Original Research ARTICLE
Boosting Ethanol Productivity of Zymomonas mobilis 8b in Enzymatic Hydrolysate of Dilute Acid and Ammonia Pretreated Corn Stover Through Medium Optimization, High Cell Density Fermentation and Cell Recycling
- 1School of Environmental and Biological Engineering, Nanjing University of Science and Technology, Nanjing, China
- 2Department of Plant Pathology and Microbiology, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX, United States
The presence of toxic degradation products in lignocellulosic hydrolysate typically reduced fermentation rates and xylose consumption rate, resulting in a decreased ethanol productivity. In the present study, Zymomonas mobilis 8b was investigated for high cell density fermentation with cell recycling to improve the ethanol productivity in lignocellulosic hydrolysate. The fermentation performances of Z. mobilis 8b at various conditions were first studied in yeast extract-tryptone medium. It was found that nutrient level was essential for glucose and xylose co-fermentation by Z. mobilis 8b and high cell density fermentation with cell recycling worked well in yeast extract-tryptone medium for 6 rounds fermentation. Z. mobilis 8b was then studied in enzymatic hydrolysates derived from dilute acid (DA) pretreated corn stover (CS) and ammonia pretreated CS for high cell density fermentation with cell recycling. Ethanol productivity obtained was around three times higher compared to traditional fermentation. Ethanol titer and metabolic yield were also enhanced with high cell density fermentation. Z. mobilis 8b cells showed high recyclability in ammonia pretreated CS hydrolysate.
Bioconversion of lignocellulosic biomass to ethanol has drawn great attention because of its benefit to environmental, economic, and social sustainability. However, the high production cost of lignocellulosic ethanol remains the bottleneck for its commercialization (Jin et al., 2012; Karagoz et al., 2019). One of the causes for the high production costs is the low volumetric productivity (Ferreira et al., 2018). Although many previous studies have engineered the microorganisms to improve the fermentation rates of glucose and xylose, the overall xylose fermentation rate remains slow (Ong et al., 2018; Yang S. et al., 2018; Xia et al., 2019). On the other hand, process engineering could be used to enhance the volumetric productivity (Matano et al., 2013; Zhou et al., 2017). As reported by our previous study, high cell density fermentation coupled with cell recycling increased cellulosic ethanol productivity by twofold–threefold (Jin et al., 2012, 2016). However, our previous studies focused on the improvement of fermentation efficiencies of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, while other commonly used fermenting microorganisms were not assessed. Compared with S. cerevisiae, Zymomonas mobilis 8b has been reported to exhibit excellent ethanol productivity, high ethanol tolerance and efficient sugar uptake (Rogers et al., 2007; Clarke et al., 2018; Xia et al., 2019). Recently, many studies have engineered Z. mobilis strains to enable it to utilize both five-carbon and six-carbon sugars (Yang S. et al., 2018; Yang Y. et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2019). Although the molecular biology and fermentation capabilities of these Z. mobilis recombinants have been extensively documented, the reduced volumetric productivity of these recombinants in lignocellulosic hydrolysate was also observed due to the presence of toxic degradation products (Zheng et al., 2019). High cell density has been used for ethanol fermentation as it can significantly accelerate fermentation rates, eliminate unproductive lag phase and promote inhibitor tolerance (Sarks et al., 2014). In addition, cell recycling can serve as useful strategy to maintain sufficient cell density and efficient fermentation. We have demonstrated high cell density fermentation with cell recycling on S. cerevisiae (Jin et al., 2012, 2016) and preliminary found the great potential of this strategy on Z. mobilis 8b. Thus, it would be interesting to further study and demonstrate the possibility of using high cell density fermentation strategy to improve the ethanol productivity of Z. mobilis 8b in lignocellulosic hydrolysate.
To obtain sugar streams from lignocellulosic biomass for fermentation, a pretreatment is needed to break up the lignocellulose and enzymatic hydrolysis is required to degrade the polysaccharide into fermentable monosaccharides, such as glucose and xylose (Lai et al., 2019). Many pretreatment strategies such as dilute acid (DA) (Zhai et al., 2018; Huang et al., 2019), dilute alkali (McIntosh and Vancov, 2011), steam explosion (Liu and Chen, 2017; Zhong et al., 2019), liquid hot water (Zhuang et al., 2016; Tian et al., 2019), ammonia fiber expansion (Serate et al., 2015; Jin et al., 2016), and extractive ammonia pretreatment (Sousa et al., 2016) have been developed to deconstruct the lignocellulose to improve their hydrolysablity by cellulases. Among these pretreatment, DA pretreatment has been studied widely because of the advantages such as simple operation, easy industrial application, and hemicellulose degradation (Alvira et al., 2010; Pedersen et al., 2011). However, DA pretreatment generates toxic compounds that impair fermentation (Zhai et al., 2016; Liu et al., 2018). Different from DA pretreatment, ammonia pretreatment was featured with its low toxicity toward fermentation as well as capability to convert cellulose I to cellulose III (Wada et al., 2006; Ong et al., 2016). As these two promising pretreatments have been studied widely for the commercial production of ethanol from lignocellulosic biomass, they could serve as representative pretreatment methods.
