Original Research ARTICLE
Comparative Genomics of Thalassobius Including the Description of Thalassobius activus sp. nov., and Thalassobius autumnalis sp. nov.
- Departamento de Microbiología and Colección Española de Cultivos Tipo, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain
A taxogenomic study was conducted to describe two new Thalassobius species and to analyze the internal consistency of the genus Thalassobius along with Shimia and Thalassococcus. Strains CECT 5113T, CECT 5114, CECT 5118T, and CECT 5120 were isolated from coastal Mediterranean seawater, Spain. Cells were Gram-negative, non- motile coccobacilli, aerobic chemoorganotrophs, with an optimum temperature of 26°C and salinity of 3.5–5%. Major cellular fatty acids of strains CECT 5113T and CECT 5114 were C18 : 1 ω7c/ω6c and C10 : 0 3OH, G+C content was 54.4–54.5 mol% and were able to utilize propionate, L-threonine, L- arginine, and L-aspartate as carbon sources. They exhibited 98.3% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity, 75.0–75.1 ANIb and 19.5–20.9 digital DDH to type strain of their closest species, Thalassobius maritimus. Based on these data, strains CECT 5113T and CECT 5114 are recognized as a new species, for which the name Thalassobius activus is proposed, with strain CECT 5113T (=LMG 29900T) as type strain. Strains CECT 5118T and CECT 5120 were found to constitute another new species, with major cellular fatty acids C18 : 1 ω7c/ω6c and C18 : 1 ω7c 11-methyl and a G+C content of 59.8 mol%; they were not able to utilize propionate, L-threonine, L- arginine or L-aspartate. Their closest species was Thalassobius mediterraneus, with values of 99.6% 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity, 79.1% ANIb and 23.2% digital DDH compared to the type strain, CECT 5383T. The name Thalassobius autumnalis is proposed for this second new species, with strain CECT 5118T (=LMG 29904T) as type strain. To better determine the phylogenetic relationship of the two new species, we submitted 12 genomes representing species of Thalassobius, Shimia, and Thalassoccocus, to a phylogenomic analysis based on 54 single protein-encoding genes (BCG54). The resulting phylogenomic tree did not agree with the current genera classification, as Thalassobius was divided in three clades, Thalassobius sensu stricto (T. mediterraneus, T. autumnalis sp. nov., and T. gelatinovorus), Thalassobius aestuarii plus the three Shimia spp (S. marina, S. haliotis, and Shimia sp. SK013) and finally, Thalasobius maritimus plus T. activus sp. nov. Thalassococcus halodurans remained apart from the two genera. Phenotypic inferences from explored genomes are presented.
The genus Thalassobius was established to accommodate the species Thalassobius mediterraneus and the reclassified Thalassobius gelatinovorus (formerly Ruegeria gelatinovorans) by Arahal et al. (2005). It is affiliated to the Roseobacter group, in the family Rhodobacteraceae, class Alphaproteobacteria (Pujalte et al., 2014). Since the description of the first pair of species, five more have been added: Thalassobius aestuarii (Yi and Chun, 2006), Thalassobius maritimus (Park et al., 2012), Thalassobius aquaeponti (Park et al., 2014), Thalassobius abyssi (Nogi et al., 2016), and Thalassobius litorarius (Park et al., 2016). All species so far characterized are aerobic chemoorganotrophic marine bacteria able to accumulate polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB). They have been isolated from marine environments, particularly surface coastal seawater and tidal flat samples, but one species (T. abyssi) was isolated from deep seawater (around 1,000 m depth). Strains identified as Thalassobius sp. on the basis of 16S rRNA gene sequence have been isolated and reported from diverse marine samples, including corals, mollusks, sand, microalgal cultures, and mariculture samples of different types, and show a wide geographic distribution (from temperate zones such as Kuwait coast to polar regions, as Antarctica or Norwegian subartic fjords). Most species show complex ionic requirements, as they require seawater based media and are unable to grow in media containing only NaCl or just a combination of NaCl with calcium, magnesium or potassium salts. None of the species produces BChl a or synthetizes carotenoid pigments.
The Roseobacter group, which comprises a very large number of genera (100 at the time of the writing), expands at a quick rate. The phylogenetic position of the genus Thalassobius in the group has been addressed with 16S rRNA gene sequence comparisons: Thalassobius species form a clade in the phylogenetic trees, but it frequently incorporates sequences of Thalassococcus (LTP128, https://www.arb-silva.de/projects/living-tree/) or Shimia species (Pujalte et al., 2014). Shimia includes five species, Shimia marina (Choi and Cho, 2006), Shimia isoporae (Chen et al., 2011), Shimia haliotis (Hyun et al., 2013), Shimia biformata (Hameed et al., 2013), and Shimia sagamensis (Nogi et al., 2015) while Thalassococcus includes two, Thalassococcus halodurans (Lee et al., 2007) and Thalassococcus lentus (Park et al., 2013). The relationships of Thalassobius to both genera (Shimia and Thalassococcus) are thus unclear. The use of whole genome sequences and multiple gene trees would surely add confidence and resolution to the inference of their evolutionary relationships but this approach is, at present, limited by the gap in whole genome sequences from type strains. Unfortunately, recent phylogenomic studies on the Roseobacter group or the Rhodobacteraceae family have not included any reference genome of the genus Thalassobius (Newton et al., 2010; Tang et al., 2010; Luo and Moran, 2014; Simon et al., 2017).
Whole genome drafts of T. mediterraneus and T. gelatinovorus and S. marina type strains have been determined and characterized in the last two years (Rodrigo-Torres et al., 2016a,b, 2017). Also, Nogales and co-workers have explored the phylogenomics of a large collection of the Roseobacter group members, including several type strain genomes, by using more than a 100 single copy protein coding genes and found four Thalassobius species forming a well-defined lineage, which includes Shimia species (unpublished, Nogales et al., 2017, FEMS Meeting of European Microbiologists). Thus, the possible polyphyletic/paraphyletic nature of the genus is an open question.
During a survey aimed to resolve the taxonomic position of unidentified marine strains kept at the Spanish Type Culture Collection (CECT), whole genome sequences were obtained for four Thalassobius spp. strains. In this paper, we address the genome-based taxonomy of the genus Thalassobius, describe two new species of Thalassobius revealed through genome relatedness and present some predicted phenotypic traits of the group.
Materials and Methods
The strains used in this study are listed in Table 1 with indication of their origins and references of previous studies. Marine Agar (MA) and Marine Broth (MB) were used as routine cultivation media and incubations were done at 26°C.
16S rRNA Gene Sequence Analysis
The complete 16S rRNA gene sequence of strains CECT 5113T, CECT 5114, CECT 5118T, and CECT 5120 were 1,465, 1,465, 1,469, and 1,469 nucleotides in length, respectively. These sequences extracted from the genome were compared with corresponding sequences of the type strains within the Roseobacter group using alignments retrieved from SILVA and LTP (Yarza et al., 2010) latest updates as references. When necessary, additional sequences were retrieved from the GenBank/EMBL/DDBJ databases. Alignments were corrected manually based on secondary structure information. Sequence similarities were calculated in ARB based on sequence similarities without the use of an evolutionary substitution model. Phylogenetic analysis using alternative treeing methods (maximum-parsimony, maximum-likelihood, and distance matrix) and data subsets were performed using the appropriate ARB tools (Ludwig et al., 2004).
