Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Microbiol., 12 November 2015
Sec. Food Microbiology

High Prevalence of Hyper-Aerotolerant Campylobacter jejuni in Retail Poultry with Potential Implication in Human Infection

  • 1School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
  • 2Department of Agricultural, Food and Nutritional Science, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada

Campylobacter jejuni is a leading cause of foodborne illnesses around the world. Since C. jejuni is microaerophilic and sensitive to oxygen, aerotolerance is important in the transmission of C. jejuni to humans via foods under aerobic conditions. In this study, 70 C. jejuni strains were isolated from retail raw chicken meats and were subject to multilocus sequence typing (MLST) analysis. In the aerotolerance testing by aerobic shaking at 200 rpm, 50 (71.4%) isolates survived after 12 h (i.e., aerotolerant), whereas 20 (28.6%) isolates did not (i.e., aerosensitive). Interestingly, further aerobic cultivation showed that 25 (35.7%) isolates still survived even after 24 h of vigorous aerobic shaking (i.e., hyper-aerotolerant). Compared to aerosensitive strains, the hyper-aerotolerant strains exhibited increased resistance to oxidative stress, both peroxide and superoxide. A mutation of ahpC in hyper-aerotolerant strains significantly impaired aerotolerance, indicating oxidative stress defense plays an important role in hyper-aerotolerance. The aerotolerant and hyper-aerotolerant strains were primarily classified into MLST clonal complexes (CCs)-21 and -45, which are known to be the major CCs implicated in human gastroenteritis. Compared to the aerosensitive strains, CC-21 was more dominant than CC-45 in aerotolerant and hyper-aerotolerant strains. The findings in this study revealed that hyper-aerotolerant C. jejuni is highly prevalent in raw chicken meats. The enhanced aerotolerance in C. jejuni would impact human infection by increasing possibilities of the foodborne transmission of C. jejuni under aerobic conditions.

Introduction

Campylobacter jejuni is one of the leading bacterial causes of gastroenteritis (Altekruse et al., 1999), annually causing approximately 400–500 million infection cases worldwide (Ruiz-Palacios, 2007). C. jejuni is a commensal bacterium in a wide range of animals and is zoonotically transmitted to humans mainly by the consumption of contaminated animal products (Nielsen et al., 2006; Wilson et al., 2008). Particularly, high colonization levels of C. jejuni in the poultry intestines often result in the contamination of poultry products during processing, and contaminated poultry is the major source of transferring C. jejuni to humans (Silva et al., 2011). In Canada, 62% of retail raw chicken legs are contaminated with Campylobacter (Bohaychuk et al., 2006). In UK and US, similarly, Campylobacter is found in 76 and 57.3% of retail oultry products, respectively (Cui et al., 2005; Little et al., 2008). The transmission of Campylobacter is also caused by contamination through food handlers and cross-contamination involving contaminated kitchen equipment (Medeiros et al., 2008; Kennedy et al., 2011). Campylobacter is also isolated from various environmental sources, such as wildlife, sewage, and manure, which may work as vehicles to disseminate Campylobacter in food production systems and to humans (Whiley et al., 2013). In both foodborne and environmental routes of C. jejuni transmission to humans, C. jejuni should overcome harsh environmental conditions, particularly high oxygen tensions in atmosphere, which may directly impact the viability of C. jejuni.

As a thermotolerant and microaerophilic bacterium, C. jejuni grows optimally at 42°C under low oxygen environments (Young et al., 2007). Although C. jejuni is sensitive to high oxygen tensions in atmosphere, it exhibits a certain level of aerotolerance to survive under oxygen-rich conditions (Kaakoush et al., 2007; Luber and Bartelt, 2007). Aerotolerance is closely related to oxidative stress defense, since aerobic exposure results in the accumulation of toxic reactive oxygen species (ROS) that may give damage to proteins and lipids in C. jejuni (Oh et al., 2015). A few genes of oxidative stress defense have been shown to affect aerotolerance in C. jejuni. For instance, a mutation of fdxA encoding the ferredoxin FdxA significantly reduces aerotolerance in C. jejuni (van Vliet et al., 2001). A double mutation of bacterioferritin comigratory protein (i.e., Bcp) and thiol peroxidase (i.e., Tpx) impairs the aerotolerance of C. jejuni (Atack et al., 2008). Recently, we reported that alkyl hydroperoxide reductase (AhpC) plays a more important role in the aerotolerance of C. jejuni than other key ROS-detoxification enzymes, such as catalase (KatA) and superoxide dismutase (SodB; Oh et al., 2015).

