Impact Factor 4.076

The 3rd most cited journal in Microbiology

SUPPLEMENTAL DATA

Original Research ARTICLE

Front. Microbiol., 28 August 2017 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01590

Evolution of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in Cystic Fibrosis Lung over Chronic Infection: A Genomic and Phenotypic Population Study

  • 1Centre for Integrative Biology, University of Trento, Trento, Italy
  • 2Department of Medical, Oral, and Biotechnological Sciences, Center of Excellence on Aging and Translational Medicine (CeSI-MeT), Università degli Studi “G. d'Annunzio” Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy
  • 3Laboratory of Cystic Fibrosis Microbiology, “Bambino Gesù” Hospital, Rome, Italy

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia has been recognized as an emerging multi-drug resistant opportunistic pathogen in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. We report a comparative genomic and phenotypic analysis of 91 S. maltophilia strains from 10 CF patients over a 12-year period. Draft genome analyses included in silico Multi-Locus Sequence Typing (MLST), Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs), and pangenome characterization. Growth rate, biofilm formation, motility, mutation frequency, in vivo virulence, and in vitro antibiotic susceptibility were determined and compared with population structure over time. The population consisted of 20 different sequence types (STs), 11 of which are new ones. Pangenome and SNPs data showed that this population is composed of three major phylogenetic lineages. All patients were colonized by multiple STs, although most of them were found in a single patient and showed persistence over years. Only few phenotypes showed some correlation with population phylogenetic structure. Our results show that S. maltophilia adaptation to CF lung is associated with consistent genotypic and phenotypic heterogeneity. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infecting multiple hosts likely experiences different selection pressures depending on the host environment. The poor genotype-phenotype correlation suggests the existence of complex regulatory mechanisms that need to be explored in order to better design therapeutic strategies.

Introduction

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is a life-limiting autosomal recessive disorder caused by a mutation targeting the Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane conductance Regulator (CFTR) gene. This leads to altered regulation of ion transport homeostasis in epithelial cells, particularly in the airways where impaired mucociliary clearance and antimicrobial defense create a perfect niche for microbial colonization.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus are the most common bacterial pathogens isolated from the CF respiratory tract where they cause persistent infections associated with a more rapid decline in lung function and survival (Emerson et al., 2002). However, the selective pressure exerted on bacterial populations mainly by the antipseudomonal antibiotic therapy in recent years led to an increasing number of reports on potentially emerging and challenging pathogens (Parkins and Floto, 2015). In this context, both the overall prevalence and incidence of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolations from CF respiratory tract secretions have increased steadily in recent years. Despite this, the clinical relevance of S. maltophilia remains undetermined because of conflicting results arising from clinical studies focused on the correlation between infection and lung damage (Colin and Rabin, 2011).

However, recent studies showed that in CF individuals, chronic pulmonary infection with S. maltophilia is associated with an increased risk of pulmonary exacerbations, lung transplantation, and death (Waters et al., 2013). In the past years, we gained in vitro and in vivo evidence for the pathogenetic potential of S. maltophilia in these patients (Pompilio et al., 2008, 2010, 2015; Di Bonaventura et al., 2010). In particular, the persistence of microorganism in CF lung is probably due to its ability to colonize bronchial CF-derived cells in the form of biofilms, sessile communities inherently resistant to both antibiotics and host immunity (Pompilio et al., 2010), probably as a consequence of a selective adaptation to CF airways. S. maltophilia biofilms are intrinsecally resistant to antibiotics, being not eradicated also following exposure to bactericidal concentrations (Di Bonaventura et al., 2004).

During a chronic colonization, pathogens adapt over time to cope with changing selection pressures, co-infecting species, and antibiotic therapies (Cullen and McClean, 2015). In the lung, these adaptations are induced by environmental pressures, such as, inflammatory responses, hypoxia, nutrient deficiency, osmolarity, low pH, and antibiotic therapies. The evolution of P. aeruginosa during chronic lung infection has been widely studied. The main phenotypic adaptations occurring during transition from acute to chronic P. aeruginosa infection include acquisition of antibiotic resistance, exopolysaccharide production (mucoidy), loss in motility, formation of small colony variants, increased mutation rate, quorum sensing, and altered production of virulence factors (Clark et al., 2015; Cullen and McClean, 2015).

More recently, the adaptation S. maltophilia undergoes during chronic infection has also been investigated. For the first time, genotypic diversity, mutation frequency, and antibiotic resistance in 90 S. maltophilia isolates chronically colonizing 19 CF patients have been studied (Vidigal et al., 2014). They found that S. maltophilia adaptation during chronic CF lung infection leads to high genetic diversity, although a decreased mutation rate was observed in the late isolates. Similarily, previous epidemiological studies of S. maltophilia populations showed that there is high genetic variability among clones, and that environmental strains may carry an extended antibiotic-resistance gene set (Valdezate et al., 2004; Youenou et al., 2015). The forces shaping the genetic diversity of this species are mainly driven by homologous recombination, followed by gene gain and loss events (Yu et al., 2016). Recently, we comparatively evaluated 13 S. maltophilia strains isolated from the same CF chronically infected patient over a 10-year period for growth rate, biofilm formation, motility, mutation frequencies, antibiotic resistance, and pathogenicity (Pompilio et al., 2016). S. maltophilia adaptation leads to increased antibiotic resistance, but decreased in vivo pathogenicity as well as biofilm formation. However, having considered only one chronically infected patient did not allow us to evaluate if the adaptation process may relate to the complexity of the individual host niche.

For these reasons, in order to gain new and improved knowledge on the genetic and phenotypic basis underlying S. maltophilia evolution in CF airways, 91 S. maltophilia strains collected over a 12 year-period from 10 CF patients at a single hospital were considered in the present work. Each strain was evaluated for several phenotypic traits, namely growth rate, biofilm formation, motility (swimming, swarming, twitching), mutation frequency, in vivo virulence, and in vitro antibiotic susceptibility. A genome-wide analysis of mutations among strains was also performed, aimed at elucidating genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationships within this population. Temporal trends in phenotypic traits in relation to the genetic background of the strains were then pointed out.

Materials and Methods

Ethic Statement

This study was carried out in accordance with the recommendations of the Ethical Committee of the Children's Hospital “Bambino Gesù,” Rome, Italy, project 1413_OPBG_2017 “Evaluation of mechanisms underlying S. maltophilia adaptation to cystic fibrosis lung during chronic infection.” All patients gave written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. For patients aged <18 years at the date of first sampling the consent was released by their legal representative.

Bacterial Strains

Ninety-one S. maltophilia strains were isolated over a 12 year-period (2003–2014) in sputum samples collected from 10 CF patients (ethically coded as ZC, CV, MS, TG, FMa, AV, GC, MC, BB, and SanG) at the CF Unit of “Bambino Gesù” Children's Hospital of Rome, Italy (Table 1). Only patients chronically infected with S. maltophilia, that are those with at least 50% of samples positive in the past 12 months (Pressler et al., 2011), were selected. One strain was collected yearly during a pulmonary exacerbation episode, except when different morphotypes were observed. Strains were identified by Vitek automated system (bioMérieux Italia SpA; Florence, Italy) and stored at −80°C for further characterization. The following control strains were used: S. maltophilia ATCC13637 (mutation frequency assay), S. maltophilia Sm111 knock-out for fliI-gene (motility assays) (Pompilio et al., 2010), Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, P. aeruginosa ATCC 27853 (antibiotic susceptibility tests), and S. maltophilia K279a (identification of polymorphisms).

