Impact Factor 5.640 | CiteScore 7.3
More on impact ›


Front. Microbiol., 21 July 2017 |

Detection and Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus in Foods Confiscated in EU Borders

  • 1Microbiology Division, Department of Biotechnology and Food Science, Faculty of Science, University of Burgos, Burgos, Spain
  • 2Faculty of Food Science and Engineering, Dunarea de Jos University of Galati, Galati, Romania
  • 3Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Microbiology, Instituto Tecnológico Agrario de Castilla y León, Valladolid, Spain
  • 4Dependencia de Sanidad de Vizcaya, Delegación del Gobierno en el País Vasco, Bilbao, Spain
  • 5Department of Clinical Microbiology, Complejo Asistencial Universitario de León, León, Spain
  • 6Institute of Biomedicine, University of León, León, Spain
  • 7Department of Clinical Microbiology, University Hospital Rio Hortega, Valladolid, Spain
  • 8Institute for Milk Hygiene, Milk Technology and Food Science, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna, Austria
  • 9Departamento de Ingeniería Agrícola y Forestal, Tecnología de los Alimentos, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingenierías Agrarias, Universidad de Valladolid, Palencia, Spain

The aim of the study was to evaluate the potential role of the illegal entry of food in UE in the Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) spread. We studied the prevalence and characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus and MRSA isolated from foods of animal origin confiscated from passengers on flights from 45 non-EU countries from 2012 to 2015 by the Border Authorities at Bilbao International Airport (Spain) and Vienna International Airport (Austria), as well as foods from open markets close to EU land borders. Of 868 food samples tested (diverse meat samples including antelope, duck, guinea pig, pork, rodents, turkey, dairy products, and eggs), 136 (15.7%) were positive for S. aureus and 26 (3.0%) for MRSA. All MRSA strains were mecA-positive. The prevalence of S. aureus-positive dairy samples among food confiscated at Bilbao International Airport was 64.6%, and this airport also had the highest value (11.8%) for MRSA-positive samples. The predominant sequence type was ST5 (30.8%), followed by ST8, ST1649, ST1, and other lineages were found to a lesser extent (ST7, ST22, ST72, ST97, and ST398). Six isolates tested positive for luk-PVL genes (SCCmec IV subtypes IVc and IVe). Enterotoxin profiling revealed that 19 MRSA strains were enterotoxigenic, harboring one or more se genes. The MRSA isolates positive for luk-PVL genes were not enterotoxigenic, and none of the isolates tested positive for enterotoxin E. We found 14 resistance profiles, and more than 69% of the MRSA isolates were resistant to three or more types of antimicrobial agents. This finding reveals both the wide diversity of the antimicrobial resistance found in the strains and the capacity to resist not only to beta-lactam drugs. One MRSA strain showed unusual characteristics: it was oxacillin-susceptible, harbored SCCmec V, and was positive for sed, seg, and sej but negative for PVL virulence factors. This study shows the presence of enterotoxigenic HA-, CA-, and LA-MRSA in foods illegally entering the EU, and highlights illegal importation of food as route of enterotoxigenic MRSA spread. Uncontrolled entry of food stuffs into the EU can be a relevant neglected route of MRSA dissemination.


Staphylococcus aureus is a well-known opportunistic foodborne pathogen, and is involved in numerous nosocomial and community-associated (CA) outbreaks worldwide (Paterson et al., 2014). The widespread use of antibiotics, and particularly inappropriate use or overuse, has facilitated the emergence of pathogens resistant to antibiotics, such as methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA). In addition to human clinical applications, antibiotics are also used in veterinary medicine and animal feeding, contributing to the substantial appearance of antibiotic-resistant strains (Valsangiacomo et al., 2000; Grema et al., 2015). The first reported nosocomial episode involving MRSA was in 1960, and MRSA has become an emergent pathogen (Bonten and Weinstein, 2016; Oniciuc et al., 2017), affecting patients in hospitals and people in community settings such as nursing homes and nurseries (Lo et al., 2007; Murphy et al., 2012; Blumental et al., 2013). MRSA has been found in livestock, linked to a jump from humans to animals (Voss et al., 2005; Price et al., 2012). The prevalence of livestock-associated (LA)-MRSA in farm animals is increasing and the resulting food products may become contaminated. This may be an important ecological niche, favoring the evolution of LA-MRSA (Yan et al., 2014; Verhegghe et al., 2016), and the apparently increasing prevalence can lead to human outbreaks (Grøntvedt et al., 2016).

Lineages other than LA-MRSA are found in food intended for human consumption. Contaminated food of animal origin may contribute to the prevalence of CA-MRSA (Ogata et al., 2012; Rodríguez-Lázaro et al., 2015) or hospital-acquired (HA)-MRSA (Pu et al., 2009; Weese et al., 2010). We demonstrated the presence of CA-MRSA in foods confiscated from passengers on international flights, mostly from Central and South America (Rodríguez-Lázaro et al., 2015). This has food safety implications: contamination with the CA-MRSA lineages isolated may have been due to incorrect food handling, and not zoonotic transmission.