In the present study, we systematically studied the fermentation behaviors of Z. mobilis 8b and identified the essential conditions that affect the fermentation rate and ethanol productivity. Based on the fermentation performances of Z. mobilis 8b, we designed and investigated high cell density fermentation with cell recycling in both synthetic medium and lignocellulosic hydrolysate derived from DA and ammonia pretreated corn stover (CS).
Materials and Methods
Corn stover was harvested at Lianyungang, Jiangsu, China. The contents of glucan, xylan, lignin, and ash were determined with the standard method published by National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) (Sluiter et al., 2008). Cellulase (60 mg protein/mL, 118 FPU/mL) and xylanase (25 mg protein/mL, 100,000 U/mL for Beachwood xylan) were provided by Qingdao Vland Biotech Inc.
Dilute acid and ammonia pretreatments were performed according to previous studies with a little modification (Hsu et al., 2010; Da Costa Sousa et al., 2016). Specifically, for DA pretreatment, CS was pretreated in a 2 L high pressure reactor (Weihai Chemical Device, Shandong, China) with 10% (w/w) solid loading and 1% w/w H2SO4, at 160°C for 10 min. After pretreatment, the CS slurry was neutralized by 10 M potassium hydroxide to pH 7, and dried at 60°C until the moisture of treated CS was between 10 and 20%. The DA pretreated CS was composed of 27.2% glucan and 12.7% xylan. Ammonia pretreatment was similar with extractive ammonia pretreatment except that the extraction step was removed. Specifically, the ammonia pretreatment was carried out by soaking 10% (w/w) CS (dry weight basis) in anhydrous liquid ammonia (6 g ammonia/g dry biomass) at 120°C for 30 min. The sample was dried in fume hood overnight to remove residual ammonia. The ammonia pretreated CS was composed of 31.6% glucan and 17.8% xylan. All the pretreated CS was stored at 4°C.
Enzymatic Hydrolysis of Pretreated CS
DA-CS (dilute sulfuric acid pretreated CS) and A-CS (ammonia pretreated CS) were hydrolyzed using commercial enzyme mixture including cellulase (28 mg protein/g glucan) and xylanase (12 mg protein/g glucan). Enzymatic hydrolysis was carried out at 18% (w/w) solid loading in 250 mL flasks at pH 4.8, 50°C and 250 rpm. After 72 h hydrolysis, the enzymatic hydrolysate was centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min. Supernatant’s pH was adjusted by 10 M potassium hydroxide to pH 5.8, and then kept in a sterile bottle. Hydrolysate obtained from DA at 18% solid loading contained 47.7 g/L glucose and 28.3 g/L xylose, while hydrolysate obtained from ammonia pretreated CS contained 65.8 g/L glucose and 22.9 g/L xylose.
Microorganism and Seed Culture Preparation
For Z. mobilis 8b, a two-stage seed culture was applied. Pre-culture medium contained (g/L): 10 yeast extract (YE), 20 tryptone, 2 potassium dihydrogen phosphate, 50 glucose, 20 xylose. A glycerol stock of Z. mobilis 8b was used to inoculate the medium. Seed culture was prepared in a 50 mL flask with 40 mL medium at 30°C and 150 rpm. When the OD600 reached around 6, 5 mL of the culture was then transferred to another fresh pre-culture medium. When the OD600 of the pre-culture reached around 10, the cells were centrifuged and transferred to fermentation medium.
Fermentation in Yeast Extract-Peptone Medium or Hydrolysate
Fermentation in yeast extract-peptone (YP) medium or in hydrolysate was conducted at 150 rpm, 30°C in 50 mL flasks with a working volume of 40 mL. The concentration of each component in YP medium were 1–10 g/L for YE, 2–20 g/L for tryptone, 60–120 g/L for glucose (G), 30–90 g/L for xylose (X). For hydrolysate fermentation, 6 M KOH was used to adjust the pH of the enzymatic hydrolysate to 5.8. To release carbon dioxide generated during fermentation, rubber stoppers pierced through by a hollow needle were used to cap the flasks. Fermentation was performed in triplicate and means and standard deviations were calculated. The significance of difference were further analyzed using the one-way ANOVA test.
High Cell Density Fermentation With Cell Recycling
The fermentation was performed in a 50 mL flask with working volume of 40 mL at 30°C, 150 rpm. Z. mobilis 8b cell obtained from centrifugation of seed culture was used for inoculation to reach an initial OD600 of 1 and 8. After 24 h fermentation, the cell was separated by centrifugation at 5,000 rpm for 10 min. Then, the recycled cell was resuspended to fresh hydrolysate for the next round fermentation.
