ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Adaptive Significance of Quorum Sensing-Dependent Regulation of Rhamnolipids by Integration of Growth Rate in Burkholderia glumae: A Trade-Off between Survival and Efficiency
- Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique – Institut Armand-Frappier, Laval, QC, Canada
Quorum sensing (QS) is a cell density-dependent mechanism which enables a population of bacteria to coordinate cooperative behaviors in response to the accumulation of self-produced autoinducer signals in their local environment. An emerging framework is that the adaptive significance of QS in the regulation of production of costly extracellular metabolites (“public goods”) is to maintain the homeostasis of cooperation. We investigated this model using the phytopathogenic bacterium Burkholderia glumae, which we have previously demonstrated uses QS to regulate the production of rhamnolipids, extracellular surface-active glycolipids promoting the social behavior called “swarming motility.” Using mass spectrometric quantification and chromosomal lux-based gene expression, we made the unexpected finding that when unrestricted nutrient resources are provided, production of rhamnolipids is carried out completely independently of QS regulation. This is a unique observation among known QS-controlled factors in bacteria. On the other hand, under nutrient-limited conditions, QS then becomes the main regulating mechanism, significantly enhancing the specific rhamnolipids yield. Accordingly, decreasing nutrient concentrations amplifies rhamnolipid biosynthesis gene expression, revealing a system where QS-dependent regulation is specifically triggered by the growth rate of the population, rather than by its cell density. Furthermore, a gradual increase in QS signal specific concentration upon decrease of specific growth rate suggests a reduction in quorum threshold, which reflects an increase in cellular demand for production of QS-dependent target gene product at low density populations. Integration of growth rate with QS as a decision-making mechanism for biosynthesis of costly metabolites, such as rhamnolipids, could serve to assess the demand and timing for expanding the carrying capacity of a population through spatial expansion mechanisms, such as swarming motility, thus promoting the chances of survival, even if the cell density might not be high enough for an otherwise efficient production of rhamnolipids. In conclusion, we propose that the adaptive significance of growth rate-dependent functionality of QS in biosynthesis of costly public goods lies within providing a regulatory mechanism for selecting the optimal trade-off between survival and efficiency.
Quorum sensing (QS) is a cell density-dependent mechanism which enables a population of bacteria to synchronize the expression of behaviors in response to the accumulation of self-produced autoinducer signals in their local environment (Fuqua et al., 1994). Such auto-induction regulatory systems are implicated in regulation of various cooperative phenotypes ranging from bioluminescence, virulence and nutrient acquisition to multicellular swarming motility and biofilm development (Bainton et al., 1992; Passador et al., 1993; Stevens and Greenberg, 1997; Davies et al., 1998; Daniels et al., 2004; An et al., 2014). These behaviors are considered cooperative because they mostly involve the production of costly extracellular metabolites (“public goods”) which, once produced, are available to all members of the community to share their benefits (Platt and Bever, 2009). Examples among bacteria are widespread and include production of siderophores, exoenzymes, or surfactants (West et al., 2006). While cooperative production of public goods enhances the fitness of the whole population, at the individual level it is prone to exploitation by non-cooperative individual cells (“cheaters”) that, by not producing the metabolite or QS signal, gain a competitive edge over cooperative cells and hence threaten the homeostasis of the cooperation (Diggle et al., 2007; Sandoz et al., 2007); this brings up questions about the evolutionary stability of cooperation.
In recent years, the adaptive functionality of QS in regulation of public goods has constituted the main subject of several studies, and has been reviewed extensively (Schuster et al., 2013; Hense and Schuster, 2015). The central question relates to the benefits provided by QS in the production of public goods, and thus its role in the evolution and stability of cooperative behaviors (Schuster et al., 2013). In this regard, few studies addressing the social function of QS in regulation of public goods have demonstrated that QS can offer density-dependent fitness benefits (Darch et al., 2012; Goo et al., 2012; Pai et al., 2012). QS is used to coordinate the triggering of social behaviors at high cell densities when the benefits of the extracellular secretions are relatively higher and will provide the greatest advantage to the community (Darch et al., 2012). Moreover, the social function of QS in regulation of public goods is not only limited to providing fitness benefits at higher cell densities, as it can also serve as a means to anticipate stationary phase or foresee the optimum cell density of a population (Goo et al., 2012). Furthermore, QS can impose metabolic constraints on social cheating and protect the population from a ‘tragedy of the commons’ by simultaneously controlling the expression of private goods (Dandekar et al., 2012). Another possible solution to stabilizing cooperation is ‘policing,’ where cooperators actively penalize social cheats to hinder their success (Wang et al., 2015).
