The role of biofilms as environmental reservoirs of antibiotic resistance

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance has become a significant and growing threat to public and environmental health. To face this problem both at local and global scales, a better understanding of the sources and mechanisms that contribute to the emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance is required. Recent studies demonstrate that aquatic ecosystems are reservoirs of resistant bacteria and antibiotic resistance genes as well as potential conduits for their transmission to human pathogens. Despite the wealth of information about antibiotic pollution and its effect on the aquatic microbial resistome, the contribution of environmental biofilms to the acquisition and spread of antibiotic resistance has not been fully explored in aquatic systems. Biofilms are structured multicellular communities embedded in a self-produced extracellular matrix that acts as a barrier to antibiotic diffusion. High population densities and proximity of cells in biofilms also increases the chances for genetic exchange among bacterial species converting biofilms in hot spots of antibiotic resistance. This review focuses on the potential effect of antibiotic pollution on biofilm microbial communities, with special emphasis on ecological and evolutionary processes underlying acquired resistance to these compounds.

Environmental Biofilms

Nature is often unpleasant. It is then better to face environmental uncertainties under the principle of “strength through unity". In many habitats, either natural or artificial, microorganisms attach themselves to surfaces, either abiotic or biotic, forming a complex matrix of biopolymers known as biofilm that protect them from environmental hazards (Costerton et al., 1978). Biofilms may be composed of a single bacterial species (e.g., Vibrio cholerae, Teschler et al., 2015) but more frequently they are formed by a complex and diverse community of microorganisms (bacteria, algae, fungi and protozoa) embedded in an extracellular matrix of polysaccharides, exudates, and detritus (Costerton et al., 1978; Wimpenny et al., 2000). Many microbial species are able to change their lifestyle (free-living vs. attached) depending on their physiological status and the physicochemical conditions in their surroundings, taking advantage of the greater availability of organic matter in suspended particles and surfaces (Simon et al., 2002; Grossart et al., 2004; Grossart, 2010; Teschler et al., 2015). In aquatic habitats, biofilms develop not only in benthic substrata, such as streambed cobbles and sand (epilithic and epipsammic biofilms, respectively), but also on floating macro– and microaggregates (Simon et al., 2002). From an ecological perspective, microorganisms in environmental biofilms actively participate in organic matter decomposition, nutrient dynamics and biogeochemical cycling, being a key component of cosystem functioning (Sabater and Romaní, 1996; Sabater et al., 2002; Simon et al., 2002; Battin et al., 2007; Romaní, 2010). Moreover, streambed biofilms are considered as good indicators of the overall water quality and the ecological status of the system (i.e., ecosystem health) (Burns and Ryder, 2001; Sabater et al., 2007). It is then of special interest to assess how biofilm communities respond to anthropogenic pollution of aquatic environments (e.g., rivers, lakes, and reservoirs) considering the increasing amount of chemical compounds (metals, personal care products and drugs used in veterinary and human medicine) released into these waterbodies mainly through wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) effluents and agricultural run-off (Pruden et al., 2006; Sarmah et al., 2006; Baquero et al., 2008). This review focuses on the role of streambed biofilms as reservoirs of antibiotic resistant bacteria and resistance genes, providing a general overview of the causes and consequences of a chronic exposure of biofilm communities to sub-inhibitory concentrations of antibiotics and their role in the spread and persistence of antibiotic resistance.

Biofilms And Antibiotics

Biofilms show an increased survival and resistance to environmental and chemical stressors (e.g., antibiotics) mainly, but not only, by the protection conferred by the extracellular polysaccharide matrix (Mah and O’Toole, 2001; Stewart and Costerton, 2001; Donlan, 2002; Donlan and Costerton, 2002; Stewart, 2002; Hall-Stoodley et al., 2004; Høiby et al., 2010). In biofilms, bacterial cells exhibit 10 to 1,000 times less susceptibility to specific antimicrobial agents compared with their planktonic counterparts (Gilbert et al., 2002). This reduced susceptibility is caused by a combination of different factors, namely: (i) a poor antibiotic penetration into the polysaccharide matrix; (ii) the arbitrary presence of cells showing a resistant phenotype (known as “persisters”); and (iii) the presence of either non-growing cells or cells that triggered stress responses under unfavorable chemical conditions within the biofilm matrix (Stewart and Costerton, 2001; Stewart, 2002). These protective mechanisms act synergistically to those responsible for conventional resistance linked to the presence of antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in bacterial genomes or extrachromosomal elements, yielding an overall increased resistance of biofilms to antimicrobial compounds. For instance, β-lactamase producing bacteria offered increased protection in biofilms because the β-lactam antibiotic, such as ampicillin, was inactivated by those β-lactamases (Anderl et al., 2000). Moreover, the ampC gene of Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms was strongly induced by exposure to antibiotics, such as imipenem (Bagge et al., 2004). Additionally, biofilm formation may result as a defensive reaction to the presence of antibiotics. Hoffman et al. (2005) found that sub-inhibitory concentrations of aminoglycosides induce biofilm formation as part of a defense response in Escherichia coli and P. aeruginosa. Similar results were described by Salcedo et al. (2014), who observed that sub-inhibitory concentrations of tetracycline and cephradine induce biofilm formation and enhance the transfer rate of the pB10 plasmid among the biofilm biomass (E. coli and P. aeruginosa) at rates 2–5 times faster than without antibiotic treatment. Since biofilm formation is also common for most bacterial pathogens, the enhanced resistance of biofilms to antibiotics is a serious concern for human health as many chronic infections are linked to biofilm growth on either natural surfaces (e.g., teeth, lungs) or foreign-body devices (e.g., pacemakers, catheters, prosthetic heart valves). The characteristics, composition, growth dynamics, and resistance mechanisms of clinically relevant biofilms have been reviewed in detail by several authors (Donlan and Costerton, 2002; Parsek and Singh, 2003; Hall-Stoodley et al., 2004; Høiby et al., 2010), and are out of the scope of this review. In clear contrast, lesser is known about the role of environmental biofilms as natural reservoirs of ARGs, their contribution to ARGs spreading among biofilm inhabitants and their transfer to free-living bacteria, increasing the risk for their transmission to aquatic microorganisms and potential human pathogens (Vaz-Moreira et al., 2014 and references therein).

