ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Microbial Metabolism in Soil at Subzero Temperatures: Adaptation Mechanisms Revealed by Position-Specific 13C Labeling
- 1Department of Agricultural Soil Science, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
- 2Department of Soil Science of Temperate Ecosystems, University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
- 3Institute of Environmental Sciences, Kazan Federal University, Kazan, Russia
Although biogeochemical models designed to simulate carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) dynamics in high-latitude ecosystems incorporate extracellular parameters, molecular and biochemical adaptations of microorganisms to freezing remain unclear. This knowledge gap hampers estimations of the C balance and ecosystem feedback in high-latitude regions. To analyze microbial metabolism at subzero temperatures, soils were incubated with isotopomers of position-specifically 13C-labeled glucose at three temperatures: +5 (control), -5, and -20°C. 13C was quantified in CO2, bulk soil, microbial biomass, and dissolved organic carbon (DOC) after 1, 3, and 10 days and also after 30 days for samples at -20°C. Compared to +5°C, CO2 decreased 3- and 10-fold at -5 and -20°C, respectively. High 13C recovery in CO2 from the C-1 position indicates dominance of the pentose phosphate pathway at +5°C. In contrast, increased oxidation of the C-4 position at subzero temperatures implies a switch to glycolysis. A threefold higher 13C recovery in microbial biomass at -5 than +5°C points to synthesis of intracellular compounds such as glycerol and ethanol in response to freezing. Less than 0.4% of 13C was recovered in DOC after 1 day, demonstrating complete glucose uptake by microorganisms even at -20°C. Consequently, we attribute the fivefold higher extracellular 13C in soil than in microbial biomass to secreted antifreeze compounds. This suggests that with decreasing temperature, intracellular antifreeze protection is complemented by extracellular mechanisms to avoid cellular damage by crystallizing water. The knowledge of sustained metabolism at subzero temperatures will not only be useful for modeling global C dynamics in ecosystems with periodically or permanently frozen soils, but will also be important in understanding and controlling the adaptive mechanisms of food spoilage organisms.
Microbial processes in high-latitude ecosystems with permafrost or frozen soils during winter periods are important contributors to global carbon (C) and nitrogen (N) cycling. Metabolic activity has been detected in soil at temperatures as low as -39°C (Panikov et al., 2006; Schaefer and Jafarov, 2016) and an absence of subzero temperature limit for microbial metabolism was suggested by Price and Sowers (2004). Although biogeochemical models designed to simulate C and N dynamics in high-latitude ecosystems incorporate extracellular parameters (Schaefer and Jafarov, 2016), molecular and biochemical adaptations responsible for microbial freeze tolerance remain unclear. This knowledge gap hampers the estimation of C balances and ecosystem feedback responses. Consequently, tracing the metabolic pathways through which microorganisms transform organic substances under frozen conditions is crucial for unraveling the metabolic adaptation mechanisms (Scandellari et al., 2009; Dijkstra et al., 2011b; Dippold et al., 2014). Physiological studies have demonstrated that microorganisms remain metabolically active under frozen conditions, even at temperatures below -20°C (Panikov et al., 2006; Amato and Christner, 2009). A recent study has shown metabolism suggestive of microbial growth (DNA replication) at temperatures down -20°C (Tuorto et al., 2014). Therefore, a better understanding of how microorganisms circumvent challenges under frozen conditions is crucial. The challenges that organisms experience under frozen conditions include: (1) denaturation and loss of protein flexibility, (2) loss of membrane fluidity, which affects nutrient transport and decreases the activity of membrane-bound enzymes (Chattopadhyay, 2006), and (3) DNA and RNA secondary structures become more stable, inhibiting replication, transcription, and translation (D’Amico et al., 2006). Extracellularly, freezing leads to: (1) low water availability and activity (Oquist et al., 2009; Stevenson et al., 2015), (2) low thermal energy, slowing diffusion of nutrients, and excreted wastes to and from microorganisms (Hoehler and Jorgensen, 2013), and (3) high solute concentrations causing osmotic imbalance (Lorv et al., 2014). Intrusive ice crystals formed intracellularly and extracellularly can mechanically damage the cells (Gilichinsky et al., 2003). Several studies have been conducted to understand the survival strategies adopted by microorganisms to overcome these challenges. Attributes include the synthesis of cold-adapted enzymes that have high specific activities at low temperature (Herbert, 1989; Berry and Foegeding, 1997; Nakagawa et al., 2003), synthesis of antifreeze proteins (AFP) that bind to ice crystals, inhibiting their growth and recrystallization (Fletcher et al., 2001; Holt, 2003; Lorv et al., 2014), and adjustment of membrane composition by synthesis of unsaturated fatty acids to increase fluidity (Berry and Foegeding, 1997; Drotz et al., 2010).
