Original Research ARTICLE
Oligonucleotide Array and VITEK Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry in Species Identification of Blood Yeast Isolates
- 1Department of Internal Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
- 2Center for Infection Control, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
- 3Department of Medical Laboratory Science and Biotechnology, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
- 4Department of Pathology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
- 5National Institute of Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology, National Health Research Institutes, Tainan, Taiwan
- 6Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
- 7Faculty of Medicine, School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
- 8Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan
- 9Department of Internal Medicine, Madou Sin-Lau Hospital, Tainan, Taiwan
We evaluated matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry using VITEK MS (IVD database) and an oligonucleotide array based on the internal transcribed spacer-1 (ITS-1) and ITS-2 sequences of rRNA genes for the identification of Candida spp. from blood cultures. Five-hundred and twelve consecutive bloodstream yeast isolates were collected daily and initially identified by the phenotypic automated method (VITEK YBC or VITEK2 YST card). Inconsistent results were confirmed by D1-D2 region of 28S rRNA genes and ITSs. Excluding two unidentified yeast isolates, the oligonucleotide array and VITEK MS correctly identified 99.6% (508) and 96.9% (494) of 510 yeast isolates, respectively. The oligonucleotide array and VITEK MS demonstrated high correct identification rates for four major Candida species (C. albicans 100%, 98.4%; C. glabrata 100%, 100%; C. parapsilosis 100%, 93.3%; C. tropicalis 100%, 97.3%), but lower correct identification rates for other Candida species (91.7 and 87.5%, respectively). In conclusion, the identification performance of the oligonucleotide array is comparable to that of VITEK MS, and can serve as a supplemental tool for the identification of Candida species.
Candidemia remains one of the most important invasive fungal infections, is associated with a high mortality rate (up to 30%), and is a significant healthcare burden (Hassan et al., 2009). Since a delay in the initiation of antifungal therapy for candidemia increases the risk of mortality (Garey et al., 2006), timely antifungal therapy for the treatment of candidiasis is essential. Nevertheless, the antifungal susceptibility patterns vary among different Candida species (Hajjeh et al., 2004), and precise and rapid identification of Candida species is still a challenge in clinical practice.
Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) has recently been introduced into clinical laboratory diagnosis as a tool for rapid identification of microorganisms, including Candida species (Marklein et al., 2009; Stevenson et al., 2010; Dhiman et al., 2011; Tan et al., 2012; Buchan and Ledeboer, 2013; Westblade et al., 2013). Moreover, an oligonucleotide array based on the internal transcribed spacer-1 (ITS-1) and ITS-2 sequences of rRNA genes was developed for diagnosis of invasive fungal infections and species identification (Hsiao et al., 2005; Leaw et al., 2007; Hsiue et al., 2010; Kuo et al., 2012; Li et al., 2016). The array was able to identify 77 species of clinically relevant yeasts, and the analytic procedure was completed within 8 hours. Similar to MALDI-TOF MS, the array showed superiority to conventional identification methods for Candida species found in blood cultures (Hsiue et al., 2010). Thus, both MALDI-TOF MS and the oligonucleotide array can be used in clinical care.
VITEK MS, a MALDI-TOF MS system, is currently used in clinical microbiology laboratories, but its identification accuracy may be unsatisfactory for some Candida species (Westblade et al., 2013), which may suggest that a supplemental diagnostic tool is needed. The performance of the oligonucleotide assay for species identification of candidemic isolates has not been compared to that of VITEK MS. Therefore, we analyzed yeast isolates from blood cultures and compared the identification performance of these two tools.
Materials and Methods
Five-hundred and twelve yeasts isolates were collected from blood cultures from 2011 to 2014 at the National Cheng Kung University Hospital, a medical center in southern Taiwan. All blood samples were incubated in BACTEC FX (Becton, Dickinson and Company, Sparks, MD, United States), and the laboratory yeast isolates were identified by the VITEK Yeast Biochemical Card (YBC) before 2012 and VITEK 2 YST ID Card (bioMérieux, Inc., Hazelwood, MO, United States) after 2012. Morphological identification and germ tube tests were also used when necessary. Pure colonies of those isolates were further analyzed by the commercial VITEK MALDI-TOF MS system (bioMérieux; hereinafter named VITEK MS) and oligonucleotide arrays.