Presumably due to our traditional notion that C. jejuni is sensitive to oxygen, aerotolerance has not been investigated extensively in C. jejuni isolates from poultry. To examine the level of aerotolerance in C. jejuni, in the present study, we isolated 70 C. jejuni strains from retail chicken meats in Edmonton, Alberta, and analyzed their aerotolerance, revealing that aerotolerant and hyper-aerotolerant C. jejuni strains are highly prevalent in chicken. Moreover, most hyper-aerotolerant C. jejuni isolates belong to the clonal complexes (CCs) of multilocus sequence typing (MLST) that are frequently implicated in human infection and outbreaks.

Materials and Methods

Isolation of C. jejuni from Retail Chicken Meats

Chicken meats of different brands and products were purchased from seven different retail stores in Edmonton, Canada. C. jejuni was isolated as described by Chon et al. (2012) with some modifications. Briefly, the chicken meats were submerged in buffered peptone water (Oxoid, UK) at 37°C overnight and then inoculated in Bolton Campylobacter selective broth (Oxoid) at 42°C for 24 h under microaerobic conditions (5% O2, 10% CO2, 85% N2). Aliquots (100 μl) were serially diluted and spread on Mueller-Hinton (MH) agar plates supplemented with Preston Campylobacter selective supplements (Oxoid). Cultures were incubated at 42°C for 48 h under microaerobic conditions. C. jejuni colonies were confirmed by multiplex PCR as described previously (Wang et al., 2002). The primer sequences were described in Table 1. All C. jejuni strains were grown on MH media at 42°C under microaerobic conditions. Occasionally, culture media were supplemented with kanamycin (50 μg/ml).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 1. Primers used in this study.

MLST Analysis

MLST analysis of C. jejuni isolates was performed based on the method outlined in pubMLST (pubmlst.org) and a previous report (Dingle et al., 2001) by using seven housekeeping genes, including aspA, glnA, gltA, glyA, pgm, tkt, and uncA (Table 1). Overnight culture of C. jejuni on MH agar plates was harvested in 1 ml of PBS, and then 10 μl of C. jejuni suspension was mixed with 90 μl of PBS and boiled for 10 min. After centrifugation, pellets were removed, and supernatant was used as template. PCR was carried out with ExTaq polymerase (Takara, Japan). PCR amplicons were commercially sequenced by Macrogen (Seoul, Korea), and the sequences were analyzed in the Campylobacter PubMLST database (http://pubmlst.org/campylobacter/).

Aerotolerance Test

Aerotolerance test was carried out according to our previous report (Oh et al., 2015). Briefly, C. jejuni strains were grown on MH agar at 42°C for 18 h under microaerobic conditions. C. jejuni strains were resuspended in fresh MH broth and diluted to an OD600 of 0.07, and then bacterial suspensions were incubated at 42°C with shaking at 200 rpm under aerobic conditions. Samples were taken after 0, 12, and 24 h for serial dilution and CFU counting.

Susceptibility to Oxidative Stress

Campylobacter jejuni strains were inoculated in MH broth at 42°C for 8 h with agitation under microaerobic conditions, and then bacterial cultures were exposed for 1 h to oxidants, including 100 μM of cumene hydroperoxide (CHP), 1 mM of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) and 100 μM menadione (MND; a superoxide generator). The viability was determined by serial dilution and CFU counting.

Construction of ahpC Mutants

A suicide plasmid for an ahpC mutation in C. jejuni was described in our previous study (Oh and Jeon, 2014). The ahpC suicide vector was introduced to C. jejuni strains by electroporation, and ahpC mutants were selected by growing on MH agar supplemented with kanamycin (50 μg/ml). The ahpC mutation was also confirmed by PCR with mahpC-F and mahpC-R primers (Table 1).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, inc., USA). Statistical significance of differences between the groups was compared by using two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). The frequency distribution was determined as described elsewhere (Callicott et al., 2008) by performing the Mann–Whitney test followed by one-way ANOVA. n.s.: P > 0.5, P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001.

