Abstract
Mercury (Hg) is a toxic heavy metal that poses significant environmental and human health risks. Soils and sediments, where Hg can exist as the Hg sulfide mineral metacinnabar (β-HgS), represent major Hg reservoirs in aquatic environments. Metacinnabar has historically been considered a sink for Hg in all but severely acidic environments, and thus disregarded as a potential source of Hg back to aqueous or gaseous pools. Here, we conducted a combination of field and laboratory incubations to identify the potential for metacinnabar as a source of dissolved Hg within near neutral pH environments and the underpinning (a)biotic mechanisms at play. We show that the abundant and widespread sulfur-oxidizing bacteria of the genus Thiobacillus extensively colonized metacinnabar chips incubated within aerobic, near neutral pH creek sediments. Laboratory incubations of axenic Thiobacillus thioparus cultures led to the release of metacinnabar-hosted Hg(II) and subsequent volatilization to Hg(0). This dissolution and volatilization was greatly enhanced in the presence of thiosulfate, which served a dual role by enhancing HgS dissolution through Hg complexation and providing an additional metabolic substrate for Thiobacillus. These findings reveal a new coupled abiotic-biotic pathway for the transformation of metacinnabar-bound Hg(II) to Hg(0), while expanding the sulfide substrates available for neutrophilic chemosynthetic bacteria to Hg-laden sulfides. They also point to mineral-hosted Hg as an underappreciated source of gaseous elemental Hg to the environment.
Introduction
Mercury (Hg) is a toxic heavy metal that poses significant environmental and human health risks (Wiener et al., 2002; Clarkson and Magos, 2006). Because gaseous elemental Hg travels over hemispheric scales, it is now an internationally recognized priority pollutant in need of global regulation (McNutt, 2013). Mineral associated Hg is the largest Hg reservoir in the environment where it can account for nearly 60% of the total Hg mass inventory (Mason et al., 2012). A large fraction of this pool is comprised of mercury sulfide minerals (HgS) (Smith-Downey et al., 2010).
The dominant Hg minerals are the two HgS polymorphs cinnabar (α-HgS) and metacinnabar (β-HgS). Metacinnabar is the dominant authigenic phase, where it forms under sulfidic conditions within soils and sediments (Barnett et al., 1997). Under acidic pH conditions (pH~3), HgS dissolution can be enhanced in the presence of mine tailing-derived microbial cultures (Jew et al., 2014). Under these acidic conditions, bacteria of the genus Acidithiobacillus have been implicated in inducing cinnabar dissolution and volatilization of released Hg (Baldi and Olson, 1987). Yet under non-acidic conditions (pH > 4), both HgS phases are considered to be poorly reactive and stable due to their low solubility (e.g., logKso ~ -39) (Dyrssen, 1989) and very slow abiotic dissolution kinetics (Barnett et al., 2001; Holley et al., 2007). There is a growing appreciation, however, for the role of dissolved organic matter in increasing HgS dissolution and inhibiting HgS precipitation and aggregation in the absence and presence of bacterial activity (Ravichandran, 2004; Graham et al., 2012). Nevertheless, HgS minerals are still largely considered as stable Hg phases and microbial-assisted dissolution of HgS at near neutral pH conditions is assumed to be negligible.
Observations of substantial Hg fluxes from unknown sources within terrestrial and marine sulfidic sediments, however, have called into question the validity of this assumption. For instance, HgS minerals have recently been implicated as a source of high dissolved Hg concentrations originating from sulfide-rich deep-sea vent sediments, raising the possibility that chemosynthetic microorganisms mobilize Hg from these low solubility phases (Crespo-Medina et al., 2009). Despite the widespread presence of HgS minerals in both terrestrial and marine sediments, a clear understanding of the extent and mechanisms of HgS dissolution in these systems is lacking. Here we address this knowledge gap by conducting a combination of field and laboratory incubations to identify the potential for metacinnabar as a source of dissolved Hg within near neutral pH environments and the underpinning mechanisms at play.
Materials and methods
Field incubations
Metacinnabar and pyrite specimens were obtained from the Harvard Museum of Natural History (HMNH) Mineralogical Collection (specimen #122749). For in-situ creek incubations, minerals were cut into sections approximately 2 cm by 2 cm by 1 mm and polished. Mineral sections were mounted on glass slides (2 cm by 2.5 cm), which were then secured into precut holes on a polycarbonate sampler, and covered in mesh to prevent large organisms from interfering with the slabs. This sampler was inserted directly into the East Fork Poplar Creek (EFPC) sediments at a depth of 2.5–5 cm in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA at N 36° 00.101', W 084° 15.011', ±18 ft. Minerals were incubated for 6 weeks between September and October 2010 within the aerobic sediments of the EFPC creek channel. The geochemistry of the EFPC porewater near sampler deployment location (EFK 22) has been extensively monitored, and Supplementary Table S1 includes geochemical parameters collected on the day of sampler retrieval.
Once retrieved from the creek, mineral samplers were transported on ice to our laboratory where they were preserved within 24 h. Mineral sections used for DNA extraction and sequencing were stored aseptically at −80°C. Minerals for thin sections were fixed using 4% paraformaldehyde, rinsed twice in PBS solution, and stored at −20°C in a 1:1 (v/v) mixture of PBS and 96% ethanol until further processing.
Molecular methods
Field-incubated minerals were aseptically crushed and DNA was extracted using the Ultraclean soil DNA kit (Mo Bio Laboratories) using the maximum yield protocol with the following modifications. After minerals were added to the bead solution tubes, tubes were sonicated for 5 min. Following addition of IRS solution, tubes were incubated at 70°C for 10 min, and 200 μg of polyadenylic acid were added (Webster et al., 2003; Santelli et al., 2008), followed by vortexing at maximum speed for 15 min. The 16S rRNA region of environmental DNA was amplified using the 8F and 1492R primer set and conditions used previously (Lane, 1991; Turner et al., 1999; Hansel et al., 2008) in triplicate or quadruplicate to yield sufficient DNA for pyrosequencing. Amplification products were purified using the QIAquick nucleotide removal kit (Qiagen). Bacterial tag-encoded pyrosequencing (bTEFAP) was conducted by the Research and Testing Laboratory, Lubbock, TX using the GS FLX Titanium sequencing platform (Roche Applied Science). Primers 28F (5′GAGTTTGATCNTGGCTCAG) and 519r (5′GTNTTACNGCGGCKGCTG) were used to sequence variable regions V1-V3 of the 16S rRNA gene.