Whole Genome Sequencing and Comparison
Genomic DNA was isolated using Real Pure Spin kit (Durviz) following the standard protocol recommended by the manufacturer. The integrity of the extracted DNA was checked by visualization in a 2.0% (w/v) agarose gel electrophoresis. Its purity and quantity was checked by measuring the absorbance at 260 and 280 nm with a spectrophotometer Nanodrop2000c (Thermo Scientific) and calculating the ratio A260/A280. Genome sequencing was achieved at Central Service of Support to Experimental Research (SCSIE) of the University of Valencia (Valencia, Spain) using an Illumina Miseq technology with 2 × 250 paired-end reads. The Illumina reads were analyzed for quality control using FASTQC, a common quality control tool developed by Babraham Bioinformatics to check raw sequencing data, which is wrapped in Galaxy Orione Server (Cuccuru et al., 2014). After filtering, the remaining reads were assembled using several software choices for comparative purposes: (i) Spades 3.0.0 (Bankevich et al., 2012) incorporated as a tool in Galaxy Orione Server, (ii) Seqman Ngen 12.0.1 (DNAstar), and (iii) Velvet 1.0.0 de novo assembler (Zerbino and Birney, 2008). After performance evaluation and comparison of metrics, the best assembly for each organism was further processed. The bioinformatic tool CheckM (Parks et al., 2015) was used to assess the genome quality prior to annotation using Prokka v1.4.0 (Seemann, 2014), an open source software tool within Galaxy Orione Server, and RAST v2.0 (Rapid Annotation using Subsystem Technology; Aziz et al., 2008).
The similarity between genomes was assessed using several indices useful for species delineation. Thus, the DNA-DNA hybridization (DDH) was estimated in silico with the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator (GGDC 2.0) using the BLAST method and recommended formula 2 (Meier-Kolthoff et al., 2013); the average nucleotide identities according to MUMmer (ANIm) and BLAST (ANIb) were determined in JSpeciesWS (Richter et al., 2015); and OrthoANI values were calculated with the standalone Orthologous Average Nucleotide Identity Tool (OAT) (Lee et al., 2016).
The phylogenetic relationship of the genomes was explored with BCG54 using default settings. This software tool is available for download at EzBioCloud (Yoon et al., 2017) and employs a set of bacterial core genes, namely 54, that are single-copy and commonly present in all bacterial genomes.
All determinations were performed in duplicate in non-simultaneous assays. Cell morphology was determined on wet mounts prepared from 24 to 48 h MA cultures of the strains, by using phase contrast microscopy in a Leica DMRB fluorescence microscopy. Colony morphology and pigmentation were recorded from 48 h MA cultures. PHB accumulation was determined according to Spiekermann et al. (1999). Ranges of temperature (4, 15, 26, 37, and 40°C) and salinities (3.5–10%) were determined in MA incubated up to 7 days. Marine Agar was supplemented with NaCl to attain total salinities of 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10%. Optimal values were taken from the fastest grown plates. Specific ionic requirements were tested by assessing the growth abilities of the strain on solid media with defined combinations of four sea salts (NaCl, MgCl2, CaCl2, and KCl), according with already reported methods (Macián et al., 2005). Extracellular hydrolytic activities on casein, starch, Tween-80, and DNA were determined after 6 d incubation by using Marine Agar supplemented with 10% (v/v) casein suspension, or 0.2% (w/v) soluble starch, for the first substrates. Tween-80 Agar (Smibert and Krieg, 2007) and DNAse agar (Oxoid) were supplemented with sea salts (Marine Cation Supplement, Farmer and Hickman-Brenner, 2006). Activity on starch was revealed after lugol addition and HCl 1 N was used to show DNAse activity. Oxidase test was performed with Oxoid oxidase discs and catalase was tested with 10 vol. H2O2. API 20NE and API ZYM strips were inoculated with cell suspensions prepared in 3.5% Seasalts (Oxoid) and AUX Medium for API 20NE assimilation tubes was supplemented with a concentrated Seasalts solution to give the same salinity used in the cell suspension. Sole carbon and energy sources used for growth were tested on Basal Medium Agar as described by Baumann and Baumann (1981).
Fatty acid methyl esters were extracted from biomass grown for 48 h on MA at 26°C and prepared according to standard protocols as described for the MIDI Microbial Identification System (Sasser, 1990) at the CECT. Cellular fatty acid content was analyzed by gas chromatography with an Agilent 6850 chromatographic unit, with the MIDI Microbial Identification System using the TSBA6 method (MIDI, 2008) and identified using the Microbial Identification Sherlock software package.
Results and Discussion
16S rRNA Gene Phylogeny
Strains CECT 5113T, CECT 5114, CECT 5118T, and CECT 5120 were affiliated to the genus Thalassobius based on partial 16S rRNA gene sequence comparison performed among routine identification and authentication procedures at CECT. The strains had been isolated from the same samples and geographic location that rendered the type strain of T. mediterraneus (CECT 5383T = XSM19T). In fact, they were provisionally identified as T. mediterraneus or Thalassobius sp. strains in the CECT catalog. The similarities of their respective 16S rRNA gene sequences to T. mediterraneus CECT 5383T were low (only 96.6%) for strains CECT 5113T and CECT 5114, which showed a closer position to T. maritimus (98.3%). On the other hand, strains CECT 5118T and CECT 5120 showed a 99.6% similarity to T. mediterraneus CECT 5383T.
When a phylogenetic tree based on almost complete (genome derived) 16S rRNA gene sequences was built with the whole set of Roseobacter group species plus these four strains (Figure 1), a clear affiliation to the genus Thalassobius could be seen, as the sequences are included among Thalassobius spp. As expected, strains CECT 5113T and CECT 5114 join T. maritimus GSW-M6T with a high bootstrap support while strains CECT 5118T and CECT 5120 merge with T. mediterraneus CECT 5383T, also with high bootstrap, according with their similarity levels toward these species. The Thalassobius species, however, do not only include the sequences of these four strains, but also the types of the five Shimia species (all forming a monophyletic cluster within the Thalassobius group), plus the two species of Thalassococcus, which remain as a pair related to T. maritimus.
Figure 1. Phylogenetic reconstruction based on the 16S rRNA gene using the maximum likelihood method. Bootstrap values (if >70% and outside subclades) based on 1,000 resamplings are shown as percentages at the branch nodes. Circles indicate that corresponding nodes were recovered in trees generated with the Maximum Parsimony (open circles) or the Neighbor joining (filled circles) methods. Bar. substitutions per nucleotide position. Name of the strains corresponding to new species are indicated in bold. In parentheses, RefSeq assembly accession number.
A close revision of 16S rRNA trees presented along the proposals of new species on these three genera reveal large variations in the relative positions of the taxa included in the analysis, depending on the particular set of selected taxa and the treeing method. The instability of the branching is always noticeable: for example, Nogi et al. (2015) used four Thalassobius spp. and no Thalassococcus to build their Neighbor Joining tree with the five species of Shimia: Thalassobius spp. appear as closest neighbors, forming a monophyletic cluster with the Shimia spp. By contrast, Hameed et al. (2013) presented a Neighbor Joining tree in which neighbors of Shimia are not Thalassobius spp., but Nautella italica and Lentibacter algarum. More examples of instability could be seen when comparing other papers describing Roseobacter group members. It is clear that 16S rRNA gene sequences alone are unable to resolve the phylogeny of a group displaying such complexity and overburden of genera descriptions. It seems particularly important to include not only taxa showing the highest 16S rRNA sequence similarity to the strains being considered, but a large representative set of members of the group. A more robust phylogeny is likely to be achieved by the use of whole genome information and selection of a large, optimized set of genes allowing more sound phylogenetic resolution of the clade, an approach currently in development. Genomic sequences are also valuable for the circumscription of the isolates at the species level and for providing insights into their biology, as will be reported in the coming subheadings.