While these studies offer insights on the role of QS in the evolution and stability of cooperative behaviors, the adaptive significance of QS has remained debatable. In fact, it was suggested that it is only through studying each specific auto-induction system in its evolutionary and ecological context that we can figure out its adaptive significance (Platt and Fuqua, 2010). The general framework is that, while conditions specific to each ecological context, such as population cell density and spatial diffusion properties, determine whether triggering of the costly QS-regulated cooperative behaviors is beneficial to the population, the integration of QS circuitry with other global regulatory pathways such as stress responses, specific environmental and physiological cues ensures an optimized demand-driven supply of target cooperative behaviors (Hense and Schuster, 2015). Indeed, integration of metabolic information into decision-making processes governing production of public goods, called ‘metabolic prudence,’ can stabilize cooperative behaviors and reduce the cost of cooperation for the individual cell (Xavier et al., 2011; Boyle et al., 2015). Thus, the emerging model is that, in order for QS to properly regulate costly bacterial cooperative behaviors (when benefits outweigh costs of production), it must be integrated with additional physiological cues (Hense and Schuster, 2015).
Here, we demonstrate that QS-dependent regulation of a public good in the Gram-negative bacterium Burkholderia glumae, a pathogen of rice, is dependent on growth rate, a direct measure of the carrying capacity of a population through prevailing environmental conditions. B. glumae uses the LuxI/LuxR-type QS system TofR/TofI to regulate protein secretion, oxalate production and expression of various virulence determinants such as toxoflavin, lipase, KatG and flagella (Kim et al., 2007; Chun et al., 2009; Goo et al., 2010, 2012). The TofR QS transcriptional regulator is activated by its cognate N-octanoyl homoserine lactone (C8-HSL) autoinducer, the product of the TofI N-acyl-HSL synthase, to control the expression of target genes (Kim et al., 2004). Similarly, to what is seen in Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Ochsner and Reiser, 1995; Köhler et al., 2000), we have previously demonstrated that in B. glumae as well, QS positively regulates the expression of the rhlA gene, encoding the enzyme catalyzing the first step in biosynthesis of rhamnolipids. These extracellular surface-active glycolipids promote the social surface behavior called swarming motility (Nickzad et al., 2015). Now, we show that, in contrast to P. aeruginosa, this QS regulation is dispensable in B. glumae, as rhamnolipid production is unaffected in a QS-negative mutant under unrestricted, rich nutritional conditions. This unexpected observation led us to investigate the interplay between QS and nutrition-based regulation of rhamnolipids in B. glumae. We found that growth rate, and not cell density itself, is the key factor triggering the QS-dependent regulation of rhamnolipid biosynthesis. Since rhamnolipids act as public goods promoting social swarming motility, integration of growth rate with QS-dependent regulation of rhamnolipids in B. glumae supports the concept that the adaptive significance of QS lies in providing a regulatory mechanism for trade-off between survival and efficiency.
Materials and Methods
Bacterial Strains, Plasmids, Media, and Growth Conditions
All B. glumae strains used are derivatives of the wild-type strain BGR1; the bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table 1. Unless otherwise specified, the strains were routinely regrown from frozen stocks by culturing at 37°C in tryptic soy broth (TSB; BD) and 240 rpm in a TC-7 roller drum (New Brunswick, Canada), or on TSB agar plates. Antibiotics were used at the following concentrations: tetracycline (Tc), 10 μg/ml, gentamycin (Gm), 20 μg/ml, and triclosan 25 μg/ml.
