Abstract
Background:
Childhood hunger not only directly affects the physical and mental health of children and adolescents but also has a long-term negative effect on later health outcomes. In this cross-sectional study, we used a nationally representative Chinese sample to examine the relationship between hunger in childhood and frailty in older adults.
Materials and methods:
The data were obtained from the 2018 Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey. The frailty index with 44 health deficits was used to identify frailty. Childhood hunger was measured by the question “Did you often go to bed hungry as a child?” Insurance status was categorized as New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme (NRCMS), Urban Basic Medical Insurance Scheme (UBMIS), others, and no insurance. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to estimate the adjusted relationship between childhood hunger and frailty.
Results:
A total of 7,342 older people aged 65 years and older were analyzed in this study. Older people who experienced childhood hunger were more likely to have frailty than those who did not (OR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.02–1.26), after adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics, family/social support, socioeconomic status, insurance status, and health behaviors. The association of childhood hunger with frailty was found in the 65–79 years group (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.03–1.43), women (OR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.08–1.45), individuals with rural residence (OR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.03–1.31), agricultural work (OR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.00–1.34), financial dependence (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.02–1.37), and those participating in NRCMS (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.16–1.56). Participants with hunger in childhood who were 80 years or older (OR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.65–0.98) had lower odds of frailty. NRCMS (OR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.02–1.98) showed increased odds of childhood hunger-related frailty.
Conclusion:
Exposure to hunger during childhood is linked to frailty among older adults, and age, financial support, and insurance status may mediate this relationship. Targeted interventions and policies to address frailty in older adults should be implemented.
Introduction
Frailty is a modern geriatric syndrome among older adults and is one of the most serious global public health challenges we will face in the next century (1). It reflects a multifactorial syndrome that includes physical, psychological, and social deficits that accumulate during the aging process, loss of reserves, and decreased resistance to stress and is linked with a high risk of adverse health-related outcomes, such as decreased functional capacity, falls, delirium, hospitalization, and death (2). Research (3) shows that frailty is reversible, and health promotion, nutrition, and physical and social support interventions can be used to treat and delay frailty.
China experienced the Great Leap Forward Famine in 1959–1961. Most Chinese people aged over 65 years today have experienced famine in their early life (4). Early life food deprivation has been found to be an important risk factor of negative health outcomes (5) and increase the risk of developing obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and other diseases in adulthood (6). Childhood experiences of hunger are common among older people, and understanding the impact of hunger on individuals can be particularly enlightening (7). There is growing evidence that traumatic events in childhood may have an impact on health throughout the life course (7).
The link between childhood conditions and health in later life might be explained by the theory of cumulative disadvantage/advantage, which places individual trajectories under the context of structural factors that might ameliorate or exacerbate previous disadvantages/advantages, and further influences individual health in later life and population-level inequality (8). The three aspects of the cumulative disadvantage/advantage hypothesis can be tested in the context of frailty as follows. First, to examine the relationship between childhood hunger and frailty by age, sex, and residence. Second, to examine the role of adulthood socioeconomic conditions (e.g., education, occupation, and financial support) in the association between childhood hunger and frailty at older age. Third, to evaluate the role of insurance status in the association between child hunger and frailty. Relating factors in the life course to frailty will increase our understanding of the social origins of frailty (9). Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the association between childhood hunger and frailty in older people and to determine the roles of sociodemographic characteristics and socioeconomic status in this association.
Materials and methods
Study sample
Data for the present study were obtained from the seventh wave of the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey (CLHLS) in 2018, which was conducted by Peking University and the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The CLHLS is a nationally representative survey that aims to understand the health status of older adults and related biological, behavioral, and social factors in China. A multi-stage disproportionate and targeted random sampling was adopted. Approximately 50% of counties/districts were randomly selected from 23 out of the 31 provinces of mainland China, in which all centenarians who volunteered to participate were interviewed. For each centenarian interviewee, one non-agenarian, one octogenarian, and three participants aged 65–79 years were matched nearby in the same street, village, or town. All information was obtained in participants’ homes through face-to-face interviews using internationally compatible questionnaires by trained investigators. The CLHLS study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Peking University (IRB00001052-13074), and all participants provided written informed consent.
A total of 15,874 participants were interviewed in the 2018 CLHLS survey. Among them, the proportion of the senior population (≥ 80 years old) was 65.7%. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) participant aged 65 years old or above; (2) complete information on frailty index and childhood hunger was collected. After excluding 8,524 participants due to missing data on key variables (6,830 with missing frailty data, and 1,694 with missing childhood hunger information), 7,342 participants aged 65 years or above finished the survey and had complete information on the frailty index and childhood hunger. Moreover, 5,700 had complete covariates data, and 1,642 had missing data on covariates (137 with missing residence, 64 with missing marriage, 127 with missing living arrangements, 118 with missing education, 131 with missing occupation, 609 with missing financial support, 175 with missing insurance status, 66 with missing smoking, 74 with missing drinking, 88 with missing exercise, 79 with missing social and leisure activity index, 152 with missing dietary patterns, and 246 with missing nutritional status). The samples having answers of “I don’t know/have no idea” in key variables were excluded in this study. Missing data were mainly due to no answer to key variables. To control bias from missing data, we managed missing data using multiple imputations, which is a relatively flexible and general purpose approach to dealing with missing data (10). Finally, a total of 7,342 participants were analyzed in this study (Figure 1). The missing participants were more likely to be female, aged 80 years or above, illiterate, have other marital statuses, living with household members, financially dependent on others, non-smokers, non-drinkers, performing no exercise, and have a low Body Mass Index (BMI).
FIGURE 1
Flowchart on the sample selection and exclusion. *Covariates: residence, marriage, living arrangements, education, occupation, smoking, drinking, exercise, social and leisure activity index, dietary pattern, and nutrition status, financial support, insurance status.