Staphylococcal enterotoxins (SEs, se genes) have been detected in many foodstuff causing staphylococcal food poisoning, toxic shock, and allergic and autoimmune reactions (Gonano et al., 2009). Staphylococcal enterotoxins are classified into 23 different SEs and SE-like toxins (SELs) including the five major serological types SEA, SEB, SEC, SED, and SEE (Hennekinne et al., 2012; Carfora et al., 2015; Ono et al., 2015). However, little is known about the prevalence of MRSA in foods involved in international trade, or about their enterotoxin production. The role, if any, of foods illegally transported between different parts of the globe in MRSA epidemiology is unknown. We investigated whether the uncontrolled entry of foods into Europe through international flight passengers or from open markets at European Union (EU) borders is a potential route of transmission of enterotoxigenic antibiotic-resistant strains, particularly MRSA. Our study reveals the entry of MRSA by this route, and that the lineages involved showed enterotoxigenicity. Uncontrolled entry of foodstuffs into the EU can be a relevant neglected route of MRSA dissemination.

Materials and Methods

Food Sample Collection

This study was part of the EU-funded project PROMISE1Protection of consumers by microbial risk mitigation through combating segregation of expertise.” One of the PROMISE’s goals was to evaluate neglected risks for transmission of foodborne pathogens through exogenous routes of transmission (i.e., from non-UE countries) evaluating several UE international airports and borders (Wagner et al., 2015). A total of 868 animal-derived food items collected from August 2012 to July 2015 were tested for the presence of S. aureus and MRSA. The foods were confiscated from the luggage of passengers on flights from non-EU countries by the Border Authorities at Bilbao International Airport (Spain) (263 food products) and Vienna International Airport (Austria) (595 food products), or were collected from foods illegally introduced and sold in an open market closed to an EU border (the southeast part of Romania, on the border with Republic of Moldavia; Giurgiuleşti- Galaţi) (10 food products). Open markets at the Romanian borders are authorized to sell fresh vegetables, but not food of animal origin. Crossing the Romanian EU border with food is allowed just for low amounts of foods on distances that do not overpass 50 km (Romanian law 10/2010), but very often these foods are illegally sold in those open markets.

Food samples included 408 (47%) meat samples of diverse origin (including antelope, beef, chicken, duck, guinea pig, pork, rodents, and turkey), 447 (51.5%) milk and dairy products, 7 eggs (0.8%), and 6 fish and fish products (0.7%). The geographical origin of the food samples collected at the airports was wide: Africa (Côte d’Ivoire, Egypt, Ethiopia, Niger, South Africa, and Tunisia), America (Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Colombia, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Honduras, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Paraguay, and Peru), Asia (Azerbaijan, China, India, Iran, Israel, Jordan, Kazakhstan, North Korea, Mongolia, Philippines, Qatar, South Korea, Thailand, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and Vietnam), and non-EU Europe (Albania, Armenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Republic of Kosovo, Former Republic of Macedonia, Moldova, Republic of Serbia, Montenegro, Russia, and Ukraine).

Detection and Isolation of S. aureus

Staphylococcus aureus was counted by the ISO 6888-2 method (ISO, 1999). Real-time PCR was used to confirm S. aureus isolates as previously described (Trnčíková et al., 2008). Positive colonies with the correct morphology on Baird Parker agar plates were taken for further typing tests (MRSA biotype, antibiotic resistance, and genetic characterization).

Screening for the Presence of MRSA

Staphylococcus aureus isolates were tested for mecA and mecC by multiplex PCR as previously described (Stegger et al., 2012).

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing

Susceptibility to antimicrobials was determined by a microdilution method, applying the recommendations and minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoints of the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) guidelines 2015 (EUCAST, 2015). Susceptibility to 20 antimicrobial agents was tested: penicillin (PEN), oxacillin (OXA), amoxicillin/clavulanate (AMC), daptomycin (DAP), erythromycin (ERY), clindamycin (CLI), teicoplanin (TEC), vancomycin (VAN), ciprofloxacin (CIP), levofloxacin (LVX), amikacin (AMK), gentamicin (GEN), tobramycin (TOB), mupirocin (MUP), rifampicin (RIF), tetracycline (TET), fusidic acid (FUS), fosfomycin (FOF), linezolid (LZD) and trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole (SXT).

Characterization of the Genetic Background

All MRSA isolates were subjected to Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE) (McDougal et al., 2003), Multi Locus Sequence Typing (MLST) (Enright et al., 2000) and typing and subtyping of the SCCmec (staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec) element (Kondo et al., 2007; Milheiriço et al., 2007). PFGE patterns were analyzed with Bionumerics software v6.6 (Applied-Maths NV, Sint-Martens-Latem, Belgium), and dendrograms were constructed using the Dice similarity coefficient and the unweighted pair group mathematical average (UPGMA) clustering algorithm with 1% tolerance and optimization values. The allelic profiles obtained by MLST were assigned by comparison with the S. aureus MLST database hosted at (2016). Information about MRSA strains was submitted to that database. Bionumerics software v6.6 was used for allelic profile-based comparisons applying a minimum spanning tree (MST) to define the relationships among MRSA strains at the micro evolutionary level. A sequence type (ST) number was attributed to each distinct combination of alleles at the seven genes (Ragon et al., 2008).