Environmental Biofilms Under Chemical Stress

Many aquatic systems (rivers, lakes, reservoirs) are affected by human activities such as continuous discharges from WWTP effluents. Under such conditions, macro- and microorganisms inhabiting these waterbodies are exposed to a low but constant concentration of a wide range of chemical pollutants (antibiotics but also analgesics, anti-inflammatory, and psychiatric drugs, β-blockers, pesticides, etc.) that alter their behavior at different levels, with consequences that we are only beginning to grasp (Bernier and Surette, 2013; Boxall, 2014). Several studies have demonstrated the effects of the so-called emerging pollutants on the composition, activity, and resilience of streambed biofilms (Bonnineau et al., 2010; Ricart et al., 2010; Proia et al., 2011, 2013a,b; Osorio et al., 2014), although the ecological implications of such background pollution are difficult to envisage. A serious drawback arises when comparing the environmental concentrations of antibiotics measured in polluted aquatic habitats (from ng/L to μg/L) to those used to treat bacterial infections (i.e., therapeutic concentrations, which are usually ≥1 mg/L). Since environmental concentrations of antimicrobial compounds are several orders of magnitude below the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of most bacterial pathogens, their antibiotic effect is doubtful, if any (Waksman, 1961; Davies, 2006; Davies et al., 2006; Davies and Davies, 2010). Current data strongly suggest that antibiotics, at these sub-MIC concentrations, act as signaling molecules mediating a wide variety of cell processes (gene transcription and expression, quorum sensing, inter- or intra-species communication, biofilm formation, among others; Davies, 2006; Romero et al., 2011; Sengupta et al., 2013; Andersson and Hughes, 2014), instead of causing growth arrest or cell death. Moreover, low concentration of antibiotics may also trigger different stress responses that might accelerate horizontal gene transfer (HGT) and the spread of ARGs in a broad range of bacterial species (Beaber et al., 2004; Miller et al., 2004; Maiques et al., 2006). Under this perspective, the chronic exposure to subinhibitory antibiotic concentrations that occurs in most aquatic ecosystems offers new avenues for research that deserve exploration. For instance, is the effect of this chronic exposure strong enough to shape the composition of microbial communities? Or is it buffered by the many other physico-chemical constraints that microbes face in their habitat? Is the antibiotic pollution adding a background noise that interferes with normal communication among bacterial cells in their habitats (e.g., biofilms)? If so, how can this noise effect be measured? And what about activity? Does antibiotic pollution have measurable effects on biogeochemical cycles at both local and global scales? In this regard, Roose-Amsaleg and Laverman (2015) have recently reviewed 31 articles dealing with the effects of antibiotics on microorganisms involved in biogeochemical cycles to ascertain if environmental concentrations of these compounds have side-effects on such cycles, with special focus on N cycling (anammox, denitrification, and nitrification). Despite the few studies available and the variability in terms of antibiotic types and conditions tested, conclusions of their work point to a clear alteration of microbial activity in key biogeochemical cycles, thus affecting ecosystem functioning at different levels.

Despite these considerations, it is now clear that chronic exposure to antibiotics, even at very low concentrations, promotes and maintains a pool of resistance genes in natural microbial communities (Séveno et al., 2002; Allen et al., 2010; Sengupta et al., 2013; Andersson and Hughes, 2014). It should be mentioned, however, that most of these genes, although conferring a resistant phenotype when expressed, are probably not “true” resistance genes (Martinez et al., 2015) thus having a function distantly related to that under therapeutic conditions (Allen et al., 2010; Martinez et al., 2015). Notwithstanding this, current data indicate that the extensive use of antibiotics over the last century has generated a selective pressure that has accelerated the acquisition and spread of ARGs among environmental bacteria posing a risk for human health assuming the striking capacity of microbes to share genes.