Results

MLST Analysis of C. jejuni Isolates from Retail Chicken Meats

We isolated 70 C. jejuni strains from 19 raw chicken meats from seven different retail stores in Edmonton, Alberta. The majority (77.1%) of C. jejuni strains was isolated from whole chicken samples, and 18.6% from drumsticks, and 4.3% from thighs (Table 2). The MLST results showed that the 70 strains were distributed in six different CCs. The major CCs were 21 and 45 that constituted 42.86 and 21.43% of C. jejuni isolates from chickens, respectively (Table 2 and Supplementary Figure S1).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 2. Clonal complexes of C. jejuni isolates from raw chicken meats.

Differential Aerotolerance Levels in C. jejuni Chicken Isolates

The aerotolerance of the 70 C. jejuni isolates from chickens was investigated by growing them aerobically with vigorous shaking at 200 rpm. Depending on the levels of aerotolerance, the 70 isolates were clustered into three groups: (i) the aerosensitive group that lost viability before 12 h (Figure 1A), (ii) the aerotolerant group in which C. jejuni strains maintained viability for 12∼24 h (Figure 1B), and (iii) the hyper-aerotolerant group where C. jejuni strains remained viable even after 24 h of aerobic shaking (Figure 1C). Whereas a total of 20 strains were aerosensitive, most isolates were aerotolerant or hyper-aerotolerant (Figure 1). Interestingly, 25 C. jejuni strains were hyper-aerotolerant and maintained viability even after 24 h of vigorous shaking (at 200 rpm) under aerobic conditions (Figure 2C). The major CCs were CC-45 (35%) and CC-21 (30%) in the aerosensitive group (Figure 2A). However, CC-21 was predominant in both aerotolerant and hyper-aerotolerant groups; 48% in each (Figures 2B,C). No C. jejuni isolates in CC-353 and CC-362 were aerosensitive, but they constituted about 16% of hyper-aerotolerant C. jejuni isolates (Figures 2A,C). These data show high prevalence of hyper-aerotolerant C. jejuni in retail chicken meats, which clusters mainly in a few major CCs.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 1. The aerotolerance levels of Campylobacter jejuni isolates from raw chicken meats. (A) Aerosensitive strains lost the viability prior to 12 h of aerobic shaking. (B) Aerotolerant strains maintained viability 12∼24 h of aerobic shaking. (C) Hyper-aerotolerant strains remained viable after 24 h of aerobic ∼shaking at 200 rpm. The results show the means and standard deviations of three different experiments. The aerotolerance tests were repeated at least three times, and similar results were observed in all the experiments.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 2. Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) clonal complexes of C. jejuni isolates in three different aerotolerance groups; (A) aerosensitive, (B) aerotolerant, (C) hyper-aerotolerant groups.

Oxidative Stress Resistance in C. jejuni Isolates

Since oxidative stress defense plays an important role in the aerotolerance of C. jejuni (Oh et al., 2015), oxidative stress resistance was compared between the different aerotolerance groups. Two strains from each aerotolerance group were randomly chosen and exposed to different kinds of oxidants for 1 h for viability testing. The strains from the aerosensitive group easily lost viability by exposure to H2O2, CHP, and menadione (Figure 3). However, two strains from the hyper-aerotolerance group demonstrated significantly enhanced resistance to oxidative stress, both peroxide and superoxide (Figure 3). The strains from the aerotolerant group were more resistant to oxidants than the strains from the aerosensitive group but more susceptible than those from the hyper-aerotolerant group (Figure 3). The results clearly indicate that hyper-aerotolerant strains are more resistant to oxidative stress than aerosensitive strains.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 3. Oxidative stress resistance of C. jejuni isolates from different aerotolerance groups. The results show the CFU levels after 1 h exposure to oxidants, including 1 mM hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), 100 μM cumene hydroperoxide (CHP), and 100 μM menadione (MND). Statistical significance was analyzed with two-way ANOVA using GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, inc.). P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001.

