Abstract
Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) is an emerging problem in many parts of the world. Although animal-adapted LA-MRSA has been known for many years, recent reports suggest a possible increasing trend in the zoonotic transmission of LA-MRSA in Europe. Since its emergence in the early 2000’s, several investigations have indicated that persons in prolonged, repeated contact with affected livestock are at a higher risk of becoming colonized with LA-MRSA. LA-MRSA monitoring in livestock is voluntary under current EU legislation, and not all member states, including the UK, participate. UK LA-MRSA isolates have been detected through scanning surveillance, where samples are submitted from clinically diseased livestock for diagnostic investigation, and research studies. Surveys conducted on retail beef, pig and poultry meat on sale in the UK have also detected LA-MRSA. Taken together these results suggest that LA-MRSA is present in the UK, possibly at low prevalence level, as suggested by available evidence. In this review, we examine the data available from UK livestock and animal products, and make recommendations for future. We also review the findings from whole genome sequencing (WGS) of the possible lineage of some UK livestock isolates.
Introduction
Livestock associated MRSA (LA-MRSA) was first described in 2005 (Voss et al., 2005) where a new clone of MRSA of sequence type (ST) 398 was identified and grouped within clonal complex (CC) 3981. The LA-MRSA CC398 lineage, which apparently emerged in European pigs between 2003 and 2005, has since detected in other animal species in many European countries and also in North America, where it can colonize the animal but only rarely cause infections (Voss et al., 2005; Khanna et al., 2008; Smith et al., 2009, 2013; Goerge et al., 2017). Asymptomatic colonization is common although it can cause a variety of human and animal infections including fatal courses, as described for S. aureus and MRSA where heavily colonized carriers are more likely to be infected than transient or intermittent carriers (Bradley, 2007; Cuny et al., 2015). However, the human disease burden of LA-MRSA is lower compared to other MRSA lineages possibly because patients affected by MRSA CC398 generally show different demographics in that they are younger, or stay for a shorter time in hospital, and the clinical characteristics are usually less severe or complicated (Becker et al., 2017); but LA-MRSA CC398 is thought not to be inherently less pathogenic for humans than S. aureus (Cuny et al., 2013). In fact, LA-MRSA is an emerging category of S. aureus throughout the world (Smith, 2015).
Several studies have speculated that CC398 MSSA originated in humans but lost human associated factors such as Panton-Valentine Leukocidin (PVL)-associated phages, toxic shock syndrome toxin I and exfoliative toxins, which are markers of community associated (CA)-MRSA and hospital associated (HA)-MRSA strains (Kadlec et al., 2012; Mohamed et al., 2012; Ballhausen et al., 2017), and acquired antibiotic resistance genes such as mecA and tetM as they adapted to livestock (Fitzgerald, 2012a, b; Price et al., 2012). Furthermore, several investigations have shown that persons in contact with livestock may be at increased risk of becoming colonized with LA-MRSA. LA-MRSA CC398 colonization has been detected in 24–86% of pig-, 31–37% of cattle-, and 9–37% of poultry-farmers, as well as 44–45% of pig-care veterinarians in European countries (Goerge et al., 2017). Nevertheless, colonization is thought to be dependent on frequency and intensity of animal contact and the duration of exposure, as livestock are thought to be transiently rather than permanently colonized (Bangerter et al., 2016) Also, human contamination of carcasses or meat product at abattoir or meat processing plants may occur and be a source of MRSA, which are not livestock associated (Hadjirin et al., 2015).
Although CC398 is the main lineage associated with MRSA isolated from livestock other clonal complexes, and sequence types (STs) which are not within CC398, have also been associated with livestock and animal products, both in the UK and elsewhere. In this review we focus on the findings from UK livestock and animal products.
LA-MRSA in the United Kingdom
During the last decade, LA-MRSA (mainly MRSA CC398), has become increasingly common among pigs in several European countries (Verkade and Kluytmans, 2014); it has also been reported from humans and animal products (European Food Safety Authority, and European Centre for Disease Prevention, and Control, 2015). Surveillance for LA-MRSA in animals and food is voluntary in the European Union, although the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) recommends routine surveillance for LA-MRSA in broiler flocks, fattening pigs and dairy cattle. The recommendation also includes veal calves under 1 year of age and fattening turkey flocks in countries where production exceeds 10 million tonnes slaughtered/year. Prevalence data for LA-MRSA is available from all member states that participate in the routine systematic surveillance in annual reports compiled by EFSA (European Food Safety Authority and European Centre for Disease Prevention, and Control, 2017). However, the production levels in the UK for veal calves are below these thresholds and there is currently no structured surveillance of LA MRSA in UK livestock. Despite increasing reports of LA-MRSA from animals and food sampled in continental Europe, there have been limited reports of its recovery in the UK (Table 1).