The species-specific probes of the oligonucleotide array were designed from the ITS-1 and ITS-2 regions of the rRNA genes. The design process and sequences of the individual probes were published previously (Leaw et al., 2007). The genomic DNA of yeast colonies was extracted, and the ITS regions were amplified by fungus specific universal primers ITS1 (5′-DIG-TCCGTAGGTGAACCTGCGG-3′) and ITS4 (5′-DIG-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGC-3′). The amplified PCR products amplified encompassed ITS1, ITS2, and partial regions of the 18S and 28S rRNA genes. The PCR products were further hybridized with species-specific probes as previously described (Leaw et al., 2007).
For the VITEK MS analysis, each yeast isolate was applied directly onto a target slide composed of 48-spots and was lysed with 0.5 μl of 25% formic acid (Product no. 411072, bioMérieux). After drying, 1 μl of matrix solution (Product no. 411071, bioMérieux) was applied to the spots prior to VITEK MS analysis (Iriart et al., 2012). Using VITEK MS (MS-ID version 2.0 knowledge base clinical use or in vitro devices [IVD]), the identification scheme produced a confidence value for each microorganism. When an organism with a confidence value of 60.0–99.9 was found, the identification result was retained and confirmed. For every isolate without a confirmed identification, the sample preparation was repeated again. If the repeated analysis still showed no matching species with adequate confidence values, the identification result was recorded as “no matched species in the database.” When the result showed “bad spectrum during acquisition,” the analysis was repeated. If the result remained “bad spectrum during acquisition,” these isolates were submitted to an extraction protocol with 70% ethanol and 70% formic acid. In brief, the collected colony was suspended in a 2 ml tube containing 900 μl of 70% ethanol. After centrifugation, the supernatant was discarded and then 40 μl of 70% formic acid was added. After complete resuspension, 40 μl of 100% acetonitrile was added, and the tube was centrifuged for at least 2 min. Then, spot immediately 1 μl of the supernatant on a target slide and allow the spot to dry completely. After air drying, 1 μl of α-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid matrix solution was applied to the target plate and dried at room temperature prior to mass spectrometry analysis, as recommended by the manufacture.
Analysis of Discrepant Specimens
For the isolates with discrepant identification among the VITEK card, oligonucleotide array, and VITEK MS, the D1-D2 region of the 28S rRNA genes and ITS region of each isolate were amplified by PCR, sequenced, and then compared with sequences in public databases using the BLAST algorithm. A threshold of ≥99% sequence identity was applied. The fungus-specific primers, ITS1 (5′-TCCGTAGGT GAACCTGCGG-3′) and ITS4 (5′-TCCTCCGCTTATTGATATGCC-3′), were used to amplify the ITS region (White et al., 1990). For D1-D2 region amplification, the primers NL1 (5′-GCATATCAATAAGCGGAGGAAAAG-3′) and NL4 (5′-GGTCCGTGTTTCA AGACGG-3′) were used (Kurtzman and Robnett, 1997). PCR products were sequenced on a model 377 sequencing system (Applied Biosystems, Taipei, Taiwan), and the results were regarded as the final identification in this study. To provide information on the identification performance for Candida species, we calculated the accurate identification rate of the oligonucleotide array and VITEK MS after categorizing Candida isolates as C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, and other Candida species. Only an accurate identification to the species level was regarded as a correct identification. The identification results of VITEK MS were categorized into “correct identification,” “incorrect identification,” and “no matched species in the database.”
Of the 512 yeast isolates, C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. glabrata, and C. parapsilosis accounted for 49.4% (n = 253), 21.5% (n = 110), 11.7% (n = 60), and 11.7% (n = 60), respectively. Three isolates were identified as Lodderomyces elongisporus (two isolates) and Cryptococcus curvatus (one isolate), according to the sequencing of the ITS region and 28S rRNA genes. Twenty-four isolates were composed of several uncommon Candida species. Two isolates were regarded as unidentified since their sequence identities according to the ITS and 28SrRNA sequences were less than 99%.
