidence of PPD at 3 months after eCS; the incidence of anxiety state (as assessed by GAD-7) at 4 weeks and 3 months after the CS; the quality of recovery (as assessed by QoR-15; higher score indicates better quality of maternal recovery) at 48 h post operation; pain at rest [assessed by numerical rating scale (36) (NRS; 0 = no pain, 10 = unbearable pain)] and Ramsay sedation score (37) at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h post-operation; the incidence of inadequate analgesia (VAS > 40) at 48 h post operation; early walking time (determined by the time point when patients could ambulate independently); lactation onset time (based on patient self-reported onset time); sleep quality (self-reported by patients and rated as “very poor to poor,” “general,” or “good to very good”) on day 0 and day 1 post-operation; incidence of related postoperative adverse events (AEs) including nausea and vomiting, dizziness, pruritus, headache, and hypoesthesia; the length of hospital stay post-operation and hospitalization costs. All of the data were collected in the phases of postoperative follow-up during the hospitalization period or long-term follow-up after discharge except for AEs which were monitored and recorded post-operation until discharge.

QoR-15 is an easy-to-use score for assessing the quality of postoperative recovery from the patient's perspective. It has good validity, reliability, and reproducibility in patients who have undergone surgery under anesthesia (38, 39). The QoR-15 includes two parts—physical and mental well-being, comprising items from five dimensions (pain, physical comfort, physical independence, psychological support, and emotional state).

Procedures

The study had four phases: preoperative recruitment, operation under anesthesia, postoperative follow-up during the hospitalization period, and long-term follow-up after discharge.

At the time of preoperative recruitment, participants were screened and recruited in the obstetric ward after admission and before eCS. Information about the demographic characteristics was recorded. The participants were assessed by professionally trained researchers on the EPDS and the GAD-7. Considering the stratification factor (preoperative EPDS ≥ 10), eligible subjects were randomly assigned to receive tramadol PCIA, hydromorphone PCIA, or ropivacaine PCEA. During operation under anesthesia, subjects were routinely monitored after entering the operating room. Then, a standardized CS under standard CSEA was implemented for each subject by an experienced anesthesiologist and obstetrician. After the operation, the patients from the venous analgesia group had the epidural catheter removed and was connected to the PCIA pump, but the epidural catheter of the PCEA group was retained. All patients received PCIA or PCEA immediately post-operation, were trained and supervised in the obstetrics intensive care unit for 6 h, and then returned to the general ward. Outcome data were collected during the postoperative follow-up in the hospital by a specialized researcher. Long-term follow-up after discharge was performed by a professionally trained researcher at 4 weeks (±3 days) and 3 months (±7 days) postpartum via telephone interviews. The specific content of the phone interview was as follows: (1) ask two emotionally related questions: (a) during the past month, have you often been bothered by feeling down, depressed, or hopeless? (b) have you often been bothered by little interest or pleasure in doing things? (2) ask patients if they completed the self-reported EPDS and GAD-7 questionnaires as they did during hospitalization before the CS. The EPDS and GAD-7 questionnaires were sent via “WeChat” (the most commonly used social networking software in China). Participants who were assessed to be at risk of depression (EPDS ≥ 10) were referred to a professional psychiatrist for further clinical assessment by telephone or face-to-face consultation using the DSM-5 to determine if patients had PPD. An appropriate treatment plan for PPD was developed at the psychiatrist's discretion, taking into account the severity of the patient's symptoms, and her functional status, including their ability to care for and relate to the new-born (40). Participants who were uncontactable for more than 1 week were considered lost to follow-up. Finally, data analysis is performed by specialized statisticians.

A phone and WeChat return visit to the last randomized participant of the study was completed on Sep 5, 2019.

Statistical Analysis

We estimated the incidence of PPD to be ~15% based on a previous study that showed that the incidence of PPD after CS in Chinese women is ~7.3 to 26.3% (41). Considering that the postoperative Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores in the tramadol group were less than half of those in the hydromorphone group at 1 week post-operation in our previous pilot trial (19), we hypothesized that the risk of PPD would be reduced by 50% in the TRA group compared with other control groups, that is, an estimated incidence of 7.5% in the TRA group and 15% in the control group. Based on a significance level of 0.05, power of 0.9, and considering an ~10% loss to follow-up, we planned to enroll 410 patients for each group, with a total sample size of 1,230 patients.