Sequence processing
Pyrosequencing reads were denoised using AmpliconNoise, and chimeras were removed using Perseus (Quince et al., 2011). Following denoising, the metacinnabar and pyrite sequence library contained 10 846 and 5 177 sequence reads respectively with an average read length of 342 bp. Resulting sample reads were all longer than 150 bp, had a quality score greater than 20, and no ambiguous reads, therefore no further quality filtering was needed. Denoised, single reads were aligned and clustered using the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP) Pyrosequencing Pipeline (Nawrocki et al., 2009) and classified using a naïve Bayesian rRNA classifier, version 2.0, with a bootstrap cutoff of 80% (Wang et al., 2007). Eighty-two percent of denoised metacinnabar reads and 35% denoised pyrite reads were classifiable down to the genus level. Genus level abundances are presented as percent abundance of sequences falling within that genus relative to the total number of sequences classifiable at the genus level.
merA gene amplification and sequencing
Genomic DNA from T. thioparus pure cultures was extracted using the Ultraclean soil DNA kit (Mo Bio Laboratories). A 285 bp fragment at the 3′ end of merA was amplified using PCR primers A1s-n.F and A5-n.R following previously reported amplification conditions (Chadhain et al., 2006). Gel electrophoresis was used for size separation of the PCR products, and the expected 285 bp merA amplification product was confirmed. The gel purified (QIAquick gel extraction kit, Qiagen) 285 bp amplification product was concentrated (DNA Clean and Concentrator-5, Zymo Research), cloned (StrataClone PCR Cloning Kits, Agilent Technologies) and sequenced. The nucleotide sequence of the T. thioparus partial merA sequence was analyzed by BLASTN 2.2.31 (Altschul et al., 1997) using the NCBI Genomic Reference Sequences (refseq_genomic) database.
X-ray absorption spectroscopy
Fixed field-incubated metacinnabar slabs were air dried and embedded in EpoHeat Epoxy (Buehler). Cross sections (~500 μm) of the embedded minerals were obtained using a diamond saw, subsequently attached to a high-purity fused quartz slide using Hillquist Thin Section Epoxy A-B (Hillquist), and filed and polished down to 50–100 μm thickness using a microtome and 1000 grit silicon carbide paper (Buehler).
Spatially-resolved (μ-scale) X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and X-ray absorption spectroscopy were conducted at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory (SSRL) by collecting spectra at select points of interest or defining and rastering a defined region. Synchrotron-based μ-XRF on beamline 14-3 at SSRL was used to map the Hg (M-edge) and S (K-edge) spatial distribution within the mineral matrix and oxidation rind. Similarly, beamline 2–3 was used to map the distribution of Fe (K-edge) in relation to Hg. The beam size on the sample at both beamlines was approximately 2 × 2 μm. Total Hg and S distributions were collected at 2495 eV (BL14-3) and 13200 eV (BL2-3). Maps were also collected at several discrete incident energies in continuous raster scanning mode in order to collect the fluorescence at several distinguishing points within the S (2470.7, 2473, 2473.7, 2478.5, 2481.3, and 2483 eV) and Fe absorption edge (7123, 7126, 7128, 7130, 7133 eV) at beamlines 14-3 and 2-3, respectively. X-ray absorption near edge structure (XANES) spectra were collected at spots of interest to confirm the oxidation state at discrete locations and compared to standard spectra. Fluorescence maps and XANES spectra were analyzed using the MicroAnalysis Toolkit (Webb, 2006) and SIXPACK (Webb, 2005), respectively.
For bulk S solid-phase speciation, dried samples were mounted onto S-free Lexan. S XANES spectra were collected within a He-purged sample chamber under a continuous He flow with a Lytle detector at SSRL beamline 4-3. The spectra were calibrated with a thiosulfate standard. Samples were run in a He-purged anaerobic bag surrounding the sample holder chamber within the beamline hutch. XAS scans were averaged, background-subtracted, normalized, and deglitched if necessary using SIXPACK (Webb, 2005). The lineshapes (peak position and peak shape) of the XANES spectra were used to compare the relative proportions of different sulfur species within the sample.
Pure culture incubations
Glass serum vials were soaked in 10% Instra-Analyzed HCl (J.T. Baker), and rinsed 4× in nanopure water. Glass vials were not reused following contact with Hg. Vials were loosely capped using similarly acid washed polypropylene caps which allowed air penetration while maintaining a sterile environment. Following contact with Hg caps were cleaned using a previously established protocol (Hammerschmidt et al., 2011). In order to close the system for volatile Hg capture, glass serum vials were capped with rubber stoppers and stainless steel needles were used to direct incoming and outgoing air. All incubation materials were autoclaved prior to use.
Thiobacillus thioparus (ATCC 8158) was incubated aerobically at room temperature in 100 mL glass serum vials in the dark for all experiments in the presence and absence of ground natural metacinnabar. Metacinnabar obtained from the HMNH Mineralogical Collection was sieved (<250 μm) prior to use in incubations, and surface area of processed minerals was determined using the BET Kr adsorption technique (0.1321 ± 0.0007 m2 g−1).