TABLE 1
| Type | Clonal information | Species | Studies |
| Farm | ST398 | Pig | Hartley et al., 2014 |
| Farm | ST398 | Pig | Hall et al., 2015 |
| Farm | ST398 | Pig | Sharma et al., 2016 |
| Farm | CC30 | Pig | Lahuerta-Marin et al., 2016 |
| Farm | CC398 | Various | Anonymous, 2017∗ |
| Farm | ST398 | Turkey | GOV. UK, 2013 |
| Farm | CC9/CC398 | Turkey | Sharma et al., 2018 |
| Game Farm | CC9/CC398 | Pheasant | Sharma et al., 2018 |
| Farm | CC398 | Beef cattle calf | Stone, 2017 |
| Meat | CC9, CC22 | Chicken, pork and beef | Dhup et al., 2015 |
| Meat | ST398 | Pork and chicken | Hadjirin et al., 2015 |
| Meat | ST398 | Chicken, turkey and pork | Fox et al., 2017 |
| Milk bulk tank | CC130, CC705, ST425 | Dairy cattle | Garcia-Alvarez et al., 2011 |
| Milk bulk tank | CC398 | Dairy cattle | Paterson et al., 2012 |
| Milk bulk tank | CC130, ST398, ST425 | Dairy cattle | Paterson et al., 2014 |
| Equine hospital | ST398 | Horse | Loeffler et al., 2009 |
| Equine hospital | CC398 | Horse | Bortolami et al., 2017 |
Published reports of LA-MRSA from livestock and animal-derived food products in the United Kingdom.
∗Provides summary of all LA-MRSA isolations from UK government laboratories since February 2013, including some isolates already listed in this table, which have been referenced separately e.g., CC30.
A single structured prevalence study for LA-MRSA in pig herds was performed in the UK in 2008 as part of a wider study to determine the prevalence of positive pig herds in EU Member States (MS). The prevalence in MS ranged from 0 to 46% in breeding herds, and 0 to 51% in production/fattening herds (European Food Safety Authority, 2009). In the UK, a total of 258 pig holdings were tested and none was found positive for LA-MRSA CC398. This yielded 95% confidence intervals of 0.0–3.8% estimated prevalence in UK pig breeding herds and 0.0–1.8% in UK pig production herds (European Food Safety Authority, 2009). Following the 2008 study there have been sporadic reports of LA-MRSA in UK livestock although no further prevalence studies have been carried out. The majority of LA-MRSA detections have been made through scanning surveillance activities. Scanning surveillance comprises the submission of clinical samples from livestock, by veterinarians, to government laboratories, where microbiological and other investigations are performed to identify the possible causative agent. Scanning surveillance and other studies have reported the presence in the UK of LA-MRSA CC398, CC9, CC9/CC398 hybrid, CC22, CC30, CC130, CC705, and ST425 (Table 1). These isolates have been reported from horses (Loeffler et al., 2009; Bortolami et al., 2017), dairy cattle (Garcia-Alvarez et al., 2011; Paterson et al., 2012, 2014) beef cattle (Stone, 2017), poultry and pheasant (GOV. UK, 2013; Stone, 2017; Sharma et al., 2018), pigs (Hartley et al., 2014; Hall et al., 2015; Lahuerta-Marin et al., 2016; Sharma et al., 2016), pork meat (Dhup et al., 2015; Hadjirin et al., 2015; Fox et al., 2017), beef meat (Dhup et al., 2015), chicken and turkey meat (Dhup et al., 2015; Fox et al., 2017).
Government institutes involved in scanning surveillance includes the Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA) in England and Wales, Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute (AFBI; Northern Ireland) and Scotland’s Rural College (SRUC). Generally S. aureus isolated by routine microbiology from diagnostic samples such as mastitis in cattle are tested for penicillin or ampicillin sensitivity by disc diffusion; only some pig and poultry samples are tested. Any penicillin/ampicillin resistant isolate is tested for cefoxitin and oxacillin antibiotic sensitivity for identification of presumptive mecA or mecC harboring MRSA. For any phenotypically positive isolates, a multiplex PCR that can detect mecA, as well as S. aureus species specific genes nuc and 16S rRNA (European Union Reference Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance, 2009) are used. For mecA negative samples a PCR is used for amplification of mecA and mecC, identification of S. aureus by amplification of the spa gene, and detection of the Panton-Valentine Leukocidin (PVL or LukF PV) encoding gene (Stegger et al., 2012). In any mecA or mecC positive sample, spa-typing and WGS is performed (Sharma et al., 2016, 2018). Between 2013 and 2015, nine LA-MRSA were identified after screening more than 1000 S. aureus isolated from diagnostic submissions submitted through scanning surveillance to APHA and AFBI (160); none had been reported from Scotland during this period. A low frequency of detection has continued since 2015. Details of the UK isolates gathered from scanning surveillance and other studies are provided in Table 1. The disease surveillance and microbiological laboratories based in Northern Ireland and Scotland are involved in isolation of LA-MRSA from these countries.