We analyzed the outcome data with the intention-to-treat (ITT) principal and repeated the analysis for the primary endpoint with the per-protocol (PP) principal. The ITT analyses included all randomized patients in each group. For patients who withdrew from the study, the data collected at the point of withdrawal were used as part of the ITT analysis. Patients who failed to follow the study protocol, lacked data for the primary outcome, or presented severe complications during CS or hospitalization were excluded from the PP analysis. We did not perform an interim analysis. Categorical variables were compared between groups using the χ2 test, continuity correction χ2 test, or Fisher's exact test. Continuous variables were compared between groups using analysis of t-test, variance (ANOVA) with post-hoc least significant difference test, or Mann-Whitney U-test. The difference (and 95% CI for the difference) between the two medians was calculated using the Hodges-Lehmann estimator, and the rate difference with 95% CI between different groups was also calculated. Variables were summarized as mean ± standard deviation (SD), number (frequency), and median (interquartile range [IQR]). Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 24.0, SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA), with two-tailed p < 0.05 being considered statistically significant. P-values were adjusted using Bonferroni correction of 0.05/2. Major outcomes were compared between the TRA group and HYD group and the TRA group and ROP group. Because prenatal depression may affect the primary outcome, subgroup analyses in women with preoperative EPDS ≥ 10 (high risk women) were also performed.

An exploratory stepwise binary logistic regression analysis using the forward logistic regression model was performed to investigate whether the onset of PPD at 4 weeks after CS was affected by the selected demographic and clinical characteristics. According to the model selection principle, the model with the smallest Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) value was selected (42). The independent variables included age, BMI, gestational weeks, complication, number of CSs, history of surgery (except CS), sleep quality in the last week, preoperative EPDS and GAD-7 scores, operation duration, postpartum hemorrhage, occupation, educational level, spouse's occupation, spouse's educational level, marital status, marital relationship, monthly household income, QoR-15, NRS at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after operation, early walking time, lactation onset time, sleep quality on the day 0 and day 1 post-operation, the length of hospital stay post-operation, and hospitalization costs.

Results

Of the 1,230 patients who were enrolled in the study, 410 were randomized to receive tramadol PCIA, hydromorphone PCIA, or ropivacaine PCEA, respectively (Figure 1). At 4 weeks after the operation, 25 patients (2%) lacked data for the primary outcome (six withdrew during hospitalization, 19 were lost to follow-up). Fifty-six patients (4.6%) lacked data on the incidence of PPD at 3 months. The characteristics of the randomized groups and subgroups are shown in Table 1 and Supplementary Table 1, respectively.

Primary Outcome

PPD occurred in 112 (9.3%) of the 1,205 patients at 4 weeks after CS. In the ITT analysis (Table 2 and Figure 2A), the incidence of PPD in the TRA group (6.6% [27/410]) was not statistically different from that in the HYD group (10.2% [42/410]), but was significantly lower than that in the ROP group (10.5% [43/410]). After Bonferroni correction, these differences were not statistically significant. Similarly, PP analysis showed that the incidence of PPD in the TRA group (6.7% [27/405]) was lower than that in the HYD group (10.4% [42/403], OR 1.63, 95% CI: 0.98~2.70) and the ROP group (10.8% [43/397], OR 1.70, 95% CI 1.03~2.81). However, the differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.056 [Bonferroni corrected p = 0.112]; p = 0.037 [Bonferroni corrected p = 0.074]).

Figure 2

Subgroup Analysis

We performed a subgroup analysis (ITT analysis) in women with preoperative EPDS ≥ 10, indicating high risk of PPD (Table 3 and Figure 2B). The incidence of PPD in the TRA group (16.5% [16/97]) was significantly lower than that in the HYD (32.6% [28/86], OR 2.44, 95% CI 1.21~4.93; p = 0.011) and the ROP groups (30.9% [29/94], OR 2.49, 95% CI 1.25~4.95; p = 0.019), which remained statistically significant even after Bonferroni correction (p = 0.022 and p = 0.038, respectively). In the PP analysis, the incidence of PPD in the TRA group (16.7% [16/96]) was significantly lower than that in the HYD group (33.3% [28/84], OR 2.50, 95% CI 1.24~5.05, p = 0.009; Bonferroni corrected p = 0.018) and the ROP group (31.1% [28/90], OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.12~4.54, p = 0.021; Bonferroni corrected p = 0.042) even after Bonferroni correction.