Role of ahpC in the Aerotolerance of Hyper-aerotolerant C. jejuni Isolates

Our previous study showed that ahpC plays a key role in C. jejuni survival under aerobic conditions, compared to other ROS-detoxification genes, such as katA and sodB (Oh et al., 2015); thus, we decided to investigate how ahpC contributes to hyper-aerotolerance in C. jejuni. We constructed ahpC knockout mutants of the six C. jejuni strains from the three different aerotolerance groups. The ahpC mutation in the strains from the aerosensitive group resulted in approximately 3 log CFU reduction compared to wild type after 6 h of aerobic culture (Figure 4). Interestingly, ahpC mutants of the hyper-aerotolerant strains did not survive after 24 h, indicating the ahpC mutation reduced the aerotolerance level from hyper-aerotolerance to aerotolerance. These findings clearly showed that oxidative stress defense, particularly ahpC, is critical for the hyper-aerotolerance in C. jejuni.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 4. Growth defects in the ahpC mutants under aerobic conditions. The results show the CFU levels of triplicate samples after 6, 12, and 24 h culture under aerobic conditions with shaking at 200 rpm. The strains were selected from the three different aerotolerance groups. The experiment was repeated at least three times, and similar ∼results were ∼observed in all experiments. Statistical significance was determined with two-way ANOVA using GraphPad Prism 6 (GraphPad Software, inc.). n.s.: P > 0.5, P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, ∗∗∗P < 0.001, ∗∗∗∗P < 0.0001.

Discussion

The poultry intestines provide optimal growth conditions for C. jejuni, such as high body temperature (42°C), high nutrients, and low oxygen levels. However, C. jejuni is exposed to oxygen-rich conditions during food processing and preservation. Thus, oxidative stress is an unavoidable stress that C. jejuni should overcome to survive during its foodborne transmission to humans (Kim et al., 2015). Despite our common perception that C. jejuni is sensitive to oxygen, in this study, we revealed that hyper-aerotolerant C. jejuni is highly prevalent in raw chicken meats. Arcobacter sp. are similar to Campylobacter and previously described as an aerotolerant Camplyobacter-like organism. Arcobacter is associated with animals and humans, and is frequently isolated in poultry (Vandamme et al., 1992; Snelling et al., 2006). Therefore, specific identification methods are needed to differentiate between Campylobacter and Arcobacter (Call et al., 2003), and multiplex PCR is often used for this purpose (Mandrell and Wachtelt, 1999). The hipO gene encoding hipuricase is present only in C. jejuni but not in any other Campylobacter sp. and Arcobacter sp. (Wang et al., 2002; Jensen et al., 2005). Whereas C. jejuni preferably grows at 42°C, Arcobacter grows optimally 24∼30°C (Phillips, 2001). In this study, C. jejuni was isolated at 42°C, at which Arcobacter cannot grow (Bhunia, 2008). In addition, the isolates were confirmed by PCR with primers for the hipO gene and classified by the MLST scheme for C. jejuni.

Most C. jejuni isolates from raw chicken meats belonged to CC-21 (42%) and CC-45 (21%; Table 2 and Supplementary Figure S1). This is consistent with previous reports from Canada and other countries. The ST-21 and ST-45 complexes are most dominant in a variety of sources around the world, accounting for 39 and 14% C. jejuni isolates deposited in pubMLST, where 76% of isolates in the CC ST-21 and 60% in the CC ST-45 are of human origin, such as stool and blood (Colles and Maiden, 2012). In the UK, CCs ST-21 and ST-45 are commonly detected in veterinary (i.e., cow, pet, sheep, and poultry) and human sources (Manning et al., 2003). CCs 21, 45, 353, and 354 are also highly prevalent in sources from humans and foods in Eastern China (Zhang et al., 2015). According to the results of an MLST analysis of 122 C. jejuni isolates from Danish patients with symptoms of gaostroenteritis, reactive arithritis, and Guillain–Barré syndrome, CCs ST-21, -45, and -22 are highly prevalent, accounting for 64% of all C. jejuni isolates from humans. Whereas ST-22 is significantly linked to Guillain–Barré syndrome, ST-21 and -45 are primarily associated with gastroenteritis (Nielsen et al., 2010). An extensive MLST analysis of 289 C. jejuni isolates in Canada showed that CCs 21, 45, and 353 constitute the major C. jejuni population (CC-21: 26%, CC-45: 18%, and CC-353: 11%) in a variety of sources, including humans, chickens, raw milk, and environmental water. Interestingly, more than 50% of isolates that were classified in CC-21 were from humans (Lévesque et al., 2008), indicating high frequencies of human infection by C. jejuni strains in CC-21. In the US, an MLST analysis of 47 C. jejuni isolates from 12 outbreaks exhibited that CC ST-21 is commonly involved in human epidemics (Sails et al., 2003). Whereas CC-21 and CC-45 were distributed at similar levels in the aerosensitive C. jejuni isolates (CC-21: 30%, CC-45: 35%; Figure 2A), CC-21 is predominant in both aerotolerant (48%) and hyper-aerotolerant (48%) isolates (Figures 2B,C), and the frequencies of CC-21 distribution in aerotolerant and hyper-aerotolerant groups were statistically significant (Supplementary Figure S2).