With the exclusion of the two unidentified isolates, 510 yeast isolates were further analyzed. The accuracy of the oligonucleotide array and VITEK MS results are listed in Table 1. The oligonucleotide array only misidentified two isolates of C. nivariensis as C. glabrata and correctly identified 99.6% (508/510) of yeast isolates. This correct identification rate was significantly higher than that of the VITEK MS (96.9%, 494/510; P = 0.001 by Fisher’s exact test). Of the 16 isolates unidentified by VITEK MS, 8 isolates were incorrectly identified, and 8 had no matched species in the database.
Twenty-six isolates with discrepant identification among the oligonucleotide array, VITEK MS, and VITEK card are listed in Table 2. The oligonucleotide array identified all but two isolates of C. nivariensis. Using VITEK MS, two C. albicans isolates were misidentified as C. glabrata and one as C. tropicalis. No misidentification was found using VITEK MS for the species identification of C. glabrata. VITEK MS identified three C. parapsilosis isolates as C. glabrata, C. pulcherima, or Penicillium camemberti. Among the C. tropicalis isolates with discrepant identification, three C. tropicalis isolates had no matched species in the database. There was one L. elongisporus isolate misidentified as C. silvicola by VITEK MS.
TABLE 2. Twenty-six yeast isolates with discrepant identification by the oligonucleotide array, MALDI-TOF MS (VITEK MS) and biochemical identification (VITEK card).
To precisely evaluate the identification performance of the oligonucleotide array and VITEK MS for Candida species, we excluded two unidentified yeasts and three non-Candida isolates (i.e., L. elongisporus and C. curvatus). The proportions of accurate identifications of C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, and other Candida species by the oligonucleotide array and VITEK MS are shown in Figure 1A. The correct identification rates of C. albicans and C. glabrata by both identification tools were more than 98%. For C. parapsilosis and C. tropicalis, the correct identification rate by the oligonucleotide array was higher than that of VITEK MS (C. parapsilosis 100%, 93.3%; C. tropicalis 100%, 97.3%). For other Candida species, a similar trend (91.7% versus 87.5%) was noted, and lower correct identification rates were found for both methods. As for the identification results of VITEK MS, three (5%) isolates of C. parapsilosis and one of (4.2%) the other Candida species were incorrectly identified. There were no matched species in the database for two (8.3%) isolates of the other Candida species and three (2.7%) C. tropicalis isolates (Figure 1B).
FIGURE 1. (A) Proportions of correct identification of the oligonucleotide array and VITEK MS in Candida species. (B) Identification results of VITEK MS in Candida species by proportion.
Antifungal susceptibilities differ in different Candida species. For example, up to 13.3 and 21.4% of clinical C. tropicalis isolates are not susceptible to fluconazole and voriconazole, respectively (Huang et al., 2014). Accurate identification of Candida species would guide clinicians to optimize antifungal therapy. In this study, we collected more than 500 yeast isolates from blood to assess the performance of two identification tools. By the oligonucleotide array and VITEK MS, 99.6% (508) and 96.9% (494) of 510 yeast isolates were accurately identified, respectively. Several isolates were misidentified at the genus level by VITEK MS. By the oligonucleotide array, only two C. nivariensis isolates were misidentified as C. glabrata. These results were expected because there was no C. nivariensis-specific probe in the oligonucleotide array. All of the clinical isolates of four common candidemic species, C. albicans, C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis, and C. tropicalis were correctly identified by the oligonucleotide array, suggesting that the array is a potential tool for use in clinical microbiology.