Sugars and ethanol were analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) using refractive index detector and a Biorad Aminex HPX-87H column at 65°C with 5 mM sulfuric acid as the mobile carrier at a flow rate 0.6 mL/min. Each sample was diluted and filtered through a 0.22 μm nylon syringe filter before analysis. Metabolic yield was calculated based on the theoretical ethanol yield from consumed glucose and xylose, which is 2 mol ethanol/mol glucose or 0.51 g ethanol/g glucose (1.67 mol/mol xylose or 0.51 g/g xylose). The metabolic yield, sugar conversion and ethanol productivity were calculated by Eqs 1–3, respectively:
where sugart is the mass of sugar at fermentation time t.
Results and Discussion
Fermentation Characteristics of Z. mobilis 8b
Fermentation of Z. mobilis 8b on Glucose and Xylose
To improve the sugar utilization by Z. mobilis 8b and achieve satisfactory high cell density fermentation performance, understanding the factors that affect fermentation is necessary. Therefore, the effect of sugar concentrations on fermentation performance of Z. mobilis 8b was studied (Figure 1). The sugar concentrations were selected on the basis of sugar release from enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass at different solid loadings. In general, Z. mobilis 8b grew significantly better in yeast extract-peptone-glucose (YPG) medium than in yeast extract-peptone-xylose (YPX) medium (one-way ANOVA test, p < 0.01). For example, the OD600 of the strain with 60 and 90 g/L glucose reached 6.7 and 9.1, respectively, which is much higher than that with the same concentrations of xylose (Figures 1A,B). This is consistent with the study reported by Kim et al. (2000). The reason for such result was likely due to the slower consumption of xylose, and less energy generated for cell growth during xylose metabolism.
Figure 1. Effect of sugar concentrations and initial OD600 on fermentation by Z. mobilis 8b. (A) Fermentation with different glucose concentration; (B) fermentation with different xylose concentration; (C) fermentation with different concentrations of mixed sugars (glucose and xylose); and (D) fermentation with different initial OD600. The fermentation experiment was performed at 30°C, 150 rpm, for 72 h. For (A–D), the nutrient concentrations were 2.5 g/L yeast extract (YE), 5 g/L tryptone; for (A–C), the initial OD600 was 1, for (D), sugar concentrations were 90 g/L glucose, 45 g/L xylose.
For fermentation at different glucose concentrations, glucose was all completely consumed, and the metabolic yield of ethanol was all above 94.5%. This indicates that glucose concentration less than 120 g/L may have no significant effect on glucose consumption and ethanol yield (one-way ANOVA test, p > 0.05). However, the xylose consumption decreased gradually with the increase of xylose concentration, and dropped to 89% when xylose concentration reached 90 g/L (Figure 1B). This result was possibly caused by the increased ethanol concentration. Higher xylose concentration produced higher ethanol concentration, which in turn inhibited xylose fermentation and resulted in less xylose consumption. Furthermore, the metabolic yield on xylose (lower than 90% in most cases) was lower than that on glucose. Similar result was also observed by Yang et al. (2014). It has been suggested when only glucose was used as the carbon source, efficient Z. mobilis fermentation pathway enzymes allowed fast ethanol production with minimal acetate produced as byproducts. When only xylose was used as the carbon source (Yang et al., 2014), much higher concentration of toxic intermediates such as xylitol was produced, resulting in a inhibition of cell growth. Interestingly, the metabolic yields were higher with initial xylose concentrations of 60and 90 g/L as compared to lower ones. At 60 g/L xylose, the metabolic yield achieved 91%. This interesting phenomenon was unexpected. Xylose utilization could pose a significant metabolic burden to the cells of Z. mobilis 8b and trigger responses with gene expression (Yang et al., 2014). Different concentrations of xylose and ethanol might have induced different metabolic responses and hence led to different metabolic yields.
As both glucose and xylose are present in lignocellulosic hydrolysate, we further studied the performance of Z. mobilis 8b in yeast extract-peptone-glucose-xylose (YPGX) medium with different concentrations of glucose and xylose. Glucose was all completely consumed in all cases. However, xylose consumption was significantly reduced in the presence of glucose, compared to that using xylose as the sole carbon source (one-way ANOVA test, p < 0.05). This result was probably due to the presence of high ethanol concentration generated from glucose fermentation, which in turn inhibited xylose consumption. In addition, inefficient xylose transport represents another bottleneck. In Z. mobilis, xylose enters the cell through the diffusion protein that may be blocked by glucose through a competitive inhibition mechanism (Wang et al., 2018).
When the total sugar concentration increased to 180 g/L (120 g/L glucose and 60 g/L xylose), the xylose consumption decreased to 38% (Figure 1C). In addition, the OD was also significantly decreased with increasing mixed sugar concentration, which indicated that the growth of Z. mobilis 8b was greatly suppressed (one-way ANOVA test, p < 0.01). Hence, the concentrations of the mixed sugar less than or equal to 90 g/L glucose and 45 g/L xylose were selected for the following studies.