Background of UK LA-MRSA Isolates
Isolation From Scanning Surveillance of Livestock
The first confirmation of CC398 LA-MRSA on a pig farm in the UK was reported in 2014, and the piglet harboring CC398 LA-MRSA was one of a group of five piglets submitted to the Omagh disease surveillance laboratory, AFBI, with a history of pneumonia and wasting (Hartley et al., 2014). Also in 2014, CC398 LA-MRSA was isolated from one 10-day-old piglet with skin lesions submitted to an APHA veterinary investigation center (Hall et al., 2015). CC398 LA-MRSA has been isolated from the caecal content of healthy pigs at abattoir from 2 of 56 pig farms in England that were sampled during 2014–2015, as part of a research project based at APHA (AbuOun et al., 2017). All three APHA isolates belonged to spa-type t011 and showed similar characteristics to other UK and European CC398 LA-MRSA strains by WGS (Sharma et al., 2016). In 2015, three pigs with signs of ill-thrift (low rate of growth) from a farm in Northern Ireland were submitted to the AFBI Veterinary Sciences Division for post-mortem investigation. S. aureus was obtained from different tissues in the three animals and all nine detected S. aureus isolates were identified as CC30 MRSA (Lahuerta-Marin et al., 2016). The APHA also reported detection of LA-MRSA CC398 in 2016 through scanning surveillance from pigs during a non-clinical investigation, and in 2017 from pigs during a clinical investigation (Anonymous, 2017). In addition, CC398 LA-MRSA, isolated from seven clinical investigations in pigs from Northern Ireland, have been reported between 2014 and 2017 (Anonymous, 2017).
The first isolation of CC398 LA-MRSA at farm level was reported in November 2013 in turkeys on a poultry farm (GOV. UK, 2013), where all isolates were shown to belong to spa-type t011 with WGS indicating the same clone to be disseminated across the farm (Sharma et al., 2016). LA-MRSA CC398 isolates were reported by APHA from UK fattening turkeys in 2016 from England. The turkey was incidentally diagnosed with LA-MRSA CC398 spa-type t899 while under investigation for an unrelated upper respiratory tract infection (Stone, 2017). A CC398 LA-MRSA, also of spa-type t899, isolated from a pheasant during a clinical investigation in Scotland was reported in 2017 (Anonymous, 2017). Both avian isolates were shown by WGS to belong to the CC9/C398 hybrid genotype (Sharma et al., 2018).
Government surveillance reported LA-MRSA CC398 isolates detected by APHA from a spontaneously aborted calf from England/Wales in 2016, and from a single clinical investigation of cattle from Northern Ireland between 2014 and 2017 (Anonymous, 2017; Stone, 2017).
Isolation From Retail Meat
Three point-prevalence surveys were conducted on meat products by Dhup in 2011, and Hadjin and Fox in 2015, at UK retail outlets; all three studies examined pork meat. CC398 LA-MRSA was identified in 3 of 52 (5.8%) (Hadjirin et al., 2015) and 3 of 63 (4.7%) pork products (Fox et al., 2017) on sale in 2015, while CC9 LA-MRSA was identified in 1 of 30 (3.3%) pork products on sale in 2011 (Dhup et al., 2015). It is noteworthy that only one of the three products from the Fox et al. study (Fox et al., 2017) was specified as UK origin.
Although LA-MRSA has not been detected directly on UK broiler farms, two out of three studies that examined chicken meat at retail isolated LA-MRSA. In 2011, CC22 a common HA-MRSA, was reported from 2 of 30 samples (6.7%) suggesting contamination from human sources; while one CC9 isolate (3.3%) that lacked the immune evasion cluster characteristic of LA-MRSA, was detected (Dhup et al., 2015). CC398 LA-MRSA was also reported in four of 50 (8.0%) chicken meat samples and two of 11 (18.2%) turkey meat samples in 2015; although these samples were bought from retail meat outlets in North West England only three were from UK, two were from continental Europe, the origin of one was not specified (Fox et al., 2017).
In beef, CC22 MRSA was identified in 2011 from 1 of 30 meat samples (3.3%), suggesting contamination from human source during processing (Dhup et al., 2015).
When results from the 2011 retail study by Dhup et al. (2015) was compared with that from 2015 by Fox et al. (2017), which was performed in the same geographic region, it indicated a possible increase in prevalence of LA-MRSA in the UK. The authors suggested this could be due to the fact that 60% of meat consumed in the UK is imported from European countries where CC398 contamination has been reported in up to 60% of samples (Fessler et al., 2011; European Food Safety Authority, and European Centre for Disease Prevention, and Control, 2015; Dhup et al., 2015).
Isolation From Milk
In bulk milk from dairy cattle, the first isolation of CC398 LA-MRSA was reported in 2012 (Paterson et al., 2012). A survey of 1500 bulk tank milk (BTM) samples from about 1500 farms was undertaken to determine the prevalence of both mecA and mecC MRSA. Seven mecA CC398 isolates were identified, including three from the same farm. A total of five geographically dispersed farms in the UK were positive for LA-MRSA CC398 (Shore et al., 2012). Following the detection and reporting of mecC MRSA from dairy cattle in England (Garcia-Alvarez et al., 2011), the same authors conducted a study to determine the occurrence of mecC MRSA in bovine bulk milk in Great Britain. A total of 1090 dairy farms were evaluated for the presence of mecC MRSA in BTM samples (Paterson et al., 2014). mecC MRSA was identified in 10 of 465 dairy farms (2.15%, [95% CI 1.17–3.91]) from England and Wales but not from 625 farms sampled from Scotland. However, only one CC398 LA-MRSA was identified (0.06%) from a farm in England. Three of the ten mecC MRSA isolates were CC130 and seven were ST425 (Paterson et al., 2014).