For rhamnolipid production, complex nutrient broth (NB) medium (BD Difco, Mississauga, ON, Canada) supplemented with 4% (w/v) glycerol or mineral salt medium supplemented with 2% (w/v) glycerol and 0.1 M urea was used. The composition of the latter medium was (g/l): KH2PO4, 2.5; K2HPO4, 1.5; MgSO4, 0.1; CaCl2.2H2O, 0.1. For NB dilution cultures, glycerol concentration was kept constant at 4% (w/v). To determine whether the rhamnolipid production could be restored by exogenous addition of signal molecules, culture media were supplemented with 8 μM C8-HSL. Cultures were grown at 34°C with shaking (240 rpm) in a TC-7 roller drum (New Brunswick, Canada).
Growth Rate Measurement
The specific growth rate for wild-type and tofI– mutant in each dilution of NB medium was determined using the following equation: where Xt2 refers to optical cell density at time t2, Xt1 is the optical cell density at time t1 and μ represents specific growth rate.
Transcriptional fusion strains of B. glumae were constructed by PCR amplification of a 923-bp fragment containing the promoter region of rhlA from BGR1 genome using primers promrhlAF: 5′-ACGTAGAATTCGGGAAAGCAGGCAGGGTAG-3′ and prom rhlAR: 5′-ACGTAAAGCTTTTTCGATAGGCATGGCGTACTC-3′. The PCR product was digested with EcoRI and HindIII and ligated within the corresponding sites in mini-CTX-lux (Becher and Schweizer, 2000). The resulting construct was integrated into BGR1 and tofI– mutant chromosome at the attB site through conjugation. Successful chromosomal integration of construct in BGR1 and tofI– mutant was confirmed by PCR.
LC/MS Rhamnolipid Analysis
The rhamnolipid concentration in the various bacterial cultures was determined by LC/MS (Abdel-Mawgoud et al., 2014). During a period of 6 days, 400 μl culture samples were retrieved at regular time intervals and the OD600 was measured (Nanodrop ND-1000, Thermo Fisher Scientific). Then the samples were centrifuged at 16,000 × g for 10 min to remove the bacteria. To 300 μl of supernatant were added 300 μl of acetonitrile and 10 mg/L 5,6,7,8-tetradeutero-4-hydroxy-2-heptylquinoline (HHQ-d4) as an internal standard (Dubeau et al., 2009). Samples were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC; Waters 2795, Mississauga, ON, Canada) equipped with a C8 reverse-phase column (Kinetex, Phenomenex) using a water/acetonitrile gradient with a constant 2 mmol/L concentration of ammonium acetate (Dubeau et al., 2009). The detector was a mass spectrometer (Quattro Premier XE, Waters). Analyses were carried out in the negative electrospray ionization (ESI-) mode.
LC/MS-MS Analyses for AHL Production
AHL production analyses were carried out by HPLC (Waters 2795, Mississauga, ON, Canada) equipped with a C8 reverse-phase column (Kinetex C8, Phenomenex), and the detector was a mass spectrometer (Quattro Premier XE, Waters). Analyses were carried out in the positive electrospray ionization (ESI+) mode, supplemented by the multiple reactions monitoring (MRM) mode. Samples were prepared as described in Chapalain et al. (2013).
Measurement of rhlA′-lux Activity
Expression from the rhl operon promoter in wild-type and QS-negative tofI– strains was quantified by measuring the luminescence of cultures of bacteria containing a transcriptional fusion of the rhlA promoter with the luciferase gene integrated in the genome. Cells from overnight cultures were washed twice in PBS and inoculated into test medium at an OD600 of 0.05 in white clear bottom 96-well plates (Corning; 3632) containing three replicates of 200 μl per sample. The plates were incubated at 34°C in a multimode plate reader (Cytation3, BioTek, Winooski, VT, USA) with double orbital shaking. OD600 and luminescence (relative light units, RLU) were measured every 15 min for a duration of 48 h. The luminescence (rhlA-lux activity) was adjusted for culture density (RLU/OD600).
Quorum Sensing Regulation of Rhamnolipid Production in B. glumae is Nutritionally Conditional
To strengthen our understanding on the specific role of QS regulation in the production of rhamnolipids in B. glumae we studied the kinetics of rhamnolipid production in wild-type strain and tofI– mutant using a minimal [mineral salts medium (MSM)] typically used to promote production of rhamnolipids and a complex NB culture media, both supplemented with non-limiting glycerol as carbon source (thus MSMG and NBG). As expected, the tofI– mutant that lacks the production of C8-HSL does not produce rhamnolipids in the minimal medium and this production is restored by adding C8-HSL (Figure 1A). On the other hand, unexpectedly, the tofI– mutant presents no defect in production of rhamnolipids in rich NB medium (Figure 1B).