In order to improve the fermentation performance with mixed sugar, the effect of inoculation size was further studied. The xylose consumption increased to the highest of 64.8% when the initial OD increased to 4.0 (Figure 1D). Meanwhile, the metabolic yield was as high as 97.6%, which was higher than those using glucose or xylose as the sole carbon source. Further increasing initial OD did not further improve the fermentation performance. Rather, the xylose consumption was decreased. Overall, the mixed sugar fermentation was still not satisfactory. It was likely that a reasonable high OD was needed for mixed sugar fermentation. The fundamentals underlying this phenomenon may be quorum sensing, which has been reported as typical feature of Gram-negative bacteria such as Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Papenfort and Bassler, 2016). It is likely that the high cell density can trigger quorum sensing and help the cell to maintain favorable physiological trait that is important for bioethanol production. However, the nutrient level in the medium was not sufficient to sustain the cell activities at high cell density.
Effect of Nutrient Concentration on Z. mobilis 8b Fermentation
Nutrient has great impact on sugar utilization as the ability of strains to achieve a high level of ethanol titer greatly depends on the nutritional conditions and protective functions provided by some nutrients (Lau and Dale, 2009; Sarks et al., 2014). Thus, to further improve sugar utilization, the effect of nutrient (yeast extract and tryptone) concentration on fermentation of mixed sugars was studied. At 60 g/L glucose and 30 g/L xylose with initial OD 1, the increase of nutrient concentration improve both cell growth (OD) and xylose consumption (Figure 2A). With yeast extract 5 g/L and tryptone 10 g/L, the xylose consumption reached as high as 95.8% and ethanol concentration reach 45.7 g/L with a metabolic yield of 96.9% (Figure 2A). Although further increase of nutrient concentration improved xylose consumption, the increase was less obvious. At 90 g/L glucose and 45 g/L xylose with initial OD 4, the trend with increasing nutrient level was similar (Figure 2B). Therefore, the nutrient level 5 g/L yeast extract and 10 g/L tryptone seemed sufficient for mixed sugar fermentation.
Figure 2. Effect of nitrogen nutrient concentrations on fermentation of Z. mobilis 8b in synthetic medium. The fermentation experiment was performed at 30°C, 150 rpm for 72 h. (A) the initial OD600 was 1, while the sugar concentrations were 60 g/L glucose and 30 g/L xylose; and (B) the initial OD600 was 4, while the sugar concentrations were 90 g/L glucose, 45 g/L xylose.
After studying the effect of various conditions on fermentation, the sugar utilization and ethanol production kinetics under the optimized conditions were further investigated. As shown in Figure 3, glucose was rapidly and completely converted to ethanol within 12 h, while xylose was consumed much slower, with 8.7 g/L left unconsumed after 24 h fermentation. After 72 h fermentation, 5.1 g/L xylose remained unconsumed, accounting for a xylose consumption of 88%, while the ethanol titer reached 63 g/L, accounting for a metabolic yield of 94.4%. The fact that xylose consumption was also greatly improved suggested that sufficient nutrients are needed for fully support high cell population for ethanol fermentation. In addition, as Z. mobilis 8b is an engineered strain that requires heterogenous expression of enzymes for the conversion of xylose into ethanol, it is thus expected that higher nitrogen level facilitated the overexpression of certain enzymes that promote the xylose consumption.
Figure 3. Fermentation time course of Z. mobilis 8b in yeast extract-peptone-glucose-xylose medium. The fermentation experiment was performed at 30°C, 150 rpm with initial OD600 of 1. The nutrient include 5 g/L yeast extract and 10 g/L tryptone.
Cell Recycling of Z. mobilis 8b for Fermentation on Mixed Sugars
To evaluate the feasibility of high cell density fermentation with cell recycling using Z. mobilis 8b, 6-cycle fermentations were carried out on YPGX medium with initial ODs of 1 and 8, respectively. As cell recycling led to accumulation of large amount of cells in the reactor, it might be too much for fermentation and might cause activity loss of partial cells (Sarks et al., 2014). Thus, instead of recycling all cells, 75% cells were recycled for each 24-h fermentation cycle. As shown in Figure 4, the fermentation performance did not decrease from cycle to cycle. With initial ODs of 1 (Figure 4A) and 8 (Figure 4B), glucose was completely consumed at the end of each cycle, leaving less than 10 g/L xylose in the fermentation broth. The overall ethanol productivity of each cycle was kept between 2.4 and 2.6 g L–1 h–1 after six cycles (Figure 4). This was higher than the study reported by Kim et al., who used Z. mobilis 8b for fermentation at sugar concentration of 100 g/L and obtained 1.43 g L–1 h–1 (Clarke et al., 2018). The increased ethanol productivity was related with the high cell density fermentation with cell recycling, which can accelerate fermentation in the reactor (Santos et al., 2016). Therefore, it seems high cell density fermentation with cell recycling worked well on Z. mobilis 8b.