Acquisition And Spread Of Args In Biofilms

Susceptible bacteria may become resistant to antibiotics through chromosomal mutations or by HGT, being the latter the major contributor to the spread of antibiotic resistance determinants. The significance of HGT to microbial adaptation was initially recognized when antibiotic-resistant pathogens were identified (Sobecky and Hazen, 2009). HGT is mediated by mobile genetic elements (MGEs), which play an important role in the evolution and adaptation of bacterial species to new and/or changing environmental conditions (Frost et al., 2005). MGEs are segments of DNA encoding a variety of enzymes and proteins that mediate their movement within the host genome (intracellular mobility) or between bacterial cells (intercellular mobility). Interchange of DNA fragments between a cell donor and a receptor takes place through conjugation, transformation, or transduction, whereas intracellular movement is facilitated by integrons and transposons (Modi et al., 2014).

Together with phage transduction and natural transformation, the exchange of genetic material through conjugation is one of the most efficient pathways to disseminate antibiotic resistance among bacterial cells, where donor and recipient cells are in close contact. Conjugation is mainly mediated by the so-called “conjugative plasmids”, although “conjugative transposons” are also capable of triggering the process. One of the most important aspects of conjugative plasmids is that they can be exchanged among both related and phylogenetically distant bacteria (Dionisio et al., 2002). The high cell density and close contact among cells within the biofilm matrix together with increased genetic competence and accumulation of MGEs in these habitats convert them into an optimal scenario for the acquisition and spread of ARGs (Fux et al., 2005). Several studies have shown increased conjugation efficiencies in biofilms when compared to free-living bacterial cells. In fact, conjugation of the broad-host-range plasmid RP4 between two species of Pseudomonas occurred in a biofilm reactor at high frequencies (Ehlers and Bouwer, 1999). In situ assessment of gene transfer rates in biofilms using automated confocal laser scanning microscopy revealed conjugation rates 1,000-fold higher than those determined by classical plating techniques (Hausner and Wuertz, 1999). Molin and Tolker-Nielsen (2003) also showed that the efficiency of gene transfer seems to be correlated with the biofilm surface, suggesting that a high surface/volume ratios favor transfer within or between biofilm populations.

The diversity and abundance of ARGs in environmental biofilms have been investigated by several authors to unveil differences in the concentration of target genes between planktonic and benthic compartments. Less information is available, however, on the contribution of MGE to the acquisition and spread of ARGs among biofilm inhabitants and between them and free-living bacteria. Table 1 summarizes some relevant studies dealing with the presence, diversity and abundance of ARGs in biofilms from different environmental settings such as rivers exposed to WWTP effluent discharges, WWTP and drinking water network pipelines, experimental mesocosm, and sand filters. Although not exhaustive, Table 1 provides a general overview of results obtained by different research groups studying the role of environmental biofilms as hot spots for the accumulation and transfer of ARGs. Schwartz et al. (2003) demonstrated that the vanA gene, which confers a high-level resistance to vancomycin, was detected in drinking water biofilms in the absence of any vancomycin-resistant enterococci, suggesting a potential gene transfer from them to autochthonous bacteria in drinking water systems. Gillings et al. (2008) investigated the presence of a MGE, the class 1 integrase (intI1) gene, in bacterial isolates collected from diverse environmental samples near Sydney. Authors found that 1 to 3% of bacterial isolates from lake sediments were intI1 positive, while in biofilms from a groundwater treatment plant, the number of intI1-positive isolates reached 30% despite no antibiotics were used as selective agents for culturing. Moreover, Engemann et al. (2008) found that the abundance of six genes conferring resistance to tetracycline was reduced at different rates in the water column, and some genes, particularly tetW, readily migrated into biofilms. Transfer to biofilms did not, however, completely explain disappearance of tet genes from the planktonic compartment and other factors such as sunlight and potential microbial degradation would probably contributed (Engemann et al., 2006, 2008). In a similar experimental approach but using periodical piglet waste loadings, Zhang et al. (2009) observed that tet genes migrate rapidly to biofilms, where they persist longer than in adjacent waters. Recently, Farkas et al. (2013) also observed that 9.4% of isolates from drinking water biofilms harbored class 1 integrons, which were mainly detected in bacteria (e.g., Enterobacteriaceae) that may be associated with microbiological contamination.