Genome Sequence Metrics and Relatedness Indices
Genome length, G+C molar content, protein and rRNA genes are summarized in Table 2 for all the genomes used. Strains CECT 5113T and CECT 5114 possess genomes in the lower size and G+C range: <3.5 Mb genome size and <55 mol% G+C molar content. They are similar to T. maritimus, the phylogenetically closest species, which is also under 3.5 Mb genome length and was until now the one with lower G+C content (56.3 mol%). Other type strains except for T. mediterraneus have genomes larger than 3.9 Mb and G+C higher than 58 mol%. Strains CECT 5118T and CECT 5120 had larger genomes, 4.3–4.4 Mb, and G+C molar content is among the higher in the genus, 59.8 mol%, surpassed only by the value of the T. aestuarii type strain (60.4 mol%).
Table 2. Genomic sequences employed with general features and accession numbers in public databases (an asterisk indicates those reported in this study).
ANIb, ANIm, OrthoANI, and digital DDH were determined in order to relate the strains CECT 5113T, CECT 5114, CECT 5118T, and CECT 5120 to the eight strains of Thalassobius, Shimia, and Thalassococcus sp. with publicly available genomes. Results of these determinations are reported in Table 3 (ANIb, ANIm, digital DDH) and Figure 2 (OrthoANI).
Table 3. ANIb, ANIm, and estimated DDH values between genomes of Thalassobius, Shimia, and Thalassococcus species (arranged as in Figure 3).
Figure 2. OrthoANI indices between pairs of Thalassobius, Shimia and Thalassococcus strains (according to Lee et al., 2016).
The four strains formed two very tight pairs related by almost 100% with all ANI calculations: strains CECT 5113T and CECT 5114 were 99.8–100% related to each other and showed a maximum relatedness to the genome of the type strain of T. maritimus (as expected from 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity), with values of 75.0–75.1% (ANIb), 75.6–75.7% (OrthoANI), and 19.5–20.9% (digital DDH). Values with other species were even lower. According with the currently established boundaries for genomic species definition (95–96 for ANI, 70% for digital DDH) these values qualify both strains as members of a single genomic species, different from any of their closest relatives.
Strains CECT 5118T and CECT 5120 also show high levels of reciprocal relatedness (99.9% ANI and 98.5% digital DDH). T. mediterraneus, the species most related in terms of 16S rRNA gene sequence, is also the closest, with 79.1% ANIb, 79.9% OrthoANI, and 23.2% digital DDH relatedness to them. All other Thalassobius, Shimia, and Thalassococcus species compared show even lower values. Thus, strains CECT 5118T and CECT 5120 should also be considered as yet another new species from a genomic point of view.
In order to substantiate the recognition of the two novel species, a wide phenotypic characterization of the strains was undertaken, including the type strains of T. mediterraneus, T. gelatinovorus, T. aestuarii, and T. maritimus.
Phenotypic Characterization and Discrimination
Strains CECT 5113T, CECT 5114, CECT 5118T, and CECT 5120 were Gram-reaction (lyse in 3% KOH) and Gram-staining negative coccobacilli or short rods. Motility was negative in all cases and previous data (Ortigosa et al., 1994) on flagella stain indicate that the strains do not synthetize flagella. All four strains grow well on Marine Agar forming circular, slightly convex colonies with entire margin, which develop in 2 days incubation at 26°C. Strain CECT 5120 was slower and grew to a density lower than the three other strains. Strain CECT 5118T produced a beige to brown diffusible pigment in prolonged incubations. All strains were able to accumulate polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) as revealed by the Nile Red plate assay on Marine Agar plus D-glucose (Spiekermann et al., 1999).
All strains grew optimally at 26°C and with salinities ranging from that in Marine Agar (3.4% aprox.) to 5% (3.5% of mixed salts in MA plus additional 1.6% NaCl). When cultured in media of the same nutritional content as MA (1% Tryptone and 0.3% yeast extract) but deprived of salts or supplemented with 2% NaCl or 2% KCl none of the strains was able to grow, indicating a strictly halophilic nature. Strains CECT 5118T and CECT 5120 were also unable to grow when the medium was supplemented with mixtures of 2% NaCl plus 0.9% MgCl2, 0.2% CaCl2, or 0.1% KCl or combinations of the four salts. Strains CECT 5113T and CECT 5114 did not grow with 2% NaCl or 2% KCl or with 2% NaCl plus MgCl2 or CaCl2 separately, but were able to grow when both divalent cations, calcium, and magnesium chlorides, were added to NaCl.
The strains were poorly reactive in API ZYM and API 20NE supplemented with Marine Cations Supplement, which contains the four principal marine cations as sulfate and chloride salts. In order to better fulfill the ionic requirements of the strains, API strips were replicated using Ocean Salts (Oxoid) solution, so the final salinity was 3.5%, but reactivity on the miniaturized tests systems did not improve.
Anaerobic growth with nitrate as alternative electron-acceptor and a mixture of succinate, acetate and lactate as substrates was assayed in Baumann's denitrification medium (Baumann and Baumann, 1981) with negative results for all four strains. T. gelatinovorus CECT 4357T was the only positive strain. Results for nitrate to nitrite reduction in API 20NE strips were in accordance with the results obtained in Baumann's medium. None of the strains was able to ferment D-glucose, a result that, in combination to the inability to live anaerobically with nitrate, usually qualifies a strain as strict aerobe.
A large number of sole carbon and energy sources for growth were tested on Baumann's Basal medium Agar supplemented with 0.2% carbohydrates, or 0.1% organic acids, amino acids, and amines. The list of used substrates is included in the species descriptions. As a general rule, organic acids were the most widely used carbon sources, although most amino acids and some carbohydrates were also used by the strains. This behavior was already described as characteristic for the genus. The spectrum of carbon sources is useful to differentiate species within the group, as indicated in Table 4.
Table 4. Differential characteristics between the type strains of Thalassobius species: 1, T. autumnalis sp. nov. CECT 5118T; 2, T. mediterraneus CECT 5383T; 3, T. gelatinovorus CECT 4357T; 4, T. activus sp. nov. CECT 5113T; 5, T. maritimus GSW-M6T (Park et al., 2012); 6, T. aestuarii JC2049T (Yi and Chun, 2006); 7, T. aquaeponti GJSW-22T (Park et al., 2014); 8, T. abyssi JAMH043T (Nogi et al., 2016); 9, T. litorarius MME-075T (Park et al., 2016).
Hydrolytic extracellular activities were very scarce among Thalassobius strains, with two exceptions: T. gelatinovorus CECT 4357T and T. aestuarii CECT 8650T were able to degrade gelatin, but other strains did not show hydrolysis on any of the substrates tested: gelatin, casein, Tween-80, starch, or DNA.
Cellular fatty acid composition was determined for the eight strains alongside with the result reflected in Table 5. The main fatty acid for all strains is included in the Summed Feature 8, corresponding to C18 : 1 ω7c/C18 : 1 ω6c, which accounts for 72–88% of the total. It is also the dominant fatty acid in the whole Rhodobacteraceae family. The second most abundant, common fatty acid, is C16 : 0 (3–9%) while C18 : 0 is also common to all species but accounts for 1–2.6%. The rest of fatty acids have a differential distribution among species, with C18 : 1 ω7c 11methyl, C10 : 0 3OH, and C12 : 1 2OH amounting up to 9% in some species.