Frailty index
The frailty index (FI) is a mathematical model based on the accumulation of deficits, which can include any symptom, sign, disease, laboratory abnormality, or disability (11). Following the standard procedure proposed by Searle et al., we constructed the FI using 44 health deficits, including daily life events, chronic illness, and psychological functioning (Table 1). Although different numbers of deficits were used to construct each FI, the pattern of frailty with age remained consistent as long as the major domains of health, such as activities of daily living, were included (12). The deficits in the present study were comparable with those of other studies (12), with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.868. Each deficit variable was dichotomized or multicut and mapped to the 0–1 interval (e.g., routine task-bathing, with “no assistance” coded as 0, “partial assistance” coded as 0.5, and “need assistance” coded as 1) to indicate its severity. The sum of all deficits (n = 44) was then used to calculate the FI, which ranged from 0 to 1. We divided the FI score into three levels of variables: non-frail (FI ≤ 0.10), pre-frail (0.10 < FI ≤ 0.21), and frail (FI > 0.21) (13).
TABLE 1
| Number | Variables | Values |
| 1 | Feel useless with age | Never = 0; seldom = 0.25; sometimes = 0.5; often = 0.75; always = 1 |
| 2 | Feel lonely and isolated | Never = 0; seldom = 0.25; sometimes = 0.5; often = 0.75; always = 1 |
| 3 | Feel fearful or anxious | Never = 0; seldom = 0.25; sometimes = 0.5; often = 0.75; always = 1 |
| 4 | Keep my belongings neat and clean | Always = 0; often = 0.25; sometimes = 0.5; seldom = 0.75; never = 1 |
| 5 | Self-reported health | Very good = 0; good = 0.25; so so = 0.5; bad = 0.75; very bad = 1 |
| 6 | Do you feel any change in your health since | Much better = 0; slightly better = 0.25; almost the same = 0.5; |
| The last year? | Slightly worse = 0.75; much worse = 1 | |
| 7 | Make own decision | Always = 0; often = 0.25; sometimes = 0.5; seldom = 0.75; never = 1 |
| 8 | Bathing | Without assistance = 0; partial assistance = 0.5; need assistance = 1 |
| 9 | Dressing | Without assistance = 0; partial assistance = 0.5; need assistance = 1 |
| 10 | Toileting | Without assistance = 0; partial assistance = 0.5; need assistance = 1 |
| 11 | Transferring | Without assistance = 0; partial assistance = 0.5; need assistance = 1 |
| 12 | Continence | Without assistance = 0; partial assistance = 0.5; need assistance = 1 |
| 13 | Feeding | Without assistance = 0; partial assistance = 0.5; need assistance = 1 |
| 14 | Able to go outside to visit neighbors? | Yes = 0; a little difficult = 0.5; not able to do so = 1 |
| 15 | Able to go shopping by yourself? | Yes = 0; a little difficult = 0.5; not able to do so = 1 |
| 16 | Able to make food by yourself? | Yes = 0; a little difficult = 0.5; not able to do so = 1 |
| 17 | Able to wash clothes by yourself? | Yes = 0; a little difficult = 0.5; not able to do so = 1 |
| 18 | Able to walk 1 km? | Yes = 0; a little difficult = 0.5; not able to do so = 1 |
| 19 | Able to carry 5-kg weight? | Yes = 0; a little difficult = 0.5; not able to do so = 1 |
| 20 | Able to crouch and stand for three times? | Yes = 0; a little difficult = 0.5; not able to do so = 1 |
| 21 | Able to take public transport? | Yes = 0; a little difficult = 0.5; not able to do so = 1 |
| 22 | Visual function | Can see and distinguish the break in the circle = 0; can see but not |
| Distinguish the break in the circle = 0.33; cannot see = 0.67; blind = 1 | ||
| 23 | Hand behind neck | Both = 0; right = 0.5; left = 0.5; neither = 1 |
| 24 | Hand behind lower back | Both = 0; right = 0.5; left = 0.5; neither = 1 |
| 25 | Raise arms upright | Both = 0; right = 0.5; left = 0.5; neither = 1 |
| 26 | Able to stand up from sitting in a chair | Yes, without using hands = 0; yes, using hands = 0.5; no = 1 |
| 27 | Able to pick up a book from the floor | Yes, without using hands = 0; yes, using hands = 0.5; no = 1 |
| 28 | Of times suffering from serious illness | Not applicable = 0; one serious illness = l; two or more serious |
| In the past 2 years | Illnesses = 2 | |
| 29 | Suffering from hypertension? | No = 0; yes = 1 |
| 30 | Suffering from diabetes? | No = 0; yes = 1 |
| 31 | Suffering from heart disease? | No = 0; yes = 1 |
| 32 | Suffering from stroke or cardiovascular disease? | No = 0; yes = 1 |
| 33 | Suffering from bronchitis, emphysema, | No = 0; yes = 1 |
| Pneumonia, and asthma? | ||
| 34 | Suffering from tuberculosis? | No = 0; yes = 1 |
| 35 | Suffering from cataract? | No = 0; yes = 1 |
| 36 | Suffering from cancer? | No = 0; yes = 1 |
| 37 | Suffering from glaucoma? | No = 0; yes = 1 |
| 38 | Suffering from gastric or duodenal ulcer? | No = 0; yes = 1 |
| 39 | Suffering from Parkinson’s disease? | No = 0; yes = 1 |
| 40 | Suffering from bedsore? | No = 0; yes = 1 |
| 41 | Suffering from arthritis? | No = 0; yes = 1 |
| 42 | Suffering from dementia? | No = 0; yes = 1 |
| 43 | Was interviewee able to hear? | Yes, without hearing aid = 0; yes, but needs hearing aid = 0.33; |
| Partly, despite using hearing aid = 0.67; no = 1 | ||
| 44 | The health of interviewee rated | Surprisingly healthy = 0; relatively healthy = 0.33; moderately |
| By interviewer | ill = 0.67; very ill = 1 |
Variables for constructing frailty index in the 2018 waves of Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey.
Childhood hunger
Childhood hunger was measured by the question “Did you often go to bed hungry as a child?” The responses included “yes” or “no.”