Most of the studies on metabolism at low temperatures are based on isolated pure cultures from permafrost or used permafrost samples with inherently adapted microbes (Rivkina et al., 2000; Mykytczuk et al., 2013; Tuorto et al., 2014). However, subzero temperatures are also relevant to soils in temperate zones that freeze during winter. In frozen state, significant greenhouse gases are released from temperate soils, which make these soils a good analog for what we might expect from thawing permafrost (Nikrad et al., 2016). The importance of these soils in global C cycling while frozen and their vulnerability to thawing, calls for a better understanding of how microbes in these soils will contribute to global C feedback (Nikrad et al., 2016). This study was therefore designed to gain insights into microbial activities in temperate frozen soils. The study is bolstered by the novel method of applying position-specifically labeled substances as metabolic tracers in soil microbiomes (Scandellari et al., 2009; Dijkstra et al., 2011b; Apostel et al., 2015). Glucose has been identified as one of the most suitable candidates for tracing metabolic processes in soil, because it lacks physical and chemical interactions with mineral or organic soil components due to absence of charged functional groups or hydrophobic moieties (Fischer et al., 2010; Apostel et al., 2015). The use of position-specifically labeled glucose permits detailed reconstruction of microbial metabolic pathways and enables conclusions to be drawn on the microbial products formed under frozen conditions (Scandellari et al., 2009; Dijkstra et al., 2011a; Dippold and Kuzyakov, 2013; Apostel et al., 2015). This approach helps to identify the metabolic adaptations for overcoming the challenges under frozen conditions.
Analyses of 13C incorporated from specific glucose positions into soil, microbial biomass, dissolved organic carbon (DOC), and CO2 were conducted to identify microbial metabolic adaptations in frozen soil habitats. Poor water availability and low thermal energy limit microbial activity in frozen conditions. To survive these stresses, microorganisms form biofilms composed of exopolysaccharides (EPS). Sugars units forming the EPS are synthesized via the pentose phosphate pathway. Therefore, we hypothesized that the glucose C-1 position will be preferentially oxidized to meet energy demands. Consequently, high 13C recovery from the glucose C-1 position is expected in CO2. More of the remaining glucose C positions will be used for EPS synthesis than cellular compounds at subzero temperatures. This would result in higher 13C in the extracellular environment than in microbial biomass from the remaining glucose C positions due to the secreted EPS.
Materials and Methods
The soils were collected (0–10 cm depth) from agriculturally used loamy Luvisol in northern Bavaria (49°54′ northern latitude; 11°08′ eastern longitude, 500 masl) in August 2014, sieved to 2 mm, and stored for 1 day at +5°C except for samples (n = 3) used to determine dry weight. Mean annual temperature and precipitation at the site are +7°C and 874 mm, respectively. The soil had a pH (KCl) of 4.88, a pH (H2O) of 6.49, a total organic carbon (TOC) and total nitrogen content of 1.77 and 0.19%, respectively, and a cation exchange capacity of 13 cmolC kg-1.
Screw-cap glass microcosms (10 cm diameter and height of 12 cm) with a base layer of quartz sand were used for incubations. Eighty grams samples of soil were transferred to sample rings and installed on ceramic plates above the quartz sand. The soils were rewetted to field capacity by adding 10 ml of water to the underlying sand at +5°C for 2 days. Thereafter, the microcosms were preconditioned at +5, -5, and -20°C for 24 h. These temperatures were chosen to simulate (1) average annual soil temperature at the sampling site (control), (2) average winter temperature, and (3) lowest temperatures in some winters on this site and common deep freezer storage temperatures, respectively. Four position-specifically 13C-labeled isotopomers of glucose (13C-1, 13C-2, 13C-4, and 13C-6), uniformly 13C-labeled (U-13C) and unlabeled glucose (natural abundance background) were applied to the soils in separate microcosms with four replicates of each. 5 ml of 2.55 mM glucose solutions were applied on top of the soil. This C concentration was less than 5% of microbial biomass C and therefore, does not alter microbial community structure (Kuzyakov, 2010). Cups with 5 ml of 1 M NaOH were placed in each microcosm to trap CO2. 20% (w/v) of NaCl was dissolved in NaOH traps at -20°C to depress the freezing point. The microcosms were sealed and incubated at the respective temperatures. NaOH in the vials was exchanged after 10 h, 1, 2, 3, 6, and 10 days at +5 and -5°C and in addition after 15, 20, and 30 days at -20°C. Soil samples were collected after 1, 3, and 10 days at +5 and -5°C and also after 30 days at -20°C, to account for the slow processes expected in deeply frozen conditions. Thirty grams of each sample was immediately subjected to chloroform fumigation-extraction, as described below.
Amount and δ13C Value of CO2
0.4 ml of each CO2 trap was diluted 1:10 with ultrapure water, and the CO2 content was determined with a non-dispersive infrared (NDIR) gas analyzer (TOC 5050, Shimadzu Corporation, Kyoto, Japan). The remainder of the CO2 in the NaOH traps was precipitated with 5 ml of 0.5 M SrCl2 solution. SrCO3 precipitates were separated by centrifuging four times at 2000 × g for 10 min and washing in between with Millipore water until pH 7 was attained. δ13C values of the dried SrCO3 (1–2 g) were measured with a Flash 2000 elemental analyzer coupled by a ConFlo III interface to a Delta V Advantage isotope ratio mass spectrometer (all Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany). 13C respired from the applied glucose was calculated according to a mixing model Eqs 1 and 2 (Gearing et al., 1991), where the C content of the background ([C]BG) in Eq. 1 was determined by Eq. 2.
