Contribution of gut microbiota in determining human diseases
With the development of next generation sequencing (NGS) technology, the role of gut microbiota in human health has been extensively studied. Metagenome sequencing analysis, which is based on NGS, and subsequent statistical analysis showed that the relationship between gut microbiota and humans is not merely commensal but rather a mutualistic relationship (Chen et al., 2013; Jandhyala et al., 2015). Recent advances in the field of gut microbiota are elucidating our understanding of human biology.
The microbiota of the human gut is a massive and complex microbial community consisting of 100 trillion microbes in the intestine. The gut microbiota is essential to the health and well-being of the host (Marchesi et al., 2016). Although interactions between gut microbiota and its host have negative effects in some cases, these interactions positively affect the host in most cases. It is now clear that the gut microbiota contributes significantly to the traits of humans as much as our genes, especially in the case of atherosclerosis, hypertension, obesity, diabetes, metabolic syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), gastrointestinal tract malignancies, hepatic encephalopathy, allergies, behavior, intelligence, autism, neurological diseases, and psychological diseases (Chen et al., 2013; Nguyen et al., 2017; Zhang et al., 2017; Table 1). It has also been found that alteration of the composition of the gut microbiota in its host affects the behavior, intelligence, mood, autism, psychology, and migraines of its host through the gut-brain axis (Chen et al., 2013). Thus, the effect of the gut microbiota on human phenotypes has become a booming area of research and presents a new paradigm of opportunities for medical and food applications.
Table 1
| Disease/ disorder | Implicated microbiota | Potential role of the microbiome |
|---|---|---|
| METABOLIC DISEASES | ||
| Obesity | Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio Prevotellaceae Eubacterium Faecalibacterium Roseburia | Significant changes in gut microbiota are associated with increased obesity |
| Type II diabetes | Bacteroidetes/Firmicutes Bacteroides-Prevotella Eggerthella lenta Clostridia Eubacterium rectale Faecalibacterium prausnitzii Roseburia intestinalis Roseburia inulinivorans | Shifts in gut microbiota are associated with increases in plasma glucose concentrations |
| Hypertension | Prevotella Klebsiella Bifidobacterium Butyrivibrio Coprococcus Faecalibacterium Roseburia | Gut dysbiosis increases hypertension |
| IMMUNE DISEASES | ||
| IBD | Bacteroidetes Lachnospiraceae Actinobacteria Proteobacteria Clostridium leptum Clostridium coccoides Faecalibacterium prausnitzii Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio Bifidobacteria | Immune response to the gut microbial community Composition of the gut microbiota contributes to inflammation |
| Allergies | Lactobacillus spp. Bifidobacterium adolescentis Clostridium difficile | Early colonization with Lactobacillus is associated with decreased allergies Early colonization with more diverse microbiota might prevent allergies |
| Celiac disease | Bacteroides vulgatus Escherichia coli Clostridium coccoides | High diversity in Celiac disease patients vs. control |
| Type I diabetes | Bacteroides Streptococci Clostridium cluster IV and XIVa | Interaction between the gut community and the innate immune system may be a predisposing factor for diabetes |
| Rheumatoid arthritis | Bifidobacteria Bacteroides Porphyromonas Prevotella Bacteroides fragilis Eubacterium rectale Clostridium coccoides | Treg-promoting organisms depleted; overgrowth of bacteria that induce Th17 cell populations, leading to inflammation Intestinal microbes associated with etiology |
| Atopy and asthma | Bifidobacteria Bacteroides Staphylococcus spp. Streptococcus spp. Enterobacteria Clostridium difficile | Pre- and post-natal microbial exposure appear key to appropriate immune development Mode of delivery and nutrient uptake are important factors for GI community development and protection against subsequent atopic disease development |
| AUTISM | ||
| Autism | Clostridial species | Increased bacterial diversity in the feces of autistic children compared to control |
| PSYCHOLOGICAL DISEASE | ||
| Anxiety and depression | Lactobacillus reuteri Lactobacillus rhamnosus Bifidobacterium infantis | Decreased anxiety and stress-induced increase of corticosterone |
Effect of the gut microbiota on human diseases.
The gut microbiota of humans fluctuates in response to nutritional uptake rather than remaining stably immutable throughout life
Recent studies have elucidated that the gut microbiota plays essential roles in the health and well-being of its host, and whether the composition of the gut microbiota fluctuates or stays constant throughout the lifetime of its host has become one of the main questions to ponder in the scientific community. The prevailing opinion has been that the gut microbiota develops rapidly right after birth and fluctuates only until it matures, which usually takes ~2 years after birth (Koenig et al., 2011). Once the gut microbiota is established, its composition remains stably immutable throughout life. However, recent evidence shows that this opinion is wrong, and the composition of gut microbiota can fluctuate during the lifetime of its host (Wu et al., 2011; David et al., 2014).