In the present study, C. albicans accounted for less than 50% of candidemic isolates and non-albicans Candida isolates outweighed C. albicans, as noted in previous reports (Puig-Asensio et al., 2014; Hii et al., 2015). Since non-albicans Candida species are less susceptible to azoles (Huang et al., 2014), echinocandin therapy is preferred due to the documented therapeutic efficacy (Pappas et al., 2016). However, increasing use of echinocandins has undoubtedly provoked the emergence of echinocandin resistance (Arendrup and Perlin, 2014). Therefore, species identification is essential for the management for candidemia. MALDI-TOF MS was shown to be able to accurately identify more than 95% of yeast isolates in earlier reports (Sendid et al., 2013; Westblade et al., 2013; Hamprecht et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2016), and we found that 3.1% of yeast isolates were misidentified or could not be identified to the genus level. Jamal et al. (2014) reported that the accurate identification rates of two MALDI-TOF MS systems, VITEK MS and Bruker Biotyper MS, were 93.0% (175/188) and 92.6% (174/188), respectively (Jamal et al., 2014), highlighting the need for a performance improvement of the MALDI-TOF MS system.
Though the VITEK 2 system is popularly used in clinical microbiology laboratories, its performance is not optimal (Kim et al., 2014; Karabıçak et al., 2015; Posteraro et al., 2015). Candida auris, an emerging multidrug resistant pathogen causing healthcare-associated infections (Schelenz et al., 2016), was misidentified as C. haemulonii by the VITEK 2 system (Kathuria et al., 2015). Additionally, L. elongisporus, reported to cause bloodstream infections and infective endocarditis (Lockhart et al., 2008; Daveson and Woods, 2012), was misidentified as C. parapsilosis in this study, which may mislead the clinical judgment of physicians. Though MALDI-TOF MS was recently introduced in clinical practice, the accuracy of yeast identification by MALDI-TOF MS varies from 84 to 99% (Stevenson et al., 2010; Mancini et al., 2013), depending on the system and species tested. These findings imply the need for an alternative identification method in microbiology laboratories, in addition to traditional biochemical methods and MALDI-TOF MS. With a high accuracy rate in species identification and low cost (6.62 US dollars every assay), the oligonucleotide array may serve as an alternative yeast identification tool.
There were several limitations of this study. First, the yeast isolates were collected from a single medical center, and therefore, the results may not be generalized to other areas. However, these isolates were collected on a daily basis, which reflects real world practice. The hundreds of Candida isolates in this study may still provide useful information for reference. Second, there are at least two commercial MALDI-TOF MS systems, and we only compared the VITEK MS system with the oligonucleotide array. These results may not apply to the MALDI Biotyper CA System, though with respect to yeast identification, the diagnostic performance of Biotyper MS has been found to be comparable to (Hamprecht et al., 2014; Jamal et al., 2014) or slightly better than (Mancini et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2016) VITEK MS. In addition, the database of VITEK MS that we used in this study was IVD, not the VITEK MS database for research only (RUO). According to previous studies, there were some discrepant identification results between these two databases (Chao et al., 2014; Grenfell et al., 2016). Third, the identification results of several isolates were “bad spectrum during acquisition,” even after repeated testing by VITEK MS. Our initial extraction method recommended by the manufacturer for the VITEK MS IVD database used formic acid. This method was also used in several reports studying the performance of VITEK MS (Iriart et al., 2012; Won et al., 2013; Chao et al., 2014; Wang et al., 2016). For these isolates with the result of “bad spectrum,” extraction protocol with 70% ethanol and 70% formic acid may be required if on-target lysis is unsuccessful. Additionally, some Candida species were not included in the VITEK MS database, resulting in underestimating the performance of VITEK MS. With the information of uncommon clinical Candida species, the updated version of VITEK MS may improve its identification accuracy. Finally, the numbers of less common Candida species in this study were limited, and further studies with more isolates would be warranted.
The performance of the oligonucleotide array for the identification of yeasts is comparable to that of the VITEK MS, especially for common Candida species in clinical practice. The reliability makes the array a promising supplemental tool for species identification of yeast isolates in blood.
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of National Cheng Kung University Hospital (B-ER-103-111).
M-CL, TC, and W-CK designed the study. H-MC, C-JW, S-LS, and SL performed the experiments and interpreted the data. P-LC, N-YL, C-CL, C-WL, and L-SS helped with acquisition and data analysis. H-MC and TC: contributed critical reagents and analysis tools. M-CL and W-CK wrote and revised the manuscript. M-CL, TC, H-MC, C-JW, S-LS, SL, P-LC, N-YL, C-CL, C-WL, L-SS, and W-CK: agree to all of the aspects of the work and approved of the final work.