[C]CO2/BG/appG C content of the sample/background/applied glucose (mg C g-1 soil)
rCO2/BG/appG 13C atom %-excess of labeled sample/background/applied glucose (at %)
Quantification of Bulk Soil C Content and 13C Signature
Aliquots of soil were freeze dried, ground in a ball mill and 13–15 mg were weighed into tin capsules. 13C isotope measurements were performed with EuroVector elemental analyzers (HEKAtech GmbH, Wegberg, Germany) coupled by a ConFlo III interface to a Delta Plus XP IRMS (both units from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany). C recovery from applied glucose was calculated according to Eqs 1 and 2.
13C in Microbial Biomass and DOC Determination
Microbial biomass C was determined by chloroform fumigation-extraction. Two subsamples of 12 g were taken from each soil sample. One set of subsamples was extracted directly, while the other was first fumigated with chloroform for 3 days in a desiccator to lyse microbial cells. Thirty-six milliliters of 0.05 M K2SO4 was used to extract organic C on an orbital shaker for 1.5 h. Samples were centrifuged for 10 min at 2000 rpm and the supernatant was filtered for determination of C concentration (TOC/TIC analyzer, Multi C/N 2100, Analytik Jena, Jena, Germany). About 25 mg (fumigated) and 40 mg (unfumigated) freeze-dried extracts were used for δ13C determination via EA-IRMS, performed by the same instrument coupling used for bulk soil δ13C determination. Incorporation of glucose C into fumigated and unfumigated samples was calculated according to Eqs 1 and 2. Microbial biomass C and 13C were calculated by subtracting unfumigated from fumigated values and dividing by an extractability correction factor of 0.45 (Wu et al., 1990). C concentration and 13C recovery in unfumigated samples are DOC and its 13C content, respectively.
A Nalimov outlier test with 95% significance level was performed on CO2. 13C incorporation into bulk soil, microbial biomass, and CO2 were tested for significant differences between the positions, time of incubation and effect of temperature with a factorial analysis of variance (ANOVA). If assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variances with groups were not met, outcomes were validated by a non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA. Significant differences were determined with Tukey’s honest significance difference (Tukey’s HSD) post hoc test at a confidence level of 95%. Statistical tests were performed with Statistica (version 12.0, Statsoft GmbH, Hamburg, Germany).
CO2 and Recovery of Incorporated 13C
CO2 was released down to -20°C, although cumulatively, there were 3- and 10-fold reductions at -5 and -20°C, respectively, compared to +5°C at day 10. Similarly, recovery of glucose-derived 13C in CO2 at -5 and -20°C was respectively 19 and 24% lower than +5°C (Figure 1A). At +5°C, 13C recovery in CO2 showed preferential oxidation of the glucose C-1 position. In contrast, the glucose C-4 position was the most respired at subzero temperatures. Irrespective of temperature, two phases of glucose C mineralization were observed: (1) high glucose 13C respiration within the first 3 days at 5°C and 2 days at -5 and -20°C and (2) low respiration of glucose-derived 13C thereafter (Figures 1B–D).
FIGURE 1. Cumulative CO2 and 13C in CO2. Cumulative CO2 (mean ± SEM, n = 4; solid symbols and continuous lines) and 13C (mean ± SEM, n = 4; open symbols and broken lines) recovered in CO2 released from uniformly labeled glucose (A) and cumulative 13C (mean ± SEM, n = 4) recovered in CO2 released from position-specifically labeled glucose at +5 (B), –5 (C), and –20°C (D). 13C curves were fitted with non-linear least-square regressions according to an exponential equation [cum13C(t) = 13Cmax∗(1 – e-kt)], where cum 13C (t) is the cumulative 13C amount depending on time, 13Cmax is the parametrically determined maximum of 13C, k is the mineralization rate, and t is time (parameter estimates in Supplementary Table S1). Steven’s runs test for the linearized, fitted 13C curves revealed no deviation from linearity (Supplementary Table S2). Significant differences (p < 0.05) between fitted curves are displayed in Supplementary Table S4.
13C in Bulk Soil and Microbial Biomass
At day 1, 13C recovery in bulk soil from uniformly labeled glucose was over 24% higher at -5°C than at +5 and -20°C. After the first day, recovery did not differ with temperature (Figure 2A). Similarly, position-specific patterns of 13C recovery in bulk soil were comparable between +5 and -20°C but differed at -5°C. At +5 and -20°C, 13C recoveries in bulk soil from C-2, C-4, and C-6 were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than C-1 (Figures 2B,D). In contrast, recovery from C-2 and C-6 was significantly higher (p < 0.05) than from C-1 and C-4 at -5°C (Figure 2C).
FIGURE 2. 13C recovery in bulk soil (BS) and microbial biomass (MB). 13C recovery (mean ± SEM, n = 4) from uniformly (A) and position-specifically labeled glucose in BS and extractable MB, 1, 3, 10, and 30 (–20°C) days after application at +5 (B), –5 (C), and –20°C (D). Total MBC at each temperature is provided in Supplementary Table S3. Significant effects (p < 0.05) of temperature, days, and individual glucose positions in BS are indicated by upper case letters above the error bars, and in extractable MB by lower case letters.
From uniformly labeled glucose, the highest 13C recovery from microbial biomass was obtained at -5°C and it was two and three times higher than at +5 and -20°C, respectively (Figure 2A). The position-specific patterns of 13C incorporation into microbial biomass were not affected by temperature. The 13C recovery in microbial biomass from C-1 was ≈1.7 times lower than C-2, C-4, and C-6 at each temperature (Figures 2B–D). Moreover, recovery from each position did not differ over time at any incubation temperature.