FIGURE 1. Rhamnolipid production of B. glumae strains in minimal vs. complex media. (A) While the wild-type strain produces rhamnolipids during culture in MSMG medium, the tofI– mutant is not capable of producing rhamnolipids. The wild-type production level is restored upon exogenous addition of 8 μM C8-HSL to tofI– mutant culture medium. (B) In contrast, in NBG medium the tofI– mutant is capable of producing rhamnolipids at wild-type levels. The error bars indicate the standard deviation of the mean for three independent cultures. Insert graphs show the growth data plotted against time for the all the strains.
Quorum Sensing-Dependent Regulation of Rhamnolipids is Coupled to Growth Rate
Since a key difference between the two culture conditions is slower growth in MSMG vs. NBG (Figure 1), we hypothesized the impact of QS on biosynthesis of rhamnolipids is influenced by the nutritional conditions. We thus compared the rhamnolipid yield per biomass in wild-type and tofI– mutant in increasing dilutions of NB medium, while maintaining the glycerol at 4%, in order to have a decreasing gradient of nutrients.
By calculating the ratio of specific production yields of the wild-type over the tofI– mutant, we found that the contribution of QS on rhamnolipid production rises linearly with increasing NB medium dilution (Figure 2). This shows that the regulation of rhamnolipid production relies more and more on QS upon increasing the nutrient limitation, supporting the hypothesis.
FIGURE 2. Contribution of quorum sensing in production of rhamnolipids by B. glumae in different dilutions of complex NB culture medium. Cultures were performed in increasing dilutions of NB (glycerol maintain stable) medium for 48 h of incubation, then bacterial growth and rhamnolipids production were measured and specific production yield (Ypx) was calculated. The error bars indicate the standard deviation of the mean for three independent experiments.
Diluting the concentration of available nutrients should decrease the growth rate. Thus, to investigate the effect of growth rate on the production of rhamnolipids upon increasing nutrient limitation, the specific growth rate for each NB dilution was determined (Figure 3). Interestingly, upon decreasing nutrient availability and consequently the specific growth rate (μ), the specific rhamnolipid production yields of the wild-type and tofI– mutant were not significantly different until about μ = 0.08 (1/h), mirroring the absence of contribution of QS under unrestricted growth conditions (Figure 1B). However, from this point on to lower μ values, and in contrast with the QS mutant, we observed a sudden increase in rhamnolipid production yield by the wild-type strain, indicating the initiation of an activating contribution by QS as the growth rate decreases. This reveals a situation where QS-dependent regulation of rhamnolipids is triggered by the growth rate of the population rather than by its cell density.
FIGURE 3. Effect of growth rate on specific yield of rhamnolipids and C8-HSL concentration. After 48 h of incubation, rhamnolipids specific production yield in wild-type and tofI– mutant and specific yield of C8-HSLs in wild-type in different dilutions of NB medium were determined for a range of specific growth rates, determined as described in Section “Materials and Methods.” The error bars indicate the standard deviation of the mean for three independent experiments.
To better understand this mechanism, we measured the yield of C8-HSLs in wild-type strain cultures and uncovered a gradual increase in signal specific concentration as the growth rate decreases (Figure 3). This means that the number of molecules of C8-HSL per unit of cell decreases as the growth rate augments. In addition, we saw that the wild-type C8-HSL and rhamnolipid yield curves are never parallel, which further substantiates that additional regulatory elements control the expression of QS-modulated factors such as rhamnolipids.
Nutritional Cues Amplify Rhamnolipid Biosynthesis Gene Expression through QS-Dependent Regulation
Finally, to look more closely at the regulatory level where QS is acting, we wanted to know if nutrient-depleted conditions directly influence the expression of QS-dependent rhamnolipid biosynthesis genes. To do so, we monitored rhlA transcription in wild-type and tofI– strains using a rhlA-lux reporter gene fusion in different dilutions of NB medium (always with the same glycerol concentration). This allowed us to investigate the direct effect of growth rate on QS-dependent regulation of rhlA gene. Hence, we plotted the rhlA expression levels in wild-type and tofI– strains at a range of specific growth rates. As shown in Figure 4, as the growth rate decreases we can observe a sudden increase in rhlA gene expression in wild-type strain. However, the expression level of rhlA gene in the tofI– mutant remains mostly unchanged. Taken together, these data suggests that induction of rhlA transcription by TofR occurs at a specific growth rate, instead of specific cell density or AHL concentration.