Detection of Panton-Valentine Leukocidin Virulence Factors

All MRSA strains were tested for the PVL genes (lukS-PV and lukF-PV) by conventional PCR as described (Lina et al., 1999). Reference strain ATCC 49775 was used as a positive control.

Enterotoxin Profiling

Methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates were tested by a multiplex PCR targeting sea, seb, sec, sed, see, seg, seh, sei, sej genes as described by Gonano et al. (2009).


MRSA in Food Samples Confiscated by Border Authorities

Microbiological tests revealed S. aureus in 15.7% of confiscated food items and MRSA in 3.0% (26/868) (Figures 1, 2). The highest prevalence of S. aureus we observed was 64.6% in dairy samples confiscated at Bilbao Airport, and the highest value for MRSA-positive samples was 11.8% (Figure 2). The mean S. aureus count overall was 2.9 × 106 CFU/g, with a minimum value of 1.0 × 101 CFU/g in raw pork meat confiscated at Bilbao Airport from a passenger flying from Moscow, and a maximum value of 2.45 × 108 CFU/g in cheese confiscated at Vienna Airport from a passenger flying from Turkey (Figure 3).


FIGURE 1. Heat map of the origin and distribution of Staphylococcus aureus-positive food samples.


FIGURE 2. Prevalence (%) of S. aureus in food samples. Columns with stripes represent S. aureus-positive isolates and solid columns represent methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA)-positive samples.


FIGURE 3. Staphylococcus aureus counts (log10CFU/g) per food category, type and origin. The number of food samples analyzed per food type are displayed above each column. Lines passing through the columns represent: (- -) the maximum (M) acceptable value in the microbiological criteria for raw milk intended for processing and in powdered milk; and ( – ) the M acceptable value for cheeses made from raw milk, according to Anonymous (2005). The International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Foods (ICMSF) recommends an M acceptable value of 103 CFU/g for cooked meat and poultry products (ICMSF, 2011).

The MRSA strains were isolated from 21 milk and dairy products (cow, sheep or goat milk and cheese, either fresh, brined or with spices), and five meat and meat products (raw and cooked meat). The MRSA-positive foods confiscated at Bilbao Airport were from flights from Nigeria (1), Egypt (2), Republic of Honduras (1), China (1), Nicaragua (5), Bolivia (4), Ecuador (1), Peru (2), Columbia (1), and Republic of Serbia (1). Those at Vienna Airport, were from flights from Egypt (3) and Turkey (2). Two MRSA-positive food samples were from the Republic of Moldova and were confiscated at the Romanian border.

Antibiotic Profile of the MRSA Isolates

Antibiotic susceptibility testing identified 14 resistance profiles (Table 1). Sixteen of the 49 MRSA strains were multiresistant.


TABLE 1. Antibiotic resistance profiles of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) strains isolated from food confiscated from passengers of non-EU-flights or at a land border, 2012–2015.

Genetic Characterization of MRSA Isolates

All the MRSA isolates harbored the mecA gene and none harbored the mecC gene. More than 75% of the isolates were SCCmec type IV: 48.9% were IVc and IVe, 22.4% IVa, and 4.1% IVh, and 24.5% were SCCmec type V. SCCmec typing of three isolates was not possible: the multiplex PCR-2, which types the mecA complex class, amplified a 804 bp DNA fragment, consistent with type C, but the multiplex PCR-1 targeting the ccr gene complex did not give an amplification product. Similarly, for another isolate the multiplex PCR-1 amplified a 937 bp DNA fragment consistent with ccr type 2 (A2B2), but the multiplex PCR-2 did not give an amplification product. In addition, six isolates tested positive for luk-PVL genes (all of them were SCCmec IV subtypes IVc and IVe).

Most of the MRSA isolates were positive for the enterotoxin genes A, B, C, D, G, H, I, J, but none were positive for enterotoxin E. Nineteen of the 26 MRSA strains (73%) tested positive for one or more se genes (Table 2); four strains (15.4%) harbored only one kind of se gene, and 15 strains (57.6%) more than one type of se gene (six strains carried seg/sei genes). None of the MRSA isolates positive for luk-PVL genes were enterotoxigenic.


TABLE 2. Enterotoxin profiles of MRSA strains.

Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis patterns and ST types were determined. SmaI-PFGE provided a fingerprint pattern consisting of 13–17 DNA fragments of 20–670 Kbp, approximately (Figure 4). Two isolates were not typeable by SmaI-PFGE suggesting they may be ST398, a lineage with an unusual resistance to digestion by SmaI (Chung et al., 2000). MLST identified nine ST, with eight MRSA strains (30.8%) being ST5. These eight ST5 isolates were of related genotypes: three showed the same fingerprint pattern, harboring SCCmec type V, and five, SCCmec type IV. The eight strains were isolated from food samples not confiscated on the same date, or at the same airport; they were cheese (n = 7) from Nicaragua, Columbia, Egypt, and Turkey and fresh beef meat (n = 1) from Egypt.


FIGURE 4. Genetic relationships among the SmaI Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE) profiles of the 26 MRSA isolates. MRSA isolates were obtained from the 136 for S. aureus-positive food samples, confiscated from people traveling into the European Union (EU), from August 2012 to July 2015. The dendrogram was generated from Dice similarity coefficients with the unweighted pair group mathematical average (UPGMA) clustering algorithm with 1% in the tolerance and optimization values. The scale indicates similarity values.

The other MRSA strains were ST1649, ST8, ST1, ST22, ST72, ST97, and ST398 (Figure 5). ST1649 (15.4%) and ST8 (15.4%) were the most prevalent (15.4% each), and the three ST8 carried PVL genes. ST1, ST22, ST72, and ST97 were found in different hard and semi-hard cheeses. ST398 is a livestock clone and was found in fresh meat confiscated from a passenger traveling from the Republic of Serbia to Bilbao Airport.


FIGURE 5. Multi Locus Sequence Typing (MLST) of 26 MRSA strains isolated from food illegally imported into the EU. The isolated were clustered according to seven housekeeping genes using a minimum spanning tree (MST). A different randomized color was attributed to each sequence type (ST). MRSA strains belonging to the same ST are displayed surrounded by dotted boxes. Information referring to sample type/country of origin/confiscation point/date of confiscation: DD.MM.YYYY/resistance profile is given in brackets for each MRSA strain, following the strain code. Abbreviations used: AT, Austria; ES, Spain; RO, Romania.

An oxacillin-susceptible mecA-positive S. aureus (OS-MRSA) strain was isolated from cheese confiscated from a passenger flying from Turkey. To our knowledge, this is the first time that an OS-MRSA has been isolated from processed food, and the first time that an OS-MRSA has been isolated from food in Europe. This might indicate that OS-MRSA may be circulating in Europe and may enter the EU via the illegal import of food.


We document S. aureus and MRSA in food confiscated to international flight travelers in UE airports or illegally sold foods in open markets at EU borders. Approximately one in six of the foods tested (136 of 868; 15.7%) were positive for S. aureus, and 3.0 % were positive for MRSA (26 of 868). The confiscated foods in which S. aureus counts exceeded international microbiological recommendations and EU regulations (Anonymous, 2005) were of very diverse geographical origins, including South and Central America, Europe, Africa, and Asia (Figures 1, 2). This is a serious public health concern because S. aureus can produce enterotoxins that can be present in food products. Our results agree with previous reports of the prevalence of S. aureus contamination (13–60%) of food products of animal origin (Crago et al., 2012; Rodríguez-Lázaro et al., 2015; Sun et al., 2015; Ciolacu et al., 2016). Various confiscated cheeses, including soft, semi hard, or hard had counts of up to 3.17 log10 above the limit established by Anonymous (2005). The high S. aureus counts may be in part the consequence of improper storage and poor hygiene according to the nature of surfaces and number of people handling the food (Chen et al., 2001). There may also be two way bacterial transfer between clothes and food preparation surfaces (Bloomfield et al., 2011). Twenty-six of the S. aureus strains isolated were MRSA (3.0%) of which 19 were enterotoxigenic. Under inappropriate food transportation conditions, heat-stable enterotoxins could emerge leading to gastroenteritis outbreaks. Many of the MRSA strains were positive for one or more se genes, consistent with previous studies (Pereira et al., 2009; Carfora et al., 2015). Contaminated milk and dairy products are major vectors of enterotoxins but, the link between the source of food contamination and transfer of antibiotic resistance determinants remains unclear; there are few reports describing the presence and possible origin of MRSA in foods (Ortega et al., 2010). However, there has been one case of community-acquired foodborne illness caused by SEC-producing MRSA (Jones et al., 2002) in the United States, and production of SE types SEB, SEC, SED, and SEE in two MRSA strains of milk origin from Minnesota farms (Haran et al., 2012).

Little is known about the prevalence of MRSA in food (Oniciuc et al., 2017), and particularly on in foods entering the EU. Our research group has performed several studies in airports and at borders (Oniciuc et al., 2015; Rodríguez-Lázaro et al., 2015) and found S. aureus and MRSA prevalence values of 8–33.9% and 0.5–3.1%, respectively. The values we report here are similar: 15.7 and 3.0% for S. aureus and MRSA, respectively. The number, the type of food sample, the geographical origin and the sampling place (Vienna International Airport was included in this study) are larger than in previous studies, but no significant differences in the overall percentages were observed. Nevertheless, 19 of 263 food items (7.2%) were MRSA positive at Bilbao Airport but only 7 of 595 (0.8%) at Vienna Airport. This significant difference could be a consequence of the geographical origins of the flights: most of the MRSA-positive foods at the Bilbao Airport were from Central and South America (14 of 19; 73.7%).