The ratio of extracellular 13C recovery in bulk soil to microbial biomass was highest at -20°C (factor 3), followed by +5°C (factor 1.5) and -5°C (factor 0.6) (Figure 2A).
Dissolved Organic Carbon
Total extractable C in soil was highest at -20°C, being 1.4- and 2.3-fold higher than +5°C and -5°C, respectively (Figure 3A). Whereas DOC did not differ over time at -20 and +5°C, it increased by a factor of 1.5 between day 3 and 10 at -5°C, to reach a level similar to +5°C. 13C recovery in DOC at -20°C was also two times higher than both at -5 and +5°C (Figure 3A). Less than 0.4% of the applied 13C was recovered in DOC on day 1, irrespective of temperature (Figure 3A). The position-specific 13C patterns detected in CO2 were different to DOC at each temperature. Whereas recoveries in DOC at -5°C did not differ between the four glucose positions, the recovery from the glucose C-6 position was twice as high as C-1 at +5 and -20°C (Figures 3B–D).
FIGURE 3. DOC and 13C in DOC. Total DOC (mean ± SEM, n = 4) extracted (solid symbols and continuous lines), 13C recovery (mean ± SEM, n = 4) from uniformly labeled (open symbols and broken lines) (A) and 13C recovery (mean ± SE, n = 4) from glucose positions in DOC at +5 (B), –5 (C), and –20°C (D). Significant effects (p < 0.05) of temperature, days, and individual glucose positions in DOC are indicated by letters above the error bars.
Metabolic Pathways Revealed by Glucose Mineralization
Microbial activity has been detected in soil down to -39°C (Panikov et al., 2006; Schaefer and Jafarov, 2016). This has evoked interest in the adaptive metabolic mechanisms of microorganisms at such extremely low temperatures. At subzero temperatures, low thermal energy is expected to slow down processes such as microbial substrate uptake (Hoehler and Jorgensen, 2013). However, less than 0.4% of applied 13C was recovered in DOC on the first day, irrespective of temperature (Figure 3A) suggesting that all applied glucose was taken up by microorganisms within the first day. These results agree with previous data showing that substrate uptake of highly available substances, such as glucose, is largely independent of temperature (Herbert and Bell, 1977; Schimel and Mikan, 2005). At the end of the incubation period, cumulative CO2 was 3- and 10-fold lower at -5 and -20°C than +5°C, respectively (Figure 1A). The results agree with studies showing strong temperature sensitivity of CO2 production in frozen soils (Monson et al., 2006; Panikov et al., 2006; Drotz et al., 2010). Irrespective of temperature, two phases of glucose C mineralization were observed: Phase 1 with high rates of 13C recovery in CO2 is consistent with intense glucose mineralization. Phase 2 thereafter, with low 13C recovery rates (Figures 1B,D), reflects mineralization of glucose-derived metabolites (Blagodatskaya et al., 2011). These results contradict those of Drotz et al. (2010), who observed low 13C in CO2 during phase 1 and high in phase 2. This discrepancy may reflect the soil types used for incubation. While our soils were agriculturally used loamy Luvisols, their soils were forest Podsols from the boreal region sampled from the organic horizon. Cold temperatures were shown to increase concentration of DOC in these soils (Haei et al., 2010), which implies a high concentration of low molecular weight organic substances and therefore low competition for applied substrate among microbes. In contrast, our agricultural soil was low in organic matter and the competition between microbes for applied glucose was highest immediately after application, leading to a fast uptake and release of glucose-derived CO2.
The 13C recovery pattern in CO2 showed high oxidation of the C-1 position in control soils (Figure 1B), and revealed that glucose was predominantly catabolized via the pentose phosphate pathway (Caspi et al., 2008; Dijkstra et al., 2011c; Apostel et al., 2015). Contrary to our hypothesis, metabolic behaviors completely switched over to a preferential respiration of the glucose C-4 position at -5°C and this behavior was still weakly visible at -20°C (Figures 1C,D). High 13C recovery from the C-4 position reflects glucose transformation via glycolysis (Dijkstra et al., 2011c; Apostel et al., 2013). Significant 13C recovery from the C-1 position, especially at -20°C, implies that, at such very low temperatures the pentose phosphate pathway again plays a greater role than at -5°C. This shift in metabolic pathways may reflect the need for antifreeze compounds. To confirm this interpretation, we assessed 13C incorporation into microbial biomass.
13C Incorporation into Microbial Biomass
Liquid water in soil is a prerequisite for microbial activity (Oquist et al., 2009). At +5°C, microbial activity was not constrained by water availability or slow substrate diffusion. The enzymes responsible for organic matter decomposition also remain active at this temperature (Razavi et al., 2015, 2016). Consequently, this temperature was favorable for glucose use, as reflected by the 4- and 13-fold higher 13C recovery in CO2 than at -5 and -20°C, respectively. Nonetheless, this high catabolic use of glucose-derived 13C with increasing temperature did not correspond to anabolic use. The highest 13C incorporation into microbial biomass was recorded at -5°C. The position-specific 13C recovery patterns in bulk soil and microbial biomass at +5°C were complementary to the metabolic fluxes observed in CO2, showing that glucose was predominantly metabolized via pentose phosphate pathway. The dominance of this pathway at similar temperatures under moderate C supply reflects the classical metabolic C allocation observed in previous studies (Dijkstra et al., 2011c). This is triggered by the need for pentose and NADPH for biosynthesis (Fuhrer and Sauer, 2009).