T. thioparus cultures were pre-grown in a pH 7 buffered basal freshwater medium containing 20 mM Na2S2O3, 29 mM KH2PO4, 23 mM K2HPO4, 3.8 mM Na2CO3, 7.5 mM NH4Cl, 1.0 mM MgCl2·6H2O, 0.3% vitamin solution (Widdel and Bak, 1992), and 0.1% Trace Element Solution (Widdel and Bak, 1992) at 30°C for 5 days. These cells were then centrifuged (5000× g for 10 min at 4°C) and concentrated approximately 30× by re-suspending in spent medium. A 1:100 inoculation of these cells was used for 40 μM, 60 μM, 100 μM and 20 mM initial thiosulfate experiments. For 20 mM initial thiosulfate experiments, a stock solution of sterile Na2S2O was prepared and added into incubations. For 40–100 μM initial thiosulfate experiments, no additional thiosulfate was added and the thiosulfate present was carryover from the inoculum, which served as a low level thiosulfate addition in the experiment. For zero thiosulfate experiments, centrifuged cells were re-suspended in thiosulfate-free medium, centrifuged again and then concentrated approximately 30× in the thiosulfate-free medium. A 1:100 or 1:50 inoculation of these cell suspensions was then performed.
Basal freshwater medium containing EDTA was used only for one sample series of aqueous Hg measurements as a function of thiosulfate concentration within incubations containing killed cells and metacinnabar. All other experiments were conducted in the absence of EDTA. Basal freshwater medium containing EDTA was identical to the basal freshwater medium described with the exception that Trace Element Solution was prepared following the T2 Medium for Thiobacillus Trace Metals solution (Atlas, 2005) using Na2MoO4 instead of (NH4)2MoO4. This Trace Element Solution contained 5% w/w EDTA (170 mM) resulting in 0.005% or 170 μM EDTA in the final medium.
Killed controls consisted of autoclaved (121°C, 30 min) concentrated cells or 6-day old pre-grown cultures that were killed with 4% formaldehyde, frozen overnight, thawed, centrifuged down, and re-suspended in thiosulfate-free medium. Similar to the processing for live cells, for killed cell preparations, the washing step was performed once for 40 μM and 20 mM initial thiosulfate experiments, and twice for zero thiosulfate experiments. Experimental inoculum contained elemental sulfur resulting from pre-growth in thiosulfate medium, and was homogenized to minimize differences in this carryover in the experiments. HgS used in experiments was sterilized by autoclaving under an oxygen-free N2 atmosphere to prevent mineral oxidation. Mineral loading used in all incubations with metacinnabar was 2 g L−1. Cultures were grown without shaking although vials were swirled prior to aseptically drawing samples for aqueous analyses.
Hg volatilization rates were determined by pumping air into T. thioparus incubations at a rate of 1.60 ± 0.2 mL min−1, and then capturing volatile Hg in outflow using gold-coated quartz sand traps. Incoming air was Hg-stripped using an upstream gold-coated sand trap and filtered through a 0.22 μm cellulose filter. Similarly, outflow was filtered upstream of the gold-coated quartz trap. The mass of Hg on traps was subsequently quantified by dual-stage gold amalgamation and the Tekran-2600 cold vapor atomic fluorescence spectrophotometer following previously established modifications (Lamborg et al., 2012). Hg emissions from incubations were sampled in intervals of minutes to hours to collect a Hg mass within the instrument detection range. Total Hg emissions from incubations were then estimated based upon volatilization rates obtained at time intervals throughout the experiment assuming a constant rate of change in volatilization rates. Hg emissions from incubations were sampled more frequently within the first few days of the experiment, with sampling frequency decreasing as the experiment progressed. Hg emissions from incubations started with no exogenous thiosulfate and 40 μM thiosulfate, were sampled daily for 2 and 7 days following inoculation. Sampling frequency was gradually decreased, with weekly sampling by day 19, and every 2 weeks by day 45. Incubations started with 20 mM thiosulfate were sampled daily for 4 and 9 days following inoculations with sampling frequency thereafter reduced to every 10 days.
For comparisons of Hg volatilization rates between natural and synthetic metacinnabar, a commercial synthetic metacinnabar (black HgS, Alfa Aesar) was used. The surface area of this synthetic metacinnabar was 1.2804 ± 0.0045 m2 g−1 as determined by BET Kr adsorption. The same natural metacinnabar used for other incubations was used for comparison. Live cells and incubations were prepared identically to the 40 μM thiosulfate incubations. Killed controls were autoclave killed cells. Incubations were spiked with a 25 mM thiosulfate stock solution every 24 h resulting in a daily 125–132 μM thiosulfate spike, with the range in concentration resulting from the volume change throughout the incubation (this is henceforth referred to as the 100 μM thiosulfate spike). Hg emission rates were quantified 0–16 h following the thiosulfate spike, and are presented as ng Hg per liter of culture volume per day.
Samples to be used for sulfate and thiosulfate quantification were filtered through a 0.22 μm cellulose filter and stored at −20°C until analysis. Sulfate and thiosulfate concentrations were quantified via suppressed anion chromatography with conductivity detection using a Dionex ICS-2000 (AS11 Column) with a KOH eluent generator. An eluent gradient method was employed (flow rate 1.5 mL min−1): beginning for 8 min at 1 mM, followed by a linear ramp to 15 mM over 4 min, another linear ramp to 60 mM over 8 min, followed by a sustained 60 mM for 2 min, and 1 mM for 13 min. A blank was run between all samples and standards to prevent carryover between samples. Samples for total dissolved Hg analysis were oxidized with 1–2% (v/v) bromine monochloride (BrCl) per EPA Method 1631. High thiosulfate samples had greater reducing capacity and were oxidized with either 5 or 10% (v/v) BrCl. Samples for total dissolved Hg analysis were refrigerated between collection and analysis except during the BrCl oxidation step. Calibration of the DMA-80 direct Hg analyzer was performed with a series of dissolved Hg(II) standards and the calibration was regularly verified using reference material from the Quebec National Institute for Public Health (INSPQ) Interlaboratory Comparison Program for Metals in Biological Matrices.
