Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Microbiol., 19 October 2016
Sec. Plant Pathogen Interactions
This article is part of the Research Topic Harnessing useful rhizosphere microorganisms for pathogen and pest biocontrol View all 26 articles

Editorial: Harnessing Useful Rhizosphere Microorganisms for Pathogen and Pest Biocontrol

  • 1Dipartimento di Scienze Agroalimentari, Istituto per la Protezione Sostenibile delle Piante, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Bari, Italy
  • 2Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Institute of Environmental Biology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
  • 3Instituto Agricultura Sostenible, Agencia Estatal Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Córdoba, Spain

Growing demographic trends require sustainable technologies to improve quality and yield of future food productions. However, there is uncertainty about plant protection strategies in many agro-ecosystems. Pests, diseases, and weeds are overwhelmingly controlled by chemicals which pose health risks and cause other undesirable effects. Therefore, an increasing concern on control measures emerged in recent years. Many chemicals became questioned with regard to their sustainability and are (or will be) banned. Alternative management tools are studied, relying on biological, and low impact solutions.

This Research Topic concerns microbial biocontrol agents, root-associated microbiomes, and rhizosphere networks. Understanding how they interact or respond to (a) biotic environmental cues is instrumental for an effective and sustainable impact. The rhizosphere is in this regard a fundamental object of study, because of its role in plant productivity.

Microbial Volatiles and Other Compounds

Roots are surrounded by a flow of molecules released by microorganisms. Some volatiles may affect growth through different mechanisms, such as biochemical signals eliciting local defense reactions or systemic resistance (Kai et al., 2007; Chung et al., 2016). Yi et al. studied the effects of 2,3-butanediol produced by a Bacillus subtilis isolate overexpressing the bud operon synthesis encoding genes. They showed that the isolate persisted on pepper roots more than the wild type, thereby interfering with colonization by fungi. Exudates from isolate pre-treated roots inhibited colonization by Trichoderma sp., by another B. subtilis strain, and by the soil-borne pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum. Application of 2,3-butanediol to roots followed by R. solanacearum exposure enhanced the expression of pathogenesis-related (PR) genes. The volatile triggered the secretion of root exudates modulating fitness of soil fungi and bacteria, thus acting as a plant defense inducer.

Bacteria metabolism affects nutrient assimilation. Aziz et al. reported a new mechanism in the plant growth-promoting (PGP) Bacillus amyloliquefaciens GB03, which activates genes involved in sulfur assimilation and uptake by Arabidopsis. Other transcripts encoding for proteins involved in the biosynthesis of sulfur-rich aliphatic and indolic glucosinolates were also expressed. The enhanced sulfur assimilation increased plant glucosinolate biosynthesis, and conferred protection against the beet armyworm Spodoptera exigua.

Bacterial metabolites may also protect plants by inhibiting herbivores (Mithöfer and Boland, 2012). Ganassi et al. reported that also fungal metabolites may have this effect, as shown by a Trichoderma citrinoviride isolate, interfering with feeding of the cereal aphid Rhopalosiphum padi. Different long-chain primary alcohols (LCOHs) showed a phagodeterrent effect restraining aphids from settling on treated leaves. The LCOHs, perceived through taste receptor neurons and effective at low concentrations, hold potential for insect control in synergy with other compounds.

Lysobacter spp. may affect soil-borne pathogens through extracellular enzymes and other metabolites (Folman et al., 2003). Members of this genus appeared abundant in soil suppressive to the root pathogen Rhizoctonia solani. Some strains showed in vitro activity against R. solani and other phytopathogens such as Pythium ultimum, Aspergillus niger, Fusarium oxysporum, and Xanthomonas campestris. In soil, however, suppression of R. solani damping-off on sugar beet and cauliflower was low, and no PGP effect was found on sugar beet, cauliflower, onion and Arabidopsis thaliana, likely due to poor rhizosphere colonization. Antagonistic Lysobacter spp. are an important source of new enzymes and antimicrobial compounds, although their role in disease suppressiveness needs to be confirmed (Gómez Expósito et al.).

Soil Amendments

The characterization of organic matter amendments enhancing biocontrol and influencing resident soil communities is a growing research field (Bailey and Lazarovits, 2003; Bonilla et al., 2012). Debode et al. studied the effect of chitin on lettuce growth and survival of pathogenic Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella enterica colonizing leaves. Chitin addition increased yields and reduced phyllosphere survival of both bacteria, increasing fungal and bacterial biomass in the rhizosphere. An increase was observed for bacterial genera Cellvibrio, Pedobacter, Dyadobacter, and Streptomyces and the fungi Lecanicillium and Mortierella. These taxa include species involved in biocontrol, PGP, nitrogen cycle, and chitin degradation, showing a potential for chitin-based amendments.