Secondary Outcomes

PPD occurred in 92 (7.9%) of the 1,170 patients at 3 months after CS. The incidence of PPD in the TRA group (7.8% [32/410]) was not statistically different from that in the HYD (7.1% [29/410]) and ROP groups (7.6% [31/410]) (Table 2 and Figure 2A). Subgroup analysis in women with a high risk of PPD also showed no differences (Table 3 and Figure 2B). The incidence of PPD at 3 months after operation was largely similar to that at 4 weeks in the TRA group whereas the incidence of PPD at 3 months declined in the control groups. To investigate the changes in the incidence of PPD between 4 weeks and 3 months post-operation, the remission rate after 3 months, and the proportion of new cases of PPD between 4 weeks and 3 months were compared among the three groups (Figure 3). At 3 months, the remission rate of cases of depressive episode at 4 weeks in the TRA group (60% [15/25]) was not statistically different from that in the HYD (76.9 [30/39], OR 2.22, 95% CI 0.75~6.63, p = 0.148) and ROP groups (55.3% [21/38], OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.30~2.29, p = 0.710). The proportion of new cases of PPD between 4 weeks and 3 months in the TRA group (68.8% [22/32]) was also not statistically different from that in the HYD (69.0% [20/29], OR 1.01, 95% CI 0.34~2.99, p = 0.986) and ROP groups (45.2% [14/31], OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.13~1.05, p = 0.059).

Figure 3

Other secondary outcomes are presented in Table 2. The mean ± SD QoR-15 score at 48 h after CS in the TRA group (121.30 ± 15.75) was significantly higher than that in the HYD (118.06 ± 17.56; Difference [D] = 3.24, 95% CI 0.43~6.05; p = 0.018) and the ROP groups (116.22 ± 18.20; D=5.08, 95% CI 2.19~7.96; p < 0.001). After Bonferroni correction, the difference was still statistically significant (p = 0.036 and p < 0.001, respectively). Sleep quality on day 0 or day 1 post-operation in the TRA group was not different from that in the HYD group (p = 0.738 and p = 0.305, respectively) but significantly better than the ROP group (p = 0.009 and p = 0.002, respectively, Bonferroni corrected p = 0.018 and p = 0.004, respectively).

The median (IQR) NRS scores at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h post-operation in the TRA group (4[2–6], 3[2–4], 2[1–4], and 2[0–3], respectively) were not significantly different from the HYD group (4[2–6], 3[2–4], 3[2–4], and 2[0–3], respectively; p = 0.145, p = 0.731, p = 0.066, and p = 0.264, respectively). The median (IQR) NRS scores at 12, 24, and 48 h post-operation in the TRA group (3[2–4], 2[1–4], and 2[0–3], respectively) were significantly lower than that in the ROP group (4[2–5], 3[2–5], and 2[0–3], respectively; p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.001, respectively; Bonferroni corrected p < 0.001, p < 0.001, and p = 0.002, respectively); however, the mean difference in NRS pain scores between the groups was small (−1 to −1, −1 to 0). The median NRS score at 6 h post-operation was not significantly different between the TRA and ROP groups (p = 0.651). The incidence of inadequate analgesia at 48 h post-operation in the TRA group (7.6% [31/410]) was not statistically different from that in the HYD (10.2% [42/410]; OR 1.40, 95% CI 0.86~2.27, p = 0.177) and the ROP groups (9.8% [40/410]; OR 1.32, 95% CI 0.81~2.16, p = 0.264), respectively. No significant difference was found between the TRA and HYD groups (p = 0.576) in the average of Ramsay sedation score after operation, as in the TRA and ROP groups (p = 0.795).

To further explore the risk factors for PPD in women who underwent cesarean delivery, we conducted an exploratory analysis using stepwise binary logistic regression (Table 4). Higher preoperative EPDS scores and longer lactation onset times were correlated with an increased risk of PPD at 4 weeks after cesarean delivery (OR 1.36, 95% CI 1.27–1.45, p < 0.001; OR 1.03, 95% CI 1.01–1.04, p = 0.001). History of dysmenorrhea was significantly correlated with the occurrence of PPD (OR 2.54, 95% CI 1.39–4.63, p = 0.002). A good marital relationship was associated with a lower risk of PPD (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.18–0.76, p = 0.007). Taking tramadol PCIA as the reference group, hydromorphone PCIA and ropivacaine PCEA were significantly correlated with the occurrence of PPD (OR 2.10, 95% CI 1.10–4.11; OR 2.24, 95% CI 1.14–4.40, p = 0.004).