For the determination of total cell abundance, cultures were fixed with a final concentration of 4% formaldehyde and frozen. Prior to enumeration using epifluorescence microscopy, cells were stained using SYBR Green I Nucleic Acid Stain. A 0.1% p-phenylenediamine mounting solution was used to prevent photo bleaching (Noble and Fuhrman, 1998). Cell counts were performed for 20 random fields of view. Viable cell enumeration was conducted by making serial dilutions of the culture in PBS, and then plating onto agar dishes with the same culture medium.
Results and discussion
Colonization and oxidation of metacinnabar in creek sediments
We first characterized the microbial colonization and mineralogical transformations of metacinnabar mineral sections that were emplaced below the sediment-water interface (2.5–5 cm) within the aerobic hyporheic zone of a Hg-contaminated creek. Culture-independent analysis of the microbial communities showed that the metacinnabar surfaces were extensively colonized by chemosynthetic bacteria, which accounted for a striking majority (>92%) of the taxonomically classified microbial community (Figure 1A, Supplementary Table S2). This chemosynthetic population was composed predominantly of members of the genera Thiobacillus (71%), Sulfuricurvum (13%), and Sulfuricella (8%), genera that have the demonstrated ability to oxidize reduced sulfur compounds. Pyrite surfaces similarly enriched for these organisms, but to a lower relative magnitude (Figure 1A). The metacinnabar surface evidently enriched for these sulfur-oxidizing organisms as previous characterization of these creek sediments revealed a microbial community that was phylogenetically diverse and taxonomically distinct from those found on the mineral incubations (Vishnivetskaya et al., 2011). Furthermore, the Thiobacillus population on the metacinnabar surface was mainly (>50%) comprised of a single species, T. thioparus. T. thioparus is a common neutrophilic obligate aerobic sulfur-oxidizing bacterium that couples the oxidation of various sulfur species (e.g., sulfur, thiosulfate, sulfide) to the reduction of oxygen (Kelly and Wood, 2000). This organism (a beta-proteobacterium) is distinct from the iron- and sulfur-oxidizing Acidithiobacillus species (gamma-proteobacteria) that have previously demonstrated metacinnabar dissolution at acidic pH. Specifically, T. thioparus lives solely in circumneutral environments and cannot respire or otherwise oxidize Fe(II). Thus, the proliferation of these organisms on the metacinnabar surface may have ensued due to enhanced access to mineral-hosted sulfur to fuel respiration.
Figure 1
In fact, metacinnabar oxidation is implicated by observations of sulfide oxidation products on the surface of cross sections of the same metacinnabar incubated in the creek sediments (Figure 1B). Specifically, principal component analysis (PCA) of X-ray fluorescence maps (XRF) were collected at seven different energies around the sulfur K-edge that are indicative of a full range of organic and inorganic sulfur species. This analysis indicated that three unique components were in the incubated metacinnabar samples. These components were identified as HgS, elemental sulfur (S0), and sulfate (SO4) by obtaining spot X-ray absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectra and comparing them to model compounds (Figure 1B). Using unique spectral signatures for these phases, multiple-energy XRF maps for these three spectral components revealed heterogeneous surface rinds on the incubated metacinnabar surface composed primarily of elemental sulfur with isolated sulfate regions (Figure 1B). Oxidized sulfur products on the surface of metacinnabar incubated in sterile freshwater were not observed (Supplementary Figure S1).
Further, energy specific XRF maps reveal the presence of oxidized iron, as Fe(III) (hydr)oxides, in isolated regions on the surface of metacinnabar incubated in the creek sediments (Figure 2). Iron is present in the metacinnabar primarily as pyritic inclusions (Figure 2) and likely also as a trace co-precipitate within the structure. These results indicate that the metacinnabar surface was in fact dissolving leading to the formation of substantial surficial S0 rinds and Fe (hydr)oxide precipitates. This oxidation may be a direct or indirect consequence of the activity of the chemosynthetic bacterial communities that had extensively colonized the mineral surface. In particular, these elemental sulfur rinds coupled with the extensive colonization of the surface by the obligate sulfur-oxidizer T. thioparus, an organism that cannot oxidize Fe(II), point to a role for microbially-mediated sulfur oxidation in the oxidative dissolution of metacinnabar in these incubations.
Figure 2
Metacinnabar dissolution by Thiobacillus cultures
Incubation of T. thioparus axenic cultures with metacinnabar at varying thiosulfate concentrations further points to microbially induced metacinnabar oxidation. In incubations containing an environmentally relevant thiosulfate concentration (initially ~60–100 μM), thiosulfate was consumed by T. thioparus within the first 5 days (Figure 3A) with the dominant oxidation product being sulfate (Figure 3B), formed through a S0 intermediate (Supplementary Figure S2) as shown previously (Sattley and Madigan, 2006). Following thiosulfate consumption, sulfate concentrations in the presence of metacinnabar continued to increase at a faster rate than in its absence (17 and 10 μM day−1 sulfate production, respectively, Figure 3B). Further, a substantially higher sulfate concentration was observed in the presence of metacinnabar relative to its absence (Figure 3B) and was formed in excess of that supported solely by oxidation of added thiosulfate and residual elemental sulfur in the inoculum (see Table 1). Together, these results suggest that metacinnabar is in fact fueling sulfur respiration and thereby undergoing microbially mediated oxidative dissolution.
Figure 3
Table 1
| Initial Thiosulfate Concentration | x days | Hx μM | Nx μM | Ax μM | C0 μM | Mx μM | Contribution of microbial processes to total HgS dissolution (%) | R μMol (sulfate) m−2 d−1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 μM | 11 | 1024 | 927 | 57 | 7 | 47 | 48 | 16.2 |
| 10 | 710 | 560 | 120 | 60 | 90 | 60 | 34.1 | |
| 60 μM | 22 | 760 | 570 | 120 | 60 | 130 | 68 | 22.4 |
| 75 | 810 | 610 | 150 | 60 | 110 | 55 | – |
Microbial contribution to metacinnabar dissolution and microbially mediated dissolution rates.