Explanatory variables
Sociodemographic characteristics included age (age 65–79 vs. age 80 +), sex (male vs. female), and residence (rural vs. urban). Family/social support included marriage and living arrangements. Marriage was divided into married and other (including separated, divorced, widowed, and unmarried). Living arrangements were classified as follows: living alone, living with household members, and living in an institution. Socioeconomic status included education, occupation, and financial support. Education was divided into illiterate, primary school, junior high school, and high school and above. Occupations before 60 years old were allocated into two categories: agricultural work, which was coded as 0, and non-agricultural work, which was coded as 1. Financial support included financial dependence (coded as 0) and financial independence (coded as 1). Participants’ financial independence included work and retirement wages, and financial dependence included participants’ financial dependence on other family members. Insurance status was categorized into the New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme (NRCMS), Urban Basic Medical Insurance Scheme (UBMIS) (including urban resident basic medical insurance and urban employee basic medical insurance), others (including commercial medical insurance and public free medical services), and no insurance.
Health behaviors included smoking (yes or no), drinking per day (liang) (including 0, 0 < –1, 1 < –2, and > 2), exercise (yes or no), social and leisure activity index, dietary patterns, and nutritional status. The social and leisure activity scores were calculated for eight activity types (whether a respondent gardened, practiced Tai Chi, participated in square dancing, kept poultry or pets, read, played Mahjong or cards, listened to the radio or watched TV, and participated in community social activities). We scored each activity 1 for “never,” 2 for “sometimes,” and 3 for “almost every day.” Scores ranged from 8 to 24, with 14 or less being defined as a low social and leisure activity level, and higher scores indicating more leisure activities. Dietary patterns were classified as unfavorable, intermediate, or favorable through a simplified healthy eating index based on the frequency of intake of five food groups: fish, vegetables, fruits, tea, and bean products, which have been shown to be associated with frailty. The intake scores for these five food groups were summed and divided into three categories: unfavorable: 0–4; intermediate: 5–6; favorable: 7–10. BMI reflects nutritional status. According to the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria (14), the BMI cut-off for malnutrition risk is < 18.5 kg/m2 if the participant is aged < 70 years, and < 20 kg/m2 if the participant is aged ≥ 70 years; or else, the participant is identified as normal BMI.
Statistical analysis
Multiple imputation was used to adjust for selection bias and information loss. In the multiple imputation strategy, 50 iterations were used to impute missing data, and five imputed datasets were generated using predictive mean matching. The results were pooled over all five sets using Rubin’s rules. We present the descriptive statistics, and the results are expressed as the number of categorical variables (proportions). The relationship between childhood hunger and sociodemographic characteristics, family/social support, socioeconomic status, insurance status, and health behaviors was analyzed using chi-square tests, and the same process was applied to frailty. Covariates with three or more classifications were analyzed for their differences using a chi-square test of partitioning. Bonferroni correction was used for multiple comparisons. P < 0.017 was considered statistically significant for a two-way comparison between the 3 groups and P < 0.008 was considered statistically significant for a two-way comparison between the 4 groups. Mean and standard deviation (SD) were used to describe age. We evaluated multicollinearity among covariates, and the largest variance inflation factor was < 2, suggesting no multicollinearity biases in the models. The relationship between childhood hunger and frailty was evaluated by ordinal logistic regression analysis. Subgroup analyses were then conducted by stratifying variables. Finally, we explored whether age, financial support, and insurance status were potential moderators of this relationship, and we added an interaction term to test for a moderating effect. All statistical analyses were conducted with SPSS 26.0. A p-value of < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
As shown in Table 2, the sample was composed of 7,342 participants, comprising 3,420 males (46.6%) and 3,922 females (53.4%). The mean age of the study group was 82.99 (SD = 11.4) years. Of these participants, 42.1% were aged 65–79 years, 57.9% were aged ≥ 80 years, 46.0% were married, 82.9% resided in rural areas, 17.3% had high school and above, 61.2% did agricultural work, and 58.5% were financially dependent on others. A total of 1,888 (25.7%) were covered by UBMIS, 4,429 (60.3%) were covered by NRCMS, 229 (3.1%) were others, and 796 (10.9%) were not covered.
TABLE 2
| Characteristics | Total n (%) | Childhood hunger n (%) | χ2 | Frailty n (%) | χ2 |
| Total | 7,342 | 5,170 (70.42) | 2,150 (29.28) | ||
| Age group (years) | 13.211*** | 1437.747*** | |||
| 65–79 | 3,089 (42.07) | 2,105 (68.15) | 253 (8.19) | ||
| 80 + | 4,253 (57.93) | 3,065 (72.07) | 1,897 (44.60) | ||
| Sex | 6.374* | 192.327*** | |||
| Female | 3,922 (53.42) | 2,811 (71.67) | 1,377 (35.11) | ||
| Male | 3,420 (46.58) | 2,359 (68.98) | 773 (22.60) | ||
| Residence | 517.174*** | 17.609*** | |||
| Rural | 6,085 (82.88) | 4,620 (75.92) | 1,720 (28.27) | ||
| Urban | 1,257 (17.12) | 550 (43.76) | 430 (34.18) | ||
| Marital status | 14.425*** | 761.973*** | |||