Isolation From Horses
In 2009, CC398 LA-MRSA was reported from two horses (one with a history of travel outside UK) detected in a screening study at an equine hospital performed by the Royal Veterinary College (Loeffler et al., 2009). This was the first isolation of CC398 LA-MRSA reported from UK animals. Further analysis of these two isolates by WGS indicated that they resembled other spa type 11 strains, clustering closely to another horse isolate from Belgium (Sharma et al., 2016). In a study from University of Liverpool, presence of LA-MRSA CC398 isolates, predominantly of spa-type 11 was reported from surveillance at an UK Equine Veterinary Hospital from 2011 to 2016; 65 of the 829 samples collected from environmental sites, surgical site implants and hand-plates were CC398 (Bortolami et al., 2017).
Whole Genome Sequencing of UK Livestock Isolates
MRSA lineages can be identified with molecular tests such as pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), Staphylococcus protein A or spa typing or multiple locus variable number tandem repeat analysis (MLVA), multilocus sequence typing (MLST), and Staphylococcal cassette chromosome (SCCmec) typing. DNA microarrays, which have been used for determining virulence or antimicrobial gene presence in diverse bacteria (Hopkins et al., 2007; Carter et al., 2008; Wragg et al., 2009), have also been applied to MRSA, as have WGS (Schouls et al., 2009; Monecke et al., 2011; Piccinini et al., 2012; Shore et al., 2012; Sharma et al., 2016; Sabat et al., 2017). The latter has been particularly useful and is increasingly being used instead of PFGE for purposes such as tracing outbreaks, as well as identifying the most likely source of acquisition, which is an essential component of an effective surveillance system to describe epidemiological trends and infection control strategies (Rebic et al., 2016; Sharma et al., 2016). In addition, although phenotypic methods are easier to perform and interpret, and they are cost effective and widely available, they may be less discriminatory. Genotypic methods, although more expensive and technically demanding, can provide more detailed characterisation of the isolate (Anjum, 2015; Rebic et al., 2016). Specifically, WGS is a more rapid method for identifying genetic determinants such as virulence and AMR genes, as well as studying phylogenetic relationships between groups of isolates based on the core genome of hundreds of genes, rather than DNA microarray. The latter is based on a finite panel of selected genes and it can be time consuming to update with new genes; also it is becoming easier to apply WGS routinely as the associated costs are being reduced and bioinformatic tools are becoming more readily available (Anjum, 2015; Anjum et al., 2017).
Phylogenetic comparison of WGS data derived from a subset of the LA-MRSA CC398 isolates from livestock detected in United Kingdom, with isolates across Europe and North America, has indicated a possible European origin of UK LA-MRSA isolates. All UK isolates included in the phylogenetic comparison belonged to spa-types t011 and t034 (Sharma et al., 2016). Also, these isolates showed a multi-drug resistance genotype i.e., presence of three or more antimicrobial resistance genes including the tetracycline resistance gene, which is often present in LA-MRSA isolated from animals (Sharma et al., 2016). They did not harbor any human associated virulence factors such as the human φSa3 Immune Evasion Cluster (IEC) which contains a number of genes including staphylococcal complement inhibitor, staphylokinase and toxins that promotes survival within the human host (Xu et al., 2014); nor did they harbor the avian prophage carrying the SAAV_2008 and SAAV_2009 genes which have been detected in CC398 isolates from poultry, and produces resistance to killing by avian phagocytes (Argudin et al., 2013). However, as many of the isolates were from diseased livestock, further exploration of the WGS data is warranted to help identify possible animal-associated virulence factors, which may be another marker of adaptation in animals. A study which used genome-wide high-throughput screening to identify essential genes for CC398 LA-MRSA survival identified 24 genes important for survival in porcine blood; none of the genes were directly related to virulence factors (Christiansen et al., 2014).
More recently WGS of two spa-type t899 isolates, reported as incidental findings from a turkey and a pheasant in the UK, was performed. Both avian isolates harbored the sac scn chp genes associated with the φSa3 Immune Evasion Cluster. Also, both isolates were multi-drug resistant, although the heavy metal resistance gene czrC, encoding zinc resistance, was not detected in either isolate (Sharma et al., 2018). This is in contrast to previous findings where all nine UK isolates from pigs, cattle and turkey examined by WGS harbored the czrC gene (Sharma et al., 2016). Also, neither isolate harbored the avian prophage genes. Phylogenetic reconstruction indicated both isolates clustered with other spa-type t899 isolates, which display a unique genotype of being a CC9/CC398 hybrid. The English t899 turkey strain was closely related to t899 isolated from turkey in Germany and France, and from UK retail chicken meat, which had previously been classed as CC398 (Fox et al., 2017). The Scottish pheasant isolate, although still within the same phylogenetic cluster, was more distantly related (Sharma et al., 2018).