The microbial contribution to metacinnabar dissolution observed in our incubations was calculated using sulfate production as a proxy for metacinnabar dissolution as has been reported previously (Barnett et al., 2001; Holley et al., 2007) and calculated using the equation, Mx = (Hx – Nx) – (Ax – C0), where Mx is the microbial contribution to sulfate production x days after inoculation, Hx is the sulfate produced in live Thiobacillus incubations in the presence of metacinnabar (+HgS), Nx is sulfate produced in live Thiobacillus incubations in the absence of metacinnabar (–HgS), Ax is sulfate produced in killed cell incubations in the presence of metacinnabar (+HgS), and C0 is the initial sulfate concentration (t = 0) in live Thiobacillus incubations in the absence of metacinnabar (–HgS). The term Nx represents sulfate production attributed to thiosulfate and elemental sulfur oxidation, as well as carryover sulfate from the inoculum, and (Hx – Nx) represents sulfate release from metacinnabar from biotic and abiotic processes. The term (Ax – C0) represents abiotic oxidative dissolution and release of any sulfate bound to the metacinnabar surface, with C0 representing carryover sulfate from the inoculum. Mx, Hx, Nx, Ax, and C0 are reported in μM. Microbially mediated metacinnabar dissolution rates (R) are calculated by taking into account mineral loading (2 g metacinnabar L−1 incubation) and surface area (0.1321 m2 g−1) and are presented as μMoles (sulfate) m−2 d−1.
Yet, despite apparent HgS dissolution, negligible levels of aqueous Hg were detected. Dissolved Hg2+ was observed in incubations containing killed (formaldehyde-treated or autoclaved) T. thioparus cells, with concentrations ranging from 36 nM to more than 500 nM within 10 days (Figures 3C, 4). In contrast, aqueous Hg was below 3 nM in equivalent incubations containing viable cells (Figures 3C, 4) and even after extended periods of time (>11 weeks). The explanation for this is that the aqueous Hg released during metacinnabar dissolution was rapidly volatilized to gaseous Hg0 in the presence of viable T. thioparus. In fact, a substantial amount of gaseous Hg0 was observed in metacinnabar incubations with viable cells (Figure 5). The cumulative gaseous Hg0 released in the presence of T. thioparus varied with reaction time, cell density and initial thiosulfate concentration and ranged from ~100 to >8000 ng Hg0 per liter of culture over a 20-day period (Figures 5A,B).
Figure 4
Figure 5
Impact of thiosulfate on metacinnabar dissolution
In incubations with initial thiosulfate concentrations of 0 and 60 μM, 48–68% of the excess sulfate production, could be solely attributed to microbial-enhanced HgS dissolution (see Table 1 and Supplementary Figure S3). Even in the absence of any exogenous thiosulfate, Hg0 formation was still occurring after 40 days amounting to nearly 400 ng of Hg(0) per liter of culture (Figure 5C) and further hinting at sustained microbial respiration and oxidation of metacinnabar-derived sulfur. Meanwhile, minimal volatilization was observed in incubations with killed cells, and with viable cells in the absence of metacinnabar (i.e., background Hg levels in air). The non-metabolic contribution in the killed cell controls is likely due to abiotic Hg(II) reduction by Fe(II) (Wiatrowski et al., 2009; Amirbahman et al., 2013) impurities within the metacinnabar structure (Figure 2). Elevated Hg0 production in the presence of live cells demonstrates that Hg was in fact released from metacinnabar and then volatilized to Hg0 by T. thioparus. Many sulfur-oxidizing organisms possess the enzyme mercuric reductase (Benson et al., 2009), merA, which reduces Hg2+ to Hg0 (Barkay et al., 2003). Although T. thioparus may also have other strategies or proteins capable of Hg2+ reduction, PCR amplification using mer-specific primers and sequencing confirmed that T. thioparus possesses the merA gene. BLAST analysis of the merA fragment nucleotide sequence revealed a 98% sequence similarity to T. thioparus DSM 505 and 85% similarity to Thiobacillus denitrificans ATCC 25259, both containing putative mercuric reductase genes. Supplementary Data S1 includes the 285-bp sequence for the merA fragment identified. Hence, the T. thioparus strain used in these investigations has the genetic potential to reduce Hg2+ as observed in our incubations here.
Addition of higher thiosulfate levels led to enhanced metacinnabar dissolution and volatilization. In the absence of microbial activity (e.g., killed cells), aqueous Hg2+ levels increased with increasing initial thiosulfate concentration (Figure 4), indicating that thiosulfate stimulated metacinnabar dissolution. Thiosulfate is a strong Hg2+ complexing ligand (Crespo-Medina et al., 2009) and MINTEQ modeling indicated that under the experimental conditions tested, nearly all aqueous Hg2+ was complexed to thiosulfate, predominantly as Hg(S2O3)−22 (98%) under low (100 μM) thiosulfate conditions and Hg(S2O3)−43 (77%) under high (20 mM) thiosulfate concentrations. In the presence of live T. thioparus, higher thiosulfate concentrations also led to higher cell densities (Supplementary Figure S4) ultimately resulting in a greater mass of Hg volatilized over a given time period (Figure 5). The Hg volatilization rate (~100–500 ng L−1 d−1) after 11–30 days of incubation, when most thiosulfate had been consumed by cells (concentration remaining 0–5 μM), however is similar when normalized to cell abundance (~50 ag Hg cell−1 d−1) for a wide range of initial thiosulfate concentrations (40 μM to 20 mM) (Supplementary Figure S5). Thus, thiosulfate had a dual effect on HgS dissolution, by acting as both a complexing ligand inducing abiotic metacinnabar dissolution before it was consumed through cell respiration and by thereby supporting higher cell densities to stimulate microbially induced dissolution. Our findings demonstrate that at environmentally relevant concentrations, even a small increase in initial thiosulfate abundance (from <4 to 40 μM) resulted in a large enhancement of Hg volatilization (~35 times, Figure 5).