FIGURE 4. The effect of growth rate on expression from the rhl operon promoter in wild-type and tofI– strains carrying a chromosomal rhlA′-lux transcriptional reporter. The rhlA promoter activity in wild-type and tofI– mutant plotted against growth rates achieved by different dilutions of NB medium. The error bars indicate the standard deviation of the mean for three independent experiments.
We present conclusive evidence for a functional role of QS in providing an optimized demand-driven supply of target cooperative behavior, wherein QS-dependent regulation of rhamnolipids is tightly coupled to specific growth rate. Our results support the proposed model that the adaptive functionality of QS in regulation of public goods is to maintain the homeostasis of cooperation where the production of costly public goods is conditioned by assessment of demand and efficiency (Hense and Schuster, 2015).
We have previously demonstrated that in the rice pathogen B. glumae, QS positively regulates the biosynthesis of rhamnolipids, extracellular surface-active glycolipids which are necessary for promoting the social surface behavior called swarming motility (Nickzad et al., 2015). Here, we found that a signal-negative mutant that does not produce C8-HSL maintains the ability to produce rhamnolipids in a rich NB medium, in contrast with growth in a minimal medium where rhamnolipid production is absent (Figure 1). This led us to hypothesize that QS-dependent regulation of rhamnolipids in B. glumae is nutritionally conditional. Comparison of the yield of rhamnolipids per biomass in the wild-type and tofI– mutant strains in a decreasing gradient of nutrients revealed that the more we dilute the growth medium the more QS regulation contributes to the production of rhamnolipids (Figure 2). We increasingly realize that the QS circuitry in various bacteria is highly integrated with other global regulatory pathways, stress responses and specific environmental and physiological cues (Williams and Camara, 2009; Mellbye and Schuster, 2011). Although, up-regulation or down-regulation of QS-controlled factors such as rhamnolipids biosynthesis genes rhlAB in P. aeruginosa by elements other than cell-to-cell communications such as nutritional status is well-known (Guerra-Santos et al., 1986; Déziel et al., 2003), this modulation always necessitates the presence of a functional QS system. The identification of a QS-dispensable regulation of rhamnolipids in B. glumae adds these metabolites to the list of B. glumae factors whose dependence on QS is conditional (Kim et al., 2007; Chen et al., 2012; Jang et al., 2014; Kato et al., 2014).
The dispensability of QS-regulated virulence factors and other costly metabolites, such as rhamnolipids, upon prevailing conditions and environmental cues provides insights into how these regulatory pathways have evolved to optimize the functionality of target genes they regulate. For instance, in the case of rhamnolipids biosynthesis in B. glumae, we found that once unrestricted nutrient resources are available, production of rhamnolipids is carried out independently of QS regulation, obviously through still-unidentified regulatory mechanisms. However, under nutrient-limited conditions with excess carbon source, QS becomes the main regulating mechanism significantly enhancing the specific rhamnolipids yield. Under nutrient-limited conditions, which B. glumae presumably meets in its natural habitat such as plant tissue environment, it might be more cost-effective for rhamnolipids biosynthesis to be carried out via a decision-making mechanism such as QS which places more restrictive controls over nutrient utilization. Notably, QS in B. glumae directly controls nutrient acquisition of individual cells in crowded populations (An et al., 2014).