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strains tested in the present study.

DNA Extraction and Sequencing Library Preparation

S. maltophilia isolates were grown on Columbia agar plates with 5% sheep blood (bioMérieux Italia S.p.A, Florence, Italy) for 24 h at 37°C, and genomic DNA was extracted using DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). DNA was quantified using Qubit 2.0 fluorometer (Invitrogen by Thermo Fisher Scientific, Life Technologies Italia, Monza, Italy). Paired-end libraries were prepared from 1 ng of total bacterial DNA using Nextera XT DNA Sample Preparation kit and Nextera XT Index kit (Illumina Inc., San Diego, California, U.S.A.). Library concentration and average fragment size were calculated by Qubit 2.0 fluorometer and Caliper LabChip GXI System (PerkinElmer, Waltham, USA), respectively. Libraries' concentration was normalized to 2 nM, pooled for multiplexing in equal volumes, and sequenced at 14 pM on the Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina Inc., San Diego, California, U.S.A.) with 300 nt paired-end reads to achieve a coverage of about 30x per base, using MiSeq V3 flow cell.

Bioinformatic Analyses

Raw reads underwent a series of steps for quality filtering which included a general quality check with the software FastQC (Andrews, 2010) and the trimming of low-quality ends. After the preliminary quality check, library 44 was removed due to its low quality. Library number 21 was removed a posteriori due to an anomalous placement in the phylogenetic tree, a blast search on the whole NCBI-nt database showed high similarity of the contigs obtained by this library with Serratia marcescens. The de novo assembly was performed using SPAdes (Bankevich et al., 2012). The parameters were the following: the values of “k” set as 23, 43, 63, 83, 103, 113, the cutoff of coverage as 3, and the “-careful” option. Contigs below 200 bp were removed as contigs below this length are not accepted by NCBI whole genome submission system. To improve further the quality of the assembly, raw reads were mapped on the contigs using bowtie2 (Langmead and Salzberg, 2012), and the contigs with no reads mapping were removed. The degree of similarity among genomes was estimated calculating the pairwise average nucleotide identity (ANI), that consists of a comparison between each genome and all the others using BLAST and the averaging of the identity percentages among all hits in each comparison. ANI was calculated using the python package pyani (Pritchard et al., 2016). In silico Multi-Locus Sequence Typing (MLST) analysis was done using the specific tool available from the web server of the Centre for Genomic Epidemiology (Larsen et al., 2012). To estimate the relatedness of Sequence Types (STs), an eBURST analysis was performed with PHYLOViZ 2.0 (Nascimento et al., 2016). Polymorphic sites were identified with Snippy (https://github.com/tseemann/snippy), using S. maltophilia K279a (NCBI acc. no. NC_010943) as reference strain. Phylogenetic analyses were performed from core Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) data with the maximum likelihood method as implemented in PHYLIP (Felsenstein, 1989). Phenotypic traits were mapped on the tree using iTOL (Letunic and Bork, 2016). Contigs were annotated using Prokka (Seemann, 2014) and pangenome analysis was done with Roary (Page et al., 2015), using all default parameters for gene clustering. To estimate whether S. maltophilia pangenome was open or closed based on Heaps' law model (Tettelin et al., 2008), the alpha decay parameter was calculated using the R-package micropan (Snipen and Liland, 2015). Binary heatmaps for gene (or SNP) presence absence were done in R environment (R Core Team, 2012), using the heatmap() function of the base package. An heatmap representing the phylogenetic distances among isolates was done using the R-package “pheatmap” on a distance matrix calculated on the aligned core SNP-ome with the dist.alignment() function of the “seqinr” R-package. To identify clinically relevant functions, S. maltophilia draft genomes were mined for 19 antibiotic resistance genes and for 24 virulence genes described in the literature using BLAST (Altschul et al., 1990), with both coverage and similarity threshold set at 80%. Two additional analyses were performed to maximize the number of resistance genes identified: first, genomes were mined for additional antibiotic resistance genes not specific for S. maltophilia using ResFinder tool from the server of the Centre for Genomic Epidemiology (Zankari et al., 2012), setting an identity threshold at 98% and a length threshold at 100%; second, the Resistance Gene Identifier (RGI) software, available from the CARD database (Jia et al., 2017), was run using the “perfect and strict hits only” default parameters. The degree of recombination among the strains was evaluated using the software ClonalFrameML (Didelot and Wilson, 2015), using as inputs the alignment of the core genes obtained by roary.

Phenotypic Characterization

Each S. maltophilia strain was evaluated for growth rate, biofilm formation, motility (swimming, swarming, twitching), mutation frequency, in vivo virulence, and in vitro antibiotic susceptibility, as previously described (Pompilio et al., 2016). All experiments were performed in triplicate and repeated twice.

Growth Rate

Overnight cultures in Trypticase Soy broth (TSB; Oxoid SpA; Garbagnate M.se, Milan, Italy) were corrected with fresh TSB to an OD550 of 1.00, corresponding to about 1–5 × 109 CFU/ml. This suspension was diluted 1:100 in fresh TSB, then 200 μl were dispensed in each well of a microtiter plate (Kartell SpA; Noviglio, Milan, Italy), and incubated at 37°C, under static conditions, in a microplate reader (Sinergy H1 Multi-Mode Reader; BioTek Instruments, Inc., Winooski, VT, USA). OD550 readings were taken every 30 min for 24 h. Considering the exponential growth phase selected on a graph of ln OD550 vs. time (t), mean generation time (MGT) was calculated as follows: MGT = ln2/μ, where μ (growth rate) = (lnODt − lnODt0)/t.

Biofilm Formation

Biofilm formation was measured, as previously described (Pompilio et al., 2008), in a flat bottom 96-well polystyrene tissue culture-treated plate (Falcon BD; Milan, Italy). Following 24 h of static incubation at 37°C, biofilm was stained with crystal violet and biomass measured as OD492. To calculate the category of biofilm production, we determined the cut-off optical density (ODc) as three standard deviations above the mean OD of the negative control. Tested strains were then divided into four groups, according to Stepanović et al. (2007): OD ≤ ODc (non-adherent strain, no biofilm producer); ODc < OD ≤ 2 × ODc (weak biofilm producer); 2 × ODc < OD ≤ 4 × ODc (moderate biofilm producer); 4 × ODc < OD (strong biofilm producer).

Motility

Motility assays were performed as described by Rashid and Kornberg (2000), with modifications. A single colony was inoculated onto swimming (10 g/l tryptone, 5 g/l NaCl, 3 g/l agar) or into swarming (8 g/l nutrient broth, 5 g/l dextrose, g/l agar) agar. After incubation at 37°C for 24 h, swimming and swarming motilities were measured as the diameter of growth zone. Twitching was measured by inoculating a single colony to the bottom of Petri dish containing 1% TSB solidified with 1% agar. After 72 h of incubation at 37°C, the agarose layer was removed and the diameter of twitch zones were measured, following staining with crystal violet solution.