Figure 4. Cell recycling with 75% cell recycled after 24 h fermentation on yeast extract-peptone medium using Z. mobilis 8b with (A) initial OD600 of 1 and (B) initial OD600 of 8. The fermentation experiment was performed at 30°C, 150 rpm. The nutrient includes 5 g/L yeast extract and 10 g/L tryptone. The sugar mixture includes 90 g/L glucose and 45 g/L xylose. Cell recycling was performed after 24 h fermentation, and for each cycle, 75% of cell was recycled for next round of fermentation.
Fermentation of A-CS Hydrolysate by Z. mobilis 8b at High Cell Density
To investigate the feasibility of using high cell density fermentation with cell recycling in real lignocellulosic hydrolysate, A-CS and DA-CS were used for study. Fermentation of A-CS hydrolysate was first tested using Z. mobilis 8b with initial ODs of 1 and 8. With initial OD 1, glucose was not completely consumed until around 24 h (Figure 5A). The glucose consumption rate in A-CS hydrolysate was much slower than that in YP, as glucose was almost consumed after 12 h in YP (Figure 3). According to a previous study, 1 g ammonia pretreated CS could release around 651 μg furans, 1.7 mg aromatic compounds and 10 mg carboxylic acids (Chundawat et al., 2010). Thus, this result was likely due to the presence of toxic degradation products in the A-CS hydrolysate which reduced the fermentation performance. Furthermore, xylose consumption was also much slower than that in YP medium with 7.7 g/L xylose remained in the fermentation broth after 72 h. When the initial OD increased to 8, it only took 6 h to consume all the glucose in the hydrolysate and took around 24 h to reduce xylose concentration to the same level as that with initial OD 1 (Figure 5B). In addition, when the initial OD increased from 1 to 8, the metabolic yield increased from 79.5 to 87.0% and the final ethanol titer increased from 32.8 to 35.7 g/L. Therefore, high cell density fermentation with Z. mobilis 8b worked in A-CS hydrolysate, which greatly shortened the fermentation time and thus increased the productivity. Cell recycling with initial OD 8 for the first cycle was then performed (Figure 6).
Figure 5. Fermentation performance of Z. mobilis 8b in hydrolysate derived from enzymatic hydrolysis of ammonia pretreated corn stover at 18% solid loading with (A) initial OD600 of 1 and (B) initial OD600 of 8. The fermentation experiment was performed at 30°C, 150 rpm. Nutrients supplemented include 5 g/L yeast extract and 10 g/L tryptone.
Figure 6. Flow chart of cell recycling strategy. In each cycle, fresh hydrolysate was added in the reactor. Fresh cells were only added at the first round. From second to sixth round, 75% of cells in previous round were collected by centrifugation and recycled to the following cycle.
Figure 7 shows that glucose was completely consumed in each 24-h cycle, while unconsumed xylose concentration slightly fluctuated from cycle to cycle in the range of 5.3–8.5 g/L. Ethanol titer of each cycle was between 36.2 and 32.7 g/L with OD increased from cycle to cycle. Although there were some fluctuations, the overall fermentation performance was slightly reduced from cycle to cycle. High density fermentation and cell recycling produced metabolic yield of 87.8–94.5% and ethanol productivity of 1.70–1.89 g L–1 h–1, which showed superior performance as compared to traditional fermentation with metabolic yield of 79.5% and productivity of 0.46 g L–1 h–1 (Figure 5A).
Figure 7. Cells recycling in fermentation of hydrolysate of ammonia pretreated corn stover. The fermentation experiment was performed at 30°C, 150 rpm with initial OD600 of 8. The nutrients supplemented included 5 g/L yeast extract and 10 g/L tryptone.
Fermentation of DA-CS Hydrolysate by Z. mobilis 8b at High Cell Density
Fermentation performance of Z. mobilis 8b in DA-CS hydrolysate was also studied. Similar to fermentation in A-CS hydrolysate, with initial OD 1, it took 24 h to consume all the glucose and took 72 h to reduce xylose concentration to 5.9 g/L, which was much longer than the fermentation in YP medium (Figure 8A). The final ethanol titer and metabolic yield was 30.8 g/L and 88.1%, respectively, which were lower than that in synthetic medium. When the initial OD increased to 8, glucose was consumed rapidly in the first 6 h and xylose was almost consumed within 24 h, reaching a final xylose concentration of 3.6 g/L (Figure 8B). The ethanol titer was 35.1 g/L, while the ethanol productivity and metabolic yield in the first 24 h was 1.82 g L–1 h–1 and 96.44%, respectively. These results were all higher as compared to that with initial OD 1.
Figure 8. Fermentation performance of hydrolysate of dilute sulfuric acid pretreated corn stover by Z. mobilis 8b with different initial OD600. (A) initial OD600 was 1; (B) initial OD600 was 8. The fermentation experiment was performed at 30°C, 150 rpm for 72 h. The nutrients supplemented included 5 g/L yeast extract and 10 g/L tryptone.