Since growth rate is a direct function of nutrient availability, we hypothesized that growth rate is the key triggering factor that induces QS-dependent regulation of rhamnolipids. Our results indicate there is a growth rate threshold below which QS engages in the regulation of rhamnolipids (Figure 3). In P. aeruginosa, slow growth is one key condition inducing regulation of QS-controlled public good genes in a metabolic prudent manner (Mellbye and Schuster, 2014). For instance, prudent regulation of rhamnolipid production ensures that cells only invest carbon into rhamnolipids biosynthesis when growth is limited by another growth-limiting nutrient, such as nitrogen (Xavier et al., 2011). In fact, presence of excess carbon in different dilutions of NB medium in our experiments, also suggest that in B. glumae, QS-dependent regulation of rhamnolipids is coupled to growth rate in a metabolic prudent manner. Furthermore, a gradual increase in QS signal specific concentration upon decrease of specific growth rate suggests a reduction in activation signal threshold, which reflects an increase in cellular demand for production of QS-dependent target gene product at such low density populations. Importantly, our gene expression analyses demonstrate the direct influence of the specific growth rate on QS-dependent induction of rhlA expression in the wild-type background, in agreement with a previous report showing that rhlAB expression in P. aeruginosa in the presence of excess carbon is tightly coupled to the growth rate, and not just cell density (Xavier et al., 2011). Therefore, the role of QS in regulation of public goods is not limited to stationary phase situations at higher cell densities where production is more efficient, but also upon encountering restrictive environmental conditions, an early induction of QS by slowed growth rate could provide some inclusive fitness benefits for the survival of an individual cell and could act as a trade-off mechanism between survival and efficiency. Our results are also in accordance with the regulation of QS gene expression by starvation in P. aeruginosa in which stringent response can lower the quorum threshold via triggering an increased signal synthesis (van Delden et al., 2001; Schuster et al., 2013).
From an ecological significance perspective, induction of QS-dependent regulation of rhamnolipids at low specific growth rates could reflect two distinct scenarios for which such integrated regulation has evolved: (i) restricted nutritional conditions with low cell density (free living bacteria exposed to nutritional stress during establishment of host infection), and (ii) exhausted nutritional environment with a high cell density (bacteria living in biofilms). In both instances, since population growth is limited by the carrying capacity of the direct environment, it is conceivable that slow growth can serve as a predictive factor of the population carrying capacity (de Vargas Roditi et al., 2013). Accordingly, in B. glumae, QS is used for anticipation of a population reaching the carrying capacity of an habitat to avoid lethal ammonia-induced alkalization by activating oxalate production, and thus promoting survival in the stationary phase (Goo et al., 2012).
An effective colonization of surface niches necessitates a balance between biofilm and motility (van Ditmarsch et al., 2013). In this regard, there is an inverse regulation of biofilm formation and swarming motility (Caiazza et al., 2007). Since production of surfactants is as crucial for biofilm development as for swarming motility (Nickzad and Déziel, 2014), it seems that the induction of QS-dependent rhamnolipids biosynthesis upon reduced growth rate is a key evolved strategy to modulate swarming motility and promote dissemination of bacterial cells to find new surface niches to colonize (Déziel et al., 2003; Tremblay and Déziel, 2010). Thus, integration of slowed growth rate with QS as a decision-making mechanism for biosynthesis of costly rhamnolipids could serve to assess the demand and timing for expanding the carrying capacity of a population through spatial expansion mechanisms such as swarming motility, thus promoting the chances of survival.
We propose that the adaptive significance of growth rate-dependent functionality of QS in rhamnolipids biosynthesis lies within providing a regulatory mechanism for selecting the optimal trade-off between survival and efficiency.
AN and ED conceived and designed the experiments. AN performed the experiments. AN and ED analyzed the data. ED contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools. AN and ED contributed to writing, editing and finalizing the manuscript.
Investigations on rhamnolipids in the ED laboratory are funded by the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) Discovery grant No. 312478 and by Team grant 174316 from the Fonds de recherche du Québec-Nature et Technologie (FRQ-NT). AN was recipient of a Ph.D. scholarship awarded by the Fondation Universitaire Armand-Frappier de l’INRS. ED is Canada Research Chair in Sociomicrobiology.
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Thanks to Professor You-Hee Cho (CHA University, South Korea) for providing strains BGR1 and BGS2. Special thanks to Marie-Christine Groleau for insightful comments and to Sylvain Milot for technical advice. We are grateful to Joao Xavier (Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA) for critical review of the manuscript.