Because biofilms play an important role as reservoirs for ARGs, they could be considered as biological indicators of antibiotic resistance pollution in the same way as river ecologists use streambed biofilms as indicators of the overall “ecological status” of the river ecosystem (Sabater et al., 2007). The chronic exposure to sub-MIC concentration of antibiotics exerts a selective pressure on biofilm bacterial communities that may stimulate the emergence and spread of antibiotic resistance (Allen et al., 2010; Andersson and Hughes, 2014; Marti et al., 2014a; Chow et al., 2015). The presence of other pollutants, such as heavy metals from feed additives, organic, and inorganic fertilizers, pesticides and anti-fouling products, also contributes in the co-selection of antibiotic resistance because the close location of genes encoding for these resistance phenotypes in the same MGE (Seiler and Berendonk, 2012). Such exposures may eventually have consequences on the selection and abundance of MGEs, thereby facilitating the spread of ARGs among different species; different biofilm compartments (e.g., epilithic, epipsammic, and hyporheic streambed); or even between different prokaryotic communities as recently assessed by plasmid metagenomics (Sentchilo et al., 2013). Besides, several studies provided evidence that ARGs tend to accumulate in biofilms rather than in the planktonic compartment. In this regard, Börjesson et al. (2009) found a high proportion of genes encoding resistance to aminoglycosides and tetracyclines in biofilm samples collected at a WWTP. Winkworth (2013) demonstrated that, while the levels of ARGs in biofilm samples collected along the Taieri River were low, sites subjected to combined influences of greater human activity and intensive dairy farming showed an increased level of ARGs. Likewise, a study carried out by our research group clearly showed the effect of WWTP effluents on the prevalence of several ARGs in the Ter River, accompanied by a significant increase in their relative abundance in biofilm samples collected downstream the WWTP discharge point (Marti et al., 2013). Moreover, we have investigated the prevalence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) determinants in ciprofloxacin-resistant strains isolated in biofilm and sediments from a WWTP discharge point and its receiving river (upstream and downstream sites). We observed that, while the number of strains harboring PMQR determinants was higher in sediments, PMQR-positive strains were also detected in biofilm samples, especially in those from the WWTP discharge point and downstream sites (Marti et al., 2014b). In a study carried out in a horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland, Nõlvak et al. (2013) found that copy numbers of tetA and sul1 genes in the wetland biofilms were one order of magnitude higher than in the effluent water, despite the fact that this facility had a similar efficiency to conventional WWTP in removing ARGs from wastewater. Altogether, these studies undoubtedly demonstrate the contribution of biofilms in the acquisition and spread of ARGs.

Antibiotic Resistance In Biofilms Assessed By Metagenomics

Until the last decade our knowledge of antibiotic resistance has largely depended on data provided by traditional culture-based methods (Cockerill, 1999). Although useful, these data are limited and biased towards cultivable members of the community. Recent advances in genomics and metagenomics are now providing new avenues for understanding evolutionary processes controlling antibiotic resistance mechanisms and their spreading among microbial populations.

To date, several thousand metagenomes have already been sequenced from a large variety of environments, and this number is set to grow rapidly in the forthcoming years. Most of these metagenomes are publically available through various databases and annotation platforms, such as MG-RAST (Meyer et al., 2008), CAMERA (Sun et al., 2011), and IMG/M (Markowitz et al., 2012), which provide additional insight in the function of complex microbial communities through comparative analyses. Moreover, the availability of specialized databases such as the ARG Database (ARDB; Liu and Pop, 2009), the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (CARD; McArthur et al., 2013), the Integron Database (INTEGRALL; Moura et al., 2009), the Bush, Palzkill, and Jacoby’s collection of curated β-lactamase proteins (http://www.lahey.org/Studies/), and the implementation of high-throughput sequence analysis tools such as BLAT (Kent, 2002), USEARCH (Edgar, 2010), and DIAMOND (Buchfink et al., 2015), provide a comprehensive molecular toolbox that allow a better understanding of the evolution, ecology, and spread of antibiotic resistance in different organisms and ecosystems.

We have conducted a comparative analysis of selected metagenomes corresponding to several projects and environments publically available in the MG-RAST database (http://metagenomics.anl.gov/) to provide an overall insight on the prevalence of MGEs and ARGs in environmental biofilms. This analysis showed that MGEs-related sequences, such those from phages and plasmids, were found in a lower proportion in metagenomes from river biofilms than those from WWTPs and river water environments. Remarkably, transposons were detected in a higher proportion in WWTPs and river biofilms than those from river water environments (Figure 1). Similarly, sequences related to genes conferring resistance to β-lactam antibiotics were also detected more frequently among microbial communities from WWTPs and streambed river biofilms than those from river water environments. Sequences related to genes conferring resistance to tetracyclines were also abundant in WWTPs and river biofilms, but to a lesser extent than β-lactams. Finally, no differences in the proportion of genes conferring resistance to sulfonamides were observed among the examined environments.

FIGURE 1

Interestingly, the analysis of the selected metagenomes also showed that two acid mine drainage biofilm samples from the Richmond Mine (4441138.3 and 4441137.3) yielded a high proportion of sequences related to genes conferring resistance to β-lactam antibiotics (5.7 to 7.2%). These relatively high values of β-lactamases might be related to the higher proportion of transposons in these acidophilic biofilms (0.5 to 1.6%) than those detected in environments close to neutral pH such as riverbed biofilms, WWTPs and freshwater systems (Figure 1).

A recent study revealed a remarkable abundance and diversity of genes encoding transposases in the metagenome of a hydrothermal chimney biofilm (Brazelton and Baross, 2009). The comparative analysis between this metagenome (4461585.3) and the metagenomes mentioned above confirmed these observations (8.1% of transposase sequences), but similar proportions were observed for β-lactamases between the hydrothermal vent biofilms and those from river water environments. The high relative proportion of transposases may favor an enhanced gene transfer between bacterial genomes that confer new and useful accessory functions, including resistance to heavy metals or antimicrobial compounds. The presence of genes conferring resistance to β-lactams in environments not subjected to antibiotic pollution such as deep sea vents or pristine systems raises interesting questions not only about the origin and ecological function of these genes in nature but also the criteria that researchers adopt when defining a resistance gene (Martinez et al., 2015).