The fermentation performance of DA-CS hydrolysate with six round cell recycling was also studied at initial OD 8 for the first round fermentation. During each fermentation cycle, glucose was almost completely consumed within 24 h, while partial xylose remained unconsumed. The amount of unconsumed xylose increased from 4.2 to 10.4 g/L after six rounds of recycling (Figure 9). This result might be due to the decreased xylose consumption capacity of Z. mobilis 8b. DA pretreatment is known to generate more inhibitory degradation products compared to ammonia pretreatment (Lau et al., 2009), which might have caused less growth of OD and reduced fermentation performance with recycled cells. As reported by a previous study, 1 g diluted acid pretreated CS could release 24 mg furans, 4 mg aromatic compounds and 44 mg carboxylic acids, which was higher than that released from ammonia pretreated CS (Chundawat et al., 2010). Thus, the presence of more degradation product may pose significant stress to the cell growth. Because of the insufficient sugar consumption, ethanol titer decreased from 33.1 g/L for the first cycle to 30.3 g/L for the 6th cycle, while the metabolic yield was between 89.7 and 92.6%. The ethanol productivity was between 1.58 and 1.75 g L–1 h–1, which was much higher than 0.54 g L–1 h–1 for traditional fermentation (Figure 8A). Overall, high cell density fermentation with cell recycling worked for around five cycles in DA-CS hydrolysate without reducing ethanol titer compared to traditional fermentation. Together with the fermentation performance of A-CS hydrolysate, these results suggested that Z. mobilis 8b in A-CS hydrolysate could be recycled with good fermentation performance as compared to that in DA-CS hydrolysate.
Figure 9. Cells recycling in fermentation of hydrolysate of dilute sulfuric acid pretreated corn stover. The fermentation experiment was performed at 30°C, 150 rpm with initial OD600 of 8. The nutrients supplemented included 5 g/L yeast extract and 10 g/L tryptone.
The fermentation performance of Z. mobilis 8b significantly depended on the composition/concentration of sugars, initial OD and especially nutrient concentration. Sufficient nutrient level seems necessary for satisfactory glucose and xylose co-fermentation. High cell density fermentation with cell recycling of Z. mobilis 8b worked well in YP medium and showed high ethanol productivity. Sugar consumption rates significantly decreased in lignocellulosic hydrolysates, which resulted in the decrease of ethanol productivity. High cell density fermentation with cell recycling greatly shortened fermentation time and improved ethanol productivity in both DA-CS and A-CS hydrolysate with increased ethanol titer and metabolic yield, while Z. mobilis 8b in A-CS hydrolysate showed higher cell recyclability.
Data Availability Statement
All datasets generated for this study are included in the manuscript/supplementary files.
YL performed most of the experiments, data acquisition, and data interpretation, and wrote the manuscript. RZ supervised the execution of the experiments, analyzed the data, assisted in coordinating this study, and wrote the manuscript. XJ, XC, and XY performed the pretreatment of corn stover. ZL provided the technical assistance. MJ coordinated this study, designed the experiments, evaluated the data, and wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final version of manuscript.
This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (Grant No. 2016YFE0105400), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 21606132), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (Grant Nos. BK20160823, BK20170037, and BK20170832), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant Nos. 30916011202 and 30919011215), the Foundation of Jiangsu Specially Appointed Professor, and the Foundation of Jiangsu Innovative and Entrepreneurial Doctors.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Alvira, P., Tomas-Pejo, E., Ballesteros, M., and Negro, M. J. (2010). Pretreatment technologies for an efficient bioethanol production process based on enzymatic hydrolysis: a review. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 4851–4861. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.093
Chundawat, S. P. S., Vismeh, R., Sharma, L. N., Humpula, J. F., da Costa Sousa, L., Chambliss, C. K., et al. (2010). Multifaceted characterization of cell wall decomposition products formed during ammonia fiber expansion (AFEX) and dilute acid based pretreatments. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 8429–8438. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.027
Clarke, K. G., Mokomele, T., Callanan, L. H., and Groenewald, J. (2018). “Zymomonas mobilis—towards bacterial biofuel,” in The Nexus: Energy, Environment and Climate Change, eds W. Leal Filho, and D. Surroop, (Cham: Springer International Publishing), 205–219. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-63612-2_13
Da Costa Sousa, L., Jin, M., Chundawat, S. P. S., Bokade, V., Tang, X., Azarpira, A., et al. (2016). Next-generation ammonia pretreatment enhances cellulosic biofuel production. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 1215–1223. doi: 10.1039/c5ee03051j
Ferreira, R. D. G., Azzoni, A. R., and Freitas, S. (2018). Techno-economic analysis of the industrial production of a low-cost enzyme using E. coli: the case of recombinant beta-glucosidase. Biotechnol. Biofuels 11:81. doi: 10.1186/s13068-018-1077-0