The MRSA lineages found included ST5, ST8, ST1649, ST1 and other lineages represented in a lesser extent (ST7, ST22, ST72, ST97, and ST398) (Figure 5). The ST most frequently isolated was ST5 (30.8%). This ST is believed to be the result of a species jump followed by adaption to the new host (Lowder et al., 2009). ST5 has mostly been found among poultry isolates (Lowder et al., 2009), but in our study was mostly isolated from dairy products. The ST5 lineage is a major component of hospital- and community-associated MRSA and MSSA worldwide (Miko et al., 2013). Other MRSA strains identified in our study were ST8-MRSA-IV/V and ST1649-MRSA-IV, which are successful of CA-MRSA clones. The presence of PVL genes and different antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in ST8-MRSA are causes of concern; it is not clear whether human handlers played any role in the preliminary post slaughter process.

The LA-MRSA ST398 is widespread in Europe (Oniciuc et al., 2017). It emerged rapidly in the Netherlands and now accounts for 20% of all human MRSA cases and for 42% of newly detected MRSA, indicating that animals are important reservoirs for human MRSA infection (Kadariya et al., 2014). There have already been outbreaks due to LA-MRSA ST398 (Wulf et al., 2008; Verkade et al., 2012). However, LA-MRSA ST398 was found only in one dairy product from Egypt in our study; this isolate harbors the luk-PVL genes but not enterotoxin-producing genes, in accordance with previous studies (Argudín et al., 2011). We isolated one OS-MRSA strain from a cheese from Turkey at Vienna airport: this MRSA variant is important because it may be misidentified as MSSA (Ariza-Miguel et al., 2015), such that β-lactam antibiotics may be used for treatment resulting in the potential development of highly resistant MRSA.

Many of our MRSA isolates were resistant to three or more antimicrobial agents (Table 1). This relatively high prevalence of these strains and their antimicrobial resistance profiles reveals the potential public health problems associated with illegal import of food in passenger luggage. Multiresistant strains are being distributed worldwide by air travel, and indeed undoubtedly by the various other forms travel across borders. United States custom officers ask all passengers from outside the United States to fill a form about contact with animals (Category A referring to zoonotic disease transmissible through animal contact) and any animal-origin food product potentially infected with zoonotic agents (Category B) (Noordhuizen et al., 2013). The EU forbids the importation of personal foodstuff of animal origin including meat, milk, and derived foodstuffs, from non-EU-countries (other than the Faeroe Islands, Greenland, and Iceland) (Anonymous, 2009). The EU has issued several regulations for the import of animals and food products of animal origin, but these regulations generally refer to commercial trade and bulk food products (Anonymous, 2007, 2009). This disregard of the risk associated with illegally transported foodstuffs combined with insufficient border controls could lead to foodborne outbreaks (Noordhuizen et al., 2013). The prevalence of MRSA in food depends on, among other factors, origin and country of provenance (Rodríguez-Lázaro et al., 2015; Oniciuc et al., 2015). Foodborne outbreaks of MRSA infection have been reported (Jones et al., 2002), confirming that food serves as a transmission pathway for MRSA (Oniciuc et al., 2017).


This study shows the presence of enterotoxigenic HA-, CA-, and LA-MRSA in foods confiscated from passengers on flights entering the EU and in food illegally introduced and sold at EU borders. There is therefore a risk of foodborne transmission of MRSA, and illegal entry of food is a possible route for enterotoxigenic MRSA transmission and spread. Efficient control measures (such as the increase of the in situ examination and testing for the presence of uncontrolled entry of foods at EU borders) are required to avoid transmission of antimicrobial-resistant strains to humans by the consumption of such foods. Travelers should be made aware of the dangers, to promote acceptation of prohibition of food transport and thereby reduce the risk of spreading of foodborne pathogens.

Author Contributions

DR-L designed, supervised the experiments, analyzed the results, revised the first draft, and prepare the last draft of the manuscript. E-AO performed part of the experiments, analyst the data and prepare the first draft of the manuscript. PG, IF-N, DG, and MD-G performed part of the experiments. JE-B performed part of the experiments and revised the different version of the manuscript. MW and AIN collaborated in the design of the experiment and revised the different version of the manuscript. MH collaborated in the design of the experiment, in the supervision of the experiments, and in the analysis of the results and revised the different versions of the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.


This work was supported by the 7th EU Framework Programme PROMISE project (project n. 265877) and the Project AGL2016-74882-C3-3 of the Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness, Government of Spain. E-AO was the beneficiary of COST Action FA1202 (STSM-FA1202-011015-063402) and FEMS (FEMS-RG-2015-0053) grants. We thank Dr. Jaime Ariza-Miguel for technical assistance.