The incidence of related AEs is shown in Table 5. In addition to dizziness, the incidence of nausea and vomiting, pruritus, and headache were not significantly different among the three groups (p = 0.022, p = 0.072, p = 0.803, and p = 0.803, respectively). The incidence of dizziness in the TRA group (2.2% [9/410] was significantly higher than that in the ROP group (0.2% [1/410], OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01–0.86, Bonferroni corrected p = 0.022), but not statistically different from that in the HYD group (1% [4/410], OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.13–1.44, p = 0.162). At 24 h postoperatively, 48 patients in the ROP group and no patients in the TRA and HYD groups reported hypoesthesia. Reported AEs in mothers were mostly mild and subsided soon after the end of the infusion. No cases of abnormal sleepiness, difficulty in breastfeeding, and breathing problems for infants were reported during the study. No of the patients discontinued treatment due to AEs.

Discussion

In this RCT involving women who underwent eCS, tramadol PCIA led to a lower incidence of PPD at 4 weeks postpartum in high-risk women and better overall QoR and sleep quality than one or both of the control groups.

Evidence shows that early intervention is vital for the prevention of PPD (43). Our perioperative tramadol PCIA strategy demonstrates the dual benefits of reducing the occurrence of PPD while relieving postoperative pain for the high risk of the PPD population. It is known that tramadol is relatively safe for breastfeeding. These results suggest that tramadol PCIA could be a rational strategy for early intervention of PPD following planned CS. Although dexmedetomidine PCIA after CS reduces the incidence of PPD and pain, it is not clear how much of the medication enters the breastmilk (44). Other medications, such as brexanolone, a novel antidepressant, and sertraline, a traditional first-line antidepressant, have demonstrated improvements in PPD (14, 45). However, these do not offer postoperative analgesia, and are aimed at intervention after the onset of PPD, which requires long treatment cycles with limited curative effect (14, 45).

Tramadol is a weak opioid agonist with selectivity for the μ-receptor. It also inhibits serotonin and norepinephrine uptake like tricyclic antidepressive agents (TCAs) and reduces alpha-2-adrenergic receptors (46) that are related to depression (47, 48). Our study included a primary control group (hydromorphone PCIA, commonly used after CS with a pure μ opioid receptor agonist). Our findings suggest tramadol may exerts its antidepressant effects by inhibiting serotonin and norepinephrine uptake and/or downregulating the alpha-2-adrenergic receptors. In addition, pain and depression share common pathways in the brain (49, 50). The antidepressant effects of tramadol may be secondary to pain relief. The TRA group had similar pain control as the HYD group during postoperative 48 h, but slightly better pain control than the ROP group at postoperative 12, 24, and 48 h. The incidence of inadequate analgesia at 48 h post-operation was comparable between the TRA and control groups. A study has reported that the optimal concentration of ropivacaine when used alone for PCEA is 2 mg/ml (51). However, a higher incidence (20%) of numbness in both lower limbs was observed in our previous clinical observations, which prompted us to change the concentration of ropivacaine to 1.5 mg/ml. This may have contributed to the insufficient analgesia in the ROP group.

The QoR at 48 h post-operation was significantly better in the TRA group than that in the control group. QoR-15 is an easy-to-use scoring system that assesses the quality of postoperative recovery from the patient's perspective, including physical and mental well-being. It has good validity, reliability and reproducibility in patients after surgery with anesthesia (38, 39). Therefore, the results may indicate that the postoperative tramadol scheme improved the physical and mental well-being of women who underwent CS. In addition, the TRA group had sleep quality comparable to that of the HYD group on day 0 and day 1 post-operation, but significantly better sleep quality than the ROP group. This is consistent with earlier studies showing that opioids can improve sleep quality while relieving pain (52, 53). Good sleep quality can reduce the risk of depression (54–57). Thus, the antidepressant effect of TRA may be through not only the improvement of sleep and pain compared to HYD, but also through a comprehensive approach.

The incidence of PPD in the control group declined to a level comparable to that in the TRA group at 3 months post-operation. Further, evaluation showed similar remission rates and proportion of new PPD cases in the period from 4 weeks to 3 months post-operation in all groups. It has been shown that high levels of depressive symptoms remit over the perinatal period in most women (58), similar to our results. Taken together, the perioperative tramadol PCIA strategy may ameliorate PPD in advance.

No unexpected tolerability concerns were noted in the TRA group. AEs were generally manageable and subsided within a few h after the end of infusion (18). Considering the low potential of tramadol for addiction (59, 60) and the technique and relatively short duration of tramadol administration in this study, the risk of developing tramadol dependence is likely to be low.