| Married | 3,375 (45.97) | 2,302 (68.22) | 508 (15.04) | ||
| Others | 3,967 (54.03) | 2,868 (72.28) | 1,642 (41.40) | ||
| Living arrangement | 16.685*** | 182.672*** | |||
| With household member(s) (1) | 6,123 (83.39) | 4,348 (71.02) | 1,884 (30.76) | ||
| In an institution (2) | 197 (2.69) | 114 (57.85)a | 106 (53.90)a | ||
| Alone (3) | 1,022 (13.92) | 708 (69.25)b | 160 (15.66)ab | ||
| Education | 607.065*** | 514.832*** | |||
| High school and above (1) | 1,273 (17.34) | 568 (44.64) | 267 (20.97) | ||
| Junior high school (2) | 1,130 (15.39) | 752 (66.54)a | 193 (17.09) | ||
| Primary school (3) | 1,766 (24.05) | 1,259 (71.30)ab | 400 (22.68)b | ||
| Illiterate (4) | 3,173 (43.22) | 2,591 (81.65)abc | 1,290 (40.64)abc | ||
| Occupation | 463.701*** | 13.535** | |||
| Agricultural work | 4,492 (61.19) | 3,574 (79.55) | 1,253 (27.89) | ||
| Non-agricultural work | 2,850 (38.81) | 1,596 (56.01) | 897 (31.49) | ||
| Financial support | 390.197*** | 201.103*** | |||
| Financial dependence | 4,296 (58.52) | 3,406 (79.28) | 1,462 (34.02) | ||
| Financial independence | 3,046 (41.48) | 1,764 (57.92) | 688 (22.60) | ||
| Insurance status | 499.079*** | 49.934*** | |||
| NRCMS (1) | 4,429 (60.32) | 3,539 (79.90) | 1,189 (26.84) | ||
| UBMIS (2) | 1,888 (25.71) | 1,015 (53.77)a | 581 (30.76)a | ||
| Others (3) | 229 (3.12) | 125 (54.71)a | 80 (35.08)a | ||
| No (4) | 796 (10.85) | 491 (61.63)ab | 300 (37.72)ab | ||
| Smoking | 5.186* | 148.532*** | |||
| Yes | 1,212 (16.51) | 887 (73.14) | 201 (16.58) | ||
| No | 6,130 (83.49) | 4,283 (69.88) | 1,949 (31.80) | ||
| Drinking per day (liang) | 1.358 | 125.001*** | |||
| 0 (1) | 5,309 (72.30) | 3,718 (70.04) | 1,710 (32.21) | ||
| 0 < –1 (2) | 641 (8.73) | 457 (71.34) | 172 (26.82)a | ||
| 1 < –2 (3) | 618 (8.43) | 443 (71.68) | 131 (21.21)a | ||
| >2 (4) | 774 (10.54) | 552 (71.25) | 137 (17.72)ab | ||
| Exercise | 41.657*** | 452.748*** | |||
| Yes | 2,623 (35.72) | 1,726 (65.80) | 402 (15.32) | ||
| No | 4,719 (64.28) | 3,444 (72.98) | 1,748 (37.04) | ||
| Social and leisure activity level | 58.064*** | 387.330*** | |||
| High | 1,248 (17.00) | 767 (61.45) | 119 (9.55) | ||
| Low | 6,094 (83.00) | 4,403 (72.25) | 2,031 (33.33) | ||
| Dietary pattern | 197.711*** | 159.645*** | |||
| Unfavorable (1) | 2,828 (38.52) | 2,207 (78.04) | 998 (35.31) | ||
| Intermediate (2) | 3,161 (43.05) | 2,192 (69.35)a | 841 (26.61)a | ||
| Favorable (3) | 1,353 (18.43) | 771 (56.99)ab | 311 (22.95)ab | ||
| BMI | 33.582*** | 146.387*** | |||
| Low BMI | 1,855 (25.27) | 1,405 (75.72) | 730 (39.36) | ||
| Normal BMI | 5,487 (74.73) | 3,765 (68.62) | 1,420 (25.88) |
Association of baseline characteristics with childhood hunger and frailty; data are expressed as number (prevalence) [n (%)].
UBMIS represents urban basic medical insurance scheme, NRCMS represents new rural cooperative medical scheme, Others represents commercial medical insurance and public free medical services, BMI represents body mass index.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
a represents significant difference in childhood hunger or frailty compared with the group (1); b represents significant difference in childhood hunger or frailty compared with the group (2); c represents significant difference in childhood hunger or frailty compared with the group (3).
Overall, the prevalence of childhood hunger was 70.4%, with 68.2% in the 65–79 years group and 72.1% in the ≥ 80 years group (Table 2). Hunger in childhood was more likely to be experienced by individuals with the following characteristics: female, residents of rural areas, other marital statuses, living with household members, illiterate, had been an agricultural worker, financial dependence on others, having NRCMS, smoking, performing no exercise, low social and leisure activity levels, unfavorable dietary patterns, and low BMI. There were no significant differences between childhood hunger and drinking.
Table 2 also shows the prevalence of frailty according to participants’ characteristics. Of the 7,342 eligible participants, 2,465 (33.6%) were non-frail, 2,727 (37.1%) were pre-frail and 2,150 (29.3%) were frail. Participants with frailty symptoms were likely to have the following characteristics: older, female, living in urban areas, other marital statuses, living in an institution, illiterate, non-agricultural work, financial dependence on others, without insurance, non-smokers, non-drinkers, performing no exercise, low social and leisure activity levels, unfavorable dietary patterns, and low BMI.
As shown in Table 3, older adults who experienced childhood hunger were more likely to have frailty than those who did not (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.05–1.26) in the crude model. Further adjustment for sociodemographic characteristics, family/social support, socioeconomic status, insurance status, and health behaviors did not affect the relationship (OR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.02–1.26). Considering differences in age, sex, residence, socioeconomic status, and insurance status in relation to frailty, post hoc analyses stratified by age, sex, residence, socioeconomic status, and insurance status were conducted. In the final model, the association of childhood hunger with frailty was found in the 65–79 years group (OR = 1.21, 95% CI: 1.03–1.43), women (OR = 1.25, 95% CI: 1.08–1.45), rural residents (OR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.03–1.31), agricultural work (OR = 1.16, 95% CI: 1.00–1.34), those with financial dependence (OR = 1.18, 95% CI: 1.02–1.37), and NRCMS (OR = 1.35, 95% CI: 1.16–1.56). In the crude model, childhood hunger was significantly associated with lower odds of frailty in high school and above and financial independence. However, in the final model, the difference was small and not statistically significant.