It is observed that the growth of almost all microbial organisms is very sensitive to their ambient nutrients. Additionally, considering the diversity and number of microbes in the gut microbiota, it would be more reasonable to speculate that the composition of the gut microbiota could constantly fluctuate, reflecting the diet of its host. Wu et al. recently showed that the long-term consumption of different diets, such as plant-based diets or animal-based diets, drastically altered the composition of gut microbiota, even at the phylum level in the taxonomic hierarchy (Wu et al., 2011). Vegetarian diets consist of fibers containing resistant starch and non-starch polysaccharides. Interestingly, numerous studies have shown that vegetarian diets increased the abundance of carbohydrate-degrading microbes, such as Prevotella, Roseburia, Eubacterium rectale, and Ruminococcus bromii, in their gut microbiota (Wu et al., 2011; David et al., 2014). In contrast, western diets high in protein and fat, which promote chylomicron and bile acids, increase the abundance of bile acid-tolerant microbes, such as Alistipes, Bilophila, and Bacteroides, in their gut microbiota (David et al., 2014). A defined food consumption experiment by David et al. even showed that the composition of gut microbiota is promptly affected by the dietary fluctuations within a day. Even cyclical shifts in daily feeding or fasting affected the increase of specific genera in the gut microbiota (David et al., 2014). These studies clearly show that the composition of the human gut microbiota constantly fluctuates in response to the nutritional composition of the diet rather than remaining stably immutable throughout life.
Nutrients affect the composition of the gut microbiota, and both modified gut microbiota and nutrients affect human traits together
Nutrients are dietary components that an organism metabolizes for survival and growth. Nutrients are substances that provide energy and/or form a component of body tissues. Higher organisms, such as humans, intake nutrients in their diets to maintain the precisely functioning metabolic machinery affecting the health and well-being of the organism. Because nutrients are essential substances for sustaining life, there is much less genetic variation in the genes involved in processing nutrients compared to other genes in humans (Fraser, 2015). Considering that nutrients absorbed by an organism are precisely processed by the well-orchestrated metabolic machinery in the bodies of organisms, diets have a limited ability in terms of affecting the traits of human. However, epidemiological research has proven that diet significantly affects human traits (Sharief et al., 2011; Boada et al., 2016). The quantity of calories and dietary patterns are key determinants of the anthropometric quantitative traits, which are especially reflected in the positive height trend in the developed countries (Jelenkovic et al., 2016). In the context of the nature of nutrients, an association between anthropometric quantitative traits and nutrients is expected. Interestingly, the effect of nutrients on human traits is not limited to anthropometric quantitative traits. Studies on monozygotic twins show that nutrients strongly affect various metabolic diseases and immune diseases (Rissanen et al., 2002; Spehlmann et al., 2012). Epidemiological research has shown that nutrients are considered a fundamental factor along with genetics in the development and/or prevention of rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, asthma, and allergies (Sharief et al., 2011; Thorburn et al., 2014). In addition, numerous studies have proven an association between cancer and nutrients (Boada et al., 2016). Because of the clear association between cancer and nutrients, the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) even declared that hydrogenated oils, potato chips, processed meats, red meats, farmed salmon, and refined sugar are associated with various cancers. These results definitely indicate that human traits are also strongly shaped by nutrients. In this sense, the opinion of “we are what we eat” by the general public would be scientifically wise. Despite the expectation that nutrients only slightly affect human traits, it is surprising to observe that nutrients seem to affect human traits as much as our own genes, which suggests that there might be a strong link between nutrients and human traits.
Recent scientific evidence regarding the gut microbiota makes it possible to explain the link between nutrients and human traits. The gut microbiota not only directly interacts with the somatic cells of its host to affect the traits of human, as in the case of training immunological networks, but also generates various chemicals, which can directly modify the biochemical pathways of humans. The composition of the gut microbiota fluctuates based on the nutrient uptake of its host, and the composition of the gut microbiota affects various human traits as much as our genes (Figure 1). Therefore, it is reasonable to speculate that the effect of nutrients on human traits would be the combined results from both the gut microbiota modified by the nutrient uptake and the nutrients themselves. We believe that the gut microbiota is the missing link between nutrients and modifications of human traits.
Figure 1
The schematic diagram on how nutrients affect the human traits through gut microbiota.
Statements
Author contributions
S-TH conceived the idea and designed the structure of the manuscript. H-JC, TN, and S-TH drafted the manuscript, table and figure. All authors have critically read, corrected, and approved the final version of the manuscript and agree with the opinions expressed here.