Abdel-Mawgoud, A. M., Lépine, F., and Déziel, E. (2014). Liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry for the identification and quantification of rhamnolipids. Methods Mol. Biol. 1149, 359–373. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-0473-0_30
An, J. H., Goo, E., Kim, H., Seo, Y. S., and Hwang, I. (2014). Bacterial quorum sensing and metabolic slowing in a cooperative population. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 14912–14917. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1412431111
Bainton, N. J., Bycroft, B. W., Chhabra, S. R., Stead, P., Gledhill, L., Hill, P. J., et al. (1992). A general role for the lux autoinducer in bacterial cell signalling: control of antibiotic biosynthesis in Erwinia. Gene 116, 87–91. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(92)90633-Z
Boyle, K. E., Monaco, H., van Ditmarsch, D., Deforet, M., and Xavier, J. B. (2015). Integration of metabolic and quorum sensing signals governing the decision to cooperate in a bacterial social trait. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11:e1004279. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004279
Caiazza, N. C., Merritt, J. H., Brothers, K. M., and O’Toole, G. A. (2007). Inverse regulation of biofilm formation and swarming motility by Pseudomonas aeruginosa PA14. J. Bacteriol. 189, 3603–3612. doi: 10.1128/JB.01685-06
Chapalain, A., Vial, L., Laprade, N., Dekimpe, V., Perreault, J., and Déziel, E. (2013). Identification of quorum sensing-controlled genes in Burkholderia ambifaria. Microbiologyopen 2, 226–242. doi: 10.1002/mbo3.67
Chen, R. X., Barphagha, I. K., Karki, H. S., and Ham, J. H. (2012). Dissection of quorum-sensing genes in Burkholderia glumae reveals non-canonical regulation and the new regulatory gene tofM for toxoflavin production. PLoS ONE 7:e52150. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052150
Chun, H., Choi, O., Goo, E., Kim, N., Kim, H., Kang, Y., et al. (2009). The quorum sensing-dependent gene katG of Burkholderia glumae is important for protection from visible light. J. Bacteriol. 191, 4152–4157. doi: 10.1128/JB.00227-09
Darch, S. E., West, S. A., Winzer, K., and Diggle, S. P. (2012). Density-dependent fitness benefits in quorum-sensing bacterial populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 8259–8263. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1118131109
Davies, D. G., Parsek, M. R., Pearson, J. P., Iglewski, B. H., Costerton, J. W., and Greenberg, E. P. (1998). The involvement of cell-to-cell signals in the development of a bacterial biofilm. Science 280, 295–298. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5361.295
Déziel, E., Lépine, F., Milot, S., and Villemur, R. (2003). rhlA is required for the production of a novel biosurfactant promoting swarming motility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: 3-(3-hydroxyalkanoyloxy)alkanoic acids (HAAs), the precursors of rhamnolipids. Microbiology 149, 2005–2013. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.26154-0
Dubeau, D., Déziel, E., Woods, D. E., and Lépine, F. (2009). Burkholderia thailandensis harbors two identical rhl gene clusters responsible for the biosynthesis of rhamnolipids. BMC Microbiol. 9:263. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-9-263
Goo, E., Majerczyk, C. D., An, J. H., Chandler, J. R., Seo, Y. S., Ham, H., et al. (2012). Bacterial quorum sensing, cooperativity, and anticipation of stationary-phase stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 19775–19780. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1218092109
Guerra-Santos, L. H., Käppeli, O., and Fiechter, A. (1986). Dependence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa continous culture biosurfactant production on nutritional and environmental factors. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 24, 443–448. doi: 10.1007/bf00250320
Jeong, Y., Kim, J., Kim, S., Kang, Y., Nagamatsu, T., and Hwang, I. (2003). Toxoflavin produced by Burkholderia glumae causing rice grain rot is responsible for inducing bacterial wilt in many field crops. Plant Dis. 87, 890–895. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2003.87.8.890
Kato, T., Morohoshi, T., Tsushima, S., and Ikeda, T. (2014). Characterization of three types of quorum-sensing mutants in Burkholderia glumae strains isolated in Japan. J. Agric. Sci. 6:16. doi: 10.5539/jas.v6n7p16
Kim, J., Kang, Y., Choi, O., Jeong, Y., Jeong, J. E., Lim, J. Y., et al. (2007). Regulation of polar flagellum genes is mediated by quorum sensing and FlhDC in Burkholderia glumae. Mol. Microbiol. 64, 165–179. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05646.x
Kim, J., Kim, J. G., Kang, Y., Jang, J. Y., Jog, G. J., Lim, J. Y., et al. (2004). Quorum sensing and the LysR-type transcriptional activator ToxR regulate toxoflavin biosynthesis and transport in Burkholderia glumae. Mol. Microbiol. 54, 921–934. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04338.x
Köhler, T., Curty, L. K., Barja, F., Van Delden, C., and Pechère, J.-C. (2000). Swarming of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is dependent on cell-to-cell signaling and requires flagella and pili. J. Bacteriol. 182, 5990–5996. doi: 10.1128/JB.182.21.5990-5996.2000
Mellbye, B., and Schuster, M. (2011). “More than just a quorum: integration of stress and other environmental cues in acyl-homoserine lactone signaling,” in Bacterial Stress Responses, eds G. Storz and R. Hengge (Washington, DC: ASM Press), 349–363.