A positive effect of amendments on soil microbial communities was reported by Vida et al. Composted almond shells elicited suppression of Rosellinia necatrix, causal agent of white root rot on avocado, increasing Proteobacteria and Ascomycota, and reducing Acidobacteria and Mortierellales. Beneficial Pseudomonas, Burkholderia spp., or Actinobacteria were found only in the amended soil.

Biocontrol and Suppression

Soil suppressiveness is an unfrequent condition, regulating noxious organisms, including root-knot nematodes (Meloidogyne spp.; Bent et al., 2008). In two organic horticulture greenhouses in Spain, nematodes decreased progressively in a crop rotation, a decline associated to eggs parasitism by the hyphomycete Pochonia chlamydosporia. Controlled assays confirmed suppressiveness, as indicated by lower egg densities and reduced Meloidogyne reproduction, observed in non-sterilized soil. A higher microbial diversity was also reported from suppressive soils (Giné et al.).

Entomopathogenic nematodes rely on phoretically associated, insect-killing bacteria (Lewis et al., 2015). In Florida, Steinernema sp. and S. diaprepesi occupy habitats with different soil properties and water potential. They have opposite migration behaviors in relation to soil water potential, the latter being attracted toward drier soil. After three migration cycles through soil to infect insect larvae, S. diaprepesi dominated the nematode community when soil was maintained at 6% moisture, whereas Steinernema sp. was dominant at 18% moisture. The nematode responses to water potential and osmotic gradients explained their geospatial patterns. Steinernema sp. was recovered only from shallow water tables and moist soils, whereas S. diaprepesi inhabited ecoregions with well-drained soils and deeper water tables. Differential expression of proteins involved in thermo or mechano-sensation and movement was associated to soil moisture. Proteins involved in metabolism, lectin detoxification, gene regulation, and cell division also differed between the two conditions. Modifying soil moisture in orchards may favor effective entomopathogens, useful in different environments (El-Borai et al.).

Late blight caused by the oomycete Phytophthora infestans is the most severe disease of potato (Nowicki et al., 2012). To find alternative solutions to copper-based products, three Pseudomonas isolates originating from potato phyllo—and rhizosphere were studied for their protective effect against late blight. When sprayed on potato leaves they survived 15 days in the greenhouse and 8 days in the field. Pseudomonas chlororaphis R47 was the most active in vitro, and the best protectant in the greenhouse. Its beneficial effects against P. infestans, high rates of phyllosphere survival and rhizosphere colonization suggested a potential for application as tuber treatment or leaf spray (Guyer et al.).

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is a model system due to endophytism and antagonism toward plant pathogens and pests. Nevertheless, it is also a human pathogen, a trait compromising its exploitation in agriculture (Deredjian et al., 2014). Thomas and Sekhar studied P. aeruginosa applications to control other phytopathogenic bacteria. Strain GNS.13.2a isolated from banana rhizosphere significantly reduced the density of native bacteria soon after inoculation. However, its density declined within a week, while a resilient response was observed for native soil bacteria. Assays under axenic conditions or with soil microbiota showed antagonism by the native microbial community, with varying interactive or antagonistic effects.

The use of bacteria, fungi and viruses for weed biocontrol received attention due to prevalence of herbicide-resistant weeds and pesticide bans. Benefits include low environmental impact, higher specificity, reduced costs, and identification of new herbicidal mechanisms. Harding and Raizada reviewed fungal bioherbicides from North America, based on genera Colletotrichum, Phoma, and Sclerotinia. Bioherbicides also include bacteria of genera Xanthomonas and Pseudomonas and some viruses. Weed suppression in field conditions is a challenge, as bioherbicides with cytotoxic mechanisms are more sensitive to environmental variables than conventional herbicides.

Bacterial formulations are increasingly produced for sustainable agriculture using biocontrol and PGP species, including endospore-forming Bacillus spp. as alternatives to pesticides. Wu et al. reviewed the use of B. amyloliquefaciens type strain FZB42, as an application example.