TABLE 3
| Characteristics | Crude model OR (95% CI) | Final model OR (95% CI) |
| Childhood hunger | 1.15 (1.05, 1.26)** | 1.13 (1.02, 1.26)* |
| Stratified by age group | ||
| 65–79 | 1.15 (0.99, 1.33) | 1.21 (1.03, 1.43)* |
| 80 + | 1.04 (0.91, 1.18) | 1.05 (0.92, 1.21) |
| Stratified by sex | ||
| Female | 1.27 (1.12, 1.45)*** | 1.25 (1.08, 1.45)** |
| Male | 0.98 (0.86, 1.12) | 1.03 (0.88, 1.20) |
| Stratified by residence | ||
| Urban | 1.03 (0.84, 1.26) | 1.11 (0.87, 1.41) |
| Rural | 1.28 (1.14, 1.43)*** | 1.16 (1.03, 1.31)* |
| Stratified by education | ||
| High school and above | 0.64 (0.52, 0.79)*** | 1.01 (0.79, 1.29) |
| Junior high school | 1.02 (0.81, 1.28) | 1.22 (0.94, 1.59) |
| Primary school | 0.82 (0.68, 1.00) | 1.15 (0.93, 1.42) |
| Illiterate | 1.14 (0.96, 1.35) | 1.14 (0.95, 1.37) |
| Stratified by occupation | ||
| Agricultural work | 1.37 (1.20, 1.57)*** | 1.16 (1.00, 1.34)* |
| Non-agricultural work | 1.03 (0.89, 1.18) | 1.17 (0.99, 1.37) |
| Stratified by financial support | ||
| Financial dependence | 1.28 (1.11, 1.47)** | 1.18 (1.02, 1.37)* |
| Financial independence | 0.77 (0.67, 0.88)*** | 1.11 (0.94, 1.30) |
| Stratified by insurance status | ||
| NRCMS | 1.52 (1.33, 1.75)*** | 1.35 (1.16, 1.56)*** |
| UBMIS | 0.97 (0.82, 1.15) | 0.99 (0.82, 1.20) |
| Others | 0.89 (0.55, 1.44) | 1.37 (0.73, 2.55) |
| No | 1.11 (0.84, 1.45) | 0.93 (0.68, 1.28) |
The association of childhood hunger and frailty stratified by age, sex, residence, socioeconomic status, insurance status.
OR represents the odds ratio, 95% CI represents 95% confidence intervals, UBMIS represents urban basic medical insurance scheme, NRCMS represents new rural cooperative medical scheme, Others represents commercial medical insurance and public free medical services.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
The final model is adjusted for age, sex, residence, marital status, living arrangement, education, occupation, financial support, insurance status, smoking, drinking per day, exercise, social and leisure activity index, dietary pattern, and BMI.
Given that age, financial support, and insurance status could mediate the relationship of childhood hunger with frailty, we tested the interaction between childhood hunger and age, financial support, and insurance status (Table 4). The results showed that the effects of childhood hunger on frailty were partially mediated by age, financial support, and insurance status. The 80 years or older group (OR = 3.61, 95% CI: 3.22–4.04) were significantly associated with higher odds of frailty. Participants with hunger in childhood who were 80 years or older (OR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.65–0.98) had a lower odds ratio of frailty. NRCMS (OR = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.56–0.77) was significantly associated with lower odds of frailty. However, NRCMS (OR = 1.42, 95% CI: 1.02–1.98) showed an increased odds ratio of childhood hunger-related frailty.
TABLE 4
| Characteristics | Crude model OR (95% CI) | Final model OR (95% CI) |
| Childhood hunger | 1.15 (1.05, 1.26)** | 1.13 (1.02, 1.26)* |
| Age group (Ref. = 65–79 years) | ||
| 80 + | 5.95 (5.40, 6.55)*** | 3.61 (3.22, 4.04)*** |
| Childhood hunger × Age group | 0.80 (0.65, 0.98)* | |
| Insurance status (Ref. = No) | ||
| NRCMS | 0.67 (0.58, 0.77)*** | 0.66 (0.56, 0.77)*** |
| UBMIS | 0.78 (0.67, 0.91)** | 1.07 (0.90, 1.27) |
| Others | 0.79 (0.60, 1.04) | 1.05 (0.78, 1.42) |
| Childhood hunger × Insurance status | ||
| NRCMS | 1.42 (1.02, 1.98)* | |
| UBMIS | 0.91 (0.65, 1.28) | |
| Others | 1.06 (0.59, 1.91) |
Effect of the interaction between childhood hunger and age, and insurance status on frailty.
OR represents the odds ratio, 95% CI represents 95% confidence intervals, Ref. represents reference, UBMIS represents urban basic medical insurance scheme, NRCMS represents new rural cooperative medical scheme, Others represents commercial medical insurance and public free medical services.
*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.
Multiple logistic regression analysis was applied to estimate the OR and 95% CI for frailty. The final model is adjusted for age, sex, residence, marital status, living arrangement, education, occupation, financial support, insurance status, smoking, drinking per day, exercise, social and leisure activity index, dietary pattern, and BMI.
Discussion
This study used a large, nationally representative sample of older Chinese individuals to evaluate the association between childhood hunger and frailty in old age. The findings showed that older adults who often experienced hunger as children had a significantly higher risk of frailty, especially those with low socioeconomic status, suggesting that more light should be shed on policies or interventions to end children and adolescents’ hunger in consideration of the socioeconomic status, providing a better understanding of the determinants of healthy longevity.
Previous studies (5) explored the relationship between food deprivation in early life and risk of frailty in older Chinese adults aged 45 years and above using the data from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal study, and showed that exposure to food deprivation in childhood was also significantly associated with frailty. Experiencing prolonged hunger and poor health and growing up in a family with poor socioeconomic conditions can have a strong and lasting impact on later health (15). Our findings suggested that older adults who experienced childhood hunger were more likely to experience frailty than those who did not. People who experience malnutrition in their early years are at a higher risk of subsequently developing metabolic syndrome in a nutrient-rich environment due to metabolic maladjustment (6). Exposure to hunger early in life was found to increase the probability of being overweight and depressed in old age (4). Our findings suggested that nutrition is closely related to frailty syndrome, and all frailty criteria are more or less influenced by poor dietary habits. Studies have shown an association between frailty and specific components of the diet, including protein and energy intake, as well as the intake of specific micronutrients (16). This evidence indicates that nutritional status in early life is closely linked to health conditions in old age. Thus, improving nutritional status early in life should be prioritized to control the increasing trend of chronic non-communicable diseases (17).
Our findings suggested that older adults who were hungry in childhood, females, rural residents, agricultural workers, those with NRCMS, and those who were financially dependent had a higher odds ratio of frailty, which is consistent with earlier studies (18). Generally, the prevalence of frailty increased with the increase of age. The aging process and longevity have a direct impact on frailty status; thus, frailty is more prevalent in older people (19). However, our findings also showed that people who were 80 years or older and experienced hunger in childhood had a lower odds ratio of frailty. A potential reason for this finding relates to survivor bias, as individuals who were 80 years or older may already have died if they had a poor health status and from a low socioeconomic status (20).