Mellbye, B., and Schuster, M. (2014). Physiological framework for the regulation of quorum sensing-dependent public goods in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 196, 1155–1164. doi: 10.1128/JB.01223-13
Nickzad, A., and Déziel, E. (2014). The involvement of rhamnolipids in microbial cell adhesion and biofilm development - an approach for control? Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 58, 447–453. doi: 10.1111/lam.12211
Nickzad, A., Lépine, F., and Déziel, E. (2015). Quorum sensing controls swarming motility of Burkholderia glumae through regulation of rhamnolipids. PLoS ONE 10:e0128509. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0128509
Ochsner, U. A., and Reiser, J. (1995). Autoinducer-mediated regulation of rhamnolipid biosurfactant synthesis in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 92, 6424–6428. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.14.6424
Pai, A., Tanouchi, Y., and You, L. (2012). Optimality and robustness in quorum sensing (QS)-mediated regulation of a costly public good enzyme. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 109, 19810–19815. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211072109
Passador, L., Cook, J. M., Gambello, M. J., Rust, L., and Iglewski, B. H. (1993). Expression of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence genes requires cell-to-cell communication. Science 260, 1127–1130. doi: 10.1126/science.8493556
Schuster, M., Sexton, D. J., Diggle, S. P., and Greenberg, E. P. (2013). Acyl-homoserine lactone quorum sensing: from evolution to application. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 67, 43–63. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-092412-155635
Simon, R., Priefer, U., and Puhler, A. (1983). A Broad host range mobilization system for in vivo genetic engineering: transposon mutagenesis in gram negative bacteria. Nat. Biotechnol. 1, 784–791. doi: 10.1038/nbt1183-784
van Delden, C., Comte, R., and Bally, A. M. (2001). Stringent response activates quorum sensing and modulates cell density-dependent gene expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Bacteriol. 183, 5376–5384. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.18.5376-5384.2001
van Ditmarsch, D., Boyle, K. E., Sakhtah, H., Oyler, J. E., Nadell, C. D., Deziel, E., et al. (2013). Convergent evolution of hyperswarming leads to impaired biofilm formation in pathogenic bacteria. Cell Rep. 4, 697–708. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.07.026
Wang, M. Z., Schaefer, A. L., Dandekar, A. A., and Greenberg, E. P. (2015). Quorum sensing and policing of Pseudomonas aeruginosa social cheaters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112, 2187–2191. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1500704112
Williams, P., and Camara, M. (2009). Quorum sensing and environmental adaptation in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a tale of regulatory networks and multifunctional signal molecules. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 12, 182–191. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2009.01.005
Keywords: quorum sensing, sociomicrobiology, cooperation, bacteria, secondary metabolism, Burkholderia, growth rate
Citation: Nickzad A and Déziel E (2016) Adaptive Significance of Quorum Sensing-Dependent Regulation of Rhamnolipids by Integration of Growth Rate in Burkholderia glumae: A Trade-Off between Survival and Efficiency. Front. Microbiol. 7:1215. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01215
Received: 28 April 2016; Accepted: 21 July 2016;
Published: 04 August 2016.
Edited by:Akos T. Kovacs, University of Jena, Germany
Reviewed by:Tom Coenye, Ghent University, Belgium
Anton Hartmann, Helmholtz Zentrum München, Germany
Copyright © 2016 Nickzad and Déziel. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Eric Déziel, firstname.lastname@example.org