  1. ^


Anonymous (2005). Commission regulation (EC) No 2073/2005 of 15th November 2005 on microbiological criteria for foodstuffs. Off. J. Eur. Union 338, 1–26.

Anonymous (2007). EC 275/2007 concerning lists of animals and products to be subject to controls at border inspection posts under Council Directives 91/496/EEC and 97/78/EC. Off. J. Eur. Union 2007, 9–33.

Anonymous (2009). EC 206/2009 on the introduction into the Community of personal consignments of products of animal origin and amending Regulation (EC) No 136/2004. Off. J. Eur. Union 77, 1–19.

Argudín, M. A., Tenhagen, B. A., Fetsch, A., Sachsenröder, J., Käsbohrer, A., Schroeter, A., et al. (2011). Virulence and resistance determinants of German Staphylococcus aureus ST398 isolates from nonhuman sources. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 77, 3052–3060. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02260-10

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ariza-Miguel, J., Oniciuc, E. A., Sanz, I., Fernández-Natal, I., Hernández, M., Rodríguez-Lázaro, D., et al. (2015). Evaluation of two commercially available chromogenic media for confirmation of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus from human, animal, and food samples. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 209, 26–28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.05.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bloomfield, S. F., Exner, M., Signorelli, C., Nath, Y., and Scott, E. A. (2011). The Infection Risks Associated with Clothing and Household Linens in Home and Everyday Life Settings, and the Role of Laundry. International Scientific Forum on Home Hygiene. Available at:

Google Scholar

Blumental, S., Deplano, A., Jourdain, S., De Mendonça, R., Hallin, M., Nonhoff, C., et al. (2013). Dynamic pattern and genotypic diversity of Staphylococcus aureus nasopharyngeal carriage in healthy pre-school children. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 68, 1517–1523. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkt080

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bonten, M. J. M., and Weinstein, R. A. (2016). Making sense of universal screening for MRSA. Lancet Infect. Dis. 16, 272–273. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(15)00435-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Carfora, V., Caprioli, A., Marri, N., Sagrafoli, D., Boselli, C., Giacinti, G., et al. (2015). Enterotoxin genes, enterotoxin production, and methicillin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from milk and dairy products in central Italy. Int. Dairy J. 42, 12–15. doi: 10.1016/j.idairyj.2014.10.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chen, Y., Jackson, K. M., Chea, F. P., and Schaffner, D. W. (2001). Quantification and variability analysis of bacterial cross-contamination rates in common food service tasks. J. Food Prot. 64, 72–80. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X-64.1.72

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chung, M., de Lencastre, H., Matthews, P., Tomasz, A., Adamsson, I., Aires de Sousa, M., et al. (2000). Molecular typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: comparison of results obtained in a multilaboratory effort using identical protocols and MRSA strains. Microb. Drug Resist. 6, 189–198. doi: 10.1089/mdr.2000.6.189

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ciolacu, L., Stessl, B., Bolocan, A. S., Oniciuc, E. A., Wagner, M., Rychli, K., et al. (2016). Tracking foodborne pathogenic bacteria in raw and ready-to-eat food illegally sold at the eastern EU border. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 13, 148–155. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2015.2057

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Crago, B., Ferrato, C., Drews, S. J., Svenson, L. W., Tyrrell, G., Louie, M., et al. (2012). Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in food samples associated with foodborne illness in Alberta, Canada from 2007 to 2010. Food Microbiol. 32, 202–205. doi: 10.1016/

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Enright, M. C., Day, N. P., Davies, C. E., Peacock, S. J., and Spratt, B. G. (2000). Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38, 1008–1015.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

EUCAST (2015). The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing - EUCAST. EUCAST Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Available at:

Google Scholar

Gonano, M., Hein, I., Zangerl, P., Rammelmayr, A., and Wagner, M. (2009). Phenotypic and molecular characterization of Staphylococcus aureus strains of veterinary, dairy and human origin. Epidemiol. Infect. 137, 688–699. doi: 10.1017/S0950268808001453

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grema, H. A., Geidam, Y. A., Gadzama, G. B., Ameh, J. A., and Suleiman, A. (2015). Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): a review. Adv. Anim. Vet. Sci. 3, 79–98. doi: 10.14737/journal.aavs/2015/

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Grøntvedt, C. A., Elstrøm, P., Stegger, M., Skov, R. L., Skytt Andersen, P., Larssen, K. W., et al. (2016). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC398 in humans and pigs in Norway: a one health” perspective on introduction and transmission. Clin. Infect. Dis. 63, 1431–1438. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciw552

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Haran, K. P., Godden, S. M., Boxrud, D., Jawahir, S., Bender, J. B., and Sreevatsan, S. (2012). Prevalence and characterization of Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, isolated from bulk tank milk from Minnesota dairy farms. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50, 688–695. doi: 10.1128/JCM.05214-11

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hennekinne, J. A., De Buyser, M. L., and Dragacci, S. (2012). Staphylococcus aureus and its food poisoning toxins: characterization and outbreak investigation. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 36, 815–836. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00311.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

ICMSF (2011). International Commission on Microbiological Specifications for Foods. Available at:

Google Scholar

ISO (1999). ISO 6888-2:1999. In Microbiology of Food and Animal Feeding Stuffs- Horizontal Method for the Enumeration of Coagulase-Positive Staphylococci (Staphylococcus aureus and other Species)- Part 2: Technique using Rabbit Plasma Fibrinogen Agar Medium. Geneva: ISO.