Hyper-aerotolerant C. jejuni strains were more resistant to peroxide (i.e., H2O2 and CHP) and superoxide (i.e., menadione) stresses than aerosensitive strains (Figure 3), suggesting that increased resistance to oxidative stress would contribute to hyper-aerotolerance in C. jejuni. Our previous study showed that ahpC is the most important ROS-detoxification gene in the aerotolerance of C. jejuni (Oh et al., 2015). In this study, we demonstrated that ahpC is also a key player in C. jejuni’s hyper-aerotolerance (Figure 4). Enhanced resistance to oxidative stress may result in hyper-aerotolerance; this enables hyper-aerotolerant C. jejuni to survive easily under aerobic conditions during food processing, increasing risks of foodborne transmission to humans. Interestingly, it has been reported that C. jejuni strains in CC-21 from poultry and human clinical samples frequently exhibit hyper-invasiveness than strains in other CCs (Fearnley et al., 2008). C. jejuni strains in CC-21 usually (85.7%) have the sialylated lipooligosaccharide (LOS) class C and are highly invasive than isolates from other CCs (Habib et al., 2009). Taken our findings and these previous reports together, C. jejuni strains in CC-21 are often hyper-aerotolerant and likely to be invasive. Presumably, this would be why CC-21 is frequently involved in human infection and outbreaks (Sails et al., 2003; Nielsen et al., 2010).

To be the best of our knowledge, this is the first report about the prevalence of hyper-aerotolerant C. jejuni in chicken meats. Importantly, hyper-aerotolerant C. jejuni isolates are distributed mostly in the CCs that are often implicated in human infection, suggesting potential impact of hyper-aerotolerance on food safety and public health. Although we showed oxidative stress defense contributes to hyper-aerotolerance in C. jejuni in this study, there seems to be other unknown factors associated with hyper-aerotolerance since ahpC reduced aerotolerance, but not completely eliminated it (Figure 4). Based on the differential clustering of the LOS class in CC-21 (Habib et al., 2009), possibly some other genetic variations might also be involved in hyper-aerotolerance. Therefore, an extensive future study, such as whole genome sequencing, will be needed to further characterize hyper-aerotolerant C. jejuni and to reveal its implication in human infection.

Author Contributions

Design of the project: EO, LM, and BJ; Performance of the experiments: EO; Data analysis: EO, LM, and BJ; Writing of the manuscript: EO, LM, and BJ.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgment

This study was supported by the Alberta Livestock and Meat Agency (ALMA) and the Canada Foundation for Innovation (CFI).

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2015.01263

References

Altekruse, S. F., Stern, N. J., Fields, P. I., and Swerdlow, D. L. (1999). Campylobacter jejuni–an emerging foodborne pathogen. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 5, 28–35. doi: 10.3201/eid0501.990104

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Atack, J. M., Harvey, P., Jones, M. A., and Kelly, D. J. (2008). The Campylobacter jejuni thiol peroxidases Tpx and Bcp both contribute to aerotolerance and peroxide-mediated stress resistance but have distinct substrate specificities. J. Bacteriol. 190, 5279–5290. doi: 10.1128/JB.00100-08

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bhunia, A. K. (2008). “Campylobacter and arcobacter,” in Foodborne Microbial Pathogens: Mechanisms and Pathogenesis, ed. A. K. Bhunia (New York, NY: Springer), 217–226.

Google Scholar

Bohaychuk, V., Gensler, G., King, R., Manninen, K., Sorensen, O., Wu, J., et al. (2006). Occurrence of pathogens in raw and ready-to-eat meat and poultry products collected from the retail marketplace in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. J. Food Prot. 69, 2176–2182.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Call, D. R., Borucki, M. K., and Loge, F. J. (2003). Detection of bacterial pathogens in environmental samples using DNA microarrays. J. Microbiol. Methods 53, 235–243. doi: 10.1016/S0167-7012(03)00027-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Callicott, K. A., Harðardóttir, H., Georgsson, F., Reiersen, J., Friðriksdóttir, V., Gunnarsson, E., et al. (2008). Broiler Campylobacter contamination and human campylobacteriosis in Iceland. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 74, 6483–6494. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01129-08