Although water availability, water activity, and thermal energy are low at subzero temperatures (Davidson and Janssens, 2006; Oquist et al., 2009; Stevenson et al., 2015), recent studies demonstrated microbial growth down to -15°C in permafrost isolates (Mykytczuk et al., 2013), -20°C in permafrost cores (Tuorto et al., 2014), and the microbial metabolism limit was set at -33°C (Rummel et al., 2014). Therefore, the substantial amount of 13C incorporated into microbial biomass we observed at -5°C is not surprising. To survive and grow at such extremely low temperatures, microorganisms induce a suite of physiological processes which include both metabolic and biomass adjustments (Wouters et al., 2000; Drotz et al., 2010). A better understanding of these metabolic and biomass adjustments will be necessary in estimating the role of microorganisms in biogeochemical cycles of frozen soils.
Antifreeze Adaptation Mechanisms
13C incorporation into microbial biomass at -5°C was two and three times higher than at +5 and -20°C, respectively, and this incorporation made up more than two-thirds of the total glucose-derived 13C recovered in bulk soil (Figure 2A). In a recent study, 13C incorporation into microbial DNA was not detected after 1 month at subzero temperatures (Tuorto et al., 2014). This suggests that glucose utilization by microorganisms at -5°C were mainly intracellular metabolic responses to freezing and was rapidly activated. Intracellularly, for the vast majority of prokaryotic cells, contain no unbound water (Coombe, 2002). Hence, deleterious effects of freezing to these microbes, include, but are not limited to osmotic imbalance. Since water is not a limiting factor at -5°C, due to freezing point depression by increasing solute concentration in unfrozen volume (Brooks et al., 1997; Price, 2000), microorganisms invest energy in the synthesis of intracellular compounds that minimize effects of osmotic stress brought about by freeze-dehydration. This freeze-dehydration alters cell membrane ultrastructure and membrane bilayer fusion and causes organelle disruption (Mazur, 2004). Glycerol and ethanol were recently identified as abundantly synthesized compounds at -4°C (Drotz et al., 2010). The synthesis of these compounds is consistent with glucose transformation via glycolysis, which is confirmed by the high 13C recovery from C-4 in CO2. These compounds act as cryoprotectants and are compatible solutes against freeze-dehydration (Block, 2003). Glycerol also interacts with water through hydrogen bonds depressing its freezing point (Lovelock, 1954). Glycerol therefore limits intracellular damage caused by freezing, hence maintaining microbial activity and CO2 production at subzero temperatures (Drotz et al., 2010). We emphasize that conversion of glucose to alcohols (ethanol and glycerol) does not limit synthesis of other cellular compounds such as phospholipids and proteins. Nonetheless, conversion of glucose to alcohols explains the high glycolysis (C-4) and low pentose phosphate pathway (C-1) fingerprints (Figure 1C) observed at -5°C (Figure 4).
FIGURE 4. Proposed model of microbial glucose transformation pathways at +5°C (central compartment) and antifreeze adaptation mechanisms at subzero temperatures (–5°C on the left and –20°C on the right compartments). Colored arrows correspond to glucose C positions and indicate their fate.
We obtained lowest 13C incorporation into microbial biomass at -20°C (1.3 and 3 times lower than at +5 and -5°C, respectively; Figure 2A. Nonetheless, the ratio of extracellular 13C to microbial biomass in soil was highest (ratio 5) at -20°C (Figure 2A). This high ratio could not be attributed to the non-metabolized glucose that remained in the soil because less than 0.4% of applied 13C was recovered in DOC at day 1 (Figure 3A); moreover, extracellular 13C recovery increased again at later time points. The high 13C recovery in bulk soil compared to microbial biomass at -20°C suggests that microorganisms utilized glucose for extracellular antifreeze compounds. To resist physical, environmental, and biological stress, and to survive in diverse ecological niches, microorganisms form biofilms. These biofilms are mainly composed of EPS secreted by microbes. Recently, culture-based studies revealed EPS secretion at -15°C by bacterial cells (Mykytczuk et al., 2013). In addition to cryoprotection, the high polyhydroxyl content of EPS lowers the freezing point and ice nucleation temperatures (Nichols et al., 2005; Qin et al., 2007; De Maayer et al., 2014). A key intermediate linking the anabolic pathway of EPS production and the catabolic pathway of glucose degradation is glucose-6-phosphate. In this step, the C flux bifurcates between the formation of glycolysis products and the biosynthesis of sugar monomers for EPS production via the pentose phosphate pathway (Welman and Maddox, 2003; Figure 4). Increasing glucose concentration was found to increase EPS production at low temperatures (Cayol et al., 2015). EPS production and secretion potentially explain the relevance of glycolysis and the pentose phosphate pathways, as reflected by preferential oxidation of glucose C-4 followed by C-1 positions (Figure 1D). This would account for the higher extracellular 13C in soil at -20°C compared to -5 and +5°C (Figure 2A). The poor extractability of EPS in water (Hughes, 1997) may explain why extracellular 13C was not entirely recovered in DOC at -20°C. Nevertheless, high 13C recovery in DOC coincided with high absolute DOC at -20°C (Figure 3A). This is consistent with the results of both Krembs et al. (2002), who found that EPS concentration in ice correlated positively with DOC, and with those of Hentschel et al. (2008), who observed the highest DOC content in forest soil at -13°C, followed by successively lower values at +5 and -3°C. This pattern, based on forest soils in a field experiment, agrees perfectly with our observation on agricultural soils in a laboratory experiment (Figure 3A), suggesting that underlying adaptation strategies are rather general. The spectroscopic properties of DOC at -13°C did not indicate lysis of microbial biomass induced by freezing (Hentschel et al., 2008), which confirm the maintenance of cellular integrity.