Table 5. Fatty acid composition of 1, T. activus CECT 5113T; 2, T. activus CECT 5114; 3, T. autumnalis CECT 5118T; 4, T. autumnalis CECT 5120; 5, T. gelatinovorus CECT 4357T; 6, T. mediterraneus CECT 5383T; 7, T. maritimus CECT 8650T; 8, T. aestuarii CECT 8650T.
Differentiation among species of the genus based on experimental phenotypic tests could be achieved as indicated in Table 4.
Genome Derived Features of Strains CECT 5113T, CECT 5114, CECT 5118T, and CECT 5120
After annotation with RAST and Prokka, using the SEED Viewer (Overbeek et al., 2014) and BIOiPLUG to explore annotated genomes and Metacyc as a resource for metabolic pathway information (Caspi et al., 2016), the following features could be predicted from genome sequences:
1. Chemotaxonomic traits: A set of genes (cdsA, pgsA, pgpA, pgpB, and cls) coding for polar lipid biosynthetic enzymes for phosphatidylglycerol (EC 18.104.22.168, EC 22.214.171.124, and EC 126.96.36.199) and for phosphatidyl choline (EC 188.8.131.52) production was present but those for phosphatidyl ethanolamine, sulfoquinovosyl diacyl glycerol, diphosphatidyl glycerol (cardiolipin), phosphatidyl serine, or phosphatidyl myo inositol biosynthetic enzymes were not found. The presence of the gene coding for enzyme decaprenyl diphosphate synthase (EC 184.108.40.206) suggests ubiquinone 10 as major isoprenoid quinone. Polyamine biosynthetic abilities comprise, at least, production of putrescine, via arginine decarboxylase (speA) plus agmatinase (speB). Strains CECT 5113T and CECT 5114 encode carboxy nor-spermidine dehydrogenase and carboxy nor-spermidine decarboxylase, but genes for these enzymes are absent from strains CECT 5118T and CECT 5120. Peptidoglycan composition: pentapeptide was predicted to contain meso-DAP in third position, as predicted by the presence of murE, coding for UDP-N-acetyl muramoyl alanyl D-glutamate- 2,6 diaminopimelate ligase (EC 220.127.116.11).
2. Polyhydroxyalkanoate accumulation and degradation: the four strains present a complete set of genes for this subsystem.
3. Motility: No gene related to flagellar synthesis and movement was annotated in the genomes of strains CECT 5118T and CECT 5120, in full agreement with their non-motile behavior. Strains CECT 5113T and CECT 5114, also non motile, contain up to 66 genes in the subsystem, but apparently lack some essential ones (as the flagellin gene), among others, according to RAST annotation. However, in the Prokka-annotated version of these genomes flagellin was detected by BIOiPLUG search.
4. Cell cycle: the absence of the minCDE in the cytoskeleton set of genes is notorious; this absence is, to the best of our knowledge, common to the Roseobacter group and it might be related to the uneven division behavior found in several Rhodobacteraceae taxa. In addition, strains CECT 5113T and CECT 5114 lack ftsQ and strains CECT 5118T and CECT 5120 lack mreD.
5. DNA metabolism and Horizontal Gene Transfer-related functions. None of the four strains contains a CRISPR/Cas system but defense against foreign DNA in the form of a restriction-modification system type I is present in the four strains. An additional type III R-M system is present in strain CECT 5118. All four strains contain a Gene Transfer Agent (GTA) set of genes. This GTA is universal in the Rhodobacteraceae so far explored, but the members of Thalassobius, Shimia, and Thalassococcus genera all lack the major capsid protein gene. Other horizontal transfer mechanisms seem to be present in strains CECT 5118T and CECT 5120: they have the machinery to produce a type IV secretion system (T4SS) which may mediate protein and nucleoprotein transfer. Strains CECT 5113T and CECT 5114 lack T4SS. Plasmid related functions were not predicted by RAST search, but all the four strains contain the plasmid replication genes repA, repB, and repC, characteristic of repABC type plasmids of Rhodobacteraceae that may also contain the T4SS (Petersen and Wagner-Döbler, 2017).
6. Cell to cell communication and adherence: Although none of the strains presents identifiable quorum-sensing systems, they all show the two component chv regulatory system characteristic of Alphaproteobacteria, involved in the regulation of exopolysaccharide synthesis and symbiotic recognition in Rhizobium. It is also noticeable the presence in the four strains (and in the rest of Thalassobius type strains) of a T2SS related to tight adherence (tad) gene cluster, involved in tenacious biofilm formation, as well as several genes encoding for capsular exopolysaccharide synthesis.
7. Stress response: Osmotic stress-related genes code for a complete betaine synthesis from choline. Oxidative stress is counteracted by the presence of catalase, peroxidase and a Fe-containing superoxide dismutase (SOD).
8. Light-related genes: None of the strains contains genes for the synthesis of a photosynthetic apparatus, but regA, a part of a two-component system related to the expression of photosynthesis in anaerobiosis, is predicted in all four strains; hvrA, a transcriptional activator of puf and puh genes at dim light intensities, is found only in strains CECT 5118T and CECT 5120. All four lack genes for rhodopsin synthesis.
9. Anaerobic respiration. Nitrate reduction and denitrification: the strains do not possess respiratory nitrate reductase, in agreement with the negative results obtained in the corresponding test. They lack also the nitrous oxide and nitric oxide reductases needed for denitrification. Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) reductase and thiosulfate or sulfite reductases are also absent but an arsenate reductase gene is detected in all strains.
10. Sulfur metabolism: Sulfur oxidation is predicted from the genomes of strains CECT 5118T and CECT 5120 (a behavior common to several taxa in the Rhodobacteraceae), but not from the genomes of strains CECT 5113T and CECT 5114, due to the lack of several sox genes (soxA, X, W, and H). Sulfite oxidase is absent in all four. Another well studied, widely represented activity on sulfur compounds, the degradation of dimethyl sulfoniopropionate (DMSP), is present in the genomes of strains CECT 5118T and CECT 5120 with a complete demethylation pathway. Strains CECT 5113T and CECT 5114 present dmdA (demethylase) but it is uncertain if the pathway is complete (apparently, they lack the 3-methylmercapto propionyl-CoA ligase). On the other hand, strain CECT 5114 possesses a gene for DMSP lyase, thus being able to degrade DMSP directly to dimethylsulfide (DMS) plus acrylate.
11. Carbon monoxide oxidation: together with sulfur oxidation, this trait is present in several members of the Roseobacter group and apparently functions as a complementary energy resource. Aerobic carbon monoxide dehydrogenase is present in the genomes of strains CECT 5118T and CECT 5120, but not in strains CECT 5113T or CECT 5114.
12. Membrane transport (solutes): strains CECT 5118T and CECT 5120 possess the highest number of genes involved in ABC transporters (86) while strains CECT 5113T and CECT 5114 contain only 35–43 genes in this category. TRAP transporters account for 31–32 genes on strains CECT 5118T and CECT 5120 and 32–36 in strains CECT 5113T and CECT 5114.