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chon, J.-W., Hyeon, J.-Y., Park, J.-H., Song, K.-Y., and Seo, K.-H. (2012). Comparison of 2 types of broths and 3 selective agars for the detection of Campylobacter species in whole-chicken carcass-rinse samples. Poult. Sci. 91, 2382–2385. doi: 10.3382/ps.2011-01980

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Colles, F., and Maiden, M. (2012). Campylobacter sequence typing databases: applications and future prospects. Microbiology 158, 2695–2709. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.062000-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cui, S., Ge, B., Zheng, J., and Meng, J. (2005). Prevalence and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter spp. and Salmonella serovars in organic chickens from Maryland retail stores. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71, 4108–4111. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.7.4108-4111.2005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Dingle, K., Colles, F., Wareing, D., Ure, R., Fox, A., Bolton, F., et al. (2001). Multilocus sequence typing system for Campylobacter jejuni. J. Clin. Microbiol. 39, 14–23. doi: 10.1128/JCM.39.1.14-23.2001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fearnley, C., Manning, G., Bagnall, M., Javed, M. A., Wassenaar, T. M., and Newell, D. G. (2008). Identification of hyperinvasive Campylobacter jejuni strains isolated from poultry and human clinical sources. J. Med. Microbiol. 57, 570–580. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.47803-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Habib, I., Louwen, R., Uyttendaele, M., Houf, K., Vandenberg, O., Nieuwenhuis, E. E., et al. (2009). Correlation between genotypic diversity, lipooligosaccharide gene locus class variation, and Caco-2 cell invasion potential of Campylobacter jejuni isolates from chicken meat and humans: contribution to virulotyping. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 4277–4288. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02269-08

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jensen, A. N., Andersen, M., Dalsgaard, A., Baggesen, D. L., and Nielsen, E. (2005). Development of real-time PCR and hybridization methods for detection and identification of thermophilic Campylobacter spp. in pig faecal samples. J. Appl. Microbiol. 99, 292–300. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2005.02616.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kaakoush, N. O., Miller, W. G., De Reuse, H., and Mendz, G. L. (2007). Oxygen requirement and tolerance of Campylobacter jejuni. Res. Microbiol. 158, 644–650. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2007.07.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kennedy, J., Nolan, A., Gibney, S., O’brien, S., Mcmahon, M., Mckenzie, K., et al. (2011). Deteminants of cross-contamination during home food preparation. Br. Food J. 113, 280–297. doi: 10.1108/00070701111105349

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kim, J.-C., Oh, E., Kim, J., and Jeon, B. (2015). Regulation of oxidative stress resistance in Campylobacter jejuni, a microaerophilic foodborne pathogen. Front. Microbiol. 6:751. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00751

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lévesque, S., Frost, E., Arbeit, R. D., and Michaud, S. (2008). Multilocus sequence typing of Campylobacter jejuni isolates from humans, chickens, raw milk, and environmental water in Quebec. Can. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46, 3404–3411. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00042-08

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Little, C. L., Richardson, J. F., Owen, R. J., De Pinna, E., and Threlfall, E. J. (2008). Prevalence, characterisation and antimicrobial resistance of Campylobacter and Salmonella in raw poultrymeat in the UK, 2003–2005. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 18, 403–414. doi: 10.1080/09603120802100220

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Luber, P., and Bartelt, E. (2007). Enumeration of Campylobacter spp. on the surface and within chicken breast fillets. J. Appl. Microbiol. 102, 313–318.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Mandrell, R. E., and Wachtelt, M. R. (1999). Novel detection techniques for human pathogens that contaminate poultry. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 10, 273–278. doi: 10.1016/S0958-1669(99)80048-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Manning, G., Dowson, C. G., Bagnall, M. C., Ahmed, I. H., West, M., and Newell, D. G. (2003). Multilocus sequence typing for comparison of veterinary and human isolates of Campylobacter jejuni. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 69, 6370–6379. doi: 10.1128/AEM.69.11.6370-6379.2003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Medeiros, D. T., Sattar, S. A., Farber, J. M., and Carrillo, C. D. (2008). Occurrence of Campylobacter spp. in raw and ready-to-eat foods and in a Canadian food service operation. J. Food Prot. 71, 2087–2093.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Nielsen, E. M., Fussing, V., Engberg, J., Nielsen, N., and Neimann, J. (2006). Most Campylobacter subtypes from sporadic infections can be found in retail poultry products and food animals. Epidemiol. Infect. 134, 758–767. doi: 10.1017/S0950268805005509