Jones, T. F., Kellum, M. E., Porter, S. S., Bell, M., and Schaffner, W. (2002). An outbreak of community-acquired foodborne illness caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 8, 82–84. doi: 10.3201/eid0801.010174

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kadariya, J., Smith, T. C., and Thapaliya, D. (2014). Staphylococcus aureus and staphylococcal food-borne disease: an ongoing challenge in public health. Biomed Res. Int. 2014:827965. doi: 10.1155/2014/827965

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kondo, Y., Ito, T., Ma, X. X., Watanabe, S., Kreiswirth, B. N., Etienne, J., et al. (2007). Combination of multiplex PCRs for staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type assignment: rapid identification system for mec, ccr, and major differences in junkyard regions. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51, 264–274. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00165-06

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lina, G., Piémont, Y., Godail-Gamot, F., Bes, M., Peter, M. O., Gauduchon, V., et al. (1999). Involvement of panton-valentine leukocidin-producing Staphylococcus aureus in primary skin infections and pneumonia. Clin. Infect. Dis. 29, 1128–1132. doi: 10.1086/313461

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lo, W.-T., Lin, W. J., Tseng, M. H., Lu, J. J., Lee, S. Y., Chu, M. L., et al. (2007). Nasal carriage of a single clone of community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among kindergarten attendees in northern Taiwan. BMC Infect. Dis. 7:51. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-7-51

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lowder, B. V., Guinane, C. M., Ben Zakour, N. L., Weinert, L. A., Conway-Morris, A., Cartwright, R. A., et al. (2009). Recent human-to-poultry host jump, adaptation, and pandemic spread of Staphylococcus aureus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 19545–19550. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0909285106

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McDougal, L. K., Steward, C. D., Killgore, G. E., Chaitram, J. M., McAllister, S. K., Tenover, F. C., et al. (2003). Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing of oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from the United States: establishing a national database. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41, 5113–5120. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.11.5113-5120.2003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Miko, B. A., Hafer, C. A., Lee, C. J., Sullivan, S. B., Hackel, M. A., Johnson, B. M., et al. (2013). Molecular characterization of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates in the United States, 2004 to 2010. J. Clin. Microbiol. 51, 874–879. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00923-12

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Milheiriço, C., Oliveira, D. C., and de Lencastre, H. (2007). Multiplex PCR strategy for subtyping the staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type IV in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: “SCCmec IV multiplex”. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 60, 42–48. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkm112

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Murphy, C. R., Victor, Q., Diane, K., Ellena, P., Matthew, W., Grace, T., et al. (2012). Nursing home characteristics associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) burden and transmission. BMC Infect. Dis. 12:269. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-269

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Noordhuizen, J., Surborg, H., and Smulders, F. J. M. (2013). On the efficacy of current biosecurity measures at EU borders to prevent the transfer of zoonotic and livestock diseases by travellers. Vet. Q. 33, 161–171. doi: 10.1080/01652176.2013.826883

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ogata, K., Narimatsu, H., Suzuki, M., Higuchi, W., Yamamoto, T., and Taniguchi, H. (2012). Commercially distributed meat as a potential vehicle for community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 78, 2797–2802. doi: 10.1128/AEM.07470-11

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oniciuc, E.-A., Ariza-Miguel, J., Bolocan, A. S., Diez-Valcarce, M., Rovira, J., Hernández, M., et al. (2015). Foods from black market at EU border as a neglected route of potential methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 209, 34–38. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.11.015

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oniciuc, E.-A., Nicolau, A. L., Hernández, M., and Rodríguez-Lázaro, D. (2017). Presence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the food chain. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 61, 49–59. doi: 10.1016/j.tifs.2016.12.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ono, H. K., Sato’o, Y., Narita, K., Naito, I., Hirose, S., Hisatsune, J., et al. (2015). Identification and characterization of a novel staphylococcal emetic toxin. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 81, 7034–7040. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01873-15

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ortega, E., Abriouel, H., Lucas, R., and Gálvez, A. (2010). Multiple roles of Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxins: pathogenicity, superantigenic activity, and correlation to antibiotic resistance. Toxins 2, 2117–2131. doi: 10.3390/toxins2082117