13. Central metabolism and respiration: the four strains have a complete tricarboxylic acid cycle and aerobic respiration. The ethyl malonyl-CoA pathway for C2 assimilation is also complete in all four strains. Glycolytic abilities, on the other hand, include incomplete glycolysis (no phosphofructokinase is predicted), nor Entner-Doudoroff or Pentose phosphate pathways for strains CECT 5118T and CECT 5120. Strain CECT 5113T has a complete pentose phosphate and incomplete glycolytic and KDPG routes while strain CECT 5114 has incomplete versions of Pentose Phosphate and KDPG pathways. In any case, the four strains manage to use and grow with several carbohydrates, including D-ribose, some hexoses, a few disaccharides (as lactose, all present β-galactosidase activity) and some uronic acids. The precise combination of carbohydrates being used by the strains in experimental tests is useful for the species differentiation (Table 4).
14. CO2 fixation is not predicted for any of the four strains.
15. Metabolism of aromatic compounds: the strains do not possess genes encoding for complete pathways for aromatic ring cleavage nor they encode dioxygenases, whereas some members of the genus do.
Selected genome-predicted differences for these two pairs and other Thalassobius, Shimia, and one Thalassococcus spp. are summarized in Table 6.
Table 6. Selected differential characteristics between the genomes of Thalassobius, Shimia, and Thalassococcus species: 1, T. autumnalis sp. nov. CECT 5118T and CECT 5120; 2, T. mediterraneus CECT 5383T; 3, T. gelatinovorus CECT 4357T; 4, T. activus sp. nov. CECT 5113T and CECT 5114; 5, T. maritimus DSM 28223T; 6, T. aestuarii DSM 15283T; 7, S. marina CECT 7688T; 8, S. haliotis DSM 28453T; 9, T. halodurans DSM 26915T.
Considering both the experimentally determined features and the presence of genes predicting given phenotypic traits in the genomes, there are enough differences between strains and their closely related species for unequivocally differentiate the genomic groups previously delineated (Tables 4, 6). Genomic, phylogenetic and phenotypic information thus confirm that the four strains represent two novel species. They fulfill the basic characteristics defining the genus Thalassobius (Arahal et al., 2005) and have Thalassobius species as their closest phylogenetic neighbors in both cases, thus, they should be recognized as new Thalassobius species: we propose the name of Thalassobius activus, for strains CECT 5113T and CECT 5114, with CECT 5113T as type strain. Strains CECT 5118T and CECT 5120 constitute another new species, for which we propose the name of Thalassobius autumnalis, with CECT 5118T as type strain. Protologues for both species are included at the end of the section.
Phylogenomic Analysis of Genera Thalassobius, Shimia, and Thalassococcus
As previously pointed, another goal of this study was to study the relationships between the species of the genera Thalassobius, Shimia, and Thalassococcus by using genome-derived data. All publicly available type strain genomes of species in these three genera have been considered together with the genome from an unclassified Shimia species (Kanukollu et al., 2016) that has been proven to constitute a separate genomic species (Tables 2, 3). The tree generated with BCG54 using Thalassobacter stenotrophicus CECT 5294T (CYRX01) and Nereida ignava CECT 5292T (CVQV01) as outgroup is shown in Figure 3. The tree confirms the phylogenetic relationships previously suggested by 16S rRNA gene sequence comparison and genomic relatedness, confirming the close position of T. activus to T. maritimus and of T. autumnalis to T. mediterraneus. The grouping of T. mediterraneus plus T. autumnalis with T. gelatinovorus, a regular finding with other approaches, is also confirmed. All three Shimia species appear inside the Thalassobius genus, as closest relatives of T. aestuarii, while T. halodurans separates from Thalassobius and Shimia, and merges with the pair used as an outgroup, discarding the topology that Thalassococcus spp. occupied in the 16S rRNA tree. The results obtained from the BCG54 tree do not sustain monophyly for Thalassobius as currently defined. Furthermore, monophyly for Thalassobius—Shimia grouping is not resolved, as the group formed by T. mediterraneus-T. autumnalis-T. gelatinovorus does not merge with the rest of species before the last node. A better resolution of this node might be attained if the genomes of all Shimia, Thalassobius, and Thalassococcus were available, but, for the moment, we only can conclude that there are three possible monophyletic groups to be considered: the core Thalassobius spp. or Thalassobius spp. sensu stricto (containing the type species T. mediterraneus plus T. autumnalis and T. gelatinovorus), the one of T. maritimus plus T. activus sp. nov. and the one of Shimia spp. plus T. aestuarii. A strict taxonomic procedure would split Thalassobius spp. in three genera, with T. aestuarii (and perhaps others, as T. abyssi, T. aquaeponti, and T. litoreus) being reclassified as new combinations of Shimia, and T. maritimus plus T. activus being proposed as a new genus. But as already commented, this would be premature, since the addition of more type strain genomes would eventually reveal if the whole group constitutes a monophyletic lineage at higher levels, thus allowing a reclassification of all Shimia spp as Thalassobius new combinations, a solution that, in our opinion, would be also possible and more clarifying than the splitting option, which would imply to describe more and more indistinguishable genera within the Roseobacter group.
Figure 3. Phylogenetic tree generated with BCG54. Thalassobacter stenotrophicus CECT 5294T (CYRX01) and Nereida ignava CECT 5292T (CVQV01) were included as outgroup organisms. The numbers at the nodes indicate the gene support index (maximal value is 54).
Genome Derived Features of Thalassobius spp., Shimia spp., and Thalassococcus Halodurans: Common and Differential Features
A survey of the gene content of the Thalassobius spp., Shimia spp., and T. halodurans draft genomes was conducted in order to enlighten the taxonomic status of the three genera. We looked for traits especially used for taxonomic work at the genus level. Genomic traits that are differential among species and/or genera are presented in Table 6. A list of features shared by all three genera representatives is included as Table 7.
Table 7. A list of common genomic features shared by Thalassobius-Shimia group included in the study.
All three genera representatives share characteristics owned by the whole Rhodobacteraceae family, as the peptidoglycan composition (with m-DAP at 3rd position), predominant ubiquinone (Q10), major cellular fatty acid (C18:1 ω7c/C18:1 ω6c) and a G+C molar content over 50%. Maybe, the lack of minCDE genes should be added to this list of traits common to all Rhodobacteraceae: the absence of these genes in various Rhodobacteraceae was already noted by Lutkenhaus (2007) and we have been unable, so far, to find any member of this group that contained this part of the cytoskeletal machinery. Obviously, these shared common traits (symplesiomorphies) should not be considered as relevant to back a genera fusion proposal. But there are other that are shared by these particular genera (synapomorphies): we would highlight, for example, the GTA gene set composition, characterized by the common absence of capsid gene, which seems to be exclusive of these genera in contrast to the other >40 genomes of Roseobacter group members that could be compared in the Seed Viewer. The ability to accumulate polyhydroxyalkanoates, although not exclusive, would be another common character, not shared with all other Rhodobacteraceae. Other candidate traits are indicated in Table 7.
On the other hand, several genomic differences were found that allow species discrimination, as well as differentiation of the three phylogenetic clusters revealed by gene and multigenic trees: polar lipid synthesis, for example, pull apart the T. aestuarii-Shimia spp. group by the exclusive presence of DPG synthetic ability, while Thalassococcus could be differentiated by the unique presence of gene psd, encoding a phosphatidyl ethanolamine-synthetizing enzyme, phosphatidyl serine decarboxylase (EC 18.104.22.168), which is absent from all other species. The absence of genes encoding for PE biosynthesis in all Thalassobius species was surprising, as Park et al. (2012) reported the detection of PE in the type strains of four species (T. maritimus, T. aestuarii, T. gelatinovorus, and T. mediterraneus) by using TLC chromatography. But genomes of these type strains did not contain phosphatidylserine decarboxylase gene and PE synthesis is not predicted by RAST for any of the eight Thalassobius strains whose genomes have been explored. Genes for key enzymes of the alternative routes for PE synthesis, ethanolamine phosphotransferase (EC 22.214.171.124) or L-serine phosphatidylethanolamine phosphatidyl transferase (EC 126.96.36.199) were also undetected. Undoubtedly, this is a point that needs more attention, because of the importance that is given to polar lipid composition in bacterial taxonomy.