This study was supported by the research fund of the Ministry of Health and Welfare of Taiwan (MOHW105-TDU-B-211-133016 and MOHW106-TDU-B-211-113003).
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Buchan, B. W., and Ledeboer, N. A. (2013). Advances in identification of clinical yeast isolates by use of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry. J. Clin. Microbiol. 51, 1359–1366. doi: 10.1128/JCM.03105-12
Chao, Q. T., Lee, T. F., Teng, S. H., Peng, L. Y., Chen, P. H., Teng, L. J., et al. (2014). Comparison of the accuracy of two conventional phenotypic methods and two MALDI-TOF MS systems with that of DNA sequencing analysis for correctly identifying clinically encountered yeasts. PLOS ONE 9:e109376. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0109376
Daveson, K. L., and Woods, M. L. (2012). Lodderomyces elongisporus endocarditis in an intravenous drug user: a new entity in fungal endocarditis. J. Med. Microbiol. 61(Pt 9), 1338–1340. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.047548-0
Dhiman, N., Hall, L., Wohlfiel, S. L., Buckwalter, S. P., and Wengenack, N. L. (2011). Performance and cost analysis of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry for routine identification of yeast. J. Clin. Microbiol. 49, 1614–1616. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02381-10
Garey, K. W., Rege, M., Pai, M. P., Mingo, D. E., Suda, K. J., Turpin, R. S., et al. (2006). Time to initiation of fluconazole therapy impacts mortality in patients with candidemia: a multi-institutional study. Clin. Infect. Dis. 43, 25–31. doi: 10.1086/504810
Grenfell, R. C., da Silva, A. R. Jr., Del Negro, G. M., Munhoz, R. B., Gimenes, V. M., Assis, D. M., et al. (2016). Identification of Candida haemulonii complex species: use of ClinProToolsTM to overcome limitations of the Bruker BiotyperTM, VITEK MSTM IVD, and VITEK MSTM RUO databases. Front. Microbiol. 7:940. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00940
Hajjeh, R. A., Sofair, A. N., Harrison, L. H., Lyon, G. M., Arthington-Skaggs, B. A., Mirza, S. A., et al. (2004). Incidence of bloodstream infections due to Candida species and in vitro susceptibilities of isolates collected from 1998 to 2000 in a population-based active surveillance program. J. Clin. Microbiol. 42, 1519–1527. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.4.1519-1527.2004
Hamprecht, A., Christ, S., Oestreicher, T., Plum, G., Kempf, V. A., and Göttig, S. (2014). Performance of two MALDI-TOF MS systems for the identification of yeasts isolated from bloodstream infections and cerebrospinal fluids using a time-saving direct transfer protocol. Med. Microbiol. Immunol. 203, 93–99. doi: 10.1007/s00430-013-0319-9
Hassan, I., Powell, G., Sidhu, M., Hart, W. M., and Denning, D. W. (2009). Excess mortality, length of stay and cost attributable to candidaemia. J. Infect. 59, 360–365. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2009.08.020
Hii, I. M., Chang, H. L., Lin, L. C., Lee, Y. L., Liu, Y. M., Liu, C. E., et al. (2015). Changing epidemiology of candidemia in a medical center in middle Taiwan. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 48, 306–315. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2013.08.017
Hsiao, C. R., Huang, L., Bouchara, J. P., Barton, R., Li, H. C., and Chang, T. C. (2005). Identification of medically important molds by an oligonucleotide array. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43, 3760–3768. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.8.3760-3768.2005
Hsiue, H. C., Huang, Y. T., Kuo, Y. L., Liao, C. H., Chang, T. C., and Hsueh, P. R. (2010). Rapid identification of fungal pathogens in positive blood cultures using oligonucleotide array hybridization. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 16, 493–500. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.02828.x
Huang, Y. T., Liu, C. Y., Liao, C. H., Chung, K. P., Sheng, W. H., and Hsueh, P. R. (2014). Antifungal susceptibilities of Candida isolates causing bloodstream infections at a medical center in Taiwan, 2009–2010. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 58, 3814–3819. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01035-13