Hsu, T. C., Guo, G. L., Chen, W. H., and Hwang, W. S. (2010). Effect of dilute acid pretreatment of rice straw on structural properties and enzymatic hydrolysis. Bioresour. Technol. 101, 4907–4913. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.10.009
Huang, C., Lin, W., Lai, C., Li, X., Jin, Y., and Yong, Q. (2019). Coupling the post-extraction process to remove residual lignin and alter the recalcitrant structures for improving the enzymatic digestibility of acid-pretreated bamboo residues. Bioresour. Technol. 285:121355. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.121355
Jin, M., Gunawan, C., Uppugundla, N., Balan, V., and Dale, B. E. (2012). A novel integrated biological process for cellulosic ethanol production featuring high ethanol productivity, enzyme recycling and yeast cells reuse. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 7168–7175. doi: 10.1039/c2ee03058f
Jin, M. J., Sousa, L. D., Schwartz, C., He, Y. X., Sarks, C., Gunawan, C., et al. (2016). Toward lower cost cellulosic biofuel production using ammonia based pretreatment technologies. Green Chem. 18, 957–966. doi: 10.1039/c5gc02433a
Karagoz, P., Bill, R. M., and Ozkan, M. (2019). Lignocellulosic ethanol production: evaluation of new approaches, cell immobilization and reactor configurations. Renew. Energy 143, 741–752. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.05.045
Kim, I. S., Barrow, K. D., and Rogers, P. L. (2000). Kinetic and nuclear magnetic resonance studies of xylose metabolism by recombinant Zymomonas mobilis ZM4(pZB5). Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66, 186–193. doi: 10.1128/aem.66.1.186-193.2000
Lai, C., Yang, B., Lin, Z., Jia, Y., Huang, C., Li, X., et al. (2019). New strategy to elucidate the positive effects of extractable lignin on enzymatic hydrolysis by quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation. Biotechnol. Biofuels 12:57. doi: 10.1186/s13068-019-1402-2
Lau, M. W., and Dale, B. E. (2009). Cellulosic ethanol production from AFEX-treated corn stover using Saccharomyces cerevisiae 424A(LNH-ST). Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 1368–73. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812364106
Lau, M. W., Gunawan, C., and Dale, B. E. (2009). The impacts of pretreatment on the fermentability of pretreated lignocellulosic biomass: a comparative evaluation between ammonia fiber expansion and dilute acid pretreatment. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2:30. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-2-30
Liu, Z.-H., and Chen, H.-Z. (2017). Two-step size reduction and post-washing of steam exploded corn stover improving simultaneous saccharification and fermentation for ethanol production. Bioresour. Technol. 223, 47–58. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.10.049
Liu, Z. H., Xie, S. X., Lin, F. R., Jin, M. J., and Yuan, J. S. (2018). Combinatorial pretreatment and fermentation optimization enabled a record yield on lignin bioconversion. Biotechnol. Biofuels 11:21. doi: 10.1186/s13068-018-1021-3
Matano, Y., Hasunuma, T., and Kondo, A. (2013). Cell recycle batch fermentation of high-solid lignocellulose using a recombinant cellulase-displaying yeast strain for high yield ethanol production in consolidated bioprocessing. Bioresour. Technol. 135, 403–409. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.07.025
Ong, R. G., Higbee, A., Bottoms, S., Dickinson, Q., Xie, D., Smith, S. A., et al. (2016). Inhibition of microbial biofuel production in drought-stressed switchgrass hydrolysate. Biotechnol. Biofuels 9:237.
Ong, R. G., Shinde, S., da Costa Sousa, L., and Sanford, G. R. (2018). Pre-senescence harvest of switchgrass inhibits xylose utilization by engineered yeast. Front. Energy Res. 6:52. doi: 10.3389/fenrg.2018.00052
Pedersen, M., Johansen, K. S., and Meyer, A. S. (2011). Low temperature lignocellulose pretreatment: effects and interactions of pretreatment pH are critical for maximizing enzymatic monosaccharide yields from wheat straw. Biotechnol. Biofuels 4:11. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-4-11
Santos, S. C., de Sousa, A. S., Dionísio, S. R., Tramontina, R., Ruller, R., Squina, F. M., et al. (2016). Bioethanol production by recycled scheffersomyces stipitis in sequential batch fermentations with high cell density using xylose and glucose mixture. Bioresour. Technol. 219, 319–329. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.07.102
Sarks, C., Jin, M. J., Sato, T. K., Balan, V., and Dale, B. E. (2014). Studying the rapid bioconversion of lignocellulosic sugars into ethanol using high cell density fermentations with cell recycle. Biotechnol. Biofuels 7:73. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-7-73
Serate, J., Xie, D., Pohlmann, E., Donald, C., Shabani, M., Hinchman, L., et al. (2015). Controlling microbial contamination during hydrolysis of AFEX-pretreated corn stover and switchgrass: effects on hydrolysate composition, microbial response and fermentation. Biotechnol. Biofuels 8:180. doi: 10.1186/s13068-015-0356-2
Sluiter, A., Hames, B., Ruiz, R., Scarlata, C., Sluiter, J., Templeton, D., et al. (2008). Determination of Structural Carbohydrates and Lignin in Biomass. Technical Report NREL/TP-510-42618. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory.