Absence of carbon monoxide dehydrogenase and hvrA gene are characteristic of T. maritimus-T. activus, while, the presence of aryl sulfatase is exclusive of the Shimia spp.-T. aestuarii group.
It is interesting to highlight that T. aestuarii shares with T. gelatinovorus the ability to degrade aromatic compounds, as confirmed through Aromadeg (Duarte et al., 2014) showing a complete that both type strains contain genes coding for extradiol dioxygenases of Viccinal Chelate superfamily and Lig B superfamily (for degrading monocyclic substrates in the first case and homoprorocatechuate and protocatechuate, in the second) and Rieske non-heme iron oxygenases of the phthalate dioxygenases family. However, only T. aestuarii DSM 15283T genome harbors an extradiol dioxygenase of the Cupin superfamily, which anables to degrade gentisate and, on the other side, T. gelatinovorus CECT 4357T possesses an additional phthalate oxygenase and a benzoate oxygenase. T. halodurans DSM 26915T genome also encodes two extradiol dioxygenases of Viccinal Chelate superfamily and one Rieske non-heme iron oxygenases of the phthalate dioxygenases. The three Shimia genomes were also checked with Aromadeg (default parameters) but no protein had matches with the database.
In a recent phylogenomic study, Simon et al. (2017) analyse the evolutionary adaptation of Rhodobacteraceae to marine and non-marine habitats. Among other things, they conclude that the so-called Roseobacter group is not monophyletic, but their members derived from a common marine ancestor shared with other non-marine, non-halophilic Rhodobacteraceae (Rhodobacter and Paracoccus, mainly), the later representing an adaptation to non-marine habitats. A selection of genome-predicted, habitat-correlated enzymes is shown in their Table 1, including several lost in non-marine habitats plus others that were gained in marine habitats. The analysis of Simon et al. (2017) included no Thalassobius, Shimia, or Thalassococcus (the genome labeled as “Thalassiobium sp. R2A62” is completely unrelated to any true Thalassobius), so we have explored the distribution of the marine-related enzymes they reported in the genomes employed in this paper, as all of them pertain to marine inhabitants. Results are indicated in Table 8. As it can readily be observed, the five enzymes classified under the category of “Lost in non-marine habitats” are all present in the genomes of Thalassobius spp. (6 species), Shimia spp (3 species), and in the single Thalassococcus species included. The only significant exception was the genes for large, medium, and small carbon monoxide dehydrogenase chains, absent from the genomes of T. maritimus and T. activus sp. nov. (both strains), a trait already highlighted as characteristic of this small clade (Figure 3). On the other hand, enzymes apparently “gained in marine habitats” are not widely represented in Thalassobius or Shimia genomes. A few interesting exceptions are the betaine homocysteine S-methyl transferase (EC 188.8.131.52), involved in glycine-betaine catabolism, present in all these genomes, and the nitrile hydratase (EC 184.108.40.206), absent only from the genomes T. activus sp. nov. and T. halodurans, but present in the rest. Two additional occurrences are worth to note: γ-butyrobetaine dioxygenase (EC 220.127.116.11), participating in carnitine biosynthesis, is found exclusively in the genomes of Thalassobius spp. sensu stricto (T. mediterraneus, T. autumnalis sp. nov., and T. gelatinovorus) while aryl sulfatase (EC 18.104.22.168) is present only in T. aestuarii and Shimia spp. (as already mentioned); thus, these two enzymes could be used as discriminant traits to differentiate the respective groups.
Table 8. Habitat-related enzymes and their presence in the genomes of different Thalassobius, Shimia and Thalassococcus type and reference strains: 1, T. autumnalis sp. nov. CECT 5118T and CECT 5120; 2, T. mediterraneus CECT 5383T; 3, T. gelatinovorus CECT 4357T; 4, T. activus sp. nov. CECT 5113T and CECT 5114; 5, T. maritimus DSM 28223T; 6, T. aestuarii DSM 15283T; 7, S. marina CECT 7688T; 8, S. haliotis DSM 28453T; 9, T. halodurans DSM 26915T.
So, this analysis proves there is room for either a proposal of reunification of (at least) Shimia spp. with Thalassobius spp. under the name of Thalassobius, but also for the splitting of Thalassobius-Shimia in three genera (one of them a new one for T. maritimus-T. activus). However, any decision should be postponed until the gap in genomes of type strains pertaining to the group is closed.
This study provides the first taxogenomic approach conducted on the genus Thalassobius and permits the classification of four isolates into two novel species, whose description is given below. An effort has been done to explore the possibilities of phenotypic inference opening a trend for similar studies. It also provides an analysis of the complexity for classification at the genus level within the Roseobacter group, here illustrated by the case of the genera Thalassobius-Shimia-Thalassococcus.
Description of Thalassobius Activus sp. nov.
Thalassobius activus (ac.ti'vus. L. masc. adj. activus, active, referring to the metabolic activity of the type strain).
Cells are Gram-reaction-negative, non- motile coccobacilli. Aerobic and chemoorganotroph, they grow on Marine Agar as regular unpigmented circular colonies. Cells accumulate PHB. Mesophilic, able to grow from 15 to 26°C (optimum, 26°C), but not a 4 or 37°C. Slightly halophilic, requires sodium, calcium and magnesium salts for growth. Maximum salinity for growth is 6% (optimum 3.5–5%), no growth is obtained without salt, at 7% or above. Oxidase and catalase are positive. Fermentation of carbohydrates, nitrate reduction and denitrification are negative. Negative for urea, casein, gelatin, starch, Tween-80 and DNA hydrolysis. Indole production from tryptophan and arginine dihydrolase are negative, PNPG and alkaline phosphatase are positive.
Carbon sources used for growth included D-cellobiose, sucrose, D-melibiose, D-mannitol, m-inositol, acetate, pyruvate, propionate, butyrate, t-aconitate, citrate, 2-oxoglutarate, succinate, lactate, 3-hydroxybutyrate, glycine, L-leucine, L-serine, L-threonine, L-arginine, L-glutamate, L-alanine, L-tyrosine, L-ornithine, 4-aminobutyrate, and L-aspartate. No growth is obtained with D-ribose, L-arabinose, D-xylose, D-glucose, D-fructose, D-galactose, D-trehalose, D-mannose, L-rhamnose, maltose, lactose, salicin, amygdalin, D-glycerol, D-sorbitol, D-gluconate, D-glucuronate, D-galacturonate, D-glycerate, D-saccharate, L-citrulline, L-histidine, L-lysine, L-sarcosine, or putrescine.
Major cellular fatty acids are C18 : 1 ω7c/ω6c and C10 : 0 3OH.
The predominant respiratory quinone, Q10 was inferred from annotated gene encoding decaprenyldiphosphate synthase (EC 22.214.171.124). Major polar lipids, PG and PC, were inferred from annotated genes encoding CTP-phosphatidate cytidyl transferase (EC 126.96.36.199), phosphatidyl glycerophosphate synthase (EC 188.8.131.52), phosphatidyl glycerophosphatase (EC 184.108.40.206), and phosphatidyl choline synthase (EC 220.127.116.11), in the genomes of strains CECT 5113T and CECT 5114.