WGS has also been applied to isolates recovered from three pigs with signs of ill-thrift from a farm in Northern Ireland and shown to be phenotypically penicillin, cefoxitin and tetracycline resistant. The eight isolates identified as MRSA belonged to a novel CC30 clone, being positive for lukM and lukF-P83 genes, a marker for virulence restricted to animal lineages which has been implicated in the pathogenesis of mastitis cattle and exudative dermatitis in squirrels (Lahuerta-Marin et al., 2016).
Discussion
The fact that in the UK only a handful of LA-MRSA were identified after screening more than 1000 S. aureus isolated from diagnostic submissions from livestock submitted through scanning surveillance between 2013 and 2015 (Sharma et al., 2016), indicates it may be an emerging problem with currently a possible low prevalence. In some cases, LA MRSA was reported as an incidental finding and there was little evidence of it causing significant disease in animals. However, scanning surveillance is biased to investigations of clinically significant S. aureus isolates, which have originated primarily from cattle, with few isolates from pigs or poultry, where it may be present asymptomatically in the healthy population. In specific screening programs of pigs, MRSA is most commonly sampled through collection of nasal swabs; skin swabs can also be taken and sampling both skin behind the ear in conjunction with nasal swabs has been shown to be the most sensitive method for detection of MRSA in live pigs, suggesting a targeted approach to sampling is required (Pletinckx et al., 2012; Agerso et al., 2014). Furthermore, pooling of swabs can increase the sensitivity of detection of MRSA in herds compared to single swabs (Friese et al., 2012). Also, the MRSA status in individual pigs from a MRSA-positive herd can change, as pigs may be transiently rather than permanently colonized (Bangerter et al., 2016).
Although the frequency of reports in livestock in the UK remains low, the geographic and species dispersal suggests a widening distribution. Given the lack of available data, there is a need for surveillance of healthy livestock to establish how prevalent LA-MRSA is in UK livestock, and what the risks are for humans. The guidelines for harmonization of sampling strategies, outlined by EFSA, provide valuable guidance for the effective detection of LA-MRSA within the livestock industry (European Food Safety Authority, 2012).
Livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus was also reported at a low-to-moderate prevalence in UK animal products such as bulk tank milk and retail meat, although the latter may partly reflect EU meat. It is also noteworthy that phylogenetic comparisons of UK livestock isolates through WGS, suggests a possible European origin with multiple incursions (Sharma et al., 2016, 2018).
Nevertheless, although frequency has increased since 2007, and CC398 is the dominant type, LA MRSA is rarely identified from human samples in the EU (Kinross et al., 2017). A recent assessment by the Food Standards Agency also reported a very low risk in the UK food chain and noted that there have been no reported foodborne outbreaks worldwide2. The need to revisit the assessment in the light of new data was recognized due to uncertainties on the prevalence of LA-MRSA in food and livestock. Furthermore, evidence from EU countries suggests a risk of transmission to people in contact with livestock but the zoonotic risk remains to be fully explored. The current lack of information suggests the need for systematic surveillance to understand reservoirs and transmission routes, applying a One Health approach and MRSA typing across sectors.
Harmonized structured surveillance would reduce uncertainties in risk assessment and linked epidemiological studies could be used to inform options for control and cost effectiveness. Furthermore, surveillance can be used to monitor the effectiveness of risk management at national and international levels as has been performed for zoonoses such as Salmonella.
Statements
Author contributions
MA and SE conceived the study. All authors wrote the manuscript.