Our findings indicated that women who experienced childhood hunger had an aggravated possibility of frailty. A previous study reported that childhood hunger has a stronger effect on physical health outcomes in women than in men (21). The discrepancy may be associated with the noticeable gender difference to pro-male bias in the Chinese culture (4). The apparent increase in the prevalence of frailty with age among women may be in part a result of frail women outliving frail men (22). This survival advantage in women is often linked to a higher prevalence of disability and poor health status (22). Additionally, women are also more prone to developing psychosocial disorders associated with frailty due to their lifetime stressors, poverty, and loneliness at the end of life (23).
Our findings showed that rural residence was significantly associated with childhood hunger. Rural residents had a significantly higher risk of malnutrition than urban residents (18), and differences in frailty and life expectancy were found between rural and urban older adults. Urban residents may have an advantageous educational system compared to rural residents, which may influence individual health outcomes (24). Rural residence with low levels of education might increase the risk of frailty in older adults. This finding may reflect the impacts of regional differences in socioeconomic and environmental attributes or access to health care between two populations (25). Our analysis found that having UBMIS as the main payment method was effective in alleviating healthcare costs for older Chinese individuals compared to out-of-pocket spending. Our findings showed that participants who experienced hunger in childhood and with UBMIS had a lower odds ratio of frailty. However, NRCMS showed an increased odds ratio of childhood hunger-related frailty. Previous studies have reported that the actual reimbursement rate for UBMIS enrollees was higher than that for NRCMS enrollees in China (26). The NRCMS has the weakest financial security, which is consistent with other scholars’ studies. The NRCMS covers a greater proportion of the rural population, who are also the most vulnerable group for non-communicable diseases (27). In China, the rural population has more restricted access to health services and a heavier financial burden than urban residents (28). Higher income individuals are reimbursed more frequently than lower income individuals, who are less healthy, and inequalities in welfare exacerbated health inequities (29). There is a gap between nominal and actual reimbursement rates, and the NRCMS has not significantly reduced this gap (30).
Previous studies interviewed 13,185 individuals aged 65–99 years and found that childhood experiences of hunger affect socioeconomic status in adult life, which, in turn, can affect health outcomes in older adults (31). Our findings showed that high educational level and financial independence may reduce the probability of childhood hunger-mediated frailty in older age. Education builds an individual’s knowledge and skills, determines future attitudes and behaviors, and helps people achieve a better occupational class and higher economic status (32). Although education and income do not directly affect the pathophysiology of frailty, they may interfere with the lifestyle of the individual and influence the development of frailty (33). Thus, education is also a good social predictor of frailty, and reflects childhood circumstances and attained adult socioeconomic status (34). Our findings also identified that financial dependence was significantly associated with both childhood hunger and frailty, and older adults with childhood hunger who were financially dependent on others had a higher odds ratio of frailty. Poor financial security is one of the most important risk factors of frailty in old age (35). Older people with a low income might choose to live alone, which can lead to an increased risk of developing frailty because they may be less likely to have the ability to meet their daily needs (36).
As older people become frailer, their level of physical activity decreases, and this lowered physical activity in turn provokes a vicious cycle, which can make the frail older people become frailer (37). Our findings suggested that participants with frailty symptoms were likely to have no exercise and low social and leisure activity levels. Social participation in older people directly increases social interactions, which has the potential to result in decreased cognitive decline and decreased risk of having depression; moreover, it also increases physical activities, which decreases the risk of developing frailty (38).
Our study showed that high prevalence of frailty was associated with low BMI. Being underweight or obese can increase the risk of frailty and sarcopenia (39). Healthy nutrition may alleviate the risk of being obese or underweight, further decreasing the risk of frailty (40). Older people with normal BMI had a relatively low prevalence of frailty in our study. In fact, in addition to the population, the setting also seems to determine the relationship between BMI and adverse outcomes in older adults (41). A lower BMI would be more favorable in community dwelling older adults in terms of frailty or functionality (42), but the opposite was reported to be true for nursing home residents (43). Maintaining a healthy BMI in older adults is important for maintaining healthy nutritional status and skeletal muscle mass (44). Notably, non-smokers and non-drinkers were more likely to be frail in our study. It is possibly explained by abstainer/quitter bias; for example, people might have been advised not to smoke or drink because of poor health (45).
Strengths and limitations
This study investigated the relationship of childhood conditions with the aging process and health status in older adults in the context of socioeconomic status based on a large representative sample of centenarians in China, providing a better understanding of the determinants of healthy longevity. Our research has several limitations. First, frailty index represents the cumulative deficit model and has been criticized for being a disease checklist rather than an assessment tool for physiological reserves. This study adopted a more detailed definition of frailty index using 44 health deficits as top studies constructing a frailty index (13); actually, there are appropriate and useful tools for identifying “true frailty,” e.g., Fried frailty scale (46) and SARC-F questionnaire (47). Second, this study determined the nutritional status of older people according to the GLIM criteria. However, it does not take gender difference into account, since it is well known that female gender is associated with higher fat mass than male. Third, differences in demographic characteristics, social support, socioeconomic status, and health behaviors between the missing participants and study participants may have influenced our results. Finally, frailty status might change over time, and we could not explore the impact of relevant risk factors on the frailty trajectory. More longitudinal studies are needed to identify the determinants of frailty progression or remission in older adults.
Conclusion
Exposure to hunger during childhood is linked to frailty among older adults, and age, financial support, and insurance status may mediate this relationship. In early life, nutrition-targeted interventions and policies should be implemented to address hunger, and universal access to education should be promoted to reduce the socioeconomic status gap that accumulates in old age. In old age, socio-economically relevant strategies to control medical expenses for older people and to improve the reimbursement rate for NRCMS are beneficial in reducing inequality in frailty.
Statements
Data availability statement
The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found below: https://opendata.pku.edu.cn/dataverse/CHADS.
Author contributions
TG and HL conceived the study. TG and SH analyzed the data. GM, QS, and MZ helped in interpreting the data. TG wrote the manuscript. All authors reviewed and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the Natural Science Research Project of Anhui Educational Committee (KJ2019A0302) and the 512 Talent training Project of Bengbu Medical College (BY51201203).