In addition to EPS, organisms commonly synthesize AFP to overcome freezing effects. These AFP have been identified in fungi, bacteria, plants, insects, and polar fishes (Holt, 2003). Some bacterial AFP are secreted as lipoglycoproteins or anchored on the outer cell membrane as lipoproteins, stabilizing membrane lipids at low temperatures (Kawahara, 2002). Based on adsorption inhibition, bound AFP inhibit rapid water movement between ice crystals, preventing destabilization of small ice crystal grains and thus minimizing ice recrystallization (Yu et al., 2010). For this reason, 3–8% of water remains unfrozen as thin films coating organo-mineral particles. This protects viable cells sorbed onto their surfaces from mechanical destruction due to intrusive ice crystals growing in frozen soil (Gilichinsky et al., 2003). The unfrozen water provides channels through which nutrients reach the cells and through which waste products are eliminated by diffusion (Rivkina et al., 2000). The synthesis of extracellular AFP further underlines the greater relevance of the pentose phosphate pathway (oxidation of C-1) at -20°C than at -5°C (Figure 1D). Increased pentose phosphate pathway activity signifies increased NADPH production, which is required as a source of reduction equivalents in protein and lipid synthesis (Nelson et al., 2008). Moreover, synthesis of hardly extractable extracellular AFP could also account for the fivefold higher extracellular 13C recovery in bulk soil than in microbial biomass at -20°C (Figure 2A).
The position-specific tracing of metabolic pathways in our study revealed that microorganisms induce a suite of temperature-dependent physiological processes to cope with freezing. This enables both catabolic and anabolic processes. These physiological changes reflect microbial resilience, enabling them to inhabit any ecological niche. Whether these responses are accompanied by a microbial community shift or solely reflect phenotypic plasticity remains to be determined.
Position-specific 13C labeling proved to be a valuable tool in understanding the survival strategies of microorganisms at subzero temperatures. Glucose was metabolized by the pentose phosphate pathway at +5°C and this shifted to glycolysis at subzero temperatures. High 13C recovery within microbial biomass at -5°C suggests that microorganisms invest energy and resources in intracellular antifreeze metabolites. In contrast, strategies differ greatly at -20°C, where predominantly extracellular secretion protects the cells.
High-latitude C and N dynamic models such as Simple Biosphere/Carnegie-Ames-Stanford Approach (SiBCASA) focuses on extracellular parameters and only the thawing of permafrost is assumed to increase CO2 emission (Schaefer et al., 2011; Schaefer and Jafarov, 2016). This increase is likely to be overestimated because permafrost soils—even if completely frozen at low temperatures—exhibit considerable microbial activity. This newly gained information is useful in modeling C dynamics at high altitude and latitude regions with frozen soils, hence, improving the estimation of global C balances and ecosystem feedback responses.
The concept was contributed by YK and MD, experimental design by EB and MD, data acquisition and analysis by CA and SH, interpretation and drafting by EB, and revision including final approval of the version by YK and MD.
The project and instruments was funded by German research foundation (DFG - Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft) under grant numbers DI-2136/1-1 and NTS 186/1006-1/P, respectively. Discussion of results with Paul Dijkstra was facilitated by DAAD under travel grant number - PPP USA (ID-57211766).
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
We thank Paul Dijkstra for helpful discussions, DAAD for jointly funding EB with the Kenyan government, technical staff of the Department of Agricultural Soil Science and the Department of Soil Science of Temperate Ecosystems, University of Göttingen, in particular Karin Schmidt and Anita Kriegel for microbial biomass C content determination, the entire team at KOSI (Centre for Stable Isotopes Analysis) for δ13C analysis and Kyle Mason-Jones for English proofreading.
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00946/full#supplementary-material
Amato, P., and Christner, B. C. (2009). Energy metabolism response to low-temperature and frozen conditions in Psychrobacter cryohalolentis. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 711–718. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02193-08
Apostel, C., Dippold, M., Glaser, B., and Kuzyakov, Y. (2013). Biochemical pathways of amino acids in soil: assessment by position-specific labeling and 13C-PLFA analysis. Soil Biol. Biochem. 67, 31–40. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2013.08.005
Apostel, C., Dippold, M., and Kuzyakov, Y. (2015). Biochemistry of hexose and pentose transformations in soil analyzed by position-specific labeling and 13C-PLFA. Soil Biol. Biochem. 80, 199–208. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.09.005
Blagodatskaya, E., Yuyukina, T., Blagodatsky, S., and Kuzyakov, Y. (2011). Three-source-partitioning of microbial biomass and of CO2 efflux from soil to evaluate mechanisms of priming effects. Soil Biol. Biochem. 43, 778–786. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.12.011
Brooks, D. P., Schmidt, K. S., and Williams, W. M. (1997). Winter production of CO2 and N2O from alpine tundra: environmental controls and relationship to inter-system C and N fluxes. Oecologia 110, 403–413. doi: 10.1007/PL00008814
Caspi, R., Foerster, H., Fulcher, C. A., Kaipa, P., Krummenacker, M., Latendresse, M., et al. (2008). The metacyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the biocyc collection of Pathway/Genome Databases. Nucl. Acids Res. 36, D623–D631.