Thiosulfate is a major intermediate sulfur species in environmental systems formed through both oxidative and reductive legs of the sulfur cycle, leading to high thiosulfate fluxes despite variable steady-state concentrations (typically low- to mid-micromolar concentrations, but as high as 3 mM in estuarine and marine waters and sediments) (Luther et al., 1986; Jorgensen, 1990a,b; Zopfi et al., 2004; Mullaugh et al., 2008). Accordingly, a subset of experiments was performed to determine the impact of sustained fluxes of thiosulfate on metacinnabar dissolution and Hg volatilization, as well as to compare natural metacinnabar (surface area = 0.1321 ± 0.0007 m2 g−1) to a synthetic iron-free, finer grained, and higher surface area metacinnabar phase (surface area = 1.2804 ± 0.0045 m2 g−1). Daily 100 μM thiosulfate spikes were quickly oxidized within hours in the presence of live T. thioparus with concomitant sulfate production, while thiosulfate was minimally consumed in killed incubations (Figure 6). Dissolved Hg in killed incubations increased over the course of the experiment, due to thiosulfate-induced Hg complexation and dissolution, with a more pronounced increase in natural than in synthetic metacinnabar incubations (Figure 6). Dissolved Hg concentrations in natural metacinnabar incubations were ~7× higher than with synthetic metacinnabar, which may be a consequence of greater Hg adsorption to the higher surface area synthetic phase. Equivalent dissolved Hg levels were obtained for solutions filtered with 0.02 and 0.2 μm filters, indicating that the released Hg from metacinnabar was in fact dissolved Hg and there was no significant nanoparticulate contribution. As expected, gaseous Hg(0) was observed in both the natural and synthetic HgS incubations; albeit with a high degree of variability likely due to an offset in the microbial activity of the biological replicates (Figure 7). Overall, a general trend toward decreasing Hg volatilization rates was observed over time following the thiosulfate spike (Figure 7).
Figure 6
Figure 7
The timing of thiosulfate additions had a substantial effect on the dynamics of microbially-induced volatilization of mineral-hosted Hg, with release of volatile Hg from natural and synthetic metacinnabar occurring rapidly within the first few hours following the thiosulfate spike, and decreasing volatilization after thiosulfate is consumed by T. thioparus (Figure 7). Thus, in natural systems where a low continuous flux of thiosulfate is likely present, microbial volatilization of Hg-thiosulfate complexes may lead to substantial metacinnabar dissolution and represent a significant source of gaseous Hg(0). Further, despite synthetic metacinnabar having a higher surface area and thus theoretically higher solubility, enhanced abiotic dissolution of natural metacinnabar here points to more complex controls on metacinnabar dissolution and likely highlights the importance of impurities such as iron.
Conclusion
Here we show that authigenic HgS is not merely a sink for Hg within non-acidic natural environments and instead is a source of gaseous Hg (Figures 5, 7). Volatilization of metacinnabar-hosted Hg is a coupled process involving metacinnabar dissolution (Figure 4) and microbial reduction of released Hg (Figures 5, 7). Both microbial activity and thiosulfate enhance Hg release through presumably oxidative and ligand-promoted dissolution processes, respectively. Surprisingly, it appears that metacinnabar could serve as a respiratory source of sulfur in the absence of thiosulfate for T. thioparus (Figure 3, Table 1) and likely other sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (e.g., Sulfuricurvum and Sulfuricella) explaining their extensive colonization on metacinnabar in sediments (Figure 1). Utilizing HgS as a metabolic substrate, however, likely limits the sulfur-oxidizing community to those that can also detoxify the Hg released upon dissolution. Metacinnabar dissolution by thiosulfate (Figure 4) or other Hg complexing ligands will also provide sulfide or other S intermediates (e.g., formed via abiotic oxidation of sulfide) further fueling the metabolism of sulfur-oxidizing organisms. Within aerobic systems, as explored here, this volatilized Hg may evade to the atmosphere. Under fluctuating redox conditions, however, methylation may compete for the released Hg from metacinnabar. The ultimate fate of released Hg from metacinnabar will undoubtedly be a function of the system geochemistry and resident microbial community. Regardless of the dissolution mechanisms and fate of Hg, these complex dynamics challenge the notion that metacinnabar serves as a static Hg host within non-acidic sediments.
These findings point to HgS as an underappreciated source of Hg to the environment. Based on these Hg volatilization rates, this process could account for a significant amount of Hg release from sediments and soils into the atmosphere. The microbially enhanced dissolution rates observed here, excluding any abiotic contribution, are 9–1000 times higher than known oxidative dissolution rates (3.15 × 10−2 to 1.90 μmol (sulfate) m−2 d−1) (Barnett et al., 2001; Holley et al., 2007) (see Table 1). A reasonable extrapolation for the environmentally relevant Hg volatilization rate from the processes observed in this study is 34 ng Hg m−2 h−1 (see Table 1), which falls within the range of observed emissions from mineral mercury enriched areas (2–440 ng Hg m−2 h−1) (Gustin, 2011). Our findings may provide a mechanistic understanding, at least in part, for these field observations. Further, as a first approximation, extrapolating this area normalized rate to an area roughly equivalent to that of all wetlands, redox dynamic systems rich in metal sulfides and thiosulfate, yields a Hg release rate of 1 Mmoles yr−1 (see Supplementary Table S3). For scale, total Hg emissions from terrestrial soils are estimated at 15 Mmoles yr−1 (Smith-Downey et al., 2010) with the contribution from geologically enriched soils estimated at 2.5–7.5 M yr−1 (Gustin, 2011). With that being said, the HgS loadings used in this study were employed to mimic Hg contaminated systems that are common worldwide (Barnett et al., 1997), and thus the application of this process to regional and global scale budgets that take into account also lower HgS environments requires further exploration and validation.