Acknowledgments
Data used for this study were obtained from the “Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey” (CLHLS), organized and managed by the Center for Healthy Aging and Development Studies, Peking University, with joint funding from the U.S. National Institutes on Aging (NIA), China Natural Science Foundation, China Social Science Foundation, and UNFPA.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Abbreviations
- CLHLS
Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey
- GLIM
Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition
- FI
Frailty Index
- OR
Odds Ratio
- CI
Confidence Intervals
- NRCMS
New Rural Cooperative Medical Scheme
- UBMIS
Urban Basic Medical Insurance Scheme
- BMI
body mass index.
References
1.
DentEMartinFCBergmanHWooJRomero-OrtunoRWalstonJD. Management of frailty: opportunities, challenges, and future directions.Lancet. (2019) 394:1376–86. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31785-4
2.
CarneiroJACardosoRRDurãesMSGuedesMCASantosFLCostaFMD. Frailty in the elderly: prevalence and associated factors.Rev Bras Enferm. (2017) 70:747–52. 10.1590/0034-7167-2016-0633
3.
FuPZhouCMengQ. Associations of sleep quality and frailty among the older adults with chronic disease in China: the mediation effect of psychological distress.Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2020) 17:5240. 10.3390/ijerph17145240
4.
CuiHSmithJPZhaoY. Early-life deprivation and health outcomes in adulthood: evidence from childhood hunger episodes of middle-aged and elderly Chinese.J Dev Econ. (2020) 143:102417. 10.1016/j.jdeveco.2019.102417
5.
YeCAihemaitijiangSWangRHalimulatiMZhangZ. Associations between early-life food deprivation and risk of frailty of middle-age and elderly people: evidence from the China health and retirement longitudinal study.Nutrients. (2021) 13:3066. 10.3390/nu13093066
6.
XuXLiuLXieWZhangYZengHZhangFet alIncrease in the prevalence of arthritis in adulthood among adults exposed to Chinese famine of 1959 to 1961 during childhood: a cross-sectional survey.Medicine. (2017) 96:e6496. 10.1097/MD.0000000000006496
7.
StickleyAKoyanagiAInoueYLeinsaluM. Childhood hunger and thoughts of death or suicide in older adults.Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. (2018) 26:1070–8. 10.1016/j.jagp.2018.06.005
8.
JacksonHEngelmanM. Deaths, disparities, and cumulative (Dis)advantage: how social inequities produce an impairment paradox in later life.J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. (2022) 77:392–401. 10.1093/gerona/glab181
9.
AlvaradoBEZunzuneguiMVBélandFBamvitaJM. Life course social and health conditions linked to frailty in Latin American older men and women.J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. (2008) 63:1399–406. 10.1093/gerona/63.12.1399
10.
SterneJACWhiteIRCarlinJBSprattMRoystonPKenwardMGet alMultiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls.BMJ. (2009) 338:b2393. 10.1136/bmj.b2393
11.
TheouOStathokostasLRolandKPJakobiJMPattersonCVandervoortAAet alThe effectiveness of exercise interventions for the management of frailty: a systematic review.J Aging Res. (2011) 2011:569194. 10.4061/2011/569194
12.
DupreMEGuDWarnerDFYiZ. Frailty and type of death among older adults in China: prospective cohort study.BMJ. (2009) 338:b1175. 10.1136/bmj.b1175
13.
LiuZYWeiYZWeiLQJiangXYWangXFShiYet alFrailty transitions and types of death in Chinese older adults: a population-based cohort study.Clin Interv Aging. (2018) 13:947–56. 10.2147/CIA.S157089
14.
AkazawaNKishiMHinoTTsujiRTamuraKMoriyamaH. Using GLIM criteria, cutoff value for low BMI in Asian populations discriminates high or low muscle mass: a cross-sectional study.Nutrition. (2021) 81:110928. 10.1016/j.nut.2020.110928
15.
PeeleME. Domains of childhood disadvantage and functional limitation trajectories among midlife men and women in China.J Aging Health. (2020) 32:501–12. 10.1177/0898264319834813
16.
YannakouliaMNtanasiEAnastasiouCAScarmeasN. Frailty and nutrition: from epidemiological and clinical evidence to potential mechanisms.Metabolism. (2017) 68:64–76. 10.1016/j.metabol.2016.12.005
17.
LiuLPangZCSunJPXueBWangSJNingFet alExposure to famine in early life and the risk of obesity in adulthood in Qingdao: evidence from the 1959–1961 Chinese famine.Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. (2017) 27:154–60. 10.1016/j.numecd.2016.11.125
18.
MuszalikMGurtowskiMDoroszkiewiczHGobbensRJKędziora-KornatowskaK. Assessment of the relationship between frailty syndrome and the nutritional status of older patients.Clin Interv Aging. (2019) 14:773–80. 10.2147/CIA.S201835
19.
da SilvaVDTribessSMeneguciJSasakiJEGarcia-MeneguciCACarneiroJAOet alAssociation between frailty and the combination of physical activity level and sedentary behavior in older adults.BMC Public Health. (2019) 19:709. 10.1186/s12889-019-7062-0
20.
MendonçaNKingstonAYadegarfarMHansonHDuncanRJaggerCet alTransitions between frailty states in the very old: the influence of socioeconomic status and multi-morbidity in the Newcastle 85+ cohort study.Age Ageing. (2020) 49:974–81. 10.1093/ageing/afaa054
21.
StickleyALeinsaluM. Childhood hunger and depressive symptoms in adulthood: findings from a population-based study.J Affect Disord. (2018) 226:332–8. 10.1016/j.jad.2017.09.013
22.
ArosioBGueriniFRCostaASDicitoreAFerriEMariDet alVitamin D receptor polymorphisms in sex-frailty paradox.Nutrients. (2020) 12:2714. 10.3390/nu12092714
23.
WhitesidesLLynnJ. The psychosocial effects of frailty on women.Clin Geriatr Med. (2021) 37:543–52. 10.1016/j.cger.2021.05.003
24.