Final Remarks And Future Prospects

Biofilms occur in almost any submerged surface in both natural and man-made systems providing a suitable and optimal environment for the growth, activity, and interaction of different bacterial species. Biofilms also provide a shelter where to cope with transient or permanent stress conditions, also favoring metabolic interactions and genetic interchange between different bacterial species struggling for survival in a changing environment. Punctual or continuous discharges of pharmaceutical compounds into aquatic systems might constitute not only a selective pressure on aquatic bacterial communities that stimulate the transmission and spread of ARG, but also a chronic source of background biochemical noise that may potentially interfere the communication networks that microbes finely tuned during evolution. Although little information is available on the actual capacity of aquatic bacteria to transfer antibiotic-resistance determinants to potential human pathogens, current data corroborate that environmental biofilms are true reservoirs of ARGs. Further research is needed; however, to elucidate to which extent such hot spots of antibiotic resistance may constitute a serious concern for human health, how the diversity and abundance of ARG change between different biofilm compartments, how this resistance genetic pool moves among communities and how this gene transfer varies in response to the amount of chemical pollution (antibiotics but also other stressors such as heavy metals and xenobiotic compounds) in the receiving waters. The continuous refinement of sequencing technologies (e.g., metagenomics, metatranscriptomics) and bioinformatic tools and the availability of specialized and properly curated databases may help to reach these goals and hit new research targets. Answering these (and other) questions will provide a better knowledge of the transfer dynamics of resistance genes at ecosystem level (between species, communities, and/or habitats), yielding clues to fight against antibiotic resistance and the threat that it poses to the environment and to the human health.

References

• 1

  AllenH. K.DonatoJ.WangH. H.Cloud-HansenK. A.DaviesJ.HandelsmanJ. (2010). Call of the wild: antibiotic resistance genes in natural environments.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.8251–259. 10.1038/nrmicro2312

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 2

  AnderlJ. N.FranklinM. J.StewartP. S. (2000). Role of antibiotic penetration limitation in Klebsiella pneumoniae biofilm resistance to ampicillin and ciprofloxacin.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.441818–1824. 10.1128/AAC.44.7.1818-1824.2000

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 3

  AnderssonD. I.HughesD. (2014). Microbiological effects of sublethal levels of antibiotics.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.12465–478. 10.1038/nrmicro3270

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 4

  BaggeN.SchusterM.HentzerM.CiofuO.GivskovM.GreenbergE. P.et al (2004). Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms exposed to imipenem exhibit changes in global gene expression and β-lactamase and alginate production.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.481175–1187. 10.1128/AAC.48.4.1175-1187.2004

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 5

  BaqueroF.MartínezJ.-L.CantónR. (2008). Antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in water environments.Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.19260–265. 10.1016/j.copbio.2008.05.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 6

  BattinT. J.SloanW. T.KjellebergS.DaimsH.HeadI. M.CurtisT. P.et al (2007). Microbial landscapes: new paths to biofilm research.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.576–81. 10.1038/nrmicro1556

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 7

  BeaberJ. W.HochhutB.WaldorM. K. (2004). SOS response promotes horizontal dissemination of antibiotic resistance genes.Nature42772–74. 10.1038/nature02241

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 8

  BernierS. P.SuretteM. G. (2013). Concentration-dependent activity of antibiotics in natural environments.Front. Microbiol.4:20. 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00020

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 9

  BonnineauC.GuaschH.ProiaL.RicartM.GeiszingerA.RomaníA. M.et al (2010). Fluvial biofilms: a pertinent tool to assess β-blockers toxicity.Aquat. Toxicol.96225–233. 10.1016/j.aquatox.2009.10.024

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 10

  BörjessonS.DienuesO.JarnheimerP. A.OlsenB.MatussekA.LindgrenP. E. (2009). Quantification of genes encoding resistance to aminoglycosides, β-lactams and tetracyclines in wastewater environments by real-time PCR.Int. J. Environ. Health Res.19219–230. 10.1080/09603120802449593

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 11

  BoxallA. B. (2014). The environmental side effects of medication.EMBO Rep.51110–1116. 10.1038/sj.embor.7400307

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 12

  BrazeltonW. J.BarossJ. A. (2009). Abundant transposases encoded by the metagenome of a hydrothermal chimney biofilm.ISME J.31420–1424. 10.1038/ismej.2009.79

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 13

  BuchfinkB.XieC.HusonD. H. (2015). Fast and sensitive protein alignment using DIAMOND.Nat. Methods1259–60. 10.1038/nmeth.3176

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 14

  BurnsA.RyderD. S. (2001). Potential for biofilms as biological indicators in Australian riverine systems.Ecol. Manag. Restor.253–64. 10.1046/j.1442-8903.2001.00069.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 15

  ChowL.WaldronL.GillingsM. R. (2015). Potential impacts of aquatic pollutants: sub-clinical antibiotic concentrations induce genome changes and promote antibiotic resistance.Front. Microbiol.6:803. 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00803

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 16

  CockerillF. R.III. (1999). Genetic methods for assessing antimicrobial resistance.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.43199–212.