Sousa, L. D., Jin, M. J., Chundawat, S. P. S., Bokade, V., Tang, X. Y., Azarpira, A., et al. (2016). Next-generation ammonia pretreatment enhances cellulosic biofuel production. Energy Environ. Sci. 9, 1215–1223. doi: 10.1039/c5ee03051j
Tian, D., Shen, F., Yang, G., Deng, S., Long, L., He, J., et al. (2019). Liquid hot water extraction followed by mechanical extrusion as a chemical-free pretreatment approach for cellulosic ethanol production from rigid hardwood. Fuel 252, 589–597. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2019.04.155
Wada, M., Nishiyama, Y., and Langan, P. (2006). X-ray structure of ammonia-cellulose I: new insights into the conversion of cellulose I to cellulose IIII. Macromolecules 39, 2947–2952. doi: 10.1021/ma060228s
Xia, J., Yang, Y., Liu, C.-G., Yang, S., and Bai, F.-W. (2019). Engineering Zymomonas mobilis for robust cellulosic ethanol production. Trends Biotechnol. 37, 960–972. doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.02.002
Yang, S., Franden, M. A., Brown, S. D., Chou, Y. C., Pienkos, P. T., and Zhang, M. (2014). Insights into acetate toxicity in Zymomonas mobilis 8b using different substrates. Biotechnol. Biofuels 7:140. doi: 10.1186/s13068-014-0140-8
Yang, S., Vera, J. M., Grass, J., Savvakis, G., Moskvin, O. V., Yang, Y., et al. (2018). Complete genome sequence and the expression pattern of plasmids of the model ethanologen Zymomonas mobilis ZM4 and its xylose-utilizing derivatives 8b and 2032. Biotechnol. Biofuels 11:125. doi: 10.1186/s13068-018-1116-x
Yang, Y., Hu, M., Tang, Y., Geng, B., Qiu, M., He, Q., et al. (2018). Progress and perspective on lignocellulosic hydrolysate inhibitor tolerance improvement in Zymomonas mobilis. Bioresour. Bioproc. 5:6.
Yang, Y., Shen, W., Huang, J., Li, R., Xiao, Y., Wei, H., et al. (2019). Prediction and characterization of promoters and ribosomal binding sites of Zymomonas mobilis in system biology era. Biotechnol. Biofuels 12:52. doi: 10.1186/s13068-019-1399-6
Zhai, R., Hu, J. G., and Saddler, J. N. (2016). What are the major components in steam pretreated lignocellulosic biomass that inhibit the efficacy of cellulase enzyme mixtures? ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 4, 3429–3436. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.6b00481
Zhai, R., Hu, J. G., and Saddler, J. N. (2018). Minimizing cellulase inhibition of whole slurry biomass hydrolysis through the addition of carbocation scavengers during acid-catalyzed pretreatment. Bioresour. Technol. 258, 12–17. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.02.124
Zheng, Y., Han, J., Liang, W., Li, R., Hu, X., Wang, B., et al. (2019). Characterization and repurposing of the endogenous Type I-F CRISPR-Cas system of Zymomonas mobilis for genome engineering. bioRxiv doi: 10.1101/576355
Zhong, N., Chandra, R., and Saddler, J. N. (2019). Sulfite post-treatment to simultaneously detoxify and improve the enzymatic hydrolysis and fermentation of a steam-pretreated softwood lodgepole pine whole slurry. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 7, 5192–5199. doi: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b06092
Zhou, X., Zhou, X., and Xu, Y. (2017). Improvement of fermentation performance of Gluconobacter oxydans by combination of enhanced oxygen mass transfer in compressed-oxygen-supplied sealed system and cell-recycle technique. Bioresour. Technol. 244, 1137–1141. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.107
Zhuang, X., Wang, W., Yu, Q., Qi, W., Wang, Q., Tan, X., et al. (2016). Liquid hot water pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for bioethanol production accompanying with high valuable products. Bioresour. Technol. 199, 68–75. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.08.051
Keywords: high cell density fermentation, cell recycling, Zymomonas mobilis 8b, hydrolysate, ethanol productivity
Citation: Li Y, Zhai R, Jiang X, Chen X, Yuan X, Liu Z and Jin M (2019) Boosting Ethanol Productivity of Zymomonas mobilis 8b in Enzymatic Hydrolysate of Dilute Acid and Ammonia Pretreated Corn Stover Through Medium Optimization, High Cell Density Fermentation and Cell Recycling. Front. Microbiol. 10:2316. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02316
Received: 03 July 2019; Accepted: 23 September 2019;
Published: 04 October 2019.
Edited by:Uldis Kalnenieks, University of Latvia, Latvia
Reviewed by:Cheng Zhong, Tianjin University of Science and Technology, China
Ling Jiang, Nanjing Tech University, China
Chang Dou, University of Washington, United States
Copyright © 2019 Li, Zhai, Jiang, Chen, Yuan, Liu and Jin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Mingjie Jin, firstname.lastname@example.org
†These authors have contributed equally to this work