Mutation Frequency

Mutation frequency was assessed according to Oliver et al. (2000), with modifications. Twenty milliliters of overnight cultures grew in Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB; Oxoid) were centrifuged (4,500 rpm, 10 min, 4°C) and resuspended in 1 ml of MHB. Ten-fold dilution of each sample was seeded onto Mueller-Hinton agar (MHA; Oxoid) plates (controls) and onto MHA + rifampin 250 μg/ml (Sigma-Aldrich) then incubated at 37°C. Colony counts were performed after 24 h- (control plates) or 48 h-incubation (rifampin added plates), and mutation frequency (f) was calculated as the ratio of mutants/total cells in the population. Strains were classified as hypo—(f ≤ 8 × 10−9), normo—(8 × 10−9 < f < 4 × 10−8), weak—(4 × 10−8f < 4 × 10−7), and strong-mutators (f ≥ 4 × 10−7; Turrientes et al., 2010).

In vivo virulence

Galleria mellonella virulence assay was performed as previously described (Betts et al., 2014), with modifications. Overnight cultures of each S. maltophilia strain grown in TSB were washed and resuspended in PBS. Twenty larvae were inoculated—directly into the hemocoel via the right proleg using Hamilton syringe—with 10 μl containing 103, 104, 105, and 106 CFU, or PBS only (controls). Larvae were incubated in the dark at 37°C and the number of dead caterpillars was scored every 24 h until 96 h, considering as dead those nonresponsive to touch. A “pathogenicity score” was assigned to each strain, considering both time and dose needed to achieve LD50 and LD100.

Antibiotic Susceptibility

In vitro susceptibility to doxicycline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, minocycline, ciprofloxacin, levofloxacin, ticarcillin-clavulanate, ceftazidime, piperacillin-tazobactam, amikacin, and chloramphenicol was assessed by MIC-Test Strip (Liofilchem; Roseto degli Abruzzi, Italy). When CLSI breakpoints were not available for S. maltophilia (CLSI, 2016), ECOFF (epidemiological cut-off) values were calculated according EUCAST guidelines (http://www.eucast.org/mic_distributions_and_ecoffs/): 128/4 μg/ml (piperacillin/tazobactam), 16 μg/ml (ciprofloxacin), 64 μg/ml (amikacin).

Statistical Analysis and Interpretative Criteria

Statistical analysis was performed using Prism 6 (version 6.01; GraphPad Software Inc., La Jolla, USA), considering p-values lower than 0.05 as significant. Gaussian distribution was evaluated by D'Agostino-Pearson omnibus and Shapiro-Wilk normality tests. Differences between groups were evaluated using both parametric (one-way ANOVA-test followed by Newman-Keuls' multiple comparison post-test), and non-parametric (Mann-Whitney test; Kruskal-Wallis ANOVA test followed by Dunn's multiple comparison post-test) tests. Differences between proportions were assessed by chi-square test. Correlation between each phenotype and the phylogenetic structure of the population was assessed by Pagel's lambda (Pagel, 1999), using the phylosig() function of the R-package phytools.

To identify temporal trends and correlation among phenotypes, only the monophyletic groups with the highest number of strains colonizing a single patient were investigated in order to strengthen the statistical significance, yet minimizing confounding variables connected to the genetic background of the strain itself and of the host. By this way, five groups of strains were selected: ST184 from patient TG (n = 14, TG_184); ST91 from patient GC (n = 10, GC_91); ST185 from patient FMa (n = 8, FMa_185); ST179 from patient ZC (n = 7, ZC_179), and ST5 from patient CV (n = 7, CV_5). The two groups with the highest number of strains (TG_184 and GC_91) were selected for a microevolutionary analysis based on a reduced dataset consisting of SNPs that were occurring only in the group under study.

Correlations among pairs of phenotypic traits in each group, as well as the trend of each phenotype over time, were inferred by linear regression analysis. With regard to antibiotic susceptibility tests, out-of-range MICs ≥256 and ≥ 32 μg/ml were considered as 256 and 32 μg/ml, respectively. The graphics displaying the temporal trends in the ST and patient_ST combination were obtained using the “ggplot2” package, the confidence interval was calculated using the function geom_smooth() with the default parameters.

Results

Bioinformatic Analyses

Table 2 and Supplementary Table 1 report the statistics regarding assembly, SNP analysis, annotation, and phenotypes. The values of assembly statistics and annotation are comparable with those found in other studies (Youenou et al., 2015; Yu et al., 2016). Genome sequences are publicly available under GenBank accession numbers MQWK00000000-MQZW00000000; unassembled reads that passed the cleaning step are available from the Sequence Reads Archive (SRA) at the acc. no. SRR5569163–SRR5569253. ANI values ranged from 0.90 to 1 (with 1 representing perfect id), with an average of 0.95 ± 0.03, calculated over an alignment length ranging from 3.450 to 5.214 kbp, with an average of 3.996 ± 330 kbp (Supplementary Table 2).

TABLE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Table 2. Main assembly, SNP, and annotation statistics.

The population consisted of 20 different STs, 11 of which are new ones, including 33 new alleles and 47 strains out of 91 (51.6%); the new STs were submitted to pubMLST.org (Table 3). The eBURST analysis showed that eight of the STs found in this study were linked either each other or with known STs (Figure 1), while the remaining ones showed no first or second level connection to any described ST. Nine out of eleven new STs were found in a single patient whereas this was the case for six out of nine known STs. The most prevalent ST in the population was ST5 (20 isolates from 6 patients), followed by the new ST184 (14 isolates from a single patient), and ST91 (11 isolates from 2 patients). Among the new STs, ST183 was found in the largest number of patients (3) (Figure 1). Table 1 reports the timeline of isolation of STs from each patient. In some cases (patient TG), intermittent infection of the same clone was observed. In some other cases, there are either different clones co-infecting the same patient (as in patient ZC during years 2012–2013), or ST replacement through time was observed (as for patient AV, that was initially infected by ST2 and successively by ST5). Furthermore, in two patients (GC and FMa), the ST found in the initial isolation was no more isolated for 1 or 2 years, and appeared again in a persistent way.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3. MLST table resuming allele number of each ST.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. eBURST diagram of S. maltophilia population. Each circle represents one ST. Diameter of circles is proportional to the number of isolates belonging to each ST. The thickness and color of the connections between STs represent the number of loci with one or more different allele (thick black link, 1 different allele; thin gray link, 2 different alleles). Black circles represent previously characterized STs which were not found in the present study.