Statements
Author contributions
AV and CH jointly conceived of the study and designed the experiments. AV performed the experiments; AV, TZ, and CH collected the data; CS, SW, and CL assisted in data analysis; SB assisted with fieldwork. AV and CH wrote the manuscript with input from TZ, CL, CS, SW, and SB.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship under Grant No. DGE-0644491 awarded to AV. The authors thank R. Perdigão-Henriques and W. D. Leavitt for assistance in processing field samples; C. S. Kim, C. J. Lentini, and J. P. Shine for helpful conversations regarding this study; G. Swarr for assistance with Tekran operation; and N. Lupoli and Z. Dong for assistance with the DMA-80.
Part of this research was conducted at the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource. Use of the Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Lightsource, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, is supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences under Contract No. DE-AC02-76SF00515.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00596
References
1
AltschulS. F.MaddenT. L.SchafferA. A.ZhangJ.ZhangZ.MillerW.et al. (1997). Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 3389–3402. 10.1093/nar/25.17.3389
2
AmirbahmanA.KentD. B.CurtisG. P.Marvin-DipasqualeM. C. (2013). Kinetics of homogeneous and surface-catalyzed mercury(II) reduction by iron(II). Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 7204–7213. 10.1021/es401459p
3
AtlasR. M. (2005). Handbook of Media for Environmental Microbiology. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
4
BaldiF.OlsonG. J. (1987). Effects of Cinnabar on Pyrite Oxidation by Thiobacillus ferrooxidans and Cinnabar Mobilization by a Mercury-Resistant Strain. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53, 772–776.
5
BarkayT.MillerS. M.SummersA. O. (2003). Bacterial mercury resistance from atoms to ecosystems. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 27, 355–384. 10.1016/S0168-6445(03)00046-9
6
BarnettM. O.HarrisL. A.TurnerR. R.StevensonR. J.HensonT. J.MeltonR. C.et al. (1997). Formation of mercuric sulfide in soil. Environ. Sci. Technol. 31, 3037–3043. 10.1021/es960389j
7
BarnettM. O.TurnerR. R.SingerP. C. (2001). Oxidative dissolution of metacinnabar (beta-HgS) by dissolved oxygen. Appl. Geochem. 16, 1499–1512. 10.1016/S0883-2927(01)00026-9
8
BensonD. A.Karsch-MizrachiI.LipmanD. J.OstellJ.SayersE. W. (2009). GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, D26–D31. 10.1093/nar/gkn723
9
ChadhainS. M. N.SchaeferJ. K.CraneS.ZylstraG. J.BarkayT. (2006). Analysis of mercuric reductase (merA) gene diversity in an anaerobic mercury-contaminated sediment enrichment. Environ. Microbiol. 8, 1746–1752. 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2006.01114.x
10
ClarksonT. W.MagosL. (2006). The toxicology of mercury and its chemical compounds. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 36, 609–662. 10.1080/10408440600845619
11
Crespo-MedinaM.ChatziefthimiouA. D.BloomN. S.LutherG. W.WrightD. D.ReinfelderJ. R.et al. (2009). Adaptation of chemosynthetic microorganisms to elevated mercury concentrations in deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Limnol. Oceanogr. 54, 41–49. 10.4319/lo.2009.54.1.0041
12
DyrssenD. (1989). Biogenic sulfur in two different marine environments. Mar. Chem. 28, 241–249. 10.1016/0304-4203(89)90198-9
13
GrahamA. M.AikenG. R.GilmourC. C. (2012). Dissolved organic matter enhances microbial mercury methylation under sulfidic conditions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 2715–2723. 10.1021/es203658f
14
GustinM. S. (2011). Exchange of mercury between the atmosphere and terrestrial ecosystems, in Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology of Mercury, eds LiuG.CaiY.O'DriscollN. (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,), 423–451. 10.1002/9781118146644.ch13
15
HammerschmidtC. R.BowmanK. L.TabatchnickM. D.LamborgC. H. (2011). Storage bottle material and cleaning for determination of total mercury in seawater. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods9, 426–431. 10.4319/lom.2011.9.426
16
HanselC. M.FendorfS.JardineP. M.FrancisC. A. (2008). Changes in bacterial and archaeal community structure and functional diversity along a geochemically variable soil profile. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 1620–1633. 10.1128/AEM.01787-07
17
HolleyE. A.McQuillanA. J.CrawD.KimJ. P.SanderS. G. (2007). Mercury mobilization by oxidative dissolution of cinnabar (alpha-HgS) and metacinnabar (beta-HgS). Chem. Geol. 240, 313–325. 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2007.03.001
18
JewA. D.BehrensS. F.RytubaJ. J.KapplerA.SpormannA. M.BrownG. E.Jr. (2014). Microbially enhanced dissolution of HgS in an acid mine drainage system in the California Coast Range. Geobiology12, 20–33. 10.1111/gbi.12066
19
JorgensenB. B. (1990a). The Sulfur cycle of freshwater sediments: role of thiosulfate. Limnol. Oceanogr. 35, 1329–1342. 10.4319/lo.1990.35.6.1329
20
JorgensenB. B. (1990b). A thiosulfate shunt in the sulfur cycle of marine sediments. Science249, 152–154. 10.1126/science.249.4965.152
21
KellyD. P.WoodA. P. (2000). Confirmation of Thiobacillus denitrificans as a species of the genus Thiobacillus, in the beta-subclass of the Proteobacteria, with strain NCIMB 9548 as the type strain. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 50, 547–550. 10.1099/00207713-50-2-547
22
LamborgC. H.HammerschmidtC. R.GillG. A.MasonR. P.GichukiS. (2012). An intercomparison of procedures for the determination of total mercury in seawater and recommendations regarding mercury speciation during GEOTRACES cruises. Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods10, 90–100. 10.4319/lom.2012.10.90
23
LaneD. J. (1991). 16S/23S rRNA sequencing, in Nucleic Acid Techniques in Bacterial Systematics, eds StackbrandtE.GoodfellowM. (Chichester: Wiley), 115–175.