The G+C content of the DNA is 54.4–54.5 mol% (partial genome sequences).
The type strain, CECT 5113T (=11SM13T =LMG 29900T) was isolated from coastal seawater, Mediterranean Sea, at Vinaroz coast, Spain.
Description of Thalassobius Autumnalis sp. nov.
Thalassobius autumnalis (au.tum.na'lis. L. adj. autumnus, fall, autumn, after the season of isolation).
Cells are Gram-reaction negative, non-motile coccobacilli, aerobic, and chemoorganotroph. Grows on Marine Agar forming regular circular colonies. Some strains produce a brown diffusible pigment on prolonged incubation. Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) is accumulated in the cells. Mesophilic and slightly halophilic, growth is observed from 15 to 37°C (optimum, 26°C), but not at 4 or 40°C and up to 6% total salinity in media supplemented with sea salts (optimum 3.5–5%). Does not grow at 7% or more salinity. It displays complex ionic requirements, as it is unable to grow either without added salts or with addition of simple salts (NaCl, KCl, MgCl2, CaCl2). Oxidase and catalase positive. Nitrate reduction to nitrite or N2 is negative. Does not ferment carbohydrates. Negative for urea, casein, gelatin, starch, Tween-80, and DNA hydrolysis. Indole production from tryptophan and arginine dihydrolase are negative, PNPG (β-galactosidase) and leucine arylamidase are positive.
The following sole carbon and energy sources are used for growth: D-ribose, D-xylose, D-glucose, D-mannose, D-galactose, D-cellobiose, sucrose, salicin, N-acetyl-D-glucosamine, D-glycerol, m-inositol, acetate, pyruvate, propionate, butyrate, t-aconitate, citrate, 2-oxoglutarate, succinate, malate, lactate, 3-hydroxybutyrate, L-leucine, L-serine, L-glutamate, L-alanine, L-tyrosine, L-ornithine, 4-aminobutyrate, L-sarcosine, and putrescine. Growth is negative with L-arabinose, D-fructose, D-trehalose, L-rhamnose, maltose, lactose, D-melibiose, D-amygdalin, D-mannitol, D-sorbitol, D-gluconate, D-glucuronate, D-galacturonate, D-glycerate, D-saccharate, glycine, L-threonine, L-arginine, L-citrulline, L-histidine, L-lysine, and L-aspartate.
Major cellular fatty acids are C18:1 ω7c/ω6c and C18:1 ω7c 11-methyl.
The predominant respiratory quinone, Q10 was inferred from annotated gene encoding decaprenyldiphosphate synthase (EC 18.104.22.168). Major polar lipids, PG and PC, were inferred from annotated genes encoding CTP-phosphatidate cytidyl transferase (EC 22.214.171.124), phosphatidyl glycerophosphate synthase (EC 126.96.36.199), phosphatidyl glycerophosphatase (EC 188.8.131.52), and phosphatidyl choline synthase (EC 184.108.40.206), in the genomes of strains CECT 5118T and CECT 5120.
The G+C content of the DNA is 59.8 mol% (partial genome sequences).
The type strain, CECT 5118T (=XSM11T =LMG 29904T) was isolated from coastal seawater, Mediterranean Sea, at Vinaroz coast, Spain.
DA and MP: Designed the study; LR-T: Obtained the genomes and did the mainstream processing; TL, LR-T, and MP: Further analyzed the annotations; MP: Drafted the manuscript and conducted the phenotypic testing; TL and DA: Did the phylogenomic analysis; all authors corrected and approved the manuscript.
The study has been funded through projects TAXPROMAR 2010 CGL2010-18123/BOS (Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitivity) to MP and PROMETEO 2012-040 (Generalitat Valenciana).
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
We thank M. A. Ruvira and L. Jiménez-Gadea for technical support.
Arahal, D. R., Macián, M. C., Garay, E., and Pujalte, M. J. (2005). Thalassobius mediterraneus gen. nov., sp. nov., and reclassification of Ruegeria gelatinovorans as Thalassobius gelatinovorus comb. nov. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 55, 2371–2376. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63842-0
Aziz, R. K., Bartels, D., Best, A. A., DeJongh, M., Disz, T., Edwards, R. A., et al. (2008). The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 9:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-9-75
Bankevich, A., Nurk, S., Antipov, D., Gurevich, A. A., Dvorkin, M., Kulikov, A. S., et al. (2012). SPAdes: a new genome assembly algorithm and its applications to single-cell sequencing. J. Comput. Biol. 19, 455–477. doi: 10.1089/cmb.2012.0021
Baumann, P., and Baumann, L. (1981). “The marine gram-negative eubacteria: genera Photobacterium, Beneckea, Alteromonas, Pseudomonas and Alcaligenes,” in The Prokaryotes, Vol. 2, eds M. P. Starr, H. Stolp, H. G. Trueper, A. Balows, and H. Schleger (Berlin; Heidelberg: Springer), 1302–1331.
Caspi, R., Billington, R., Ferrer, L., Foerster, H., Fulcher, C. A., Keseler, I. M., et al. (2016). The MetaCyc database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of pathway/genome databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D471–D480. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1164
Chen, M. H., Sheu, S. Y., Chen, C. A., Wang, J. T., and Chen, W. M. (2011). Shimia isoporae sp. nov., isolated from the reef-building coral Isopora palifera. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 61, 823–827. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.022848-0
Choi, D. H., and Cho, B. C. (2006). Shimia marina sp. nov., a novel bacterium of the Roseobacter clade isolated from biofilm in a coastal fish farm. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 56, 1869–1873. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64235-0
Cuccuru, G., Orsini, M., Pinna, A., Sbardellati, A., Soranzo, N., Travaglione, A., et al. (2014). Orione, a web-based framework for NGS analysis in microbiology. Bioinformatics 30, 1928–1929. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu135
Duarte, M., Jauregui, R., Vilchez-Vargas, R., Junca, H., and Pieper, D. H. (2014). AromaDeg, a novel database for phylogenomics of aerobic bacterial degradation of aromatics. Database 2014:bau118. doi: 10.1093/database/bau118
Farmer, J. J. III., and and Hickman-Brenner, F. W. (2006). “The genera vibrio and photobacterium,” in The Prokaryotes, 3rd Edn., eds M. Dworkin, S. Falkow, E. Rosenberg, K. H. Schleifer, and E. Stackebrandt (New York, NY: Springer), 508–563.