BrigolaAGAlexandreTDSInouyeKYassudaMSPavariniSCIMioshiE. Limited formal education is strongly associated with lower cognitive status, functional disability and frailty status in older adults.Dement Neuropsychol. (2019) 13:216–24. 10.1590/1980-57642018dn13-020011
25.
SongXMacKnightCLattaRMitnitskiABRockwoodK. Frailty and survival of rural and urban seniors: results from the Canadian study of health and aging.Aging Clin Exp Res. (2007) 19:145–53. 10.1007/BF03324681
26.
YangXChenMDuJWangZ. The inequality of inpatient care net benefit under integration of urban-rural medical insurance systems in China.Int J Equity in Health. (2018) 17:173. 10.1186/s12939-018-0891-0
27.
XiaQWuLTianWMiaoWZhangXXuJet alTen-year poverty alleviation effect of the medical insurance system on families with members who have a non-communicable disease: evidence from Heilongjiang province in China.Front Public Health. (2021) 9:705488. 10.3389/fpubh.2021.705488
28.
GuHQLiZXZhaoXQLiuLPLiHWangCJet alInsurance status and 1-year outcomes of stroke and transient ischaemic attack: a registry-based cohort study in China.BMJ Open. (2018) 8:e021334. 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-021334
29.
DiaoLLiuY. Inequity under equality: research on the benefits equity of Chinese basic medical insurance.BMC Health Serv Res. (2020) 20:710. 10.1186/s12913-020-05584-w
30.
ZengYLiJYuanZFangY. The effect of China’s new cooperative medical scheme on health expenditures among the rural elderly.Int J Equity Health. (2019) 18:27. 10.1186/s12939-019-0933-2
31.
DongHDuCWuBWuQ. Multi-state analysis of the impact of childhood starvation on the healthy life expectancy of the elderly in China.Front Public Health. (2021) 9:690645. 10.3389/fpubh.2021.690645
32.
IavicoliILesoVCesariM. The contribution of occupational factors on frailty.Arch Gerontol Geriatr. (2018) 75:51–8. 10.1016/j.archger.2017.11.010
33.
KendhapediKKDevasenapathyN. Prevalence and factors associated with frailty among community-dwelling older people in rural Thanjavur district of South India: a cross-sectional study.BMJ Open. (2019) 9:e032904. 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032904
34.
HuangCEloIT. Mortality of the oldest old Chinese: the role of early-life nutritional status, socio-economic conditions, and sibling sex-composition.Popul Stud. (2009) 63:7–20. 10.1080/00324720802626921
35.
Van der LindenBWAChevalBSieberSOrsholitsDGuessousIStringhiniSet alLife course socioeconomic conditions and frailty at older ages.J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. (2020) 75:1348–57. 10.1093/geronb/gbz018
36.
HayajnehAARababaM. The association of frailty with poverty in older adults: a systematic review.Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. (2021) 50:407–13. 10.1159/000520486
37.
SagongHJangARKimDEWonCWYoonJY. The cross-lagged panel analysis between frailty and physical activity among community-dwelling older adults by age groups.J Aging Health. (2021) 33:387–95. 10.1177/0898264320987365
38.
SunJKongXLiHChenJYaoQLiHet alDoes social participation decrease the risk of frailty? Impacts of diversity in frequency and types of social participation on frailty in middle-aged and older populations.BMC Geriatr. (2022) 22:553. 10.1186/s12877-022-03219-9
39.
BahatGİlhanBKaranMA. The concept of frailty should not be limited to malnutrition.Clin Nutr. (2020) 39:325. 10.1016/j.clnu.2019.10.007
40.
FeartC. Nutrition and frailty: current knowledge.Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. (2019) 95:109703. 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2019.109703
41.
BahatGMuratlıSİlhanBTufanATufanFAydinYet alBody mass index and functional status in community dwelling older Turkish males.Aging Male. (2015) 18:228–32. 10.3109/13685538.2015.1061493
42.
BahatGTufanAAydinYTufanFBahatZAkpinarTSet alThe relationship of body mass index and the functional status of community-dwelling female older people admitting to a geriatric outpatient clinic.Aging Clin Exp Res. (2015) 27:303–8. 10.1007/s40520-014-0291-2
43.
BahatGTufanFSakaBAkinSOzkayaHYucelNet alWhich body mass index (BMI) is better in the elderly for functional status?.Arch Gerontol Geriatr. (2012) 54:78–81. 10.1016/j.archger.2011.04.019
44.
WatanabeDYoshidaTWatanabeYYamadaYKimuraM. A U-shaped relationship between the prevalence of frailty and body mass index in community-dwelling Japanese Older adults: the Kyoto–Kameoka study.J Clin Med. (2020) 9:1367. 10.3390/jcm9051367
45.
HeKZhangWHuXZhaoHGuoBShiZet alRelationship between multimorbidity, disease cluster and all-cause mortality among older adults: a retrospective cohort analysis.BMC Public Health. (2021) 21:1080. 10.1186/s12889-021-11108-w
46.
BahatGIlhanBTufanADoganHKaranMA. Success of simpler modified fried frailty scale to predict mortality among nursing home residents.J Nutr Health Aging. (2021) 25:606–10. 10.1007/s12603-020-1582-2
47.
BahatGOzkokSKilicCKaranMA. SARC-F questionnaire detects frailty in older adults.J Nutr Health Aging. (2021) 25:448–53. 10.1007/s12603-020-1543-9
Summary
Keywords
childhood, China, frailty, hunger, older people
Citation
Gao T, Han S, Mo G, Sun Q, Zhang M and Liu H (2022) A positive association between hunger in childhood and frailty in old age: Findings from the Chinese longitudinal healthy longevity survey. Front. Med. 9:955834. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.955834
Received
29 May 2022
Accepted
11 October 2022
Published
24 October 2022
Volume
9 - 2022
Edited by
Karolina Maria Piotrowicz, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Poland
Reviewed by
Hanna Kujawska-Danecka, Medical University of Gdańsk, Poland; Gülistan Bahat, Istanbul University, Turkey
Updates
Copyright
© 2022 Gao, Han, Mo, Sun, Zhang and Liu.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Huaqing Liu, lhqbbmc@163.com
This article was submitted to Geriatric Medicine, a section of the journal Frontiers in Medicine
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.