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Paterson, G. K., Harrison, E. M., and Holmes, M. A. (2014). The emergence of mecC methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Trends Microbiol. 22, 42–47. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2013.11.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pereira, V., Lopes, C., Castro, A., Silva, J., Gibbs, P., and Teixeira, P. (2009). Characterization for enterotoxin production, virulence factors, and antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from various foods in Portugal. Food Microbiol. 26, 278–282. doi: 10.1016/

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Price, L. B., Stegger, M., Hasman, H., Aziz, M., Larsen, J., Andersen, P. S., et al. (2012). Staphylococcus aureus CC398: host adaptation and emergence of methicillin resistance in livestock. mBio 3:e00305-11. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00305-11

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pu, S., Han, F., and Ge, B. (2009). Isolation and characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains from Louisiana retail meats. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75, 265–267. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01110-08

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ragon, M., Wirth, T., Hollandt, F., Lavenir, R., Lecuit, M., Le Monnie, A., et al. (2008). A new perspective on Listeria monocytogenes evolution. PLoS Pathog. 4:e1000146. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000146

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rodríguez-Lázaro, D., Ariza-Miguel, J., Diez-Valcarce, M., Fernández-Natal, I., Hernández, M., and Rovira, J. (2015). Foods confiscated from non-EU flights as a neglected route of potential methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus transmission. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 209, 29–33. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2014.08.016

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar (2016). Staphylococcus aureus. MLST database.

Stegger, M., Andersen, P. S., Kearns, A., Pichon, B., Holmes, M. A., Edwards, G., et al. (2012). Rapid detection, differentiation and typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus harbouring either mecA or the new mecA homologue mecALGA251. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 18, 395–400. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03715.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sun, J., Yang, M., Sreevatsan, S., and Davies, P. R. (2015). Prevalence and characterization of Staphylococcus aureus in growing pigs in the USA. PLoS ONE 10:e0143670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143670

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trnčíková, T., Hrušková, V., Oravcová, K., Pangallo, D., and Kaclíková, E. (2008). Rapid and sensitive detection of Staphylococcus aureus in food using selective enrichment and real-time PCR targeting a new gene marker. Food Anal. Methods 2, 241–250. doi: 10.1007/s12161-008-9056-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Valsangiacomo, C., Dolina, M., Peduzzi, R., and Jäggli, M. (2000). Antimicrobial susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from hospitalized patients and dairy food (fresh cheese): a survey over a decade in southern Switzerland. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 6, 393–394. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2000.00080.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Verhegghe, M., Crombé, F., Luyckx, K., Haesebrouck, F., Butaye, P., Herman, L., et al. (2016). Prevalence and genetic diversity of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus on Belgian pork. J. Food Prot. 79, 82–89. doi: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-15-266

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Verkade, E., Bosch, T., Hendriks, Y., and Kluytmans, J. (2012). Outbreak of methicillin-resistant _Staphylococcus aureus_ ST398 in a Dutch nursing home. Infect. Control Hosp. Epidemiol. 33, 624–626. doi: 10.1086/665726

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Voss, A., Loeffen, F., Bakker, J., Klaassen, C., and Wulf, M. (2005). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pig farming. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 11, 1965–1966. doi: 10.3201/eid1112.050428

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wagner, M., Skandamis, P., and Rodríguez-Lázaro, D. (2015). What stimulated a consortium to settle some pieces of information on neglected routes of pathogen transmission? Int. J. Food Microbiol. 209, 1–2. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.06.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Weese, J. S., Avery, B. P., and Reid-Smith, R. J. (2010). Detection and quantification of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) clones in retail meat products. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 51, 338–342. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2010.02901.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wulf, M. W. H., Markestein, A., van der Linden, F. T., Voss, A., Klaassen, C., and Verduin, C. M. (2008). First outbreak of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ST398 in a Dutch hospital, June 2007. Euro Surveill. 13:8051.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Yan, X., Yu, X., Tao, X., Zhang, J., Zhang, B., Dong, R., et al. (2014). Staphylococcus aureus ST398 from slaughter pigs in northeast China. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 304, 379–383. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.12.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: MRSA, food contamination, typing, illegal import, food safety, EU

Citation: Rodríguez-Lázaro D, Oniciuc E-A, García PG, Gallego D, Fernández-Natal I, Dominguez-Gil M, Eiros-Bouza JM, Wagner M, Nicolau AI and Hernández M (2017) Detection and Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus and Methicillin-Resistant S. aureus in Foods Confiscated in EU Borders. Front. Microbiol. 8:1344. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01344

Received: 15 June 2017; Accepted: 03 July 2017;
Published: 21 July 2017.

Edited by:

Paula Teixeira, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Portugal

Reviewed by:

Vincenzina Fusco, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR), Italy
Jorge Pinto Ferreira, Safoso, Switzerland

Copyright © 2017 Rodríguez-Lázaro, Oniciuc, García, Gallego, Fernández-Natal, Dominguez-Gil, Eiros-Bouza, Wagner, Nicolau and Hernández. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: David Rodríguez-Lázaro,;