Mycorrhizae, Endophytes, Symbioses

Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) are primary soil components whose impairment affects the rhizosphere functioning. In their review, Berruti et al. highlighted AMF as valid alternatives to conventional fertilization in sustainable agriculture. Although soil inoculation appears a successful strategy, results may vary, depending on host plant, and fungi. Factors affecting AMF success and persistence include species compatibility with the soil environment, spatial competition and inoculation timing. Genomic and transcriptomic data advanced the knowledge on AMF interactions with the host-plant and other soil organisms, unraveling important factors. AMF can protect host plants against biotic stresses like plant-parasitic nematodes. Mechanisms include enhanced root tolerance, direct competition for nutrients and space, induced systemic resistance, and altered rhizosphere interactions. In a second AMF review, Schouteden et al. emphasized the importance of AMF-based systemic resistance for effective biocontrol of nematode pests.

Besides mycorrhizae, the root niche has been “discovered” also by other endophytic microorganisms contributing to plant health and disease containment (Mercado-Blanco and Lugtenberg, 2014; Hardoim et al., 2015). Bacterial root endophytes control the tomato resistance to R. solanacearum. Resistant cultivar Arka Abha showed a bacterial endophyte diversity higher than a susceptible cultivar, including species producing siderophores, HCN and antibiotics, of which three isolates (Pseudomonas oleovorans, Pantoea ananatis, and Enterobacter cloacae) were effective antagonists. Other resistant cultivars also showed higher prevalence for antagonistic than susceptible bacteria, confirming a role of root-associated endophytes in plant protection (Upreti and Thomas).

Colonization of lettuce roots and rhizosphere by five genetically modified Streptomyces spp. was studied by Bonaldi et al. The strains, transformed with a green fluorescent protein marker and apramycin resistance, inhibited in vitro the soil-borne pathogen Sclerotinia sclerotiorum. In a non-sterile substrate, a transformed strain colonized soil, roots and rhizosphere. When directly inoculated, the bacterium was re-isolated from rhizosphere and roots at densities higher than after seed coating, showing that it is either rhizospheric, and endophytic.

Microbial symbioses also contribute to the competitiveness of invasive plant species. In this regard, the interactions of their microbiome with native species may provide indications for effective biocontrol. A research agenda aiming at developing novel microbial-based biocontrol strategies was proposed by Kowalski et al. based on the invasive plant Phragmites australis.

Virulence and Induced Resistance

Abscisic acid (ABA) is active in the rice interactions with the blast fungal pathogen Magnaporthe oryzae and the antagonistic bacterium P. chlororaphis EA105. Spence et al. reported that abscisic acid (ABA) affects plant defense by acting antagonistically on salicylic acid (SA), jasmonic acid (JA), and ethylene signaling. Magnaporthe oryzae-produced ABA enhanced plant susceptibility by accelerating pathogenesis through higher rates of spore germination and appressoria formation. Strain EA105 reduced the pathogen virulence by preventing its up-regulation of the ABA biosynthetic gene NCED3 in rice roots and of a β-glucosidase, activating ABA forms. EA105 counteracted the virulence-promoting effects of ABA on M. oryzae by inhibiting appressoria formation, preventing spores from increasing ABA biosynthesis and related signaling. ABA implication in plant protection by EA105 involved both direct mechanisms and plant signaling. The role of endogenous fungal ABA was confirmed through the inability of a knoc-kout mutant impaired in ABA synthesis to form lesions on rice, dramatically reducing fungal virulence. Studying the effect of virulence inducers (pH, temperature and acetosyringone concentration) on three homologous genes of Agrobacterium tumefaciens (VBP1, VBP2, and VBP3, involved in the T-DNA transfer), Yang et al. showed that vbp2 was affected by pH and by the deletion of vbp1. Results indicated that, in addition to T-complex recruitment, the three homologous genes were involved also in other biological processes.

Martínez-Hidalgo et al. reported how Micromonospora strains control fungal pathogens by stimulating plant immunity. This Gram-positive inhabits nitrogen fixing nodules of healthy leguminous plants, with PGP effects. Inoculation of tomato roots with antifungal Micromonospora isolates reduced leaf infection by Botrytis cinerea, with a durable induced systemic resistance. Gene expression analyses showed that Micromonospora stimulates plant defense, enhancing jasmonate-regulated defense pathways, an effects confirmed using defense-impaired tomato mutants. Nodule-isolated Micromonospora strains appear as excellent biocontrol agents, combining antifungal activity with the ability to elicit plant immunity.