Cayol, J.-L., Ollivier, B., Alazard, D., Amils, R., Godfroy, A., Piette, F., et al. (2015). “The extreme conditions of life on the planet and exobiology,” in Environmental Microbiology: Fundamentals and Applications: Microbial Ecology, eds J. C. Bertrand, P. Caumette, P. Lebaron, R. Matheron, P. Normand, and T. Sime-Ngando (Dordrecht: Springer), 353–394.
Dijkstra, P., Blankinship, J. C., Selmants, P. C., Hart, S. C., Koch, G. W., Schwartz, E., et al. (2011a). Probing carbon flux patterns through soil microbial metabolic networks using parallel position-specific tracer labeling. Soil Biol. Biochem. 43, 126–132. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2010.09.022
Dijkstra, P., Dalder, J. J., Selmants, P. C., Hart, S. C., Koch, G. W., Schwartz, E., et al. (2011b). Modeling soil metabolic processes using isotopologue pairs of position-specific C-13-labeled glucose and pyruvate. Soil Biol. Biochem. 43, 1848–1857. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.05.001
Dijkstra, P., Thomas, S. C., Heinrich, P. L., Koch, G. W., Schwartz, E., and Hungate, B. A. (2011c). Effect of temperature on metabolic activity of intact microbial communities: evidence for altered metabolic pathway activity but not for increased maintenance respiration and reduced carbon use efficiency. Soil Biol. Biochem. 43, 2023–2031. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2011.05.018
Dippold, M., Biryukov, M., and Kuzyakov, Y. (2014). Sorption affects amino acid pathways in soil: implications from position-specific labeling of alanine. Soil Biol. Biochem. 72, 180–192. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2014.01.015
Drotz, S. H., Sparrman, T., Nilsson, M. B., Schleucher, J., and Oquist, M. G. (2010). Both catabolic and anabolic heterotrophic microbial activity proceed in frozen soils. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 21046–21051. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008885107
Fischer, H., Ingwersen, J., and Kuzyakov, Y. (2010). Microbial uptake of low-molecular-weight organic substances out-competes sorption in soil. Eur. J. Soil Sci. 61, 504–513. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.2010.01244.x
Fuhrer, T., and Sauer, U. (2009). Different biochemical mechanisms ensure network-wide balancing of reducing equivalents in microbial metabolism. J. Bacteriol. 191, 2112–2121. doi: 10.1128/JB.01523-08
Gearing, P. J., Gearing, J. N., Maughan, J. T., and Oviatt, C. A. (1991). Isotopic distribution of carbon from sewage-sludge and eutrophication in the sediments and food feb of estuarine ecosystems. Environ. Sci. Technol. 25, 295–301. doi: 10.1021/es00014a012
Gilichinsky, D., Rivkina, E., Shcherbakova, V., Laurinavichuis, K., and Tiedje, J. (2003). Supercooled water brines within permafrost - an unknown ecological niche for microorganisms: a model for astrobiology. Astrobiology 3, 331–341. doi: 10.1089/153110703769016424
Haei, M., Öquist, M. G., Buffam, I., Ågren, A., Blomkvist, P., Bishop, K., et al. (2010). Cold winter soils enhance dissolved organic carbon concentrations in soil and stream water. Geophys. Res. Lett. 37:L08501. doi: 10.1029/2010GL042821
Hentschel, K., Borken, W., and Matzner, E. (2008). Repeated freeze-thaw events affect leaching losses of nitrogen and dissolved organic matter in a forest soil. J. Plant Nut. Soil Sci. 171, 699–706. doi: 10.1002/jpln.200700154
Krembs, C., Eicken, H., Junge, K., and Deming, J. W. (2002). High concentrations of exopolymeric substances in Arctic winter sea ice: implications for the polar ocean carbon cycle and cryoprotection of diatoms. Deep Sea Res. Part I: Oceanogr. Res. Papers 49, 2163–2181. doi: 10.1016/S0967-0637(02)00122-X
Monson, R. K., Lipson, D. L., Burns, S. P., Turnipseed, A. A., Delany, A. C., Williams, M. W., et al. (2006). Winter forest soil respiration controlled by climate and microbial community composition. Nature 439, 711–714. doi: 10.1038/nature04555
Mykytczuk, N. C. S., Foote, S. J., Omelon, C. R., Southam, G., Greer, C. W., and Whyte, L. G. (2013). Bacterial growth at-15 degrees C: molecular insights from the permafrost bacterium planococcus halocryophilus Or1. ISME J. 7, 1211–1226. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.8
Nakagawa, T., Fujimoto, Y., Uchino, M., Miyaji, T., Takano, K., and Tomizuka, N. (2003). Isolation and characterization of psychrophiles producing cold-active beta-galactosidase. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 37, 154–157. doi: 10.1046/j.1472-765X.2003.01369.x
Nichols, C. A. M., Guezennec, J., and Bowman, J. P. (2005). Bacterial exopolysaccharides from extreme marine environments with special consideration of the southern ocean, sea ice, and deep-sea hydrothermal vents: a review. Mar. Biotechnol. 7, 253–271. doi: 10.1007/s10126-004-5118-2