Iriart, X., Lavergne, R. A., Fillaux, J., Valentin, A., Magnaval, J. F., Berry, A., et al. (2012). Routine identification of medical fungi by the new Vitek MS matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight system with a new time-effective strategy. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50, 2107–2110. doi: 10.1128/JCM.06713-11
Jamal, W. Y., Ahmad, S., Khan, Z. U., and Rotimi, V. O. (2014). Comparative evaluation of two matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) systems for the identification of clinically significant yeasts. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 26, 167–170. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2014.05.031
Karabıçak, N., Uludağ, A. H., Karatuna, O., Hazırolan, G., Aksu, N., Adiloğlu, A., et al. (2015). Evaluation of common commercial systems for the identification of yeast isolates in microbiology laboratories: a multicenter study. Mikrobiyol. Bul. 49, 210–220. doi: 10.5578/mb.9370
Kathuria, S., Singh, P. K., Sharma, C., Prakash, A., Masih, A., Kumar, A., et al. (2015). Multidrug-resistant Candida auris misidentified as Candida haemulonii: characterization by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry and DNA sequencing and its antifungal susceptibility profile variability by Vitek2, CLSI broth microdilution, and Etest method. J. Clin. Microbiol. 53, 1823–1830. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00367-15
Kim, S. H., Shin, J. H., Mok, J. H., Kim, S. Y., Song, S. A., Kim, H. R., et al. (2014). Misidentification of Candida guilliermondii as C. famata among strains isolated from blood cultures by the VITEK 2 system. Biomed. Res. Int. 2014:205408. doi: 10.1155/2014/250408
Kuo, M. T., Chang, H. C., Cheng, C. K., Chien, C. C., Fang, P. C., and Chang, T. C. (2012). A highly sensitive method for molecular diagnosis of fungal keratitis: a dot hybridization assay. Ophthalmology 119, 2434–2442. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.06.049
Kurtzman, C. P., and Robnett, C. J. (1997). Identification of clinically important ascomycetous yeasts based on nucleotide divergence in the 5′ end of the large-subunit (26S) ribosomal DNA gene. J. Clin. Microbiol. 35, 1216–1223.
Leaw, S. N., Chang, H. C., Barton, R., Bouchara, J. P., and Chang, T. C. (2007). Identification of medically important Candida and non-Candida yeast species by an oligonucleotide array. J. Clin. Microbiol. 45, 2220–2229. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00543-07
Li, M. C., Chang, T. C., Wu, C. J., Luo, C. Y., and Ko, W. C. (2016). Diagnostic role of an oligonucleotide array in a heart transplantation patient with invasive pulmonary aspergillosis. J. Microbiol. Immunol. Infect. 49, 817–818. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2015.05.025
Lockhart, S. R., Messer, S. A., Pfaller, M. A., and Diekema, D. J. (2008). Lodderomyces elongisporus masquerading as Candida parapsilosis as a cause of bloodstream infections. J. Clin. Microbiol. 46, 374–376. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01790-07
Mancini, N., De Carolis, E., Infurnari, L., Vella, A., Clementi, N., Vaccaro, L., et al. (2013). Comparative evaluation of the Bruker Biotyper and Vitek MS matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass spectrometry systems for identification of yeasts of medical importance. J. Clin. Microbiol. 51, 2453–2457. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00841-13
Marklein, G., Josten, M., Klanke, U., Müller, E., Horré, R., Maier, T., et al. (2009). Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry for fast and reliable identification of clinical yeast isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 47, 2912–2917. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00389-09
Pappas, P. G., Kauffman, C. A., Andes, D. R., Clancy, C. J., Marr, K. A., Ostrosky-Zeichner, L., et al. (2016). Clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis: 2016 update by the infectious diseases society of America. Clin. Infect. Dis. 62, e1–e50. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ1194
Posteraro, B., Efremov, L., Leoncini, E., Amore, R., Posteraro, P., Ricciardi, W., et al. (2015). Are the conventional commercial yeast identification methods still helpful in the era of new clinical microbiology diagnostics? A meta-analysis of their accuracy. J. Clin. Microbiol. 53, 2439–2450. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00802-15