Our study suggests that the tramadol PCIA strategy is a valuable perioperative treatment option for early intervention of PPD following eCS, especially in the high-risk groups. It also relieves postoperative pain. These dual effects remove the burden of additional time, cost and side effects associated with the use of a separate antidepressant medication and psychological therapy. Moreover, depression is underdiagnosed in pregnant women compared with non-pregnant women (61), particularly for PPD (62, 63), due to insufficient attention from patients and perioperative doctors. The perioperative tramadol strategy can help perioperative physicians to reduce the risk of PPD in high-risk women.

Limitations

First, to survey the effects of pain relief on depression, the study included a second control group (ropivacaine PCEA). An epidural infusion of ropivacaine and fentanyl is considered more effective than epidural ropivacaine alone for relieving pain after major abdominal surgery (51); using ropivacaine alone in our study may not have optimized postoperative analgesia. However, a comparison between the two PCIA groups was reasonable. Second, only patients who underwent CS were evaluated. Our findings may not be generalizable to all pregnant women, such as those who undergo vaginal delivery. Third, we carried out tramadol PCIA for 48 h at a rate of 16 mg/h (64) and did not explore the effects of other doses or durations on the primary outcome. Fourth, although tramadol is unlikely to adversely affect nursing infant (65) and its related effect is currently poorly understood (no case was reported in our study, too), tramadol is metabolized by P450 iso enzymes CYP2D6 which, in patients who are ultra-rapid metabolizers, may convert tramadol to M1 at high and unsafe levels in both maternal blood and breast milk potentially (66). This problem deserves a specialized detailed scheme to be investigated in the future. Fifth, although, we have included a number of factors in the analysis of risk factors for PPD, other risk factors may exist. Finally, the assessment of sleep quality in the current study was self-reported, which is subject to poor recall and bias.

Conclusion

Tramadol PCIA in high-risk women who undergo eCS reduces the risk of PPD in the early postpartum period, relieves pain, and improves patients' quality of life and sleep quality post-operation. Future studies are required to fully elucidate the precise mechanisms underlying the antidepressant effects of tramadol. More work is also be needed to determine the optimal dose and duration of tramadol PCIA for reducing PPD and explore its efficacy in women undergoing vaginal delivery.

Prior Presentations

The research findings in this manuscript have not been Published previously nor presented in any abstract or poster.

References

• 1.

  American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed.Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing (2013). 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2.

  Munk-OlsenTLaursenTMPedersenCBMorsOMortensenPB. New parents and mental disorders: a population-based register study. JAMA. (2006) 296:2582–9. 10.1001/jama.296.21.2582

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3.

  DingGNiuLVinturacheAZhangJLuMGaoYet al. “Doing the month” and postpartum depression among Chinese women: a Shanghai prospective cohort study. Women Birth. (2020) 33:e151–8. 10.1016/j.wombi.2019.04.004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4.

  SiuBWLeungSSIpPHungSFO'HaraMW. Antenatal risk factors for postnatal depression: a prospective study of Chinese women at maternal and child health centres. BMC Psychiatry. (2012) 12:22. 10.1186/1471-244X-12-22

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5.

  MaoQZhuLXSuXY. A comparison of postnatal depression and related factors between Chinese new mothers and fathers. J Clin Nurs. (2011) 20:645–52. 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2010.03542.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6.

  LiHTHellersteinSZhouYBLiuJMBlusteinJ. Trends in cesarean delivery rates in China, 2008-2018. JAMA. (2020) 323:89–91. 10.1001/jama.2019.17595

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7.

  MolinaGWeiserTGLipsitzSREsquivelMMUribe-LeitzTAzadTet al. Relationship between cesarean delivery rate and maternal and neonatal mortality. JAMA. (2015) 314:2263–70. 10.1001/jama.2015.15553

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8.

  XieRHLeiJWangSXieHWalkerMWenSW. Cesarean section and postpartum depression in a cohort of Chinese women with a high cesarean delivery rate. J Womens Health. (2011) 20:1881–6. 10.1089/jwh.2011.2842

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9.

  XuHDingYMaYXinXZhangD. Cesarean section and risk of postpartum depression: a meta-analysis. J Psychosom Res. (2017) 97:118–26. 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2017.04.016

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10.

  GoodmanJH. Postpartum depression beyond the early postpartum period. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. (2004) 33:410–20. 10.1177/0884217504266915

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11.

  ReefhuisJDevineOFriedmanJMLouikCHoneinMANational Birth Defects Prevention Study. Specific SSRIs and birth defects: Bayesian analysis to interpret new data in the context of previous reports. BMJ. (2015) 351:h3190. 10.1136/bmj.h3190

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12.