A total of 279,538 SNPs was identified. The phylogenetic tree based on the alignment of all polymorphic positions consisted of two major lineages separated by a large phylogenetic distance (Figures 2, 3). One cluster included the reference strain with most strains belonging to known STs, while the other one comprised all isolates from TG_184 and MC_186; another minor monophyletic lineage was also present (ST183, Figure 3). The number of SNPs unique to TG_184 and GC_91 were 2,940 and 1,109, respectively. All SNPs were monomorphic and the number of variable SNPs within the group was 783 (in TG_184) and 18 (in GC_91). A cluster analysis based on the reduced datasets was performed for both TG_184 and GC_91, revealing that only in the latter case the clustering pattern was consistent with the timeline of isolation (Figure 4, Supplementary Figure 1). This set of isolates was considered as likely deriving from a single recent common ancestor. A closer look was given on the kind of mutations (missense, nonsense, silent) occurring in this series (Figure 4). Seven genes with fixed mutations were identified during the course of infection, namely: SMLT_RS18770, SMLT_RS03905, SMLT_RS04300, SMLT_RS10020, SMLT_RS01245, SMLT_RS00660, and SMLT_RS20060 (Figure 4). The pangenome consisted of 16,486 genes, with a core genome of 1,911 genes (Supplementary Figure 2). The number of genes present in a single genome (strain-specific genes) was 5,599 (33.9% of the whole gene pool). According to Heaps' law, the pangenome was open (alpha = 0.77). The phylogenomic dendrogram based on gene presence/absence was globally consistent with the topology and branch lengths of the SNPs-based tree (Supplementary Figure 3). S. maltophilia-specific genes for antibiotic resistance (identified using BLAST) were ubiquitous, with the exception of qnrR (found in 89 isolates), smeO and smeY (90 isolates), and spgM (66 isolates). ResFinder analysis instead, which looks at genes nonspecific to S. maltophilia, found very few genes in very few strains, except for aac(6)-Iz and aph(3)-IIc which were found in 50 and 42 strains, respectively (Supplementary Figure 4A). A widely overlapping result was found by the RGI software of CARD database, with 46 genes (among which 24 ubiquitary ones) belonging to 10 different ARO categories (Supplementary Table 3). Similarly, virulence genes were either widely distributed or rarely found (Supplementary Figure 4B). We acknowledge that in some instances (for example for smeO, smeI, and qnrR), the absence of the gene in a single isolate may be due to the fragmentation of the assembly. The clustering pattern defined by ClonalFrameML was highly consistent with the one shown in Figure 2. The recombination events within the clusters seem to be not homogeneous neither among STs nor among patient_ST combinations (Supplementary Figure 5). An additional analysis was performed on the alignment of nucleotide sequences of genes known to be involved in the mutator phenotype (mutL, mutS, and uvrD). Main statistics about polymorphic sites and neutral evolution test are reported in Supplementary Table 4.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Radial cladogram inferred from a Maximum Likelihood analysis of core genome SNPs and including all phenotypic traits. Branches are colored according to ST, and dashed branches represent new STs. Innermost to outermost circles represent: (i) patient IDs (ZC, empty diamond; CV, empty square; MS, empty triangle; TG, empty circle; FMa, empty pentagon; AV, full diamond; GC, full square; MC, full triangle; BB, full circle; SanG, full pentagon); (ii) antibiotic susceptibility profiles (codified as: white-susceptible, orange-intermediate, and black-resistant) for the following antibiotics: TZP, piperacillin/tazobactam; AMK, amikacin; CAZ, ceftazidime; TIM, ticarcillin/clavulanic acid; CIP, ciprofloxacin; CHL, chloramphenicol; SXT, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole; LVX, levofloxacin; DOX, doxicycline; and MIN, minocycline; (iii) biofilm biomass (black), growth rate (green), and mutation frequency (purple), normalized dividing each value by the maximum value (the out-of-range biofilm values of strains 2, 28, and 69 were reported as 1 for visualization issues); (iv) swimming (blue), swarming (orange), and twitching motility (green); (v) G. mellonella virulence scores. Bootstrap support is codified as “*” for >95% and “**” for 75–95%, placed at the nodes of the tree.

FIGURE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Heatmap representing the phylogenetic distances as inferred by the SNP data. The clustering pattern reflects the one in Figure 2, but the distance between the two main clusters and the minor ones is highlighted. The monophyletic STs are shown with the same color and line type as in Figure 2.

FIGURE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Binary heatmap of the subset of SNP data present only in isolates of patient_ST combination GC_91. Annotations for each SNP are shown on the right panel.

Phenotypic Trends over Time

All traits showed significant temporal trends or significantly different values among STs, patient or both (see Supplementary Figures 6A–G).

Biofilm Formation

ST5 isolates formed significantly higher biofilm biomass amount than those belonging to ST184 (OD492 median values: 0.369 vs. 0.029, respectively; p < 0.05; Supplementary Figure 6A2). A significantly higher percentage of “strong producers” strains was observed in ST5 compared to ST184 (35 vs. 0%; p < 0.05), whereas “non-producers” strains were found mostly in ST184 (60 vs. 5%, respectively; p < 0.01; Supplementary Table 5). ST91 isolates significantly decreased their ability to form biofilm over time in patient GC (r2 = 0.697; p < 0.01; Table 4; Supplementary Figure 6A4).

TABLE 4
www.frontiersin.org

Table 4. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia trends in expression over time across all phenotypic traits, both in the most prevalent sequence types (STs) and ST_patient combinations.

Growth Rate

ST5 isolates showed significantly higher growth rate than ST184 ones (U/h, median values: 0.444 vs. 0.386, respectively; p < 0.05; Supplementary Figure 6B2). An opposite trend was found according to the patient_ST combination considered: positive for ZC_179 (r2 = 0.768; p < 0.001), negative for TG_184 (r2 = −0.462; p < 0.01; Table 4; Supplementary Figure 6B4).

Motility

ST184 isolates exhibited lower swimming motility compared to ST185, ST5, and ST91 ones (median value: 2 vs. 11, 7, and 9 mm, respectively; p < 0.01; Supplementary Figure 6C2), and also decreased swarming and twitching motilities compared with ST185 isolates (swarming: 3 vs. 4 mm; twitching: 3 vs. 8 mm, respectively; p < 0.05; Supplementary Figures 6D2,E2). Trends in motility over time differed according to ST and motility type considered. ST5 isolates significantly increased swimming and twitching motility over time (r2 = 0.248 and 0.243, respectively; p < 0.05; Table 4; Supplementary Figures 6C3,E3). Contrarily, a decreasing trend was observed for both swarming in TG_184 isolates (r2 = 0.315; p < 0.05), and swimming in ZC_179 isolates (r2 = 0.648; p < 0.05; Table 4; Supplementary Figures 6C4,D4).

Mutation Frequency

Most of strains were weak-mutators (45 out of 91, 49.4%), with a frequency significantly higher (p ≤ 0.01) than that observed for strong—(28, 30.8%), normo—(16, 17.6%), and hypo-mutators (2, 2.2%). ST184 isolates showed the highest median mutation frequency (1.3 × 10−6 vs. 1.4 × 10−7, 1.2 × 10−7, 2.9 × 10−8, and 1.3 × 10−7 for ST5, ST91, ST179, and ST185, respectively; p < 0.05; Supplementary Figure 6F-2). The occurrence of strong-mutators in ST184 (93.4%) was in fact significantly higher compared to other STs (30, 25, and 0% for ST5, ST185, ST91, and ST179, respectively; p < 0.001; Supplementary Table 6). TG_184 isolates showed significant trend toward increased mutation rate (r2 = 0.564; p<0.01; Supplementary Table 6; Supplementary Figure 6F4).

In vivo Virulence

ST179 isolates resulted to be significantly more virulent in G. mellonella compared to ST5 (median virulence score: 24 vs. 0, respectively; p < 0.001). ST185 isolates were completely avirulent, resulting significantly different from ST179 isolates (p < 0.001) and ST91 isolates (median score: 14; p < 0.05; Supplementary Figure 6G2). No significant temporal trend was observed for virulence, regardless of ST and ST_patient combination considered (Table 4).

Antibiotic Susceptibility

Minocycline, doxycycline, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole were the most effective antibiotics against S. maltophilia, showing comparable susceptibility rates (98.9, 94.6, and 93.4%, respectively), whereas ceftazidime, piperacillin/tazobactam, and amikacin were the least effective, showing a resistance rate of 86.6, 85.5, and 62%, respectively (Supplementary Table 6). A significant trend toward increased number of resistant strains over time was observed only in GC_91 isolates (r2 = 0.607; p < 0.01; Table 4).