  • Google Scholar

• 17

  CostertonJ. W.GeeseyG. G.ChengK. J. (1978). How bacteria stick.Sci. Am.23886–95. 10.1038/scientificamerican0178-86

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 18

  DaviesJ. (2006). Are antibiotics naturally antibiotics?J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol.33496–499. 10.1007/s10295-006-0112-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 19

  DaviesJ.DaviesD. (2010). Origins and evolution of antibiotic resistance.Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev.74417–433. 10.1128/MMBR.00016-10

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 20

  DaviesJ.SpiegelmanG. B.YimG. (2006). The world of subinhibitory antibiotic concentrations.Curr. Opin. Microbiol.9445–453. 10.1016/j.mib.2006.08.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 21

  DionisioF.MaticI.RadmanM.RodriguesO. R.TaddeiF. (2002). Plasmids spread very fast in heterogeneous bacterial communities.Genetics1621525–1532.

  • Google Scholar

• 22

  DonlanR. M. (2002). Biofilms: microbial life on surfaces.Emerg. Infect. Dis.8881–890. 10.3201/eid0809.020063

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 23

  DonlanR. M.CostertonJ. W. (2002). Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms.Clin. Microbiol. Rev.15167–193. 10.1128/CMR.15.2.167-193.2002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 24

  EdgarR. C. (2010). Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST.Bioinformatics262460–2461. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 25

  EhlersL. J.BouwerE. J. (1999). Rp4 plasmid transfer among species of Pseudomonas in a biofilm reactor.Water Sci. Technol.39163–171. 10.1016/S0273-1223(99)00164-X

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 26

  EngemannC. A.AdamsL.KnappC. W.GrahamD. W. (2006). Disappearance of oxytetracycline resistance genes in aquatic systems.FEMS Microbiol. Lett.263176–182. 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2006.00419.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 27

  EngemannC. A.KeenP. L.KnappC. W.HallK. J.GrahamD. W. (2008). Fate of tetracycline resistance genes in aquatic systems: migration from the water column to peripheral biofilms.Environ. Sci. Technol.425131–5136. 10.1021/es800238e

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 28

  FarkasA.Butiuc-KeulA.CiatarâksD.NeamktuC.CrvaciunaksC.PodarD.et al (2013). Microbiological contamination and resistance genes in biofilms occurring during the drinking water treatment process.Sci. Total Environ.443932–938. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.068

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 29

  FrostL. S.LeplaeR.SummersA. O.ToussaintA. (2005). Mobile genetic elements: the agents of open source evolution.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.3722–732. 10.1038/nrmicro1235

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 30

  FuxC. A.CostertonJ. W.StewartP. S.StoodleyP. (2005). Survival strategies of infectious biofilms.Trends Microbiol.1334–40. 10.1016/j.tim.2004.11.010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 31

  GilbertP.Maira-LitranT.McBainA. J.RickardA. H.WhyteF. (2002). The physiology and collective recalcitrance of microbial biofilm communities.Adv. Microb. Physiol.46203–256. 10.1016/S0065-2911(02)46005-5

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 32

  GillingsM.BoucherY.LabbateM.HolmesA.KrishnanS.HolleyM.et al (2008). The evolution of class 1 integrons and the rise of antibiotic resistance.J. Bacteriol.1905095–5100. 10.1128/JB.00152-08

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 33

  GrossartH. P. (2010). Ecological consequences of bacterioplankton lifestyles: changes in concepts are needed.Environ. Microbiol. Rep.2706–714. 10.1111/j.1758-2229.2010.00179.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 34

  GrossartH. P.SchlingloffA.BernhardM.SimonM.BrinkhoffT. (2004). Antagonistic activity of bacteria isolated from organic aggregates of the German Wadden Sea.FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.47387–396. 10.1016/S0168-6496(03)00305-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 35

  Hall-StoodleyL.CostertonJ. W.StoodleyP. (2004). Bacterial biofilms: from the natural environment to infectious diseases.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.295–108. 10.1038/nrmicro821

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 36

  HausnerM.WuertzS. (1999). High rates of conjugation in bacterial biofilms as determined by quantitative in situ analysis.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.653710–3713.

  • Google Scholar

• 37

  HoffmanL. R.D’ArgenioD. A.MacCossM. J.ZhangZ.JonesR. A.MillerS. I. (2005). Aminoglycoside antibiotics induce bacterial biofilm formation.Nature4361171–1175. 10.1038/nature03912

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 38

  HøibyN.BjarnsholtT.GivskovM.MolinS.CiofuO. (2010). Antibiotic resistance of bacterial biofilms.Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents35322–332. 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.12.011

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 39

  KentW. J. (2002). BLAT – the BLAST-like alignment tool.Genome Res.12656–664. 10.1101/gr.229202.

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 40

  LiuB.PopM. (2009). ARDB – Antibiotic Resistance Genes Database.Nucleic Acids Res.37D443–D447. 10.1093/nar/gkn656

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 41

  MahT. F. C.O’TooleG. A. (2001). Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents.Trends Microbiol.934–39. 10.1016/S0966-842X(00)01913-2

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 42

  MaiquesE.ÚbedaC.CampoyS.LasaI.NovickR. P.BarbéJ.et al (2006). β-lactam antibiotics induce the SOS response and horizontal transfer of virulence factors in Staphylococcus aureus.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.1882726–2729.