Funding
We are grateful to the Veterinary Medicines Directorate in the UK for funding this work through VMD0533. FM-J contributed during a sabbatical to the APHA with a grant from ConsellerÃa de Educación y Ciencia of Generalitat Valenciana (BEST/2017/050). CM contributed during a sabbatical to the APHA which was supported by a Lecturer research grant from the Santander bank (programme XIII Convocatoria de ayudas a la movilidad investigadora CEU-Banco Santander).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AbuOunM.StubberfieldE. J.DuggettN. A.KirchnerM.DormerL.Nunez-GarciaJ.et al (2017). mcr-1 and mcr-2 variant genes identified in Moraxella species isolated from pigs in great Britain from 2014 to 2015.J. Antimicrob. Chemother.722745–2749. 10.1093/jac/dkx286
2
AgersoY.VigreH.CavacoL. M.JosefsenM. H. (2014). Comparison of air samples, nasal swabs, ear-skin swabs and environmental dust samples for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in pig herds.Epidemiol. Infect.1421727–1736. 10.1017/S095026881300280X
3
AnjumM. F. (2015). Screening methods for the detection of antimicrobial resistance genes present in bacterial isolates and the microbiota.Future Microbiol.10317–320. 10.2217/fmb.15.2
4
AnjumM. F.ZankariE.HasmanH. (2017). Molecular methods for detection of antimicrobial resistance.Microbiol. Spectr.5.10.1128/microbiolspec.ARBA-0011-2017
5
Anonymous (2017). Antimicrobial resistance update: LA-MRSA.Vet. Rec.181:340. 10.1136/vr.j4220
6
ArgudinM. A.CariouN.SalandreO.Le GuennecJ.NemeghaireS.ButayeP. (2013). Genotyping and antimicrobial resistance of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from diseased turkeys.Avian. Pathol.42572–580. 10.1080/03079457.2013.854308
7
BallhausenB.KriegeskorteA.van AlenS.JungP.KöckR.PetersG.et al (2017). The pathogenicity and host adaptation of livestock-associated MRSA CC398.Vet. Microbiol.20039–45. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2016.05.006
8
BangerterP. D.SidlerX.PerretenV.OvereschG. (2016). Longitudinal study on the colonisation and transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pig farms.Vet. Microbiol.183125–134. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.12.007
9
BeckerK.BallhausenB.KahlB. C.KockR. (2017). The clinical impact of livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus of the clonal complex 398 for humans.Vet. Microbiol.20033–38. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.11.013
10
BortolamiA.WilliamsN. J.McGowanC. M.KellyP. G.ArcherD. C.CorroM.et al (2017). Environmental surveillance identifies multiple introductions of MRSA CC398 in an equine veterinary hospital in the UK, 2011-2016.Sci. Rep.7:5499. 10.1038/s41598-017-05559-8
11
BradleyS. F. (2007). Eradication or decolonization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriage: what are we doing and why are we doing it?Clin. Infect. Dis.44186–189. 10.1086/510395
12
CarterB.WuG.WoodwardM. J.AnjumM. F. (2008). A process for analysis of microarray comparative genomics hybridisation studies for bacterial genomes.BMC Genomics9:53. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-53
13
ChristiansenM. T.KaasR. S.ChaudhuriR. R.HolmesM. A.HasmanH.AarestrupF. M. (2014). Genome-wide high-throughput screening to investigate essential genes involved in methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus sequence type 398 survival.PLoS One9:e89018. 10.1371/journal.pone.0089018
14
CunyC.KockR.WitteW. (2013). Livestock associated MRSA (LA-MRSA) and its relevance for humans in Germany.Int. J. Med. Microbiol.303331–337. 10.1016/j.ijmm.2013.02.010
15
CunyC.WielerL. H.WitteW. (2015). Livestock-Associated MRSA: the Impact on Humans.Antibiotics4521–543. 10.3390/antibiotics4040521
16
DhupV.KearnsA. M.PichonB.FosterH. A. (2015). First report of identification of livestock-associated MRSA ST9 in retail meat in England.Epidemiol. Infect.1432989–2992. 10.1017/S0950268815000126
17
European Food Safety Authority (2012). Technical specifications on the harmonised monitoring and reporting of antimicrobial resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in food-producing animals and food.EFSA J.10:2897. 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2897
18
European Food Safety Authority (2009). Analysis of the baseline survey on the prevalence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in holdings with breeding pigs, in the EU, 2008 [1]. Part A: MRSA prevalence estimates.EFSA J.7:1376. 10.2903/j.efsa.2009.1376
19
European Food Safety Authority, and European Centre for Disease Prevention, and Control (2015). EU summary report on antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2013.EFSA J.13:4036.
20
European Food Safety Authority and European Centre for Disease Prevention, and Control (2017). EU summary report on antimicrobial resistance in zoonotic and indicator bacteria from humans, animals and food in 2015.EFSA J.15:4694.
21
European Union Reference Laboratory for Antimicrobial Resistance (2009). Protocol for screening for MRSA. Lyngby: Technical University of Denmark. Available at: https://www.eurl-ar.eu/CustomerData/Files/Folders/21-protocols/287_3-final-mrsa-protocol.pdf
22
FesslerA. T.KadlecK.HasselM.HauschildT.EidamC.EhrichtR.et al (2011). Characterization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates from food and food products of poultry origin in Germany.Appl. Environ. Microbiol.777151–7157. 10.1128/AEM.00561-11
23
FitzgeraldJ. R. (2012a). Human origin for livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.mBio3:e00082-12.