Pérez et al. showed that the Trichoderma parareesei gene Tparo7 encodes a chorismate mutase (CM), an intermediate of aromatic amino acids, essential in protein synthesis and precursor of many secondary metabolites. Decreased levels of Tparo7 in silenced transformants showed reduced CM activity, lower growth rates and mycoparasite behavior against phytopathogenic fungi (R. solani, F. oxysporum, and B. cinerea) in dual cultures. Higher amounts of aromatic metabolites (tyrosol, 2-phenylethanol and SA) were produced from the silenced transformant, which inhibited growth of F. oxysporum and B. cinerea. The silenced transformants also showed reduced colonization of tomato root in vitro. In greenhouse assays the plants colonized by the silenced transformants were reduced, with a higher susceptibility to B. cinerea. The treated plants became yellowish and were defective in JA- and ethylene-regulated signaling pathways, as shown by expression analysis of of lipoxygenase 1, ethylene-insensitive protein 2, and PR protein 1 genes.

Greenhouse trials with fermentation broth of B. amyloliquefaciens LJ02 showed effective reduction of cucurbits powdery mildew in China. Li et al. reported that treated seedlings produced superoxide dismutase, peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase, and phenylalanine ammonia lyase at levels higher than control. Free SA, with the PR-1 gene product, increased after leaf treatments, suggesting SA-mediated defense. Secretions from treated cucumber leaves also inhibited fungal spores germination in the rhizosphere. The bacterium and its fermented products showed SA induction, available for powdery mildew biocontrol through systemic resistance.

-Omics

Recent “-omics” research advances coupled to progressive cost reduction allow a better understanding on many trophic interactions in rhizosphere systems (Massart et al., 2015). The genomes of 12 Bacillus subtilis strains with PGP activity were sequenced and analyzed by Hossain et al. The strains exhibited high genomic diversity, except highly conserved B. amyloliquefaciens strains (B. subtilis group), with 32–90% gene family similarity among Bacillus genomes and 2839 core genome genes, similar to B. amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum. Comparative analyses identified genes linked to biocontrol and roots/leaf colonization, including 73 genes from subsp. plantarum with functions related to signaling, transport, secondary metabolites and carbon utilization. They encoded several secondary metabolites, with conserved polyketide biosynthetic clusters encoding difficidin and macrolactin. Deletion of secondary metabolite genes in B. amyloliquefaciens subsp. plantarum showed that expression of difficidin is critical to reduce damage by Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. vesicatoria on tomato.

Van der Voort et al. sequenced and analyzed the genome of Pseudomonas sp. SH-C52. This bacterium, from a R. solani suppressive soil, has antifungal activity attributed to the chlorinated 9-amino-acid lipopeptide thanamycin. Its 6.3 Mb genome showed 5579 predicted ORFs, matching Pseudomonas corrugata as closest taxon. In silico, secondary metabolite analysis showed six non-ribosomal peptide synthetase gene clusters, including clusters for thanamycin and the 2-amino acid antibacterial lipopeptide brabantamide. Thanamycin is an antifungal whereas brabantamide has anti-oomycete activity, affecting phospholipases of Phytophthora infestans. A third lipopeptide, thanapeptin, was discovered, with structural variants active against P. infestans. Remaining clusters encode for another unknown lipopeptide. Results indicated a potential for SH-C52 lipopeptides with different antimicrobial activities.

Lichen microbioms were studied by Cernava et al. to analyze antagonism against bacteria and fungi. The Lobaria pulmonaria antagonistic community was dominated by Stenotrophomonas, Pseudomonas, and Burkholderia. 24.5% of isolates were antagonists, accounting for 7% of the metagenome, indicative of an overrepresentation in the culturable fraction. Stenotrophomonas bioactive components like spermidine showed PGP effects. Lichens represent important reservoirs for antagonistic bacteria, useful for biotechnological applications.

Outlook and Future Challenges

Articles in this Research Topic provide a polyhedral perspective on many issues in which beneficial microorganisms are involved. Data indeed demonstrate that they represent an as yet poorly-explored resource, whose exploitation may actively sustain plant protection and crop production. Given the huge number of microbial species present on the planet, the microorganisms studied represent just the tip of an iceberg. Data produced are, however, informative enough about their genetic and functional biodiversity, as well as about the ecosystem services they provide to underpin crop production. Challenges for future research work concern not only the biology of these species, but also the practices required to protect their biodiversity and to extend their application in the wide range of agricultural soils and systems present in the world. Agriculture cannot remain successfully and sustainable unless plant germplasm and useful microbial species are integrated, a goal for which new knowledge and information-based approaches are urgently needed.

Author Contributions

AC wrote the paper, JM and CP have made direct contributions to the work, and approved it for publication.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

Bailey, K. L., and Lazarovits, G. (2003). Suppressing soil-borne diseases with residue management and organic amendments. Soil Tillage Res. 72, 169–180. doi: 10.1016/S0167-1987(03)00086-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bent, E., Loffredo, A., McKenry, M. V., Becker, J. O., and Borneman, J. (2008). Detection and investigation of soil biological activity against Meloidogyne incognita. J. Nematol. 40, 109–118.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Bonilla, N., Gutiérrez-Barranquero, J. A., de Vicente, A., and Cazorla, F. M. (2012). Enhancing soil quality and plant health through suppressive organic amendments. Diversity 4, 475–491. doi: 10.3390/d4040475

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chung, J. H., Song, G. C., and Ryu, C. M. (2016). Sweet scents from good bacteria: case studies on bacterial volatile compounds for plant growth and immunity. Plant Mol. Biol. 90, 677–687. doi: 10.1007/s11103-015-0344-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Deredjian, A., Colinon, C., Hien, E., Brothier, E., Youenou, B., Cournoyer, B., et al. (2014). Low occurrence of Pseudomonas aeruginosa in agricultural soils with and without organic amendment. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 4:53. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2014.00053

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Folman, L. B., Postma, J., and Van Veen, J. A. (2003). Characterisation of Lysobacter enzymogenes (Christensen and Cook 1978) strain 3.1 T8, a powerful antagonist of fungal diseases of cucumber. Microbiol. Res. 158, 107–115. doi: 10.1078/0944-5013-00185

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hardoim, P. R., van Overbeek, L. S., Berg, G., Pirttilä, A. M., Compant, S., Campisano, A., et al. (2015). The hidden world within plants: ecological and evolutionary considerations for defining functioning of microbial endophytes. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 79, 293–320. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00050-14

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kai, M., Effmert, U., Berg, G., and Piechulla, B. (2007). Volatiles of bacterial antagonists inhibit mycelial growth of the plant pathogen Rhizoctonia solani. Arch. Microbiol. 187, 351–360. doi: 10.1007/s00203-006-0199-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lewis, E. E., Hazir, S., Hodson, A., and Gulcu, B. (2015). “Trophic relationships of entomopathogenic nematodes in agricultural habitats,” in Nematode Pathogenesis of Insects and Other Pests, ed R. Campos-Herrera (Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing), 139–163.

Massart, S., Perazzolli, M., Höfte, M., Pertot, I., and Jijakli, M. H. (2015). Impact of the omic technologies for understanding the modes of action of biological control agents against plant pathogens. BioControl 60, 725–746. doi: 10.1007/s10526-015-9686-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mercado-Blanco, J., and Lugtenberg, B. J. J. (2014). Biotechnological applications of bacterial endophytes. Curr. Biotechnol. 3, 60–75. doi: 10.2174/22115501113026660038

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mithöfer, A., and Boland, W. (2012). Plant defense against herbivores: chemical aspects. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 63, 431–450. doi: 10.1146/annurev-arplant-042110-103854

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nowicki, M., Foolad, M. R., Nowakowska, M., and Kozik, E. U. (2012). Potato and tomato late blight caused by Phytophthora infestans: an overview of pathology and resistance breeding. Plant Dis. 96, 4–17. doi: 10.1094/PDIS-05-11-0458

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: biocontrol, induced resistance, plant growth promotion, rhizosphere microbiology, plant microbe interaction, soil microbiology

Citation: Ciancio A, Pieterse CMJ and Mercado-Blanco J (2016) Editorial: Harnessing Useful Rhizosphere Microorganisms for Pathogen and Pest Biocontrol. Front. Microbiol. 7:1620. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01620

Received: 16 July 2016; Accepted: 28 September 2016;
Published: 19 October 2016.

Edited by:

Laure Weisskopf, University of Applied Sciences Western Switzerland, Switzerland

Reviewed by:

Paolina Garbeva, Nederlands Instituut voor Ecologie (Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen), Netherlands

Copyright © 2016 Ciancio, Pieterse and Mercado-Blanco. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Aurelio Ciancio, aurelio.ciancio@ipsp.cnr.it

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.