Funding
This research was financially supported by the Global accompanied growth R&BD program (N042600010) through the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy (MOTIE, Korea).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
Boada L. D. Henríquez-Hernández L. A. Luzardo O. P. (2016). The impact of red and processed meat consumption on cancer and other health outcomes: epidemiological evidences. Food Chem. Toxicol.92, 236–244. 10.1016/j.fct.2016.04.008
2
Chen X. D'Souza R. Hong S. T. (2013). The role of gut microbiota in the gut-brain axis: current challenges and perspectives. Protein Cell4, 403–414. 10.1007/s13238-013-3017-x
3
David L. A. Maurice C. F. Carmody R. N. Gootenberg D. B. Button J. E. Wolfe B. E. et al . (2014). Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature505, 559–563. 10.1038/nature12820
4
Fraser A. (2015). Essential human genes. Cell Syst.1, 381–382. 10.1016/j.cels.2015.12.007
5
Jandhyala S. M. Talukdar R. Subramanyam C. Vuyyuru H. Sasikala M. Nageshwar Reddy D. (2015). Role of the normal gut microbiota. World J. Gastroenterol.21, 8787–8803. 10.3748/wjg.v21.i29.8787
6
Jelenkovic A. Sund R. Hur Y. M. Yokoyama Y. Hjelmborg J. M. Möller S. et al . (2016). Genetic and environmental influences on height from infancy to early adulthood: an individual-based pooled analysis of 45 twin cohorts. Sci. Rep. 6:28496. 10.1038/srep28496
7
Koenig J. E. Spora A. Scalfonea N. Frickera A. D. Stombaughb J. Knight R. et al . (2011). Succession of microbial consortia in the developing infant gut microbiome. Pro. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.108, 4578–4585. 10.1073/pnas.1000081107
8
Marchesi J. R. Adams D. H. Fava F. Hermes G. D. Hirschfield G. M. Hold G. et al . (2016). The gut microbiota and host health: a new clinical frontier. Gut65, 330–339. 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309990
9
Nguyen T. T. B. Jin Y. Y. Chung H. J. Hong S. T. (2017). Pharmabiotics as an emerging medication for metabolic syndrome and its related diseases. Molecules22:1795. 10.3390/molecules22101795
10
Rissanen A. Hakala P. Lissner L. Mattlar C. E. Koskenvuo M. Rönnemaa T. (2002). Acquired preference especially for dietary fat and obesity: a study of weight-discordant monozygotic twin pairs. Int. J. Obes.26, 973–977. 10.1038/sj.ijo.0802014
11
Sharief S. Jariwala S. Kumar J. Muntner P. Melamed M. L. (2011). Vitamin D levels and food and environmental allergies in the United States: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2006. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol.127, 1195–1202. 10.1016/j.jaci.2011.01.017
12
Spehlmann M. E. Begun A. Z. Saroglou E. Hinrichs F. Tiemann U. Raedler A. et al . (2012). Risk factors in German twins with inflammatory bowel disease: results of a questionnaire-based survey. J. Crohns. Colitis6, 29–42. 10.1016/j.crohns.2011.06.007
13
Thorburn A. N. Macia L. Mackay C. R. (2014). Diet, metabolites, and “western-lifestyle” inflammatory diseases. Immunity40, 833–842. 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.05.014
14
Wu G. D. Chen J. Hoffmann C. Bittinger K. Chen Y. Y. Keilbaugh S. A. et al . (2011). Linking long-term dietary patterns with gut microbial enterotypes. Science334, 105–108. 10.1126/science.1208344
15
Zhang M. Sun K. Wu Y. Yang Y. Tso P. Wu Z. (2017). Interactions between intestinal microbiota and host immune response in inflammatory bowel disease. Front. Immunol.8:942. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00942
Summary
Keywords
gut microbiota, nutrients, human traits, diet, disease
Citation
Chung H-J, Nguyen TTB, Kim H-J and Hong S-T (2018) Gut Microbiota as a Missing Link Between Nutrients and Traits of Human. Front. Microbiol. 9:1510. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01510
Received
01 December 2017
Accepted
18 June 2018
Published
06 July 2018
Volume
9 - 2018
Edited by
Zhaoping Li, Ronald Reagan UCLA Medical Center, United States
Reviewed by
Daniela Fiocco, University of Foggia, Italy; Pasquale Russo, University of Foggia, Italy
Updates
Copyright
© 2018 Chung, Nguyen, Kim and Hong.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Seong-Tshool Hong seonghong@chonbuk.ac.kr
This article was submitted to Food Microbiology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.