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nielsen, L. N., Sheppard, S., Mccarthy, N., Maiden, M., Ingmer, H., and Krogfelt, K. (2010). MLST clustering of Campylobacter jejuni isolates from patients with gastroenteritis, reactive arthritis and Guillain–Barré syndrome. J. Appl. Microbiol. 108, 591–599. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2672.2009.04444.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oh, E., and Jeon, B. (2014). Role of alkyl hydroperoxide reductase (AhpC) in the biofilm formation of Campylobacter jejuni. PLoS ONE 9:e87312. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087312

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oh, E., Mcmullen, L., and Jeon, B. (2015). Impact of oxidative stress defense on bacterial survival and morphological change in Campylobacter jejuni under aerobic conditions. Front. Microbiol. 6:295. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00295

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Phillips, C. (2001). Arcobacter spp in food: isolation, identification and control. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 12, 263–275. doi: 10.1016/S0924-2244(01)00090-5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ruiz-Palacios, G. M. (2007). The health burden of Campylobacter infection and the impact of antimicrobial resistance: playing chicken. Clin. Infect. Dis. 44, 701–703. doi: 10.1086/509936

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sails, A. D., Swaminathan, B., and Fields, P. I. (2003). Utility of multilocus sequence typing as an epidemiological tool for investigation of outbreaks of gastroenteritis caused by Campylobacter jejuni. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41, 4733–4739. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.10.4733-4739.2003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Silva, J., Leite, D., Fernandes, M., Mena, C., Gibbs, P. A., and Teixeira, P. (2011). Campylobacter spp. as a foodborne pathogen: a review. Front. Microbiol. 2:200. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00200

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Snelling, W., Matsuda, M., Moore, J., and Dooley, J. (2006). Under the microscope: Arcobacter. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 42, 7–14. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2005.01841.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vandamme, P., Vancanneyt, M., Pot, B., Mels, L., Hoste, B., Dewettinck, D., et al. (1992). Polyphasic taxonomic study of the emended genus Arcobacter with Arcobacter butzleri comb. nov. and Arcobacter skirrowii sp. nov., an aerotolerant bacterium isolated from veterinary specimens. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 42, 344–356. doi: 10.1099/00207713-42-3-344

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

van Vliet, A. H., Baillon, M.-L. A., Penn, C. W., and Ketley, J. M. (2001). The iron-induced ferredoxin FdxA of Campylobacter jejuni is involved in aerotolerance. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 196, 189–193. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2001.tb10563.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, G., Clark, C. G., Taylor, T. M., Pucknell, C., Barton, C., Price, L., et al. (2002). Colony multiplex PCR assay for identification and differentiation of Campylobacter jejuni, C. coli, C. lari, C. upsaliensis, and C. fetus subsp. fetus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 40, 4744–4747. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.12.4744-4747.2002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Whiley, H., Van Den Akker, B., Giglio, S., and Bentham, R. (2013). The role of environmental reservoirs in human campylobacteriosis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 10, 5886–5907. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10115886

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wilson, D. J., Gabriel, E., Leatherbarrow, A. J., Cheesbrough, J., Gee, S., Bolton, E., et al. (2008). Tracing the source of campylobacteriosis. PLoS Genet. 4:e1000203. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000203

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Young, K. T., Davis, L. M., and Dirita, V. J. (2007). Campylobacter jejuni: molecular biology and pathogenesis. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 5, 665–679. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1718

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, G., Zhang, X., Hu, Y., Jiao, X.-A., and Huang, J. (2015). Multilocus Sequence types of Campylobacter jejuni isolates from different sources in Eastern China. Curr. Microbiol. 71, 341–346. doi: 10.1007/s00284-015-0853-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Campylobacter jejuni, aerotolerance, chicken isolates, MLST-genotyping, oxidative stress

Citation: Oh E, McMullen L and Jeon B (2015) High Prevalence of Hyper-Aerotolerant Campylobacter jejuni in Retail Poultry with Potential Implication in Human Infection. Front. Microbiol. 6:1263. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01263

Received: 03 September 2015; Accepted: 30 October 2015;
Published: 12 November 2015.

Edited by:

Javier Carballo, University of Vigo, Spain

Reviewed by:

Kiiyukia Matthews Ciira, Mount Kenya University, Kenya
Antonio Valero, University of Cordoba, Spain

Copyright © 2015 Oh, McMullen and Jeon. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Byeonghwa Jeon, bjeon@ualberta.ca

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.