MIC-values were stratified on ST and results are summarized in Supplementary Tables 7, 8. Isolates belonging to ST179 were more resistant to levofloxacin compared with ST184 and ST185 ones (85.7 vs. 26.6% and 0%, respectively; p < 0.05), but susceptible to chloramphenicol differently from ST5, ST184, and ST185 isolates (resistance rate: 0 vs. 55%, 53.3%, and 75%, respectively; p < 0.05). ST91 isolates were less resistant to amikacin than those belonging to other STs (20 vs. 100%, 93.3, 100, and 80%, for ST179, ST184, ST185, and ST5, respectively; p < 0.01). ST5 isolates were less esistant to ticarcillin/clavulanic acid compared to ST179, ST184, and ST185 (55 vs. 100%, 93.3 and 100%, respectively; p < 0.05).

Trends in MIC-values differed according to antibiotic, ST, and ST_patient combination (Table 5; Supplementary Figures 7–15). Minocycline MICs only did not significantly change over time, whereas a constant trend was observed for fluoroquinolones (decreasing) and ceftazidime (increasing). ST179 isolates did not significantly change their MICs over time, regardless of antibiotic considered, whereas ST5 ones exhibited significant trends for four antibiotics, mostly decreasing. Only a trend with of increased values was found in ST91 isolates for ticarcillin/clavulanic acid (r2 = 0.448; p < 0.05) and ceftazidime (r2 = 0.483; p < 0.05). Regarding ST_patient combinations, it is worth noting that the persistence of ST91 in patient GC was associated with increased MICs of piperacillin/tazobactam (r2 = 0.713; p < 0.01), ticarcillin/clavulanic acid (r2 = 0.629; p < 0.05), and ceftazidime (r2 = 0.722; p < 0.01).

TABLE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Table 5. Stenotrophomonas maltophilia trends in susceptibility (MIC values) to nine antibiotics over time.

Correlation among Phenotypic Traits

Spearman r-values measurements (Table 6) showed that: (i) growth rate is positively correlated with all motility types tested, but negatively related to biofilm production; (ii) mutation frequency was inversely correlated with both swimming and twitching motility; and (iii) twitching was positively correlated with both swimming and swarming motility. Several trends were observed when data was stratified according to ST (Supplementary Table 9) or ST_patient combination (Supplementary Table 10), except for ST185 and FMa_185 isolates for which no significant correlations were found. Swimming, twitching, and resistance to amikacin and ciprofloxacin were the only phenotypes showing a low (0.50 > λ > 0.55), but significant (p < 0.01), phylogenetic signal (Supplementary Table 11).

TABLE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Table 6. Spearman correlation values (upper half) and p-values (lower half) for each pairwise comparison of phenotype values on the whole population (n = 91).

Mutation frequency was associated to antibiotic resistance (data not shown). Considering isolates as a whole, the proportion of MDR strains was significantly higher in strong-mutators compared to weak-mutators (100 vs. 73.3%, respectively; p < 0.05). Particularly, the mean number of resistances per isolate was significantly higher in strong- and normo-mutators than weak-mutators (5.4 and 4.3 vs. 3.0, respectively; p < 0.0001 and p < 0.05, respectively).

Stratifying on antibiotics tested, strong-mutator isolates were found significantly more resistant to ticarcillin/clavulanate and ceftazidime compared to weak-mutators, as shown by both percentage of resistance (ticarcillin/clavulanate: 82.1 vs. 53.3%, respectively; ceftazidime: 100 vs. 77.8%, respectively; p < 0.05) and the mean MIC-value of each antibiotic (ticarcillin/clavulanate: 194.9 vs. 95.7, respectively, p < 0.01; ceftazidime: 256 vs. 185.8, respectively, p < 0.01). The same trend in mean MIC values was observed for piperacillin/tazobactam (247.4 vs. 179.6, respectively; p < 0.05).

Discussion

The CF lung is a very stressful environment for infecting bacterial populations that must overcome these challenges to persist and survive, thus leading to a strong genotypic and phenotypic diversification. After infection, bacteria are exposed to several postulated stressors including mucin hypersecretion and increased osmotic pressure (Henderson et al., 2014), oxidative and nitrosative stresses (Antus, 2016) due to host responses, sublethal concentrations of antibiotics (Wozniak and Keyser, 2004), and the competition with other microorganisms (Pompilio et al., 2015).

However, CF lung is also the source of a wide variety of untapped ecological opportunities, thus originating an explosive radiation of bacterial population toward specialized phenotypes. This is the case for P. aeruginosa, whose adaptation to the CF lung is accelerated by the generation of mutant variants, including mutators, that can additionally increase adaptation producing niche specialists (Smith et al., 2006; Waters et al., 2011; Markussen et al., 2014). In fact, higher mutation supply provides more opportunities for adaptation by means of adaptive changes such as, mucoid conversion (Govan and Deretic, 1996), a switch to an non-motile biofilm lifestyle (McElroy et al., 2014), loss of major virulence factors (Bianconi et al., 2015), auxotrophy in the amino acid-rich lung environment (Barth and Pitt, 1996), loss of motility (Mahenthiralingam et al., 1994), and the emergence of hypermutators (Oliver et al., 2000).

Given that CF patients are constantly exposed to repeated and often intensive antibiotic therapy cycles, the evolution of antibiotic resistance is also a common adaptation (Macia et al., 2005). Once chronic infection is established, adapted mutants start new cycles of mutagenesis and selection of further adaptations in a self-sustained vicious circle, which makes the infection virtually impossible to eradicate. Although the genetic adaptations and related phenotypic variations occurring during CF chronic lung infection are well documented in P. aeruginosa (Clark et al., 2015; Cullen and McClean, 2015), the mechanisms driving S. maltophilia persistence in CF lungs remain largely unknown.

In the present work, we aimed at increase our understanding of the genetic and phenotypic mechanisms underlying S. maltophilia persistence in CF lung, looking at the existence of typical genotypic and/or phenotypical profiles related to chronic infection. The approach followed in this study was to combine genotypic profiling with phenotypic characterization to compare 91 S. maltophilia isolates recovered, over 12 year-period, from 10 chronically infected CF patients. The high degree of genetic diversity in S. maltophilia is well recognized, and it has been proposed that this species actually consists of a complex (Svensson-Stadler et al., 2012). A previous study (Ormerod et al., 2015) found an ANI of 91.5% between two reference genomes (K279a and JV3), while genomes within a given species usually have an ANI >95%. In our dataset we found ANI values as low as 0.90%, therefore our survey corroborates this statement.

Eleven new STs including 33 new alleles were found in the population, and at least two new deeply branching lineages were revealed: a major one constituted by ST184 and ST186 isolates, and a smaller one constituted by ST183 isolates. Despite the fact that all CF patients were colonized by multiple STs (with up to six different STs in patient MS), most STs (15 out of 20) were occurring in a single patient and showed persistence over years in many cases (Figure 1, Table 1). Differently, using DNA fingerprinting by repetitive sequence-based PCR Vidigal et al. (2014) found a unique S. maltophilia genotype in 6 out of 19 (31.6%) CF patients during the 4-year study course. This discrepancy might be due both to the lower discriminatory power of rep-PCR compared to MLST that, although more expensive and time consuming, represents along with PFGE the typing method of choice (Gherardi et al., 2015) in the shorter study-period considered in the spanish study.