  • Google Scholar

• 43

  MarkowitzV. M.ChenI. M.ChuK.SzetoE.PalaniappanK.GrechkinY.et al (2012). IMG/M: the integrated metagenome data management and comparative analysis system.Nucleic Acids Res.40D123–D129. 10.1093/nar/gkr975

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 44

  MartiE.JofreJ.BalcazarJ. L. (2013). Prevalence of antibiotic resistance genes and bacterial community composition in a river influenced by a wastewater treatment plant.PLoS ONE8:e78906. 10.1371/journal.pone.0078906

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 45

  MartiE.VariatzaE.BalcazarJ. L. (2014a). The role of aquatic ecosystems as reservoirs of antibiotic resistance.Trends Microbiol.2236–41. 10.1016/j.tim.2013.11.001

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 46

  MartiE.HuertaB.Rodríguez-MozazS.BarcelóD.JofreJ.BalcazarJ. L. (2014b). Characterization of ciprofloxacin-resistant isolates from a wastewater treatment plant and its receiving river.Water Res.6167–76. 10.1016/j.watres.2014.05.006

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 47

  MartinezJ. L.CoqueT. M.BaqueroF. (2015). What is a resistance gene? Ranking risk in resistomes.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.13116–123. 10.1038/nrmicro3399

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 48

  McArthurA. G.WaglechnerN.NizamF.YanA.AzadM. A.BaylayA. J.et al (2013). The comprehensive antibiotic resistance database.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.573348–3357. 10.1128/AAC.00419-13

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 49

  MeyerF.PaarmannD.D’SouzaM.OlsonR.GlassE. M.KubalM.et al (2008). The metagenomics RAST server – a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes.BMC Bioinformatics9:386. 10.1186/1471-2105-9-386

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 50

  MillerC.ThomsenL. E.GaggeroC.MosseriR.IngmerH.CohenS. N. (2004). SOS response induction by beta-lactams and bacterial defense against antibiotic lethality.Science3051629–1631. 10.1126/science.1101630

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 51

  ModiS. R.CollinsJ. J.RelmanD. A. (2014). Antibiotics and the gut microbiota.J. Clin. Invest.1244212–4218. 10.1172/JCI72333

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 52

  MolinS.Tolker-NielsenT. (2003). Gene transfer occurs with enhanced efficiency in biofilms and induces enhanced stabilisation of the biofilm structure.Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.14255–261. 10.1016/S0958-1669(03)00036-3

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 53

  MouraA.SoaresM.PereiraC.LeitãoN.HenriquesI.CorreiaA. (2009). INTEGRALL: a database and search engine for integrons, integrases and gene cassettes.Bioinformatics251096–1098. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp105

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 54

  NõlvakH.TruuM.TiirikK.OopkaupK.SildveeT.KaasikA.et al (2013). Dynamics of antibiotic resistance genes and their relationships with system treatment efficiency in a horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland.Sci. Total Environ.46636–644. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.052

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 55

  OsorioV.ProiaL.RicartM.PérezS.GinebredaA.CortinaJ. L.et al (2014). Hydrological variation modulates pharmaceutical levels and biofilm responses in a Mediterranean river.Sci. Total Environ.4721052–1061. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.069

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 56

  ParsekM. R.SinghP. K. (2003). Bacterial biofilms: an emerging link to disease pathogenesis.Annu. Rev. Microbiol.57677–701. 10.1146/annurev.micro.57.030502.090720

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 57

  ProiaL.MorinS.PeipochM.RomaníA. M.SabaterS. (2011). Resistance and recovery of river biofilms receiving short pulses of Triclosan and Diuron.Sci. Total Environ.4093129–3137. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.05.013

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 58

  ProiaL.OsorioV.SoleyS.Köck-SchulmeyerM.PérezS.BarcelóD.et al (2013a). Effects of pesticides and pharmaceuticals on biofilms in a highly impacted river.Environ. Pollut.178220–228. 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.02.022

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 59

  ProiaL.LupiniG.OsorioV.PérezS.BarcelóD.SchwartzT.et al (2013b). Response of biofilm bacterial communities to antibiotic pollutants in a Mediterranean river.Chemosphere921126–1135. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2013.01.063

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 60

  PrudenA.PeiR.StorteboomH.CarlsonK. H. (2006). Antibiotic resistance genes as emerging contaminants: studies in northern colorado.Environ. Sci. Technol.407445–7450. 10.1021/es060413l

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 61

  RicartM.GuaschH.AlberchM.BarcelóD.BonnineauC.GeiszingerbA.et al (2010). Triclosan persistence through wastewater treatment plants and its potential toxic effects on river biofilms.Aquat. Toxicol.100346–353. 10.1016/j.aquatox.2010.08.010

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 62

  RomaníA. M. (2010). “Freshwater biofilms,” in Biofouling, edsThomasonJ. C.DürrS. (Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell), 137–153.