Oquist, M. G., Sparrman, T., Klemedtsson, L., Drotz, S. H., Grip, H., Schleucher, J., et al. (2009). Water availability controls microbial temperature responses in frozen soil CO2 production. Glob. Change Biol. 15, 2715–2722. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2009.01898.x
Panikov, N. S., Flanagan, P. W., Oechel, W. C., Mastepanov, M. A., and Christensen, T. R. (2006). Microbial activity in soils frozen to below -39°C. Soil Biol. Biochem. 38, 785–794. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1008885107
Price, P. B., and Sowers, T. (2004). Temperature dependence of metabolic rates for microbial growth, maintenance, and survival. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 4631–4636. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0400522101
Qin, G. K., Zhu, L. Z., Chen, X. L., Wang, P. G., and Zhang, Y. Z. (2007). Structural characterization and ecological roles of a novel exopolysaccharide from the deep-sea psychrotolerant bacterium Pseudoalteromonas spp SM9913. Microbiol. Soc. 153, 1566–1572. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2006/003327-0
Razavi, B. S., Blagodatskaya, E., and Kuzyakov, Y. (2015). Nonlinear temperature sensitivity of enzyme kinetics explains canceling effect-a case study on loamy haplic Luvisol. Front. Microbiol. 6:1126. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01126
Razavi, B. S., Blagodatskaya, E., and Kuzyakov, Y. (2016). Temperature selects for static soil enzyme systems to maintain high catalytic efficiency. Soil Biol. Biochem. 97, 15–22. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.02.018
Rivkina, E. M., Friedmann, E. I., Mckay, C. P., and Gilichinsky, D. A. (2000). Metabolic activity of permafrost bacteria below the freezing point. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 3230–3233. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.8.3230-3233.2000
Rummel, J. D., Beaty, D. W., Jones, M. A., Bakermans, C., Barlow, N. G., Boston, P. J., et al. (2014). A new analysis of Mars “Special Regions”: findings of the second MEPAG special regions science analysis group (SR-SAG2). Astrobiology 14, 887–968. doi: 10.1089/ast.2014.1227
Scandellari, F., Hobbie, E. A., Ouimette, A. P., and Stucker, V. K. (2009). Tracing metabolic pathways of lipid biosynthesis in ectomycorrhizal fungi from position-specific 13C-labelling in glucose. Environ. Microbiol. 11, 3087–3095. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02013.x
Schaefer, K., Zhang, T., Bruhwiler, L., and Barrett, A. P. (2011). Amount and timing of permafrost carbon release in response to climate warming. Tellus B 63, 165–180. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0889.2011.00527.x
Stevenson, A., Burkhardt, J., Cockell, C. S., Cray, J. A., Dijksterhuis, J., Fox-Powell, M., et al. (2015). Multiplication of microbes below 0.690 water activity: implications for terrestrial and extraterrestrial life. Environ. Microbiol. 17, 257–277. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12598
Tuorto, S. J., Darias, P., Mcguinness, L. R., Panikov, N., Zhang, T., Häggblom, M. M., et al. (2014). Bacterial genome replication at subzero temperatures in permafrost. ISME J. 8, 139–149. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2013.140
Wouters, J. A., Kamphuis, H. H., Hugenholtz, J., Kuipers, O. P., De Vos, W. M., and Abee, T. (2000). Changes in glycolytic activity of lactococcus lactis induced by low temperature. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 3686–3691. doi: 10.1128/AEM.66.9.3686-3691.2000
Wu, J., Joergensen, R. G., Pommerening, B., Chaussod, R., and Brookes, P. C. (1990). Measurement of soil microbial biomass C by fumigation extraction - an automated procedure. Soil Biol. Biochem. 22, 1167–1169. doi: 10.1016/0038-0717(90)90046-3
Yu, S. O., Brown, A., Middleton, A. J., Tomczak, M. M., Walker, V. K., and Davies, P. L. (2010). Ice restructuring inhibition activities in antifreeze proteins with distinct differences in thermal hysteresis. Cryobiology 61, 327–334. doi: 10.1016/j.cryobiol.2010.10.158
Keywords: psychrophiles, cryoprotectants, position-specific labeling, metabolic pathways, freeze tolerance
Citation: Bore EK, Apostel C, Halicki S, Kuzyakov Y and Dippold MA (2017) Microbial Metabolism in Soil at Subzero Temperatures: Adaptation Mechanisms Revealed by Position-Specific 13C Labeling. Front. Microbiol. 8:946. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00946
Received: 07 March 2017; Accepted: 11 May 2017;
Published: 29 May 2017.
Edited by:Jesse G. Dillon, California State University, Long Beach, United States
Reviewed by:Peter Bergholz, North Dakota State University, United States
Brent Craig Christner, University of Florida, United States
Copyright © 2017 Bore, Apostel, Halicki, Kuzyakov and Dippold. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ezekiel K. Bore, email@example.com