  BeckerMWeinbergerTChandyASchmuklerS. Depression during pregnancy and postpartum. Curr Psychiatry Rep. (2016) 18:32. 10.1007/s11920-016-0664-7

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13.

  SockolLEEppersonCNBarberJP. A meta-analysis of treatments for perinatal depression. Clin Psychol Rev. (2011) 31:839–49. 10.1016/j.cpr.2011.03.009

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14.

  Meltzer-BrodySColquhounHRiesenbergREppersonCNDeligiannidisKMRubinowDRet al. Brexanolone injection in post-partum depression: two multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials. Lancet. (2018) 392:1058–70. 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31551-4

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15.

  HowardLMMolyneauxEDennisCLRochatTSteinAMilgromJ. Non-psychotic mental disorders in the perinatal period. Lancet. (2014) 384:1775–88. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61276-9

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16.

  EisenachJCPanPHSmileyRLavand'hommePLandauRHouleTT. Severity of acute pain after childbirth, but not type of delivery, predicts persistent pain and postpartum depression. Pain. (2008) 140:87–94. 10.1016/j.pain.2008.07.011

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 17.

  SuttonCDCarvalhoB. Optimal pain management after cesarean delivery. Anesthesiol Clin. (2017) 35:107–24. 10.1016/j.anclin.2016.09.010

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18.

  ScottLJPerryCM. Tramadol: a review of its use in perioperative pain. Drugs. (2000) 60:139–76. 10.2165/00003495-200060010-00008

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19.

  DuanGBaoXYangGPengJWuZZhaoPet al. Patient-controlled intravenous tramadol versus patient-controlled intravenous hydromorphone for analgesia after secondary cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial to compare analgesic, anti-anxiety and anti-depression effects. J Pain Res. (2019) 12:49–59. 10.2147/JPR.S184782

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20.

  Faron-GoreckaAKusmiderMInanSYSiwanowiczJPiwowarczykTDziedzicka-WasylewskaM. Long-term exposure of rats to tramadol alters brain dopamine and alpha 1-adrenoceptor function that may be related to antidepressant potency. Eur J Pharmacol. (2004) 501:103–10. 10.1016/j.ejphar.2004.08.011

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21.

  BamigbadeTADavidsonCLangfordRMStamfordJA. Actions of tramadol, its enantiomers and principal metabolite, O-desmethyltramadol, on serotonin (5-HT) efflux and uptake in the rat dorsal raphe nucleus. Br J Anaesth. (1997) 79:352–6. 10.1093/bja/79.3.352

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 22.

  HalfpennyDMCalladoLFHopwoodSEBamigbadeTALangfordRMStamfordJA. Effects of tramadol stereoisomers on norepinephrine efflux and uptake in the rat locus coeruleus measured by real time voltammetry. Br J Anaesth. (1999) 83:909–15. 10.1093/bja/83.6.909

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23.

  IlettKFPaechMJPage-SharpMSySKKristensenJHGoyRet al. Use of a sparse sampling study design to assess transfer of tramadol and its O-desmethyl metabolite into transitional breast milk. Br J Clin Pharmacol. (2008) 65:661–6. 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2008.03117.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24.

  ItoS. Drug therapy for breast-feeding women. N Engl J Med. (2000) 343:118–26. 10.1056/NEJM200007133430208

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25.

  CaspaniOReitzMCCeciAKremerATreedeRD. Tramadol reduces anxiety-related and depression-associated behaviors presumably induced by pain in the chronic constriction injury model of neuropathic pain in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. (2014) 124:290–6. 10.1016/j.pbb.2014.06.018

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26.

  OstadhadiSNorouzi-JavidanAChamanaraMAkbarianRImran-KhanMGhasemiMet al. Involvement of NMDA receptors in the antidepressant-like effect of tramadol in the mouse forced swimming test. Brain Res Bull. (2017) 134:136–41. 10.1016/j.brainresbull.2017.07.016

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27.

  BarberJ. Examining the use of tramadol hydrochloride as an antidepressant. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. (2011) 19:123–30. 10.1037/a0022721

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28.

  DuanGWuZZhaoPPengJChenZZhangQet al. Protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to explore the effect of tramadol in the prevention of postpartum depression (ETPPD). BMJ Open. (2018) 8:e022538. 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-022538

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29.

  PattonGCRomaniukHSpryECoffeyCOlssonCDoyleLWet al. Prediction of perinatal depression from adolescence and before conception (VIHCS):20-year prospective cohort study. Lancet. (2015) 386:875–83. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62248-0

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30.