Hameed, A., Shahina, M., Lin, S. Y., Lai, W. A., Hsu, Y. H., Liu, Y. C., et al. (2013). Shimia biformata sp. nov., isolated from surface seawater, and emended description of the genus Shimia Choi and Cho 2006. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 63, 4533–4539. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.053553-0
Hyun, D. W., Kim, M. S., Shin, N. R., Kim, J. Y., Kim, P. S., Whon, T. W., et al. (2013). Shimia haliotis sp. nov., a bacterium isolated from the gut of an abalone, Haliotis discus hannai. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 63, 4248–4253. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.053140-0
Kanukollu, S., Voget, S., Pohlner, M., Vandieken, V., Petersen, J., Kyrpides, N., et al. (2016). Genome sequence of Shimia str. SK013, a representative of the Roseobacter group isolated from marine sediment. Stand. Genom. Sci. 11:25. doi: 10.1186/s40793-016-0143-0
Lee, I., Kim, Y. O., Park, S.-C., and Chun, J. (2016). OrthoANI: an improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 66, 1100–1103. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000760
Lee, O. O., Tsoi, M. M. Y., Li, X., Wong, P. K., and Qian, P. Y. (2007). Thalassococcus halodurans gen. nov., sp., nov., a novel halotolerant member of the Roseobacter clade isolated from the marine sponge Halichondria panicea at Friday Harbor, USA. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 57, 1919–1924. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.64801-0
Macián, M. C., Arahal, D. R., Garay, E., Ludwig, W., Schleifer, K. H., and Pujalte, M. J. (2005). Thalassobacter stenotrophicus gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel marine α-proteobacterium isolated from Mediterranean Sea water. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 55, 105–110. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.63275-0
Meier-Kolthoff, J. P., Auch, A. F., Klenk, H. P., and Göker, M. (2013). Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinformatics 14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60
Newton, R. J., Griffin, L. E., Bowlwes, K. M., Meile, C., Gifford, S., Givens, C. E., et al. (2010). Genome characteristics of a generalist marine bacterial lineage. ISME J. 4, 784–798. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2009.150
Nogi, Y., Mori, K., Makita, H., and Hatada, Y. (2016). Thalassobius abyssi sp. nov., a marine bacterium isolated from cold-seep sediment. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 66, 574–579. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.000758
Nogi, Y., Mori, K., Uchida, H., and Hatada, Y. (2015). Shimia sagamensis sp. nov., a marine bacterium isolated from cold-seep sediment. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 65, 2786–2790. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.000333
Ortigosa, M., Garay, E., and Pujalte, M. J. (1994). Numerical taxonomy of aerobic, gram-negative bacteria associated with oysters and surrounding seawater of the Mediterranean coast. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 17, 589–600. doi: 10.1016/S0723-2020(11)80081-0
Overbeek, R., Olson, R., Pusch, G. D., Olsen, G. J., Davis, J. J., Disz, T., et al. (2014). The SEED and the rapid annotation of microbial genomes using subsystems technology (RAST). Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D206–D214. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1226
Park, S., Jung, Y. T., Kim, S. I., and Yoon, J. H. (2013). Thalassococcus lentus sp. nov., an alphaproteobacterium isolated from seawater of a seaweed farm. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 103, 465–473. doi: 10.1007/s10482-012-9826-8
Park, S., Jung, Y. T., Won, S. M., Park, J. M., and Yoon, J. H. (2014). Thalassobius aquaeponti sp. nov., an alphaproteobacterium isolated from seawater. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 106, 535–542. doi: 10.1007/s10482-014-0225-1
Parks, D. H., Imelfort, M., Skennerton, C. T., Hugenholtz, P., and Tyson, G. W. (2015). CheckM: assessing the quality of microbial genomes recovered from isolates, single cells, and metagenomes. Genome Res. 25, 1043–1055. doi: 10.1101/gr.186072.114
Pujalte, M. J., Lucena, T., Ruvira, M. A., Arahal, D. R., and Macián, M. C. (2014). “The family Rhodobacteraceae,” in The Prokaryotes—Alphaproteobacteria and Betaproteobacteria, 4th Edn., Vol. 8, eds E. Rosenberg, E. F. DeLong, E. Stackebrandt, S. Lory, and F. Thompson (Berlin: Springer Verlag), 439–512.
Richter, M., Rosselló-Móra, R., Glöckner, F. O., and Peplies, J. (2015). JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 32, 929–931. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv681
Rodrigo-Torres, L., Pujalte, M. J., and Arahal, D. R. (2016a). Draft genome sequence of Thalassobius mediterraneus CECT 5383T, a poly-beta-hydroxybutyrate producer. Genomics Data 7, 237–239. doi: 10.1016/j.gdata.2016.01.013
Rodrigo-Torres, L., Pujalte, M. J., and Arahal, D. R. (2017). Draft genome sequence of Thalassobius gelatinovorus CECT 4357T, a roseobacter with the potential ability to degrade polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Gene Rep. 9, 32–36. doi: 10.1016/j.genrep.2017.08.005
Rüger, H. J., and Höfle, M. (1992). Marine star-shaped-aggregate-forming bacteria: Agrobacterium atlanticum sp. nov.; Agrobacterium meteori sp. nov.; Agrobacterium ferrugineum sp. nov., nom. rev.; Agrobacterium gelatinovorum sp. nov., nom. rev.; and Agrobacterium stellulatum sp. nov., nom. rev. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 42, 133–143. doi: 10.1099/00207713-42-1-133
Simon, M., Scheuner, C., Meier-Kolthoff, J. P., Brinkhoff, T., Wagner-Döbler, I., Ulbrich, M., et al. (2017). Phylogenomics of Rhodobacteraceae reveals evolutionary adaptation to marine and non-marine habitats. ISME J. 11, 1483–1499. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.198
Smibert, R. M., and Krieg, N. R. (2007). “Phenotypic characterization,” in Manual of Methods for General Bacteriology, eds C. A. Reddy, T. J. Beveridge, J. A. Breznak, G. Marzluf, T. M. Schmidt, and L. R. Snyder (Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology), 607–654.
Spiekermann, P., Rehm, B. H. A., Kalschenuer, R., Baumeister, D., and Steinbüchel, A. (1999). A sensitive, viable-colony staining method usig Nile red for direct screening of bacteria that accumulate polyhydroxyalkanoic acids and other lipid storage compounds. Arch. Microbiol. 171, 73–80. doi: 10.1007/s002030050681
Uchino, Y., Hirata, A., Yokota, A., and Sugiyama, J. (1998). Reclassification of marine agrobacterium species: proposals of Stappia stellulata gen. nov., comb. nov., Stappia aggregata sp. nov., nom. rev., Ruegeria atlantica gen. nov. comb. nov., Ruegeria gelatinovora comb. nov., Ruegeria algicola comb. nov., and Ahrensia kieliense gen. nov., sp. nov., nom. rev. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 44, 201–210. doi: 10.2323/jgam.44.201
Yarza, P., Ludwig, W., Euzéby, J., Amann, R., Schleifer, K.-H., Glöckner, F. O. et al. (2010). Update of the all-species living tree project based on 16S and 23S rRNA sequence analyses. Syst. Appl. Microbiol. 33, 291–299. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2010.08.001
Yoon, S. H., Ha, S. M., Kwon, S., Lim, J., Kim, Y., Seo, H., et al. (2017). Introducing EzBioCloud: a taxonomically united database of 16S rRNA and whole genome assemblies. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 67, 1613–1617. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.001755
Keywords: Thalassobius, taxogenomics, phylogenomics, Rhodobacteraceae, Roseobacter group, Shimia, Thalassococcus
Citation: Pujalte MJ, Lucena T, Rodrigo-Torres L and Arahal DR (2018) Comparative Genomics of Thalassobius Including the Description of Thalassobius activus sp. nov., and Thalassobius autumnalis sp. nov. Front. Microbiol. 8:2645. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02645
Received: 13 October 2017; Accepted: 19 December 2017;
Published: 12 January 2018.
Edited by:Sabela Balboa, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Reviewed by:Mohammad Ali Amoozegar, University of Tehran, Iran
Maher Gtari, Carthage University, Tunisia
Copyright © 2018 Pujalte, Lucena, Rodrigo-Torres and Arahal. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: María J. Pujalte, firstname.lastname@example.org