24
LutherG. W.ChurchT. M.ScudlarkJ. R.CosmanM. (1986). Inorganic and organic sulfur cycling in salt-marsh pore waters. Science232, 746–749. 10.1126/science.232.4751.746
25
MasonR. P.ChoiA. L.FitzgeraldW. F.HammerschmidtC. R.LamborgC. H.SoerensenA. L.et al. (2012). Mercury biogeochemical cycling in the ocean and policy implications. Environ. Res. 119, 101–117. 10.1016/j.envres.2012.03.013
26
McNuttM. (2013). Mercury and Health. Science341, 1430. 10.1126/science.1245924
27
MullaughK. M.LutherG. W.III.MaS.MooreT. S.YucelM.BeckerE. L.et al. (2008). Voltammetric (micro)electrodes for the in situ study of Fe2+ oxidation kinetics in hot springs and S2O32- production at hydrothermal vents. Electroanalysis20, 280–290. 10.1002/elan.200704056
28
NawrockiE. P.KolbeD. L.EddyS. R. (2009). Infernal 1.0: inference of RNA alignments. Bioinformatics25, 1335–1337. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp157
29
NobleR. T.FuhrmanJ. A. (1998). Use of SYBR Green I for rapid epifluorescence counts of marine viruses and bacteria. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 14, 113–118. 10.3354/ame014113
30
QuinceC.LanzenA.DavenportR. J.TurnbaughP. J. (2011). Removing noise from pyrosequenced amplicons. BMC Bioinformatics12:38. 10.1186/1471-2105-12-38
31
RavichandranM. (2004). Interactions between mercury and dissolved organic matter - a review. Chemosphere55, 319–331. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.11.011
32
SantelliC. M.OrcuttB. N.BanningE.BachW.MoyerC. L.SoginM. L.et al. (2008). Abundance and diversity of microbial life in ocean crust. Nature453, U653–U657. 10.1038/nature06899
33
SattleyW. M.MadiganM. T. (2006). Isolation, characterization, and ecology of cold-active, chemolithotrophic, sulfur-oxidizing bacteria from perennially ice-covered lake Fryxell, Antarctica. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72, 5562–5568. 10.1128/AEM.00702-06
34
Smith-DowneyN. V.SunderlandE. M.JacobD. J. (2010). Anthropogenic impacts on global storage and emissions of mercury from terrestrial soils: insights from a new global model. J. Geophys. Res. 115, G03008. 10.1029/2009JG001124
35
TurnerS. J.PryerK. M.MiaoV. P. M.PalmerJ. D. (1999). Investigting deep phylogenetic relationships among cyanobacteria and plastids by small subunit rRNA sequence analysis. J. Eukaryot. Microbiol. 46, 327–338. 10.1111/j.1550-7408.1999.tb04612.x
36
VishnivetskayaT. A.MosherJ. J.PalumboA. V.YangZ. K.PodarM.BrownS. D.et al. (2011). Mercury and other heavy metals influence bacterial community structure in contaminated Tennessee Streams. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 302–311. 10.1128/AEM.01715-10
37
WangQ.GarrityG. M.TiedjeJ. M.ColeJ. R. (2007). Naive Bayesian classifier for rapid assignment of rRNA sequences into the new bacterial taxonomy. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 73, 5261–5267. 10.1128/AEM.00062-07
38
WebbS. M. (2005). SIXPack a graphical user interface for XAS analysis using IFEFFIT. Phys. Scr. T115:1011. 10.1238/Physica.Topical.115a01011
39
WebbS. M. (2006). SMAK: Sam's Microprobe Analysis Kit, v.0.25. Menlo Park, CA: Stanford Synchrotron Radiation Laboratory.
40
WebsterG.NewberryC. J.FryJ. C.WeightmanA. J. (2003). Assessment of bacterial community structure in the deep sub-seafloor biosphere by 16S rDNA-based techniques: a cautionary tale. J. Microbiol. Methods55, 155–164. 10.1016/S0167-7012(03)00140-4
41
WiatrowskiH. A.DasS.KukkadapuR.IltonE. S.BarkayT.YeeN. (2009). Reduction of Hg(II) to Hg(0) by Magnetite. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43, 5307–5313. 10.1021/es9003608
42
WiddelF.BakF. (1992). Gram-negative mesophilic sulfate-reducing bacteria, in The Prokaryotes eds BalowsA.TruperG.DworkinM.HarderW.SchleiferK. H. (New York, NY: Springer), 3352–3378.
43
WienerJ. G.KrabbenhoftD. P.HeinzG. H.ScheuhammerA. M. (2002). Ecotoxicology of mercury, in Handbook of Ecotoxicology, 2nd Edn., eds HoffmanD. J.RattnerB. A.BurtonG. A.Jr.CairnsJ.Jr. (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press), 409–464.
44
ZopfiJ.FerdelmanT. G.FossingH. (2004). Distribution and fate of sulfur intermediates—sulfite, tetrathionate, thiosulfate, and elemental sulfur—in marine sediments. Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Pap. 379, 97–116. 10.1130/0-8137-2379-5.97
Summary
Keywords
mercury, metacinnabar, sulfur chemosynthesis, Thiobacillus, thiosulfate, mercury sulfide dissolution, sulfur metabolism, sulfur oxidation
Citation
Vázquez-Rodríguez AI, Hansel CM, Zhang T, Lamborg CH, Santelli CM, Webb SM and Brooks SC (2015) Microbial- and thiosulfate-mediated dissolution of mercury sulfide minerals and transformation to gaseous mercury. Front. Microbiol. 6:596. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00596
Received
27 March 2015
Accepted
30 May 2015
Published
23 June 2015
Volume
6 - 2015
Edited by
Tanja Bosak, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA
Reviewed by
Ulrike Kappler, University of Queensland, Australia; Mustafa Yucel, GEOMAR - Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Germany
Copyright
© 2015 Vázquez-Rodríguez, Hansel, Zhang, Lamborg, Santelli, Webb and Brooks.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Colleen M. Hansel, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, 266 Woods Hole Road, Mailstop 52, Woods Hole, MA 02543, USA chansel@whoi.edu
This article was submitted to Microbiological Chemistry and Geomicrobiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.