  LeeDTYipSKChiuHFLeungTYChanKPChauIOet al. Detecting postnatal depression in Chinese women. Validation of the Chinese version of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry. (1998) 172:433–7. 10.1192/bjp.172.5.433

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31.

  TongXAnDMcGonigalAParkSPZhouD. Validation of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) among Chinese people with epilepsy. Epilepsy Res. (2016) 120:31–6. 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2015.11.019

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32.

  HeXLiCQianJCuiHWuW. Reliability and validity of a generalized anxiety disorder scale in general hospital outpatients. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. (2010) 2010:200–3. 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0829.2010.04.002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33.

  WisnerKLSitDKMcSheaMCRizzoDMZoretichRAHughesCLet al. Onset timing, thoughts of self-harm, and diagnoses in postpartum women with screen-positive depression findings. JAMA Psychiatry. (2013) 70:490–8. 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.87

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34.

  PostpartumDepression. Action towards C, treatment C: heterogeneity of postpartum depression: a latent class analysis. Lancet Psychiatry. (2015) 2:59–67. 10.1016/S2215-0366(14)00055-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35.

  BoufidouFLambrinoudakiIArgeitisJZervasIMPliatsikaPLeonardouAAet al. CSF and plasma cytokines at delivery and postpartum mood disturbances. J Affect Disord. (2009) 115:287–92. 10.1016/j.jad.2008.07.008

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36.

  HjermstadMJFayersPMHaugenDFCaraceniAHanksGWLogeJHet al. Studies comparing numerical rating scales, verbal rating scales, and visual analogue scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. J Pain Symptom Manage. (2011) 41:1073–93. 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.08.016

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 37.

  De JongheBCookDAppere-De-VecchiCGuyattGMeadeMOutinH. Using and understanding sedation scoring systems: a systematic review. Intensive Care Med. (2000) 26:275–85. 10.1007/s001340051150

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38.

  StarkPAMylesPSBurkeJA. Development and psychometric evaluation of a postoperative quality of recovery score: the QoR-15. Anesthesiology. (2013) 118:1332–40. 10.1097/ALN.0b013e318289b84b

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39.

  BuXSZhangJZuoYX. Validation of the Chinese version of the quality of recovery-15 score and its comparison with the post-operative quality recovery scale. Patient. (2016) 9:251–9. 10.1007/s40271-015-0148-6

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40.

  National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health (UK). Antenatal and Postnatal Mental Health: The NICE Guideline on Clinical Management and Service Guidance. Leicester: British Psychological Society (2014).

  • Google Scholar

• 41.

  WangSYDuanKMTanXFYinJYMaoXYZhengWet al. Genetic variants of the kynurenine-3-monooxygenase and postpartum depressive symptoms after cesarean section in Chinese women. J Affect Disord. (2017) 215:94–101. 10.1016/j.jad.2017.03.023

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42.

  ZhangZ. Variable selection with stepwise and best subset approaches. Ann Transl Med. (2016) 4:136. 10.21037/atm.2016.03.35

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 43.

  SteinAPearsonRMGoodmanSHRapaERahmanAMcCallumMet al. Effects of perinatal mental disorders on the fetus and child. Lancet. (2014) 384:1800–19

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • Google Scholar

• 44.

  NakanishiRYoshimuraMSunoMYamamotoKItoHUchimineYet al. Detection of dexmedetomidine in human breast milk using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry: application to a study of drug safety in breastfeeding after Cesarean section. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. (2017) 1040:208–13. 10.1016/j.jchromb.2016.11.015

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45.

  O'HaraMWPearlsteinTStuartSLongJDMillsJAZlotnickC. A placebo controlled treatment trial of sertraline and interpersonal psychotherapy for postpartum depression. J Affect Disord. (2019) 245:524–32. 10.1016/j.jad.2018.10.361

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46.

  Faron-GoreckaAKusmiderMInanSYSiwanowiczJDziedzicka-WasylewskaM. Effects of tramadol on alpha2-adrenergic receptors in the rat brain. Brain Res. (2004) 1016:263–7. 10.1016/j.brainres.2004.05.026

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47.

  GonzalezAMPascualJMeanaJJBarturenFdel ArcoCPazosAet al. Autoradiographic demonstration of increased alpha 2-adrenoceptor agonist binding sites in the hippocampus and frontal cortex of depressed suicide victims. J Neurochem. (1994) 63:256–65. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1994.63010256.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48.