The monophyletic lineages of the phylogenetic tree were in perfect agreement with the ST, and support their relationships revealed by eBURST analysis. This is the case for instance for the pairs ST5–ST185 and ST184–ST186, which branch as sister groups in the phylogenetic tree and are also connected in the eBURST diagram (Figures 1, 2). The nearly perfect correspondence of the clustering pattern derived from core genome SNPs and pan-genomic analysis of the accessory genome further supports this observation: clusters of isolates belonging to TG_184 and MC_186 combinations have 1,094 genes differing from all others (Supplementary Figure 1). Furthermore, a clear difference of gene presence/absence pattern in isolates 23 (ST29), 14 (ST180), 27 (ST182), and 28, 61, 79 (ST183) was noted. The result of this heterogeneity is a very narrow core genome of only 1,911 genes out of 16,486 genes in the pangenome (11.6%). A possible explanation for this is that S. maltophilia lives in a community, and that sympatric species tend to have large genomes and an open pan-genome (Rouli et al., 2015).

The patient_ST combinations TG_184 and GC_91 were those with the highest number of isolates and were thus suitable for a microevolutionary study. The clustering pattern of the combination patient_ST GC_91 was consistent with the time of sampling, with the late isolates branching out from the earlier ones, and 7 out of 18 mutations were fixed over time (Figure 4).

The number of SNPs was about one order of magnitude higher in ST184 isolates (highest in the late isolates 47–49) than in any other isolate (Supplementary Table 1). In this frame, the prevalence of strong-mutators we found (28 out of 91 strains, 30.8%) was comparable to those observed in previous studies (Turrientes et al., 2010; Vidigal et al., 2014). Hypermutator phenotype clusterized mainly in ST184 whose strains were, all but one, strong mutators. In disagreement with Vidigal et al. (2014), we did not observe decreased mutation rate over time. Contrarily, a significant trend toward increased mutation rate in patient TG was observed (Table 4; Supplementary Figure 6F4).

Although S. maltophilia chronic infection has recently been shown to be an independent predictor of pulmonary exacerbation requiring hospitalization and antibiotics (Waters et al., 2011, 2013), the role of antibiotic treatment of these infections in CF people is still unclear since randomized clinical trials are lacking (Amin and Waters, 2016). Trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, the first-line therapy for S. maltophilia infections, and minocycline and doxycycline, that have also shown some promise to assist with the treatment (Farrell et al., 2010; Chung et al., 2013), resulted the most active antibiotics against isolates tested in the present study. Trends in MIC-values, as well as percentage of resistance, differed according to antibiotic, ST, and ST_patient combination. In disagreement with Vidigal et al. (2014), we observed that hypermutation plays a role in the evolution of S. maltophilia resistance, at least toward ticarcillin/clavulanate, ceftazidime, and piperacillin/tazobactam. Similarily, P. aeruginosa mutators were more frequently resistant to different antibiotics than nonmutators isolates (Oliver et al., 2000).

The analysis of antibiotic resistance and virulence genes showed that the gene repertoire is homogeneous within the population, and no significant association between the antibiotic susceptibility profiles or virulence phenotypes with the presence of those genes was found (Supplementary Figures 4A,B). The lack of genotype-phenotype association has been previously reported for S. maltophilia, with specific reference to antibiotic susceptibility profiles (Youenou et al., 2015). It is well known that SNPs accumulated in P. aeruginosa populations colonizing CF patients are highly homoplastic, and that phenotypes display significant correlation with recombinational events rather than with SNPs themselves (Darch et al., 2015). The fact that recombination is one of the main driver of genetic diversity in S. maltophilia could further explain this discrepancy (Yu et al., 2016). Recombination seems to be widespread within the population (Supplementary Figure 5), although the genomes belonging to the highly mutable ST184 appear to contain more homoplasic characters, implying an higher recombination rate for this ST. Conversely the patient_ST combinations ZC_179, Fma_185, and GC_91 display an higher degree of clonality.

Trend in phenotypic traits changed over time, depending on both patient and ST, therefore suggesting niche separation and the existence of a competition among different genotypes for the same specific niches of CF lung. Particularly, in four cases (growth rate and swarming motility in ST184, biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance in ST91) temporal trends that were not significant for the ST itself resulted to be significant when considering only isolates from a single patient. Conversely, in one case (twitching motility in ST5) a significant trend for the whole ST was not confirmed by the corresponding patient_ST combination, probably due to the low number of isolates for CV_5. Clonal complexes showed different levels of adaptation and persistence in their host, with replacements of infecting ST. ST5 was the most frequent among known STs, thus confirming its successful genetic background (Corlouer et al., 2017). However, according to the main evolutionary changes observed in P. aeruginosa during CF lung chronic infection (transition to a biofilm lifestyle, increased antibiotic resistance, loss of motility, and the emergence of hypermutators; Winstanley et al., 2016), S. maltophilia isolates belonging to the new ST184 showed the highest level of adaptation to CF lung (Figure 5).

FIGURE 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. The prevalence of each evolutionary change observed in P. aeruginosa—namely transition to a biofilm lifestyle, increased antibiotic resistance, loss of motility, and the emergence of hypermutators (Winstanley et al., 2016)—was calculated for each of the five most abundant S. maltophilia ST. On this basis, adaptation level to CF lung during chronic infection increases from left-to-right. MDR: multidrug resistance.

The main conclusion arising from our results is that during chronic infection in CF patients S. maltophilia populations exhibit consistent genotypic and phenotypic heterogeneity. Probably, this is due to the “biological cost” the microorganism has to pay to successfully adapt to the highly stressful CF lung environment, and in the presence of different selection pressures depending on the host environment. In confirmation of this, the findings from the present study could not confirm trends we observed in a preliminary study aimed at investigating the adaptation of S. maltophilia to the lung of a single CF patient (Pompilio et al., 2016). The high genomic heterogeneity results in a wide range of phenotypes, which are only marginally correlated with the distribution of mutations across the genomes. This poor genotype-phenotype correlation is probably a result of the inherent complexity of S. maltophilia regulatory networks, whose mechanisms need to be explored in order to design better strategies for clinical intervention.

Author Contributions

AE, AP, OJ, and GDB contributed equally to this report. GDB and OJ jointly conceived the study. AP, VC, CB, and EG performed the experiments. AE and AP analyzed genomic and phenotypic data. AE, GDB, AP, and OJ analyzed data, interpreted results, and wrote the manuscript. EF interpreted results. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was partly supported by the “G. d'Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara (grant “ex-60%,” year 2015) and by OJ's startup fund provided by the Centre for Integrative Biology of the University of Trento.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank Veronica De Sanctis and Roberto Bertorelli (NGS Facility at the Centre for Integrative Biology and LaBSSAH, University of Trento) for NGS sequencing and helpful discussions, and Fabiana Tarantelli (Clinical Microbiology Laboratory, “G. d'Annunzio” University of Chieti-Pescara) for contributing to biofilm formation assays.