Puig-Asensio, M., Padilla, B., Garnacho-Montero, J., Zaragoza, O., Aguado, J. M., Zaragoza, R., et al. (2014). Epidemiology and predictive factors for early and late mortality in Candida bloodstream infections: a population-based surveillance in Spain. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 20, O245–O254. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12380
Schelenz, S., Hagen, F., Rhodes, J. L., Abdolrasouli, A., Chowdhary, A., Hall, A., et al. (2016). First hospital outbreak of the globally emerging Candida auris in a European hospital. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control. 5:35. doi: 10.1186/s13756-016-0132-5
Sendid, B., Ducoroy, P., François, N., Lucchi, G., Spinali, S., Vagner, O., et al. (2013). Evaluation of MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for the identification of medically-important yeasts in the clinical laboratories of Dijon and Lille hospitals. Med. Mycol. 51, 25–32. doi: 10.3109/13693786.2012.693631
Stevenson, L. G., Drake, S. K., Shea, Y. R., Zelazny, A. M., and Murray, P. R. (2010). Evaluation of matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry for identification of clinically important yeast species. J. Clin. Microbiol. 48, 3482–3486. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00687-09
Tan, K. E., Ellis, B. C., Lee, R., Stamper, P. D., Zhang, S. X., and Carroll, K. C. (2012). Prospective evaluation of a matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry system in a hospital clinical microbiology laboratory for identification of bacteria and yeasts: a bench-by-bench study for assessing the impact on time to identification and cost-effectiveness. J. Clin. Microbiol. 50, 3301–3308. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01405-12
Wang, H., Fan, Y. Y., Kudinha, T., Xu, Z. P., Xiao, M., Zhang, L., et al. (2016). A comprehensive evaluation of the Bruker Biotyper MS and Vitek MS matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry systems for identification of yeasts, part of the national China hospital invasive fungal surveillance net (CHIF-NET) study, 2012 to 2013. J. Clin. Microbiol. 54, 1376–1380. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00162-16
Westblade, L. F., Jennemann, R., Branda, J. A., Bythrow, M., Ferraro, M. J., Garner, O. B., et al. (2013). Multicenter study evaluating the Vitek MS system for identification of medically important yeasts. J. Clin. Microbiol. 51, 2267–2272. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00680-13
White, T. J., Bruns, T., Lee, S., and Taylor, J. (1990). “Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics,” in PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications, eds M. A. Innis, D. H. Gefland, J. J. Sninsky, and T. J. White (San Diego, CA: Academic Press), 315–322.
Won, E. J., Shin, J. H., Lee, K., Kim, M. N., Lee, H. S., Park, Y. J., et al. (2013). Accuracy of species-level identification of yeast isolates from blood cultures from 10 university hospitals in South Korea by use of the matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry-based Vitek MS system. J. Clin. Microbiol. 51, 3063–3065. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00945-13
Keywords: oligonucleotide array, MALDI-TOF, vitek ms, candidemia, Candida, yeast
Citation: Li M-C, Chang TC, Chen H-M, Wu C-J, Su S-L, Lee SS-J, Chen P-L, Lee N -Y, Lee C-C, Li C-W, Syue L-S and Ko W-C (2018) Oligonucleotide Array and VITEK Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry in Species Identification of Blood Yeast Isolates. Front. Microbiol. 9:51. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00051
Received: 18 August 2017; Accepted: 10 January 2018;
Published: 26 January 2018.
Edited by:Lorenza Putignani, Bambino Gesù Ospedale Pediatrico (IRCCS), Italy
Reviewed by:João Nobrega De Almeida Júnior, Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo, Brazil
Macit Ilkit, Çukurova University, Turkey
Copyright © 2018 Li, Chang, Chen, Wu, Su, Lee, Chen, Lee, Lee, Li, Syue and Ko. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Wen-Chien Ko, firstname.lastname@example.org