24
FitzgeraldJ. R. (2012b). Livestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus: origin, evolution and public health threat.Trends Microbiol.20192–198. 10.1016/j.tim.2012.01.006
25
FoxA.PichonB.WilkinsonH.DoumithM.HillR. L. R.McLauchlinJ.et al (2017). Detection and molecular characterization of livestock-associated MRSA in raw meat on retail sale in North West England.Lett. Appl. Microbiol.64239–245. 10.1111/lam.12709
26
FrieseA.SchulzJ.HoehleL.FetschA.TenhagenB. A.HartungJ.et al (2012). Occurrence of MRSA in air and housing environment of pig barns.Vet. Microbiol.158129–135. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2012.01.019
27
Garcia-AlvarezL.HoldenM. T.LindsayH.WebbC. R.BrownD. F.CurranM. D.et al (2011). Meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus with a novel mecA homologue in human and bovine populations in the UK and Denmark: a descriptive study.Lancet Infect. Dis.11595–603. 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70126-8
28
GoergeT.LorenzM. B.van AlenS.HubnerN. O.BeckerK.KockR. (2017). MRSA colonization and infection among persons with occupational livestock exposure in Europe: prevalence, preventive options and evidence.Vet. Microbiol.2006–12. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.10.027
29
GOV. UK (2013). Livestock-associated MRSA found at a farm in East Anglia.London: GOV.UK.
30
HadjirinN. F.LayE. M.PatersonG. K.HarrisonE. M.PeacockS. J.ParkhillJ.et al (2015). Detection of livestock-associated meticillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus CC398 in retail pork, United Kingdom, february 2015.Eurosurveillance201–4.
31
HallS.KearnsA.EckfordS. (2015). Livestock-associated MRSA detected in pigs in Great Britain.Vet. Rec.176151–152. 10.1136/vr.h627
32
HartleyH.WatsonC.NugentP.BeggsN.DicksonE.KearnsA. (2014). Confirmation of LA-MRSA in pigs in the UK.Vet. Rec.17574–75. 10.1136/vr.g4620
33
HopkinsK. L.BatchelorM. J.AnjumM.DaviesR. H.ThrelfallE. J. (2007). Comparison of antimicrobial resistance genes in nontyphoidal salmonellae of serotypes enteritidis, hadar, and virchow from humans and food-producing animals in England and wales.Microb. Drug Resist.13281–288. 10.1089/mdr.2007.779
34
KadlecK.FesslerA. T.HauschildT.SchwarzS. (2012). Novel and uncommon antimicrobial resistance genes in livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.Clin. Microbiol. Infect.18745–755. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2012.03842.x
35
KhannaT.FriendshipR.DeweyC.WeeseJ. S. (2008). Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus colonization in pigs and pig farmers.Vet. Microbiol.128298–303. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2007.10.006
36
KinrossP.PetersenA.SkovR.Van HauwermeirenE.PantostiA.LaurentF.et al (2017). Livestock-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) among human MRSA isolates, European Union/European Economic Area countries, 2013.Euro. Surveill22.10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2017.22.44.16-00696
37
Lahuerta-MarinA.Guelbenzu-GonzaloM.PichonB.AllenA.DoumithM.LaveryJ. F.et al (2016). First report of lukM-positive livestock-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC30 from fattening pigs in Northern Ireland.Vet. Microbiol.182131–134. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2015.11.019
38
LoefflerA.KearnsA. M.EllingtonM. J.SmithL. J.UntV. E.LindsayJ. A.et al (2009). First isolation of MRSA ST398 from UK animals: a new challenge for infection control teams?J. Hosp. Infect.72269–271. 10.1016/j.jhin.2009.04.002
39
MohamedD. H.SaberesheikhS.KearnsA. M.SaundersN. A. (2012). Putative link between Staphylococcus aureus bacteriophage serotype and community association.Int. J. Med. Microbiol.302135–144. 10.1016/j.ijmm.2012.02.002
40
MoneckeS.CoombsG.ShoreA. C.ColemanD. C.AkpakaP.BorgM.et al (2011). A field guide to pandemic, epidemic and sporadic clones of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.PLoS One6:e17936. 10.1371/journal.pone.0017936
41
PatersonG. K.LarsenJ.HarrisonE. M.LarsenA. R.MorganF. J.PeacockS. J.et al (2012). First detection of livestock-associated meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus CC398 in bulk tank milk in the United Kingdom, January to July 2012.Euro. Surveill.17:20337.
42
PatersonG. K.MorganF. J.HarrisonE. M.PeacockS. J.ParkhillJ.ZadoksR. N.et al (2014). Prevalence and properties of mecC methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in bovine bulk tank milk in Great Britain.J Antimicrob Chemother69598–602. 10.1093/jac/dkt417
43
PiccininiR.TassiR.DapraV.PillaR.FennerJ.CarterB.et al (2012). Study of Staphylococcus aureus collected at slaughter from dairy cows with chronic mastitis.J. Dairy Res.79249–255. 10.1017/S002202991200009X
44
PletinckxL. J.De BleeckerY.DewulfJ.RasschaertG.GoddeerisB. M.De ManI. (2012). Evaluation of salt concentrations, chromogenic media and anatomical sampling sites for detection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pigs.Vet. Microbiol.154363–368. 10.1016/j.vetmic.2011.07.027
45
PriceL. B.SteggerM.HasmanH.AzizM.LarsenJ.AndersenP. S.et al (2012). Staphylococcus aureus CC398: host adaptation and emergence of methicillin resistance in livestock.mBio3e305–e311. 10.1128/mBio.00305-11
46
RebicV.BudimirA.AljicevicM.BektasS.VranicS. M.RebicD. (2016). Typing of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus using DNA fingerprints by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.Acta Inform Med24248–252.