  OrdwayGAWiddowsonPSSmithKSHalarisA. Agonist binding to alpha 2-adrenoceptors is elevated in the locus coeruleus from victims of suicide. J Neurochem. (1994) 63:617–24. 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1994.63020617.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49.

  GerritsMMVogelzangsNvan OppenPvan MarwijkHWvan der HorstHPenninxBW. Impact of pain on the course of depressive and anxiety disorders. Pain. (2012) 153:429–36. 10.1016/j.pain.2011.11.001

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50.

  DoanLMandersTWangJ. Neuroplasticity underlying the comorbidity of pain and depression. Neural Plast. (2015) 2015:504691. 10.1155/2015/504691

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51.

  ScottDABlakeDBucklandMEtchesRHalliwellRMarslandCet al. A comparison of epidural ropivacaine infusion alone and in combination with 1, 2, and 4 microg/mL fentanyl for seventy-two hours of postoperative analgesia after major abdominal surgery. Anesth Analg. (1999) 88:857–64. 10.1097/00000539-199904000-00033

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52.

  TangNKYStellaMTBanksPDWSandhuHKBernaC. The effect of opioid therapy on sleep quality in patients with chronic non-malignant pain. A systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis. Sleep Med Rev. (2019) 45:105–26. 10.1016/j.smrv.2019.03.005

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53.

  BrennanMJLiebermanJAIII. Sleep disturbances in patients with chronic pain: effectively managing opioid analgesia to improve outcomes. Curr Med Res Opin. (2009) 25:1045–55. 10.1185/03007990902797790

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54.

  WeickerHStruderHK. Influence of exercise on serotonergic neuromodulation in the brain. Amino Acids. (2001) 20:35–47. 10.1007/s007260170064

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 55.

  JanalMNColtEWClarkWCGlusmanM. Pain sensitivity, mood and plasma endocrine levels in man following long-distance running: effects of naloxone. Pain. (1984) 19:13–25. 10.1016/0304-3959(84)90061-7

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56.

  SalmonP. Effects of physical exercise on anxiety, depression, and sensitivity to stress: a unifying theory. Clin Psychol Rev. (2001) 21:33–61. 10.1016/S0272-7358(99)00032-X

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57.

  JonesIChandraPSDazzanPHowardLM. Bipolar disorder, affective psychosis, and schizophrenia in pregnancy and the post-partum period. Lancet. (2014) 384:1789–99. 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61278-2

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58.

  HeronJO'ConnorTGEvansJGoldingJGloverVTeamAS. The course of anxiety and depression through pregnancy and the postpartum in a community sample. J Affect Disord. (2004) 80:65–73. 10.1016/j.jad.2003.08.004

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59.

  CiceroTJAdamsEHGellerAInciardiJAMunozASchnollSHet al. A postmarketing surveillance program to monitor Ultram (tramadol hydrochloride) abuse in the United States. Drug Alcohol Depend. (1999) 57:7–22. 10.1016/S0376-8716(99)00041-1

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60.

  CamiJLamasXFarreM. Acute effects of tramadol in methadone-maintained volunteers. Drugs. (1994) 47(Suppl. 1):39–43. 10.2165/00003495-199400471-00007

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 61.

  KoJYFarrSLDietzPMRobbinsCL. Depression and treatment among U.S. pregnant and nonpregnant women of reproductive age, 2005-2009.J Womens Health. (2012) 21:830–6. 10.1089/jwh.2011.3466

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 62.

  EvinsGGTheofrastousJPGalvinSL. Postpartum depression: a comparison of screening and routine clinical evaluation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2000) 182:1080–2. 10.1067/mob.2000.105409

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 63.

  FergersonSSJamiesonDJLindsayM. Diagnosing postpartum depression: can we do better?Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2002) 186:899–902. 10.1067/mob.2002.123404

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 64.

  GrondSSablotzkiA. Clinical pharmacology of tramadol. Clin Pharmacokinet. (2004) 43:879–923. 10.2165/00003088-200443130-00004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 65.

  PalmerGMAndersonBJLinscottDKPaechMJAllegaertK. Tramadol, breast feeding, and safety in the newborn. Arch Dis Child. (2018) 103:1110–3. 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313786

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 66.

  AllegaertKRochetteAVeyckemansF. Developmental pharmacology of tramadol during infancy: ontogeny, pharmacogenetics, and elimination clearance. Paediatr Anaesth. (2011) 21:266–73. 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2010.03389.x

  • Pubmed Abstract
  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar