Impact Factor 4.019
2017 JCR, Clarivate Analytics 2018

The world's most-cited Microbiology journal

Original Research ARTICLE

Front. Microbiol., 27 October 2016 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01689

The Role of Hydrophobicity and Surface Receptors at Hyphae of Lyophyllum sp. Strain Karsten in the Interaction with Burkholderia terrae BS001 – Implications for Interactions in Soil

  • 1Laboratório de Biologia Celular de Fungos, Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • 2Department of Microbial Ecology, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life Sciences, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
  • 3Department of Environmental Sciences, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Abbottabad, Pakistan
  • 4Laboratório de Química Biológica de Microrganismos, Instituto de Microbiologia Paulo de Goes, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
  • 5Department of Environmental Microbiology, UFZ - Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, Leipzig, Germany

The soil bacterium Burkholderia terrae strain BS001 can interact with varying soil fungi, using mechanisms that range from the utilization of carbon/energy sources such as glycerol to the ability to reach novel territories in soil via co-migration with growing fungal mycelia. Here, we investigate the intrinsic properties of the B. terrae BS001 interaction with the basidiomycetous soil fungus Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten. In some experiments, the ascomycetous Trichoderma asperellum 302 was also used. The hyphae of Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten were largely hydrophilic on water-containing media versus hydrophobic when aerial, as evidenced by contact angle analyses (CA). Co-migration of B. terrae strain BS001 cells with the hyphae of the two fungi occurred preferentially along the - presumably hydrophilic - soil-dwelling hyphae, whereas aerial hyphae did not allow efficient migration, due to reduced thickness of their surrounding mucous films. Moreover, the cell numbers over the length of the hyphae in soil showed an uneven distribution, i.e., the CFU numbers increased from minima at the inoculation point to maximal numbers in the middle of the extended hyphae, then decreasing toward the terminal side. Microscopic analyses of the strain BS001 associations with the Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten hyphae in the microcosms confirmed the presence of B. terrae BS001 cells on the mucous matter that was present at the hyphal surfaces of the fungi used. Cell agglomerates were found to accumulate at defined sites on the hyphal surfaces, which were coined ‘fungal-interactive’ hot spots. Evidence was further obtained for the contention that receptors for a physical bacterium-fungus interaction occur at the Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten hyphal surface, in which the specific glycosphingolipid ceramide monohexoside (CMH) plays an important role. Thus, bacterial adherence may be mediated by heterogeneously distributed fungal-specific receptors, implying the CMH moieties. This study sheds light on the physical aspects of the B. terrae BS001 – Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten interaction, highlighting heterogeneity along the hyphae with respect to hydrophobicity and the presence of potential anchoring sites.

Introduction

Next to bacteria, the fungi in soil are responsible for key ecosystem functions (De Boer et al., 2005). Several soil fungi show interactions with bacteria, of mutualistic, commensalistic, and/or antagonistic nature (De Boer et al., 2005; Mille–Lindblom et al., 2006; Nazir et al., 2010; Frey-Klett et al., 2011; Haq et al., 2014). For example, Amanita muscaria counters the antibiotics produced by associated Streptomyces sp. AcH505 by releasing organic acids (Riedlinger et al., 2006). Aspergillus niger is affected by collimomycins produced by Collimonas fungivorans associated with it (Fritsche et al., 2014). Clearly, soil fungi often ‘tolerate’ bacterial associates, even slowing their growth rate, to allow co–existence (Mille–Lindblom et al., 2006). Nazir postulated that interactions can thus be mutualistic (Nazir, 2012).

In previous work in our laboratory, a predominance of different Burkholderia species, in particular Burkholderia terrae, was found in the soil underneath the foot of Laccaria proxima fruiting bodies, denoted the mycosphere (Warmink and van Elsas, 2008). Subsequently, similar Burkholderia types turned out to be enriched in soil that is colonized by a closely related fungus, the saprotrophic fungus Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten (Warmink and van Elsas, 2009). Thus, B. terrae strains BS001 (interactive with Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten; Warmink and van Elsas, 2009; Warmink et al., 2011) and BS110 (interactive with Laccaria proxima; Warmink and van Elsas, 2008) were identified as typical mycosphere dwellers. In later work, co-migration of strain BS001 along the hyphae of a suite of soil fungi, including Trichoderma asperellum 302, was found (Nazir et al., 2014). This co-migration capacity was spread across several species related to B. terrae (Nazir et al., 2012), and so this particular subgroup within the genus Burkholderia might be denoted as a group of ‘potentially fungal-interactive’ soil bacteria.

The association of B. terrae BS001 with fungal surfaces is likely to have a physical component. For the establishment of a successful interactive pair, this presumably involves a recognition phase, followed by a, possibly multifaceted, physical interaction between bacterial and fungal surface components. From the bacterial side, a role for the type 3 secretion system (T3SS) and/or for type 4 pili has been proposed (Yang et al., 2016). However, there has so far been no clue as to the existence of any dedicated ‘receptor’ site at the fungal cell surface, even though Haq et al. (2016) recently found evidence for the presence of ceramide monohexosides (CMH) as molecular ‘rafts’ in the cell surface of Trichoderma asperellum 302. In previous studies, we have reported the finding of biofilm-like structures (cell agglomerates) consisting of B. terrae BS001 cells at the hyphae of Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten, as well as other fungi (Nazir et al., 2014). However, it is so far unknown how and to what extent B. terrae BS001 colonizes the fungal hyphae, as related to the physical and chemical parameters that characterize the hyphal surface. Here, the molecular structure, in particular the role of CMH rafts, and the surface hydrophobicity of the hyphal cell walls are key aspects to be addressed.

In this study, we thus extend the previous work on B. terrae BS001 migration along the hyphal networks of Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten (Warmink et al., 2011) by addressing the following research questions: (i) Is the migration of B. terrae BS001 along the hyphae of soil fungi dependent on the surface hydrophobicity of the latter? (ii) To what extent and in what fashion does B. terrae BS001 colonize the fungal hyphae? (iii) Is there a specific surface receptor on the fungal hyphae that may serve as a cell-binding (anchoring) site? Using [mainly] the reference system B. terrae BS001 – Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten, we performed interaction experiments both in soil microcosms and in vitro, followed by observations by (electron) microscopy.

Materials and Methods

Strains and Culture Conditions

The fungal strains used in this study, i.e., the basidiomycete Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten (DSM2979) and the ascomycete Trichoderma asperellum 302, were routinely grown on oat flake agar (OFA) plates, prepared with 30 g of oat flakes as obtained from a grocery shop and 15 g of agar (Duchefa, Haarlem, The Netherlands) in milliQ water to 1 l, and sterilized at 121°C for 21 min. Once every 4 weeks, the fungal cultures were transferred to fresh OFA plates for maintenance. Prior to each experiment, fungal pieces were transferred to Erlenmeyer flasks with 200 ml of fresh potato dextrose (PD) broth and allowed to grow for 7 days (room temperature, with shaking).

Two B. terrae strains were used, i.e., the wild-type strain BS001 and its gfp-modified derivative BS001-GFP (tagged previously and described in Nazir et al., 2014). The strains were kept in 20% glycerol stored at -80°C. Prior to each experiment, bacteria were grown for 72 h in 5 ml of LB broth at 28°C.

Determination of Fungal Growth

Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten mycelium grown for 7 days in PD broth was transferred to sterile Falcon tubes (50 ml) using a 50 ml glass pipette, and vortexed vigorously to homogenize. The suspension was then centrifuged (3000 RPM) in a swinging bucket rotor centrifuge for 10 min. The pellet containing fungal propagules was washed three times with 0.01 M phosphate buffered saline (PBS; pH 7.2). After the last wash, the pellet was resuspended in fresh PD broth. An aliquot (500 μL) of this standardized fungal suspension (assuring that similar inoculum sizes were used to start the culture each time the experiment was carried out) was added to each well of a sterile 24-well microplate (TPP, Techno Plastic Products, Switzerland) and allowed to grow for 3, 24, 48 and 72 h, at room temperature, in static conditions. At each time point, the resulting fungal biomass was quantified using a crystal violet (CV) assay, as described earlier (Silva et al., 2009). First, biofilms formed in 24-well microtiter plates were fixed with 100 μL of methanol for 15 min at room temperature. Then, supernatants were removed and plates air-dried. Next, 500 μL of CV solution (0.02%, Sigma-Aldrich; USA) was added to each well and plates were kept for 20 min. Excess dye was then removed and plates were washed three times with distilled water. Lastly, 400 μl of 33% acetic acid (Merck Millipore, USA) was added and plates kept for 5 min. Then, 100 μL from each well was transferred to a 96-well microtiter plate (TPP, Techno Plastic Products; Switzerland) and absorbance at 590 nm quantified by a plate reader (Spectra-MAX 340 Tunable Microplate Reader, Molecular Devices Ltd.; USA).

Contact Angle (CA) Analysis

Water contact angles (CA) of aerial mycelia of Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten were measured after growth on cellulose acetate membrane filters (diameters of 25 mm; pore size 0.45 μm, type OE 67, Schleicher and Schuell, Dassel, Germany) overlying either malt extract agar (MA) or OFA as previously described (Smits et al., 2003). Shortly, 3 μL of fungal mycelium suspension was placed as the inoculum on top of the center of each filter and the fungus allowed to fully overgrow the filter (ca. 14-20 days). Mycelium-covered filters were removed from the plate and washed three times under suction with 20 ml 10 mM KNO3. Afterwards, the filters were mounted on a microscopy glass slide, air-dried for either 2, 4 or 6 h at room temperature and the CA of the upper side of the mycelia derived from the CA of >8 water droplets placed on the mycelia of a least two independent growth experiments using a goniometric eye piece (Krüss GmbH, Hamburg, Germany). As hyphal surfaces are known to vary their CA in response to humidity, growth medium and physiological status (Smits et al., 2003), two further experiments were performed. In order to simulate the effect of humidity and nutrients on the CA, mycelia-covered filters were submerged three days after inoculation in a thin sterile physiological 0.9% NaCl solution (ca. 8 ml per agar plate) in separate experiments. Although physiological NaCl solution is primarily free of nutrients, it will dissolve water-soluble compounds from the underlying MA or OFA and hence provide nutrients to the hyphae. After ca. 14 days, the overgrown filters were harvested, washed as described above and allowed to dry in air either for 4 or 6 h before CA analysis. Secondly, in order to assess the effects of possible hydrophobin formation on the CA during drying, identical experiments were performed, yet the filters exposed (for 10 min) to 15 ml of 0.2% cycloheximide (CH) prior to drying for 4 and 6 h and subsequent CA analysis, respectively. CH was used during drying as a eukaryotic protein synthesis inhibitor to allow assessment of hydrophobin-related impacts on the CAs.

The CA of B. terrae BS001 cells was determined as described earlier (Wick et al., 2002), using early stationary-phase cells growing in minimal medium in the presence of 1 g/l of glucose.

Microscopic Assays of Bacterial-Fungal Interactions: Growth Conditions

Fungal biomass (Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten) grown for 7 days was prepared as described above. An aliquot of 500 μL was added to each well of a 24-well microplate (TPP, Techno Plastic Products, Switzerland) containing a round glass slide or to a glass-bottom dish (CELLviewTM, Greiner Bio-One, Germany) and allowed to adhere for 90 min at room temperature under static conditions. Following this, the supernatant was removed and a standardized suspension of strain BS001-GFP cells (107 CFU/ml) was added to each well (500 μL). The plate was incubated for 3, 5 or 24 h at room temperature under static conditions. Following incubation, the supernatant was removed and the biomass adhering to the microplate (or to the glass slide) was washed with PBS for three times to remove any loosely attached bacteria. Finally, the systems were prepared for microscopic analyses.

Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy (CLSM): Sample Preparation and Analysis

The biomass adhering to the glass-bottom dish wells was fixed in 4% formaldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer for one hour at room temperature. Next, the samples were treated with Calcofluor white M2R (0.05% v/v in distilled water; Sigma-Aldrich, USA) to stain fungal cell walls (10 min, room temperature). Then, samples were washed in PBS (at least six times) and submerged in PBS for analysis by CLSM (Leica TCS SPE, Leica Mycrosystems, Germany). CLSM images were analyzed for fluorescence intensity using the ImageJ software (NIH, USA). The biomass (Z-stack) was virtually divided in four parts: top, middle, deep and bottom. At least 20 confocal planes were analyzed in each image (n = 2, Z-stacks, five planes for each virtual part) and, in each plane, 40-50 hyphae or hyphal areas were selected for fluorescence intensity quantification. Each area analyzed generates a fluorescence intensity graph containing all three dyes used, allowing comparison between them.

Electron Microscopy: Sample Preparation and Analysis

Glass slides containing the strain BS001 – Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten association, as well as samples of each species alone, were processed for scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten alone was also processed for transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Briefly, samples were washed in 0.01 M PBS, pH 7.2 (at least twice, to remove all non-adhered bacteria from the hyphae) and fixed in 2.5% glutaraldehyde and 4% formaldehyde, in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, for 1 h at room temperature. Subsequently, samples were washed in the same buffer, post-fixed in 1% osmium tetroxide (OsO4) and 1.25% potassium ferrocyanide for 2 h and then dehydrated in a series of increasing ethanol concentrations (30%, 50%, 70%, 90%, 100%, and ultra-dry ethanol) for 30 min at each dehydration step. For SEM, samples were critical-point-dried in CO2, coated with gold and observed under a FEI Quanta 250 scanning electron microscope (FEI, The Netherlands). For TEM, dehydrated samples were slowly embedded in Spurr resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences - EMS, USA). Ultrathin sections of the samples were stained with uranyl acetate and lead citrate, and images were obtained in a FEI Spirit Transmission electron microscope (FEI, The Netherlands). All images were processed with Adobe Photoshop CS5 (Adobe System Co., USA).

Effect of Anti-CMH Antibodies on Bacterial-Fungal Interactions

Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten grown for 7 days was prepared as described in the Section “Determination of Fungal Growth”. An aliquot of 500 μL of fungal cells in water was added to each well of a 4-well glass-bottom dish (CELLviewTM, Greiner Bio-One, Germany) and allowed to adhere for 90 min at room temperature in static conditions. The supernatant was then removed and fungal biomass was incubated with 2% BSA solution (blocking solution) for 1 h. After incubation, the biomass was washed three times with sterile PBS and treated with anti-CMH antibody at 200 μg/ml for 1 h. After that, the biomass was washed four times with sterile PBS and incubated with anti-mouse secondary antibody IgG conjugated to the fluorochrome Alexafluor 546 for 1 h. At this point, the complex “CMH antibody-anti-IgG conjugate” was blocking all CMH moieties at the fungal cell wall. Then, after several washes with sterile PBS, a standardized suspension of B. terrae strain BS001-GFP, prepared in sterile water (107 CFU/ml), was added to three wells of the 4-well glass-bottom dish (the last well did not receive bacteria to serve as control). The system was incubated for 3h (initial interaction) or 24 h (late interaction) at room temperature (∼ 25°C) in static conditions, to allow the bacterial cells to interact with the fungal surface. Following incubation, the supernatant was removed, and the biomass washed with sterile PBS at least three times to remove any remaining non-adherent bacteria. Finally, samples were taken for subsequent analyses.

Extraction and Purification of Glucosylceramides (GlcCer) from Lyophyllum sp. Strain Karsten

Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten cells were extracted at room temperature using chloroform/methanol at 2:1 and 1:2 (v/v) ratio’s. Extracts were combined and concentrated in vacuum and crude lipid fractions partitioned (Folch et al., 1957). The lipids recovered from the Folch lower layer were fractionated on a silica gel column and eluted with chloroform, acetone and methanol. The methanol fraction, containing glycosphingolipids, was further purified by silica gel column chromatography. Columns were sequentially eluted with chloroform/methanol containing increasing concentrations of methanol (95:5, 9:1, 8:2, 7:3, and 1:1 v/v) and, finally, with methanol. Fractions were analyzed on thin layer chromatography (TLC) plates developed with CHCl3: MeOH: NH4OH (2 mol/l) (40:10:1 v/v/v) and visualized with iodine vapor, as well as by spraying with orcinol-sulfuric acid (Svennerholm, 1956). The chloroform/methanol 8:2 (v/v) and 7:3 fractions were further purified by silica gel chromatography, using the same elution system to obtain a purified glycosphingolipid fraction. The purified fraction was then analyzed by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) in the positive ionization mode. See Supplementary Figure S1.

ESI-MS Analysis of Lyophyllum sp. Strain Karsten GlcCer

Samples were prepared in CH3OH at 1 mg/ml, then diluted to 0.1 mg/ml in CH3OH:H2O (7:3 v/v) containing 1 mM LiCl, as in Rollin-Pinheiro et al. (2014). ESI-MS analysis was carried out in a model Quattro-LC (Waters, Milford, MA, USA) with a triple-quadrupole mass analyzer, operating at atmospheric pressure ionization (API), assisted by a syringe pump (KD Scientific) for sample infusion. Nitrogen was used as the nebulizing and desolvation gas and ionization energies were 80 V (cone) and 2.5 kV (capillary), when operating in the positive ionization mode. Second-stage tandem MS was obtained by collision induced dissociation mass spectrometry (CID-MS) using argon as the collision gas and collision energy ranging between 35 and 60 eV.

Interaction of B. terrae BS001 with Growing Fungal Hyphae in Soil Microcosms

Suspensions of strain BS001 were grown overnight in 5 ml of Luria-Bertani (LB) medium (pH 7.0; Sigma-Aldrich, Haarlem, Netherlands) at 23°C, with shaking. The cells were spun down for 5 min at 5,000 × g, washed, and re-suspended in 1 ml of sterile saline (0.85% w/vol NaCl). This procedure was repeated twice. Final cell suspensions adjusted to contain about 107 cells ml-1, as evidenced using dilution plating on R2A agar, were used (50 μl) directly for inoculation of soil for the interaction assays.

The microcosms used in this study have been described and validated in several previous studies (Warmink and van Elsas, 2009; Nazir et al., 2012, 2013, 2014). Briefly, they consisted of three-compartment Petri dishes (Greiner Bio one, Frickenhausen, Germany), of which one served as a fungal source and two had sterilized soil. The systems were inoculated, in replicates, with Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten, next to the other selected fungus, Trichoderma asperellum 302 (Nazir et al., 2014), on the OFA medium, and incubated at 28°C. Thereby, colonization of the OFA compartment plus about 1 mm of the soil took place prior to introduction of the bacterial inocula. Control plates had no fungal inoculum. The washed suspensions (50 μl) of B. terrae strain BS001 cells were placed evenly in one 3-mm-wide streak in the soil compartments adjacent to the hyphal growth fronts. Control treatments consisted of the addition of BS001 cells in a similar streak to microcosms without fungal mycelium, and of sterile water added to the fungal-plus microcosms in a similar streak. The systems were incubated at 23°C (keeping soil moisture content even, at about 70% of soil water holding capacity) and spatially explicit sampling was performed appropriately. Thus samples of about 100 mg were punched out (using an auger; 4 mm diameter) at different sites within the soil compartments. Triplicate samples were used for the further analyses by different methods, including dilution plating according to Nazir et al. (2013) and microscopy. For this, the aboveground and soil parts were split, after which fungal biomass was determined in each compartment using hyphal separation [for soil] and microscopic quantification of hyphal length (Zhang and Zhang, 1994; Shen et al., 2016). The microscopy further included the use of sterile cover slips in the soil microcosms at a point distant from the fungal and bacterial inocula. When the fungal migration front had encroached upon the cover slips, these were carefully removed from the microcosms and analyzed under the microscope. For the analyses, a Zeiss microscope (Zeiss, Jena, Germany) with phase contrast was used.

Data Analysis

All experiments were performed in triplicate per treatment. At each time point, the CFU data were log-transformed, after which average values and standard deviations (shown between brackets in the text and/or as error bars in the figures) were calculated. Comparisons were made by statistical tests (Student’s t-test, ANOVA) using the SPSS package (SPSS, IBM, Statistics 1.8 for Windows), and data are reported as being significant at P < 0.05.

Results

Effect of Growth Conditions on the Hydrophobicity of Mycelia of Lyophyllum sp. Strain Karsten

The CA of small water droplets on the mycelial mats of Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten growing under conditions of varying humidity and substrate availability were quantified. Mycelia exposed to air (i.e., to dry conditions, as occurring in aboveground mycelium) were highly hydrophobic, i.e., 125 ± 5° (MA) and 126 ± 2° (OFM). This was independent of the growth substrate and drying time of the filters (Table 1). Mycelia growing submerged in 0.9% NaCl solution (as a mimic for soil pore water) were significantly less hydrophobic, exhibiting CAs of 64 ± 20° (OFM) and 32 ± 6° (MA) (Table 1). Increasing the drying period to 6 h changed the CA to 61° on MA, and 56° on OFM, respectively, indicating the possible formation of hydrophobins at the hyphal surfaces. In order to assess hydrophobin-related impacts on the CAs, during drying we prepared mycelia that were treated by a known inhibitor of eukaryotic protein biosynthesis, CH. The CH -treated cells exhibited clearly reduced CA of 14 ± 1° (MA) and 44 ± 11° (OFM), that were virtually independent of the drying time (Table 1).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

TABLE 1. Effects of growth conditions and drying time on the contact angles (CA) of mycelia of Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten.

B. terrae BS001 Interactions with Fungal Hyphae in Soil Microcosms

We previously reported (Nazir et al., 2012, 2014) that B. terrae BS001 migrates along with developing hyphae of Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten and other fungi through soil, establishing varying population densities at the migration front. Here, we evaluated the type of hyphae that may facilitate the bacterial co-migration and also the distribution of bacterial cells over the mycelial network.

Spatial Distribution of B. terrae BS001 Cells

To evaluate the spatial distribution of BS001 cells on the total (soil-bound and aerial) hyphae of Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten and Trichoderma asperellum 302, different sites along the distal length of growth were sampled on the same day (day 15 after inoculation) from the soil microcosms (Figure 1A). First, the control microcosms did not show any bacterial migration, confirming previous data (Nazir et al., 2014). In the fungal-containing microcosms, the BS001 cell numbers at the inoculation site were similar for both fungi, at about 107 CFU per g soil. These then increased and decreased differentially toward the distal ends, i.e., the hyphal fronts (Figure 1). As shown in this Figure, Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten supported relatively consistent bacterial loads on the hyphae, while Trichoderma asperellum 302 showed an increase in bacterial numbers, followed by a slight decrease. The microscopic observations confirmed these observations.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 1. Burkholderia terrae BS001 interaction with two soil fungi-Microcosm experiments. B. terrae BS001 distribution along fungal hyphae (A) at different spatial points sampled on the same day for Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten (Lyo; represented by squares) and Trichoderma asperellum 302 (Trich302; represented by diamonds) and (B) on different hyphal types, i.e., aboveground (gray) or belowground (black).

Colonization of Soil-Bound vs. Aerial Lyophyllum sp. Strain Karsten Hyphae by B. terrae BS001 Cells

In a second analysis, the bacterial loads on soil-bound versus aerial hyphae were studied in the Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten and Trichoderma asperellum 302 microcosms. From the samples, aerial hyphae were scraped off with sterilized forceps, whereas the remaining soil beneath the aerial hyphae served to sample the soil-bound hyphae. The distribution of fungal hyphae (m per g soil) over the below- and aboveground compartments was 6.8 (0.8 [standard deviation])/53.0 (0.7) for Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten and 16.6 (5.8)/29.0 (11.5) for Trichoderma asperellum 302, respectively. The bacterial loads on the former hyphae of Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten were about 108 CFU per g of dry soil (estimated to equal 0.15 × 108 CFU per m of hyphal tissue, whereas those on the aerial ones were <1/m of hyphal tissue (∼500 CFU per g), as also confirmed by microscopic observations. Thus, the B. terrae BS001 CFU numbers on the soil-dwelling hyphae were significantly (orders of magnitude) higher than those on the aerial hyphae (P < 0.05) (Figure 1B). Similar observations were made with B. terrae BS001 migrating along with Trichoderma asperellum 302. In the latter experiment, the estimated bacterial loads on the soil-dwelling versus the aerial hyphae were about 0.2 × 106 per m and <1/m (∼300 CFU per g), respectively. These values were also significantly different from each other (P < 0.05).

B. terrae BS001 Interaction with Lyophyllum sp. Strain Karsten in Microtiter Plates

Lyophyllum sp. Strain Karsten Growth

To elucidate if Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten was able to adhere to, and grow in, the wells of a polystyrene microtiter plate, fungal growth was monitored over 72 h. The Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten mycelium rapidly adhered to the surface of the wells and started to develop robust biomass after 3 h, which grew continuously further until 72 h (Supplementary Figure S2). In the light of the data indicating rapid growth, a 1.5 h adherence period was used in the ensuing fungal-bacterial interaction experiments. In these, observations were made by CLSM and SEM.

CLSM Observation of the B. terrae BS001-GFP -Lyophyllum sp. Strain Karsten Interaction

The progression of the B. terrae BS001-GFP -Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten interaction was analyzed using CLSM. Reconstructed 3-D images clearly indicated that the B. terrae BS001-GFP cells adhered irregularly to the hyphal surfaces (Figure 2). The cells appeared to cluster in specific regions of the hyphae (white arrow in Figures 2a,c, higher magnification in Figure 2b). Calcofluor white proved to be an excellent marker that stained the Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten cell wall, which ensured the perfect observation of the complex network of hyphae that composes the fungal mycelium (Figure 2). We also observed an important sexual reproduction structure, called the “clamp” (Figure 2a, white bold arrow).

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 2. Microscopy of the interaction between B. terrae BS001-GFP and Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten. (a-c) Green B. terrae BS001 cells attached to Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten hyphae (blue). Cells cluster in specific hyphal regions, coined hot spots. Magnification 63×, bar: 20 μM. (b) Magnified image of a hot spot area (indicated with a white square). (c) Virtual zoom of a hot spot area indicated with a white narrow arrow. Calcofluor white staining showed ‘clamps’ (bold white arrow), which are unique reproductive structures of Basidiomycetes. (d) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) of Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten hyphae, showing a characteristic dolipore pore (red ) and a clamp, formed during asexual reproduction. Bar: 1 μm.

Electron Microscopic Observation of the B. terrae BS001 -Lyophyllum sp. Strain Karsten Interaction

In order to examine the B. terrae BS001 -Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten interaction at higher resolution, SEM was applied to systems that had co-existed for 1.5 h and then had been thoroughly washed. Controls included fungus-only and bacterium-only samples. Clearly, the controls showed that both the bacterial cells (Figure 3A) and the hyphal networks (Figure 3B) were well preserved. These observations also confirmed the abundant presence of clamps in the fungal networks (Figure 3C, inset). The latter were better visualized by TEM (Figure 2D), confirming the intense asexual reproduction inside the mycelia. Furthermore, large amounts of extracellular material adhering to the Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten hyphae, also connecting these to each other, were observed (Figure 3C). Next, analyses of the interactomes showed the B. terrae BS001 cells to adhere to the fungal hyphae in an irregular way (Figures 3D-F). Often, these cells were found to be enfolded in extracellular material (Figures 3D-F, insets). The electron microscopic observations thus confirmed that the strain BS001 cells formed clusters at particular “hot spot” points of interaction with the fungal hyphae (Figures 3E,F). We surmised that such points of interaction might be characterized by particular fungal cell surface compounds that served as anchoring points for the bacterial cells.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 3. Ultrastructural study of the B. terrae BS001 interaction with Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of (A) B. terrae BS001; (B-C) Mycelia of Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten, showing many “clamps” (inset) and extracellular material (white arrow); (D-F) Bacterial-fungal interactomes showing B. terrae BS001 cells enfolded by extracellular material (white arrow). Bars: 50 μm (B); 5 μm (A,C); 2,5 μm (D,E), and 1 μm (F).

Structural Analysis of Lyophyllum sp. Strain Karsten CMHs

In a recent paper, we provide the arguments for a focus on CMHs as dynamic molecular ‘rafts’ that can become surface-exposed in fungal hyphae (Haq et al., 2016). We thus questioned the putative role of such CMH ‘anchors’ as sites for attachment of mycosphere bacteria. Here, we produced CMH from Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten as shown in Supplementary Figure S1. After extraction with mixtures of chloroform and methanol followed by different chromatographic separation steps, an orcinol-reactive band was detected by HPTLC, with a chromatographic mobility corresponding to a standard bovine brain cerebroside.

Analysis of the GlcCer-enriched fraction by positive ion mode ESI-MS then showed a cluster of singly charged ions with m/z ranging from 730 to 800 (Supplementary Figure S3), with a profile similar to that of other fungal cerebrosides (Barreto-Bergter et al., 2011). Four major ion species were observed at m/z 734, 750, 766 and 778. These were subjected to ESI-MS/MS analysis (Supplementary Figure S3). The loss of 162 units, common to all CMH analyzed and diagnostic of a monosaccharide unit, gave rise to major daughter ions at m/z 574, 588, 604 and 616 [M – hexose + Li+], corresponding to the ceramide monolithiated ion from the parental ions at m/z 734, 750, 766 and 778, respectively. The daughter ion at m/z 480 is consistent with the loss of an OH-C16 fatty acid (Supplementary Figure S3). Two fragments at m/z 187 and 169 confirmed the presence of a hexose. The difference of 16 units observed among CMH structures (Supplementary Figures S3B,C) remained detectable after loss of either monosaccharide or fatty acid, suggesting that the long chain base could have an extra hydroxyl group. The daughter ion at m/z 496 is consistent with the loss of a OH-C18 fatty acid present in the ceramide from structures B and D (Figure 4). Based on these observations, we concluded that the glycosphingolipid structures (Figure 4) consist of a hexose, a long chain base, 9-methyl-4,8-sphingadienine (Figure 4A) or 4-OH-9-methyl-4,8-sphingadienine (Figures 4B–D) and hydroxylated C16:0 fatty acid (Figures 4A–C) or a hydroxylated C18:0 fatty acid (Figure 4D).

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 4. Proposed structures for the CMH species of Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten. Structures composed by a hexose, a long chain base, 9-methyl-4,8-sphingadienine (A) or 4-OH-9-methyl-4,8-sphingadienine (B–D) and hydroxylated C16:0 fatty acid (A–C) or a hydroxylated C18:0 fatty acid (D).

Is the Adherence of B. terrae BS001 Cells to Lyophyllum sp. Strain Karsten Hyphae Aided by a Glycosphingolipid?

In order to elucidate whether CMH participates in the Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten interaction with B. terrae BS001, we combined visual and quantitative analyses, using CLSM. Initially, the interaction was evaluated at two different times. The results showed that, after 3 h, in the treatment without anti-fungal antibodies, a considerable amount of bacterial cells had adhered to the fungal hyphae (Figure 5A). After 24 h, as both fungi and bacteria had grown, the fungal biomass had increased and new bacterial cells had also attached to the hyphae (Figure 5B).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 5. Confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) reconstructed Z-stack images of Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten interaction with B. terrae BS001. Magnification 63×, bar: 20 μM. The fungal cell wall was stained with Calcofluor white M2R (blue fluorescence), B. terrae BS001-GFP is visible by green fluorescence and the antibodies binding to CMH on the fungal cell wall were conjugated to alexafluor-546 dye (red fluorescence). (A) Three hours of interaction; (B) 24 h of interaction.

In the systems to which anti-CMH antibodies had been added before the interaction with bacterial cells, varied red, green, and red-green areas appeared. First, areas where red fluorescence overwhelmed the green were taken to indicate inhibition of bacterial adhesion by the antibody. Remarkably, other areas, with overlapping red-green fluorescence, indicated bacterial attachment next to that of antibody. Finally, areas where green fluorescence dominated indicated bacterial cell adherence at the expense of adherence of, and possible blockage by, the antibody. Figure 5A (3 h of interaction) shows areas in which the presence of the antibody appears to inhibit bacterial cell adherence (red > green fluorescence). In contrast, at 24 h, bacterial adhesion was observed to occur throughout most of the hyphae (Figure 5B). Further quantitative analyses were performed using the 3h interaction images.

Visual evaluation of the reconstructed Z-stack of all confocal planes at 3 h that were scanned showed two main patterns of bacterial adherence: (1) some hyphal areas were highly covered with green (gfp-marked) bacteria, while other areas had just few bacterial cells adhered. The latter were highly covered with anti-CMH antibody (Figure 6A). Analysis of the different layers of the biomass separately, as single confocal planes, revealed that the presence of anti-CMH antibodies inhibited cellular adherence to the fungal hyphae mostly in the top and middle layers. In contrast, in the deeper layers bacterial adherence was more evident along the hyphae (Figure 6B). A quantitative analysis of the fluorescence intensity of 40-50 hyphae/field for each fluorescent dye confirmed this contention. Representative fields of both the top and bottom layers are shown in Figures 6C,D, respectively. Three different representative areas of these images were selected and the graphs (a, b, c and d, e, f) show the fluorescence intensity patterns for each dye along the selected area. In the top layer, all three graphs show intense red fluorescence overwhelming the green color, indicating that hyphae covered with anti-CMH antibody have few (a, c) or no (b) adhering bacterial cells. Thus CMH molecules are indicated to be involved in the attachment of B. terrae BS001 to Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten. In the bottom layers, the number of hyphae with intense green fluorescence surpassed the red fluorescence increases (Figure 6D, representative graph e), which indicated that the CMH molecules may not be the only moieties involved in bacterial attachment.

FIGURE 6
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 6. The role of CMH in the B. terrae BS001 interaction with Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten. Magnification 63×, bar: 20 μM. The fungal cell wall was stained with Calcofluor white M2R (blue fluorescence), B. terrae BS001-GFP is visible by green fluorescence and CMH on fungal cell wall was stained with alexa-546 (red fluorescence, see legend Figure 5). (A) Z-stack reconstructed area after 3 h of Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten and B. terrae BS001 interaction.(B) Quantitative analysis of fluorescence intensity, hyphal area in depth (of the biomass). As CMH antibodies were added before the interaction, red-green fluorescence intensity indicates areas where cell attachment to the fungal cell wall occurs via CMH. Areas with overlapsed red-green fluorescence indicate attachment through the antibody, areas with prevailing red fluorescence indicate inhibition of cell adhesion; areas where green fluorescence prevails indicate bacterial adhesion irrespective of antibody presence. (C) Top layer; (D) Bottom layer. Areas a, b, and c of image (C) and d, e, and f of image (D) were quantified regarding fluorescence intensity. Each graph: intensity of each fluorescent dye along the selected hyphae. This analysis showed that pre-incubation with CMH antibodies blocked cell adherence to the hyphal top layers more effectively than that to the bottom layers, where bacterial attachment occurred regardless of antibody presence.

Discussion

Burkholderia terrae, exemplified by strain BS001, has been reported to be enriched in the mycospheres of the ectomycorrhizal fungus Laccaria proxima and the basidiomycete Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten in soil (Warmink and van Elsas, 2008; Warmink and van Elsas, 2009). The association with the mycelial networks in soil is important for migration over longer distances (mm range), as it facilitates the passage of air-filled voids in the soil (De Boer et al., 2005) and allows to access new soil microhabitats (Kohlmeier et al., 2005; Furuno et al., 2010; Nazir et al., 2010).

Nazir et al. (2014) indicated that strain BS001 has a ‘broad’ fungal-interactive ability, which can result in the emergence of bacterial cell agglomerates/biofilms associated with hyphal networks. Given this capacity, we surmised that physical parameters of the fungal surfaces determine, to a great extent, their colonization and subsequent migration success (Kohlmeier et al., 2005). Thus, fungal surfaces may provide shared local conditions that are conducive to colonization by the bacterial associate. Here, we examined the B. terrae BS001 – Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten interactome with respect to discernable characteristics of the colonization process, including the hydrophobicity of the hyphae in response to the environment (as related to ‘conditions’), its ultrastructural aspects and the potential presence of a receptor moiety at the fungal surface.

In soil, for both Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten and Trichoderma asperellum 302, the abundance of strain BS001 CFUs was by far the highest on the soil-bound hyphae (soil at about 70% of water-holding capacity, at which pores with neck sizes of 4 μm are estimated to be water-filled) as compared to the aerial hyphae. Hyphae growing in humid conditions such as in the soil were found to be more hydrophilic than aerial hyphae (Table 1). The more efficient colonization of the hydrophilic hyphae can be best explained by the presence of broader liquid films (Kohlmeier et al., 2005) which serve as dispersal and growth habitats for strain BS001, which itself was found to be hydrophilic (CA = 22 ± 1°). This underpins the importance of the compatibility of (micro-)habitats for growth and ecophysiological responses. The physicochemical surface properties of the hyphae may thus constitute important criteria that modulate the interactions of B. terrae BS001 with Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten.

From the experiment in the microtiter plates, we concluded that B. terrae BS001 adheres to, and creates a biofilm around, the Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten hyphae. Material, presumably consisting of extracellular polysaccharides (EPSs), was found around the BS001 cells. Such material was also found in the system with the fungus only. Hence, EPSs can be produced by Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten hyphae and/or by the fungal-bacterial interacting pair under the conditions applied. The EPS may serve as a protectant as well as an anchoring medium for the bacterium, allowing it to move from one point to another. Furthermore, the matrix formed by the EPS may electrostatically interact with the charged surface of the fungus, establishing a physicochemical bond.

The ultrastructural study of the Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten – B. terrae BS001 interactome confirmed that the bacterial cells form clusters at particular “points of interaction” with the fungal hyphae. Such cells not only adhered to the fungal surface, but were also enfolded in the extracellular material, confirming that they were organized in structures that resemble biofilms along the hyphae. This material, often connecting the hyphae, was also observed in Lyophyllum sp. Karsten preparations, suggesting it forms its own ‘biofilm’ in vitro. The same observation was recently made for other filamentous fungi like Aspergillus sp. (Kaur and Singh, 2014) and Mucorales (Singh et al., 2011), and even multi-layered biofilms have been found (Sardi et al., 2014). The biofilm ‘mode of growth’ is also prevalent in bacteria in natural settings (Costerton et al., 1995), and the presence of an extracellular matrix (ECM) is key to biofilm success (Donlan and Costerton, 2002). It is associated with an increased resistance to stressors such as UV radiation, drought, phagocytosis and antimicrobial/pesticide/toxic compounds (Flemming and Wingender, 2010). In this study, we found a potential ‘coalescence’ of bacterial and fungal biofilms. Multi-species biofilms can prevail in nature (Hogan and Kolter, 2002; Brandl et al., 2011; Morales et al., 2013; Trejo-Hernández et al., 2014) if they confer a survival strategy to the partners. In such biofilms, the ECM, composed of secreted compounds, establishes a complex matrix structure (Flemming and Wingender, 2010). Here, polysaccharides secreted by B. terrae BS001 and Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten cells may have incited the mixed biofilm, with implications for the life of both partners. Further studies should focus on the composition of this ECM and its role in bacterial adherence, co-migration and other interactive actions.

Given the fact that bacterial adherence occurred in clusters and was not spread along the entire hyphal network, we examined whether the adherence of BS001 cells to the fungal cell wall was mediated by a specific ligand-receptor system. From work with other fungi, it is known that, next to the common fungal cell wall compounds chitin and β-glucan, CMH moieties provide specific exposed sites at the fungal surface. These glycosphingolipids have been indicated as adhesion receptors for several medically related bacteria. Zhang and Zhang (1994), using a TLC overlay assay, identified sulfated glycolipids as the receptors for attachment of Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae to porcine cells. Moreover, Borrelia burgdorferi cells were found to bind specifically to galactosylceramide (GalCer) and glucosylceramide (GlcCer) present in various types of cells (Kaneda et al., 1997).

More recently, a specific sugar sequence, such as NeuAcα2→3 Galβ- (present as non-reducing end of the glycolipid) was found to function as the attachment site for Vibrio harveyi at the epithelial cells of fish intestines (Chisada et al., 2013). Concerning the binding of fungi such as Cryptococcus neoformans, Candida albicans, Histoplasma capsulatum, and Sporothrix schenckii, these were found to bind to lactosyl ceramide. Terminal galactose in the lactosyl ceramide was essential for the binding, as removal of this sugar abolished it (Jimenez-Lucho et al., 1990).

In order to elucidate whether CMH participates in the Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten interaction with B. terrae BS001, we combined visual and quantitative analysis of CLSM Z-stacks. Clearly, in the top and middle layers of the interactome, blocking of CMH by an antibody hampered bacterial adherence, while in deeper layers strong bacterial adherence was evident along the hyphae. The collective results indicate that the fungal glycosphingolipid CMH can act as a receptor in the fungal cell wall for the attachment of B. terrae BS001 cells. However, the data also indicated that CMH might be part of a bigger structure that governs the physical interactions between B. terrae BS001 cells and the fungal hyphae.

In summary, our work confirmed that B. terrae BS001 colonizes the hydrophilic rather than the hydrophobic hyphae of Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten, which highlights the relevance of local (soil) conditions, such as water availability, for the interactions. For instance, the aerial hyphae growing over the soil, being abundant, were very poor carriers of the bacterial cells, whereas those growing through the soil, being a relative minority, represented excellent colonization sites. We also showed that bacterial adherence occurs in specific areas of the hyphal surface of Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten and that the fungal glycosphingolipid CMH can act as a receptor in the fungal cell wall for attachment of B. terrae BS001 cells. From our further studies, we then obtained evidence for the contention that B. terrae BS001 adheres to, and creates biofilms around, the Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten hyphae, which also grows in a biofilm-related way. We hypothesized that, when together, Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten and B. terrae BS001 form a mixed biofilm, in which the ECM also contributes to the interaction between the species.

Author Contributions

TV, RN, GdS, RC, and LW conceived of and analyzed all experiments; TV, RN, SR, EB-B, LW, and JDvE analyzed the data, drafted, and revised the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version to be published.

Funding

TV, SR, and EB-B were financially supported by grants from Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) and Fundação Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Rio de Janeiro (FAPERJ). RC was financially supported by CNPq-Brazil. RN was financially supported by the HEC programme of the government of Pakistan and further assisted by the Soil Biotechnology Foundation, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the technician Fernando Almeida; from the Centro Nacional de Bioimagens do Rio de Janeiro (CENABIO), Brazil, for helping with confocal imaging acquisition and Centro de Espectrometria de Massas de Biomoléculas (CEMBIO, Rio de Janeiro – RJ, Brazil) for the ESI-MS data analysis.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2016.01689/full#supplementary-material

References

Barreto-Bergter, E., Sassaki, G. L., and de Souza, L. M. (2011). Structural analysis of fungal cerebrosides. Front. Microbiol. 5:239. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2011.00239

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brandl, M. T., Carter, M. Q., Parker, C. T., Chapman, M. R., Huynh, S., and Zhou, Y. (2011). Salmonella biofilm formation on Aspergillus niger involves cellulose–chitin interactions. PLoS One 6:e25553. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0025553

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chisada, S., Shimizu, K., Kamada, H., Matsunaga, N., Okino, N., and Ito, M. (2013). Vibrios adhere to epithelial cells in the intestinal tract of red sea bream, Pagrus major, utilizing GM4 as an attachment site. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 341, 18–26. doi: 10.1111/1574-6968.12082

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Costerton, J. W., Lewandowski, Z., Caldwell, D. E., Korber, D. R., and Lappin-Scott, H. M. (1995). Microbial biofilms. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 49, 711–745. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.49.100195.003431

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

De Boer, W., Folman, L. B., Summerbell, R. C., and Boddy, L. (2005). Living in a fungal world: impact of fungi on soil bacterial niche development. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 29, 795–811. doi: 10.1016/j.femsre.2004.11.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Donlan, R. M., and Costerton, J. W. (2002). Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 15, 167–193. doi: 10.1128/CMR.15.2.167-193.2002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Flemming, H.-C., and Wingender, J. (2010). The biofilm matrix. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 8, 623–633. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2415

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Folch, J., Lees, M., and Sloane Stanley, G. H. (1957). A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipids from animal tissues. J. Biol. Chem. 226, 497–509.

Google Scholar

Frey-Klett, P., Burlinson, P., Deveau, A., Barret, M., Tarkka, M., and Sarniguet, A. (2011). Bacterial–fungal interactions: hyphens between agricultural, clinical, environmental, and food microbiologists. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev 75, 583–609. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00020-11

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fritsche, K., van den Berg, M., de Boer, W., van Beek, T. A., Raaijmakers, J. M., van Veen, J. A., et al. (2014). Biosynthetic genes and activity spectrum of antifungal polyynes from Collimonas fungivorans Ter331. Environ. Microbiol. 16, 1334–1345. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12440

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Furuno, S., Päzolt, K., Rabe, C., Neu, T. R., Harms, H., and Wick, L. Y. (2010). Fungal mycelia allow chemotactic dispersal of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria in water-unsaturated systems. Environ. Microbiol. 12, 1391–1398. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02022.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Haq, I. U., Calixto, R. O., Yang, P., Dos Santos, G. M. P., Barreto–Bergter, E., and van Elsas, J. D. (2016). Chemotaxis and adherence to fungal surfaces are key components of the behavioral response of Burkholderia terrae BS001 to two selected soil fungi. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 92, fiw164. doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiw164

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Haq, I. U., Zhang, M., Yang, P., and van, Elsas JD (2014). The interactions of bacteria with fungi in soil: emerging concepts. Adv. Appl. Microbiol. 89, 185–215. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-800259-9.00005-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hogan, D., and Kolter, R. (2002). Pseudomonas-Candida interactions: an ecological role for virulence factors. Science 296, 2229–2232. doi: 10.1126/science.1070784

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jimenez-Lucho, V., Ginsburg, V., and Krivan, H. C. (1990). Cryptococcus neoformans, Candida albicans, and other fungi bind specifically to the glycosphingolipid lactosylceramide (Galβ1-4Glcβ1-1Cer), a possible adhesion receptor for yeasts. Infect. Immun. 58, 2085–2090.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Kaneda, K., Masuzawa, T., Yasugami, K., Suzuki, T., Suzuki, Y., and Yanagihara, Y. (1997). Glycosphingolipid-binding protein of Borrelia burgdorferi sensu lato. Infect. Immun. 65, 3180–3185.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Kaur, S., and Singh, S. (2014). Biofilm formation by Aspergillus fumigatus. Med. Mycol. 52, 2–9. doi: 10.3109/13693786.2013.819592

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kohlmeier, S., Smits, T. H. M., Ford, R. M., Keel, C., Harms, H., and Wick, L. Y. (2005). Taking the fungal highway: mobilization of pollutant-degrading bacteria by fungi. Environ. Sci. Tech. 39, 4640–4646. doi: 10.1021/es047979z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mille–Lindblom, C., Fischer, H., and Tranvik, L. J. (2006). Antagonism between bacteria and fungi: substrate competition and a possible tradeoff between fungal growth and tolerance towards bacteria. Oikos 113, 233–242.

Google Scholar

Morales, D. K., Grahl, N., Okegbe, C., Dietrich, L. E., Jacobs, N. J., and Hogan, D. A. (2013). Control of Candida albicans metabolism and biofilm formation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa phenazines. MBio 4, e526–e512. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00526-12

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nazir, R. (2012). Interaction of Burkholderia Terrae with Soil Fungi. Dissertation thesis, University of Groningen, Groningen.

Nazir, R., Tazetdinova, D. I., and van Elsas, J. D. (2014). Burkholderia terrae BS001 migrates proficiently with diverse fungal hosts through soil and provides protection from antifungal agents. Front. Microbiol. 5:598. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00598

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nazir, R., Warmink, J. A., Boersma, H., and van Elsas, J. D. (2010). Mechanisms that promote bacterial fitness in fungal-affected soil microhabitats. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 71, 169–185. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2009.00807.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nazir, R., Warmink, J. A., Voordes, D. C., van de Bovenkamp, H. H., and van Elsas, J. D. (2013). Inhibition of mushroom formation and induction of glycerol release–ecological strategies of Burkholderia terrae BS001 to create a hospitable niche at the fungus Lyophyllum sp. Strain Karsten. Microb. Ecol. 65, 245–254. doi: 10.1007/s00248-012-0100-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nazir, R., Zhang, M., de Boer, W., and van Elsas, J. D. (2012). The capacity to comigrate with Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten through different soils is spread among several phylogenetic groups within the genus Burkholderia. Soil Biol. Biochem. 50, 221–233. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.03.015

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Riedlinger, J., Schrey, S. D., Tarkka, M. T., Hampp, R., Kapur, M., and Fiedler, H. P. (2006). Auxofuran, a novel metabolite that stimulates the growth of fly agaric, is produced by the mycorrhiza helper bacterium Streptomyces strain AcH505. Appl. Environ Microb. 72, 3550–3557. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.5.3550-3557.2006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rollin-Pinheiro, R., Liporagi-Lopes, L. C., de Meirelles, J. V., Souza, L. M., and Barreto-Bergter, E. (2014). Characterization of Scedosporium apiospermum glucosylceramides and their involvement in fungal development and macrophage functions. PLoS ONE 9:e98149. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098149

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sardi, J. D. C. O., Pitangui, N. D. S., Rodríguez-Arellanes, G., Taylor, M. L., Fusco-Almeida, A. M., and Mendes-Giannini, M. J. S. (2014). Highlights in pathogenic fungal biofilms. Rev. Iberoam. Micol. 31, 22–29. doi: 10.1016/j.riam.2013.09.014

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shen, Q., Kirschbaum, M. U. F., Hedley, M. J., and Arbestain, M. C. (2016). Testing an alternative method for estimating the length of fungal hyphae using photomicrography and image processing. PLoS ONE 11:e0157017. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Silva, S., Henriques, M., Martins, A., Oliveira, R., Williams, D., and Azeredo, J. (2009). Biofilms of non-Candida albicans Candida species: quantification, structure and matrix composition. Med. Mycol. 47, 681–689. doi: 10.3109/13693780802549594

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh, R., Shivaprakash, M. R., and Chakrabarti, A. (2011). Biofilm formation by zygomycetes: quantification, structure and matrix composition. Microbiology 157, 2611–2618. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.048504-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Smits, T. H., Wick, L. Y., Harms, H., and Keel, C. (2003). Characterization of the surface hydrophobicity of filamentous fungi. Environ. Microbiol. 5, 85–91. doi: 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003.00389.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Svennerholm, L. (1956). The quantitative estimation of cerebrosides in nervous tissue. J. Neurochem. 1, 42–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1956.tb12053.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trejo-Hernández, A., Andrade-Domínguez, A., Hernández, M., and Sergio Encarnación, S. (2014). Interspecies competition triggers virulence and mutability in Candida albicansPseudomonas aeruginosa mixed biofilms. ISME J. 8, 1974–1988. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.53

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Warmink, J. A., Nazir, R., Corten, B., and van Elsas, J. D. (2011). Hitchhikers on the fungal highway: the helper effect for bacterial migration via fungal hyphae. Soil Biol. Biochem. 43, 760–765. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.12.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Warmink, J. A., and van Elsas, J. D. (2008). Selection of bacterial populations in the mycosphere of Laccaria proxima: is type III secretion involved? ISME J. 2, 887–900. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2008.41

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Warmink, J. A., and van Elsas, J. D. (2009). Migratory response of soil bacteria to Lyophyllum sp. strain Karsten in soil microcosms. Appl. Environ. Microb. 75, 2820–2830. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02110-08

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wick, L. Y., de Munain, A. R., Springael, D., and Harms, H. (2002). Responses of Mycobacterium sp. LB501T to the low bioavailability of solid anthracene. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 58, 378–385. doi: 10.1007/s00253-001-0898-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, P., Zhang, M., Warmink, J. A., Wang, M., and van Elsas, J. D. (2016). The type three secretion system facilitates migration of Burkholderia terrae BS001 in the mycosphere of two soil-borne fungi. Biol. Fertil. Soils 52, 1037–1046. doi: 10.1007/s00374-016-1140-6

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Z., and Zhang, C. (1994). A method for the quantification of Frankia by estimation of hyphal length. Protoplasma 183, 182–184. doi: 10.1007/BF01276825

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Burkholderia terrae, Lyophyllum sp. Karsten, fungal-bacterial association, cerebroside, CMH, soil fungi

Citation: Vila T, Nazir R, Rozental S, dos Santos GMP, Calixto ROR, Barreto-Bergter E, Wick LY and van Elsas JD (2016) The Role of Hydrophobicity and Surface Receptors at Hyphae of Lyophyllum sp. Strain Karsten in the Interaction with Burkholderia terrae BS001 – Implications for Interactions in Soil. Front. Microbiol. 7:1689. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01689

Received: 25 July 2016; Accepted: 10 October 2016;
Published: 27 October 2016.

Edited by:

Helio K. Takahashi, Federal University of São Paulo, Brazil

Reviewed by:

Gerardo Díaz-Godínez, Autonomous University of Tlaxcala, Mexico
Pilar Junier, University of Neuchâtel, Switzerland

Copyright © 2016 Vila, Nazir, Rozental, dos Santos, Calixto, Barreto-Bergter, Wick and van Elsas. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Jan Dirk van Elsas, j.d.van.elsas@rug.nl

Present address: Taissa V. M. Vila, Department of Biology, University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, USA