  • Google Scholar

• 63

  RomeroD.TraxlerM. F.LópezD.KolterR. (2011). Antibiotics as signal molecules.Chem. Rev.1115492–5505. 10.1021/cr2000509

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 64

  Roose-AmsalegC.LavermanA. M. (2015). Do antibiotics have environmental side-effects? Impact of synthetic antibiotics on biogeochemical processes.Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res.10.1007/s11356-015-4943-3[Epub ahead of print].

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 65

  SabaterS.GuaschH.RicartM.RomaníA.VidalG.KlünderC.et al (2007). Monitoring the effect of chemicals on biological communities. The biofilm as an interface.Anal. Bioanal. Chem.3871425–1434. 10.1007/s00216-006-1051-8

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 66

  SabaterS.GuaschH.RomaníA.MuñozI. (2002). The effect of biological factors on the efficiency of river biofilms in improving water quality.Hydrobiologia469149–156. 10.1023/A:1015549404082

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 67

  SabaterS.RomaníA. M. (1996). Metabolic changes associated with biofilm formation in an undisturbed Mediterranean stream.Hydrobiologia335107–113. 10.1007/BF00015272

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 68

  SalcedoD. E.LeeJ. H.HaU. H.KimS. P. (2014). The effects of antibiotics on the biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance gene transfer.Desalination Water Treat.543582–3588. 10.1080/19443994.2014.923206

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 69

  SarmahA. K.MeyerM. T.BoxallA. B. A. (2006). A global perspective on the use, sales, exposure pathways, occurrence, fate and effects of veterinary antibiotics (VAs) in the environment.Chemosphere65725–759. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.03.026

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 70

  SchwartzT.KohnenW.JansenB.ObstU. (2003). Detection of antibiotic-resistant bacteria and their resistance genes in wastewater, surface water, and drinking water biofilms.FEMS Microbiol. Ecol.43325–335. 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2003.tb01073.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 71

  SeilerC.BerendonkT. U. (2012). Heavy metal driven co-selection of antibiotic resistance in soil and water bodies impacted by agriculture and aquaculture.Front. Microbiol.3:399. 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00399

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 72

  SenguptaS.ChattopadhyayM. K.GrossartH. P. (2013). The multifaceted roles of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in nature.Front. Microbiol.4:47. 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00047

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 73

  SentchiloV.MayerA. P.GuyL.MiyazakiR.Green TringeS.BarryK.et al (2013). Community-wide plasmid gene mobilization and selection.ISME J.71173–1186. 10.1038/ismej.2013.13

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 74

  SévenoN. A.KallifidasD.SmallaK.van ElsasJ. D.CollardJ. M.KaragouniA. D.et al (2002). Occurrence and reservoirs of antibiotic resistance genes in the environment.Rev. Med. Microbiol.1315–27. 10.1097/00013542-200201000-00002

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 75

  SimonM.GrossartH. P.SchweitzerB.PlougH. (2002). Microbial ecology of organic aggregates in aquatic ecosystems.Aquat. Microb. Ecol.28175–211. 10.3354/ame028175

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 76

  SobeckyP. A.HazenT. C. (2009). Horizontal gene transfer and mobile genetic elements in marine systems.Methods Mol. Biol.532435–453. 10.1007/978-1-60327-853-9_25

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 77

  StewartP. S. (2002). Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance in bacterial biofilms.Int. J. Med. Microbiol.292107–113. 10.1078/1438-4221-00196

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 78

  StewartP. S.CostertonJ. W. (2001). Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms.Lancet358135–138. 10.1016/S0140-6736(01)05321-1

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 79

  SunS.ChenJ.LiW.AltintasI.LinA.PeltierS.et al (2011). Community cyberinfrastructure for advanced microbial ecology research and analysis: the CAMERA resource.Nucleic Acids Res.39D546–D551. 10.1093/nar/gkq1102

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 80

  TeschlerJ. K.Zamorano-SánchezD.UtadaA. S.WarnerC. J. A.WongG. C. L.LiningtonR. G.et al (2015). Living in the matrix: assembly and control of Vibrio cholerae biofilms.Nat. Rev. Microbiol.13255–268. 10.1038/nrmicro3433

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 81

  Vaz-MoreiraI.NunesO. C.ManaiaC. M. (2014). Bacterial diversity and antibiotic resistance in water habitats: searching the links with the human microbiome.FEMS Microbiol. Rev.38761–778. 10.1111/1574-6976.12062

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 82

  WaksmanS. A. (1961). The role of antibiotics in nature.Perspect. Biol. Med.4271–287.

  • Google Scholar

• 83

  WimpennyJ.ManzW.SzewzykU. (2000). Heterogeneity in biofilms.FEMS Microbiol. Rev.24661–671. 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2000.tb00565.x

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 84

  WinkworthC. L. (2013). Antibiotic resistance genes in freshwater biofilms along a whole river.J. Water Health11186–197. 10.2166/wh.2013.223

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar

• 85

  ZhangW.SturmB. S. M.KnappC. W.GrahamD. W. (2009). Accumulation of tetracycline resistance genes in aquatic biofilms due to periodic waste loadings from swine lagoons.Environ. Sci. Technol.437643–7650. 10.1021/es9014508

  • CrossRef
  • Google Scholar