Supplementary Material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01590/full#supplementary-material

References

Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., and Lipman, D. J. (1990). Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Amin, R., and Waters, V. (2016). Antibiotic treatment for Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in people with cystic fibrosis. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 7:CD009249. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009249

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Andrews, S. (2010). FastQC: A Quality Control Tool for High Throughput Sequence Data. Available online at: http://www.Bioinformatics.Babraham.Ac.Uk/Projects/Fastqc/

Antus, B. (2016). Oxidative stress markers in sputum. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2016:2930434. doi: 10.1155/2016/2930434

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bankevich, A., Nurk, S., Antipov, D., Gurevich, A. A., Dvorkin, M., Kulikov, A. S., et al. (2012). SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 19, 455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barth, A. L., and Pitt, T. L. (1996). The high amino-acid content of sputum from cystic fibrosis patients promotes growth of auxotrophic Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Med. Microbiol. 45, 110–119. doi: 10.1099/00222615-45-2-110

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Betts, J. W., Phee, L. M., Woodford, N., and Wareham, D. W. (2014). Activity of colistin in combination with tigecycline or rifampicin against multidrug-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 33, 1565–1572. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2101-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bianconi, I., Jeukens, J., Freschi, L., Alcalá-Franco, B., Facchini, M., Boyle, B., et al. (2015). Comparative genomics and biological characterization of sequential Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from persistent airways infection. BMC Genomics 16:1105. doi: 10.1186/s12864-015-2276-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chung, H. S., Hong, S. G., Kim, Y. R., Shin, K. S., Whang, D. H., Ahn, J. Y., et al. (2013). Antimicrobial susceptibility of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates from Korea, and the activity of antimicrobial combinations against the isolates. J. Korean Med. Sci. 28, 62–66. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2013.28.1.62

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Clark, S. T., Diaz Caballero, J., Cheang, M., Coburn, B., Wang, P. W., Donaldson, S. L., et al. (2015). Phenotypic diversity within a Pseudomonas aeruginosa population infecting an adult with cystic fibrosis. Sci. Rep. 5:10932. doi: 10.1038/srep109320

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (2016). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. M100S, 26th Edn. Wayne, PA.

Colin, A. A., and Rabin, H. R. (2011). Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in cystic fibrosis: guilty or innocent? Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 183, 564–566. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201010-1668ED

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Corlouer, C., Lamy, B., Desroches, M., Ramos-Vivas, J., Mehiri-Zghal, E., Lemenand, O., et al. (2017). Stenotrophomonas maltophilia healthcare-associated infections: identification of two main pathogenic genetic backgrounds. J. Hosp. Infect. 96, 183–188. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.02.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cullen, L., and McClean, S. (2015). Bacterial adaptation during chronic respiratory infections. Pathogens 4, 66–89. doi: 10.3390/pathogens4010066

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Darch, S. E., McNally, A., Harrison, F., Corander, J., Barr, H. L., Paszkiewicz, K., et al. (2015). Recombination is a key driver of genomic and phenotypic diversity in a Pseudomonas aeruginosa population during cystic fibrosis infection. Sci. Rep. 5:7649. doi: 10.1038/srep07649

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Di Bonaventura, G., Pompilio, A., Zappacosta, R., Petrucci, F., Fiscarelli, E., Rossi, C., et al. (2010). Role of excessive inflammatory response to Stenotrophomonas maltophilia lung infection in DBA/2 mice and implications for cystic fibrosis. Infect. Immun. 78, 2466–2476. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01391-09

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Di Bonaventura, G., Spedicato, I., D'Antonio, D., Robuffo, I., and Piccolomini, R. (2004). Biofilm formation by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: modulation by quinolones, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and ceftazidime. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48, 151–160. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.1.151-160.2004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Didelot, X., and Wilson, D. J. (2015). ClonalFrameML: efficient inference of recombination in whole bacterial genomes. PLoS Comput. Biol. 11:e1004041. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1004041

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Emerson, J., Rosenfeld, M., McNamara, S., Ramsey, B., and Gibson, R. L. (2002). Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other predictors of mortality and morbidity in young children with cystic fibrosis. Pediatr. Pulmonol. 34, 91–100. doi: 10.1002/ppul.10127

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Farrell, D. J., Sader, H. S., and Jones, R. N. (2010). Antimicrobial susceptibilities of a worldwide collection of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates tested against tigecycline and agents commonly used for S. maltophilia infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54, 2735–2737. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01774-09

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Felsenstein, J. (1989). PHYLIP - Phylogeny inference package - v3.2. Cladistics 51, 64–166.

Gherardi, G., Creti, R., Pompilio, A., and Di Bonaventura, G. (2015). An overview of various typing methods for clinical epidemiology of the emerging pathogen Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 81, 219–226. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.11.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Govan, J. R., and Deretic, V. (1996). Microbial pathogenesis in cystic fibrosis: mucoid Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Burkholderia cepacia. Microbiol. Rev. 60, 539–574.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Henderson, A. G., Ehre, C., Button, B., Abdullah, L. H., Cai, L. H., and Leigh, M. W. (2014). Cystic fibrosis airway secretions exhibit mucin hyperconcentration and increased osmotic pressure. J. Clin. Invest. 124, 3047–3060. doi: 10.1172/JCI73469

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jia, B., Raphenya, A. R., Alcock, B., Waglechner, N., Guo, P., Tsang, K. K., et al. (2017). CARD 2017: expansion and model-centric curation of the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res. 45, D566–D573. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Langmead, B., and Salzberg, S. L. (2012). Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Larsen, M. V., Cosentino, S., Rasmussen, S., Friis, C., Hasman, H., Marvig, R. L., et al. (2012). Multilocus sequence typing of total-genome-sequenced bacteria. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50, 1355–1361. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06094-11

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

Letunic, I., and Bork, P. (2016). Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W242–W245. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw290

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Macia, M. D., Blanquer, D., Togores, B., Sauleda, J., Perez, J. L., and Oliver, A. (2005). Hypermutation is a key factor in development of multiple-antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains causing chronic lung infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49, 3382–3386. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.8.3382-3386.2005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mahenthiralingam, E., Campbell, M. E., and Speert, D. P. (1994). Nonmotility and phagocytic resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from chronically colonized patients with cystic fibrosis. Infect. Immun. 62, 596–605.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

Markussen, T., Marvig, R. L., Gómez-Lozano, M., Aanæs, K., Burleigh, A. E., Høiby, N., et al. (2014). Environmental heterogeneity drives within-host diversification and evolution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. MBio 5:e01592–14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01592-14

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

McElroy, K. E., Hui, J. G., Woo, J. K., Luk, A. W., Webb, J. S., Kjelleberg, S., et al. (2014). Strain-specific parallel evolution drives short-term diversification during Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, E1419–E1427. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1314340111

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Nascimento, M., Sousa, A., Ramirez, M., Francisco, A. P., Carriço, J. A., and Vaz, C. (2016). PHYLOViZ 2.0: providing scalable data integration and visualization for multiple phylogenetic inference methods. Bioinformatics 33, 128–129. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw582.