47
SabatA. J.HermelijnS. M.AkkerboomV.JulianaA.DegenerJ. E.GrundmannH.et al (2017). Complete-genome sequencing elucidates outbreak dynamics of CA-MRSA USA300 (ST8-spa t008) in an academic hospital of Paramaribo, Republic of Suriname.Sci. Rep.7:41050. 10.1038/srep41050
48
SchoulsL. M.SpalburgE. C.van LuitM.HuijsdensX. W.PluisterG. N.van Santen-VerheuvelM. G.et al (2009). Multiple-locus variable number tandem repeat analysis of Staphylococcus aureus: comparison with pulsed-field gel electrophoresis and spa-typing.PLoS One4:e5082. 10.1371/journal.pone.0005082
49
SharmaM.AbuOunM.Nunez-GarciaJ.RogersJ.WelchmanD.TealeC.et al (2018). MRSA spa type t899 from food animals in the UK.Vet. Rec.182697–698. 10.1136/vr.k2576
50
SharmaM.Nunez-GarciaJ.KearnsA. M.DoumithM.ButayeP. R.Angeles ArgudÃnM.et al (2016). Livestock-associated methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (LA-MRSA) clonal complex (CC) 398 isolated from UK animals belong to European lineages.Front. Microbiol.7:1741. 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01741
51
ShoreA. C.BrennanO. M.DeasyE. C.RossneyA. S.KinneveyP. M.EhrichtR.et al (2012). DNA microarray profiling of a diverse collection of nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates assigns the majority to the correct sequence type and staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) type and results in the subsequent identification and characterization of novel SCCmec-SCCM1 composite islands.Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.565340–5355. 10.1128/AAC.01247-12
52
SmithT. C. (2015). Livestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus: the United States experience.PLoS Pathog.11:e1004564. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004564
53
SmithT. C.GebreyesW. A.AbleyM. J.HarperA. L.ForsheyB. M.MaleM. J.et al (2013). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pigs and farm workers on conventional and antibiotic-free swine farms in the USA.PLoS One8:e63704. 10.1371/journal.pone.0063704
54
SmithT. C.MaleM. J.HarperA. L.KroegerJ. S.TinklerG. P.MoritzE. D.et al (2009). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) strain ST398 is present in midwestern U.S. swine and swine workers.PLoS One4:e4258. 10.1371/journal.pone.0004258
55
SteggerM.AndersenP. S.KearnsA.PichonB.HolmesM. A.EdwardsG.et al (2012). Rapid detection, differentiation and typing of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus harbouring either mecA or the new mecA homologue mecA(LGA251).Clin. Microbiol. Infect.18395–400. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03715.x
56
StoneK. (2017). Risk Assessment on Meticillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), with a focus on Livestock-associated MRSA, in the UK Food Chain. London: Food Standard Agency. 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03715.x
57
VerkadeE.KluytmansJ. (2014). Livestock-associated Staphylococcus aureus CC398: animal reservoirs and human infections.Infect. Genet. Evol.21523–530. 10.1016/j.meegid.2013.02.013
58
VossA.LoeffenF.BakkerJ.KlaassenC.WulfM. (2005). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in pig farming.Emerg. Infect. Dis.111965–1966.
59
WraggP.La RagioneR. M.BestA.ReichelR.AnjumM. F.MafuraM.et al (2009). Characterisation of Escherichia fergusonii isolates from farm animals using an Escherichia coli virulence gene array and tissue culture adherence assays.Res. Vet. Sci.8627–35. 10.1016/j.rvsc.2008.05.014
60
XuS. X.GilmoreK. J.SzaboP. A.ZeppaJ. J.BarojaM. L.HaeryfarS. M.et al (2014). Superantigens subvert the neutrophil response to promote abscess formation and enhance Staphylococcus aureus survival in vivo.Infect. Immun.823588–3598. 10.1128/IAI.02110-14
Summary
Keywords
MRSA, United Kingdom, livestock, animal products, animal
Citation
Anjum MF, Marco-Jimenez F, Duncan D, MarÃn C, Smith RP and Evans SJ (2019) Livestock-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus From Animals and Animal Products in the UK. Front. Microbiol. 10:2136. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02136
Received
14 December 2018
Accepted
30 August 2019
Published
12 September 2019
Volume
10 - 2019
Edited by
Patrick Rik Butaye, Ross University School of Veterinary Medicine, Saint Kitts and Nevis
Reviewed by
Jean-Yves Madec, National Agency for Sanitary Safety of Food, Environment and Labor (ANSES), France; Tim Maisch, University of Regensburg, Germany
Updates
Copyright
© 2019 Anjum, Marco-Jimenez, Duncan, MarÃn, Smith and Evans.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Muna F. Anjum, Muna.Anjum@apha.gov.uk
This article was submitted to Antimicrobials, Resistance and Chemotherapy, a section of the journal Frontiers in Microbiology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.