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Oliver, A., Cantòn, R., Pilar, C., Baquero, F., and Blàsquez, J. (2000). High frequency of hypermutable Pseudomonas aeruginosa in cystic fibrosis lung infection. Science 288, 1251–1253. doi: 10.1126/science.288.5469.1251

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ormerod, K. L., George, N. M., Fraser, J. A., Wainwright, C., and Hugenholtz, P. (2015). Comparative genomics of non-pseudomonal bacterial species colonising paediatric cystic fibrosis patients. PeerJ 3:e1223. doi: 10.7717/peerj.1223

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Page, A. J., Cummins, C. A., Hunt, M., Wong, V. K., Reuter, S., Holden, M. T. G., et al. (2015). Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 31, 3691–3693. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv421

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pagel, M. (1999). Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401, 877–884. doi: 10.1038/44766

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Parkins, M. D., and Floto, R. A. (2015). Emerging bacterial pathogens and changing concepts of bacterial pathogenesis in cystic fibrosis. J. Cyst. Fibros. 14, 293–304. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2015.03.012

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pompilio, A., Crocetta, V., Confalone, P., Nicoletti, M., Petrucca, A., Guarnieri, S., et al. (2010). Adhesion to and biofilm formation on IB3-1 bronchial cells by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia isolates from cystic fibrosis patients. BMC Microbiol. 10:102. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-10-102

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pompilio, A., Crocetta, V., De Nicola, S., Verginelli, F., Fiscarelli, E., and Di Bonaventura, G. (2015). Cooperative pathogenicity in cystic fibrosis: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia modulates Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence in mixed biofilm. Front. Microbiol. 6:951. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00951

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pompilio, A., Crocetta, V., Ghosh, D., Chakrabarti, M., Gherardi, G., Vitali, L. A., et al. (2016). Stenotrophomonas maltophilia phenotypic and genotypic diversity during a 10-year colonization in the lungs of a cystic fibrosis patient. Front. Microbiol. 7:1551. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01551

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pompilio, A., Piccolomini, R., Picciani, C., D'Antonio, D., Savini, V., and Di Bonaventura, G. (2008). Factors associated with adherence to and biofilm formation on polystyrene by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: the role of cell surface hydrophobicity and motility. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 287, 41–47. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01292.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pressler, T., Bohmova, C., Conway, S., Dumcius, S., Hjelte, L., Høiby, N., et al. (2011). Chronic Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection definition: euroCareCF Working Group report. J Cyst Fibros. 10, S75–S78. doi: 10.1016/S1569-1993(11)60011-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pritchard, L., Glover, R. H., Humphris, S., Elphinstone, J. G., and Toth, I. K. (2016). Genomics and taxonomy in diagnostics for food security: soft-rotting enterobacterial plant pathogens. Anal. Methods 8, 12–24. doi: 10.1039/C.5A.Y.02550H

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rashid, M. H., and Kornberg, A. (2000). Inorganic polyphosphate is needed for swimming, swarming, and twitching motilities of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97, 4885–4890. doi: 10.1073/pnas.060030097

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

R Core Team (2012). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Available online at: http://www.r-project.org

Rouli, L., Merhej, V., Fournier, P. E., and Raoult, D. (2015). The bacterial pangenome as a new tool for analyzing pathogenic bacteria. New Microbes New Infect. 7, 72–85. doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2015.06.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Seemann, T. (2014). Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30, 2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Smith, E. E., Buckley, D. G., Wu, Z., Saenphimmachak, C., Hoffman, L. R., D'Argenio, D. A., et al. (2006). Genetic adaptation by Pseudomonas aeruginosa to the airways of cystic fibrosis patients. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 8487–8492. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0602138103

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Snipen, L., and Liland, K. H. (2015). micropan: an R-package for microbial pan-genomics. BMC Bioinformatics 16:79. doi: 10.1186/s12859-015-0517-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Stepanović, S., Vuković, D., Hola, V., Di Bonaventura, G., Djukić, S., Ćirković, I., et al. (2007). Quantification of biofilm in microtiter plates: overview of testing conditions and practical recommendations for assessment of biofilm production by staphylococci. APMIS 115, 891–899. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0463.2007.apm_630.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Svensson-Stadler, L. A., Mihaylova, S. A., and Moore, E. R. B. (2012). Stenotrophomonas interspecies differentiation and identification by gyrB sequence analysis. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 327, 15–24. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02452.x

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tettelin, H., Riley, D., Cattuto, C., and Medini, D. (2008). Comparative genomics: the bacterial pan-genome. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 11, 472–477. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2008.09.006

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Turrientes, M. C., Baquero, M. R., Sánchez, M. B., Valdezate, S., Escudero, E., Berg, G., et al. (2010). Polymorphic mutation frequencies of clinicaland environmental Stenotrophomonas maltophilia populations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 76, 1746–1758. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02817-09

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Valdezate, S., Vindel, A., Martín-Dávila, P., Del Saz, B. S., Baquero, F., and Cantón, R. (2004). High genetic diversity among Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strains despite their originating at a single hospital. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42, 693–699. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.2.693-699.2003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vidigal, P. G., Dittmer, S., Steinmann, E., Buer, J., Rath, P.-M., and Steinmann, J. (2014). Adaptation of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in cystic fibrosis: molecular diversity, mutation frequency and antibiotic resistance. Int. J. Med. Microbiol. 304, 613–619. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.04.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Waters, V., Atenafu, E. G., Lu, A., Yau, Y., Tullis, E., and Ratjen, F. (2013). Chronic Stenotrophomonas maltophilia infection and mortality or lung transplantation in cystic fibrosis patients. J. Cyst. Fibros. 12, 482–486. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2012.12.006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Waters, V., Yau, Y., Prasad, S., Lu, A., Atenafu, E., Crandall, I., et al. (2011). Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in cystic fibrosis: serologic response and effect on lung disease. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 183, 635–640. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201009-1392OC

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Winstanley, C., O'Brien, S., and Brockhurst, M. A. (2016). Pseudomonas aeruginosa evolutionary adaptation and diversification in cystic fibrosis chronic lung infections. Trends Microbiol. 24, 327–337. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2016.01.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wozniak, D. J., and Keyser, R. (2004). Effects of subinhibitory concentrations of macrolide antibiotics on Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Chest 125(2 Suppl.), 62S–69S. doi: 10.1378/chest.125.2_suppl.62S

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text

Youenou, B., Favre-Bonté, S., Bodilis, J., Brothier, E., Dubost, A., Muller, D., et al. (2015). Comparative genomics of environmental and clinical Stenotrophomonas maltophilia strains with different antibiotic resistance profiles. Genome Biol. Evol. 7, 2484–2505. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evv161

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yu, D., Yin, Z., Li, B., Jin, Y., Ren, H., Zhou, J., et al. (2016). Gene flow, recombination, and positive selection in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: mechanisms underlying the diversity of the widespread opportunistic pathogen. Genome 59, 1063–1075. doi: 10.1139/gen-2016-0073

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zankari, E., Hasman, H., Cosentino, S., Vestergaard, M., Rasmussen, S., Lund, O., et al. (2012). Identification of acquired antimicrobial resistance genes. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 67, 2640–2644. doi: 10.1093/jac/dks261

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, cystic fibrosis, evolution, genomics, longitudinal study

Citation: Esposito A, Pompilio A, Bettua C, Crocetta V, Giacobazzi E, Fiscarelli E, Jousson O and Di Bonaventura G (2017) Evolution of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia in Cystic Fibrosis Lung over Chronic Infection: A Genomic and Phenotypic Population Study. Front. Microbiol. 8:1590. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01590

Received: 23 May 2017; Accepted: 04 August 2017;
Published: 28 August 2017.

Edited by:

Rakesh Sharma, Institute of Genomics and Integrative Biology (CSIR), India

Reviewed by:

Jose L. Martinez, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Spain
Prabhu B. Patil, Institute of Microbial Technology (CSIR), India

Copyright © 2017 Esposito, Pompilio, Bettua, Crocetta, Giacobazzi, Fiscarelli, Jousson and Di Bonaventura. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Olivier Jousson, olivier.jousson@unitn.it